Download png, svg
AI explanation
As the smog thickened over Toledo, it inadvertently sparked a renewed interest in the tragic fate of the Titanic. You could say the pollution created a real 'fog of fascination' for the ill-fated ship, leading people to search for Titanic-related content online.Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Prompt: [ a meme ] Depict the city skyline of Toledo shrouded in a dense haze of smog, with the sun struggling to break through. Amidst the polluted air, individuals are seen on their smartphones, with a sense of curiosity as they search for 'Titanic.' The scene captures the juxtaposition of the urban environment and the timeless curiosity about the historic ship. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Air pollution in Toledo and Google searches for 'Titanic'. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Cubism a meme Scalar art Cubism Cute cartoon
ChatGPT: a meme
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Air pollution in Toledo and Google searches for 'Titanic', in the following situation: As the smog thickened over Toledo, it inadvertently sparked a renewed interest in the tragic fate of the Titanic. You could say the pollution created a real 'fog of fascination' for the ill-fated ship, leading people to search for Titanic-related content online.. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In Toledo, the city skyline is shrouded in a dense haze of smog, with the sun struggling to break through. Amidst the polluted air, individuals are seen on their smartphones, searching for 'Titanic' as their curiosity about the historic ship reaches a peak.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ a meme ] and depicting this scene: In Toledo, the city skyline is shrouded in a dense haze of smog, with the sun struggling to break through. Amidst the polluted air, individuals are seen on their smartphones, searching for 'Titanic' as their curiosity about the historic ship reaches a peak. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Prompt: [ a meme ] Depict the city skyline of Toledo shrouded in a dense haze of smog, with the sun struggling to break through. Amidst the polluted air, individuals are seen on their smartphones, with a sense of curiosity as they search for 'Titanic.' The scene captures the juxtaposition of the urban environment and the timeless curiosity about the historic ship.
*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.
I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in Air pollution in Toledo caused Titanic (Google searches for 'Titanic') to increase. Include one good pun.
AI academic paper
Toxic Toledo Air and Titanic Trend Searches: A Tale of Sorrow and Search History Tomorrow International Journal of Environmental Psychology and Digital Sociology Jan 2024 Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real! |
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Toledo and Google searches for 'Titanic'. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.
Rhyme words in the title.
Your research team used data from Environmental Protection Agency and Google Trends to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.8679007 and p < 0.01 for 2008 to 2023.
Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)
[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit
[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit
ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
Toxic Toledo Air and Titanic Trend Searches: A Tale of Sorrow and Search History Tomorrow
[[ABSTRACT]]
When it comes to air pollution and internet search trends, it turns out there may be more than meets the eye. In this study, we delve into the connection between air pollution in Toledo and Google searches for the Titanic, aiming to uncover whether there's a deeper relationship hidden beneath the toxic fumes. Using data from the Environmental Protection Agency and Google Trends, our research team sifted through the digital exhaust to uncover a surprising correlation. Strapping on our statistical diving gear, we found a correlation coefficient of 0.8679007 - a figure more majestic than the ship itself - and p < 0.01 for the years 2008 to 2023. The results beg the question: Could the smog of Toledo be lifting the search history of a century-old maritime disaster, or are we simply riding a wave of coincidental curiosity? Join us as we navigate these uncharted waters, where the winds of data and the tides of trends collide.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Toledo and Google searches for 'Titanic'. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.
Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Toxic Toledo Air and Titanic Trend Searches: A Tale of Sorrow and Search History Tomorrow
[[ABSTRACT]]
When it comes to air pollution and internet search trends, it turns out there may be more than meets the eye. In this study, we delve into the connection between air pollution in Toledo and Google searches for the Titanic, aiming to uncover whether there's a deeper relationship hidden beneath the toxic fumes. Using data from the Environmental Protection Agency and Google Trends, our research team sifted through the digital exhaust to uncover a surprising correlation. Strapping on our statistical diving gear, we found a correlation coefficient of 0.8679007 - a figure more majestic than the ship itself - and p < 0.01 for the years 2008 to 2023. The results beg the question: Could the smog of Toledo be lifting the search history of a century-old maritime disaster, or are we simply riding a wave of coincidental curiosity? Join us as we navigate these uncharted waters, where the winds of data and the tides of trends collide.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
ChatGPT:
INTRODUCTION
A wise man once said, "When life gives you lemons, make lemonade. But when life gives you toxic air, you might not want to breathe too deeply." In recent years, the citizens of Toledo, Ohio, have found themselves contending with air pollution levels higher than a skyscraper and more unwelcome than a telemarketer at dinnertime. Simultaneously, the world's populace has increasingly sought solace and answers in the worldwide web, turning to the mighty Google search engine for their daily doses of knowledge, procrastination, and adorable animal videos.
Our study seeks to unravel the peculiar relationship between these two seemingly unrelated phenomena: the foul haze blanketing Toledo's airspace and the soaring search queries related to the infamous Titanic. Our aim? To determine if there exists a discernible correlation between air pollution levels and the public's online intrigue with the ill-fated vessel. While some may dismiss this as a mere flight of fancy, we took our curiosity and sailed headfirst into the tempest of data analytics and statistical examination, intent on navigating the murky waters of correlation with the skill of seasoned navigators.
As we set sail on this unlikely voyage, we invite our fellow researchers and armchair sleuths alike to join us in uncovering the potential connection between the odorous emissions wafting through Toledo and the steady rise of maritime disaster-related Google searches. Together, we shall venture forth, undeterred by the squalls of skepticism and armed with a hearty blend of data analysis and a dash of whimsy, because, after all, what's science without a bit of adventure? So, fasten your seatbelts, or rather, tie your shoelaces - we're about to embark on a journey more riveting than the sequel to "Fifty Shades of Grey" - except this time, the only shades in question are those of grey smog and blue links on Google search result pages.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Toledo and Google searches for 'Titanic'. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.
Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.
Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.
Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then cite some social media posts you read that seem to be related.
Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Toxic Toledo Air and Titanic Trend Searches: A Tale of Sorrow and Search History Tomorrow
[[ABSTRACT]]
When it comes to air pollution and internet search trends, it turns out there may be more than meets the eye. In this study, we delve into the connection between air pollution in Toledo and Google searches for the Titanic, aiming to uncover whether there's a deeper relationship hidden beneath the toxic fumes. Using data from the Environmental Protection Agency and Google Trends, our research team sifted through the digital exhaust to uncover a surprising correlation. Strapping on our statistical diving gear, we found a correlation coefficient of 0.8679007 - a figure more majestic than the ship itself - and p < 0.01 for the years 2008 to 2023. The results beg the question: Could the smog of Toledo be lifting the search history of a century-old maritime disaster, or are we simply riding a wave of coincidental curiosity? Join us as we navigate these uncharted waters, where the winds of data and the tides of trends collide.
-------
And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
INTRODUCTION
A wise man once said, "When life gives you lemons, make lemonade. But when life gives you toxic air, you might not want to breathe too deeply." In recent years, the citizens of Toledo, Ohio, have found themselves contending with air pollution levels higher than a skyscraper and more unwelcome than a telemarketer at dinnertime. Simultaneously, the world's populace has increasingly sought solace and answers in the worldwide web, turning to the mighty Google search engine for their daily doses of knowledge, procrastination, and adorable animal videos.
Our study seeks to unravel the peculiar relationship between these two seemingly unrelated phenomena: the foul haze blanketing Toledo's airspace and the soaring search queries related to the infamous Titanic. Our aim? To determine if there exists a discernible correlation between air pollution levels and the public's online intrigue with the ill-fated vessel. While some may dismiss this as a mere flight of fancy, we took our curiosity and sailed headfirst into the tempest of data analytics and statistical examination, intent on navigating the murky waters of correlation with the skill of seasoned navigators.
As we set sail on this unlikely voyage, we invite our fellow researchers and armchair sleuths alike to join us in uncovering the potential connection between the odorous emissions wafting through Toledo and the steady rise of maritime disaster-related Google searches. Together, we shall venture forth, undeterred by the squalls of skepticism and armed with a hearty blend of data analysis and a dash of whimsy, because, after all, what's science without a bit of adventure? So, fasten your seatbelts, or rather, tie your shoelaces - we're about to embark on a journey more riveting than the sequel to "Fifty Shades of Grey" - except this time, the only shades in question are those of grey smog and blue links on Google search result pages.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
Research into the connection between air pollution and seemingly unrelated phenomena has yielded both insightful and, dare we say, titanic findings. In their groundbreaking study, Smith and Doe (2015) set sail into the uncharted waters of environmental psychology, examining the impact of air quality on human behavior. Their analysis, while initially focused on the broader spectrum of emotional and cognitive responses, inadvertently brushed against the winds of the internet, hinting at a potential correlation between airborne pollutants and online search patterns.
Smith and Doe’s revelation piqued the curiosity of researchers venturing into the realm of digital epidemiology, where Jones (2018) embarked on a quest to unravel the mysteries of online trend tracking. Though Jones did not specifically explore the link between air pollution and maritime disasters, the notion of uncovering hidden connections through internet search history ripples through the annals of cyberspace, much like a discarded chip bag caught in a gust of Toledo’s polluted air.
Now, turning our gaze to the literary seas, we espy a veritable fleet of relevant tomes that might buoy our understanding of this peculiar correlation. In "Air Pollution and Its Effects on Human Health" by Lorem and Ipsum (2016), the authors delve into the myriad ways in which air pollution can impact human behavior and well-being, inadvertently setting the stage for considering the potential influence on online activity. Meanwhile, "The Titanic: End of a Dream" by Wyn Craig Wade (2012) and "Futility, or the Wreck of the Titan" by Morgan Robertson (1898) provide historical context for the enduring allure of Titanic-related searches, shedding light on the timeless fascination with the tragic vessel.
But wait, the plot thickens! A survey of social media posts reveals a trove of curious musings, akin to seagulls circling a digital mariner’s tale, hinting at the intriguing intersection of air pollution and search engine queries. One Twitter user, amidst a fog of existential pondering, remarked: “Is the smog making us search for the Titanic, or are we collectively seeking a ship to escape this airpocalypse?” Another mused, “Toledo's air may be murky, but at least our search history is crystal clear - Titanic, Titanic, and more Titanic! Ahoy, online obsessions!”
As we navigate these uncharted waters of academia, it becomes clear that the connection between Toledo's air pollution and the public’s fascination with the Titanic is no mere flight of fancy - it’s a voyager’s delight, replete with unexpected twists and turns that could rival the most dramatic of maritime sagas. So batten down the hatches, fellow scholars, for we are about to embark on an expedition more spirited than a sea shanty and more illuminating than a lighthouse beam cutting through the haze of uncertainty.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Toledo and Google searches for 'Titanic'. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.
Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Environmental Protection Agency and Google Trends . You used data from 2008 to 2023
Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.
Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Toxic Toledo Air and Titanic Trend Searches: A Tale of Sorrow and Search History Tomorrow
[[ABSTRACT]]
When it comes to air pollution and internet search trends, it turns out there may be more than meets the eye. In this study, we delve into the connection between air pollution in Toledo and Google searches for the Titanic, aiming to uncover whether there's a deeper relationship hidden beneath the toxic fumes. Using data from the Environmental Protection Agency and Google Trends, our research team sifted through the digital exhaust to uncover a surprising correlation. Strapping on our statistical diving gear, we found a correlation coefficient of 0.8679007 - a figure more majestic than the ship itself - and p < 0.01 for the years 2008 to 2023. The results beg the question: Could the smog of Toledo be lifting the search history of a century-old maritime disaster, or are we simply riding a wave of coincidental curiosity? Join us as we navigate these uncharted waters, where the winds of data and the tides of trends collide.
[[INTRODUCTION]]
INTRODUCTION
A wise man once said, "When life gives you lemons, make lemonade. But when life gives you toxic air, you might not want to breathe too deeply." In recent years, the citizens of Toledo, Ohio, have found themselves contending with air pollution levels higher than a skyscraper and more unwelcome than a telemarketer at dinnertime. Simultaneously, the world's populace has increasingly sought solace and answers in the worldwide web, turning to the mighty Google search engine for their daily doses of knowledge, procrastination, and adorable animal videos.
Our study seeks to unravel the peculiar relationship between these two seemingly unrelated phenomena: the foul haze blanketing Toledo's airspace and the soaring search queries related to the infamous Titanic. Our aim? To determine if there exists a discernible correlation between air pollution levels and the public's online intrigue with the ill-fated vessel. While some may dismiss this as a mere flight of fancy, we took our curiosity and sailed headfirst into the tempest of data analytics and statistical examination, intent on navigating the murky waters of correlation with the skill of seasoned navigators.
As we set sail on this unlikely voyage, we invite our fellow researchers and armchair sleuths alike to join us in uncovering the potential connection between the odorous emissions wafting through Toledo and the steady rise of maritime disaster-related Google searches. Together, we shall venture forth, undeterred by the squalls of skepticism and armed with a hearty blend of data analysis and a dash of whimsy, because, after all, what's science without a bit of adventure? So, fasten your seatbelts, or rather, tie your shoelaces - we're about to embark on a journey more riveting than the sequel to "Fifty Shades of Grey" - except this time, the only shades in question are those of grey smog and blue links on Google search result pages.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
ChatGPT:
METHODOLOGY
To uncover the mysterious relationship between the air pollution plaguing Toledo and the Google search trends for the Titanic, our research team embarked on a journey rivaling Odysseus' ten-year expedition - albeit with fewer Cyclops encounters and more coffee breaks. Our approach blended the precision of a surgeon's scalpel with the tenacity of a bloodhound on the scent, as we scavenged through a digital jungle for morsels of data gold.
Data Collection and Sources
First, we turned our attention to the Environmental Protection Agency's treasure trove of air quality data. Armed with our trusty spectrometers and metaphorical gas masks, we mined data on various air pollutants, including but not limited to sulfur dioxide, nitrogen dioxide, and particulate matter. We then combed through the Google Trends platform like detectives on a crime scene, analyzing the search interest for terms related to the Titanic, ensuring we didn't overlook even a speck of digital evidence. Our search terms included "Titanic," "RMS Titanic," "shipwreck," and "unsinkable ship," among others, capturing the full spectrum of Titanic-related inquiries.
Integration and Analysis
Next, we harnessed the power of statistical software akin to alchemists turning lead into gold, merging the disparate datasets into a harmonious symphony of variables. We then performed a rigorous wave of regression analysis, teasing out the subtle correlations between air pollutant levels in Toledo and the ebb and flow of Titanic-themed Google searches. Like seasoned fishermen casting their nets, we sought to capture elusive patterns amid the ever-shifting currents of data, hoping to reel in a catch that would make even Ahab envious.
Timeframe
Our study encompassed a window of data stretching from the year 2008 to 2023 - a period marked by the evolution of both air pollution monitoring techniques and the ebb and flow of internet search habits. Anchoring ourselves in this time frame allowed us to capture the full breadth of digital tides and atmospheric fluctuations, akin to seasoned sailors charting their course through ever-changing storm fronts.
Limitations and Assumptions
It is essential to note the caveats and assumptions that underpin our study, much like the navigational cautions printed on a treasure map. We assumed a linear relationship between air pollution levels and Google search trends, acknowledging that the web of human behavior is as tangled as a sailor's knot after a few too many rounds of grog. Additionally, our reliance on publicly available data entailed the risk of overlooking potential confounding variables, akin to sailing into uncharted waters with only a vague map and a hopeful spirit.
In essence, our methodology fused tenacity with precision and whimsy with rigor, navigating the whirlpools of digital data and statistical analysis to uncover the potential links between Toledo's air pollution and the captivating lure of the Titanic in the vast sea of web searches.
Now, let's set our sights on the horizon as we delve into the deep waters of our findings - a journey fraught with intrigue, surprise, and perhaps the occasional "I didn't see that one coming" exclamation. Science, after all, is the art of unraveling the unexpected and connecting the unconnected, much like discovering a soggy treasure map in the midst of a howling internet storm. So, secure your proverbial life jackets - we're about to embark on a voyage more daring than Gutenberg's first attempts at software coding. Let's set sail, preferably with a hearty chantey and a side of digital compass - it's going to be a remarkable expedition, indeed.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Toledo and Google searches for 'Titanic'. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.
Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Environmental Protection Agency and Google Trends .
For the time period 2008 to 2023, you found a correlation 0.8679007, r-squared of 0.7532516, and p < 0.01.
One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.
Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Toxic Toledo Air and Titanic Trend Searches: A Tale of Sorrow and Search History Tomorrow
[[ABSTRACT]]
When it comes to air pollution and internet search trends, it turns out there may be more than meets the eye. In this study, we delve into the connection between air pollution in Toledo and Google searches for the Titanic, aiming to uncover whether there's a deeper relationship hidden beneath the toxic fumes. Using data from the Environmental Protection Agency and Google Trends, our research team sifted through the digital exhaust to uncover a surprising correlation. Strapping on our statistical diving gear, we found a correlation coefficient of 0.8679007 - a figure more majestic than the ship itself - and p < 0.01 for the years 2008 to 2023. The results beg the question: Could the smog of Toledo be lifting the search history of a century-old maritime disaster, or are we simply riding a wave of coincidental curiosity? Join us as we navigate these uncharted waters, where the winds of data and the tides of trends collide.
-------
And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
INTRODUCTION
A wise man once said, "When life gives you lemons, make lemonade. But when life gives you toxic air, you might not want to breathe too deeply." In recent years, the citizens of Toledo, Ohio, have found themselves contending with air pollution levels higher than a skyscraper and more unwelcome than a telemarketer at dinnertime. Simultaneously, the world's populace has increasingly sought solace and answers in the worldwide web, turning to the mighty Google search engine for their daily doses of knowledge, procrastination, and adorable animal videos.
Our study seeks to unravel the peculiar relationship between these two seemingly unrelated phenomena: the foul haze blanketing Toledo's airspace and the soaring search queries related to the infamous Titanic. Our aim? To determine if there exists a discernible correlation between air pollution levels and the public's online intrigue with the ill-fated vessel. While some may dismiss this as a mere flight of fancy, we took our curiosity and sailed headfirst into the tempest of data analytics and statistical examination, intent on navigating the murky waters of correlation with the skill of seasoned navigators.
As we set sail on this unlikely voyage, we invite our fellow researchers and armchair sleuths alike to join us in uncovering the potential connection between the odorous emissions wafting through Toledo and the steady rise of maritime disaster-related Google searches. Together, we shall venture forth, undeterred by the squalls of skepticism and armed with a hearty blend of data analysis and a dash of whimsy, because, after all, what's science without a bit of adventure? So, fasten your seatbelts, or rather, tie your shoelaces - we're about to embark on a journey more riveting than the sequel to "Fifty Shades of Grey" - except this time, the only shades in question are those of grey smog and blue links on Google search result pages.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[RESULTS]]
ChatGPT:
RESULTS
The outcome of our expedition into the hazy realms of air pollution and internet search trends has revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.8679007 between the concentration of air pollutants in Toledo and the frequency of Google searches for the Titanic. This numerical value shines brighter than the Hope Diamond, pointing to a strong positive relationship between these seemingly unconnected phenomena. Not to be outdone, the r-squared value of 0.7532516 further bolsters the evidence for a substantial association, proving that this isn't just a passing cloud of statistical noise.
The figure (Fig. 1) presented below illustrates the robust correlation with a scatterplot that could rival the starry night sky in terms of sheer beauty. The data points align themselves like a constellation of evidence, demonstrating the synchronicity between Toledo's polluted atmosphere and the public's intrigue with the ill-fated ship.
This correlation coefficient has a significance level of p < 0.01, implying that the strength of the relationship is substantially beyond what one would expect by mere chance. The statistical significance of this finding is as clear as the nose on one's face (though hopefully not clogged with pollution), signaling that there may indeed be more than meets the eye when it comes to Toledo's air quality and the public's online interests.
The implications of this discovery speak volumes, echoing through the digital halls of internet searches and the brick-and-mortar landscape of environmental policy. Could it be that Toledo's polluted air is not only a matter of public health concern but also a catalyst for a surge in historical curiosity, drawing eyes to a centuries-old maritime tragedy? Or are we witnessing a coincidental ebb and flow of internet queries and air pollutants, like the rise and fall of the ocean's tides?
These results prompt a call to action, encouraging further exploration into this curious connection and its potential impact on public attitudes, behaviors, and even policy decisions. Our research raises more questions than it answers, beckoning fellow scholars and enthusiasts to set sail on the uncharted waters of correlation and causation, armed with curiosity and an analytical compass.
In the words of Leonardo DiCaprio's character in the Titanic movie, "I'm the king of the world!" Well, perhaps we haven't reached that level of exuberance just yet, but if air pollution and historic search trends can converge in such a compelling manner, who knows what other unexpected connections lie waiting to be uncovered in the digital expanse?
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Toledo and Google searches for 'Titanic'. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.
Limit your response to 500 tokens.
Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.
Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.
[[TITLE]]
Toxic Toledo Air and Titanic Trend Searches: A Tale of Sorrow and Search History Tomorrow
[[ABSTRACT]]
When it comes to air pollution and internet search trends, it turns out there may be more than meets the eye. In this study, we delve into the connection between air pollution in Toledo and Google searches for the Titanic, aiming to uncover whether there's a deeper relationship hidden beneath the toxic fumes. Using data from the Environmental Protection Agency and Google Trends, our research team sifted through the digital exhaust to uncover a surprising correlation. Strapping on our statistical diving gear, we found a correlation coefficient of 0.8679007 - a figure more majestic than the ship itself - and p < 0.01 for the years 2008 to 2023. The results beg the question: Could the smog of Toledo be lifting the search history of a century-old maritime disaster, or are we simply riding a wave of coincidental curiosity? Join us as we navigate these uncharted waters, where the winds of data and the tides of trends collide.
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
Research into the connection between air pollution and seemingly unrelated phenomena has yielded both insightful and, dare we say, titanic findings. In their groundbreaking study, Smith and Doe (2015) set sail into the uncharted waters of environmental psychology, examining the impact of air quality on human behavior. Their analysis, while initially focused on the broader spectrum of emotional and cognitive responses, inadvertently brushed against the winds of the internet, hinting at a potential correlation between airborne pollutants and online search patterns.
Smith and Doe’s revelation piqued the curiosity of researchers venturing into the realm of digital epidemiology, where Jones (2018) embarked on a quest to unravel the mysteries of online trend tracking. Though Jones did not specifically explore the link between air pollution and maritime disasters, the notion of uncovering hidden connections through internet search history ripples through the annals of cyberspace, much like a discarded chip bag caught in a gust of Toledo’s polluted air.
Now, turning our gaze to the literary seas, we espy a veritable fleet of relevant tomes that might buoy our understanding of this peculiar correlation. In "Air Pollution and Its Effects on Human Health" by Lorem and Ipsum (2016), the authors delve into the myriad ways in which air pollution can impact human behavior and well-being, inadvertently setting the stage for considering the potential influence on online activity. Meanwhile, "The Titanic: End of a Dream" by Wyn Craig Wade (2012) and "Futility, or the Wreck of the Titan" by Morgan Robertson (1898) provide historical context for the enduring allure of Titanic-related searches, shedding light on the timeless fascination with the tragic vessel.
But wait, the plot thickens! A survey of social media posts reveals a trove of curious musings, akin to seagulls circling a digital mariner’s tale, hinting at the intriguing intersection of air pollution and search engine queries. One Twitter user, amidst a fog of existential pondering, remarked: “Is the smog making us search for the Titanic, or are we collectively seeking a ship to escape this airpocalypse?” Another mused, “Toledo's air may be murky, but at least our search history is crystal clear - Titanic, Titanic, and more Titanic! Ahoy, online obsessions!”
As we navigate these uncharted waters of academia, it becomes clear that the connection between Toledo's air pollution and the public’s fascination with the Titanic is no mere flight of fancy - it’s a voyager’s delight, replete with unexpected twists and turns that could rival the most dramatic of maritime sagas. So batten down the hatches, fellow scholars, for we are about to embark on an expedition more spirited than a sea shanty and more illuminating than a lighthouse beam cutting through the haze of uncertainty.
[[RESULTS]]
RESULTS
The outcome of our expedition into the hazy realms of air pollution and internet search trends has revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.8679007 between the concentration of air pollutants in Toledo and the frequency of Google searches for the Titanic. This numerical value shines brighter than the Hope Diamond, pointing to a strong positive relationship between these seemingly unconnected phenomena. Not to be outdone, the r-squared value of 0.7532516 further bolsters the evidence for a substantial association, proving that this isn't just a passing cloud of statistical noise.
The figure (Fig. 1) presented below illustrates the robust correlation with a scatterplot that could rival the starry night sky in terms of sheer beauty. The data points align themselves like a constellation of evidence, demonstrating the synchronicity between Toledo's polluted atmosphere and the public's intrigue with the ill-fated ship.
This correlation coefficient has a significance level of p < 0.01, implying that the strength of the relationship is substantially beyond what one would expect by mere chance. The statistical significance of this finding is as clear as the nose on one's face (though hopefully not clogged with pollution), signaling that there may indeed be more than meets the eye when it comes to Toledo's air quality and the public's online interests.
The implications of this discovery speak volumes, echoing through the digital halls of internet searches and the brick-and-mortar landscape of environmental policy. Could it be that Toledo's polluted air is not only a matter of public health concern but also a catalyst for a surge in historical curiosity, drawing eyes to a centuries-old maritime tragedy? Or are we witnessing a coincidental ebb and flow of internet queries and air pollutants, like the rise and fall of the ocean's tides?
These results prompt a call to action, encouraging further exploration into this curious connection and its potential impact on public attitudes, behaviors, and even policy decisions. Our research raises more questions than it answers, beckoning fellow scholars and enthusiasts to set sail on the uncharted waters of correlation and causation, armed with curiosity and an analytical compass.
In the words of Leonardo DiCaprio's character in the Titanic movie, "I'm the king of the world!" Well, perhaps we haven't reached that level of exuberance just yet, but if air pollution and historic search trends can converge in such a compelling manner, who knows what other unexpected connections lie waiting to be uncovered in the digital expanse?
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[DISCUSSION]]
ChatGPT:
[[DISCUSSION]]
As we sail through the misty seas of correlation and causation, our study has unearthed a connection between Toledo's contaminated air and the public's fascination with the Titanic that is as sturdy as a well-built ship. This finding resonates with previous research in unexpected and tantalizing ways.
One particularly intriguing insight from our literature review comes from Jones' investigation into online trend tracking. While Jones didn't specifically explore the link between air pollution and maritime disasters, the notion of uncovering hidden connections through internet search history is eerily reminiscent of our own quest. It's as if we're both explorers navigating the tangled web of online data, with the scent of discovery lingering in the air - though hopefully not the polluted air of Toledo.
Likewise, Lorem and Ipsum (2016) provided a sturdy vessel of insight into the myriad ways in which air pollution can impact human behavior, inadvertently setting the stage for considering the potential influence on online activity. Our findings seem to echo their sentiments, suggesting that the impact of air pollution may extend beyond physical health and into the digital landscape, where the Titanic beckons like a siren to curious searchers.
And let's not forget the seafaring musings we stumbled upon in the literary seas - the Twitter user's ponderings about Toledo's murky air and the crystal-clear search history for Titanic. These humorous observations mirror our own quest in an unexpected light, reminding us that even amidst the fog of academia, there's room for a bit of levity and introspection.
So, what does all this mean for the wider world of research and policy? Well, it suggests that the influence of air pollution may extend beyond the confines of physical health and into the digital realm, where our collective interests ebb and flow like the tide. Our findings hint at the possibility of a broader web of impact, weaving together Toledo's polluted air with a surge in historical curiosity. This creates an intriguing narrative thread that beckons further exploration and study.
As we chart our course for further investigation, this study underscores the potential interplay between environmental factors and online behavior. It's a reminder that, much like the unpredictable seas, the digital world may hold hidden currents and connections waiting to be uncovered.
So, fellow researchers and enthusiasts, let's batten down the hatches and prepare for further voyages into the delightful choppy waters of correlation and causation. With our curiosity as our compass, who knows what marvels we may yet discover in the digital expanse?
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Toledo and Google searches for 'Titanic'. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.
Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.
Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
Toxic Toledo Air and Titanic Trend Searches: A Tale of Sorrow and Search History Tomorrow
[[ABSTRACT]]
When it comes to air pollution and internet search trends, it turns out there may be more than meets the eye. In this study, we delve into the connection between air pollution in Toledo and Google searches for the Titanic, aiming to uncover whether there's a deeper relationship hidden beneath the toxic fumes. Using data from the Environmental Protection Agency and Google Trends, our research team sifted through the digital exhaust to uncover a surprising correlation. Strapping on our statistical diving gear, we found a correlation coefficient of 0.8679007 - a figure more majestic than the ship itself - and p < 0.01 for the years 2008 to 2023. The results beg the question: Could the smog of Toledo be lifting the search history of a century-old maritime disaster, or are we simply riding a wave of coincidental curiosity? Join us as we navigate these uncharted waters, where the winds of data and the tides of trends collide.
[[INTRDUCTION]]
INTRODUCTION
A wise man once said, "When life gives you lemons, make lemonade. But when life gives you toxic air, you might not want to breathe too deeply." In recent years, the citizens of Toledo, Ohio, have found themselves contending with air pollution levels higher than a skyscraper and more unwelcome than a telemarketer at dinnertime. Simultaneously, the world's populace has increasingly sought solace and answers in the worldwide web, turning to the mighty Google search engine for their daily doses of knowledge, procrastination, and adorable animal videos.
Our study seeks to unravel the peculiar relationship between these two seemingly unrelated phenomena: the foul haze blanketing Toledo's airspace and the soaring search queries related to the infamous Titanic. Our aim? To determine if there exists a discernible correlation between air pollution levels and the public's online intrigue with the ill-fated vessel. While some may dismiss this as a mere flight of fancy, we took our curiosity and sailed headfirst into the tempest of data analytics and statistical examination, intent on navigating the murky waters of correlation with the skill of seasoned navigators.
As we set sail on this unlikely voyage, we invite our fellow researchers and armchair sleuths alike to join us in uncovering the potential connection between the odorous emissions wafting through Toledo and the steady rise of maritime disaster-related Google searches. Together, we shall venture forth, undeterred by the squalls of skepticism and armed with a hearty blend of data analysis and a dash of whimsy, because, after all, what's science without a bit of adventure? So, fasten your seatbelts, or rather, tie your shoelaces - we're about to embark on a journey more riveting than the sequel to "Fifty Shades of Grey" - except this time, the only shades in question are those of grey smog and blue links on Google search result pages.
[[RESULTS]]
RESULTS
The outcome of our expedition into the hazy realms of air pollution and internet search trends has revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.8679007 between the concentration of air pollutants in Toledo and the frequency of Google searches for the Titanic. This numerical value shines brighter than the Hope Diamond, pointing to a strong positive relationship between these seemingly unconnected phenomena. Not to be outdone, the r-squared value of 0.7532516 further bolsters the evidence for a substantial association, proving that this isn't just a passing cloud of statistical noise.
The figure (Fig. 1) presented below illustrates the robust correlation with a scatterplot that could rival the starry night sky in terms of sheer beauty. The data points align themselves like a constellation of evidence, demonstrating the synchronicity between Toledo's polluted atmosphere and the public's intrigue with the ill-fated ship.
This correlation coefficient has a significance level of p < 0.01, implying that the strength of the relationship is substantially beyond what one would expect by mere chance. The statistical significance of this finding is as clear as the nose on one's face (though hopefully not clogged with pollution), signaling that there may indeed be more than meets the eye when it comes to Toledo's air quality and the public's online interests.
The implications of this discovery speak volumes, echoing through the digital halls of internet searches and the brick-and-mortar landscape of environmental policy. Could it be that Toledo's polluted air is not only a matter of public health concern but also a catalyst for a surge in historical curiosity, drawing eyes to a centuries-old maritime tragedy? Or are we witnessing a coincidental ebb and flow of internet queries and air pollutants, like the rise and fall of the ocean's tides?
These results prompt a call to action, encouraging further exploration into this curious connection and its potential impact on public attitudes, behaviors, and even policy decisions. Our research raises more questions than it answers, beckoning fellow scholars and enthusiasts to set sail on the uncharted waters of correlation and causation, armed with curiosity and an analytical compass.
In the words of Leonardo DiCaprio's character in the Titanic movie, "I'm the king of the world!" Well, perhaps we haven't reached that level of exuberance just yet, but if air pollution and historic search trends can converge in such a compelling manner, who knows what other unexpected connections lie waiting to be uncovered in the digital expanse?
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[CONCLUSION]]
ChatGPT:
[[CONCLUSION]]
As we bid adieu to our expedition through the misty realms of air pollution and internet search trends, we are left with more questions than answers. The strength of the correlation coefficient, as formidable as the iceberg that met the Titanic, suggests a tangible link between Toledo's unhealthy air and heightened public interest in the ill-fated ship. It seems that when Toledo's air quality goes down, the Titanic's search history goes up – a relationship seemingly stranger than fiction, or as we like to call it, "Toxic Toledo meets Titanic Trendmania."
These findings shed light on the curious ways in which environmental factors may influence the collective digital consciousness. Could it be that Toledo's polluted air acts as a not-so-subliminal cue for internet users to embark on a historically themed voyage? Or are we merely witness to a statistical dance of chance, where correlation and causation part ways like ships in the night? The intricacies of this connection are as enthralling as a suspense novel, leaving us on the edge of our seats, eagerly awaiting a sequel.
While our study offers an initial glimpse into this enigmatic association, it also serves as a call to launch further research expeditions. As we navigate the uncharted waters of data analysis and concoct hypotheses as bold as the ship's ill-fated maiden voyage, we must remember that every breakthrough begins with the combination of curiosity, diligence, and the occasional pun. Future endeavors may uncover even more unexpected connections, reminding us that the world of research is not just a sea of data points, but also a treasure trove of unforeseen correlations and delightful surprises.
In conclusion, our findings warrant careful consideration of the potential ripple effect of environmental factors on digital behavior. It's a reminder that behind every trend search lies a story waiting to be unearthed – and who knows, there may be more unexpected connections waiting to be discovered in the vast expanse of search history. As for our study, we firmly assert that no further research is needed in this area unless, of course, you would like to uncover the connection between air pollution in Pittsburgh and searches for "Penguins." But for now, we're setting our sights on new horizons and leaving this peculiar correlation to bask in its own limelight.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Toxic Toledo Air and Titanic Trend Searches: A Tale of Sorrow and Search History Tomorrow. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.
ChatGPT:
International Journal of Environmental Psychology and Digital Sociology
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Toxic Toledo Air and Titanic Trend Searches: A Tale of Sorrow and Search History Tomorrow. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.
ChatGPT:
The Society for Quirky Environmental Analysis and Research (SQUEAR)
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Toxic Toledo Air and Titanic Trend Searches: A Tale of Sorrow and Search History Tomorrow with an abstract of When it comes to air pollution and internet search trends, it turns out there may be more than meets the eye. In this study, we delve into the connection between air pollution in Toledo and Google searches for the Titanic, aiming to uncover whether there's a deeper relationship hidden beneath the toxic fumes. Using data from the Environmental Protection Agency and Google Trends, our research team sifted through the digital exhaust to uncover a surprising correlation. Strapping on our statistical diving gear, we found a correlation coefficient of 0.8679007 - a figure more majestic than the ship itself - and p < 0.01 for the years 2008 to 2023. The results beg the question: Could the smog of Toledo be lifting the search history of a century-old maritime disaster, or are we simply riding a wave of coincidental curiosity? Join us as we navigate these uncharted waters, where the winds of data and the tides of trends collide.
ChatGPT:
toxic Toledo air, air pollution, Google searches, Titanic, search trends, correlation, environmental protection agency, Google Trends, statistical analysis, data analysis
*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.
Discover a new correlation
View all correlations
View all research papers
Report an error
Data details
Air pollution in ToledoDetailed data title: Percentage of days 'unhealthy' or worse air quality in Toledo, OH
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
See what else correlates with Air pollution in Toledo
Google searches for 'Titanic'
Detailed data title: Relative volume of Google searches for 'Titanic' (Worldwide, without quotes)
Source: Google Trends
Additional Info: Relative search volume (not absolute numbers)
See what else correlates with Google searches for 'Titanic'
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.
r2 = 0.7532516 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 75.3% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Google searches for 'Titanic') is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Air pollution in Toledo) over the 16 years from 2008 through 2023.
p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 1.3E-5. 0.0000131799117489496360000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.
But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.
Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.87 in 0.0013% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 75,873 random variables You don't actually need 75 thousand variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.
p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.
In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.
Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 15 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 15 because we have two variables measured over a period of 16 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.
[ 0.65, 0.95 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.
This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!
All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.
Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
2008 | 2009 | 2010 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | |
Air pollution in Toledo (Bad air quality days) | 0 | 0.273973 | 0.277778 | 0 | 0.819672 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.287356 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.823045 |
Google searches for 'Titanic' (Rel. search volume) | 12.5 | 13.5 | 14.0833 | 14.6667 | 24 | 14.25 | 12.6667 | 12.1667 | 12.75 | 12.5 | 11.9167 | 11.25 | 11 | 9.91667 | 9.91667 | 19.6667 |
Why this works
- Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
- Lack of causal connection: There is probably
Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied. - Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple
Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is. - Y-axis doesn't start at zero: I truncated the Y-axes of the graph above. I also used a line graph, which makes the visual connection stand out more than it deserves.
Nothing against line graphs. They are great at telling a story when you have linear data! But visually it is deceptive because the only data is at the points on the graph, not the lines on the graph. In between each point, the data could have been doing anything. Like going for a random walk by itself!
Mathematically what I showed is true, but it is intentionally misleading. Below is the same chart but with both Y-axes starting at zero.
Try it yourself
You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.
Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"
Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.
Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.
Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.
Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"
If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:
"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."
# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats
# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):
# Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)
# Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
r_squared = correlation**2
return correlation, r_squared, p_value
# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([0,0.273973,0.277778,0,0.819672,0,0,0,0,0,0.287356,0,0,0,0,0.823045,])
array_2 = np.array([12.5,13.5,14.0833,14.6667,24,14.25,12.6667,12.1667,12.75,12.5,11.9167,11.25,11,9.91667,9.91667,19.6667,])
array_1_name = "Air pollution in Toledo"
array_2_name = "Google searches for 'Titanic'"
# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)
# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)
Reuseable content
You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.
For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."
When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.
Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.
Download images for these variables:
- High resolution line chart
The image linked here is a Scalable Vector Graphic (SVG). It is the highest resolution that is possible to achieve. It scales up beyond the size of the observable universe without pixelating. You do not need to email me asking if I have a higher resolution image. I do not. The physical limitations of our universe prevent me from providing you with an image that is any higher resolution than this one.
If you insert it into a PowerPoint presentation (a tool well-known for managing things that are the scale of the universe), you can right-click > "Ungroup" or "Create Shape" and then edit the lines and text directly. You can also change the colors this way.
Alternatively you can use a tool like Inkscape. - High resolution line chart, optimized for mobile
- Alternative high resolution line chart
- Scatterplot
- Portable line chart (png)
- Portable line chart (png), optimized for mobile
- Line chart for only Air pollution in Toledo
- Line chart for only Google searches for 'Titanic'
- AI-generated correlation image
- The spurious research paper: Toxic Toledo Air and Titanic Trend Searches: A Tale of Sorrow and Search History Tomorrow
I'm genuinely thankful for your rating!
Correlation ID: 4693 · Black Variable ID: 21339 · Red Variable ID: 1419