about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #4,805 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Popularity of the first name Adonis and the second variable is Votes for Democratic Senators in Georgia.  The chart goes from 1978 to 2021, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

As the name Adonis gained popularity, more parents started raising incredibly charming and persuasive children who convinced their Democrat-leaning neighbors to get out and vote in Georgia. It's like the state was swept off its feet by a political tidal wave of charisma!

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Create an image that captures a neighborhood in Georgia with a whimsical, storybook charm. Picture a street lined with colorful houses and lush, blooming trees. In the foreground, imagine a group of children named Adonis standing proudly behind a lemonade stand, their faces beaming with determination and enthusiasm. As the children interact with their neighbors, portray the energy of the moment with vibrant colors and a sense of bustling activity. Show the spirited exchange between the Adonises and their Democrat-leaning neighbors, as the entire neighborhood comes alive with a palpable sense of excitement and motivation. The image should exude a magical quality, evoking the charm and charisma of a scene from a Disney movie, while also conveying the powerful message of civic engagement and community involvement. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Popularity of the first name Adonis and Democrat votes for Senators in Georgia. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: A comic-book-style illustration with muted colors and a dotted halftone pattern from the 1960s Glitch art An image that looks like it is a scene from A Disney Movie Vaporwave Charcoal
ChatGPT: An image that looks like it is a scene from A Disney Movie

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Popularity of the first name Adonis and Democrat votes for Senators in Georgia, in the following situation: As the name Adonis gained popularity, more parents started raising incredibly charming and persuasive children who convinced their Democrat-leaning neighbors to get out and vote in Georgia. It's like the state was swept off its feet by a political tidal wave of charisma!. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: Imagine a Georgia neighborhood where children named Adonis are hosting a lemonade stand. The charming and persuasive kids with the popular name Adonis are convincing their Democrat-leaning neighbors to get out and vote. The entire neighborhood is buzzing with energy as more people head to the polls, swept off their feet by the political tidal wave of charisma.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ An image that looks like it is a scene from A Disney Movie ] and depicting this scene: Imagine a Georgia neighborhood where children named Adonis are hosting a lemonade stand. The charming and persuasive kids with the popular name Adonis are convincing their Democrat-leaning neighbors to get out and vote. The entire neighborhood is buzzing with energy as more people head to the polls, swept off their feet by the political tidal wave of charisma. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Create an image that captures a neighborhood in Georgia with a whimsical, storybook charm. Picture a street lined with colorful houses and lush, blooming trees. In the foreground, imagine a group of children named Adonis standing proudly behind a lemonade stand, their faces beaming with determination and enthusiasm. As the children interact with their neighbors, portray the energy of the moment with vibrant colors and a sense of bustling activity. Show the spirited exchange between the Adonises and their Democrat-leaning neighbors, as the entire neighborhood comes alive with a palpable sense of excitement and motivation. The image should exude a magical quality, evoking the charm and charisma of a scene from a Disney movie, while also conveying the powerful message of civic engagement and community involvement.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in Popularity of the first name Adonis caused Democrat votes for Senators in Georgia to increase. Add a funny one-liner at the end.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Adonis or Democrat-is? The Electrifying Connection Between Name Popularity and Political Affiliation in Georgia

The Journal of Political Nomenclature and Socioelectoral Dynamics

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Adonis and Democrat votes for Senators in Georgia. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Make the title punny if you can come up with clever pun. If not, just make it sound clever.

Your research team used data from US Social Security Administration and MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9100537 and p < 0.01 for 1978 to 2021.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
"Adonis or Democrat-is? The Electrifying Connection Between Name Popularity and Political Affiliation in Georgia"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In the dynamic landscape of political science, researchers are constantly exploring new avenues to understand the complex web of factors that shape voting behavior. One oft-overlooked variable is the influence of first names on political affiliations. In this groundbreaking study, we delve into the intriguing correlation between the popularity of the first name "Adonis" and Democrat votes for Senators in Georgia. A mix of jest and joust, our analysis draws on data from the US Social Security Administration and MIT Election Data and Science Lab to examine voting trends spanning over four decades.

Our findings, while steeped in statistical rigor, also yield a curious revelation that can't be "Adonis-ed." We unearth a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.9100537 and p < 0.01 for the years 1978 to 2021, pointing to a striking alignment between the popularity of the name "Adonis" and Democrat votes for Senators in Georgia. It seems that the allure of the name "Adonis" may extend beyond mere aesthetics, casting a charming spell on political affiliations in the Peach State.

As we navigate the labyrinthine pathways of voter behavior, our study uncovers the light-hearted yet consequential influence of nomenclature on political preferences. This research not only sheds light on the whimsical interplay between names and voting patterns but also imbues the field of political science with a dash of levity. After all, who knew that the "Adonis" effect could extend beyond Greek mythology to shape electoral dynamics in Georgia? With a nuanced blend of wit and wisdom, our findings offer a fresh perspective on the manifold whims of voter affiliations, and perhaps a name can indeed be more than what meets the "eye-donis."


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Adonis and Democrat votes for Senators in Georgia. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Adonis or Democrat-is? The Electrifying Connection Between Name Popularity and Political Affiliation in Georgia"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In the dynamic landscape of political science, researchers are constantly exploring new avenues to understand the complex web of factors that shape voting behavior. One oft-overlooked variable is the influence of first names on political affiliations. In this groundbreaking study, we delve into the intriguing correlation between the popularity of the first name "Adonis" and Democrat votes for Senators in Georgia. A mix of jest and joust, our analysis draws on data from the US Social Security Administration and MIT Election Data and Science Lab to examine voting trends spanning over four decades.

Our findings, while steeped in statistical rigor, also yield a curious revelation that can't be "Adonis-ed." We unearth a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.9100537 and p < 0.01 for the years 1978 to 2021, pointing to a striking alignment between the popularity of the name "Adonis" and Democrat votes for Senators in Georgia. It seems that the allure of the name "Adonis" may extend beyond mere aesthetics, casting a charming spell on political affiliations in the Peach State.

As we navigate the labyrinthine pathways of voter behavior, our study uncovers the light-hearted yet consequential influence of nomenclature on political preferences. This research not only sheds light on the whimsical interplay between names and voting patterns but also imbues the field of political science with a dash of levity. After all, who knew that the "Adonis" effect could extend beyond Greek mythology to shape electoral dynamics in Georgia? With a nuanced blend of wit and wisdom, our findings offer a fresh perspective on the manifold whims of voter affiliations, and perhaps a name can indeed be more than what meets the "eye-donis."

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

As Shakespeare once pondered, "What's in a name? That which we call a rose by any other name would smell as sweet." Well, it turns out that in the realm of politics, there might be more than meets the eye-donis when it comes to the influence of nomenclature on voting behavior.

In the electrifying landscape of political affiliations, our research sets out to unravel the enigmatic connection between the popularity of the first name "Adonis" and Democrat votes for Senators in Georgia. This study aims to lend a touch of levity to the field of political science, because let's face it, politics could use a good pun or two.

While some may consider our exploration into the correlation between a name and political affiliations as mere whimsy, our findings reveal a correlation coefficient that can't be ignored, much like a persistent dad joke at the dinner table. The statistical rigour of our analysis reveals a striking alignment between the popularity of the name "Adonis" and Democrat votes for Senators in Georgia, with a correlation coefficient of 0.9100537 and p < 0.01. It seems the allure of the name "Adonis" may be more than just a pretty face.

This research not only offers a unique insight into the whimsical interplay between names and voting patterns but also adds a dose of humor to the sometimes solemn world of political science. After all, who would have thought that a name associated with Greek mythology could have such an impact on electoral dynamics in the Peach State? It seems that a name can indeed be more than what meets the "eye-donis."

So, grab your toga and strap on your sandals, as we embark on a journey to uncover the unexpected ways in which a name can shape political preferences, because in the realm of political science, even the most serious subjects could use a bit of a cheeky twist.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Adonis and Democrat votes for Senators in Georgia. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Perhaps you also got inspiration from some board games that are vaugely related.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Adonis or Democrat-is? The Electrifying Connection Between Name Popularity and Political Affiliation in Georgia"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In the dynamic landscape of political science, researchers are constantly exploring new avenues to understand the complex web of factors that shape voting behavior. One oft-overlooked variable is the influence of first names on political affiliations. In this groundbreaking study, we delve into the intriguing correlation between the popularity of the first name "Adonis" and Democrat votes for Senators in Georgia. A mix of jest and joust, our analysis draws on data from the US Social Security Administration and MIT Election Data and Science Lab to examine voting trends spanning over four decades.

Our findings, while steeped in statistical rigor, also yield a curious revelation that can't be "Adonis-ed." We unearth a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.9100537 and p < 0.01 for the years 1978 to 2021, pointing to a striking alignment between the popularity of the name "Adonis" and Democrat votes for Senators in Georgia. It seems that the allure of the name "Adonis" may extend beyond mere aesthetics, casting a charming spell on political affiliations in the Peach State.

As we navigate the labyrinthine pathways of voter behavior, our study uncovers the light-hearted yet consequential influence of nomenclature on political preferences. This research not only sheds light on the whimsical interplay between names and voting patterns but also imbues the field of political science with a dash of levity. After all, who knew that the "Adonis" effect could extend beyond Greek mythology to shape electoral dynamics in Georgia? With a nuanced blend of wit and wisdom, our findings offer a fresh perspective on the manifold whims of voter affiliations, and perhaps a name can indeed be more than what meets the "eye-donis."

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
As Shakespeare once pondered, "What's in a name? That which we call a rose by any other name would smell as sweet." Well, it turns out that in the realm of politics, there might be more than meets the eye-donis when it comes to the influence of nomenclature on voting behavior.
In the electrifying landscape of political affiliations, our research sets out to unravel the enigmatic connection between the popularity of the first name "Adonis" and Democrat votes for Senators in Georgia. This study aims to lend a touch of levity to the field of political science, because let's face it, politics could use a good pun or two.
While some may consider our exploration into the correlation between a name and political affiliations as mere whimsy, our findings reveal a correlation coefficient that can't be ignored, much like a persistent dad joke at the dinner table. The statistical rigour of our analysis reveals a striking alignment between the popularity of the name "Adonis" and Democrat votes for Senators in Georgia, with a correlation coefficient of 0.9100537 and p < 0.01. It seems the allure of the name "Adonis" may be more than just a pretty face.
This research not only offers a unique insight into the whimsical interplay between names and voting patterns but also adds a dose of humor to the sometimes solemn world of political science. After all, who would have thought that a name associated with Greek mythology could have such an impact on electoral dynamics in the Peach State? It seems that a name can indeed be more than what meets the "eye-donis."
So, grab your toga and strap on your sandals, as we embark on a journey to uncover the unexpected ways in which a name can shape political preferences, because in the realm of political science, even the most serious subjects could use a bit of a cheeky twist.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

The empirical investigation into the intersection of name popularity and political affiliations has been a subject of great intrigue in the annals of social science. Smith et al. (2015) delved into the influence of names on voter behavior, shedding light on the fascinating relationship between nomenclature and political inclinations. Similarly, Doe and Jones (2018) conducted a seminal study that explored the impact of first names on political affiliations, offering valuable insights into the underlying mechanisms at play.

In "Freakonomics" by Steven D. Levitt and Stephen J. Dubner, the authors explore the unexpected correlations that shape human behavior, drawing attention to the unconventional factors that influence decision-making. This work plants the seed of curiosity in exploring the seemingly whimsical association between the popularity of the name "Adonis" and Democrat votes for Senators in Georgia.

Drawing inspiration from fiction, the works of "The Great Gatsby" by F. Scott Fitzgerald and "Pride and Prejudice" by Jane Austen offer glimpses into the societal nuances that attach meaning to names, setting the stage for our exploration into the political ramifications of nomenclature.

In the spirit of unraveling the unexpected, "Clue" - the classic board game - serves as a fitting analogy to our research endeavor. Just as unassuming clues lead to revelations in the game, our findings uncover the tantalizing correlation between the name "Adonis" and political affiliations, casting a lighthearted yet consequential spell on the landscape of voter behavior.

The amalgamation of statistical analysis and whimsy is reminiscent of the game "Monopoly" – in our case, it's the "Adonis Effect" that monopolizes our attention, transcending the realm of chance and landing squarely on a statistically significant association between the name "Adonis" and Democrat votes for Senators in Georgia.

A dad joke materializes for good measure: Why did the politician name his son Adonis? Because he wanted a vote of confidence!

Continuing our review, the works of "The Name of the Wind" by Patrick Rothfuss and "The Alchemist" by Paulo Coelho offer intriguing parallels to our investigation, opening the door to the mystical allure of nomenclature and its potential impact on human inclinations.

In conclusion, the literature presents a rich tapestry of insights into the interplay between names and political affiliations, serving as a wellspring of inspiration for our foray into the captivating correlation between the popularity of the name "Adonis" and Democrat votes for Senators in Georgia.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Adonis and Democrat votes for Senators in Georgia. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from US Social Security Administration and MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse . You used data from 1978 to 2021

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Adonis or Democrat-is? The Electrifying Connection Between Name Popularity and Political Affiliation in Georgia"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In the dynamic landscape of political science, researchers are constantly exploring new avenues to understand the complex web of factors that shape voting behavior. One oft-overlooked variable is the influence of first names on political affiliations. In this groundbreaking study, we delve into the intriguing correlation between the popularity of the first name "Adonis" and Democrat votes for Senators in Georgia. A mix of jest and joust, our analysis draws on data from the US Social Security Administration and MIT Election Data and Science Lab to examine voting trends spanning over four decades.

Our findings, while steeped in statistical rigor, also yield a curious revelation that can't be "Adonis-ed." We unearth a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.9100537 and p < 0.01 for the years 1978 to 2021, pointing to a striking alignment between the popularity of the name "Adonis" and Democrat votes for Senators in Georgia. It seems that the allure of the name "Adonis" may extend beyond mere aesthetics, casting a charming spell on political affiliations in the Peach State.

As we navigate the labyrinthine pathways of voter behavior, our study uncovers the light-hearted yet consequential influence of nomenclature on political preferences. This research not only sheds light on the whimsical interplay between names and voting patterns but also imbues the field of political science with a dash of levity. After all, who knew that the "Adonis" effect could extend beyond Greek mythology to shape electoral dynamics in Georgia? With a nuanced blend of wit and wisdom, our findings offer a fresh perspective on the manifold whims of voter affiliations, and perhaps a name can indeed be more than what meets the "eye-donis."

[[INTRODUCTION]]
As Shakespeare once pondered, "What's in a name? That which we call a rose by any other name would smell as sweet." Well, it turns out that in the realm of politics, there might be more than meets the eye-donis when it comes to the influence of nomenclature on voting behavior.
In the electrifying landscape of political affiliations, our research sets out to unravel the enigmatic connection between the popularity of the first name "Adonis" and Democrat votes for Senators in Georgia. This study aims to lend a touch of levity to the field of political science, because let's face it, politics could use a good pun or two.
While some may consider our exploration into the correlation between a name and political affiliations as mere whimsy, our findings reveal a correlation coefficient that can't be ignored, much like a persistent dad joke at the dinner table. The statistical rigour of our analysis reveals a striking alignment between the popularity of the name "Adonis" and Democrat votes for Senators in Georgia, with a correlation coefficient of 0.9100537 and p < 0.01. It seems the allure of the name "Adonis" may be more than just a pretty face.
This research not only offers a unique insight into the whimsical interplay between names and voting patterns but also adds a dose of humor to the sometimes solemn world of political science. After all, who would have thought that a name associated with Greek mythology could have such an impact on electoral dynamics in the Peach State? It seems that a name can indeed be more than what meets the "eye-donis."
So, grab your toga and strap on your sandals, as we embark on a journey to uncover the unexpected ways in which a name can shape political preferences, because in the realm of political science, even the most serious subjects could use a bit of a cheeky twist.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To get to the root of the "Adonis" effect on Democrat votes for Senators in Georgia, we embarked on an odyssey of data collection and analysis that could even make Odysseus envious. Our research team sought to robustly establish the extent of the correlation, much like a marathon runner striving for a personal best.

We combed through the enchanting archives of the US Social Security Administration to gather data on the popularity of the name "Adonis" from 1978 to 2021. It was no Herculean task, but we made sure to leave no stone unturned in the quest for comprehensive nomenclatural insights. After all, analyzing decades of data requires patience, much like waiting for a good dad joke to mature and develop.

Next, we turned our gaze towards the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, a veritable treasure trove of electoral information, to procure voting data for Senators in Georgia over the same period. We navigated through the labyrinth of datasets with the finesse of Theseus, carefully selecting and verifying the data to ensure its reliability in our quest for illuminating correlations.

With the data in hand, our analysis combined a medley of statistical methods, including correlation analysis and linear regression, to decipher the trends and relationships between the popularity of the name "Adonis" and Democrat votes for Senators in Georgia. Our modeling approach was as rigorous as a Spartan training regimen, ensuring that our findings could withstand the scrutiny of academic battle.

Upon completing our analysis, we stepped back to survey the landscape of our results, much like a triumphant conqueror gazing upon the spoils of victory. The statistical significance of our findings, with a correlation coefficient of 0.9100537 and p < 0.01, validated our suspicions and left us feeling as elated as a philosopher who has unearthed a hidden truth – or as amused as a dad who has just heard a particularly good dad joke.

In sum, our methodology combined the meticulous acquisition of data from diverse sources with the application of robust statistical analyses, all overlaid with a sprinkle of humor and wit to ensure that our research journey was as engaging as it was informative. After all, in the pursuit of knowledge, a little levity goes a long way – much like the effect of a well-timed dad joke at a political debate.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Adonis and Democrat votes for Senators in Georgia. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from US Social Security Administration and MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse .

For the time period 1978 to 2021, you found a correlation 0.9100537, r-squared of 0.8281977, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Adonis or Democrat-is? The Electrifying Connection Between Name Popularity and Political Affiliation in Georgia"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In the dynamic landscape of political science, researchers are constantly exploring new avenues to understand the complex web of factors that shape voting behavior. One oft-overlooked variable is the influence of first names on political affiliations. In this groundbreaking study, we delve into the intriguing correlation between the popularity of the first name "Adonis" and Democrat votes for Senators in Georgia. A mix of jest and joust, our analysis draws on data from the US Social Security Administration and MIT Election Data and Science Lab to examine voting trends spanning over four decades.

Our findings, while steeped in statistical rigor, also yield a curious revelation that can't be "Adonis-ed." We unearth a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.9100537 and p < 0.01 for the years 1978 to 2021, pointing to a striking alignment between the popularity of the name "Adonis" and Democrat votes for Senators in Georgia. It seems that the allure of the name "Adonis" may extend beyond mere aesthetics, casting a charming spell on political affiliations in the Peach State.

As we navigate the labyrinthine pathways of voter behavior, our study uncovers the light-hearted yet consequential influence of nomenclature on political preferences. This research not only sheds light on the whimsical interplay between names and voting patterns but also imbues the field of political science with a dash of levity. After all, who knew that the "Adonis" effect could extend beyond Greek mythology to shape electoral dynamics in Georgia? With a nuanced blend of wit and wisdom, our findings offer a fresh perspective on the manifold whims of voter affiliations, and perhaps a name can indeed be more than what meets the "eye-donis."

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
As Shakespeare once pondered, "What's in a name? That which we call a rose by any other name would smell as sweet." Well, it turns out that in the realm of politics, there might be more than meets the eye-donis when it comes to the influence of nomenclature on voting behavior.
In the electrifying landscape of political affiliations, our research sets out to unravel the enigmatic connection between the popularity of the first name "Adonis" and Democrat votes for Senators in Georgia. This study aims to lend a touch of levity to the field of political science, because let's face it, politics could use a good pun or two.
While some may consider our exploration into the correlation between a name and political affiliations as mere whimsy, our findings reveal a correlation coefficient that can't be ignored, much like a persistent dad joke at the dinner table. The statistical rigour of our analysis reveals a striking alignment between the popularity of the name "Adonis" and Democrat votes for Senators in Georgia, with a correlation coefficient of 0.9100537 and p < 0.01. It seems the allure of the name "Adonis" may be more than just a pretty face.
This research not only offers a unique insight into the whimsical interplay between names and voting patterns but also adds a dose of humor to the sometimes solemn world of political science. After all, who would have thought that a name associated with Greek mythology could have such an impact on electoral dynamics in the Peach State? It seems that a name can indeed be more than what meets the "eye-donis."
So, grab your toga and strap on your sandals, as we embark on a journey to uncover the unexpected ways in which a name can shape political preferences, because in the realm of political science, even the most serious subjects could use a bit of a cheeky twist.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The tantalizing connection between the popularity of the name "Adonis" and Democrat votes for Senators in Georgia has left us more than just "a-muse"-d. Our rigorous analysis of data from the US Social Security Administration and MIT Election Data and Science Lab has unveiled a correlation coefficient of 0.9100537, an r-squared of 0.8281977, and p < 0.01 for the years 1978 to 2021. It seems that the influence of this alluring name extends far beyond the annals of Greek mythology.

Fig. 1 (to be included) showcases the strong correlation between the two variables, illustrating the captivating relationship between the popularity of the name "Adonis" and Democrat votes for Senators in Georgia. It appears that this name carries with it a certain political gravitas, and our findings underscore the unexpected interplay between nomenclature and voter behavior.

Our research, while grounded in statistical significance, also injects a playful element into the discourse of political science, offering a refreshing twist to the oft-serious milieu. It seems that the "Adonis" effect permeates the political landscape in Georgia, proving that a name can indeed wield influence beyond its mere syllables.

The robust correlation uncovered in our study challenges the notion that a name is but a neutral identifier, and instead suggests that it can hold sway over political affiliations in ways we never dared to dream. This investigation not only enriches our understanding of the nuances underlying voter behavior but also infuses the field of political science with a touch of whimsy - after all, who knew that a name could carry such electoral weight in the Peach State?

In sum, our research sheds light on the captivating correlation between the first name "Adonis" and Democrat votes for Senators in Georgia, presenting a compelling case for the extraordinary influence a name can exude. As we continue to unravel the enigmatic ties between names and political affiliations, we mustn't lose sight of the profound impact that nomenclature can have on the democratic process. After all, in the world of politics, every name may indeed have its vote.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Adonis and Democrat votes for Senators in Georgia. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
"Adonis or Democrat-is? The Electrifying Connection Between Name Popularity and Political Affiliation in Georgia"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In the dynamic landscape of political science, researchers are constantly exploring new avenues to understand the complex web of factors that shape voting behavior. One oft-overlooked variable is the influence of first names on political affiliations. In this groundbreaking study, we delve into the intriguing correlation between the popularity of the first name "Adonis" and Democrat votes for Senators in Georgia. A mix of jest and joust, our analysis draws on data from the US Social Security Administration and MIT Election Data and Science Lab to examine voting trends spanning over four decades.

Our findings, while steeped in statistical rigor, also yield a curious revelation that can't be "Adonis-ed." We unearth a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.9100537 and p < 0.01 for the years 1978 to 2021, pointing to a striking alignment between the popularity of the name "Adonis" and Democrat votes for Senators in Georgia. It seems that the allure of the name "Adonis" may extend beyond mere aesthetics, casting a charming spell on political affiliations in the Peach State.

As we navigate the labyrinthine pathways of voter behavior, our study uncovers the light-hearted yet consequential influence of nomenclature on political preferences. This research not only sheds light on the whimsical interplay between names and voting patterns but also imbues the field of political science with a dash of levity. After all, who knew that the "Adonis" effect could extend beyond Greek mythology to shape electoral dynamics in Georgia? With a nuanced blend of wit and wisdom, our findings offer a fresh perspective on the manifold whims of voter affiliations, and perhaps a name can indeed be more than what meets the "eye-donis."

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The empirical investigation into the intersection of name popularity and political affiliations has been a subject of great intrigue in the annals of social science. Smith et al. (2015) delved into the influence of names on voter behavior, shedding light on the fascinating relationship between nomenclature and political inclinations. Similarly, Doe and Jones (2018) conducted a seminal study that explored the impact of first names on political affiliations, offering valuable insights into the underlying mechanisms at play.
In "Freakonomics" by Steven D. Levitt and Stephen J. Dubner, the authors explore the unexpected correlations that shape human behavior, drawing attention to the unconventional factors that influence decision-making. This work plants the seed of curiosity in exploring the seemingly whimsical association between the popularity of the name "Adonis" and Democrat votes for Senators in Georgia.
Drawing inspiration from fiction, the works of "The Great Gatsby" by F. Scott Fitzgerald and "Pride and Prejudice" by Jane Austen offer glimpses into the societal nuances that attach meaning to names, setting the stage for our exploration into the political ramifications of nomenclature.
In the spirit of unraveling the unexpected, "Clue" - the classic board game - serves as a fitting analogy to our research endeavor. Just as unassuming clues lead to revelations in the game, our findings uncover the tantalizing correlation between the name "Adonis" and political affiliations, casting a lighthearted yet consequential spell on the landscape of voter behavior.
The amalgamation of statistical analysis and whimsy is reminiscent of the game "Monopoly" – in our case, it's the "Adonis Effect" that monopolizes our attention, transcending the realm of chance and landing squarely on a statistically significant association between the name "Adonis" and Democrat votes for Senators in Georgia.
A dad joke materializes for good measure: Why did the politician name his son Adonis? Because he wanted a vote of confidence!
Continuing our review, the works of "The Name of the Wind" by Patrick Rothfuss and "The Alchemist" by Paulo Coelho offer intriguing parallels to our investigation, opening the door to the mystical allure of nomenclature and its potential impact on human inclinations.
In conclusion, the literature presents a rich tapestry of insights into the interplay between names and political affiliations, serving as a wellspring of inspiration for our foray into the captivating correlation between the popularity of the name "Adonis" and Democrat votes for Senators in Georgia.

[[RESULTS]]
The tantalizing connection between the popularity of the name "Adonis" and Democrat votes for Senators in Georgia has left us more than just "a-muse"-d. Our rigorous analysis of data from the US Social Security Administration and MIT Election Data and Science Lab has unveiled a correlation coefficient of 0.9100537, an r-squared of 0.8281977, and p < 0.01 for the years 1978 to 2021. It seems that the influence of this alluring name extends far beyond the annals of Greek mythology.
Fig. 1 (to be included) showcases the strong correlation between the two variables, illustrating the captivating relationship between the popularity of the name "Adonis" and Democrat votes for Senators in Georgia. It appears that this name carries with it a certain political gravitas, and our findings underscore the unexpected interplay between nomenclature and voter behavior.
Our research, while grounded in statistical significance, also injects a playful element into the discourse of political science, offering a refreshing twist to the oft-serious milieu. It seems that the "Adonis" effect permeates the political landscape in Georgia, proving that a name can indeed wield influence beyond its mere syllables.
The robust correlation uncovered in our study challenges the notion that a name is but a neutral identifier, and instead suggests that it can hold sway over political affiliations in ways we never dared to dream. This investigation not only enriches our understanding of the nuances underlying voter behavior but also infuses the field of political science with a touch of whimsy - after all, who knew that a name could carry such electoral weight in the Peach State?
In sum, our research sheds light on the captivating correlation between the first name "Adonis" and Democrat votes for Senators in Georgia, presenting a compelling case for the extraordinary influence a name can exude. As we continue to unravel the enigmatic ties between names and political affiliations, we mustn't lose sight of the profound impact that nomenclature can have on the democratic process. After all, in the world of politics, every name may indeed have its vote.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

Our findings serve as a skin-tilating testament to the unassuming yet substantial influence of a name. It seems that the name "Adonis" carries with it a certain electoral charm that transcends mere convention. Our results align with the existing literature, as Smith et al. (2015) and Doe and Jones (2018) laid the groundwork with their explorations into the connection between names and political preferences. It appears that the allure of a name can extend beyond its phonetic appeal, delving into the intricate realm of political affiliations.

A dad joke for your intellectual pleasure: Why did Adonis vote for the Democrat Senator? Because he wanted to be "Sen-Adonis" (Senate Adonis) himself!

Our results echo the whimsical yet consequential influences elucidated by Levitt and Dubner in "Freakonomics." The unexpected correlations that shape human behavior seem to extend to the realm of nomenclature, and our investigation into the "Adonis Effect" showcases the unanticipated sway that a name can wield over political inclinations.

The connection between the popularity of the name "Adonis" and Democrat votes for Senators in Georgia serves as a delightful deviation from the serious tenor of political science. Drawing inspiration from the societal nuances depicted in "The Great Gatsby" and "Pride and Prejudice" further underscores the poignant role of nomenclature in shaping human interactions, even within the realm of politics.

As we reflect on our findings, it's as if we've landed squarely on the "Adonis" square of a political "Monopoly" board, where the unexpected influence of a name has monopolized our attention. Just like uncovering a clue in the game "Clue," our study has revealed a captivating correlation that enriches our understanding of the intricate pathways that underpin voter behavior.

A quick pun for a chuckle: Why did the researcher study the "Adonis Effect"? Because they wanted to unveil the "elector-al" allure of a name on voting behavior!

In light of our statistically significant findings, we mustn't overlook the nuanced parallels presented in "The Name of the Wind" and "The Alchemist." These works offer compelling parallels to our investigation, inviting us to contemplate the ethereal allure of nomenclature and its potential impact on democratic processes.

Last but not least, let's not forget the hilarious yet eye-opening game of electoral antics. After all, in the world of politics, every name may indeed have its vote, and the "Adonis Effect" stands as a testament to the unexpected whims that shape our democratic tapestry.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Adonis and Democrat votes for Senators in Georgia. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
"Adonis or Democrat-is? The Electrifying Connection Between Name Popularity and Political Affiliation in Georgia"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In the dynamic landscape of political science, researchers are constantly exploring new avenues to understand the complex web of factors that shape voting behavior. One oft-overlooked variable is the influence of first names on political affiliations. In this groundbreaking study, we delve into the intriguing correlation between the popularity of the first name "Adonis" and Democrat votes for Senators in Georgia. A mix of jest and joust, our analysis draws on data from the US Social Security Administration and MIT Election Data and Science Lab to examine voting trends spanning over four decades.

Our findings, while steeped in statistical rigor, also yield a curious revelation that can't be "Adonis-ed." We unearth a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.9100537 and p < 0.01 for the years 1978 to 2021, pointing to a striking alignment between the popularity of the name "Adonis" and Democrat votes for Senators in Georgia. It seems that the allure of the name "Adonis" may extend beyond mere aesthetics, casting a charming spell on political affiliations in the Peach State.

As we navigate the labyrinthine pathways of voter behavior, our study uncovers the light-hearted yet consequential influence of nomenclature on political preferences. This research not only sheds light on the whimsical interplay between names and voting patterns but also imbues the field of political science with a dash of levity. After all, who knew that the "Adonis" effect could extend beyond Greek mythology to shape electoral dynamics in Georgia? With a nuanced blend of wit and wisdom, our findings offer a fresh perspective on the manifold whims of voter affiliations, and perhaps a name can indeed be more than what meets the "eye-donis."

[[INTRDUCTION]]
As Shakespeare once pondered, "What's in a name? That which we call a rose by any other name would smell as sweet." Well, it turns out that in the realm of politics, there might be more than meets the eye-donis when it comes to the influence of nomenclature on voting behavior.
In the electrifying landscape of political affiliations, our research sets out to unravel the enigmatic connection between the popularity of the first name "Adonis" and Democrat votes for Senators in Georgia. This study aims to lend a touch of levity to the field of political science, because let's face it, politics could use a good pun or two.
While some may consider our exploration into the correlation between a name and political affiliations as mere whimsy, our findings reveal a correlation coefficient that can't be ignored, much like a persistent dad joke at the dinner table. The statistical rigour of our analysis reveals a striking alignment between the popularity of the name "Adonis" and Democrat votes for Senators in Georgia, with a correlation coefficient of 0.9100537 and p < 0.01. It seems the allure of the name "Adonis" may be more than just a pretty face.
This research not only offers a unique insight into the whimsical interplay between names and voting patterns but also adds a dose of humor to the sometimes solemn world of political science. After all, who would have thought that a name associated with Greek mythology could have such an impact on electoral dynamics in the Peach State? It seems that a name can indeed be more than what meets the "eye-donis."
So, grab your toga and strap on your sandals, as we embark on a journey to uncover the unexpected ways in which a name can shape political preferences, because in the realm of political science, even the most serious subjects could use a bit of a cheeky twist.

[[RESULTS]]
The tantalizing connection between the popularity of the name "Adonis" and Democrat votes for Senators in Georgia has left us more than just "a-muse"-d. Our rigorous analysis of data from the US Social Security Administration and MIT Election Data and Science Lab has unveiled a correlation coefficient of 0.9100537, an r-squared of 0.8281977, and p < 0.01 for the years 1978 to 2021. It seems that the influence of this alluring name extends far beyond the annals of Greek mythology.
Fig. 1 (to be included) showcases the strong correlation between the two variables, illustrating the captivating relationship between the popularity of the name "Adonis" and Democrat votes for Senators in Georgia. It appears that this name carries with it a certain political gravitas, and our findings underscore the unexpected interplay between nomenclature and voter behavior.
Our research, while grounded in statistical significance, also injects a playful element into the discourse of political science, offering a refreshing twist to the oft-serious milieu. It seems that the "Adonis" effect permeates the political landscape in Georgia, proving that a name can indeed wield influence beyond its mere syllables.
The robust correlation uncovered in our study challenges the notion that a name is but a neutral identifier, and instead suggests that it can hold sway over political affiliations in ways we never dared to dream. This investigation not only enriches our understanding of the nuances underlying voter behavior but also infuses the field of political science with a touch of whimsy - after all, who knew that a name could carry such electoral weight in the Peach State?
In sum, our research sheds light on the captivating correlation between the first name "Adonis" and Democrat votes for Senators in Georgia, presenting a compelling case for the extraordinary influence a name can exude. As we continue to unravel the enigmatic ties between names and political affiliations, we mustn't lose sight of the profound impact that nomenclature can have on the democratic process. After all, in the world of politics, every name may indeed have its vote.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our study has not only revealed an uncanny correlation between the popularity of the name "Adonis" and Democrat votes for Senators in Georgia but has also added a comedic twist to the often-serious discourse of political science. It seems that the "Adonis" effect extends beyond Greek mythology, casting a charming spell on political affiliations in the Peach State. This correlation coefficient of 0.9100537 is nothing short of, well, "electoral-ious."

Our findings suggest that a name can indeed hold considerable persuasive power over voter behavior, underscoring the whimsical yet consequential influence of nomenclature on political preferences. Much like how the name "Adonis" has cast its enchanting sway on the political landscape, our study has injected a dose of levity into the often-stoic field of political science. Who knew that a name could "politicize" so effectively?

With robust statistical significance and a touch of humor, our research emphasizes the need to consider the quirky, unexpected ways in which nomenclature can shape electoral dynamics. It seems that in the realm of politics, even a name as seemingly innocuous as "Adonis" can carry substantial electoral weight. As we wrap up our investigation into this charming correlation, it's clear that the "Adonis" effect is nothing to be taken lightly.

In light of these groundbreaking findings, we assert that no more research is needed in this area. After all, when it comes to the influence of names on voting behavior, it seems we've whipped this topic into shape.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Adonis or Democrat-is? The Electrifying Connection Between Name Popularity and Political Affiliation in Georgia. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Political Nomenclature and Socioelectoral Dynamics


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Adonis or Democrat-is? The Electrifying Connection Between Name Popularity and Political Affiliation in Georgia. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Society for Political Nameology Research


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Adonis or Democrat-is? The Electrifying Connection Between Name Popularity and Political Affiliation in Georgia with an abstract of In the dynamic landscape of political science, researchers are constantly exploring new avenues to understand the complex web of factors that shape voting behavior. One oft-overlooked variable is the influence of first names on political affiliations. In this groundbreaking study, we delve into the intriguing correlation between the popularity of the first name "Adonis" and Democrat votes for Senators in Georgia. A mix of jest and joust, our analysis draws on data from the US Social Security Administration and MIT Election Data and Science Lab to examine voting trends spanning over four decades.
Our findings, while steeped in statistical rigor, also yield a curious revelation that can't be "Adonis-ed." We unearth a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.9100537 and p < 0.01 for the years 1978 to 2021, pointing to a striking alignment between the popularity of the name "Adonis" and Democrat votes for Senators in Georgia. It seems that the allure of the name "Adonis" may extend beyond mere aesthetics, casting a charming spell on political affiliations in the Peach State.
As we navigate the labyrinthine pathways of voter behavior, our study uncovers the light-hearted yet consequential influence of nomenclature on political preferences. This research not only sheds light on the whimsical interplay between names and voting patterns but also imbues the field of political science with a dash of levity. After all, who knew that the "Adonis" effect could extend beyond Greek mythology to shape electoral dynamics in Georgia? With a nuanced blend of wit and wisdom, our findings offer a fresh perspective on the manifold whims of voter affiliations, and perhaps a name can indeed be more than what meets the "eye-donis.

ChatGPT:

Adonis, Democrat, political affiliation, name popularity, Georgia, voting behavior, first names, US Social Security Administration, MIT Election Data and Science Lab, correlation, voting trends, Senators, Georgia elections, nomenclature, electoral dynamics, voter behavior, political science, Adonis effect, whims of voter affiliations

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Popularity of the first name Adonis
Detailed data title: Babies of all sexes born in the US named Adonis
Source: US Social Security Administration
See what else correlates with Popularity of the first name Adonis

Votes for Democratic Senators in Georgia
Detailed data title: Total number of votes cast for Federal Democrat Senate candidates in Georgia
Source: MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse
See what else correlates with Votes for Democratic Senators in Georgia

Correlation r = 0.9100537 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.8281977 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 82.8% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Votes for Democratic Senators in Georgia) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Popularity of the first name Adonis) over the 17 years from 1978 through 2021.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 4.03E-7. 0.0000004028537418130293400000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.91 in 4.03E-5% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 2,482,290 random variables You don't actually need 2 million variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 16 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 16 because we have two variables measured over a period of 17 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.76, 0.97 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
19781980198419861990199219961998200020022004200820102014201620202021
Popularity of the first name Adonis (Babies born)37564759829017219922218924025126933480916751728
Votes for Democratic Senators in Georgia (Total votes)53632077614313441006237071033440172729011039907919041413220932422128769026673209965161160810159973047528304557710




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Confounding variable: 2020 is particularly different from the other years on this graph. Confounding variables (like global pandemics) will cause two variables to look connected when in fact a "sneaky third" variable is influencing both of them behind the scenes.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([37,56,47,59,82,90,172,199,222,189,240,251,269,334,809,1675,1728,])
array_2 = np.array([536320,776143,1344100,623707,1033440,1727290,1103990,791904,1413220,932422,1287690,2667320,996516,1160810,1599730,4752830,4557710,])
array_1_name = "Popularity of the first name Adonis"
array_2_name = "Votes for Democratic Senators in Georgia"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Kudos for rating!


Correlation ID: 4805 · Black Variable ID: 3856 · Red Variable ID: 26222
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0