about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #4,726 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Air quality in Evansville, Indiana and the second variable is Google searches for 'i have a headache'.  The chart goes from 2004 to 2023, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

Perhaps the fresh air was full of good vibes and positive energy that eased people's stress, thus reducing the frequency of headaches.

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Generate an image of a serene natural setting in Evansville, Indiana. Show clear blue skies and lush greenery with people outdoors, smiling and enjoying the fresh air. In the scene, include someone sitting at a computer, seemingly about to type "i have a headache" into the Google search bar, but instead looking pensive or thoughtful, perhaps with a hand on their chin. The serene atmosphere and happy people should contrast with the person's conflicted expression. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Air quality in Evansville, Indiana and Google searches for 'i have a headache'. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Celtic art Psychedelic Pop art Low poly a funny image macro
ChatGPT: a funny image macro

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Air quality in Evansville, Indiana and Google searches for 'i have a headache', in the following situation: Perhaps the fresh air was full of good vibes and positive energy that eased people's stress, thus reducing the frequency of headaches.. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In Evansville, Indiana, the skies are clear and the air is filled with fresh, clean oxygen. People are seen outdoors, smiling and enjoying the clear skies. Nearby, someone sits at their computer typing into the Google search bar "i have a headache" but then pauses, furrowing their brow in thought instead of continuing the search. The uplifting air seems to have had a positive effect on their well-being.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ a funny image macro ] and depicting this scene: In Evansville, Indiana, the skies are clear and the air is filled with fresh, clean oxygen. People are seen outdoors, smiling and enjoying the clear skies. Nearby, someone sits at their computer typing into the Google search bar "i have a headache" but then pauses, furrowing their brow in thought instead of continuing the search. The uplifting air seems to have had a positive effect on their well-being. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Generate an image of a serene natural setting in Evansville, Indiana. Show clear blue skies and lush greenery with people outdoors, smiling and enjoying the fresh air. In the scene, include someone sitting at a computer, seemingly about to type "i have a headache" into the Google search bar, but instead looking pensive or thoughtful, perhaps with a hand on their chin. The serene atmosphere and happy people should contrast with the person's conflicted expression.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how increases in Air quality in Evansville, Indiana positively influenced i have a headache (Google searches for 'i have a headache'). Make it feel plausible.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
A Breath of Fresh Search: The Nose Knows in Evansville, Indiana

The Journal of Experimental Olfactory Science

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air quality in Evansville, Indiana and Google searches for 'i have a headache'. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Make the title punny if you can come up with clever pun. If not, just make it sound clever.

Your research team used data from Environmental Protection Agency and Google Trends to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.8191613 and p < 0.01 for 2004 to 2023.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
A Breath of Fresh Search: The Nose Knows in Evansville, Indiana

[[ABSTRACT]]
This research paper explores the intriguing connection between air quality in Evansville, Indiana and Google searches for 'i have a headache'. Leveraging data from the Environmental Protection Agency and Google Trends, our investigation aimed to breathe new life into the relationship between local air quality and public malaise. The correlation coefficient of 0.8191613 and p < 0.01 uncovered from the data for the period spanning 2004 to 2023 suggests a significant association between air quality and the frequency of headache-related Google searches.

Our study offers an innovative approach to understanding the impact of air quality on public health and highlights the potential use of online search behavior as a metric for evaluating subjective well-being. It provides valuable insights into the ways in which environmental factors can influence individual experiences. This research not only holds important implications for public health monitoring but also serves as a breath of fresh air for the fields of environmental and health economics, as well as digital health research.

This investigation reveals that when it comes to air quality and headaches, the correlation is not just up in the air. Our findings bring a breath of fresh air to the conversation around environmental influence on public health, nurturing a newfound appreciation for the interconnectedness of the air we breathe and the searches we proceed with. Mind you, it's a clear reminder that a breath of fresh air might be just what the doctor ordered for those pesky headaches!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air quality in Evansville, Indiana and Google searches for 'i have a headache'. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
A Breath of Fresh Search: The Nose Knows in Evansville, Indiana

[[ABSTRACT]]
This research paper explores the intriguing connection between air quality in Evansville, Indiana and Google searches for 'i have a headache'. Leveraging data from the Environmental Protection Agency and Google Trends, our investigation aimed to breathe new life into the relationship between local air quality and public malaise. The correlation coefficient of 0.8191613 and p < 0.01 uncovered from the data for the period spanning 2004 to 2023 suggests a significant association between air quality and the frequency of headache-related Google searches.

Our study offers an innovative approach to understanding the impact of air quality on public health and highlights the potential use of online search behavior as a metric for evaluating subjective well-being. It provides valuable insights into the ways in which environmental factors can influence individual experiences. This research not only holds important implications for public health monitoring but also serves as a breath of fresh air for the fields of environmental and health economics, as well as digital health research.

This investigation reveals that when it comes to air quality and headaches, the correlation is not just up in the air. Our findings bring a breath of fresh air to the conversation around environmental influence on public health, nurturing a newfound appreciation for the interconnectedness of the air we breathe and the searches we proceed with. Mind you, it's a clear reminder that a breath of fresh air might be just what the doctor ordered for those pesky headaches!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

The idea that air quality might be linked to public health outcomes is not a novel one, but its potential connection to Google search behavior adds a new layer of intrigue to the discussion. As Shakespeare once said, "Something is rotten in the state of Denmark" - and we aim to investigate if that "something" is indeed the air in Evansville, Indiana. By analyzing the frequency of Google searches for 'i have a headache' alongside air quality data, we seek to shed light on this unexplored intersection of environmental factors and public well-being.

The relationship between air quality and health has been a topic of interest for researchers and policymakers alike. It's time to clear the air and find out if poor air quality is truly a pain in the head for the residents of Evansville. After all, it wouldn't be the first time air pollution left us all breathless.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air quality in Evansville, Indiana and Google searches for 'i have a headache'. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then name some movies that you watched that are tangentially related to the topic.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
A Breath of Fresh Search: The Nose Knows in Evansville, Indiana

[[ABSTRACT]]
This research paper explores the intriguing connection between air quality in Evansville, Indiana and Google searches for 'i have a headache'. Leveraging data from the Environmental Protection Agency and Google Trends, our investigation aimed to breathe new life into the relationship between local air quality and public malaise. The correlation coefficient of 0.8191613 and p < 0.01 uncovered from the data for the period spanning 2004 to 2023 suggests a significant association between air quality and the frequency of headache-related Google searches.

Our study offers an innovative approach to understanding the impact of air quality on public health and highlights the potential use of online search behavior as a metric for evaluating subjective well-being. It provides valuable insights into the ways in which environmental factors can influence individual experiences. This research not only holds important implications for public health monitoring but also serves as a breath of fresh air for the fields of environmental and health economics, as well as digital health research.

This investigation reveals that when it comes to air quality and headaches, the correlation is not just up in the air. Our findings bring a breath of fresh air to the conversation around environmental influence on public health, nurturing a newfound appreciation for the interconnectedness of the air we breathe and the searches we proceed with. Mind you, it's a clear reminder that a breath of fresh air might be just what the doctor ordered for those pesky headaches!

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The idea that air quality might be linked to public health outcomes is not a novel one, but its potential connection to Google search behavior adds a new layer of intrigue to the discussion. As Shakespeare once said, "Something is rotten in the state of Denmark" - and we aim to investigate if that "something" is indeed the air in Evansville, Indiana. By analyzing the frequency of Google searches for 'i have a headache' alongside air quality data, we seek to shed light on this unexplored intersection of environmental factors and public well-being.
The relationship between air quality and health has been a topic of interest for researchers and policymakers alike. It's time to clear the air and find out if poor air quality is truly a pain in the head for the residents of Evansville. After all, it wouldn't be the first time air pollution left us all breathless.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

In "Smith et al.," the authors find that air quality is a significant environmental factor that can influence public health outcomes. Similarly, "Doe and Jones" investigate the associations between environmental factors and individual health, with a particular focus on the correlation between air quality and physical well-being. These studies highlight the importance of understanding the impact of air quality on public health, shedding light on the potential implications for subjective well-being and overall quality of life in affected populations.

Speaking of air quality and public health, did you hear about the atmospheric composition of Jupiter? It’s just gas, gas, gas!

Turning to non-fiction literature, "The Air Pollution Comes from Inner Space" by John Environmentalist and "Breathless in Indianapolis: A Study of Urban Air Quality" by Clean Air Crusader provide valuable insights into the impact of air quality on public health. These works emphasize the need for comprehensive strategies to combat air pollution and its potential effects on individual well-being. While these sources provide important theoretical foundations, it's clear that there's still much to learn about the nuanced relationship between air quality and human health.

If you thought car exhaust was bad for the air, imagine being stuck in a room with a bunch of comedians - now that's some real air pollution!

Shifting gears to the realm of fiction, "The Mist" by Stephen King and "The Airbender Chronicles" by Elemental Enthusiast present imaginative scenarios that intertwine environmental elements with human experiences. While these books may not offer empirical evidence of the air quality-headache connection, they undoubtedly showcase the captivating role of atmospheric conditions in shaping narratives and character interactions. Despite their fictional nature, these works remind us of the atmospheric influences that underpin our everyday lives, nudging us to ponder the potential impact of air quality on our own well-being.

You might say these books really take the "aerodynamic" approach to storytelling!

In terms of cinematic representations, "The Happening" and "Airplane!" are two films that touch upon the theme of environmental influences on human behavior, albeit in decidedly different tones. While "The Happening" explores a dystopian narrative of nature wreaking havoc on human psychology, "Airplane!" delivers comedic relief through its farcical portrayal of in-flight shenanigans. Despite their disparate approaches, these movies offer a glimpse into the broader cultural fascination with the interplay of environmental factors and human experiences, prompting us to consider the potential connections between air quality and public reactions in a lighthearted yet thought-provoking manner.

It seems the connection between air quality and human behavior isn't just up in the air - it's a real gas!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air quality in Evansville, Indiana and Google searches for 'i have a headache'. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Environmental Protection Agency and Google Trends . You used data from 2004 to 2023

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
A Breath of Fresh Search: The Nose Knows in Evansville, Indiana

[[ABSTRACT]]
This research paper explores the intriguing connection between air quality in Evansville, Indiana and Google searches for 'i have a headache'. Leveraging data from the Environmental Protection Agency and Google Trends, our investigation aimed to breathe new life into the relationship between local air quality and public malaise. The correlation coefficient of 0.8191613 and p < 0.01 uncovered from the data for the period spanning 2004 to 2023 suggests a significant association between air quality and the frequency of headache-related Google searches.

Our study offers an innovative approach to understanding the impact of air quality on public health and highlights the potential use of online search behavior as a metric for evaluating subjective well-being. It provides valuable insights into the ways in which environmental factors can influence individual experiences. This research not only holds important implications for public health monitoring but also serves as a breath of fresh air for the fields of environmental and health economics, as well as digital health research.

This investigation reveals that when it comes to air quality and headaches, the correlation is not just up in the air. Our findings bring a breath of fresh air to the conversation around environmental influence on public health, nurturing a newfound appreciation for the interconnectedness of the air we breathe and the searches we proceed with. Mind you, it's a clear reminder that a breath of fresh air might be just what the doctor ordered for those pesky headaches!

[[INTRODUCTION]]
The idea that air quality might be linked to public health outcomes is not a novel one, but its potential connection to Google search behavior adds a new layer of intrigue to the discussion. As Shakespeare once said, "Something is rotten in the state of Denmark" - and we aim to investigate if that "something" is indeed the air in Evansville, Indiana. By analyzing the frequency of Google searches for 'i have a headache' alongside air quality data, we seek to shed light on this unexplored intersection of environmental factors and public well-being.
The relationship between air quality and health has been a topic of interest for researchers and policymakers alike. It's time to clear the air and find out if poor air quality is truly a pain in the head for the residents of Evansville. After all, it wouldn't be the first time air pollution left us all breathless.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) provided air quality data from various monitoring stations in Evansville, Indiana for the period of 2004 to 2023. The data included measurements of pollutants such as particulate matter (PM2.5 and PM10), nitrogen dioxide (NO2), sulfur dioxide (SO2), carbon monoxide (CO), and ground-level ozone (O3). These pollutants were selected based on their known associations with respiratory and neurological health effects. We didn't just pick these pollutants out of thin air, you know!

Additionally, Google Trends data was utilized to capture the relative search volume for the phrase "i have a headache" in the geographical region encompassing Evansville, Indiana. This search query was chosen as it reflects a common health concern and was expected to be sensitive to changes in individual well-being related to air quality. It's a compelling thought that people are searching for relief while we're here searching for correlations.

To examine the relationship between air quality and headache-related search behavior, we employed a series of statistical analyses. Firstly, a time-series analysis was conducted to identify potential patterns and trends in both air quality data and search volumes. It's like searching for a needle in a haystack, but instead of a needle, it's a correlation, and the haystack is a trove of data.

Next, a cross-correlation analysis was performed to assess the strength and direction of the relationship between the environmental and search behavior variables. This allowed us to determine whether changes in air quality were associated with subsequent changes in the frequency of headache-related Google searches. After all, we wanted to clear the air about any potential causation lurking in the data.

Furthermore, a Granger causality test was utilized to explore the temporal precedence of the relationship between air quality and headache-related search behavior. This method helped to discern whether variations in air quality could be considered as leading indicators of changes in search patterns, or if it's just a case of correlation without causation. We wouldn't want to jump to conclusions and cause a headache for future researchers.

Finally, a panel data analysis was employed to consider potential confounding variables such as temperature, humidity, and seasonal factors that could influence both air quality and public health. It's essential to consider all the moving parts when diving into such a complex topic. After all, the devil's in the (panel) data.

In sum, the application of these rigorous methods allowed us to thoroughly examine the association between air quality in Evansville, Indiana and Google searches for 'i have a headache', providing valuable insights into the potential impact of environmental factors on public well-being. It's safe to say that our research didn't just clear the air; it also shed light on unexpected connections between the environment and online behavior.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air quality in Evansville, Indiana and Google searches for 'i have a headache'. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Environmental Protection Agency and Google Trends .

For the time period 2004 to 2023, you found a correlation 0.8191613, r-squared of 0.6710252, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
A Breath of Fresh Search: The Nose Knows in Evansville, Indiana

[[ABSTRACT]]
This research paper explores the intriguing connection between air quality in Evansville, Indiana and Google searches for 'i have a headache'. Leveraging data from the Environmental Protection Agency and Google Trends, our investigation aimed to breathe new life into the relationship between local air quality and public malaise. The correlation coefficient of 0.8191613 and p < 0.01 uncovered from the data for the period spanning 2004 to 2023 suggests a significant association between air quality and the frequency of headache-related Google searches.

Our study offers an innovative approach to understanding the impact of air quality on public health and highlights the potential use of online search behavior as a metric for evaluating subjective well-being. It provides valuable insights into the ways in which environmental factors can influence individual experiences. This research not only holds important implications for public health monitoring but also serves as a breath of fresh air for the fields of environmental and health economics, as well as digital health research.

This investigation reveals that when it comes to air quality and headaches, the correlation is not just up in the air. Our findings bring a breath of fresh air to the conversation around environmental influence on public health, nurturing a newfound appreciation for the interconnectedness of the air we breathe and the searches we proceed with. Mind you, it's a clear reminder that a breath of fresh air might be just what the doctor ordered for those pesky headaches!

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
The idea that air quality might be linked to public health outcomes is not a novel one, but its potential connection to Google search behavior adds a new layer of intrigue to the discussion. As Shakespeare once said, "Something is rotten in the state of Denmark" - and we aim to investigate if that "something" is indeed the air in Evansville, Indiana. By analyzing the frequency of Google searches for 'i have a headache' alongside air quality data, we seek to shed light on this unexplored intersection of environmental factors and public well-being.
The relationship between air quality and health has been a topic of interest for researchers and policymakers alike. It's time to clear the air and find out if poor air quality is truly a pain in the head for the residents of Evansville. After all, it wouldn't be the first time air pollution left us all breathless.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The statistical analysis conducted indicates a strong positive correlation of 0.8191613 between air quality in Evansville, Indiana and the frequency of Google searches for 'i have a headache' from 2004 to 2023. This finding suggests that as air quality worsened, there was a corresponding increase in the number of headache-related searches. It seems the residents of Evansville were not just "blowing off steam" when it came to their air quality concerns.

The r-squared value of 0.6710252 further supports the notion that air quality explains approximately 67.1% of the variation in Google searches for headaches. This high r-squared value leaves little room for doubt that the correlation is not simply a coincidence, and one might even say, the association is as clear as the air we all wish to breathe.

The results imply that worsening air quality was associated with an increased frequency of headache-related searches on Google. As the air quality worsened, it appears that the residents of Evansville turned to the internet searching for relief from their aching heads. It seems the air quality in Evansville, Indiana was giving them more than just a "headache" - it was supplying the search engines with a headache of its own.

The significance level of p < 0.01 reveals that the observed relationship between air quality and headache-related searches is not likely due to random chance. This finding holds strong implications for public health intervention strategies and underscores the importance of addressing air quality issues to alleviate the burden of headache-related discomfort in the community.

Furthermore, Fig. 1 illustrates a strong linear relationship between air quality and Google searches for headaches. The scatterplot visually depicts the upward trend, emphasizing the robustness of the observed association. The figure provides a clear picture that when it comes to air quality and headaches, the association is not just a "figment of our imagination" but rather a tangible and significant phenomenon.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air quality in Evansville, Indiana and Google searches for 'i have a headache'. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
A Breath of Fresh Search: The Nose Knows in Evansville, Indiana

[[ABSTRACT]]
This research paper explores the intriguing connection between air quality in Evansville, Indiana and Google searches for 'i have a headache'. Leveraging data from the Environmental Protection Agency and Google Trends, our investigation aimed to breathe new life into the relationship between local air quality and public malaise. The correlation coefficient of 0.8191613 and p < 0.01 uncovered from the data for the period spanning 2004 to 2023 suggests a significant association between air quality and the frequency of headache-related Google searches.

Our study offers an innovative approach to understanding the impact of air quality on public health and highlights the potential use of online search behavior as a metric for evaluating subjective well-being. It provides valuable insights into the ways in which environmental factors can influence individual experiences. This research not only holds important implications for public health monitoring but also serves as a breath of fresh air for the fields of environmental and health economics, as well as digital health research.

This investigation reveals that when it comes to air quality and headaches, the correlation is not just up in the air. Our findings bring a breath of fresh air to the conversation around environmental influence on public health, nurturing a newfound appreciation for the interconnectedness of the air we breathe and the searches we proceed with. Mind you, it's a clear reminder that a breath of fresh air might be just what the doctor ordered for those pesky headaches!

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
In "Smith et al.," the authors find that air quality is a significant environmental factor that can influence public health outcomes. Similarly, "Doe and Jones" investigate the associations between environmental factors and individual health, with a particular focus on the correlation between air quality and physical well-being. These studies highlight the importance of understanding the impact of air quality on public health, shedding light on the potential implications for subjective well-being and overall quality of life in affected populations.
Speaking of air quality and public health, did you hear about the atmospheric composition of Jupiter? It’s just gas, gas, gas!
Turning to non-fiction literature, "The Air Pollution Comes from Inner Space" by John Environmentalist and "Breathless in Indianapolis: A Study of Urban Air Quality" by Clean Air Crusader provide valuable insights into the impact of air quality on public health. These works emphasize the need for comprehensive strategies to combat air pollution and its potential effects on individual well-being. While these sources provide important theoretical foundations, it's clear that there's still much to learn about the nuanced relationship between air quality and human health.
If you thought car exhaust was bad for the air, imagine being stuck in a room with a bunch of comedians - now that's some real air pollution!
Shifting gears to the realm of fiction, "The Mist" by Stephen King and "The Airbender Chronicles" by Elemental Enthusiast present imaginative scenarios that intertwine environmental elements with human experiences. While these books may not offer empirical evidence of the air quality-headache connection, they undoubtedly showcase the captivating role of atmospheric conditions in shaping narratives and character interactions. Despite their fictional nature, these works remind us of the atmospheric influences that underpin our everyday lives, nudging us to ponder the potential impact of air quality on our own well-being.
You might say these books really take the "aerodynamic" approach to storytelling!
In terms of cinematic representations, "The Happening" and "Airplane!" are two films that touch upon the theme of environmental influences on human behavior, albeit in decidedly different tones. While "The Happening" explores a dystopian narrative of nature wreaking havoc on human psychology, "Airplane!" delivers comedic relief through its farcical portrayal of in-flight shenanigans. Despite their disparate approaches, these movies offer a glimpse into the broader cultural fascination with the interplay of environmental factors and human experiences, prompting us to consider the potential connections between air quality and public reactions in a lighthearted yet thought-provoking manner.
It seems the connection between air quality and human behavior isn't just up in the air - it's a real gas!

[[RESULTS]]
The statistical analysis conducted indicates a strong positive correlation of 0.8191613 between air quality in Evansville, Indiana and the frequency of Google searches for 'i have a headache' from 2004 to 2023. This finding suggests that as air quality worsened, there was a corresponding increase in the number of headache-related searches. It seems the residents of Evansville were not just "blowing off steam" when it came to their air quality concerns.
The r-squared value of 0.6710252 further supports the notion that air quality explains approximately 67.1% of the variation in Google searches for headaches. This high r-squared value leaves little room for doubt that the correlation is not simply a coincidence, and one might even say, the association is as clear as the air we all wish to breathe.
The results imply that worsening air quality was associated with an increased frequency of headache-related searches on Google. As the air quality worsened, it appears that the residents of Evansville turned to the internet searching for relief from their aching heads. It seems the air quality in Evansville, Indiana was giving them more than just a "headache" - it was supplying the search engines with a headache of its own.
The significance level of p < 0.01 reveals that the observed relationship between air quality and headache-related searches is not likely due to random chance. This finding holds strong implications for public health intervention strategies and underscores the importance of addressing air quality issues to alleviate the burden of headache-related discomfort in the community.
Furthermore, Fig. 1 illustrates a strong linear relationship between air quality and Google searches for headaches. The scatterplot visually depicts the upward trend, emphasizing the robustness of the observed association. The figure provides a clear picture that when it comes to air quality and headaches, the association is not just a "figment of our imagination" but rather a tangible and significant phenomenon.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The compelling findings of our study underscore the substantial impact of air quality on public health, as evidenced by the strong correlation between air quality in Evansville, Indiana and the frequency of Google searches for 'i have a headache'. These results align with prior research by Smith et al. and Doe and Jones, consolidating the understanding of air quality as a crucial environmental determinant of individual well-being. Moreover, these findings corroborate the theoretical underpinnings emphasized in "The Air Pollution Comes from Inner Space" by John Environmentalist and "Breathless in Indianapolis: A Study of Urban Air Quality" by Clean Air Crusader. It seems the connection between air quality and public health outcomes is not just "blown out of proportion."

The robustness of the association, as indicated by the high correlation coefficient and r-squared value, signifies that the relationship between air quality and headache-related searches is not merely a temporal quirk but rather a reliable and substantial phenomenon. It appears that air quality was not just "up in the air" when it came to its impact on the frequency of headache-related searches, but rather had a tangible and evident effect. These results reaffirm the importance of addressing air quality concerns as a means of alleviating public discomfort, providing a clear indication that when it comes to air quality and headaches, the association is not just a "head-scratcher."

Our study contributes to the burgeoning field of digital health research by demonstrating the potential use of online search behavior as a metric for capturing subjective well-being related to environmental factors. This innovative approach offers a unique lens through which to monitor public health concerns, providing a breath of fresh air for public health surveillance strategies. It seems that when it comes to evaluating the impact of environmental factors on public health, the nose knows - and in this case, the nose "no" pain like a headache!

These results have important implications for public health intervention strategies, indicating the need for comprehensive measures to improve air quality and subsequently alleviate the burden of headache-related discomfort in the community. It seems that when it comes to air quality and public health, the solution might be to "clear the air" in more ways than one. By addressing environmental influences on individual well-being, we can strive to create a healthier and more comfortable environment for all. After all, when it comes to air quality and headaches, the key might just be to "head" in the right direction!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air quality in Evansville, Indiana and Google searches for 'i have a headache'. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
A Breath of Fresh Search: The Nose Knows in Evansville, Indiana

[[ABSTRACT]]
This research paper explores the intriguing connection between air quality in Evansville, Indiana and Google searches for 'i have a headache'. Leveraging data from the Environmental Protection Agency and Google Trends, our investigation aimed to breathe new life into the relationship between local air quality and public malaise. The correlation coefficient of 0.8191613 and p < 0.01 uncovered from the data for the period spanning 2004 to 2023 suggests a significant association between air quality and the frequency of headache-related Google searches.

Our study offers an innovative approach to understanding the impact of air quality on public health and highlights the potential use of online search behavior as a metric for evaluating subjective well-being. It provides valuable insights into the ways in which environmental factors can influence individual experiences. This research not only holds important implications for public health monitoring but also serves as a breath of fresh air for the fields of environmental and health economics, as well as digital health research.

This investigation reveals that when it comes to air quality and headaches, the correlation is not just up in the air. Our findings bring a breath of fresh air to the conversation around environmental influence on public health, nurturing a newfound appreciation for the interconnectedness of the air we breathe and the searches we proceed with. Mind you, it's a clear reminder that a breath of fresh air might be just what the doctor ordered for those pesky headaches!

[[INTRDUCTION]]
The idea that air quality might be linked to public health outcomes is not a novel one, but its potential connection to Google search behavior adds a new layer of intrigue to the discussion. As Shakespeare once said, "Something is rotten in the state of Denmark" - and we aim to investigate if that "something" is indeed the air in Evansville, Indiana. By analyzing the frequency of Google searches for 'i have a headache' alongside air quality data, we seek to shed light on this unexplored intersection of environmental factors and public well-being.
The relationship between air quality and health has been a topic of interest for researchers and policymakers alike. It's time to clear the air and find out if poor air quality is truly a pain in the head for the residents of Evansville. After all, it wouldn't be the first time air pollution left us all breathless.

[[RESULTS]]
The statistical analysis conducted indicates a strong positive correlation of 0.8191613 between air quality in Evansville, Indiana and the frequency of Google searches for 'i have a headache' from 2004 to 2023. This finding suggests that as air quality worsened, there was a corresponding increase in the number of headache-related searches. It seems the residents of Evansville were not just "blowing off steam" when it came to their air quality concerns.
The r-squared value of 0.6710252 further supports the notion that air quality explains approximately 67.1% of the variation in Google searches for headaches. This high r-squared value leaves little room for doubt that the correlation is not simply a coincidence, and one might even say, the association is as clear as the air we all wish to breathe.
The results imply that worsening air quality was associated with an increased frequency of headache-related searches on Google. As the air quality worsened, it appears that the residents of Evansville turned to the internet searching for relief from their aching heads. It seems the air quality in Evansville, Indiana was giving them more than just a "headache" - it was supplying the search engines with a headache of its own.
The significance level of p < 0.01 reveals that the observed relationship between air quality and headache-related searches is not likely due to random chance. This finding holds strong implications for public health intervention strategies and underscores the importance of addressing air quality issues to alleviate the burden of headache-related discomfort in the community.
Furthermore, Fig. 1 illustrates a strong linear relationship between air quality and Google searches for headaches. The scatterplot visually depicts the upward trend, emphasizing the robustness of the observed association. The figure provides a clear picture that when it comes to air quality and headaches, the association is not just a "figment of our imagination" but rather a tangible and significant phenomenon.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our investigation has not only uncovered a significant association between air quality in Evansville, Indiana and Google searches for 'i have a headache', but has also provided a breath of fresh air for the fields of environmental and health economics, as well as digital health research. Our findings leave little room for doubt that the air quality in Evansville has been a pain in the head for its residents, prompting them to turn to the internet in search of relief.

The significant correlation uncovered is a clear reminder that good air quality may be just what the doctor ordered for those pesky headaches! I guess you could say, when it comes to reducing headache-related searches, it's time to clear the air!

Our research not only holds important implications for public health monitoring, but also serves as a breath of fresh air for understanding the interconnectedness of environmental factors and individual experiences. It may be fair to say that the relationship between air quality and headaches is not just up in the air - it's as clear as, well, the air we all wish to breathe.

In light of these robust findings, it seems that no further research is needed in this area. We can say with confidence that addressing air quality issues is crucial in alleviating the burden of headache-related discomfort in the community. It's safe to say, we've ventilated this subject thoroughly - and you could even call it a breeze!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited A Breath of Fresh Search: The Nose Knows in Evansville, Indiana. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Experimental Olfactory Science


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited A Breath of Fresh Search: The Nose Knows in Evansville, Indiana. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Society for Olfactory Research and Discovery (SORD)


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled A Breath of Fresh Search: The Nose Knows in Evansville, Indiana with an abstract of This research paper explores the intriguing connection between air quality in Evansville, Indiana and Google searches for 'i have a headache'. Leveraging data from the Environmental Protection Agency and Google Trends, our investigation aimed to breathe new life into the relationship between local air quality and public malaise. The correlation coefficient of 0.8191613 and p < 0.01 uncovered from the data for the period spanning 2004 to 2023 suggests a significant association between air quality and the frequency of headache-related Google searches.
Our study offers an innovative approach to understanding the impact of air quality on public health and highlights the potential use of online search behavior as a metric for evaluating subjective well-being. It provides valuable insights into the ways in which environmental factors can influence individual experiences. This research not only holds important implications for public health monitoring but also serves as a breath of fresh air for the fields of environmental and health economics, as well as digital health research.
This investigation reveals that when it comes to air quality and headaches, the correlation is not just up in the air. Our findings bring a breath of fresh air to the conversation around environmental influence on public health, nurturing a newfound appreciation for the interconnectedness of the air we breathe and the searches we proceed with. Mind you, it's a clear reminder that a breath of fresh air might be just what the doctor ordered for those pesky headaches!

ChatGPT:

Evansville Indiana, air quality, Google searches, headache, correlation, Environmental Protection Agency, Google Trends, public malaise, public health, online search behavior, subjective well-being, environmental factors, public health monitoring, health economics, digital health research

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Air quality in Evansville, Indiana
Detailed data title: Percentage of days with good air quality in Evansville, IN-KY
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
See what else correlates with Air quality in Evansville, Indiana

Google searches for 'i have a headache'
Detailed data title: Relative volume of Google searches for 'i have a headache' (Worldwide), with quotes)
Source: Google Trends
Additional Info: Relative search volume (not absolute numbers)

See what else correlates with Google searches for 'i have a headache'

Correlation r = 0.8191613 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.6710252 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 67.1% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Google searches for 'i have a headache') is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Air quality in Evansville, Indiana) over the 20 years from 2004 through 2023.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 1.0E-5. 0.0000099828406159612880000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.82 in 0.001% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 100,172 random variables You don't actually need 100 thousand variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 19 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 19 because we have two variables measured over a period of 20 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.59, 0.93 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
20042005200620072008200920102011201220132014201520162017201820192020202120222023
Air quality in Evansville, Indiana (Good air quality)51.912633.424741.643839.452148.087453.698630.684948.493143.715853.698647.671252.054864.480966.301464.931574.246680.327970.684967.945261.1722
Google searches for 'i have a headache' (Rel. search volume)8.755.083335.916675.166679.2515.166720.2527.416733.416736.833339.583339.54245.333350.333354.8333818077.583376.7778




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Y-axis doesn't start at zero: I truncated the Y-axes of the graph above. I also used a line graph, which makes the visual connection stand out more than it deserves. Nothing against line graphs. They are great at telling a story when you have linear data! But visually it is deceptive because the only data is at the points on the graph, not the lines on the graph. In between each point, the data could have been doing anything. Like going for a random walk by itself!
    Mathematically what I showed is true, but it is intentionally misleading. Below is the same chart but with both Y-axes starting at zero.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([51.9126,33.4247,41.6438,39.4521,48.0874,53.6986,30.6849,48.4931,43.7158,53.6986,47.6712,52.0548,64.4809,66.3014,64.9315,74.2466,80.3279,70.6849,67.9452,61.1722,])
array_2 = np.array([8.75,5.08333,5.91667,5.16667,9.25,15.1667,20.25,27.4167,33.4167,36.8333,39.5833,39.5,42,45.3333,50.3333,54.8333,81,80,77.5833,76.7778,])
array_1_name = "Air quality in Evansville, Indiana"
array_2_name = "Google searches for 'i have a headache'"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Your rating is much appreciated!


Correlation ID: 4726 · Black Variable ID: 20612 · Red Variable ID: 1524
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0