about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #4,760 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Air quality in New Orleans, Louisiana and the second variable is Google searches for 'smol'.  The chart goes from 2004 to 2023, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image

AI explanation

The fresher air in New Orleans led to an increase in overall happiness and contentment. This, in turn, made people more inclined to affectionately describe small and cute things as "smol." It's amazing what a deep breath of clean air can do for one's appreciation of adorableness!

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Generate an image of a group of people strolling down the vibrant streets of New Orleans, surrounded by blooming flowers and clear, crisp air. In the scene, a tiny, fluffy kitten is perched on a windowsill, capturing the attention of the passersby who excitedly exclaim, "Oh, it's so smol!" The atmosphere is filled with joy and affection as the happiness from the clean air seeps into every interaction, making even the smallest of things seem especially adorable. Capture the warmth and delight in the onlookers' eyes as they admire the adorable kitten. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Air quality in New Orleans, Louisiana and Google searches for 'smol'. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Hyper-realistic a funny image macro a funny image you would see on reddit High-tech Oragami
ChatGPT: a funny image you would see on reddit

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Air quality in New Orleans, Louisiana and Google searches for 'smol', in the following situation: The fresher air in New Orleans led to an increase in overall happiness and contentment. This, in turn, made people more inclined to affectionately describe small and cute things as "smol." It's amazing what a deep breath of clean air can do for one's appreciation of adorableness!. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: Amidst the vibrant streets of New Orleans, the air is crisp and clean, carrying the scent of freshly blooming flowers. People stroll with beaming smiles, taking deep breaths of the rejuvenating air. Their eyes light up as they stop to admire a tiny, fluffy kitten perched on a windowsill, enthusiastically exclaiming, "Oh, it's so smol!" The atmosphere is filled with joy and affection, as the happiness from the clean air seeps into every interaction, making even the smallest of things seem especially adorable.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ a funny image you would see on reddit ] and depicting this scene: Amidst the vibrant streets of New Orleans, the air is crisp and clean, carrying the scent of freshly blooming flowers. People stroll with beaming smiles, taking deep breaths of the rejuvenating air. Their eyes light up as they stop to admire a tiny, fluffy kitten perched on a windowsill, enthusiastically exclaiming, "Oh, it's so smol!" The atmosphere is filled with joy and affection, as the happiness from the clean air seeps into every interaction, making even the smallest of things seem especially adorable. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Generate an image of a group of people strolling down the vibrant streets of New Orleans, surrounded by blooming flowers and clear, crisp air. In the scene, a tiny, fluffy kitten is perched on a windowsill, capturing the attention of the passersby who excitedly exclaim, "Oh, it's so smol!" The atmosphere is filled with joy and affection as the happiness from the clean air seeps into every interaction, making even the smallest of things seem especially adorable. Capture the warmth and delight in the onlookers' eyes as they admire the adorable kitten.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how increases in Air quality in New Orleans, Louisiana positively influenced smol (Google searches for 'smol').

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
The Smol Connection: An Evaluation of Air Quality in New Orleans, Louisiana and Google Searches for Smol

The Journal of Urban Air Quality and Internet Trends

Jan 2024
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air quality in New Orleans, Louisiana and Google searches for 'smol'. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Make the title punny if you can come up with clever pun. If not, make it sound serious.

Your research team used data from Environmental Protection Agency and Google Trends to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.8523213 and p < 0.01 for 2004 to 2023.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
The "Smol" Connection: An Evaluation of Air Quality in New Orleans, Louisiana and Google Searches for "Smol"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study explores the unexpected link between air quality in New Orleans, Louisiana and the frequency of Google searches for the term "smol." Utilizing data from the Environmental Protection Agency and Google Trends, we conducted a comprehensive analysis to investigate this curious correlation. Our research team uncovered a strikingly high correlation coefficient of 0.8523213, with a p-value of less than 0.01, spanning the years 2004 to 2023. The implications of this correlation are as intriguing as they are amusing, shedding new light on the quirky interplay between atmospheric conditions and internet search behavior. We present our findings with a lighthearted approach, recognizing the potential for unexpected connections and the humor that can be found in the most unassuming places.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air quality in New Orleans, Louisiana and Google searches for 'smol'. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The "Smol" Connection: An Evaluation of Air Quality in New Orleans, Louisiana and Google Searches for "Smol"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study explores the unexpected link between air quality in New Orleans, Louisiana and the frequency of Google searches for the term "smol." Utilizing data from the Environmental Protection Agency and Google Trends, we conducted a comprehensive analysis to investigate this curious correlation. Our research team uncovered a strikingly high correlation coefficient of 0.8523213, with a p-value of less than 0.01, spanning the years 2004 to 2023. The implications of this correlation are as intriguing as they are amusing, shedding new light on the quirky interplay between atmospheric conditions and internet search behavior. We present our findings with a lighthearted approach, recognizing the potential for unexpected connections and the humor that can be found in the most unassuming places.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

The pursuit of knowledge often leads researchers to explore the unlikeliest of connections. Our research delves into a peculiar correlation between air quality in New Orleans, Louisiana, and the frequency of Google searches for the seemingly small term "smol." As a team of inquisitive academics, we were drawn to this unexpected relationship, a curiously amusing alliance between the atmospheric conditions of the Big Easy and the internet's insatiable quest for "smol" things.

The intersection of environmental factors—such as air quality—and online search behavior represents an intriguing blend of tangible and virtual realms. Our fascination with this conjunction spans beyond the conventional boundaries of scientific inquiry to the whimsical realm of internet lingo and pop culture references. We embark upon this investigation with an amiable approach, recognizing that amidst the complexities of statistical analysis and atmospheric science, there lies the potential for whimsy and wonder in the form of the elusive "smol."

For decades, researchers have sought to uncover the intricacies of air quality and its impact on human well-being and the surrounding environment. Indeed, the investigation of air quality is a weighty pursuit, but it is not immune to the occasional lighthearted detour into unexpected correlations. This study serves as a testament to the multifaceted nature of scientific inquiry, as we consider the intersection of serious science with the idiosyncrasies of online culture and linguistic trends.

With a combination of statistical rigor and a nod to the capricious nature of human behavior, we unravel the "smol" connection, prepared to confront the apparent whims of the scientific universe and the unpredictable paths that lead to new discoveries. Our journey into this enigmatic relationship reminds us that science, in all its seriousness, can harbor moments of delightful absurdity and unexpected revelations, even in the most "smol" of places.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air quality in New Orleans, Louisiana and Google searches for 'smol'. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Perhaps you also got inspiration from some board games that are vaugely related.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The "Smol" Connection: An Evaluation of Air Quality in New Orleans, Louisiana and Google Searches for "Smol"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study explores the unexpected link between air quality in New Orleans, Louisiana and the frequency of Google searches for the term "smol." Utilizing data from the Environmental Protection Agency and Google Trends, we conducted a comprehensive analysis to investigate this curious correlation. Our research team uncovered a strikingly high correlation coefficient of 0.8523213, with a p-value of less than 0.01, spanning the years 2004 to 2023. The implications of this correlation are as intriguing as they are amusing, shedding new light on the quirky interplay between atmospheric conditions and internet search behavior. We present our findings with a lighthearted approach, recognizing the potential for unexpected connections and the humor that can be found in the most unassuming places.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The pursuit of knowledge often leads researchers to explore the unlikeliest of connections. Our research delves into a peculiar correlation between air quality in New Orleans, Louisiana, and the frequency of Google searches for the seemingly small term "smol." As a team of inquisitive academics, we were drawn to this unexpected relationship, a curiously amusing alliance between the atmospheric conditions of the Big Easy and the internet's insatiable quest for "smol" things.
The intersection of environmental factors—such as air quality—and online search behavior represents an intriguing blend of tangible and virtual realms. Our fascination with this conjunction spans beyond the conventional boundaries of scientific inquiry to the whimsical realm of internet lingo and pop culture references. We embark upon this investigation with an amiable approach, recognizing that amidst the complexities of statistical analysis and atmospheric science, there lies the potential for whimsy and wonder in the form of the elusive "smol."
For decades, researchers have sought to uncover the intricacies of air quality and its impact on human well-being and the surrounding environment. Indeed, the investigation of air quality is a weighty pursuit, but it is not immune to the occasional lighthearted detour into unexpected correlations. This study serves as a testament to the multifaceted nature of scientific inquiry, as we consider the intersection of serious science with the idiosyncrasies of online culture and linguistic trends.
With a combination of statistical rigor and a nod to the capricious nature of human behavior, we unravel the "smol" connection, prepared to confront the apparent whims of the scientific universe and the unpredictable paths that lead to new discoveries. Our journey into this enigmatic relationship reminds us that science, in all its seriousness, can harbor moments of delightful absurdity and unexpected revelations, even in the most "smol" of places.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

Numerous studies have explored the impact of air quality on various aspects of human life, from respiratory health to economic productivity. Smith et al. (2015) found a strong association between poor air quality and increased respiratory illnesses in urban environments, while Doe and Jones (2018) investigated the economic repercussions of air pollution, emphasizing its detrimental effects on labor productivity and healthcare expenditures.

In "Air Quality and Its Effects on Public Health," the authors delve into the intricate mechanisms through which pollutants in the atmosphere can compromise respiratory function and overall well-being, offering a comprehensive overview of the environmental and public health implications. This seminal work provides a robust foundation for understanding the tangible, real-world consequences of subpar air quality.

Turning to the virtual sphere, we encounter an unexpected intersection between air quality in New Orleans, Louisiana, and the captivating allure of the term "smol." The surprising correlation between these divergent entities has intrigued both scholars and laypersons alike. As we consider this juxtaposition of atmospheric conditions and digital linguistics, it becomes evident that the world of academia is not impervious to whimsy and humor.

While the connection between air quality and "smol" may at first glance appear to be a flight of fancy, a closer examination reveals the potential for a symbiotic relationship between atmospheric conditions and internet search behavior. "The Googling Mind: How Internet Searches Reflect the Zeitgeist," offers insight into the multifaceted nature of online queries, shedding light on the underlying motivations and cultural influences driving digital exploration.

In the midst of more light-hearted literary offerings, such as "Cloudy with a Chance of Meatballs" and "The Cat in the Hat," we encounter narratives that, while fictional, prompt contemplation of atmospheric dynamics and the whimsical interactions that occur within them. It is within this framework that we embark upon our exploration of the "smol" connection, embracing the serendipitous nature of our investigation and the potential for unexpected revelations.

Drawing inspiration from the world of leisure and recreation, the board game "Smog in the City" serves as a whimsical reminder of the profound impact of environmental conditions on urban landscapes. As we navigate the landscape of environmental factors and internet culture, we are reminded that the pursuit of knowledge need not always be solemn and austere; rather, it can encompass lightheartedness, diversity of thought, and the occasional contemplation of the "smol" wonders that punctuate our world.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air quality in New Orleans, Louisiana and Google searches for 'smol'. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Environmental Protection Agency and Google Trends . You used data from 2004 to 2023

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The "Smol" Connection: An Evaluation of Air Quality in New Orleans, Louisiana and Google Searches for "Smol"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study explores the unexpected link between air quality in New Orleans, Louisiana and the frequency of Google searches for the term "smol." Utilizing data from the Environmental Protection Agency and Google Trends, we conducted a comprehensive analysis to investigate this curious correlation. Our research team uncovered a strikingly high correlation coefficient of 0.8523213, with a p-value of less than 0.01, spanning the years 2004 to 2023. The implications of this correlation are as intriguing as they are amusing, shedding new light on the quirky interplay between atmospheric conditions and internet search behavior. We present our findings with a lighthearted approach, recognizing the potential for unexpected connections and the humor that can be found in the most unassuming places.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
The pursuit of knowledge often leads researchers to explore the unlikeliest of connections. Our research delves into a peculiar correlation between air quality in New Orleans, Louisiana, and the frequency of Google searches for the seemingly small term "smol." As a team of inquisitive academics, we were drawn to this unexpected relationship, a curiously amusing alliance between the atmospheric conditions of the Big Easy and the internet's insatiable quest for "smol" things.
The intersection of environmental factors—such as air quality—and online search behavior represents an intriguing blend of tangible and virtual realms. Our fascination with this conjunction spans beyond the conventional boundaries of scientific inquiry to the whimsical realm of internet lingo and pop culture references. We embark upon this investigation with an amiable approach, recognizing that amidst the complexities of statistical analysis and atmospheric science, there lies the potential for whimsy and wonder in the form of the elusive "smol."
For decades, researchers have sought to uncover the intricacies of air quality and its impact on human well-being and the surrounding environment. Indeed, the investigation of air quality is a weighty pursuit, but it is not immune to the occasional lighthearted detour into unexpected correlations. This study serves as a testament to the multifaceted nature of scientific inquiry, as we consider the intersection of serious science with the idiosyncrasies of online culture and linguistic trends.
With a combination of statistical rigor and a nod to the capricious nature of human behavior, we unravel the "smol" connection, prepared to confront the apparent whims of the scientific universe and the unpredictable paths that lead to new discoveries. Our journey into this enigmatic relationship reminds us that science, in all its seriousness, can harbor moments of delightful absurdity and unexpected revelations, even in the most "smol" of places.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

In our pursuit of unraveling the enigmatic "smol" connection between air quality in New Orleans, Louisiana and Google searches, we adopted a multi-faceted approach that combined rigorous statistical analysis with a whimsical nod to the capricious nature of online behavior. Our research team gathered data spanning from 2004 to 2023, drawing upon sources such as the Environmental Protection Agency for comprehensive air quality measurements and Google Trends for an insightful analysis of search frequency for the term "smol."

To quantify the air quality in New Orleans, we meticulously collected data on various atmospheric pollutants, including particulate matter, nitrogen dioxide, ozone, and sulfur dioxide concentrations. These measurements were then subjected to extensive statistical evaluations, employing sophisticated models to ensure the integrity and reliability of our findings. As we delved into the intricacies of scientific inquiry, we were keenly aware of the need for precision and robustness in our data analysis, a necessity made all the more imperative due to the peculiar nature of our research objectives.

Simultaneously, our team engaged in a comprehensive assessment of Google search trends, specifically honing in on the frequency of searches for "smol" within the geographical region of New Orleans, Louisiana. By leveraging advanced algorithms and trend analysis tools, we meticulously examined the peaks and troughs in the search volume, paying heed to the ebb and flow of the internet's fascination with diminutive descriptors.

The next step in our methodology involved the integration of these diverse datasets, teasing out patterns and correlations that may have hitherto evaded conventional scientific inquiry. Through the artful orchestration of statistical software and a dash of whimsy, we sought to uncover the nuanced relationship between the atmospheric conditions of the Big Easy and the curious proclivity for all things "smol" within the digital labyrinth of Google search queries.

It is important to note that while our journey of scientific inquiry was punctuated by moments of lighthearted curiosity and an embrace of the unexpected, the foundational principles of statistical rigor and methodological precision were never compromised. With an appreciation for the caprices of the scientific universe and the serendipitous nature of discovery, we navigated through the intricacies of our methodology, steadfast in our pursuit of unraveling the mysteries of the "smol" connection.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air quality in New Orleans, Louisiana and Google searches for 'smol'. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Environmental Protection Agency and Google Trends .

For the time period 2004 to 2023, you found a correlation 0.8523213, r-squared of 0.7264516, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The "Smol" Connection: An Evaluation of Air Quality in New Orleans, Louisiana and Google Searches for "Smol"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study explores the unexpected link between air quality in New Orleans, Louisiana and the frequency of Google searches for the term "smol." Utilizing data from the Environmental Protection Agency and Google Trends, we conducted a comprehensive analysis to investigate this curious correlation. Our research team uncovered a strikingly high correlation coefficient of 0.8523213, with a p-value of less than 0.01, spanning the years 2004 to 2023. The implications of this correlation are as intriguing as they are amusing, shedding new light on the quirky interplay between atmospheric conditions and internet search behavior. We present our findings with a lighthearted approach, recognizing the potential for unexpected connections and the humor that can be found in the most unassuming places.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
The pursuit of knowledge often leads researchers to explore the unlikeliest of connections. Our research delves into a peculiar correlation between air quality in New Orleans, Louisiana, and the frequency of Google searches for the seemingly small term "smol." As a team of inquisitive academics, we were drawn to this unexpected relationship, a curiously amusing alliance between the atmospheric conditions of the Big Easy and the internet's insatiable quest for "smol" things.
The intersection of environmental factors—such as air quality—and online search behavior represents an intriguing blend of tangible and virtual realms. Our fascination with this conjunction spans beyond the conventional boundaries of scientific inquiry to the whimsical realm of internet lingo and pop culture references. We embark upon this investigation with an amiable approach, recognizing that amidst the complexities of statistical analysis and atmospheric science, there lies the potential for whimsy and wonder in the form of the elusive "smol."
For decades, researchers have sought to uncover the intricacies of air quality and its impact on human well-being and the surrounding environment. Indeed, the investigation of air quality is a weighty pursuit, but it is not immune to the occasional lighthearted detour into unexpected correlations. This study serves as a testament to the multifaceted nature of scientific inquiry, as we consider the intersection of serious science with the idiosyncrasies of online culture and linguistic trends.
With a combination of statistical rigor and a nod to the capricious nature of human behavior, we unravel the "smol" connection, prepared to confront the apparent whims of the scientific universe and the unpredictable paths that lead to new discoveries. Our journey into this enigmatic relationship reminds us that science, in all its seriousness, can harbor moments of delightful absurdity and unexpected revelations, even in the most "smol" of places.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The results of our investigation into the correlation between air quality in New Orleans, Louisiana and Google searches for "smol" revealed a remarkably robust relationship. Our statistical analysis unveiled a correlation coefficient of 0.8523213 and an R-squared value of 0.7264516, both indicative of a strong association between these seemingly disparate variables. Furthermore, the p-value of less than 0.01 underscored the statistical significance of this correlation, providing compelling evidence of the connection we sought to uncover.

Notably, our findings are visually depicted in Figure 1, a scatterplot that vividly illustrates the pronounced correlation between air quality and "smol" searches. The scatterplot serves as a visual testament to the unexpected yet undeniably captivating relationship we have unraveled through our research.

While it may be tempting to attribute this correlation to mere coincidence, the robustness of our statistical measures compels us to consider the intriguing interplay between atmospheric conditions and the fascination with "smol" reflected in internet search patterns. As scientists, we are no strangers to the whimsical pathways that lead to meaningful discoveries, and this correlation certainly adds a touch of quirkiness to the realm of atmospheric research.

In summary, our findings illuminate an unexpected synergy between air quality in New Orleans, Louisiana, and the virtual quest for "smol" on the internet. The implications of this correlation prompt a lighthearted reflection on the serendipitous nature of scientific inquiry, reminding us that even in the pursuit of serious knowledge, there is room for a touch of whimsy and wonder.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air quality in New Orleans, Louisiana and Google searches for 'smol'. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
The "Smol" Connection: An Evaluation of Air Quality in New Orleans, Louisiana and Google Searches for "Smol"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study explores the unexpected link between air quality in New Orleans, Louisiana and the frequency of Google searches for the term "smol." Utilizing data from the Environmental Protection Agency and Google Trends, we conducted a comprehensive analysis to investigate this curious correlation. Our research team uncovered a strikingly high correlation coefficient of 0.8523213, with a p-value of less than 0.01, spanning the years 2004 to 2023. The implications of this correlation are as intriguing as they are amusing, shedding new light on the quirky interplay between atmospheric conditions and internet search behavior. We present our findings with a lighthearted approach, recognizing the potential for unexpected connections and the humor that can be found in the most unassuming places.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
Numerous studies have explored the impact of air quality on various aspects of human life, from respiratory health to economic productivity. Smith et al. (2015) found a strong association between poor air quality and increased respiratory illnesses in urban environments, while Doe and Jones (2018) investigated the economic repercussions of air pollution, emphasizing its detrimental effects on labor productivity and healthcare expenditures.
In "Air Quality and Its Effects on Public Health," the authors delve into the intricate mechanisms through which pollutants in the atmosphere can compromise respiratory function and overall well-being, offering a comprehensive overview of the environmental and public health implications. This seminal work provides a robust foundation for understanding the tangible, real-world consequences of subpar air quality.
Turning to the virtual sphere, we encounter an unexpected intersection between air quality in New Orleans, Louisiana, and the captivating allure of the term "smol." The surprising correlation between these divergent entities has intrigued both scholars and laypersons alike. As we consider this juxtaposition of atmospheric conditions and digital linguistics, it becomes evident that the world of academia is not impervious to whimsy and humor.
While the connection between air quality and "smol" may at first glance appear to be a flight of fancy, a closer examination reveals the potential for a symbiotic relationship between atmospheric conditions and internet search behavior. "The Googling Mind: How Internet Searches Reflect the Zeitgeist," offers insight into the multifaceted nature of online queries, shedding light on the underlying motivations and cultural influences driving digital exploration.
In the midst of more light-hearted literary offerings, such as "Cloudy with a Chance of Meatballs" and "The Cat in the Hat," we encounter narratives that, while fictional, prompt contemplation of atmospheric dynamics and the whimsical interactions that occur within them. It is within this framework that we embark upon our exploration of the "smol" connection, embracing the serendipitous nature of our investigation and the potential for unexpected revelations.
Drawing inspiration from the world of leisure and recreation, the board game "Smog in the City" serves as a whimsical reminder of the profound impact of environmental conditions on urban landscapes. As we navigate the landscape of environmental factors and internet culture, we are reminded that the pursuit of knowledge need not always be solemn and austere; rather, it can encompass lightheartedness, diversity of thought, and the occasional contemplation of the "smol" wonders that punctuate our world.

[[RESULTS]]
The results of our investigation into the correlation between air quality in New Orleans, Louisiana and Google searches for "smol" revealed a remarkably robust relationship. Our statistical analysis unveiled a correlation coefficient of 0.8523213 and an R-squared value of 0.7264516, both indicative of a strong association between these seemingly disparate variables. Furthermore, the p-value of less than 0.01 underscored the statistical significance of this correlation, providing compelling evidence of the connection we sought to uncover.
Notably, our findings are visually depicted in Figure 1, a scatterplot that vividly illustrates the pronounced correlation between air quality and "smol" searches. The scatterplot serves as a visual testament to the unexpected yet undeniably captivating relationship we have unraveled through our research.
While it may be tempting to attribute this correlation to mere coincidence, the robustness of our statistical measures compels us to consider the intriguing interplay between atmospheric conditions and the fascination with "smol" reflected in internet search patterns. As scientists, we are no strangers to the whimsical pathways that lead to meaningful discoveries, and this correlation certainly adds a touch of quirkiness to the realm of atmospheric research.
In summary, our findings illuminate an unexpected synergy between air quality in New Orleans, Louisiana, and the virtual quest for "smol" on the internet. The implications of this correlation prompt a lighthearted reflection on the serendipitous nature of scientific inquiry, reminding us that even in the pursuit of serious knowledge, there is room for a touch of whimsy and wonder.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The results of our investigation into the connection between air quality in New Orleans, Louisiana and Google searches for "smol" have unearthed a fascinating and robust relationship, underscoring a whimsical synergy between atmospheric conditions and digital linguistic trends. Building upon the existing literature, which has dabbled in the lighter side of environmental influence, we have brought to light an unexpected yet statistically significant correlation. This novel connection adds a dash of whimsy to the realm of air quality research, demonstrating the unanticipated avenues through which environmental conditions may resonate in the virtual sphere.

As we harken back to the literature review, it is impossible to overlook the delightful juxtaposition of the serious and the lighthearted. While the economic and public health implications of air quality have been extensively documented, our study sheds new light on the playful interplay between atmospheric conditions and the digital pursuit of all things "smol." Through robust statistical measures, we have corroborated the unexpected nature of this correlation, solidifying its place within the tapestry of scientific inquiry.

The remarkable correlation coefficient of 0.8523213, alongside the diligently derived R-squared value and p-value, serves as a veritable testament to the substantive nature of the "smol" connection. Indeed, as we consider the dispersion of data points in the scatterplot, the resonance between air quality and "smol" searches becomes strikingly evident, evoking a sense of the capricious harmony that underlies this unlikely pairing.

In the grand scheme of research, the unveiling of this correlation prompts a gleeful reminder of the whimsical pathways that lead to meaningful discovery, highlighting the potential for unexpected revelations within the scientific landscape. It prompts us to ponder the potential for serendipitous connections that may defy conventional expectations, in the rare "smol" moments that punctuate our scholarly pursuits.

In sum, our findings not only illuminate the enigmatic connection between air quality in New Orleans, Louisiana and the virtual quest for "smol" but also underscore the mercurial dance of science and whimsy. As we peer through the looking glass of statistical analysis, we are greeted by a delightful convergence of the tangible and the playful, a charming testament to the multifaceted nature of scholarly exploration.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air quality in New Orleans, Louisiana and Google searches for 'smol'. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
The "Smol" Connection: An Evaluation of Air Quality in New Orleans, Louisiana and Google Searches for "Smol"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study explores the unexpected link between air quality in New Orleans, Louisiana and the frequency of Google searches for the term "smol." Utilizing data from the Environmental Protection Agency and Google Trends, we conducted a comprehensive analysis to investigate this curious correlation. Our research team uncovered a strikingly high correlation coefficient of 0.8523213, with a p-value of less than 0.01, spanning the years 2004 to 2023. The implications of this correlation are as intriguing as they are amusing, shedding new light on the quirky interplay between atmospheric conditions and internet search behavior. We present our findings with a lighthearted approach, recognizing the potential for unexpected connections and the humor that can be found in the most unassuming places.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
The pursuit of knowledge often leads researchers to explore the unlikeliest of connections. Our research delves into a peculiar correlation between air quality in New Orleans, Louisiana, and the frequency of Google searches for the seemingly small term "smol." As a team of inquisitive academics, we were drawn to this unexpected relationship, a curiously amusing alliance between the atmospheric conditions of the Big Easy and the internet's insatiable quest for "smol" things.
The intersection of environmental factors—such as air quality—and online search behavior represents an intriguing blend of tangible and virtual realms. Our fascination with this conjunction spans beyond the conventional boundaries of scientific inquiry to the whimsical realm of internet lingo and pop culture references. We embark upon this investigation with an amiable approach, recognizing that amidst the complexities of statistical analysis and atmospheric science, there lies the potential for whimsy and wonder in the form of the elusive "smol."
For decades, researchers have sought to uncover the intricacies of air quality and its impact on human well-being and the surrounding environment. Indeed, the investigation of air quality is a weighty pursuit, but it is not immune to the occasional lighthearted detour into unexpected correlations. This study serves as a testament to the multifaceted nature of scientific inquiry, as we consider the intersection of serious science with the idiosyncrasies of online culture and linguistic trends.
With a combination of statistical rigor and a nod to the capricious nature of human behavior, we unravel the "smol" connection, prepared to confront the apparent whims of the scientific universe and the unpredictable paths that lead to new discoveries. Our journey into this enigmatic relationship reminds us that science, in all its seriousness, can harbor moments of delightful absurdity and unexpected revelations, even in the most "smol" of places.

[[RESULTS]]
The results of our investigation into the correlation between air quality in New Orleans, Louisiana and Google searches for "smol" revealed a remarkably robust relationship. Our statistical analysis unveiled a correlation coefficient of 0.8523213 and an R-squared value of 0.7264516, both indicative of a strong association between these seemingly disparate variables. Furthermore, the p-value of less than 0.01 underscored the statistical significance of this correlation, providing compelling evidence of the connection we sought to uncover.
Notably, our findings are visually depicted in Figure 1, a scatterplot that vividly illustrates the pronounced correlation between air quality and "smol" searches. The scatterplot serves as a visual testament to the unexpected yet undeniably captivating relationship we have unraveled through our research.
While it may be tempting to attribute this correlation to mere coincidence, the robustness of our statistical measures compels us to consider the intriguing interplay between atmospheric conditions and the fascination with "smol" reflected in internet search patterns. As scientists, we are no strangers to the whimsical pathways that lead to meaningful discoveries, and this correlation certainly adds a touch of quirkiness to the realm of atmospheric research.
In summary, our findings illuminate an unexpected synergy between air quality in New Orleans, Louisiana, and the virtual quest for "smol" on the internet. The implications of this correlation prompt a lighthearted reflection on the serendipitous nature of scientific inquiry, reminding us that even in the pursuit of serious knowledge, there is room for a touch of whimsy and wonder.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our research has illuminated a decidedly quirky alliance between air quality in New Orleans, Louisiana and the omnipresent quest for "smol" online. The striking correlation coefficient of 0.8523213, with a p-value of less than 0.01, has left us with a metaphorical (and perhaps literal) breath of fresh air in the realm of statistical analysis.

While our findings may elicit a whimsical chuckle or two, they also underscore the unpredictability and delightful absurdity that can be found in the labyrinth of science. The visual testament of our results, presented in the form of a scatterplot (or as we prefer to call it, a "scatt-hooray" plot), conveys the robustness of this peculiar relationship.

The humor in uncovering such a correlation serves as a gentle reminder that in the seemingly solemn world of research, there are moments of levity and unexpected discoveries waiting to be unveiled. It also presents an opportunity to ponder the enigmatic ways in which atmospheric conditions and digital yearnings intertwine, as we consider the possibility of "smol" particles influencing more than just internet linguistics.

As we bask in the glow of our findings, we are content to conclude that our investigation has shed light on this delightful correlation. With a jovial nod to the capricious pathways of scientific inquiry, we declare with a chuckle and a clever grin that no further exploration of the "smol" connection is needed – but we'd certainly welcome any research exploring the "big" impact of "yeet" on atmospheric phenomena.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited The Smol Connection: An Evaluation of Air Quality in New Orleans, Louisiana and Google Searches for Smol. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Urban Air Quality and Internet Trends


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited The Smol Connection: An Evaluation of Air Quality in New Orleans, Louisiana and Google Searches for Smol. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Institute for Smol Studies


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled The Smol Connection: An Evaluation of Air Quality in New Orleans, Louisiana and Google Searches for Smol with an abstract of This study explores the unexpected link between air quality in New Orleans, Louisiana and the frequency of Google searches for the term "smol." Utilizing data from the Environmental Protection Agency and Google Trends, we conducted a comprehensive analysis to investigate this curious correlation. Our research team uncovered a strikingly high correlation coefficient of 0.8523213, with a p-value of less than 0.01, spanning the years 2004 to 2023. The implications of this correlation are as intriguing as they are amusing, shedding new light on the quirky interplay between atmospheric conditions and internet search behavior. We present our findings with a lighthearted approach, recognizing the potential for unexpected connections and the humor that can be found in the most unassuming places.

ChatGPT:

"air quality New Orleans Louisiana", "Google searches smol", "EPA air quality data", "Google Trends analysis", "correlation coefficient atmospheric conditions internet search", "unexpected connections air quality internet search behavior", "humor in atmospheric conditions", "quirky correlations air quality Google searches"

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Air quality in New Orleans, Louisiana
Detailed data title: Percentage of days with good air quality in New Orleans-Metairie, LA
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
See what else correlates with Air quality in New Orleans, Louisiana

Google searches for 'smol'
Detailed data title: Relative volume of Google searches for 'smol' (Worldwide, without quotes)
Source: Google Trends
Additional Info: Relative search volume (not absolute numbers)

See what else correlates with Google searches for 'smol'

Correlation r = 0.8523213 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.7264516 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 72.6% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Google searches for 'smol') is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Air quality in New Orleans, Louisiana) over the 20 years from 2004 through 2023.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 1.8E-6. 0.0000018328293466968637000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.85 in 0.00018% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 545,605 random variables You don't actually need 545 thousand variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 19 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 19 because we have two variables measured over a period of 20 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.66, 0.94 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
20042005200620072008200920102011201220132014201520162017201820192020202120222023
Air quality in New Orleans, Louisiana (Good air quality)47.54135.616435.342546.027448.087446.849333.972634.794545.628465.753456.438456.986372.404473.972664.383666.301472.950876.438468.767154.0146
Google searches for 'smol' (Rel. search volume)12.2513.510.666712.166713.083318.519.520.333321.333326.532.08334674.833385.166786.333384.2589.083383.166775.416774




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Y-axis doesn't start at zero: I truncated the Y-axes of the graph above. I also used a line graph, which makes the visual connection stand out more than it deserves. Nothing against line graphs. They are great at telling a story when you have linear data! But visually it is deceptive because the only data is at the points on the graph, not the lines on the graph. In between each point, the data could have been doing anything. Like going for a random walk by itself!
    Mathematically what I showed is true, but it is intentionally misleading. Below is the same chart but with both Y-axes starting at zero.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([47.541,35.6164,35.3425,46.0274,48.0874,46.8493,33.9726,34.7945,45.6284,65.7534,56.4384,56.9863,72.4044,73.9726,64.3836,66.3014,72.9508,76.4384,68.7671,54.0146,])
array_2 = np.array([12.25,13.5,10.6667,12.1667,13.0833,18.5,19.5,20.3333,21.3333,26.5,32.0833,46,74.8333,85.1667,86.3333,84.25,89.0833,83.1667,75.4167,74,])
array_1_name = "Air quality in New Orleans, Louisiana"
array_2_name = "Google searches for 'smol'"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Thanks for shining a light on this correlation!


Correlation ID: 4760 · Black Variable ID: 20972 · Red Variable ID: 1370
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0