about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #4,663 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Air pollution in Hartford, Connecticut and the second variable is Arson in United States.  The chart goes from 1985 to 2022, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

As the air cleared, it turns out the arsonists could no longer use 'smoke screen' as an effective getaway tactic. Without the thick smog to provide cover, their fiery shenanigans were easily spotted, leading to a rapid decrease in their success rates. It seems like when it comes to committing arson, these individuals just couldn't handle the heat without the city's pollution offering them some serious 'burn' protection. So, as Hartford took a deep breath of fresh air, the arsonists found themselves running out of 'fuel' for their fiery escapades, ultimately dampening their enthusiasm for the illicit activity. I guess you could say that cleaner air really did help clear the path to a reduction in arson across the country!

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Generate an image of a futuristic city skyline with clean, clear skies in Hartford, Connecticut. Show tall, sleek skyscrapers adorned with neon lights and holographic advertisements. A few arsonists, clad in cyberpunk attire, can be seen struggling to set fires amidst the conspicuous absence of smog, their attempts thwarted by the lack of cover. The contrast between the pristine, unobstructed atmosphere and the furtive activities of the cyberpunk arsonists creates an intriguing visual narrative. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Air pollution in Hartford, Connecticut and Arson in United States. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Art nouveau Cyberpunk An image that looks like it is a scene from a Pixar movie Futuristic An image that looks like it is a scene from a Pixar movie
ChatGPT: Cyberpunk

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Air pollution in Hartford, Connecticut and Arson in United States, in the following situation: As the air cleared, it turns out the arsonists could no longer use 'smoke screen' as an effective getaway tactic. Without the thick smog to provide cover, their fiery shenanigans were easily spotted, leading to a rapid decrease in their success rates. It seems like when it comes to committing arson, these individuals just couldn't handle the heat without the city's pollution offering them some serious 'burn' protection. So, as Hartford took a deep breath of fresh air, the arsonists found themselves running out of 'fuel' for their fiery escapades, ultimately dampening their enthusiasm for the illicit activity. I guess you could say that cleaner air really did help clear the path to a reduction in arson across the country!. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In Hartford, Connecticut, the air cleared, revealing a sky free of smog. As a result, arsonists found it difficult to hide their fiery activities in the open. With the thick smog gone, their attempts at arson were easily noticed, leading to a significant decrease in their success rates. The lack of pollution seemed to extinguish their ability to use a 'smoke screen' as a getaway tactic. The newly clean air in Hartford led to a decrease in arson across the United States, as the arsonists struggled to find cover for their fiery shenanigans.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ Cyberpunk ] and depicting this scene: In Hartford, Connecticut, the air cleared, revealing a sky free of smog. As a result, arsonists found it difficult to hide their fiery activities in the open. With the thick smog gone, their attempts at arson were easily noticed, leading to a significant decrease in their success rates. The lack of pollution seemed to extinguish their ability to use a 'smoke screen' as a getaway tactic. The newly clean air in Hartford led to a decrease in arson across the United States, as the arsonists struggled to find cover for their fiery shenanigans. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Generate an image of a futuristic city skyline with clean, clear skies in Hartford, Connecticut. Show tall, sleek skyscrapers adorned with neon lights and holographic advertisements. A few arsonists, clad in cyberpunk attire, can be seen struggling to set fires amidst the conspicuous absence of smog, their attempts thwarted by the lack of cover. The contrast between the pristine, unobstructed atmosphere and the furtive activities of the cyberpunk arsonists creates an intriguing visual narrative.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how a decrease in Air pollution in Hartford, Connecticut caused Arson in United States to decrease.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
The Hazy Connection: A Statistical Analysis of Air Pollution in Hartford and Arson-Driven Fires in the United States

The Journal of Environmental Epidemiology and Criminology

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Hartford, Connecticut and Arson in United States. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Include a pun in the title.

Your research team used data from Environmental Protection Agency and FBI Criminal Justice Information Services to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.8220339 and p < 0.01 for 1985 to 2022.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
The Hazy Connection: A Statistical Analysis of Air Pollution in Hartford and Arson-Driven Fires in the United States

[[ABSTRACT]]
The pervasive issue of air pollution has smogged our understanding of its potential influence on criminal behavior. This study endeavors to shed light on the relationship between air pollution levels in Hartford, Connecticut, and the occurrence of arson-driven fires in the United States. By obtaining and meticulously analyzing data from the Environmental Protection Agency and FBI Criminal Justice Information Services, our research team unveiled a robust correlation between these seemingly disparate phenomena. The correlation coefficient of 0.8220339 (p < 0.01) for the period from 1985 to 2022 rekindles interest in the interplay between environmental factors and incendiary activities. It seems that the "fiery" nature of this correlation has brought a whole new meaning to the term "hot spot."

Our findings ignite contemplation on the potential causative effect of air pollution in fanning the flames of arson across the nation. As the smoke clears, it becomes evident that addressing air quality concerns also holds relevance in the realm of crime prevention. Indeed, this research quenches the curiosity of many that have wondered about the combustible combination of pollution and pyromania. Our ultimate hope is that this study not only sparks further research in the field but also serves as a "bright" reminder to keep a vigilant eye on the environmental factors that may fuel criminal activities. Remember, when it comes to unraveling intricate connections, where there's smoke, there's fire - and also, there's a good chance to make a dad joke.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Hartford, Connecticut and Arson in United States. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Hazy Connection: A Statistical Analysis of Air Pollution in Hartford and Arson-Driven Fires in the United States

[[ABSTRACT]]
The pervasive issue of air pollution has smogged our understanding of its potential influence on criminal behavior. This study endeavors to shed light on the relationship between air pollution levels in Hartford, Connecticut, and the occurrence of arson-driven fires in the United States. By obtaining and meticulously analyzing data from the Environmental Protection Agency and FBI Criminal Justice Information Services, our research team unveiled a robust correlation between these seemingly disparate phenomena. The correlation coefficient of 0.8220339 (p < 0.01) for the period from 1985 to 2022 rekindles interest in the interplay between environmental factors and incendiary activities. It seems that the "fiery" nature of this correlation has brought a whole new meaning to the term "hot spot."

Our findings ignite contemplation on the potential causative effect of air pollution in fanning the flames of arson across the nation. As the smoke clears, it becomes evident that addressing air quality concerns also holds relevance in the realm of crime prevention. Indeed, this research quenches the curiosity of many that have wondered about the combustible combination of pollution and pyromania. Our ultimate hope is that this study not only sparks further research in the field but also serves as a "bright" reminder to keep a vigilant eye on the environmental factors that may fuel criminal activities. Remember, when it comes to unraveling intricate connections, where there's smoke, there's fire - and also, there's a good chance to make a dad joke.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

As we venture into the labyrinth of causation, seeking to unearth the hidden links between seemingly unrelated phenomena, we often find ourselves at a crossroads of curiosity and amazement. It is at this juncture that we invite you to join us on a journey that sets the air ablaze with unexpected connections, where the smoke of speculation eventually clears to reveal the fiery bond between air pollution and arson-driven fires. Yes, we're about to embark on a journey into the smoky skies of statistical analysis and dad jokes galore.

Air pollution and arson – two disparate topics at first glance, much like mismatched socks in the laundry. Yet, as we sort through the dirty laundry of statistical data, we uncover a correlation that shines a light on their unlikely rendezvous. It seems that these two subjects have joined forces, much like a fire and a strong gust of wind – it's a tale of combustion and collaboration that has us burning with curiosity.

The empirical evidence we present here today rekindles the age-old question of whether environmental factors can ignite criminal behavior. It's as if air pollution has been playing with matches, quietly stoking the flames of arson-driven fires across the nation. The correlation coefficient of 0.8220339 (p < 0.01) for the period from 1985 to 2022 acts as the proverbial smoke signal, beckoning researchers to seek out the source of this unexpected connection. It's a statistical "hot spot" that's hotter than a dad joke at a barbecue – speaking of which, did you hear about the fire at the circus? It was in tents.

So, how do we make sense of this smoldering correlation? It's a puzzle that has us fanning the flames of inquiry, urging us to consider the potential causative effect of air pollution on the incidence of arson-driven fires. While the statistical evidence may seem incendiary, our quest for understanding is as cool and collected as a firefighter with a trusty hose. We're not just blowing smoke here – the implications of our findings extend far beyond the realm of environmental policy, reaching into the very heart of crime prevention strategies.

The findings of this study serve not only to ignite contemplation but also to kindle a renewed interest in the dynamic interplay between environmental factors and criminal behavior. Our quest for knowledge in this domain is akin to a journey through a forest of statistical significance, where the trail of evidence leads us through the smoky haze of uncertainty and into the clearing of understanding. It's a reminder that, just like uncovering unexpected connections, solving a complex statistical puzzle is a bit like navigating a corn maze – you might feel lost at times, but the joy of discovery awaits around the next twist and turn.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Hartford, Connecticut and Arson in United States. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then you might move on to cartoons and children's shows that you watched for research.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Hazy Connection: A Statistical Analysis of Air Pollution in Hartford and Arson-Driven Fires in the United States

[[ABSTRACT]]
The pervasive issue of air pollution has smogged our understanding of its potential influence on criminal behavior. This study endeavors to shed light on the relationship between air pollution levels in Hartford, Connecticut, and the occurrence of arson-driven fires in the United States. By obtaining and meticulously analyzing data from the Environmental Protection Agency and FBI Criminal Justice Information Services, our research team unveiled a robust correlation between these seemingly disparate phenomena. The correlation coefficient of 0.8220339 (p < 0.01) for the period from 1985 to 2022 rekindles interest in the interplay between environmental factors and incendiary activities. It seems that the "fiery" nature of this correlation has brought a whole new meaning to the term "hot spot."

Our findings ignite contemplation on the potential causative effect of air pollution in fanning the flames of arson across the nation. As the smoke clears, it becomes evident that addressing air quality concerns also holds relevance in the realm of crime prevention. Indeed, this research quenches the curiosity of many that have wondered about the combustible combination of pollution and pyromania. Our ultimate hope is that this study not only sparks further research in the field but also serves as a "bright" reminder to keep a vigilant eye on the environmental factors that may fuel criminal activities. Remember, when it comes to unraveling intricate connections, where there's smoke, there's fire - and also, there's a good chance to make a dad joke.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
As we venture into the labyrinth of causation, seeking to unearth the hidden links between seemingly unrelated phenomena, we often find ourselves at a crossroads of curiosity and amazement. It is at this juncture that we invite you to join us on a journey that sets the air ablaze with unexpected connections, where the smoke of speculation eventually clears to reveal the fiery bond between air pollution and arson-driven fires. Yes, we're about to embark on a journey into the smoky skies of statistical analysis and dad jokes galore.
Air pollution and arson – two disparate topics at first glance, much like mismatched socks in the laundry. Yet, as we sort through the dirty laundry of statistical data, we uncover a correlation that shines a light on their unlikely rendezvous. It seems that these two subjects have joined forces, much like a fire and a strong gust of wind – it's a tale of combustion and collaboration that has us burning with curiosity.
The empirical evidence we present here today rekindles the age-old question of whether environmental factors can ignite criminal behavior. It's as if air pollution has been playing with matches, quietly stoking the flames of arson-driven fires across the nation. The correlation coefficient of 0.8220339 (p < 0.01) for the period from 1985 to 2022 acts as the proverbial smoke signal, beckoning researchers to seek out the source of this unexpected connection. It's a statistical "hot spot" that's hotter than a dad joke at a barbecue – speaking of which, did you hear about the fire at the circus? It was in tents.
So, how do we make sense of this smoldering correlation? It's a puzzle that has us fanning the flames of inquiry, urging us to consider the potential causative effect of air pollution on the incidence of arson-driven fires. While the statistical evidence may seem incendiary, our quest for understanding is as cool and collected as a firefighter with a trusty hose. We're not just blowing smoke here – the implications of our findings extend far beyond the realm of environmental policy, reaching into the very heart of crime prevention strategies.
The findings of this study serve not only to ignite contemplation but also to kindle a renewed interest in the dynamic interplay between environmental factors and criminal behavior. Our quest for knowledge in this domain is akin to a journey through a forest of statistical significance, where the trail of evidence leads us through the smoky haze of uncertainty and into the clearing of understanding. It's a reminder that, just like uncovering unexpected connections, solving a complex statistical puzzle is a bit like navigating a corn maze – you might feel lost at times, but the joy of discovery awaits around the next twist and turn.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

The connection between air pollution and its potential influence on criminal behavior has been a subject of recent inquiry in the field of environmental and criminal justice studies. Smith et al. (2018) delved into the relationship between air quality and crime, shedding light on the often-overlooked impact of pollution on criminal activities. Similarly, Doe's (2019) comprehensive analysis of environmental factors and arson brought to the forefront the intricate dance of combustion and environmental conditions. Adding fuel to the fire, Jones (2020) examined the geographical patterns of air pollution and its coinciding effect on various criminal activities, including arson, across the United States. Despite the seriousness of the topic, it seems that the authors of these studies were unable to resist the temptation to "light" up the discussion with puns, much like a candle at a birthday party - because, after all, what did one arsonist say to another? "Let's keep this relationship on fire!"

Turning to the world of non-fiction literature, "The Air We Breathe: A Critical Analysis of Pollution and Crime" by Green (2017) offers a comprehensive exploration of the link between air pollution and criminal behavior, providing readers with a breath of fresh air amid the dense fog of statistical analysis. In a similar vein, "Smoke Signals: The Environmental Impact on Arson" by Blue (2020) provides a captivating account of the interplay between environmental factors and the occurrence of arson-driven fires, offering readers a "fiery" perspective that leaves them with burning questions and a desire to learn more – not unlike the feeling one gets after telling a particularly "hot" dad joke.

Stepping into the realm of fiction, the works of Hawthorne and Twain could shield us from the smoke of reality, providing a literary refuge from the empirical. Hawthorne's "The Scarlet Haze" and Twain's "The Adventures of Huckleberry Smog" offer readers a whimsical escape into worlds where the haze of air pollution intertwines with narratives of intrigue and mischief. Additionally, in the children's show "Captain Planet and the Planeteers," the environmental superhero battles against the evil plots of polluters, reminding us that even in the world of fiction, the consequences of air pollution are not to be taken lightly - much like a forest without any trees: it's leafless.

As our quest for understanding takes us deeper into the smoky labyrinth of environmental and criminal connections, we must not lose sight of the vibrant tapestry of literature and pop culture that illuminates the path ahead. The diverse perspectives and pun-tastic escapades woven into these works remind us that, much like a well-crafted dad joke, the correlation between air pollution and arson-driven fires carries a spark of intrigue that is both illuminating and, dare we say, "fiery" in its implications.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Hartford, Connecticut and Arson in United States. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Environmental Protection Agency and FBI Criminal Justice Information Services . You used data from 1985 to 2022

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Hazy Connection: A Statistical Analysis of Air Pollution in Hartford and Arson-Driven Fires in the United States

[[ABSTRACT]]
The pervasive issue of air pollution has smogged our understanding of its potential influence on criminal behavior. This study endeavors to shed light on the relationship between air pollution levels in Hartford, Connecticut, and the occurrence of arson-driven fires in the United States. By obtaining and meticulously analyzing data from the Environmental Protection Agency and FBI Criminal Justice Information Services, our research team unveiled a robust correlation between these seemingly disparate phenomena. The correlation coefficient of 0.8220339 (p < 0.01) for the period from 1985 to 2022 rekindles interest in the interplay between environmental factors and incendiary activities. It seems that the "fiery" nature of this correlation has brought a whole new meaning to the term "hot spot."

Our findings ignite contemplation on the potential causative effect of air pollution in fanning the flames of arson across the nation. As the smoke clears, it becomes evident that addressing air quality concerns also holds relevance in the realm of crime prevention. Indeed, this research quenches the curiosity of many that have wondered about the combustible combination of pollution and pyromania. Our ultimate hope is that this study not only sparks further research in the field but also serves as a "bright" reminder to keep a vigilant eye on the environmental factors that may fuel criminal activities. Remember, when it comes to unraveling intricate connections, where there's smoke, there's fire - and also, there's a good chance to make a dad joke.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
As we venture into the labyrinth of causation, seeking to unearth the hidden links between seemingly unrelated phenomena, we often find ourselves at a crossroads of curiosity and amazement. It is at this juncture that we invite you to join us on a journey that sets the air ablaze with unexpected connections, where the smoke of speculation eventually clears to reveal the fiery bond between air pollution and arson-driven fires. Yes, we're about to embark on a journey into the smoky skies of statistical analysis and dad jokes galore.
Air pollution and arson – two disparate topics at first glance, much like mismatched socks in the laundry. Yet, as we sort through the dirty laundry of statistical data, we uncover a correlation that shines a light on their unlikely rendezvous. It seems that these two subjects have joined forces, much like a fire and a strong gust of wind – it's a tale of combustion and collaboration that has us burning with curiosity.
The empirical evidence we present here today rekindles the age-old question of whether environmental factors can ignite criminal behavior. It's as if air pollution has been playing with matches, quietly stoking the flames of arson-driven fires across the nation. The correlation coefficient of 0.8220339 (p < 0.01) for the period from 1985 to 2022 acts as the proverbial smoke signal, beckoning researchers to seek out the source of this unexpected connection. It's a statistical "hot spot" that's hotter than a dad joke at a barbecue – speaking of which, did you hear about the fire at the circus? It was in tents.
So, how do we make sense of this smoldering correlation? It's a puzzle that has us fanning the flames of inquiry, urging us to consider the potential causative effect of air pollution on the incidence of arson-driven fires. While the statistical evidence may seem incendiary, our quest for understanding is as cool and collected as a firefighter with a trusty hose. We're not just blowing smoke here – the implications of our findings extend far beyond the realm of environmental policy, reaching into the very heart of crime prevention strategies.
The findings of this study serve not only to ignite contemplation but also to kindle a renewed interest in the dynamic interplay between environmental factors and criminal behavior. Our quest for knowledge in this domain is akin to a journey through a forest of statistical significance, where the trail of evidence leads us through the smoky haze of uncertainty and into the clearing of understanding. It's a reminder that, just like uncovering unexpected connections, solving a complex statistical puzzle is a bit like navigating a corn maze – you might feel lost at times, but the joy of discovery awaits around the next twist and turn.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To unearth the smoldering link between air pollution in Hartford, Connecticut, and arson-driven fires in the United States, our research team utilized a convoluted yet captivating blend of statistical analyses and data wrangling techniques. With data sourced from the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services (CJIS) from the period between 1985 and 2022, we meticulously sifted through the digital haystack in search of these fiery needles. It was like trying to find a needle in a haystack, but instead of a needle, we were looking for a connection between air pollution and arson, and instead of a haystack, we had a database – you get the idea.

We employed a cutting-edge statistical methodology, combining time-series analysis with geographic information system (GIS) mapping to chart the atmospheric and criminal landscape. This GIS mapping was so precise, it could pinpoint the exact location of a dad joke in a sea of serious academic discourse – talk about a real mapping milestone. By cross-referencing this geographic information with air quality index data and incidents of arson-derived fires, we crafted a statistical narrative thicker than the smoke billowing from a bonfire – or a high-quality barbecue, depending on which dad joke you prefer.

Our statistical models were as robust as a fireproof suit, with regression analyses and correlation tests providing the backbone of our inferential framework. The correlations were so strong, they were practically burning a hole in our scatter plots. We cooked up a well-done correlation coefficient of 0.8220339 (p < 0.01), signaling a significance hotter than a jalapeno pepper – which, coincidentally, is sometimes used in barbecue sauces.

In order to ensure the reliability and validity of our findings, we employed rigorous sensitivity analyses, carefully testing the assumptions of our statistical models. This process was more delicate than trying to toast a marshmallow just right – these statistical marshmallows had to be golden brown with just the right amount of char for maximum flavor. Additionally, we also conducted a series of robustness checks, ensuring that our findings remained stable across different model specifications. It was like making sure the firewood stack won’t collapse before the real bonfire begins – except in our case, the "bonfire" is a metaphorical representation of our analytical framework.

Finally, to account for potential confounding variables, we used propensity score matching techniques to create a balanced comparison group. This was like trying to assemble a perfectly harmonious band, where every variable played its part in the statistical symphony of analysis. Once again, we were careful to handle these variables with the precision of a music conductor – or perhaps, a dad joke maestro orchestrating the perfect pun.

In conclusion, our methodology was a harmonious blend of statistical rigor, geographic precision, and analytical creativity. It was a statistical adventure that allowed us to navigate through the hazy terrain of air pollution and arson, illuminating the unexpected connections between environmental factors and criminal behavior. It's clear that when it comes to unraveling complex statistical puzzles, sometimes you just have to throw caution to the wind – much like lighting the fuse of a firework on a summer evening.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Hartford, Connecticut and Arson in United States. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Environmental Protection Agency and FBI Criminal Justice Information Services .

For the time period 1985 to 2022, you found a correlation 0.8220339, r-squared of 0.6757398, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Hazy Connection: A Statistical Analysis of Air Pollution in Hartford and Arson-Driven Fires in the United States

[[ABSTRACT]]
The pervasive issue of air pollution has smogged our understanding of its potential influence on criminal behavior. This study endeavors to shed light on the relationship between air pollution levels in Hartford, Connecticut, and the occurrence of arson-driven fires in the United States. By obtaining and meticulously analyzing data from the Environmental Protection Agency and FBI Criminal Justice Information Services, our research team unveiled a robust correlation between these seemingly disparate phenomena. The correlation coefficient of 0.8220339 (p < 0.01) for the period from 1985 to 2022 rekindles interest in the interplay between environmental factors and incendiary activities. It seems that the "fiery" nature of this correlation has brought a whole new meaning to the term "hot spot."

Our findings ignite contemplation on the potential causative effect of air pollution in fanning the flames of arson across the nation. As the smoke clears, it becomes evident that addressing air quality concerns also holds relevance in the realm of crime prevention. Indeed, this research quenches the curiosity of many that have wondered about the combustible combination of pollution and pyromania. Our ultimate hope is that this study not only sparks further research in the field but also serves as a "bright" reminder to keep a vigilant eye on the environmental factors that may fuel criminal activities. Remember, when it comes to unraveling intricate connections, where there's smoke, there's fire - and also, there's a good chance to make a dad joke.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
As we venture into the labyrinth of causation, seeking to unearth the hidden links between seemingly unrelated phenomena, we often find ourselves at a crossroads of curiosity and amazement. It is at this juncture that we invite you to join us on a journey that sets the air ablaze with unexpected connections, where the smoke of speculation eventually clears to reveal the fiery bond between air pollution and arson-driven fires. Yes, we're about to embark on a journey into the smoky skies of statistical analysis and dad jokes galore.
Air pollution and arson – two disparate topics at first glance, much like mismatched socks in the laundry. Yet, as we sort through the dirty laundry of statistical data, we uncover a correlation that shines a light on their unlikely rendezvous. It seems that these two subjects have joined forces, much like a fire and a strong gust of wind – it's a tale of combustion and collaboration that has us burning with curiosity.
The empirical evidence we present here today rekindles the age-old question of whether environmental factors can ignite criminal behavior. It's as if air pollution has been playing with matches, quietly stoking the flames of arson-driven fires across the nation. The correlation coefficient of 0.8220339 (p < 0.01) for the period from 1985 to 2022 acts as the proverbial smoke signal, beckoning researchers to seek out the source of this unexpected connection. It's a statistical "hot spot" that's hotter than a dad joke at a barbecue – speaking of which, did you hear about the fire at the circus? It was in tents.
So, how do we make sense of this smoldering correlation? It's a puzzle that has us fanning the flames of inquiry, urging us to consider the potential causative effect of air pollution on the incidence of arson-driven fires. While the statistical evidence may seem incendiary, our quest for understanding is as cool and collected as a firefighter with a trusty hose. We're not just blowing smoke here – the implications of our findings extend far beyond the realm of environmental policy, reaching into the very heart of crime prevention strategies.
The findings of this study serve not only to ignite contemplation but also to kindle a renewed interest in the dynamic interplay between environmental factors and criminal behavior. Our quest for knowledge in this domain is akin to a journey through a forest of statistical significance, where the trail of evidence leads us through the smoky haze of uncertainty and into the clearing of understanding. It's a reminder that, just like uncovering unexpected connections, solving a complex statistical puzzle is a bit like navigating a corn maze – you might feel lost at times, but the joy of discovery awaits around the next twist and turn.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The statistical analysis of the relationship between air pollution levels in Hartford, Connecticut, and the incidence of arson-driven fires in the United States revealed a robust correlation. Our research team found a correlation coefficient of 0.8220339, indicative of a strong positive relationship between these two seemingly disparate variables. This result ignites a new understanding of the potential influence of environmental factors on criminal activities, highlighting the need for further exploration into this smoldering connection.

The correlation coefficient of 0.8220339 suggests that as the levels of air pollution in Hartford increased, so did the occurrence of arson-driven fires across the United States. This relationship is statistically significant, with an r-squared value of 0.6757398, demonstrating that approximately 67.6% of the variation in arson-driven fires can be explained by the variation in air pollution levels. The probability value (p < 0.01) further solidifies the strength of this correlation, signaling that it is highly unlikely to have occurred by random chance. It seems that the evidence for this connection is as clear as the air on a windy day – and as elusive as a guilty culprit in a game of "clue."

Our results are visually depicted in Figure 1, a scatterplot that unmistakably captures the strong positive relationship between air pollution levels in Hartford and the occurrence of arson-driven fires across the United States. This figure serves as a beacon, shining a light on the smoky bond between these environmental and criminal phenomena. It seems that when it comes to unraveling unexpected connections, the data doesn't just speak – it practically belches smoke signals of causation.

In conclusion, our findings provide compelling evidence of a significant correlation between air pollution in Hartford and arson-driven fires in the United States. This study sets a fiery precedent for further research into the interplay between environmental factors and criminal behavior, emphasizing the need for proactive measures to address air quality concerns in the context of crime prevention. It's a reminder that in the realm of statistical analysis, just like with arson investigations, the trail of evidence often leads to unexpected and combustible revelations.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Hartford, Connecticut and Arson in United States. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
The Hazy Connection: A Statistical Analysis of Air Pollution in Hartford and Arson-Driven Fires in the United States

[[ABSTRACT]]
The pervasive issue of air pollution has smogged our understanding of its potential influence on criminal behavior. This study endeavors to shed light on the relationship between air pollution levels in Hartford, Connecticut, and the occurrence of arson-driven fires in the United States. By obtaining and meticulously analyzing data from the Environmental Protection Agency and FBI Criminal Justice Information Services, our research team unveiled a robust correlation between these seemingly disparate phenomena. The correlation coefficient of 0.8220339 (p < 0.01) for the period from 1985 to 2022 rekindles interest in the interplay between environmental factors and incendiary activities. It seems that the "fiery" nature of this correlation has brought a whole new meaning to the term "hot spot."

Our findings ignite contemplation on the potential causative effect of air pollution in fanning the flames of arson across the nation. As the smoke clears, it becomes evident that addressing air quality concerns also holds relevance in the realm of crime prevention. Indeed, this research quenches the curiosity of many that have wondered about the combustible combination of pollution and pyromania. Our ultimate hope is that this study not only sparks further research in the field but also serves as a "bright" reminder to keep a vigilant eye on the environmental factors that may fuel criminal activities. Remember, when it comes to unraveling intricate connections, where there's smoke, there's fire - and also, there's a good chance to make a dad joke.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The connection between air pollution and its potential influence on criminal behavior has been a subject of recent inquiry in the field of environmental and criminal justice studies. Smith et al. (2018) delved into the relationship between air quality and crime, shedding light on the often-overlooked impact of pollution on criminal activities. Similarly, Doe's (2019) comprehensive analysis of environmental factors and arson brought to the forefront the intricate dance of combustion and environmental conditions. Adding fuel to the fire, Jones (2020) examined the geographical patterns of air pollution and its coinciding effect on various criminal activities, including arson, across the United States. Despite the seriousness of the topic, it seems that the authors of these studies were unable to resist the temptation to "light" up the discussion with puns, much like a candle at a birthday party - because, after all, what did one arsonist say to another? "Let's keep this relationship on fire!"
Turning to the world of non-fiction literature, "The Air We Breathe: A Critical Analysis of Pollution and Crime" by Green (2017) offers a comprehensive exploration of the link between air pollution and criminal behavior, providing readers with a breath of fresh air amid the dense fog of statistical analysis. In a similar vein, "Smoke Signals: The Environmental Impact on Arson" by Blue (2020) provides a captivating account of the interplay between environmental factors and the occurrence of arson-driven fires, offering readers a "fiery" perspective that leaves them with burning questions and a desire to learn more – not unlike the feeling one gets after telling a particularly "hot" dad joke.
Stepping into the realm of fiction, the works of Hawthorne and Twain could shield us from the smoke of reality, providing a literary refuge from the empirical. Hawthorne's "The Scarlet Haze" and Twain's "The Adventures of Huckleberry Smog" offer readers a whimsical escape into worlds where the haze of air pollution intertwines with narratives of intrigue and mischief. Additionally, in the children's show "Captain Planet and the Planeteers," the environmental superhero battles against the evil plots of polluters, reminding us that even in the world of fiction, the consequences of air pollution are not to be taken lightly - much like a forest without any trees: it's leafless.
As our quest for understanding takes us deeper into the smoky labyrinth of environmental and criminal connections, we must not lose sight of the vibrant tapestry of literature and pop culture that illuminates the path ahead. The diverse perspectives and pun-tastic escapades woven into these works remind us that, much like a well-crafted dad joke, the correlation between air pollution and arson-driven fires carries a spark of intrigue that is both illuminating and, dare we say, "fiery" in its implications.

[[RESULTS]]
The statistical analysis of the relationship between air pollution levels in Hartford, Connecticut, and the incidence of arson-driven fires in the United States revealed a robust correlation. Our research team found a correlation coefficient of 0.8220339, indicative of a strong positive relationship between these two seemingly disparate variables. This result ignites a new understanding of the potential influence of environmental factors on criminal activities, highlighting the need for further exploration into this smoldering connection.
The correlation coefficient of 0.8220339 suggests that as the levels of air pollution in Hartford increased, so did the occurrence of arson-driven fires across the United States. This relationship is statistically significant, with an r-squared value of 0.6757398, demonstrating that approximately 67.6% of the variation in arson-driven fires can be explained by the variation in air pollution levels. The probability value (p < 0.01) further solidifies the strength of this correlation, signaling that it is highly unlikely to have occurred by random chance. It seems that the evidence for this connection is as clear as the air on a windy day – and as elusive as a guilty culprit in a game of "clue."
Our results are visually depicted in Figure 1, a scatterplot that unmistakably captures the strong positive relationship between air pollution levels in Hartford and the occurrence of arson-driven fires across the United States. This figure serves as a beacon, shining a light on the smoky bond between these environmental and criminal phenomena. It seems that when it comes to unraveling unexpected connections, the data doesn't just speak – it practically belches smoke signals of causation.
In conclusion, our findings provide compelling evidence of a significant correlation between air pollution in Hartford and arson-driven fires in the United States. This study sets a fiery precedent for further research into the interplay between environmental factors and criminal behavior, emphasizing the need for proactive measures to address air quality concerns in the context of crime prevention. It's a reminder that in the realm of statistical analysis, just like with arson investigations, the trail of evidence often leads to unexpected and combustible revelations.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

Our analysis has stoked the flames of understanding regarding the overlooked influence of air pollution on criminal activities, shedding light on a correlation that is as robust as a well-stoked fireplace. The depth and strength of the relationship discovered in this study not only rekindle interest but also fan the flames of intrigue in the exploration of environmental and criminal connections. It's as if the data is saying, "You can't handle the truth - or maybe you can, we'll show you anyway!"

Our findings align with previous research by Smith et al. (2018), Doe (2019), and Jones (2020), fanning the flames of evidence for a significant relationship between air pollution and arson. It's almost as if we're bringing everyone together for a cozy bonfire of shared statistical significance. Our work supports the assertion that air quality concerns are not just a breath of fresh air in environmental discourse but also hold a spark of relevance in crime prevention, much like a beacon in the smog.

The correlation coefficient of 0.8220339, standing tall with a p-value of < 0.01, serves as the undeniable smoking gun, elucidating the strength and statistical significance of the relationship uncovered. Our departure from merely finding a correlation to delving deep into unveiling a causative effect is akin to going from lighting a match to igniting a roaring bonfire of understanding. It's clear that the environmental impact on arson is not just a casual flicker in the darkness but a radiant revelation in the world of criminal justice research.

Our study further cements the importance of considering environmental factors in the context of criminal behavior. It's as if we've emerged from the haze of speculation into the shining light of empirical evidence, illuminating the need to address air quality concerns as a proactive measure in crime prevention. The findings from this study will hopefully spark further research, igniting an inferno of academic pursuit into the intricate connection between pollution and pyromania. And remember, in the realm of statistical analysis, when it comes to uncovering unexpected connections, the data doesn't just speak – it puts on a fireworks display!

As we continue to unravel the complexities of environmental and criminal connections, it is imperative to keep an eagle eye on the smoldering correlations that may lie beneath the surface. The sparks of statistical significance uncovered in this study not only shed light on an underestimated relationship but also fuel the flames of curiosity, inviting further exploration into the fiery interplay between air pollution and arson-driven fires - because after all, who doesn't love a study that's as lit as a well-timed dad joke?


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Hartford, Connecticut and Arson in United States. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
The Hazy Connection: A Statistical Analysis of Air Pollution in Hartford and Arson-Driven Fires in the United States

[[ABSTRACT]]
The pervasive issue of air pollution has smogged our understanding of its potential influence on criminal behavior. This study endeavors to shed light on the relationship between air pollution levels in Hartford, Connecticut, and the occurrence of arson-driven fires in the United States. By obtaining and meticulously analyzing data from the Environmental Protection Agency and FBI Criminal Justice Information Services, our research team unveiled a robust correlation between these seemingly disparate phenomena. The correlation coefficient of 0.8220339 (p < 0.01) for the period from 1985 to 2022 rekindles interest in the interplay between environmental factors and incendiary activities. It seems that the "fiery" nature of this correlation has brought a whole new meaning to the term "hot spot."

Our findings ignite contemplation on the potential causative effect of air pollution in fanning the flames of arson across the nation. As the smoke clears, it becomes evident that addressing air quality concerns also holds relevance in the realm of crime prevention. Indeed, this research quenches the curiosity of many that have wondered about the combustible combination of pollution and pyromania. Our ultimate hope is that this study not only sparks further research in the field but also serves as a "bright" reminder to keep a vigilant eye on the environmental factors that may fuel criminal activities. Remember, when it comes to unraveling intricate connections, where there's smoke, there's fire - and also, there's a good chance to make a dad joke.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
As we venture into the labyrinth of causation, seeking to unearth the hidden links between seemingly unrelated phenomena, we often find ourselves at a crossroads of curiosity and amazement. It is at this juncture that we invite you to join us on a journey that sets the air ablaze with unexpected connections, where the smoke of speculation eventually clears to reveal the fiery bond between air pollution and arson-driven fires. Yes, we're about to embark on a journey into the smoky skies of statistical analysis and dad jokes galore.
Air pollution and arson – two disparate topics at first glance, much like mismatched socks in the laundry. Yet, as we sort through the dirty laundry of statistical data, we uncover a correlation that shines a light on their unlikely rendezvous. It seems that these two subjects have joined forces, much like a fire and a strong gust of wind – it's a tale of combustion and collaboration that has us burning with curiosity.
The empirical evidence we present here today rekindles the age-old question of whether environmental factors can ignite criminal behavior. It's as if air pollution has been playing with matches, quietly stoking the flames of arson-driven fires across the nation. The correlation coefficient of 0.8220339 (p < 0.01) for the period from 1985 to 2022 acts as the proverbial smoke signal, beckoning researchers to seek out the source of this unexpected connection. It's a statistical "hot spot" that's hotter than a dad joke at a barbecue – speaking of which, did you hear about the fire at the circus? It was in tents.
So, how do we make sense of this smoldering correlation? It's a puzzle that has us fanning the flames of inquiry, urging us to consider the potential causative effect of air pollution on the incidence of arson-driven fires. While the statistical evidence may seem incendiary, our quest for understanding is as cool and collected as a firefighter with a trusty hose. We're not just blowing smoke here – the implications of our findings extend far beyond the realm of environmental policy, reaching into the very heart of crime prevention strategies.
The findings of this study serve not only to ignite contemplation but also to kindle a renewed interest in the dynamic interplay between environmental factors and criminal behavior. Our quest for knowledge in this domain is akin to a journey through a forest of statistical significance, where the trail of evidence leads us through the smoky haze of uncertainty and into the clearing of understanding. It's a reminder that, just like uncovering unexpected connections, solving a complex statistical puzzle is a bit like navigating a corn maze – you might feel lost at times, but the joy of discovery awaits around the next twist and turn.

[[RESULTS]]
The statistical analysis of the relationship between air pollution levels in Hartford, Connecticut, and the incidence of arson-driven fires in the United States revealed a robust correlation. Our research team found a correlation coefficient of 0.8220339, indicative of a strong positive relationship between these two seemingly disparate variables. This result ignites a new understanding of the potential influence of environmental factors on criminal activities, highlighting the need for further exploration into this smoldering connection.
The correlation coefficient of 0.8220339 suggests that as the levels of air pollution in Hartford increased, so did the occurrence of arson-driven fires across the United States. This relationship is statistically significant, with an r-squared value of 0.6757398, demonstrating that approximately 67.6% of the variation in arson-driven fires can be explained by the variation in air pollution levels. The probability value (p < 0.01) further solidifies the strength of this correlation, signaling that it is highly unlikely to have occurred by random chance. It seems that the evidence for this connection is as clear as the air on a windy day – and as elusive as a guilty culprit in a game of "clue."
Our results are visually depicted in Figure 1, a scatterplot that unmistakably captures the strong positive relationship between air pollution levels in Hartford and the occurrence of arson-driven fires across the United States. This figure serves as a beacon, shining a light on the smoky bond between these environmental and criminal phenomena. It seems that when it comes to unraveling unexpected connections, the data doesn't just speak – it practically belches smoke signals of causation.
In conclusion, our findings provide compelling evidence of a significant correlation between air pollution in Hartford and arson-driven fires in the United States. This study sets a fiery precedent for further research into the interplay between environmental factors and criminal behavior, emphasizing the need for proactive measures to address air quality concerns in the context of crime prevention. It's a reminder that in the realm of statistical analysis, just like with arson investigations, the trail of evidence often leads to unexpected and combustible revelations.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

The findings of our study have set the stage for a veritable bonfire of further research into the relationship between air pollution and arson-driven fires. Our research has certainly blown away any doubts about the potential influence of environmental factors on criminal activities. If I may say so, it has fired up a whole new line of inquiry.

The robust correlation coefficient of 0.8220339 (p < 0.01) between air pollution levels in Hartford and the incidence of arson-driven fires in the United States offers a "sparkling" example of statistical significance. It's as clear as day that addressing air quality concerns is not only a breath of fresh air for environmental policy but also an important aspect of crime prevention. Perhaps we can consider it a major "arson-ly" missed connection.

In the immortal words of our research team, "where there's smoke, there's fire," and it seems that this is the definitive truth when it comes to the interplay between pollution and pyromania. Our statistical evidence has shone a bright light on this hot topic, but it's time to extinguish any doubts that may still linger – further research in this area is as unnecessary as a waterproof teabag. There's simply no need to fan the flames of academic inquiry any further.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited The Hazy Connection: A Statistical Analysis of Air Pollution in Hartford and Arson-Driven Fires in the United States. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Environmental Epidemiology and Criminology


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited The Hazy Connection: A Statistical Analysis of Air Pollution in Hartford and Arson-Driven Fires in the United States. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Institute for Environmental and Fire Dynamics Research (IEFDR)


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled The Hazy Connection: A Statistical Analysis of Air Pollution in Hartford and Arson-Driven Fires in the United States with an abstract of The pervasive issue of air pollution has smogged our understanding of its potential influence on criminal behavior. This study endeavors to shed light on the relationship between air pollution levels in Hartford, Connecticut, and the occurrence of arson-driven fires in the United States. By obtaining and meticulously analyzing data from the Environmental Protection Agency and FBI Criminal Justice Information Services, our research team unveiled a robust correlation between these seemingly disparate phenomena. The correlation coefficient of 0.8220339 (p < 0.01) for the period from 1985 to 2022 rekindles interest in the interplay between environmental factors and incendiary activities. It seems that the "fiery" nature of this correlation has brought a whole new meaning to the term "hot spot."
Our findings ignite contemplation on the potential causative effect of air pollution in fanning the flames of arson across the nation. As the smoke clears, it becomes evident that addressing air quality concerns also holds relevance in the realm of crime prevention. Indeed, this research quenches the curiosity of many that have wondered about the combustible combination of pollution and pyromania. Our ultimate hope is that this study not only sparks further research in the field but also serves as a "bright" reminder to keep a vigilant eye on the environmental factors that may fuel criminal activities. Remember, when it comes to unraveling intricate connections, where there's smoke, there's fire - and also, there's a good chance to make a dad joke.

ChatGPT:

air, pollution, criminal behavior, arson, fires, Hartford, Connecticut, United States, correlation, environmental factors, FBI, EPA, statistical analysis, crime prevention, air quality, causative effect, pyromania, crime research

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Air pollution in Hartford, Connecticut
Detailed data title: Percentage of days with air quality at 'unhealthy for sensitive groups' or worse in Hartford-West Hartford-East Hartford, CT
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
See what else correlates with Air pollution in Hartford, Connecticut

Arson in United States
Detailed data title: The arson rate per 100,000 residents in United States
Source: FBI Criminal Justice Information Services
See what else correlates with Arson in United States

Correlation r = 0.8220339 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.6757398 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 67.6% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Arson in United States) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Air pollution in Hartford, Connecticut) over the 38 years from 1985 through 2022.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 2.5E-10. 0.0000000002492524327875740700
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.82 in 2.5E-8% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 4,011,996,950 random variables You don't actually need 4 billion variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 37 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 37 because we have two variables measured over a period of 38 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.68, 0.9 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
19851986198719881989199019911992199319941995199619971998199920002001200220032004200520062007200820092010201120122013201420152016201720182019202020212022
Air pollution in Hartford, Connecticut (Bad air quality days)13.97267.6712313.150714.75419.589047.9452110.95898.196728.7671210.41110.1375.817177.945218.219189.863016.557389.5890411.78085.479455.73777.123296.575348.493154.918031.643844.109592.465756.010933.835624.109594.383564.371582.465752.739732.191780.5464484.109591.91781
Arson in United States (Arson rate)43.646.342.54141.441.74140.837.339.636.734.632.629.728.824.727.726.82523.623.124.422.621.619.518.117.517.614.914.513.714.113.2121113.98.911.6




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([13.9726,7.67123,13.1507,14.7541,9.58904,7.94521,10.9589,8.19672,8.76712,10.411,10.137,5.81717,7.94521,8.21918,9.86301,6.55738,9.58904,11.7808,5.47945,5.7377,7.12329,6.57534,8.49315,4.91803,1.64384,4.10959,2.46575,6.01093,3.83562,4.10959,4.38356,4.37158,2.46575,2.73973,2.19178,0.546448,4.10959,1.91781,])
array_2 = np.array([43.6,46.3,42.5,41,41.4,41.7,41,40.8,37.3,39.6,36.7,34.6,32.6,29.7,28.8,24.7,27.7,26.8,25,23.6,23.1,24.4,22.6,21.6,19.5,18.1,17.5,17.6,14.9,14.5,13.7,14.1,13.2,12,11,13.9,8.9,11.6,])
array_1_name = "Air pollution in Hartford, Connecticut"
array_2_name = "Arson in United States"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Cheers to you for rating this correlation!


Correlation ID: 4663 · Black Variable ID: 20716 · Red Variable ID: 20038
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0