about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #4,800 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Kerosene used in Barbados and the second variable is The average number of likes on Vihart's YouTube videos.  The chart goes from 2009 to 2021, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

As Barbados reduced its kerosene usage, it inadvertently led to a shortage of energy for a group of dedicated Vihart fans who used to generate likes using old-fashioned manual crank devices. With their arm muscles now focused on other activities, such as sipping coconut-based beverages, the average number of likes on Vihart's YouTube videos naturally took a downward spiral.

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: [Data cyber art] Generate an image of a quaint Barbados town with colorful buildings, palm trees, and a clear blue sky. In the foreground, show a row of traditional kerosene lamps softly flickering, creating a warm glow. Beside the lamps, depict a group of Vihart's fans gathering and chatting while sipping coconut-based drinks. Show their old crank devices sitting idle, with hints of mechanical details and worn edges. Project a serene atmosphere with an underlying sense of wistfulness, symbolizing the impact of reduced kerosene usage on the likes for Vihart's YouTube videos. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Kerosene used in Barbados and The average number of likes on Vihart YouTube videos. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: A comic-book-style illustration with muted colors and a dotted halftone pattern from the 1960s a Polaroid photo Scalar art Data cyber art a funny image you would see on reddit
ChatGPT: Data cyber art

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Kerosene used in Barbados and The average number of likes on Vihart YouTube videos, in the following situation: As Barbados reduced its kerosene usage, it inadvertently led to a shortage of energy for a group of dedicated Vihart fans who used to generate likes using old-fashioned manual crank devices. With their arm muscles now focused on other activities, such as sipping coconut-based beverages, the average number of likes on Vihart's YouTube videos naturally took a downward spiral.. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In a sunny Barbados town, a row of traditional kerosene lamps flickers softly beside a group of Vihart's loyal fans. As they chat and sip coconut-based drinks, their old crank devices sit idle, once used to generate likes for Vihart's YouTube videos. The likes have dwindled as the energy shortage hinders their efforts, symbolizing the unintended impact of reduced kerosene usage on the average number of likes.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ Data cyber art ] and depicting this scene: In a sunny Barbados town, a row of traditional kerosene lamps flickers softly beside a group of Vihart's loyal fans. As they chat and sip coconut-based drinks, their old crank devices sit idle, once used to generate likes for Vihart's YouTube videos. The likes have dwindled as the energy shortage hinders their efforts, symbolizing the unintended impact of reduced kerosene usage on the average number of likes. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: [Data cyber art] Generate an image of a quaint Barbados town with colorful buildings, palm trees, and a clear blue sky. In the foreground, show a row of traditional kerosene lamps softly flickering, creating a warm glow. Beside the lamps, depict a group of Vihart's fans gathering and chatting while sipping coconut-based drinks. Show their old crank devices sitting idle, with hints of mechanical details and worn edges. Project a serene atmosphere with an underlying sense of wistfulness, symbolizing the impact of reduced kerosene usage on the likes for Vihart's YouTube videos.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how a decrease in Kerosene used in Barbados caused The average number of likes on Vihart YouTube videos to decrease.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Kerosene-ity Likes: Exploring the Inflammable Link between Kerosene Consumption in Barbados and Vihart YouTube Videos' Popularity

The Journal of Flammable Aesthetics

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Kerosene used in Barbados and The average number of likes on Vihart YouTube videos. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Include a pun in the title.

Your research team used data from Energy Information Administration and YouTube to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.8028025 and p < 0.01 for 2009 to 2021.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
"Kerosene-ity Likes: Exploring the Inflammable Link between Kerosene Consumption in Barbados and Vihart YouTube Videos' Popularity"

[[ABSTRACT]]
Do likes on Vihart YouTube videos wax and wane with the consumption of kerosene in Barbados? This seemingly bizarre yet inexplicably tantalizing question has flared into an unextinguishable curiosity amongst social media enthusiasts and energy aficionados alike. In this study, we levitated above the traditional research norms and delved into the fiery connection between the two seemingly unrelated phenomena. Blazing the trail with data collected from the Energy Information Administration and the all-powerful oracle of YouTube, we boldly ventured to examine the nexus between kerosene usage in Barbados and the average number of likes garnered by Vihart's captivating mathematics and music videos. Our findings ignited a spark of astonishment as we unraveled a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8028025, affirming a substantive link. Tantalizingly, our results wield a statistical significance of p < 0.01, suggesting that the association is more than just a flash in the pan. Thus, our study fuels a provocative revelation that calls for further investigation into the blazing interrelationship between kerosene consumption and the digital approval bestowed upon Vihart's algorithmic symphonies.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Kerosene used in Barbados and The average number of likes on Vihart YouTube videos. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Kerosene-ity Likes: Exploring the Inflammable Link between Kerosene Consumption in Barbados and Vihart YouTube Videos' Popularity"

[[ABSTRACT]]
Do likes on Vihart YouTube videos wax and wane with the consumption of kerosene in Barbados? This seemingly bizarre yet inexplicably tantalizing question has flared into an unextinguishable curiosity amongst social media enthusiasts and energy aficionados alike. In this study, we levitated above the traditional research norms and delved into the fiery connection between the two seemingly unrelated phenomena. Blazing the trail with data collected from the Energy Information Administration and the all-powerful oracle of YouTube, we boldly ventured to examine the nexus between kerosene usage in Barbados and the average number of likes garnered by Vihart's captivating mathematics and music videos. Our findings ignited a spark of astonishment as we unraveled a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8028025, affirming a substantive link. Tantalizingly, our results wield a statistical significance of p < 0.01, suggesting that the association is more than just a flash in the pan. Thus, our study fuels a provocative revelation that calls for further investigation into the blazing interrelationship between kerosene consumption and the digital approval bestowed upon Vihart's algorithmic symphonies.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
**[[INTRODUCTION]]**

"Fuel for thought: Exploring the Combustible Connection"

In the realm of seemingly inexplicable correlations, the enigmatic and flamboyant world of kerosene usage in Barbados has unexpectedly collided with the mesmerizing allure of Vihart's YouTube videos, sparking a conundrum that transcends the boundaries of logic and reason. As social media enthusiasts and energy aficionados engage in a fiery debate, fueled by unbridled curiosity, it becomes increasingly apparent that a blazing interrelationship has ignited a rather unlikely alliance.

The incendiary curiosity surrounding this unusual juxtaposition has not only sparked the interest of researchers but also kindled a fervor of speculation among the online community. As the flames of intrigue continue to rise, it becomes imperative to not only investigate this seemingly bizarre association but also to shed light on the burning question: Can the consumption of kerosene in Barbados ignite an exponential surge in the average number of likes bestowed upon Vihart's captivating mathematical and musical musings?

In this study, we embark on a perilous yet exhilarating journey to unravel the scintillating connection between these two seemingly disparate phenomena. Armed with data sourced from the Energy Information Administration and the ever-illuminating oracle of YouTube analytics, we endeavor to illuminate the perplexing dynamics at play.

So buckle up and don your flame-retardant gear as we traverse the volatile landscape of social media and energy consumption, where anomalies and conundrums are not just par for the course but also serve as tinder for our wildest academic escapades. Let the sparks fly as we delve into the heart of this combustible conundrum, wielding statistical firepower akin to a proverbial blowtorch as we seek to unearth the incandescent truth that lies at the intersection of kerosene consumption and digital acclaim.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Kerosene used in Barbados and The average number of likes on Vihart YouTube videos. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then name some cartoons and childrens' shows that you watched that are related to the topic.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Kerosene-ity Likes: Exploring the Inflammable Link between Kerosene Consumption in Barbados and Vihart YouTube Videos' Popularity"

[[ABSTRACT]]
Do likes on Vihart YouTube videos wax and wane with the consumption of kerosene in Barbados? This seemingly bizarre yet inexplicably tantalizing question has flared into an unextinguishable curiosity amongst social media enthusiasts and energy aficionados alike. In this study, we levitated above the traditional research norms and delved into the fiery connection between the two seemingly unrelated phenomena. Blazing the trail with data collected from the Energy Information Administration and the all-powerful oracle of YouTube, we boldly ventured to examine the nexus between kerosene usage in Barbados and the average number of likes garnered by Vihart's captivating mathematics and music videos. Our findings ignited a spark of astonishment as we unraveled a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8028025, affirming a substantive link. Tantalizingly, our results wield a statistical significance of p < 0.01, suggesting that the association is more than just a flash in the pan. Thus, our study fuels a provocative revelation that calls for further investigation into the blazing interrelationship between kerosene consumption and the digital approval bestowed upon Vihart's algorithmic symphonies.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
"Fuel for thought: Exploring the Combustible Connection"
In the realm of seemingly inexplicable correlations, the enigmatic and flamboyant world of kerosene usage in Barbados has unexpectedly collided with the mesmerizing allure of Vihart's YouTube videos, sparking a conundrum that transcends the boundaries of logic and reason. As social media enthusiasts and energy aficionados engage in a fiery debate, fueled by unbridled curiosity, it becomes increasingly apparent that a blazing interrelationship has ignited a rather unlikely alliance.
The incendiary curiosity surrounding this unusual juxtaposition has not only sparked the interest of researchers but also kindled a fervor of speculation among the online community. As the flames of intrigue continue to rise, it becomes imperative to not only investigate this seemingly bizarre association but also to shed light on the burning question: Can the consumption of kerosene in Barbados ignite an exponential surge in the average number of likes bestowed upon Vihart's captivating mathematical and musical musings?
In this study, we embark on a perilous yet exhilarating journey to unravel the scintillating connection between these two seemingly disparate phenomena. Armed with data sourced from the Energy Information Administration and the ever-illuminating oracle of YouTube analytics, we endeavor to illuminate the perplexing dynamics at play.
So buckle up and don your flame-retardant gear as we traverse the volatile landscape of social media and energy consumption, where anomalies and conundrums are not just par for the course but also serve as tinder for our wildest academic escapades. Let the sparks fly as we delve into the heart of this combustible conundrum, wielding statistical firepower akin to a proverbial blowtorch as we seek to unearth the incandescent truth that lies at the intersection of kerosene consumption and digital acclaim.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

A plethora of studies have ventured into the abyss of seemingly incongruent phenomena, aiming to shed light on the inexplicable bonds that intertwine the fabric of our world. Smith et al. (2015) discovered a significant correlation between coffee consumption and the likelihood of encountering a black cat on a Friday the 13th, while Doe and Jones (2018) uncovered an astonishing link between the frequency of avocado toast consumption and the probability of encountering an alien spacecraft. However, as we navigate through these seemingly disparate strands of inquiry, we arrive at the perplexing juncture where the consumption of kerosene in Barbados converges with the whimsical world of Vihart's YouTube channel.

Venturing beyond the boundaries of conventional research, our exploration takes an unconventional turn as we sift through the annals of literature that may shed light on this fiery enigma. "Kerosene Chronicles: A Historical Perspective" and "The Luminescent Lure of Liquefied Petroleum" offer invaluable insights into the cultural and practical facets of kerosene usage, providing a foundation for understanding its potential impact on digital phenomena.

In an unexpected twist, fictional works such as "The Mystery of the Flaming Equations" and "The Adventures of Vihart and the Kerosene Conundrum" present whimsical narratives that, while not rooted in empirical data, tickle the imagination and spark a semblance of curiosity akin to our current inquiry. This eclectic juxtaposition of reality and fantasy mirrors the unorthodox nature of our research, fueling the flames of intrigue that propel our investigation.

Furthermore, an unexpected intersection with childhood memories and youthful exuberance emerges as we recall the captivating allure of "Magic School Bus" and the scientific escapades of "Bill Nye the Science Guy," where educational content intertwined seamlessly with entertainment. The unconventional juxtaposition of kerosene and YouTube hits a chord reminiscent of the whimsy and wonderment that permeated these beloved childhood shows, creating a combustible concoction of nostalgia and scholarly curiosity.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Kerosene used in Barbados and The average number of likes on Vihart YouTube videos. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Energy Information Administration and YouTube . You used data from 2009 to 2021

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Kerosene-ity Likes: Exploring the Inflammable Link between Kerosene Consumption in Barbados and Vihart YouTube Videos' Popularity"

[[ABSTRACT]]
Do likes on Vihart YouTube videos wax and wane with the consumption of kerosene in Barbados? This seemingly bizarre yet inexplicably tantalizing question has flared into an unextinguishable curiosity amongst social media enthusiasts and energy aficionados alike. In this study, we levitated above the traditional research norms and delved into the fiery connection between the two seemingly unrelated phenomena. Blazing the trail with data collected from the Energy Information Administration and the all-powerful oracle of YouTube, we boldly ventured to examine the nexus between kerosene usage in Barbados and the average number of likes garnered by Vihart's captivating mathematics and music videos. Our findings ignited a spark of astonishment as we unraveled a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8028025, affirming a substantive link. Tantalizingly, our results wield a statistical significance of p < 0.01, suggesting that the association is more than just a flash in the pan. Thus, our study fuels a provocative revelation that calls for further investigation into the blazing interrelationship between kerosene consumption and the digital approval bestowed upon Vihart's algorithmic symphonies.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
"Fuel for thought: Exploring the Combustible Connection"
In the realm of seemingly inexplicable correlations, the enigmatic and flamboyant world of kerosene usage in Barbados has unexpectedly collided with the mesmerizing allure of Vihart's YouTube videos, sparking a conundrum that transcends the boundaries of logic and reason. As social media enthusiasts and energy aficionados engage in a fiery debate, fueled by unbridled curiosity, it becomes increasingly apparent that a blazing interrelationship has ignited a rather unlikely alliance.
The incendiary curiosity surrounding this unusual juxtaposition has not only sparked the interest of researchers but also kindled a fervor of speculation among the online community. As the flames of intrigue continue to rise, it becomes imperative to not only investigate this seemingly bizarre association but also to shed light on the burning question: Can the consumption of kerosene in Barbados ignite an exponential surge in the average number of likes bestowed upon Vihart's captivating mathematical and musical musings?
In this study, we embark on a perilous yet exhilarating journey to unravel the scintillating connection between these two seemingly disparate phenomena. Armed with data sourced from the Energy Information Administration and the ever-illuminating oracle of YouTube analytics, we endeavor to illuminate the perplexing dynamics at play.
So buckle up and don your flame-retardant gear as we traverse the volatile landscape of social media and energy consumption, where anomalies and conundrums are not just par for the course but also serve as tinder for our wildest academic escapades. Let the sparks fly as we delve into the heart of this combustible conundrum, wielding statistical firepower akin to a proverbial blowtorch as we seek to unearth the incandescent truth that lies at the intersection of kerosene consumption and digital acclaim.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To illuminate the fiery connection between the kerosene consumption in Barbados and the average number of likes on Vihart's YouTube videos, our research team embarked on an exhilarating and labyrinthine odyssey that would make Odysseus' journey seem like a stroll in the park. Our methodology danced on the edge of conventional research practices, yet it carefully avoided getting burned by the perils of statistical inference and empirical analysis.

Data Collection: Our intrepid journey began with data collection from the Energy Information Administration, where we gleaned information on the consumption of kerosene in Barbados from 2009 to 2021. As we waded through the voluminous seas of statistical tables, we couldn't help but marvel at the illuminating insights offered by these seemingly unassuming figures. The allure of data pulled us deeper into the abyss of energy consumption, where we were determined to uncover the molten ingredients that could potentially fuel Vihart's YouTube success.

YouTube Analytics: Venturing into the digital realm, we harnessed the formidable power of YouTube analytics to capture the average number of likes on Vihart's videos during the same period. It was a rollercoaster ride through the labyrinth of digital metrics, where likes, views, and comments intertwine in a web of numerical intrigue. As we surfed the waves of Vihart's mathematical and musical universe, we were captivated by the resonating symphonies of data that promised to unlock the enigmatic correlation we sought.

Statistical Incantations: Armed with a cauldron of statistical tools and a dash of wizardry, we stirred the pot of correlation analysis to discern the combustible relationship between kerosene consumption and YouTube engagement. Our incantations conjured the Pearson correlation coefficient, which unveiled the scorching correlation of 0.8028025, igniting a blaze of excitement within the hallowed halls of academia. We then stoked the flames of statistical significance, leading to a revelation that burned brighter than the North Star – a p-value of less than 0.01.

Controlling for Confounding Variables: Amidst the tempest of empirical analysis, we navigated the treacherous waters of confounding variables, ensuring that our findings weren't engulfed in the flames of spurious correlations. Controlling for factors such as internet penetration, cultural zeitgeist, and the gravitational pull of Vihart's charisma, we sought to validate the robustness of our findings, extinguishing any doubts that may have flickered in the minds of skeptics.

In essence, our methodology may have danced on the edge of unorthodoxy, yet it was illuminated by the beacon of rigor and scholarly inquiry, fanning the embers of unconventional research into the exuberant flames of discovery. We invite fellow scholars to take heed of our journey and join us in the scintillating pursuit of uncovering the incendiary truths that lie at the dazzling crossroads of kerosene consumption and digital approbation.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Kerosene used in Barbados and The average number of likes on Vihart YouTube videos. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Energy Information Administration and YouTube .

For the time period 2009 to 2021, you found a correlation 0.8028025, r-squared of 0.6444918, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Kerosene-ity Likes: Exploring the Inflammable Link between Kerosene Consumption in Barbados and Vihart YouTube Videos' Popularity"

[[ABSTRACT]]
Do likes on Vihart YouTube videos wax and wane with the consumption of kerosene in Barbados? This seemingly bizarre yet inexplicably tantalizing question has flared into an unextinguishable curiosity amongst social media enthusiasts and energy aficionados alike. In this study, we levitated above the traditional research norms and delved into the fiery connection between the two seemingly unrelated phenomena. Blazing the trail with data collected from the Energy Information Administration and the all-powerful oracle of YouTube, we boldly ventured to examine the nexus between kerosene usage in Barbados and the average number of likes garnered by Vihart's captivating mathematics and music videos. Our findings ignited a spark of astonishment as we unraveled a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8028025, affirming a substantive link. Tantalizingly, our results wield a statistical significance of p < 0.01, suggesting that the association is more than just a flash in the pan. Thus, our study fuels a provocative revelation that calls for further investigation into the blazing interrelationship between kerosene consumption and the digital approval bestowed upon Vihart's algorithmic symphonies.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
"Fuel for thought: Exploring the Combustible Connection"
In the realm of seemingly inexplicable correlations, the enigmatic and flamboyant world of kerosene usage in Barbados has unexpectedly collided with the mesmerizing allure of Vihart's YouTube videos, sparking a conundrum that transcends the boundaries of logic and reason. As social media enthusiasts and energy aficionados engage in a fiery debate, fueled by unbridled curiosity, it becomes increasingly apparent that a blazing interrelationship has ignited a rather unlikely alliance.
The incendiary curiosity surrounding this unusual juxtaposition has not only sparked the interest of researchers but also kindled a fervor of speculation among the online community. As the flames of intrigue continue to rise, it becomes imperative to not only investigate this seemingly bizarre association but also to shed light on the burning question: Can the consumption of kerosene in Barbados ignite an exponential surge in the average number of likes bestowed upon Vihart's captivating mathematical and musical musings?
In this study, we embark on a perilous yet exhilarating journey to unravel the scintillating connection between these two seemingly disparate phenomena. Armed with data sourced from the Energy Information Administration and the ever-illuminating oracle of YouTube analytics, we endeavor to illuminate the perplexing dynamics at play.
So buckle up and don your flame-retardant gear as we traverse the volatile landscape of social media and energy consumption, where anomalies and conundrums are not just par for the course but also serve as tinder for our wildest academic escapades. Let the sparks fly as we delve into the heart of this combustible conundrum, wielding statistical firepower akin to a proverbial blowtorch as we seek to unearth the incandescent truth that lies at the intersection of kerosene consumption and digital acclaim.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

Our research endeavors have set ablaze a rather unexpected yet striking revelation. Through an exhaustive analysis spanning the years 2009 to 2021, we discovered a scorching correlation coefficient of 0.8028025 between kerosene usage in Barbados and the average number of likes accrued by Vihart's captivating YouTube videos. This fiery correlation illuminated a substantial connection between the seemingly incongruous entities, leaving us in a state of both bewilderment and fiery fascination.

This incendiary relationship was further corroborated by an r-squared value of 0.6444918, signifying that approximately 64.45% of the variation in the average number of likes on Vihart's videos could be explicable by the fluctuations in kerosene consumption in Barbados. It's as if the flames of statistical significance were undeniably kindled, blazing a trail of undeniable association.

Furthermore, the statistical significance of our findings, denoted by a p-value of less than 0.01, adds fuel to the fire by bolstering the argument that this scorching interrelationship is not merely a flash in the pan, but a bona fide conflagration of influence.

To visually illuminate this combustible correlation, we present Fig. 1, a scatterplot that unequivocally highlights the blazing tandem between kerosene consumption in Barbados and the favorable reception of Vihart's mathematical and musical masterpieces.

In essence, our findings indicate that the consumption of kerosene in Barbados and the admiration lavished upon Vihart's YouTube creations are enmeshed in a conflagration of influence, igniting a fervor of curiosity and stimulating a desire for further exploration into this smoldering relationship.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Kerosene used in Barbados and The average number of likes on Vihart YouTube videos. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
"Kerosene-ity Likes: Exploring the Inflammable Link between Kerosene Consumption in Barbados and Vihart YouTube Videos' Popularity"

[[ABSTRACT]]
Do likes on Vihart YouTube videos wax and wane with the consumption of kerosene in Barbados? This seemingly bizarre yet inexplicably tantalizing question has flared into an unextinguishable curiosity amongst social media enthusiasts and energy aficionados alike. In this study, we levitated above the traditional research norms and delved into the fiery connection between the two seemingly unrelated phenomena. Blazing the trail with data collected from the Energy Information Administration and the all-powerful oracle of YouTube, we boldly ventured to examine the nexus between kerosene usage in Barbados and the average number of likes garnered by Vihart's captivating mathematics and music videos. Our findings ignited a spark of astonishment as we unraveled a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8028025, affirming a substantive link. Tantalizingly, our results wield a statistical significance of p < 0.01, suggesting that the association is more than just a flash in the pan. Thus, our study fuels a provocative revelation that calls for further investigation into the blazing interrelationship between kerosene consumption and the digital approval bestowed upon Vihart's algorithmic symphonies.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
A plethora of studies have ventured into the abyss of seemingly incongruent phenomena, aiming to shed light on the inexplicable bonds that intertwine the fabric of our world. Smith et al. (2015) discovered a significant correlation between coffee consumption and the likelihood of encountering a black cat on a Friday the 13th, while Doe and Jones (2018) uncovered an astonishing link between the frequency of avocado toast consumption and the probability of encountering an alien spacecraft. However, as we navigate through these seemingly disparate strands of inquiry, we arrive at the perplexing juncture where the consumption of kerosene in Barbados converges with the whimsical world of Vihart's YouTube channel.
Venturing beyond the boundaries of conventional research, our exploration takes an unconventional turn as we sift through the annals of literature that may shed light on this fiery enigma. "Kerosene Chronicles: A Historical Perspective" and "The Luminescent Lure of Liquefied Petroleum" offer invaluable insights into the cultural and practical facets of kerosene usage, providing a foundation for understanding its potential impact on digital phenomena.
In an unexpected twist, fictional works such as "The Mystery of the Flaming Equations" and "The Adventures of Vihart and the Kerosene Conundrum" present whimsical narratives that, while not rooted in empirical data, tickle the imagination and spark a semblance of curiosity akin to our current inquiry. This eclectic juxtaposition of reality and fantasy mirrors the unorthodox nature of our research, fueling the flames of intrigue that propel our investigation.
Furthermore, an unexpected intersection with childhood memories and youthful exuberance emerges as we recall the captivating allure of "Magic School Bus" and the scientific escapades of "Bill Nye the Science Guy," where educational content intertwined seamlessly with entertainment. The unconventional juxtaposition of kerosene and YouTube hits a chord reminiscent of the whimsy and wonderment that permeated these beloved childhood shows, creating a combustible concoction of nostalgia and scholarly curiosity.

[[RESULTS]]
Our research endeavors have set ablaze a rather unexpected yet striking revelation. Through an exhaustive analysis spanning the years 2009 to 2021, we discovered a scorching correlation coefficient of 0.8028025 between kerosene usage in Barbados and the average number of likes accrued by Vihart's captivating YouTube videos. This fiery correlation illuminated a substantial connection between the seemingly incongruous entities, leaving us in a state of both bewilderment and fiery fascination.
This incendiary relationship was further corroborated by an r-squared value of 0.6444918, signifying that approximately 64.45% of the variation in the average number of likes on Vihart's videos could be explicable by the fluctuations in kerosene consumption in Barbados. It's as if the flames of statistical significance were undeniably kindled, blazing a trail of undeniable association.
Furthermore, the statistical significance of our findings, denoted by a p-value of less than 0.01, adds fuel to the fire by bolstering the argument that this scorching interrelationship is not merely a flash in the pan, but a bona fide conflagration of influence.
To visually illuminate this combustible correlation, we present Fig. 1, a scatterplot that unequivocally highlights the blazing tandem between kerosene consumption in Barbados and the favorable reception of Vihart's mathematical and musical masterpieces.
In essence, our findings indicate that the consumption of kerosene in Barbados and the admiration lavished upon Vihart's YouTube creations are enmeshed in a conflagration of influence, igniting a fervor of curiosity and stimulating a desire for further exploration into this smoldering relationship.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

Our scorching revelation of a formidable correlation between kerosene consumption in Barbados and the number of likes on Vihart's YouTube videos sets the stage for a blazing discussion. Just when we thought we had seen it all, this fiery connection sparked a cascade of unexpected inquiries. But as we journey back to the literature review, we find ourselves confronting the captivating absurdity of prior research. It's as if the coffee-sipping cat-crossing Fridays and the avocado-toast-eating extraterrestrial encounters were mere kindling for our own flaring investigation.

But let's put out the humor and get serious for a moment. Our findings fueled a blaze of statistical significance, affirming the substantial link between kerosene usage in Barbados and the digital adoration heaped upon Vihart's algorithmic symphonies. This outcome is not merely a flash in the pan; it's a fiery conflagration of influence, as evidenced by the p-value of less than 0.01. Our research sets a new benchmark for the unconventional coalescence of seemingly disparate phenomena, and it behooves us to fan the flames of further investigation into this blazing interrelationship.

As our results corroborated the prior literature on the inexplicable bonds that intertwine the fabric of our world, we must acknowledge the unexpected twist of fiction, whimsy, and childhood nostalgia that permeated our exploration. The juxtaposition of kerosene and YouTube is not just an academic curiosity; it's a buoyant reminder of the infectious combination of imagination and scholarly inquiry that propels unconventional research endeavors into uncharted territories.

In conclusion, our findings add tinder to the flames of curiosity, beckoning further scrutiny into this bewildering nexus between kerosene consumption and the digital approval bestowed upon Vihart's mesmerizing content. As we illuminate this combustible correlation, we invite fellow researchers to stoke the fires of inquiry, spark multidisciplinary discussions, and embark on a collective journey to unravel the enigmatic allure of this scorching interrelationship.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Kerosene used in Barbados and The average number of likes on Vihart YouTube videos. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
"Kerosene-ity Likes: Exploring the Inflammable Link between Kerosene Consumption in Barbados and Vihart YouTube Videos' Popularity"

[[ABSTRACT]]
Do likes on Vihart YouTube videos wax and wane with the consumption of kerosene in Barbados? This seemingly bizarre yet inexplicably tantalizing question has flared into an unextinguishable curiosity amongst social media enthusiasts and energy aficionados alike. In this study, we levitated above the traditional research norms and delved into the fiery connection between the two seemingly unrelated phenomena. Blazing the trail with data collected from the Energy Information Administration and the all-powerful oracle of YouTube, we boldly ventured to examine the nexus between kerosene usage in Barbados and the average number of likes garnered by Vihart's captivating mathematics and music videos. Our findings ignited a spark of astonishment as we unraveled a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8028025, affirming a substantive link. Tantalizingly, our results wield a statistical significance of p < 0.01, suggesting that the association is more than just a flash in the pan. Thus, our study fuels a provocative revelation that calls for further investigation into the blazing interrelationship between kerosene consumption and the digital approval bestowed upon Vihart's algorithmic symphonies.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
"Fuel for thought: Exploring the Combustible Connection"
In the realm of seemingly inexplicable correlations, the enigmatic and flamboyant world of kerosene usage in Barbados has unexpectedly collided with the mesmerizing allure of Vihart's YouTube videos, sparking a conundrum that transcends the boundaries of logic and reason. As social media enthusiasts and energy aficionados engage in a fiery debate, fueled by unbridled curiosity, it becomes increasingly apparent that a blazing interrelationship has ignited a rather unlikely alliance.
The incendiary curiosity surrounding this unusual juxtaposition has not only sparked the interest of researchers but also kindled a fervor of speculation among the online community. As the flames of intrigue continue to rise, it becomes imperative to not only investigate this seemingly bizarre association but also to shed light on the burning question: Can the consumption of kerosene in Barbados ignite an exponential surge in the average number of likes bestowed upon Vihart's captivating mathematical and musical musings?
In this study, we embark on a perilous yet exhilarating journey to unravel the scintillating connection between these two seemingly disparate phenomena. Armed with data sourced from the Energy Information Administration and the ever-illuminating oracle of YouTube analytics, we endeavor to illuminate the perplexing dynamics at play.
So buckle up and don your flame-retardant gear as we traverse the volatile landscape of social media and energy consumption, where anomalies and conundrums are not just par for the course but also serve as tinder for our wildest academic escapades. Let the sparks fly as we delve into the heart of this combustible conundrum, wielding statistical firepower akin to a proverbial blowtorch as we seek to unearth the incandescent truth that lies at the intersection of kerosene consumption and digital acclaim.

[[RESULTS]]
Our research endeavors have set ablaze a rather unexpected yet striking revelation. Through an exhaustive analysis spanning the years 2009 to 2021, we discovered a scorching correlation coefficient of 0.8028025 between kerosene usage in Barbados and the average number of likes accrued by Vihart's captivating YouTube videos. This fiery correlation illuminated a substantial connection between the seemingly incongruous entities, leaving us in a state of both bewilderment and fiery fascination.
This incendiary relationship was further corroborated by an r-squared value of 0.6444918, signifying that approximately 64.45% of the variation in the average number of likes on Vihart's videos could be explicable by the fluctuations in kerosene consumption in Barbados. It's as if the flames of statistical significance were undeniably kindled, blazing a trail of undeniable association.
Furthermore, the statistical significance of our findings, denoted by a p-value of less than 0.01, adds fuel to the fire by bolstering the argument that this scorching interrelationship is not merely a flash in the pan, but a bona fide conflagration of influence.
To visually illuminate this combustible correlation, we present Fig. 1, a scatterplot that unequivocally highlights the blazing tandem between kerosene consumption in Barbados and the favorable reception of Vihart's mathematical and musical masterpieces.
In essence, our findings indicate that the consumption of kerosene in Barbados and the admiration lavished upon Vihart's YouTube creations are enmeshed in a conflagration of influence, igniting a fervor of curiosity and stimulating a desire for further exploration into this smoldering relationship.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our expedition into the combustible connection between kerosene usage in Barbados and the digital adulation of Vihart's YouTube videos has unearthed a scintillating revelation. The incendiary correlation coefficient of 0.8028025 has left us ignited with both astonishment and amusement, raising the question of whether Vihart's fanbase is secretly fueled by the fiery musings of kerosene aficionados. The statistically significant link, with a p-value of less than 0.01, blazes a path for understanding this enigmatic nexus. As we extinguish the flames of speculation, it becomes evident that the relationship between these seemingly unrelated entities is not merely flickering in the wind but is a roaring bonfire of influence.

These findings undoubtedly kindle the need for further research into the sparks that ignite digital acclaim and energy consumption in unison. Nevertheless, as we bask in the warmth of our statistical fires, it's evident that this particular conundrum has been set ablaze with curiosity and humor, leaving us to ponder the inexplicable nature of this smoldering association. In the grand scheme of academic inquiry, the fiery alliance between kerosene and Vihart's YouTube dominance may forever remain a whimsical enigma, a spark of amusement amidst the otherwise serious pursuits of scholarly endeavors. Thus, we assert that no further research is needed in this area, as the flames of inquiry have illuminated the tangential yet vibrant interplay between these unconventional bedfellows.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Kerosene-ity Likes: Exploring the Inflammable Link between Kerosene Consumption in Barbados and Vihart YouTube Videos' Popularity. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Flammable Aesthetics


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Kerosene-ity Likes: Exploring the Inflammable Link between Kerosene Consumption in Barbados and Vihart YouTube Videos' Popularity. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

Society for Flammable Substance Consumption Studies


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Kerosene-ity Likes: Exploring the Inflammable Link between Kerosene Consumption in Barbados and Vihart YouTube Videos' Popularity with an abstract of Do likes on Vihart YouTube videos wax and wane with the consumption of kerosene in Barbados? This seemingly bizarre yet inexplicably tantalizing question has flared into an unextinguishable curiosity amongst social media enthusiasts and energy aficionados alike. In this study, we levitated above the traditional research norms and delved into the fiery connection between the two seemingly unrelated phenomena. Blazing the trail with data collected from the Energy Information Administration and the all-powerful oracle of YouTube, we boldly ventured to examine the nexus between kerosene usage in Barbados and the average number of likes garnered by Vihart's captivating mathematics and music videos. Our findings ignited a spark of astonishment as we unraveled a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8028025, affirming a substantive link. Tantalizingly, our results wield a statistical significance of p < 0.01, suggesting that the association is more than just a flash in the pan. Thus, our study fuels a provocative revelation that calls for further investigation into the blazing interrelationship between kerosene consumption and the digital approval bestowed upon Vihart's algorithmic symphonies.

ChatGPT:

kerosene consumption, Barbados, YouTube likes, Vihart, correlation, statistical significance, energy consumption, social media, data analysis, research, nexus, correlation coefficient, statistical significance, digital approval, algorithmic symphonies

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Kerosene used in Barbados
Detailed data title: Volume of kerosene used consumed in Barbados in millions of barrels per day
Source: Energy Information Administration
See what else correlates with Kerosene used in Barbados

The average number of likes on Vihart's YouTube videos
Detailed data title: The average number of likes on Vihart YouTube videos.
Source: YouTube
See what else correlates with The average number of likes on Vihart's YouTube videos

Correlation r = 0.8028025 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.6444918 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 64.4% of the change in the one variable (i.e., The average number of likes on Vihart's YouTube videos) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Kerosene used in Barbados) over the 13 years from 2009 through 2021.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 0.00095. 0.0009537891275586311000000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.8 in 0.095% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 1,048 random variables Which I absolutely did.
with the same 12 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 12 because we have two variables measured over a period of 13 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.45, 0.94 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
2009201020112012201320142015201620172018201920202021
Kerosene used in Barbados (Million Barrels/Day)0.07602930.2361360.1988620.1626260.195050.01145950.0114590.0116450.1927640.0116770.0116770.009852770.0104865
The average number of likes on Vihart's YouTube videos (Average likes)2949.885106731158.631793.844303.115336.718150.316481.926560.414372.112416.72392015851.7




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([0.0760293,0.236136,0.198862,0.162626,0.19505,0.0114595,0.011459,0.011645,0.192764,0.011677,0.011677,0.00985277,0.0104865,])
array_2 = np.array([2949.88,51067,31158.6,31793.8,44303.1,15336.7,18150.3,16481.9,26560.4,14372.1,12416.7,23920,15851.7,])
array_1_name = "Kerosene used in Barbados"
array_2_name = "The average number of likes on Vihart's YouTube videos"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

You're a rater extraordinaire!


Correlation ID: 4800 · Black Variable ID: 24183 · Red Variable ID: 25548
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0