about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #4,601 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in New Mexico and the second variable is Global shipwrecks .  The chart goes from 1976 to 2014, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

The increase in Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in New Mexico has led to a surge in demand for smaller government, causing a reduction in maritime regulations. This has inadvertently created a more laissez-faire attitude towards ship safety, ultimately leading to a higher frequency of global shipwrecks. Remember, when it comes to politics and maritime mishaps, it's all about staying afloat in the sea of governance!

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Generate an image of a Cubism-style scene with New Mexico's desert in the background as the sun sets, casting warm, vibrant colors across the landscape. In the foreground, depict a group of proud Libertarian voters casting their ballots for the party's Presidential candidate. They stand in front of the unfurling Libertarian flag, its torch symbolizing freedom held high amid the gusty wind. In the distance, portray rough seas with an abstract representation of a ship encountering hidden hazards and facing turbulent waters. The entire scene should be fragmented and reassembled with vibrant geometric shapes, capturing the essence of Cubism and the dual narratives of political freedom and maritime peril. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in New Mexico and Global shipwrecks . Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Cubism Cute cartoon A photo-realistic image inspired by bauhaus a funny image macro
ChatGPT: Cubism

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in New Mexico and Global shipwrecks , in the following situation: The increase in Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in New Mexico has led to a surge in demand for smaller government, causing a reduction in maritime regulations. This has inadvertently created a more laissez-faire attitude towards ship safety, ultimately leading to a higher frequency of global shipwrecks. Remember, when it comes to politics and maritime mishaps, it's all about staying afloat in the sea of governance!. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In New Mexico, a wave of Libertarian voters proudly cast their ballots for the party's Presidential candidate as the sun sets behind the desert horizon. Meanwhile, across the globe, ships are encountering rough seas and hidden hazards, leading to an increase in shipwrecks. The scene is set against the backdrop of the Libertarian flag, with its iconic torch symbolizing freedom, as it slowly unfurls in the gusty wind, while the silhouette of a vessel encounters an unforeseen obstacle in the tumultuous waters.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ Cubism ] and depicting this scene: In New Mexico, a wave of Libertarian voters proudly cast their ballots for the party's Presidential candidate as the sun sets behind the desert horizon. Meanwhile, across the globe, ships are encountering rough seas and hidden hazards, leading to an increase in shipwrecks. The scene is set against the backdrop of the Libertarian flag, with its iconic torch symbolizing freedom, as it slowly unfurls in the gusty wind, while the silhouette of a vessel encounters an unforeseen obstacle in the tumultuous waters. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Generate an image of a Cubism-style scene with New Mexico's desert in the background as the sun sets, casting warm, vibrant colors across the landscape. In the foreground, depict a group of proud Libertarian voters casting their ballots for the party's Presidential candidate. They stand in front of the unfurling Libertarian flag, its torch symbolizing freedom held high amid the gusty wind. In the distance, portray rough seas with an abstract representation of a ship encountering hidden hazards and facing turbulent waters. The entire scene should be fragmented and reassembled with vibrant geometric shapes, capturing the essence of Cubism and the dual narratives of political freedom and maritime peril.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in New Mexico caused Global shipwrecks to increase. Add a funny one-liner at the end.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Navigating Political Tides: A Libertarian's Ship to Shipwrecks

The Journal of Political Maritime Studies

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in New Mexico and Global shipwrecks . You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Include a pun in the title.

Your research team used data from MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse and Wikipedia to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9537802 and p < 0.01 for 1976 to 2014.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
Navigating Political Tides: A Libertarian's "Ship" to Shipwrecks

[[ABSTRACT]]
Ahoy, mateys! In this study, we set sail to uncover the curious correlation between the votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in New Mexico and global shipwrecks. Avast, ye landlubbers, for we delved into the treasure trove of data from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and Wikipedia to unravel this enigmatic relationship. Our findings revealed a seaworthy correlation coefficient of 0.9537802 with a p-value less than 0.01 for the years 1976 to 2014.

Sail with us through the murky waters of statistical analysis as we navigate through the perilous seas of election results and maritime mishaps. It seems that the Libertarian votes in New Mexico may have a larger impact on global nautical history than previously thought! But wait, here comes a pun-make sure to steer clear of rocky political shores to avoid any shipwrecks!

So, shiver me timbers, the correlation between New Mexico's political preferences and global shipwrecks is nothing to scoff at. Join us in this adventurous voyage as we untangle the complexities of this unexpected association. Arrr, matey, prepare to be amazed by the unlikely connections we've uncovered.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in New Mexico and Global shipwrecks . You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Navigating Political Tides: A Libertarian's "Ship" to Shipwrecks

[[ABSTRACT]]
Ahoy, mateys! In this study, we set sail to uncover the curious correlation between the votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in New Mexico and global shipwrecks. Avast, ye landlubbers, for we delved into the treasure trove of data from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and Wikipedia to unravel this enigmatic relationship. Our findings revealed a seaworthy correlation coefficient of 0.9537802 with a p-value less than 0.01 for the years 1976 to 2014.

Sail with us through the murky waters of statistical analysis as we navigate through the perilous seas of election results and maritime mishaps. It seems that the Libertarian votes in New Mexico may have a larger impact on global nautical history than previously thought! But wait, here comes a pun-make sure to steer clear of rocky political shores to avoid any shipwrecks!

So, shiver me timbers, the correlation between New Mexico's political preferences and global shipwrecks is nothing to scoff at. Join us in this adventurous voyage as we untangle the complexities of this unexpected association. Arrr, matey, prepare to be amazed by the unlikely connections we've uncovered.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

The intersection of political behavior and maritime mishaps may seem like uncharted waters, but as the saying goes, "Where there's a political wheel, there's a seaway." In this paper, we dive deep into the unexpected connection between the votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in New Mexico and the occurrence of global shipwrecks. This analysis aims to shed light on the potential influence of state-level political preferences on international maritime events, and you can bet your bottom doubloon we'll have a whale of a time uncovering this correlation.

To set the stage for our voyage, let's first consider the historical significance of New Mexico in presidential elections. The state has often been a battleground for political parties, but perhaps it's also a battleground for ships navigating the treacherous waters of our planet. After all, it would be fitting to say that New Mexico's electoral decisions have ripple effects not only in the political arena but also in the seven seas. And speaking of ripples, have you heard the one about the Libertarian who tried to integrate calculus and sailing? He wanted to find the integral of x^2, but all he got were sea-leeks.

Our quest for understanding this peculiar correlation entails weaving through the waves of data obtained from reputable sources, including the MIT Election Data and Science Lab and historical records of maritime incidents. We used rigorous statistical methods to chart our course, and the results were not just ship-shape but also brought to light an unexpected link between the political preferences of New Mexicans and the fate of seafaring vessels around the globe. It appears that the votes cast in the Land of Enchantment hold more sway than one might have bargained for – pun intended, of course. And remember, when you're researching political tides and marine mishaps, it's crucial to stay buoyant!

As we hoist the sails and navigate through the uncharted waters of this peculiar correlation, we invite readers to join us on this intellectual expedition. Not all who wander are lost, but those who wander into unexpected research pairings may find themselves with a boatload of intriguing discoveries. So, batten down the hatches, for we're about to embark on a scholarly escapade that promises not only academic insights but also a fair share of sea-themed puns. After all, why did the political scientist bring a map on their yacht? They wanted to navigate the political currents and make sure they didn't get "left-ern" behind! So hop on board as we navigate this uncharted intellectual terrain, ready to uncover the surprises that lurk beneath the waves of statistical analysis.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in New Mexico and Global shipwrecks . You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then name some movies that you watched that are tangentially related to the topic.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Navigating Political Tides: A Libertarian's "Ship" to Shipwrecks

[[ABSTRACT]]
Ahoy, mateys! In this study, we set sail to uncover the curious correlation between the votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in New Mexico and global shipwrecks. Avast, ye landlubbers, for we delved into the treasure trove of data from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and Wikipedia to unravel this enigmatic relationship. Our findings revealed a seaworthy correlation coefficient of 0.9537802 with a p-value less than 0.01 for the years 1976 to 2014.

Sail with us through the murky waters of statistical analysis as we navigate through the perilous seas of election results and maritime mishaps. It seems that the Libertarian votes in New Mexico may have a larger impact on global nautical history than previously thought! But wait, here comes a pun-make sure to steer clear of rocky political shores to avoid any shipwrecks!

So, shiver me timbers, the correlation between New Mexico's political preferences and global shipwrecks is nothing to scoff at. Join us in this adventurous voyage as we untangle the complexities of this unexpected association. Arrr, matey, prepare to be amazed by the unlikely connections we've uncovered.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The intersection of political behavior and maritime mishaps may seem like uncharted waters, but as the saying goes, "Where there's a political wheel, there's a seaway." In this paper, we dive deep into the unexpected connection between the votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in New Mexico and the occurrence of global shipwrecks. This analysis aims to shed light on the potential influence of state-level political preferences on international maritime events, and you can bet your bottom doubloon we'll have a whale of a time uncovering this correlation.
To set the stage for our voyage, let's first consider the historical significance of New Mexico in presidential elections. The state has often been a battleground for political parties, but perhaps it's also a battleground for ships navigating the treacherous waters of our planet. After all, it would be fitting to say that New Mexico's electoral decisions have ripple effects not only in the political arena but also in the seven seas. And speaking of ripples, have you heard the one about the Libertarian who tried to integrate calculus and sailing? He wanted to find the integral of x^2, but all he got were sea-leeks.
Our quest for understanding this peculiar correlation entails weaving through the waves of data obtained from reputable sources, including the MIT Election Data and Science Lab and historical records of maritime incidents. We used rigorous statistical methods to chart our course, and the results were not just ship-shape but also brought to light an unexpected link between the political preferences of New Mexicans and the fate of seafaring vessels around the globe. It appears that the votes cast in the Land of Enchantment hold more sway than one might have bargained for – pun intended, of course. And remember, when you're researching political tides and marine mishaps, it's crucial to stay buoyant!
As we hoist the sails and navigate through the uncharted waters of this peculiar correlation, we invite readers to join us on this intellectual expedition. Not all who wander are lost, but those who wander into unexpected research pairings may find themselves with a boatload of intriguing discoveries. So, batten down the hatches, for we're about to embark on a scholarly escapade that promises not only academic insights but also a fair share of sea-themed puns. After all, why did the political scientist bring a map on their yacht? They wanted to navigate the political currents and make sure they didn't get "left-ern" behind! So hop on board as we navigate this uncharted intellectual terrain, ready to uncover the surprises that lurk beneath the waves of statistical analysis.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

Smith et al. (2017) delved into the political landscape of New Mexico and its impact on national elections, shedding light on the intriguing dynamics of state-level voting patterns. Doe and Jones (2019) echoed these sentiments, emphasizing the nuanced interplay between local and federal politics. But what they may not have realized is that these political tides could potentially lead to some unexpected nautical consequences. Now, let's steer our ship into the unconventional waters of literary and cinematic references related to our study.

In "The Sea Around Us," Rachel Carson explores the captivating mysteries of the ocean, sparking curiosity about the hidden stories beneath the waves. Similarly, "Unsinkable: The Full Story of the RMS Titanic" by Daniel Allen Butler provides a detailed account of a maritime disaster that continues to intrigue and captivate audiences. Ah, the allure of shipwrecks and the ocean's enigmatic hold on our collective imagination!

Turning to fiction, Jules Verne's "Twenty Thousand Leagues Under the Sea" immerses readers in a world of underwater exploration, where the unexpected lurks around every corner. Meanwhile, Clive Cussler's "Sahara" takes readers on a high-octane adventure that intertwines politics and maritime peril. Now, if only our research journey could be as action-packed as a Clive Cussler novel!

On the silver screen, movies like "Master and Commander: The Far Side of the World" and "Pirates of the Caribbean: The Curse of the Black Pearl" showcase the drama and danger of seafaring adventures. In these tales of high seas and high stakes, we catch glimpses of the unpredictable nature of maritime exploration and the thrilling escapades that await those who dare to venture into uncharted waters. Such films may not be directly related to our research, but they certainly add a cinematic flair to the maritime theme of our study.

Now, back to the serious business of academic research. Our analysis leads us to an intriguing juncture where the winds of statistical significance blow in unison with the currents of electoral preference. Lorem and ipsum, but let’s not lose sight of the larger picture amid these statistical intricacies. As we navigate this curious correlation, remember folks, always be on the lookout for potential political shipwrecks – they may just be lurking beneath the surface!

But hey, you know what's even more fascinating than a shipwreck? A politically informed electorate that also appreciates a good dad joke. Because let's face it, when it comes to research on unexpected correlations, we're all in the same boat! And if you're ever feeling adrift in the complexities of academic literature, just remember: buoyancy is key, both in research and at sea.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in New Mexico and Global shipwrecks . You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse and Wikipedia . You used data from 1976 to 2014

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Navigating Political Tides: A Libertarian's "Ship" to Shipwrecks

[[ABSTRACT]]
Ahoy, mateys! In this study, we set sail to uncover the curious correlation between the votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in New Mexico and global shipwrecks. Avast, ye landlubbers, for we delved into the treasure trove of data from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and Wikipedia to unravel this enigmatic relationship. Our findings revealed a seaworthy correlation coefficient of 0.9537802 with a p-value less than 0.01 for the years 1976 to 2014.

Sail with us through the murky waters of statistical analysis as we navigate through the perilous seas of election results and maritime mishaps. It seems that the Libertarian votes in New Mexico may have a larger impact on global nautical history than previously thought! But wait, here comes a pun-make sure to steer clear of rocky political shores to avoid any shipwrecks!

So, shiver me timbers, the correlation between New Mexico's political preferences and global shipwrecks is nothing to scoff at. Join us in this adventurous voyage as we untangle the complexities of this unexpected association. Arrr, matey, prepare to be amazed by the unlikely connections we've uncovered.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
The intersection of political behavior and maritime mishaps may seem like uncharted waters, but as the saying goes, "Where there's a political wheel, there's a seaway." In this paper, we dive deep into the unexpected connection between the votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in New Mexico and the occurrence of global shipwrecks. This analysis aims to shed light on the potential influence of state-level political preferences on international maritime events, and you can bet your bottom doubloon we'll have a whale of a time uncovering this correlation.
To set the stage for our voyage, let's first consider the historical significance of New Mexico in presidential elections. The state has often been a battleground for political parties, but perhaps it's also a battleground for ships navigating the treacherous waters of our planet. After all, it would be fitting to say that New Mexico's electoral decisions have ripple effects not only in the political arena but also in the seven seas. And speaking of ripples, have you heard the one about the Libertarian who tried to integrate calculus and sailing? He wanted to find the integral of x^2, but all he got were sea-leeks.
Our quest for understanding this peculiar correlation entails weaving through the waves of data obtained from reputable sources, including the MIT Election Data and Science Lab and historical records of maritime incidents. We used rigorous statistical methods to chart our course, and the results were not just ship-shape but also brought to light an unexpected link between the political preferences of New Mexicans and the fate of seafaring vessels around the globe. It appears that the votes cast in the Land of Enchantment hold more sway than one might have bargained for – pun intended, of course. And remember, when you're researching political tides and marine mishaps, it's crucial to stay buoyant!
As we hoist the sails and navigate through the uncharted waters of this peculiar correlation, we invite readers to join us on this intellectual expedition. Not all who wander are lost, but those who wander into unexpected research pairings may find themselves with a boatload of intriguing discoveries. So, batten down the hatches, for we're about to embark on a scholarly escapade that promises not only academic insights but also a fair share of sea-themed puns. After all, why did the political scientist bring a map on their yacht? They wanted to navigate the political currents and make sure they didn't get "left-ern" behind! So hop on board as we navigate this uncharted intellectual terrain, ready to uncover the surprises that lurk beneath the waves of statistical analysis.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

Setting Sail with Data Collection:
Ahoy there, fellow seafarers of academia! Our intrepid journey into the uncharted waters of statistical correlation began with the collection of electoral and maritime data. We cast our net far and wide, trawling the digital seas for information from dependable sources such as the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and the annals of maritime history as immortalized on Wikipedia. We harnessed the power of the internet's glistening waves to gather election results for the state of New Mexico from 1976 to 2014, alongside a treasure trove of worldwide shipwreck data covering the same time span. Our trusty crew of data analysts toiled day and night, navigating the tumultuous currents of online databases and archives to amass a bounty of information fit for scientific scrutiny.

Sampling Strategies:
As any seasoned researcher knows, plotting a course through the tempestuous seas of data necessitates a well-crafted sampling strategy. We utilized a systematic sampling method to navigate through the electoral results in New Mexico, ensuring that each presidential election year was represented in our analysis. Similarly, for the maritime mishaps, we adopted a stratified sampling approach based on geographical regions to capture the breadth of shipwreck occurrences across the globe. Our data set thus became a veritable compass of statistical significance, guiding our inquiry into the uncharted territory of the unexpected correlation between political preferences and nautical misadventures. But speaking of sampling, have you heard about the statistician who loved to go sailing? He always advocated for a nautical approach, saying, "When in doubt, use a Bayesian net!"

Statistical Rigging and Data Analysis:
With our data securely hoisted aboard, we navigated the currents of statistical rigging and analysis. Employing the venerable tool of correlation analysis, we calculated the Pearson correlation coefficient to measure the strength and direction of the relationship between votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in New Mexico and global shipwrecks. The results were as clear as a cloudless day at sea, revealing a significant correlation coefficient of 0.9537802 with a p-value less than 0.01. This finding buoyed our spirits, signaling a compelling association worthy of further exploration. We resisted the siren call of overfitting and diligently steered clear of common method bias to ensure the integrity of our findings, all while wearing our statistical safety goggles to prevent any data "sea-prises" from catching us off guard. After all, in the realm of statistical analysis, it's crucial to stay afloat and never let your guard down, lest you become a victim of the dreaded statistical undertow!

But wait, there's a wave of humor heading our way! Did you hear about the ship captain who was a statistics enthusiast? When asked about the correlation between his course and the ship's speed, he simply replied, "I'm not sure, but let's chart a scatterplot and see if we're on a collision course with statistical significance!"

In conclusion, our methodology navigated the treacherous waters of data collection, sampling strategies, and statistical analysis with unwavering resolve. We set our sights on the horizon of knowledge, ready to uncover the mysteries hidden beneath the waves of electoral choices and maritime calamities. Join us as we chart a course toward the discussion and interpretation of our findings, promising both academic enlightenment and the occasional sea-worthy pun along the way.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in New Mexico and Global shipwrecks . You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse and Wikipedia .

For the time period 1976 to 2014, you found a correlation 0.9537802, r-squared of 0.9096967, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Navigating Political Tides: A Libertarian's "Ship" to Shipwrecks

[[ABSTRACT]]
Ahoy, mateys! In this study, we set sail to uncover the curious correlation between the votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in New Mexico and global shipwrecks. Avast, ye landlubbers, for we delved into the treasure trove of data from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and Wikipedia to unravel this enigmatic relationship. Our findings revealed a seaworthy correlation coefficient of 0.9537802 with a p-value less than 0.01 for the years 1976 to 2014.

Sail with us through the murky waters of statistical analysis as we navigate through the perilous seas of election results and maritime mishaps. It seems that the Libertarian votes in New Mexico may have a larger impact on global nautical history than previously thought! But wait, here comes a pun-make sure to steer clear of rocky political shores to avoid any shipwrecks!

So, shiver me timbers, the correlation between New Mexico's political preferences and global shipwrecks is nothing to scoff at. Join us in this adventurous voyage as we untangle the complexities of this unexpected association. Arrr, matey, prepare to be amazed by the unlikely connections we've uncovered.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
The intersection of political behavior and maritime mishaps may seem like uncharted waters, but as the saying goes, "Where there's a political wheel, there's a seaway." In this paper, we dive deep into the unexpected connection between the votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in New Mexico and the occurrence of global shipwrecks. This analysis aims to shed light on the potential influence of state-level political preferences on international maritime events, and you can bet your bottom doubloon we'll have a whale of a time uncovering this correlation.
To set the stage for our voyage, let's first consider the historical significance of New Mexico in presidential elections. The state has often been a battleground for political parties, but perhaps it's also a battleground for ships navigating the treacherous waters of our planet. After all, it would be fitting to say that New Mexico's electoral decisions have ripple effects not only in the political arena but also in the seven seas. And speaking of ripples, have you heard the one about the Libertarian who tried to integrate calculus and sailing? He wanted to find the integral of x^2, but all he got were sea-leeks.
Our quest for understanding this peculiar correlation entails weaving through the waves of data obtained from reputable sources, including the MIT Election Data and Science Lab and historical records of maritime incidents. We used rigorous statistical methods to chart our course, and the results were not just ship-shape but also brought to light an unexpected link between the political preferences of New Mexicans and the fate of seafaring vessels around the globe. It appears that the votes cast in the Land of Enchantment hold more sway than one might have bargained for – pun intended, of course. And remember, when you're researching political tides and marine mishaps, it's crucial to stay buoyant!
As we hoist the sails and navigate through the uncharted waters of this peculiar correlation, we invite readers to join us on this intellectual expedition. Not all who wander are lost, but those who wander into unexpected research pairings may find themselves with a boatload of intriguing discoveries. So, batten down the hatches, for we're about to embark on a scholarly escapade that promises not only academic insights but also a fair share of sea-themed puns. After all, why did the political scientist bring a map on their yacht? They wanted to navigate the political currents and make sure they didn't get "left-ern" behind! So hop on board as we navigate this uncharted intellectual terrain, ready to uncover the surprises that lurk beneath the waves of statistical analysis.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The results of our analysis revealed a remarkably strong correlation of 0.9537802 between the votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in New Mexico and the occurrence of global shipwrecks from 1976 to 2014. This correlation was accompanied by an r-squared value of 0.9096967, indicating that over 90% of the variance in global shipwrecks can be explained by the votes for the Libertarian candidate in New Mexico. The p-value of less than 0.01 suggests that this correlation is statistically significant, which is certainly a cause for celebration – perhaps with a maritime-themed party, complete with ship-shaped cookies and sea shanties.

In Fig. 1, the scatterplot visually depicts this strong correlation, illustrating the undeniable link between the political choices of New Mexicans and the unfortunate fate of ships worldwide. We can almost hear the ships crying "aye-aye" to the Libertarian votes, as if expressing their approval of the electoral decisions influencing their nautical destiny. One might even say that the votes in New Mexico cast a "Liber-ship-tarian" spell on global maritime events – or at least provided an unexpectedly strong tug on the seas of fate.

It's fascinating to ponder how the political preferences of one state could be linked to global shipwrecks, but as the saying goes, "All hands on deck for unexpected correlations!" Our findings not only shed light on this curious relationship but also add a splash of intrigue to the often-serious world of statistical analysis. After all, who would have thought that the political landscape of New Mexico holds such sway over the high seas? It's a reminder that in the vast ocean of data, unexpected connections can emerge from the depths and embark on their own scholarly voyages.

As we reflect on these results, it's clear that the tale of libertarian votes and maritime mishaps is not just a "fishy" story but a statistically robust phenomenon worth further exploration. Our findings have set sail on a new frontier of interdisciplinary inquiry, emphasizing the need to navigate not only the expected routes of research but also the uncharted waters of unusual correlations. And who knows, perhaps uncovering these unexpected connections will eventually lead us to the elusive "treasure island" of knowledge, or at the very least, a good laugh at the quirky twists of academic exploration.

In conclusion, our study not only confirms the compelling association between the votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in New Mexico and global shipwrecks but also beckons researchers to embrace the spirit of intellectual adventure. So, as we bid adieu to this leg of our research journey, we encourage fellow scholars to keep their eyes on the horizon for the next captivating conundrum that awaits discovery. After all, in the world of academia, there's always another unexpected correlation just waiting to be uncovered – and who knows, it might just be anchored in a sea of puns.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in New Mexico and Global shipwrecks . You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
Navigating Political Tides: A Libertarian's "Ship" to Shipwrecks

[[ABSTRACT]]
Ahoy, mateys! In this study, we set sail to uncover the curious correlation between the votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in New Mexico and global shipwrecks. Avast, ye landlubbers, for we delved into the treasure trove of data from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and Wikipedia to unravel this enigmatic relationship. Our findings revealed a seaworthy correlation coefficient of 0.9537802 with a p-value less than 0.01 for the years 1976 to 2014.

Sail with us through the murky waters of statistical analysis as we navigate through the perilous seas of election results and maritime mishaps. It seems that the Libertarian votes in New Mexico may have a larger impact on global nautical history than previously thought! But wait, here comes a pun-make sure to steer clear of rocky political shores to avoid any shipwrecks!

So, shiver me timbers, the correlation between New Mexico's political preferences and global shipwrecks is nothing to scoff at. Join us in this adventurous voyage as we untangle the complexities of this unexpected association. Arrr, matey, prepare to be amazed by the unlikely connections we've uncovered.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
Smith et al. (2017) delved into the political landscape of New Mexico and its impact on national elections, shedding light on the intriguing dynamics of state-level voting patterns. Doe and Jones (2019) echoed these sentiments, emphasizing the nuanced interplay between local and federal politics. But what they may not have realized is that these political tides could potentially lead to some unexpected nautical consequences. Now, let's steer our ship into the unconventional waters of literary and cinematic references related to our study.
In "The Sea Around Us," Rachel Carson explores the captivating mysteries of the ocean, sparking curiosity about the hidden stories beneath the waves. Similarly, "Unsinkable: The Full Story of the RMS Titanic" by Daniel Allen Butler provides a detailed account of a maritime disaster that continues to intrigue and captivate audiences. Ah, the allure of shipwrecks and the ocean's enigmatic hold on our collective imagination!
Turning to fiction, Jules Verne's "Twenty Thousand Leagues Under the Sea" immerses readers in a world of underwater exploration, where the unexpected lurks around every corner. Meanwhile, Clive Cussler's "Sahara" takes readers on a high-octane adventure that intertwines politics and maritime peril. Now, if only our research journey could be as action-packed as a Clive Cussler novel!
On the silver screen, movies like "Master and Commander: The Far Side of the World" and "Pirates of the Caribbean: The Curse of the Black Pearl" showcase the drama and danger of seafaring adventures. In these tales of high seas and high stakes, we catch glimpses of the unpredictable nature of maritime exploration and the thrilling escapades that await those who dare to venture into uncharted waters. Such films may not be directly related to our research, but they certainly add a cinematic flair to the maritime theme of our study.
Now, back to the serious business of academic research. Our analysis leads us to an intriguing juncture where the winds of statistical significance blow in unison with the currents of electoral preference. Lorem and ipsum, but let’s not lose sight of the larger picture amid these statistical intricacies. As we navigate this curious correlation, remember folks, always be on the lookout for potential political shipwrecks – they may just be lurking beneath the surface!
But hey, you know what's even more fascinating than a shipwreck? A politically informed electorate that also appreciates a good dad joke. Because let's face it, when it comes to research on unexpected correlations, we're all in the same boat! And if you're ever feeling adrift in the complexities of academic literature, just remember: buoyancy is key, both in research and at sea.

[[RESULTS]]
The results of our analysis revealed a remarkably strong correlation of 0.9537802 between the votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in New Mexico and the occurrence of global shipwrecks from 1976 to 2014. This correlation was accompanied by an r-squared value of 0.9096967, indicating that over 90% of the variance in global shipwrecks can be explained by the votes for the Libertarian candidate in New Mexico. The p-value of less than 0.01 suggests that this correlation is statistically significant, which is certainly a cause for celebration – perhaps with a maritime-themed party, complete with ship-shaped cookies and sea shanties.
In Fig. 1, the scatterplot visually depicts this strong correlation, illustrating the undeniable link between the political choices of New Mexicans and the unfortunate fate of ships worldwide. We can almost hear the ships crying "aye-aye" to the Libertarian votes, as if expressing their approval of the electoral decisions influencing their nautical destiny. One might even say that the votes in New Mexico cast a "Liber-ship-tarian" spell on global maritime events – or at least provided an unexpectedly strong tug on the seas of fate.
It's fascinating to ponder how the political preferences of one state could be linked to global shipwrecks, but as the saying goes, "All hands on deck for unexpected correlations!" Our findings not only shed light on this curious relationship but also add a splash of intrigue to the often-serious world of statistical analysis. After all, who would have thought that the political landscape of New Mexico holds such sway over the high seas? It's a reminder that in the vast ocean of data, unexpected connections can emerge from the depths and embark on their own scholarly voyages.
As we reflect on these results, it's clear that the tale of libertarian votes and maritime mishaps is not just a "fishy" story but a statistically robust phenomenon worth further exploration. Our findings have set sail on a new frontier of interdisciplinary inquiry, emphasizing the need to navigate not only the expected routes of research but also the uncharted waters of unusual correlations. And who knows, perhaps uncovering these unexpected connections will eventually lead us to the elusive "treasure island" of knowledge, or at the very least, a good laugh at the quirky twists of academic exploration.
In conclusion, our study not only confirms the compelling association between the votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in New Mexico and global shipwrecks but also beckons researchers to embrace the spirit of intellectual adventure. So, as we bid adieu to this leg of our research journey, we encourage fellow scholars to keep their eyes on the horizon for the next captivating conundrum that awaits discovery. After all, in the world of academia, there's always another unexpected correlation just waiting to be uncovered – and who knows, it might just be anchored in a sea of puns.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

Ahoy, there! Our findings have charted a course through the uncharted waters of interdisciplinary research, revealing a remarkably sturdy link between the votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in New Mexico and global shipwrecks. It's as if the political winds blowing through the desert state have set sail on a global maritime escapade, leaving their mark on nautical history.

Now, let's dive into these results as we navigate the scholarly sea of unexpected correlations. It's clear that the association between New Mexico's political preferences and global shipwrecks isn't just a fluke – it's a statistically robust phenomenon that's all shipshape and Bristol fashion. The r-squared value points to over 90% of the variance in global shipwrecks being influenced by the votes for the Libertarian candidate in New Mexico, leaving very little room for mere coincidence. One might even say this correlation is as solid as the bow of a seaworthy vessel.

Our findings corroborate the musings of Smith et al. (2017) and Doe and Jones (2019) regarding the impact of state-level voting patterns on national politics, but they inadvertently hoist the sails of our study into the academic stratosphere, elevating seemingly unconventional connections to the status of serious scholarly inquiry. We've managed to unearth a treasure trove of statistical evidence that not only supports prior research but also pushes the boundaries of what we understand about the intersection of politics and maritime history. It's enough to make one ship their breeches with excitement!

Fig. 1 paints a vivid picture of this correlation, akin to a seafaring adventure where every plotted point is a waypoint on the journey to uncovering unexpected scholarly treasures. And speaking of treasures, who knew that the electoral decisions of New Mexicans could hold such sway over the fate of ships across the globe? It's as if the waters of statistical significance have parted to reveal a novel phenomenon worthy of further investigation.

In essence, this correlation isn't just a footnote in the annals of academic research; it's the crowning jewel in our scholarly treasure chest. Our findings call for a paradigm shift in the way we approach and appreciate unexpected correlations, urging researchers to hoist their intellectual sails and venture into uncharted territories of inquiry. After all, in the vast ocean of data, one can never be sure what curious tides may bring.

As we navigate these uncharted waters of scholarly discovery, it's clear that unexpected correlations can serve as the North Star guiding our research pursuits. So, let's heed the call to embrace the spirit of intellectual adventure and be on the lookout for the next captivating conundrum that awaits discovery. And remember, in the world of academia, there's always another unexpected correlation just waiting to be uncovered – and who knows, it might just be anchored in a sea of puns.

Now, we'll leave the conclusion to further research, but in the meantime, let's bask in the glow of our scholarly voyage and appreciate the unexpected connections that have emerged from the depths. After all, in the grand adventure of academia, it's not every day that we stumble upon a correlation that's as captivating as a siren's song. So, until we meet again in the scholarly seas, fair winds and following seas to all who dare to explore the uncharted waters of research!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in New Mexico and Global shipwrecks . You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
Navigating Political Tides: A Libertarian's "Ship" to Shipwrecks

[[ABSTRACT]]
Ahoy, mateys! In this study, we set sail to uncover the curious correlation between the votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in New Mexico and global shipwrecks. Avast, ye landlubbers, for we delved into the treasure trove of data from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and Wikipedia to unravel this enigmatic relationship. Our findings revealed a seaworthy correlation coefficient of 0.9537802 with a p-value less than 0.01 for the years 1976 to 2014.

Sail with us through the murky waters of statistical analysis as we navigate through the perilous seas of election results and maritime mishaps. It seems that the Libertarian votes in New Mexico may have a larger impact on global nautical history than previously thought! But wait, here comes a pun-make sure to steer clear of rocky political shores to avoid any shipwrecks!

So, shiver me timbers, the correlation between New Mexico's political preferences and global shipwrecks is nothing to scoff at. Join us in this adventurous voyage as we untangle the complexities of this unexpected association. Arrr, matey, prepare to be amazed by the unlikely connections we've uncovered.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
The intersection of political behavior and maritime mishaps may seem like uncharted waters, but as the saying goes, "Where there's a political wheel, there's a seaway." In this paper, we dive deep into the unexpected connection between the votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in New Mexico and the occurrence of global shipwrecks. This analysis aims to shed light on the potential influence of state-level political preferences on international maritime events, and you can bet your bottom doubloon we'll have a whale of a time uncovering this correlation.
To set the stage for our voyage, let's first consider the historical significance of New Mexico in presidential elections. The state has often been a battleground for political parties, but perhaps it's also a battleground for ships navigating the treacherous waters of our planet. After all, it would be fitting to say that New Mexico's electoral decisions have ripple effects not only in the political arena but also in the seven seas. And speaking of ripples, have you heard the one about the Libertarian who tried to integrate calculus and sailing? He wanted to find the integral of x^2, but all he got were sea-leeks.
Our quest for understanding this peculiar correlation entails weaving through the waves of data obtained from reputable sources, including the MIT Election Data and Science Lab and historical records of maritime incidents. We used rigorous statistical methods to chart our course, and the results were not just ship-shape but also brought to light an unexpected link between the political preferences of New Mexicans and the fate of seafaring vessels around the globe. It appears that the votes cast in the Land of Enchantment hold more sway than one might have bargained for – pun intended, of course. And remember, when you're researching political tides and marine mishaps, it's crucial to stay buoyant!
As we hoist the sails and navigate through the uncharted waters of this peculiar correlation, we invite readers to join us on this intellectual expedition. Not all who wander are lost, but those who wander into unexpected research pairings may find themselves with a boatload of intriguing discoveries. So, batten down the hatches, for we're about to embark on a scholarly escapade that promises not only academic insights but also a fair share of sea-themed puns. After all, why did the political scientist bring a map on their yacht? They wanted to navigate the political currents and make sure they didn't get "left-ern" behind! So hop on board as we navigate this uncharted intellectual terrain, ready to uncover the surprises that lurk beneath the waves of statistical analysis.

[[RESULTS]]
The results of our analysis revealed a remarkably strong correlation of 0.9537802 between the votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in New Mexico and the occurrence of global shipwrecks from 1976 to 2014. This correlation was accompanied by an r-squared value of 0.9096967, indicating that over 90% of the variance in global shipwrecks can be explained by the votes for the Libertarian candidate in New Mexico. The p-value of less than 0.01 suggests that this correlation is statistically significant, which is certainly a cause for celebration – perhaps with a maritime-themed party, complete with ship-shaped cookies and sea shanties.
In Fig. 1, the scatterplot visually depicts this strong correlation, illustrating the undeniable link between the political choices of New Mexicans and the unfortunate fate of ships worldwide. We can almost hear the ships crying "aye-aye" to the Libertarian votes, as if expressing their approval of the electoral decisions influencing their nautical destiny. One might even say that the votes in New Mexico cast a "Liber-ship-tarian" spell on global maritime events – or at least provided an unexpectedly strong tug on the seas of fate.
It's fascinating to ponder how the political preferences of one state could be linked to global shipwrecks, but as the saying goes, "All hands on deck for unexpected correlations!" Our findings not only shed light on this curious relationship but also add a splash of intrigue to the often-serious world of statistical analysis. After all, who would have thought that the political landscape of New Mexico holds such sway over the high seas? It's a reminder that in the vast ocean of data, unexpected connections can emerge from the depths and embark on their own scholarly voyages.
As we reflect on these results, it's clear that the tale of libertarian votes and maritime mishaps is not just a "fishy" story but a statistically robust phenomenon worth further exploration. Our findings have set sail on a new frontier of interdisciplinary inquiry, emphasizing the need to navigate not only the expected routes of research but also the uncharted waters of unusual correlations. And who knows, perhaps uncovering these unexpected connections will eventually lead us to the elusive "treasure island" of knowledge, or at the very least, a good laugh at the quirky twists of academic exploration.
In conclusion, our study not only confirms the compelling association between the votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in New Mexico and global shipwrecks but also beckons researchers to embrace the spirit of intellectual adventure. So, as we bid adieu to this leg of our research journey, we encourage fellow scholars to keep their eyes on the horizon for the next captivating conundrum that awaits discovery. After all, in the world of academia, there's always another unexpected correlation just waiting to be uncovered – and who knows, it might just be anchored in a sea of puns.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In navigating the uncharted waters of unexpected correlations, our study has illuminated a captivating association between the votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in New Mexico and global shipwrecks. The robust correlation coefficient of 0.9537802 and the r-squared value of 0.9096967 leave little doubt that New Mexico's political preferences have a significant impact on maritime mishaps worldwide. It's as if the ships are saying, "Lib-arr, matey, we feel the pull of those votes!”

The statistical significance of this correlation, with a p-value less than 0.01, emphasizes the need to take these findings seriously – but not too seriously! After all, we don't want to end up shipwrecked in a sea of overly solemn academic prose. As the saying goes, "Why did the statistical pirate go to school? To improve his arrrrrrrrr-squared!" So, while we take pride in the rigorous statistical analysis underpinning this study, we also appreciate the need to infuse scholarly pursuits with a sense of adventure and, dare we say, a splash of humor.

Our findings underscore the interconnectedness of seemingly disparate phenomena, reminding us that research is not merely about drawing straight lines but also about following the captivating curves that emerge from unexpected correlations. It's like finding a hidden treasure map in the midst of data – exhilarating and full of promise, much like a well-crafted dad joke.

Now, as we steer our ship towards the horizon of further research, it's unmistakably clear that no more research is needed into the connection between the votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in New Mexico and global shipwrecks. This unexpected correlation has been thoroughly explored, leaving us with a plethora of maritime-inspired puns and a newfound appreciation for the serendipitous discoveries that lie beneath the tides of data analysis. But fear not, fellow scholars, for the seas of academic inquiry are teeming with other mysterious connections waiting to be brought to light. So, hoist the sails, set course for new intellectual endeavors, and never underestimate the power of a well-timed pun to keep scholarly pursuits afloat!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Navigating Political Tides: A Libertarian's Ship to Shipwrecks. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Political Maritime Studies


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Navigating Political Tides: A Libertarian's Ship to Shipwrecks. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Institute for Libertarian Seafaring Studies


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Navigating Political Tides: A Libertarian's Ship to Shipwrecks with an abstract of Ahoy, mateys! In this study, we set sail to uncover the curious correlation between the votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in New Mexico and global shipwrecks. Avast, ye landlubbers, for we delved into the treasure trove of data from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and Wikipedia to unravel this enigmatic relationship. Our findings revealed a seaworthy correlation coefficient of 0.9537802 with a p-value less than 0.01 for the years 1976 to 2014.
Sail with us through the murky waters of statistical analysis as we navigate through the perilous seas of election results and maritime mishaps. It seems that the Libertarian votes in New Mexico may have a larger impact on global nautical history than previously thought! But wait, here comes a pun-make sure to steer clear of rocky political shores to avoid any shipwrecks!
So, shiver me timbers, the correlation between New Mexico's political preferences and global shipwrecks is nothing to scoff at. Join us in this adventurous voyage as we untangle the complexities of this unexpected association. Arrr, matey, prepare to be amazed by the unlikely connections we've uncovered.

ChatGPT:

Libertarian, presidential candidate, New Mexico, shipwrecks, correlation, MIT Election Data, Harvard Dataverse, Wikipedia, statistical analysis, election results, maritime mishaps, nautical history, political preferences, global, correlation coefficient, p-value, 1976-2014, maritime, association

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in New Mexico
Detailed data title: Percentage of all votes cast for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in New Mexico
Source: MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse
See what else correlates with Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in New Mexico

Global shipwrecks
Detailed data title: Ships sunk, foundered, grounded, or otherwise lost during the year
Source: Wikipedia
See what else correlates with Global shipwrecks

Correlation r = 0.9537802 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.9096967 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 91% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Global shipwrecks ) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in New Mexico) over the 10 years from 1976 through 2014.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 1.9E-5. 0.0000188797763071220300000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.95 in 0.0019% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 52,967 random variables You don't actually need 52 thousand variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 9 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 9 because we have two variables measured over a period of 10 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.81, 0.99 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
1976198019841988199219962000200420082012
Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in New Mexico (Percentage of votes)0.2664490.956740.8668860.6459690.283340.5387770.3437990.3149530.2924743.54548
Global shipwrecks (Wrecks)363433291315141831111




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([0.266449,0.95674,0.866886,0.645969,0.28334,0.538777,0.343799,0.314953,0.292474,3.54548,])
array_2 = np.array([36,34,33,29,13,15,14,18,31,111,])
array_1_name = "Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in New Mexico"
array_2_name = "Global shipwrecks "

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Thanks for shining a light on this correlation!


Correlation ID: 4601 · Black Variable ID: 26140 · Red Variable ID: 504
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0