about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #4,645 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Bachelor's degrees awarded in consumer sciences and the second variable is Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Montana.  The chart goes from 2012 to 2020, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

As more students gained expertise in Family and consumer sciences/human sciences, they also learned the art of running a smooth household. This led to a surge in support for the Libertarian candidate, who promised a hands-off approach to governance - a true testament to the power of home economics in shaping political ideologies. It seems like these graduates were truly making a "capital" investment in their preferred candidate!

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: An image that looks like it is a scene from a Pixar movie]: In the heart of a cozy living room, a group of graduates with Bachelor's degrees in Family and Consumer Sciences/Human Sciences are animatedly gathered around a warm, wooden table, deep in discussion. Each character exudes passion and knowledge, embodying the essence of household management techniques. Their vibrant expressions hint at a shared understanding and enthusiasm for their field. Through the window, the outside world comes to life with a line of people patiently waiting to cast their votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Montana. The scene outside is filled with hope, determination, and a wave of change, beautifully contrasting with the warmth of the interior setting. The visual subtly highlights the impact of home economics education on the graduates' perspectives, adding depth and complexity to the vibrant world of the Pixar-like scene. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Bachelor's degrees awarded in Family and consumer sciences/human sciences and Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Montana. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: inspired by bauhaus Glitch art An image that looks like it is a scene from a Pixar movie a meme Art nouveau
ChatGPT: An image that looks like it is a scene from a Pixar movie

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Bachelor's degrees awarded in Family and consumer sciences/human sciences and Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Montana, in the following situation: As more students gained expertise in Family and consumer sciences/human sciences, they also learned the art of running a smooth household. This led to a surge in support for the Libertarian candidate, who promised a hands-off approach to governance - a true testament to the power of home economics in shaping political ideologies. It seems like these graduates were truly making a "capital" investment in their preferred candidate!. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In a cozy living room, a group of graduates with Bachelor's degrees in Family and consumer sciences/human sciences are gathered around a table, discussing household management techniques. Meanwhile, outside the window, a line of people are seen casting their votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Montana. The scene illustrates the impact of home economics education on shaping the political beliefs of the graduates, as well as the surge in support for the Libertarian candidate.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ An image that looks like it is a scene from a Pixar movie ] and depicting this scene: In a cozy living room, a group of graduates with Bachelor's degrees in Family and consumer sciences/human sciences are gathered around a table, discussing household management techniques. Meanwhile, outside the window, a line of people are seen casting their votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Montana. The scene illustrates the impact of home economics education on shaping the political beliefs of the graduates, as well as the surge in support for the Libertarian candidate. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: An image that looks like it is a scene from a Pixar movie]: In the heart of a cozy living room, a group of graduates with Bachelor's degrees in Family and Consumer Sciences/Human Sciences are animatedly gathered around a warm, wooden table, deep in discussion. Each character exudes passion and knowledge, embodying the essence of household management techniques. Their vibrant expressions hint at a shared understanding and enthusiasm for their field. Through the window, the outside world comes to life with a line of people patiently waiting to cast their votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Montana. The scene outside is filled with hope, determination, and a wave of change, beautifully contrasting with the warmth of the interior setting. The visual subtly highlights the impact of home economics education on the graduates' perspectives, adding depth and complexity to the vibrant world of the Pixar-like scene.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how increases in Bachelor's degrees awarded in Family and consumer sciences/human sciences positively influenced Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Montana. Include one good pun.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.05)
Consumer Science Credentials: A Libertarian Lean in Montana?

Journal of Quirky Consumer Behavior

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Bachelor's degrees awarded in consumer sciences and Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Montana. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Make the title punny if you can come up with clever pun. If not, make it sound serious.

Your research team used data from National Center for Education Statistics and MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9993683 and p < 0.05 for 2012 to 2020.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
Consumer Science Credentials: A Libertarian Lean in Montana?

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study investigates the correlation between the number of Bachelor's degrees awarded in consumer sciences and votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in the state of Montana. Utilizing data from the National Center for Education Statistics and the MIT Election Data and Science Lab at Harvard Dataverse, a rigorous statistical analysis was performed. The findings reveal a remarkably strong correlation coefficient of 0.9993683 and a significant p-value of less than 0.05 from 2012 to 2020. The implications of this association for consumer science education and political preferences in the Big Sky Country are discussed, shedding light on the fascinating interplay between academic pursuits and electoral inclinations.



Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Bachelor's degrees awarded in consumer sciences and Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Montana. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Consumer Science Credentials: A Libertarian Lean in Montana?

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study investigates the correlation between the number of Bachelor's degrees awarded in consumer sciences and votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in the state of Montana. Utilizing data from the National Center for Education Statistics and the MIT Election Data and Science Lab at Harvard Dataverse, a rigorous statistical analysis was performed. The findings reveal a remarkably strong correlation coefficient of 0.9993683 and a significant p-value of less than 0.05 from 2012 to 2020. The implications of this association for consumer science education and political preferences in the Big Sky Country are discussed, shedding light on the fascinating interplay between academic pursuits and electoral inclinations.


-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

Consumer behavior, individual preferences, and voting patterns are topics that have captivated the academic world and political arena alike. The amalgamation of these topics, particularly as they relate to the correlation between academic credentials in consumer sciences and support for the Libertarian party in the state of Montana, has not been extensively explored. For this investigation, we embarked on a statistical journey to unravel the potential relationship between the number of Bachelor's degrees awarded in consumer sciences and votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in Montana.

Montana, known for its breathtaking landscapes and independent spirit, presents an intriguing backdrop for this study. As the fourth largest state in terms of land area and the eighth least populous, it boasts an eclectic mix of urban and rural communities. With a diverse demographic landscape and unique socio-political dynamics, the state sets the stage for an investigation into the potential influence of consumer science education on political leanings.

The purpose of this research is to scrutinize the connection between the pursuit of knowledge in consumer sciences and the alignment with the Libertarian party in Montana. While this might sound like an unlikely union, it behooves us to delve deeper into the data and ascertain whether a hidden kinship between consumer science enthusiasts and aficionados of libertarian ideals exists. This bonds us to the inquiry of whether consumer science graduates, armed with their expertise in understanding consumer behavior and economic principles, are predisposed towards advocating for individual freedom and limited government intervention.

Through a robust exploration of the available data, we aim to uncover whether individuals with a penchant for consumer science education exhibit a correlation with the libertarian inclinations prevalent in the untamed frontier of Montana. The scrutinization of these interwoven strands of academic pursuit and political predilections promises to provide invaluable insights into the intricate tapestry of human behavior and societal influences. In the following sections, we will outline the methodology employed, present the findings, and engage in an interpretative discussion of the implications of our discoveries. It is our aspiration that this scholarly endeavor not only sheds light on the fascinating interplay between consumer science education and political preferences in the Big Sky Country, but also serves as a beacon for further research in these intersecting domains.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Bachelor's degrees awarded in consumer sciences and Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Montana. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then name some cartoons and childrens' shows that you watched that are related to the topic.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Consumer Science Credentials: A Libertarian Lean in Montana?

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study investigates the correlation between the number of Bachelor's degrees awarded in consumer sciences and votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in the state of Montana. Utilizing data from the National Center for Education Statistics and the MIT Election Data and Science Lab at Harvard Dataverse, a rigorous statistical analysis was performed. The findings reveal a remarkably strong correlation coefficient of 0.9993683 and a significant p-value of less than 0.05 from 2012 to 2020. The implications of this association for consumer science education and political preferences in the Big Sky Country are discussed, shedding light on the fascinating interplay between academic pursuits and electoral inclinations.


-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
Consumer behavior, individual preferences, and voting patterns are topics that have captivated the academic world and political arena alike. The amalgamation of these topics, particularly as they relate to the correlation between academic credentials in consumer sciences and support for the Libertarian party in the state of Montana, has not been extensively explored. For this investigation, we embarked on a statistical journey to unravel the potential relationship between the number of Bachelor's degrees awarded in consumer sciences and votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in Montana.
Montana, known for its breathtaking landscapes and independent spirit, presents an intriguing backdrop for this study. As the fourth largest state in terms of land area and the eighth least populous, it boasts an eclectic mix of urban and rural communities. With a diverse demographic landscape and unique socio-political dynamics, the state sets the stage for an investigation into the potential influence of consumer science education on political leanings.
The purpose of this research is to scrutinize the connection between the pursuit of knowledge in consumer sciences and the alignment with the Libertarian party in Montana. While this might sound like an unlikely union, it behooves us to delve deeper into the data and ascertain whether a hidden kinship between consumer science enthusiasts and aficionados of libertarian ideals exists. This bonds us to the inquiry of whether consumer science graduates, armed with their expertise in understanding consumer behavior and economic principles, are predisposed towards advocating for individual freedom and limited government intervention.
Through a robust exploration of the available data, we aim to uncover whether individuals with a penchant for consumer science education exhibit a correlation with the libertarian inclinations prevalent in the untamed frontier of Montana. The scrutinization of these interwoven strands of academic pursuit and political predilections promises to provide invaluable insights into the intricate tapestry of human behavior and societal influences. In the following sections, we will outline the methodology employed, present the findings, and engage in an interpretative discussion of the implications of our discoveries. It is our aspiration that this scholarly endeavor not only sheds light on the fascinating interplay between consumer science education and political preferences in the Big Sky Country, but also serves as a beacon for further research in these intersecting domains.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

In their study, Smith et al. (2015) examined the relationship between educational attainment in consumer sciences and political behavior, finding a moderate correlation between the two variables. Likewise, Doe and Jones (2018) conducted a similar investigation and reported a tentative association between consumer science education and libertarian-leaning attitudes in specific geographic regions, albeit lacking generalizability. However, as we transition from these earnest examinations to the broader literature, we encounter an eclectic mix of sources that veer into the unexpected.

Turning to non-fiction literature, "Freakonomics" by Steven D. Levitt and Stephen J. Dubner provides a fascinating exploration of human behavior and economic principles, offering tangential insights into the realms of consumer sciences and political decision-making. Similarly, "Predictably Irrational" by Dan Ariely delves into the quirks of human decision-making, shedding light on the idiosyncrasies that may underpin voting inclinations.

In the realm of fiction, "Brave New World" by Aldous Huxley and "The Fountainhead" by Ayn Rand, though not directly related to consumer sciences, offer philosophical musings on individual freedom and societal structures, resonating with the libertarian ethos. These works, while diverging from empirical scrutiny, offer contemplative perspectives on the interplay between education, ideology, and individual agency.

Amidst the unexpected diversions, one must not overlook the influence of popular culture. Cartoons and children's shows such as "Schoolhouse Rock!" and "Dora the Explorer" infuse educational content with engaging narratives, inadvertently shaping young minds and potentially instigating future political dispositions. While their direct relevance to consumer sciences and the libertarian party may be tenuous, their role in seeding foundational knowledge and impressionable attitudes cannot be discounted.

As we traverse this whimsical array of literature, it becomes evident that the intersection of consumer science education and libertarian inclinations elicits unexpected tangents and unorthodox connections. This amalgamation of rigorous research, speculative musings, and childhood influences lays the groundwork for a vibrant and multifaceted exploration of our research inquiry.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Bachelor's degrees awarded in consumer sciences and Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Montana. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from National Center for Education Statistics and MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse . You used data from 2012 to 2020

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Consumer Science Credentials: A Libertarian Lean in Montana?

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study investigates the correlation between the number of Bachelor's degrees awarded in consumer sciences and votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in the state of Montana. Utilizing data from the National Center for Education Statistics and the MIT Election Data and Science Lab at Harvard Dataverse, a rigorous statistical analysis was performed. The findings reveal a remarkably strong correlation coefficient of 0.9993683 and a significant p-value of less than 0.05 from 2012 to 2020. The implications of this association for consumer science education and political preferences in the Big Sky Country are discussed, shedding light on the fascinating interplay between academic pursuits and electoral inclinations.


[[INTRODUCTION]]
Consumer behavior, individual preferences, and voting patterns are topics that have captivated the academic world and political arena alike. The amalgamation of these topics, particularly as they relate to the correlation between academic credentials in consumer sciences and support for the Libertarian party in the state of Montana, has not been extensively explored. For this investigation, we embarked on a statistical journey to unravel the potential relationship between the number of Bachelor's degrees awarded in consumer sciences and votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in Montana.
Montana, known for its breathtaking landscapes and independent spirit, presents an intriguing backdrop for this study. As the fourth largest state in terms of land area and the eighth least populous, it boasts an eclectic mix of urban and rural communities. With a diverse demographic landscape and unique socio-political dynamics, the state sets the stage for an investigation into the potential influence of consumer science education on political leanings.
The purpose of this research is to scrutinize the connection between the pursuit of knowledge in consumer sciences and the alignment with the Libertarian party in Montana. While this might sound like an unlikely union, it behooves us to delve deeper into the data and ascertain whether a hidden kinship between consumer science enthusiasts and aficionados of libertarian ideals exists. This bonds us to the inquiry of whether consumer science graduates, armed with their expertise in understanding consumer behavior and economic principles, are predisposed towards advocating for individual freedom and limited government intervention.
Through a robust exploration of the available data, we aim to uncover whether individuals with a penchant for consumer science education exhibit a correlation with the libertarian inclinations prevalent in the untamed frontier of Montana. The scrutinization of these interwoven strands of academic pursuit and political predilections promises to provide invaluable insights into the intricate tapestry of human behavior and societal influences. In the following sections, we will outline the methodology employed, present the findings, and engage in an interpretative discussion of the implications of our discoveries. It is our aspiration that this scholarly endeavor not only sheds light on the fascinating interplay between consumer science education and political preferences in the Big Sky Country, but also serves as a beacon for further research in these intersecting domains.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

Data Collection:
The data for this research endeavor was sourced from the National Center for Education Statistics and the MIT Election Data and Science Lab at Harvard Dataverse. We delved into the depths of the internet, navigating the digital labyrinth with the dexterity of a seasoned explorer, albeit with significantly less peril involved. Our search took us far and wide, from the hallowed halls of statistical databases to the obscure corners of election archives, in pursuit of the elusive connection between consumer science credentials and libertarian proclivities in the heart of Montana.

The time frame for the data collection spanned from 2012 to 2020, capturing an era replete with socio-political turbulence, technological advancements, and, at times, eyebrow-raising electoral circumstances. Our data spelunking expedition unraveled a trove of information, each data point akin to a glistening gem waiting to be harnessed for statistical scrutiny.

Data Analysis:
Once our treasure trove of data was meticulously compiled, we embarked on the formidable task of wielding the methodological tools of statistical inquiry. Our trusty companions in this intellectual escapade included robust regression analyses, correlation coefficients, and p-values that would make even the most stoic of statisticians raise an inquisitive eyebrow. We engaged in a passionate pas de deux with the data, coaxing forth its hidden patterns and associations with the finesse of interpretative dancers navigating the intricacies of human behavior.

The onerous task of data wrangling was tackled with the unyielding determination of a culinary artist meticulously crafting a delicately balanced recipe. It involved performing data cleansing, imputation of missing values, and the harmonious orchestration of variables to ensure that our statistical symphony would resonate with scholarly significance.

Ethical Considerations:
As custodians of data, we approached our task with the ethical gravity befitting such a scholarly pursuit. The data was handled with the utmost care and respect, akin to the delicate handling of a priceless artifact by a museum curator. The principles of confidentiality, integrity, and scholarly rigor guided our every move, ensuring that the sanctity of the data remained inviolable throughout our analytical odyssey.

Our ethical compass, a steadfast companion in our academic sojourn, steered us clear of any dubious practices and firmly anchored our research in the bedrock of academic integrity. We traversed the labyrinthine pathways of data analysis with an unwavering commitment to the principles of research ethics, akin to intrepid sailors navigating treacherous waters with eyes fixed on the guiding light of scholarly rectitude.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Bachelor's degrees awarded in consumer sciences and Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Montana. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from National Center for Education Statistics and MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse .

For the time period 2012 to 2020, you found a correlation 0.9993683, r-squared of 0.9987370, and p < 0.05.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Consumer Science Credentials: A Libertarian Lean in Montana?

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study investigates the correlation between the number of Bachelor's degrees awarded in consumer sciences and votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in the state of Montana. Utilizing data from the National Center for Education Statistics and the MIT Election Data and Science Lab at Harvard Dataverse, a rigorous statistical analysis was performed. The findings reveal a remarkably strong correlation coefficient of 0.9993683 and a significant p-value of less than 0.05 from 2012 to 2020. The implications of this association for consumer science education and political preferences in the Big Sky Country are discussed, shedding light on the fascinating interplay between academic pursuits and electoral inclinations.


-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
Consumer behavior, individual preferences, and voting patterns are topics that have captivated the academic world and political arena alike. The amalgamation of these topics, particularly as they relate to the correlation between academic credentials in consumer sciences and support for the Libertarian party in the state of Montana, has not been extensively explored. For this investigation, we embarked on a statistical journey to unravel the potential relationship between the number of Bachelor's degrees awarded in consumer sciences and votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in Montana.
Montana, known for its breathtaking landscapes and independent spirit, presents an intriguing backdrop for this study. As the fourth largest state in terms of land area and the eighth least populous, it boasts an eclectic mix of urban and rural communities. With a diverse demographic landscape and unique socio-political dynamics, the state sets the stage for an investigation into the potential influence of consumer science education on political leanings.
The purpose of this research is to scrutinize the connection between the pursuit of knowledge in consumer sciences and the alignment with the Libertarian party in Montana. While this might sound like an unlikely union, it behooves us to delve deeper into the data and ascertain whether a hidden kinship between consumer science enthusiasts and aficionados of libertarian ideals exists. This bonds us to the inquiry of whether consumer science graduates, armed with their expertise in understanding consumer behavior and economic principles, are predisposed towards advocating for individual freedom and limited government intervention.
Through a robust exploration of the available data, we aim to uncover whether individuals with a penchant for consumer science education exhibit a correlation with the libertarian inclinations prevalent in the untamed frontier of Montana. The scrutinization of these interwoven strands of academic pursuit and political predilections promises to provide invaluable insights into the intricate tapestry of human behavior and societal influences. In the following sections, we will outline the methodology employed, present the findings, and engage in an interpretative discussion of the implications of our discoveries. It is our aspiration that this scholarly endeavor not only sheds light on the fascinating interplay between consumer science education and political preferences in the Big Sky Country, but also serves as a beacon for further research in these intersecting domains.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The analysis of the data revealed a remarkably strong correlation between the number of Bachelor's degrees awarded in consumer sciences and votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in Montana. From 2012 to 2020, our research team found a correlation coefficient of 0.9993683, indicating an almost perfect positive linear relationship between these variables. The r-squared value of 0.9987370 further confirmed the robustness of this association, suggesting that 99.87% of the variation in Libertarian votes can be explained by the number of Bachelor's degrees awarded in consumer sciences.

The statistical significance of this relationship was demonstrated by a p-value of less than 0.05, indicating that the observed correlation is highly unlikely to have occurred by chance. This compelling evidence underscores the substantive connection between educational pursuits in consumer sciences and the electoral inclinations of Montanans towards the Libertarian party.

Furthermore, the scatterplot presented in Figure 1 visually encapsulates the strength of this association, portraying a strikingly clear pattern of increasing Libertarian votes as the number of Bachelor's degrees awarded in consumer sciences rises. The data points align so perfectly that they seem almost eager to support the connection we set out to uncover. It's as if the data itself is saying, "Hey, look at us, we're practically holding hands with each other!"

These findings illuminate a fascinating interplay between academic pursuits and political preferences, underscoring the potential influence of consumer science education on the ideological leanings within the diverse socio-political landscape of Montana. Our results not only affirm the statistical significance of this correlation but also invite deeper exploration into the underlying mechanisms that bring together the realms of consumer science education and political ideologies, giving us a lot to chew on, metaphorically speaking, of course.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Bachelor's degrees awarded in consumer sciences and Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Montana. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
Consumer Science Credentials: A Libertarian Lean in Montana?

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study investigates the correlation between the number of Bachelor's degrees awarded in consumer sciences and votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in the state of Montana. Utilizing data from the National Center for Education Statistics and the MIT Election Data and Science Lab at Harvard Dataverse, a rigorous statistical analysis was performed. The findings reveal a remarkably strong correlation coefficient of 0.9993683 and a significant p-value of less than 0.05 from 2012 to 2020. The implications of this association for consumer science education and political preferences in the Big Sky Country are discussed, shedding light on the fascinating interplay between academic pursuits and electoral inclinations.


[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
In their study, Smith et al. (2015) examined the relationship between educational attainment in consumer sciences and political behavior, finding a moderate correlation between the two variables. Likewise, Doe and Jones (2018) conducted a similar investigation and reported a tentative association between consumer science education and libertarian-leaning attitudes in specific geographic regions, albeit lacking generalizability. However, as we transition from these earnest examinations to the broader literature, we encounter an eclectic mix of sources that veer into the unexpected.
Turning to non-fiction literature, "Freakonomics" by Steven D. Levitt and Stephen J. Dubner provides a fascinating exploration of human behavior and economic principles, offering tangential insights into the realms of consumer sciences and political decision-making. Similarly, "Predictably Irrational" by Dan Ariely delves into the quirks of human decision-making, shedding light on the idiosyncrasies that may underpin voting inclinations.
In the realm of fiction, "Brave New World" by Aldous Huxley and "The Fountainhead" by Ayn Rand, though not directly related to consumer sciences, offer philosophical musings on individual freedom and societal structures, resonating with the libertarian ethos. These works, while diverging from empirical scrutiny, offer contemplative perspectives on the interplay between education, ideology, and individual agency.
Amidst the unexpected diversions, one must not overlook the influence of popular culture. Cartoons and children's shows such as "Schoolhouse Rock!" and "Dora the Explorer" infuse educational content with engaging narratives, inadvertently shaping young minds and potentially instigating future political dispositions. While their direct relevance to consumer sciences and the libertarian party may be tenuous, their role in seeding foundational knowledge and impressionable attitudes cannot be discounted.
As we traverse this whimsical array of literature, it becomes evident that the intersection of consumer science education and libertarian inclinations elicits unexpected tangents and unorthodox connections. This amalgamation of rigorous research, speculative musings, and childhood influences lays the groundwork for a vibrant and multifaceted exploration of our research inquiry.

[[RESULTS]]
The analysis of the data revealed a remarkably strong correlation between the number of Bachelor's degrees awarded in consumer sciences and votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in Montana. From 2012 to 2020, our research team found a correlation coefficient of 0.9993683, indicating an almost perfect positive linear relationship between these variables. The r-squared value of 0.9987370 further confirmed the robustness of this association, suggesting that 99.87% of the variation in Libertarian votes can be explained by the number of Bachelor's degrees awarded in consumer sciences.
The statistical significance of this relationship was demonstrated by a p-value of less than 0.05, indicating that the observed correlation is highly unlikely to have occurred by chance. This compelling evidence underscores the substantive connection between educational pursuits in consumer sciences and the electoral inclinations of Montanans towards the Libertarian party.
Furthermore, the scatterplot presented in Figure 1 visually encapsulates the strength of this association, portraying a strikingly clear pattern of increasing Libertarian votes as the number of Bachelor's degrees awarded in consumer sciences rises. The data points align so perfectly that they seem almost eager to support the connection we set out to uncover. It's as if the data itself is saying, "Hey, look at us, we're practically holding hands with each other!"
These findings illuminate a fascinating interplay between academic pursuits and political preferences, underscoring the potential influence of consumer science education on the ideological leanings within the diverse socio-political landscape of Montana. Our results not only affirm the statistical significance of this correlation but also invite deeper exploration into the underlying mechanisms that bring together the realms of consumer science education and political ideologies, giving us a lot to chew on, metaphorically speaking, of course.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The results of our study support and extend prior research on the relationship between educational pursuits in consumer sciences and political behavior. The remarkably strong correlation coefficient of 0.9993683 obtained in our analysis aligns with previous studies that have reported a connection between consumer science education and libertarian-leaning attitudes. Smith et al. (2015) and Doe and Jones (2018) hinted at the association between educational attainment in consumer sciences and political preferences, but our findings provide a more robust affirmation of this link.

Our investigation was not without its moments of levity, as we harkened back to the unexpected diversions in the literature review, where tangential insights from non-fiction literature, philosophical musings from fiction, and the influence of popular culture were addressed. Although these elements may have been initially presented in jest, our results shed light on the fascinating interplay between consumer science education and political preferences, validating and aptly intertwining the unexpected tangents uncovered in our review. It appears that serious data analysis can validate even the most playful of musings, demonstrating that truth really is stranger than fiction.

The observed correlation between the number of Bachelor's degrees awarded in consumer sciences and votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in Montana is strikingly compelling, as evidenced by the near-perfect positive linear relationship and the r-squared value of 0.9987370. The statistical significance, with a p-value of less than 0.05, firmly establishes the substantive connection between these variables and provides a solid foundation for further exploration into the complex dynamics that underpin this association.

Our findings not only affirm the statistical significance of this correlation but also highlight the potential influence of consumer science education on the ideological leanings within the socio-political landscape of Montana. The results certainly give us a lot to chew on, metaphorically speaking, of course, and underline the need for continued investigation into the underlying mechanisms that bring together the realms of consumer science education and political inclinations. Who would have thought that the path to political enlightenment could be paved with consumer science credentials?


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Bachelor's degrees awarded in consumer sciences and Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Montana. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
Consumer Science Credentials: A Libertarian Lean in Montana?

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study investigates the correlation between the number of Bachelor's degrees awarded in consumer sciences and votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in the state of Montana. Utilizing data from the National Center for Education Statistics and the MIT Election Data and Science Lab at Harvard Dataverse, a rigorous statistical analysis was performed. The findings reveal a remarkably strong correlation coefficient of 0.9993683 and a significant p-value of less than 0.05 from 2012 to 2020. The implications of this association for consumer science education and political preferences in the Big Sky Country are discussed, shedding light on the fascinating interplay between academic pursuits and electoral inclinations.


[[INTRDUCTION]]
Consumer behavior, individual preferences, and voting patterns are topics that have captivated the academic world and political arena alike. The amalgamation of these topics, particularly as they relate to the correlation between academic credentials in consumer sciences and support for the Libertarian party in the state of Montana, has not been extensively explored. For this investigation, we embarked on a statistical journey to unravel the potential relationship between the number of Bachelor's degrees awarded in consumer sciences and votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in Montana.
Montana, known for its breathtaking landscapes and independent spirit, presents an intriguing backdrop for this study. As the fourth largest state in terms of land area and the eighth least populous, it boasts an eclectic mix of urban and rural communities. With a diverse demographic landscape and unique socio-political dynamics, the state sets the stage for an investigation into the potential influence of consumer science education on political leanings.
The purpose of this research is to scrutinize the connection between the pursuit of knowledge in consumer sciences and the alignment with the Libertarian party in Montana. While this might sound like an unlikely union, it behooves us to delve deeper into the data and ascertain whether a hidden kinship between consumer science enthusiasts and aficionados of libertarian ideals exists. This bonds us to the inquiry of whether consumer science graduates, armed with their expertise in understanding consumer behavior and economic principles, are predisposed towards advocating for individual freedom and limited government intervention.
Through a robust exploration of the available data, we aim to uncover whether individuals with a penchant for consumer science education exhibit a correlation with the libertarian inclinations prevalent in the untamed frontier of Montana. The scrutinization of these interwoven strands of academic pursuit and political predilections promises to provide invaluable insights into the intricate tapestry of human behavior and societal influences. In the following sections, we will outline the methodology employed, present the findings, and engage in an interpretative discussion of the implications of our discoveries. It is our aspiration that this scholarly endeavor not only sheds light on the fascinating interplay between consumer science education and political preferences in the Big Sky Country, but also serves as a beacon for further research in these intersecting domains.

[[RESULTS]]
The analysis of the data revealed a remarkably strong correlation between the number of Bachelor's degrees awarded in consumer sciences and votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in Montana. From 2012 to 2020, our research team found a correlation coefficient of 0.9993683, indicating an almost perfect positive linear relationship between these variables. The r-squared value of 0.9987370 further confirmed the robustness of this association, suggesting that 99.87% of the variation in Libertarian votes can be explained by the number of Bachelor's degrees awarded in consumer sciences.
The statistical significance of this relationship was demonstrated by a p-value of less than 0.05, indicating that the observed correlation is highly unlikely to have occurred by chance. This compelling evidence underscores the substantive connection between educational pursuits in consumer sciences and the electoral inclinations of Montanans towards the Libertarian party.
Furthermore, the scatterplot presented in Figure 1 visually encapsulates the strength of this association, portraying a strikingly clear pattern of increasing Libertarian votes as the number of Bachelor's degrees awarded in consumer sciences rises. The data points align so perfectly that they seem almost eager to support the connection we set out to uncover. It's as if the data itself is saying, "Hey, look at us, we're practically holding hands with each other!"
These findings illuminate a fascinating interplay between academic pursuits and political preferences, underscoring the potential influence of consumer science education on the ideological leanings within the diverse socio-political landscape of Montana. Our results not only affirm the statistical significance of this correlation but also invite deeper exploration into the underlying mechanisms that bring together the realms of consumer science education and political ideologies, giving us a lot to chew on, metaphorically speaking, of course.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our research has illuminated a compelling relationship between the number of Bachelor's degrees awarded in consumer sciences and votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in Montana. The remarkably strong correlation coefficient of 0.9993683 and the p-value of less than 0.05 attest to the robustness and statistical significance of this association. These findings not only highlight the unlikely camaraderie between consumer science education and libertarian inclinations but also raise thought-provoking questions about the influence of academic pursuits on political preferences. It seems that consumer science graduates in Montana are not just experts in economic principles but also potential influencers of political leanings, embracing a "vote with your wallet" mindset. The data aligns so neatly that one might wonder if the variables are secretly in cahoots, almost as if they've formed a "consumer-party" alliance. These results serve as a tantalizing appetizer, leaving us hungry for further exploration into the underlying mechanisms and causality of this relationship. However, it appears that for now, this study has conclusively demonstrated the strength of the bond between consumer science credentials and libertarian leanings in the Big Sky Country, leaving little room for skepticism. It's safe to say that, in the landscape of research, we've sown our statistical seeds and harvested a bountiful crop of insights. As such, it's high time we hang up our academic boots in this particular field of inquiry, for the connection between consumer sciences and libertarian votes in Montana has been unmistakably established. After all, there's no need to beat a dead horse, or a dead data set for that matter.



Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Consumer Science Credentials: A Libertarian Lean in Montana?. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

Journal of Quirky Consumer Behavior


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Consumer Science Credentials: A Libertarian Lean in Montana?. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

Society for Rational Economic Inquiry


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Consumer Science Credentials: A Libertarian Lean in Montana? with an abstract of This study investigates the correlation between the number of Bachelor's degrees awarded in consumer sciences and votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in the state of Montana. Utilizing data from the National Center for Education Statistics and the MIT Election Data and Science Lab at Harvard Dataverse, a rigorous statistical analysis was performed. The findings reveal a remarkably strong correlation coefficient of 0.9993683 and a significant p-value of less than 0.05 from 2012 to 2020. The implications of this association for consumer science education and political preferences in the Big Sky Country are discussed, shedding light on the fascinating interplay between academic pursuits and electoral inclinations.

ChatGPT:

Consumer science credentials, libertarian presidential candidate votes, Montana, Bachelor's degrees, consumer sciences, National Center for Education Statistics, MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, statistical analysis, correlation coefficient, p-value, political preferences, academic pursuits, electoral inclinations, Big Sky Country

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Bachelor's degrees awarded in consumer sciences
Detailed data title: Bachelor's degrees conferred by postsecondary institutions, in field of study: Family and consumer sciences/human sciences
Source: National Center for Education Statistics
See what else correlates with Bachelor's degrees awarded in consumer sciences

Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Montana
Detailed data title: Percentage of all votes cast for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Montana
Source: MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse
See what else correlates with Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Montana

Correlation r = 0.9993683 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.9987370 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 99.9% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Montana) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Bachelor's degrees awarded in consumer sciences) over the 3 years from 2012 through 2020.

p < 0.05, which statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 0.023. 0.0226292654838073860000000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 1 in 2.3% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 44 random variables Which I absolutely did.
with the same 2 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 2 because we have two variables measured over a period of 3 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ -1, 1 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
201220162020
Bachelor's degrees awarded in consumer sciences (Degrees awarded)234412538923248
Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Montana (Percentage of votes)2.926365.669472.52653




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Very low n: There are not many data points included in this analysis. Even if the p-value is high, we should be suspicious of using so few datapoints in a correlation.
  5. Y-axis doesn't start at zero: I truncated the Y-axes of the graph above. I also used a line graph, which makes the visual connection stand out more than it deserves. Nothing against line graphs. They are great at telling a story when you have linear data! But visually it is deceptive because the only data is at the points on the graph, not the lines on the graph. In between each point, the data could have been doing anything. Like going for a random walk by itself!
    Mathematically what I showed is true, but it is intentionally misleading. Below is the same chart but with both Y-axes starting at zero.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([23441,25389,23248,])
array_2 = np.array([2.92636,5.66947,2.52653,])
array_1_name = "Bachelor's degrees awarded in consumer sciences"
array_2_name = "Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Montana"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Cheers to you for rating this correlation!


Correlation ID: 4645 · Black Variable ID: 1276 · Red Variable ID: 26127
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0