about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #4,796 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Popularity of the first name Liana and the second variable is Libertarian votes for Senators in Iowa.  The chart goes from 1978 to 2020, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image

AI explanation

There are more Lianas, who are secretly lobbying for a government of, by, and for the Lianas. They're swinging the libertarian votes in Iowa by vine-ing and dining the voters with their persuasive charm. Remember, behind every Liana is a political agenda!

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Generate an image that looks like a scene from a Pixar movie where in a bustling Iowa town, Lianas gracefully swing from tree to tree, gathering around groups of voters. The Lianas charmingly sway the libertarian votes their way, their silver-tongued persuasiveness echoing through the air. Meanwhile, the name "Liana" is being chanted by many, becoming increasingly popular in the community, as if quietly weaving their influence into the fabric of the society. Capture the whimsical nature of the Lianas as they interact with the community, conveying their smooth and persuasive movements in a vibrant, animated setting reminiscent of a scene from a Pixar movie. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Popularity of the first name Liana and Libertarian votes for Senators in Iowa. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Celtic art An image that looks like it is a scene from a Pixar movie Sci-fi fantacy Low poly Magic realism
ChatGPT: An image that looks like it is a scene from a Pixar movie

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Popularity of the first name Liana and Libertarian votes for Senators in Iowa, in the following situation: There are more Lianas, who are secretly lobbying for a government of, by, and for the Lianas. They're swinging the libertarian votes in Iowa by vine-ing and dining the voters with their persuasive charm. Remember, behind every Liana is a political agenda!. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In a bustling Iowa town, Lianas gracefully swing from tree to tree, gathering around groups of voters. They charmingly sway the libertarian votes their way, their silver-tongued persuasiveness echoing through the air. Meanwhile, the name "Liana" is being chanted by many, becoming increasingly popular in the community, as if quietly weaving their influence into the fabric of the society.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ An image that looks like it is a scene from a Pixar movie ] and depicting this scene: In a bustling Iowa town, Lianas gracefully swing from tree to tree, gathering around groups of voters. They charmingly sway the libertarian votes their way, their silver-tongued persuasiveness echoing through the air. Meanwhile, the name "Liana" is being chanted by many, becoming increasingly popular in the community, as if quietly weaving their influence into the fabric of the society. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Generate an image that looks like a scene from a Pixar movie where in a bustling Iowa town, Lianas gracefully swing from tree to tree, gathering around groups of voters. The Lianas charmingly sway the libertarian votes their way, their silver-tongued persuasiveness echoing through the air. Meanwhile, the name "Liana" is being chanted by many, becoming increasingly popular in the community, as if quietly weaving their influence into the fabric of the society. Capture the whimsical nature of the Lianas as they interact with the community, conveying their smooth and persuasive movements in a vibrant, animated setting reminiscent of a scene from a Pixar movie.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in Popularity of the first name Liana caused Libertarian votes for Senators in Iowa to increase.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Liana-Fide Libertarians? Correlating the Popularity of the Name Liana with Libertarian Votes for Senators in Iowa

The Journal of Political Nameology

Jan 2024
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Liana and Libertarian votes for Senators in Iowa. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Include a pun in the title.

Your research team used data from US Social Security Administration and MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.8803237 and p < 0.01 for 1978 to 2020.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
"Liana-Fide Libertarians? Correlating the Popularity of the Name Liana with Libertarian Votes for Senators in Iowa"

[[ABSTRACT]]
The present study investigates the peculiar relationship between the popularity of the first name Liana and the tendency of voters to support Libertarian candidates in senatorial elections in the state of Iowa. Drawing from comprehensive datasets provided by the US Social Security Administration and the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, we conducted a rigorous statistical analysis spanning the years 1978 to 2020. Our findings reveal a strikingly high correlation coefficient of 0.8803237 (p < 0.01), suggesting a strong association between the frequency of the name Liana and the propensity of Iowan voters to lean towards Libertarian candidates. The implications of our results are as intriguing as they are surprising, shedding light on a previously overlooked aspect of electoral behavior. This study not only challenges conventional notions of political demographics, but also provides ample material for name-related puns and pop culture references.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Liana and Libertarian votes for Senators in Iowa. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Liana-Fide Libertarians? Correlating the Popularity of the Name Liana with Libertarian Votes for Senators in Iowa"

[[ABSTRACT]]
The present study investigates the peculiar relationship between the popularity of the first name Liana and the tendency of voters to support Libertarian candidates in senatorial elections in the state of Iowa. Drawing from comprehensive datasets provided by the US Social Security Administration and the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, we conducted a rigorous statistical analysis spanning the years 1978 to 2020. Our findings reveal a strikingly high correlation coefficient of 0.8803237 (p < 0.01), suggesting a strong association between the frequency of the name Liana and the propensity of Iowan voters to lean towards Libertarian candidates. The implications of our results are as intriguing as they are surprising, shedding light on a previously overlooked aspect of electoral behavior. This study not only challenges conventional notions of political demographics, but also provides ample material for name-related puns and pop culture references.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
Introduction

The relationship between the popularity of given names and various societal phenomena has been a topic of interest to researchers across disciplines. From studies on the influence of names on academic and professional success to the association between names and certain personality traits, the impact of nomenclature on human behavior has garnered scholarly attention. In a similar vein, this study delves into the curious correlation between the prevalence of the first name Liana and the electoral behavior of voters in Iowa, particularly in their support for Libertarian candidates vying for senatorial positions.

The state of Iowa, famed for its cornfields, the Iowa caucuses, and a certain fictional field of dreams, provides an intriguing setting for exploring this connection. The presence of Libertarian candidates in the political landscape of Iowa, though not always at the forefront of public discourse, has nevertheless piqued the curiosity of political analysts. Moreover, the name Liana, with its melodic syllables and elegant phonetic rhythm, adds an element of whimsy and intrigue to this investigation.

The selection of Iowa as the geographic focus of this study was not arbitrary. The state's unique blend of rural and urban populations, along with its history of political independence, provides an ideal backdrop for examining the intersection of name popularity and political preferences. It is in this context that we set out to discern whether there exists a substantial association between the frequency of the name Liana among Iowan residents and their propensity to cast their votes in favor of Libertarian candidates in senatorial elections.

To achieve this, we conducted a meticulous analysis of decades worth of data, sourcing information from the US Social Security Administration's records on baby names and the MIT Election Data and Science Lab's comprehensive electoral data. Our statistical methodology, infused with all the rigor and earnestness befitting scholarly inquiry, revealed a correlation that surpassed our initial expectations and invited us to consider the implications with equal parts astonishment and amusement.

Indeed, with a correlation coefficient of 0.8803237 and a p-value less than 0.01, the findings of this study lend credence to the notion of a noteworthy connection between the prevalence of the name Liana and the electoral inclination toward Libertarian candidates in Iowa. This unexpected revelation not only prompts further inquiry into the underlying mechanisms at play but also invites lighthearted musings regarding the influence of nomenclature on political behavior. After all, it is not every day that one stumbles upon a name-related phenomenon of such idiosyncratic charm.

In the subsequent sections of this paper, we will proceed to delineate the methodology employed, present our findings in earnest detail, and engage in a balanced discussion of the possible implications and limitations of our study. Ultimately, we aim to contribute to the growing body of literature on the intricate interplay between nomenclature and electoral dynamics, all the while embracing the occasional opportunity for name-related puns and cultural references that this unique correlation affords us.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Liana and Libertarian votes for Senators in Iowa. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then cite some social media posts you read that seem to be related.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Liana-Fide Libertarians? Correlating the Popularity of the Name Liana with Libertarian Votes for Senators in Iowa"

[[ABSTRACT]]
The present study investigates the peculiar relationship between the popularity of the first name Liana and the tendency of voters to support Libertarian candidates in senatorial elections in the state of Iowa. Drawing from comprehensive datasets provided by the US Social Security Administration and the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, we conducted a rigorous statistical analysis spanning the years 1978 to 2020. Our findings reveal a strikingly high correlation coefficient of 0.8803237 (p < 0.01), suggesting a strong association between the frequency of the name Liana and the propensity of Iowan voters to lean towards Libertarian candidates. The implications of our results are as intriguing as they are surprising, shedding light on a previously overlooked aspect of electoral behavior. This study not only challenges conventional notions of political demographics, but also provides ample material for name-related puns and pop culture references.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
Introduction
The relationship between the popularity of given names and various societal phenomena has been a topic of interest to researchers across disciplines. From studies on the influence of names on academic and professional success to the association between names and certain personality traits, the impact of nomenclature on human behavior has garnered scholarly attention. In a similar vein, this study delves into the curious correlation between the prevalence of the first name Liana and the electoral behavior of voters in Iowa, particularly in their support for Libertarian candidates vying for senatorial positions.
The state of Iowa, famed for its cornfields, the Iowa caucuses, and a certain fictional field of dreams, provides an intriguing setting for exploring this connection. The presence of Libertarian candidates in the political landscape of Iowa, though not always at the forefront of public discourse, has nevertheless piqued the curiosity of political analysts. Moreover, the name Liana, with its melodic syllables and elegant phonetic rhythm, adds an element of whimsy and intrigue to this investigation.
The selection of Iowa as the geographic focus of this study was not arbitrary. The state's unique blend of rural and urban populations, along with its history of political independence, provides an ideal backdrop for examining the intersection of name popularity and political preferences. It is in this context that we set out to discern whether there exists a substantial association between the frequency of the name Liana among Iowan residents and their propensity to cast their votes in favor of Libertarian candidates in senatorial elections.
To achieve this, we conducted a meticulous analysis of decades worth of data, sourcing information from the US Social Security Administration's records on baby names and the MIT Election Data and Science Lab's comprehensive electoral data. Our statistical methodology, infused with all the rigor and earnestness befitting scholarly inquiry, revealed a correlation that surpassed our initial expectations and invited us to consider the implications with equal parts astonishment and amusement.
Indeed, with a correlation coefficient of 0.8803237 and a p-value less than 0.01, the findings of this study lend credence to the notion of a noteworthy connection between the prevalence of the name Liana and the electoral inclination toward Libertarian candidates in Iowa. This unexpected revelation not only prompts further inquiry into the underlying mechanisms at play but also invites lighthearted musings regarding the influence of nomenclature on political behavior. After all, it is not every day that one stumbles upon a name-related phenomenon of such idiosyncratic charm.
In the subsequent sections of this paper, we will proceed to delineate the methodology employed, present our findings in earnest detail, and engage in a balanced discussion of the possible implications and limitations of our study. Ultimately, we aim to contribute to the growing body of literature on the intricate interplay between nomenclature and electoral dynamics, all the while embracing the occasional opportunity for name-related puns and cultural references that this unique correlation affords us.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

The connection between the popularity of given names and various social phenomena has been a subject of avid exploration among scholars. Numerous studies have delved into the influence of nomenclature on academic and professional success, as well as the potential associations between names and certain personality traits. In line with these investigations, the present study seeks to unravel the enigmatic relationship between the prevalence of the first name Liana and the electoral proclivities of voters in Iowa, particularly in their support for Libertarian candidates in senatorial elections.

Smith (2015) conducted a comprehensive analysis of the impact of given names on political preferences, yet surprisingly omitted any mention of the specific name Liana. Doe (2018) investigated sociopolitical correlations with individual names, but regrettably did not delve into the nuanced dynamics of libertarian voting behavior in Iowa. Jones (2017) explored the intersection of nomenclature and electoral choices, however, the particular charm of the name Liana remained unexplored in their research.

Moving beyond the realm of academic studies, non-fiction works such as "The Name Book" by Moss and Wattenberg (2009) and "Freakonomics" by Levitt and Dubner (2009) shed light on the intriguing influence of names on various facets of human life, though they do not specifically address the curious relationship between the name Liana and Libertarian voting patterns in Iowa. On a more speculative note, the fictional works "Liana of the Jungle" by Wilder (2010) and "Libertarian Liana: Adventures in the Cornfields" by Whimsy (2015) offer imaginative narratives that, while not grounded in empirical research, evoke a whimsical contemplation of the potential connections between the name Liana and libertarian sentiment in Iowa.

Moreover, it is worth noting the anecdotal but intriguing observations gleaned from social media. A tweet by @PoliticalPunster quipped, "I guess you could say Liana-tarianism is on the rise in Iowa! #PunnyPolitics", providing a light-hearted yet thought-provoking perspective on the association between the name Liana and political ideology.

While these sources offer valuable insights into the broader realm of name-related factors influencing human behavior and societal trends, the intersection of the name Liana with Libertarian votes for Senators in Iowa remains conspicuously absent from scholarly discourse and literary narratives. Thus, the present study endeavors to bridge this gap, shedding light on an unconventional but undoubtedly compelling correlation.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Liana and Libertarian votes for Senators in Iowa. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from US Social Security Administration and MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse . You used data from 1978 to 2020

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Liana-Fide Libertarians? Correlating the Popularity of the Name Liana with Libertarian Votes for Senators in Iowa"

[[ABSTRACT]]
The present study investigates the peculiar relationship between the popularity of the first name Liana and the tendency of voters to support Libertarian candidates in senatorial elections in the state of Iowa. Drawing from comprehensive datasets provided by the US Social Security Administration and the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, we conducted a rigorous statistical analysis spanning the years 1978 to 2020. Our findings reveal a strikingly high correlation coefficient of 0.8803237 (p < 0.01), suggesting a strong association between the frequency of the name Liana and the propensity of Iowan voters to lean towards Libertarian candidates. The implications of our results are as intriguing as they are surprising, shedding light on a previously overlooked aspect of electoral behavior. This study not only challenges conventional notions of political demographics, but also provides ample material for name-related puns and pop culture references.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
Introduction
The relationship between the popularity of given names and various societal phenomena has been a topic of interest to researchers across disciplines. From studies on the influence of names on academic and professional success to the association between names and certain personality traits, the impact of nomenclature on human behavior has garnered scholarly attention. In a similar vein, this study delves into the curious correlation between the prevalence of the first name Liana and the electoral behavior of voters in Iowa, particularly in their support for Libertarian candidates vying for senatorial positions.
The state of Iowa, famed for its cornfields, the Iowa caucuses, and a certain fictional field of dreams, provides an intriguing setting for exploring this connection. The presence of Libertarian candidates in the political landscape of Iowa, though not always at the forefront of public discourse, has nevertheless piqued the curiosity of political analysts. Moreover, the name Liana, with its melodic syllables and elegant phonetic rhythm, adds an element of whimsy and intrigue to this investigation.
The selection of Iowa as the geographic focus of this study was not arbitrary. The state's unique blend of rural and urban populations, along with its history of political independence, provides an ideal backdrop for examining the intersection of name popularity and political preferences. It is in this context that we set out to discern whether there exists a substantial association between the frequency of the name Liana among Iowan residents and their propensity to cast their votes in favor of Libertarian candidates in senatorial elections.
To achieve this, we conducted a meticulous analysis of decades worth of data, sourcing information from the US Social Security Administration's records on baby names and the MIT Election Data and Science Lab's comprehensive electoral data. Our statistical methodology, infused with all the rigor and earnestness befitting scholarly inquiry, revealed a correlation that surpassed our initial expectations and invited us to consider the implications with equal parts astonishment and amusement.
Indeed, with a correlation coefficient of 0.8803237 and a p-value less than 0.01, the findings of this study lend credence to the notion of a noteworthy connection between the prevalence of the name Liana and the electoral inclination toward Libertarian candidates in Iowa. This unexpected revelation not only prompts further inquiry into the underlying mechanisms at play but also invites lighthearted musings regarding the influence of nomenclature on political behavior. After all, it is not every day that one stumbles upon a name-related phenomenon of such idiosyncratic charm.
In the subsequent sections of this paper, we will proceed to delineate the methodology employed, present our findings in earnest detail, and engage in a balanced discussion of the possible implications and limitations of our study. Ultimately, we aim to contribute to the growing body of literature on the intricate interplay between nomenclature and electoral dynamics, all the while embracing the occasional opportunity for name-related puns and cultural references that this unique correlation affords us.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

Data Collection
The first step in our research endeavor involved the comprehensive gathering of data from disparate sources, including the US Social Security Administration's trove of baby name records and the MIT Election Data and Science Lab's repository of electoral data. With the precision of a truffle-hunting pig and the determination of a student cramming for finals, we meticulously extracted information spanning the years 1978 to 2020. Our approach, while not as dramatic as an archaeological dig or as thrilling as a heist movie, was nonetheless infused with a sense of purpose and a touch of nerdy enthusiasm.

Name Frequency Analysis
Upon assembling the relevant data, we employed statistical techniques that would make even the most stoic of mathematicians crack a smile. We dissected the frequency of the name Liana with the same precision that a chef uses for slicing a ripe avocado, examining its occurrence across different years and geographical areas within the state of Iowa. The meticulousness of our analysis could rival that of a watchmaker tinkering with a delicate timepiece, as we sought to capture every nuance and fluctuation in Liana's prevalence.

Electoral Data Examination
Simultaneously, we delved into the electoral data with an eagerness akin to a child unwrapping a birthday present, albeit with far more solemnity. We scrutinized the voting behavior in senatorial elections, meticulously categorizing instances where Libertarian candidates garnered support from individuals within the state of Iowa. This process involved rigorous cross-referencing and intricate pattern recognition, akin to solving a convoluted puzzle but without the satisfaction of finding a hidden treasure at the end.

Statistical Analysis
With our data in hand and our minds buzzing with caffeinated fervor, we subjected the information to a battery of statistical tests. The tools of our trade included correlation analysis, regression modeling, and hypothesis testing, which we wielded with the precision of a skilled magician manipulating a deck of cards. Our approach may not have involved pulling rabbits out of hats, but it did entail a fair amount of number crunching and head scratching as we sought to unlock the secrets hidden within the data.

Ethical Considerations
As with any scholarly pursuit, ethical considerations remained at the forefront of our methodology. We ensured the anonymity and confidentiality of the individuals represented in the datasets, treating their monikers with the utmost respect and discretion. Our commitment to ethical research practices was unwavering, akin to a knight sworn to uphold chivalrous conduct in the realm of academia.

The meticulous orchestration of data collection, analysis, and ethical adherence culminated in a robust methodology that allowed us to explore the enigmatic relationship between the prevalence of the name Liana and the predilection for Libertarian candidates in Iowa's senatorial elections. With this methodological framework firmly in place, we proceeded to unveil the intriguing findings that emerged from our inquiry, showcasing the unexpected affinity between nomenclature and political preferences.

In the subsequent sections of this paper, we will unfurl the tapestry of our findings, presenting the statistical revelations with academic gravitas while allowing for the occasional giddy nod to the whimsical nature of our research subject. After all, what is scholarship without a hint of mirth and wonder?


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Liana and Libertarian votes for Senators in Iowa. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from US Social Security Administration and MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse .

For the time period 1978 to 2020, you found a correlation 0.8803237, r-squared of 0.7749699, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Liana-Fide Libertarians? Correlating the Popularity of the Name Liana with Libertarian Votes for Senators in Iowa"

[[ABSTRACT]]
The present study investigates the peculiar relationship between the popularity of the first name Liana and the tendency of voters to support Libertarian candidates in senatorial elections in the state of Iowa. Drawing from comprehensive datasets provided by the US Social Security Administration and the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, we conducted a rigorous statistical analysis spanning the years 1978 to 2020. Our findings reveal a strikingly high correlation coefficient of 0.8803237 (p < 0.01), suggesting a strong association between the frequency of the name Liana and the propensity of Iowan voters to lean towards Libertarian candidates. The implications of our results are as intriguing as they are surprising, shedding light on a previously overlooked aspect of electoral behavior. This study not only challenges conventional notions of political demographics, but also provides ample material for name-related puns and pop culture references.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
Introduction
The relationship between the popularity of given names and various societal phenomena has been a topic of interest to researchers across disciplines. From studies on the influence of names on academic and professional success to the association between names and certain personality traits, the impact of nomenclature on human behavior has garnered scholarly attention. In a similar vein, this study delves into the curious correlation between the prevalence of the first name Liana and the electoral behavior of voters in Iowa, particularly in their support for Libertarian candidates vying for senatorial positions.
The state of Iowa, famed for its cornfields, the Iowa caucuses, and a certain fictional field of dreams, provides an intriguing setting for exploring this connection. The presence of Libertarian candidates in the political landscape of Iowa, though not always at the forefront of public discourse, has nevertheless piqued the curiosity of political analysts. Moreover, the name Liana, with its melodic syllables and elegant phonetic rhythm, adds an element of whimsy and intrigue to this investigation.
The selection of Iowa as the geographic focus of this study was not arbitrary. The state's unique blend of rural and urban populations, along with its history of political independence, provides an ideal backdrop for examining the intersection of name popularity and political preferences. It is in this context that we set out to discern whether there exists a substantial association between the frequency of the name Liana among Iowan residents and their propensity to cast their votes in favor of Libertarian candidates in senatorial elections.
To achieve this, we conducted a meticulous analysis of decades worth of data, sourcing information from the US Social Security Administration's records on baby names and the MIT Election Data and Science Lab's comprehensive electoral data. Our statistical methodology, infused with all the rigor and earnestness befitting scholarly inquiry, revealed a correlation that surpassed our initial expectations and invited us to consider the implications with equal parts astonishment and amusement.
Indeed, with a correlation coefficient of 0.8803237 and a p-value less than 0.01, the findings of this study lend credence to the notion of a noteworthy connection between the prevalence of the name Liana and the electoral inclination toward Libertarian candidates in Iowa. This unexpected revelation not only prompts further inquiry into the underlying mechanisms at play but also invites lighthearted musings regarding the influence of nomenclature on political behavior. After all, it is not every day that one stumbles upon a name-related phenomenon of such idiosyncratic charm.
In the subsequent sections of this paper, we will proceed to delineate the methodology employed, present our findings in earnest detail, and engage in a balanced discussion of the possible implications and limitations of our study. Ultimately, we aim to contribute to the growing body of literature on the intricate interplay between nomenclature and electoral dynamics, all the while embracing the occasional opportunity for name-related puns and cultural references that this unique correlation affords us.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The statistical analysis yielded a remarkably robust correlation between the frequency of the name Liana and the tendency of Iowan voters to favor Libertarian candidates in senatorial elections. The correlation coefficient of 0.8803237 indicated a strong positive relationship, with an r-squared value of 0.7749699, thereby accounting for approximately 77.5% of the variability in Libertarian votes for Senators in Iowa. The p-value of less than 0.01 further underscored the statistical significance of this correlation, affirming the likelihood that the observed association was not due to mere chance.

Figure 1 depicts a scatterplot illustrating the conspicuous relationship between the frequency of the name Liana and the propensity of Iowan voters to support Libertarian candidates in senatorial elections. This visualization vividly portrays the pronounced clustering of data points, affirming the substantial correlation unveiled by our analysis. It would seem that there is more to the name Liana than meets the eye, as it apparently exerts an unexpected influence on the political inclinations of voters in the heartland of America.

The implications of these findings are as intriguing as they are perplexing, prompting contemplation of the underlying mechanisms driving this striking association. While one might be tempted to dismiss this correlation as mere happenstance, the robustness of the statistical results suggests otherwise.

What do we make of this correlation? Are Iowan voters with the name Liana predisposed to favor libertarian values, or does the popularity of the name Liana exert a subliminal influence on the political leanings of the electorate? The answers to these questions remain elusive, inviting further exploration and speculation in equal measure.

The idiosyncratic charm of these findings cannot escape notice, as they challenge conventional wisdom and open the door to a plethora of name-related puns and cultural references. Indeed, it is not every day that an academic study offers such ample material for jesting about the influence of nomenclature on political behavior.

In the following sections, we will expound upon the nuances of our findings, delineate potential avenues for future research, and discuss the implications of this study on our understanding of the intricate interplay between names and electoral dynamics. Indeed, the Liana-Fide Libertarian connection has emerged as a tantalizing enigma, beckoning scholars and pun enthusiasts alike to ponder its whimsical implications.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Liana and Libertarian votes for Senators in Iowa. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
"Liana-Fide Libertarians? Correlating the Popularity of the Name Liana with Libertarian Votes for Senators in Iowa"

[[ABSTRACT]]
The present study investigates the peculiar relationship between the popularity of the first name Liana and the tendency of voters to support Libertarian candidates in senatorial elections in the state of Iowa. Drawing from comprehensive datasets provided by the US Social Security Administration and the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, we conducted a rigorous statistical analysis spanning the years 1978 to 2020. Our findings reveal a strikingly high correlation coefficient of 0.8803237 (p < 0.01), suggesting a strong association between the frequency of the name Liana and the propensity of Iowan voters to lean towards Libertarian candidates. The implications of our results are as intriguing as they are surprising, shedding light on a previously overlooked aspect of electoral behavior. This study not only challenges conventional notions of political demographics, but also provides ample material for name-related puns and pop culture references.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The connection between the popularity of given names and various social phenomena has been a subject of avid exploration among scholars. Numerous studies have delved into the influence of nomenclature on academic and professional success, as well as the potential associations between names and certain personality traits. In line with these investigations, the present study seeks to unravel the enigmatic relationship between the prevalence of the first name Liana and the electoral proclivities of voters in Iowa, particularly in their support for Libertarian candidates in senatorial elections.
Smith (2015) conducted a comprehensive analysis of the impact of given names on political preferences, yet surprisingly omitted any mention of the specific name Liana. Doe (2018) investigated sociopolitical correlations with individual names, but regrettably did not delve into the nuanced dynamics of libertarian voting behavior in Iowa. Jones (2017) explored the intersection of nomenclature and electoral choices, however, the particular charm of the name Liana remained unexplored in their research.
Moving beyond the realm of academic studies, non-fiction works such as "The Name Book" by Moss and Wattenberg (2009) and "Freakonomics" by Levitt and Dubner (2009) shed light on the intriguing influence of names on various facets of human life, though they do not specifically address the curious relationship between the name Liana and Libertarian voting patterns in Iowa. On a more speculative note, the fictional works "Liana of the Jungle" by Wilder (2010) and "Libertarian Liana: Adventures in the Cornfields" by Whimsy (2015) offer imaginative narratives that, while not grounded in empirical research, evoke a whimsical contemplation of the potential connections between the name Liana and libertarian sentiment in Iowa.
Moreover, it is worth noting the anecdotal but intriguing observations gleaned from social media. A tweet by @PoliticalPunster quipped, "I guess you could say Liana-tarianism is on the rise in Iowa! #PunnyPolitics", providing a light-hearted yet thought-provoking perspective on the association between the name Liana and political ideology.
While these sources offer valuable insights into the broader realm of name-related factors influencing human behavior and societal trends, the intersection of the name Liana with Libertarian votes for Senators in Iowa remains conspicuously absent from scholarly discourse and literary narratives. Thus, the present study endeavors to bridge this gap, shedding light on an unconventional but undoubtedly compelling correlation.

[[RESULTS]]
The statistical analysis yielded a remarkably robust correlation between the frequency of the name Liana and the tendency of Iowan voters to favor Libertarian candidates in senatorial elections. The correlation coefficient of 0.8803237 indicated a strong positive relationship, with an r-squared value of 0.7749699, thereby accounting for approximately 77.5% of the variability in Libertarian votes for Senators in Iowa. The p-value of less than 0.01 further underscored the statistical significance of this correlation, affirming the likelihood that the observed association was not due to mere chance.
Figure 1 depicts a scatterplot illustrating the conspicuous relationship between the frequency of the name Liana and the propensity of Iowan voters to support Libertarian candidates in senatorial elections. This visualization vividly portrays the pronounced clustering of data points, affirming the substantial correlation unveiled by our analysis. It would seem that there is more to the name Liana than meets the eye, as it apparently exerts an unexpected influence on the political inclinations of voters in the heartland of America.
The implications of these findings are as intriguing as they are perplexing, prompting contemplation of the underlying mechanisms driving this striking association. While one might be tempted to dismiss this correlation as mere happenstance, the robustness of the statistical results suggests otherwise.
What do we make of this correlation? Are Iowan voters with the name Liana predisposed to favor libertarian values, or does the popularity of the name Liana exert a subliminal influence on the political leanings of the electorate? The answers to these questions remain elusive, inviting further exploration and speculation in equal measure.
The idiosyncratic charm of these findings cannot escape notice, as they challenge conventional wisdom and open the door to a plethora of name-related puns and cultural references. Indeed, it is not every day that an academic study offers such ample material for jesting about the influence of nomenclature on political behavior.
In the following sections, we will expound upon the nuances of our findings, delineate potential avenues for future research, and discuss the implications of this study on our understanding of the intricate interplay between names and electoral dynamics. Indeed, the Liana-Fide Libertarian connection has emerged as a tantalizing enigma, beckoning scholars and pun enthusiasts alike to ponder its whimsical implications.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The robust correlation uncovered between the popularity of the name Liana and the proclivity of Iowan voters to support Libertarian candidates in senatorial elections raises intriguing questions about the influences that names may exert on political behavior. While some may be quick to dismiss this correlation as mere coincidence, the statistical rigor of our analysis reinforces the solidity of this association.

Our findings resonate with prior research that has long delved into the curious impact of names on various social phenomena. Smith's (2015) exploration of the influence of given names on political preferences, unceremoniously excluding Liana, and Doe's (2018) investigation into nomenclature-sociopolitical correlations glaringly overlooking nuanced dynamics in libertarian voting behavior, unwittingly provide the thematic backdrop against which our study unearths the unanticipated connection. Additional citations such as Jones (2017) and the non-fiction works of Moss and Wattenberg (2009) and Levitt and Dubner (2009), as well as the imaginative works of Wilder (2010) and Whimsy (2015), set the stage for our investigation, albeit unwittingly. Moreover, the anecdotal insights from social media, exemplified by @PoliticalPunster's astute observation, add a whimsical yet thought-provoking layer to our scholarly pursuits.

It is with considerable satisfaction that we note the alignment of our results with the humorous hypothetical musings scattered throughout the literature review, proving that truth can indeed be stranger than fiction. The name Liana has emerged as a lighthearted paragon of political inclinations, beckoning us to pause in reflection and indulge in witty wordplay.

In light of these findings, one cannot help but ponder the underlying mechanisms driving this unexpected association. Is it the subconscious influence of a name that leads Iowan voters to favor libertarian ideals, or are individuals with the name Liana inherently predisposed to embrace such political inclinations? The possibilities are as amusing as they are enigmatic, inspiring further research and speculation.

In conclusion, the Liana-Fide Libertarian connection has emerged as a captivating puzzle that defies conventional wisdom and invites lighthearted contemplation. As we navigate the intricate interplay between names and electoral dynamics, we must not overlook the potential for levity that this research offers, as the puns and pop culture references practically write themselves. After all, in the realm of academia, one must always leave room for a touch of whimsy.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Liana and Libertarian votes for Senators in Iowa. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
"Liana-Fide Libertarians? Correlating the Popularity of the Name Liana with Libertarian Votes for Senators in Iowa"

[[ABSTRACT]]
The present study investigates the peculiar relationship between the popularity of the first name Liana and the tendency of voters to support Libertarian candidates in senatorial elections in the state of Iowa. Drawing from comprehensive datasets provided by the US Social Security Administration and the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, we conducted a rigorous statistical analysis spanning the years 1978 to 2020. Our findings reveal a strikingly high correlation coefficient of 0.8803237 (p < 0.01), suggesting a strong association between the frequency of the name Liana and the propensity of Iowan voters to lean towards Libertarian candidates. The implications of our results are as intriguing as they are surprising, shedding light on a previously overlooked aspect of electoral behavior. This study not only challenges conventional notions of political demographics, but also provides ample material for name-related puns and pop culture references.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
Introduction
The relationship between the popularity of given names and various societal phenomena has been a topic of interest to researchers across disciplines. From studies on the influence of names on academic and professional success to the association between names and certain personality traits, the impact of nomenclature on human behavior has garnered scholarly attention. In a similar vein, this study delves into the curious correlation between the prevalence of the first name Liana and the electoral behavior of voters in Iowa, particularly in their support for Libertarian candidates vying for senatorial positions.
The state of Iowa, famed for its cornfields, the Iowa caucuses, and a certain fictional field of dreams, provides an intriguing setting for exploring this connection. The presence of Libertarian candidates in the political landscape of Iowa, though not always at the forefront of public discourse, has nevertheless piqued the curiosity of political analysts. Moreover, the name Liana, with its melodic syllables and elegant phonetic rhythm, adds an element of whimsy and intrigue to this investigation.
The selection of Iowa as the geographic focus of this study was not arbitrary. The state's unique blend of rural and urban populations, along with its history of political independence, provides an ideal backdrop for examining the intersection of name popularity and political preferences. It is in this context that we set out to discern whether there exists a substantial association between the frequency of the name Liana among Iowan residents and their propensity to cast their votes in favor of Libertarian candidates in senatorial elections.
To achieve this, we conducted a meticulous analysis of decades worth of data, sourcing information from the US Social Security Administration's records on baby names and the MIT Election Data and Science Lab's comprehensive electoral data. Our statistical methodology, infused with all the rigor and earnestness befitting scholarly inquiry, revealed a correlation that surpassed our initial expectations and invited us to consider the implications with equal parts astonishment and amusement.
Indeed, with a correlation coefficient of 0.8803237 and a p-value less than 0.01, the findings of this study lend credence to the notion of a noteworthy connection between the prevalence of the name Liana and the electoral inclination toward Libertarian candidates in Iowa. This unexpected revelation not only prompts further inquiry into the underlying mechanisms at play but also invites lighthearted musings regarding the influence of nomenclature on political behavior. After all, it is not every day that one stumbles upon a name-related phenomenon of such idiosyncratic charm.
In the subsequent sections of this paper, we will proceed to delineate the methodology employed, present our findings in earnest detail, and engage in a balanced discussion of the possible implications and limitations of our study. Ultimately, we aim to contribute to the growing body of literature on the intricate interplay between nomenclature and electoral dynamics, all the while embracing the occasional opportunity for name-related puns and cultural references that this unique correlation affords us.

[[RESULTS]]
The statistical analysis yielded a remarkably robust correlation between the frequency of the name Liana and the tendency of Iowan voters to favor Libertarian candidates in senatorial elections. The correlation coefficient of 0.8803237 indicated a strong positive relationship, with an r-squared value of 0.7749699, thereby accounting for approximately 77.5% of the variability in Libertarian votes for Senators in Iowa. The p-value of less than 0.01 further underscored the statistical significance of this correlation, affirming the likelihood that the observed association was not due to mere chance.
Figure 1 depicts a scatterplot illustrating the conspicuous relationship between the frequency of the name Liana and the propensity of Iowan voters to support Libertarian candidates in senatorial elections. This visualization vividly portrays the pronounced clustering of data points, affirming the substantial correlation unveiled by our analysis. It would seem that there is more to the name Liana than meets the eye, as it apparently exerts an unexpected influence on the political inclinations of voters in the heartland of America.
The implications of these findings are as intriguing as they are perplexing, prompting contemplation of the underlying mechanisms driving this striking association. While one might be tempted to dismiss this correlation as mere happenstance, the robustness of the statistical results suggests otherwise.
What do we make of this correlation? Are Iowan voters with the name Liana predisposed to favor libertarian values, or does the popularity of the name Liana exert a subliminal influence on the political leanings of the electorate? The answers to these questions remain elusive, inviting further exploration and speculation in equal measure.
The idiosyncratic charm of these findings cannot escape notice, as they challenge conventional wisdom and open the door to a plethora of name-related puns and cultural references. Indeed, it is not every day that an academic study offers such ample material for jesting about the influence of nomenclature on political behavior.
In the following sections, we will expound upon the nuances of our findings, delineate potential avenues for future research, and discuss the implications of this study on our understanding of the intricate interplay between names and electoral dynamics. Indeed, the Liana-Fide Libertarian connection has emerged as a tantalizing enigma, beckoning scholars and pun enthusiasts alike to ponder its whimsical implications.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our study has unveiled a compelling correlation between the prevalence of the name Liana and the affinity of Iowan voters for Libertarian candidates in senatorial elections. The remarkably robust correlation coefficient of 0.8803237 has sparked contemplation of the underlying influences at play, prompting musings on whether the melodic syllables of Liana carry a libertarian lilt.

While we refrain from making categorical claims about causation, the statistical significance of our findings cannot be ignored. It appears that the name Liana wields an inexplicable sway over the political predilections of Iowan voters, suggesting that the idyllic charm of this name extends beyond its phonetic allure.

The implications of our results are as intriguing as they are amusing, inviting considerations of the whimsical dance between nomenclature and political proclivities. One cannot help but wonder whether there exists a covert Liana-Libertarian alliance shaping the electoral landscape of Iowa, a notion that would surely elicit a chuckle or two.

Despite the allure of name-related musings, we acknowledge the need for tempered interpretation and restraint in drawing sweeping inferences. Nevertheless, the Liana-Libertarian correlation endures as a delightful enigma, prompting future inquiry and the occasional lighthearted pun.

In light of these findings, we assert that the connection between the popularity of the name Liana and Libertarian votes for Senators in Iowa is a matter deserving of further scrutiny and contemplation. However, we are also inclined to declare, with a touch of mirth, that no more research is needed in this area. After all, we wouldn't want to over-Liana-te the political implications of a name, now would we?

Till next time, when we embark on equally whimsical academic pursuits, the Liana-Libertarian saga beckons us to ponder the enigmatic intersection of nomenclature and political proclivities with a twinkle in our eye and a syllabic sway.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Liana-Fide Libertarians? Correlating the Popularity of the Name Liana with Libertarian Votes for Senators in Iowa. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Political Nameology


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Liana-Fide Libertarians? Correlating the Popularity of the Name Liana with Libertarian Votes for Senators in Iowa. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Institute for Sociopolitical Research and Analysis


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Liana-Fide Libertarians? Correlating the Popularity of the Name Liana with Libertarian Votes for Senators in Iowa with an abstract of The present study investigates the peculiar relationship between the popularity of the first name Liana and the tendency of voters to support Libertarian candidates in senatorial elections in the state of Iowa. Drawing from comprehensive datasets provided by the US Social Security Administration and the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, we conducted a rigorous statistical analysis spanning the years 1978 to 2020. Our findings reveal a strikingly high correlation coefficient of 0.8803237 (p < 0.01), suggesting a strong association between the frequency of the name Liana and the propensity of Iowan voters to lean towards Libertarian candidates. The implications of our results are as intriguing as they are surprising, shedding light on a previously overlooked aspect of electoral behavior. This study not only challenges conventional notions of political demographics, but also provides ample material for name-related puns and pop culture references.

ChatGPT:

Liana, libertarian votes, senatorial elections, Iowa, US Social Security Administration, MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, statistical analysis, electoral behavior, political demographics, name frequency, correlation coefficient, Iowan voters, libertarian candidates

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Popularity of the first name Liana
Detailed data title: Babies of all sexes born in the US named Liana
Source: US Social Security Administration
See what else correlates with Popularity of the first name Liana

Libertarian votes for Senators in Iowa
Detailed data title: Percentage of votes cast for Federal Libertarian Senate candidates in Iowa
Source: MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse
See what else correlates with Libertarian votes for Senators in Iowa

Correlation r = 0.8803237 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.7749699 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 77.5% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Libertarian votes for Senators in Iowa) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Popularity of the first name Liana) over the 8 years from 1978 through 2020.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 0.00391. 0.0039097151931203100000000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.88 in 0.391% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 256 random variables Which I absolutely did.
with the same 7 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 7 because we have two variables measured over a period of 8 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.46, 0.98 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
19781980200220042010201420162020
Popularity of the first name Liana (Babies born)154147313370554522684668
Libertarian votes for Senators in Iowa (Percentage of votes)0.4473810.3314840.8664081.028782.2660.7286892.712072.17401




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Very low n: There are not many data points included in this analysis. Even if the p-value is high, we should be suspicious of using so few datapoints in a correlation.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([154,147,313,370,554,522,684,668,])
array_2 = np.array([0.447381,0.331484,0.866408,1.02878,2.266,0.728689,2.71207,2.17401,])
array_1_name = "Popularity of the first name Liana"
array_2_name = "Libertarian votes for Senators in Iowa"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Your correlation inspection deserves a standing ovation!


Correlation ID: 4796 · Black Variable ID: 3628 · Red Variable ID: 26385
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0