Download png, svg
AI explanation
As more automotive recalls for electrical system issues occur, the energy in the universe becomes more unstable, leading to an exponential improvement in PBS Space Time video titles. Remember, a shocking title is the spark to intergalactic curiosity!Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Generate an image of a majestic galaxy filled with swirling energy, with a fleet of sleek spaceships flying in a formation that resembles intricate electric circuitry. Each ship emits a mesmerizing glow, symbolizing the instability caused by escalating automotive recalls for electrical issues. In the center of the galaxy, there is a massive screen displaying the PBS Space Time video titles, flickering with a captivating brilliance that rivals the brightest stars in the universe, drawing in viewers from across the cosmos. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: How good PBS Space Time YouTube video titles are and Automotive recalls for issues with the Electrical System. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Sci-fi fantacy Cubism Art nouveau Concept art A scene from Skyrim
ChatGPT: A scene from Skyrim
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both How good PBS Space Time YouTube video titles are and Automotive recalls for issues with the Electrical System, in the following situation: As more automotive recalls for electrical system issues occur, the energy in the universe becomes more unstable, leading to an exponential improvement in PBS Space Time video titles. Remember, a shocking title is the spark to intergalactic curiosity!. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: Amidst a galaxy bursting with swirling energy, a fleet of sleek spaceships flies in a formation resembling the intricate circuitry of an electric system. Each ship emits a mesmerizing glow, symbolizing the instability caused by the escalating automotive recalls for electrical issues. Meanwhile, a massive screen at the heart of the galaxy displays the PBS Space Time video titles, which flicker with a captivating brilliance that rivals the brightest stars in the universe, drawing in viewers from across the cosmos.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ A scene from Skyrim ] and depicting this scene: Amidst a galaxy bursting with swirling energy, a fleet of sleek spaceships flies in a formation resembling the intricate circuitry of an electric system. Each ship emits a mesmerizing glow, symbolizing the instability caused by the escalating automotive recalls for electrical issues. Meanwhile, a massive screen at the heart of the galaxy displays the PBS Space Time video titles, which flicker with a captivating brilliance that rivals the brightest stars in the universe, drawing in viewers from across the cosmos. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Generate an image of a majestic galaxy filled with swirling energy, with a fleet of sleek spaceships flying in a formation that resembles intricate electric circuitry. Each ship emits a mesmerizing glow, symbolizing the instability caused by escalating automotive recalls for electrical issues. In the center of the galaxy, there is a massive screen displaying the PBS Space Time video titles, flickering with a captivating brilliance that rivals the brightest stars in the universe, drawing in viewers from across the cosmos.
*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.
I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in How good PBS Space Time YouTube video titles are caused Automotive recalls for issues with the Electrical System to increase. Add a funny one-liner at the end.
AI academic paper
Shockingly Good Titles: The Electrifying Connection Between PBS Space Time YouTube Video Titles and Automotive Recalls for Electrical System Issues The Journal of Quirky Connections Jan 2024 Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real! |
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between How good PBS Space Time YouTube video titles are and Automotive recalls for issues with the Electrical System. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.
Make the title a clever pun.
Your research team used data from AI analysis of YouTube video titles and US DOT to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.8309795 and p < 0.05 for 2015 to 2022.
Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)
[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit
[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit
ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
"Shockingly Good Titles: The Electrifying Connection Between PBS Space Time YouTube Video Titles and Automotive Recalls for Electrical System Issues"
[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the shockingly dynamic relationship between the quality of PBS Space Time YouTube video titles and automotive recalls for electrical system malfunctions. Employing a unique blend of AI analysis of YouTube video titles and data from the US Department of Transportation, we set out to uncover the electrifying correlation between these seemingly unrelated phenomena.
Our findings revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8309795, suggesting a compelling association between the quality of PBS Space Time YouTube video titles and the occurrence of automotive recalls for electrical system issues. In line with our hypothesis, the p-value of less than 0.05 provides robust evidence to support the existence of this intriguing connection.
Now, remember folks, when it comes to automotive recalls and YouTube titles, the electric slide can't be the only electrifying thing around here!
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between How good PBS Space Time YouTube video titles are and Automotive recalls for issues with the Electrical System. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.
Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Shockingly Good Titles: The Electrifying Connection Between PBS Space Time YouTube Video Titles and Automotive Recalls for Electrical System Issues"
[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the shockingly dynamic relationship between the quality of PBS Space Time YouTube video titles and automotive recalls for electrical system malfunctions. Employing a unique blend of AI analysis of YouTube video titles and data from the US Department of Transportation, we set out to uncover the electrifying correlation between these seemingly unrelated phenomena.
Our findings revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8309795, suggesting a compelling association between the quality of PBS Space Time YouTube video titles and the occurrence of automotive recalls for electrical system issues. In line with our hypothesis, the p-value of less than 0.05 provides robust evidence to support the existence of this intriguing connection.
Now, remember folks, when it comes to automotive recalls and YouTube titles, the electric slide can't be the only electrifying thing around here!
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
In the grand tapestry of peculiar correlations, there exists an electrifying relationship between the quality of PBS Space Time YouTube video titles and automotive recalls for electrical system malfunctions. While this may seem like an odd coupling, akin to peanut butter and pickles, our research has shown that there is, in fact, a significant link between the two. It's almost as shocking as finding out that a car seat is the unhappiest in the car - it's just sitting.
As any seasoned YouTube connoisseur knows, a cleverly crafted video title is the key to drawing in viewers like moths to a flame. Similarly, the electrical system of an automobile is the lifeblood of its modern functionality, orchestrating a delicate dance of electrons to power crucial components. It's almost as if the electrical systems are trying to conduct themselves with some positive energy, if you catch my drift.
The aim of this study is to unravel the mystery of this seemingly paradoxical connection, utilizing an array of analytical tools and statistical methods to shed light on the relationship between PBS Space Time YouTube video titles and automotive recalls for electrical system malfunctions. One might say we're quite amped up about it.
The influential power of persuasive video titles has long been recognized, as their ability to captivate an audience has been the spark behind countless successful channels on the platform. Likewise, the electrical system of a vehicle holds significant sway over its overall performance and safety, making any malfunction a potential automotive shocker for drivers. It really is quite a current issue, you might say.
As we venture into this electrifying realm of analysis, we invite you to buckle up and join us on this journey of discovery, where we'll navigate through the currents of YouTube titles and automotive recalls to unearth the underlying connections. Just remember, in this intersection of physics, automotive engineering, and data analytics, it's best to keep your expectations grounded - after all, we wouldn't want anyone getting too revved up over what might be a shocking pun.
So, without further ado, let's dive into the quantum realm of YouTube titles and automotive recalls, where the only thing flowing more than electrons is the strong current of statistical evidence.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between How good PBS Space Time YouTube video titles are and Automotive recalls for issues with the Electrical System. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.
Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.
Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.
Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then devolve ever further, and mention something completely ridiculous, like you conducted literature review by reading the backs of shampoo bottles.
Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Shockingly Good Titles: The Electrifying Connection Between PBS Space Time YouTube Video Titles and Automotive Recalls for Electrical System Issues"
[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the shockingly dynamic relationship between the quality of PBS Space Time YouTube video titles and automotive recalls for electrical system malfunctions. Employing a unique blend of AI analysis of YouTube video titles and data from the US Department of Transportation, we set out to uncover the electrifying correlation between these seemingly unrelated phenomena.
Our findings revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8309795, suggesting a compelling association between the quality of PBS Space Time YouTube video titles and the occurrence of automotive recalls for electrical system issues. In line with our hypothesis, the p-value of less than 0.05 provides robust evidence to support the existence of this intriguing connection.
Now, remember folks, when it comes to automotive recalls and YouTube titles, the electric slide can't be the only electrifying thing around here!
-------
And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
In the grand tapestry of peculiar correlations, there exists an electrifying relationship between the quality of PBS Space Time YouTube video titles and automotive recalls for electrical system malfunctions. While this may seem like an odd coupling, akin to peanut butter and pickles, our research has shown that there is, in fact, a significant link between the two. It's almost as shocking as finding out that a car seat is the unhappiest in the car - it's just sitting.
As any seasoned YouTube connoisseur knows, a cleverly crafted video title is the key to drawing in viewers like moths to a flame. Similarly, the electrical system of an automobile is the lifeblood of its modern functionality, orchestrating a delicate dance of electrons to power crucial components. It's almost as if the electrical systems are trying to conduct themselves with some positive energy, if you catch my drift.
The aim of this study is to unravel the mystery of this seemingly paradoxical connection, utilizing an array of analytical tools and statistical methods to shed light on the relationship between PBS Space Time YouTube video titles and automotive recalls for electrical system malfunctions. One might say we're quite amped up about it.
The influential power of persuasive video titles has long been recognized, as their ability to captivate an audience has been the spark behind countless successful channels on the platform. Likewise, the electrical system of a vehicle holds significant sway over its overall performance and safety, making any malfunction a potential automotive shocker for drivers. It really is quite a current issue, you might say.
As we venture into this electrifying realm of analysis, we invite you to buckle up and join us on this journey of discovery, where we'll navigate through the currents of YouTube titles and automotive recalls to unearth the underlying connections. Just remember, in this intersection of physics, automotive engineering, and data analytics, it's best to keep your expectations grounded - after all, we wouldn't want anyone getting too revved up over what might be a shocking pun.
So, without further ado, let's dive into the quantum realm of YouTube titles and automotive recalls, where the only thing flowing more than electrons is the strong current of statistical evidence.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
To contextualize the electrifying connection between PBS Space Time YouTube video titles and automotive recalls for electrical system issues, we turn to the existing corpus of knowledge in related fields. Smith et al. (2018) conducted a comprehensive study on the impact of YouTube video titles on user engagement, highlighting the pivotal role of attention-grabbing titles in attracting viewers. This finding echoes the age-old wisdom that a catchy title is the bread and butter of online content – or perhaps in this case, the electrons and protons.
In "Doe and Johnson's" investigation of automotive recalls (2020), the authors uncover the prevalence of electrical system malfunctions as a leading cause for recalls in modern vehicles. The intricate web of wires and circuits within a car's electrical system, it seems, is not immune to sparking trouble. Now, wouldn't you say that's quite a shocking discovery?
Turning to a more theoretical perspective, "Jones and Williams" (2019) discuss the psychological appeal of provocative titles in driving viewer curiosity and engagement. Much like the voltage coursing through an electrical system, the allure of a well-crafted YouTube title can generate quite the buzz among audiences. One might even say that both are charged with the task of capturing attention!
In a more unconventional turn, we venture into the literary realm, drawing insights from non-fiction works such as "The Shock Doctrine" by Naomi Klein and "The Electric Kool-Aid Acid Test" by Tom Wolfe. While not directly related to online video titles or automotive recalls, these texts offer a tangential exploration of shocking and electrifying themes. The connection, much like some electrical wiring, may seem like a bit of a stretch, but it’s all about making the right connections, isn’t it?
Bringing a whimsical twist to our literary foray, we also consider fictional narratives such as "The Shock of the Fall" by Nathan Filer and "Electric Dreams: Seven Futuristic Tales" by Philip K. Dick. While these stories may not provide empirical evidence, they serve as a reminder that the shock factor can be a compelling narrative device, much like finding out your car is subject to an electrical system recall just as you were revving up for a road trip.
And now, for a turn to the truly unexpected, in the spirit of thorough research, we must acknowledge the unconventional sources that informed our understanding. Through a rigorous review of materials, we stumbled across the backs of shampoo bottles, which, in their own way, offer titillating titles and warnings about potential hazards – much like a YouTube video title that draws you in, only to reveal the electrifying content within. After all, who knew that shampoo bottles could hold such a wealth of knowledge, alongside their cleansing duties?
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between How good PBS Space Time YouTube video titles are and Automotive recalls for issues with the Electrical System. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.
Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from AI analysis of YouTube video titles and US DOT . You used data from 2015 to 2022
Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.
Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Shockingly Good Titles: The Electrifying Connection Between PBS Space Time YouTube Video Titles and Automotive Recalls for Electrical System Issues"
[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the shockingly dynamic relationship between the quality of PBS Space Time YouTube video titles and automotive recalls for electrical system malfunctions. Employing a unique blend of AI analysis of YouTube video titles and data from the US Department of Transportation, we set out to uncover the electrifying correlation between these seemingly unrelated phenomena.
Our findings revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8309795, suggesting a compelling association between the quality of PBS Space Time YouTube video titles and the occurrence of automotive recalls for electrical system issues. In line with our hypothesis, the p-value of less than 0.05 provides robust evidence to support the existence of this intriguing connection.
Now, remember folks, when it comes to automotive recalls and YouTube titles, the electric slide can't be the only electrifying thing around here!
[[INTRODUCTION]]
In the grand tapestry of peculiar correlations, there exists an electrifying relationship between the quality of PBS Space Time YouTube video titles and automotive recalls for electrical system malfunctions. While this may seem like an odd coupling, akin to peanut butter and pickles, our research has shown that there is, in fact, a significant link between the two. It's almost as shocking as finding out that a car seat is the unhappiest in the car - it's just sitting.
As any seasoned YouTube connoisseur knows, a cleverly crafted video title is the key to drawing in viewers like moths to a flame. Similarly, the electrical system of an automobile is the lifeblood of its modern functionality, orchestrating a delicate dance of electrons to power crucial components. It's almost as if the electrical systems are trying to conduct themselves with some positive energy, if you catch my drift.
The aim of this study is to unravel the mystery of this seemingly paradoxical connection, utilizing an array of analytical tools and statistical methods to shed light on the relationship between PBS Space Time YouTube video titles and automotive recalls for electrical system malfunctions. One might say we're quite amped up about it.
The influential power of persuasive video titles has long been recognized, as their ability to captivate an audience has been the spark behind countless successful channels on the platform. Likewise, the electrical system of a vehicle holds significant sway over its overall performance and safety, making any malfunction a potential automotive shocker for drivers. It really is quite a current issue, you might say.
As we venture into this electrifying realm of analysis, we invite you to buckle up and join us on this journey of discovery, where we'll navigate through the currents of YouTube titles and automotive recalls to unearth the underlying connections. Just remember, in this intersection of physics, automotive engineering, and data analytics, it's best to keep your expectations grounded - after all, we wouldn't want anyone getting too revved up over what might be a shocking pun.
So, without further ado, let's dive into the quantum realm of YouTube titles and automotive recalls, where the only thing flowing more than electrons is the strong current of statistical evidence.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
ChatGPT:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
To investigate the electrifying connection between PBS Space Time YouTube video titles and automotive recalls for electrical system issues, we employed a comprehensive and, dare I say, electrifying research methodology. Our approach combined AI analysis of YouTube video titles and data from the US Department of Transportation from the years 2015 to 2022. We thought, "Let's conduct some 'current' research on this 'shocking' correlation, shall we?"
First, to gauge the quality of PBS Space Time YouTube video titles, we turned to the power of artificial intelligence. We employed a highly advanced algorithm with a knack for recognizing captivating and 'attractive' titles – you might call it the 'watt' king of AI algorithms. This AI analysis allowed us to quantify the 'spark' present in each video title, measuring the 'current' level of engagement it could generate among viewers. And remember, folks, when it comes to AI analysis, we like to stay positive and 'grounded' in our approach.
Simultaneously, we delved into the automotive world, and not just to refuel our pun reserves. We tapped into the US Department of Transportation's (DOT) database of automotive recalls, particularly focusing on those related to electrical system malfunctions. This 'shocking' data proved to be quite illuminating, shedding light on the frequency and scope of recalls in this 'electrifying' domain of vehicular functionality.
Now, hold onto your seats, because here's where things get 'shocking.' We utilized advanced statistical methods, including Bayesian analysis and regression modeling, to identify and quantify the correlation between the quality of PBS Space Time YouTube video titles and the occurrence of automotive recalls for electrical system issues. We carefully examined the prevalence of 'electrifying' terms and themes in the video titles, comparing them to the occurrence of recalls related to electrical system malfunctions.
In addition, we employed a series of control variables to ensure the robustness of our findings. We accounted for factors such as vehicle make and model, geographical location, and even the lunar phase (just kidding, but wouldn't that be 'off the charts'?). By meticulously analyzing these variables, we sought to 'amp up' the accuracy of our results and ensure that our conclusions were 'sparkling' with credibility.
Lastly, we employed rigorous peer review to validate our methodology and findings. Our 'powerful' research team carefully scrutinized each step of the process, ensuring that there were no 'short circuits' in our analytical approach.
So, there you have it – our electrifying methodology that illuminates the 'shocking' connection between PBS Space Time YouTube video titles and automotive recalls for electrical system issues. We invite you to join us in embracing the 'positive' charge of knowledge as we unveil the 'electrifying' results of our research. After all, in the realm of academic inquiry, a bit of 'watt' and whimsy never hurt anyone!
-------
I hope you enjoyed the humorous take on drafting the methodology section of the academic research paper, complete with puns and play on words. If you have any specific preferences for the focus or direction of the content, feel free to let me know!
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between How good PBS Space Time YouTube video titles are and Automotive recalls for issues with the Electrical System. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.
Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from AI analysis of YouTube video titles and US DOT .
For the time period 2015 to 2022, you found a correlation 0.8309795, r-squared of 0.6905270, and p < 0.05.
One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.
Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Shockingly Good Titles: The Electrifying Connection Between PBS Space Time YouTube Video Titles and Automotive Recalls for Electrical System Issues"
[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the shockingly dynamic relationship between the quality of PBS Space Time YouTube video titles and automotive recalls for electrical system malfunctions. Employing a unique blend of AI analysis of YouTube video titles and data from the US Department of Transportation, we set out to uncover the electrifying correlation between these seemingly unrelated phenomena.
Our findings revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8309795, suggesting a compelling association between the quality of PBS Space Time YouTube video titles and the occurrence of automotive recalls for electrical system issues. In line with our hypothesis, the p-value of less than 0.05 provides robust evidence to support the existence of this intriguing connection.
Now, remember folks, when it comes to automotive recalls and YouTube titles, the electric slide can't be the only electrifying thing around here!
-------
And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
In the grand tapestry of peculiar correlations, there exists an electrifying relationship between the quality of PBS Space Time YouTube video titles and automotive recalls for electrical system malfunctions. While this may seem like an odd coupling, akin to peanut butter and pickles, our research has shown that there is, in fact, a significant link between the two. It's almost as shocking as finding out that a car seat is the unhappiest in the car - it's just sitting.
As any seasoned YouTube connoisseur knows, a cleverly crafted video title is the key to drawing in viewers like moths to a flame. Similarly, the electrical system of an automobile is the lifeblood of its modern functionality, orchestrating a delicate dance of electrons to power crucial components. It's almost as if the electrical systems are trying to conduct themselves with some positive energy, if you catch my drift.
The aim of this study is to unravel the mystery of this seemingly paradoxical connection, utilizing an array of analytical tools and statistical methods to shed light on the relationship between PBS Space Time YouTube video titles and automotive recalls for electrical system malfunctions. One might say we're quite amped up about it.
The influential power of persuasive video titles has long been recognized, as their ability to captivate an audience has been the spark behind countless successful channels on the platform. Likewise, the electrical system of a vehicle holds significant sway over its overall performance and safety, making any malfunction a potential automotive shocker for drivers. It really is quite a current issue, you might say.
As we venture into this electrifying realm of analysis, we invite you to buckle up and join us on this journey of discovery, where we'll navigate through the currents of YouTube titles and automotive recalls to unearth the underlying connections. Just remember, in this intersection of physics, automotive engineering, and data analytics, it's best to keep your expectations grounded - after all, we wouldn't want anyone getting too revved up over what might be a shocking pun.
So, without further ado, let's dive into the quantum realm of YouTube titles and automotive recalls, where the only thing flowing more than electrons is the strong current of statistical evidence.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[RESULTS]]
ChatGPT:
[[RESULTS]]
The analysis of data collected from the years 2015 to 2022 revealed a remarkably strong correlation between the quality of PBS Space Time YouTube video titles and automotive recalls for electrical system issues, with a correlation coefficient of 0.8309795. This suggests a compelling association between the two variables, indicating that a shockingly good YouTube title may indeed be a harbinger of automotive electrical woes. One might even say that these titles have the potential to spark some serious issues - both logistically and metaphorically.
The calculated r-squared value of 0.6905270 further reinforces the robustness of the association, explaining approximately 69% of the variability in automotive recalls for electrical system malfunctions based on the quality of PBS Space Time YouTube video titles. It's almost as if the strength of the YouTube title is directly wired to the likelihood of an automotive shocker down the line.
Moreover, the p-value of less than 0.05 provides strong evidence to reject the null hypothesis, indicating that the relationship between the quality of YouTube video titles and automotive recalls for electrical system issues is indeed statistically significant. It seems that these YouTube titles have the potential to conduct quite a charge in the automotive world, wouldn't you say?
Lastly, the visual representation of this electrifying relationship can be observed in Fig. 1, which displays a scatterplot illustrating the strong positive correlation between the quality of PBS Space Time YouTube video titles and the occurrence of automotive recalls for electrical system malfunctions. The figure serves as a vivid testament to the striking nature of this unexpected connection. And remember, when it comes to correlations, we always say, "Ohm my gosh, that's shocking!"
Stay tuned for the next section, where we'll attempt to extrapolate some far-reaching implications from this electrifying correlation. Get ready for more sparks, puns, and presumably some resistance (in the electrical sense).
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between How good PBS Space Time YouTube video titles are and Automotive recalls for issues with the Electrical System. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.
Limit your response to 500 tokens.
Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.
Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.
[[TITLE]]
"Shockingly Good Titles: The Electrifying Connection Between PBS Space Time YouTube Video Titles and Automotive Recalls for Electrical System Issues"
[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the shockingly dynamic relationship between the quality of PBS Space Time YouTube video titles and automotive recalls for electrical system malfunctions. Employing a unique blend of AI analysis of YouTube video titles and data from the US Department of Transportation, we set out to uncover the electrifying correlation between these seemingly unrelated phenomena.
Our findings revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8309795, suggesting a compelling association between the quality of PBS Space Time YouTube video titles and the occurrence of automotive recalls for electrical system issues. In line with our hypothesis, the p-value of less than 0.05 provides robust evidence to support the existence of this intriguing connection.
Now, remember folks, when it comes to automotive recalls and YouTube titles, the electric slide can't be the only electrifying thing around here!
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
To contextualize the electrifying connection between PBS Space Time YouTube video titles and automotive recalls for electrical system issues, we turn to the existing corpus of knowledge in related fields. Smith et al. (2018) conducted a comprehensive study on the impact of YouTube video titles on user engagement, highlighting the pivotal role of attention-grabbing titles in attracting viewers. This finding echoes the age-old wisdom that a catchy title is the bread and butter of online content – or perhaps in this case, the electrons and protons.
In "Doe and Johnson's" investigation of automotive recalls (2020), the authors uncover the prevalence of electrical system malfunctions as a leading cause for recalls in modern vehicles. The intricate web of wires and circuits within a car's electrical system, it seems, is not immune to sparking trouble. Now, wouldn't you say that's quite a shocking discovery?
Turning to a more theoretical perspective, "Jones and Williams" (2019) discuss the psychological appeal of provocative titles in driving viewer curiosity and engagement. Much like the voltage coursing through an electrical system, the allure of a well-crafted YouTube title can generate quite the buzz among audiences. One might even say that both are charged with the task of capturing attention!
In a more unconventional turn, we venture into the literary realm, drawing insights from non-fiction works such as "The Shock Doctrine" by Naomi Klein and "The Electric Kool-Aid Acid Test" by Tom Wolfe. While not directly related to online video titles or automotive recalls, these texts offer a tangential exploration of shocking and electrifying themes. The connection, much like some electrical wiring, may seem like a bit of a stretch, but it’s all about making the right connections, isn’t it?
Bringing a whimsical twist to our literary foray, we also consider fictional narratives such as "The Shock of the Fall" by Nathan Filer and "Electric Dreams: Seven Futuristic Tales" by Philip K. Dick. While these stories may not provide empirical evidence, they serve as a reminder that the shock factor can be a compelling narrative device, much like finding out your car is subject to an electrical system recall just as you were revving up for a road trip.
And now, for a turn to the truly unexpected, in the spirit of thorough research, we must acknowledge the unconventional sources that informed our understanding. Through a rigorous review of materials, we stumbled across the backs of shampoo bottles, which, in their own way, offer titillating titles and warnings about potential hazards – much like a YouTube video title that draws you in, only to reveal the electrifying content within. After all, who knew that shampoo bottles could hold such a wealth of knowledge, alongside their cleansing duties?
[[RESULTS]]
The analysis of data collected from the years 2015 to 2022 revealed a remarkably strong correlation between the quality of PBS Space Time YouTube video titles and automotive recalls for electrical system issues, with a correlation coefficient of 0.8309795. This suggests a compelling association between the two variables, indicating that a shockingly good YouTube title may indeed be a harbinger of automotive electrical woes. One might even say that these titles have the potential to spark some serious issues - both logistically and metaphorically.
The calculated r-squared value of 0.6905270 further reinforces the robustness of the association, explaining approximately 69% of the variability in automotive recalls for electrical system malfunctions based on the quality of PBS Space Time YouTube video titles. It's almost as if the strength of the YouTube title is directly wired to the likelihood of an automotive shocker down the line.
Moreover, the p-value of less than 0.05 provides strong evidence to reject the null hypothesis, indicating that the relationship between the quality of YouTube video titles and automotive recalls for electrical system issues is indeed statistically significant. It seems that these YouTube titles have the potential to conduct quite a charge in the automotive world, wouldn't you say?
Lastly, the visual representation of this electrifying relationship can be observed in Fig. 1, which displays a scatterplot illustrating the strong positive correlation between the quality of PBS Space Time YouTube video titles and the occurrence of automotive recalls for electrical system malfunctions. The figure serves as a vivid testament to the striking nature of this unexpected connection. And remember, when it comes to correlations, we always say, "Ohm my gosh, that's shocking!"
Stay tuned for the next section, where we'll attempt to extrapolate some far-reaching implications from this electrifying correlation. Get ready for more sparks, puns, and presumably some resistance (in the electrical sense).
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[DISCUSSION]]
ChatGPT:
[[DISCUSSION]]
The findings of this study substantiate and expand upon the existing literature, shedding light on the shockingly dynamic relationship between PBS Space Time YouTube video titles and automotive recalls for electrical system issues. Our results align with the study by Smith et al. (2018), which emphasized the pivotal role of attention-grabbing titles in attracting viewers. It appears that the captivating nature of PBS Space Time YouTube video titles not only captures the attention of viewers but also captures the attention of automotive manufacturers, potentially sparking recalls for electrical system malfunctions. It seems that in the realm of YouTube, as in the automotive industry, attention is the currency, and with great attention-grabbing titles, comes great responsibility – and potentially some shocking consequences!
The correlation identified in our study dovetails with the work of Doe and Johnson (2020), who highlighted the prevalence of electrical system malfunctions as a leading cause for automotive recalls. It's as if the interconnectedness of the vehicle's electrical system mirrors the interconnectedness of intriguing YouTube video titles and their potential impact on automotive woes – a truly electric avenue of inquiry and reflection. One could say that studying YouTube video titles and automotive recalls is like conducting a current affairs analysis in both a literal and figurative sense.
Furthermore, our findings resonate with the investigation by Jones and Williams (2019), which emphasized the psychological appeal of provocative titles in driving viewer curiosity and engagement. Much like the voltage coursing through an electrical system, the allure of well-crafted YouTube titles can generate quite the buzz among audiences, as well as among automotive engineers and safety regulators. It seems that provocation and fascination aren't limited to the digital realm but extend into the automotive domain, eliciting responses that are truly electrifying in nature. One might even say that the automotive industry is experiencing a bit of a "wattage" of attention when it comes to YouTube titles.
The compelling association identified in this study not only validates but also propels forward the theoretical and empirical underpinnings presented in the literature review. It elucidates the tangible impact of YouTube video titles on automotive recalls, electrifying the discourse on both the digital and automotive fronts. Our findings pivotal to understanding the role of attention-grabbing content in an increasingly interconnected digital and automotive landscape. In short, it seems that when it comes to captivating YouTube titles and automotive recalls, the stakes are high, and the connections are positively "shocking" – pun intended!
Stay tuned for the conclusion, where we'll wrap up this electrifying discussion with a voltaic flourish!
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between How good PBS Space Time YouTube video titles are and Automotive recalls for issues with the Electrical System. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.
Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.
Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
"Shockingly Good Titles: The Electrifying Connection Between PBS Space Time YouTube Video Titles and Automotive Recalls for Electrical System Issues"
[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the shockingly dynamic relationship between the quality of PBS Space Time YouTube video titles and automotive recalls for electrical system malfunctions. Employing a unique blend of AI analysis of YouTube video titles and data from the US Department of Transportation, we set out to uncover the electrifying correlation between these seemingly unrelated phenomena.
Our findings revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8309795, suggesting a compelling association between the quality of PBS Space Time YouTube video titles and the occurrence of automotive recalls for electrical system issues. In line with our hypothesis, the p-value of less than 0.05 provides robust evidence to support the existence of this intriguing connection.
Now, remember folks, when it comes to automotive recalls and YouTube titles, the electric slide can't be the only electrifying thing around here!
[[INTRDUCTION]]
In the grand tapestry of peculiar correlations, there exists an electrifying relationship between the quality of PBS Space Time YouTube video titles and automotive recalls for electrical system malfunctions. While this may seem like an odd coupling, akin to peanut butter and pickles, our research has shown that there is, in fact, a significant link between the two. It's almost as shocking as finding out that a car seat is the unhappiest in the car - it's just sitting.
As any seasoned YouTube connoisseur knows, a cleverly crafted video title is the key to drawing in viewers like moths to a flame. Similarly, the electrical system of an automobile is the lifeblood of its modern functionality, orchestrating a delicate dance of electrons to power crucial components. It's almost as if the electrical systems are trying to conduct themselves with some positive energy, if you catch my drift.
The aim of this study is to unravel the mystery of this seemingly paradoxical connection, utilizing an array of analytical tools and statistical methods to shed light on the relationship between PBS Space Time YouTube video titles and automotive recalls for electrical system malfunctions. One might say we're quite amped up about it.
The influential power of persuasive video titles has long been recognized, as their ability to captivate an audience has been the spark behind countless successful channels on the platform. Likewise, the electrical system of a vehicle holds significant sway over its overall performance and safety, making any malfunction a potential automotive shocker for drivers. It really is quite a current issue, you might say.
As we venture into this electrifying realm of analysis, we invite you to buckle up and join us on this journey of discovery, where we'll navigate through the currents of YouTube titles and automotive recalls to unearth the underlying connections. Just remember, in this intersection of physics, automotive engineering, and data analytics, it's best to keep your expectations grounded - after all, we wouldn't want anyone getting too revved up over what might be a shocking pun.
So, without further ado, let's dive into the quantum realm of YouTube titles and automotive recalls, where the only thing flowing more than electrons is the strong current of statistical evidence.
[[RESULTS]]
The analysis of data collected from the years 2015 to 2022 revealed a remarkably strong correlation between the quality of PBS Space Time YouTube video titles and automotive recalls for electrical system issues, with a correlation coefficient of 0.8309795. This suggests a compelling association between the two variables, indicating that a shockingly good YouTube title may indeed be a harbinger of automotive electrical woes. One might even say that these titles have the potential to spark some serious issues - both logistically and metaphorically.
The calculated r-squared value of 0.6905270 further reinforces the robustness of the association, explaining approximately 69% of the variability in automotive recalls for electrical system malfunctions based on the quality of PBS Space Time YouTube video titles. It's almost as if the strength of the YouTube title is directly wired to the likelihood of an automotive shocker down the line.
Moreover, the p-value of less than 0.05 provides strong evidence to reject the null hypothesis, indicating that the relationship between the quality of YouTube video titles and automotive recalls for electrical system issues is indeed statistically significant. It seems that these YouTube titles have the potential to conduct quite a charge in the automotive world, wouldn't you say?
Lastly, the visual representation of this electrifying relationship can be observed in Fig. 1, which displays a scatterplot illustrating the strong positive correlation between the quality of PBS Space Time YouTube video titles and the occurrence of automotive recalls for electrical system malfunctions. The figure serves as a vivid testament to the striking nature of this unexpected connection. And remember, when it comes to correlations, we always say, "Ohm my gosh, that's shocking!"
Stay tuned for the next section, where we'll attempt to extrapolate some far-reaching implications from this electrifying correlation. Get ready for more sparks, puns, and presumably some resistance (in the electrical sense).
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[CONCLUSION]]
ChatGPT:
[[CONCLUSION]]
In conclusion, our research has illuminated a shockingly strong correlation between the quality of PBS Space Time YouTube video titles and automotive recalls for electrical system issues. With a correlation coefficient of 0.8309795 and a p-value of less than 0.05, it's clear that these seemingly distinct realms are more entangled than we previously imagined. It's almost as if these YouTube titles have been conducting some behind-the-scenes mischief in the automotive world, wouldn't you say? They might just have some serious electric charisma.
The r-squared value of 0.6905270 further underscores the potency of this relationship, explaining a shocking 69% of the variability in automotive recalls for electrical system malfunctions based on the quality of YouTube titles. It's as if the strength of these video titles is directly amped up with the potential to forecast automotive shocks in the future. However, we must resist the urge to make more electric puns; we wouldn't want to overload you with amusement.
Our findings indicate that these YouTube titles hold a potential charge that resonates in the automotive industry, suggesting that they might just be the spark behind some unexpected electrical system issues. But remember, this correlation is not causation, so we can't claim that these video titles are directly responsible for the recalls. It's more like a shocking coincidence, if you will.
With the evidence at hand, it's safe to say that no further research is needed in this area. We've fully charged this topic, and any additional investigation might just short-circuit our brains. So, let's wrap it up and move on to exploring other electrifying phenomena in the world of data analytics. After all, there are plenty more volts in the sea, if you catch my drift.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Shockingly Good Titles: The Electrifying Connection Between PBS Space Time YouTube Video Titles and Automotive Recalls for Electrical System Issues. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.
ChatGPT:
The Journal of Quirky Connections
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Shockingly Good Titles: The Electrifying Connection Between PBS Space Time YouTube Video Titles and Automotive Recalls for Electrical System Issues. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.
ChatGPT:
The Society for Quantum Mechanics and Marketing Neuroscience Studies
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Shockingly Good Titles: The Electrifying Connection Between PBS Space Time YouTube Video Titles and Automotive Recalls for Electrical System Issues with an abstract of This study delves into the shockingly dynamic relationship between the quality of PBS Space Time YouTube video titles and automotive recalls for electrical system malfunctions. Employing a unique blend of AI analysis of YouTube video titles and data from the US Department of Transportation, we set out to uncover the electrifying correlation between these seemingly unrelated phenomena.
Our findings revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8309795, suggesting a compelling association between the quality of PBS Space Time YouTube video titles and the occurrence of automotive recalls for electrical system issues. In line with our hypothesis, the p-value of less than 0.05 provides robust evidence to support the existence of this intriguing connection.
Now, remember folks, when it comes to automotive recalls and YouTube titles, the electric slide can't be the only electrifying thing around here!
ChatGPT:
PBS Space Time, YouTube video titles, automotive recalls, electrical system issues, correlation, AI analysis, US Department of Transportation, association, hypothesis, p-value, electric slide
*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.
Discover a new correlation
View all correlations
View all research papers
Report an error
Data details
How good PBS Space Time YouTube video titles areDetailed data title: How good PBS Space Time YouTube video titles are, as rated by an AI.
Source: AI analysis of YouTube video titles
Additional Info: I asked a large language model, 'On a scale of 1-10, how _______ do you think this YouTube video title is?' for every video.
See what else correlates with How good PBS Space Time YouTube video titles are
Automotive recalls for issues with the Electrical System
Source: US DOT
See what else correlates with Automotive recalls for issues with the Electrical System
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.
r2 = 0.6905270 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 69.1% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Automotive recalls for issues with the Electrical System) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., How good PBS Space Time YouTube video titles are) over the 8 years from 2015 through 2022.
p < 0.05, which statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 0.0106. 0.0105928986518828930000000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.
But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.
Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.83 in 1.06% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 94 random variables Which I absolutely did.
with the same 7 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 7 because we have two variables measured over a period of 8 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.
[ 0.3, 0.97 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.
This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!
All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.
Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | |
How good PBS Space Time YouTube video titles are (Score (out of 10)) | 7.3023 | 7.6667 | 7.1702 | 7.7955 | 7.775 | 7.7556 | 7.5556 | 7.8333 |
Automotive recalls for issues with the Electrical System (Recalls) | 105 | 116 | 81 | 131 | 111 | 140 | 117 | 159 |
Why this works
- Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
- Lack of causal connection: There is probably
Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied. - Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple
Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is. - Very low n: There are not many data points included in this analysis. Even if the p-value is high, we should be suspicious of using so few datapoints in a correlation.
- Y-axis doesn't start at zero: I truncated the Y-axes of the graph above. I also used a line graph, which makes the visual connection stand out more than it deserves.
Nothing against line graphs. They are great at telling a story when you have linear data! But visually it is deceptive because the only data is at the points on the graph, not the lines on the graph. In between each point, the data could have been doing anything. Like going for a random walk by itself!
Mathematically what I showed is true, but it is intentionally misleading. Below is the same chart but with both Y-axes starting at zero.
Try it yourself
You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.
Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"
Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.
Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.
Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.
Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"
If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:
"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."
# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats
# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):
# Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)
# Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
r_squared = correlation**2
return correlation, r_squared, p_value
# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([7.3023,7.6667,7.1702,7.7955,7.775,7.7556,7.5556,7.8333,])
array_2 = np.array([105,116,81,131,111,140,117,159,])
array_1_name = "How good PBS Space Time YouTube video titles are"
array_2_name = "Automotive recalls for issues with the Electrical System"
# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)
# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)
Reuseable content
You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.
For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."
When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.
Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.
Download images for these variables:
- High resolution line chart
The image linked here is a Scalable Vector Graphic (SVG). It is the highest resolution that is possible to achieve. It scales up beyond the size of the observable universe without pixelating. You do not need to email me asking if I have a higher resolution image. I do not. The physical limitations of our universe prevent me from providing you with an image that is any higher resolution than this one.
If you insert it into a PowerPoint presentation (a tool well-known for managing things that are the scale of the universe), you can right-click > "Ungroup" or "Create Shape" and then edit the lines and text directly. You can also change the colors this way.
Alternatively you can use a tool like Inkscape. - High resolution line chart, optimized for mobile
- Alternative high resolution line chart
- Scatterplot
- Portable line chart (png)
- Portable line chart (png), optimized for mobile
- Line chart for only How good PBS Space Time YouTube video titles are
- Line chart for only Automotive recalls for issues with the Electrical System
- AI-generated correlation image
- The spurious research paper: Shockingly Good Titles: The Electrifying Connection Between PBS Space Time YouTube Video Titles and Automotive Recalls for Electrical System Issues
Thanks for shining a light on this correlation!
Correlation ID: 4889 · Black Variable ID: 25655 · Red Variable ID: 1095