Download png, svg
AI explanation
As people switched to almond and oat milk, there was a reduced dairy air quality in Canton. This udderly unexpected change curd not be ignored, as it led to a dairy good improvement in air pollution. It's a-moo-sing how something as unrelated as milk consumption could whey in on the air quality in Canton!Model: dalle-3
Prompt: [ Concept art ] Generate an image showing a bustling street in Canton, Ohio with people leisurely enjoying glasses of almond and oat milk. The sunlight filters through the clean air, casting a warm glow on the scene. As they sip their milk alternatives, greenery and flowers bloom around them, and the sky visibly clears of pollutants, showing a transformative connection between milk consumption and improved air quality in the city. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Milk consumption and Air pollution in Canton, Ohio. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Celtic art Cybernetic art Scalar art Scalar art Concept art
ChatGPT: Concept art
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Milk consumption and Air pollution in Canton, Ohio, in the following situation: As people switched to almond and oat milk, there was a reduced dairy air quality in Canton. This udderly unexpected change curd not be ignored, as it led to a dairy good improvement in air pollution. It's a-moo-sing how something as unrelated as milk consumption could whey in on the air quality in Canton!. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In Canton, Ohio, we see people enjoying glasses of almond and oat milk on a sunny day. The air is noticeably cleaner than before, with fewer pollutants. As people sip on their milk alternatives, the air quality visibly improves around them, creating a udderly unexpected connection between milk consumption and air pollution in Canton.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ Concept art ] and depicting this scene: In Canton, Ohio, we see people enjoying glasses of almond and oat milk on a sunny day. The air is noticeably cleaner than before, with fewer pollutants. As people sip on their milk alternatives, the air quality visibly improves around them, creating a udderly unexpected connection between milk consumption and air pollution in Canton. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: [ Concept art ] Generate an image showing a bustling street in Canton, Ohio with people leisurely enjoying glasses of almond and oat milk. The sunlight filters through the clean air, casting a warm glow on the scene. As they sip their milk alternatives, greenery and flowers bloom around them, and the sky visibly clears of pollutants, showing a transformative connection between milk consumption and improved air quality in the city.
*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.
I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how a decrease in Milk consumption caused Air pollution in Canton, Ohio to decrease. Include one good pun.
AI academic paper
Got Milk? Exploring the Milky Way: A Holistic Approach to Investigate the Relationship between Milk Consumption and Air Pollution in Canton, Ohio Journal of Interdisciplinary Dairy Science Jan 2024 Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real! |
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Milk consumption and Air pollution in Canton, Ohio. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.
Make the title seem clever.
Your research team used data from USDA and Environmental Protection Agency to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.8014636 and p < 0.01 for 1990 to 2021.
Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)
[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit
[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit
ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
"Got Milk? Exploring the Milky Way: A Holistic Approach to Investigate the Relationship between Milk Consumption and Air Pollution in Canton, Ohio"
[[ABSTRACT]]
In this udderly compelling study, we set out to investigate the tantalizing yet elusive link between the consumption of milk and air pollution in the charming locale of Canton, Ohio. Utilizing a multi-faceted approach, we synthesized data from the USDA and the Environmental Protection Agency to conduct a thoroughly pasture-based analysis.
Our findings revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8014636, with a p-value less than 0.01, thereby mooooving beyond mere speculation to demonstrate a robust statistical association between milk consumption and air pollution from 1990 to 2021. This bovine-related connection left us utterly astounded.
We surmise that the potential sources of this unexpected correlation may stem from factors such as dairy production emissions, cow-related methane release, and perhaps even unsuspected interactions between lactose intolerance and air quality. In conducting this research, we encountered unexpected challenges, but we persevered, as the p-value we attained was no laughing matter, much to the relief of our statistical sensibilities.
Our fruitful investigation beckons further exploration into the mechanisms underlying this curious relationship, calling for continued research endeavours in unraveling the abounding mysteries of the interplay between dairy delights and atmospheric dynamics. We sincerely hope this study will spark further 'udder'ly fascinating inquiries and whimsical moooo-rvels in the realm of statistical investigations.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Milk consumption and Air pollution in Canton, Ohio. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.
Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Got Milk? Exploring the Milky Way: A Holistic Approach to Investigate the Relationship between Milk Consumption and Air Pollution in Canton, Ohio"
[[ABSTRACT]]
In this udderly compelling study, we set out to investigate the tantalizing yet elusive link between the consumption of milk and air pollution in the charming locale of Canton, Ohio. Utilizing a multi-faceted approach, we synthesized data from the USDA and the Environmental Protection Agency to conduct a thoroughly pasture-based analysis.
Our findings revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8014636, with a p-value less than 0.01, thereby mooooving beyond mere speculation to demonstrate a robust statistical association between milk consumption and air pollution from 1990 to 2021. This bovine-related connection left us utterly astounded.
We surmise that the potential sources of this unexpected correlation may stem from factors such as dairy production emissions, cow-related methane release, and perhaps even unsuspected interactions between lactose intolerance and air quality. In conducting this research, we encountered unexpected challenges, but we persevered, as the p-value we attained was no laughing matter, much to the relief of our statistical sensibilities.
Our fruitful investigation beckons further exploration into the mechanisms underlying this curious relationship, calling for continued research endeavours in unraveling the abounding mysteries of the interplay between dairy delights and atmospheric dynamics. We sincerely hope this study will spark further 'udder'ly fascinating inquiries and whimsical moooo-rvels in the realm of statistical investigations.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The relationship between milk consumption and air pollution is one that is not immediately obvious, and yet, it is an area that has garnered increasing interest within the scientific community. As we delved into this peculiar conundrum, we found ourselves navigating through a veritable maze of data, udderly determined to milk every possible shred of knowledge from our research. It is, after all, a matter of great significance in a world where environmental and dietary concerns continue to intertwine in unexpected ways.
It is well-known that air pollution has a multitude of adverse effects on human health and the environment, with implications ranging from respiratory ailments to climate change. As for milk consumption, it is a dietary staple for many and carries with it a rich cultural and nutritional history. Yet, despite these seemingly disparate realms, our investigation sought to unravel the twisty, winding pathways that connect the consumption of this dairy elixir and the atmospheric soup of Canton, Ohio.
Our research, therefore, seeks to contribute to the scientific discourse by shedding light on the unlikely bond between these two seemingly unrelated entities. As we embark on this journey of statistical exploration, we do so with an open mind and a willingness to be utterly surprised by the curdles and wheys of this enigmatic relationship. After all, as they say, it's not just air that's full of particles – our data analysis uncovered a wealth of cheese-y findings that add a whole new dimension to our understanding of the interplay between milk consumption and air quality in Canton, Ohio.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Milk consumption and Air pollution in Canton, Ohio. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.
Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.
Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.
Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then name some cartoons and childrens' shows that you watched that are related to the topic.
Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Got Milk? Exploring the Milky Way: A Holistic Approach to Investigate the Relationship between Milk Consumption and Air Pollution in Canton, Ohio"
[[ABSTRACT]]
In this udderly compelling study, we set out to investigate the tantalizing yet elusive link between the consumption of milk and air pollution in the charming locale of Canton, Ohio. Utilizing a multi-faceted approach, we synthesized data from the USDA and the Environmental Protection Agency to conduct a thoroughly pasture-based analysis.
Our findings revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8014636, with a p-value less than 0.01, thereby mooooving beyond mere speculation to demonstrate a robust statistical association between milk consumption and air pollution from 1990 to 2021. This bovine-related connection left us utterly astounded.
We surmise that the potential sources of this unexpected correlation may stem from factors such as dairy production emissions, cow-related methane release, and perhaps even unsuspected interactions between lactose intolerance and air quality. In conducting this research, we encountered unexpected challenges, but we persevered, as the p-value we attained was no laughing matter, much to the relief of our statistical sensibilities.
Our fruitful investigation beckons further exploration into the mechanisms underlying this curious relationship, calling for continued research endeavours in unraveling the abounding mysteries of the interplay between dairy delights and atmospheric dynamics. We sincerely hope this study will spark further 'udder'ly fascinating inquiries and whimsical moooo-rvels in the realm of statistical investigations.
-------
And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The relationship between milk consumption and air pollution is one that is not immediately obvious, and yet, it is an area that has garnered increasing interest within the scientific community. As we delved into this peculiar conundrum, we found ourselves navigating through a veritable maze of data, udderly determined to milk every possible shred of knowledge from our research. It is, after all, a matter of great significance in a world where environmental and dietary concerns continue to intertwine in unexpected ways.
It is well-known that air pollution has a multitude of adverse effects on human health and the environment, with implications ranging from respiratory ailments to climate change. As for milk consumption, it is a dietary staple for many and carries with it a rich cultural and nutritional history. Yet, despite these seemingly disparate realms, our investigation sought to unravel the twisty, winding pathways that connect the consumption of this dairy elixir and the atmospheric soup of Canton, Ohio.
Our research, therefore, seeks to contribute to the scientific discourse by shedding light on the unlikely bond between these two seemingly unrelated entities. As we embark on this journey of statistical exploration, we do so with an open mind and a willingness to be utterly surprised by the curdles and wheys of this enigmatic relationship. After all, as they say, it's not just air that's full of particles – our data analysis uncovered a wealth of cheese-y findings that add a whole new dimension to our understanding of the interplay between milk consumption and air quality in Canton, Ohio.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
Several seminal studies have sought to explore the potential connections between milk consumption and air pollution, with conflicting findings and an air of uncertainty permeating the literature. Smith et al. (2010) conducted a comprehensive analysis, observing a positive correlation between milk consumption and particulate matter concentrations in urban environments. Doe and Jones (2015), however, arrived at a fundamentally different conclusion, asserting that there exists no substantial association between dairy intake and air quality deterioration.
In "Milk Matters: The Role of Dairy in Sustainable Diets," the authors assert that the production and transportation of dairy products can contribute to greenhouse gas emissions, suggesting a plausible avenue through which milk consumption may impact air pollution in urban areas. On a lighter note, "Got Milk? A Guide to the Health Benefits of Dairy" presents a thorough examination of the nutritional benefits of milk, but regrettably avoids delving into its potential atmospheric ramifications.
In a surprising turn of events, "The Dairy of Anne Frank" presents an entirely fictional account of a young girl's experiences hiding in an attic with nothing but a cow and a steady supply of milk. Although this memoir provides no tangible evidence to support our hypotheses, its engaging narrative serves as a poignant reminder of the importance of dairy in our daily lives.
Cartoons such as "The Magic School Bus" and "Arthur" have brought attention to environmental issues, planting the seeds of awareness about air pollution and the impact of human activities on the environment in the minds of young audiences. It is in these seemingly unrelated realms of fiction and animation that we may find unexpected insights into the dynamic interplay between milk consumption and air pollution.
In "Sesame Street," the beloved character Cookie Monster inadvertently sheds light on the potential consequences of dairy consumption on air quality, demonstrating an unexpected connection between indulging in milk and a craving for cleaner skies. These light-hearted reflections on a serious topic remind us that even in the world of statistical analysis, there is room for a good old dad joke or two. Speaking of which, why did the cow jump over the moon? Because it wanted to avoid the air pollution in Canton, Ohio!
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Milk consumption and Air pollution in Canton, Ohio. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.
Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from USDA and Environmental Protection Agency . You used data from 1990 to 2021
Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.
Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Got Milk? Exploring the Milky Way: A Holistic Approach to Investigate the Relationship between Milk Consumption and Air Pollution in Canton, Ohio"
[[ABSTRACT]]
In this udderly compelling study, we set out to investigate the tantalizing yet elusive link between the consumption of milk and air pollution in the charming locale of Canton, Ohio. Utilizing a multi-faceted approach, we synthesized data from the USDA and the Environmental Protection Agency to conduct a thoroughly pasture-based analysis.
Our findings revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8014636, with a p-value less than 0.01, thereby mooooving beyond mere speculation to demonstrate a robust statistical association between milk consumption and air pollution from 1990 to 2021. This bovine-related connection left us utterly astounded.
We surmise that the potential sources of this unexpected correlation may stem from factors such as dairy production emissions, cow-related methane release, and perhaps even unsuspected interactions between lactose intolerance and air quality. In conducting this research, we encountered unexpected challenges, but we persevered, as the p-value we attained was no laughing matter, much to the relief of our statistical sensibilities.
Our fruitful investigation beckons further exploration into the mechanisms underlying this curious relationship, calling for continued research endeavours in unraveling the abounding mysteries of the interplay between dairy delights and atmospheric dynamics. We sincerely hope this study will spark further 'udder'ly fascinating inquiries and whimsical moooo-rvels in the realm of statistical investigations.
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The relationship between milk consumption and air pollution is one that is not immediately obvious, and yet, it is an area that has garnered increasing interest within the scientific community. As we delved into this peculiar conundrum, we found ourselves navigating through a veritable maze of data, udderly determined to milk every possible shred of knowledge from our research. It is, after all, a matter of great significance in a world where environmental and dietary concerns continue to intertwine in unexpected ways.
It is well-known that air pollution has a multitude of adverse effects on human health and the environment, with implications ranging from respiratory ailments to climate change. As for milk consumption, it is a dietary staple for many and carries with it a rich cultural and nutritional history. Yet, despite these seemingly disparate realms, our investigation sought to unravel the twisty, winding pathways that connect the consumption of this dairy elixir and the atmospheric soup of Canton, Ohio.
Our research, therefore, seeks to contribute to the scientific discourse by shedding light on the unlikely bond between these two seemingly unrelated entities. As we embark on this journey of statistical exploration, we do so with an open mind and a willingness to be utterly surprised by the curdles and wheys of this enigmatic relationship. After all, as they say, it's not just air that's full of particles – our data analysis uncovered a wealth of cheese-y findings that add a whole new dimension to our understanding of the interplay between milk consumption and air quality in Canton, Ohio.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
ChatGPT:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
To thoroughly probe the intriguing nexus between milk consumption and air pollution in Canton, Ohio, our research team embarked on a multidimensional and data-intensive quest. Our primary data sources included reports from the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) and the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). The time frame for our investigation spanned from 1990 to 2021, allowing us to capture the evolving dynamics of milk consumption and air pollution in this bucolic yet industrial setting.
Our approach involved a complex and systematic method, incorporating both quantitative and qualitative analyses to derive meaningful insights. We milked every possible avenue for data, employing a hybridized approach that could be likened to a "curdled convergence" of statistical techniques.
In order to explore the relationship between milk consumption and air pollution, we first conducted a comprehensive analysis of milk production and distribution data from the USDA. Calculating per capita milk consumption within the geographic confines of Canton, Ohio, we meticulously tracked the dairy intake patterns over the years. Our approach was methodically designed to avoid any "udder"ly erroneous assumptions and ensure accuracy in our calculations.
Simultaneously, we engaged in an in-depth examination of air pollution metrics, drawing on EPA records to glean insights into air quality indices, emission levels, and contaminant concentrations in Canton, Ohio. This involved parsing through a myriad of atmospheric data, navigating a proverbial "cheese-maze" of information to discern the temporal and spatial patterns of air pollution within the locale.
To establish the statistical relationships between milk consumption and air pollution, we employed advanced analytical techniques including correlation analysis, regression modeling, and time series evaluation. Our statistical arsenal was carefully selected to ensure robustness and precision in capturing the dairy-air dynamics without curdling the findings.
In the spirit of scientific rigor, we supplemented our quantitative analyses with qualitative investigations, engaging in interviews with local dairy farmers, environmental advocates, and community members to gain deeper insights into the contextual nuances shaping milk consumption and air quality in Canton, Ohio. These interactions, though not immune to the occasional dairy-centric jest, provided invaluable qualitative data to enrich our understanding of the socio-environmental fabric underpinning our statistical observations.
At the heart of our methodology lay an unwavering commitment to unraveling the "moosical" interplay between milk consumption and air pollution, as our rigorous approach aimed to transcend conventional research boundaries and engage with the complex, sometimes whimsical, realities of statistical inquiry.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Milk consumption and Air pollution in Canton, Ohio. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.
Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from USDA and Environmental Protection Agency .
For the time period 1990 to 2021, you found a correlation 0.8014636, r-squared of 0.6423438, and p < 0.01.
One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.
Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Got Milk? Exploring the Milky Way: A Holistic Approach to Investigate the Relationship between Milk Consumption and Air Pollution in Canton, Ohio"
[[ABSTRACT]]
In this udderly compelling study, we set out to investigate the tantalizing yet elusive link between the consumption of milk and air pollution in the charming locale of Canton, Ohio. Utilizing a multi-faceted approach, we synthesized data from the USDA and the Environmental Protection Agency to conduct a thoroughly pasture-based analysis.
Our findings revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8014636, with a p-value less than 0.01, thereby mooooving beyond mere speculation to demonstrate a robust statistical association between milk consumption and air pollution from 1990 to 2021. This bovine-related connection left us utterly astounded.
We surmise that the potential sources of this unexpected correlation may stem from factors such as dairy production emissions, cow-related methane release, and perhaps even unsuspected interactions between lactose intolerance and air quality. In conducting this research, we encountered unexpected challenges, but we persevered, as the p-value we attained was no laughing matter, much to the relief of our statistical sensibilities.
Our fruitful investigation beckons further exploration into the mechanisms underlying this curious relationship, calling for continued research endeavours in unraveling the abounding mysteries of the interplay between dairy delights and atmospheric dynamics. We sincerely hope this study will spark further 'udder'ly fascinating inquiries and whimsical moooo-rvels in the realm of statistical investigations.
-------
And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
The relationship between milk consumption and air pollution is one that is not immediately obvious, and yet, it is an area that has garnered increasing interest within the scientific community. As we delved into this peculiar conundrum, we found ourselves navigating through a veritable maze of data, udderly determined to milk every possible shred of knowledge from our research. It is, after all, a matter of great significance in a world where environmental and dietary concerns continue to intertwine in unexpected ways.
It is well-known that air pollution has a multitude of adverse effects on human health and the environment, with implications ranging from respiratory ailments to climate change. As for milk consumption, it is a dietary staple for many and carries with it a rich cultural and nutritional history. Yet, despite these seemingly disparate realms, our investigation sought to unravel the twisty, winding pathways that connect the consumption of this dairy elixir and the atmospheric soup of Canton, Ohio.
Our research, therefore, seeks to contribute to the scientific discourse by shedding light on the unlikely bond between these two seemingly unrelated entities. As we embark on this journey of statistical exploration, we do so with an open mind and a willingness to be utterly surprised by the curdles and wheys of this enigmatic relationship. After all, as they say, it's not just air that's full of particles – our data analysis uncovered a wealth of cheese-y findings that add a whole new dimension to our understanding of the interplay between milk consumption and air quality in Canton, Ohio.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[RESULTS]]
ChatGPT:
[[RESULTS]]
In this section, we present the statistical findings of the relationship between milk consumption and air pollution in Canton, Ohio from 1990 to 2021. After an extensive analysis utilizing data primarily obtained from the USDA and the Environmental Protection Agency, we uncovered a correlation coefficient of 0.8014636 between these two variables, a revelation that certainly raised some eyebrows. It seems the dairy air industry is not just full of hot air!
The strength of this correlation is further supported by an r-squared value of 0.6423438, indicating that approximately 64% of the variation in air pollution can be explained by milk consumption. This finding certainly adds some creaminess to the coffee of statistical significance.
Furthermore, the p-value of less than 0.01 underscores the robustness of this association, demonstrating that the likelihood of this result occurring purely by chance is as rare as finding a unicorn in a dairy farm. Or, should I say, it's rarer than lactose-free cheese!
Our team generated a scatterplot (Fig. 1) to visually depict the strong correlation between milk consumption and air pollution in Canton, Ohio. The chart effectively illustrates the upward trend, making it clear that these two variables are not just "moo-tually exclusive" after all!
These findings are remarkable, shedding light on the unexpected relationship between dairy consumption and atmospheric quality. It seems that the question "Got Milk?" may not only pertain to dietary habits but also to the air we breathe. Dairy air-some results, indeed!
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Milk consumption and Air pollution in Canton, Ohio. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.
Limit your response to 500 tokens.
Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.
Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.
[[TITLE]]
"Got Milk? Exploring the Milky Way: A Holistic Approach to Investigate the Relationship between Milk Consumption and Air Pollution in Canton, Ohio"
[[ABSTRACT]]
In this udderly compelling study, we set out to investigate the tantalizing yet elusive link between the consumption of milk and air pollution in the charming locale of Canton, Ohio. Utilizing a multi-faceted approach, we synthesized data from the USDA and the Environmental Protection Agency to conduct a thoroughly pasture-based analysis.
Our findings revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8014636, with a p-value less than 0.01, thereby mooooving beyond mere speculation to demonstrate a robust statistical association between milk consumption and air pollution from 1990 to 2021. This bovine-related connection left us utterly astounded.
We surmise that the potential sources of this unexpected correlation may stem from factors such as dairy production emissions, cow-related methane release, and perhaps even unsuspected interactions between lactose intolerance and air quality. In conducting this research, we encountered unexpected challenges, but we persevered, as the p-value we attained was no laughing matter, much to the relief of our statistical sensibilities.
Our fruitful investigation beckons further exploration into the mechanisms underlying this curious relationship, calling for continued research endeavours in unraveling the abounding mysteries of the interplay between dairy delights and atmospheric dynamics. We sincerely hope this study will spark further 'udder'ly fascinating inquiries and whimsical moooo-rvels in the realm of statistical investigations.
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
Several seminal studies have sought to explore the potential connections between milk consumption and air pollution, with conflicting findings and an air of uncertainty permeating the literature. Smith et al. (2010) conducted a comprehensive analysis, observing a positive correlation between milk consumption and particulate matter concentrations in urban environments. Doe and Jones (2015), however, arrived at a fundamentally different conclusion, asserting that there exists no substantial association between dairy intake and air quality deterioration.
In "Milk Matters: The Role of Dairy in Sustainable Diets," the authors assert that the production and transportation of dairy products can contribute to greenhouse gas emissions, suggesting a plausible avenue through which milk consumption may impact air pollution in urban areas. On a lighter note, "Got Milk? A Guide to the Health Benefits of Dairy" presents a thorough examination of the nutritional benefits of milk, but regrettably avoids delving into its potential atmospheric ramifications.
In a surprising turn of events, "The Dairy of Anne Frank" presents an entirely fictional account of a young girl's experiences hiding in an attic with nothing but a cow and a steady supply of milk. Although this memoir provides no tangible evidence to support our hypotheses, its engaging narrative serves as a poignant reminder of the importance of dairy in our daily lives.
Cartoons such as "The Magic School Bus" and "Arthur" have brought attention to environmental issues, planting the seeds of awareness about air pollution and the impact of human activities on the environment in the minds of young audiences. It is in these seemingly unrelated realms of fiction and animation that we may find unexpected insights into the dynamic interplay between milk consumption and air pollution.
In "Sesame Street," the beloved character Cookie Monster inadvertently sheds light on the potential consequences of dairy consumption on air quality, demonstrating an unexpected connection between indulging in milk and a craving for cleaner skies. These light-hearted reflections on a serious topic remind us that even in the world of statistical analysis, there is room for a good old dad joke or two. Speaking of which, why did the cow jump over the moon? Because it wanted to avoid the air pollution in Canton, Ohio!
[[RESULTS]]
In this section, we present the statistical findings of the relationship between milk consumption and air pollution in Canton, Ohio from 1990 to 2021. After an extensive analysis utilizing data primarily obtained from the USDA and the Environmental Protection Agency, we uncovered a correlation coefficient of 0.8014636 between these two variables, a revelation that certainly raised some eyebrows. It seems the dairy air industry is not just full of hot air!
The strength of this correlation is further supported by an r-squared value of 0.6423438, indicating that approximately 64% of the variation in air pollution can be explained by milk consumption. This finding certainly adds some creaminess to the coffee of statistical significance.
Furthermore, the p-value of less than 0.01 underscores the robustness of this association, demonstrating that the likelihood of this result occurring purely by chance is as rare as finding a unicorn in a dairy farm. Or, should I say, it's rarer than lactose-free cheese!
Our team generated a scatterplot (Fig. 1) to visually depict the strong correlation between milk consumption and air pollution in Canton, Ohio. The chart effectively illustrates the upward trend, making it clear that these two variables are not just "moo-tually exclusive" after all!
These findings are remarkable, shedding light on the unexpected relationship between dairy consumption and atmospheric quality. It seems that the question "Got Milk?" may not only pertain to dietary habits but also to the air we breathe. Dairy air-some results, indeed!
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[DISCUSSION]]
ChatGPT:
[[DISCUSSION]]
The results of our study provide compelling evidence of a substantial and statistically significant correlation between milk consumption and air pollution in Canton, Ohio. Despite the initial "udder" absurdity of such a connection, our findings align with prior research that has suggested a potential link between dairy intake and atmospheric degradation. The positive correlation we observed is consistent with the work of Smith et al. (2010), who similarly identified a positive relationship between milk consumption and particulate matter concentrations in urban environments. It seems that the impact of dairy on air quality is not just a mere "moo-tation" of the truth.
Our results also support the notion put forth by "Milk Matters: The Role of Dairy in Sustainable Diets" that the production and transportation of dairy products may contribute to greenhouse gas emissions, providing a pathway through which milk consumption can influence air pollution. The “dairy air” industry, as we affectionately refer to it, certainly seems to be making a substantial contribution to the atmospheric composition in Canton, Ohio.
The surprising strength of our correlation, as indicated by the r-squared value of 0.6423438, underscores the extent to which milk consumption appears to impact air pollution levels in the area. It's a result that certainly adds some creaminess to the coffee of statistical significance. The p-value less than 0.01 only further emphasizes the robustness of this link, highlighting that the likelihood of our findings being purely coincidental is as rare as finding lactose-free cheese – let alone a unicorn roaming a dairy farm!
Our analysis also aligns with the unexpected insights presented in seemingly unrelated realms of fiction and animation. The light-hearted reflections on a weighty topic remind us that even in the world of statistical analysis, there is room for a good old dad joke or two. Speaking of which, why did the cow jump over the moon? Because it wanted to avoid the air pollution in Canton, Ohio – a whimsical reflection of the unexpected connection between milk consumption and atmospheric dynamics in our findings.
Overall, our study not only unveils the surprising correlation between milk consumption and air pollution in Canton, Ohio, but also highlights the potential environmental impact of dairy intake. These findings have significant implications for public health and environmental policies, demonstrating the need for further research and the development of strategies to mitigate the dairy air industry's contribution to atmospheric pollution. It's now up to us to raise awareness and implement measures that can help clear the air – both in Canton, Ohio and in the broader context of dairy-related air pollution.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Milk consumption and Air pollution in Canton, Ohio. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.
Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.
Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
"Got Milk? Exploring the Milky Way: A Holistic Approach to Investigate the Relationship between Milk Consumption and Air Pollution in Canton, Ohio"
[[ABSTRACT]]
In this udderly compelling study, we set out to investigate the tantalizing yet elusive link between the consumption of milk and air pollution in the charming locale of Canton, Ohio. Utilizing a multi-faceted approach, we synthesized data from the USDA and the Environmental Protection Agency to conduct a thoroughly pasture-based analysis.
Our findings revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8014636, with a p-value less than 0.01, thereby mooooving beyond mere speculation to demonstrate a robust statistical association between milk consumption and air pollution from 1990 to 2021. This bovine-related connection left us utterly astounded.
We surmise that the potential sources of this unexpected correlation may stem from factors such as dairy production emissions, cow-related methane release, and perhaps even unsuspected interactions between lactose intolerance and air quality. In conducting this research, we encountered unexpected challenges, but we persevered, as the p-value we attained was no laughing matter, much to the relief of our statistical sensibilities.
Our fruitful investigation beckons further exploration into the mechanisms underlying this curious relationship, calling for continued research endeavours in unraveling the abounding mysteries of the interplay between dairy delights and atmospheric dynamics. We sincerely hope this study will spark further 'udder'ly fascinating inquiries and whimsical moooo-rvels in the realm of statistical investigations.
[[INTRDUCTION]]
The relationship between milk consumption and air pollution is one that is not immediately obvious, and yet, it is an area that has garnered increasing interest within the scientific community. As we delved into this peculiar conundrum, we found ourselves navigating through a veritable maze of data, udderly determined to milk every possible shred of knowledge from our research. It is, after all, a matter of great significance in a world where environmental and dietary concerns continue to intertwine in unexpected ways.
It is well-known that air pollution has a multitude of adverse effects on human health and the environment, with implications ranging from respiratory ailments to climate change. As for milk consumption, it is a dietary staple for many and carries with it a rich cultural and nutritional history. Yet, despite these seemingly disparate realms, our investigation sought to unravel the twisty, winding pathways that connect the consumption of this dairy elixir and the atmospheric soup of Canton, Ohio.
Our research, therefore, seeks to contribute to the scientific discourse by shedding light on the unlikely bond between these two seemingly unrelated entities. As we embark on this journey of statistical exploration, we do so with an open mind and a willingness to be utterly surprised by the curdles and wheys of this enigmatic relationship. After all, as they say, it's not just air that's full of particles – our data analysis uncovered a wealth of cheese-y findings that add a whole new dimension to our understanding of the interplay between milk consumption and air quality in Canton, Ohio.
[[RESULTS]]
In this section, we present the statistical findings of the relationship between milk consumption and air pollution in Canton, Ohio from 1990 to 2021. After an extensive analysis utilizing data primarily obtained from the USDA and the Environmental Protection Agency, we uncovered a correlation coefficient of 0.8014636 between these two variables, a revelation that certainly raised some eyebrows. It seems the dairy air industry is not just full of hot air!
The strength of this correlation is further supported by an r-squared value of 0.6423438, indicating that approximately 64% of the variation in air pollution can be explained by milk consumption. This finding certainly adds some creaminess to the coffee of statistical significance.
Furthermore, the p-value of less than 0.01 underscores the robustness of this association, demonstrating that the likelihood of this result occurring purely by chance is as rare as finding a unicorn in a dairy farm. Or, should I say, it's rarer than lactose-free cheese!
Our team generated a scatterplot (Fig. 1) to visually depict the strong correlation between milk consumption and air pollution in Canton, Ohio. The chart effectively illustrates the upward trend, making it clear that these two variables are not just "moo-tually exclusive" after all!
These findings are remarkable, shedding light on the unexpected relationship between dairy consumption and atmospheric quality. It seems that the question "Got Milk?" may not only pertain to dietary habits but also to the air we breathe. Dairy air-some results, indeed!
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[CONCLUSION]]
ChatGPT:
[[CONCLUSION]]
In conclusion, our study has revealed a compelling statistical association between milk consumption and air pollution in Canton, Ohio from 1990 to 2021. The striking correlation coefficient of 0.8014636, supported by a p-value of less than 0.01, denotes a robust relationship that is "udderly" intriguing. It appears that the dairy industry is churning out more than just milk – it's also contributing to the atmospheric froth!
Our findings suggest that factors such as dairy production emissions and bovine-related methane release may be significant contributors to the observed correlation. This also raises the question of whether lactose intolerance could be impacting not only digestive systems but also atmospheric conditions. It seems like the lactose-intolerant are not the only ones feeling the effects of dairy products in the air – talk about cheese with an attitude!
Through our comprehensive analysis, we have demonstrated that approximately 64% of the variation in air pollution can be elucidated by milk consumption. This unexpected connection provides a rich source of "moo-dy" material for further investigation.
Our scatterplot visually emphasizes the "moo-tual" nature of the relationship between milk consumption and air pollution, making it evident that these two variables are indeed entangled like a messy spaghetti dish – but with mooo-re cheese!
Overall, our research offers a novel perspective on the interconnectedness of dietary habits and environmental quality, with its implications reaching beyond Canton, Ohio. As seen from our findings, it seems that the age-old question "Got Milk?" may have broader implications for the air we breathe, proving that the dairy industry is truly expanding its "moo-tivations."
We recommend that future studies delve deeper into the mechanisms driving this unexpected relationship, exploring potential mitigating strategies and examining similar connections in different geographic locations. However, given the strength of our findings, it's safe to say that no more research is needed in this "moo-dy" area.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Got Milk? Exploring the Milky Way: A Holistic Approach to Investigate the Relationship between Milk Consumption and Air Pollution in Canton, Ohio. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.
ChatGPT:
Journal of Interdisciplinary Dairy Science
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Got Milk? Exploring the Milky Way: A Holistic Approach to Investigate the Relationship between Milk Consumption and Air Pollution in Canton, Ohio. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.
ChatGPT:
Society for Dairy-Related Environmental Studies (SDRES)
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Got Milk? Exploring the Milky Way: A Holistic Approach to Investigate the Relationship between Milk Consumption and Air Pollution in Canton, Ohio with an abstract of In this udderly compelling study, we set out to investigate the tantalizing yet elusive link between the consumption of milk and air pollution in the charming locale of Canton, Ohio. Utilizing a multi-faceted approach, we synthesized data from the USDA and the Environmental Protection Agency to conduct a thoroughly pasture-based analysis.
Our findings revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8014636, with a p-value less than 0.01, thereby mooooving beyond mere speculation to demonstrate a robust statistical association between milk consumption and air pollution from 1990 to 2021. This bovine-related connection left us utterly astounded.
We surmise that the potential sources of this unexpected correlation may stem from factors such as dairy production emissions, cow-related methane release, and perhaps even unsuspected interactions between lactose intolerance and air quality. In conducting this research, we encountered unexpected challenges, but we persevered, as the p-value we attained was no laughing matter, much to the relief of our statistical sensibilities.
Our fruitful investigation beckons further exploration into the mechanisms underlying this curious relationship, calling for continued research endeavours in unraveling the abounding mysteries of the interplay between dairy delights and atmospheric dynamics. We sincerely hope this study will spark further 'udder'ly fascinating inquiries and whimsical moooo-rvels in the realm of statistical investigations.
ChatGPT:
milk consumption, air pollution, correlation, statistical analysis, dairy production emissions, methane release, lactose intolerance, atmospheric dynamics, USDA data, Environmental Protection Agency data, Canton Ohio, statistical association, dairy industry, environmental impact, statistical correlation
*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.
Discover a new correlation
View all correlations
View all research papers
Report an error
Data details
Milk consumptionDetailed data title: Per capita consumption of Fluid beverage milk in the US
Source: USDA
See what else correlates with Milk consumption
Air pollution in Canton, Ohio
Detailed data title: Percentage of days with air quality at 'unhealthy for sensitive groups' or worse in Canton-Massillon, OH
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
See what else correlates with Air pollution in Canton, Ohio
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.
r2 = 0.6423438 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 64.2% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Air pollution in Canton, Ohio) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Milk consumption) over the 32 years from 1990 through 2021.
p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 3.6E-8. 0.0000000355296268057419500000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.
But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.
Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.8 in 3.6E-6% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 28,145,525 random variables You don't actually need 28 million variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.
p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.
In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.
Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 31 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 31 because we have two variables measured over a period of 32 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.
[ 0.63, 0.9 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.
This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!
All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.
Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
1990 | 1991 | 1992 | 1993 | 1994 | 1995 | 1996 | 1997 | 1998 | 1999 | 2000 | 2001 | 2002 | 2003 | 2004 | 2005 | 2006 | 2007 | 2008 | 2009 | 2010 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | |
Milk consumption (Pounds per person) | 220 | 218 | 215 | 210 | 208 | 205 | 205 | 201 | 198 | 197 | 196 | 192 | 191 | 188 | 185 | 185 | 185 | 183 | 181 | 181 | 177 | 173 | 169 | 164 | 158 | 155 | 153 | 149 | 145 | 141 | 141 | 134 |
Air pollution in Canton, Ohio (Bad air quality days) | 7.94521 | 15.0685 | 6.30137 | 10.7143 | 11.2329 | 10.411 | 10.3825 | 7.41758 | 13.9726 | 12.6027 | 6.84932 | 9.31507 | 13.4247 | 5.75342 | 4.38356 | 9.41828 | 7.30994 | 12.1127 | 5.68182 | 0.547945 | 6.84932 | 3.28767 | 5.7377 | 0.821918 | 0.547945 | 1.91781 | 1.63934 | 0.547945 | 0.821918 | 0 | 1.11732 | 0.821918 |
Why this works
- Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
- Lack of causal connection: There is probably
Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied. - Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple
Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is. - Y-axis doesn't start at zero: I truncated the Y-axes of the graph above. I also used a line graph, which makes the visual connection stand out more than it deserves.
Nothing against line graphs. They are great at telling a story when you have linear data! But visually it is deceptive because the only data is at the points on the graph, not the lines on the graph. In between each point, the data could have been doing anything. Like going for a random walk by itself!
Mathematically what I showed is true, but it is intentionally misleading. Below is the same chart but with both Y-axes starting at zero.
Try it yourself
You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.
Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"
Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.
Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.
Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.
Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"
If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:
"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."
# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats
# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):
# Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)
# Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
r_squared = correlation**2
return correlation, r_squared, p_value
# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([220,218,215,210,208,205,205,201,198,197,196,192,191,188,185,185,185,183,181,181,177,173,169,164,158,155,153,149,145,141,141,134,])
array_2 = np.array([7.94521,15.0685,6.30137,10.7143,11.2329,10.411,10.3825,7.41758,13.9726,12.6027,6.84932,9.31507,13.4247,5.75342,4.38356,9.41828,7.30994,12.1127,5.68182,0.547945,6.84932,3.28767,5.7377,0.821918,0.547945,1.91781,1.63934,0.547945,0.821918,0,1.11732,0.821918,])
array_1_name = "Milk consumption"
array_2_name = "Air pollution in Canton, Ohio"
# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)
# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)
Reuseable content
You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.
For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."
When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.
Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.
Download images for these variables:
- High resolution line chart
The image linked here is a Scalable Vector Graphic (SVG). It is the highest resolution that is possible to achieve. It scales up beyond the size of the observable universe without pixelating. You do not need to email me asking if I have a higher resolution image. I do not. The physical limitations of our universe prevent me from providing you with an image that is any higher resolution than this one.
If you insert it into a PowerPoint presentation (a tool well-known for managing things that are the scale of the universe), you can right-click > "Ungroup" or "Create Shape" and then edit the lines and text directly. You can also change the colors this way.
Alternatively you can use a tool like Inkscape. - High resolution line chart, optimized for mobile
- Alternative high resolution line chart
- Scatterplot
- Portable line chart (png)
- Portable line chart (png), optimized for mobile
- Line chart for only Milk consumption
- Line chart for only Air pollution in Canton, Ohio
- AI-generated correlation image
- The spurious research paper: Got Milk? Exploring the Milky Way: A Holistic Approach to Investigate the Relationship between Milk Consumption and Air Pollution in Canton, Ohio
Your dedication to rating warms my heart!
Correlation ID: 4609 · Black Variable ID: 554 · Red Variable ID: 20406