about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #4,813 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is How geeky LockPickingLawyer YouTube video titles are and the second variable is Burglaries in Vermont.  The chart goes from 2015 to 2022, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image

AI explanation

LockPickingLawyer's videos cause burglars to pursue more fulfilling careers as locksmiths.

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: [ A photo-realistic image ] Depict a cozy, rustic workshop in a quaint small town in Vermont. The former burglars are gathered around a wooden workbench, their attention captured by a projected screen displaying LockPickingLawyer's YouTube videos on lockpicking techniques. The warm glow of the projected light illuminates their faces and the workshop's surroundings. On the wall behind them, a chart showcases the decreasing rate of burglaries in the town, with visually appealing graphics that indicate the positive trend. Nearby, a proud sign boldly advertises their new locksmith business, adding a touch of entrepreneurial spirit to the scene. The atmosphere should convey a sense of camaraderie, determination, and transformation, as the group of former burglars wholeheartedly embraces their new venture. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: How geeky LockPickingLawyer YouTube video titles are and Burglaries in Vermont. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: a meme A photo-realistic image Cyber folk Symbolism inspired by bauhaus
ChatGPT: A photo-realistic image

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both How geeky LockPickingLawyer YouTube video titles are and Burglaries in Vermont, in the following situation: LockPickingLawyer's videos cause burglars to pursue more fulfilling careers as locksmiths.. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In a small town in Vermont, a group of former burglars stand around a workbench, engrossed in watching LockPickingLawyer's YouTube videos on lockpicking techniques. On the wall behind them, a chart displays the decreasing rate of burglaries in the town, while a nearby sign proudly advertises their new locksmith business.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ A photo-realistic image ] and depicting this scene: In a small town in Vermont, a group of former burglars stand around a workbench, engrossed in watching LockPickingLawyer's YouTube videos on lockpicking techniques. On the wall behind them, a chart displays the decreasing rate of burglaries in the town, while a nearby sign proudly advertises their new locksmith business. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: [ A photo-realistic image ] Depict a cozy, rustic workshop in a quaint small town in Vermont. The former burglars are gathered around a wooden workbench, their attention captured by a projected screen displaying LockPickingLawyer's YouTube videos on lockpicking techniques. The warm glow of the projected light illuminates their faces and the workshop's surroundings. On the wall behind them, a chart showcases the decreasing rate of burglaries in the town, with visually appealing graphics that indicate the positive trend. Nearby, a proud sign boldly advertises their new locksmith business, adding a touch of entrepreneurial spirit to the scene. The atmosphere should convey a sense of camaraderie, determination, and transformation, as the group of former burglars wholeheartedly embraces their new venture.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how a decrease in How geeky LockPickingLawyer YouTube video titles are caused Burglaries in Vermont to decrease.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Lock, Stock, and Two Smoking Barrels: The Jocular Relationship Between LockPickingLawyer YouTube Video Titles and Burglaries in Vermont

The Journal of Mischief Studies

Jan 2024
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between How geeky LockPickingLawyer YouTube video titles are and Burglaries in Vermont. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Include a pun in the title.

Your research team used data from AI analysis of YouTube video titles and FBI Criminal Justice Information Services to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9922000 and p < 0.01 for 2015 to 2022.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
"Lock, Stock, and Two Smoking Barrels: The Jocular Relationship Between LockPickingLawyer YouTube Video Titles and Burglaries in Vermont"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we delve into the world of lock-picking, videos, and puns to investigate the potential connection between the content of LockPickingLawyer YouTube video titles and the occurrence of burglaries in the picturesque state of Vermont. Utilizing AI analysis of the intriguingly geeky video titles and data from the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services, we set out to unlock the mystery behind this unlikely association. Our findings revealed a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9922000 and a significance level of p < 0.01 from the years 2015 to 2022.

We carefully analyzed the lexical choices and thematic elements of the LockPickingLawyer's video titles, and the results brought to light an unexpected alignment with burglary patterns in Vermont. While conducting our research, we stumbled upon a lock-picking pun: "I told my wife she should embrace her mistakes. She gave me a hug." Humorous as it may be, this finding underscored the need for a lighthearted approach in examining this eyebrow-raising correlation.

Our study not only offers insight into the possible influence of popular YouTube content on real-world events but also emphasizes the importance of infusing academia with a touch of whimsy. In conclusion, our research sheds light on the entertaining yet thought-provoking relationship between lock-picking videos and burglary rates, prompting further exploration into the realm of unconventional correlations.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between How geeky LockPickingLawyer YouTube video titles are and Burglaries in Vermont. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Lock, Stock, and Two Smoking Barrels: The Jocular Relationship Between LockPickingLawyer YouTube Video Titles and Burglaries in Vermont"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we delve into the world of lock-picking, videos, and puns to investigate the potential connection between the content of LockPickingLawyer YouTube video titles and the occurrence of burglaries in the picturesque state of Vermont. Utilizing AI analysis of the intriguingly geeky video titles and data from the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services, we set out to unlock the mystery behind this unlikely association. Our findings revealed a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9922000 and a significance level of p < 0.01 from the years 2015 to 2022.

We carefully analyzed the lexical choices and thematic elements of the LockPickingLawyer's video titles, and the results brought to light an unexpected alignment with burglary patterns in Vermont. While conducting our research, we stumbled upon a lock-picking pun: "I told my wife she should embrace her mistakes. She gave me a hug." Humorous as it may be, this finding underscored the need for a lighthearted approach in examining this eyebrow-raising correlation.

Our study not only offers insight into the possible influence of popular YouTube content on real-world events but also emphasizes the importance of infusing academia with a touch of whimsy. In conclusion, our research sheds light on the entertaining yet thought-provoking relationship between lock-picking videos and burglary rates, prompting further exploration into the realm of unconventional correlations.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

The use of technology has greatly transformed the way information is disseminated, and social media platforms have become primary sources of entertainment, education, and, strangely enough, potential catalysts for criminal activities. One such intriguing phenomenon that piqued our curiosity revolves around the YouTube channel of the enigmatic LockPickingLawyer and its apparent connection to the prevalence of burglaries in Vermont. As we embarked on this investigation, we couldn't help but reflect on a pertinent dad joke: "Why don't locksmiths ever get along? Because they always lock horns." The pun may be a bit corny, but it's a lock-solid reminder of the levity inherent in our explorations.

The LockPickingLawyer, with his fascinating videos showcasing deft lock-picking skills and an uncanny knack for puns, inadvertently became the crux of our research. The juxtaposition of lighthearted banter and a serious subject matter led us to ponder the unexpected relationship between the content of his video titles and the occurrence of burglaries in the charming state of Vermont. In the spirit of unlocking the truth, our study delved into the heart of this paradox, driven by both scholarly rigor and the occasional urge to crack a joke or two.

It goes without saying that our curiosity was further fueled when we observed a particularly fitting pun in one of the LockPickingLawyer's videos: "I used to be a baker, but I couldn't make enough dough." Humorous as it may be, this jest served as a poignant reminder of the whimsical nature of our investigation. As we delved deeper into the sea of data and puns, we couldn't help but notice the unexpected synergy between the lexical choices in the video titles and the statistical trends in criminal activities, prompting us to consider the possibility of a jocular ripple effect in real-world incidents.

In the midst of our academic pursuits, we inevitably pondered the interplay of humor and scholarly inquiry, prompting a lighthearted reflection on the timeless question: "Why did the burglar break into song? Because he couldn't find the key to success!" While undoubtedly amusing, this line of reasoning underscored our dedication to unraveling the intricacies of this seemingly incongruous correlation. Our research belies a serious investigation, but it is interspersed with moments of whimsy, highlighting the dynamic interplay between academia and everyday humor.

In summation, our foray into the curious connection between LockPickingLawyer YouTube video titles and burglary rates in Vermont offers a glimpse into the multifaceted nature of correlations, as well as the surprising influence of online content on real-world dynamics. It's been a journey filled with unexpected twists and turns, not unlike navigating a series of elaborate locks. Ultimately, our findings serve as a reminder that even in the pursuit of scholarly rigor, a touch of humor can go a long way in unlocking the potential for unconventional insights.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between How geeky LockPickingLawyer YouTube video titles are and Burglaries in Vermont. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then name some movies that you watched that are tangentially related to the topic.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Lock, Stock, and Two Smoking Barrels: The Jocular Relationship Between LockPickingLawyer YouTube Video Titles and Burglaries in Vermont"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we delve into the world of lock-picking, videos, and puns to investigate the potential connection between the content of LockPickingLawyer YouTube video titles and the occurrence of burglaries in the picturesque state of Vermont. Utilizing AI analysis of the intriguingly geeky video titles and data from the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services, we set out to unlock the mystery behind this unlikely association. Our findings revealed a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9922000 and a significance level of p < 0.01 from the years 2015 to 2022.

We carefully analyzed the lexical choices and thematic elements of the LockPickingLawyer's video titles, and the results brought to light an unexpected alignment with burglary patterns in Vermont. While conducting our research, we stumbled upon a lock-picking pun: "I told my wife she should embrace her mistakes. She gave me a hug." Humorous as it may be, this finding underscored the need for a lighthearted approach in examining this eyebrow-raising correlation.

Our study not only offers insight into the possible influence of popular YouTube content on real-world events but also emphasizes the importance of infusing academia with a touch of whimsy. In conclusion, our research sheds light on the entertaining yet thought-provoking relationship between lock-picking videos and burglary rates, prompting further exploration into the realm of unconventional correlations.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The use of technology has greatly transformed the way information is disseminated, and social media platforms have become primary sources of entertainment, education, and, strangely enough, potential catalysts for criminal activities. One such intriguing phenomenon that piqued our curiosity revolves around the YouTube channel of the enigmatic LockPickingLawyer and its apparent connection to the prevalence of burglaries in Vermont. As we embarked on this investigation, we couldn't help but reflect on a pertinent dad joke: "Why don't locksmiths ever get along? Because they always lock horns." The pun may be a bit corny, but it's a lock-solid reminder of the levity inherent in our explorations.
The LockPickingLawyer, with his fascinating videos showcasing deft lock-picking skills and an uncanny knack for puns, inadvertently became the crux of our research. The juxtaposition of lighthearted banter and a serious subject matter led us to ponder the unexpected relationship between the content of his video titles and the occurrence of burglaries in the charming state of Vermont. In the spirit of unlocking the truth, our study delved into the heart of this paradox, driven by both scholarly rigor and the occasional urge to crack a joke or two.
It goes without saying that our curiosity was further fueled when we observed a particularly fitting pun in one of the LockPickingLawyer's videos: "I used to be a baker, but I couldn't make enough dough." Humorous as it may be, this jest served as a poignant reminder of the whimsical nature of our investigation. As we delved deeper into the sea of data and puns, we couldn't help but notice the unexpected synergy between the lexical choices in the video titles and the statistical trends in criminal activities, prompting us to consider the possibility of a jocular ripple effect in real-world incidents.
In the midst of our academic pursuits, we inevitably pondered the interplay of humor and scholarly inquiry, prompting a lighthearted reflection on the timeless question: "Why did the burglar break into song? Because he couldn't find the key to success!" While undoubtedly amusing, this line of reasoning underscored our dedication to unraveling the intricacies of this seemingly incongruous correlation. Our research belies a serious investigation, but it is interspersed with moments of whimsy, highlighting the dynamic interplay between academia and everyday humor.
In summation, our foray into the curious connection between LockPickingLawyer YouTube video titles and burglary rates in Vermont offers a glimpse into the multifaceted nature of correlations, as well as the surprising influence of online content on real-world dynamics. It's been a journey filled with unexpected twists and turns, not unlike navigating a series of elaborate locks. Ultimately, our findings serve as a reminder that even in the pursuit of scholarly rigor, a touch of humor can go a long way in unlocking the potential for unconventional insights.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

In their seminal work, Smith and Doe (2018) conducted a comprehensive analysis of the semantic and lexical composition of YouTube video titles in relation to criminal activities. Their findings illuminated the potential influence of online content on real-world phenomena, laying the groundwork for our investigation into the connection between LockPickingLawyer's video titles and burglary rates in Vermont. As we delved into their data, we couldn't help but ponder the age-old question: "Why did the scarecrow become a successful locksmith? Because he was outstanding in his field."

Furthermore, Jones et al. (2020) explored the linguistic subtleties of lock-picking tutorials and their impact on the public perception of security. Their research provided valuable insights into the nuances of locksmithing content and its portrayal in digital media, setting the stage for our examination of the quirky and informative nature of the LockPickingLawyer's videos. Amidst our scholarly pursuits, we stumbled upon a relevant pun in their work: "I accidentally swallowed some lock picks. Thankfully, my condition is now picking up."

In "The Art of Intrigue: The Psychology of Locks and Keys" by Lockson (2017), the author offers a comprehensive overview of the cultural and psychological significance of locks, delving into their symbolic implications in literature, art, and popular culture. This exploration not only deepened our understanding of the allure of lock-picking content but also served as a timely reminder that even the most serious subjects can be intertwined with elements of humor. A pertinent dad joke comes to mind: "Did you hear about the kidnapping at the locksmith's? They took a lot of keys but they made a bolt for it."

Venturing into the realm of fiction, the work of Arthur Conan Doyle, particularly "The Adventures of Sherlock Holmes," shed light on the enigmatic world of locks and keys, albeit in a different context. While not directly related to our study, these literary masterpieces underscore the enduring fascination with security and intrigue, offering a whimsical parallel to our own investigation. It's like the lock-picking equivalent of a "Locked Room Mystery" - except in this case, the room is filled with puns.

Movies such as "The Italian Job" and "Ocean's Eleven" intricately weave the art of lock-picking and burglary into captivating heist narratives, showcasing the blend of tension and humor inherent in such scenarios. While we acknowledge that these cinematic portrayals stand apart from our empirical research, they nonetheless serve as a colorful backdrop to our scholarly endeavors, adding a touch of cinematic flair to our otherwise data-driven exploration.

In "Lock, Stock, and Two Smoking Barrels" by Smith (1998), a fictional tale of interwoven criminal plots, the art of lock-picking takes center stage amidst a myriad of comical and suspenseful events. Although a work of fiction, the parallels between this narrative and our investigation are striking, prompting us to view our research as a captivating journey akin to navigating a tumultuous maze of twists, puns, and unexpected correlations.

To err is human; to arr is pirate. This whimsical adage encapsulates the spirit of our literature review, which seamlessly blends academic rigor with lighthearted musings, offering a refreshing take on the multifaceted relationship between LockPickingLawyer YouTube video titles and burglary rates in Vermont.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between How geeky LockPickingLawyer YouTube video titles are and Burglaries in Vermont. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from AI analysis of YouTube video titles and FBI Criminal Justice Information Services . You used data from 2015 to 2022

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Lock, Stock, and Two Smoking Barrels: The Jocular Relationship Between LockPickingLawyer YouTube Video Titles and Burglaries in Vermont"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we delve into the world of lock-picking, videos, and puns to investigate the potential connection between the content of LockPickingLawyer YouTube video titles and the occurrence of burglaries in the picturesque state of Vermont. Utilizing AI analysis of the intriguingly geeky video titles and data from the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services, we set out to unlock the mystery behind this unlikely association. Our findings revealed a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9922000 and a significance level of p < 0.01 from the years 2015 to 2022.

We carefully analyzed the lexical choices and thematic elements of the LockPickingLawyer's video titles, and the results brought to light an unexpected alignment with burglary patterns in Vermont. While conducting our research, we stumbled upon a lock-picking pun: "I told my wife she should embrace her mistakes. She gave me a hug." Humorous as it may be, this finding underscored the need for a lighthearted approach in examining this eyebrow-raising correlation.

Our study not only offers insight into the possible influence of popular YouTube content on real-world events but also emphasizes the importance of infusing academia with a touch of whimsy. In conclusion, our research sheds light on the entertaining yet thought-provoking relationship between lock-picking videos and burglary rates, prompting further exploration into the realm of unconventional correlations.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
The use of technology has greatly transformed the way information is disseminated, and social media platforms have become primary sources of entertainment, education, and, strangely enough, potential catalysts for criminal activities. One such intriguing phenomenon that piqued our curiosity revolves around the YouTube channel of the enigmatic LockPickingLawyer and its apparent connection to the prevalence of burglaries in Vermont. As we embarked on this investigation, we couldn't help but reflect on a pertinent dad joke: "Why don't locksmiths ever get along? Because they always lock horns." The pun may be a bit corny, but it's a lock-solid reminder of the levity inherent in our explorations.
The LockPickingLawyer, with his fascinating videos showcasing deft lock-picking skills and an uncanny knack for puns, inadvertently became the crux of our research. The juxtaposition of lighthearted banter and a serious subject matter led us to ponder the unexpected relationship between the content of his video titles and the occurrence of burglaries in the charming state of Vermont. In the spirit of unlocking the truth, our study delved into the heart of this paradox, driven by both scholarly rigor and the occasional urge to crack a joke or two.
It goes without saying that our curiosity was further fueled when we observed a particularly fitting pun in one of the LockPickingLawyer's videos: "I used to be a baker, but I couldn't make enough dough." Humorous as it may be, this jest served as a poignant reminder of the whimsical nature of our investigation. As we delved deeper into the sea of data and puns, we couldn't help but notice the unexpected synergy between the lexical choices in the video titles and the statistical trends in criminal activities, prompting us to consider the possibility of a jocular ripple effect in real-world incidents.
In the midst of our academic pursuits, we inevitably pondered the interplay of humor and scholarly inquiry, prompting a lighthearted reflection on the timeless question: "Why did the burglar break into song? Because he couldn't find the key to success!" While undoubtedly amusing, this line of reasoning underscored our dedication to unraveling the intricacies of this seemingly incongruous correlation. Our research belies a serious investigation, but it is interspersed with moments of whimsy, highlighting the dynamic interplay between academia and everyday humor.
In summation, our foray into the curious connection between LockPickingLawyer YouTube video titles and burglary rates in Vermont offers a glimpse into the multifaceted nature of correlations, as well as the surprising influence of online content on real-world dynamics. It's been a journey filled with unexpected twists and turns, not unlike navigating a series of elaborate locks. Ultimately, our findings serve as a reminder that even in the pursuit of scholarly rigor, a touch of humor can go a long way in unlocking the potential for unconventional insights.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

In order to investigate the curious correlation between the titles of LockPickingLawyer YouTube videos and burglary rates in Vermont, our research employed a multi-faceted methodology that embraced both traditional quantitative analysis and the whimsical musings that came along our scholarly journey. Our primary sources of data were drawn from AI analysis of the lexical and thematic compositions of the video titles, in conjunction with pertinent burglary statistics provided by the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services. This combination of high-tech analysis and old-fashioned crime data laid the foundation for our investigation, much like a sturdy deadbolt secures a door.

To capture the essence of the LockPickingLawyer's eclectic video titles, we implemented a robust AI algorithm that traversed the depths of YouTube, meticulously cataloging and dissecting the textual elements of each video title. Our AI-driven analysis was as thorough as a locksmith meticulously examining a lock, systematically identifying linguistic patterns, word choices, and thematic undertones within the titles. We cannot help but appreciate the punny parallels; after all, who knew that cracking the code in YouTube titles would be as engaging as picking a lock?

For the quantitative aspect of our study, we socialized with statistical models and employed advanced regression analysis to scrutinize the correlation between the lexical composition of the video titles and burglary rates in Vermont. We must admit, our statistical tests brought to light some unexpected surprises, not unlike finding a hidden compartment in a vintage safe. The precision and rigor of our analysis mirrored the meticulous scrutiny applied by the LockPickingLawyer to intricate locks, albeit in a metaphorical sense.

To balance our rigorous statistical examination, we delved into the realm of qualitative analysis, engaging in the careful examination of puns and wordplay embedded within the video titles. This qualitative approach offered insights that quantifiable data alone could not provide, akin to a master locksmith using intuition and experience to finesse a perplexing lock. Our team's close reading of the titles yielded a treasure trove of puns, wordplay, and clever linguistic choices, a veritable gold mine of linguistic locks and keys.

Furthermore, we conducted interviews with a diverse array of individuals, including avid viewers of the LockPickingLawyer's channel, law enforcement personnel, and lighting technicians (for the sake of shedding light on the matter). These interactions provided valuable firsthand perspectives, enriching our understanding of the potential impact of lock-picking videos on public perception and, by extension, criminal behavior. These conversations were not only illuminating but also a source of unexpected humor, not unlike stumbling across a cleverly hidden Easter egg in a video game.

Finally, we incorporated geospatial analysis to map the geographic distribution of the LockPickingLawyer's viewership and the reported burglary incidents in Vermont. This spatial examination allowed us to visualize potential hotspots and overlay them with the reach of lock-picking aficionados, highlighting the intriguing interplay between online viewership and real-world occurrences. Our geospatial analysis was as intricate and revealing as, well, the interior mechanism of a well-crafted lock.

In conclusion, our research methodology was a quirky fusion of technological innovation, statistical rigor, qualitative exploration, and the occasional dad joke, reminiscent of the eclectic blend of charm and mystery inherent in the lock-picking world. We firmly believe that this approach not only encapsulated the spirit of our investigation but also, much like a securely locked door, provided an array of avenues for unlocking unconventional insights.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between How geeky LockPickingLawyer YouTube video titles are and Burglaries in Vermont. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from AI analysis of YouTube video titles and FBI Criminal Justice Information Services .

For the time period 2015 to 2022, you found a correlation 0.9922000, r-squared of 0.9844608, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Lock, Stock, and Two Smoking Barrels: The Jocular Relationship Between LockPickingLawyer YouTube Video Titles and Burglaries in Vermont"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we delve into the world of lock-picking, videos, and puns to investigate the potential connection between the content of LockPickingLawyer YouTube video titles and the occurrence of burglaries in the picturesque state of Vermont. Utilizing AI analysis of the intriguingly geeky video titles and data from the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services, we set out to unlock the mystery behind this unlikely association. Our findings revealed a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9922000 and a significance level of p < 0.01 from the years 2015 to 2022.

We carefully analyzed the lexical choices and thematic elements of the LockPickingLawyer's video titles, and the results brought to light an unexpected alignment with burglary patterns in Vermont. While conducting our research, we stumbled upon a lock-picking pun: "I told my wife she should embrace her mistakes. She gave me a hug." Humorous as it may be, this finding underscored the need for a lighthearted approach in examining this eyebrow-raising correlation.

Our study not only offers insight into the possible influence of popular YouTube content on real-world events but also emphasizes the importance of infusing academia with a touch of whimsy. In conclusion, our research sheds light on the entertaining yet thought-provoking relationship between lock-picking videos and burglary rates, prompting further exploration into the realm of unconventional correlations.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
The use of technology has greatly transformed the way information is disseminated, and social media platforms have become primary sources of entertainment, education, and, strangely enough, potential catalysts for criminal activities. One such intriguing phenomenon that piqued our curiosity revolves around the YouTube channel of the enigmatic LockPickingLawyer and its apparent connection to the prevalence of burglaries in Vermont. As we embarked on this investigation, we couldn't help but reflect on a pertinent dad joke: "Why don't locksmiths ever get along? Because they always lock horns." The pun may be a bit corny, but it's a lock-solid reminder of the levity inherent in our explorations.
The LockPickingLawyer, with his fascinating videos showcasing deft lock-picking skills and an uncanny knack for puns, inadvertently became the crux of our research. The juxtaposition of lighthearted banter and a serious subject matter led us to ponder the unexpected relationship between the content of his video titles and the occurrence of burglaries in the charming state of Vermont. In the spirit of unlocking the truth, our study delved into the heart of this paradox, driven by both scholarly rigor and the occasional urge to crack a joke or two.
It goes without saying that our curiosity was further fueled when we observed a particularly fitting pun in one of the LockPickingLawyer's videos: "I used to be a baker, but I couldn't make enough dough." Humorous as it may be, this jest served as a poignant reminder of the whimsical nature of our investigation. As we delved deeper into the sea of data and puns, we couldn't help but notice the unexpected synergy between the lexical choices in the video titles and the statistical trends in criminal activities, prompting us to consider the possibility of a jocular ripple effect in real-world incidents.
In the midst of our academic pursuits, we inevitably pondered the interplay of humor and scholarly inquiry, prompting a lighthearted reflection on the timeless question: "Why did the burglar break into song? Because he couldn't find the key to success!" While undoubtedly amusing, this line of reasoning underscored our dedication to unraveling the intricacies of this seemingly incongruous correlation. Our research belies a serious investigation, but it is interspersed with moments of whimsy, highlighting the dynamic interplay between academia and everyday humor.
In summation, our foray into the curious connection between LockPickingLawyer YouTube video titles and burglary rates in Vermont offers a glimpse into the multifaceted nature of correlations, as well as the surprising influence of online content on real-world dynamics. It's been a journey filled with unexpected twists and turns, not unlike navigating a series of elaborate locks. Ultimately, our findings serve as a reminder that even in the pursuit of scholarly rigor, a touch of humor can go a long way in unlocking the potential for unconventional insights.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

In our investigation into the potential connection between the content of LockPickingLawyer YouTube video titles and the occurrence of burglaries in Vermont, we unearthed a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9922000, with an r-squared value of 0.9844608, and a significance level of p < 0.01 across the years 2015 to 2022.

The correlation, visually depicted in Figure 1 (not shown), graphically portrays the striking relationship between the two variables. This remarkable level of association prompts us to consider the phrase, "Where do locksmiths go to cry? The tear and lock shop." While this catchy pun brings a glimmer of levity to our findings, the strength of the correlation underscores the potential impact of seemingly innocuous online content on real-world phenomena.

The LockPickingLawyer's repertoire of videos, characterized by dexterous lock-picking demonstrations and clever wordplay, captivated our attention and led to an intriguing discovery. Our exploration of this unexpected correlation was punctuated by moments of playful humor, exemplified by the pun, "What did the locksmith say when he got locked in? A key-exit door." This amusing episode not only lightened the weight of our analysis but also underscored the resonating influence of wit amidst the intricacies of scholarly inquiry.

The findings from our investigation not only shed light on the curious relationship between lock-picking video titles and burglary rates but also emphasize the multi-dimensional nature of scholarly exploration. As we strive to unravel the complexities of this unlikely association, we are reminded of the enduring question, "Why was the locksmith always calm? Because he knew how to handle any situation with ease!" This apt jest reflects the blend of rigor and amusement inherent in our pursuit of understanding unconventional correlations.

In summary, our study reflects the unusual yet compelling connection between the esoteric world of lock-picking videos and the occurrence of burglaries, proving the adage that sometimes, the most unexpected locks can yield the most surprising insights.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between How geeky LockPickingLawyer YouTube video titles are and Burglaries in Vermont. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
"Lock, Stock, and Two Smoking Barrels: The Jocular Relationship Between LockPickingLawyer YouTube Video Titles and Burglaries in Vermont"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we delve into the world of lock-picking, videos, and puns to investigate the potential connection between the content of LockPickingLawyer YouTube video titles and the occurrence of burglaries in the picturesque state of Vermont. Utilizing AI analysis of the intriguingly geeky video titles and data from the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services, we set out to unlock the mystery behind this unlikely association. Our findings revealed a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9922000 and a significance level of p < 0.01 from the years 2015 to 2022.

We carefully analyzed the lexical choices and thematic elements of the LockPickingLawyer's video titles, and the results brought to light an unexpected alignment with burglary patterns in Vermont. While conducting our research, we stumbled upon a lock-picking pun: "I told my wife she should embrace her mistakes. She gave me a hug." Humorous as it may be, this finding underscored the need for a lighthearted approach in examining this eyebrow-raising correlation.

Our study not only offers insight into the possible influence of popular YouTube content on real-world events but also emphasizes the importance of infusing academia with a touch of whimsy. In conclusion, our research sheds light on the entertaining yet thought-provoking relationship between lock-picking videos and burglary rates, prompting further exploration into the realm of unconventional correlations.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
In their seminal work, Smith and Doe (2018) conducted a comprehensive analysis of the semantic and lexical composition of YouTube video titles in relation to criminal activities. Their findings illuminated the potential influence of online content on real-world phenomena, laying the groundwork for our investigation into the connection between LockPickingLawyer's video titles and burglary rates in Vermont. As we delved into their data, we couldn't help but ponder the age-old question: "Why did the scarecrow become a successful locksmith? Because he was outstanding in his field."
Furthermore, Jones et al. (2020) explored the linguistic subtleties of lock-picking tutorials and their impact on the public perception of security. Their research provided valuable insights into the nuances of locksmithing content and its portrayal in digital media, setting the stage for our examination of the quirky and informative nature of the LockPickingLawyer's videos. Amidst our scholarly pursuits, we stumbled upon a relevant pun in their work: "I accidentally swallowed some lock picks. Thankfully, my condition is now picking up."
In "The Art of Intrigue: The Psychology of Locks and Keys" by Lockson (2017), the author offers a comprehensive overview of the cultural and psychological significance of locks, delving into their symbolic implications in literature, art, and popular culture. This exploration not only deepened our understanding of the allure of lock-picking content but also served as a timely reminder that even the most serious subjects can be intertwined with elements of humor. A pertinent dad joke comes to mind: "Did you hear about the kidnapping at the locksmith's? They took a lot of keys but they made a bolt for it."
Venturing into the realm of fiction, the work of Arthur Conan Doyle, particularly "The Adventures of Sherlock Holmes," shed light on the enigmatic world of locks and keys, albeit in a different context. While not directly related to our study, these literary masterpieces underscore the enduring fascination with security and intrigue, offering a whimsical parallel to our own investigation. It's like the lock-picking equivalent of a "Locked Room Mystery" - except in this case, the room is filled with puns.
Movies such as "The Italian Job" and "Ocean's Eleven" intricately weave the art of lock-picking and burglary into captivating heist narratives, showcasing the blend of tension and humor inherent in such scenarios. While we acknowledge that these cinematic portrayals stand apart from our empirical research, they nonetheless serve as a colorful backdrop to our scholarly endeavors, adding a touch of cinematic flair to our otherwise data-driven exploration.
In "Lock, Stock, and Two Smoking Barrels" by Smith (1998), a fictional tale of interwoven criminal plots, the art of lock-picking takes center stage amidst a myriad of comical and suspenseful events. Although a work of fiction, the parallels between this narrative and our investigation are striking, prompting us to view our research as a captivating journey akin to navigating a tumultuous maze of twists, puns, and unexpected correlations.
To err is human; to arr is pirate. This whimsical adage encapsulates the spirit of our literature review, which seamlessly blends academic rigor with lighthearted musings, offering a refreshing take on the multifaceted relationship between LockPickingLawyer YouTube video titles and burglary rates in Vermont.

[[RESULTS]]
In our investigation into the potential connection between the content of LockPickingLawyer YouTube video titles and the occurrence of burglaries in Vermont, we unearthed a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9922000, with an r-squared value of 0.9844608, and a significance level of p < 0.01 across the years 2015 to 2022.
The correlation, visually depicted in Figure 1 (not shown), graphically portrays the striking relationship between the two variables. This remarkable level of association prompts us to consider the phrase, "Where do locksmiths go to cry? The tear and lock shop." While this catchy pun brings a glimmer of levity to our findings, the strength of the correlation underscores the potential impact of seemingly innocuous online content on real-world phenomena.
The LockPickingLawyer's repertoire of videos, characterized by dexterous lock-picking demonstrations and clever wordplay, captivated our attention and led to an intriguing discovery. Our exploration of this unexpected correlation was punctuated by moments of playful humor, exemplified by the pun, "What did the locksmith say when he got locked in? A key-exit door." This amusing episode not only lightened the weight of our analysis but also underscored the resonating influence of wit amidst the intricacies of scholarly inquiry.
The findings from our investigation not only shed light on the curious relationship between lock-picking video titles and burglary rates but also emphasize the multi-dimensional nature of scholarly exploration. As we strive to unravel the complexities of this unlikely association, we are reminded of the enduring question, "Why was the locksmith always calm? Because he knew how to handle any situation with ease!" This apt jest reflects the blend of rigor and amusement inherent in our pursuit of understanding unconventional correlations.
In summary, our study reflects the unusual yet compelling connection between the esoteric world of lock-picking videos and the occurrence of burglaries, proving the adage that sometimes, the most unexpected locks can yield the most surprising insights.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

Our study exposes a fascinating correlation between the content of LockPickingLawyer YouTube video titles and the incidence of burglaries in Vermont, shedding light on the captivating interplay between online content and real-world events. The robust correlation coefficient of 0.9922000, accompanied by the remarkably high significance level of p < 0.01, underscores the unexpected yet compelling relationship between seemingly unrelated phenomena. It's like discovering a hidden key in a lock - unexpected, yet undeniably satisfying.

Building upon the groundwork laid by Smith and Doe (2018) and Jones et al. (2020), we have provided empirical evidence supporting the notion that online content, specifically the quirky and informative video titles of the LockPickingLawyer, can exert a tangible influence on burglary rates. The unassuming nature of lock-picking content on online platforms belies its potential impact on real-world occurrences, akin to a stealthy lock-picker navigating a maze of unsuspecting locks.

Intertwining solemn analysis with whimsical musings, our journey led us to deciphering the unexpected alignment between lexical choices and thematic elements in the LockPickingLawyer's video titles and burglary patterns in Vermont. Amidst our scholarly pursuits, we stumbled upon a lock-picking pun: "Why did the locksmith go to therapy? He had too many issues." While seemingly lighthearted, this jest encapsulates the multifaceted layers of our research, blending humor with rigorous examination.

The unexpected but compelling nature of our findings serves as a testament to the intricate connections that permeate the digital landscape and reverberate in the real world. Our study not only adds a touch of whimsy to academia but also underscores the need to embrace unconventional correlations with open-mindedness and levity. After all, as the old adage goes, "A good pun is its own reword."

In essence, our research has unearthed a fascinating association that merits further exploration and contemplation. As we unlock the mysteries of this improbable correlation, we are reminded of the enduring question, "What did the locksmith say to the forgetful bee? Your key has been pollen for me." This playful twist encapsulates the essence of our findings, merging serious inquiry with lighthearted wit, ultimately paving the way for new dimensions of scholarly investigation.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between How geeky LockPickingLawyer YouTube video titles are and Burglaries in Vermont. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
"Lock, Stock, and Two Smoking Barrels: The Jocular Relationship Between LockPickingLawyer YouTube Video Titles and Burglaries in Vermont"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we delve into the world of lock-picking, videos, and puns to investigate the potential connection between the content of LockPickingLawyer YouTube video titles and the occurrence of burglaries in the picturesque state of Vermont. Utilizing AI analysis of the intriguingly geeky video titles and data from the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services, we set out to unlock the mystery behind this unlikely association. Our findings revealed a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9922000 and a significance level of p < 0.01 from the years 2015 to 2022.

We carefully analyzed the lexical choices and thematic elements of the LockPickingLawyer's video titles, and the results brought to light an unexpected alignment with burglary patterns in Vermont. While conducting our research, we stumbled upon a lock-picking pun: "I told my wife she should embrace her mistakes. She gave me a hug." Humorous as it may be, this finding underscored the need for a lighthearted approach in examining this eyebrow-raising correlation.

Our study not only offers insight into the possible influence of popular YouTube content on real-world events but also emphasizes the importance of infusing academia with a touch of whimsy. In conclusion, our research sheds light on the entertaining yet thought-provoking relationship between lock-picking videos and burglary rates, prompting further exploration into the realm of unconventional correlations.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
The use of technology has greatly transformed the way information is disseminated, and social media platforms have become primary sources of entertainment, education, and, strangely enough, potential catalysts for criminal activities. One such intriguing phenomenon that piqued our curiosity revolves around the YouTube channel of the enigmatic LockPickingLawyer and its apparent connection to the prevalence of burglaries in Vermont. As we embarked on this investigation, we couldn't help but reflect on a pertinent dad joke: "Why don't locksmiths ever get along? Because they always lock horns." The pun may be a bit corny, but it's a lock-solid reminder of the levity inherent in our explorations.
The LockPickingLawyer, with his fascinating videos showcasing deft lock-picking skills and an uncanny knack for puns, inadvertently became the crux of our research. The juxtaposition of lighthearted banter and a serious subject matter led us to ponder the unexpected relationship between the content of his video titles and the occurrence of burglaries in the charming state of Vermont. In the spirit of unlocking the truth, our study delved into the heart of this paradox, driven by both scholarly rigor and the occasional urge to crack a joke or two.
It goes without saying that our curiosity was further fueled when we observed a particularly fitting pun in one of the LockPickingLawyer's videos: "I used to be a baker, but I couldn't make enough dough." Humorous as it may be, this jest served as a poignant reminder of the whimsical nature of our investigation. As we delved deeper into the sea of data and puns, we couldn't help but notice the unexpected synergy between the lexical choices in the video titles and the statistical trends in criminal activities, prompting us to consider the possibility of a jocular ripple effect in real-world incidents.
In the midst of our academic pursuits, we inevitably pondered the interplay of humor and scholarly inquiry, prompting a lighthearted reflection on the timeless question: "Why did the burglar break into song? Because he couldn't find the key to success!" While undoubtedly amusing, this line of reasoning underscored our dedication to unraveling the intricacies of this seemingly incongruous correlation. Our research belies a serious investigation, but it is interspersed with moments of whimsy, highlighting the dynamic interplay between academia and everyday humor.
In summation, our foray into the curious connection between LockPickingLawyer YouTube video titles and burglary rates in Vermont offers a glimpse into the multifaceted nature of correlations, as well as the surprising influence of online content on real-world dynamics. It's been a journey filled with unexpected twists and turns, not unlike navigating a series of elaborate locks. Ultimately, our findings serve as a reminder that even in the pursuit of scholarly rigor, a touch of humor can go a long way in unlocking the potential for unconventional insights.

[[RESULTS]]
In our investigation into the potential connection between the content of LockPickingLawyer YouTube video titles and the occurrence of burglaries in Vermont, we unearthed a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9922000, with an r-squared value of 0.9844608, and a significance level of p < 0.01 across the years 2015 to 2022.
The correlation, visually depicted in Figure 1 (not shown), graphically portrays the striking relationship between the two variables. This remarkable level of association prompts us to consider the phrase, "Where do locksmiths go to cry? The tear and lock shop." While this catchy pun brings a glimmer of levity to our findings, the strength of the correlation underscores the potential impact of seemingly innocuous online content on real-world phenomena.
The LockPickingLawyer's repertoire of videos, characterized by dexterous lock-picking demonstrations and clever wordplay, captivated our attention and led to an intriguing discovery. Our exploration of this unexpected correlation was punctuated by moments of playful humor, exemplified by the pun, "What did the locksmith say when he got locked in? A key-exit door." This amusing episode not only lightened the weight of our analysis but also underscored the resonating influence of wit amidst the intricacies of scholarly inquiry.
The findings from our investigation not only shed light on the curious relationship between lock-picking video titles and burglary rates but also emphasize the multi-dimensional nature of scholarly exploration. As we strive to unravel the complexities of this unlikely association, we are reminded of the enduring question, "Why was the locksmith always calm? Because he knew how to handle any situation with ease!" This apt jest reflects the blend of rigor and amusement inherent in our pursuit of understanding unconventional correlations.
In summary, our study reflects the unusual yet compelling connection between the esoteric world of lock-picking videos and the occurrence of burglaries, proving the adage that sometimes, the most unexpected locks can yield the most surprising insights.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our research has illuminated the uncanny correlation between the whimsical realm of LockPickingLawyer YouTube video titles and the occurrence of burglaries in Vermont. The remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9922000 and a significance level of p < 0.01 across the years 2015 to 2022 undoubtedly underscores the potential impact of seemingly innocuous online content on real-world phenomena. This correlation is as tight as a well-secured deadlock – no pun intended, or maybe a little bit.

Our findings not only challenge conventional assumptions about the influence of online content on societal dynamics but also emphasize the need to infuse academic inquiry with a touch of lightheartedness. As we unlock the mysteries of this unlikely association, we are reminded of a classic dad joke: "I asked the locksmith how business was going. He replied, 'It's key to our success.'" We acknowledge the need to balance scholarly rigor with moments of humor, as both are essential in navigating the intriguing complexities of unconventional correlations.

Thus, we assert that no further research is needed in this area, as our findings have shed light on the entertaining yet thought-provoking relationship between lock-picking videos and burglary rates. It's a lock!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Lock, Stock, and Two Smoking Barrels: The Jocular Relationship Between LockPickingLawyer YouTube Video Titles and Burglaries in Vermont. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Mischief Studies


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Lock, Stock, and Two Smoking Barrels: The Jocular Relationship Between LockPickingLawyer YouTube Video Titles and Burglaries in Vermont. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Society for Mirthful and Unconventional Research Endeavors (SMURE)


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Lock, Stock, and Two Smoking Barrels: The Jocular Relationship Between LockPickingLawyer YouTube Video Titles and Burglaries in Vermont with an abstract of In this study, we delve into the world of lock-picking, videos, and puns to investigate the potential connection between the content of LockPickingLawyer YouTube video titles and the occurrence of burglaries in the picturesque state of Vermont. Utilizing AI analysis of the intriguingly geeky video titles and data from the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services, we set out to unlock the mystery behind this unlikely association. Our findings revealed a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9922000 and a significance level of p < 0.01 from the years 2015 to 2022.
We carefully analyzed the lexical choices and thematic elements of the LockPickingLawyer's video titles, and the results brought to light an unexpected alignment with burglary patterns in Vermont. While conducting our research, we stumbled upon a lock-picking pun: "I told my wife she should embrace her mistakes. She gave me a hug." Humorous as it may be, this finding underscored the need for a lighthearted approach in examining this eyebrow-raising correlation.
Our study not only offers insight into the possible influence of popular YouTube content on real-world events but also emphasizes the importance of infusing academia with a touch of whimsy. In conclusion, our research sheds light on the entertaining yet thought-provoking relationship between lock-picking videos and burglary rates, prompting further exploration into the realm of unconventional correlations.

ChatGPT:

LockPickingLawyer, YouTube video titles, burglaries, Vermont, AI analysis, FBI Criminal Justice Information Services, correlation coefficient, lexical choices, thematic elements, burglary patterns, lighthearted approach, popular YouTube content, real-world events, academia, unconventional correlations

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

How geeky LockPickingLawyer YouTube video titles are
Detailed data title: How geeky LockPickingLawyer YouTube video titles are, as rated by an AI.
Source: AI analysis of YouTube video titles
Additional Info: I asked a large language model, 'On a scale of 1-10, how _______ do you think this YouTube video title is?' for every video.

See what else correlates with How geeky LockPickingLawyer YouTube video titles are

Burglaries in Vermont
Detailed data title: The burglary rate per 100,000 residents in Vermont
Source: FBI Criminal Justice Information Services
See what else correlates with Burglaries in Vermont

Correlation r = 0.9922000 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.9844608 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 98.4% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Burglaries in Vermont) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., How geeky LockPickingLawyer YouTube video titles are) over the 8 years from 2015 through 2022.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 1.2E-6. 0.0000011794708095580980000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.99 in 0.00012% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 847,838 random variables You don't actually need 847 thousand variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 7 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 7 because we have two variables measured over a period of 8 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.96, 1 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
20152016201720182019202020212022
How geeky LockPickingLawyer YouTube video titles are (Geeky score (out of 10))7.73867.55387.63227.12276.72736.54956.70526.36
Burglaries in Vermont (Burglary rate)324.9302.2311.4239.6206.1154.2181.8152.1




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Very low n: There are not many data points included in this analysis. Even if the p-value is high, we should be suspicious of using so few datapoints in a correlation.
  5. Y-axis doesn't start at zero: I truncated the Y-axes of the graph above. I also used a line graph, which makes the visual connection stand out more than it deserves. Nothing against line graphs. They are great at telling a story when you have linear data! But visually it is deceptive because the only data is at the points on the graph, not the lines on the graph. In between each point, the data could have been doing anything. Like going for a random walk by itself!
    Mathematically what I showed is true, but it is intentionally misleading. Below is the same chart but with both Y-axes starting at zero.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([7.7386,7.5538,7.6322,7.1227,6.7273,6.5495,6.7052,6.36,])
array_2 = np.array([324.9,302.2,311.4,239.6,206.1,154.2,181.8,152.1,])
array_1_name = "How geeky LockPickingLawyer YouTube video titles are"
array_2_name = "Burglaries in Vermont"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

I'm genuinely thankful for your rating!


Correlation ID: 4813 · Black Variable ID: 25768 · Red Variable ID: 20124
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0