about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #4,633 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Air pollution in Topeka, Kansas and the second variable is Wind power generated in Venezuela.  The chart goes from 2012 to 2021, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

The cleaner air in Topeka led to an increase in local tornado production, which in turn boosted wind power generation in Venezuela. Looks like Topeka was really blowing some fresh ideas over to Venezuela!

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Create an image that captures a moment where the skies above Topeka, Kansas are crystal clear, illustrating people leisurely moving about the city. Simultaneously, the scene should depict wind turbines in Venezuela spinning rapidly, symbolizing the generation of clean energy. As dark clouds gather over Topeka, hinting at an approaching tornado, the strong winds should visually travel across the globe, eventually reaching the wind turbines in Venezuela, powering them up even more. The use of contrasting colors, textures, and movement will effectively convey the shift in weather patterns and the impact on the environment. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Air pollution in Topeka, Kansas and Wind power generated in Venezuela. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: A TIME magazine cover image High-tech Realistic An image that looks like it is a scene from a Pixar movie Magic realism
ChatGPT: A TIME magazine cover image

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Air pollution in Topeka, Kansas and Wind power generated in Venezuela, in the following situation: The cleaner air in Topeka led to an increase in local tornado production, which in turn boosted wind power generation in Venezuela. Looks like Topeka was really blowing some fresh ideas over to Venezuela!. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In Topeka, Kansas, the air is visibly clearer as people walk around the city. Wind turbines can be seen spinning rapidly in Venezuela, generating clean energy. Suddenly, dark clouds gather over Topeka, indicating an approaching tornado. The strong winds from the tornado travel across the globe and reach Venezuela, powering up the wind turbines even more.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ A TIME magazine cover image ] and depicting this scene: In Topeka, Kansas, the air is visibly clearer as people walk around the city. Wind turbines can be seen spinning rapidly in Venezuela, generating clean energy. Suddenly, dark clouds gather over Topeka, indicating an approaching tornado. The strong winds from the tornado travel across the globe and reach Venezuela, powering up the wind turbines even more. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Create an image that captures a moment where the skies above Topeka, Kansas are crystal clear, illustrating people leisurely moving about the city. Simultaneously, the scene should depict wind turbines in Venezuela spinning rapidly, symbolizing the generation of clean energy. As dark clouds gather over Topeka, hinting at an approaching tornado, the strong winds should visually travel across the globe, eventually reaching the wind turbines in Venezuela, powering them up even more. The use of contrasting colors, textures, and movement will effectively convey the shift in weather patterns and the impact on the environment.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how a decrease in Air pollution in Topeka, Kansas caused Wind power generated in Venezuela to increase. Add a funny one-liner at the end.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Blowing in the Wind: Exploring the Inverse Relationship Between Air Pollution in Topeka, Kansas, and Wind Power Generated in Venezuela

The International Journal of Atmospheric Dynamics and Renewable Energy Economics

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Topeka, Kansas and Wind power generated in Venezuela. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Make the title seem clever.

Your research team used data from Environmental Protection Agency and Energy Information Administration to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of -0.9770497 and p < 0.01 for 2012 to 2021.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
"Blowing in the Wind: Exploring the Inverse Relationship Between Air Pollution in Topeka, Kansas, and Wind Power Generated in Venezuela"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper investigates the intriguing relationship between air pollution levels in Topeka, Kansas, and wind power generation in Venezuela. Using data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the Energy Information Administration, we analyzed the temporal association between these two seemingly unrelated variables. We observed a remarkably strong inverse correlation, with a correlation coefficient of -0.9770497 and a significance level of p < 0.01 for the period spanning from 2012 to 2021. Our findings suggest that as air pollution levels in Topeka fluctuated, wind power generated in Venezuela demonstrated a remarkable tendency to blow in the opposite direction. While this association may seem baffling at first glance, our research sheds light on the whims of environmental interconnection, as if the winds of fate and the gusts of global energy production are conspiring in a dance of atmospheric harmony. Our study not only uncovers this comical correlation but also underscores the intricate and often surprising web of interconnected environmental dynamics.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Topeka, Kansas and Wind power generated in Venezuela. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Blowing in the Wind: Exploring the Inverse Relationship Between Air Pollution in Topeka, Kansas, and Wind Power Generated in Venezuela"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper investigates the intriguing relationship between air pollution levels in Topeka, Kansas, and wind power generation in Venezuela. Using data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the Energy Information Administration, we analyzed the temporal association between these two seemingly unrelated variables. We observed a remarkably strong inverse correlation, with a correlation coefficient of -0.9770497 and a significance level of p < 0.01 for the period spanning from 2012 to 2021. Our findings suggest that as air pollution levels in Topeka fluctuated, wind power generated in Venezuela demonstrated a remarkable tendency to blow in the opposite direction. While this association may seem baffling at first glance, our research sheds light on the whims of environmental interconnection, as if the winds of fate and the gusts of global energy production are conspiring in a dance of atmospheric harmony. Our study not only uncovers this comical correlation but also underscores the intricate and often surprising web of interconnected environmental dynamics.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

The field of environmental research is often characterized by the search for connections and relationships between seemingly disparate variables, and the peculiar inverse relationship between air pollution in Topeka, Kansas, and wind power generated in Venezuela is no exception. As the old adage goes, "When the wind of change blows, some build walls while others build wind turbines." In this vein, our study delves into the enigmatic dance of air pollutants and wind power, exploring the statistical twists and turns that guide their seemingly divergent trajectories.

The field of environmental science is not without its share of surprises, and our investigation sets out to unravel a correlation that seems to defy the laws of atmospheric physics and statistical probability. Indeed, one might consider it a "breezy mystery" as to how the air pollution levels in Topeka and the wind power generated in Venezuela could be intricately linked in an inverse manner. However, as researchers, it is our duty to "turbine" over every potential connection, no matter how whimsical it may initially seem.

At first glance, one might be forgiven for thinking that there could not possibly be any meaningful relationship between the air pollution levels in the heartland of America and the wind power harnessed in the far reaches of South America. Yet, our data analysis has blown away any preconceived notions, revealing a correlation coefficient of astonishing magnitude, one that even a statistical "gust" could not have predicted. Our findings suggest that as the winds of fate playfully influence the air quality in Topeka, the prevailing breezes across the troposphere are choreographing a dance of global energy production, as if the forces of nature are whispering their own humorous anecdotes in the language of wind and statistical inference.

In shedding light on this unexpected association, our study not only contributes to the body of environmental research but also serves as a reminder of the capricious and whimsical nature of statistical relationships. As we embark on this statistical voyage into the realms of air and wind, we invite our readers to join us in unraveling the breezy mysteries that may lie in the simple act of drawing connections between variables that, at first glance, seem to have about as much in common as a fish and a bicycle.

In the subsequent sections of this paper, we will embark on a statistical journey through the winds of environmental data, exploring the compelling yin and yang of air pollution and wind power. So hold on to your hats, and let us navigate the statistical currents and whimsical winds that animate this unusual correlation, exploring the interconnections that underscore the intricately interwoven tapestry of our planet's environmental dynamics.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Topeka, Kansas and Wind power generated in Venezuela. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then devolve ever further, and mention something completely ridiculous, like you conducted literature review by reading the backs of shampoo bottles.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Blowing in the Wind: Exploring the Inverse Relationship Between Air Pollution in Topeka, Kansas, and Wind Power Generated in Venezuela"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper investigates the intriguing relationship between air pollution levels in Topeka, Kansas, and wind power generation in Venezuela. Using data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the Energy Information Administration, we analyzed the temporal association between these two seemingly unrelated variables. We observed a remarkably strong inverse correlation, with a correlation coefficient of -0.9770497 and a significance level of p < 0.01 for the period spanning from 2012 to 2021. Our findings suggest that as air pollution levels in Topeka fluctuated, wind power generated in Venezuela demonstrated a remarkable tendency to blow in the opposite direction. While this association may seem baffling at first glance, our research sheds light on the whims of environmental interconnection, as if the winds of fate and the gusts of global energy production are conspiring in a dance of atmospheric harmony. Our study not only uncovers this comical correlation but also underscores the intricate and often surprising web of interconnected environmental dynamics.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The field of environmental research is often characterized by the search for connections and relationships between seemingly disparate variables, and the peculiar inverse relationship between air pollution in Topeka, Kansas, and wind power generated in Venezuela is no exception. As the old adage goes, "When the wind of change blows, some build walls while others build wind turbines." In this vein, our study delves into the enigmatic dance of air pollutants and wind power, exploring the statistical twists and turns that guide their seemingly divergent trajectories.
The field of environmental science is not without its share of surprises, and our investigation sets out to unravel a correlation that seems to defy the laws of atmospheric physics and statistical probability. Indeed, one might consider it a "breezy mystery" as to how the air pollution levels in Topeka and the wind power generated in Venezuela could be intricately linked in an inverse manner. However, as researchers, it is our duty to "turbine" over every potential connection, no matter how whimsical it may initially seem.
At first glance, one might be forgiven for thinking that there could not possibly be any meaningful relationship between the air pollution levels in the heartland of America and the wind power harnessed in the far reaches of South America. Yet, our data analysis has blown away any preconceived notions, revealing a correlation coefficient of astonishing magnitude, one that even a statistical "gust" could not have predicted. Our findings suggest that as the winds of fate playfully influence the air quality in Topeka, the prevailing breezes across the troposphere are choreographing a dance of global energy production, as if the forces of nature are whispering their own humorous anecdotes in the language of wind and statistical inference.
In shedding light on this unexpected association, our study not only contributes to the body of environmental research but also serves as a reminder of the capricious and whimsical nature of statistical relationships. As we embark on this statistical voyage into the realms of air and wind, we invite our readers to join us in unraveling the breezy mysteries that may lie in the simple act of drawing connections between variables that, at first glance, seem to have about as much in common as a fish and a bicycle.
In the subsequent sections of this paper, we will embark on a statistical journey through the winds of environmental data, exploring the compelling yin and yang of air pollution and wind power. So hold on to your hats, and let us navigate the statistical currents and whimsical winds that animate this unusual correlation, exploring the interconnections that underscore the intricately interwoven tapestry of our planet's environmental dynamics.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

The findings presented in this study build upon a foundation of previous research that has sought to disentangle the intricate web of environmental dynamics. Smith et al. (2015) investigated the impacts of air pollution on atmospheric circulation patterns, highlighting the far-reaching implications of air quality control measures. Meanwhile, Doe and Jones (2018) delved into the complexities of wind power generation, uncovering the profound implications of renewable energy sources on global energy landscapes. These seminal studies provide crucial context for our exploration of the unexpected relationship between air pollution in Topeka, Kansas, and wind power generated in Venezuela.

Extending beyond the realms of academic research, we draw insights from non-fiction works such as "The Wind and the Breeze: A Comprehensive Analysis of Atmospheric Interactions" by Environmental Scientist Lorem Ipsum (2007), which offers a comprehensive overview of the intricate dance of atmospheric forces. Furthermore, "Gone with the Wind Turbines: A Renewable Energy Odyssey" by Energy Expert Lorem Ipsum (2012) offers a deep dive into the world of wind power and its implications for global energy sustainability. These works serve as invaluable resources for contextualizing our findings within the broader literature on environmental dynamics and renewable energy.

In exploring the intersection of fiction and reality, we turn to the fictional realm for inspiration, with books such as "The Kite Runner" by Khaled Hosseini and "The Wind-Up Bird Chronicle" by Haruki Murakami offering nuanced perspectives on the metaphors of wind and air in literature. While these works may not directly relate to the empirical findings of our study, they remind us of the rich tapestry of associations that the concept of wind evokes in the collective imagination.

Going a step further, our review encompasses sources that are unconventional in the context of academic research. As an integral part of our rigorous literature review process, the authors conducted a comprehensive analysis of all available texts, including the information found on the backs of shampoo bottles, which surprisingly yielded insights into the unsuspected relationship between air pollution and wind power. While unconventional, these sources offered valuable perspectives on the broader cultural significance of air and wind, reminding us that the whims of statistical inference often blow in unpredictable directions.

In sum, our literature review integrates a diverse array of sources, ranging from academic studies to non-fiction works, and even delving into the world of fiction and unconventional textual sources. By drawing on this eclectic mix of resources, we aim to provide a comprehensive foundation for our investigation into the inverse relationship between air pollution in Topeka, Kansas, and wind power generated in Venezuela.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Topeka, Kansas and Wind power generated in Venezuela. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Environmental Protection Agency and Energy Information Administration . You used data from 2012 to 2021

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Blowing in the Wind: Exploring the Inverse Relationship Between Air Pollution in Topeka, Kansas, and Wind Power Generated in Venezuela"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper investigates the intriguing relationship between air pollution levels in Topeka, Kansas, and wind power generation in Venezuela. Using data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the Energy Information Administration, we analyzed the temporal association between these two seemingly unrelated variables. We observed a remarkably strong inverse correlation, with a correlation coefficient of -0.9770497 and a significance level of p < 0.01 for the period spanning from 2012 to 2021. Our findings suggest that as air pollution levels in Topeka fluctuated, wind power generated in Venezuela demonstrated a remarkable tendency to blow in the opposite direction. While this association may seem baffling at first glance, our research sheds light on the whims of environmental interconnection, as if the winds of fate and the gusts of global energy production are conspiring in a dance of atmospheric harmony. Our study not only uncovers this comical correlation but also underscores the intricate and often surprising web of interconnected environmental dynamics.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
The field of environmental research is often characterized by the search for connections and relationships between seemingly disparate variables, and the peculiar inverse relationship between air pollution in Topeka, Kansas, and wind power generated in Venezuela is no exception. As the old adage goes, "When the wind of change blows, some build walls while others build wind turbines." In this vein, our study delves into the enigmatic dance of air pollutants and wind power, exploring the statistical twists and turns that guide their seemingly divergent trajectories.
The field of environmental science is not without its share of surprises, and our investigation sets out to unravel a correlation that seems to defy the laws of atmospheric physics and statistical probability. Indeed, one might consider it a "breezy mystery" as to how the air pollution levels in Topeka and the wind power generated in Venezuela could be intricately linked in an inverse manner. However, as researchers, it is our duty to "turbine" over every potential connection, no matter how whimsical it may initially seem.
At first glance, one might be forgiven for thinking that there could not possibly be any meaningful relationship between the air pollution levels in the heartland of America and the wind power harnessed in the far reaches of South America. Yet, our data analysis has blown away any preconceived notions, revealing a correlation coefficient of astonishing magnitude, one that even a statistical "gust" could not have predicted. Our findings suggest that as the winds of fate playfully influence the air quality in Topeka, the prevailing breezes across the troposphere are choreographing a dance of global energy production, as if the forces of nature are whispering their own humorous anecdotes in the language of wind and statistical inference.
In shedding light on this unexpected association, our study not only contributes to the body of environmental research but also serves as a reminder of the capricious and whimsical nature of statistical relationships. As we embark on this statistical voyage into the realms of air and wind, we invite our readers to join us in unraveling the breezy mysteries that may lie in the simple act of drawing connections between variables that, at first glance, seem to have about as much in common as a fish and a bicycle.
In the subsequent sections of this paper, we will embark on a statistical journey through the winds of environmental data, exploring the compelling yin and yang of air pollution and wind power. So hold on to your hats, and let us navigate the statistical currents and whimsical winds that animate this unusual correlation, exploring the interconnections that underscore the intricately interwoven tapestry of our planet's environmental dynamics.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

Our research employed a multidimensional approach to investigate the inverse relationship between air pollution in Topeka, Kansas, and wind power generated in Venezuela. Leveraging data collected from the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the Energy Information Administration (EIA) spanning the years 2012 to 2021, we embarked on a statistical odyssey that aimed to untangle the whimsical dance of air quality and wind energy production.

Firstly, we gathered voluminous datasets on air pollution levels in Topeka, Kansas, meticulously sifting through the EPA's treasure trove of atmospheric measurements. As we delved into these records, we couldn't help but observe the irony of seeking clarity in the midst of air pollution data, akin to searching for a needle in a smogstack. Nonetheless, armed with statistical tools and a touch of whimsy, we diligently curated this information to uncover the fluctuations in air pollutants over the designated time frame.

Simultaneously, we turned our attention to the winds of Venezuela, metaphorically catching the gusts of wind power data spanning across the years 2012 to 2021. While the EIA's repository of energy statistics provided a wealth of information, there was a distinct sense of humor in analyzing the statistical winds of fate while exploring wind power generation. It seemed as if statistical gusts and pun-filled zephyrs were conspiring to impart the winds of knowledge in a manner both metaphorical and meteorological.

Having amassed these datasets, we employed advanced statistical methodologies to explore the relationship between these seemingly disconnected variables. With the seasoned precision of a statistical weather vane, we conducted a comprehensive time series analysis, considering both the magnitude and direction of change in air pollution levels and wind power generation. Through the lenses of correlation analysis and regression modeling, we set out to capture the capricious nuances of their interplay, akin to chasing the mercurial winds of environmental association.

Notably, our regression models incorporated lagged effects to discern whether changes in air pollution levels in Topeka preceded or followed alterations in wind power generated in Venezuela. This approach accentuated the tempo and timing of their inverse correlation, allowing us to metaphorically capture the ebb and flow of atmospheric influences with the precision of statistical anemometers.

Furthermore, we ventured into the realm of spatiotemporal analysis, considering the geographic and temporal dimensions of air pollution and wind power. This entailed mapping the regional dispersal of air pollutants in Topeka and juxtaposing them with the geographical contours of wind power generation in Venezuela. Such spatial exploration served as a whimsical cartographic companion to our statistical pursuits, allowing us to discern the invisible threads of environmental connection as if tracing out the invisible zephyrs of correlated influence.

In light of the whimsical nature of our research topic, we maintained a lighthearted approach to our statistical analyses, often engaging in statistical quips and jovial wordplay as we navigated the numbers and the nuance. While the methods may seem conventional on the surface, we winked at statistical possibilities and whimsical correlations, infusing our data explorations with an air of intellectual mirth.

In sum, our methodology was guided by both rigor and levity, blending traditional statistical techniques with a whimsical appreciation for the interconnected harmonies of air and wind. This spirited approach allowed us to delve into the statistical current and ride the winds of data, unraveling a serendipitous and statistically significant inverse relationship that underscores the aerodynamics of environmental correlation.

In the following sections, we will unveil the statistical revelations gleaned from our methodology, inviting readers to humor our exploratory statistical winds while delving into the substantial findings awaiting in the heart of this breezy mishmash of statistical correlations and environmental intrigue.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Topeka, Kansas and Wind power generated in Venezuela. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Environmental Protection Agency and Energy Information Administration .

For the time period 2012 to 2021, you found a correlation -0.9770497, r-squared of 0.9546261, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Blowing in the Wind: Exploring the Inverse Relationship Between Air Pollution in Topeka, Kansas, and Wind Power Generated in Venezuela"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper investigates the intriguing relationship between air pollution levels in Topeka, Kansas, and wind power generation in Venezuela. Using data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the Energy Information Administration, we analyzed the temporal association between these two seemingly unrelated variables. We observed a remarkably strong inverse correlation, with a correlation coefficient of -0.9770497 and a significance level of p < 0.01 for the period spanning from 2012 to 2021. Our findings suggest that as air pollution levels in Topeka fluctuated, wind power generated in Venezuela demonstrated a remarkable tendency to blow in the opposite direction. While this association may seem baffling at first glance, our research sheds light on the whims of environmental interconnection, as if the winds of fate and the gusts of global energy production are conspiring in a dance of atmospheric harmony. Our study not only uncovers this comical correlation but also underscores the intricate and often surprising web of interconnected environmental dynamics.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
The field of environmental research is often characterized by the search for connections and relationships between seemingly disparate variables, and the peculiar inverse relationship between air pollution in Topeka, Kansas, and wind power generated in Venezuela is no exception. As the old adage goes, "When the wind of change blows, some build walls while others build wind turbines." In this vein, our study delves into the enigmatic dance of air pollutants and wind power, exploring the statistical twists and turns that guide their seemingly divergent trajectories.
The field of environmental science is not without its share of surprises, and our investigation sets out to unravel a correlation that seems to defy the laws of atmospheric physics and statistical probability. Indeed, one might consider it a "breezy mystery" as to how the air pollution levels in Topeka and the wind power generated in Venezuela could be intricately linked in an inverse manner. However, as researchers, it is our duty to "turbine" over every potential connection, no matter how whimsical it may initially seem.
At first glance, one might be forgiven for thinking that there could not possibly be any meaningful relationship between the air pollution levels in the heartland of America and the wind power harnessed in the far reaches of South America. Yet, our data analysis has blown away any preconceived notions, revealing a correlation coefficient of astonishing magnitude, one that even a statistical "gust" could not have predicted. Our findings suggest that as the winds of fate playfully influence the air quality in Topeka, the prevailing breezes across the troposphere are choreographing a dance of global energy production, as if the forces of nature are whispering their own humorous anecdotes in the language of wind and statistical inference.
In shedding light on this unexpected association, our study not only contributes to the body of environmental research but also serves as a reminder of the capricious and whimsical nature of statistical relationships. As we embark on this statistical voyage into the realms of air and wind, we invite our readers to join us in unraveling the breezy mysteries that may lie in the simple act of drawing connections between variables that, at first glance, seem to have about as much in common as a fish and a bicycle.
In the subsequent sections of this paper, we will embark on a statistical journey through the winds of environmental data, exploring the compelling yin and yang of air pollution and wind power. So hold on to your hats, and let us navigate the statistical currents and whimsical winds that animate this unusual correlation, exploring the interconnections that underscore the intricately interwoven tapestry of our planet's environmental dynamics.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

Upon conducting our statistical analysis, we found a truly unexpected and, dare we say, breezy association between air pollution levels in Topeka, Kansas, and wind power generated in Venezuela. In examining the temporal patterns from 2012 to 2021, we uncovered a correlation coefficient of -0.9770497, indicating a remarkably strong inverse relationship between these seemingly unrelated variables. This correlation was further supported by an r-squared value of 0.9546261, demonstrating the robustness of the association. With a p-value of less than 0.01, we can confidently declare that this finding is not just blowing in the wind.

The correlation plot in Fig. 1 graphically portrays this intriguing inverse relationship, with air pollution levels in Topeka appearing to move in harmony with wind power generated in Venezuela, albeit in opposite directions. It paints a striking picture of how the winds of change in one location seem to echo in the energy production of another, as if there were a gustatory symphony at play between these two distinct environmental phenomena.

This humorous correlation may seem like a statistical anomaly at first, akin to a zephyr in a sea of calm, but it aptly highlights the capricious nature of environmental dynamics and the unpredictable intertwining of variables across the globe. As we unfold this comical statistical tale, we invite the reader to join us in marveling at the whimsical yet undeniable interconnectedness that underlies our planet's environmental intricacies.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Topeka, Kansas and Wind power generated in Venezuela. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
"Blowing in the Wind: Exploring the Inverse Relationship Between Air Pollution in Topeka, Kansas, and Wind Power Generated in Venezuela"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper investigates the intriguing relationship between air pollution levels in Topeka, Kansas, and wind power generation in Venezuela. Using data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the Energy Information Administration, we analyzed the temporal association between these two seemingly unrelated variables. We observed a remarkably strong inverse correlation, with a correlation coefficient of -0.9770497 and a significance level of p < 0.01 for the period spanning from 2012 to 2021. Our findings suggest that as air pollution levels in Topeka fluctuated, wind power generated in Venezuela demonstrated a remarkable tendency to blow in the opposite direction. While this association may seem baffling at first glance, our research sheds light on the whims of environmental interconnection, as if the winds of fate and the gusts of global energy production are conspiring in a dance of atmospheric harmony. Our study not only uncovers this comical correlation but also underscores the intricate and often surprising web of interconnected environmental dynamics.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The findings presented in this study build upon a foundation of previous research that has sought to disentangle the intricate web of environmental dynamics. Smith et al. (2015) investigated the impacts of air pollution on atmospheric circulation patterns, highlighting the far-reaching implications of air quality control measures. Meanwhile, Doe and Jones (2018) delved into the complexities of wind power generation, uncovering the profound implications of renewable energy sources on global energy landscapes. These seminal studies provide crucial context for our exploration of the unexpected relationship between air pollution in Topeka, Kansas, and wind power generated in Venezuela.
Extending beyond the realms of academic research, we draw insights from non-fiction works such as "The Wind and the Breeze: A Comprehensive Analysis of Atmospheric Interactions" by Environmental Scientist Lorem Ipsum (2007), which offers a comprehensive overview of the intricate dance of atmospheric forces. Furthermore, "Gone with the Wind Turbines: A Renewable Energy Odyssey" by Energy Expert Lorem Ipsum (2012) offers a deep dive into the world of wind power and its implications for global energy sustainability. These works serve as invaluable resources for contextualizing our findings within the broader literature on environmental dynamics and renewable energy.
In exploring the intersection of fiction and reality, we turn to the fictional realm for inspiration, with books such as "The Kite Runner" by Khaled Hosseini and "The Wind-Up Bird Chronicle" by Haruki Murakami offering nuanced perspectives on the metaphors of wind and air in literature. While these works may not directly relate to the empirical findings of our study, they remind us of the rich tapestry of associations that the concept of wind evokes in the collective imagination.
Going a step further, our review encompasses sources that are unconventional in the context of academic research. As an integral part of our rigorous literature review process, the authors conducted a comprehensive analysis of all available texts, including the information found on the backs of shampoo bottles, which surprisingly yielded insights into the unsuspected relationship between air pollution and wind power. While unconventional, these sources offered valuable perspectives on the broader cultural significance of air and wind, reminding us that the whims of statistical inference often blow in unpredictable directions.
In sum, our literature review integrates a diverse array of sources, ranging from academic studies to non-fiction works, and even delving into the world of fiction and unconventional textual sources. By drawing on this eclectic mix of resources, we aim to provide a comprehensive foundation for our investigation into the inverse relationship between air pollution in Topeka, Kansas, and wind power generated in Venezuela.

[[RESULTS]]
Upon conducting our statistical analysis, we found a truly unexpected and, dare we say, breezy association between air pollution levels in Topeka, Kansas, and wind power generated in Venezuela. In examining the temporal patterns from 2012 to 2021, we uncovered a correlation coefficient of -0.9770497, indicating a remarkably strong inverse relationship between these seemingly unrelated variables. This correlation was further supported by an r-squared value of 0.9546261, demonstrating the robustness of the association. With a p-value of less than 0.01, we can confidently declare that this finding is not just blowing in the wind.
The correlation plot in Fig. 1 graphically portrays this intriguing inverse relationship, with air pollution levels in Topeka appearing to move in harmony with wind power generated in Venezuela, albeit in opposite directions. It paints a striking picture of how the winds of change in one location seem to echo in the energy production of another, as if there were a gustatory symphony at play between these two distinct environmental phenomena.
This humorous correlation may seem like a statistical anomaly at first, akin to a zephyr in a sea of calm, but it aptly highlights the capricious nature of environmental dynamics and the unpredictable intertwining of variables across the globe. As we unfold this comical statistical tale, we invite the reader to join us in marveling at the whimsical yet undeniable interconnectedness that underlies our planet's environmental intricacies.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

Our results, as unexpected as they may seem, aligned with the prior research that has probed into the enigmatic interplay between atmospheric elements and energy dynamics. The seminal study by Smith et al. (2015) highlighted the profound impact of air pollution on atmospheric circulation, echoing the notion that the winds of change in Topeka might indeed reverberate across the globe. Likewise, the work of Doe and Jones (2018) underscored the transformative power of wind energy, laying the groundwork for our investigation into the whimsical dance of wind power generation in Venezuela. It's as if the winds of empirical evidence have conspired to blow us in the direction of this unconventional yet robust correlation.

Indeed, our findings pivot on the same whimsical axis that Lorem Ipsum (2007) articulately elucidated in "The Wind and the Breeze," as if the atmospheric forces themselves were waltzing to the tune of statistical significance. Furthermore, the work of Lorem Ipsum (2012) on wind power serves as a fitting prelude to our findings, as if we've stumbled upon a renewable energy odyssey that mirrors the fascinating interplay of air pollution and wind power. Even the fictional works of Hosseini and Murakami, with their metaphoric musings on wind, seem to lend an unexpected breeze of inspiration to our empirical exploration.

Our research, buoyed by the breezy statistical significance of the inverse relationship between air pollution in Topeka and wind power generated in Venezuela, holds a mirror to the capricious yet intertwined nature of environmental variables. As we navigate this gusty terrain of statistical inference, it becomes all too clear that the winds of research sometimes blow in whimsical directions, leading us to uncover unexpected correlations that defy the conventional currents of scientific inquiry.

In unraveling this comical correlation, we invite our readers to partake in the lighthearted yet enlightening journey of statistical discovery, as if we were charting a course through a statistical tempest that offers unexpected insight into the interconnectedness of our global environment. From the back of shampoo bottles to the annals of academic research, this study underscores the playful yet astute nature of statistical exploration, reminding us that even the most improbable statistical winds can carry forth a tale of empirical significance. Let us traverse this zephyr of statistical discovery with a sense of wonder and mirth, for in the realm of research, as in the winds of nature, the most whimsical of findings often hold the firmest grip on truth.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Topeka, Kansas and Wind power generated in Venezuela. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
"Blowing in the Wind: Exploring the Inverse Relationship Between Air Pollution in Topeka, Kansas, and Wind Power Generated in Venezuela"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper investigates the intriguing relationship between air pollution levels in Topeka, Kansas, and wind power generation in Venezuela. Using data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the Energy Information Administration, we analyzed the temporal association between these two seemingly unrelated variables. We observed a remarkably strong inverse correlation, with a correlation coefficient of -0.9770497 and a significance level of p < 0.01 for the period spanning from 2012 to 2021. Our findings suggest that as air pollution levels in Topeka fluctuated, wind power generated in Venezuela demonstrated a remarkable tendency to blow in the opposite direction. While this association may seem baffling at first glance, our research sheds light on the whims of environmental interconnection, as if the winds of fate and the gusts of global energy production are conspiring in a dance of atmospheric harmony. Our study not only uncovers this comical correlation but also underscores the intricate and often surprising web of interconnected environmental dynamics.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
The field of environmental research is often characterized by the search for connections and relationships between seemingly disparate variables, and the peculiar inverse relationship between air pollution in Topeka, Kansas, and wind power generated in Venezuela is no exception. As the old adage goes, "When the wind of change blows, some build walls while others build wind turbines." In this vein, our study delves into the enigmatic dance of air pollutants and wind power, exploring the statistical twists and turns that guide their seemingly divergent trajectories.
The field of environmental science is not without its share of surprises, and our investigation sets out to unravel a correlation that seems to defy the laws of atmospheric physics and statistical probability. Indeed, one might consider it a "breezy mystery" as to how the air pollution levels in Topeka and the wind power generated in Venezuela could be intricately linked in an inverse manner. However, as researchers, it is our duty to "turbine" over every potential connection, no matter how whimsical it may initially seem.
At first glance, one might be forgiven for thinking that there could not possibly be any meaningful relationship between the air pollution levels in the heartland of America and the wind power harnessed in the far reaches of South America. Yet, our data analysis has blown away any preconceived notions, revealing a correlation coefficient of astonishing magnitude, one that even a statistical "gust" could not have predicted. Our findings suggest that as the winds of fate playfully influence the air quality in Topeka, the prevailing breezes across the troposphere are choreographing a dance of global energy production, as if the forces of nature are whispering their own humorous anecdotes in the language of wind and statistical inference.
In shedding light on this unexpected association, our study not only contributes to the body of environmental research but also serves as a reminder of the capricious and whimsical nature of statistical relationships. As we embark on this statistical voyage into the realms of air and wind, we invite our readers to join us in unraveling the breezy mysteries that may lie in the simple act of drawing connections between variables that, at first glance, seem to have about as much in common as a fish and a bicycle.
In the subsequent sections of this paper, we will embark on a statistical journey through the winds of environmental data, exploring the compelling yin and yang of air pollution and wind power. So hold on to your hats, and let us navigate the statistical currents and whimsical winds that animate this unusual correlation, exploring the interconnections that underscore the intricately interwoven tapestry of our planet's environmental dynamics.

[[RESULTS]]
Upon conducting our statistical analysis, we found a truly unexpected and, dare we say, breezy association between air pollution levels in Topeka, Kansas, and wind power generated in Venezuela. In examining the temporal patterns from 2012 to 2021, we uncovered a correlation coefficient of -0.9770497, indicating a remarkably strong inverse relationship between these seemingly unrelated variables. This correlation was further supported by an r-squared value of 0.9546261, demonstrating the robustness of the association. With a p-value of less than 0.01, we can confidently declare that this finding is not just blowing in the wind.
The correlation plot in Fig. 1 graphically portrays this intriguing inverse relationship, with air pollution levels in Topeka appearing to move in harmony with wind power generated in Venezuela, albeit in opposite directions. It paints a striking picture of how the winds of change in one location seem to echo in the energy production of another, as if there were a gustatory symphony at play between these two distinct environmental phenomena.
This humorous correlation may seem like a statistical anomaly at first, akin to a zephyr in a sea of calm, but it aptly highlights the capricious nature of environmental dynamics and the unpredictable intertwining of variables across the globe. As we unfold this comical statistical tale, we invite the reader to join us in marveling at the whimsical yet undeniable interconnectedness that underlies our planet's environmental intricacies.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our study has revealed a windswept saga of statistical peculiarity, as the inverse relationship between air pollution in Topeka and wind power generated in Venezuela has blown us away with its unexpected whimsy. The correlation coefficient of -0.9770497 serves as a testament to the unseen forces of environmental interplay, almost as if the statistical winds of fate conspired to produce this comical association. This finding not only underscores the capricious nature of environmental dynamics but also serves as a reminder that in the realm of statistical inference, even the most unconventional relationships can "blow the lid off" our preconceived notions.

The correlation plot in Fig. 1 acts as a visual testament to the breezy ballet between air pollution and wind power, painting a picture of interconnectedness that transcends geographical boundaries, much like a playful game of atmospheric tag. It is as if the winds of statistical fate are whispering their own humorous anecdotes, nudging us to reconsider the seemingly disparate dance of air quality and wind energy production.

While we may be tempted to breeze past these findings, a deeper reflection on the interconnectedness of our planet's environmental variables invites us to pause and marvel at the statistical puns and whimsical paradoxes that underpin our statistical models. As we bid adieu to this statistical escapade, we are left with a fond appreciation for the unexpected, the breezy, and the statistical "wind-erful" revelations that continue to enliven our scientific pursuits.

In light of these breezy findings, we are inclined to assert that no further research "blows" is needed in this area.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Blowing in the Wind: Exploring the Inverse Relationship Between Air Pollution in Topeka, Kansas, and Wind Power Generated in Venezuela. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The International Journal of Atmospheric Dynamics and Renewable Energy Economics


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Blowing in the Wind: Exploring the Inverse Relationship Between Air Pollution in Topeka, Kansas, and Wind Power Generated in Venezuela. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Society for Global Atmospheric and Renewable Energy Studies (SGARES)


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Blowing in the Wind: Exploring the Inverse Relationship Between Air Pollution in Topeka, Kansas, and Wind Power Generated in Venezuela with an abstract of This paper investigates the intriguing relationship between air pollution levels in Topeka, Kansas, and wind power generation in Venezuela. Using data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the Energy Information Administration, we analyzed the temporal association between these two seemingly unrelated variables. We observed a remarkably strong inverse correlation, with a correlation coefficient of -0.9770497 and a significance level of p < 0.01 for the period spanning from 2012 to 2021. Our findings suggest that as air pollution levels in Topeka fluctuated, wind power generated in Venezuela demonstrated a remarkable tendency to blow in the opposite direction. While this association may seem baffling at first glance, our research sheds light on the whims of environmental interconnection, as if the winds of fate and the gusts of global energy production are conspiring in a dance of atmospheric harmony. Our study not only uncovers this comical correlation but also underscores the intricate and often surprising web of interconnected environmental dynamics.

ChatGPT:

air pollution, Topeka Kansas, wind power, Venezuela, correlation, inverse relationship, environmental interconnection, energy production, environmental dynamics

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Air pollution in Topeka, Kansas
Detailed data title: Percentage of days with air quality at 'unhealthy for sensitive groups' or worse in Topeka, KS
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
See what else correlates with Air pollution in Topeka, Kansas

Wind power generated in Venezuela
Detailed data title: Total wind power generated in Venezuela in billion kWh
Source: Energy Information Administration
See what else correlates with Wind power generated in Venezuela

Correlation r = -0.9770497 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.9546261 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 95.5% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Wind power generated in Venezuela) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Air pollution in Topeka, Kansas) over the 10 years from 2012 through 2021.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 1.2E-6. 0.0000011806479654758995000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as -0.98 in 0.00012% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 846,993 random variables You don't actually need 846 thousand variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 9 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 9 because we have two variables measured over a period of 10 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ -0.99, -0.9 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
2012201320142015201620172018201920202021
Air pollution in Topeka, Kansas (Bad air quality days)0.05737700.002739730.002739730000.002739730.0109290.00821918
Wind power generated in Venezuela (Billion kWh)0.0530.0880.0880.0880.0880.0880.0880.0880.0880.088




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Y-axis doesn't start at zero: I truncated the Y-axes of the graph above. I also used a line graph, which makes the visual connection stand out more than it deserves. Nothing against line graphs. They are great at telling a story when you have linear data! But visually it is deceptive because the only data is at the points on the graph, not the lines on the graph. In between each point, the data could have been doing anything. Like going for a random walk by itself!
    Mathematically what I showed is true, but it is intentionally misleading. Below is the same chart but with both Y-axes starting at zero.
  5. Inverted Y-axis: I inverted the Y-axis on the chart above so that the lines would move together. This is visually pleasing, but not at all intuitive. Below is a line graph that does not invert the Y-axis.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([0.057377,0,0.00273973,0.00273973,0,0,0,0.00273973,0.010929,0.00821918,])
array_2 = np.array([0.053,0.088,0.088,0.088,0.088,0.088,0.088,0.088,0.088,0.088,])
array_1_name = "Air pollution in Topeka, Kansas"
array_2_name = "Wind power generated in Venezuela"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Your rating skills are top-notch!


Correlation ID: 4633 · Black Variable ID: 21631 · Red Variable ID: 24098
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0