about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #4,773 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is How fun Steve Mould's YouTube video titles are and the second variable is Points allowed by the Los Angeles Chargers.  The chart goes from 2017 to 2023, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

As the Chargers' defense struggles, it creates a shocking lack of entertainment for Steve Mould, sparking a need for him to amp up the fun in his video titles to compensate for the Bolt's inability to stop anyone. After all, when the Chargers can't hold their opponents, Steve has to make sure his audience is positively charged with excitement.

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Generate an image that looks like a still from a Disney movie. The scene features Steve Mould looking disheartened while watching the Chargers' defense struggle on TV. In the background, his computer screen displays vibrant and playful YouTube video titles such as "Exploding Watermelon Challenge" and "The Magic of Ferrofluid." The contrast between Steve's disappointment and the lively video titles on the screen highlights the need for him to bring more fun to compensate for the Chargers' struggles. Remember to keep the visual depiction simple, without any words or speech bubbles. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: How fun Steve Mould YouTube video titles are and Points allowed by the Los Angeles Chargers. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Macabre inspired by bauhaus Art nouveau Steampunk An image that looks like it is a scene from A Disney Movie
ChatGPT: An image that looks like it is a scene from A Disney Movie

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both How fun Steve Mould YouTube video titles are and Points allowed by the Los Angeles Chargers, in the following situation: As the Chargers' defense struggles, it creates a shocking lack of entertainment for Steve Mould, sparking a need for him to amp up the fun in his video titles to compensate for the Bolt's inability to stop anyone. After all, when the Chargers can't hold their opponents, Steve has to make sure his audience is positively charged with excitement.. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In the scene, we see Steve Mould frowning as he watches the Chargers' defense struggle on TV. Nearby, we notice his computer screen with vibrant and playful YouTube video titles, such as "Exploding Watermelon Challenge" and "The Magic of Ferrofluid." The juxtaposition of the lackluster performance by the Chargers' defense and the exuberant video titles on Steve's screen highlights the need for him to ramp up the fun to compensate for the Chargers' struggles.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ An image that looks like it is a scene from A Disney Movie ] and depicting this scene: In the scene, we see Steve Mould frowning as he watches the Chargers' defense struggle on TV. Nearby, we notice his computer screen with vibrant and playful YouTube video titles, such as "Exploding Watermelon Challenge" and "The Magic of Ferrofluid." The juxtaposition of the lackluster performance by the Chargers' defense and the exuberant video titles on Steve's screen highlights the need for him to ramp up the fun to compensate for the Chargers' struggles. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Generate an image that looks like a still from a Disney movie. The scene features Steve Mould looking disheartened while watching the Chargers' defense struggle on TV. In the background, his computer screen displays vibrant and playful YouTube video titles such as "Exploding Watermelon Challenge" and "The Magic of Ferrofluid." The contrast between Steve's disappointment and the lively video titles on the screen highlights the need for him to bring more fun to compensate for the Chargers' struggles. Remember to keep the visual depiction simple, without any words or speech bubbles.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in How fun Steve Mould YouTube video titles are caused Points allowed by the Los Angeles Chargers to increase. Include one good pun.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.05)
Finding Fun in Football: Exploring the Correlation Between Steve Mould YouTube Video Titles and Points Allowed by the Los Angeles Chargers

The Journal of Sporty Statistics

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between How fun Steve Mould YouTube video titles are and Points allowed by the Los Angeles Chargers. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Make the title punny if you can come up with clever pun. If not, make it sound serious.

Your research team used data from AI analysis of YouTube video titles and Pro-Football-Reference.com to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.8177883 and p < 0.05 for 2017 to 2023.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
"Finding Fun in Football: Exploring the Correlation Between Steve Mould YouTube Video Titles and Points Allowed by the Los Angeles Chargers"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we sought to investigate the seemingly disparate realms of YouTube humor and professional football performance through the unexpected lens of correlation analysis. By leveraging AI analysis of Steve Mould YouTube video titles and data from Pro-Football-Reference.com, we explored the potential connections between the entertaining content of Steve Mould's videos and the defensive performance of the Los Angeles Chargers. Striking a whimsical chord with this unusual pairing, we examine the surprising relationship between fun video titles and football metrics.

Much like a well-timed dad joke, our findings revealed a remarkable correlation coefficient of 0.8177883 (p < 0.05) during the years 2017 to 2023. The data not only captivates the imagination but also prompts the question: could the playful allure of Steve Mould's video titles secretly influence the defensive strategies and outcomes of the Los Angeles Chargers?

As we navigate the unpredictable landscape of academic inquiry, this study demonstrates the potential for delight and discovery in unexpected connections. Our results offer a compelling blend of analytical rigor and lighthearted curiosity, reminding us that statistical analysis can be both enlightening and entertaining. Just like a successful dad joke, the correlation between fun video titles and defensive football performance is bound to leave an impression that lingers far beyond the research paper.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between How fun Steve Mould YouTube video titles are and Points allowed by the Los Angeles Chargers. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Finding Fun in Football: Exploring the Correlation Between Steve Mould YouTube Video Titles and Points Allowed by the Los Angeles Chargers"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we sought to investigate the seemingly disparate realms of YouTube humor and professional football performance through the unexpected lens of correlation analysis. By leveraging AI analysis of Steve Mould YouTube video titles and data from Pro-Football-Reference.com, we explored the potential connections between the entertaining content of Steve Mould's videos and the defensive performance of the Los Angeles Chargers. Striking a whimsical chord with this unusual pairing, we examine the surprising relationship between fun video titles and football metrics.

Much like a well-timed dad joke, our findings revealed a remarkable correlation coefficient of 0.8177883 (p < 0.05) during the years 2017 to 2023. The data not only captivates the imagination but also prompts the question: could the playful allure of Steve Mould's video titles secretly influence the defensive strategies and outcomes of the Los Angeles Chargers?

As we navigate the unpredictable landscape of academic inquiry, this study demonstrates the potential for delight and discovery in unexpected connections. Our results offer a compelling blend of analytical rigor and lighthearted curiosity, reminding us that statistical analysis can be both enlightening and entertaining. Just like a successful dad joke, the correlation between fun video titles and defensive football performance is bound to leave an impression that lingers far beyond the research paper.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

In the vast and often esoteric world of data analysis, there are occasional moments of levity and whimsy that bring an unexpected joy to the otherwise serious pursuit of understanding complex phenomena. It is in this spirit of scholarly mirth that we present our investigation into the correlation between Steve Mould YouTube video titles and the points allowed by the Los Angeles Chargers. Yes, you read that correctly - we delved into the world of YouTube entertainment and professional football, and the results are as surprising as a punchline at a statistical conference.

As we set out on this peculiar academic escapade, we couldn't help but ponder: "What do you call a group of chargers fans stuck in a lift? Claustrophobolts." This lighthearted inquiry into the potential relationship between the engaging titles of Steve Mould's videos and the defensive performance of an NFL team might seem like an exercise in pure frivolity, but as we sifted through the data, we discovered that statistical analysis, much like a dad joke, can yield unexpected insight and amusement.

Our investigation spanned the years 2017 to 2023, encompassing a range of Steve Mould's creative video titles and the defensive ups and downs of the Los Angeles Chargers. Like a playful twist in a movie plot, the correlation coefficient of 0.8177883 (p < 0.05) that emerged from our analysis left us both astonished and entertained. It was as though statistical significance and comedic whimsy had joined forces to create a partnership more unexpected than a penguin at a beach party.

Now, as we unpack the implications of this unlikely connection, we invite you to join us on this scholarly rollercoaster of laughter and football statistics. Strap yourself in and get ready for a ride that's as wild and unpredictable as a pun competition at a statistics convention.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between How fun Steve Mould YouTube video titles are and Points allowed by the Los Angeles Chargers. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then name a couple popular internet memes that are related to one of the topics.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Finding Fun in Football: Exploring the Correlation Between Steve Mould YouTube Video Titles and Points Allowed by the Los Angeles Chargers"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we sought to investigate the seemingly disparate realms of YouTube humor and professional football performance through the unexpected lens of correlation analysis. By leveraging AI analysis of Steve Mould YouTube video titles and data from Pro-Football-Reference.com, we explored the potential connections between the entertaining content of Steve Mould's videos and the defensive performance of the Los Angeles Chargers. Striking a whimsical chord with this unusual pairing, we examine the surprising relationship between fun video titles and football metrics.

Much like a well-timed dad joke, our findings revealed a remarkable correlation coefficient of 0.8177883 (p < 0.05) during the years 2017 to 2023. The data not only captivates the imagination but also prompts the question: could the playful allure of Steve Mould's video titles secretly influence the defensive strategies and outcomes of the Los Angeles Chargers?

As we navigate the unpredictable landscape of academic inquiry, this study demonstrates the potential for delight and discovery in unexpected connections. Our results offer a compelling blend of analytical rigor and lighthearted curiosity, reminding us that statistical analysis can be both enlightening and entertaining. Just like a successful dad joke, the correlation between fun video titles and defensive football performance is bound to leave an impression that lingers far beyond the research paper.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
In the vast and often esoteric world of data analysis, there are occasional moments of levity and whimsy that bring an unexpected joy to the otherwise serious pursuit of understanding complex phenomena. It is in this spirit of scholarly mirth that we present our investigation into the correlation between Steve Mould YouTube video titles and the points allowed by the Los Angeles Chargers. Yes, you read that correctly - we delved into the world of YouTube entertainment and professional football, and the results are as surprising as a punchline at a statistical conference.
As we set out on this peculiar academic escapade, we couldn't help but ponder: "What do you call a group of chargers fans stuck in a lift? Claustrophobolts." This lighthearted inquiry into the potential relationship between the engaging titles of Steve Mould's videos and the defensive performance of an NFL team might seem like an exercise in pure frivolity, but as we sifted through the data, we discovered that statistical analysis, much like a dad joke, can yield unexpected insight and amusement.
Our investigation spanned the years 2017 to 2023, encompassing a range of Steve Mould's creative video titles and the defensive ups and downs of the Los Angeles Chargers. Like a playful twist in a movie plot, the correlation coefficient of 0.8177883 (p < 0.05) that emerged from our analysis left us both astonished and entertained. It was as though statistical significance and comedic whimsy had joined forces to create a partnership more unexpected than a penguin at a beach party.
Now, as we unpack the implications of this unlikely connection, we invite you to join us on this scholarly rollercoaster of laughter and football statistics. Strap yourself in and get ready for a ride that's as wild and unpredictable as a pun competition at a statistics convention.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

Smith et al. (2018) offer a comprehensive analysis of humor and its psychological effects in their study "The Science of Laughter." The authors find that humor can significantly impact mood and cognitive processes, shedding light on the potential influence of comedic content on cognitive performance. In a similar vein, Doe and Jones (2020) delve into the neurological underpinnings of amusement in "The Laughing Brain," emphasizing the interconnectedness of humor and brain function.

In the realm of popular internet humor, "The Evolution and Impact of Internet Memes" by Brown (2019) provides an insightful examination of the cultural significance of internet memes. This exploration of meme culture serves as a reminder that humor can permeate various spheres of human experience, much like a good dad joke at a formal dinner party.

Turning to the world of fiction, the whimsical and enigmatic nature of "Alice's Adventures in Wonderland" by Lewis Carroll lends itself to contemplation of the unexpected connections we encounter in our pursuit of understanding. Similarly, the imaginative landscapes and serendipitous encounters in "The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy" by Douglas Adams invite readers to embrace the delight of unexpected revelations, much like the surprising correlation between Steve Mould's video titles and the performance of the Los Angeles Chargers.

On a practical note, the statistical analysis conducted by our esteemed colleagues at Pro-Football-Reference.com offers a wealth of data on the defensive performance of NFL teams. This valuable resource not only provides insight into football metrics but also serves as a reminder that data analysis can be as intriguing as a well-crafted punchline.

With the stage set for our empirical exploration of the correlation between fun video titles and defensive football performance, we embark on a journey that promises to be as engaging as a stand-up comedy show and as unpredictable as a football game in overtime. Just like a clever dad joke, the intertwining of statistical analysis and humorous content yields unforeseen revelations that beckon us to ponder anew the delightful intersections of entertainment and professional sports.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between How fun Steve Mould YouTube video titles are and Points allowed by the Los Angeles Chargers. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from AI analysis of YouTube video titles and Pro-Football-Reference.com . You used data from 2017 to 2023

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Finding Fun in Football: Exploring the Correlation Between Steve Mould YouTube Video Titles and Points Allowed by the Los Angeles Chargers"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we sought to investigate the seemingly disparate realms of YouTube humor and professional football performance through the unexpected lens of correlation analysis. By leveraging AI analysis of Steve Mould YouTube video titles and data from Pro-Football-Reference.com, we explored the potential connections between the entertaining content of Steve Mould's videos and the defensive performance of the Los Angeles Chargers. Striking a whimsical chord with this unusual pairing, we examine the surprising relationship between fun video titles and football metrics.

Much like a well-timed dad joke, our findings revealed a remarkable correlation coefficient of 0.8177883 (p < 0.05) during the years 2017 to 2023. The data not only captivates the imagination but also prompts the question: could the playful allure of Steve Mould's video titles secretly influence the defensive strategies and outcomes of the Los Angeles Chargers?

As we navigate the unpredictable landscape of academic inquiry, this study demonstrates the potential for delight and discovery in unexpected connections. Our results offer a compelling blend of analytical rigor and lighthearted curiosity, reminding us that statistical analysis can be both enlightening and entertaining. Just like a successful dad joke, the correlation between fun video titles and defensive football performance is bound to leave an impression that lingers far beyond the research paper.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
In the vast and often esoteric world of data analysis, there are occasional moments of levity and whimsy that bring an unexpected joy to the otherwise serious pursuit of understanding complex phenomena. It is in this spirit of scholarly mirth that we present our investigation into the correlation between Steve Mould YouTube video titles and the points allowed by the Los Angeles Chargers. Yes, you read that correctly - we delved into the world of YouTube entertainment and professional football, and the results are as surprising as a punchline at a statistical conference.
As we set out on this peculiar academic escapade, we couldn't help but ponder: "What do you call a group of chargers fans stuck in a lift? Claustrophobolts." This lighthearted inquiry into the potential relationship between the engaging titles of Steve Mould's videos and the defensive performance of an NFL team might seem like an exercise in pure frivolity, but as we sifted through the data, we discovered that statistical analysis, much like a dad joke, can yield unexpected insight and amusement.
Our investigation spanned the years 2017 to 2023, encompassing a range of Steve Mould's creative video titles and the defensive ups and downs of the Los Angeles Chargers. Like a playful twist in a movie plot, the correlation coefficient of 0.8177883 (p < 0.05) that emerged from our analysis left us both astonished and entertained. It was as though statistical significance and comedic whimsy had joined forces to create a partnership more unexpected than a penguin at a beach party.
Now, as we unpack the implications of this unlikely connection, we invite you to join us on this scholarly rollercoaster of laughter and football statistics. Strap yourself in and get ready for a ride that's as wild and unpredictable as a pun competition at a statistics convention.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To conduct this lighthearted yet rigorous investigation, we implemented a multifaceted approach that combined the precision of statistical analysis with the effervescent charm of online content. First, we utilized state-of-the-art AI algorithms to scrutinize the intricacies of Steve Mould's YouTube video titles. These algorithms were carefully trained to quantify parameters such as pun density, whimsy level, and chuckle potential. It's safe to say that our AI counterparts really "excel-ed" at identifying the mirth-inducing qualities of the video titles.

Next, we turned our attention to the NFL realm, tapping into the treasure trove of defensive data from Pro-Football-Reference.com. We meticulously sifted through the points allowed by the Los Angeles Chargers, examining defensive performances with the same level of scrutiny one might use to analyze the delivery of a well-crafted dad joke – they're either a touchdown or a total fumble.

In a comically convoluted endeavor akin to a slapstick routine, we reconciled these seemingly disparate datasets, weaving a narrative that translated the whimsical nature of Steve Mould's video titles into statistical variables. It was like interpreting the punchline of a particularly elusive joke, but with numbers instead of syllables.

Taking a cue from the harmonious convergence of a sitcom episode's plotlines, we employed correlation analysis to discern any potential relationships between the playfulness of Steve Mould's video titles and the defensive performance of the Los Angeles Chargers. The statistical calculations were as intricate as the setup of a well-crafted dad joke – after all, we wanted to be thorough, not half-baked.

Throughout the process, we maintained the spirit of inquiry, humor, and intellectual gusto, embracing the unexpected similarities between whimsical YouTube content and professional football statistics with the enthusiasm of a researcher discovering a hidden pun in a data set.



Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between How fun Steve Mould YouTube video titles are and Points allowed by the Los Angeles Chargers. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from AI analysis of YouTube video titles and Pro-Football-Reference.com .

For the time period 2017 to 2023, you found a correlation 0.8177883, r-squared of 0.6687777, and p < 0.05.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Finding Fun in Football: Exploring the Correlation Between Steve Mould YouTube Video Titles and Points Allowed by the Los Angeles Chargers"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we sought to investigate the seemingly disparate realms of YouTube humor and professional football performance through the unexpected lens of correlation analysis. By leveraging AI analysis of Steve Mould YouTube video titles and data from Pro-Football-Reference.com, we explored the potential connections between the entertaining content of Steve Mould's videos and the defensive performance of the Los Angeles Chargers. Striking a whimsical chord with this unusual pairing, we examine the surprising relationship between fun video titles and football metrics.

Much like a well-timed dad joke, our findings revealed a remarkable correlation coefficient of 0.8177883 (p < 0.05) during the years 2017 to 2023. The data not only captivates the imagination but also prompts the question: could the playful allure of Steve Mould's video titles secretly influence the defensive strategies and outcomes of the Los Angeles Chargers?

As we navigate the unpredictable landscape of academic inquiry, this study demonstrates the potential for delight and discovery in unexpected connections. Our results offer a compelling blend of analytical rigor and lighthearted curiosity, reminding us that statistical analysis can be both enlightening and entertaining. Just like a successful dad joke, the correlation between fun video titles and defensive football performance is bound to leave an impression that lingers far beyond the research paper.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
In the vast and often esoteric world of data analysis, there are occasional moments of levity and whimsy that bring an unexpected joy to the otherwise serious pursuit of understanding complex phenomena. It is in this spirit of scholarly mirth that we present our investigation into the correlation between Steve Mould YouTube video titles and the points allowed by the Los Angeles Chargers. Yes, you read that correctly - we delved into the world of YouTube entertainment and professional football, and the results are as surprising as a punchline at a statistical conference.
As we set out on this peculiar academic escapade, we couldn't help but ponder: "What do you call a group of chargers fans stuck in a lift? Claustrophobolts." This lighthearted inquiry into the potential relationship between the engaging titles of Steve Mould's videos and the defensive performance of an NFL team might seem like an exercise in pure frivolity, but as we sifted through the data, we discovered that statistical analysis, much like a dad joke, can yield unexpected insight and amusement.
Our investigation spanned the years 2017 to 2023, encompassing a range of Steve Mould's creative video titles and the defensive ups and downs of the Los Angeles Chargers. Like a playful twist in a movie plot, the correlation coefficient of 0.8177883 (p < 0.05) that emerged from our analysis left us both astonished and entertained. It was as though statistical significance and comedic whimsy had joined forces to create a partnership more unexpected than a penguin at a beach party.
Now, as we unpack the implications of this unlikely connection, we invite you to join us on this scholarly rollercoaster of laughter and football statistics. Strap yourself in and get ready for a ride that's as wild and unpredictable as a pun competition at a statistics convention.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The correlation analysis conducted between the captivating YouTube video titles of Steve Mould and the defensive performances of the Los Angeles Chargers yielded a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8177883 (p < 0.05) during the years 2017 to 2023. This correlation, much like corny dad jokes, was undeniably strong and left us chuckling at the unexpected connection we uncovered.

The scatterplot (Fig. 1) vividly illustrates the robust positive relationship between the two variables, much like a perfectly timed joke enhances a conversation. It's clear that the fun and excitement evoked by Steve Mould's video titles are curiously intertwined with the defensive prowess (or lack thereof) displayed by the Chargers. You could say these findings really "charged" up our interest in the intersection of comedy and football stats.

Now, one might wonder, "Why did the football team go to the bank? They wanted to get their quarterback!" This amusing revelation prompts us to consider the potential influence of engaging and enjoyable content on the performance of professional athletes. Could the whimsical allure of Steve Mould's YouTube titles subtly permeate the defensive strategies and on-field achievements of the Chargers? It certainly seems that the connection between merriment and touchdowns is stronger than we previously estimated.

In line with the spirit of good-natured inquiry and scholarly curiosity, these results serve as a lighthearted reminder that unexpected correlations can be as delightful as a well-crafted pun. This correlation coefficient, much like a clever dad joke, has left an indelible mark on our understanding of the intersection between amusement and athletic achievement.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between How fun Steve Mould YouTube video titles are and Points allowed by the Los Angeles Chargers. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
"Finding Fun in Football: Exploring the Correlation Between Steve Mould YouTube Video Titles and Points Allowed by the Los Angeles Chargers"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we sought to investigate the seemingly disparate realms of YouTube humor and professional football performance through the unexpected lens of correlation analysis. By leveraging AI analysis of Steve Mould YouTube video titles and data from Pro-Football-Reference.com, we explored the potential connections between the entertaining content of Steve Mould's videos and the defensive performance of the Los Angeles Chargers. Striking a whimsical chord with this unusual pairing, we examine the surprising relationship between fun video titles and football metrics.

Much like a well-timed dad joke, our findings revealed a remarkable correlation coefficient of 0.8177883 (p < 0.05) during the years 2017 to 2023. The data not only captivates the imagination but also prompts the question: could the playful allure of Steve Mould's video titles secretly influence the defensive strategies and outcomes of the Los Angeles Chargers?

As we navigate the unpredictable landscape of academic inquiry, this study demonstrates the potential for delight and discovery in unexpected connections. Our results offer a compelling blend of analytical rigor and lighthearted curiosity, reminding us that statistical analysis can be both enlightening and entertaining. Just like a successful dad joke, the correlation between fun video titles and defensive football performance is bound to leave an impression that lingers far beyond the research paper.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
Smith et al. (2018) offer a comprehensive analysis of humor and its psychological effects in their study "The Science of Laughter." The authors find that humor can significantly impact mood and cognitive processes, shedding light on the potential influence of comedic content on cognitive performance. In a similar vein, Doe and Jones (2020) delve into the neurological underpinnings of amusement in "The Laughing Brain," emphasizing the interconnectedness of humor and brain function.
In the realm of popular internet humor, "The Evolution and Impact of Internet Memes" by Brown (2019) provides an insightful examination of the cultural significance of internet memes. This exploration of meme culture serves as a reminder that humor can permeate various spheres of human experience, much like a good dad joke at a formal dinner party.
Turning to the world of fiction, the whimsical and enigmatic nature of "Alice's Adventures in Wonderland" by Lewis Carroll lends itself to contemplation of the unexpected connections we encounter in our pursuit of understanding. Similarly, the imaginative landscapes and serendipitous encounters in "The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy" by Douglas Adams invite readers to embrace the delight of unexpected revelations, much like the surprising correlation between Steve Mould's video titles and the performance of the Los Angeles Chargers.
On a practical note, the statistical analysis conducted by our esteemed colleagues at Pro-Football-Reference.com offers a wealth of data on the defensive performance of NFL teams. This valuable resource not only provides insight into football metrics but also serves as a reminder that data analysis can be as intriguing as a well-crafted punchline.
With the stage set for our empirical exploration of the correlation between fun video titles and defensive football performance, we embark on a journey that promises to be as engaging as a stand-up comedy show and as unpredictable as a football game in overtime. Just like a clever dad joke, the intertwining of statistical analysis and humorous content yields unforeseen revelations that beckon us to ponder anew the delightful intersections of entertainment and professional sports.

[[RESULTS]]
The correlation analysis conducted between the captivating YouTube video titles of Steve Mould and the defensive performances of the Los Angeles Chargers yielded a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8177883 (p < 0.05) during the years 2017 to 2023. This correlation, much like corny dad jokes, was undeniably strong and left us chuckling at the unexpected connection we uncovered.
The scatterplot (Fig. 1) vividly illustrates the robust positive relationship between the two variables, much like a perfectly timed joke enhances a conversation. It's clear that the fun and excitement evoked by Steve Mould's video titles are curiously intertwined with the defensive prowess (or lack thereof) displayed by the Chargers. You could say these findings really "charged" up our interest in the intersection of comedy and football stats.
Now, one might wonder, "Why did the football team go to the bank? They wanted to get their quarterback!" This amusing revelation prompts us to consider the potential influence of engaging and enjoyable content on the performance of professional athletes. Could the whimsical allure of Steve Mould's YouTube titles subtly permeate the defensive strategies and on-field achievements of the Chargers? It certainly seems that the connection between merriment and touchdowns is stronger than we previously estimated.
In line with the spirit of good-natured inquiry and scholarly curiosity, these results serve as a lighthearted reminder that unexpected correlations can be as delightful as a well-crafted pun. This correlation coefficient, much like a clever dad joke, has left an indelible mark on our understanding of the intersection between amusement and athletic achievement.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

Our study has not only drawn attention to the unexpected correlation between the captivating YouTube video titles of Steve Mould and the defensive performances of the Los Angeles Chargers, but it has also highlighted the potential influence of engaging and enjoyable content on professional sports outcomes. The remarkable correlation coefficient of 0.8177883 (p < 0.05) during the years 2017 to 2023, much like a classic dad joke, has left us pleasantly surprised and pondering the intriguing connections between humor and athletic achievement.

Building upon the existing literature, our results lend empirical support to the notion that humor and cognitive processes are intertwined, echoing the findings of Smith et al. (2018). It seems that the playful allure of Steve Mould's video titles may indeed have subtle yet tangible effects on the defensive strategies and performances of the Chargers, much like a witty retort can shape the direction of a conversation. As we suspected, the connection between amusement and NFL metrics runs deeper than previously discerned, much like a dad joke that keeps resurfacing in familial gatherings.

Furthermore, our findings mirror the insights of Doe and Jones (2020) regarding the neurological underpinnings of amusement, suggesting that humor may have a more pervasive influence on cognitive and behavioral dynamics than anticipated. It appears that the whimsical appeal of Steve Mould's video titles can elicit a tangible impact on the field, much like a good dad joke that lingers in the mind long after it's been told.

In a delightful turn of events, our empirical exploration bolsters the unconventional goings-on in internet culture illustrated by Brown's (2019) study on the impact of internet memes. Just as the cultural significance of memes permeates various aspects of human experience, our findings hint at the unexpected intersections of online entertainment and professional sports. The association between fun video titles and defensive football performance emerges as a humorous twist in the realm of sports analytics, akin to the comical anecdotes shared at a lighthearted family gathering.

With our study, we've aptly demonstrated the potential for light-hearted inquiry to intersect with rigorous statistical analysis much like a well-orchestrated dad joke; illuminating the unexpected and reminding us of the delightful confluence of entertainment and professional sports. As we continue to unravel these whimsical connections, it's becoming increasingly apparent that the line between humor and athletic performance may be more blurred than we initially thought, much like a dad joke that gracefully straddles the line between jovial and groan-inducing.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between How fun Steve Mould YouTube video titles are and Points allowed by the Los Angeles Chargers. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
"Finding Fun in Football: Exploring the Correlation Between Steve Mould YouTube Video Titles and Points Allowed by the Los Angeles Chargers"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we sought to investigate the seemingly disparate realms of YouTube humor and professional football performance through the unexpected lens of correlation analysis. By leveraging AI analysis of Steve Mould YouTube video titles and data from Pro-Football-Reference.com, we explored the potential connections between the entertaining content of Steve Mould's videos and the defensive performance of the Los Angeles Chargers. Striking a whimsical chord with this unusual pairing, we examine the surprising relationship between fun video titles and football metrics.

Much like a well-timed dad joke, our findings revealed a remarkable correlation coefficient of 0.8177883 (p < 0.05) during the years 2017 to 2023. The data not only captivates the imagination but also prompts the question: could the playful allure of Steve Mould's video titles secretly influence the defensive strategies and outcomes of the Los Angeles Chargers?

As we navigate the unpredictable landscape of academic inquiry, this study demonstrates the potential for delight and discovery in unexpected connections. Our results offer a compelling blend of analytical rigor and lighthearted curiosity, reminding us that statistical analysis can be both enlightening and entertaining. Just like a successful dad joke, the correlation between fun video titles and defensive football performance is bound to leave an impression that lingers far beyond the research paper.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
In the vast and often esoteric world of data analysis, there are occasional moments of levity and whimsy that bring an unexpected joy to the otherwise serious pursuit of understanding complex phenomena. It is in this spirit of scholarly mirth that we present our investigation into the correlation between Steve Mould YouTube video titles and the points allowed by the Los Angeles Chargers. Yes, you read that correctly - we delved into the world of YouTube entertainment and professional football, and the results are as surprising as a punchline at a statistical conference.
As we set out on this peculiar academic escapade, we couldn't help but ponder: "What do you call a group of chargers fans stuck in a lift? Claustrophobolts." This lighthearted inquiry into the potential relationship between the engaging titles of Steve Mould's videos and the defensive performance of an NFL team might seem like an exercise in pure frivolity, but as we sifted through the data, we discovered that statistical analysis, much like a dad joke, can yield unexpected insight and amusement.
Our investigation spanned the years 2017 to 2023, encompassing a range of Steve Mould's creative video titles and the defensive ups and downs of the Los Angeles Chargers. Like a playful twist in a movie plot, the correlation coefficient of 0.8177883 (p < 0.05) that emerged from our analysis left us both astonished and entertained. It was as though statistical significance and comedic whimsy had joined forces to create a partnership more unexpected than a penguin at a beach party.
Now, as we unpack the implications of this unlikely connection, we invite you to join us on this scholarly rollercoaster of laughter and football statistics. Strap yourself in and get ready for a ride that's as wild and unpredictable as a pun competition at a statistics convention.

[[RESULTS]]
The correlation analysis conducted between the captivating YouTube video titles of Steve Mould and the defensive performances of the Los Angeles Chargers yielded a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8177883 (p < 0.05) during the years 2017 to 2023. This correlation, much like corny dad jokes, was undeniably strong and left us chuckling at the unexpected connection we uncovered.
The scatterplot (Fig. 1) vividly illustrates the robust positive relationship between the two variables, much like a perfectly timed joke enhances a conversation. It's clear that the fun and excitement evoked by Steve Mould's video titles are curiously intertwined with the defensive prowess (or lack thereof) displayed by the Chargers. You could say these findings really "charged" up our interest in the intersection of comedy and football stats.
Now, one might wonder, "Why did the football team go to the bank? They wanted to get their quarterback!" This amusing revelation prompts us to consider the potential influence of engaging and enjoyable content on the performance of professional athletes. Could the whimsical allure of Steve Mould's YouTube titles subtly permeate the defensive strategies and on-field achievements of the Chargers? It certainly seems that the connection between merriment and touchdowns is stronger than we previously estimated.
In line with the spirit of good-natured inquiry and scholarly curiosity, these results serve as a lighthearted reminder that unexpected correlations can be as delightful as a well-crafted pun. This correlation coefficient, much like a clever dad joke, has left an indelible mark on our understanding of the intersection between amusement and athletic achievement.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, this study has uncovered an unexpected and remarkably strong correlation between the entertaining titles of Steve Mould's YouTube videos and the defensive performance of the Los Angeles Chargers, much like how a good dad joke unexpectedly pulls the whole room together. The correlation coefficient of 0.8177883 (p < 0.05) during the years 2017 to 2023 has left us as astonished and amused as a mathematician in a comedy club.

Much like a well-timed dad joke can lighten the mood, our findings lightheartedly suggest that there may be an intriguing link between the playful allure of Steve Mould's video titles and the defensive strategies and outcomes of the Chargers. It seems that amidst the tough and grueling world of professional football, there may be room for a good laugh, much like how a pun can punctuate a serious conversation.

As we reflect on our research, we can't help but think, "Why couldn't the bicycle stand up by itself? It was two-tired!" Just as a goofy pun can bring a smile to our faces, this study has reminded us of the potential for delight and discovery in unexpected connections, whether in statistical analysis or in the playbooks of NFL teams.

Therefore, in the spirit of data-driven dad jokes and scholarly amusement, we assert that no further research is needed in this area. Our results stand as a testament to the whimsical and unanticipated intersections of humor and football performance. Just like a good dad joke, this correlation is a delightful surprise that we're happy to leave hanging in the air.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Finding Fun in Football: Exploring the Correlation Between Steve Mould YouTube Video Titles and Points Allowed by the Los Angeles Chargers. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Sporty Statistics


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Finding Fun in Football: Exploring the Correlation Between Steve Mould YouTube Video Titles and Points Allowed by the Los Angeles Chargers. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Society for Sports and Silly Studies


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Finding Fun in Football: Exploring the Correlation Between Steve Mould YouTube Video Titles and Points Allowed by the Los Angeles Chargers with an abstract of In this study, we sought to investigate the seemingly disparate realms of YouTube humor and professional football performance through the unexpected lens of correlation analysis. By leveraging AI analysis of Steve Mould YouTube video titles and data from Pro-Football-Reference.com, we explored the potential connections between the entertaining content of Steve Mould's videos and the defensive performance of the Los Angeles Chargers. Striking a whimsical chord with this unusual pairing, we examine the surprising relationship between fun video titles and football metrics.
Much like a well-timed dad joke, our findings revealed a remarkable correlation coefficient of 0.8177883 (p < 0.05) during the years 2017 to 2023. The data not only captivates the imagination but also prompts the question: could the playful allure of Steve Mould's video titles secretly influence the defensive strategies and outcomes of the Los Angeles Chargers?
As we navigate the unpredictable landscape of academic inquiry, this study demonstrates the potential for delight and discovery in unexpected connections. Our results offer a compelling blend of analytical rigor and lighthearted curiosity, reminding us that statistical analysis can be both enlightening and entertaining. Just like a successful dad joke, the correlation between fun video titles and defensive football performance is bound to leave an impression that lingers far beyond the research paper.

ChatGPT:

Steve Mould, YouTube video titles, Los Angeles Chargers, correlation analysis, professional football performance, AI analysis, Pro-Football-Reference.com, defensive performance, correlation coefficient, whimsical, football metrics, dad joke, statistical analysis, analytical rigor, lighthearted curiosity, delight and discovery, unexpected connections.

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

How fun Steve Mould's YouTube video titles are
Detailed data title: How fun Steve Mould YouTube video titles are, as rated by an AI.
Source: AI analysis of YouTube video titles
Additional Info: I asked a large language model, 'On a scale of 1-10, how _______ do you think this YouTube video title is?' for every video.

See what else correlates with How fun Steve Mould's YouTube video titles are

Points allowed by the Los Angeles Chargers
Detailed data title: Total points the Los Angeles Chargers allowed their opponents to score during the year
Source: Pro-Football-Reference.com
See what else correlates with Points allowed by the Los Angeles Chargers

Correlation r = 0.8177883 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.6687777 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 66.9% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Points allowed by the Los Angeles Chargers) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., How fun Steve Mould's YouTube video titles are) over the 7 years from 2017 through 2023.

p < 0.05, which statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 0.025. 0.0246109884308745660000000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.82 in 2.5% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 41 random variables Which I absolutely did.
with the same 6 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 6 because we have two variables measured over a period of 7 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.17, 0.97 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
2017201820192020202120222023
How fun Steve Mould's YouTube video titles are (Fun score (out of 10))5.755.86676.18186.52946.56.456.5
Points allowed by the Los Angeles Chargers (Chargers points)272329345426459384345




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Very low n: There are not many data points included in this analysis. Even if the p-value is high, we should be suspicious of using so few datapoints in a correlation.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([5.75,5.8667,6.1818,6.5294,6.5,6.45,6.5,])
array_2 = np.array([272,329,345,426,459,384,345,])
array_1_name = "How fun Steve Mould's YouTube video titles are"
array_2_name = "Points allowed by the Los Angeles Chargers"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Your rating is much appreciated!


Correlation ID: 4773 · Black Variable ID: 25536 · Red Variable ID: 19724
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0