about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #4,672 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Master's degrees awarded in Public administration and the second variable is Average number of comments on SmarterEveryDay YouTube videos.  The chart goes from 2012 to 2021, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

As the number of Public administration Master's degree holders rose, so did the government's emphasis on communication. This led to a comment-ment of understanding and an in-administration of engagement, creating a public policy of discourse. In other words, it's a masterful case of comment sadministration!

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Prompt: Generate an image in the style of photorealism depicting a vibrant government office. In the center, a row of proud graduates, adorned in cap and gown, holds their Master's degrees in Public Administration. They stand amidst a bustling atmosphere surrounded by charts and graphs illustrating the rising average number of comments on SmarterEveryDay's YouTube videos. Vibrant discussions fill the air as government officials and citizens engage in active dialogue, shaping new public discourse policies. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Master's degrees awarded in Public administration and Average number of comments on SmarterEveryDay YouTube videos. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: a Polaroid photo a meme Magic realism Photorealism Cyberpunk
ChatGPT: Photorealism

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Master's degrees awarded in Public administration and Average number of comments on SmarterEveryDay YouTube videos, in the following situation: As the number of Public administration Master's degree holders rose, so did the government's emphasis on communication. This led to a comment-ment of understanding and an in-administration of engagement, creating a public policy of discourse. In other words, it's a masterful case of comment sadministration!. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In a bustling government office, a row of graduates proudly holds their Master's degrees in Public Administration. They are surrounded by charts and graphs showing the increasing average number of comments on SmarterEveryDay's YouTube videos. The atmosphere is abuzz with lively discussions and active engagement, as government officials and citizens come together to share ideas and insight, shaping a new public policy of discourse.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ Photorealism ] and depicting this scene: In a bustling government office, a row of graduates proudly holds their Master's degrees in Public Administration. They are surrounded by charts and graphs showing the increasing average number of comments on SmarterEveryDay's YouTube videos. The atmosphere is abuzz with lively discussions and active engagement, as government officials and citizens come together to share ideas and insight, shaping a new public policy of discourse. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Prompt: Generate an image in the style of photorealism depicting a vibrant government office. In the center, a row of proud graduates, adorned in cap and gown, holds their Master's degrees in Public Administration. They stand amidst a bustling atmosphere surrounded by charts and graphs illustrating the rising average number of comments on SmarterEveryDay's YouTube videos. Vibrant discussions fill the air as government officials and citizens engage in active dialogue, shaping new public discourse policies.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in Master's degrees awarded in Public administration caused Average number of comments on SmarterEveryDay YouTube videos to increase. Include one good pun.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Mastering Management: An Empirical Analysis of the Relationship Between Master's Degrees in Public Administration and Average Comment Counts on SmarterEveryDay YouTube Videos

The Journal of Experimental Bureaucracy

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Master's degrees awarded in Public administration and Average number of comments on SmarterEveryDay YouTube videos. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Make the title punny if you can come up with clever pun. If not, just make it sound clever.

Your research team used data from National Center for Education Statistics and YouTube to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9787575 and p < 0.01 for 2012 to 2021.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
Mastering Management: An Empirical Analysis of the Relationship Between Master's Degrees in Public Administration and Average Comment Counts on SmarterEveryDay YouTube Videos

[[ABSTRACT]]
This research paper investigates the intriguing correlation between the number of Master's degrees awarded in Public Administration and the average number of comments on SmarterEveryDay YouTube videos. Utilizing data from the National Center for Education Statistics and YouTube, we conducted a comprehensive analysis covering the period from 2012 to 2021. Our findings reveal a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9787575 and a statistically significant relationship with p < 0.01. The unexpected and somewhat whimsical nature of this relationship invites further exploration and raises questions worthy of additional scholarly attention. We believe that this peculiar connection between academic achievements in public administration and online engagement reflects the interplay of knowledge dissemination and digital discourse in the 21st century. This paper not only offers a thought-provoking insight into the realm of online interactions but also presents a lighthearted perspective on the unexpected intersections of academic pursuits and internet culture.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Master's degrees awarded in Public administration and Average number of comments on SmarterEveryDay YouTube videos. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Mastering Management: An Empirical Analysis of the Relationship Between Master's Degrees in Public Administration and Average Comment Counts on SmarterEveryDay YouTube Videos

[[ABSTRACT]]
This research paper investigates the intriguing correlation between the number of Master's degrees awarded in Public Administration and the average number of comments on SmarterEveryDay YouTube videos. Utilizing data from the National Center for Education Statistics and YouTube, we conducted a comprehensive analysis covering the period from 2012 to 2021. Our findings reveal a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9787575 and a statistically significant relationship with p < 0.01. The unexpected and somewhat whimsical nature of this relationship invites further exploration and raises questions worthy of additional scholarly attention. We believe that this peculiar connection between academic achievements in public administration and online engagement reflects the interplay of knowledge dissemination and digital discourse in the 21st century. This paper not only offers a thought-provoking insight into the realm of online interactions but also presents a lighthearted perspective on the unexpected intersections of academic pursuits and internet culture.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
**[[INTRODUCTION]]**

The modern age has witnessed an unprecedented surge in both online engagement and academic pursuits. As the digital realm continues to intertwine with various aspects of society, it is intriguing to explore the unexpected connections that emerge. From the proliferation of educational content on digital platforms to the evolving dynamics of public administration, the interplay between online discourse and academic achievements presents a fascinating milieu for investigation.

In this study, we embark on a somewhat unconventional journey as we delve into the seemingly disparate realms of Master's degrees in Public Administration and the average number of comments on SmarterEveryDay YouTube videos. While these two domains may appear to inhabit different spheres, an initial observation suggests that there might be an underlying relationship waiting to be unearthed. Thus, our endeavor is not only a testament to academic inquiry but also an ode to the serendipitous nature of statistical analysis.

The merging of educational attainment in the realm of public administration with the digital engagement witnessed on a popular YouTube channel leads to an exploration that is both unexpected and enlightening. This exploration builds upon the foundation of quantitative analysis, sparking a lighthearted yet intellectually stimulating investigation into the uncharted waters of academic pursuit and online interaction. As we navigate through this unorthodox terrain, we invite the reader to embark on a journey that challenges traditional scholarly boundaries and embraces the whimsical facets of statistical inquiry.

With a twinkle of curiosity and a dash of statistical rigor, we set out to unravel the intriguing relationship between Master's degrees awarded in Public Administration and the average comment counts on SmarterEveryDay YouTube videos. This paper not only seeks to discern the statistical significance of this connection but also to infuse a sense of levity and wonder into the scholarly discourse. In doing so, we hope to kindle a spirit of merriment and inquiry while shedding light on the unforeseen interplay of academic achievements and online engagement.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Master's degrees awarded in Public administration and Average number of comments on SmarterEveryDay YouTube videos. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then cite some social media posts you read that seem to be related.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Mastering Management: An Empirical Analysis of the Relationship Between Master's Degrees in Public Administration and Average Comment Counts on SmarterEveryDay YouTube Videos

[[ABSTRACT]]
This research paper investigates the intriguing correlation between the number of Master's degrees awarded in Public Administration and the average number of comments on SmarterEveryDay YouTube videos. Utilizing data from the National Center for Education Statistics and YouTube, we conducted a comprehensive analysis covering the period from 2012 to 2021. Our findings reveal a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9787575 and a statistically significant relationship with p < 0.01. The unexpected and somewhat whimsical nature of this relationship invites further exploration and raises questions worthy of additional scholarly attention. We believe that this peculiar connection between academic achievements in public administration and online engagement reflects the interplay of knowledge dissemination and digital discourse in the 21st century. This paper not only offers a thought-provoking insight into the realm of online interactions but also presents a lighthearted perspective on the unexpected intersections of academic pursuits and internet culture.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The modern age has witnessed an unprecedented surge in both online engagement and academic pursuits. As the digital realm continues to intertwine with various aspects of society, it is intriguing to explore the unexpected connections that emerge. From the proliferation of educational content on digital platforms to the evolving dynamics of public administration, the interplay between online discourse and academic achievements presents a fascinating milieu for investigation.
In this study, we embark on a somewhat unconventional journey as we delve into the seemingly disparate realms of Master's degrees in Public Administration and the average number of comments on SmarterEveryDay YouTube videos. While these two domains may appear to inhabit different spheres, an initial observation suggests that there might be an underlying relationship waiting to be unearthed. Thus, our endeavor is not only a testament to academic inquiry but also an ode to the serendipitous nature of statistical analysis.
The merging of educational attainment in the realm of public administration with the digital engagement witnessed on a popular YouTube channel leads to an exploration that is both unexpected and enlightening. This exploration builds upon the foundation of quantitative analysis, sparking a lighthearted yet intellectually stimulating investigation into the uncharted waters of academic pursuit and online interaction. As we navigate through this unorthodox terrain, we invite the reader to embark on a journey that challenges traditional scholarly boundaries and embraces the whimsical facets of statistical inquiry.
With a twinkle of curiosity and a dash of statistical rigor, we set out to unravel the intriguing relationship between Master's degrees awarded in Public Administration and the average comment counts on SmarterEveryDay YouTube videos. This paper not only seeks to discern the statistical significance of this connection but also to infuse a sense of levity and wonder into the scholarly discourse. In doing so, we hope to kindle a spirit of merriment and inquiry while shedding light on the unforeseen interplay of academic achievements and online engagement.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

The investigation of the relationship between academic achievements in Public Administration and online engagement on SmarterEveryDay YouTube videos has spurred a plethora of scholarly inquiries, though some more serious than others. Smith et al. (2015) delved into the dynamics of educational attainment and its impact on digital participation, paving the way for subsequent explorations. Meanwhile, Doe (2017) conducted a comprehensive analysis of online discourse in relation to academic pursuits, shedding light on the nuanced interplay between the two spheres. Furthermore, Jones (2019) offered a thought-provoking perspective on the potential correlations between knowledge dissemination in public administration and the digital realm, an angle that continues to intrigue researchers in the field.

In "Public Administration: Concepts and Cases," the authors expound upon the multifaceted nature of administrative governance, offering a comprehensive understanding of the discipline that contributes to our exploration of the underlying connection with online engagement. Similarly, "Digital Engagement: Strategies for the Modern Era" provides insights into the intricacies of online interactions, laying the groundwork for our study's contemplation of the intersection between academic achievements and digital discourse.

As we journey into less traditional scholarly resources, we encounter fictional works that, albeit indirectly, offer an amusing lens through which to perceive our topic of interest. For instance, the fictional novel "The Administrative Adventures of Alice" may not offer empirical data, but its whimsical portrayal of bureaucratic escapades certainly adds a touch of levity to our exploration of public administration. Similarly, the fictional account "Virtual Voyages: Navigating the Digital Seas" presents an imaginative foray into the realm of virtual engagement, providing a delightful backdrop for our scholarly pursuit.

Furthermore, from a social media perspective, a tweet from @OnlineEngagementEnthusiast provocatively noted, "Mastering public administration is like crafting the perfect YouTube comment – it requires finesse, strategy, and a touch of humor." While seemingly lighthearted, this social media insight alludes to the underlying parallels between academic expertise and digital participation, infusing a sense of wit into our scholarly interrogation.

Embracing the spirit of statistical investigation with a tinge of whimsy, we set the stage for a more light-hearted, yet thought-provoking, examination of the relationship between Master's degrees awarded in Public Administration and the average comment counts on SmarterEveryDay YouTube videos.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Master's degrees awarded in Public administration and Average number of comments on SmarterEveryDay YouTube videos. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from National Center for Education Statistics and YouTube . You used data from 2012 to 2021

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Mastering Management: An Empirical Analysis of the Relationship Between Master's Degrees in Public Administration and Average Comment Counts on SmarterEveryDay YouTube Videos

[[ABSTRACT]]
This research paper investigates the intriguing correlation between the number of Master's degrees awarded in Public Administration and the average number of comments on SmarterEveryDay YouTube videos. Utilizing data from the National Center for Education Statistics and YouTube, we conducted a comprehensive analysis covering the period from 2012 to 2021. Our findings reveal a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9787575 and a statistically significant relationship with p < 0.01. The unexpected and somewhat whimsical nature of this relationship invites further exploration and raises questions worthy of additional scholarly attention. We believe that this peculiar connection between academic achievements in public administration and online engagement reflects the interplay of knowledge dissemination and digital discourse in the 21st century. This paper not only offers a thought-provoking insight into the realm of online interactions but also presents a lighthearted perspective on the unexpected intersections of academic pursuits and internet culture.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
The modern age has witnessed an unprecedented surge in both online engagement and academic pursuits. As the digital realm continues to intertwine with various aspects of society, it is intriguing to explore the unexpected connections that emerge. From the proliferation of educational content on digital platforms to the evolving dynamics of public administration, the interplay between online discourse and academic achievements presents a fascinating milieu for investigation.
In this study, we embark on a somewhat unconventional journey as we delve into the seemingly disparate realms of Master's degrees in Public Administration and the average number of comments on SmarterEveryDay YouTube videos. While these two domains may appear to inhabit different spheres, an initial observation suggests that there might be an underlying relationship waiting to be unearthed. Thus, our endeavor is not only a testament to academic inquiry but also an ode to the serendipitous nature of statistical analysis.
The merging of educational attainment in the realm of public administration with the digital engagement witnessed on a popular YouTube channel leads to an exploration that is both unexpected and enlightening. This exploration builds upon the foundation of quantitative analysis, sparking a lighthearted yet intellectually stimulating investigation into the uncharted waters of academic pursuit and online interaction. As we navigate through this unorthodox terrain, we invite the reader to embark on a journey that challenges traditional scholarly boundaries and embraces the whimsical facets of statistical inquiry.
With a twinkle of curiosity and a dash of statistical rigor, we set out to unravel the intriguing relationship between Master's degrees awarded in Public Administration and the average comment counts on SmarterEveryDay YouTube videos. This paper not only seeks to discern the statistical significance of this connection but also to infuse a sense of levity and wonder into the scholarly discourse. In doing so, we hope to kindle a spirit of merriment and inquiry while shedding light on the unforeseen interplay of academic achievements and online engagement.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

For this whimsical yet methodologically robust investigation, we embarked on a data collection journey that blended the scholarly seriousness of the National Center for Education Statistics with the digital vivacity of YouTube. Our analysis spanned the delightful duration of 2012 to 2021, capturing a comprehensive snapshot of academic accolades and online exchange.

Data Collection:
The National Center for Education Statistics served as our steadfast companion in the quest for insight into the realm of Master's degrees awarded in Public Administration. We navigated through the statistical labyrinth of academic achievements, embracing the intriguing nuances of educational pursuits in the domain of public administration. Our exploration of YouTube's captivating comment landscape on the esteemed SmarterEveryDay channel brought us to the vibrant shores of online engagement, where the waves of digital discourse crashed against the cliffs of statistical inquiry. Our data collection process entailed an amalgamation of quantitative masterstrokes and digital serendipity, mirroring the unconventional nature of our research endeavor.

Data Analysis:
To unravel the hidden rapport between Master's degrees in Public Administration and the average comment counts on SmarterEveryDay YouTube videos, we employed a multifaceted statistical approach. The robustness of our analysis transcended the conventional boundaries of academia, echoing the unconventional spirit of our research pursuit. Embracing the symphony of statistical tests, we orchestrated a captivating rhapsody of correlation coefficients and p-values, shedding light on the enigmatic relationship between academic accolades and online interactions. Our dedication to statistical rigor danced harmoniously with the whimsical nature of our investigation, transcending the mundane to unveil the unexpected connectivity within our data.

Statistical Models:
In our pursuit to capture the essence of this improbable yet compelling correlation, we wielded the tools of linear regression and correlation analysis with scholarly finesse. We navigated the tempestuous seas of statistical inference, anchoring our findings with robust modeling techniques. With a playful twirl of statistical creativity and a scholarly pirouette, our models illuminated the underlying relationship between Master's degrees in Public Administration and the average comment counts on SmarterEveryDay YouTube videos. Our statistical models morphed the seemingly disconnected domains into a captivating duet, enriching the scholarly discourse with an unexpected harmony of academic pursuits and digital dialogue.

Limitations:
While our research has unmasked a captivating correlation between these seemingly incongruent domains, it is essential to acknowledge the limitations that temper our intellectual revelry. The inherent idiosyncrasies of online engagement and the complexities of academic pursuits may conceal uncharted territories that our analysis may have overlooked. Furthermore, the ephemeral nature of online discourse introduces a degree of variability that adds a light-hearted challenge to our scholarly pursuit. Despite these whimsical obstacles, our research stands as a testament to the captivating intersections of statistical analysis and unexpected scholarly discourse.

Overall, our methodological odyssey has woven a tapestry of statistical finesse and scholarly merriment, propelling our investigation into the realm of Master's degrees in Public Administration and the average comment counts on SmarterEveryDay YouTube videos. With a nod to statistical rigor and a wink to the unanticipated twists of digital engagement, our methodological journey adds a touch of whimsy to the scholarly tapestry, inviting further discourse and intellectual adventure.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Master's degrees awarded in Public administration and Average number of comments on SmarterEveryDay YouTube videos. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from National Center for Education Statistics and YouTube .

For the time period 2012 to 2021, you found a correlation 0.9787575, r-squared of 0.9579662, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Mastering Management: An Empirical Analysis of the Relationship Between Master's Degrees in Public Administration and Average Comment Counts on SmarterEveryDay YouTube Videos

[[ABSTRACT]]
This research paper investigates the intriguing correlation between the number of Master's degrees awarded in Public Administration and the average number of comments on SmarterEveryDay YouTube videos. Utilizing data from the National Center for Education Statistics and YouTube, we conducted a comprehensive analysis covering the period from 2012 to 2021. Our findings reveal a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9787575 and a statistically significant relationship with p < 0.01. The unexpected and somewhat whimsical nature of this relationship invites further exploration and raises questions worthy of additional scholarly attention. We believe that this peculiar connection between academic achievements in public administration and online engagement reflects the interplay of knowledge dissemination and digital discourse in the 21st century. This paper not only offers a thought-provoking insight into the realm of online interactions but also presents a lighthearted perspective on the unexpected intersections of academic pursuits and internet culture.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
The modern age has witnessed an unprecedented surge in both online engagement and academic pursuits. As the digital realm continues to intertwine with various aspects of society, it is intriguing to explore the unexpected connections that emerge. From the proliferation of educational content on digital platforms to the evolving dynamics of public administration, the interplay between online discourse and academic achievements presents a fascinating milieu for investigation.
In this study, we embark on a somewhat unconventional journey as we delve into the seemingly disparate realms of Master's degrees in Public Administration and the average number of comments on SmarterEveryDay YouTube videos. While these two domains may appear to inhabit different spheres, an initial observation suggests that there might be an underlying relationship waiting to be unearthed. Thus, our endeavor is not only a testament to academic inquiry but also an ode to the serendipitous nature of statistical analysis.
The merging of educational attainment in the realm of public administration with the digital engagement witnessed on a popular YouTube channel leads to an exploration that is both unexpected and enlightening. This exploration builds upon the foundation of quantitative analysis, sparking a lighthearted yet intellectually stimulating investigation into the uncharted waters of academic pursuit and online interaction. As we navigate through this unorthodox terrain, we invite the reader to embark on a journey that challenges traditional scholarly boundaries and embraces the whimsical facets of statistical inquiry.
With a twinkle of curiosity and a dash of statistical rigor, we set out to unravel the intriguing relationship between Master's degrees awarded in Public Administration and the average comment counts on SmarterEveryDay YouTube videos. This paper not only seeks to discern the statistical significance of this connection but also to infuse a sense of levity and wonder into the scholarly discourse. In doing so, we hope to kindle a spirit of merriment and inquiry while shedding light on the unforeseen interplay of academic achievements and online engagement.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The correlation analysis revealed a striking relationship between the number of Master's degrees awarded in Public Administration and the average number of comments on SmarterEveryDay YouTube videos. Our analysis uncovered a correlation coefficient of 0.9787575, indicating a remarkably strong positive association between these seemingly unrelated variables. The r-squared value of 0.9579662 further accentuates the robustness of this relationship, suggesting that a substantial proportion of the variance in the average comment counts can be explained by the number of Master's degrees in Public Administration.

Furthermore, the p-value of less than 0.01 provides compelling evidence of the statistical significance of this connection, lending credence to the notion that this correlation is not just a fluke. It seems that there is truly something noteworthy about the interplay between academic pursuits in public administration and the digital dialogues that unfold on the SmarterEveryDay YouTube channel.

Perhaps it's a case of "smarter administration" leading to "smarter discussions" – a humorous twist on the relationship between these two seemingly disparate domains. The uncanny alignment between educational achievements and online engagement prompts us to ponder the intriguing dynamics at play and hints at the whimsical undercurrents of statistical exploration.

As depicted in Figure 1 (to be presented), the scatterplot visually portrays the tangible connection between Master's degrees awarded in Public Administration and the average comment counts on SmarterEveryDay YouTube videos. The alignment of data points on the plot underscores the unmistakable co-variation between these variables, inviting the beholder to marvel at the unexpected convergence of academic accomplishments and virtual discourse.

Our findings not only shed light on this peculiar correlation but also beckon for a deeper contemplation of the intricate interplay between education and online interactions. The unexpected nature of this relationship invites scholars to approach statistical analysis with a discerning eye for the unanticipated and to recognize the inherent merriment in unraveling the mysteries of quantitative inquiry.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Master's degrees awarded in Public administration and Average number of comments on SmarterEveryDay YouTube videos. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
Mastering Management: An Empirical Analysis of the Relationship Between Master's Degrees in Public Administration and Average Comment Counts on SmarterEveryDay YouTube Videos

[[ABSTRACT]]
This research paper investigates the intriguing correlation between the number of Master's degrees awarded in Public Administration and the average number of comments on SmarterEveryDay YouTube videos. Utilizing data from the National Center for Education Statistics and YouTube, we conducted a comprehensive analysis covering the period from 2012 to 2021. Our findings reveal a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9787575 and a statistically significant relationship with p < 0.01. The unexpected and somewhat whimsical nature of this relationship invites further exploration and raises questions worthy of additional scholarly attention. We believe that this peculiar connection between academic achievements in public administration and online engagement reflects the interplay of knowledge dissemination and digital discourse in the 21st century. This paper not only offers a thought-provoking insight into the realm of online interactions but also presents a lighthearted perspective on the unexpected intersections of academic pursuits and internet culture.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The investigation of the relationship between academic achievements in Public Administration and online engagement on SmarterEveryDay YouTube videos has spurred a plethora of scholarly inquiries, though some more serious than others. Smith et al. (2015) delved into the dynamics of educational attainment and its impact on digital participation, paving the way for subsequent explorations. Meanwhile, Doe (2017) conducted a comprehensive analysis of online discourse in relation to academic pursuits, shedding light on the nuanced interplay between the two spheres. Furthermore, Jones (2019) offered a thought-provoking perspective on the potential correlations between knowledge dissemination in public administration and the digital realm, an angle that continues to intrigue researchers in the field.
In "Public Administration: Concepts and Cases," the authors expound upon the multifaceted nature of administrative governance, offering a comprehensive understanding of the discipline that contributes to our exploration of the underlying connection with online engagement. Similarly, "Digital Engagement: Strategies for the Modern Era" provides insights into the intricacies of online interactions, laying the groundwork for our study's contemplation of the intersection between academic achievements and digital discourse.
As we journey into less traditional scholarly resources, we encounter fictional works that, albeit indirectly, offer an amusing lens through which to perceive our topic of interest. For instance, the fictional novel "The Administrative Adventures of Alice" may not offer empirical data, but its whimsical portrayal of bureaucratic escapades certainly adds a touch of levity to our exploration of public administration. Similarly, the fictional account "Virtual Voyages: Navigating the Digital Seas" presents an imaginative foray into the realm of virtual engagement, providing a delightful backdrop for our scholarly pursuit.
Furthermore, from a social media perspective, a tweet from @OnlineEngagementEnthusiast provocatively noted, "Mastering public administration is like crafting the perfect YouTube comment – it requires finesse, strategy, and a touch of humor." While seemingly lighthearted, this social media insight alludes to the underlying parallels between academic expertise and digital participation, infusing a sense of wit into our scholarly interrogation.
Embracing the spirit of statistical investigation with a tinge of whimsy, we set the stage for a more light-hearted, yet thought-provoking, examination of the relationship between Master's degrees awarded in Public Administration and the average comment counts on SmarterEveryDay YouTube videos.

[[RESULTS]]
The correlation analysis revealed a striking relationship between the number of Master's degrees awarded in Public Administration and the average number of comments on SmarterEveryDay YouTube videos. Our analysis uncovered a correlation coefficient of 0.9787575, indicating a remarkably strong positive association between these seemingly unrelated variables. The r-squared value of 0.9579662 further accentuates the robustness of this relationship, suggesting that a substantial proportion of the variance in the average comment counts can be explained by the number of Master's degrees in Public Administration.
Furthermore, the p-value of less than 0.01 provides compelling evidence of the statistical significance of this connection, lending credence to the notion that this correlation is not just a fluke. It seems that there is truly something noteworthy about the interplay between academic pursuits in public administration and the digital dialogues that unfold on the SmarterEveryDay YouTube channel.
Perhaps it's a case of "smarter administration" leading to "smarter discussions" – a humorous twist on the relationship between these two seemingly disparate domains. The uncanny alignment between educational achievements and online engagement prompts us to ponder the intriguing dynamics at play and hints at the whimsical undercurrents of statistical exploration.
As depicted in Figure 1 (to be presented), the scatterplot visually portrays the tangible connection between Master's degrees awarded in Public Administration and the average comment counts on SmarterEveryDay YouTube videos. The alignment of data points on the plot underscores the unmistakable co-variation between these variables, inviting the beholder to marvel at the unexpected convergence of academic accomplishments and virtual discourse.
Our findings not only shed light on this peculiar correlation but also beckon for a deeper contemplation of the intricate interplay between education and online interactions. The unexpected nature of this relationship invites scholars to approach statistical analysis with a discerning eye for the unanticipated and to recognize the inherent merriment in unraveling the mysteries of quantitative inquiry.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The remarkable strength of the correlation coefficient observed in our study echoes the findings of prior research, thereby reaffirming the previously postulated relationship between academic achievements in Public Administration and online engagement. The whimsical interjections within the literature review, such as the fictional works and social media insights, may at first glance seem lighthearted, but they serve as a subtle reminder to approach the exploration of unexpected correlations with open-mindedness and humor.

Our results align with the notion put forth by @OnlineEngagementEnthusiast's tweet, albeit in a jesting manner. Indeed, "mastering public administration" appears to resonate with the craft of cultivating thoughtful and engaged YouTube comments, making for a delightful and somewhat unexpected parallel. The statistically significant p-value further reinforces that this correlation is not mere happenstance, adding a touch of gravitas to our findings despite the seemingly lighthearted nature of our inquiry.

The visual representation of the relationship through the scatterplot not only provides a compelling depiction of the robust correlation but also injects a subtle element of amusement into the otherwise rigorous statistical analysis. The humorous framing of "smarter administration" leading to "smarter discussions" elicits a smile, yet simultaneously prompts us to contemplate the intricate dynamics at the intersection of education and digital discourse.

Our study offers a unique perspective on the interplay between academic achievements and online interactions, emphasizing the potential for unexpected and thought-provoking discoveries in the realm of statistical inquiry. The research not only converges with prior scholarship but also underlines the whimsical undercurrents of statistical exploration, urging scholars to embrace both mirth and rigor in their pursuit of knowledge.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Master's degrees awarded in Public administration and Average number of comments on SmarterEveryDay YouTube videos. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
Mastering Management: An Empirical Analysis of the Relationship Between Master's Degrees in Public Administration and Average Comment Counts on SmarterEveryDay YouTube Videos

[[ABSTRACT]]
This research paper investigates the intriguing correlation between the number of Master's degrees awarded in Public Administration and the average number of comments on SmarterEveryDay YouTube videos. Utilizing data from the National Center for Education Statistics and YouTube, we conducted a comprehensive analysis covering the period from 2012 to 2021. Our findings reveal a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9787575 and a statistically significant relationship with p < 0.01. The unexpected and somewhat whimsical nature of this relationship invites further exploration and raises questions worthy of additional scholarly attention. We believe that this peculiar connection between academic achievements in public administration and online engagement reflects the interplay of knowledge dissemination and digital discourse in the 21st century. This paper not only offers a thought-provoking insight into the realm of online interactions but also presents a lighthearted perspective on the unexpected intersections of academic pursuits and internet culture.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
The modern age has witnessed an unprecedented surge in both online engagement and academic pursuits. As the digital realm continues to intertwine with various aspects of society, it is intriguing to explore the unexpected connections that emerge. From the proliferation of educational content on digital platforms to the evolving dynamics of public administration, the interplay between online discourse and academic achievements presents a fascinating milieu for investigation.
In this study, we embark on a somewhat unconventional journey as we delve into the seemingly disparate realms of Master's degrees in Public Administration and the average number of comments on SmarterEveryDay YouTube videos. While these two domains may appear to inhabit different spheres, an initial observation suggests that there might be an underlying relationship waiting to be unearthed. Thus, our endeavor is not only a testament to academic inquiry but also an ode to the serendipitous nature of statistical analysis.
The merging of educational attainment in the realm of public administration with the digital engagement witnessed on a popular YouTube channel leads to an exploration that is both unexpected and enlightening. This exploration builds upon the foundation of quantitative analysis, sparking a lighthearted yet intellectually stimulating investigation into the uncharted waters of academic pursuit and online interaction. As we navigate through this unorthodox terrain, we invite the reader to embark on a journey that challenges traditional scholarly boundaries and embraces the whimsical facets of statistical inquiry.
With a twinkle of curiosity and a dash of statistical rigor, we set out to unravel the intriguing relationship between Master's degrees awarded in Public Administration and the average comment counts on SmarterEveryDay YouTube videos. This paper not only seeks to discern the statistical significance of this connection but also to infuse a sense of levity and wonder into the scholarly discourse. In doing so, we hope to kindle a spirit of merriment and inquiry while shedding light on the unforeseen interplay of academic achievements and online engagement.

[[RESULTS]]
The correlation analysis revealed a striking relationship between the number of Master's degrees awarded in Public Administration and the average number of comments on SmarterEveryDay YouTube videos. Our analysis uncovered a correlation coefficient of 0.9787575, indicating a remarkably strong positive association between these seemingly unrelated variables. The r-squared value of 0.9579662 further accentuates the robustness of this relationship, suggesting that a substantial proportion of the variance in the average comment counts can be explained by the number of Master's degrees in Public Administration.
Furthermore, the p-value of less than 0.01 provides compelling evidence of the statistical significance of this connection, lending credence to the notion that this correlation is not just a fluke. It seems that there is truly something noteworthy about the interplay between academic pursuits in public administration and the digital dialogues that unfold on the SmarterEveryDay YouTube channel.
Perhaps it's a case of "smarter administration" leading to "smarter discussions" – a humorous twist on the relationship between these two seemingly disparate domains. The uncanny alignment between educational achievements and online engagement prompts us to ponder the intriguing dynamics at play and hints at the whimsical undercurrents of statistical exploration.
As depicted in Figure 1 (to be presented), the scatterplot visually portrays the tangible connection between Master's degrees awarded in Public Administration and the average comment counts on SmarterEveryDay YouTube videos. The alignment of data points on the plot underscores the unmistakable co-variation between these variables, inviting the beholder to marvel at the unexpected convergence of academic accomplishments and virtual discourse.
Our findings not only shed light on this peculiar correlation but also beckon for a deeper contemplation of the intricate interplay between education and online interactions. The unexpected nature of this relationship invites scholars to approach statistical analysis with a discerning eye for the unanticipated and to recognize the inherent merriment in unraveling the mysteries of quantitative inquiry.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our investigation into the intriguing correlation between Master's degrees awarded in Public Administration and the average number of comments on SmarterEveryDay YouTube videos has yielded compelling findings. The remarkably strong positive association, evidenced by a correlation coefficient of 0.9787575 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01, serves as a testament to the unexpected interplay of academic pursuits and online engagement. It appears that the pursuit of administrative knowledge might indeed lead to smarter discussions, both in the traditional classroom setting and the digital sphere.

While the peculiarity of this relationship may elicit a chuckle or two, it also underscores the dynamic nature of statistical analysis and the delightful surprises that await within seemingly disparate datasets. Our exploration has not only added a touch of whimsy to the scholarly conversation but has also offered a lighthearted perspective on the unexpected intersections of academic accomplishments and internet culture. It seems that statistical analysis, much like life itself, is full of delightful twists and turns.

As we consider the implications of our findings, it becomes evident that this peculiar connection between academic achievements in public administration and online engagement reflects the evolving landscape of knowledge dissemination and digital discourse in the 21st century. The unexpected whimsy of this relationship invites further exploration and raises questions worthy of additional scholarly attention.

In light of these findings, we assert with confidence that no further research in this area is required. It seems we've cracked the code on the curious correlation between Master's degrees in Public Administration and the average comment counts on SmarterEveryDay YouTube videos. Let's proceed with the knowledge that statistical curiosity has been appeased, and the lighthearted merriment of uncovering such relationships has, for now, been satisfied.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Mastering Management: An Empirical Analysis of the Relationship Between Master's Degrees in Public Administration and Average Comment Counts on SmarterEveryDay YouTube Videos. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Experimental Bureaucracy


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Mastering Management: An Empirical Analysis of the Relationship Between Master's Degrees in Public Administration and Average Comment Counts on SmarterEveryDay YouTube Videos. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Society for Public Administration Research and Social Media Engagement


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Mastering Management: An Empirical Analysis of the Relationship Between Master's Degrees in Public Administration and Average Comment Counts on SmarterEveryDay YouTube Videos with an abstract of This research paper investigates the intriguing correlation between the number of Master's degrees awarded in Public Administration and the average number of comments on SmarterEveryDay YouTube videos. Utilizing data from the National Center for Education Statistics and YouTube, we conducted a comprehensive analysis covering the period from 2012 to 2021. Our findings reveal a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9787575 and a statistically significant relationship with p < 0.01. The unexpected and somewhat whimsical nature of this relationship invites further exploration and raises questions worthy of additional scholarly attention. We believe that this peculiar connection between academic achievements in public administration and online engagement reflects the interplay of knowledge dissemination and digital discourse in the 21st century. This paper not only offers a thought-provoking insight into the realm of online interactions but also presents a lighthearted perspective on the unexpected intersections of academic pursuits and internet culture.

ChatGPT:

Master's degrees in Public Administration, SmarterEveryDay YouTube videos, online engagement, digital discourse, knowledge dissemination, National Center for Education Statistics, correlation coefficient, academic achievements, internet culture, scholarly attention, statistical significance, data analysis, YouTube comments, educational research, online interactions, academic pursuits

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Master's degrees awarded in Public administration
Detailed data title: Master's degrees conferred by postsecondary institutions in Public administration and social services
Source: National Center for Education Statistics
See what else correlates with Master's degrees awarded in Public administration

Average number of comments on SmarterEveryDay YouTube videos
Detailed data title: Average number of comments on SmarterEveryDay YouTube videos.
Source: SmarterEveryDay on YouTube
See what else correlates with Average number of comments on SmarterEveryDay YouTube videos

Correlation r = 0.9787575 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.9579662 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 95.8% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Average number of comments on SmarterEveryDay YouTube videos) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Master's degrees awarded in Public administration) over the 10 years from 2012 through 2021.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 8.7E-7. 0.0000008683335358406983000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.98 in 8.7E-5% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 1,151,631 random variables You don't actually need 1 million variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 9 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 9 because we have two variables measured over a period of 10 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.91, 1 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
2012201320142015201620172018201920202021
Master's degrees awarded in Public administration (Degrees awarded)41737435914450845948467544536146300488834971849388
Average number of comments on SmarterEveryDay YouTube videos (Average Comments)1532.182997.093635.575163.575374.064361.055659.878626.7310755.39945.56




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Y-axis doesn't start at zero: I truncated the Y-axes of the graph above. I also used a line graph, which makes the visual connection stand out more than it deserves. Nothing against line graphs. They are great at telling a story when you have linear data! But visually it is deceptive because the only data is at the points on the graph, not the lines on the graph. In between each point, the data could have been doing anything. Like going for a random walk by itself!
    Mathematically what I showed is true, but it is intentionally misleading. Below is the same chart but with both Y-axes starting at zero.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([41737,43591,44508,45948,46754,45361,46300,48883,49718,49388,])
array_2 = np.array([1532.18,2997.09,3635.57,5163.57,5374.06,4361.05,5659.87,8626.73,10755.3,9945.56,])
array_1_name = "Master's degrees awarded in Public administration"
array_2_name = "Average number of comments on SmarterEveryDay YouTube videos"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Your correlation rating is out of this world!


Correlation ID: 4672 · Black Variable ID: 1338 · Red Variable ID: 25492
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0