about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #4,664 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Air pollution in Wilmington, North Carolina and the second variable is The number of painting, coating, and decorating workers in North Carolina.  The chart goes from 2003 to 2022, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

As the air became cleaner, the previously camouflaged painting, coating, and decorating workers found it harder to blend in with their surroundings. This led to a decline in their numbers as they struggled to find new ways to showcase their impeccable blending skills. The job market for professional chameleons took a colorful turn, leaving many to ponder the true cost of a breath of fresh air.

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: [ a Polaroid photo ] of a city street in Wilmington, North Carolina. The sky is a clear blue, with puffy white clouds, indicating the dispersal of the once thick smog. In the foreground, a group of workers is meticulously blending into their surroundings, their uniforms and equipment mimicking the colors of the buildings and trees, almost to the point of invisibility. Despite the improved air quality, their skills are challenged by the fading need for their services. The image captures the poignant contrast between the disappearing chameleons and the newfound clarity in the atmosphere. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Air pollution in Wilmington, North Carolina and The number of painting, coating, and decorating workers in North Carolina. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Cyberpunk A scene from Skyrim a Polaroid photo a Polaroid photo Woodblock painting
ChatGPT: a Polaroid photo

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Air pollution in Wilmington, North Carolina and The number of painting, coating, and decorating workers in North Carolina, in the following situation: As the air became cleaner, the previously camouflaged painting, coating, and decorating workers found it harder to blend in with their surroundings. This led to a decline in their numbers as they struggled to find new ways to showcase their impeccable blending skills. The job market for professional chameleons took a colorful turn, leaving many to ponder the true cost of a breath of fresh air.. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In Wilmington, North Carolina, the once thick smog in the air gradually cleared, revealing a group of painting, coating, and decorating workers trying to blend into their surroundings. As the air became cleaner, their impeccable blending skills became less effective, and they found it difficult to showcase their expertise. With the declining need for their services, the number of professional chameleons dwindled, leaving many to question the impact of a breath of fresh air on their livelihood.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ a Polaroid photo ] and depicting this scene: In Wilmington, North Carolina, the once thick smog in the air gradually cleared, revealing a group of painting, coating, and decorating workers trying to blend into their surroundings. As the air became cleaner, their impeccable blending skills became less effective, and they found it difficult to showcase their expertise. With the declining need for their services, the number of professional chameleons dwindled, leaving many to question the impact of a breath of fresh air on their livelihood. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: [ a Polaroid photo ] of a city street in Wilmington, North Carolina. The sky is a clear blue, with puffy white clouds, indicating the dispersal of the once thick smog. In the foreground, a group of workers is meticulously blending into their surroundings, their uniforms and equipment mimicking the colors of the buildings and trees, almost to the point of invisibility. Despite the improved air quality, their skills are challenged by the fading need for their services. The image captures the poignant contrast between the disappearing chameleons and the newfound clarity in the atmosphere.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how a decrease in Air pollution in Wilmington, North Carolina caused The number of painting, coating, and decorating workers in North Carolina to decrease.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
The Color of the Wind: A Punny Look at Air Pollution in Wilmington, North Carolina and the Number of Painting, Coating, and Decorating Workers in North Carolina

Journal of Atmospheric Puns

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Wilmington, North Carolina and The number of painting, coating, and decorating workers in North Carolina. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Make the title punny if you can come up with clever pun. If not, make it sound serious.

Your research team used data from Environmental Protection Agency and Bureau of Larbor Statistics to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.8265911 and p < 0.01 for 2003 to 2022.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
The Color of the Wind: A Punny Look at Air Pollution in Wilmington, North Carolina and the Number of Painting, Coating, and Decorating Workers in North Carolina

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper examines the curious relationship between air pollution in Wilmington, North Carolina, and the number of painting, coating, and decorating workers throughout the state. By using data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the Bureau of Labor Statistics spanning from 2003 to 2022, a statistically significant correlation coefficient of 0.8265911 and p < 0.01 was found, shedding light on this unexpected connection. In the realm of painting and coating, it seems that the colors in the air may indeed be influencing the labor force. This research provides a colorful perspective on the impact of environmental factors on occupational trends, uncovering the unseen hues of the labor market.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Wilmington, North Carolina and The number of painting, coating, and decorating workers in North Carolina. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Color of the Wind: A Punny Look at Air Pollution in Wilmington, North Carolina and the Number of Painting, Coating, and Decorating Workers in North Carolina

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper examines the curious relationship between air pollution in Wilmington, North Carolina, and the number of painting, coating, and decorating workers throughout the state. By using data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the Bureau of Labor Statistics spanning from 2003 to 2022, a statistically significant correlation coefficient of 0.8265911 and p < 0.01 was found, shedding light on this unexpected connection. In the realm of painting and coating, it seems that the colors in the air may indeed be influencing the labor force. This research provides a colorful perspective on the impact of environmental factors on occupational trends, uncovering the unseen hues of the labor market.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
INTRODUCTION

The relationship between air pollution and its impact on human health and the environment has been extensively studied, but the influence of air quality on the labor market in the painting, coating, and decorating industry has been a less explored avenue of research. The intriguing question arises: could the presence of air pollutants in Wilmington, North Carolina be painting a vivid picture in the employment landscape of the state?

While the link between air pollution and respiratory diseases is well-documented, our research takes a colorful, punny look at the connection between the air quality in Wilmington, North Carolina, and the number of workers engaged in painting, coating, and decorating throughout the state. This relationship is not merely a superficial coat of paint on the canvas of environmental and occupational factors; instead, it represents an intricate interplay of variables, blending together to create a truly unique picture of the labor market.

As any artist knows, a composition is not complete without a palette of data. Our study utilizes data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the Bureau of Labor Statistics covering the period from 2003 to 2022, carefully mixing and blending the variables to uncover any underlying correlations. The results reveal a statistically significant correlation coefficient of 0.8265911 with a p-value less than 0.01, indicating a strong association between air pollution in Wilmington and the number of painting, coating, and decorating workers in North Carolina.

This unexpected finding adds a splash of color to the field of environmental and occupational research, challenging conventional wisdom and encouraging us to reconsider the ways in which external factors may shape the labor market. It appears that in the realm of painting and coating, the colors in the air may indeed be influencing the labor force, creating a canvas of correlation unlike any seen before.

By delving into this unexplored area of inquiry, our research aims to provide a fresh perspective on the intricate interplay between environmental conditions and occupational trends, shedding light on the nuanced shades that permeate the labor market. Join us on this colorful journey as we unravel the unseen hues of the labor market and discover the curious connections that lie beneath the surface, ready to paint a new understanding of the impact of environmental factors on the world of work.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Wilmington, North Carolina and The number of painting, coating, and decorating workers in North Carolina. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then devolve ever further, and mention something completely ridiculous, like you conducted literature review by reading the backs of shampoo bottles.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Color of the Wind: A Punny Look at Air Pollution in Wilmington, North Carolina and the Number of Painting, Coating, and Decorating Workers in North Carolina

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper examines the curious relationship between air pollution in Wilmington, North Carolina, and the number of painting, coating, and decorating workers throughout the state. By using data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the Bureau of Labor Statistics spanning from 2003 to 2022, a statistically significant correlation coefficient of 0.8265911 and p < 0.01 was found, shedding light on this unexpected connection. In the realm of painting and coating, it seems that the colors in the air may indeed be influencing the labor force. This research provides a colorful perspective on the impact of environmental factors on occupational trends, uncovering the unseen hues of the labor market.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
INTRODUCTION
The relationship between air pollution and its impact on human health and the environment has been extensively studied, but the influence of air quality on the labor market in the painting, coating, and decorating industry has been a less explored avenue of research. The intriguing question arises: could the presence of air pollutants in Wilmington, North Carolina be painting a vivid picture in the employment landscape of the state?
While the link between air pollution and respiratory diseases is well-documented, our research takes a colorful, punny look at the connection between the air quality in Wilmington, North Carolina, and the number of workers engaged in painting, coating, and decorating throughout the state. This relationship is not merely a superficial coat of paint on the canvas of environmental and occupational factors; instead, it represents an intricate interplay of variables, blending together to create a truly unique picture of the labor market.
As any artist knows, a composition is not complete without a palette of data. Our study utilizes data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the Bureau of Labor Statistics covering the period from 2003 to 2022, carefully mixing and blending the variables to uncover any underlying correlations. The results reveal a statistically significant correlation coefficient of 0.8265911 with a p-value less than 0.01, indicating a strong association between air pollution in Wilmington and the number of painting, coating, and decorating workers in North Carolina.
This unexpected finding adds a splash of color to the field of environmental and occupational research, challenging conventional wisdom and encouraging us to reconsider the ways in which external factors may shape the labor market. It appears that in the realm of painting and coating, the colors in the air may indeed be influencing the labor force, creating a canvas of correlation unlike any seen before.
By delving into this unexplored area of inquiry, our research aims to provide a fresh perspective on the intricate interplay between environmental conditions and occupational trends, shedding light on the nuanced shades that permeate the labor market. Join us on this colorful journey as we unravel the unseen hues of the labor market and discover the curious connections that lie beneath the surface, ready to paint a new understanding of the impact of environmental factors on the world of work.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

The relationship between air pollution and its impact on human health and the environment has been a subject of substantial academic inquiries. Various studies (Smith, 2005; Doe, 2010; Jones, 2015) have delved into the adverse effects of air pollution on respiratory health, ecosystem sustainability, and overall well-being. However, the potential influence of air quality on the labor market in the painting, coating, and decorating industry has been a largely unexplored area of investigation. As we embark on this colorful journey of inquiry, it is crucial to explore the existing literature and identify the gaps that our research aims to fill.

In "The Toxicity of Airborne Particles," the authors find an extensive array of health implications associated with air pollution, ranging from respiratory diseases to cardiovascular complications. Similarly, "The Impact of Air Quality on Ecosystems" reveals the detrimental effects of air pollutants on environmental sustainability and biodiversity. These studies form the foundation for understanding the broader implications of air pollution, setting the stage for our investigation into its potential impact on the labor market.

Turning to real non-fiction books related to the topic, "The Omnivore's Dilemma" and "Silent Spring" shed light on the environmental impact of industrial activities, including air pollution, providing valuable insights into the broader landscape of environmental concerns. Meanwhile, the fictional works "The Color Purple" and "The Picture of Dorian Gray" offer intriguing parallels to our study, albeit in a more metaphorical sense, as they explore themes of color, perception, and societal influence.

Proceeding to the margins of credible sources, it is essential to acknowledge the importance of unconventional research materials. In our pursuit of comprehensive knowledge, the authors have resorted to perusing the backs of household cleaning products, the contents of fortune cookies, and the latest adventures of a certain SpongeBob SquarePants. While these sources may raise eyebrows, their potential for uncovering hidden truths should not be underestimated. After all, in the colorful world of academia, one must be open to exploring every shade of evidence.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Wilmington, North Carolina and The number of painting, coating, and decorating workers in North Carolina. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Environmental Protection Agency and Bureau of Larbor Statistics . You used data from 2003 to 2022

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Color of the Wind: A Punny Look at Air Pollution in Wilmington, North Carolina and the Number of Painting, Coating, and Decorating Workers in North Carolina

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper examines the curious relationship between air pollution in Wilmington, North Carolina, and the number of painting, coating, and decorating workers throughout the state. By using data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the Bureau of Labor Statistics spanning from 2003 to 2022, a statistically significant correlation coefficient of 0.8265911 and p < 0.01 was found, shedding light on this unexpected connection. In the realm of painting and coating, it seems that the colors in the air may indeed be influencing the labor force. This research provides a colorful perspective on the impact of environmental factors on occupational trends, uncovering the unseen hues of the labor market.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
INTRODUCTION
The relationship between air pollution and its impact on human health and the environment has been extensively studied, but the influence of air quality on the labor market in the painting, coating, and decorating industry has been a less explored avenue of research. The intriguing question arises: could the presence of air pollutants in Wilmington, North Carolina be painting a vivid picture in the employment landscape of the state?
While the link between air pollution and respiratory diseases is well-documented, our research takes a colorful, punny look at the connection between the air quality in Wilmington, North Carolina, and the number of workers engaged in painting, coating, and decorating throughout the state. This relationship is not merely a superficial coat of paint on the canvas of environmental and occupational factors; instead, it represents an intricate interplay of variables, blending together to create a truly unique picture of the labor market.
As any artist knows, a composition is not complete without a palette of data. Our study utilizes data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the Bureau of Labor Statistics covering the period from 2003 to 2022, carefully mixing and blending the variables to uncover any underlying correlations. The results reveal a statistically significant correlation coefficient of 0.8265911 with a p-value less than 0.01, indicating a strong association between air pollution in Wilmington and the number of painting, coating, and decorating workers in North Carolina.
This unexpected finding adds a splash of color to the field of environmental and occupational research, challenging conventional wisdom and encouraging us to reconsider the ways in which external factors may shape the labor market. It appears that in the realm of painting and coating, the colors in the air may indeed be influencing the labor force, creating a canvas of correlation unlike any seen before.
By delving into this unexplored area of inquiry, our research aims to provide a fresh perspective on the intricate interplay between environmental conditions and occupational trends, shedding light on the nuanced shades that permeate the labor market. Join us on this colorful journey as we unravel the unseen hues of the labor market and discover the curious connections that lie beneath the surface, ready to paint a new understanding of the impact of environmental factors on the world of work.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To investigate the intriguing correlation between air pollution in Wilmington, North Carolina and the number of painting, coating, and decorating workers in North Carolina, our research team embarked on a methodological journey that could be likened to a colorful experiment in itself. Like a meticulous painter selecting the perfect brush and palette, we carefully curated our data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, spanning the years 2003 to 2022. The data collection process involved sifting through a diverse array of statistics, much like an artist exploring a rich spectrum of colors to capture the essence of a scene.

Employing a blend of statistical and econometric techniques, we sought to uncover the hidden patterns lurking within the data, much like an artist blending pigments to create a masterpiece. Our methodology involved constructing multivariate regression models to disentangle the complex web of variables at play, akin to a painter layering different hues to capture the depth and complexity of a subject.

In our analysis, we accounted for a palette of control variables, such as economic indicators and demographic characteristics, to ensure that the observed relationship between air pollution and painting, coating, and decorating employment was not merely a mirage shimmering on the canvas of statistical noise. This careful consideration of covariates allowed us to isolate the true essence of the association between air quality and occupational trends, much like a discerning art critic peering through layers of symbolism to unravel the deeper meaning in a painting.

Furthermore, we implemented robustness checks and sensitivity analyses to ensure that our findings were not a mere illusion conjured by a trick of the statistical light, understanding the importance of verifying the stability of our results in the face of potential data perturbations. These additional analyses served as the equivalent of adjusting the lighting in a gallery, allowing us to view our findings from different perspectives and angles, thereby capturing a more complete understanding of the relationship between air pollution and the painting, coating, and decorating labor force.

Our methodology, though complex and multifaceted, was akin to an artist’s meticulous process of bringing a vision to life on canvas, blending creativity with precision to uncover the true nature of the colors in the air and their influence on the labor market. Just as a painting may reveal new depths upon closer examination, our methodological approach aimed to unveil the nuanced connections between environmental factors and occupational trends, painting a vivid portrait of the unseen forces shaping the world of work.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Wilmington, North Carolina and The number of painting, coating, and decorating workers in North Carolina. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Environmental Protection Agency and Bureau of Larbor Statistics .

For the time period 2003 to 2022, you found a correlation 0.8265911, r-squared of 0.6832528, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Color of the Wind: A Punny Look at Air Pollution in Wilmington, North Carolina and the Number of Painting, Coating, and Decorating Workers in North Carolina

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper examines the curious relationship between air pollution in Wilmington, North Carolina, and the number of painting, coating, and decorating workers throughout the state. By using data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the Bureau of Labor Statistics spanning from 2003 to 2022, a statistically significant correlation coefficient of 0.8265911 and p < 0.01 was found, shedding light on this unexpected connection. In the realm of painting and coating, it seems that the colors in the air may indeed be influencing the labor force. This research provides a colorful perspective on the impact of environmental factors on occupational trends, uncovering the unseen hues of the labor market.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
INTRODUCTION
The relationship between air pollution and its impact on human health and the environment has been extensively studied, but the influence of air quality on the labor market in the painting, coating, and decorating industry has been a less explored avenue of research. The intriguing question arises: could the presence of air pollutants in Wilmington, North Carolina be painting a vivid picture in the employment landscape of the state?
While the link between air pollution and respiratory diseases is well-documented, our research takes a colorful, punny look at the connection between the air quality in Wilmington, North Carolina, and the number of workers engaged in painting, coating, and decorating throughout the state. This relationship is not merely a superficial coat of paint on the canvas of environmental and occupational factors; instead, it represents an intricate interplay of variables, blending together to create a truly unique picture of the labor market.
As any artist knows, a composition is not complete without a palette of data. Our study utilizes data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the Bureau of Labor Statistics covering the period from 2003 to 2022, carefully mixing and blending the variables to uncover any underlying correlations. The results reveal a statistically significant correlation coefficient of 0.8265911 with a p-value less than 0.01, indicating a strong association between air pollution in Wilmington and the number of painting, coating, and decorating workers in North Carolina.
This unexpected finding adds a splash of color to the field of environmental and occupational research, challenging conventional wisdom and encouraging us to reconsider the ways in which external factors may shape the labor market. It appears that in the realm of painting and coating, the colors in the air may indeed be influencing the labor force, creating a canvas of correlation unlike any seen before.
By delving into this unexplored area of inquiry, our research aims to provide a fresh perspective on the intricate interplay between environmental conditions and occupational trends, shedding light on the nuanced shades that permeate the labor market. Join us on this colorful journey as we unravel the unseen hues of the labor market and discover the curious connections that lie beneath the surface, ready to paint a new understanding of the impact of environmental factors on the world of work.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The results of the analysis revealed a strong and significant correlation between air pollution in Wilmington, North Carolina and the number of painting, coating, and decorating workers in the state. The correlation coefficient of 0.8265911 indicates a robust relationship between these seemingly unrelated variables, suggesting that the colors in the air may indeed be influencing the labor force in North Carolina.

The scatterplot in Figure 1 beautifully illustrates the vivid relationship between air pollution and the number of painting, coating, and decorating workers, showcasing the intriguing connection that our research has uncovered. It's almost as if the data points themselves have been painted into a stunning mosaic of statistical significance!

The r-squared value of 0.6832528 further highlights the extent to which air pollution in Wilmington is associated with the employment levels of painting, coating, and decorating workers in North Carolina. This strong explanatory power underscores the impact of environmental factors on the state's labor market, adding a splash of color to the understanding of occupational trends.

With a p-value of less than 0.01, the results affirm the statistical significance of this relationship, leaving little room for doubt that the presence of air pollutants in Wilmington is indeed leaving its mark on the labor market dynamics.

In sum, our findings provide a layer of insight into the influence of air pollution on the painting, coating, and decorating industry in North Carolina, demonstrating how environmental conditions can leave an indelible imprint on occupational trends. This research paints a compelling picture of the interplay between external factors and labor market dynamics, offering an intriguing look at the unseen hues of the employment landscape.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Wilmington, North Carolina and The number of painting, coating, and decorating workers in North Carolina. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
The Color of the Wind: A Punny Look at Air Pollution in Wilmington, North Carolina and the Number of Painting, Coating, and Decorating Workers in North Carolina

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper examines the curious relationship between air pollution in Wilmington, North Carolina, and the number of painting, coating, and decorating workers throughout the state. By using data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the Bureau of Labor Statistics spanning from 2003 to 2022, a statistically significant correlation coefficient of 0.8265911 and p < 0.01 was found, shedding light on this unexpected connection. In the realm of painting and coating, it seems that the colors in the air may indeed be influencing the labor force. This research provides a colorful perspective on the impact of environmental factors on occupational trends, uncovering the unseen hues of the labor market.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The relationship between air pollution and its impact on human health and the environment has been a subject of substantial academic inquiries. Various studies (Smith, 2005; Doe, 2010; Jones, 2015) have delved into the adverse effects of air pollution on respiratory health, ecosystem sustainability, and overall well-being. However, the potential influence of air quality on the labor market in the painting, coating, and decorating industry has been a largely unexplored area of investigation. As we embark on this colorful journey of inquiry, it is crucial to explore the existing literature and identify the gaps that our research aims to fill.
In "The Toxicity of Airborne Particles," the authors find an extensive array of health implications associated with air pollution, ranging from respiratory diseases to cardiovascular complications. Similarly, "The Impact of Air Quality on Ecosystems" reveals the detrimental effects of air pollutants on environmental sustainability and biodiversity. These studies form the foundation for understanding the broader implications of air pollution, setting the stage for our investigation into its potential impact on the labor market.
Turning to real non-fiction books related to the topic, "The Omnivore's Dilemma" and "Silent Spring" shed light on the environmental impact of industrial activities, including air pollution, providing valuable insights into the broader landscape of environmental concerns. Meanwhile, the fictional works "The Color Purple" and "The Picture of Dorian Gray" offer intriguing parallels to our study, albeit in a more metaphorical sense, as they explore themes of color, perception, and societal influence.
Proceeding to the margins of credible sources, it is essential to acknowledge the importance of unconventional research materials. In our pursuit of comprehensive knowledge, the authors have resorted to perusing the backs of household cleaning products, the contents of fortune cookies, and the latest adventures of a certain SpongeBob SquarePants. While these sources may raise eyebrows, their potential for uncovering hidden truths should not be underestimated. After all, in the colorful world of academia, one must be open to exploring every shade of evidence.

[[RESULTS]]
The results of the analysis revealed a strong and significant correlation between air pollution in Wilmington, North Carolina and the number of painting, coating, and decorating workers in the state. The correlation coefficient of 0.8265911 indicates a robust relationship between these seemingly unrelated variables, suggesting that the colors in the air may indeed be influencing the labor force in North Carolina.
The scatterplot in Figure 1 beautifully illustrates the vivid relationship between air pollution and the number of painting, coating, and decorating workers, showcasing the intriguing connection that our research has uncovered. It's almost as if the data points themselves have been painted into a stunning mosaic of statistical significance!
The r-squared value of 0.6832528 further highlights the extent to which air pollution in Wilmington is associated with the employment levels of painting, coating, and decorating workers in North Carolina. This strong explanatory power underscores the impact of environmental factors on the state's labor market, adding a splash of color to the understanding of occupational trends.
With a p-value of less than 0.01, the results affirm the statistical significance of this relationship, leaving little room for doubt that the presence of air pollutants in Wilmington is indeed leaving its mark on the labor market dynamics.
In sum, our findings provide a layer of insight into the influence of air pollution on the painting, coating, and decorating industry in North Carolina, demonstrating how environmental conditions can leave an indelible imprint on occupational trends. This research paints a compelling picture of the interplay between external factors and labor market dynamics, offering an intriguing look at the unseen hues of the employment landscape.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The results of our investigation have shed light on the intriguing relationship between air pollution in Wilmington, North Carolina, and the number of painting, coating, and decorating workers in the state. Our findings not only confirm, but also add vibrant strokes to the existing literature on the impact of environmental factors on occupational trends.

Building on the colorful foundation laid by previous studies, our research has painted a clear picture of the significant correlation between air pollution and the employment levels of painting, coating, and decorating workers. The robust correlation coefficient we uncovered adds another layer of pigment to the canvas of air pollution research, highlighting the influence of environmental conditions on the labor market dynamics in North Carolina.

In aligning with the existing literature, including "The Toxicity of Airborne Particles" and "The Impact of Air Quality on Ecosystems," our findings reinforce the notion that air pollution does not merely taint the air, but also leaves an undeniable impression on the labor force in the painting and decorating industry. It's as if the colors in the air are not only influencing respiratory health and environmental sustainability, but also shaping the composition of the state's workforce.

While our results may seem like the unexpected plot twist in a fiction novel, their statistical significance cannot be brushed off. With a p-value of less than 0.01, our findings stand as a bold, unmistakable hue in the palette of occupational trends research. The r-squared value of 0.6832528 further emphasizes the extent to which air pollution in Wilmington is intertwined with the employment of painting, coating, and decorating workers in North Carolina, creating a vivid storyline of environmental influence on labor market dynamics.

In the broader context of research methodologies, the unconventional sources we examined, including the contents of fortune cookies and the latest escapades of a certain SpongeBob SquarePants, have proven to hold unexpected relevance. Much like an unexpected streak of color on a canvas, these unconventional sources have contributed to the depth and richness of our understanding, adding an element of surprise to our academic inquiry.

So, as we conclude this colorful chapter in the story of occupational trends, our findings certainly paint a compelling narrative of the interplay between air pollution and employment in the painting, coating, and decorating industry. This research has added a splash of color to the otherwise gray landscape of labor market dynamics, inviting further exploration into the unseen hues of the employment landscape.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Wilmington, North Carolina and The number of painting, coating, and decorating workers in North Carolina. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
The Color of the Wind: A Punny Look at Air Pollution in Wilmington, North Carolina and the Number of Painting, Coating, and Decorating Workers in North Carolina

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper examines the curious relationship between air pollution in Wilmington, North Carolina, and the number of painting, coating, and decorating workers throughout the state. By using data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the Bureau of Labor Statistics spanning from 2003 to 2022, a statistically significant correlation coefficient of 0.8265911 and p < 0.01 was found, shedding light on this unexpected connection. In the realm of painting and coating, it seems that the colors in the air may indeed be influencing the labor force. This research provides a colorful perspective on the impact of environmental factors on occupational trends, uncovering the unseen hues of the labor market.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
INTRODUCTION
The relationship between air pollution and its impact on human health and the environment has been extensively studied, but the influence of air quality on the labor market in the painting, coating, and decorating industry has been a less explored avenue of research. The intriguing question arises: could the presence of air pollutants in Wilmington, North Carolina be painting a vivid picture in the employment landscape of the state?
While the link between air pollution and respiratory diseases is well-documented, our research takes a colorful, punny look at the connection between the air quality in Wilmington, North Carolina, and the number of workers engaged in painting, coating, and decorating throughout the state. This relationship is not merely a superficial coat of paint on the canvas of environmental and occupational factors; instead, it represents an intricate interplay of variables, blending together to create a truly unique picture of the labor market.
As any artist knows, a composition is not complete without a palette of data. Our study utilizes data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the Bureau of Labor Statistics covering the period from 2003 to 2022, carefully mixing and blending the variables to uncover any underlying correlations. The results reveal a statistically significant correlation coefficient of 0.8265911 with a p-value less than 0.01, indicating a strong association between air pollution in Wilmington and the number of painting, coating, and decorating workers in North Carolina.
This unexpected finding adds a splash of color to the field of environmental and occupational research, challenging conventional wisdom and encouraging us to reconsider the ways in which external factors may shape the labor market. It appears that in the realm of painting and coating, the colors in the air may indeed be influencing the labor force, creating a canvas of correlation unlike any seen before.
By delving into this unexplored area of inquiry, our research aims to provide a fresh perspective on the intricate interplay between environmental conditions and occupational trends, shedding light on the nuanced shades that permeate the labor market. Join us on this colorful journey as we unravel the unseen hues of the labor market and discover the curious connections that lie beneath the surface, ready to paint a new understanding of the impact of environmental factors on the world of work.

[[RESULTS]]
The results of the analysis revealed a strong and significant correlation between air pollution in Wilmington, North Carolina and the number of painting, coating, and decorating workers in the state. The correlation coefficient of 0.8265911 indicates a robust relationship between these seemingly unrelated variables, suggesting that the colors in the air may indeed be influencing the labor force in North Carolina.
The scatterplot in Figure 1 beautifully illustrates the vivid relationship between air pollution and the number of painting, coating, and decorating workers, showcasing the intriguing connection that our research has uncovered. It's almost as if the data points themselves have been painted into a stunning mosaic of statistical significance!
The r-squared value of 0.6832528 further highlights the extent to which air pollution in Wilmington is associated with the employment levels of painting, coating, and decorating workers in North Carolina. This strong explanatory power underscores the impact of environmental factors on the state's labor market, adding a splash of color to the understanding of occupational trends.
With a p-value of less than 0.01, the results affirm the statistical significance of this relationship, leaving little room for doubt that the presence of air pollutants in Wilmington is indeed leaving its mark on the labor market dynamics.
In sum, our findings provide a layer of insight into the influence of air pollution on the painting, coating, and decorating industry in North Carolina, demonstrating how environmental conditions can leave an indelible imprint on occupational trends. This research paints a compelling picture of the interplay between external factors and labor market dynamics, offering an intriguing look at the unseen hues of the employment landscape.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

Despite the seemingly whimsical nature of our research, the findings paint a clear picture of the profound impact of air pollution on the painting, coating, and decorating industry in North Carolina. The correlation coefficient of 0.8265911 serves as a bold stroke on the canvas of environmental and occupational factors, revealing a connection that is not merely a pigment of our imagination.

This unexpected relationship between air quality and employment in the realm of painting and coating adds a touch of intrigue to the vibrant tapestry of labor market dynamics. It seems that the colors in the air are more than just a pigment of speech; they have a tangible influence on the labor force, shaping the occupational landscape in ways that may have been overlooked until now.

The statistical significance of this association, with a p-value of less than 0.01, leaves little room for skepticism. It appears that air pollution in Wilmington is not just blowing hot air; it is leaving a lasting impression on the employment levels of painting, coating, and decorating workers throughout the state.

Our research has captured the essence of this connection, shedding light on the nuanced shades that permeate the labor market. As we conclude our study, we are confident that the colors of the wind hold a significant sway over the employment canvas, adding an unexpected twist to the traditional understanding of occupational trends.

In light of these compelling findings, we boldly assert that no further research is needed in this area. It seems that the link between air pollution in Wilmington and the number of painting, coating, and decorating workers in North Carolina is a tale perfectly painted and in no need of further coat. This marks the end of our colorful journey into the unexpected impact of environmental factors on the world of work.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited The Color of the Wind: A Punny Look at Air Pollution in Wilmington, North Carolina and the Number of Painting, Coating, and Decorating Workers in North Carolina. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

Journal of Atmospheric Puns


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited The Color of the Wind: A Punny Look at Air Pollution in Wilmington, North Carolina and the Number of Painting, Coating, and Decorating Workers in North Carolina. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Society for Environmental Punnery and Painting Statistics (SEPPS)


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled The Color of the Wind: A Punny Look at Air Pollution in Wilmington, North Carolina and the Number of Painting, Coating, and Decorating Workers in North Carolina with an abstract of This paper examines the curious relationship between air pollution in Wilmington, North Carolina, and the number of painting, coating, and decorating workers throughout the state. By using data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the Bureau of Labor Statistics spanning from 2003 to 2022, a statistically significant correlation coefficient of 0.8265911 and p < 0.01 was found, shedding light on this unexpected connection. In the realm of painting and coating, it seems that the colors in the air may indeed be influencing the labor force. This research provides a colorful perspective on the impact of environmental factors on occupational trends, uncovering the unseen hues of the labor market.

ChatGPT:

air pollution, painting workers, coating workers, decorating workers, environmental impact, labor force, Wilmington, North Carolina, North Carolina, statistics, correlation coefficient, Bureau of Labor Statistics, Environmental Protection Agency

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Air pollution in Wilmington, North Carolina
Detailed data title: Percentage of days with moderate or worse air quality in Wilmington, NC
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
See what else correlates with Air pollution in Wilmington, North Carolina

The number of painting, coating, and decorating workers in North Carolina
Detailed data title: BLS estimate of painting, coating, and decorating workers in North Carolina
Source: Bureau of Larbor Statistics
See what else correlates with The number of painting, coating, and decorating workers in North Carolina

Correlation r = 0.8265911 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.6832528 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 68.3% of the change in the one variable (i.e., The number of painting, coating, and decorating workers in North Carolina) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Air pollution in Wilmington, North Carolina) over the 20 years from 2003 through 2022.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 7.04E-6. 0.0000070438279820103660000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.83 in 0.000704% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 141,968 random variables You don't actually need 141 thousand variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 19 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 19 because we have two variables measured over a period of 20 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.61, 0.93 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
20032004200520062007200820092010201120122013201420152016201720182019202020212022
Air pollution in Wilmington, North Carolina (Bad air quality days)16.901421.913631.007831.005628.176817.486312.921317.777821.052614.204524.791117.9717.90968.356557.022476.382988.333333.6414610.55567.20222
The number of painting, coating, and decorating workers in North Carolina (Laborers)820780980115012801180860760720660680660600460300240280340330210




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([16.9014,21.9136,31.0078,31.0056,28.1768,17.4863,12.9213,17.7778,21.0526,14.2045,24.7911,17.971,7.9096,8.35655,7.02247,6.38298,8.33333,3.64146,10.5556,7.20222,])
array_2 = np.array([820,780,980,1150,1280,1180,860,760,720,660,680,660,600,460,300,240,280,340,330,210,])
array_1_name = "Air pollution in Wilmington, North Carolina"
array_2_name = "The number of painting, coating, and decorating workers in North Carolina"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Your correlation inspection deserves a standing ovation!


Correlation ID: 4664 · Black Variable ID: 21455 · Red Variable ID: 12537
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0