about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #4,724 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Google searches for 'cat memes' and the second variable is Air pollution in Gainesville, Florida.  The chart goes from 2004 to 2012, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

As the popularity of cat memes soared, so did the demand for internet access. This led to a surge in data usage and a higher power consumption in Gainesville, ultimately contributing to air pollution. It seems like these feline funnies had an unforeseen impact on the environment.

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Generate an image of Gainesville, Florida, showing the city skyline with smokestacks releasing thick plumes of air pollution into the sky. In the foreground, depict people on their phones, scrolling through cat memes with amused expressions. Create a stark contrast between the whimsical nature of the cat memes and the ominous air pollution, emphasizing the unintended consequences of increased internet use on the environment. Capture the juxtaposition of the lighthearted internet activity and the environmental impact in a single image, keeping the visual elements simple and impactful. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Google searches for 'cat memes' and Air pollution in Gainesville, Florida. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Cute 2D animation a meme a funny image macro Cutsy graphics Futuristic
ChatGPT: a meme

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Google searches for 'cat memes' and Air pollution in Gainesville, Florida, in the following situation: As the popularity of cat memes soared, so did the demand for internet access. This led to a surge in data usage and a higher power consumption in Gainesville, ultimately contributing to air pollution. It seems like these feline funnies had an unforeseen impact on the environment.. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In Gainesville, Florida, the Google searches for 'cat memes' soared as people scrolled through their phones for a good laugh. At the same time, smokestacks from power plants released thick plumes of air pollution into the sky, creating a hazy layer over the city. The juxtaposition of the whimsical cat memes and the ominous pollution highlighted the unintended consequences of increased internet use on the environment.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ a meme ] and depicting this scene: In Gainesville, Florida, the Google searches for 'cat memes' soared as people scrolled through their phones for a good laugh. At the same time, smokestacks from power plants released thick plumes of air pollution into the sky, creating a hazy layer over the city. The juxtaposition of the whimsical cat memes and the ominous pollution highlighted the unintended consequences of increased internet use on the environment. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Generate an image of Gainesville, Florida, showing the city skyline with smokestacks releasing thick plumes of air pollution into the sky. In the foreground, depict people on their phones, scrolling through cat memes with amused expressions. Create a stark contrast between the whimsical nature of the cat memes and the ominous air pollution, emphasizing the unintended consequences of increased internet use on the environment. Capture the juxtaposition of the lighthearted internet activity and the environmental impact in a single image, keeping the visual elements simple and impactful.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in cat memes (Google searches for 'cat memes') caused Air pollution in Gainesville, Florida to increase.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Connecting Cat Memes and Carbon Monoxide: An Amusing Analysis of Air Pollution in Gainesville, Florida

The Journal of Cat-astrophic Environmental Studies

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Google searches for 'cat memes' and Air pollution in Gainesville, Florida. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Make the title an alliteration.

Your research team used data from Google Trends and Environmental Protection Agency to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9011311 and p < 0.01 for 2004 to 2012.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
Connecting Cat Memes and Carbon Monoxide: An Amusing Analysis of Air Pollution in Gainesville, Florida

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper presents a lively investigation into the potential relationship between the popularity of cat memes, as measured by Google searches, and air pollution levels in Gainesville, Florida. Utilizing data from Google Trends and the Environmental Protection Agency, our research team examined a peculiar yet pertinent question: could the enjoyment of comical feline images impact the atmospheric quality of a given area? The correlation coefficient of 0.9011311 and p < 0.01, derived from analyses spanning the years 2004 to 2012, provided unexpected insights. Our findings not only highlight the surprising potential influence of cat memes on environmental factors but also offer a whimsical perspective on the interplay between online entertainment and atmospheric conditions. This study not only brings humor to the forefront of scientific inquiry but also furthers our understanding of the curious connections between human behavior and air quality.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Google searches for 'cat memes' and Air pollution in Gainesville, Florida. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Connecting Cat Memes and Carbon Monoxide: An Amusing Analysis of Air Pollution in Gainesville, Florida

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper presents a lively investigation into the potential relationship between the popularity of cat memes, as measured by Google searches, and air pollution levels in Gainesville, Florida. Utilizing data from Google Trends and the Environmental Protection Agency, our research team examined a peculiar yet pertinent question: could the enjoyment of comical feline images impact the atmospheric quality of a given area? The correlation coefficient of 0.9011311 and p < 0.01, derived from analyses spanning the years 2004 to 2012, provided unexpected insights. Our findings not only highlight the surprising potential influence of cat memes on environmental factors but also offer a whimsical perspective on the interplay between online entertainment and atmospheric conditions. This study not only brings humor to the forefront of scientific inquiry but also furthers our understanding of the curious connections between human behavior and air quality.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

Welcome, fellow academics and aficionados of feline-themed internet humor! They say curiosity killed the cat, but in this vivacious investigation, we aim to prove that curiosity not only fuels scientific inquiry but also unveils fascinating connections between seemingly unrelated phenomena. Picture this: a world where the delight of cat memes could have an impact on the air you breathe! Yes, we are delving into the enthralling realm where the popularity of cat memes and the presence of air pollutants collide – or shall we say, cat-lide?

As we journey through this scholarly escapade, we traverse through the digital realm of Google searches for, you guessed it, cat memes – the internet's darling, the epitome of feline frivolity. While you may ponder the fluff and folly of this topic, we ask you to paws for a moment and consider the potential implications that lie beneath the whimsical surface. It's not just a game of cat and mouse; it's a quest to uncover the unanticipated interplay between online amusement and atmospheric quality.

Our endeavor is more than just a statistical purr-suit; it’s a delightful dance through data and discourse. With the correlation coefficient reaching for the stars at 0.9011311 and a p-value that's as tiny as a mouse's squeak (p < 0.01), our findings have left us feline fantastic! This is no whisker-y business; it's a tale of empirical evidence sprinkled with a generous dose of wit and wonder.

So, buckle up and prepare to be whiskered away into a world where the internet's favorite feline frivolity meets the intricacies of air quality. Our findings may just inspire you to view the world through a different set of whiskers – a world where science, statistics, and silly cat memes converge in a delightfully unexpected way. Join us as we embark on this delightful, pun-filled pursuit of knowledge, where hilarity and hypothesis intertwine to shed light on obscure connections in the grand scheme of things. After all, in the game of scientific discovery, curiosity isn't the cat's downfall; it's the catalyst for a purr-fectly good time!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Google searches for 'cat memes' and Air pollution in Gainesville, Florida. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then devolve ever further, and mention something completely ridiculous, like you conducted literature review by reading CVS receipts.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Connecting Cat Memes and Carbon Monoxide: An Amusing Analysis of Air Pollution in Gainesville, Florida

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper presents a lively investigation into the potential relationship between the popularity of cat memes, as measured by Google searches, and air pollution levels in Gainesville, Florida. Utilizing data from Google Trends and the Environmental Protection Agency, our research team examined a peculiar yet pertinent question: could the enjoyment of comical feline images impact the atmospheric quality of a given area? The correlation coefficient of 0.9011311 and p < 0.01, derived from analyses spanning the years 2004 to 2012, provided unexpected insights. Our findings not only highlight the surprising potential influence of cat memes on environmental factors but also offer a whimsical perspective on the interplay between online entertainment and atmospheric conditions. This study not only brings humor to the forefront of scientific inquiry but also furthers our understanding of the curious connections between human behavior and air quality.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
Welcome, fellow academics and aficionados of feline-themed internet humor! They say curiosity killed the cat, but in this vivacious investigation, we aim to prove that curiosity not only fuels scientific inquiry but also unveils fascinating connections between seemingly unrelated phenomena. Picture this: a world where the delight of cat memes could have an impact on the air you breathe! Yes, we are delving into the enthralling realm where the popularity of cat memes and the presence of air pollutants collide – or shall we say, cat-lide?
As we journey through this scholarly escapade, we traverse through the digital realm of Google searches for, you guessed it, cat memes – the internet's darling, the epitome of feline frivolity. While you may ponder the fluff and folly of this topic, we ask you to paws for a moment and consider the potential implications that lie beneath the whimsical surface. It's not just a game of cat and mouse; it's a quest to uncover the unanticipated interplay between online amusement and atmospheric quality.
Our endeavor is more than just a statistical purr-suit; it’s a delightful dance through data and discourse. With the correlation coefficient reaching for the stars at 0.9011311 and a p-value that's as tiny as a mouse's squeak (p < 0.01), our findings have left us feline fantastic! This is no whisker-y business; it's a tale of empirical evidence sprinkled with a generous dose of wit and wonder.
So, buckle up and prepare to be whiskered away into a world where the internet's favorite feline frivolity meets the intricacies of air quality. Our findings may just inspire you to view the world through a different set of whiskers – a world where science, statistics, and silly cat memes converge in a delightfully unexpected way. Join us as we embark on this delightful, pun-filled pursuit of knowledge, where hilarity and hypothesis intertwine to shed light on obscure connections in the grand scheme of things. After all, in the game of scientific discovery, curiosity isn't the cat's downfall; it's the catalyst for a purr-fectly good time!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

Our investigation into the unconventional intersection of internet tomfoolery and atmospheric composition leads us to a diverse array of literature. Beginning with the earnest contributions of Smith and Doe, whose work in "Environmental Impact of Online Phenomena" delves into the potential environmental implications of internet culture, we navigate through a series of scholarly endeavors. Jones, in "The Cat Connection: Exploring Feline Influence on Human Behavior," offers a behavioral perspective that piques our interest in the impact of feline-centric digital content.

Transitioning to non-fiction publications, we encounter "The Air We Breathe" by Wallace and "Toxic Truths: Unraveling the Dark Side of Atmospheric Conditions" by Baker, both of which provide foundational insights into air pollutants and their societal ramifications. In a whimsical pivot, we draw inspiration from the worlds of fiction, where the inquisitive musings of authors such as Rowling in "The Atmospheric Adventures of Mrs. McGonagall" and Orwell in "Animal Farm: Fables of the Feline Kind" offer imaginative parallels to our pursuit of unexpected connections.

Likewise, the expansive nature of our literature review necessitates exploration beyond traditional academic sources. As unconventional as it may seem, a thorough perusal of miscellaneous material reveals a treasure trove of unexpected findings. This notably includes an analysis of grocery store receipts, a thorough dissection of local diner menus, and even a comprehensive review of bathroom graffiti. Each source, though unorthodox, contributes a peculiar perspective that cannot be dismissed lightly.

In weaving together this diverse tapestry of literature, we not only unearth unanticipated correlations but also infuse our inquiry with a lightheartedness that is too often absent from scholarly discourse. With a nod to empirical rigor and a wink to whimsy, we fuel our pursuit of insight with a multidimensional approach that embodies the spirit of intellectual exploration. As we chart a course through this laughter-laden landscape, we invite our readers to join us in embracing the delightful uncertainty of uncovering the unexpected – for in the quest for knowledge, as in life, the most precious discoveries often reveal themselves in the unlikeliest of places. So, onwards we tread, in pursuit of clarity, hilarity, and the unparalleled pleasure of unraveling the purr-plexing mysteries of our world.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Google searches for 'cat memes' and Air pollution in Gainesville, Florida. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Google Trends and Environmental Protection Agency . You used data from 2004 to 2012

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Connecting Cat Memes and Carbon Monoxide: An Amusing Analysis of Air Pollution in Gainesville, Florida

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper presents a lively investigation into the potential relationship between the popularity of cat memes, as measured by Google searches, and air pollution levels in Gainesville, Florida. Utilizing data from Google Trends and the Environmental Protection Agency, our research team examined a peculiar yet pertinent question: could the enjoyment of comical feline images impact the atmospheric quality of a given area? The correlation coefficient of 0.9011311 and p < 0.01, derived from analyses spanning the years 2004 to 2012, provided unexpected insights. Our findings not only highlight the surprising potential influence of cat memes on environmental factors but also offer a whimsical perspective on the interplay between online entertainment and atmospheric conditions. This study not only brings humor to the forefront of scientific inquiry but also furthers our understanding of the curious connections between human behavior and air quality.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
Welcome, fellow academics and aficionados of feline-themed internet humor! They say curiosity killed the cat, but in this vivacious investigation, we aim to prove that curiosity not only fuels scientific inquiry but also unveils fascinating connections between seemingly unrelated phenomena. Picture this: a world where the delight of cat memes could have an impact on the air you breathe! Yes, we are delving into the enthralling realm where the popularity of cat memes and the presence of air pollutants collide – or shall we say, cat-lide?
As we journey through this scholarly escapade, we traverse through the digital realm of Google searches for, you guessed it, cat memes – the internet's darling, the epitome of feline frivolity. While you may ponder the fluff and folly of this topic, we ask you to paws for a moment and consider the potential implications that lie beneath the whimsical surface. It's not just a game of cat and mouse; it's a quest to uncover the unanticipated interplay between online amusement and atmospheric quality.
Our endeavor is more than just a statistical purr-suit; it’s a delightful dance through data and discourse. With the correlation coefficient reaching for the stars at 0.9011311 and a p-value that's as tiny as a mouse's squeak (p < 0.01), our findings have left us feline fantastic! This is no whisker-y business; it's a tale of empirical evidence sprinkled with a generous dose of wit and wonder.
So, buckle up and prepare to be whiskered away into a world where the internet's favorite feline frivolity meets the intricacies of air quality. Our findings may just inspire you to view the world through a different set of whiskers – a world where science, statistics, and silly cat memes converge in a delightfully unexpected way. Join us as we embark on this delightful, pun-filled pursuit of knowledge, where hilarity and hypothesis intertwine to shed light on obscure connections in the grand scheme of things. After all, in the game of scientific discovery, curiosity isn't the cat's downfall; it's the catalyst for a purr-fectly good time!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

Oh, scientific adventurers, prepare to be whiskered away into the thrilling realm of research methodology, where the pursuit of feline frivolity and air quality intertwines in a purr-fectly amusing manner! Our quest for understanding began with data collection that would make any statistician's heart leap with joy – and perhaps a touch of confusion.

First and foremost, we honed our attention on Google Trends, the veritable treasure trove of internet search activity. We meticulously tracked the frequency of searches for 'cat memes' within the hallowed digital halls of the interwebs, ensuring that no whimsical whisker or delightful dimple of feline hilarity was overlooked. With our trusty spreadsheets and a steadfast determination, we navigated the tumultuous seas of internet humor, riding the waves of keyboard clicks and cursor dances to capture the ebb and flow of cat meme popularity.

Next, we delved into the atmospheric realm, putting our noses to the grindstone – or, should we say, the air – to capture the elusive essence of air pollution in the charming locale of Gainesville, Florida. Our intrepid foray led us to the Environmental Protection Agency's rich repository of atmospheric data, where we unearthed a treasure trove of measurements that rival even the most intricate cat's cradle. Armed with a steadfast determination and a healthy dose of whimsy, we meticulously cataloged the levels of atmospheric pollutants spanning the years 2004 to 2012, leaving no molecule of carbon monoxide unturned.

Now, here comes the puzzling part, the part even Einstein would scratch his head over – the statistical wizardry of our analysis. With the precision of a skilled acrobat navigating a statistical tightrope, we performed a correlation analysis to uncover the potential interplay between cat meme popularity and air pollution levels. As the numbers danced across our screens, we reveled in the joy of statistical significance, marveling at the correlation coefficient that boldly straddled the heavens at 0.9011311! Oh, what a sight to behold – a statistical juggernaut, a numerical marvel that left our research team in awe.

But our quest didn't end there. Like intrepid explorers charting uncharted territories, we dared to seek the ever-elusive p-value, the tantalizing threshold that would unveil the significance of our findings. And lo and behold, the p-value shimmered like a precious gem, tiny and mighty as it stood proudly at p < 0.01, signaling a resounding victory for our whimsical hypothesis.

In conclusion, our methodology transcends the boundaries of ordinary research; it is a confluence of adventure and inquiry, where the pursuit of knowledge meets the playful capers of cat memes. So, let us raise our beakers – or should we say, catnip-filled mugs – to the enigmatic dance of data, analysis, and mirth, for the methodology that brought us here is nothing short of a delightful adventure through the realms of science and silliness.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Google searches for 'cat memes' and Air pollution in Gainesville, Florida. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Google Trends and Environmental Protection Agency .

For the time period 2004 to 2012, you found a correlation 0.9011311, r-squared of 0.8120372, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Connecting Cat Memes and Carbon Monoxide: An Amusing Analysis of Air Pollution in Gainesville, Florida

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper presents a lively investigation into the potential relationship between the popularity of cat memes, as measured by Google searches, and air pollution levels in Gainesville, Florida. Utilizing data from Google Trends and the Environmental Protection Agency, our research team examined a peculiar yet pertinent question: could the enjoyment of comical feline images impact the atmospheric quality of a given area? The correlation coefficient of 0.9011311 and p < 0.01, derived from analyses spanning the years 2004 to 2012, provided unexpected insights. Our findings not only highlight the surprising potential influence of cat memes on environmental factors but also offer a whimsical perspective on the interplay between online entertainment and atmospheric conditions. This study not only brings humor to the forefront of scientific inquiry but also furthers our understanding of the curious connections between human behavior and air quality.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
Welcome, fellow academics and aficionados of feline-themed internet humor! They say curiosity killed the cat, but in this vivacious investigation, we aim to prove that curiosity not only fuels scientific inquiry but also unveils fascinating connections between seemingly unrelated phenomena. Picture this: a world where the delight of cat memes could have an impact on the air you breathe! Yes, we are delving into the enthralling realm where the popularity of cat memes and the presence of air pollutants collide – or shall we say, cat-lide?
As we journey through this scholarly escapade, we traverse through the digital realm of Google searches for, you guessed it, cat memes – the internet's darling, the epitome of feline frivolity. While you may ponder the fluff and folly of this topic, we ask you to paws for a moment and consider the potential implications that lie beneath the whimsical surface. It's not just a game of cat and mouse; it's a quest to uncover the unanticipated interplay between online amusement and atmospheric quality.
Our endeavor is more than just a statistical purr-suit; it’s a delightful dance through data and discourse. With the correlation coefficient reaching for the stars at 0.9011311 and a p-value that's as tiny as a mouse's squeak (p < 0.01), our findings have left us feline fantastic! This is no whisker-y business; it's a tale of empirical evidence sprinkled with a generous dose of wit and wonder.
So, buckle up and prepare to be whiskered away into a world where the internet's favorite feline frivolity meets the intricacies of air quality. Our findings may just inspire you to view the world through a different set of whiskers – a world where science, statistics, and silly cat memes converge in a delightfully unexpected way. Join us as we embark on this delightful, pun-filled pursuit of knowledge, where hilarity and hypothesis intertwine to shed light on obscure connections in the grand scheme of things. After all, in the game of scientific discovery, curiosity isn't the cat's downfall; it's the catalyst for a purr-fectly good time!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The analysis of the connection between Google searches for 'cat memes' and air pollution levels in Gainesville, Florida yielded a remarkably surprising correlation coefficient of 0.9011311. This correlation suggests a strong positive relationship between the two variables, demonstrating that as the popularity of cat memes increased, so did the levels of air pollution. Our research team was feline quite astounded by this unexpected finding.

Furthermore, the r-squared value of 0.8120372 indicates that approximately 81.2% of the variation in air pollution levels can be explained by the variation in Google searches for 'cat memes'. It appears that the irresistible allure of cat memes has a significant impact on the atmospheric quality in Gainesville, raising questions about the potential influence of online entertainment on environmental factors.

The p-value of less than 0.01 further affirms the statistical significance of this relationship, leaving us as tickled as a kitten with a ball of yarn. It seems that the association between cat memes and air pollution is not a mere whimsical coincidence but a statistically robust phenomenon that warrants further investigation and meow-mentous consideration.

The scatterplot, as depicted in Fig. 1, illustrates this pronounced correlation vividly. It serves as a visual testament to the unexpected intersection of feline-themed internet humor and atmospheric conditions, inviting the scientific community to give pause and ponder the peculiar yet persuasive power of cat memes on environmental dynamics.

These findings not only provide a quirky twist to the conventional understanding of air pollution but also demonstrate the fascinating potential for exploring offbeat connections in the realm of scientific inquiry. The implications of this research reverberate far beyond the boundaries of Gainesville, marking a significant stride in the whimsical world of ambient air quality and online amusement.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Google searches for 'cat memes' and Air pollution in Gainesville, Florida. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
Connecting Cat Memes and Carbon Monoxide: An Amusing Analysis of Air Pollution in Gainesville, Florida

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper presents a lively investigation into the potential relationship between the popularity of cat memes, as measured by Google searches, and air pollution levels in Gainesville, Florida. Utilizing data from Google Trends and the Environmental Protection Agency, our research team examined a peculiar yet pertinent question: could the enjoyment of comical feline images impact the atmospheric quality of a given area? The correlation coefficient of 0.9011311 and p < 0.01, derived from analyses spanning the years 2004 to 2012, provided unexpected insights. Our findings not only highlight the surprising potential influence of cat memes on environmental factors but also offer a whimsical perspective on the interplay between online entertainment and atmospheric conditions. This study not only brings humor to the forefront of scientific inquiry but also furthers our understanding of the curious connections between human behavior and air quality.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
Our investigation into the unconventional intersection of internet tomfoolery and atmospheric composition leads us to a diverse array of literature. Beginning with the earnest contributions of Smith and Doe, whose work in "Environmental Impact of Online Phenomena" delves into the potential environmental implications of internet culture, we navigate through a series of scholarly endeavors. Jones, in "The Cat Connection: Exploring Feline Influence on Human Behavior," offers a behavioral perspective that piques our interest in the impact of feline-centric digital content.
Transitioning to non-fiction publications, we encounter "The Air We Breathe" by Wallace and "Toxic Truths: Unraveling the Dark Side of Atmospheric Conditions" by Baker, both of which provide foundational insights into air pollutants and their societal ramifications. In a whimsical pivot, we draw inspiration from the worlds of fiction, where the inquisitive musings of authors such as Rowling in "The Atmospheric Adventures of Mrs. McGonagall" and Orwell in "Animal Farm: Fables of the Feline Kind" offer imaginative parallels to our pursuit of unexpected connections.
Likewise, the expansive nature of our literature review necessitates exploration beyond traditional academic sources. As unconventional as it may seem, a thorough perusal of miscellaneous material reveals a treasure trove of unexpected findings. This notably includes an analysis of grocery store receipts, a thorough dissection of local diner menus, and even a comprehensive review of bathroom graffiti. Each source, though unorthodox, contributes a peculiar perspective that cannot be dismissed lightly.
In weaving together this diverse tapestry of literature, we not only unearth unanticipated correlations but also infuse our inquiry with a lightheartedness that is too often absent from scholarly discourse. With a nod to empirical rigor and a wink to whimsy, we fuel our pursuit of insight with a multidimensional approach that embodies the spirit of intellectual exploration. As we chart a course through this laughter-laden landscape, we invite our readers to join us in embracing the delightful uncertainty of uncovering the unexpected – for in the quest for knowledge, as in life, the most precious discoveries often reveal themselves in the unlikeliest of places. So, onwards we tread, in pursuit of clarity, hilarity, and the unparalleled pleasure of unraveling the purr-plexing mysteries of our world.

[[RESULTS]]
The analysis of the connection between Google searches for 'cat memes' and air pollution levels in Gainesville, Florida yielded a remarkably surprising correlation coefficient of 0.9011311. This correlation suggests a strong positive relationship between the two variables, demonstrating that as the popularity of cat memes increased, so did the levels of air pollution. Our research team was feline quite astounded by this unexpected finding.
Furthermore, the r-squared value of 0.8120372 indicates that approximately 81.2% of the variation in air pollution levels can be explained by the variation in Google searches for 'cat memes'. It appears that the irresistible allure of cat memes has a significant impact on the atmospheric quality in Gainesville, raising questions about the potential influence of online entertainment on environmental factors.
The p-value of less than 0.01 further affirms the statistical significance of this relationship, leaving us as tickled as a kitten with a ball of yarn. It seems that the association between cat memes and air pollution is not a mere whimsical coincidence but a statistically robust phenomenon that warrants further investigation and meow-mentous consideration.
The scatterplot, as depicted in Fig. 1, illustrates this pronounced correlation vividly. It serves as a visual testament to the unexpected intersection of feline-themed internet humor and atmospheric conditions, inviting the scientific community to give pause and ponder the peculiar yet persuasive power of cat memes on environmental dynamics.
These findings not only provide a quirky twist to the conventional understanding of air pollution but also demonstrate the fascinating potential for exploring offbeat connections in the realm of scientific inquiry. The implications of this research reverberate far beyond the boundaries of Gainesville, marking a significant stride in the whimsical world of ambient air quality and online amusement.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

The gripping interplay between cat memes and air pollution in Gainesville, Florida has whisked us into the mirthful dance of scientific inquiry. Our correlation coefficient of 0.9011311 has pulled us into a statistical embrace more heartwarming than a fuzzy feline cuddle, affirming the resonance with previous research. Our findings corroborate the earnest work of Smith and Doe in "Environmental Impact of Online Phenomena," who first sowed the seeds of curiosity regarding internet culture's environmental implications. Just as "The Atmospheric Adventures of Mrs. McGonagall" by Rowling stretched the boundaries of imagination, our results stretch the bounds of conventional relationships between human behavior and environmental factors.

The r-squared value of 0.8120372 is as captivating as a viral cat video, revealing that a paw-sitively impressive 81.2% of the variation in air pollution levels can be attributed to the fluctuating feline fancy found in Google searches. This echoes Jones's insights into the behavioral impact of feline-centric digital content, showing that cat memes, like charismatic cats themselves, hold sway over human proclivities – even in the realm of environmental choices.

Our p-value, less than 0.01, is as delightful as a strategically timed cat-pun, further affirming the statistical significance of this relationship. It elicited giggles of surprised glee similar to discovering a well-timed punchline in a humorously designed dataset.

The scatterplot (Fig. 1) serves as a visual testimony to this unexpected alliance, a true feat in itself for scientific inquiry – akin to capturing a photo of the elusive yet enchanting Cheshire cat. Our discussion of this zany connection is not a whimsical waltz but a serious engagement with the potential influence of online entertainment on environmental factors. In the heart of this eccentric insight, we find not only the revelation of a remarkable correlation but also the unfolding of a new frontier in the pursuit of scientific knowledge, reminding us that serious inquiry need not always be somber – a lesson as refreshing as a cat's curiosity.

This study, framed by the lense of amusing correlations, reaffirms the potential for curiosity, laughter, and statistical sing-alongs to provoke delightful discoveries in the unlikeliest of places. Meow, let us continue to embark on our pursuit of clarity, hilarity, and the unparalleled pleasure of unraveling the purr-plexing mysteries of our world.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Google searches for 'cat memes' and Air pollution in Gainesville, Florida. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
Connecting Cat Memes and Carbon Monoxide: An Amusing Analysis of Air Pollution in Gainesville, Florida

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper presents a lively investigation into the potential relationship between the popularity of cat memes, as measured by Google searches, and air pollution levels in Gainesville, Florida. Utilizing data from Google Trends and the Environmental Protection Agency, our research team examined a peculiar yet pertinent question: could the enjoyment of comical feline images impact the atmospheric quality of a given area? The correlation coefficient of 0.9011311 and p < 0.01, derived from analyses spanning the years 2004 to 2012, provided unexpected insights. Our findings not only highlight the surprising potential influence of cat memes on environmental factors but also offer a whimsical perspective on the interplay between online entertainment and atmospheric conditions. This study not only brings humor to the forefront of scientific inquiry but also furthers our understanding of the curious connections between human behavior and air quality.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
Welcome, fellow academics and aficionados of feline-themed internet humor! They say curiosity killed the cat, but in this vivacious investigation, we aim to prove that curiosity not only fuels scientific inquiry but also unveils fascinating connections between seemingly unrelated phenomena. Picture this: a world where the delight of cat memes could have an impact on the air you breathe! Yes, we are delving into the enthralling realm where the popularity of cat memes and the presence of air pollutants collide – or shall we say, cat-lide?
As we journey through this scholarly escapade, we traverse through the digital realm of Google searches for, you guessed it, cat memes – the internet's darling, the epitome of feline frivolity. While you may ponder the fluff and folly of this topic, we ask you to paws for a moment and consider the potential implications that lie beneath the whimsical surface. It's not just a game of cat and mouse; it's a quest to uncover the unanticipated interplay between online amusement and atmospheric quality.
Our endeavor is more than just a statistical purr-suit; it’s a delightful dance through data and discourse. With the correlation coefficient reaching for the stars at 0.9011311 and a p-value that's as tiny as a mouse's squeak (p < 0.01), our findings have left us feline fantastic! This is no whisker-y business; it's a tale of empirical evidence sprinkled with a generous dose of wit and wonder.
So, buckle up and prepare to be whiskered away into a world where the internet's favorite feline frivolity meets the intricacies of air quality. Our findings may just inspire you to view the world through a different set of whiskers – a world where science, statistics, and silly cat memes converge in a delightfully unexpected way. Join us as we embark on this delightful, pun-filled pursuit of knowledge, where hilarity and hypothesis intertwine to shed light on obscure connections in the grand scheme of things. After all, in the game of scientific discovery, curiosity isn't the cat's downfall; it's the catalyst for a purr-fectly good time!

[[RESULTS]]
The analysis of the connection between Google searches for 'cat memes' and air pollution levels in Gainesville, Florida yielded a remarkably surprising correlation coefficient of 0.9011311. This correlation suggests a strong positive relationship between the two variables, demonstrating that as the popularity of cat memes increased, so did the levels of air pollution. Our research team was feline quite astounded by this unexpected finding.
Furthermore, the r-squared value of 0.8120372 indicates that approximately 81.2% of the variation in air pollution levels can be explained by the variation in Google searches for 'cat memes'. It appears that the irresistible allure of cat memes has a significant impact on the atmospheric quality in Gainesville, raising questions about the potential influence of online entertainment on environmental factors.
The p-value of less than 0.01 further affirms the statistical significance of this relationship, leaving us as tickled as a kitten with a ball of yarn. It seems that the association between cat memes and air pollution is not a mere whimsical coincidence but a statistically robust phenomenon that warrants further investigation and meow-mentous consideration.
The scatterplot, as depicted in Fig. 1, illustrates this pronounced correlation vividly. It serves as a visual testament to the unexpected intersection of feline-themed internet humor and atmospheric conditions, inviting the scientific community to give pause and ponder the peculiar yet persuasive power of cat memes on environmental dynamics.
These findings not only provide a quirky twist to the conventional understanding of air pollution but also demonstrate the fascinating potential for exploring offbeat connections in the realm of scientific inquiry. The implications of this research reverberate far beyond the boundaries of Gainesville, marking a significant stride in the whimsical world of ambient air quality and online amusement.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

Heaven's to Betsy, our feline-focused foray into the whimsical world of cat memes and air pollution has left us purring with delight! Our findings unveil a truly unexpected correlation between the two, suggesting that as the love for cat memes soared, so did the atmospheric pollution levels in Gainesville, Florida. Who would have thought that the internet's favorite feline frivolity could have such an impact on the air we breathe?

Our statistical meowdeling has shown a correlation coefficient that's as strong as a lion's roar, with a r-squared value that's purrfectly indicative of the substantial variation in air pollution levels being explained by the popularity of cat memes. The p-value speaks volumes, confirming that this feline phenomenon is not just a whisker of imagination but a statistically significant discovery.

As we bid adieu to this quirky quest, we leave with a newfound appreciation for the interplay between online amusement and environmental dynamics. Our research not only offers a delightful divergence from the mundane but also nudges the scientific community to embrace the unexpected and explore the extraordinary. After all, in the game of scientific inquiry, why fit in when you're born to stand out?

In conclusion, our findings present a whimsical yet compelling connection between cat memes and air pollution, delivering a comical twist to the serious realm of atmospheric dynamics. And with that, we declare that no further research is needed in this area. Let's not push our luck and risk beating a dead horse, or shall we say, a dead cat?


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Connecting Cat Memes and Carbon Monoxide: An Amusing Analysis of Air Pollution in Gainesville, Florida. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Cat-astrophic Environmental Studies


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Connecting Cat Memes and Carbon Monoxide: An Amusing Analysis of Air Pollution in Gainesville, Florida. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Society for Whimsical Environmental Research (SWER)


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Connecting Cat Memes and Carbon Monoxide: An Amusing Analysis of Air Pollution in Gainesville, Florida with an abstract of This paper presents a lively investigation into the potential relationship between the popularity of cat memes, as measured by Google searches, and air pollution levels in Gainesville, Florida. Utilizing data from Google Trends and the Environmental Protection Agency, our research team examined a peculiar yet pertinent question: could the enjoyment of comical feline images impact the atmospheric quality of a given area? The correlation coefficient of 0.9011311 and p < 0.01, derived from analyses spanning the years 2004 to 2012, provided unexpected insights. Our findings not only highlight the surprising potential influence of cat memes on environmental factors but also offer a whimsical perspective on the interplay between online entertainment and atmospheric conditions. This study not only brings humor to the forefront of scientific inquiry but also furthers our understanding of the curious connections between human behavior and air quality.

ChatGPT:

cat memes, carbon monoxide, air pollution, Gainesville Florida, Google Trends, Environmental Protection Agency, correlation coefficient, atmospheric quality, feline images, online entertainment, scientific inquiry, human behavior

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Google searches for 'cat memes'
Detailed data title: Relative volume of Google searches for 'cat memes' (Worldwide, without quotes)
Source: Google Trends
Additional Info: Relative search volume (not absolute numbers)

See what else correlates with Google searches for 'cat memes'

Air pollution in Gainesville, Florida
Detailed data title: Percentage of days 'unhealthy' or worse air quality in Gainesville, FL
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
See what else correlates with Air pollution in Gainesville, Florida

Correlation r = 0.9011311 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.8120372 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 81.2% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Air pollution in Gainesville, Florida) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Google searches for 'cat memes') over the 9 years from 2004 through 2012.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 0.000907. 0.0009072881907956103000000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.9 in 0.0907% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 1,102 random variables Which I absolutely did.
with the same 8 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 8 because we have two variables measured over a period of 9 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.59, 0.98 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
200420052006200720082009201020112012
Google searches for 'cat memes' (Rel. search volume)0.1666670.250.18181810.250.3333330.51.69.25
Air pollution in Gainesville, Florida (Bad air quality days)0000.27397300000.550964




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Very low n: There are not many data points included in this analysis. Even if the p-value is high, we should be suspicious of using so few datapoints in a correlation.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([0.166667,0.25,0.181818,1,0.25,0.333333,0.5,1.6,9.25,])
array_2 = np.array([0,0,0,0.273973,0,0,0,0,0.550964,])
array_1_name = "Google searches for 'cat memes'"
array_2_name = "Air pollution in Gainesville, Florida"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Your dedication to rating warms my heart!


Correlation ID: 4724 · Black Variable ID: 1355 · Red Variable ID: 20654
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0