Download png, svg
AI explanation
The bill collectors were too busy learning about science to bother people for money.Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Generate an image that captures a comic-book-style illustration with muted colors and a dotted halftone pattern from the 1960s. Depict a scene in a tidy office located in Arkansas where a group of bill collectors are gathered around a computer. They are watching an AsapSCIENCE YouTube video with professional-sounding titles, engrossed in the content, taking notes and engaging in thoughtful discussion. The bill collectors are completely immersed in the fascinating science topics being presented. In the background, the phone lines and desks are noticeably clear since they've put their work aside to dive deep into the realm of science and learning. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: How professional-sounding AsapSCIENCE YouTube video titles are and The number of bill collectors in Arkansas. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: A scene from Skyrim A comic-book-style illustration with muted colors and a dotted halftone pattern from the 1960s inspired by bauhaus Surrealism Minimalism
ChatGPT: A comic-book-style illustration with muted colors and a dotted halftone pattern from the 1960s
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both How professional-sounding AsapSCIENCE YouTube video titles are and The number of bill collectors in Arkansas, in the following situation: The bill collectors were too busy learning about science to bother people for money.. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In a tidy office, a group of bill collectors in Arkansas are gathered around a computer watching an AsapSCIENCE YouTube video with professional-sounding titles. They are engrossed in the content, taking notes and engaging in thoughtful discussion, completely immersed in the fascinating science topics being presented. Meanwhile, the phone lines and desks are noticeably clear as they've put their work aside to dive deep into the realm of science and learning.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ A comic-book-style illustration with muted colors and a dotted halftone pattern from the 1960s ] and depicting this scene: In a tidy office, a group of bill collectors in Arkansas are gathered around a computer watching an AsapSCIENCE YouTube video with professional-sounding titles. They are engrossed in the content, taking notes and engaging in thoughtful discussion, completely immersed in the fascinating science topics being presented. Meanwhile, the phone lines and desks are noticeably clear as they've put their work aside to dive deep into the realm of science and learning. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Generate an image that captures a comic-book-style illustration with muted colors and a dotted halftone pattern from the 1960s. Depict a scene in a tidy office located in Arkansas where a group of bill collectors are gathered around a computer. They are watching an AsapSCIENCE YouTube video with professional-sounding titles, engrossed in the content, taking notes and engaging in thoughtful discussion. The bill collectors are completely immersed in the fascinating science topics being presented. In the background, the phone lines and desks are noticeably clear since they've put their work aside to dive deep into the realm of science and learning.
*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.
I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how a decrease in How professional-sounding AsapSCIENCE YouTube video titles are caused The number of bill collectors in Arkansas to decrease.
AI academic paper
The AsapSCIENCE Arkansas Analysis: Assessing Amusing Associations The Journal of Lighthearted Science Jan 2024 Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real! |
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between How professional-sounding AsapSCIENCE YouTube video titles are and The number of bill collectors in Arkansas. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.
Make the title an alliteration.
Your research team used data from AI analysis of YouTube video titles and Bureau of Larbor Statistics to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9676416 and p < 0.01 for 2012 to 2022.
Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)
[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit
[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit
ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
The AsapSCIENCE Arkansas Analysis: Assessing Amusing Associations
[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper explores the comedic correlation between the professional-sounding AsapSCIENCE YouTube video titles and the presence of bill collectors in Arkansas. Utilizing data from AI analysis of YouTube video titles and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, our research team meticulously scrutinized the connection between these seemingly incongruous elements. The findings revealed a strikingly high correlation coefficient of 0.9676416 with p < 0.01 for the years 2012 to 2022, prompting a closer examination of the underlying dynamics. This study offers a lighthearted yet insightful analysis that amalgamates humor and empirical rigor in an effort to elucidate the unanticipated relationship between the entertaining and the economic.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between How professional-sounding AsapSCIENCE YouTube video titles are and The number of bill collectors in Arkansas. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.
Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The AsapSCIENCE Arkansas Analysis: Assessing Amusing Associations
[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper explores the comedic correlation between the professional-sounding AsapSCIENCE YouTube video titles and the presence of bill collectors in Arkansas. Utilizing data from AI analysis of YouTube video titles and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, our research team meticulously scrutinized the connection between these seemingly incongruous elements. The findings revealed a strikingly high correlation coefficient of 0.9676416 with p < 0.01 for the years 2012 to 2022, prompting a closer examination of the underlying dynamics. This study offers a lighthearted yet insightful analysis that amalgamates humor and empirical rigor in an effort to elucidate the unanticipated relationship between the entertaining and the economic.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
In the realm of academic inquiry, it is often the case that the most unusual pairings yield the most fascinating results. In this vein, our research delves into the unexpected interplay between the erudite allure of AsapSCIENCE YouTube video titles and the rather more prosaic presence of bill collectors in the state of Arkansas. Pitting the whimsically informative against the mundanely financial, our investigation teases out an intriguing connection that may prompt the uninitiated to exclaim, "What in tarnation?"
While one might anticipate that the sophisticated allure of science-related video titles would not have a direct impact on the economic landscape of any particular state, our findings suggest otherwise. Poring over a decade's worth of AsapSCIENCE video titles and Bureau of Labor Statistics data, our team uncovered a correlation that left us equal parts amused and bemused. Not only did the correlation coefficient between these seemingly disparate variables soar to remarkable heights, but the statistical significance was as unmistakable as a Razorback on a pig farm.
Indeed, as we shall reveal in subsequent sections, the robust correlation coefficient of 0.9676416 with a p-value of less than 0.01 for the years 2012 to 2022 raises eyebrows as effectively as a bawdy joke at a Baptist potluck. Thus, this paper aims not only to present our findings but also to ignite a mirthful discussion regarding the myriad unexpected connections that underlie the tapestry of modern life.
In the pages that follow, we will endeavor to dissect the intricate relationship between the cerebral charm of AsapSCIENCE YouTube video titles and the practical presence of bill collectors in the heartland of the United States. Through our analysis, we hope to bring a touch of levity to the typically staid discourse of academic research, infusing this examination with a dash of humor and whimsy. As we embark on this scholarly expedition, let us heed the words of the illustrious Mark Twain: "The secret source of humor is not joy but sorrow; there is no humor in heaven." With this wry reminder in mind, let us journey forth into the delightful depths of the AsapSCIENCE Arkansas Analysis, where inquiry meets amusement in an unexpected fusion of the empirical and the entertaining.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between How professional-sounding AsapSCIENCE YouTube video titles are and The number of bill collectors in Arkansas. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.
Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.
Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.
Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then name a few real TV shows that sound like they might be relevant to the topic that you watched as research.
Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The AsapSCIENCE Arkansas Analysis: Assessing Amusing Associations
[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper explores the comedic correlation between the professional-sounding AsapSCIENCE YouTube video titles and the presence of bill collectors in Arkansas. Utilizing data from AI analysis of YouTube video titles and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, our research team meticulously scrutinized the connection between these seemingly incongruous elements. The findings revealed a strikingly high correlation coefficient of 0.9676416 with p < 0.01 for the years 2012 to 2022, prompting a closer examination of the underlying dynamics. This study offers a lighthearted yet insightful analysis that amalgamates humor and empirical rigor in an effort to elucidate the unanticipated relationship between the entertaining and the economic.
-------
And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
In the realm of academic inquiry, it is often the case that the most unusual pairings yield the most fascinating results. In this vein, our research delves into the unexpected interplay between the erudite allure of AsapSCIENCE YouTube video titles and the rather more prosaic presence of bill collectors in the state of Arkansas. Pitting the whimsically informative against the mundanely financial, our investigation teases out an intriguing connection that may prompt the uninitiated to exclaim, "What in tarnation?"
While one might anticipate that the sophisticated allure of science-related video titles would not have a direct impact on the economic landscape of any particular state, our findings suggest otherwise. Poring over a decade's worth of AsapSCIENCE video titles and Bureau of Labor Statistics data, our team uncovered a correlation that left us equal parts amused and bemused. Not only did the correlation coefficient between these seemingly disparate variables soar to remarkable heights, but the statistical significance was as unmistakable as a Razorback on a pig farm.
Indeed, as we shall reveal in subsequent sections, the robust correlation coefficient of 0.9676416 with a p-value of less than 0.01 for the years 2012 to 2022 raises eyebrows as effectively as a bawdy joke at a Baptist potluck. Thus, this paper aims not only to present our findings but also to ignite a mirthful discussion regarding the myriad unexpected connections that underlie the tapestry of modern life.
In the pages that follow, we will endeavor to dissect the intricate relationship between the cerebral charm of AsapSCIENCE YouTube video titles and the practical presence of bill collectors in the heartland of the United States. Through our analysis, we hope to bring a touch of levity to the typically staid discourse of academic research, infusing this examination with a dash of humor and whimsy. As we embark on this scholarly expedition, let us heed the words of the illustrious Mark Twain: "The secret source of humor is not joy but sorrow; there is no humor in heaven." With this wry reminder in mind, let us journey forth into the delightful depths of the AsapSCIENCE Arkansas Analysis, where inquiry meets amusement in an unexpected fusion of the empirical and the entertaining.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
In "The Impact of YouTube Culture on Socio-Economic Trends," Smith et al. explore the influence of digital media on various societal indicators. While their focus is primarily on broader cultural shifts, they touch upon the potential connection between online content consumption and economic behavior, providing an initial point of departure for our investigation. Similarly, Doe's "The Power of Language in Shaping Economic Realities" delves into the subtle ways in which linguistic cues can impact financial phenomena, offering theoretical insights that inform our exploration of the language employed in AsapSCIENCE video titles.
Jones' study, "The Aesthetics of Academic Discourse: A Semiotic Analysis," provides a theoretical framework for understanding the interplay between erudition and allure that underpins our inquiry. These foundational works shed light on the complexities of cultural symbols and linguistic nuances, serving as intellectual guides as we navigate the eccentric territory of AsapSCIENCE video titles and bill collectors.
Turning to non-fiction literature, "Freakonomics" by Steven D. Levitt and Stephen J. Dubner presents an engaging exploration of unexpected correlations, albeit within different contexts. "Predictably Irrational" by Dan Ariely also offers valuable insights into the irrationality that often underpins human decision-making, a theme pertinent to our investigation. As we wade deeper into the realm of fictional works, the titles "Money: A Suicide Note" by Martin Amis and "Debt: The First 5,000 Years" by David Graeber, though not directly related to our subject matter, nevertheless provide whimsical notions of economic concerns.
Fictional narratives, such as "The Office" and "Breaking Bad," though ostensibly unrelated to our research, offer intriguing portrayals of the workplace and financial pressures, fostering a broader understanding of the societal contexts within which our inquiry is situated. These cultural explorations, while outside the direct scope of academic inquiry, nonetheless infuse our work with a lighthearted appreciation for the idiosyncrasies of economic existence.
In a similar vein, our exposure to television shows during the course of our research, including "Bill Nye the Science Guy" and "Dirty Money," has imbued us with a heightened sense of whimsy and an appreciation for the varied manifestations of financial and scientific themes in popular media.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between How professional-sounding AsapSCIENCE YouTube video titles are and The number of bill collectors in Arkansas. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.
Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from AI analysis of YouTube video titles and Bureau of Larbor Statistics . You used data from 2012 to 2022
Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.
Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The AsapSCIENCE Arkansas Analysis: Assessing Amusing Associations
[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper explores the comedic correlation between the professional-sounding AsapSCIENCE YouTube video titles and the presence of bill collectors in Arkansas. Utilizing data from AI analysis of YouTube video titles and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, our research team meticulously scrutinized the connection between these seemingly incongruous elements. The findings revealed a strikingly high correlation coefficient of 0.9676416 with p < 0.01 for the years 2012 to 2022, prompting a closer examination of the underlying dynamics. This study offers a lighthearted yet insightful analysis that amalgamates humor and empirical rigor in an effort to elucidate the unanticipated relationship between the entertaining and the economic.
[[INTRODUCTION]]
In the realm of academic inquiry, it is often the case that the most unusual pairings yield the most fascinating results. In this vein, our research delves into the unexpected interplay between the erudite allure of AsapSCIENCE YouTube video titles and the rather more prosaic presence of bill collectors in the state of Arkansas. Pitting the whimsically informative against the mundanely financial, our investigation teases out an intriguing connection that may prompt the uninitiated to exclaim, "What in tarnation?"
While one might anticipate that the sophisticated allure of science-related video titles would not have a direct impact on the economic landscape of any particular state, our findings suggest otherwise. Poring over a decade's worth of AsapSCIENCE video titles and Bureau of Labor Statistics data, our team uncovered a correlation that left us equal parts amused and bemused. Not only did the correlation coefficient between these seemingly disparate variables soar to remarkable heights, but the statistical significance was as unmistakable as a Razorback on a pig farm.
Indeed, as we shall reveal in subsequent sections, the robust correlation coefficient of 0.9676416 with a p-value of less than 0.01 for the years 2012 to 2022 raises eyebrows as effectively as a bawdy joke at a Baptist potluck. Thus, this paper aims not only to present our findings but also to ignite a mirthful discussion regarding the myriad unexpected connections that underlie the tapestry of modern life.
In the pages that follow, we will endeavor to dissect the intricate relationship between the cerebral charm of AsapSCIENCE YouTube video titles and the practical presence of bill collectors in the heartland of the United States. Through our analysis, we hope to bring a touch of levity to the typically staid discourse of academic research, infusing this examination with a dash of humor and whimsy. As we embark on this scholarly expedition, let us heed the words of the illustrious Mark Twain: "The secret source of humor is not joy but sorrow; there is no humor in heaven." With this wry reminder in mind, let us journey forth into the delightful depths of the AsapSCIENCE Arkansas Analysis, where inquiry meets amusement in an unexpected fusion of the empirical and the entertaining.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
ChatGPT:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
To launch our investigation into this unlikely nexus of scientific whimsy and financial pragmatism, we embarked on a data-gathering odyssey that would have made even the most intrepid explorer raise an eyebrow in incredulous amazement. We first tapped into the bountiful reservoir of AsapSCIENCE video titles, employing a proprietary AI system to meticulously analyze the linguistic nuances and professional sheen of each intriguing descriptor. From "The Science of Selfies" to "The Surprising Power of Winter Sleep," no title escaped our discerning gaze, allowing us to capture the essence of erudition distilled into captivating clickbait.
Simultaneously, our intrepid team delved into the Bureau of Labor Statistics, wading through the empirical eddies of economic data with the diligence and determination of a prospector panning for gold in the digital creek. We meticulously cataloged the presence and pervasiveness of bill collectors in Arkansas, scrutinizing employment figures with a keen eye that would have made Sherlock Holmes nod in approval.
With the data firmly in our grasp, we employed the formidable tools of statistical analysis to wrangle the numbers and unveil the clandestine relationship between intellectual allure and fiscal absolutes. Through the arcane incantations of correlation coefficients and p-values, we unearthed the astonishing connection that lay dormant beneath the surface, awaiting discovery like a truffle nestled in the fertile soil of empirical inquiry.
Our analysis spanned a decade, from 2012 to 2022, allowing us to capture the undulating rhythms of societal ebbs and flows as they mirrored the interplay of scientific fascination and economic realities. The robustness of our approach mirrored the steadfast determination of a determined explorer charting uncharted territories, seeking to unravel the enigmatic union of wit and wealth that had remained shrouded in mystery until now.
Moreover, our methods incorporated a dash of whimsy and mischief, recognizing that the unconventional nature of our investigation demanded a lighthearted touch. Thus, as we navigated the murky waters of academia and humor, we endeavored to infuse our methods with a wink and a nod, acknowledging the quixotic nature of our quest while upholding the bastions of scholarly rigor.
In the end, our methodology stands as a testament to the convergence of levity and gravitas, a harmonious fusion of the empirical and the entertaining that captures the very essence of our curious undertaking. With our data gathered, our algorithms humming, and our spirits fortified with a rich trove of puns and japes, we set forth on this academic escapade to unravel the paradoxical dance of AsapSCIENCE YouTube titles and bill collectors in Arkansas.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between How professional-sounding AsapSCIENCE YouTube video titles are and The number of bill collectors in Arkansas. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.
Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from AI analysis of YouTube video titles and Bureau of Larbor Statistics .
For the time period 2012 to 2022, you found a correlation 0.9676416, r-squared of 0.9363303, and p < 0.01.
One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.
Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The AsapSCIENCE Arkansas Analysis: Assessing Amusing Associations
[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper explores the comedic correlation between the professional-sounding AsapSCIENCE YouTube video titles and the presence of bill collectors in Arkansas. Utilizing data from AI analysis of YouTube video titles and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, our research team meticulously scrutinized the connection between these seemingly incongruous elements. The findings revealed a strikingly high correlation coefficient of 0.9676416 with p < 0.01 for the years 2012 to 2022, prompting a closer examination of the underlying dynamics. This study offers a lighthearted yet insightful analysis that amalgamates humor and empirical rigor in an effort to elucidate the unanticipated relationship between the entertaining and the economic.
-------
And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
In the realm of academic inquiry, it is often the case that the most unusual pairings yield the most fascinating results. In this vein, our research delves into the unexpected interplay between the erudite allure of AsapSCIENCE YouTube video titles and the rather more prosaic presence of bill collectors in the state of Arkansas. Pitting the whimsically informative against the mundanely financial, our investigation teases out an intriguing connection that may prompt the uninitiated to exclaim, "What in tarnation?"
While one might anticipate that the sophisticated allure of science-related video titles would not have a direct impact on the economic landscape of any particular state, our findings suggest otherwise. Poring over a decade's worth of AsapSCIENCE video titles and Bureau of Labor Statistics data, our team uncovered a correlation that left us equal parts amused and bemused. Not only did the correlation coefficient between these seemingly disparate variables soar to remarkable heights, but the statistical significance was as unmistakable as a Razorback on a pig farm.
Indeed, as we shall reveal in subsequent sections, the robust correlation coefficient of 0.9676416 with a p-value of less than 0.01 for the years 2012 to 2022 raises eyebrows as effectively as a bawdy joke at a Baptist potluck. Thus, this paper aims not only to present our findings but also to ignite a mirthful discussion regarding the myriad unexpected connections that underlie the tapestry of modern life.
In the pages that follow, we will endeavor to dissect the intricate relationship between the cerebral charm of AsapSCIENCE YouTube video titles and the practical presence of bill collectors in the heartland of the United States. Through our analysis, we hope to bring a touch of levity to the typically staid discourse of academic research, infusing this examination with a dash of humor and whimsy. As we embark on this scholarly expedition, let us heed the words of the illustrious Mark Twain: "The secret source of humor is not joy but sorrow; there is no humor in heaven." With this wry reminder in mind, let us journey forth into the delightful depths of the AsapSCIENCE Arkansas Analysis, where inquiry meets amusement in an unexpected fusion of the empirical and the entertaining.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[RESULTS]]
ChatGPT:
[[RESULTS]]
Our analysis of the data unearthed a remarkably robust correlation between the professional-sounding AsapSCIENCE YouTube video titles and the number of bill collectors in Arkansas. The correlation coefficient of 0.9676416 and an r-squared value of 0.9363303 suggest a remarkably strong relationship between these seemingly disparate domains. Furthermore, the p-value of less than 0.01 underscores the significance of this unexpected association, prompting us to delve deeper into the whimsical world of correlational exploration.
The scatterplot in Fig. 1 vividly depicts the positive correlation between these two variables, highlighting the striking alignment of the erudite allure of science-related video titles and the practical presence of bill collectors in the state of Arkansas. The data points closely adhere to a linear pattern, emphasizing the coherence of this surprising relationship.
This intriguing correlation serves as a testament to the interplay between the esoteric and the everyday, reminding us that even the most unexpected pairings can yield thought-provoking insights. The undeniable connection between the entertaining and the economic merits further investigation and invites a lighthearted contemplation of the whimsical forces that underpin our sociocultural landscape.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between How professional-sounding AsapSCIENCE YouTube video titles are and The number of bill collectors in Arkansas. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.
Limit your response to 500 tokens.
Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.
Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.
[[TITLE]]
The AsapSCIENCE Arkansas Analysis: Assessing Amusing Associations
[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper explores the comedic correlation between the professional-sounding AsapSCIENCE YouTube video titles and the presence of bill collectors in Arkansas. Utilizing data from AI analysis of YouTube video titles and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, our research team meticulously scrutinized the connection between these seemingly incongruous elements. The findings revealed a strikingly high correlation coefficient of 0.9676416 with p < 0.01 for the years 2012 to 2022, prompting a closer examination of the underlying dynamics. This study offers a lighthearted yet insightful analysis that amalgamates humor and empirical rigor in an effort to elucidate the unanticipated relationship between the entertaining and the economic.
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
In "The Impact of YouTube Culture on Socio-Economic Trends," Smith et al. explore the influence of digital media on various societal indicators. While their focus is primarily on broader cultural shifts, they touch upon the potential connection between online content consumption and economic behavior, providing an initial point of departure for our investigation. Similarly, Doe's "The Power of Language in Shaping Economic Realities" delves into the subtle ways in which linguistic cues can impact financial phenomena, offering theoretical insights that inform our exploration of the language employed in AsapSCIENCE video titles.
Jones' study, "The Aesthetics of Academic Discourse: A Semiotic Analysis," provides a theoretical framework for understanding the interplay between erudition and allure that underpins our inquiry. These foundational works shed light on the complexities of cultural symbols and linguistic nuances, serving as intellectual guides as we navigate the eccentric territory of AsapSCIENCE video titles and bill collectors.
Turning to non-fiction literature, "Freakonomics" by Steven D. Levitt and Stephen J. Dubner presents an engaging exploration of unexpected correlations, albeit within different contexts. "Predictably Irrational" by Dan Ariely also offers valuable insights into the irrationality that often underpins human decision-making, a theme pertinent to our investigation. As we wade deeper into the realm of fictional works, the titles "Money: A Suicide Note" by Martin Amis and "Debt: The First 5,000 Years" by David Graeber, though not directly related to our subject matter, nevertheless provide whimsical notions of economic concerns.
Fictional narratives, such as "The Office" and "Breaking Bad," though ostensibly unrelated to our research, offer intriguing portrayals of the workplace and financial pressures, fostering a broader understanding of the societal contexts within which our inquiry is situated. These cultural explorations, while outside the direct scope of academic inquiry, nonetheless infuse our work with a lighthearted appreciation for the idiosyncrasies of economic existence.
In a similar vein, our exposure to television shows during the course of our research, including "Bill Nye the Science Guy" and "Dirty Money," has imbued us with a heightened sense of whimsy and an appreciation for the varied manifestations of financial and scientific themes in popular media.
[[RESULTS]]
Our analysis of the data unearthed a remarkably robust correlation between the professional-sounding AsapSCIENCE YouTube video titles and the number of bill collectors in Arkansas. The correlation coefficient of 0.9676416 and an r-squared value of 0.9363303 suggest a remarkably strong relationship between these seemingly disparate domains. Furthermore, the p-value of less than 0.01 underscores the significance of this unexpected association, prompting us to delve deeper into the whimsical world of correlational exploration.
The scatterplot in Fig. 1 vividly depicts the positive correlation between these two variables, highlighting the striking alignment of the erudite allure of science-related video titles and the practical presence of bill collectors in the state of Arkansas. The data points closely adhere to a linear pattern, emphasizing the coherence of this surprising relationship.
This intriguing correlation serves as a testament to the interplay between the esoteric and the everyday, reminding us that even the most unexpected pairings can yield thought-provoking insights. The undeniable connection between the entertaining and the economic merits further investigation and invites a lighthearted contemplation of the whimsical forces that underpin our sociocultural landscape.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[DISCUSSION]]
ChatGPT:
[[DISCUSSION]]
The findings of our research not only confirm but also deepen the existing understanding of the interplay between linguistic cues and economic phenomena. In line with previous literature, our results offer empirical evidence supporting the impact of language employed in media content on societal indicators. Building upon Smith et al.'s exploration of YouTube culture's influence, our study substantiates the notion that linguistic nuances in digital media may interact with economic realities. The striking correlation between the sophisticated AsapSCIENCE video titles and the presence of bill collectors in Arkansas further underscores the unexpected but compelling relationship between online content and socioeconomic dynamics.
Doe's theoretical insights into the power of language in shaping economic realities find resonance in our findings, as the professional-sounding video titles emerged as a significant predictor of the number of bill collectors in the state. The alignment of linguistic allure and financial indicators elucidates the subtle yet impactful ways in which language can reverberate through economic spheres, echoing the underlying message of Doe's work.
Moreover, Jones' theoretical framework on the interplay between erudition and allure provides a lens through which to understand the captivating correlation uncovered in our study. The esoteric appeal of scientific language seems to extend beyond mere entertainment value, wielding a tangible association with economic activities such as bill collection. This observation underscores the multifaceted nature of language and its potential to transcend traditional boundaries, adding a layer of whimsy to our understanding of economic phenomena.
Interestingly, our research has also been enriched by the non-fiction and fictional works mentioned in the literature review. While seemingly tangential to our core inquiry, these cultural explorations inadvertently fostered a lighthearted appreciation for the idiosyncrasies of economic existence, thereby enhancing our approach to this study. In a serendipitous turn of events, the whimsical nature of our subject matter mirrors the unpredictable correlations often revealed in Levitt and Dubner's "Freakonomics" and resonates with the irrationality underscored in Ariely's "Predictably Irrational."
The unexpected alignment between AsapSCIENCE video titles and bill collectors in Arkansas not only highlights the thought-provoking interplay between the entertaining and the economic but also beckons further exploration of the whimsical forces that underpin our societal fabric. This study, therefore, marks a whimsical yet substantive foray into the offbeat world of correlational inquiry, shedding light on the enchanting associations lurking within seemingly unrelated domains.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between How professional-sounding AsapSCIENCE YouTube video titles are and The number of bill collectors in Arkansas. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.
Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.
Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
The AsapSCIENCE Arkansas Analysis: Assessing Amusing Associations
[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper explores the comedic correlation between the professional-sounding AsapSCIENCE YouTube video titles and the presence of bill collectors in Arkansas. Utilizing data from AI analysis of YouTube video titles and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, our research team meticulously scrutinized the connection between these seemingly incongruous elements. The findings revealed a strikingly high correlation coefficient of 0.9676416 with p < 0.01 for the years 2012 to 2022, prompting a closer examination of the underlying dynamics. This study offers a lighthearted yet insightful analysis that amalgamates humor and empirical rigor in an effort to elucidate the unanticipated relationship between the entertaining and the economic.
[[INTRDUCTION]]
In the realm of academic inquiry, it is often the case that the most unusual pairings yield the most fascinating results. In this vein, our research delves into the unexpected interplay between the erudite allure of AsapSCIENCE YouTube video titles and the rather more prosaic presence of bill collectors in the state of Arkansas. Pitting the whimsically informative against the mundanely financial, our investigation teases out an intriguing connection that may prompt the uninitiated to exclaim, "What in tarnation?"
While one might anticipate that the sophisticated allure of science-related video titles would not have a direct impact on the economic landscape of any particular state, our findings suggest otherwise. Poring over a decade's worth of AsapSCIENCE video titles and Bureau of Labor Statistics data, our team uncovered a correlation that left us equal parts amused and bemused. Not only did the correlation coefficient between these seemingly disparate variables soar to remarkable heights, but the statistical significance was as unmistakable as a Razorback on a pig farm.
Indeed, as we shall reveal in subsequent sections, the robust correlation coefficient of 0.9676416 with a p-value of less than 0.01 for the years 2012 to 2022 raises eyebrows as effectively as a bawdy joke at a Baptist potluck. Thus, this paper aims not only to present our findings but also to ignite a mirthful discussion regarding the myriad unexpected connections that underlie the tapestry of modern life.
In the pages that follow, we will endeavor to dissect the intricate relationship between the cerebral charm of AsapSCIENCE YouTube video titles and the practical presence of bill collectors in the heartland of the United States. Through our analysis, we hope to bring a touch of levity to the typically staid discourse of academic research, infusing this examination with a dash of humor and whimsy. As we embark on this scholarly expedition, let us heed the words of the illustrious Mark Twain: "The secret source of humor is not joy but sorrow; there is no humor in heaven." With this wry reminder in mind, let us journey forth into the delightful depths of the AsapSCIENCE Arkansas Analysis, where inquiry meets amusement in an unexpected fusion of the empirical and the entertaining.
[[RESULTS]]
Our analysis of the data unearthed a remarkably robust correlation between the professional-sounding AsapSCIENCE YouTube video titles and the number of bill collectors in Arkansas. The correlation coefficient of 0.9676416 and an r-squared value of 0.9363303 suggest a remarkably strong relationship between these seemingly disparate domains. Furthermore, the p-value of less than 0.01 underscores the significance of this unexpected association, prompting us to delve deeper into the whimsical world of correlational exploration.
The scatterplot in Fig. 1 vividly depicts the positive correlation between these two variables, highlighting the striking alignment of the erudite allure of science-related video titles and the practical presence of bill collectors in the state of Arkansas. The data points closely adhere to a linear pattern, emphasizing the coherence of this surprising relationship.
This intriguing correlation serves as a testament to the interplay between the esoteric and the everyday, reminding us that even the most unexpected pairings can yield thought-provoking insights. The undeniable connection between the entertaining and the economic merits further investigation and invites a lighthearted contemplation of the whimsical forces that underpin our sociocultural landscape.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[CONCLUSION]]
ChatGPT:
[[CONCLUSION]]
In conclusion, the amalgamation of erudite amusement and economic entities has, for lack of a better phrase, paid off. Our investigation into the correlation between the professional-sounding AsapSCIENCE YouTube video titles and the presence of bill collectors in Arkansas has unveiled a correlation coefficient that rivals the harmonious precision of a well-rehearsed punchline. The robust correlation coefficient of 0.9676416 has left us simultaneously tickled and perplexed, much like encountering a physics joke in the midst of an economic exposition. As we reflect on the unexpected alignment of these seemingly incongruous elements, we cannot help but ponder the whimsical ways in which humor and empirical data interlace, akin to a comedic equation elucidating the unanticipated dynamics of modern life.
While our results prompt a chuckle and a raised eyebrow, they also underscore the intertwined nature of seemingly unrelated domains. The scatterplot in Fig. 1, with its linear depiction of the correlation, serves as a visual reminder of the delightful dance between the cerebral allure of science-related titles and the practical presence of bill collectors. We are reminded that, much like the complex workings of a funny bone, the interplay between entertainment and economics can yield unexpected yet intriguing outcomes.
In light of these findings, we assert that no further research is needed in this area—after all, the correlation is as clear as daylight in the Ozarks. With this study, we offer a lighthearted yet insightful analysis that encourages the academic community to appreciate the serendipitous connections that underlie our world. As we bid adieu to the AsapSCIENCE Arkansas Analysis, let us carry forth the spirit of mirthful investigation and encourage the exploration of amusing associations in the vast tapestry of empirical inquiry.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited The AsapSCIENCE Arkansas Analysis: Assessing Amusing Associations. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.
ChatGPT:
The Journal of Lighthearted Science
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited The AsapSCIENCE Arkansas Analysis: Assessing Amusing Associations. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.
ChatGPT:
The Society for Hilarious Hypotheses and Analytical Research
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled The AsapSCIENCE Arkansas Analysis: Assessing Amusing Associations with an abstract of This paper explores the comedic correlation between the professional-sounding AsapSCIENCE YouTube video titles and the presence of bill collectors in Arkansas. Utilizing data from AI analysis of YouTube video titles and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, our research team meticulously scrutinized the connection between these seemingly incongruous elements. The findings revealed a strikingly high correlation coefficient of 0.9676416 with p < 0.01 for the years 2012 to 2022, prompting a closer examination of the underlying dynamics. This study offers a lighthearted yet insightful analysis that amalgamates humor and empirical rigor in an effort to elucidate the unanticipated relationship between the entertaining and the economic.
ChatGPT:
AsapSCIENCE, Arkansas, YouTube video titles, bill collectors, correlation analysis, AI analysis, Bureau of Labor Statistics, correlation coefficient, empirical research, humor and economy, comedic correlation, data analysis, economic associations
*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.
Discover a new correlation
View all correlations
View all research papers
Report an error
Data details
How professional-sounding AsapSCIENCE YouTube video titles areDetailed data title: How professional-sounding AsapSCIENCE YouTube video titles are, as rated by an AI.
Source: AI analysis of YouTube video titles
Additional Info: I asked a large language model, 'On a scale of 1-10, how _______ do you think this YouTube video title is?' for every video.
See what else correlates with How professional-sounding AsapSCIENCE YouTube video titles are
The number of bill collectors in Arkansas
Detailed data title: BLS estimate of bill and account collectors in Arkansas
Source: Bureau of Larbor Statistics
See what else correlates with The number of bill collectors in Arkansas
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.
r2 = 0.9363303 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 93.6% of the change in the one variable (i.e., The number of bill collectors in Arkansas) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., How professional-sounding AsapSCIENCE YouTube video titles are) over the 11 years from 2012 through 2022.
p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 1.1E-6. 0.0000011018186907642973000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.
But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.
Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.97 in 0.00011% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 907,590 random variables You don't actually need 907 thousand variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.
p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.
In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.
Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 10 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 10 because we have two variables measured over a period of 11 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.
[ 0.88, 0.99 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.
This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!
All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.
Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
2012 | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | |
How professional-sounding AsapSCIENCE YouTube video titles are (Score (out of 10)) | 7.4667 | 7.0488 | 6.9231 | 7 | 6.8409 | 6.8125 | 6.5849 | 7.1852 | 7.25 | 6.6316 | 6.2264 |
The number of bill collectors in Arkansas (Laborers) | 2260 | 1920 | 1750 | 1810 | 1680 | 1730 | 1550 | 2260 | 2210 | 1600 | 1190 |
Why this works
- Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
- Lack of causal connection: There is probably
Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied. - Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple
Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is. - Y-axis doesn't start at zero: I truncated the Y-axes of the graph above. I also used a line graph, which makes the visual connection stand out more than it deserves.
Nothing against line graphs. They are great at telling a story when you have linear data! But visually it is deceptive because the only data is at the points on the graph, not the lines on the graph. In between each point, the data could have been doing anything. Like going for a random walk by itself!
Mathematically what I showed is true, but it is intentionally misleading. Below is the same chart but with both Y-axes starting at zero.
Try it yourself
You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.
Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"
Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.
Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.
Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.
Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"
If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:
"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."
# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats
# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):
# Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)
# Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
r_squared = correlation**2
return correlation, r_squared, p_value
# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([7.4667,7.0488,6.9231,7,6.8409,6.8125,6.5849,7.1852,7.25,6.6316,6.2264,])
array_2 = np.array([2260,1920,1750,1810,1680,1730,1550,2260,2210,1600,1190,])
array_1_name = "How professional-sounding AsapSCIENCE YouTube video titles are"
array_2_name = "The number of bill collectors in Arkansas"
# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)
# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)
Reuseable content
You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.
For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."
When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.
Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.
Download images for these variables:
- High resolution line chart
The image linked here is a Scalable Vector Graphic (SVG). It is the highest resolution that is possible to achieve. It scales up beyond the size of the observable universe without pixelating. You do not need to email me asking if I have a higher resolution image. I do not. The physical limitations of our universe prevent me from providing you with an image that is any higher resolution than this one.
If you insert it into a PowerPoint presentation (a tool well-known for managing things that are the scale of the universe), you can right-click > "Ungroup" or "Create Shape" and then edit the lines and text directly. You can also change the colors this way.
Alternatively you can use a tool like Inkscape. - High resolution line chart, optimized for mobile
- Alternative high resolution line chart
- Scatterplot
- Portable line chart (png)
- Portable line chart (png), optimized for mobile
- Line chart for only How professional-sounding AsapSCIENCE YouTube video titles are
- Line chart for only The number of bill collectors in Arkansas
- AI-generated correlation image
- The spurious research paper: The AsapSCIENCE Arkansas Analysis: Assessing Amusing Associations
Thanks for being the explorer we needed!
Correlation ID: 4631 · Black Variable ID: 25846 · Red Variable ID: 5236