about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #4,623 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Montana and the second variable is Popularity of the 'friday friday friday' meme.  The chart goes from 2006 to 2020, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

As more people embraced the Libertarian candidate's platform, they also adopted a 'free to have fun' mindset. This led to a surge in sharing the 'friday friday friday' meme as a rebellious declaration of their love for weekends and individual liberty. The meme became the unofficial anthem of breaking away from the traditional two-party system and embracing a 'live free, meme hard' mentality.

Create a meme inspired by the friday friday friday meme that in some way references Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Montana. Try to emulate the style of the meme - don’t violate the copyright, just make it look and feel like the original meme.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Montana caused Popularity of the 'friday friday friday' meme to increase.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.05)
The Fringe Factor: Friday Friday Friday – A Libertarian Connection?

The Journal of Quirky Political Science

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Montana and Popularity of the 'friday friday friday' meme. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Make the title punny if you can come up with clever pun. If not, just make it sound clever.

Your research team used data from MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse and Google Trends to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9673348 and p < 0.05 for 2006 to 2020.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
The Fringe Factor: Friday Friday Friday – A Libertarian Connection?

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper delves into the intriguing correlation between votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in Montana and the popularity of the 'Friday Friday Friday' meme. While on the surface the two may seem unrelated, our research team used data from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and Google Trends to reveal a striking relationship. With a correlation coefficient of 0.9673348 and p < 0.05 for the years 2006 to 2020, the findings provide compelling evidence for an unexpected link between political preferences and online meme culture. The interplay between the libertarian movement and the catchy repetition of "Friday" opens avenues for understanding voter behavior with a lighthearted twist. In exploring this connection, we may gain insight into the idiosyncrasies of Montana voters and the whims of internet humor. So, let's embark on this journey of statistical intrigue with a libertarian flair, where "Friday" is not just a day of the week, but a potential variable in the political landscape.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Montana and Popularity of the 'friday friday friday' meme. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Fringe Factor: Friday Friday Friday – A Libertarian Connection?

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper delves into the intriguing correlation between votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in Montana and the popularity of the 'Friday Friday Friday' meme. While on the surface the two may seem unrelated, our research team used data from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and Google Trends to reveal a striking relationship. With a correlation coefficient of 0.9673348 and p < 0.05 for the years 2006 to 2020, the findings provide compelling evidence for an unexpected link between political preferences and online meme culture. The interplay between the libertarian movement and the catchy repetition of "Friday" opens avenues for understanding voter behavior with a lighthearted twist. In exploring this connection, we may gain insight into the idiosyncrasies of Montana voters and the whims of internet humor. So, let's embark on this journey of statistical intrigue with a libertarian flair, where "Friday" is not just a day of the week, but a potential variable in the political landscape.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

In the annals of political research, the quest to unearth unusual correlations and unexpected connections is a noble pursuit. It is within this spirit of scholarly adventure that we set out on an investigation into the perplexing nexus between votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in Montana and the curious phenomenon of the 'Friday Friday Friday' meme.

As stewards of academia, we yearn to explore the uncharted territories of statistical significance, where the realms of politics and internet culture intersect in seemingly improbable ways. The intersection of digital tomfoolery and the solemnity of the political arena presents a delightful puzzle, akin to encountering a unicorn in the realm of statistical analyses—a rare and whimsical find indeed.

Our endeavor commenced by harnessing the power of data, drawing upon sources from the venerable MIT Election Data and Science Lab as well as the Harvard Dataverse. With intrepid spirits, we delved into the depths of Google Trends, navigating the fluctuations of online engagement with the 'Friday Friday Friday' meme, echoing the fervor of treasure hunters pursuing a fabled artifact.

Armed with spreadsheets and a plethora of statistical tools, we ventured forth, determined to unravel the enigma that eluded the superficial gaze. And lo and behold, our findings unveiled a correlation coefficient of 0.9673348, evoking a sense of astonishment akin to stumbling upon Bigfoot sipping tea in a statistical forest.

The p-value of less than 0.05 for the years 2006 to 2020 nearly caused our scholarly hearts to skip a beat, signaling a robust statistical relationship that defied conventional logic. It was as if the laws of quantitative inquiry momentarily cast off their stoic demeanor and embraced a light-hearted dance with the whims of fate.

With bated breath and a touch of bewilderment, we set forth on this expedition, aiming to excavate the subtle yet profound connection between political predilections and the unrelenting chant of "Friday." As we navigate the labyrinth of significance testing and covariate analyses, we invite the reader to join us on this whimsical journey, where the hum of statistical models mingles with the playful cadence of internet culture, and where "Friday" becomes more than a temporal marker—it becomes a potential variable in the captivating theatre of elections and memes.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Montana and Popularity of the 'friday friday friday' meme. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then name some movies that you watched that are tangentially related to the topic.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Fringe Factor: Friday Friday Friday – A Libertarian Connection?

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper delves into the intriguing correlation between votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in Montana and the popularity of the 'Friday Friday Friday' meme. While on the surface the two may seem unrelated, our research team used data from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and Google Trends to reveal a striking relationship. With a correlation coefficient of 0.9673348 and p < 0.05 for the years 2006 to 2020, the findings provide compelling evidence for an unexpected link between political preferences and online meme culture. The interplay between the libertarian movement and the catchy repetition of "Friday" opens avenues for understanding voter behavior with a lighthearted twist. In exploring this connection, we may gain insight into the idiosyncrasies of Montana voters and the whims of internet humor. So, let's embark on this journey of statistical intrigue with a libertarian flair, where "Friday" is not just a day of the week, but a potential variable in the political landscape.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
In the annals of political research, the quest to unearth unusual correlations and unexpected connections is a noble pursuit. It is within this spirit of scholarly adventure that we set out on an investigation into the perplexing nexus between votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in Montana and the curious phenomenon of the 'Friday Friday Friday' meme.
As stewards of academia, we yearn to explore the uncharted territories of statistical significance, where the realms of politics and internet culture intersect in seemingly improbable ways. The intersection of digital tomfoolery and the solemnity of the political arena presents a delightful puzzle, akin to encountering a unicorn in the realm of statistical analyses—a rare and whimsical find indeed.
Our endeavor commenced by harnessing the power of data, drawing upon sources from the venerable MIT Election Data and Science Lab as well as the Harvard Dataverse. With intrepid spirits, we delved into the depths of Google Trends, navigating the fluctuations of online engagement with the 'Friday Friday Friday' meme, echoing the fervor of treasure hunters pursuing a fabled artifact.
Armed with spreadsheets and a plethora of statistical tools, we ventured forth, determined to unravel the enigma that eluded the superficial gaze. And lo and behold, our findings unveiled a correlation coefficient of 0.9673348, evoking a sense of astonishment akin to stumbling upon Bigfoot sipping tea in a statistical forest.
The p-value of less than 0.05 for the years 2006 to 2020 nearly caused our scholarly hearts to skip a beat, signaling a robust statistical relationship that defied conventional logic. It was as if the laws of quantitative inquiry momentarily cast off their stoic demeanor and embraced a light-hearted dance with the whims of fate.
With bated breath and a touch of bewilderment, we set forth on this expedition, aiming to excavate the subtle yet profound connection between political predilections and the unrelenting chant of "Friday." As we navigate the labyrinth of significance testing and covariate analyses, we invite the reader to join us on this whimsical journey, where the hum of statistical models mingles with the playful cadence of internet culture, and where "Friday" becomes more than a temporal marker—it becomes a potential variable in the captivating theatre of elections and memes.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

The exploration of quirky and esoteric connections between political behaviors and seemingly unrelated cultural phenomena is a burgeoning area within the realms of social science research. As such, it is imperative to review the existing literature to determine the depth and breadth of scholarly inquiry into these peculiar linkages.

Smith et al. (2017) delved into the complexities of voter behavior, shedding light on the idiosyncratic nature of political preferences. Their study, however, did not touch upon the whimsical allure of internet memes and their potential influence on voting patterns. Similarly, Doe (2015) investigated the electoral landscape, providing valuable insights into the dynamics of third-party voting; yet the interplay between online humour and political leanings remained uncharted within this scholarly domain.

Venturing into the world of media and culture, Jones (2018) explored the evolution of internet memes and their impact on contemporary society, demonstrating the profound influence of digital humor on public discourse. However, the connection to political inclinations in specific geographic regions, such as Montana, was overlooked in his comprehensive analysis.

Expanding our purview beyond disciplinary confines, "The Data Connection: Exploring Unlikely Correlations" by Miller (2019) presents a thought-provoking examination of unconventional statistical relationships. While not directly addressing the peculiar nexus under scrutiny in our present inquiry, Miller's work lays the groundwork for embracing statistical anomalies with a spirit of open-minded curiosity.

Turning to the realm of fiction, "The Meme Manifesto" by A. Satirist (2016) and "Electioneering in the Age of Lolcats" by P. Humorist (2014) offer satirical narratives that tangentially brush against the fringes of our exploration, infusing levity into the serious arenas of politics and online culture with a mischievous twinkle in their prose.

In the domain of cinema, the films "The Matrix" and "Groundhog Day" present narratives that, while seemingly unrelated, evoke themes of individual agency, unpredictability, and the unrelenting passage of time—elements that may resonate with the nuanced interactions between online memes and political proclivities. While not directly addressing our subject matter, these cinematic works offer a whimsical lens through which to contemplate the unpredictable associations we aim to unravel.

As we navigate this veritable tapestry of literature and cultural narratives, we are reminded that the quest for knowledge often takes unexpected turns, leading us to traverse the convoluted paths where statistical significance meets the beguiling allure of internet whimsy.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Montana and Popularity of the 'friday friday friday' meme. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse and Google Trends . You used data from 2006 to 2020

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Fringe Factor: Friday Friday Friday – A Libertarian Connection?

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper delves into the intriguing correlation between votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in Montana and the popularity of the 'Friday Friday Friday' meme. While on the surface the two may seem unrelated, our research team used data from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and Google Trends to reveal a striking relationship. With a correlation coefficient of 0.9673348 and p < 0.05 for the years 2006 to 2020, the findings provide compelling evidence for an unexpected link between political preferences and online meme culture. The interplay between the libertarian movement and the catchy repetition of "Friday" opens avenues for understanding voter behavior with a lighthearted twist. In exploring this connection, we may gain insight into the idiosyncrasies of Montana voters and the whims of internet humor. So, let's embark on this journey of statistical intrigue with a libertarian flair, where "Friday" is not just a day of the week, but a potential variable in the political landscape.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
In the annals of political research, the quest to unearth unusual correlations and unexpected connections is a noble pursuit. It is within this spirit of scholarly adventure that we set out on an investigation into the perplexing nexus between votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in Montana and the curious phenomenon of the 'Friday Friday Friday' meme.
As stewards of academia, we yearn to explore the uncharted territories of statistical significance, where the realms of politics and internet culture intersect in seemingly improbable ways. The intersection of digital tomfoolery and the solemnity of the political arena presents a delightful puzzle, akin to encountering a unicorn in the realm of statistical analyses—a rare and whimsical find indeed.
Our endeavor commenced by harnessing the power of data, drawing upon sources from the venerable MIT Election Data and Science Lab as well as the Harvard Dataverse. With intrepid spirits, we delved into the depths of Google Trends, navigating the fluctuations of online engagement with the 'Friday Friday Friday' meme, echoing the fervor of treasure hunters pursuing a fabled artifact.
Armed with spreadsheets and a plethora of statistical tools, we ventured forth, determined to unravel the enigma that eluded the superficial gaze. And lo and behold, our findings unveiled a correlation coefficient of 0.9673348, evoking a sense of astonishment akin to stumbling upon Bigfoot sipping tea in a statistical forest.
The p-value of less than 0.05 for the years 2006 to 2020 nearly caused our scholarly hearts to skip a beat, signaling a robust statistical relationship that defied conventional logic. It was as if the laws of quantitative inquiry momentarily cast off their stoic demeanor and embraced a light-hearted dance with the whims of fate.
With bated breath and a touch of bewilderment, we set forth on this expedition, aiming to excavate the subtle yet profound connection between political predilections and the unrelenting chant of "Friday." As we navigate the labyrinth of significance testing and covariate analyses, we invite the reader to join us on this whimsical journey, where the hum of statistical models mingles with the playful cadence of internet culture, and where "Friday" becomes more than a temporal marker—it becomes a potential variable in the captivating theatre of elections and memes.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To demystify the enigmatic link between votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in Montana and the viral sensation known as 'Friday Friday Friday,' our research ventured into the digital abyss armed with an arsenal of data-mining techniques and an unyielding sense of scientific curiosity.

Data Collection:
Our esteemed team gathered a trove of political and internet culture data from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and Google Trends. We specifically targeted the years 2006 to 2020, encapsulating the chronicles of political upheaval and online fads during this period. As intrepid digital explorers, we navigated the complexity of databases with the finesse of treasure hunters seeking buried statistical treasures, perpetually mindful of the potential for serendipitous discoveries lurking in the digital hinterlands.

Libertarian Votes in Montana:
To quantify the political landscape, we tabulated the votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in Montana with meticulous precision. With the diligence of a skilled sommelier, we scrutinized the vintage of electoral data, discerning the nuances of libertarian support in the rugged terrain of Montana.

'Friday Friday Friday' Meme Popularity:
The ebbs and flows of internet culture were captured through the lens of Google Trends, illuminating the ascent and descent of the 'Friday Friday Friday' meme. As meme historians, we sifted through the digital ether, tracing the cadence of online engagement with this resounding triplet, akin to astronomers charting the cyclical dance of celestial bodies.

Statistical Analysis:
The crescendo of our research crescendoed with the application of robust statistical methods. With the elegance of an orchestral conductor, we conducted correlation analyses to reveal the intricate dance between libertarian votes and 'Friday Friday Friday' meme popularity. A resplendent correlation coefficient of 0.9673348 emerged from the statistical cauldron, captivating our senses with its brazen numerical allure.

Significance Testing:
Embracing the revered tradition of significance testing, we beseeched the p-value for its verdict. It stood before us, a symbolic gatekeeper to the domain of statistical truth, offering a threshold of less than 0.05 for the years 2006 to 2020. This signaled a robust and venerable relationship, stirring a sense of wonder akin to encountering a statistical unicorn frolicking amidst the data fields.

Covariate Analyses:
In a whimsical waltz of statistical exploration, covariates were carefully considered to unveil potential confounding factors in this peculiar confluence of politics and memes. With the meticulousness of gardeners tending to a beloved topiary, we pruned the statistical shrubbery, revealing the intricate interplay of variables in this captivating tale of libertarianism and digital jest.

As the dust settles on our data odyssey, our findings illuminate a striking association that beckons us to peer beneath the surface of political discourse and internet frivolity. With a nod to the quirks of empirical inquiry and the vivacity of online pop culture, we invite the reader to join us as we unravel the tapestry of unlikely connections, where political pursuits intersect with Friday's resounding refrain.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Montana and Popularity of the 'friday friday friday' meme. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse and Google Trends .

For the time period 2006 to 2020, you found a correlation 0.9673348, r-squared of 0.9357365, and p < 0.05.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Fringe Factor: Friday Friday Friday – A Libertarian Connection?

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper delves into the intriguing correlation between votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in Montana and the popularity of the 'Friday Friday Friday' meme. While on the surface the two may seem unrelated, our research team used data from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and Google Trends to reveal a striking relationship. With a correlation coefficient of 0.9673348 and p < 0.05 for the years 2006 to 2020, the findings provide compelling evidence for an unexpected link between political preferences and online meme culture. The interplay between the libertarian movement and the catchy repetition of "Friday" opens avenues for understanding voter behavior with a lighthearted twist. In exploring this connection, we may gain insight into the idiosyncrasies of Montana voters and the whims of internet humor. So, let's embark on this journey of statistical intrigue with a libertarian flair, where "Friday" is not just a day of the week, but a potential variable in the political landscape.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
In the annals of political research, the quest to unearth unusual correlations and unexpected connections is a noble pursuit. It is within this spirit of scholarly adventure that we set out on an investigation into the perplexing nexus between votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in Montana and the curious phenomenon of the 'Friday Friday Friday' meme.
As stewards of academia, we yearn to explore the uncharted territories of statistical significance, where the realms of politics and internet culture intersect in seemingly improbable ways. The intersection of digital tomfoolery and the solemnity of the political arena presents a delightful puzzle, akin to encountering a unicorn in the realm of statistical analyses—a rare and whimsical find indeed.
Our endeavor commenced by harnessing the power of data, drawing upon sources from the venerable MIT Election Data and Science Lab as well as the Harvard Dataverse. With intrepid spirits, we delved into the depths of Google Trends, navigating the fluctuations of online engagement with the 'Friday Friday Friday' meme, echoing the fervor of treasure hunters pursuing a fabled artifact.
Armed with spreadsheets and a plethora of statistical tools, we ventured forth, determined to unravel the enigma that eluded the superficial gaze. And lo and behold, our findings unveiled a correlation coefficient of 0.9673348, evoking a sense of astonishment akin to stumbling upon Bigfoot sipping tea in a statistical forest.
The p-value of less than 0.05 for the years 2006 to 2020 nearly caused our scholarly hearts to skip a beat, signaling a robust statistical relationship that defied conventional logic. It was as if the laws of quantitative inquiry momentarily cast off their stoic demeanor and embraced a light-hearted dance with the whims of fate.
With bated breath and a touch of bewilderment, we set forth on this expedition, aiming to excavate the subtle yet profound connection between political predilections and the unrelenting chant of "Friday." As we navigate the labyrinth of significance testing and covariate analyses, we invite the reader to join us on this whimsical journey, where the hum of statistical models mingles with the playful cadence of internet culture, and where "Friday" becomes more than a temporal marker—it becomes a potential variable in the captivating theatre of elections and memes.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The results of our investigation unveiled a remarkably strong correlation between votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in Montana and the popularity of the 'Friday Friday Friday' meme. Our analysis, spanning the years 2006 to 2020, produced a correlation coefficient of 0.9673348, reflecting a robust relationship that is as stunning as finding a statistical unicorn.

The scatterplot (Fig. 1) visually depicts the clear and compelling association between the two variables, akin to witnessing a harmonious dance between a political enthusiast and an irrepressible internet meme. One might say they are a match made in data heaven, embracing each other with a statistical fervor reminiscent of an unexpected romance in the world of academia.

Furthermore, the r-squared value of 0.9357365 signifies that a whopping 93.57% of the variation in the popularity of the 'Friday Friday Friday' meme can be explained by the votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in Montana. This level of explanatory power echoes the grandeur of a perfectly-timed punchline in a room full of data enthusiasts; it's as if the meme and the political preference are engaged in an intricate ballet, twirling together in the waltz of statistical significance.

The p-value of less than 0.05 further accentuates the strength of this connection, underscoring the statistical significance of the findings. It's as if the universe of data alignment has conspired to unravel a quirky yet fascinating relationship between the arcane nuances of political allegiance and the infectious allure of a meme that heralds the end of the workweek.

In summary, our results provide compelling evidence for an unexpected correlation between votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in Montana and the prevalence of the 'Friday Friday Friday' meme. This discovery uncovers a delightful coupling of seemingly incongruent facets of society, revealing a statistical harmony that brings a whimsical twinkle to the serious business of political analysis. So, in the spirit of scholarly revelry, let us raise a toast to this unexpected rendezvous between political inclinations and internet mirth, where statistical inquiry and subtle humor converge in a dance of correlation and causation.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Montana and Popularity of the 'friday friday friday' meme. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
The Fringe Factor: Friday Friday Friday – A Libertarian Connection?

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper delves into the intriguing correlation between votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in Montana and the popularity of the 'Friday Friday Friday' meme. While on the surface the two may seem unrelated, our research team used data from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and Google Trends to reveal a striking relationship. With a correlation coefficient of 0.9673348 and p < 0.05 for the years 2006 to 2020, the findings provide compelling evidence for an unexpected link between political preferences and online meme culture. The interplay between the libertarian movement and the catchy repetition of "Friday" opens avenues for understanding voter behavior with a lighthearted twist. In exploring this connection, we may gain insight into the idiosyncrasies of Montana voters and the whims of internet humor. So, let's embark on this journey of statistical intrigue with a libertarian flair, where "Friday" is not just a day of the week, but a potential variable in the political landscape.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The exploration of quirky and esoteric connections between political behaviors and seemingly unrelated cultural phenomena is a burgeoning area within the realms of social science research. As such, it is imperative to review the existing literature to determine the depth and breadth of scholarly inquiry into these peculiar linkages.
Smith et al. (2017) delved into the complexities of voter behavior, shedding light on the idiosyncratic nature of political preferences. Their study, however, did not touch upon the whimsical allure of internet memes and their potential influence on voting patterns. Similarly, Doe (2015) investigated the electoral landscape, providing valuable insights into the dynamics of third-party voting; yet the interplay between online humour and political leanings remained uncharted within this scholarly domain.
Venturing into the world of media and culture, Jones (2018) explored the evolution of internet memes and their impact on contemporary society, demonstrating the profound influence of digital humor on public discourse. However, the connection to political inclinations in specific geographic regions, such as Montana, was overlooked in his comprehensive analysis.
Expanding our purview beyond disciplinary confines, "The Data Connection: Exploring Unlikely Correlations" by Miller (2019) presents a thought-provoking examination of unconventional statistical relationships. While not directly addressing the peculiar nexus under scrutiny in our present inquiry, Miller's work lays the groundwork for embracing statistical anomalies with a spirit of open-minded curiosity.
Turning to the realm of fiction, "The Meme Manifesto" by A. Satirist (2016) and "Electioneering in the Age of Lolcats" by P. Humorist (2014) offer satirical narratives that tangentially brush against the fringes of our exploration, infusing levity into the serious arenas of politics and online culture with a mischievous twinkle in their prose.
In the domain of cinema, the films "The Matrix" and "Groundhog Day" present narratives that, while seemingly unrelated, evoke themes of individual agency, unpredictability, and the unrelenting passage of time—elements that may resonate with the nuanced interactions between online memes and political proclivities. While not directly addressing our subject matter, these cinematic works offer a whimsical lens through which to contemplate the unpredictable associations we aim to unravel.
As we navigate this veritable tapestry of literature and cultural narratives, we are reminded that the quest for knowledge often takes unexpected turns, leading us to traverse the convoluted paths where statistical significance meets the beguiling allure of internet whimsy.

[[RESULTS]]
The results of our investigation unveiled a remarkably strong correlation between votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in Montana and the popularity of the 'Friday Friday Friday' meme. Our analysis, spanning the years 2006 to 2020, produced a correlation coefficient of 0.9673348, reflecting a robust relationship that is as stunning as finding a statistical unicorn.
The scatterplot (Fig. 1) visually depicts the clear and compelling association between the two variables, akin to witnessing a harmonious dance between a political enthusiast and an irrepressible internet meme. One might say they are a match made in data heaven, embracing each other with a statistical fervor reminiscent of an unexpected romance in the world of academia.
Furthermore, the r-squared value of 0.9357365 signifies that a whopping 93.57% of the variation in the popularity of the 'Friday Friday Friday' meme can be explained by the votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in Montana. This level of explanatory power echoes the grandeur of a perfectly-timed punchline in a room full of data enthusiasts; it's as if the meme and the political preference are engaged in an intricate ballet, twirling together in the waltz of statistical significance.
The p-value of less than 0.05 further accentuates the strength of this connection, underscoring the statistical significance of the findings. It's as if the universe of data alignment has conspired to unravel a quirky yet fascinating relationship between the arcane nuances of political allegiance and the infectious allure of a meme that heralds the end of the workweek.
In summary, our results provide compelling evidence for an unexpected correlation between votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in Montana and the prevalence of the 'Friday Friday Friday' meme. This discovery uncovers a delightful coupling of seemingly incongruent facets of society, revealing a statistical harmony that brings a whimsical twinkle to the serious business of political analysis. So, in the spirit of scholarly revelry, let us raise a toast to this unexpected rendezvous between political inclinations and internet mirth, where statistical inquiry and subtle humor converge in a dance of correlation and causation.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The profound interplay between the votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in Montana and the exuberant resonance of the 'Friday Friday Friday' meme has unfolded like a captivating saga of statistical serendipity. Our findings not only echo the prior scholarly musings on the nuanced dance of voter behavior and whimsical cultural artifacts but also confidently steer the ship of academia into uncharted waters where data-driven enlightenment meets the infectious charm of internet irreverence.

Drawing from the scholarly tapestry revealed in our literature review, we recall the whimsical allure of "The Meme Manifesto" and "Electioneering in the Age of Lolcats." These satirical narratives, though lighthearted in their presentation, subtly beckon us to the underlying gravity of our current inquiry. In a similar vein, the cinematic parables of "The Matrix" and "Groundhog Day," while not overtly addressing our subject matter, impart a nuanced perspective on the unpredictability and interconnectedness of cultural and political phenomena, resonating with the unexpected correlation we have unveiled.

In substantiating the prior research, our results, with a correlation coefficient of 0.9673348 and p < 0.05, lend support to the idiosyncratic nature of voter behavior highlighted by Smith et al. (2017). It's as if the statistical eddies have conspired to lay bare the intricate dance of political predispositions and online amusement, akin to discovering a well-crafted punchline in the cradle of statistical significance.

Moreover, our findings reflect the unmistakable influence of the libertarian movement within the cyber landscape, mirroring the uncharted vistas of Doe's (2015) inquiry into the dynamics of third-party voting. The statistical ballet of our results showcases the harmonious embrace between individual political leanings and the infectious appeal of a meme that heralds the impending weekend, akin to witnessing the fusion of classical artistry and internet whimsy in a digital masterpiece.

In navigating this domain of empirical revelry and offbeat correlation, we are reminded of the enchanting call to embrace statistical anomalies with a spirit of open-minded curiosity, as expounded by Miller (2019). Indeed, our late-night tryst with data has revealed an unexpectedly delightful rendezvous between the arcane inclinations of Montana voters and the immersive charm of a meme that beckons the communal celebration of the end of the workweek.

As we stand on the precipice of this deeply surprising linkage, we invite fellow scholars to join us in this jovial exploration where statistical inquiry seamlessly converges with the exuberant verve of internet culture, reminding us that indeed, in the words of P. Humorist, "Lolcats and Liberty might just be closer bedfellows than we ever imagined."


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Montana and Popularity of the 'friday friday friday' meme. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
The Fringe Factor: Friday Friday Friday – A Libertarian Connection?

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper delves into the intriguing correlation between votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in Montana and the popularity of the 'Friday Friday Friday' meme. While on the surface the two may seem unrelated, our research team used data from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and Google Trends to reveal a striking relationship. With a correlation coefficient of 0.9673348 and p < 0.05 for the years 2006 to 2020, the findings provide compelling evidence for an unexpected link between political preferences and online meme culture. The interplay between the libertarian movement and the catchy repetition of "Friday" opens avenues for understanding voter behavior with a lighthearted twist. In exploring this connection, we may gain insight into the idiosyncrasies of Montana voters and the whims of internet humor. So, let's embark on this journey of statistical intrigue with a libertarian flair, where "Friday" is not just a day of the week, but a potential variable in the political landscape.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
In the annals of political research, the quest to unearth unusual correlations and unexpected connections is a noble pursuit. It is within this spirit of scholarly adventure that we set out on an investigation into the perplexing nexus between votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in Montana and the curious phenomenon of the 'Friday Friday Friday' meme.
As stewards of academia, we yearn to explore the uncharted territories of statistical significance, where the realms of politics and internet culture intersect in seemingly improbable ways. The intersection of digital tomfoolery and the solemnity of the political arena presents a delightful puzzle, akin to encountering a unicorn in the realm of statistical analyses—a rare and whimsical find indeed.
Our endeavor commenced by harnessing the power of data, drawing upon sources from the venerable MIT Election Data and Science Lab as well as the Harvard Dataverse. With intrepid spirits, we delved into the depths of Google Trends, navigating the fluctuations of online engagement with the 'Friday Friday Friday' meme, echoing the fervor of treasure hunters pursuing a fabled artifact.
Armed with spreadsheets and a plethora of statistical tools, we ventured forth, determined to unravel the enigma that eluded the superficial gaze. And lo and behold, our findings unveiled a correlation coefficient of 0.9673348, evoking a sense of astonishment akin to stumbling upon Bigfoot sipping tea in a statistical forest.
The p-value of less than 0.05 for the years 2006 to 2020 nearly caused our scholarly hearts to skip a beat, signaling a robust statistical relationship that defied conventional logic. It was as if the laws of quantitative inquiry momentarily cast off their stoic demeanor and embraced a light-hearted dance with the whims of fate.
With bated breath and a touch of bewilderment, we set forth on this expedition, aiming to excavate the subtle yet profound connection between political predilections and the unrelenting chant of "Friday." As we navigate the labyrinth of significance testing and covariate analyses, we invite the reader to join us on this whimsical journey, where the hum of statistical models mingles with the playful cadence of internet culture, and where "Friday" becomes more than a temporal marker—it becomes a potential variable in the captivating theatre of elections and memes.

[[RESULTS]]
The results of our investigation unveiled a remarkably strong correlation between votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in Montana and the popularity of the 'Friday Friday Friday' meme. Our analysis, spanning the years 2006 to 2020, produced a correlation coefficient of 0.9673348, reflecting a robust relationship that is as stunning as finding a statistical unicorn.
The scatterplot (Fig. 1) visually depicts the clear and compelling association between the two variables, akin to witnessing a harmonious dance between a political enthusiast and an irrepressible internet meme. One might say they are a match made in data heaven, embracing each other with a statistical fervor reminiscent of an unexpected romance in the world of academia.
Furthermore, the r-squared value of 0.9357365 signifies that a whopping 93.57% of the variation in the popularity of the 'Friday Friday Friday' meme can be explained by the votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in Montana. This level of explanatory power echoes the grandeur of a perfectly-timed punchline in a room full of data enthusiasts; it's as if the meme and the political preference are engaged in an intricate ballet, twirling together in the waltz of statistical significance.
The p-value of less than 0.05 further accentuates the strength of this connection, underscoring the statistical significance of the findings. It's as if the universe of data alignment has conspired to unravel a quirky yet fascinating relationship between the arcane nuances of political allegiance and the infectious allure of a meme that heralds the end of the workweek.
In summary, our results provide compelling evidence for an unexpected correlation between votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in Montana and the prevalence of the 'Friday Friday Friday' meme. This discovery uncovers a delightful coupling of seemingly incongruent facets of society, revealing a statistical harmony that brings a whimsical twinkle to the serious business of political analysis. So, in the spirit of scholarly revelry, let us raise a toast to this unexpected rendezvous between political inclinations and internet mirth, where statistical inquiry and subtle humor converge in a dance of correlation and causation.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our research has illuminated an unexpected and delightfully entertaining connection between the votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in Montana and the appeal of the 'Friday Friday Friday' meme. The robust correlation coefficient of 0.9673348 and the r-squared value of 0.9357365 highlight a statistical union akin to the melding of peanut butter and jelly – a seemingly odd pairing that, against all odds, creates a harmonious blend. It's as if statistical analysis has a whimsical sense of humor, offering us a glimpse of the unexpected laughter that can be found in the world of data.

The significance of this study extends beyond the mere intersection of political preference and internet whimsy; it opens the door to a new frontier of quantitative inquiry, where the unpredictable dance of statistical relationships provokes both scholarly contemplation and subtle amusement. Much like a comedic performance at a scientific conference, our findings invite a lighthearted appreciation for the serendipitous caprice of correlational research.

At the heart of this endeavor lies the recognition that statistical exploration need not always be solemn and staid; it can embrace the playful interplay of variables and unexpected associations, much like an impromptu game of statistical charades. As we bid adieu to this investigation, we do so with a sense of scholarly satisfaction and a gleam of bemusement, recognizing that our foray into the world of 'Friday Friday Friday' has enriched the tapestry of statistical inquiry with a dash of irrepressible frivolity.

In the spirit of scientific merriment, we declare that no further research is warranted in this peculiar yet endearing intersection of political allegiance and meme culture. Let this finding stand as a testament to the unforeseen harmony that statistical analysis can uncover, weaving together the threads of electoral dynamics and internet amusement in a symphony of correlation. As we set our sights on the next scholarly escapade, we do so with a chuckle and a nod to the enigmatic rhythm of statistical oddities.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited The Fringe Factor: Friday Friday Friday – A Libertarian Connection?. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Quirky Political Science


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited The Fringe Factor: Friday Friday Friday – A Libertarian Connection?. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Society for Quirky Policy Studies


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled The Fringe Factor: Friday Friday Friday – A Libertarian Connection? with an abstract of This paper delves into the intriguing correlation between votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in Montana and the popularity of the 'Friday Friday Friday' meme. While on the surface the two may seem unrelated, our research team used data from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and Google Trends to reveal a striking relationship. With a correlation coefficient of 0.9673348 and p < 0.05 for the years 2006 to 2020, the findings provide compelling evidence for an unexpected link between political preferences and online meme culture. The interplay between the libertarian movement and the catchy repetition of "Friday" opens avenues for understanding voter behavior with a lighthearted twist. In exploring this connection, we may gain insight into the idiosyncrasies of Montana voters and the whims of internet humor. So, let's embark on this journey of statistical intrigue with a libertarian flair, where "Friday" is not just a day of the week, but a potential variable in the political landscape.

ChatGPT:

"Libertarian presidential candidate Montana votes correlation," "Friday Friday Friday meme popularity," "MIT Election Data and Science Lab analysis," "Harvard Dataverse research," "Google Trends data," "Libertarian movement political preferences," "online meme culture impact on voter behavior," "Montana voter behavior," "internet humor and voter behavior," "Libertarian flair statistical intrigue."

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Montana
Detailed data title: Percentage of all votes cast for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Montana
Source: MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse
See what else correlates with Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Montana

Popularity of the 'friday friday friday' meme
Detailed data title: Relative volume of Google searches for 'friday friday friday' (without quotes, in the United States)
Source: Google Trends
Additional Info: Relative search volume is a unique Google thing; the shape of the chart is accurate but the actual numbers are meaningless.

See what else correlates with Popularity of the 'friday friday friday' meme

Correlation r = 0.9673348 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.9357365 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 93.6% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Popularity of the 'friday friday friday' meme) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Montana) over the 4 years from 2006 through 2020.

p < 0.05, which statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 0.033. 0.0326652495755136440000000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.97 in 3.3% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 31 random variables Which I absolutely did.
with the same 3 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 3 because we have two variables measured over a period of 4 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.09, 1 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
2008201220162020
Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Montana (Percentage of votes)0.2764692.926365.669472.52653
Popularity of the 'friday friday friday' meme (Relative popularity)6.416679.8333311.66679.66667




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Very low n: There are not many data points included in this analysis. Even if the p-value is high, we should be suspicious of using so few datapoints in a correlation.
  5. Y-axis doesn't start at zero: I truncated the Y-axes of the graph above. I also used a line graph, which makes the visual connection stand out more than it deserves. Nothing against line graphs. They are great at telling a story when you have linear data! But visually it is deceptive because the only data is at the points on the graph, not the lines on the graph. In between each point, the data could have been doing anything. Like going for a random walk by itself!
    Mathematically what I showed is true, but it is intentionally misleading. Below is the same chart but with both Y-axes starting at zero.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([0.276469,2.92636,5.66947,2.52653,])
array_2 = np.array([6.41667,9.83333,11.6667,9.66667,])
array_1_name = "Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Montana"
array_2_name = "Popularity of the 'friday friday friday' meme"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Your rating skills are top-notch!


Correlation ID: 4623 · Black Variable ID: 26127 · Red Variable ID: 25101
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0