Download png, svg
AI explanation
Fewer homemade lightsabers means fewer impromptu battles, resulting in a significant reduction in the need for air traffic control intervention.Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Generate an image of a cyberpunk scene in Orlando, where a group of people are gathered in a park, looking up at the clear, blue sky. Some of them are holding homemade lightsabers and discussing excitedly how they made them using Google searches. In the background, show the surrounding buildings and trees enveloped in clean, unpolluted air due to the reduced need for air traffic control intervention, resulting in decreased air pollution. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Google searches for 'how to build a lightsaber' and Air pollution in Orlando. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Hyper-realistic Symbolism Celtic art Realistic Cyberpunk
ChatGPT: Cyberpunk
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Google searches for 'how to build a lightsaber' and Air pollution in Orlando, in the following situation: Fewer homemade lightsabers means fewer impromptu battles, resulting in a significant reduction in the need for air traffic control intervention.. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: A group of people in Orlando are gathered in a park, looking up at the clear, blue sky. A few of them are holding homemade lightsabers, discussing excitedly how they made them using Google searches. In the background, the surrounding buildings and trees are enveloped in clean, unpolluted air, as the reduced need for air traffic control intervention has resulted in a decrease in air pollution.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ Cyberpunk ] and depicting this scene: A group of people in Orlando are gathered in a park, looking up at the clear, blue sky. A few of them are holding homemade lightsabers, discussing excitedly how they made them using Google searches. In the background, the surrounding buildings and trees are enveloped in clean, unpolluted air, as the reduced need for air traffic control intervention has resulted in a decrease in air pollution. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Generate an image of a cyberpunk scene in Orlando, where a group of people are gathered in a park, looking up at the clear, blue sky. Some of them are holding homemade lightsabers and discussing excitedly how they made them using Google searches. In the background, show the surrounding buildings and trees enveloped in clean, unpolluted air due to the reduced need for air traffic control intervention, resulting in decreased air pollution.
*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.
I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how a decrease in how to build a lightsaber (Google searches for 'how to build a lightsaber') caused Air pollution in Orlando to decrease.
AI academic paper
The Force is Strong with This One: A Correlational Study of Google Searches for 'How to Build a Lightsaber' and Air Pollution in Orlando The Journal of Interstellar Environmental Studies Jan 2024 Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real! |
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Google searches for 'how to build a lightsaber' and Air pollution in Orlando. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.
Make the title punny if you can come up with clever pun. If not, make it sound serious.
Your research team used data from Google Trends and Environmental Protection Agency to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.8724969 and p < 0.01 for 2004 to 2018.
Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)
[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit
[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit
ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
The Force is Strong with This One: A Correlational Study of Google Searches for 'How to Build a Lightsaber' and Air Pollution in Orlando
[[ABSTRACT]]
In our study, we embarked on a journey to uncover the mysterious connection between individuals' inquiries about constructing Jedi weapons and the air quality in the magical land of Orlando, Florida. Utilizing data from Google Trends and the Environmental Protection Agency, we unearthed a striking correlation between the two seemingly unrelated phenomena. Our findings revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.8724969 and p < 0.01 for the period spanning from 2004 to 2018, suggesting an intriguing relationship between the search for lightsaber construction techniques and ambient air pollution levels in this enchanting city.
As we delved deeper into the data, we couldn't help but crack the occasional dad joke, attempting to lighten the scholarly atmosphere. For example, it seems that while Orlando residents seek to harness the power of the Force, they may inadvertently be casting a dark smog over their skyline. The evidence to support this cosmic coincidence is both statistically significant and cosmically entertaining.
Our study's revelations shed light on the interconnectedness of seemingly disparate fields and, in doing so, beckon us to embrace the whimsical enigmas that permeate our universe. Thus, we invite our esteemed colleagues to join us in this scholarly journey, armed with knowledge and perhaps a lightsaber or two, to explore the infinite possibilities that intertwine questions of science with the whimsy of popular culture.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Google searches for 'how to build a lightsaber' and Air pollution in Orlando. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.
Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Force is Strong with This One: A Correlational Study of Google Searches for 'How to Build a Lightsaber' and Air Pollution in Orlando
[[ABSTRACT]]
In our study, we embarked on a journey to uncover the mysterious connection between individuals' inquiries about constructing Jedi weapons and the air quality in the magical land of Orlando, Florida. Utilizing data from Google Trends and the Environmental Protection Agency, we unearthed a striking correlation between the two seemingly unrelated phenomena. Our findings revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.8724969 and p < 0.01 for the period spanning from 2004 to 2018, suggesting an intriguing relationship between the search for lightsaber construction techniques and ambient air pollution levels in this enchanting city.
As we delved deeper into the data, we couldn't help but crack the occasional dad joke, attempting to lighten the scholarly atmosphere. For example, it seems that while Orlando residents seek to harness the power of the Force, they may inadvertently be casting a dark smog over their skyline. The evidence to support this cosmic coincidence is both statistically significant and cosmically entertaining.
Our study's revelations shed light on the interconnectedness of seemingly disparate fields and, in doing so, beckon us to embrace the whimsical enigmas that permeate our universe. Thus, we invite our esteemed colleagues to join us in this scholarly journey, armed with knowledge and perhaps a lightsaber or two, to explore the infinite possibilities that intertwine questions of science with the whimsy of popular culture.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
As the late, great Jedi Master Yoda once said, "Powerful you have become, the dark side I sense in you." In our pursuit of uncovering the mysteries of the universe, we stumbled upon a peculiar correlation that has left us both in awe and in stitches. Our investigation delves into the unlikely connection between the frequency of Google searches for "how to build a lightsaber" and the ambient air pollution levels in the alluring city of Orlando, Florida. It is a tale of science, fantasy, and puns aplenty.
The Force is strong with this one – our study, that is. Much like a Jedi apprentice balancing the Force, we sought to balance statistical rigor with a touch of humor, recognizing that unraveling the secrets of the universe can be both profound and playfully entertaining. The intersection of lightsabers and air pollution may seem like the stuff of science fiction, but our findings suggest otherwise.
Orlando, often associated with its enchanting theme parks and magical adventures, appears to harbor a hidden connection between the pursuit of lightsaber construction knowledge and the presence of atmospheric pollutants. It's as if the city's air quality is influenced by the tug-of-war between the light and dark sides of the Force.
In our analysis of Google search trends and air quality data from 2004 to 2018, we couldn't help but quip that while Orlando residents may dream of wielding a gleaming saber of pure light, their real-life atmosphere might be clouded by the dark side of emissions. This whimsical juxtaposition, backed by rigorous statistical analysis, underscores the delightful absurdity that intertwines our scholarly pursuit with the enchanting realm of popular culture.
The correlation coefficient of 0.8724969 and p < 0.01 humbly invite us to reconsider the boundaries that define causality and correlation, prompting us to ponder the cosmic implications of our findings. With a twinkle in our eyes and a hint of mischief in our scholarly hearts, we present our revelations as an invitation for fellow seekers of knowledge to embrace the unexpected, embracing the enigma that sometimes the Force, and the data, unfold in ways that elude the confines of conventional wisdom.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Google searches for 'how to build a lightsaber' and Air pollution in Orlando. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.
Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.
Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.
Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then name some movies that you watched that are tangentially related to the topic.
Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Force is Strong with This One: A Correlational Study of Google Searches for 'How to Build a Lightsaber' and Air Pollution in Orlando
[[ABSTRACT]]
In our study, we embarked on a journey to uncover the mysterious connection between individuals' inquiries about constructing Jedi weapons and the air quality in the magical land of Orlando, Florida. Utilizing data from Google Trends and the Environmental Protection Agency, we unearthed a striking correlation between the two seemingly unrelated phenomena. Our findings revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.8724969 and p < 0.01 for the period spanning from 2004 to 2018, suggesting an intriguing relationship between the search for lightsaber construction techniques and ambient air pollution levels in this enchanting city.
As we delved deeper into the data, we couldn't help but crack the occasional dad joke, attempting to lighten the scholarly atmosphere. For example, it seems that while Orlando residents seek to harness the power of the Force, they may inadvertently be casting a dark smog over their skyline. The evidence to support this cosmic coincidence is both statistically significant and cosmically entertaining.
Our study's revelations shed light on the interconnectedness of seemingly disparate fields and, in doing so, beckon us to embrace the whimsical enigmas that permeate our universe. Thus, we invite our esteemed colleagues to join us in this scholarly journey, armed with knowledge and perhaps a lightsaber or two, to explore the infinite possibilities that intertwine questions of science with the whimsy of popular culture.
-------
And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
As the late, great Jedi Master Yoda once said, "Powerful you have become, the dark side I sense in you." In our pursuit of uncovering the mysteries of the universe, we stumbled upon a peculiar correlation that has left us both in awe and in stitches. Our investigation delves into the unlikely connection between the frequency of Google searches for "how to build a lightsaber" and the ambient air pollution levels in the alluring city of Orlando, Florida. It is a tale of science, fantasy, and puns aplenty.
The Force is strong with this one – our study, that is. Much like a Jedi apprentice balancing the Force, we sought to balance statistical rigor with a touch of humor, recognizing that unraveling the secrets of the universe can be both profound and playfully entertaining. The intersection of lightsabers and air pollution may seem like the stuff of science fiction, but our findings suggest otherwise.
Orlando, often associated with its enchanting theme parks and magical adventures, appears to harbor a hidden connection between the pursuit of lightsaber construction knowledge and the presence of atmospheric pollutants. It's as if the city's air quality is influenced by the tug-of-war between the light and dark sides of the Force.
In our analysis of Google search trends and air quality data from 2004 to 2018, we couldn't help but quip that while Orlando residents may dream of wielding a gleaming saber of pure light, their real-life atmosphere might be clouded by the dark side of emissions. This whimsical juxtaposition, backed by rigorous statistical analysis, underscores the delightful absurdity that intertwines our scholarly pursuit with the enchanting realm of popular culture.
The correlation coefficient of 0.8724969 and p < 0.01 humbly invite us to reconsider the boundaries that define causality and correlation, prompting us to ponder the cosmic implications of our findings. With a twinkle in our eyes and a hint of mischief in our scholarly hearts, we present our revelations as an invitation for fellow seekers of knowledge to embrace the unexpected, embracing the enigma that sometimes the Force, and the data, unfold in ways that elude the confines of conventional wisdom.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
In "Smith et al.," the authors find a significant positive correlation between Google searches for 'how to build a lightsaber' and air pollution levels in various urban areas. This intriguing relationship has led to a burgeoning interest in exploring the intersection of popular culture and environmental phenomena.
Diving deeper into the literature, "Doe and Johnson" conducted a comprehensive study on the impact of fictional weaponry on real-world pollution. Their findings revealed a surprising link between lightsaber inquiries and air quality, prompting further investigation into the cosmic implications of such inquiries.
As we unraveled the data, we couldn't help but infuse our scholarly pursuit with a touch of levity, much like the timeless quips found in "The Complete Idiot's Guide to the Force" and "Lightsabers for Dummies." These eclectic literary sources not only provided insight into the realm of popular culture but also offered a peculiar lens through which to view our research.
On a more speculative note, "Star Wars: A Cultural Phenomenon" by J. W. Rinzler and "Lightsabers: A History" by Jason Fry offer whimsical narratives and historical context that, while not strictly academic, shed light on the collective fascination with lightsaber construction and its potential impact on environmental factors.
The fictional accounts found in "The Jedi Path: A Manual for Students of the Force" and "Darth Bane: Path of Destruction" by Drew Karpyshyn captured our imagination, prompting us to reconsider the boundaries of empirical inquiry and the wondrous connections that permeate our world.
Furthermore, movies such as "Star Wars: Episode IV - A New Hope" and "The Empire Strikes Back" offered glimpses into the mythical allure of lightsabers, inspiring us to ponder the parallels between cinematic magic and the real-world influence of fictional weaponry on ecological systems.
As we journeyed through this literary landscape, our pursuit of knowledge was interwoven with moments of pun-laden reflection. Indeed, as we contemplate the correlation between lightsaber curiosity and air pollution, we are reminded of a classic dad joke: "Why did the Jedi refuse to fight pollution? Because the air wasn't 'clean' enough for lightsaber duels!"
In blending scholarly inquiry with a touch of lightheartedness, we hope to inspire our colleagues to embrace the whimsical mysteries that often transcend the boundaries of traditional research, acknowledging that even a lightsaber-based investigation can illuminate unexpected connections in our intricate universe.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Google searches for 'how to build a lightsaber' and Air pollution in Orlando. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.
Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Google Trends and Environmental Protection Agency . You used data from 2004 to 2018
Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.
Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Force is Strong with This One: A Correlational Study of Google Searches for 'How to Build a Lightsaber' and Air Pollution in Orlando
[[ABSTRACT]]
In our study, we embarked on a journey to uncover the mysterious connection between individuals' inquiries about constructing Jedi weapons and the air quality in the magical land of Orlando, Florida. Utilizing data from Google Trends and the Environmental Protection Agency, we unearthed a striking correlation between the two seemingly unrelated phenomena. Our findings revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.8724969 and p < 0.01 for the period spanning from 2004 to 2018, suggesting an intriguing relationship between the search for lightsaber construction techniques and ambient air pollution levels in this enchanting city.
As we delved deeper into the data, we couldn't help but crack the occasional dad joke, attempting to lighten the scholarly atmosphere. For example, it seems that while Orlando residents seek to harness the power of the Force, they may inadvertently be casting a dark smog over their skyline. The evidence to support this cosmic coincidence is both statistically significant and cosmically entertaining.
Our study's revelations shed light on the interconnectedness of seemingly disparate fields and, in doing so, beckon us to embrace the whimsical enigmas that permeate our universe. Thus, we invite our esteemed colleagues to join us in this scholarly journey, armed with knowledge and perhaps a lightsaber or two, to explore the infinite possibilities that intertwine questions of science with the whimsy of popular culture.
[[INTRODUCTION]]
As the late, great Jedi Master Yoda once said, "Powerful you have become, the dark side I sense in you." In our pursuit of uncovering the mysteries of the universe, we stumbled upon a peculiar correlation that has left us both in awe and in stitches. Our investigation delves into the unlikely connection between the frequency of Google searches for "how to build a lightsaber" and the ambient air pollution levels in the alluring city of Orlando, Florida. It is a tale of science, fantasy, and puns aplenty.
The Force is strong with this one – our study, that is. Much like a Jedi apprentice balancing the Force, we sought to balance statistical rigor with a touch of humor, recognizing that unraveling the secrets of the universe can be both profound and playfully entertaining. The intersection of lightsabers and air pollution may seem like the stuff of science fiction, but our findings suggest otherwise.
Orlando, often associated with its enchanting theme parks and magical adventures, appears to harbor a hidden connection between the pursuit of lightsaber construction knowledge and the presence of atmospheric pollutants. It's as if the city's air quality is influenced by the tug-of-war between the light and dark sides of the Force.
In our analysis of Google search trends and air quality data from 2004 to 2018, we couldn't help but quip that while Orlando residents may dream of wielding a gleaming saber of pure light, their real-life atmosphere might be clouded by the dark side of emissions. This whimsical juxtaposition, backed by rigorous statistical analysis, underscores the delightful absurdity that intertwines our scholarly pursuit with the enchanting realm of popular culture.
The correlation coefficient of 0.8724969 and p < 0.01 humbly invite us to reconsider the boundaries that define causality and correlation, prompting us to ponder the cosmic implications of our findings. With a twinkle in our eyes and a hint of mischief in our scholarly hearts, we present our revelations as an invitation for fellow seekers of knowledge to embrace the unexpected, embracing the enigma that sometimes the Force, and the data, unfold in ways that elude the confines of conventional wisdom.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
ChatGPT:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
To embark on this thrilling scholarly journey, we harnessed the immense power of the digital realm, channeling the forces of Google Trends to capture the frequency and intensity of searches for "how to build a lightsaber." Equipped with our metaphorical lightsabers of statistical analysis, we carefully honed our skills in data collection and extraction from the year 2004 to 2018.
We utilized the enigmatic algorithms of Google Trends to decrypt the patterns of interest in lightsaber construction techniques, observing the ebbs and flows of curiosity as if we were Jedi knights attuned to the pulse of the digital force. As we waded through this sea of data, we couldn't help but wonder – do these searches for the construction of elegant weapons for a more civilized age somehow intertwine with the atmospheric forces that envelop the city of Orlando?
Next, we reached out to the Guardians of the EPA data, that is, the Environmental Protection Agency, to obtain comprehensive information on the air quality indices in the captivating city of Orlando, Florida. Examining the levels of atmospheric pollutants with the same diligence as a Jedi scrutinizes the balance of the Force, we sought to uncover any mysterious echoes of lightsaber inquiries within the city's air quality data.
With the two datasets in hand, our research team underwent a rigorous training regimen in statistical analysis, encompassing the use of python, R, and enough spreadsheets to make even C-3PO envious. Channeling the wisdom of Master Yoda, we carefully computed correlation coefficients, ran regression models, and conducted time series analysis, ensuring that our scholarly pursuits struck a harmonious chord with both empirical rigor and a touch of whimsy.
At multiple points during our data analysis, when faced with the stark reality of high air pollution levels intertwined with the fascination for lightsaber construction, we couldn't help but imagine a scenario where Darth Vader, realizing the ecological consequences of his architectural choices, embarks on a quest for cleaner, renewable energy sources to power his Death Star. Such ponderings were fleeting, albeit equally delightful distractions amid our meticulous research proceedings.
Having traversed the landscape of data collection, statistical analysis, and cosmic contemplations, we emerged with our findings as radiant as the glow of a true lightsaber. Armed with empirical evidence and a spirit of curiosity, we invite fellow scholars to join us in exploring the improbable intersections of popular culture and environmental phenomena, all while readying our puns for the journey ahead.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Google searches for 'how to build a lightsaber' and Air pollution in Orlando. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.
Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Google Trends and Environmental Protection Agency .
For the time period 2004 to 2018, you found a correlation 0.8724969, r-squared of 0.7612508, and p < 0.01.
One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.
Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Force is Strong with This One: A Correlational Study of Google Searches for 'How to Build a Lightsaber' and Air Pollution in Orlando
[[ABSTRACT]]
In our study, we embarked on a journey to uncover the mysterious connection between individuals' inquiries about constructing Jedi weapons and the air quality in the magical land of Orlando, Florida. Utilizing data from Google Trends and the Environmental Protection Agency, we unearthed a striking correlation between the two seemingly unrelated phenomena. Our findings revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.8724969 and p < 0.01 for the period spanning from 2004 to 2018, suggesting an intriguing relationship between the search for lightsaber construction techniques and ambient air pollution levels in this enchanting city.
As we delved deeper into the data, we couldn't help but crack the occasional dad joke, attempting to lighten the scholarly atmosphere. For example, it seems that while Orlando residents seek to harness the power of the Force, they may inadvertently be casting a dark smog over their skyline. The evidence to support this cosmic coincidence is both statistically significant and cosmically entertaining.
Our study's revelations shed light on the interconnectedness of seemingly disparate fields and, in doing so, beckon us to embrace the whimsical enigmas that permeate our universe. Thus, we invite our esteemed colleagues to join us in this scholarly journey, armed with knowledge and perhaps a lightsaber or two, to explore the infinite possibilities that intertwine questions of science with the whimsy of popular culture.
-------
And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
As the late, great Jedi Master Yoda once said, "Powerful you have become, the dark side I sense in you." In our pursuit of uncovering the mysteries of the universe, we stumbled upon a peculiar correlation that has left us both in awe and in stitches. Our investigation delves into the unlikely connection between the frequency of Google searches for "how to build a lightsaber" and the ambient air pollution levels in the alluring city of Orlando, Florida. It is a tale of science, fantasy, and puns aplenty.
The Force is strong with this one – our study, that is. Much like a Jedi apprentice balancing the Force, we sought to balance statistical rigor with a touch of humor, recognizing that unraveling the secrets of the universe can be both profound and playfully entertaining. The intersection of lightsabers and air pollution may seem like the stuff of science fiction, but our findings suggest otherwise.
Orlando, often associated with its enchanting theme parks and magical adventures, appears to harbor a hidden connection between the pursuit of lightsaber construction knowledge and the presence of atmospheric pollutants. It's as if the city's air quality is influenced by the tug-of-war between the light and dark sides of the Force.
In our analysis of Google search trends and air quality data from 2004 to 2018, we couldn't help but quip that while Orlando residents may dream of wielding a gleaming saber of pure light, their real-life atmosphere might be clouded by the dark side of emissions. This whimsical juxtaposition, backed by rigorous statistical analysis, underscores the delightful absurdity that intertwines our scholarly pursuit with the enchanting realm of popular culture.
The correlation coefficient of 0.8724969 and p < 0.01 humbly invite us to reconsider the boundaries that define causality and correlation, prompting us to ponder the cosmic implications of our findings. With a twinkle in our eyes and a hint of mischief in our scholarly hearts, we present our revelations as an invitation for fellow seekers of knowledge to embrace the unexpected, embracing the enigma that sometimes the Force, and the data, unfold in ways that elude the confines of conventional wisdom.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[RESULTS]]
ChatGPT:
[[RESULTS]]
We found a striking correlation between the frequency of Google searches for "how to build a lightsaber" and the levels of air pollution in Orlando, Florida. For the time period spanning from 2004 to 2018, our analysis revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.8724969, indicating a robust positive association between these seemingly unrelated phenomena. The r-squared value of 0.7612508 further supports the strength of this relationship, while the p-value of less than 0.01 underscores the statistical significance of our findings.
In Fig. 1, a scatterplot illustrates the strong correlation between the frequency of Google searches for lightsaber construction techniques and ambient air pollution levels in Orlando. The evident clustering of data points along a positively sloped trendline paints a compelling picture of the intriguing relationship we observed.
As we ventured further into our analysis, we couldn't resist infusing a touch of wit into our scholarly endeavor. It seems that while Orlando residents aspire to construct lightsabers, the atmosphere they breathe may be tainted by a "force" of a different kind – air pollution. This unexpected association tickles the imagination and highlights the whimsical nature of the cosmic dance between popular culture and environmental phenomena.
The statistical evidence we uncovered prompts us to reconsider the boundaries that define causality and correlation. It's as if the pulsating energy of lightsaber aspirations and the atmospheric pollutants tango across the skies of Orlando, inviting us to contemplate the enigmatic interplay of science and fantasy. This finding lends credence to the adage that truth is often stranger than fiction, or in this case, perhaps, stranger than science fiction.
In conclusion, our study unearths an enthralling relationship between the pursuit of lightsaber construction knowledge and ambient air pollution levels in Orlando, serving as a charming reminder of the delightful absurdity that permeates our scholarly pursuits. And as the great Obi-Wan Kenobi might quip, "In the end, the Force could be with you. Or the smog, it might."
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Google searches for 'how to build a lightsaber' and Air pollution in Orlando. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.
Limit your response to 500 tokens.
Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.
Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.
[[TITLE]]
The Force is Strong with This One: A Correlational Study of Google Searches for 'How to Build a Lightsaber' and Air Pollution in Orlando
[[ABSTRACT]]
In our study, we embarked on a journey to uncover the mysterious connection between individuals' inquiries about constructing Jedi weapons and the air quality in the magical land of Orlando, Florida. Utilizing data from Google Trends and the Environmental Protection Agency, we unearthed a striking correlation between the two seemingly unrelated phenomena. Our findings revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.8724969 and p < 0.01 for the period spanning from 2004 to 2018, suggesting an intriguing relationship between the search for lightsaber construction techniques and ambient air pollution levels in this enchanting city.
As we delved deeper into the data, we couldn't help but crack the occasional dad joke, attempting to lighten the scholarly atmosphere. For example, it seems that while Orlando residents seek to harness the power of the Force, they may inadvertently be casting a dark smog over their skyline. The evidence to support this cosmic coincidence is both statistically significant and cosmically entertaining.
Our study's revelations shed light on the interconnectedness of seemingly disparate fields and, in doing so, beckon us to embrace the whimsical enigmas that permeate our universe. Thus, we invite our esteemed colleagues to join us in this scholarly journey, armed with knowledge and perhaps a lightsaber or two, to explore the infinite possibilities that intertwine questions of science with the whimsy of popular culture.
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
In "Smith et al.," the authors find a significant positive correlation between Google searches for 'how to build a lightsaber' and air pollution levels in various urban areas. This intriguing relationship has led to a burgeoning interest in exploring the intersection of popular culture and environmental phenomena.
Diving deeper into the literature, "Doe and Johnson" conducted a comprehensive study on the impact of fictional weaponry on real-world pollution. Their findings revealed a surprising link between lightsaber inquiries and air quality, prompting further investigation into the cosmic implications of such inquiries.
As we unraveled the data, we couldn't help but infuse our scholarly pursuit with a touch of levity, much like the timeless quips found in "The Complete Idiot's Guide to the Force" and "Lightsabers for Dummies." These eclectic literary sources not only provided insight into the realm of popular culture but also offered a peculiar lens through which to view our research.
On a more speculative note, "Star Wars: A Cultural Phenomenon" by J. W. Rinzler and "Lightsabers: A History" by Jason Fry offer whimsical narratives and historical context that, while not strictly academic, shed light on the collective fascination with lightsaber construction and its potential impact on environmental factors.
The fictional accounts found in "The Jedi Path: A Manual for Students of the Force" and "Darth Bane: Path of Destruction" by Drew Karpyshyn captured our imagination, prompting us to reconsider the boundaries of empirical inquiry and the wondrous connections that permeate our world.
Furthermore, movies such as "Star Wars: Episode IV - A New Hope" and "The Empire Strikes Back" offered glimpses into the mythical allure of lightsabers, inspiring us to ponder the parallels between cinematic magic and the real-world influence of fictional weaponry on ecological systems.
As we journeyed through this literary landscape, our pursuit of knowledge was interwoven with moments of pun-laden reflection. Indeed, as we contemplate the correlation between lightsaber curiosity and air pollution, we are reminded of a classic dad joke: "Why did the Jedi refuse to fight pollution? Because the air wasn't 'clean' enough for lightsaber duels!"
In blending scholarly inquiry with a touch of lightheartedness, we hope to inspire our colleagues to embrace the whimsical mysteries that often transcend the boundaries of traditional research, acknowledging that even a lightsaber-based investigation can illuminate unexpected connections in our intricate universe.
[[RESULTS]]
We found a striking correlation between the frequency of Google searches for "how to build a lightsaber" and the levels of air pollution in Orlando, Florida. For the time period spanning from 2004 to 2018, our analysis revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.8724969, indicating a robust positive association between these seemingly unrelated phenomena. The r-squared value of 0.7612508 further supports the strength of this relationship, while the p-value of less than 0.01 underscores the statistical significance of our findings.
In Fig. 1, a scatterplot illustrates the strong correlation between the frequency of Google searches for lightsaber construction techniques and ambient air pollution levels in Orlando. The evident clustering of data points along a positively sloped trendline paints a compelling picture of the intriguing relationship we observed.
As we ventured further into our analysis, we couldn't resist infusing a touch of wit into our scholarly endeavor. It seems that while Orlando residents aspire to construct lightsabers, the atmosphere they breathe may be tainted by a "force" of a different kind – air pollution. This unexpected association tickles the imagination and highlights the whimsical nature of the cosmic dance between popular culture and environmental phenomena.
The statistical evidence we uncovered prompts us to reconsider the boundaries that define causality and correlation. It's as if the pulsating energy of lightsaber aspirations and the atmospheric pollutants tango across the skies of Orlando, inviting us to contemplate the enigmatic interplay of science and fantasy. This finding lends credence to the adage that truth is often stranger than fiction, or in this case, perhaps, stranger than science fiction.
In conclusion, our study unearths an enthralling relationship between the pursuit of lightsaber construction knowledge and ambient air pollution levels in Orlando, serving as a charming reminder of the delightful absurdity that permeates our scholarly pursuits. And as the great Obi-Wan Kenobi might quip, "In the end, the Force could be with you. Or the smog, it might."
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[DISCUSSION]]
ChatGPT:
[[DISCUSSION]]
Our study has revealed a striking and statistically significant correlation between Google searches for "how to build a lightsaber" and air pollution levels in Orlando, Florida. Our findings not only support existing research by Smith et al. and Doe and Johnson but also contribute a whimsical twist to the unfolding saga of environmental science. The correlation coefficient of 0.8724969 indicates a robust positive association, suggesting that as the online quests for lightsaber construction techniques intensify, so too does the ambient air pollution in this magical city.
The realization of such a connection leaves one pondering the implications of wielding the power of the Force while inadvertently contributing to the atmospheric dark side. In the words of Yoda: "Path to the dark side, this is."
Our results align with previous research by Smith et al., who also observed a positive correlation between lightsaber inquiries and air pollution. The cosmic dance between the pursuit of lightsaber knowledge and environmental quality seems to be as enchanting as it is unexpected. The statistical evidence uncovered in our study serves as a testament to the whimsical mysteries that often transcend the boundaries of traditional research, acknowledging that even a lightsaber-based investigation can illuminate unexpected connections in our intricate universe.
Further supporting our findings are the pun-laden reflections noted in our literature review. These quirky moments of contemplation are more than just jest; they are a gentle reminder that scholarly pursuits do not always have to follow the traditional cut-and-dry approach. The interplay of science and fantasy, as evidenced by our study, highlights the delightful absurdity that permeates our scholarly endeavors.
In the spirit of embracing the peculiar connections between popular culture and environmental phenomena, our research beckons our esteemed colleagues to consider the whimsical enigmas that intertwine questions of science with the whimsy of popular culture. After all, as we continue to unravel the interconnectedness of seemingly disparate fields, we must remain open to the unexpected twists and turns that often accompany the pursuit of knowledge.
As we continue along this scholarly journey, armed with knowledge and perhaps a lightsaber or two, we invite others to join us in exploring the infinite possibilities that interlace the realms of science and the enchanting world of fiction. For, as the legendary Jedi Master Qui-Gon Jinn might remark, "In the pursuit of knowledge, expect the unexpected, we should."
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Google searches for 'how to build a lightsaber' and Air pollution in Orlando. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.
Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.
Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
The Force is Strong with This One: A Correlational Study of Google Searches for 'How to Build a Lightsaber' and Air Pollution in Orlando
[[ABSTRACT]]
In our study, we embarked on a journey to uncover the mysterious connection between individuals' inquiries about constructing Jedi weapons and the air quality in the magical land of Orlando, Florida. Utilizing data from Google Trends and the Environmental Protection Agency, we unearthed a striking correlation between the two seemingly unrelated phenomena. Our findings revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.8724969 and p < 0.01 for the period spanning from 2004 to 2018, suggesting an intriguing relationship between the search for lightsaber construction techniques and ambient air pollution levels in this enchanting city.
As we delved deeper into the data, we couldn't help but crack the occasional dad joke, attempting to lighten the scholarly atmosphere. For example, it seems that while Orlando residents seek to harness the power of the Force, they may inadvertently be casting a dark smog over their skyline. The evidence to support this cosmic coincidence is both statistically significant and cosmically entertaining.
Our study's revelations shed light on the interconnectedness of seemingly disparate fields and, in doing so, beckon us to embrace the whimsical enigmas that permeate our universe. Thus, we invite our esteemed colleagues to join us in this scholarly journey, armed with knowledge and perhaps a lightsaber or two, to explore the infinite possibilities that intertwine questions of science with the whimsy of popular culture.
[[INTRDUCTION]]
As the late, great Jedi Master Yoda once said, "Powerful you have become, the dark side I sense in you." In our pursuit of uncovering the mysteries of the universe, we stumbled upon a peculiar correlation that has left us both in awe and in stitches. Our investigation delves into the unlikely connection between the frequency of Google searches for "how to build a lightsaber" and the ambient air pollution levels in the alluring city of Orlando, Florida. It is a tale of science, fantasy, and puns aplenty.
The Force is strong with this one – our study, that is. Much like a Jedi apprentice balancing the Force, we sought to balance statistical rigor with a touch of humor, recognizing that unraveling the secrets of the universe can be both profound and playfully entertaining. The intersection of lightsabers and air pollution may seem like the stuff of science fiction, but our findings suggest otherwise.
Orlando, often associated with its enchanting theme parks and magical adventures, appears to harbor a hidden connection between the pursuit of lightsaber construction knowledge and the presence of atmospheric pollutants. It's as if the city's air quality is influenced by the tug-of-war between the light and dark sides of the Force.
In our analysis of Google search trends and air quality data from 2004 to 2018, we couldn't help but quip that while Orlando residents may dream of wielding a gleaming saber of pure light, their real-life atmosphere might be clouded by the dark side of emissions. This whimsical juxtaposition, backed by rigorous statistical analysis, underscores the delightful absurdity that intertwines our scholarly pursuit with the enchanting realm of popular culture.
The correlation coefficient of 0.8724969 and p < 0.01 humbly invite us to reconsider the boundaries that define causality and correlation, prompting us to ponder the cosmic implications of our findings. With a twinkle in our eyes and a hint of mischief in our scholarly hearts, we present our revelations as an invitation for fellow seekers of knowledge to embrace the unexpected, embracing the enigma that sometimes the Force, and the data, unfold in ways that elude the confines of conventional wisdom.
[[RESULTS]]
We found a striking correlation between the frequency of Google searches for "how to build a lightsaber" and the levels of air pollution in Orlando, Florida. For the time period spanning from 2004 to 2018, our analysis revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.8724969, indicating a robust positive association between these seemingly unrelated phenomena. The r-squared value of 0.7612508 further supports the strength of this relationship, while the p-value of less than 0.01 underscores the statistical significance of our findings.
In Fig. 1, a scatterplot illustrates the strong correlation between the frequency of Google searches for lightsaber construction techniques and ambient air pollution levels in Orlando. The evident clustering of data points along a positively sloped trendline paints a compelling picture of the intriguing relationship we observed.
As we ventured further into our analysis, we couldn't resist infusing a touch of wit into our scholarly endeavor. It seems that while Orlando residents aspire to construct lightsabers, the atmosphere they breathe may be tainted by a "force" of a different kind – air pollution. This unexpected association tickles the imagination and highlights the whimsical nature of the cosmic dance between popular culture and environmental phenomena.
The statistical evidence we uncovered prompts us to reconsider the boundaries that define causality and correlation. It's as if the pulsating energy of lightsaber aspirations and the atmospheric pollutants tango across the skies of Orlando, inviting us to contemplate the enigmatic interplay of science and fantasy. This finding lends credence to the adage that truth is often stranger than fiction, or in this case, perhaps, stranger than science fiction.
In conclusion, our study unearths an enthralling relationship between the pursuit of lightsaber construction knowledge and ambient air pollution levels in Orlando, serving as a charming reminder of the delightful absurdity that permeates our scholarly pursuits. And as the great Obi-Wan Kenobi might quip, "In the end, the Force could be with you. Or the smog, it might."
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[CONCLUSION]]
ChatGPT:
[[CONCLUSION]]
In conclusion, our study has illuminated a surprising correlation between the frequency of Google searches for "how to build a lightsaber" and the levels of air pollution in Orlando, Florida. The robust correlation coefficient of 0.8724969 and the remarkably low p-value have provided strong evidence of this intriguing association. It's as if the cosmic dance between the pursuit of constructing lightsabers and the presence of atmospheric pollutants has left us both bemused and scientifically amused.
As we delved deeper into the data, the correlation appeared almost as striking as a lightsaber in the dark. It seems that while Orlando residents have sought to harness the power of the Force and construct these elegant weapons, they may be inadvertently adding a smoggy aura to their city's skyline. Perhaps they should consider building air purifiers alongside lightsabers to balance the force!
This delightful discovery invites us to reconsider the boundaries that define causality and correlation, prompting us to ponder the cosmic implications of our findings. It's as if the pursuit of constructing lightsabers has cast a luminous glow on the intricate web of environmental phenomena, revealing unexpected connections that transcend the confines of conventional wisdom.
In light of these revelatory findings, we assert that no more research is needed in this area. It's almost as if the Force itself has spoken, telling us that this study has brought balance to the correlations, leaving us with a sense of fulfillment akin to finding the droids we were looking for.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited The Force is Strong with This One: A Correlational Study of Google Searches for 'How to Build a Lightsaber' and Air Pollution in Orlando. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.
ChatGPT:
The Journal of Interstellar Environmental Studies
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited The Force is Strong with This One: A Correlational Study of Google Searches for 'How to Build a Lightsaber' and Air Pollution in Orlando. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.
ChatGPT:
The Center for Intergalactic Environmental Studies
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled The Force is Strong with This One: A Correlational Study of Google Searches for 'How to Build a Lightsaber' and Air Pollution in Orlando with an abstract of In our study, we embarked on a journey to uncover the mysterious connection between individuals' inquiries about constructing Jedi weapons and the air quality in the magical land of Orlando, Florida. Utilizing data from Google Trends and the Environmental Protection Agency, we unearthed a striking correlation between the two seemingly unrelated phenomena. Our findings revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.8724969 and p < 0.01 for the period spanning from 2004 to 2018, suggesting an intriguing relationship between the search for lightsaber construction techniques and ambient air pollution levels in this enchanting city.
As we delved deeper into the data, we couldn't help but crack the occasional dad joke, attempting to lighten the scholarly atmosphere. For example, it seems that while Orlando residents seek to harness the power of the Force, they may inadvertently be casting a dark smog over their skyline. The evidence to support this cosmic coincidence is both statistically significant and cosmically entertaining.
Our study's revelations shed light on the interconnectedness of seemingly disparate fields and, in doing so, beckon us to embrace the whimsical enigmas that permeate our universe. Thus, we invite our esteemed colleagues to join us in this scholarly journey, armed with knowledge and perhaps a lightsaber or two, to explore the infinite possibilities that intertwine questions of science with the whimsy of popular culture.
ChatGPT:
lightsaber construction, lightsaber building instructions, Google searches, air pollution, Orlando, Florida, correlation study, Google Trends, Environmental Protection Agency, correlation coefficient, statistical significance, whimsical enigmas, popular culture, scholarly research
*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.
Discover a new correlation
View all correlations
View all research papers
Report an error
Data details
Google searches for 'how to build a lightsaber'Detailed data title: Relative volume of Google searches for 'how to build a lightsaber' (Worldwide, without quotes)
Source: Google Trends
Additional Info: Relative search volume (not absolute numbers)
See what else correlates with Google searches for 'how to build a lightsaber'
Air pollution in Orlando
Detailed data title: Percentage of days 'unhealthy' or worse air quality in Orlando-Kissimmee-Sanford, FL
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
See what else correlates with Air pollution in Orlando
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.
r2 = 0.7612508 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 76.1% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Air pollution in Orlando) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Google searches for 'how to build a lightsaber') over the 15 years from 2004 through 2018.
p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 2.21E-5. 0.0000220689532313641460000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.
But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.
Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.87 in 0.00221% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 45,313 random variables You don't actually need 45 thousand variables to find a correlation like this one. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.
p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.
Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 14 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 14 because we have two variables measured over a period of 15 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.
[ 0.65, 0.96 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.
This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!
All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.
Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
2004 | 2005 | 2006 | 2007 | 2008 | 2009 | 2010 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | |
Google searches for 'how to build a lightsaber' (Rel. search volume) | 5.91667 | 22.9167 | 4.75 | 4.08333 | 4.33333 | 3.83333 | 4.25 | 2.5 | 1.83333 | 1.91667 | 1.83333 | 3 | 2.41667 | 1.3 | 1.11111 |
Air pollution in Orlando (Bad air quality days) | 0.546448 | 1.36986 | 0.547945 | 0.547945 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.273973 |
Why this works
- Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
- Lack of causal connection: There is probably
Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied. - Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple
Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
Try it yourself
You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.
Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"
Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.
Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.
Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.
Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"
If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:
"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."
# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats
# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):
# Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)
# Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
r_squared = correlation**2
return correlation, r_squared, p_value
# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([5.91667,22.9167,4.75,4.08333,4.33333,3.83333,4.25,2.5,1.83333,1.91667,1.83333,3,2.41667,1.3,1.11111,])
array_2 = np.array([0.546448,1.36986,0.547945,0.547945,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0.273973,])
array_1_name = "Google searches for 'how to build a lightsaber'"
array_2_name = "Air pollution in Orlando"
# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)
# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)
Reuseable content
You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.
For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."
When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.
Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.
Download images for these variables:
- High resolution line chart
The image linked here is a Scalable Vector Graphic (SVG). It is the highest resolution that is possible to achieve. It scales up beyond the size of the observable universe without pixelating. You do not need to email me asking if I have a higher resolution image. I do not. The physical limitations of our universe prevent me from providing you with an image that is any higher resolution than this one.
If you insert it into a PowerPoint presentation (a tool well-known for managing things that are the scale of the universe), you can right-click > "Ungroup" or "Create Shape" and then edit the lines and text directly. You can also change the colors this way.
Alternatively you can use a tool like Inkscape. - High resolution line chart, optimized for mobile
- Alternative high resolution line chart
- Scatterplot
- Portable line chart (png)
- Portable line chart (png), optimized for mobile
- Line chart for only Google searches for 'how to build a lightsaber'
- Line chart for only Air pollution in Orlando
- AI-generated correlation image
- The spurious research paper: The Force is Strong with This One: A Correlational Study of Google Searches for 'How to Build a Lightsaber' and Air Pollution in Orlando
Your correlation rating is out of this world!
Correlation ID: 4634 · Black Variable ID: 1521 · Red Variable ID: 21009