about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #4,617 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is How 'hip and with it' 'Be Smart' science  YouTube video titles are and the second variable is Fossil fuel use in Croatia.  The chart goes from 2013 to 2021, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

As more people watch these trendy videos, there's a surge in dance-offs to the catchy tunes, leading to a spike in body heat and the need for fans powered by electricity, ultimately increasing the demand for fossil fuels in Croatia. Remember, staying 'hip' can sometimes 'burn' a lot of energy!

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Create an image of a futuristic dance studio with a vibrant, pulsating atmosphere, defined by its modern decor and colorful neon lights. Within this space, a group of individuals is engaged in lively dance-offs, their silhouettes cast against the dynamic background. Screens displaying eye-catching Be Smart YouTube video titles surround the dancers, adding an electric element to the scene. Meanwhile, the increasing body heat triggers the activation of electric fans, represented by motion and energy in the air. Outside the studio, in a distant Croatia, the silhouette of power plants can be seen working tirelessly, emanating a fiery glow as they burn fossil fuels to meet the rising energy demand. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: How 'hip and with it' Be Smart YouTube video titles are and Fossil fuel use in Croatia. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Vaporwave Cutsy art illustration Photorealism Cybernetic art Magic realism
ChatGPT: Cybernetic art

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both How 'hip and with it' Be Smart YouTube video titles are and Fossil fuel use in Croatia, in the following situation: As more people watch these trendy videos, there's a surge in dance-offs to the catchy tunes, leading to a spike in body heat and the need for fans powered by electricity, ultimately increasing the demand for fossil fuels in Croatia. Remember, staying 'hip' can sometimes 'burn' a lot of energy!. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In a vibrant dance studio with colorful lights and modern decor, people gathered, surrounded by screens displaying trendy Be Smart YouTube video titles. The catchy tunes from the videos filled the room as everyone engaged in spontaneous dance-offs, creating a surge in body heat. In response, electric fans buzzed to life, whirring and upping the demand for electricity. Meanwhile, outside, in Croatia, power plants worked overtime, burning fossil fuels to meet the increased energy demand.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ Cybernetic art ] and depicting this scene: In a vibrant dance studio with colorful lights and modern decor, people gathered, surrounded by screens displaying trendy Be Smart YouTube video titles. The catchy tunes from the videos filled the room as everyone engaged in spontaneous dance-offs, creating a surge in body heat. In response, electric fans buzzed to life, whirring and upping the demand for electricity. Meanwhile, outside, in Croatia, power plants worked overtime, burning fossil fuels to meet the increased energy demand. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Create an image of a futuristic dance studio with a vibrant, pulsating atmosphere, defined by its modern decor and colorful neon lights. Within this space, a group of individuals is engaged in lively dance-offs, their silhouettes cast against the dynamic background. Screens displaying eye-catching Be Smart YouTube video titles surround the dancers, adding an electric element to the scene. Meanwhile, the increasing body heat triggers the activation of electric fans, represented by motion and energy in the air. Outside the studio, in a distant Croatia, the silhouette of power plants can be seen working tirelessly, emanating a fiery glow as they burn fossil fuels to meet the rising energy demand.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how increases in How 'hip and with it' Be Smart YouTube video titles are positively influenced Fossil fuel use in Croatia. Add a funny one-liner at the end.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Fuel for Thought: The YouTube Fossil Fueled Funnies

The Journal of Comedic Energy Studies

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between How 'hip and with it' Be Smart YouTube video titles are and Fossil fuel use in Croatia. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Make the title punny if you can come up with clever pun. If not, just make it sound clever.

Your research team used data from AI analysis of YouTube video titles and Energy Information Administration to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.8004528 and p < 0.01 for 2013 to 2021.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
"Fuel for Thought: The YouTube Fossil Fueled Funnies"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we present the findings of a study examining the correlation between the "hip and with it" nature of YouTube video titles and the consumption of fossil fuels in Croatia. Utilizing data from AI analysis of YouTube video titles and the Energy Information Administration, we aimed to bring some light-hearted humor to the often serious discussion of energy consumption. Our research uncovered a correlation coefficient of 0.8004528 and p < 0.01, suggesting a strong statistical relationship between the two variables from 2013 to 2021.

With our punny title, we aim to show that even in the realm of academia, we can still have a sense of humor. As for a dad joke related to the content, here's one: Why don't scientists trust atoms? Because they make up everything! Just like the correlation we found between our YouTube data and fossil fuel use in Croatia. We hope that our lighthearted approach brings a smile to the faces of our fellow researchers and adds a dash of whimsy to the serious world of academic inquiry.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between How 'hip and with it' Be Smart YouTube video titles are and Fossil fuel use in Croatia. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Fuel for Thought: The YouTube Fossil Fueled Funnies"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we present the findings of a study examining the correlation between the "hip and with it" nature of YouTube video titles and the consumption of fossil fuels in Croatia. Utilizing data from AI analysis of YouTube video titles and the Energy Information Administration, we aimed to bring some light-hearted humor to the often serious discussion of energy consumption. Our research uncovered a correlation coefficient of 0.8004528 and p < 0.01, suggesting a strong statistical relationship between the two variables from 2013 to 2021.

With our punny title, we aim to show that even in the realm of academia, we can still have a sense of humor. As for a dad joke related to the content, here's one: Why don't scientists trust atoms? Because they make up everything! Just like the correlation we found between our YouTube data and fossil fuel use in Croatia. We hope that our lighthearted approach brings a smile to the faces of our fellow researchers and adds a dash of whimsy to the serious world of academic inquiry.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

The way we consume information has evolved dramatically over the years. From the printed word to radio, television, and now the vast world of the internet, our methods of staying informed and entertained have undergone significant changes. In this digital age, one of the most popular and influential platforms for disseminating content is YouTube, where the thrill of the 'click' and the allure of the 'view' reign supreme. As we dive into the data, we'll uncover the unexpected connection between "hip and with it" YouTube video titles and the fossil fuel habits of Croatia. Speaking of YouTube, have you heard about the channel that only posts videos about puns? It's tearable.

Our study seeks to shed light on the often overlooked relationship between the linguistic choices of YouTube content creators and the environmental impact of fossil fuel consumption. With a wink and a nudge, we explore the intersection of digital culture and energy usage. Perhaps this topic seems unconventional at first glance, but as we delve deeper, we hope to demonstrate the potential for unexpected connections hiding in plain sight. It's like finding a fossil fuel joke in a YouTube title – it may seem farfetched at first, but it's there if you look closely enough.

We understand the gravity of the subject matter, but that doesn't mean we can't inject a bit of levity into our exploration. After all, who says academic research has to be dry and humorless? Not us! We're here to show that the correlation between YouTube video titles and environmental factors doesn't have to be a snooze-fest. And speaking of snoozing, did you hear about the guy who invented Lifesavers? They say he made a mint!

In the following sections, we'll dive into the methodology, results, and implications of our study. So buckle up and brace yourselves for a journey through the intersection of digital diction and fossil fuel folly. It's going to be a wild ride – just like trying to pronounce “fossil fuel fueled funnies” without stumbling!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between How 'hip and with it' Be Smart YouTube video titles are and Fossil fuel use in Croatia. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then name a few real TV shows that sound like they might be relevant to the topic that you watched as research.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Fuel for Thought: The YouTube Fossil Fueled Funnies"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we present the findings of a study examining the correlation between the "hip and with it" nature of YouTube video titles and the consumption of fossil fuels in Croatia. Utilizing data from AI analysis of YouTube video titles and the Energy Information Administration, we aimed to bring some light-hearted humor to the often serious discussion of energy consumption. Our research uncovered a correlation coefficient of 0.8004528 and p < 0.01, suggesting a strong statistical relationship between the two variables from 2013 to 2021.

With our punny title, we aim to show that even in the realm of academia, we can still have a sense of humor. As for a dad joke related to the content, here's one: Why don't scientists trust atoms? Because they make up everything! Just like the correlation we found between our YouTube data and fossil fuel use in Croatia. We hope that our lighthearted approach brings a smile to the faces of our fellow researchers and adds a dash of whimsy to the serious world of academic inquiry.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The way we consume information has evolved dramatically over the years. From the printed word to radio, television, and now the vast world of the internet, our methods of staying informed and entertained have undergone significant changes. In this digital age, one of the most popular and influential platforms for disseminating content is YouTube, where the thrill of the 'click' and the allure of the 'view' reign supreme. As we dive into the data, we'll uncover the unexpected connection between "hip and with it" YouTube video titles and the fossil fuel habits of Croatia. Speaking of YouTube, have you heard about the channel that only posts videos about puns? It's tearable.
Our study seeks to shed light on the often overlooked relationship between the linguistic choices of YouTube content creators and the environmental impact of fossil fuel consumption. With a wink and a nudge, we explore the intersection of digital culture and energy usage. Perhaps this topic seems unconventional at first glance, but as we delve deeper, we hope to demonstrate the potential for unexpected connections hiding in plain sight. It's like finding a fossil fuel joke in a YouTube title – it may seem farfetched at first, but it's there if you look closely enough.
We understand the gravity of the subject matter, but that doesn't mean we can't inject a bit of levity into our exploration. After all, who says academic research has to be dry and humorless? Not us! We're here to show that the correlation between YouTube video titles and environmental factors doesn't have to be a snooze-fest. And speaking of snoozing, did you hear about the guy who invented Lifesavers? They say he made a mint!
In the following sections, we'll dive into the methodology, results, and implications of our study. So buckle up and brace yourselves for a journey through the intersection of digital diction and fossil fuel folly. It's going to be a wild ride – just like trying to pronounce “fossil fuel fueled funnies” without stumbling!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

Several scholarly investigations have explored the impact of digital media on consumer behavior and societal trends. Smith et al. (2018) examined the linguistic strategies used in social media marketing, finding a significant correlation between engagement metrics and the use of trendy phrases and emojis. Similarly, Doe and Jones (2015) conducted a study on the influence of YouTube video titles on viewer retention, highlighting the importance of captivating language in attracting and retaining the attention of online audiences. The researchers offered a compelling look into the power of words in the digital realm, and we must say, their findings certainly "trended" in the right direction.

On the literary front, "The Carbon Footprint Chronicles" by Green (2019) delves into the environmental implications of modern societal habits, offering a comprehensive analysis of energy consumption patterns and their impact on the planet. Conversely, "Fossil Fueled Funnies" by Comedian (2016) provides a lighthearted take on the oft-ignored intersection of fossil fuels and humor, offering a collection of jokes and puns related to the energy industry. Who knew that fossil fuels could be so funny? It's like watching a sitcom about coal – it may sound outrageous, but it's surprisingly entertaining!

In the realm of fiction, "The Carbon Conspiracy" by Eco-Novelist (2007) weaves a thrilling tale of intrigue and scandal within the energy sector, highlighting the darker side of fossil fuel consumption. On the other hand, "Oil and Laughter" by Satirical Author (2014) presents a satirical take on the oil industry, blending humor and social commentary in a way that prompts readers to reconsider their perspectives on energy usage. These books may be fiction, but they do shine a light on a serious topic. They're not just "fuel" for the imagination – they also offer valuable insight into societal attitudes toward fossil fuels.

Our own research also involved a thorough review of YouTube content related to energy usage, including popular channels such as "Fuel Fun with Fran," "Carbon Comedies," and "Eco-Laugh Extravaganza." Watching these videos, we couldn't help but ponder the connection between catchy titles and fossil fuel consumption. It's like trying to balance a barrel of oil on your head – it may seem daunting, but with the right approach, you just might pull it off!

Stay tuned for the next sections, where we'll share the methodology, results, and implications of our study. But before we go any further, here's a dad joke for your amusement: Did you hear about the comedian who made a joke about renewable energy? It was truly electrifying! Just like our findings on the correlation between YouTube title trends and fossil fuel use in Croatia. We hope this brings a spark of joy to your day!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between How 'hip and with it' Be Smart YouTube video titles are and Fossil fuel use in Croatia. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from AI analysis of YouTube video titles and Energy Information Administration . You used data from 2013 to 2021

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Fuel for Thought: The YouTube Fossil Fueled Funnies"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we present the findings of a study examining the correlation between the "hip and with it" nature of YouTube video titles and the consumption of fossil fuels in Croatia. Utilizing data from AI analysis of YouTube video titles and the Energy Information Administration, we aimed to bring some light-hearted humor to the often serious discussion of energy consumption. Our research uncovered a correlation coefficient of 0.8004528 and p < 0.01, suggesting a strong statistical relationship between the two variables from 2013 to 2021.

With our punny title, we aim to show that even in the realm of academia, we can still have a sense of humor. As for a dad joke related to the content, here's one: Why don't scientists trust atoms? Because they make up everything! Just like the correlation we found between our YouTube data and fossil fuel use in Croatia. We hope that our lighthearted approach brings a smile to the faces of our fellow researchers and adds a dash of whimsy to the serious world of academic inquiry.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
The way we consume information has evolved dramatically over the years. From the printed word to radio, television, and now the vast world of the internet, our methods of staying informed and entertained have undergone significant changes. In this digital age, one of the most popular and influential platforms for disseminating content is YouTube, where the thrill of the 'click' and the allure of the 'view' reign supreme. As we dive into the data, we'll uncover the unexpected connection between "hip and with it" YouTube video titles and the fossil fuel habits of Croatia. Speaking of YouTube, have you heard about the channel that only posts videos about puns? It's tearable.
Our study seeks to shed light on the often overlooked relationship between the linguistic choices of YouTube content creators and the environmental impact of fossil fuel consumption. With a wink and a nudge, we explore the intersection of digital culture and energy usage. Perhaps this topic seems unconventional at first glance, but as we delve deeper, we hope to demonstrate the potential for unexpected connections hiding in plain sight. It's like finding a fossil fuel joke in a YouTube title – it may seem farfetched at first, but it's there if you look closely enough.
We understand the gravity of the subject matter, but that doesn't mean we can't inject a bit of levity into our exploration. After all, who says academic research has to be dry and humorless? Not us! We're here to show that the correlation between YouTube video titles and environmental factors doesn't have to be a snooze-fest. And speaking of snoozing, did you hear about the guy who invented Lifesavers? They say he made a mint!
In the following sections, we'll dive into the methodology, results, and implications of our study. So buckle up and brace yourselves for a journey through the intersection of digital diction and fossil fuel folly. It's going to be a wild ride – just like trying to pronounce “fossil fuel fueled funnies” without stumbling!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To commence our research, we gathered a comprehensive dataset of YouTube video titles from 2013 to 2021, focusing on channels that cater to a diverse array of audiences, ranging from tech-savvy teenagers enamored with memes to refined aficionados of educational content. In selecting these videos, we aimed to capture the zeitgeist of linguistic trends that resonated within the YouTube community. It's crucial to understand the evolution of language in online spaces, after all, as it can provide valuable insights into cultural shifts and attitudes. Just like a dad joke, these linguistic trends may seem corny at first glance, but they often hold deeper meaning!

Our team employed advanced AI algorithms to conduct sentiment analysis, linguistic pattern recognition, and even delved into the depths of sarcasm detection for good measure. These methods allowed us to discern the "hip and with it" nature of the YouTube video titles, providing a quantitative measure of their cultural relevance and, dare we say, coolness factor. Our dedication to embracing the cutting edge of linguistic analysis knows no bounds – after all, it's not every day that you get to decipher the digital lingo of a generation.

On the other side of the coin, we gathered data from the Energy Information Administration to scrutinize the consumption of fossil fuels in Croatia during the same time period. Our approach involved meticulous examination of the intricacies of energy usage, including not only the overall volume of consumption but also the specific sources of fossil fuels employed. We left no stone unturned in our quest to understand the ebb and flow of energy dynamics. Just like cracking a good dad joke, it's all about the delivery and timing.

With our robust dataset in hand, we conducted statistical analyses to assess the correlation between the "hip and with it" nature of YouTube video titles and fossil fuel consumption in Croatia. We tinkered with various regression models, performed time-series analyses, and even dabbled in the arcane art of stochastic processes. Our efforts were driven by a genuine passion to unravel the mysteries of linguistic allure and environmental impact, giving new meaning to the phrase "cracking the code."

In the next section, we'll unravel the insights obtained from our unorthodox approach and present the results of our quirky journey into the world of YouTube and fossil fuel use. Get ready - it's a rollercoaster ride of analytical revelations, complete with unpredictable twists and turns! And speaking of twists, did you hear about the cheese factory that exploded in France? There was nothing left but de-brie!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between How 'hip and with it' Be Smart YouTube video titles are and Fossil fuel use in Croatia. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from AI analysis of YouTube video titles and Energy Information Administration .

For the time period 2013 to 2021, you found a correlation 0.8004528, r-squared of 0.6407246, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Fuel for Thought: The YouTube Fossil Fueled Funnies"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we present the findings of a study examining the correlation between the "hip and with it" nature of YouTube video titles and the consumption of fossil fuels in Croatia. Utilizing data from AI analysis of YouTube video titles and the Energy Information Administration, we aimed to bring some light-hearted humor to the often serious discussion of energy consumption. Our research uncovered a correlation coefficient of 0.8004528 and p < 0.01, suggesting a strong statistical relationship between the two variables from 2013 to 2021.

With our punny title, we aim to show that even in the realm of academia, we can still have a sense of humor. As for a dad joke related to the content, here's one: Why don't scientists trust atoms? Because they make up everything! Just like the correlation we found between our YouTube data and fossil fuel use in Croatia. We hope that our lighthearted approach brings a smile to the faces of our fellow researchers and adds a dash of whimsy to the serious world of academic inquiry.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
The way we consume information has evolved dramatically over the years. From the printed word to radio, television, and now the vast world of the internet, our methods of staying informed and entertained have undergone significant changes. In this digital age, one of the most popular and influential platforms for disseminating content is YouTube, where the thrill of the 'click' and the allure of the 'view' reign supreme. As we dive into the data, we'll uncover the unexpected connection between "hip and with it" YouTube video titles and the fossil fuel habits of Croatia. Speaking of YouTube, have you heard about the channel that only posts videos about puns? It's tearable.
Our study seeks to shed light on the often overlooked relationship between the linguistic choices of YouTube content creators and the environmental impact of fossil fuel consumption. With a wink and a nudge, we explore the intersection of digital culture and energy usage. Perhaps this topic seems unconventional at first glance, but as we delve deeper, we hope to demonstrate the potential for unexpected connections hiding in plain sight. It's like finding a fossil fuel joke in a YouTube title – it may seem farfetched at first, but it's there if you look closely enough.
We understand the gravity of the subject matter, but that doesn't mean we can't inject a bit of levity into our exploration. After all, who says academic research has to be dry and humorless? Not us! We're here to show that the correlation between YouTube video titles and environmental factors doesn't have to be a snooze-fest. And speaking of snoozing, did you hear about the guy who invented Lifesavers? They say he made a mint!
In the following sections, we'll dive into the methodology, results, and implications of our study. So buckle up and brace yourselves for a journey through the intersection of digital diction and fossil fuel folly. It's going to be a wild ride – just like trying to pronounce “fossil fuel fueled funnies” without stumbling!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

We found a strong positive correlation between the "hip and with it" nature of YouTube video titles and the consumption of fossil fuels in Croatia from 2013 to 2021. The correlation coefficient of 0.8004528 and an r-squared value of 0.6407246 indicate that there is a robust statistical relationship between the linguistic choices of YouTube content creators and the usage of fossil fuels in Croatia. This suggests that the more "hip and with it" the YouTube video titles, the higher the consumption of fossil fuels.

In Fig. 1 (see below), the scatterplot visually represents this strong correlation. The data points tightly cluster around the upward sloping trend line, emphasizing the consistent relationship between the variables.

Now, for a relevant dad joke: Why don't we ever tell secrets on a farm? Because the potatoes have eyes and the corn has ears! Much like how our data analysis kept an eye on the YouTube video titles and uncovered their "fueling" effect.

This significant correlation prompts us to reevaluate the ways in which digital content impacts real-world behaviors. It raises intriguing questions about the influence of online trends on energy consumption and environmental attitudes. As we continue to navigate the ever-changing landscape of digital media and its societal effects, our findings underscore the importance of considering even the seemingly frivolous aspects of online content. After all, who would have thought that the wording of a YouTube video title could have implications for environmental sustainability? It's like finding treasure in a title!

Our research contributes to the burgeoning field of digital culture and environmental studies by highlighting an unexpected link between online language and real-world actions. The traditional boundaries of academic investigation may confine our focus at times, but we must not overlook the possibility of uncovering valuable insights in unconventional places. Just as a father can surprise his kids with a dad joke at the dinner table, we aim to surprise the academic community with the unexpected connection we discovered in our study.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between How 'hip and with it' Be Smart YouTube video titles are and Fossil fuel use in Croatia. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
"Fuel for Thought: The YouTube Fossil Fueled Funnies"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we present the findings of a study examining the correlation between the "hip and with it" nature of YouTube video titles and the consumption of fossil fuels in Croatia. Utilizing data from AI analysis of YouTube video titles and the Energy Information Administration, we aimed to bring some light-hearted humor to the often serious discussion of energy consumption. Our research uncovered a correlation coefficient of 0.8004528 and p < 0.01, suggesting a strong statistical relationship between the two variables from 2013 to 2021.

With our punny title, we aim to show that even in the realm of academia, we can still have a sense of humor. As for a dad joke related to the content, here's one: Why don't scientists trust atoms? Because they make up everything! Just like the correlation we found between our YouTube data and fossil fuel use in Croatia. We hope that our lighthearted approach brings a smile to the faces of our fellow researchers and adds a dash of whimsy to the serious world of academic inquiry.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
Several scholarly investigations have explored the impact of digital media on consumer behavior and societal trends. Smith et al. (2018) examined the linguistic strategies used in social media marketing, finding a significant correlation between engagement metrics and the use of trendy phrases and emojis. Similarly, Doe and Jones (2015) conducted a study on the influence of YouTube video titles on viewer retention, highlighting the importance of captivating language in attracting and retaining the attention of online audiences. The researchers offered a compelling look into the power of words in the digital realm, and we must say, their findings certainly "trended" in the right direction.
On the literary front, "The Carbon Footprint Chronicles" by Green (2019) delves into the environmental implications of modern societal habits, offering a comprehensive analysis of energy consumption patterns and their impact on the planet. Conversely, "Fossil Fueled Funnies" by Comedian (2016) provides a lighthearted take on the oft-ignored intersection of fossil fuels and humor, offering a collection of jokes and puns related to the energy industry. Who knew that fossil fuels could be so funny? It's like watching a sitcom about coal – it may sound outrageous, but it's surprisingly entertaining!
In the realm of fiction, "The Carbon Conspiracy" by Eco-Novelist (2007) weaves a thrilling tale of intrigue and scandal within the energy sector, highlighting the darker side of fossil fuel consumption. On the other hand, "Oil and Laughter" by Satirical Author (2014) presents a satirical take on the oil industry, blending humor and social commentary in a way that prompts readers to reconsider their perspectives on energy usage. These books may be fiction, but they do shine a light on a serious topic. They're not just "fuel" for the imagination – they also offer valuable insight into societal attitudes toward fossil fuels.
Our own research also involved a thorough review of YouTube content related to energy usage, including popular channels such as "Fuel Fun with Fran," "Carbon Comedies," and "Eco-Laugh Extravaganza." Watching these videos, we couldn't help but ponder the connection between catchy titles and fossil fuel consumption. It's like trying to balance a barrel of oil on your head – it may seem daunting, but with the right approach, you just might pull it off!
Stay tuned for the next sections, where we'll share the methodology, results, and implications of our study. But before we go any further, here's a dad joke for your amusement: Did you hear about the comedian who made a joke about renewable energy? It was truly electrifying! Just like our findings on the correlation between YouTube title trends and fossil fuel use in Croatia. We hope this brings a spark of joy to your day!

[[RESULTS]]
We found a strong positive correlation between the "hip and with it" nature of YouTube video titles and the consumption of fossil fuels in Croatia from 2013 to 2021. The correlation coefficient of 0.8004528 and an r-squared value of 0.6407246 indicate that there is a robust statistical relationship between the linguistic choices of YouTube content creators and the usage of fossil fuels in Croatia. This suggests that the more "hip and with it" the YouTube video titles, the higher the consumption of fossil fuels.
In Fig. 1 (see below), the scatterplot visually represents this strong correlation. The data points tightly cluster around the upward sloping trend line, emphasizing the consistent relationship between the variables.
Now, for a relevant dad joke: Why don't we ever tell secrets on a farm? Because the potatoes have eyes and the corn has ears! Much like how our data analysis kept an eye on the YouTube video titles and uncovered their "fueling" effect.
This significant correlation prompts us to reevaluate the ways in which digital content impacts real-world behaviors. It raises intriguing questions about the influence of online trends on energy consumption and environmental attitudes. As we continue to navigate the ever-changing landscape of digital media and its societal effects, our findings underscore the importance of considering even the seemingly frivolous aspects of online content. After all, who would have thought that the wording of a YouTube video title could have implications for environmental sustainability? It's like finding treasure in a title!
Our research contributes to the burgeoning field of digital culture and environmental studies by highlighting an unexpected link between online language and real-world actions. The traditional boundaries of academic investigation may confine our focus at times, but we must not overlook the possibility of uncovering valuable insights in unconventional places. Just as a father can surprise his kids with a dad joke at the dinner table, we aim to surprise the academic community with the unexpected connection we discovered in our study.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The results of our study have revealed a compelling and, dare I say, humorous link between the linguistic flair of YouTube video titles and the consumption of fossil fuels in Croatia. While our initial premise may have elicited a chuckle or two, the statistical analysis has provided robust evidence of a significant correlation. It seems that the "hip and with it" nature of YouTube video titles does indeed have tangible implications for real-world energy usage. It's like finding a diamond in the rough – an unexpected discovery amidst the vast expanse of digital content.

Building on the existing literature, our findings support the notion put forth by Smith et al. (2018) regarding the impact of catchy language and trendy phrases on audience engagement in digital marketing. Just as a well-crafted pun can draw a chuckle from a reader, the linguistic allure of YouTube video titles appears to captivate the attention of viewers and, in turn, influence their energy consumption patterns. It's as if the power of a well-timed dad joke extends beyond the dinner table and into the realm of fuel consumption.

Furthermore, the results echo the insights of Doe and Jones (2015), illustrating the enduring influence of captivating language on online audience retention. In a way, the allure of cleverly titled YouTube videos parallels the timeless appeal of a well-crafted punchline – both leave an impression, whether in laughter or in energy consumption. It's like the punchline of a good joke – it leaves a lasting impact.

Our discussion of the connection between YouTube title trends and fossil fuel use extends the work of Green (2019) and Comedian (2016) by shedding light on the unexpected intersection of linguistic trends and environmental implications. The lighthearted take on energy consumption presented in "Fossil Fueled Funnies" takes on new significance as we uncover the substantial relationship between linguistic choices and real-world energy behaviors. Who knew that the playful use of words and phrases could hold such weight in the context of environmental impact? It's like cracking a joke that carries underlying wisdom – a blend of mirth and meaning.

As the scholarly community continues to explore the multifaceted dynamics of digital culture and its ramifications, our study offers a reminder that even the seemingly lighthearted nuances of online content can wield tangible influence. Just as a well-timed quip can change the mood of a room, the linguistic choices embedded in YouTube video titles have the potential to shape energy consumption behaviors. The interconnectedness of seemingly disparate realms, such as digital language and environmental impact, prompts us to adopt a more holistic perspective in our academic inquiries. It's as if the punchline of our research holds more depth than meets the eye – a reminder to embrace the unexpected in our pursuit of knowledge.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between How 'hip and with it' Be Smart YouTube video titles are and Fossil fuel use in Croatia. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
"Fuel for Thought: The YouTube Fossil Fueled Funnies"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we present the findings of a study examining the correlation between the "hip and with it" nature of YouTube video titles and the consumption of fossil fuels in Croatia. Utilizing data from AI analysis of YouTube video titles and the Energy Information Administration, we aimed to bring some light-hearted humor to the often serious discussion of energy consumption. Our research uncovered a correlation coefficient of 0.8004528 and p < 0.01, suggesting a strong statistical relationship between the two variables from 2013 to 2021.

With our punny title, we aim to show that even in the realm of academia, we can still have a sense of humor. As for a dad joke related to the content, here's one: Why don't scientists trust atoms? Because they make up everything! Just like the correlation we found between our YouTube data and fossil fuel use in Croatia. We hope that our lighthearted approach brings a smile to the faces of our fellow researchers and adds a dash of whimsy to the serious world of academic inquiry.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
The way we consume information has evolved dramatically over the years. From the printed word to radio, television, and now the vast world of the internet, our methods of staying informed and entertained have undergone significant changes. In this digital age, one of the most popular and influential platforms for disseminating content is YouTube, where the thrill of the 'click' and the allure of the 'view' reign supreme. As we dive into the data, we'll uncover the unexpected connection between "hip and with it" YouTube video titles and the fossil fuel habits of Croatia. Speaking of YouTube, have you heard about the channel that only posts videos about puns? It's tearable.
Our study seeks to shed light on the often overlooked relationship between the linguistic choices of YouTube content creators and the environmental impact of fossil fuel consumption. With a wink and a nudge, we explore the intersection of digital culture and energy usage. Perhaps this topic seems unconventional at first glance, but as we delve deeper, we hope to demonstrate the potential for unexpected connections hiding in plain sight. It's like finding a fossil fuel joke in a YouTube title – it may seem farfetched at first, but it's there if you look closely enough.
We understand the gravity of the subject matter, but that doesn't mean we can't inject a bit of levity into our exploration. After all, who says academic research has to be dry and humorless? Not us! We're here to show that the correlation between YouTube video titles and environmental factors doesn't have to be a snooze-fest. And speaking of snoozing, did you hear about the guy who invented Lifesavers? They say he made a mint!
In the following sections, we'll dive into the methodology, results, and implications of our study. So buckle up and brace yourselves for a journey through the intersection of digital diction and fossil fuel folly. It's going to be a wild ride – just like trying to pronounce “fossil fuel fueled funnies” without stumbling!

[[RESULTS]]
We found a strong positive correlation between the "hip and with it" nature of YouTube video titles and the consumption of fossil fuels in Croatia from 2013 to 2021. The correlation coefficient of 0.8004528 and an r-squared value of 0.6407246 indicate that there is a robust statistical relationship between the linguistic choices of YouTube content creators and the usage of fossil fuels in Croatia. This suggests that the more "hip and with it" the YouTube video titles, the higher the consumption of fossil fuels.
In Fig. 1 (see below), the scatterplot visually represents this strong correlation. The data points tightly cluster around the upward sloping trend line, emphasizing the consistent relationship between the variables.
Now, for a relevant dad joke: Why don't we ever tell secrets on a farm? Because the potatoes have eyes and the corn has ears! Much like how our data analysis kept an eye on the YouTube video titles and uncovered their "fueling" effect.
This significant correlation prompts us to reevaluate the ways in which digital content impacts real-world behaviors. It raises intriguing questions about the influence of online trends on energy consumption and environmental attitudes. As we continue to navigate the ever-changing landscape of digital media and its societal effects, our findings underscore the importance of considering even the seemingly frivolous aspects of online content. After all, who would have thought that the wording of a YouTube video title could have implications for environmental sustainability? It's like finding treasure in a title!
Our research contributes to the burgeoning field of digital culture and environmental studies by highlighting an unexpected link between online language and real-world actions. The traditional boundaries of academic investigation may confine our focus at times, but we must not overlook the possibility of uncovering valuable insights in unconventional places. Just as a father can surprise his kids with a dad joke at the dinner table, we aim to surprise the academic community with the unexpected connection we discovered in our study.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our study has demonstrated a strong statistical relationship between the linguistic choices of YouTube video titles and the consumption of fossil fuels in Croatia from 2013 to 2021. The correlation coefficient of 0.8004528 and p < 0.01 support the notion that the "hip and with it" nature of YouTube video titles is associated with higher fossil fuel use. It seems that the more "hip and with it" video titles are, the more fuel it adds to the fire of fossil fuel consumption. Speaking of fuel, did you hear about the pilot who was a real gas at parties? He really knew how to refuel the atmosphere!

These findings underscore the potential influence of digital content on real-world behaviors, challenging the traditional boundaries of academic inquiry. Much like the unexpected humor found in a dad joke, our research illuminates the need to consider even seemingly frivolous aspects of online content in the context of environmental sustainability. It's like uncovering a nugget of wisdom in a sea of YouTube thumbnails – hidden in plain sight, but worth the search!

Given the robust support for our hypothesis, we assert that no further research is needed in this area. We've shed a light-hearted spotlight on the connection between "hip and with it" YouTube video titles and fossil fuel use, and it's high time we close the chapter on this comedic correlation. Just like a well-timed punchline, our study has delivered unexpected insight and encouraged a few chuckles along the way.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Fuel for Thought: The YouTube Fossil Fueled Funnies. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Comedic Energy Studies


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Fuel for Thought: The YouTube Fossil Fueled Funnies. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Institute for Digital Humor Studies


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Fuel for Thought: The YouTube Fossil Fueled Funnies with an abstract of In this paper, we present the findings of a study examining the correlation between the "hip and with it" nature of YouTube video titles and the consumption of fossil fuels in Croatia. Utilizing data from AI analysis of YouTube video titles and the Energy Information Administration, we aimed to bring some light-hearted humor to the often serious discussion of energy consumption. Our research uncovered a correlation coefficient of 0.8004528 and p < 0.01, suggesting a strong statistical relationship between the two variables from 2013 to 2021.
With our punny title, we aim to show that even in the realm of academia, we can still have a sense of humor. As for a dad joke related to the content, here's one: Why don't scientists trust atoms? Because they make up everything! Just like the correlation we found between our YouTube data and fossil fuel use in Croatia. We hope that our lighthearted approach brings a smile to the faces of our fellow researchers and adds a dash of whimsy to the serious world of academic inquiry.

ChatGPT:

YouTube, video titles, fossil fuel consumption, Croatia, correlation, AI analysis, Energy Information Administration, statistical relationship, humor in academia, dad jokes, energy consumption, data analysis

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

How 'hip and with it' 'Be Smart' science YouTube video titles are
Detailed data title: How 'hip and with it' Be Smart YouTube video titles are, as rated by an AI.
Source: AI analysis of YouTube video titles
Additional Info: I asked a large language model, 'On a scale of 1-10, how _______ do you think this YouTube video title is?' for every video.

See what else correlates with How 'hip and with it' 'Be Smart' science YouTube video titles are

Fossil fuel use in Croatia
Detailed data title: Total fossil fuel use in Croatia in billion kWh
Source: Energy Information Administration
See what else correlates with Fossil fuel use in Croatia

Correlation r = 0.8004528 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.6407246 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 64.1% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Fossil fuel use in Croatia) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., How 'hip and with it' 'Be Smart' science YouTube video titles are) over the 9 years from 2013 through 2021.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 0.0096. 0.0095563811074859930000000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.8 in 0.96% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 105 random variables Which I absolutely did.
with the same 8 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 8 because we have two variables measured over a period of 9 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.29, 0.96 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
201320142015201620172018201920202021
How 'hip and with it' 'Be Smart' science YouTube video titles are (Hip' score (out of 10))6.646.23086.566.52176.81826.52636.55886.686.75
Fossil fuel use in Croatia (Billion kWh)4.391683.289063.371443.850594.321383.464123.968614.337664.24272




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Very low n: There are not many data points included in this analysis. Even if the p-value is high, we should be suspicious of using so few datapoints in a correlation.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([6.64,6.2308,6.56,6.5217,6.8182,6.5263,6.5588,6.68,6.75,])
array_2 = np.array([4.39168,3.28906,3.37144,3.85059,4.32138,3.46412,3.96861,4.33766,4.24272,])
array_1_name = "How 'hip and with it' 'Be Smart' science  YouTube video titles are"
array_2_name = "Fossil fuel use in Croatia"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Big thanks for reviewing!


Correlation ID: 4617 · Black Variable ID: 25856 · Red Variable ID: 23611
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0