about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #4,851 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Air quality in Blacksburg, Virginia and the second variable is Hotdogs consumed by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion.  The chart goes from 1990 to 2022, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

The improved air quality in Blacksburg, Virginia led to larger, fluffier bread rolls being used for hotdogs, creating more space for competitive eaters to stuff their faces even faster.

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Sure, here's an image generation prompt for DALL·E-3: Generate a comic-book-style illustration with muted colors and a dotted halftone pattern from the 1960s depicting a bustling scene in Blacksburg, Virginia. In the foreground, showcase a cheerful town with crisp, fresh air wafting through the streets, depicted by clean, flowing lines and soft colors. In the background, include a comic exaggeration of the Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition, where the reigning champion is shown devouring hotdogs at an incredible speed. Highlight the larger, fluffier bread rolls enhancing the hotdogs, conveying the link between the improved air quality and the champion's impressive eating abilities in a fun and lively manner. Avoid any words or speech bubbles in the illustration. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Air quality in Blacksburg, Virginia and Hotdogs consumed by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: a meme Art nouveau Psychedelic Whimsical illustration A comic-book-style illustration with muted colors and a dotted halftone pattern from the 1960s
ChatGPT: A comic-book-style illustration with muted colors and a dotted halftone pattern from the 1960s

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Air quality in Blacksburg, Virginia and Hotdogs consumed by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion, in the following situation: The improved air quality in Blacksburg, Virginia led to larger, fluffier bread rolls being used for hotdogs, creating more space for competitive eaters to stuff their faces even faster.. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In Blacksburg, Virginia, the air quality has improved, leading to a picturesque scene of fresh, clean air wafting through the town. Meanwhile, at the Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition, the reigning champion is seen devouring hotdogs at an astonishing speed, thanks to the larger, fluffier bread rolls that have been introduced due to the improved air quality.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ A comic-book-style illustration with muted colors and a dotted halftone pattern from the 1960s ] and depicting this scene: In Blacksburg, Virginia, the air quality has improved, leading to a picturesque scene of fresh, clean air wafting through the town. Meanwhile, at the Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition, the reigning champion is seen devouring hotdogs at an astonishing speed, thanks to the larger, fluffier bread rolls that have been introduced due to the improved air quality. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Sure, here's an image generation prompt for DALL·E-3: Generate a comic-book-style illustration with muted colors and a dotted halftone pattern from the 1960s depicting a bustling scene in Blacksburg, Virginia. In the foreground, showcase a cheerful town with crisp, fresh air wafting through the streets, depicted by clean, flowing lines and soft colors. In the background, include a comic exaggeration of the Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition, where the reigning champion is shown devouring hotdogs at an incredible speed. Highlight the larger, fluffier bread rolls enhancing the hotdogs, conveying the link between the improved air quality and the champion's impressive eating abilities in a fun and lively manner. Avoid any words or speech bubbles in the illustration.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in Air quality in Blacksburg, Virginia caused Hotdogs consumed by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion to increase.\Make it sound serious until the end.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
The Link Between Air-Quality and Wiener Wonders: A Statistical Analysis of the Relationship between Air Quality in Blacksburg, Virginia and Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion's Consumption

The Journal of Gastronomic Ecology

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air quality in Blacksburg, Virginia and Hotdogs consumed by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Make the title punny if you can come up with clever pun. If not, just make it sound clever.

Your research team used data from Environmental Protection Agency and Wikipedia to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.8181650 and p < 0.01 for 1990 to 2022.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
The Link Between Air-Quality and Wiener Wonders: A Statistical Analysis of the Relationship between Air Quality in Blacksburg, Virginia and Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion's Consumption

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study serves up some statistical food for thought as we delve into the curious case of the connection between air quality in Blacksburg, Virginia, and the hotdog consumption habits of Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion. Utilizing data from the Environmental Protection Agency and Wikipedia, our research team embarked on a gastronomic adventure to analyze the purported relationship between air quality metrics and the number of hotdogs gobbled by the reigning champion.

Our findings revealed a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.8181650 with a p-value less than 0.01, uncovering a tantalizing link between the air in Blacksburg and the appetites of the hotdog-eating champion. In other words, there could be something in the air that's fueling the champion's insatiable appetite for hotdogs – perhaps a whiff of mustard or a gust of ketchup-laden breeze.

This study not only advances our understanding of the intricate interplay between atmospheric conditions and competitive eating but also brings to light the mysterious ways in which environmental factors can influence human behavior. Furthermore, it emphasizes the importance of considering outside factors in the analysis of seemingly unrelated phenomena—in this case, the correlation between air quality and hotdog consumption, no matter how much of a "wiener" it may seem at first glance.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air quality in Blacksburg, Virginia and Hotdogs consumed by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Link Between Air-Quality and Wiener Wonders: A Statistical Analysis of the Relationship between Air Quality in Blacksburg, Virginia and Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion's Consumption

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study serves up some statistical food for thought as we delve into the curious case of the connection between air quality in Blacksburg, Virginia, and the hotdog consumption habits of Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion. Utilizing data from the Environmental Protection Agency and Wikipedia, our research team embarked on a gastronomic adventure to analyze the purported relationship between air quality metrics and the number of hotdogs gobbled by the reigning champion.

Our findings revealed a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.8181650 with a p-value less than 0.01, uncovering a tantalizing link between the air in Blacksburg and the appetites of the hotdog-eating champion. In other words, there could be something in the air that's fueling the champion's insatiable appetite for hotdogs – perhaps a whiff of mustard or a gust of ketchup-laden breeze.

This study not only advances our understanding of the intricate interplay between atmospheric conditions and competitive eating but also brings to light the mysterious ways in which environmental factors can influence human behavior. Furthermore, it emphasizes the importance of considering outside factors in the analysis of seemingly unrelated phenomena—in this case, the correlation between air quality and hotdog consumption, no matter how much of a "wiener" it may seem at first glance.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

The relationship between environmental factors and human behavior has long been a topic of interest among researchers. In the case of competitive eating, the influence of air quality on the consumption habits of participants has often been overlooked. However, our study takes a bite into this unexplored area, aiming to understand the potential link between air quality in Blacksburg, Virginia, and the hotdog consumption of the Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion. As we chew over the data, it becomes evident that the air in this slice of Virginia may hold a key to unlocking the champion's voracious appetite for hotdogs – a real "wiener" of a discovery, if you ask us!

Our research is not just a flavor of the month; it's a statistical feast for the curious mind. By analyzing air quality data obtained from the Environmental Protection Agency and hotdog consumption figures from the esteemed pages of Wikipedia, we sought to uncover any viable correlation between the two seemingly unrelated phenomena. And to our surprise (and delight), our findings have cooked up quite the substantial correlation coefficient of 0.8181650 with a p-value of less than 0.01. This statistical sausage fest has certainly given us something to relish – but what could be the driving force behind this unexpected connection? It seems the air in Blacksburg may have some "buns-olutely" fascinating effects on the appetite of the hotdog-eating champion!

Our study not only spices up the existing literature on environmental influences but also adds a new flavor to the field of competitive eating research. It highlights the need to consider external factors, such as air quality, in understanding human behavior and performance, even if the link seems as improbable as a mustard-flavored ice cream. After all, as we unravel the intricacies of this connection, we can't help but savor the irony of how a breath of fresh air in Blacksburg might be the secret ingredient to the champion's insatiable hunger for hotdogs.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air quality in Blacksburg, Virginia and Hotdogs consumed by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then name a few real TV shows that sound like they might be relevant to the topic that you watched as research.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Link Between Air-Quality and Wiener Wonders: A Statistical Analysis of the Relationship between Air Quality in Blacksburg, Virginia and Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion's Consumption

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study serves up some statistical food for thought as we delve into the curious case of the connection between air quality in Blacksburg, Virginia, and the hotdog consumption habits of Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion. Utilizing data from the Environmental Protection Agency and Wikipedia, our research team embarked on a gastronomic adventure to analyze the purported relationship between air quality metrics and the number of hotdogs gobbled by the reigning champion.

Our findings revealed a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.8181650 with a p-value less than 0.01, uncovering a tantalizing link between the air in Blacksburg and the appetites of the hotdog-eating champion. In other words, there could be something in the air that's fueling the champion's insatiable appetite for hotdogs – perhaps a whiff of mustard or a gust of ketchup-laden breeze.

This study not only advances our understanding of the intricate interplay between atmospheric conditions and competitive eating but also brings to light the mysterious ways in which environmental factors can influence human behavior. Furthermore, it emphasizes the importance of considering outside factors in the analysis of seemingly unrelated phenomena—in this case, the correlation between air quality and hotdog consumption, no matter how much of a "wiener" it may seem at first glance.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The relationship between environmental factors and human behavior has long been a topic of interest among researchers. In the case of competitive eating, the influence of air quality on the consumption habits of participants has often been overlooked. However, our study takes a bite into this unexplored area, aiming to understand the potential link between air quality in Blacksburg, Virginia, and the hotdog consumption of the Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion. As we chew over the data, it becomes evident that the air in this slice of Virginia may hold a key to unlocking the champion's voracious appetite for hotdogs – a real "wiener" of a discovery, if you ask us!
Our research is not just a flavor of the month; it's a statistical feast for the curious mind. By analyzing air quality data obtained from the Environmental Protection Agency and hotdog consumption figures from the esteemed pages of Wikipedia, we sought to uncover any viable correlation between the two seemingly unrelated phenomena. And to our surprise (and delight), our findings have cooked up quite the substantial correlation coefficient of 0.8181650 with a p-value of less than 0.01. This statistical sausage fest has certainly given us something to relish – but what could be the driving force behind this unexpected connection? It seems the air in Blacksburg may have some "buns-olutely" fascinating effects on the appetite of the hotdog-eating champion!
Our study not only spices up the existing literature on environmental influences but also adds a new flavor to the field of competitive eating research. It highlights the need to consider external factors, such as air quality, in understanding human behavior and performance, even if the link seems as improbable as a mustard-flavored ice cream. After all, as we unravel the intricacies of this connection, we can't help but savor the irony of how a breath of fresh air in Blacksburg might be the secret ingredient to the champion's insatiable hunger for hotdogs.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

The relationship between air quality and competitive eating habits has been a topic of growing interest in recent years. Smith (2017) examined the impact of air pollution on eating behavior, while Doe (2018) investigated the potential effects of air quality on athletic performance, both noting the potential influence of environmental factors on human activities. However, our study aims to take a more unconventional approach by exploring the specific connection between air quality in Blacksburg, Virginia, and the hotdog consumption habits of the Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion. As we delve into this unexpected investigation, we discover that the air in Blacksburg might just be the secret ingredient in the champion's quest for glory – a revelation as unexpected as finding a pickle in the middle of a hotdog.

In "The Air We Breathe" by Jones (2019), the author explores the relationship between air quality and human health, shedding light on how atmospheric conditions can impact overall well-being. Similarly, "The Statistical Sausage: Exploring Unlikely Correlations" by Brown (2020) delves into the world of seemingly unrelated phenomena, challenging conventional thinking and uncovering unexpected associations. While these works provide valuable insights into the broader impact of air quality, they do not specifically address the peculiar link between air in Blacksburg and the consumption of hotdogs by a reigning competitive eating champion. This is like trying to understand hotdogs without the bun - it just doesn't quite cut the mustard!

Turning to non-fiction books, "The Big Book of Hotdogs" by Foodie (2018) and "Air Quality and You" by Environmentally Aware (2019) offer comprehensive perspectives on the art of hotdog consumption and the importance of air quality, respectively. On the fictional side, works such as "Sizzling Skies: A Hotdog Mystery" by Novel Enthusiast (2017) and "The Airborne Appetite" by Imaginary Author (2015) present imaginative narratives that, while not rooted in scientific fact, capture the imagination with their portrayal of airborne culinary mysteries. Much like an unexpected condiment on a hotdog, these fictional works serve to spice up the literary context of our research, adding a dash of excitement to the otherwise straightforward investigation.

In the realm of visual media, "Eats and Allergens" and "Airwaves and Appetites," two TV shows that explore culinary trends and environmental influences, respectively, have provided additional context for our investigation. Watching these shows was not just for entertainment – it was a form of "research" that allowed us to savor the complexities of the hotdog-eating world and gain a deeper appreciation for the subtleties of air quality. After all, understanding the relationship between air quality and hotdog consumption requires more than just a statistical approach; it demands a true "taste" for the subject matter.

As we sift through this literary and media mix, it becomes evident that our research plunges into uncharted territory, blending the serious and the whimsical in a delightful fusion of statistical analysis and culinary curiosity. After all, who knew that the air in Blacksburg could hold such a "relish-able" secret?


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air quality in Blacksburg, Virginia and Hotdogs consumed by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Environmental Protection Agency and Wikipedia . You used data from 1990 to 2022

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Link Between Air-Quality and Wiener Wonders: A Statistical Analysis of the Relationship between Air Quality in Blacksburg, Virginia and Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion's Consumption

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study serves up some statistical food for thought as we delve into the curious case of the connection between air quality in Blacksburg, Virginia, and the hotdog consumption habits of Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion. Utilizing data from the Environmental Protection Agency and Wikipedia, our research team embarked on a gastronomic adventure to analyze the purported relationship between air quality metrics and the number of hotdogs gobbled by the reigning champion.

Our findings revealed a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.8181650 with a p-value less than 0.01, uncovering a tantalizing link between the air in Blacksburg and the appetites of the hotdog-eating champion. In other words, there could be something in the air that's fueling the champion's insatiable appetite for hotdogs – perhaps a whiff of mustard or a gust of ketchup-laden breeze.

This study not only advances our understanding of the intricate interplay between atmospheric conditions and competitive eating but also brings to light the mysterious ways in which environmental factors can influence human behavior. Furthermore, it emphasizes the importance of considering outside factors in the analysis of seemingly unrelated phenomena—in this case, the correlation between air quality and hotdog consumption, no matter how much of a "wiener" it may seem at first glance.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
The relationship between environmental factors and human behavior has long been a topic of interest among researchers. In the case of competitive eating, the influence of air quality on the consumption habits of participants has often been overlooked. However, our study takes a bite into this unexplored area, aiming to understand the potential link between air quality in Blacksburg, Virginia, and the hotdog consumption of the Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion. As we chew over the data, it becomes evident that the air in this slice of Virginia may hold a key to unlocking the champion's voracious appetite for hotdogs – a real "wiener" of a discovery, if you ask us!
Our research is not just a flavor of the month; it's a statistical feast for the curious mind. By analyzing air quality data obtained from the Environmental Protection Agency and hotdog consumption figures from the esteemed pages of Wikipedia, we sought to uncover any viable correlation between the two seemingly unrelated phenomena. And to our surprise (and delight), our findings have cooked up quite the substantial correlation coefficient of 0.8181650 with a p-value of less than 0.01. This statistical sausage fest has certainly given us something to relish – but what could be the driving force behind this unexpected connection? It seems the air in Blacksburg may have some "buns-olutely" fascinating effects on the appetite of the hotdog-eating champion!
Our study not only spices up the existing literature on environmental influences but also adds a new flavor to the field of competitive eating research. It highlights the need to consider external factors, such as air quality, in understanding human behavior and performance, even if the link seems as improbable as a mustard-flavored ice cream. After all, as we unravel the intricacies of this connection, we can't help but savor the irony of how a breath of fresh air in Blacksburg might be the secret ingredient to the champion's insatiable hunger for hotdogs.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To embark on our quest for the tantalizing link between air quality in Blacksburg, Virginia, and the hotdog consumption habits of the Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion, we crafted a methodology as intricate as the toppings on a loaded chili dog. Our research team snapped on their statistical aprons and set out to gather the choicest ingredients from the Environmental Protection Agency and the savory pages of Wikipedia, where we uncovered data spanning from 1990 to 2022. We chose these sources for their robust and easily digestible information - after all, we didn't want to risk any "sour kraut" in our data salad!

Once we had our data basket brimming with air quality metrics and hotdog consumption figures, we employed a smorgasbord of statistical techniques to uncover any potential relationship between these two seemingly unrelated phenomena. First, we conducted a rigorous time-series analysis to observe any long-term trends in air quality and hotdog eating habits. We wanted to ensure that our findings weren't just a flash in the pan - after all, we weren't looking for a statistical hotdog, but a juicy and sustained relationship that would stand the test of time!

Next, we applied a multivariate regression analysis to account for potential confounding factors that could muddle the link between air quality and hotdog consumption. We wanted to make sure our results weren't just an illusion, akin to a disappearing hotdog in a magician's sleeve!

In addition, we employed a sophisticated spatial analysis to scrutinize any geographical patterns that could shed light on the connection between air quality in Blacksburg and the hotdog-eating champion's appetite. We didn't want to miss any "bun-intended" spatial relationships that could reveal the "hotdog hotspots" in the region where air quality might exert its "bun-believable" influence.

Lastly, we seasoned our methodology with a robust sensitivity analysis to ensure that our findings weren't just a statistical fluke, but rather a substantial and reliable connection that could withstand scrutiny. We wanted to be certain that our results weren't just an accidental sausage - after all, we were looking for a causative relationship that could stand up to the most critical of palates!

Throughout our analysis, we remained cognizant of the potential limitations and biases that could "ketchup" our findings, making sure to address any undisclosed relishes or unseen contaminants that could taint the purity of our statistical condiments. Overall, our methodology was designed to encompass a smorgasbord of statistical techniques, ensuring that our findings weren't just another "frank-furter" of statistical coincidence, but a substantial and sizzling connection between air quality and wiener wonders!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air quality in Blacksburg, Virginia and Hotdogs consumed by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Environmental Protection Agency and Wikipedia .

For the time period 1990 to 2022, you found a correlation 0.8181650, r-squared of 0.6693939, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Link Between Air-Quality and Wiener Wonders: A Statistical Analysis of the Relationship between Air Quality in Blacksburg, Virginia and Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion's Consumption

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study serves up some statistical food for thought as we delve into the curious case of the connection between air quality in Blacksburg, Virginia, and the hotdog consumption habits of Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion. Utilizing data from the Environmental Protection Agency and Wikipedia, our research team embarked on a gastronomic adventure to analyze the purported relationship between air quality metrics and the number of hotdogs gobbled by the reigning champion.

Our findings revealed a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.8181650 with a p-value less than 0.01, uncovering a tantalizing link between the air in Blacksburg and the appetites of the hotdog-eating champion. In other words, there could be something in the air that's fueling the champion's insatiable appetite for hotdogs – perhaps a whiff of mustard or a gust of ketchup-laden breeze.

This study not only advances our understanding of the intricate interplay between atmospheric conditions and competitive eating but also brings to light the mysterious ways in which environmental factors can influence human behavior. Furthermore, it emphasizes the importance of considering outside factors in the analysis of seemingly unrelated phenomena—in this case, the correlation between air quality and hotdog consumption, no matter how much of a "wiener" it may seem at first glance.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
The relationship between environmental factors and human behavior has long been a topic of interest among researchers. In the case of competitive eating, the influence of air quality on the consumption habits of participants has often been overlooked. However, our study takes a bite into this unexplored area, aiming to understand the potential link between air quality in Blacksburg, Virginia, and the hotdog consumption of the Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion. As we chew over the data, it becomes evident that the air in this slice of Virginia may hold a key to unlocking the champion's voracious appetite for hotdogs – a real "wiener" of a discovery, if you ask us!
Our research is not just a flavor of the month; it's a statistical feast for the curious mind. By analyzing air quality data obtained from the Environmental Protection Agency and hotdog consumption figures from the esteemed pages of Wikipedia, we sought to uncover any viable correlation between the two seemingly unrelated phenomena. And to our surprise (and delight), our findings have cooked up quite the substantial correlation coefficient of 0.8181650 with a p-value of less than 0.01. This statistical sausage fest has certainly given us something to relish – but what could be the driving force behind this unexpected connection? It seems the air in Blacksburg may have some "buns-olutely" fascinating effects on the appetite of the hotdog-eating champion!
Our study not only spices up the existing literature on environmental influences but also adds a new flavor to the field of competitive eating research. It highlights the need to consider external factors, such as air quality, in understanding human behavior and performance, even if the link seems as improbable as a mustard-flavored ice cream. After all, as we unravel the intricacies of this connection, we can't help but savor the irony of how a breath of fresh air in Blacksburg might be the secret ingredient to the champion's insatiable hunger for hotdogs.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The statistical analysis of the relationship between air quality in Blacksburg, Virginia, and the hotdog consumption of the Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion yielded some truly mouth-watering results. We uncovered a substantial correlation coefficient of 0.8181650, indicating a strong positive relationship between these seemingly disparate variables. This significant finding suggests that the air in Blacksburg may not just be filled with oxygen, but also with a sprinkle of hotdog-eating motivation, leading to a real "sausage fest" of a discovery!

Furthermore, the r-squared value of 0.6693939 indicates that approximately 67% of the variation in the hotdog consumption can be explained by the variation in air quality. In other words, it seems that the air in Blacksburg might be seasoning the eating champion's endeavors, making this correlation as solid as a well-cooked hotdog on the grill.

The p-value of less than 0.01 provides compelling evidence against the null hypothesis and suggests that this relationship is not due to mere chance. It seems that there's more to this correlation than just "wiener" coincidence – perhaps there's a ketchup-laden secret hiding in the air of Blacksburg, spiking the champion's craving for hotdogs.

This correlation is visually depicted in the scatterplot (Fig. 1), showcasing the strong positive relationship between air quality and hotdog consumption. The figure not only serves as a visual feast for the eyes but also reinforces the notion that there's a flavorful connection between the air in Blacksburg and the appetite of the hotdog-eating champion.

In conclusion, our study has grilled up some compelling evidence of the influence of air quality on the hotdog consumption habits of the Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion. It not only adds a surprising twist to the existing literature but also underscores the need to consider unusual external factors in understanding human behavior and performance. After all, when it comes to uncovering such unexpected connections, it's best to embrace the pun-derful world of statistics with open arms – and perhaps a bottle of hotdog relish too!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air quality in Blacksburg, Virginia and Hotdogs consumed by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
The Link Between Air-Quality and Wiener Wonders: A Statistical Analysis of the Relationship between Air Quality in Blacksburg, Virginia and Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion's Consumption

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study serves up some statistical food for thought as we delve into the curious case of the connection between air quality in Blacksburg, Virginia, and the hotdog consumption habits of Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion. Utilizing data from the Environmental Protection Agency and Wikipedia, our research team embarked on a gastronomic adventure to analyze the purported relationship between air quality metrics and the number of hotdogs gobbled by the reigning champion.

Our findings revealed a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.8181650 with a p-value less than 0.01, uncovering a tantalizing link between the air in Blacksburg and the appetites of the hotdog-eating champion. In other words, there could be something in the air that's fueling the champion's insatiable appetite for hotdogs – perhaps a whiff of mustard or a gust of ketchup-laden breeze.

This study not only advances our understanding of the intricate interplay between atmospheric conditions and competitive eating but also brings to light the mysterious ways in which environmental factors can influence human behavior. Furthermore, it emphasizes the importance of considering outside factors in the analysis of seemingly unrelated phenomena—in this case, the correlation between air quality and hotdog consumption, no matter how much of a "wiener" it may seem at first glance.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The relationship between air quality and competitive eating habits has been a topic of growing interest in recent years. Smith (2017) examined the impact of air pollution on eating behavior, while Doe (2018) investigated the potential effects of air quality on athletic performance, both noting the potential influence of environmental factors on human activities. However, our study aims to take a more unconventional approach by exploring the specific connection between air quality in Blacksburg, Virginia, and the hotdog consumption habits of the Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion. As we delve into this unexpected investigation, we discover that the air in Blacksburg might just be the secret ingredient in the champion's quest for glory – a revelation as unexpected as finding a pickle in the middle of a hotdog.
In "The Air We Breathe" by Jones (2019), the author explores the relationship between air quality and human health, shedding light on how atmospheric conditions can impact overall well-being. Similarly, "The Statistical Sausage: Exploring Unlikely Correlations" by Brown (2020) delves into the world of seemingly unrelated phenomena, challenging conventional thinking and uncovering unexpected associations. While these works provide valuable insights into the broader impact of air quality, they do not specifically address the peculiar link between air in Blacksburg and the consumption of hotdogs by a reigning competitive eating champion. This is like trying to understand hotdogs without the bun - it just doesn't quite cut the mustard!
Turning to non-fiction books, "The Big Book of Hotdogs" by Foodie (2018) and "Air Quality and You" by Environmentally Aware (2019) offer comprehensive perspectives on the art of hotdog consumption and the importance of air quality, respectively. On the fictional side, works such as "Sizzling Skies: A Hotdog Mystery" by Novel Enthusiast (2017) and "The Airborne Appetite" by Imaginary Author (2015) present imaginative narratives that, while not rooted in scientific fact, capture the imagination with their portrayal of airborne culinary mysteries. Much like an unexpected condiment on a hotdog, these fictional works serve to spice up the literary context of our research, adding a dash of excitement to the otherwise straightforward investigation.
In the realm of visual media, "Eats and Allergens" and "Airwaves and Appetites," two TV shows that explore culinary trends and environmental influences, respectively, have provided additional context for our investigation. Watching these shows was not just for entertainment – it was a form of "research" that allowed us to savor the complexities of the hotdog-eating world and gain a deeper appreciation for the subtleties of air quality. After all, understanding the relationship between air quality and hotdog consumption requires more than just a statistical approach; it demands a true "taste" for the subject matter.
As we sift through this literary and media mix, it becomes evident that our research plunges into uncharted territory, blending the serious and the whimsical in a delightful fusion of statistical analysis and culinary curiosity. After all, who knew that the air in Blacksburg could hold such a "relish-able" secret?

[[RESULTS]]
The statistical analysis of the relationship between air quality in Blacksburg, Virginia, and the hotdog consumption of the Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion yielded some truly mouth-watering results. We uncovered a substantial correlation coefficient of 0.8181650, indicating a strong positive relationship between these seemingly disparate variables. This significant finding suggests that the air in Blacksburg may not just be filled with oxygen, but also with a sprinkle of hotdog-eating motivation, leading to a real "sausage fest" of a discovery!
Furthermore, the r-squared value of 0.6693939 indicates that approximately 67% of the variation in the hotdog consumption can be explained by the variation in air quality. In other words, it seems that the air in Blacksburg might be seasoning the eating champion's endeavors, making this correlation as solid as a well-cooked hotdog on the grill.
The p-value of less than 0.01 provides compelling evidence against the null hypothesis and suggests that this relationship is not due to mere chance. It seems that there's more to this correlation than just "wiener" coincidence – perhaps there's a ketchup-laden secret hiding in the air of Blacksburg, spiking the champion's craving for hotdogs.
This correlation is visually depicted in the scatterplot (Fig. 1), showcasing the strong positive relationship between air quality and hotdog consumption. The figure not only serves as a visual feast for the eyes but also reinforces the notion that there's a flavorful connection between the air in Blacksburg and the appetite of the hotdog-eating champion.
In conclusion, our study has grilled up some compelling evidence of the influence of air quality on the hotdog consumption habits of the Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion. It not only adds a surprising twist to the existing literature but also underscores the need to consider unusual external factors in understanding human behavior and performance. After all, when it comes to uncovering such unexpected connections, it's best to embrace the pun-derful world of statistics with open arms – and perhaps a bottle of hotdog relish too!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

Our findings illuminate a curious connection between air quality in Blacksburg, Virginia and the hotdog consumption habits of the reigning Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion. The substantial correlation coefficient of 0.8181650 lends robust support to the idea that there may be more than meets the eye – or should we say, the "pie" – when it comes to the influence of environmental conditions on competitive eating. This result reinforces previous research by Smith (2017), who hinted at the potential impact of air pollution on eating behavior, and Doe (2018), who suggested the broader effects of air quality on athletic performance. It seems that our study has brought a new flavor to the table, showing that the air in Blacksburg may indeed be spicing up the hotdog-eating champion's voracious appetite.

While the literature review may have initially struck readers as a bit of a "baloney" with its unusual connections and unexpected references, our results have added a layer of legitimacy to these seemingly unconventional associations. The r-squared value of 0.6693939 further corroborates the substantial influence of air quality on hotdog consumption, lending statistical support to the notion that the air in Blacksburg may be infusing the competitive eater's performances with an extra "zing." It's as if the champion's hotdog cravings are floating on a cloud of statistical significance, much like a perfectly grilled sausage on a bed of statistical sauerkraut.

Our results not only validate the unexpected link between air quality and hotdog consumption but also open the door to a myriad of potential implications. The p-value of less than 0.01 dismisses any notions of random chance, suggesting that the observed relationship is as real as finding the mustard when you thought you were out. This isn't just any correlation; it's a meaningful statistically significant relationship – a discovery as delightful as stumbling upon an extra strip of bacon in a hotdog bun.

Moreover, the scatterplot visually captures the essence of this sizzling association, serving as a feast for the eyes and a graphical testament to the flavorful connection we've uncovered. It's as if the data points are dancing a joyful jig, celebrating the unexpected fusion of air quality and hotdog consumption. Just like a surprise ingredient in a gourmet hotdog, our study has uncovered a blend of statistical rigor and culinary whimsy, emphasizing the importance of considering even the most unlikely connections in our analyses.

This study may provoke a chuckle or two with its seemingly absurd premise, but beneath the humor lies a genuine exploration of the intricate interplay between environmental factors and human behavior. From a statistical standpoint, our findings carry significant weight, urging researchers to embrace the unexpected and consider unorthodox relationships with an open mind. After all, in the ever-evolving landscape of scientific inquiry, it's crucial to welcome unconventional investigations with the same enthusiasm one would have for an unexpected side of pickles with their hotdog – in other words, with relish.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air quality in Blacksburg, Virginia and Hotdogs consumed by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
The Link Between Air-Quality and Wiener Wonders: A Statistical Analysis of the Relationship between Air Quality in Blacksburg, Virginia and Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion's Consumption

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study serves up some statistical food for thought as we delve into the curious case of the connection between air quality in Blacksburg, Virginia, and the hotdog consumption habits of Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion. Utilizing data from the Environmental Protection Agency and Wikipedia, our research team embarked on a gastronomic adventure to analyze the purported relationship between air quality metrics and the number of hotdogs gobbled by the reigning champion.

Our findings revealed a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.8181650 with a p-value less than 0.01, uncovering a tantalizing link between the air in Blacksburg and the appetites of the hotdog-eating champion. In other words, there could be something in the air that's fueling the champion's insatiable appetite for hotdogs – perhaps a whiff of mustard or a gust of ketchup-laden breeze.

This study not only advances our understanding of the intricate interplay between atmospheric conditions and competitive eating but also brings to light the mysterious ways in which environmental factors can influence human behavior. Furthermore, it emphasizes the importance of considering outside factors in the analysis of seemingly unrelated phenomena—in this case, the correlation between air quality and hotdog consumption, no matter how much of a "wiener" it may seem at first glance.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
The relationship between environmental factors and human behavior has long been a topic of interest among researchers. In the case of competitive eating, the influence of air quality on the consumption habits of participants has often been overlooked. However, our study takes a bite into this unexplored area, aiming to understand the potential link between air quality in Blacksburg, Virginia, and the hotdog consumption of the Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion. As we chew over the data, it becomes evident that the air in this slice of Virginia may hold a key to unlocking the champion's voracious appetite for hotdogs – a real "wiener" of a discovery, if you ask us!
Our research is not just a flavor of the month; it's a statistical feast for the curious mind. By analyzing air quality data obtained from the Environmental Protection Agency and hotdog consumption figures from the esteemed pages of Wikipedia, we sought to uncover any viable correlation between the two seemingly unrelated phenomena. And to our surprise (and delight), our findings have cooked up quite the substantial correlation coefficient of 0.8181650 with a p-value of less than 0.01. This statistical sausage fest has certainly given us something to relish – but what could be the driving force behind this unexpected connection? It seems the air in Blacksburg may have some "buns-olutely" fascinating effects on the appetite of the hotdog-eating champion!
Our study not only spices up the existing literature on environmental influences but also adds a new flavor to the field of competitive eating research. It highlights the need to consider external factors, such as air quality, in understanding human behavior and performance, even if the link seems as improbable as a mustard-flavored ice cream. After all, as we unravel the intricacies of this connection, we can't help but savor the irony of how a breath of fresh air in Blacksburg might be the secret ingredient to the champion's insatiable hunger for hotdogs.

[[RESULTS]]
The statistical analysis of the relationship between air quality in Blacksburg, Virginia, and the hotdog consumption of the Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion yielded some truly mouth-watering results. We uncovered a substantial correlation coefficient of 0.8181650, indicating a strong positive relationship between these seemingly disparate variables. This significant finding suggests that the air in Blacksburg may not just be filled with oxygen, but also with a sprinkle of hotdog-eating motivation, leading to a real "sausage fest" of a discovery!
Furthermore, the r-squared value of 0.6693939 indicates that approximately 67% of the variation in the hotdog consumption can be explained by the variation in air quality. In other words, it seems that the air in Blacksburg might be seasoning the eating champion's endeavors, making this correlation as solid as a well-cooked hotdog on the grill.
The p-value of less than 0.01 provides compelling evidence against the null hypothesis and suggests that this relationship is not due to mere chance. It seems that there's more to this correlation than just "wiener" coincidence – perhaps there's a ketchup-laden secret hiding in the air of Blacksburg, spiking the champion's craving for hotdogs.
This correlation is visually depicted in the scatterplot (Fig. 1), showcasing the strong positive relationship between air quality and hotdog consumption. The figure not only serves as a visual feast for the eyes but also reinforces the notion that there's a flavorful connection between the air in Blacksburg and the appetite of the hotdog-eating champion.
In conclusion, our study has grilled up some compelling evidence of the influence of air quality on the hotdog consumption habits of the Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion. It not only adds a surprising twist to the existing literature but also underscores the need to consider unusual external factors in understanding human behavior and performance. After all, when it comes to uncovering such unexpected connections, it's best to embrace the pun-derful world of statistics with open arms – and perhaps a bottle of hotdog relish too!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In summary, our research has successfully grilled up some sizzling evidence of the tantalizing connection between air quality in Blacksburg, Virginia, and the hotdog consumption habits of the Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion. The substantial correlation coefficient of 0.8181650 and the r-squared value of 0.6693939 have left us with a "bun-believable" understanding of just how much the champion's hotdog intake may be influenced by the air he breathes. It seems there's more to the atmosphere of Blacksburg than meets the eye – perhaps a waft of hotdog-induced inspiration?

As we wrap up this statistical sausage fest, let's not forget the importance of considering seemingly unrelated factors in understanding human behavior. After all, when it comes to making unexpected connections, it's best to relish every bit of statistical insight – just like a good hotdog!

In the spirit of capturing the essence of our findings, it seems we've mustard the strength to ketchup with the champion's consumption habits, and the time has come to call it a day. Therefore, we assert with confidence that no further research is needed in this area. After all, we've already relished the most important findings – and it's not often that a pun-tastic correlation like this one comes along!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited The Link Between Air-Quality and Wiener Wonders: A Statistical Analysis of the Relationship between Air Quality in Blacksburg, Virginia and Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion's Consumption. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Gastronomic Ecology


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited The Link Between Air-Quality and Wiener Wonders: A Statistical Analysis of the Relationship between Air Quality in Blacksburg, Virginia and Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion's Consumption. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Society for Gastronomical Atmospheric Research and Analysis (SGARA)


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled The Link Between Air-Quality and Wiener Wonders: A Statistical Analysis of the Relationship between Air Quality in Blacksburg, Virginia and Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion's Consumption with an abstract of This study serves up some statistical food for thought as we delve into the curious case of the connection between air quality in Blacksburg, Virginia, and the hotdog consumption habits of Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion. Utilizing data from the Environmental Protection Agency and Wikipedia, our research team embarked on a gastronomic adventure to analyze the purported relationship between air quality metrics and the number of hotdogs gobbled by the reigning champion.
Our findings revealed a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.8181650 with a p-value less than 0.01, uncovering a tantalizing link between the air in Blacksburg and the appetites of the hotdog-eating champion. In other words, there could be something in the air that's fueling the champion's insatiable appetite for hotdogs – perhaps a whiff of mustard or a gust of ketchup-laden breeze.
This study not only advances our understanding of the intricate interplay between atmospheric conditions and competitive eating but also brings to light the mysterious ways in which environmental factors can influence human behavior. Furthermore, it emphasizes the importance of considering outside factors in the analysis of seemingly unrelated phenomena—in this case, the correlation between air quality and hotdog consumption, no matter how much of a "wiener" it may seem at first glance.

ChatGPT:

"air quality Blacksburg Virginia," "Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion," "correlation hotdog consumption air quality," "environmental factors eating habits," "statistical analysis air quality hotdog consumption," "competitive eating air quality relationship"

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Air quality in Blacksburg, Virginia
Detailed data title: Percentage of days with good or moderate air quality in Blacksburg-Christiansburg-Radford, VA
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
See what else correlates with Air quality in Blacksburg, Virginia

Hotdogs consumed by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion
Detailed data title: Hotdog Consumption by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion
Source: Wikipedia
See what else correlates with Hotdogs consumed by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion

Correlation r = 0.8181650 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.6693939 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 66.9% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Hotdogs consumed by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Air quality in Blacksburg, Virginia) over the 33 years from 1990 through 2022.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 6.07E-9. 0.0000000060666269999706765000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.82 in 6.07E-7% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 164,836,243 random variables You don't actually need 164 million variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 32 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 32 because we have two variables measured over a period of 33 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.66, 0.91 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
199019911992199319941995199619971998199920002001200220032004200520062007200820092010201120122013201420152016201720182019202020212022
Air quality in Blacksburg, Virginia (Good air quality)0.8836570.9166670.9667590.902280.9273260.8600820.9555560.8895030.8189650.8209370.8811590.9491530.8922650.9691880.9777160.9637880.9829060.9491020.98142410.9827590.9969230.9941521110.9970670.99714311111
Hotdogs consumed by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion (Hotdogs eaten)1621.519172019.522.2524.51920.25255050.544.553.334953.7566596854626869616270727471757663




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Y-axis doesn't start at zero: I truncated the Y-axes of the graph above. I also used a line graph, which makes the visual connection stand out more than it deserves. Nothing against line graphs. They are great at telling a story when you have linear data! But visually it is deceptive because the only data is at the points on the graph, not the lines on the graph. In between each point, the data could have been doing anything. Like going for a random walk by itself!
    Mathematically what I showed is true, but it is intentionally misleading. Below is the same chart but with both Y-axes starting at zero.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([0.883657,0.916667,0.966759,0.90228,0.927326,0.860082,0.955556,0.889503,0.818965,0.820937,0.881159,0.949153,0.892265,0.969188,0.977716,0.963788,0.982906,0.949102,0.981424,1,0.982759,0.996923,0.994152,1,1,1,0.997067,0.997143,1,1,1,1,1,])
array_2 = np.array([16,21.5,19,17,20,19.5,22.25,24.5,19,20.25,25,50,50.5,44.5,53.33,49,53.75,66,59,68,54,62,68,69,61,62,70,72,74,71,75,76,63,])
array_1_name = "Air quality in Blacksburg, Virginia"
array_2_name = "Hotdogs consumed by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Thanks for being the explorer we needed!


Correlation ID: 4851 · Black Variable ID: 22163 · Red Variable ID: 500
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0