about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #4,764 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Yogurt consumption and the second variable is Votes for the Democratic Presidential candidate in Washington, D.C..  The chart goes from 1990 to 2020, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

The active cultures in yogurt led to a more liberal gut microbiome, which in turn influenced political leanings towards the Democratic candidate. Additionally, the smooth and creamy texture of yogurt may have subconsciously swayed residents towards a more harmonious and inclusive political platform.

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Generate an image where in a vibrant café in Washington, D.C., patrons are immersed in conversations about voting for the Democratic presidential candidate. The café is filled with people enjoying cups of yogurt, each with a different flavor and topping. As they savor their snacks, the subtle influence of the active cultures on their gut microbiome nudges their political leanings. The scene captures a jovial and inclusive atmosphere, with patrons engaged in lively discussions while indulging in the creamy goodness of their yogurt cups. The image should reflect the welcoming and inclusive vibe that mirrors the platform of the candidate being supported, all in a humorous and light-hearted manner. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Yogurt consumption and Votes for the Democrat Presidential candidate in Washington, D.C.. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Data cyber art Voxel art a funny image you would see on reddit Futuristic Glitch art
ChatGPT: a funny image you would see on reddit

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Yogurt consumption and Votes for the Democrat Presidential candidate in Washington, D.C., in the following situation: The active cultures in yogurt led to a more liberal gut microbiome, which in turn influenced political leanings towards the Democratic candidate. Additionally, the smooth and creamy texture of yogurt may have subconsciously swayed residents towards a more harmonious and inclusive political platform.. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In a bustling café in Washington, D.C., people are enjoying cups of yogurt while engaging in passionate discussions about voting for the Democratic presidential candidate. The smooth and creamy yogurt is being savored by patrons, and as they enjoy their snacks, the active cultures are influencing their gut microbiome, subtly nudging their political leanings towards the Democratic candidate. The lively atmosphere is filled with the sounds of enthusiastic chatter and the clinking of spoons against yogurt cups, creating a welcoming and inclusive vibe that mirrors the inclusive platform of the candidate being supported.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ a funny image you would see on reddit ] and depicting this scene: In a bustling café in Washington, D.C., people are enjoying cups of yogurt while engaging in passionate discussions about voting for the Democratic presidential candidate. The smooth and creamy yogurt is being savored by patrons, and as they enjoy their snacks, the active cultures are influencing their gut microbiome, subtly nudging their political leanings towards the Democratic candidate. The lively atmosphere is filled with the sounds of enthusiastic chatter and the clinking of spoons against yogurt cups, creating a welcoming and inclusive vibe that mirrors the inclusive platform of the candidate being supported. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Generate an image where in a vibrant café in Washington, D.C., patrons are immersed in conversations about voting for the Democratic presidential candidate. The café is filled with people enjoying cups of yogurt, each with a different flavor and topping. As they savor their snacks, the subtle influence of the active cultures on their gut microbiome nudges their political leanings. The scene captures a jovial and inclusive atmosphere, with patrons engaged in lively discussions while indulging in the creamy goodness of their yogurt cups. The image should reflect the welcoming and inclusive vibe that mirrors the platform of the candidate being supported, all in a humorous and light-hearted manner.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in Yogurt consumption caused Votes for the Democrat Presidential candidate in Washington, D.C. to increase.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
The Yummy Yogurt Yield: Yoking Yogurt Consumption to Yardstick Yeas for the Democrat Presidential candidate in Washington, D.C.

The Journal of Gastronomic Politics

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Yogurt consumption and Votes for the Democrat Presidential candidate in Washington, D.C.. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Make the title an alliteration.

Your research team used data from USDA and MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9300565 and p < 0.01 for 1990 to 2020.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
The Yummy Yogurt Yield: Yoking Yogurt Consumption to Yardstick Yeas for the Democrat Presidential candidate in Washington, D.C.

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the delectable domain of delicious dairy delicacies and their intriguing intersection with political preferences. By tapping into the rich reservoir of data from the USDA and MIT Election Data and Science Lab, as well as the Harvard Dataverse, we sought to uncover the culinary connections that may influence voting behavior. Our findings reveal a striking correlation with a coefficient of 0.9300565 and p < 0.01 over the period spanning 1990 to 2020, demonstrating a curious confluence between yogurt consumption and support for the Democrat presidential nominee in the nation's capital. This yogurt-yielding yield provides food for thought for political pundits and dairy devotees alike, highlighting the need for further investigation into the nuanced nexus between dietary choices and democratic decisions.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Yogurt consumption and Votes for the Democrat Presidential candidate in Washington, D.C.. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Yummy Yogurt Yield: Yoking Yogurt Consumption to Yardstick Yeas for the Democrat Presidential candidate in Washington, D.C.

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the delectable domain of delicious dairy delicacies and their intriguing intersection with political preferences. By tapping into the rich reservoir of data from the USDA and MIT Election Data and Science Lab, as well as the Harvard Dataverse, we sought to uncover the culinary connections that may influence voting behavior. Our findings reveal a striking correlation with a coefficient of 0.9300565 and p < 0.01 over the period spanning 1990 to 2020, demonstrating a curious confluence between yogurt consumption and support for the Democrat presidential nominee in the nation's capital. This yogurt-yielding yield provides food for thought for political pundits and dairy devotees alike, highlighting the need for further investigation into the nuanced nexus between dietary choices and democratic decisions.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
Introduction

The intersection of gastronomy and governance has long been a subject of intrigue and speculation. From the culinary delights enjoyed by world leaders to the impact of food policies on public health, the relationship between food and politics is multifaceted and worthy of further exploration. In this study, we delve into the delectable domain of delicious dairy delicacies and their potential influence on political preferences, with a specific focus on the connection between yogurt consumption and votes for the Democrat presidential candidate in Washington, D.C.

It is no secret that yogurt has cultivated a cult-like following among health enthusiasts and dairy devotees alike. Its creamy texture, tangy flavor, and purported probiotic properties have made it a staple in many a refrigerator, culinarily speaking, of course. But could the consumption of this dairy delight also have an impact on political leanings? Is there a yogurty yearning for candidates of a certain persuasion, or is it merely a case of statistical serendipity?

To address these pressing questions, we turn to the rich reservoir of data provided by the USDA and MIT Election Data and Science Lab, as well as the Harvard Dataverse. By scrutinizing yogurt consumption trends and election results in the capital city over the past three decades, we seek to uncover any potential correlations or curiosities that may shed light on the nexus between dietary choices and democratic decisions.

The findings of this study reveal a striking correlation with a coefficient of 0.9300565 and p < 0.01 over the period spanning 1990 to 2020, demonstrating a curious confluence between yogurt consumption and support for the Democrat presidential nominee in Washington, D.C. The implications of this yogurt-yielding yield extend far beyond the realm of dairy dilettantes, prompting contemplation on the complex interplay between personal dietary preferences and political allegiances.

In the pages that follow, we embark on an odyssey through the realms of dairy data and democratic discourse, aiming to unravel the enigmatic relationship between yogurt consumption and votes for the Democrat presidential candidate in the nation's capital. The findings of this study are sure to churn the scholarly pot and generate food for thought for political pundits and dairy enthusiasts alike. So grab a spoon, and let us partake in this creamy confluence of gastronomical and political inquiry.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Yogurt consumption and Votes for the Democrat Presidential candidate in Washington, D.C.. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then devolve ever further, and mention something completely ridiculous, like you conducted literature review by reading the backs of shampoo bottles.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Yummy Yogurt Yield: Yoking Yogurt Consumption to Yardstick Yeas for the Democrat Presidential candidate in Washington, D.C.

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the delectable domain of delicious dairy delicacies and their intriguing intersection with political preferences. By tapping into the rich reservoir of data from the USDA and MIT Election Data and Science Lab, as well as the Harvard Dataverse, we sought to uncover the culinary connections that may influence voting behavior. Our findings reveal a striking correlation with a coefficient of 0.9300565 and p < 0.01 over the period spanning 1990 to 2020, demonstrating a curious confluence between yogurt consumption and support for the Democrat presidential nominee in the nation's capital. This yogurt-yielding yield provides food for thought for political pundits and dairy devotees alike, highlighting the need for further investigation into the nuanced nexus between dietary choices and democratic decisions.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
Introduction
The intersection of gastronomy and governance has long been a subject of intrigue and speculation. From the culinary delights enjoyed by world leaders to the impact of food policies on public health, the relationship between food and politics is multifaceted and worthy of further exploration. In this study, we delve into the delectable domain of delicious dairy delicacies and their potential influence on political preferences, with a specific focus on the connection between yogurt consumption and votes for the Democrat presidential candidate in Washington, D.C.
It is no secret that yogurt has cultivated a cult-like following among health enthusiasts and dairy devotees alike. Its creamy texture, tangy flavor, and purported probiotic properties have made it a staple in many a refrigerator, culinarily speaking, of course. But could the consumption of this dairy delight also have an impact on political leanings? Is there a yogurty yearning for candidates of a certain persuasion, or is it merely a case of statistical serendipity?
To address these pressing questions, we turn to the rich reservoir of data provided by the USDA and MIT Election Data and Science Lab, as well as the Harvard Dataverse. By scrutinizing yogurt consumption trends and election results in the capital city over the past three decades, we seek to uncover any potential correlations or curiosities that may shed light on the nexus between dietary choices and democratic decisions.
The findings of this study reveal a striking correlation with a coefficient of 0.9300565 and p < 0.01 over the period spanning 1990 to 2020, demonstrating a curious confluence between yogurt consumption and support for the Democrat presidential nominee in Washington, D.C. The implications of this yogurt-yielding yield extend far beyond the realm of dairy dilettantes, prompting contemplation on the complex interplay between personal dietary preferences and political allegiances.
In the pages that follow, we embark on an odyssey through the realms of dairy data and democratic discourse, aiming to unravel the enigmatic relationship between yogurt consumption and votes for the Democrat presidential candidate in the nation's capital. The findings of this study are sure to churn the scholarly pot and generate food for thought for political pundits and dairy enthusiasts alike. So grab a spoon, and let us partake in this creamy confluence of gastronomical and political inquiry.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

The investigation into the nexus between yogurt consumption and votes for the Democrat presidential candidate in Washington, D.C. has spurred a plethora of scholarly inquiries, which are as diverse and varied as the flavors of yogurt themselves.

Smith et al. (2015) conducted a rigorous analysis of dietary habits and political affiliations, uncovering a nominal correlation between dairy intake and liberal voting tendencies in urban areas. Similarly, Doe (2018) delved into the intriguing interplay between protein-rich snacks and partisan proclivities, shedding light on the subtle influences of dairy products on democratic decision-making. Moreover, Jones (2020) spotlighted the relationship between food preferences and presidential preferences, accentuating the role of yogurt as a potential predictor of political propensities.

Turning to related literature, "The Omnivore's Dilemma" by Michael Pollan provides a comprehensive examination of the modern food landscape, delving into the cultural, ethical, and political implications of dietary choices. Similarly, "Fast Food Nation" by Eric Schlosser offers a critical perspective on the impact of food production and consumption on society, shedding light on the broader ramifications of culinary decisions.

On a more whimsical note, fictional works such as "The Secret Life of Bees" by Sue Monk Kidd and "Like Water for Chocolate" by Laura Esquivel explore the rich tapestry of culinary traditions and their potential to shape human experiences. These literary forays into the gustatory realm offer a thought-provoking backdrop to the intersection of food and politics, albeit in a more fantastical context.

In addition to the scholarly and literary sources, the researchers embarked on a thorough examination of unconventional sources, including the backs of yogurt containers, which yielded limited but tantalizing insights into the enigmatic appeal of dairy products in the political sphere.

The multifaceted evidence gleaned from these diverse sources underscores the need for a nuanced and multidisciplinary approach to unraveling the complex relationship between yogurt consumption and political predilections.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Yogurt consumption and Votes for the Democrat Presidential candidate in Washington, D.C.. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from USDA and MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse . You used data from 1990 to 2020

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Yummy Yogurt Yield: Yoking Yogurt Consumption to Yardstick Yeas for the Democrat Presidential candidate in Washington, D.C.

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the delectable domain of delicious dairy delicacies and their intriguing intersection with political preferences. By tapping into the rich reservoir of data from the USDA and MIT Election Data and Science Lab, as well as the Harvard Dataverse, we sought to uncover the culinary connections that may influence voting behavior. Our findings reveal a striking correlation with a coefficient of 0.9300565 and p < 0.01 over the period spanning 1990 to 2020, demonstrating a curious confluence between yogurt consumption and support for the Democrat presidential nominee in the nation's capital. This yogurt-yielding yield provides food for thought for political pundits and dairy devotees alike, highlighting the need for further investigation into the nuanced nexus between dietary choices and democratic decisions.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
Introduction
The intersection of gastronomy and governance has long been a subject of intrigue and speculation. From the culinary delights enjoyed by world leaders to the impact of food policies on public health, the relationship between food and politics is multifaceted and worthy of further exploration. In this study, we delve into the delectable domain of delicious dairy delicacies and their potential influence on political preferences, with a specific focus on the connection between yogurt consumption and votes for the Democrat presidential candidate in Washington, D.C.
It is no secret that yogurt has cultivated a cult-like following among health enthusiasts and dairy devotees alike. Its creamy texture, tangy flavor, and purported probiotic properties have made it a staple in many a refrigerator, culinarily speaking, of course. But could the consumption of this dairy delight also have an impact on political leanings? Is there a yogurty yearning for candidates of a certain persuasion, or is it merely a case of statistical serendipity?
To address these pressing questions, we turn to the rich reservoir of data provided by the USDA and MIT Election Data and Science Lab, as well as the Harvard Dataverse. By scrutinizing yogurt consumption trends and election results in the capital city over the past three decades, we seek to uncover any potential correlations or curiosities that may shed light on the nexus between dietary choices and democratic decisions.
The findings of this study reveal a striking correlation with a coefficient of 0.9300565 and p < 0.01 over the period spanning 1990 to 2020, demonstrating a curious confluence between yogurt consumption and support for the Democrat presidential nominee in Washington, D.C. The implications of this yogurt-yielding yield extend far beyond the realm of dairy dilettantes, prompting contemplation on the complex interplay between personal dietary preferences and political allegiances.
In the pages that follow, we embark on an odyssey through the realms of dairy data and democratic discourse, aiming to unravel the enigmatic relationship between yogurt consumption and votes for the Democrat presidential candidate in the nation's capital. The findings of this study are sure to churn the scholarly pot and generate food for thought for political pundits and dairy enthusiasts alike. So grab a spoon, and let us partake in this creamy confluence of gastronomical and political inquiry.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To embark on our flavorful foray into the connection between yogurt consumption and votes for the Democrat presidential candidate in Washington, D.C., we employed a multi-faceted approach that blended data collection, statistical analysis, and a touch of culinary curiosity.

Data Collection:
Our research team, adorned with magnifying glasses and spoons, scoured the digital landscape in search of relevant data sources. We primarily relied on the USDA's extensive databases, which provided us with comprehensive information on yogurt production, consumption patterns, and flavor preferences. Additionally, we tapped into the MIT Election Data and Science Lab and the Harvard Dataverse to procure election results and voter demographic information. Admittedly, the allure of yogurt-flavored data was so strong that we occasionally found ourselves sidetracked by recipes for yogurt-based smoothies and frozen treats.

Statistical Analysis:
Armed with an arsenal of statistical tools and a healthy supply of yogurt snacks, we set out to analyze the collected data. To establish the association between yogurt consumption and votes for the Democrat presidential candidate in Washington, D.C., we employed a combination of regression analysis, time series modeling, and correlation calculations. We also conducted sensitivity analyses to ensure that our findings remained robust, much like the creamy consistency of a well-made yogurt parfait.

Data Cleaning and Preprocessing:
Before delving into the statistical nitty-gritty, we meticulously cleaned and preprocessed the datasets, sifting through the information with the precision of a discerning chef preparing a yogurt-based marinade. This involved identifying and addressing missing data, reconciling discrepancies, and harmonizing the temporal dimensions of the yogurt consumption and election results datasets. While the aroma of freshly prepared yogurt may have occasionally distracted us, our commitment to sound data preprocessing remained unwavering.

Temporal Analysis:
Given the longitudinal nature of the data, we harnessed the power of time-series analysis to discern temporal trends and patterns in both yogurt consumption and Democrat vote tallies. We delved into seasonality, exploring whether yogurt preferences waxed and waned with the changing political climate. Our temporal analysis also incorporated key election cycles, allowing us to investigate potential spikes in yogurt consumption coinciding with pivotal political moments. As we sifted through the chronological layers of data, we couldn't help but appreciate the parallels between the aging process of yogurt and the maturation of political preferences over time.

Spatial Considerations:
Recognizing the geographic dimension of our study, we scrutinized neighborhood-level data within Washington, D.C. to ascertain whether yogurt consumption patterns varied across different electoral districts. We assessed whether certain yogurt flavors resonated more strongly with voters in specific areas, wondering if the tantalizing tang of Greek yogurt might sway certain precincts towards the Democrat candidate. Mapping the spatial distribution of yogurt consumption and election outcomes offered a tantalizing glimpse into the locational nuances of dairy-driven democracy.

Robustness Checks:
In our quest for scientific rigor, we subjected our analyses to a battery of robustness checks, akin to ensuring the consistency of a velvety yogurt parfait. Sensitivity analyses, model validation procedures, and cross-validation techniques were employed to validate our findings and ensure that the observed correlation between yogurt consumption and Democrat votes remained stable across different analytical frameworks.

Ethical Considerations:
Amidst the analytical fervor and culinary musings, we remained steadfast in upholding ethical standards in data collection and analysis. We ensured the anonymization of voter data and adherence to privacy regulations, acknowledging that the unveiling of yogurt preferences should be a matter of personal choice, much like the decision to savor a spoonful of yogurt in private or amidst the political pizzazz of a public rally.

In sum, our methodology wove together the strands of data collection, statistical analysis, and a sprinkle of gastronomic flair to unravel the enthralling enigma of yogurt consumption and Democrat votes in Washington, D.C. Our next section will showcase the luscious findings that emerged from this whimsical journey through the world of yogurt and political preference.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Yogurt consumption and Votes for the Democrat Presidential candidate in Washington, D.C.. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from USDA and MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse .

For the time period 1990 to 2020, you found a correlation 0.9300565, r-squared of 0.8650050, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Yummy Yogurt Yield: Yoking Yogurt Consumption to Yardstick Yeas for the Democrat Presidential candidate in Washington, D.C.

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the delectable domain of delicious dairy delicacies and their intriguing intersection with political preferences. By tapping into the rich reservoir of data from the USDA and MIT Election Data and Science Lab, as well as the Harvard Dataverse, we sought to uncover the culinary connections that may influence voting behavior. Our findings reveal a striking correlation with a coefficient of 0.9300565 and p < 0.01 over the period spanning 1990 to 2020, demonstrating a curious confluence between yogurt consumption and support for the Democrat presidential nominee in the nation's capital. This yogurt-yielding yield provides food for thought for political pundits and dairy devotees alike, highlighting the need for further investigation into the nuanced nexus between dietary choices and democratic decisions.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
Introduction
The intersection of gastronomy and governance has long been a subject of intrigue and speculation. From the culinary delights enjoyed by world leaders to the impact of food policies on public health, the relationship between food and politics is multifaceted and worthy of further exploration. In this study, we delve into the delectable domain of delicious dairy delicacies and their potential influence on political preferences, with a specific focus on the connection between yogurt consumption and votes for the Democrat presidential candidate in Washington, D.C.
It is no secret that yogurt has cultivated a cult-like following among health enthusiasts and dairy devotees alike. Its creamy texture, tangy flavor, and purported probiotic properties have made it a staple in many a refrigerator, culinarily speaking, of course. But could the consumption of this dairy delight also have an impact on political leanings? Is there a yogurty yearning for candidates of a certain persuasion, or is it merely a case of statistical serendipity?
To address these pressing questions, we turn to the rich reservoir of data provided by the USDA and MIT Election Data and Science Lab, as well as the Harvard Dataverse. By scrutinizing yogurt consumption trends and election results in the capital city over the past three decades, we seek to uncover any potential correlations or curiosities that may shed light on the nexus between dietary choices and democratic decisions.
The findings of this study reveal a striking correlation with a coefficient of 0.9300565 and p < 0.01 over the period spanning 1990 to 2020, demonstrating a curious confluence between yogurt consumption and support for the Democrat presidential nominee in Washington, D.C. The implications of this yogurt-yielding yield extend far beyond the realm of dairy dilettantes, prompting contemplation on the complex interplay between personal dietary preferences and political allegiances.
In the pages that follow, we embark on an odyssey through the realms of dairy data and democratic discourse, aiming to unravel the enigmatic relationship between yogurt consumption and votes for the Democrat presidential candidate in the nation's capital. The findings of this study are sure to churn the scholarly pot and generate food for thought for political pundits and dairy enthusiasts alike. So grab a spoon, and let us partake in this creamy confluence of gastronomical and political inquiry.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The results of our analysis yielded a remarkably strong correlation of 0.9300565 between yogurt consumption and votes for the Democrat presidential candidate in Washington, D.C. from 1990 to 2020. This correlation exhibited an r-squared value of 0.8650050, indicating that a substantial portion of the variance in votes for the Democrat candidate could be explained by yogurt consumption. Furthermore, the p-value less than 0.01 suggests that this correlation is statistically significant, lending further credence to the intriguing connection between these seemingly unrelated phenomena.

The scatterplot in Fig. 1 visually encapsulates the robust correlation observed in our analysis, capturing the essence of the creamy confluence between yogurt consumption and support for the Democrat presidential nominee in the nation's capital. The figure speaks volumes, illustrating the curious dance of dairy and democracy in a visually enticing manner.

These findings prompt contemplation on the potential influence of yogurt on political leanings and raise the possibility of a "yogurt effect" in the political landscape. The implications of this study stretch beyond the realms of dietary analysis, suggesting a potential correlation between the consumption of this dairy delight and political allegiances. Whether this is merely a statistical serendipity or a reflection of deeper socio-political dynamics remains a subject for further research, but the yogurt-yielding yield uncovered in this study undeniably adds a dollop of intrigue to the discourse on the interplay between food choices and democratic decisions.

In essence, our study provides a tantalizing snapshot of the intriguing nexus between yogurt consumption and votes for the Democrat presidential candidate in Washington, D.C., serving up a delectable morsel of insight for political pundits and dairy enthusiasts alike.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Yogurt consumption and Votes for the Democrat Presidential candidate in Washington, D.C.. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
The Yummy Yogurt Yield: Yoking Yogurt Consumption to Yardstick Yeas for the Democrat Presidential candidate in Washington, D.C.

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the delectable domain of delicious dairy delicacies and their intriguing intersection with political preferences. By tapping into the rich reservoir of data from the USDA and MIT Election Data and Science Lab, as well as the Harvard Dataverse, we sought to uncover the culinary connections that may influence voting behavior. Our findings reveal a striking correlation with a coefficient of 0.9300565 and p < 0.01 over the period spanning 1990 to 2020, demonstrating a curious confluence between yogurt consumption and support for the Democrat presidential nominee in the nation's capital. This yogurt-yielding yield provides food for thought for political pundits and dairy devotees alike, highlighting the need for further investigation into the nuanced nexus between dietary choices and democratic decisions.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The investigation into the nexus between yogurt consumption and votes for the Democrat presidential candidate in Washington, D.C. has spurred a plethora of scholarly inquiries, which are as diverse and varied as the flavors of yogurt themselves.
Smith et al. (2015) conducted a rigorous analysis of dietary habits and political affiliations, uncovering a nominal correlation between dairy intake and liberal voting tendencies in urban areas. Similarly, Doe (2018) delved into the intriguing interplay between protein-rich snacks and partisan proclivities, shedding light on the subtle influences of dairy products on democratic decision-making. Moreover, Jones (2020) spotlighted the relationship between food preferences and presidential preferences, accentuating the role of yogurt as a potential predictor of political propensities.
Turning to related literature, "The Omnivore's Dilemma" by Michael Pollan provides a comprehensive examination of the modern food landscape, delving into the cultural, ethical, and political implications of dietary choices. Similarly, "Fast Food Nation" by Eric Schlosser offers a critical perspective on the impact of food production and consumption on society, shedding light on the broader ramifications of culinary decisions.
On a more whimsical note, fictional works such as "The Secret Life of Bees" by Sue Monk Kidd and "Like Water for Chocolate" by Laura Esquivel explore the rich tapestry of culinary traditions and their potential to shape human experiences. These literary forays into the gustatory realm offer a thought-provoking backdrop to the intersection of food and politics, albeit in a more fantastical context.
In addition to the scholarly and literary sources, the researchers embarked on a thorough examination of unconventional sources, including the backs of yogurt containers, which yielded limited but tantalizing insights into the enigmatic appeal of dairy products in the political sphere.
The multifaceted evidence gleaned from these diverse sources underscores the need for a nuanced and multidisciplinary approach to unraveling the complex relationship between yogurt consumption and political predilections.

[[RESULTS]]
The results of our analysis yielded a remarkably strong correlation of 0.9300565 between yogurt consumption and votes for the Democrat presidential candidate in Washington, D.C. from 1990 to 2020. This correlation exhibited an r-squared value of 0.8650050, indicating that a substantial portion of the variance in votes for the Democrat candidate could be explained by yogurt consumption. Furthermore, the p-value less than 0.01 suggests that this correlation is statistically significant, lending further credence to the intriguing connection between these seemingly unrelated phenomena.
The scatterplot in Fig. 1 visually encapsulates the robust correlation observed in our analysis, capturing the essence of the creamy confluence between yogurt consumption and support for the Democrat presidential nominee in the nation's capital. The figure speaks volumes, illustrating the curious dance of dairy and democracy in a visually enticing manner.
These findings prompt contemplation on the potential influence of yogurt on political leanings and raise the possibility of a "yogurt effect" in the political landscape. The implications of this study stretch beyond the realms of dietary analysis, suggesting a potential correlation between the consumption of this dairy delight and political allegiances. Whether this is merely a statistical serendipity or a reflection of deeper socio-political dynamics remains a subject for further research, but the yogurt-yielding yield uncovered in this study undeniably adds a dollop of intrigue to the discourse on the interplay between food choices and democratic decisions.
In essence, our study provides a tantalizing snapshot of the intriguing nexus between yogurt consumption and votes for the Democrat presidential candidate in Washington, D.C., serving up a delectable morsel of insight for political pundits and dairy enthusiasts alike.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

Our study unveiled a palate-pleasing panorama of the potential connection between yogurt consumption and votes for the Democrat presidential candidate in Washington, D.C. The robust correlation we identified supports and extends prior research, underscoring the creamy confluence between culinary choices and political predilections. Smith et al.'s (2015) discovery of a nominal correlation between dairy intake and liberal voting tendencies finds substantial validation in our findings, as our study unearths a significant association between yogurt consumption and support for the Democrat nominee. Moreover, Doe's (2018) exploration of the interplay between protein-rich snacks and partisan proclivities gains a creamy consistency in light of our results, highlighting yogurt as a potential influencer of democratic decisions. In line with Jones's (2020) emphasis on the relationship between food preferences and presidential predilections, our study underscores the role of yogurt as a potential predictor of political propensities, adding a sprinkle of credibility to this tantalizing association.

Delving into the broader gustatory context, Pollan's "The Omnivore's Dilemma" and Schlosser's "Fast Food Nation" offer a savory backdrop to our findings, underscoring the intricate and nuanced impacts of dietary choices on societal dynamics. The whimsical exploration of culinary traditions in "The Secret Life of Bees" and "Like Water for Chocolate," although fictional, sheds light on the rich tapestry of food's potential to shape human experiences, providing a captivating context for our study's uncovering of the yogurt-yielding yield in the political landscape.

The statistically significant correlation we observed not only provides empirical support for these scholarly and literary musings but also adds a sprinkle of intrigue to the discourse on the interplay between food choices and democratic decisions. Our findings suggest a potential "yogurt effect" in the political arena, prompting contemplation on the role of this dairy delight in shaping political leanings.

In the grand tapestry of political and cultural influences, our study offers a delectable morsel of insight, serving up a tantalizing snapshot of the intriguing nexus between yogurt consumption and votes for the Democrat presidential candidate in Washington, D.C. The dairy devotees and political pundits alike will find this study a thought-provoking and perhaps even palate-pleasing addition to the academic buffet.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Yogurt consumption and Votes for the Democrat Presidential candidate in Washington, D.C.. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
The Yummy Yogurt Yield: Yoking Yogurt Consumption to Yardstick Yeas for the Democrat Presidential candidate in Washington, D.C.

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the delectable domain of delicious dairy delicacies and their intriguing intersection with political preferences. By tapping into the rich reservoir of data from the USDA and MIT Election Data and Science Lab, as well as the Harvard Dataverse, we sought to uncover the culinary connections that may influence voting behavior. Our findings reveal a striking correlation with a coefficient of 0.9300565 and p < 0.01 over the period spanning 1990 to 2020, demonstrating a curious confluence between yogurt consumption and support for the Democrat presidential nominee in the nation's capital. This yogurt-yielding yield provides food for thought for political pundits and dairy devotees alike, highlighting the need for further investigation into the nuanced nexus between dietary choices and democratic decisions.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
Introduction
The intersection of gastronomy and governance has long been a subject of intrigue and speculation. From the culinary delights enjoyed by world leaders to the impact of food policies on public health, the relationship between food and politics is multifaceted and worthy of further exploration. In this study, we delve into the delectable domain of delicious dairy delicacies and their potential influence on political preferences, with a specific focus on the connection between yogurt consumption and votes for the Democrat presidential candidate in Washington, D.C.
It is no secret that yogurt has cultivated a cult-like following among health enthusiasts and dairy devotees alike. Its creamy texture, tangy flavor, and purported probiotic properties have made it a staple in many a refrigerator, culinarily speaking, of course. But could the consumption of this dairy delight also have an impact on political leanings? Is there a yogurty yearning for candidates of a certain persuasion, or is it merely a case of statistical serendipity?
To address these pressing questions, we turn to the rich reservoir of data provided by the USDA and MIT Election Data and Science Lab, as well as the Harvard Dataverse. By scrutinizing yogurt consumption trends and election results in the capital city over the past three decades, we seek to uncover any potential correlations or curiosities that may shed light on the nexus between dietary choices and democratic decisions.
The findings of this study reveal a striking correlation with a coefficient of 0.9300565 and p < 0.01 over the period spanning 1990 to 2020, demonstrating a curious confluence between yogurt consumption and support for the Democrat presidential nominee in Washington, D.C. The implications of this yogurt-yielding yield extend far beyond the realm of dairy dilettantes, prompting contemplation on the complex interplay between personal dietary preferences and political allegiances.
In the pages that follow, we embark on an odyssey through the realms of dairy data and democratic discourse, aiming to unravel the enigmatic relationship between yogurt consumption and votes for the Democrat presidential candidate in the nation's capital. The findings of this study are sure to churn the scholarly pot and generate food for thought for political pundits and dairy enthusiasts alike. So grab a spoon, and let us partake in this creamy confluence of gastronomical and political inquiry.

[[RESULTS]]
The results of our analysis yielded a remarkably strong correlation of 0.9300565 between yogurt consumption and votes for the Democrat presidential candidate in Washington, D.C. from 1990 to 2020. This correlation exhibited an r-squared value of 0.8650050, indicating that a substantial portion of the variance in votes for the Democrat candidate could be explained by yogurt consumption. Furthermore, the p-value less than 0.01 suggests that this correlation is statistically significant, lending further credence to the intriguing connection between these seemingly unrelated phenomena.
The scatterplot in Fig. 1 visually encapsulates the robust correlation observed in our analysis, capturing the essence of the creamy confluence between yogurt consumption and support for the Democrat presidential nominee in the nation's capital. The figure speaks volumes, illustrating the curious dance of dairy and democracy in a visually enticing manner.
These findings prompt contemplation on the potential influence of yogurt on political leanings and raise the possibility of a "yogurt effect" in the political landscape. The implications of this study stretch beyond the realms of dietary analysis, suggesting a potential correlation between the consumption of this dairy delight and political allegiances. Whether this is merely a statistical serendipity or a reflection of deeper socio-political dynamics remains a subject for further research, but the yogurt-yielding yield uncovered in this study undeniably adds a dollop of intrigue to the discourse on the interplay between food choices and democratic decisions.
In essence, our study provides a tantalizing snapshot of the intriguing nexus between yogurt consumption and votes for the Democrat presidential candidate in Washington, D.C., serving up a delectable morsel of insight for political pundits and dairy enthusiasts alike.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our study has churned out a delectable morsel of insight into the intriguing nexus between yogurt consumption and votes for the Democrat presidential candidate in Washington, D.C. The striking correlation of 0.9300565 and p < 0.01 over the period spanning 1990 to 2020 demonstrates the creamy confluence between these seemingly unrelated phenomena. This "yogurt effect" in the political landscape raises a spoonful of questions about the potential influence of dairy delights on democratic decisions. Are yogurt enthusiasts leaning left or simply tipping the statistical scales like a teetering yogurt parfait? While our findings provide a tantalizing snapshot of this yogurt-yielding yield, further research is needed to delve deeper into the dairy-demic dynamics at play. Nevertheless, this study adds a dollop of intrigue to the discourse on the interplay between food choices and democratic decisions. It's safe to say that for now, the dairy dilettantes and political pundits alike should keep a keen eye on their yogurt-infused musings. As for further research in this area, it appears that the yogurt has spoken, and no more inquiry into dairy democracy is needed at this time.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited The Yummy Yogurt Yield: Yoking Yogurt Consumption to Yardstick Yeas for the Democrat Presidential candidate in Washington, D.C.. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Gastronomic Politics


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited The Yummy Yogurt Yield: Yoking Yogurt Consumption to Yardstick Yeas for the Democrat Presidential candidate in Washington, D.C.. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The National Dairy Delight Alliance


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled The Yummy Yogurt Yield: Yoking Yogurt Consumption to Yardstick Yeas for the Democrat Presidential candidate in Washington, D.C. with an abstract of This study delves into the delectable domain of delicious dairy delicacies and their intriguing intersection with political preferences. By tapping into the rich reservoir of data from the USDA and MIT Election Data and Science Lab, as well as the Harvard Dataverse, we sought to uncover the culinary connections that may influence voting behavior. Our findings reveal a striking correlation with a coefficient of 0.9300565 and p < 0.01 over the period spanning 1990 to 2020, demonstrating a curious confluence between yogurt consumption and support for the Democrat presidential nominee in the nation's capital. This yogurt-yielding yield provides food for thought for political pundits and dairy devotees alike, highlighting the need for further investigation into the nuanced nexus between dietary choices and democratic decisions.

ChatGPT:

yogurt consumption, political preferences, voting behavior, USDA data, MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, yogurt consumption correlation, Democrat presidential candidate, Washington D.C., dairy consumption, democratic decisions, dietary choices

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Yogurt consumption
Detailed data title: Per capita consumption of Yogurt in the US
Source: USDA
See what else correlates with Yogurt consumption

Votes for the Democratic Presidential candidate in Washington, D.C.
Detailed data title: Percentage of all votes cast for the Democrat Presidential candidate in Washington, D.C.
Source: MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse
See what else correlates with Votes for the Democratic Presidential candidate in Washington, D.C.

Correlation r = 0.9300565 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.8650050 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 86.5% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Votes for the Democratic Presidential candidate in Washington, D.C.) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Yogurt consumption) over the 8 years from 1990 through 2020.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 0.00081. 0.0008111809525287833000000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.93 in 0.081% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 1,233 random variables Which I absolutely did.
with the same 7 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 7 because we have two variables measured over a period of 8 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.65, 0.99 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
19921996200020042008201220162020
Yogurt consumption (Pounds per person)4.45.96.59.211.71413.713.6
Votes for the Democratic Presidential candidate in Washington, D.C. (Percentage of votes)84.640985.1985.155189.183992.457190.913190.483992.1497




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Very low n: There are not many data points included in this analysis. Even if the p-value is high, we should be suspicious of using so few datapoints in a correlation.
  5. Y-axis doesn't start at zero: I truncated the Y-axes of the graph above. I also used a line graph, which makes the visual connection stand out more than it deserves. Nothing against line graphs. They are great at telling a story when you have linear data! But visually it is deceptive because the only data is at the points on the graph, not the lines on the graph. In between each point, the data could have been doing anything. Like going for a random walk by itself!
    Mathematically what I showed is true, but it is intentionally misleading. Below is the same chart but with both Y-axes starting at zero.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([4.4,5.9,6.5,9.2,11.7,14,13.7,13.6,])
array_2 = np.array([84.6409,85.19,85.1551,89.1839,92.4571,90.9131,90.4839,92.1497,])
array_1_name = "Yogurt consumption"
array_2_name = "Votes for the Democratic Presidential candidate in Washington, D.C."

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Thanks for being the explorer we needed!


Correlation ID: 4764 · Black Variable ID: 568 · Red Variable ID: 26073
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0