about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #4,852 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Popularity of the 'expanding brain' meme and the second variable is Votes for Democratic Senators in Mississippi.  The chart goes from 2006 to 2020, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

As the 'expanding brain' meme gained traction, it sparked a surge in cognitive activity, leading Mississippi Democrats to make the biggest brain move of all: casting their votes for Senators who aligned with their values. It's like they say, when the expanding brain meme goes up, Democratic turnout in Mississippi goes up even more!

Create a meme inspired by the expanding brain meme that in some way references Democrat votes for Senators in Mississippi. Try to emulate the style of the meme - don’t violate the copyright, just make it look and feel like the original meme.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how increases in Popularity of the 'expanding brain' meme positively influenced Democrat votes for Senators in Mississippi. Include one good pun.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Mirthful Memes and Mississippi's Senatorial Selections: A Playful Probing of the Expanding Brain Phenomenon

The Journal of Hilarity Studies

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the 'expanding brain' meme and Democrat votes for Senators in Mississippi. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Make the title an alliteration.

Your research team used data from Google Trends and MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9881482 and p < 0.01 for 2006 to 2020.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
Mirthful Memes and Mississippi's Senatorial Selections: A Playful Probing of the Expanding Brain Phenomenon

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this amusing academic exploration, we delve into the delightful world of internet memes and political preference in the context of Mississippi's senatorial elections. Utilizing data from Google Trends and MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, we cunningly set out to investigate the potential linkage between the popularity of the 'expanding brain' meme and the voting patterns for Democratic senators in Mississippi. Our findings, despite being both punderful and surprising, reveal a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9881482 and p < 0.01 for the timeframe spanning 2006 to 2020.

One might think that memes are just humorous distractions, but our research shows that they may hold more sway than expected. It seems that the 'expanding brain' meme's virality is positively associated with the preference for Democratic senators, demonstrating that internet memes can have an impact on political proclivities. This discovery is truly mind-blowing – just like the 'expanding brain' itself! Our research adds a touch of levity to the serious realm of politics and makes one wonder: are memes the new campaign strategy, or is this just a case of 'memetic' coincidence?

In conclusion, this paper presents a comical yet compelling connection between a popular internet meme and Mississippi's senatorial selections, revealing the power of online humor in shaping political inclinations. As the meme goes, "Don't touch my memes, they're under a protection – of laughter!".


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the 'expanding brain' meme and Democrat votes for Senators in Mississippi. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Mirthful Memes and Mississippi's Senatorial Selections: A Playful Probing of the Expanding Brain Phenomenon

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this amusing academic exploration, we delve into the delightful world of internet memes and political preference in the context of Mississippi's senatorial elections. Utilizing data from Google Trends and MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, we cunningly set out to investigate the potential linkage between the popularity of the 'expanding brain' meme and the voting patterns for Democratic senators in Mississippi. Our findings, despite being both punderful and surprising, reveal a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9881482 and p < 0.01 for the timeframe spanning 2006 to 2020.

One might think that memes are just humorous distractions, but our research shows that they may hold more sway than expected. It seems that the 'expanding brain' meme's virality is positively associated with the preference for Democratic senators, demonstrating that internet memes can have an impact on political proclivities. This discovery is truly mind-blowing – just like the 'expanding brain' itself! Our research adds a touch of levity to the serious realm of politics and makes one wonder: are memes the new campaign strategy, or is this just a case of 'memetic' coincidence?

In conclusion, this paper presents a comical yet compelling connection between a popular internet meme and Mississippi's senatorial selections, revealing the power of online humor in shaping political inclinations. As the meme goes, "Don't touch my memes, they're under a protection – of laughter!".

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

Ladies and gentlemen, statisticians and jesters, welcome to the whimsical world of meme research! Our study embarks on an exhilarating quest to unravel the enigmatic connection between internet memes and the political landscape in Mississippi. Just like a good dad joke, our research aims to combine academic rigor with a sprinkle of humor to shed light on this peculiar correlation. As we navigate through the data, fasten your seatbelts and prepare for a pun-believably entertaining journey!

The 'expanding brain' meme, with its hierarchical progression from a small brain to a significantly enlarged one, has enraptured netizens with its visual wit. And speaking of wit, how do scientists organize a space party? They planet! In our endeavor to decode the influence of this iconic meme on political preferences, we discovered a correlation that might just make your brain 'expand' in amazement.

As we dig into the statistics, it's essential to understand the gravity of our findings. Just like a well-timed pun, the correlation coefficient of 0.9881482 and p-value less than 0.01 suggests a robust and tantalizing association between the popularity of the 'expanding brain' meme and the propensity to vote for Democratic senators in Mississippi. This discovery is more surprising than finding out that 2 is a prime number, it's just very odd!

Whisking through the realms of memes and voting patterns, the question arises – are internet memes the unsung influencers of political allegiance? Or is this all just an elaborate political memeing, disguised as statistical significance? We're about to find out if Mississippi's senators have been 'memed' into office.

In conclusion, our study turns the spotlight on the power of viral internet humor in shaping political proclivities. In the words of the 'expanding brain' meme, this research edifies that when it comes to political preferences, "the brain, it's evolving!" So, let's raise a glass to the unexpected linkage between memes and Mississippi's senatorial selections, proving that memes indeed "can make a difference, no joke intended, but it's a good one!".


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the 'expanding brain' meme and Democrat votes for Senators in Mississippi. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then you might move on to cartoons and children's shows that you watched for research.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Mirthful Memes and Mississippi's Senatorial Selections: A Playful Probing of the Expanding Brain Phenomenon

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this amusing academic exploration, we delve into the delightful world of internet memes and political preference in the context of Mississippi's senatorial elections. Utilizing data from Google Trends and MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, we cunningly set out to investigate the potential linkage between the popularity of the 'expanding brain' meme and the voting patterns for Democratic senators in Mississippi. Our findings, despite being both punderful and surprising, reveal a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9881482 and p < 0.01 for the timeframe spanning 2006 to 2020.

One might think that memes are just humorous distractions, but our research shows that they may hold more sway than expected. It seems that the 'expanding brain' meme's virality is positively associated with the preference for Democratic senators, demonstrating that internet memes can have an impact on political proclivities. This discovery is truly mind-blowing – just like the 'expanding brain' itself! Our research adds a touch of levity to the serious realm of politics and makes one wonder: are memes the new campaign strategy, or is this just a case of 'memetic' coincidence?

In conclusion, this paper presents a comical yet compelling connection between a popular internet meme and Mississippi's senatorial selections, revealing the power of online humor in shaping political inclinations. As the meme goes, "Don't touch my memes, they're under a protection – of laughter!".

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
Ladies and gentlemen, statisticians and jesters, welcome to the whimsical world of meme research! Our study embarks on an exhilarating quest to unravel the enigmatic connection between internet memes and the political landscape in Mississippi. Just like a good dad joke, our research aims to combine academic rigor with a sprinkle of humor to shed light on this peculiar correlation. As we navigate through the data, fasten your seatbelts and prepare for a pun-believably entertaining journey!
The 'expanding brain' meme, with its hierarchical progression from a small brain to a significantly enlarged one, has enraptured netizens with its visual wit. And speaking of wit, how do scientists organize a space party? They planet! In our endeavor to decode the influence of this iconic meme on political preferences, we discovered a correlation that might just make your brain 'expand' in amazement.
As we dig into the statistics, it's essential to understand the gravity of our findings. Just like a well-timed pun, the correlation coefficient of 0.9881482 and p-value less than 0.01 suggests a robust and tantalizing association between the popularity of the 'expanding brain' meme and the propensity to vote for Democratic senators in Mississippi. This discovery is more surprising than finding out that 2 is a prime number, it's just very odd!
Whisking through the realms of memes and voting patterns, the question arises – are internet memes the unsung influencers of political allegiance? Or is this all just an elaborate political memeing, disguised as statistical significance? We're about to find out if Mississippi's senators have been 'memed' into office.
In conclusion, our study turns the spotlight on the power of viral internet humor in shaping political proclivities. In the words of the 'expanding brain' meme, this research edifies that when it comes to political preferences, "the brain, it's evolving!" So, let's raise a glass to the unexpected linkage between memes and Mississippi's senatorial selections, proving that memes indeed "can make a difference, no joke intended, but it's a good one!".

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

The emergence and evolution of internet memes have captured the attention of scholars and netizens alike, prompting inquiries into their influence on various aspects of modern society. Smith (2017) explores the impact of internet memes on consumer behavior, shedding light on the cognitive processes underlying the appeal of humorous content and its potential influence on decision-making. Meanwhile, Doe and Jones (2019) delve into the psychological mechanisms that underpin the virality of memes, offering insights into the factors that contribute to their widespread dissemination. Speaking of dissemination, why don't skeletons fight each other? They don't have the guts!

Turning to the political realm, the connection between online content and voter behavior has piqued the interest of researchers in recent years. In "Political Preferences in the Digital Age" by Author (2018), the authors examine the role of social media and digital platforms in shaping political opinions, highlighting the potential impact of memes and viral content on electoral outcomes. As we navigate this intriguing intersection of humor and politics, the question naturally arises - why did the meme go to school? To become a little more edgy-cational!

In addition to serious academic inquiries, a number of non-fiction works have delved into the pervasive influence of internet culture on societal dynamics. "Like, Share, Retweet: Understanding the Power of Social Media" by Social Scientist (2020) provides a comprehensive analysis of the ways in which online content shapes public discourse and political participation. Meanwhile, "Memes and the Mind: A Cognitive Analysis" by Cognition Expert (2016) offers a deep dive into the cognitive processes underlying meme comprehension and its implications for social behavior. These publications pose serious questions, but one can't help but wonder - what do you call a fake noodle? An impasta!

As we venture further into the world of memes, it's important to note the potential influence of fiction literature on cultural phenomena. In "The Art of Influence: Fiction and Social Change" by Literary Analyst (2015), the author examines the ways in which fictional narratives can impact societal beliefs and behaviors, paving the way for a contemplative exploration of the potential parallels between literary influence and the propagation of internet memes. In the same vein, "Imagination and Ideology: Exploring the Cultural Impact of Fantasy Fiction" by Fantasy Scholar (2017) offers a thought-provoking analysis of the ways in which fantastical narratives influence cultural values and norms. Speaking of fantasy, why don't scientists trust atoms? Because they make up everything!

While cartoons and children's shows may seem like unconventional sources for scholarly inquiry, their portrayal of humor and cognitive engagement can offer valuable insights into the appeal of internet memes. "Animation and Influence: Exploring the Impact of Children's Media" by Animation Expert (2018) provides an intriguing examination of the ways in which animated content shapes cognitive development and influences cultural attitudes, presenting a compelling parallel to the impact of viral internet content on public perception. Moreover, the whimsical world of children's television is not without its own intellectual merits, as evidenced by "Educational Entertainers: Analyzing the Cognitive Impact of Children's Programming" by Child Development Scholar (2019), which elucidates the cognitive and emotional resonance of children's media. Lastly, what did the hat say to the scarf? "You hang around while I go on ahead!"

As we navigate through these diverse sources, it becomes clear that the intersection of internet memes and political phenomena presents a multifaceted and thought-provoking area of study. The lighthearted nature of memes juxtaposed against the weighty realm of politics creates a compelling juxtaposition worthy of further investigation. In the words of the 'expanding brain' meme, this research endeavors to "expand" our understanding of the subtle yet impactful links between online humor and political preferences, while injecting a healthy dose of levity into the scholarly discourse. After all, a little laughter never hurt anyone!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the 'expanding brain' meme and Democrat votes for Senators in Mississippi. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Google Trends and MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse . You used data from 2006 to 2020

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Mirthful Memes and Mississippi's Senatorial Selections: A Playful Probing of the Expanding Brain Phenomenon

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this amusing academic exploration, we delve into the delightful world of internet memes and political preference in the context of Mississippi's senatorial elections. Utilizing data from Google Trends and MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, we cunningly set out to investigate the potential linkage between the popularity of the 'expanding brain' meme and the voting patterns for Democratic senators in Mississippi. Our findings, despite being both punderful and surprising, reveal a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9881482 and p < 0.01 for the timeframe spanning 2006 to 2020.

One might think that memes are just humorous distractions, but our research shows that they may hold more sway than expected. It seems that the 'expanding brain' meme's virality is positively associated with the preference for Democratic senators, demonstrating that internet memes can have an impact on political proclivities. This discovery is truly mind-blowing – just like the 'expanding brain' itself! Our research adds a touch of levity to the serious realm of politics and makes one wonder: are memes the new campaign strategy, or is this just a case of 'memetic' coincidence?

In conclusion, this paper presents a comical yet compelling connection between a popular internet meme and Mississippi's senatorial selections, revealing the power of online humor in shaping political inclinations. As the meme goes, "Don't touch my memes, they're under a protection – of laughter!".

[[INTRODUCTION]]
Ladies and gentlemen, statisticians and jesters, welcome to the whimsical world of meme research! Our study embarks on an exhilarating quest to unravel the enigmatic connection between internet memes and the political landscape in Mississippi. Just like a good dad joke, our research aims to combine academic rigor with a sprinkle of humor to shed light on this peculiar correlation. As we navigate through the data, fasten your seatbelts and prepare for a pun-believably entertaining journey!
The 'expanding brain' meme, with its hierarchical progression from a small brain to a significantly enlarged one, has enraptured netizens with its visual wit. And speaking of wit, how do scientists organize a space party? They planet! In our endeavor to decode the influence of this iconic meme on political preferences, we discovered a correlation that might just make your brain 'expand' in amazement.
As we dig into the statistics, it's essential to understand the gravity of our findings. Just like a well-timed pun, the correlation coefficient of 0.9881482 and p-value less than 0.01 suggests a robust and tantalizing association between the popularity of the 'expanding brain' meme and the propensity to vote for Democratic senators in Mississippi. This discovery is more surprising than finding out that 2 is a prime number, it's just very odd!
Whisking through the realms of memes and voting patterns, the question arises – are internet memes the unsung influencers of political allegiance? Or is this all just an elaborate political memeing, disguised as statistical significance? We're about to find out if Mississippi's senators have been 'memed' into office.
In conclusion, our study turns the spotlight on the power of viral internet humor in shaping political proclivities. In the words of the 'expanding brain' meme, this research edifies that when it comes to political preferences, "the brain, it's evolving!" So, let's raise a glass to the unexpected linkage between memes and Mississippi's senatorial selections, proving that memes indeed "can make a difference, no joke intended, but it's a good one!".

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To unveil the nexus between the meteoric rise of the 'expanding brain' meme and the electoral choices for Democratic senators in the illustrious state of Mississippi, our research team undertook a clever concoction of data collection, statistical analyses, and a pinch of lighthearted humor. Somewhat like a dad joke, our methodology is a blend of precision and joviality, designed to tickle the funny bone of academia.

With a twinkle in our eyes and a spring in our step, we sauntered through the bountiful landscapes of Google Trends and MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, in search of the most delightful data nuggets. Our data collection process resembled a virtual treasure hunt, as we meticulously harvested information from the fertile fields of internet activity and political preferences, selecting the years 2006 to 2020 for the harvest, much like a connoisseur picking the ripest grapes for a fine vintage.

Once we amassed our digital bounty, we employed a statistical feast fit for a king – or at least a whimsical academic paper. Our merry band of researchers utilized a rigorous correlation analysis to scrutinize the relationship between the popularity of the 'expanding brain' meme and the Democratic votes for Senators in the charming state of Mississippi. The statistical methods deployed danced around the data with finesse, much like a clown at a carnival, juggling significance tests and correlation coefficients with unparalleled delight.

As we waded through the data streams and ventured into the statistical labyrinth, we navigated through the thorny thickets of confounding variables and biases with the dexterity of a professional comedian skillfully handling hecklers in the audience. Every statistical move was crafted and choreographed with the precision of a stand-up routine, leaving no room for data missteps or analytical blunders.

In the end, our whimsical methodology, like a jovial firework display, lit up the landscape of meme research, casting a beaming light on the enthralling connection between internet humor and political predilections. We hope our playful approach not only tickles the statistical taste buds of academia but also underscores the mirthful potential of blending meticulous research with a sprinkle of levity. After all, where would science be without a few good puns and a hefty dose of humor?


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the 'expanding brain' meme and Democrat votes for Senators in Mississippi. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Google Trends and MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse .

For the time period 2006 to 2020, you found a correlation 0.9881482, r-squared of 0.9764369, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Mirthful Memes and Mississippi's Senatorial Selections: A Playful Probing of the Expanding Brain Phenomenon

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this amusing academic exploration, we delve into the delightful world of internet memes and political preference in the context of Mississippi's senatorial elections. Utilizing data from Google Trends and MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, we cunningly set out to investigate the potential linkage between the popularity of the 'expanding brain' meme and the voting patterns for Democratic senators in Mississippi. Our findings, despite being both punderful and surprising, reveal a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9881482 and p < 0.01 for the timeframe spanning 2006 to 2020.

One might think that memes are just humorous distractions, but our research shows that they may hold more sway than expected. It seems that the 'expanding brain' meme's virality is positively associated with the preference for Democratic senators, demonstrating that internet memes can have an impact on political proclivities. This discovery is truly mind-blowing – just like the 'expanding brain' itself! Our research adds a touch of levity to the serious realm of politics and makes one wonder: are memes the new campaign strategy, or is this just a case of 'memetic' coincidence?

In conclusion, this paper presents a comical yet compelling connection between a popular internet meme and Mississippi's senatorial selections, revealing the power of online humor in shaping political inclinations. As the meme goes, "Don't touch my memes, they're under a protection – of laughter!".

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
Ladies and gentlemen, statisticians and jesters, welcome to the whimsical world of meme research! Our study embarks on an exhilarating quest to unravel the enigmatic connection between internet memes and the political landscape in Mississippi. Just like a good dad joke, our research aims to combine academic rigor with a sprinkle of humor to shed light on this peculiar correlation. As we navigate through the data, fasten your seatbelts and prepare for a pun-believably entertaining journey!
The 'expanding brain' meme, with its hierarchical progression from a small brain to a significantly enlarged one, has enraptured netizens with its visual wit. And speaking of wit, how do scientists organize a space party? They planet! In our endeavor to decode the influence of this iconic meme on political preferences, we discovered a correlation that might just make your brain 'expand' in amazement.
As we dig into the statistics, it's essential to understand the gravity of our findings. Just like a well-timed pun, the correlation coefficient of 0.9881482 and p-value less than 0.01 suggests a robust and tantalizing association between the popularity of the 'expanding brain' meme and the propensity to vote for Democratic senators in Mississippi. This discovery is more surprising than finding out that 2 is a prime number, it's just very odd!
Whisking through the realms of memes and voting patterns, the question arises – are internet memes the unsung influencers of political allegiance? Or is this all just an elaborate political memeing, disguised as statistical significance? We're about to find out if Mississippi's senators have been 'memed' into office.
In conclusion, our study turns the spotlight on the power of viral internet humor in shaping political proclivities. In the words of the 'expanding brain' meme, this research edifies that when it comes to political preferences, "the brain, it's evolving!" So, let's raise a glass to the unexpected linkage between memes and Mississippi's senatorial selections, proving that memes indeed "can make a difference, no joke intended, but it's a good one!".

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The engaging investigation into the relationship between the popularity of the 'expanding brain' meme and the voting tendencies for Democratic senators in Mississippi has yielded results that are as amusing as they are astonishing. The correlation coefficient of 0.9881482 and an r-squared value of 0.9764369 for the time period of 2006 to 2020 drew a chuckle from even the most stoic of statisticians. The p-value of less than 0.01 further reinforced the strength of this noteworthy association. With results like these, it seems that the 'expanding brain' meme may have had a mind-expanding effect on the political landscape of Mississippi.

Fig. 1 depicts a scatterplot showcasing the robust correlation between the variables. It might just leave viewers thinking, "I can't take my eyes off this scatterplot, it's so 'punny'!"

Our findings reveal that as the popularity of the 'expanding brain' meme increased, so did the preference for Democratic senators in Mississippi. It appears that the 'expanding brain' meme's intellectual ascent correlates with an increase in Democratic votes, leaving us to wonder if this is indeed a case of 'meme magic' influencing political thought or just a curious coincidence. This discovery is akin to a dad joke – both surprising and humorous.

In the spirit of good-natured inquiry, one might ask, "Is this correlation between the 'expanding brain' meme and Democratic votes merely a 'memetic' twist of fate?" Our research provides evidence that indeed, memes may be a new and influential force in political campaigns. This brings a whole new spin to the phrase, "making a 'meme'-orable impact on the election!"


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the 'expanding brain' meme and Democrat votes for Senators in Mississippi. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
Mirthful Memes and Mississippi's Senatorial Selections: A Playful Probing of the Expanding Brain Phenomenon

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this amusing academic exploration, we delve into the delightful world of internet memes and political preference in the context of Mississippi's senatorial elections. Utilizing data from Google Trends and MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, we cunningly set out to investigate the potential linkage between the popularity of the 'expanding brain' meme and the voting patterns for Democratic senators in Mississippi. Our findings, despite being both punderful and surprising, reveal a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9881482 and p < 0.01 for the timeframe spanning 2006 to 2020.

One might think that memes are just humorous distractions, but our research shows that they may hold more sway than expected. It seems that the 'expanding brain' meme's virality is positively associated with the preference for Democratic senators, demonstrating that internet memes can have an impact on political proclivities. This discovery is truly mind-blowing – just like the 'expanding brain' itself! Our research adds a touch of levity to the serious realm of politics and makes one wonder: are memes the new campaign strategy, or is this just a case of 'memetic' coincidence?

In conclusion, this paper presents a comical yet compelling connection between a popular internet meme and Mississippi's senatorial selections, revealing the power of online humor in shaping political inclinations. As the meme goes, "Don't touch my memes, they're under a protection – of laughter!".

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The emergence and evolution of internet memes have captured the attention of scholars and netizens alike, prompting inquiries into their influence on various aspects of modern society. Smith (2017) explores the impact of internet memes on consumer behavior, shedding light on the cognitive processes underlying the appeal of humorous content and its potential influence on decision-making. Meanwhile, Doe and Jones (2019) delve into the psychological mechanisms that underpin the virality of memes, offering insights into the factors that contribute to their widespread dissemination. Speaking of dissemination, why don't skeletons fight each other? They don't have the guts!
Turning to the political realm, the connection between online content and voter behavior has piqued the interest of researchers in recent years. In "Political Preferences in the Digital Age" by Author (2018), the authors examine the role of social media and digital platforms in shaping political opinions, highlighting the potential impact of memes and viral content on electoral outcomes. As we navigate this intriguing intersection of humor and politics, the question naturally arises - why did the meme go to school? To become a little more edgy-cational!
In addition to serious academic inquiries, a number of non-fiction works have delved into the pervasive influence of internet culture on societal dynamics. "Like, Share, Retweet: Understanding the Power of Social Media" by Social Scientist (2020) provides a comprehensive analysis of the ways in which online content shapes public discourse and political participation. Meanwhile, "Memes and the Mind: A Cognitive Analysis" by Cognition Expert (2016) offers a deep dive into the cognitive processes underlying meme comprehension and its implications for social behavior. These publications pose serious questions, but one can't help but wonder - what do you call a fake noodle? An impasta!
As we venture further into the world of memes, it's important to note the potential influence of fiction literature on cultural phenomena. In "The Art of Influence: Fiction and Social Change" by Literary Analyst (2015), the author examines the ways in which fictional narratives can impact societal beliefs and behaviors, paving the way for a contemplative exploration of the potential parallels between literary influence and the propagation of internet memes. In the same vein, "Imagination and Ideology: Exploring the Cultural Impact of Fantasy Fiction" by Fantasy Scholar (2017) offers a thought-provoking analysis of the ways in which fantastical narratives influence cultural values and norms. Speaking of fantasy, why don't scientists trust atoms? Because they make up everything!
While cartoons and children's shows may seem like unconventional sources for scholarly inquiry, their portrayal of humor and cognitive engagement can offer valuable insights into the appeal of internet memes. "Animation and Influence: Exploring the Impact of Children's Media" by Animation Expert (2018) provides an intriguing examination of the ways in which animated content shapes cognitive development and influences cultural attitudes, presenting a compelling parallel to the impact of viral internet content on public perception. Moreover, the whimsical world of children's television is not without its own intellectual merits, as evidenced by "Educational Entertainers: Analyzing the Cognitive Impact of Children's Programming" by Child Development Scholar (2019), which elucidates the cognitive and emotional resonance of children's media. Lastly, what did the hat say to the scarf? "You hang around while I go on ahead!"
As we navigate through these diverse sources, it becomes clear that the intersection of internet memes and political phenomena presents a multifaceted and thought-provoking area of study. The lighthearted nature of memes juxtaposed against the weighty realm of politics creates a compelling juxtaposition worthy of further investigation. In the words of the 'expanding brain' meme, this research endeavors to "expand" our understanding of the subtle yet impactful links between online humor and political preferences, while injecting a healthy dose of levity into the scholarly discourse. After all, a little laughter never hurt anyone!

[[RESULTS]]
The engaging investigation into the relationship between the popularity of the 'expanding brain' meme and the voting tendencies for Democratic senators in Mississippi has yielded results that are as amusing as they are astonishing. The correlation coefficient of 0.9881482 and an r-squared value of 0.9764369 for the time period of 2006 to 2020 drew a chuckle from even the most stoic of statisticians. The p-value of less than 0.01 further reinforced the strength of this noteworthy association. With results like these, it seems that the 'expanding brain' meme may have had a mind-expanding effect on the political landscape of Mississippi.
Fig. 1 depicts a scatterplot showcasing the robust correlation between the variables. It might just leave viewers thinking, "I can't take my eyes off this scatterplot, it's so 'punny'!"
Our findings reveal that as the popularity of the 'expanding brain' meme increased, so did the preference for Democratic senators in Mississippi. It appears that the 'expanding brain' meme's intellectual ascent correlates with an increase in Democratic votes, leaving us to wonder if this is indeed a case of 'meme magic' influencing political thought or just a curious coincidence. This discovery is akin to a dad joke – both surprising and humorous.
In the spirit of good-natured inquiry, one might ask, "Is this correlation between the 'expanding brain' meme and Democratic votes merely a 'memetic' twist of fate?" Our research provides evidence that indeed, memes may be a new and influential force in political campaigns. This brings a whole new spin to the phrase, "making a 'meme'-orable impact on the election!"

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The results of our study present a whimsical yet thought-provoking correlation between the popularity of the 'expanding brain' meme and the voting behavior for Democratic senators in Mississippi. The r-squared value of 0.9764369 and a correlation coefficient of 0.9881482 unequivocally support the prior research that has explored the influence of internet memes on political preferences. It seems that this 'expanding brain' meme has not only expanded minds but also expanded our understanding of the potential impact of internet humor on electoral dynamics. One can't help but admire the 'meme'-orable connection we've unveiled.

Building upon our literature review, which playfully explored the influence of cartoons and imaginative fiction on societal beliefs, our findings add another layer of complexity to the relationship between online content and political attitudes. Just like a good dad joke, the connection between the 'expanding brain' meme and Democratic votes in Mississippi is both surprising and chuckle-worthy. It certainly leaves one with a sense of 'punny' amusement and intellectual reflection.

The robustness of our results, with a p-value of less than 0.01, highlights the statistically significant nature of the relationship observed. It's almost as rare as finding a four-leaf clover in a statistics textbook! This statistically significant association between the 'expanding brain' meme and Democrat votes suggests that internet memes may have a more profound impact on political preferences than previously anticipated. It's as if the 'expanding brain' meme has left an indelible imprint on the political landscape of Mississippi, almost like a punchline that just keeps getting funnier.

Furthermore, the compelling correlation between the meme's popularity and the preference for Democratic senators raises intriguing questions about the potential role of memes as a new form of political communication. One could say it's a real 'memetic' revolution taking place. It appears that internet memes are not merely lighthearted distractions but potentially influential tools in shaping public opinion. It's as if memes are the new "campaign comedians," injecting a dose of humor into the seriousness of political discourse.

In sum, our findings offer an unexpected yet delightful insight into the intersection of internet memes and political preferences. This research adds to the growing body of literature that seeks to unravel the enigmatic influence of online humor on serious social phenomena. As we navigate this 'meme'-orable journey, we are reminded of the profound words of Albert Einstein, who once quipped that "a good joke is the best brain tonic." Indeed, our research has tickled our grey matter and left us with a newfound appreciation for the subtle but impactful role of internet memes in the political arena.

So, why did the 'expanding brain' meme resonate with Democratic votes? It seems that in the world of internet memes and politics, the punchline may just be the vote itself.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the 'expanding brain' meme and Democrat votes for Senators in Mississippi. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
Mirthful Memes and Mississippi's Senatorial Selections: A Playful Probing of the Expanding Brain Phenomenon

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this amusing academic exploration, we delve into the delightful world of internet memes and political preference in the context of Mississippi's senatorial elections. Utilizing data from Google Trends and MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, we cunningly set out to investigate the potential linkage between the popularity of the 'expanding brain' meme and the voting patterns for Democratic senators in Mississippi. Our findings, despite being both punderful and surprising, reveal a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9881482 and p < 0.01 for the timeframe spanning 2006 to 2020.

One might think that memes are just humorous distractions, but our research shows that they may hold more sway than expected. It seems that the 'expanding brain' meme's virality is positively associated with the preference for Democratic senators, demonstrating that internet memes can have an impact on political proclivities. This discovery is truly mind-blowing – just like the 'expanding brain' itself! Our research adds a touch of levity to the serious realm of politics and makes one wonder: are memes the new campaign strategy, or is this just a case of 'memetic' coincidence?

In conclusion, this paper presents a comical yet compelling connection between a popular internet meme and Mississippi's senatorial selections, revealing the power of online humor in shaping political inclinations. As the meme goes, "Don't touch my memes, they're under a protection – of laughter!".

[[INTRDUCTION]]
Ladies and gentlemen, statisticians and jesters, welcome to the whimsical world of meme research! Our study embarks on an exhilarating quest to unravel the enigmatic connection between internet memes and the political landscape in Mississippi. Just like a good dad joke, our research aims to combine academic rigor with a sprinkle of humor to shed light on this peculiar correlation. As we navigate through the data, fasten your seatbelts and prepare for a pun-believably entertaining journey!
The 'expanding brain' meme, with its hierarchical progression from a small brain to a significantly enlarged one, has enraptured netizens with its visual wit. And speaking of wit, how do scientists organize a space party? They planet! In our endeavor to decode the influence of this iconic meme on political preferences, we discovered a correlation that might just make your brain 'expand' in amazement.
As we dig into the statistics, it's essential to understand the gravity of our findings. Just like a well-timed pun, the correlation coefficient of 0.9881482 and p-value less than 0.01 suggests a robust and tantalizing association between the popularity of the 'expanding brain' meme and the propensity to vote for Democratic senators in Mississippi. This discovery is more surprising than finding out that 2 is a prime number, it's just very odd!
Whisking through the realms of memes and voting patterns, the question arises – are internet memes the unsung influencers of political allegiance? Or is this all just an elaborate political memeing, disguised as statistical significance? We're about to find out if Mississippi's senators have been 'memed' into office.
In conclusion, our study turns the spotlight on the power of viral internet humor in shaping political proclivities. In the words of the 'expanding brain' meme, this research edifies that when it comes to political preferences, "the brain, it's evolving!" So, let's raise a glass to the unexpected linkage between memes and Mississippi's senatorial selections, proving that memes indeed "can make a difference, no joke intended, but it's a good one!".

[[RESULTS]]
The engaging investigation into the relationship between the popularity of the 'expanding brain' meme and the voting tendencies for Democratic senators in Mississippi has yielded results that are as amusing as they are astonishing. The correlation coefficient of 0.9881482 and an r-squared value of 0.9764369 for the time period of 2006 to 2020 drew a chuckle from even the most stoic of statisticians. The p-value of less than 0.01 further reinforced the strength of this noteworthy association. With results like these, it seems that the 'expanding brain' meme may have had a mind-expanding effect on the political landscape of Mississippi.
Fig. 1 depicts a scatterplot showcasing the robust correlation between the variables. It might just leave viewers thinking, "I can't take my eyes off this scatterplot, it's so 'punny'!"
Our findings reveal that as the popularity of the 'expanding brain' meme increased, so did the preference for Democratic senators in Mississippi. It appears that the 'expanding brain' meme's intellectual ascent correlates with an increase in Democratic votes, leaving us to wonder if this is indeed a case of 'meme magic' influencing political thought or just a curious coincidence. This discovery is akin to a dad joke – both surprising and humorous.
In the spirit of good-natured inquiry, one might ask, "Is this correlation between the 'expanding brain' meme and Democratic votes merely a 'memetic' twist of fate?" Our research provides evidence that indeed, memes may be a new and influential force in political campaigns. This brings a whole new spin to the phrase, "making a 'meme'-orable impact on the election!"

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

As we wrap up our study, we can't help but marvel at the mind-bending association between the 'expanding brain' meme and the Democratic senatorial preferences in Mississippi. It seems that the expansion of online humor may have elevated the voting inclinations of the good folks in the Magnolia State. This finding is as surprising as realizing that time flies like an arrow, but fruit flies like a banana – it's both unexpected and a little bit amusing.

Our investigation has added a touch of whimsy to the world of statistics and political analysis, demonstrating that the digital sphere of memes may have greater influence than previously imagined. It appears that the 'expanding brain' meme has left its mark on more than just the internet – it has remarkably imprinted itself on the political fabric of Mississippi. This revelation is like finding out that the square root of 4 is both 2 and -2 – it's a twist that makes you re-evaluate your assumptions.

So, what does this mean for the future of political campaigning and meme culture? One thing is for certain, the 'expanding brain' meme has shown that it's not just a visual gag – it has the potential to shape voting behaviors with its comedic prowess. Our study has unveiled a correlation as striking as a perfectly-timed punchline, prompting us to ponder whether memes might just be the new political jesters, influencing elections from the digital realm.

In light of our findings, it seems that the 'expanding brain' meme has not only expanded our cognitive horizons but has also left an indelible mark on the political landscape of Mississippi. It's like a good dad joke; it leaves you chuckling and wondering, "How did it have such an impact?" Therefore, we assert that no further research is needed in this area – for now, the 'expanding brain' meme has had its moment in the spotlight, and its influence on Mississippi's senatorial selections has been statistically, and humorously, unearthed!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Mirthful Memes and Mississippi's Senatorial Selections: A Playful Probing of the Expanding Brain Phenomenon. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Hilarity Studies


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Mirthful Memes and Mississippi's Senatorial Selections: A Playful Probing of the Expanding Brain Phenomenon. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Society for Whimsical Wonderings and Witty Writings


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Mirthful Memes and Mississippi's Senatorial Selections: A Playful Probing of the Expanding Brain Phenomenon with an abstract of In this amusing academic exploration, we delve into the delightful world of internet memes and political preference in the context of Mississippi's senatorial elections. Utilizing data from Google Trends and MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, we cunningly set out to investigate the potential linkage between the popularity of the 'expanding brain' meme and the voting patterns for Democratic senators in Mississippi. Our findings, despite being both punderful and surprising, reveal a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9881482 and p < 0.01 for the timeframe spanning 2006 to 2020.
One might think that memes are just humorous distractions, but our research shows that they may hold more sway than expected. It seems that the 'expanding brain' meme's virality is positively associated with the preference for Democratic senators, demonstrating that internet memes can have an impact on political proclivities. This discovery is truly mind-blowing – just like the 'expanding brain' itself! Our research adds a touch of levity to the serious realm of politics and makes one wonder: are memes the new campaign strategy, or is this just a case of 'memetic' coincidence?
In conclusion, this paper presents a comical yet compelling connection between a popular internet meme and Mississippi's senatorial selections, revealing the power of online humor in shaping political inclinations. As the meme goes, "Don't touch my memes, they're under a protection – of laughter!".

ChatGPT:

Mississippi senatorial elections, expanding brain meme, internet memes, political preference, Google Trends, MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, correlation coefficient, Democratic senators, political proclivities, memetic coincidence, online humor, campaign strategy, political inclinations

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Popularity of the 'expanding brain' meme
Detailed data title: Relative volume of Google searches for 'expanding brain meme' (without quotes, in the United States)
Source: Google Trends
Additional Info: Relative search volume is a unique Google thing; the shape of the chart is accurate but the actual numbers are meaningless.

See what else correlates with Popularity of the 'expanding brain' meme

Votes for Democratic Senators in Mississippi
Detailed data title: Percentage of votes cast for Federal Democrat Senate candidates in Mississippi
Source: MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse
See what else correlates with Votes for Democratic Senators in Mississippi

Correlation r = 0.9881482 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.9764369 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 97.6% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Votes for Democratic Senators in Mississippi) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Popularity of the 'expanding brain' meme) over the 6 years from 2006 through 2020.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 0.00021. 0.0002098644271887468100000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.99 in 0.021% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 4,765 random variables Which I absolutely did.
with the same 5 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 5 because we have two variables measured over a period of 6 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.89, 1 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
200620082012201420182020
Popularity of the 'expanding brain' meme (Relative popularity)2.620.3135.257.25
Votes for Democratic Senators in Mississippi (Percentage of votes)34.865438.56540.550937.894485.841344.1293




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Very low n: There are not many data points included in this analysis. Even if the p-value is high, we should be suspicious of using so few datapoints in a correlation.
  5. Y-axis doesn't start at zero: I truncated the Y-axes of the graph above. I also used a line graph, which makes the visual connection stand out more than it deserves. Nothing against line graphs. They are great at telling a story when you have linear data! But visually it is deceptive because the only data is at the points on the graph, not the lines on the graph. In between each point, the data could have been doing anything. Like going for a random walk by itself!
    Mathematically what I showed is true, but it is intentionally misleading. Below is the same chart but with both Y-axes starting at zero.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([2.6,2,0.3,1,35.25,7.25,])
array_2 = np.array([34.8654,38.565,40.5509,37.8944,85.8413,44.1293,])
array_1_name = "Popularity of the 'expanding brain' meme"
array_2_name = "Votes for Democratic Senators in Mississippi"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Big thanks for reviewing!


Correlation ID: 4852 · Black Variable ID: 25136 · Red Variable ID: 26410
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0