about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #4,812 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is How geeky 'Be Smart' science  YouTube video titles are and the second variable is The number of psychiatric aides in New Mexico.  The chart goes from 2013 to 2020, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

The influx of viewers experiencing existential crises after watching the videos has created a pressing need for psychiatric support. As more people ponder the meaning of life, the demand for psychiatric aides in New Mexico has skyrocketed. It's a race against time to ensure there are enough aides to calmly talk viewers down from their philosophical conundrums. Remember, when it comes to geeky wisdom, it's all fun and games until someone needs a therapy session!

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Generate an image with the style of a TIME magazine cover depicting a bustling office scene in New Mexico where psychiatric aides are gathered around a table. The walls are adorned with cheerful posters and plants, and a computer screen displays a list of "Be Smart" YouTube video titles such as "The Physics of Time Travel" and "The Philosophy of Artificial Intelligence." The aides are preparing to provide support to viewers experiencing existential crises after watching the videos, exuding soothing smiles and attentive gazes. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: How geeky Be Smart YouTube video titles are and The number of psychiatric aides in New Mexico. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Surrealism Whimsical illustration A TIME magazine cover image Cyberpunk Minimalism
ChatGPT: A TIME magazine cover image

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both How geeky Be Smart YouTube video titles are and The number of psychiatric aides in New Mexico, in the following situation: The influx of viewers experiencing existential crises after watching the videos has created a pressing need for psychiatric support. As more people ponder the meaning of life, the demand for psychiatric aides in New Mexico has skyrocketed. It's a race against time to ensure there are enough aides to calmly talk viewers down from their philosophical conundrums. Remember, when it comes to geeky wisdom, it's all fun and games until someone needs a therapy session!. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In a bustling office in New Mexico, the walls are adorned with cheerful posters and plants. A group of psychiatric aides are gathered around a table, each with a soothing smile and attentive gaze. On the computer screen, a list of geeky Be Smart YouTube video titles shines brightly, showcasing fascinating topics like "The Physics of Time Travel" and "The Philosophy of Artificial Intelligence." The aides are diligently preparing to provide support to the influx of viewers experiencing existential crises after watching the videos, ready to calmly talk them down from their philosophical conundrums.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ A TIME magazine cover image ] and depicting this scene: In a bustling office in New Mexico, the walls are adorned with cheerful posters and plants. A group of psychiatric aides are gathered around a table, each with a soothing smile and attentive gaze. On the computer screen, a list of geeky Be Smart YouTube video titles shines brightly, showcasing fascinating topics like "The Physics of Time Travel" and "The Philosophy of Artificial Intelligence." The aides are diligently preparing to provide support to the influx of viewers experiencing existential crises after watching the videos, ready to calmly talk them down from their philosophical conundrums. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Generate an image with the style of a TIME magazine cover depicting a bustling office scene in New Mexico where psychiatric aides are gathered around a table. The walls are adorned with cheerful posters and plants, and a computer screen displays a list of "Be Smart" YouTube video titles such as "The Physics of Time Travel" and "The Philosophy of Artificial Intelligence." The aides are preparing to provide support to viewers experiencing existential crises after watching the videos, exuding soothing smiles and attentive gazes.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how increases in How geeky Be Smart YouTube video titles are positively influenced The number of psychiatric aides in New Mexico.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
From Geek to Psych! Exploring the Correlation Between YouTube Video Titles and Psychiatric Aides in New Mexico

The Journal of Social Media Psychiatry

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between How geeky Be Smart YouTube video titles are and The number of psychiatric aides in New Mexico. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Make the title punny if you can come up with clever pun. If not, make it sound serious.

Your research team used data from AI analysis of YouTube video titles and Bureau of Larbor Statistics to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9423978 and p < 0.01 for 2013 to 2020.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
"From Geek to Psych! Exploring the Correlation Between YouTube Video Titles and Psychiatric Aides in New Mexico"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study examines the intriguing relationship between the linguistic sophistication of "How Geeky Be Smart" YouTube video titles and the employment trends of psychiatric aides in the state of New Mexico. Leveraging the power of AI analysis, we scrutinized the YouTube video titles for their semantic complexity and juxtaposed these findings with the corresponding Bureau of Labor Statistics data on psychiatric aides. Our analysis revealed a strikingly robust correlation coefficient of 0.9423978 and a p-value less than 0.01 over the period from 2013 to 2020. Our results indicate a potential link between the intellectually stimulating nature of YouTube video titles and the demand for psychiatric aides in New Mexico. Implications for both the world of online content creation and the mental health workforce are discussed, shedding light on the unanticipated connections between geekiness and psychological well-being.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between How geeky Be Smart YouTube video titles are and The number of psychiatric aides in New Mexico. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"From Geek to Psych! Exploring the Correlation Between YouTube Video Titles and Psychiatric Aides in New Mexico"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study examines the intriguing relationship between the linguistic sophistication of "How Geeky Be Smart" YouTube video titles and the employment trends of psychiatric aides in the state of New Mexico. Leveraging the power of AI analysis, we scrutinized the YouTube video titles for their semantic complexity and juxtaposed these findings with the corresponding Bureau of Labor Statistics data on psychiatric aides. Our analysis revealed a strikingly robust correlation coefficient of 0.9423978 and a p-value less than 0.01 over the period from 2013 to 2020. Our results indicate a potential link between the intellectually stimulating nature of YouTube video titles and the demand for psychiatric aides in New Mexico. Implications for both the world of online content creation and the mental health workforce are discussed, shedding light on the unanticipated connections between geekiness and psychological well-being.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

Attention, fellow scholars and aficionados of the esoteric! In this exploratory foray into the interplay of linguistics and labor, we delve into the captivating realm of YouTube video titles and their curious association with the employment trends of psychiatric aides in the Land of Enchantment, also known as New Mexico.

It is a well-established fact that the world of YouTube is a cornucopia of whimsical and intellectually stimulating content, not unlike a digital Willy Wonka's chocolate factory. Meanwhile, the field of psychiatric aides, those unsung heroes of the mental health workforce, toils in the trenches of psychological care, providing essential support to individuals in need. The question we ask ourselves is this: could there be an unsuspected nexus between the linguistic dexterity of YouTube video titles and the demand for mental health assistance in the Land of Enchantment?

Our hypothesis, like an unlikely friendship between a physics prodigy and a stand-up comedian, posits that there exists a correlation between the sophistication of "How Geeky Be Smart" YouTube video titles and the number of psychiatric aides employed in New Mexico. To uncover the hidden links between geekiness and psychological well-being, we have harnessed the formidable power of artificial intelligence to dissect the semantic complexity of the enigmatic YouTube titles, weaving a digital tapestry of lexical acrobatics and semantic elegance.

So, buckle up, fellow scholars, as we embark on a whimsical journey through the terra incognita of linguistic quirkiness and mental health workforce dynamics. Join us as we unravel the unexpected correlations and implications, and perhaps even uncover a nugget of wisdom that will leave us all marveling at the whimsicality of the human experience.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between How geeky Be Smart YouTube video titles are and The number of psychiatric aides in New Mexico. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then devolve ever further, and mention something completely ridiculous, like you conducted literature review by reading CVS receipts.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"From Geek to Psych! Exploring the Correlation Between YouTube Video Titles and Psychiatric Aides in New Mexico"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study examines the intriguing relationship between the linguistic sophistication of "How Geeky Be Smart" YouTube video titles and the employment trends of psychiatric aides in the state of New Mexico. Leveraging the power of AI analysis, we scrutinized the YouTube video titles for their semantic complexity and juxtaposed these findings with the corresponding Bureau of Labor Statistics data on psychiatric aides. Our analysis revealed a strikingly robust correlation coefficient of 0.9423978 and a p-value less than 0.01 over the period from 2013 to 2020. Our results indicate a potential link between the intellectually stimulating nature of YouTube video titles and the demand for psychiatric aides in New Mexico. Implications for both the world of online content creation and the mental health workforce are discussed, shedding light on the unanticipated connections between geekiness and psychological well-being.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
Attention, fellow scholars and aficionados of the esoteric! In this exploratory foray into the interplay of linguistics and labor, we delve into the captivating realm of YouTube video titles and their curious association with the employment trends of psychiatric aides in the Land of Enchantment, also known as New Mexico.
It is a well-established fact that the world of YouTube is a cornucopia of whimsical and intellectually stimulating content, not unlike a digital Willy Wonka's chocolate factory. Meanwhile, the field of psychiatric aides, those unsung heroes of the mental health workforce, toils in the trenches of psychological care, providing essential support to individuals in need. The question we ask ourselves is this: could there be an unsuspected nexus between the linguistic dexterity of YouTube video titles and the demand for mental health assistance in the Land of Enchantment?
Our hypothesis, like an unlikely friendship between a physics prodigy and a stand-up comedian, posits that there exists a correlation between the sophistication of "How Geeky Be Smart" YouTube video titles and the number of psychiatric aides employed in New Mexico. To uncover the hidden links between geekiness and psychological well-being, we have harnessed the formidable power of artificial intelligence to dissect the semantic complexity of the enigmatic YouTube titles, weaving a digital tapestry of lexical acrobatics and semantic elegance.
So, buckle up, fellow scholars, as we embark on a whimsical journey through the terra incognita of linguistic quirkiness and mental health workforce dynamics. Join us as we unravel the unexpected correlations and implications, and perhaps even uncover a nugget of wisdom that will leave us all marveling at the whimsicality of the human experience.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

In "Linguistic Sophistication in Digital Content and Its Socioeconomic Impacts," Smith and Doe examine the influence of linguistic complexity in online media on various societal indicators. The authors find that there is a positive correlation between the use of esoteric vocabulary and employment patterns in service-oriented sectors, suggesting that the linguistic allure of online content may have unforeseen ramifications on labor dynamics.

Furthermore, a study by Jones et al., "YouTube: A Linguistic Frontier," investigates the linguistic flair of YouTube video titles and its potential effects on viewer engagement. The findings reveal that clever wordplay and linguistic ambiguity in video titles are positively associated with increased viewer retention, indicative of the subtle influence of language on audience behavior.

Delving into the realm of non-fiction literature, "The Power of Words: Language and Its Far-reaching Effects on Society" by Nobel et al., offers insights into the profound impact of language on societal structures. The book delves into the intricate ways in which language shapes social dynamics, shedding light on the subtle yet pervasive influence of linguistic finesse in online media.

However, when we meander into fiction, we encounter realms of imagination and creativity. Works such as "The Language Chronicles: Tales of Linguistic Sorcery" by Rowling and "Semantic Serendipity: A Linguistic Odyssey" by Tolkien, although products of fantastical whimsy, nonetheless beckon us to consider the profound influence of language, even in the most imaginative of narratives.

Turning a whimsical gaze towards unconventional sources, we stumbled upon the enigmatic tale of "The CVS Receipt Chronicles: A Linguistic Expedition into the Realm of Retail" by an unnamed author. The nonsensical length and verbosity of retail receipts inadvertently provoke contemplation on the enigmatic nature of information dissemination and its purported effects on societal phenomena – a reminder that inspiration may emerge from the most unexpected of sources.

Alas, as we steel ourselves to embark on this linguistic odyssey, we must not forget the levity that accompanies scholarly pursuits. For in the pursuit of knowledge, the interplay of seriousness and whimsy serves as a reminder that the human endeavor, much like the linguistic tapestry we seek to unravel, is woven with threads of both solemnity and mirth.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between How geeky Be Smart YouTube video titles are and The number of psychiatric aides in New Mexico. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from AI analysis of YouTube video titles and Bureau of Larbor Statistics . You used data from 2013 to 2020

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"From Geek to Psych! Exploring the Correlation Between YouTube Video Titles and Psychiatric Aides in New Mexico"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study examines the intriguing relationship between the linguistic sophistication of "How Geeky Be Smart" YouTube video titles and the employment trends of psychiatric aides in the state of New Mexico. Leveraging the power of AI analysis, we scrutinized the YouTube video titles for their semantic complexity and juxtaposed these findings with the corresponding Bureau of Labor Statistics data on psychiatric aides. Our analysis revealed a strikingly robust correlation coefficient of 0.9423978 and a p-value less than 0.01 over the period from 2013 to 2020. Our results indicate a potential link between the intellectually stimulating nature of YouTube video titles and the demand for psychiatric aides in New Mexico. Implications for both the world of online content creation and the mental health workforce are discussed, shedding light on the unanticipated connections between geekiness and psychological well-being.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
Attention, fellow scholars and aficionados of the esoteric! In this exploratory foray into the interplay of linguistics and labor, we delve into the captivating realm of YouTube video titles and their curious association with the employment trends of psychiatric aides in the Land of Enchantment, also known as New Mexico.
It is a well-established fact that the world of YouTube is a cornucopia of whimsical and intellectually stimulating content, not unlike a digital Willy Wonka's chocolate factory. Meanwhile, the field of psychiatric aides, those unsung heroes of the mental health workforce, toils in the trenches of psychological care, providing essential support to individuals in need. The question we ask ourselves is this: could there be an unsuspected nexus between the linguistic dexterity of YouTube video titles and the demand for mental health assistance in the Land of Enchantment?
Our hypothesis, like an unlikely friendship between a physics prodigy and a stand-up comedian, posits that there exists a correlation between the sophistication of "How Geeky Be Smart" YouTube video titles and the number of psychiatric aides employed in New Mexico. To uncover the hidden links between geekiness and psychological well-being, we have harnessed the formidable power of artificial intelligence to dissect the semantic complexity of the enigmatic YouTube titles, weaving a digital tapestry of lexical acrobatics and semantic elegance.
So, buckle up, fellow scholars, as we embark on a whimsical journey through the terra incognita of linguistic quirkiness and mental health workforce dynamics. Join us as we unravel the unexpected correlations and implications, and perhaps even uncover a nugget of wisdom that will leave us all marveling at the whimsicality of the human experience.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To embark on this curious odyssey of unraveling the enigmatic relationship between YouTube video titles and psychiatric aide employment, we employed a methodological concoction akin to a mad scientist's experiment. First, we compiled a gargantuan dataset of "How Geeky Be Smart" YouTube video titles, undoubtedly causing our servers to groan under the weight of linguistic allure and intellectual pizzazz. From this trove of digital treasures, we tapped into the omniscient realm of artificial intelligence to parse the semantic richness and linguistic contortions within these titles, as though dissecting the polymorphous psyche of a verbose polymath.

Harnessing the power of machine learning algorithms, we subjected each title to a battery of linguistic analyses, including but not limited to sentiment analysis, word frequency distributions, and syntactic complexity evaluations. Our loyal AI assistants—resembling a digital coterie of verbose courtiers—imbued each title with the gravity of formal linguistic scrutiny, no doubt drawing the mirthful gaze of the cosmic jokester.

In parallel, we navigated the labyrinthine corridors of the Bureau of Labor Statistics, where the employment data on psychiatric aides awaited our intellectual embrace. Like intrepid explorers of the statistical realm, we charted the employment trends of psychiatric aides in the state of New Mexico from 2013 to 2020, uncovering the subtle undulations of workforce dynamics and labor market vicissitudes. The juxtaposition of these disparate datasets, one brimming with linguistic exuberance and the other laden with occupational gravitas, formed the crux of our analysis—a digital tango between textual flair and professional indispensability.

We then summoned the statistical phantoms of correlation and regression analysis, as though communing with the spirits of mathematical harmony and predictive sorcery, to discern the elusive connections between the linguistic panache of YouTube video titles and the demand for psychiatric aides. Our process was akin to navigating the high seas of data exploration, charting a course through the tempestuous waters of statistical inference, all the while keeping a watchful eye out for spurious correlations that might attempt to nefariously dupe our scholarly pursuit.

With these eccentric and rigorous methodologies in place, we sought to unravel the captivating dance between linguistic wizardry and workforce exigency, constructing a bridge between the ethereal realm of digital content creation and the grounded landscape of mental health support. And so, dear scholars, brimming with data and daring speculations, we embarked on a fervent quest for enlightenment amidst the whimsy of YouTube and the solemnity of psychiatric care.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between How geeky Be Smart YouTube video titles are and The number of psychiatric aides in New Mexico. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from AI analysis of YouTube video titles and Bureau of Larbor Statistics .

For the time period 2013 to 2020, you found a correlation 0.9423978, r-squared of 0.8881137, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"From Geek to Psych! Exploring the Correlation Between YouTube Video Titles and Psychiatric Aides in New Mexico"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study examines the intriguing relationship between the linguistic sophistication of "How Geeky Be Smart" YouTube video titles and the employment trends of psychiatric aides in the state of New Mexico. Leveraging the power of AI analysis, we scrutinized the YouTube video titles for their semantic complexity and juxtaposed these findings with the corresponding Bureau of Labor Statistics data on psychiatric aides. Our analysis revealed a strikingly robust correlation coefficient of 0.9423978 and a p-value less than 0.01 over the period from 2013 to 2020. Our results indicate a potential link between the intellectually stimulating nature of YouTube video titles and the demand for psychiatric aides in New Mexico. Implications for both the world of online content creation and the mental health workforce are discussed, shedding light on the unanticipated connections between geekiness and psychological well-being.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
Attention, fellow scholars and aficionados of the esoteric! In this exploratory foray into the interplay of linguistics and labor, we delve into the captivating realm of YouTube video titles and their curious association with the employment trends of psychiatric aides in the Land of Enchantment, also known as New Mexico.
It is a well-established fact that the world of YouTube is a cornucopia of whimsical and intellectually stimulating content, not unlike a digital Willy Wonka's chocolate factory. Meanwhile, the field of psychiatric aides, those unsung heroes of the mental health workforce, toils in the trenches of psychological care, providing essential support to individuals in need. The question we ask ourselves is this: could there be an unsuspected nexus between the linguistic dexterity of YouTube video titles and the demand for mental health assistance in the Land of Enchantment?
Our hypothesis, like an unlikely friendship between a physics prodigy and a stand-up comedian, posits that there exists a correlation between the sophistication of "How Geeky Be Smart" YouTube video titles and the number of psychiatric aides employed in New Mexico. To uncover the hidden links between geekiness and psychological well-being, we have harnessed the formidable power of artificial intelligence to dissect the semantic complexity of the enigmatic YouTube titles, weaving a digital tapestry of lexical acrobatics and semantic elegance.
So, buckle up, fellow scholars, as we embark on a whimsical journey through the terra incognita of linguistic quirkiness and mental health workforce dynamics. Join us as we unravel the unexpected correlations and implications, and perhaps even uncover a nugget of wisdom that will leave us all marveling at the whimsicality of the human experience.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The analysis of data collected over the period from 2013 to 2020 revealed a positively giddy correlation coefficient of 0.9423978 between the linguistic exuberance of "How Geeky Be Smart" YouTube video titles and the number of psychiatric aides employed in the state of New Mexico. This coefficient, akin to a jolly good friend who always has a witty quip at the ready, signifies a strong relationship between the semantic verve of YouTube video titles and the demand for mental health assistance in the Land of Enchantment.

The r-squared value of 0.8881137, often admired for its dependability like a trusty sidekick, further underscores the robustness of the observed correlation. The scatterplot (Fig. 1), which we are tantalizingly withholding here for dramatic effect, visually encapsulates this merry dance between linguistic fanciness and the vital workforce of psychiatric aides.

The p-value, being less than 0.01, elicited collective eyebrows raised higher than the Tower of Pisa, indicating that the observed association is not merely a fluke of statistical happenstance but rather a bona fide, statistically meaningful connection. This finding, like stumbling onto a rare truffle in a digital forest, suggests that there might indeed be a tangible link between the semantic grandeur of YouTube video titles and the demand for mental health support in New Mexico.

In summary, our results have unfurled an unexpected red carpet, leading us to entertain the notion that the world of linguistic flair and the realm of mental health may not be as distant as they initially seemed. This study opens the door to a whimsical brew of implications, perhaps even hinting at the potential impact of playful language on the state of psychological well-being. It serves as a vivid reminder that the intriguing dance between geekiness and the realm of the mind is one worth observing with an open mind and a healthy dose of humor.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between How geeky Be Smart YouTube video titles are and The number of psychiatric aides in New Mexico. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
"From Geek to Psych! Exploring the Correlation Between YouTube Video Titles and Psychiatric Aides in New Mexico"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study examines the intriguing relationship between the linguistic sophistication of "How Geeky Be Smart" YouTube video titles and the employment trends of psychiatric aides in the state of New Mexico. Leveraging the power of AI analysis, we scrutinized the YouTube video titles for their semantic complexity and juxtaposed these findings with the corresponding Bureau of Labor Statistics data on psychiatric aides. Our analysis revealed a strikingly robust correlation coefficient of 0.9423978 and a p-value less than 0.01 over the period from 2013 to 2020. Our results indicate a potential link between the intellectually stimulating nature of YouTube video titles and the demand for psychiatric aides in New Mexico. Implications for both the world of online content creation and the mental health workforce are discussed, shedding light on the unanticipated connections between geekiness and psychological well-being.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
In "Linguistic Sophistication in Digital Content and Its Socioeconomic Impacts," Smith and Doe examine the influence of linguistic complexity in online media on various societal indicators. The authors find that there is a positive correlation between the use of esoteric vocabulary and employment patterns in service-oriented sectors, suggesting that the linguistic allure of online content may have unforeseen ramifications on labor dynamics.
Furthermore, a study by Jones et al., "YouTube: A Linguistic Frontier," investigates the linguistic flair of YouTube video titles and its potential effects on viewer engagement. The findings reveal that clever wordplay and linguistic ambiguity in video titles are positively associated with increased viewer retention, indicative of the subtle influence of language on audience behavior.
Delving into the realm of non-fiction literature, "The Power of Words: Language and Its Far-reaching Effects on Society" by Nobel et al., offers insights into the profound impact of language on societal structures. The book delves into the intricate ways in which language shapes social dynamics, shedding light on the subtle yet pervasive influence of linguistic finesse in online media.
However, when we meander into fiction, we encounter realms of imagination and creativity. Works such as "The Language Chronicles: Tales of Linguistic Sorcery" by Rowling and "Semantic Serendipity: A Linguistic Odyssey" by Tolkien, although products of fantastical whimsy, nonetheless beckon us to consider the profound influence of language, even in the most imaginative of narratives.
Turning a whimsical gaze towards unconventional sources, we stumbled upon the enigmatic tale of "The CVS Receipt Chronicles: A Linguistic Expedition into the Realm of Retail" by an unnamed author. The nonsensical length and verbosity of retail receipts inadvertently provoke contemplation on the enigmatic nature of information dissemination and its purported effects on societal phenomena – a reminder that inspiration may emerge from the most unexpected of sources.
Alas, as we steel ourselves to embark on this linguistic odyssey, we must not forget the levity that accompanies scholarly pursuits. For in the pursuit of knowledge, the interplay of seriousness and whimsy serves as a reminder that the human endeavor, much like the linguistic tapestry we seek to unravel, is woven with threads of both solemnity and mirth.

[[RESULTS]]
The analysis of data collected over the period from 2013 to 2020 revealed a positively giddy correlation coefficient of 0.9423978 between the linguistic exuberance of "How Geeky Be Smart" YouTube video titles and the number of psychiatric aides employed in the state of New Mexico. This coefficient, akin to a jolly good friend who always has a witty quip at the ready, signifies a strong relationship between the semantic verve of YouTube video titles and the demand for mental health assistance in the Land of Enchantment.
The r-squared value of 0.8881137, often admired for its dependability like a trusty sidekick, further underscores the robustness of the observed correlation. The scatterplot (Fig. 1), which we are tantalizingly withholding here for dramatic effect, visually encapsulates this merry dance between linguistic fanciness and the vital workforce of psychiatric aides.
The p-value, being less than 0.01, elicited collective eyebrows raised higher than the Tower of Pisa, indicating that the observed association is not merely a fluke of statistical happenstance but rather a bona fide, statistically meaningful connection. This finding, like stumbling onto a rare truffle in a digital forest, suggests that there might indeed be a tangible link between the semantic grandeur of YouTube video titles and the demand for mental health support in New Mexico.
In summary, our results have unfurled an unexpected red carpet, leading us to entertain the notion that the world of linguistic flair and the realm of mental health may not be as distant as they initially seemed. This study opens the door to a whimsical brew of implications, perhaps even hinting at the potential impact of playful language on the state of psychological well-being. It serves as a vivid reminder that the intriguing dance between geekiness and the realm of the mind is one worth observing with an open mind and a healthy dose of humor.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The correlation between the linguistic exuberance of "How Geeky Be Smart" YouTube video titles and the number of psychiatric aides employed in the state of New Mexico has churned our perception of the interplay between online content and mental health dynamics. In aligning with the findings of Smith and Doe on the positive correlation between esoteric vocabulary and service-oriented employment, our results suggest that the linguistic allure of YouTube video titles may indeed ripple into real-world labor dynamics, much like a stone causing ripples in a tranquil pond.

Further converging with Jones et al.'s exploration of linguistic flair in video titles and its effect on viewer engagement, our study underscores the profound influence of language on societal indicators. The upbeat correlation coefficient strutting its stuff at 0.9423978 echoes the cheerful revelations of linguistic influence emanating from earlier research, akin to an exuberant encore at a linguistic symphony.

Our results also nod to the unconventional sources we encountered in the literature review, reinforcing the profound reach of language in diverse domains. The unexpected connection between the linguistic verve of online content and the demand for mental health assistance harkens back to the enigmatic tale of "The CVS Receipt Chronicles," reminding us that unexpected sources can yield tantalizing insights, much like discovering a hidden treasure trove of linguistic wit in the digital jungle.

The robustness of the observed correlation, reminiscent of a steadfast companion, echoes the dependability extolled by Nobel et al. in their exploration of language's impact on societal structures. Our findings invite contemplation on the intricate ways in which language weaves itself into the fabric of societal phenomena, much like the delicate threads of a linguistic tapestry.

In closing, our study, much like the playful language it scrutinized, has unfurled a whimsical tapestry of implications. It prompts us to consider the dynamic interplay between linguistic flamboyance and the realm of mental health, inviting us to observe this delightful dance with both sobriety and mirth. The unexpected link between geeky linguistic aesthetics and the demand for psychiatric aides in New Mexico serves as a vivacious reminder that language, much like life itself, is sprinkled with surprises waiting to be unwrapped.

Now, for the next act, we are compelled to delve deeper into this enthralling linguistic odyssey, to explore the nuances of language's influence on real-world phenomena and to uncover the unexpected connections that lie beneath the sleek surface of linguistic dexterity.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between How geeky Be Smart YouTube video titles are and The number of psychiatric aides in New Mexico. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
"From Geek to Psych! Exploring the Correlation Between YouTube Video Titles and Psychiatric Aides in New Mexico"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study examines the intriguing relationship between the linguistic sophistication of "How Geeky Be Smart" YouTube video titles and the employment trends of psychiatric aides in the state of New Mexico. Leveraging the power of AI analysis, we scrutinized the YouTube video titles for their semantic complexity and juxtaposed these findings with the corresponding Bureau of Labor Statistics data on psychiatric aides. Our analysis revealed a strikingly robust correlation coefficient of 0.9423978 and a p-value less than 0.01 over the period from 2013 to 2020. Our results indicate a potential link between the intellectually stimulating nature of YouTube video titles and the demand for psychiatric aides in New Mexico. Implications for both the world of online content creation and the mental health workforce are discussed, shedding light on the unanticipated connections between geekiness and psychological well-being.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
Attention, fellow scholars and aficionados of the esoteric! In this exploratory foray into the interplay of linguistics and labor, we delve into the captivating realm of YouTube video titles and their curious association with the employment trends of psychiatric aides in the Land of Enchantment, also known as New Mexico.
It is a well-established fact that the world of YouTube is a cornucopia of whimsical and intellectually stimulating content, not unlike a digital Willy Wonka's chocolate factory. Meanwhile, the field of psychiatric aides, those unsung heroes of the mental health workforce, toils in the trenches of psychological care, providing essential support to individuals in need. The question we ask ourselves is this: could there be an unsuspected nexus between the linguistic dexterity of YouTube video titles and the demand for mental health assistance in the Land of Enchantment?
Our hypothesis, like an unlikely friendship between a physics prodigy and a stand-up comedian, posits that there exists a correlation between the sophistication of "How Geeky Be Smart" YouTube video titles and the number of psychiatric aides employed in New Mexico. To uncover the hidden links between geekiness and psychological well-being, we have harnessed the formidable power of artificial intelligence to dissect the semantic complexity of the enigmatic YouTube titles, weaving a digital tapestry of lexical acrobatics and semantic elegance.
So, buckle up, fellow scholars, as we embark on a whimsical journey through the terra incognita of linguistic quirkiness and mental health workforce dynamics. Join us as we unravel the unexpected correlations and implications, and perhaps even uncover a nugget of wisdom that will leave us all marveling at the whimsicality of the human experience.

[[RESULTS]]
The analysis of data collected over the period from 2013 to 2020 revealed a positively giddy correlation coefficient of 0.9423978 between the linguistic exuberance of "How Geeky Be Smart" YouTube video titles and the number of psychiatric aides employed in the state of New Mexico. This coefficient, akin to a jolly good friend who always has a witty quip at the ready, signifies a strong relationship between the semantic verve of YouTube video titles and the demand for mental health assistance in the Land of Enchantment.
The r-squared value of 0.8881137, often admired for its dependability like a trusty sidekick, further underscores the robustness of the observed correlation. The scatterplot (Fig. 1), which we are tantalizingly withholding here for dramatic effect, visually encapsulates this merry dance between linguistic fanciness and the vital workforce of psychiatric aides.
The p-value, being less than 0.01, elicited collective eyebrows raised higher than the Tower of Pisa, indicating that the observed association is not merely a fluke of statistical happenstance but rather a bona fide, statistically meaningful connection. This finding, like stumbling onto a rare truffle in a digital forest, suggests that there might indeed be a tangible link between the semantic grandeur of YouTube video titles and the demand for mental health support in New Mexico.
In summary, our results have unfurled an unexpected red carpet, leading us to entertain the notion that the world of linguistic flair and the realm of mental health may not be as distant as they initially seemed. This study opens the door to a whimsical brew of implications, perhaps even hinting at the potential impact of playful language on the state of psychological well-being. It serves as a vivid reminder that the intriguing dance between geekiness and the realm of the mind is one worth observing with an open mind and a healthy dose of humor.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, the findings of this study shed light on the unexpected interplay between linguistic playfulness and the demand for psychiatric aides in New Mexico. The robust correlation coefficient and the p-value akin to a rare gem uncovered in the digital expanse, hint at a tangible connection between the whimsical nature of "How Geeky Be Smart" YouTube video titles and the support needed for mental well-being in the Land of Enchantment. This unanticipated correlation, reminiscent of stumbling upon a hidden treasure chest in a linguistic labyrinth, opens the door to a world of implications that tantalizingly blend the realms of online content creation and mental health.

Our foray into the terra incognita of linguistic quirkiness and mental health workforce dynamics has left us with a keen appreciation for the unexpected connections that lurk beneath the surface of seemingly unrelated domains. The playful language of YouTube video titles, much like a spirited waltz through a digital wonderland, appears to have an unforeseen resonance with the demand for psychological support, leaving us marveling at the whimsicality of human experiences and linguistic wizardry. However, while we could continue to frolic through the fountains of correlation coefficients and statistical validations, there is the opportunity to explore even further avenues of research that beckon with their own quirky symphony. Yet, in the spirit of a witty punchline that requires no further embellishment, we assert that no further research is needed in this area.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited From Geek to Psych! Exploring the Correlation Between YouTube Video Titles and Psychiatric Aides in New Mexico. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Social Media Psychiatry


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited From Geek to Psych! Exploring the Correlation Between YouTube Video Titles and Psychiatric Aides in New Mexico. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

Society for Innovative Social Media and Mental Health Research


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled From Geek to Psych! Exploring the Correlation Between YouTube Video Titles and Psychiatric Aides in New Mexico with an abstract of This study examines the intriguing relationship between the linguistic sophistication of "How Geeky Be Smart" YouTube video titles and the employment trends of psychiatric aides in the state of New Mexico. Leveraging the power of AI analysis, we scrutinized the YouTube video titles for their semantic complexity and juxtaposed these findings with the corresponding Bureau of Labor Statistics data on psychiatric aides. Our analysis revealed a strikingly robust correlation coefficient of 0.9423978 and a p-value less than 0.01 over the period from 2013 to 2020. Our results indicate a potential link between the intellectually stimulating nature of YouTube video titles and the demand for psychiatric aides in New Mexico. Implications for both the world of online content creation and the mental health workforce are discussed, shedding light on the unanticipated connections between geekiness and psychological well-being.

ChatGPT:

YouTube video titles, linguistic sophistication, psychiatric aides, New Mexico, AI analysis, semantic complexity, Bureau of Labor Statistics, correlation coefficient, p-value, demand for psychiatric aides, online content creation, mental health workforce, geekiness, psychological well-being

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

How geeky 'Be Smart' science YouTube video titles are
Detailed data title: How geeky Be Smart YouTube video titles are, as rated by an AI.
Source: AI analysis of YouTube video titles
Additional Info: I asked a large language model, 'On a scale of 1-10, how _______ do you think this YouTube video title is?' for every video.

See what else correlates with How geeky 'Be Smart' science YouTube video titles are

The number of psychiatric aides in New Mexico
Detailed data title: BLS estimate of psychiatric aides in New Mexico
Source: Bureau of Larbor Statistics
See what else correlates with The number of psychiatric aides in New Mexico

Correlation r = 0.9423978 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.8881137 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 88.8% of the change in the one variable (i.e., The number of psychiatric aides in New Mexico) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., How geeky 'Be Smart' science YouTube video titles are) over the 8 years from 2013 through 2020.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 0.00046. 0.0004574065721946192000000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.94 in 0.046% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 2,186 random variables Which I absolutely did.
with the same 7 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 7 because we have two variables measured over a period of 8 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.71, 0.99 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
20132014201520162017201820192020
How geeky 'Be Smart' science YouTube video titles are (Geeky score (out of 10))5.045.255.045.04355.47735.44745.14715.08
The number of psychiatric aides in New Mexico (Psychiatric Aides)1201408012025022015090




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Very low n: There are not many data points included in this analysis. Even if the p-value is high, we should be suspicious of using so few datapoints in a correlation.
  5. Y-axis doesn't start at zero: I truncated the Y-axes of the graph above. I also used a line graph, which makes the visual connection stand out more than it deserves. Nothing against line graphs. They are great at telling a story when you have linear data! But visually it is deceptive because the only data is at the points on the graph, not the lines on the graph. In between each point, the data could have been doing anything. Like going for a random walk by itself!
    Mathematically what I showed is true, but it is intentionally misleading. Below is the same chart but with both Y-axes starting at zero.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([5.04,5.25,5.04,5.0435,5.4773,5.4474,5.1471,5.08,])
array_2 = np.array([120,140,80,120,250,220,150,90,])
array_1_name = "How geeky 'Be Smart' science  YouTube video titles are"
array_2_name = "The number of psychiatric aides in New Mexico"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

I'm genuinely thankful for your rating!


Correlation ID: 4812 · Black Variable ID: 25863 · Red Variable ID: 11860
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0