about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #4,598 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Google searches for 'cat memes' and the second variable is Votes for Democratic Senators in California.  The chart goes from 2004 to 2018, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

As the internet was flooded with hilarious cat memes, Californians couldn't help but feel a surge of positivity. This led to a statewide increase in dopamine levels, elevating moods across the board. With Californians in higher spirits, they found themselves more inclined to engage in political activities like voting. And lo and behold, when it came time to support their Democratic Senators, they were feline good and ready to cast their ballots! It seems that this time, the purrfect combination of humor and a-meow-zing political representation truly made a difference in the election results.

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Create an image that evokes the joyful, vibrant style of a Pixar movie. Depict a cheerful Californian happily scrolling through Google searches for 'cat memes' on their phone, with a big smile on their face. In the background, show a line of voters wearing bright, smiling faces as they stand in support of their Democratic Senators. The positive energy and good vibes from the cat memes should be evident in how it seems to have inspired their political engagement. Ensure the scene is filled with a sense of community, enthusiasm, and feel-good energy. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Google searches for 'cat memes' and Democrat votes for Senators in California. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: An image that looks like it is a scene from a Pixar movie Minimalism A scene from Skyrim Hyper-realistic Glitch art
ChatGPT: An image that looks like it is a scene from a Pixar movie

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Google searches for 'cat memes' and Democrat votes for Senators in California, in the following situation: As the internet was flooded with hilarious cat memes, Californians couldn't help but feel a surge of positivity. This led to a statewide increase in dopamine levels, elevating moods across the board. With Californians in higher spirits, they found themselves more inclined to engage in political activities like voting. And lo and behold, when it came time to support their Democratic Senators, they were feline good and ready to cast their ballots! It seems that this time, the purrfect combination of humor and a-meow-zing political representation truly made a difference in the election results.. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: A cheerful Californian, scrolling through Google searches for 'cat memes' on their phone, smiles brightly. In the background, a line of voters, also with smiles on their faces, stand in support of their Democratic Senators. The positive energy and good vibes from the cat memes seem to have inspired their political engagement.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ An image that looks like it is a scene from a Pixar movie ] and depicting this scene: A cheerful Californian, scrolling through Google searches for 'cat memes' on their phone, smiles brightly. In the background, a line of voters, also with smiles on their faces, stand in support of their Democratic Senators. The positive energy and good vibes from the cat memes seem to have inspired their political engagement. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Create an image that evokes the joyful, vibrant style of a Pixar movie. Depict a cheerful Californian happily scrolling through Google searches for 'cat memes' on their phone, with a big smile on their face. In the background, show a line of voters wearing bright, smiling faces as they stand in support of their Democratic Senators. The positive energy and good vibes from the cat memes should be evident in how it seems to have inspired their political engagement. Ensure the scene is filled with a sense of community, enthusiasm, and feel-good energy.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in cat memes (Google searches for 'cat memes') caused Democrat votes for Senators in California to increase. Make it feel plausible.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Pawsitively Political: A Feline-Fueled Analysis of Google Searches for 'Cat Memes' and Democrat Votes for Senators in California

The Quarterly Journal of Feline Behavior and Political Science

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Google searches for 'cat memes' and Democrat votes for Senators in California. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Make the title punny if you can come up with clever pun. If not, make it sound serious.

Your research team used data from Google Trends and MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9892500 and p < 0.01 for 2004 to 2018.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
Pawsitively Political: A Feline-Fueled Analysis of Google Searches for 'Cat Memes' and Democrat Votes for Senators in California

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we delve into the purr-plexing connection between online feline fandom and political preferences in the Golden State. Utilizing data from Google Trends and the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, we set out to determine if the popularity of 'cat memes' could be correlated with Democrat votes for Senators in California. Our analysis covering the period from 2004 to 2018 revealed a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9892500 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01. Meow that's something to sink your claws into! Our findings suggest a strong relationship between the frequency of 'cat memes' searches and the political inclinations of Californians, supporting the notion that internet memes may have a subtle yet discernible influence on voting behavior. These results prompt a re-fur-endum on the role of online culture in shaping political engagements. Our research adds to the growing body of evidence on the impact of seemingly whimsical online phenomena on serious real-world outcomes. It's time to take this 'purr-fectly' serious!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Google searches for 'cat memes' and Democrat votes for Senators in California. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Pawsitively Political: A Feline-Fueled Analysis of Google Searches for 'Cat Memes' and Democrat Votes for Senators in California

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we delve into the purr-plexing connection between online feline fandom and political preferences in the Golden State. Utilizing data from Google Trends and the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, we set out to determine if the popularity of 'cat memes' could be correlated with Democrat votes for Senators in California. Our analysis covering the period from 2004 to 2018 revealed a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9892500 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01. Meow that's something to sink your claws into! Our findings suggest a strong relationship between the frequency of 'cat memes' searches and the political inclinations of Californians, supporting the notion that internet memes may have a subtle yet discernible influence on voting behavior. These results prompt a re-fur-endum on the role of online culture in shaping political engagements. Our research adds to the growing body of evidence on the impact of seemingly whimsical online phenomena on serious real-world outcomes. It's time to take this 'purr-fectly' serious!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:

[[INTRODUCTION]]

As scientific explorers of the digital realm, we cat-not help but be intrigued by the interplay between internet culture and political decision-making. It is a tale as old as time—well, at least as old as the internet—and it has led us down a rabbit hole, or should I say, a litter box, of unprecedented discoveries. Our prowl through the data has unearthed some fascinating findings that promise to cat-apult our understanding of the curious connections between online behavior and voting patterns.

The Internet, that vast digital savannah where information prowls and memes roam, has become an integral part of our daily lives. From "keyboard warriors" to "troll patrols," the denizens of the web shape and reshape our perceptions, opinions, and perhaps even our voting tendencies. It's enough to make a computer mouse rethink its life choices! The online landscape is a rich tapestry of ideas, emotions, and, of course, adorable pictures and videos of our feline friends. Meow, that's a lot of online purr-suasion!

This fur-tile ground of online feline fandom provides the backdrop for our investigation into the curious correlation between Google searches for 'cat memes' and Democrat votes for Senators in the Sunshine State. California, a state known for its tech-savvy population and progressive politics, serves as the purr-fect petri dish for this experiment. After all, where else would one expect to find a high concentration of both internet-savvy voters and cat aficionados? It's enough to make a statistical analyst purr with delight!

Our journey begins with the purr-usal of Google Trends data, a treasure trove of information on the search habits of netizens. With the precision of a laser pointer, we tracked the frequency of searches for 'cat memes' in California over the span of 14 years. Each search query, a tiny digital footprint in the sand, offered a glimpse into the feline fascination of the online electorate. If only we could get our paws on this data sooner! But alas, we had to wait and mewse over the numbers.

In parallel, our quest led us to the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, where we dug up the voting records for California Senators during the same period. With the patience of a cat stalking its prey, we meticulously combed through the electoral data, seeking patterns, trends, or any clues that could shed light on the potential link between online feline fervor and political leanings. It was a statistical game of cat and mouse, whiskers-to-whiskers with uncertainty and ambiguity.

The findings of our study revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.9892500, sending shockwaves through the hallowed halls of statistical analysis. In simpler terms, the relationship between 'cat memes' searches and Democrat votes for Senators in California was stronger than a cup of catnip-infused coffee! Meow that's what we call a statistically significant finding!

But what does this all mean, you might ask? Are Californians casting their ballots based on the latest cute kitten video on the internet? It's enough to make one paws and reflect on the curious ways in which the digital domain shapes our political landscape. Our findings paws-itively suggest that internet memes, as seemingly frivolous as they may appear, could wield a subtle yet discernible influence on the voting behaviors of the electorate. It's a reminder that even the most whimsical online phenomena can have real-world implications. After all, in the digital age, sometimes the smallest mouse click can produce the most profound ripple effect.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Google searches for 'cat memes' and Democrat votes for Senators in California. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then name some movies that you watched that are tangentially related to the topic.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Pawsitively Political: A Feline-Fueled Analysis of Google Searches for 'Cat Memes' and Democrat Votes for Senators in California

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we delve into the purr-plexing connection between online feline fandom and political preferences in the Golden State. Utilizing data from Google Trends and the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, we set out to determine if the popularity of 'cat memes' could be correlated with Democrat votes for Senators in California. Our analysis covering the period from 2004 to 2018 revealed a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9892500 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01. Meow that's something to sink your claws into! Our findings suggest a strong relationship between the frequency of 'cat memes' searches and the political inclinations of Californians, supporting the notion that internet memes may have a subtle yet discernible influence on voting behavior. These results prompt a re-fur-endum on the role of online culture in shaping political engagements. Our research adds to the growing body of evidence on the impact of seemingly whimsical online phenomena on serious real-world outcomes. It's time to take this 'purr-fectly' serious!

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
As scientific explorers of the digital realm, we cat-not help but be intrigued by the interplay between internet culture and political decision-making. It is a tale as old as time—well, at least as old as the internet—and it has led us down a rabbit hole, or should I say, a litter box, of unprecedented discoveries. Our prowl through the data has unearthed some fascinating findings that promise to cat-apult our understanding of the curious connections between online behavior and voting patterns.
The Internet, that vast digital savannah where information prowls and memes roam, has become an integral part of our daily lives. From "keyboard warriors" to "troll patrols," the denizens of the web shape and reshape our perceptions, opinions, and perhaps even our voting tendencies. It's enough to make a computer mouse rethink its life choices! The online landscape is a rich tapestry of ideas, emotions, and, of course, adorable pictures and videos of our feline friends. Meow, that's a lot of online purr-suasion!
This fur-tile ground of online feline fandom provides the backdrop for our investigation into the curious correlation between Google searches for 'cat memes' and Democrat votes for Senators in the Sunshine State. California, a state known for its tech-savvy population and progressive politics, serves as the purr-fect petri dish for this experiment. After all, where else would one expect to find a high concentration of both internet-savvy voters and cat aficionados? It's enough to make a statistical analyst purr with delight!
Our journey begins with the purr-usal of Google Trends data, a treasure trove of information on the search habits of netizens. With the precision of a laser pointer, we tracked the frequency of searches for 'cat memes' in California over the span of 14 years. Each search query, a tiny digital footprint in the sand, offered a glimpse into the feline fascination of the online electorate. If only we could get our paws on this data sooner! But alas, we had to wait and mewse over the numbers.
In parallel, our quest led us to the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, where we dug up the voting records for California Senators during the same period. With the patience of a cat stalking its prey, we meticulously combed through the electoral data, seeking patterns, trends, or any clues that could shed light on the potential link between online feline fervor and political leanings. It was a statistical game of cat and mouse, whiskers-to-whiskers with uncertainty and ambiguity.
The findings of our study revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.9892500, sending shockwaves through the hallowed halls of statistical analysis. In simpler terms, the relationship between 'cat memes' searches and Democrat votes for Senators in California was stronger than a cup of catnip-infused coffee! Meow that's what we call a statistically significant finding!
But what does this all mean, you might ask? Are Californians casting their ballots based on the latest cute kitten video on the internet? It's enough to make one paws and reflect on the curious ways in which the digital domain shapes our political landscape. Our findings paws-itively suggest that internet memes, as seemingly frivolous as they may appear, could wield a subtle yet discernible influence on the voting behaviors of the electorate. It's a reminder that even the most whimsical online phenomena can have real-world implications. After all, in the digital age, sometimes the smallest mouse click can produce the most profound ripple effect.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

Turning our attention to the scholarly works that have examined the intersection of internet culture and political behavior, we find a trove of compelling research. In "Smith et al.," the authors find a direct correlation between online engagement with pet-related content and civic engagement, suggesting that the digital adoration of feline companions might extend to influencing political choices. This begs the question: are Californians casting their votes based on the latest viral cat memes? Paws for thought, indeed.

What's black and white and red all over? A sunburned zebra! But on a more scholarly note, "Doe and Jones" delve into the role of online humor in shaping political discourse, with particular emphasis on the influence of animal-themed memes. Their findings hint at the possibility of a nuanced relationship between internet humor and voting preferences, with a potential for memes, including 'cat memes,' to sway political inclinations. It's as if the very fabric of democracy is woven with threads of feline frivolity!

Continuing down the scholarly alley, "Peterson and Garcia" examine the impact of online phenomena on human behavior, drawing attention to the persuasive power of internet memes in shaping opinions and decisions. While their study does not explicitly focus on cat-related content, it sets the stage for exploring the broader influence of internet culture on political engagements. When it comes to internet memes and politics, it's clear that there's more than one way to skin a cat—figuratively speaking, of course!

Now, let's turn our attention to non-fiction literature of relevance. Works such as "The Psychology of Online Behavior" by Robert Cialdini and "Politics and Internet Culture" by Lisa Nakamura offer valuable insights into the ways in which digital interactions permeate our societal and political landscape. Although these texts do not specifically address the influence of 'cat memes' on voting behavior, they provide a solid grounding for understanding the broader dynamics of online culture and civic participation. After all, understanding internet behavior is no small feat—it's like herding cats!

In a more fictional realm, the classic novel "Cat's Cradle" by Kurt Vonnegut and the whimsical "The Unbearable Lightness of Being" by Milan Kundera explore the intricate connections between seemingly unrelated phenomena, paving the way for a feline-inspired foray into the enigmatic world of internet culture and politics. While these literary works may not tackle the precise relationship between 'cat memes' and political votes, they stimulate the imagination and remind us that truth can be stranger than fiction. Much like the surprising correlation we've uncovered!

In the realm of cinema, movies such as "The Secret Life of Pets" and "The Internet's Own Boy: The Story of Aaron Swartz" provide cinematic lenses through which to view the interplay of technology, online content, and societal influence. While these films may not focus explicitly on the crossover between online cat fandom and political allegiances, they offer a glimpse into the intricate web of digital culture and its impact on human behavior. It's like watching a cat chase a laser pointer—fascinating and unpredictable, with potential for unexpected outcomes!

So, as we survey the landscape of scholarly works, non-fiction literature, and fictional narratives, we see a rich tapestry of ideas that lay the groundwork for our feline-fueled analysis of Google searches for 'cat memes' and Democrat votes for Senators in California. From scholarly musings to literary adventures, the stage is set for unraveling the quirks and quarks of internet-based political purr-suasion. After all, when it comes to understanding internet memes and voting behavior, there's no denying the purr-vasive influence of our feline friends!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Google searches for 'cat memes' and Democrat votes for Senators in California. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Google Trends and MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse . You used data from 2004 to 2018

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Pawsitively Political: A Feline-Fueled Analysis of Google Searches for 'Cat Memes' and Democrat Votes for Senators in California

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we delve into the purr-plexing connection between online feline fandom and political preferences in the Golden State. Utilizing data from Google Trends and the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, we set out to determine if the popularity of 'cat memes' could be correlated with Democrat votes for Senators in California. Our analysis covering the period from 2004 to 2018 revealed a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9892500 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01. Meow that's something to sink your claws into! Our findings suggest a strong relationship between the frequency of 'cat memes' searches and the political inclinations of Californians, supporting the notion that internet memes may have a subtle yet discernible influence on voting behavior. These results prompt a re-fur-endum on the role of online culture in shaping political engagements. Our research adds to the growing body of evidence on the impact of seemingly whimsical online phenomena on serious real-world outcomes. It's time to take this 'purr-fectly' serious!

[[INTRODUCTION]]
As scientific explorers of the digital realm, we cat-not help but be intrigued by the interplay between internet culture and political decision-making. It is a tale as old as time—well, at least as old as the internet—and it has led us down a rabbit hole, or should I say, a litter box, of unprecedented discoveries. Our prowl through the data has unearthed some fascinating findings that promise to cat-apult our understanding of the curious connections between online behavior and voting patterns.
The Internet, that vast digital savannah where information prowls and memes roam, has become an integral part of our daily lives. From "keyboard warriors" to "troll patrols," the denizens of the web shape and reshape our perceptions, opinions, and perhaps even our voting tendencies. It's enough to make a computer mouse rethink its life choices! The online landscape is a rich tapestry of ideas, emotions, and, of course, adorable pictures and videos of our feline friends. Meow, that's a lot of online purr-suasion!
This fur-tile ground of online feline fandom provides the backdrop for our investigation into the curious correlation between Google searches for 'cat memes' and Democrat votes for Senators in the Sunshine State. California, a state known for its tech-savvy population and progressive politics, serves as the purr-fect petri dish for this experiment. After all, where else would one expect to find a high concentration of both internet-savvy voters and cat aficionados? It's enough to make a statistical analyst purr with delight!
Our journey begins with the purr-usal of Google Trends data, a treasure trove of information on the search habits of netizens. With the precision of a laser pointer, we tracked the frequency of searches for 'cat memes' in California over the span of 14 years. Each search query, a tiny digital footprint in the sand, offered a glimpse into the feline fascination of the online electorate. If only we could get our paws on this data sooner! But alas, we had to wait and mewse over the numbers.
In parallel, our quest led us to the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, where we dug up the voting records for California Senators during the same period. With the patience of a cat stalking its prey, we meticulously combed through the electoral data, seeking patterns, trends, or any clues that could shed light on the potential link between online feline fervor and political leanings. It was a statistical game of cat and mouse, whiskers-to-whiskers with uncertainty and ambiguity.
The findings of our study revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.9892500, sending shockwaves through the hallowed halls of statistical analysis. In simpler terms, the relationship between 'cat memes' searches and Democrat votes for Senators in California was stronger than a cup of catnip-infused coffee! Meow that's what we call a statistically significant finding!
But what does this all mean, you might ask? Are Californians casting their ballots based on the latest cute kitten video on the internet? It's enough to make one paws and reflect on the curious ways in which the digital domain shapes our political landscape. Our findings paws-itively suggest that internet memes, as seemingly frivolous as they may appear, could wield a subtle yet discernible influence on the voting behaviors of the electorate. It's a reminder that even the most whimsical online phenomena can have real-world implications. After all, in the digital age, sometimes the smallest mouse click can produce the most profound ripple effect.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

As we set out to unravel the mysterious connection between Google searches for 'cat memes' and Democrat votes for Senators in California, our research methodology was guided by a desire to approach this whisker-y subject with rigor and seriousness. Meowever, we couldn't resist infusing a touch of humor and playfulness into our methodological approach, because, after all, what is science without a little levity? We apologize in advance for any eye-rolling that may ensue as a result of our furr-midable puns and meow-ments.

Our data collection efforts spanned a wide array of sources, much like a cat's insatiable curiosity. We scoured the digital landscape, pouncing on datasets from Google Trends for 'cat memes' search frequency and the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse for California Senator voting records. With the agility of a tabby leaping after a shoelace, we captured information from the years 2004 to 2018, ensuring a comprehensive view of the online feline fervor and political proclivities of Californians during this period. Our data collection process was as thorough as a feline's grooming routine, leaving no whisker of information unexamined.

The first component of our methodology revolved around the heart of the internet, Google Trends. Here, we sought to measure the ebb and flow of interest in 'cat memes' within the digital confines of California. Our approach involved meticulously extracting search query data, examining the frequency and temporal patterns of 'cat memes' searches. We then normalized this data, treating it with the caution of a feline cautiously approaching a suspicious object, to account for any potential seasonal or temporal variations in search behavior. In layman's terms, we made sure to remove any fluctuation purr-taining to the season, so as not to accidentally attribute an increase in 'cat memes' searches to a surge in interest during National Hairball Awareness Month. Talk about a hair-raising statistical error!

Additionally, in our pursuit to understand the political undercurrents of the Californian electorate, we delved into the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse to extract voting data on Senators of the Democrat persuasion. We mewed our way through electoral archives, meticulously tabulating and scrutinizing voting records to uncover any traces of correlation with the 'cat memes' search frequency. This process required the patience of a cat waiting for the red dot to reappear, as we meticulously examined the senatorial voting patterns over the years, swatting away any irregularities or outliers that threatened to obscure our understanding.

With the data in our clutches, we ambarked on a statistical journey that was as thrilling as a game of cat and mouse—with the roles of the cat and mouse constantly shifting. Our approach involved employing advanced statistical methods, including correlation analysis and regression modeling, to gauge the strength and significance of the relationship between 'cat memes' search frequency and Democrat votes for Senators in California. The statistical toolbox at our disposal was as diverse as a box of assorted cat toys, allowing us to tailor our analysis to the nuances of our peculiar research question.

The statistical analysis purred forth a correlation coefficient of 0.9892500, eliciting both astonishment and purrs of satisfaction from our research team. With a p-value of less than 0.01, our findings were statistically significant, fueling our excitement like a fresh can of tuna. These numbers represented more than just statistical outcomes; they were evidence of a substantial relationship meow-tween online 'cat memes' searches and Democrat voting behavior. It was a statistical revelation that left us feline quite satisfied with our methodological approach.

As our data analysis whiskered away any doubts about the link between 'cat memes' and Democrat votes, we found ourselves nipping at the heels of a profound realization. Our methodological approach, though infused with humor and feline references, was executed with the precision and thoroughness worthy of any scientific endeavor. We hope that our methodological exploits not only shed light on the intricate relationship between internet culture and political manifestations but also brought a smile—perhaps even a chuckle—to the faces of our dear readers. After all, science can be fun, especially when it's as curiosity-driven as a cat exploring a newly unloaded box.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Google searches for 'cat memes' and Democrat votes for Senators in California. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Google Trends and MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse .

For the time period 2004 to 2018, you found a correlation 0.9892500, r-squared of 0.9786155, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Pawsitively Political: A Feline-Fueled Analysis of Google Searches for 'Cat Memes' and Democrat Votes for Senators in California

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we delve into the purr-plexing connection between online feline fandom and political preferences in the Golden State. Utilizing data from Google Trends and the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, we set out to determine if the popularity of 'cat memes' could be correlated with Democrat votes for Senators in California. Our analysis covering the period from 2004 to 2018 revealed a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9892500 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01. Meow that's something to sink your claws into! Our findings suggest a strong relationship between the frequency of 'cat memes' searches and the political inclinations of Californians, supporting the notion that internet memes may have a subtle yet discernible influence on voting behavior. These results prompt a re-fur-endum on the role of online culture in shaping political engagements. Our research adds to the growing body of evidence on the impact of seemingly whimsical online phenomena on serious real-world outcomes. It's time to take this 'purr-fectly' serious!

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
As scientific explorers of the digital realm, we cat-not help but be intrigued by the interplay between internet culture and political decision-making. It is a tale as old as time—well, at least as old as the internet—and it has led us down a rabbit hole, or should I say, a litter box, of unprecedented discoveries. Our prowl through the data has unearthed some fascinating findings that promise to cat-apult our understanding of the curious connections between online behavior and voting patterns.
The Internet, that vast digital savannah where information prowls and memes roam, has become an integral part of our daily lives. From "keyboard warriors" to "troll patrols," the denizens of the web shape and reshape our perceptions, opinions, and perhaps even our voting tendencies. It's enough to make a computer mouse rethink its life choices! The online landscape is a rich tapestry of ideas, emotions, and, of course, adorable pictures and videos of our feline friends. Meow, that's a lot of online purr-suasion!
This fur-tile ground of online feline fandom provides the backdrop for our investigation into the curious correlation between Google searches for 'cat memes' and Democrat votes for Senators in the Sunshine State. California, a state known for its tech-savvy population and progressive politics, serves as the purr-fect petri dish for this experiment. After all, where else would one expect to find a high concentration of both internet-savvy voters and cat aficionados? It's enough to make a statistical analyst purr with delight!
Our journey begins with the purr-usal of Google Trends data, a treasure trove of information on the search habits of netizens. With the precision of a laser pointer, we tracked the frequency of searches for 'cat memes' in California over the span of 14 years. Each search query, a tiny digital footprint in the sand, offered a glimpse into the feline fascination of the online electorate. If only we could get our paws on this data sooner! But alas, we had to wait and mewse over the numbers.
In parallel, our quest led us to the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, where we dug up the voting records for California Senators during the same period. With the patience of a cat stalking its prey, we meticulously combed through the electoral data, seeking patterns, trends, or any clues that could shed light on the potential link between online feline fervor and political leanings. It was a statistical game of cat and mouse, whiskers-to-whiskers with uncertainty and ambiguity.
The findings of our study revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.9892500, sending shockwaves through the hallowed halls of statistical analysis. In simpler terms, the relationship between 'cat memes' searches and Democrat votes for Senators in California was stronger than a cup of catnip-infused coffee! Meow that's what we call a statistically significant finding!
But what does this all mean, you might ask? Are Californians casting their ballots based on the latest cute kitten video on the internet? It's enough to make one paws and reflect on the curious ways in which the digital domain shapes our political landscape. Our findings paws-itively suggest that internet memes, as seemingly frivolous as they may appear, could wield a subtle yet discernible influence on the voting behaviors of the electorate. It's a reminder that even the most whimsical online phenomena can have real-world implications. After all, in the digital age, sometimes the smallest mouse click can produce the most profound ripple effect.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The analysis of the data revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9892500 between the frequency of Google searches for 'cat memes' and Democrat votes for Senators in California. This coefficient indicates a very strong positive linear relationship between the two variables. Our findings indicate that as the volume of 'cat memes' searches increases, so does the number of Democrat votes for Senators in California. It's almost as if the online feline frenzy is driving the political purr-spective of Californians!

The r-squared value of 0.9786155 further emphasizes the robustness of the relationship observed in our analysis. This value suggests that a whopping 97.86% of the variability in Democrat votes for Senators in California can be explained by the frequency of 'cat memes' searches. It appears that the allure of feline-themed internet humor is more influential than we could have ever imagined. It's truly the cat's meow of statistical significance!

With a p-value of less than 0.01, the statistical significance of our findings cannot be ignored. This implies that the observed correlation between 'cat memes' searches and Democrat votes for Senators in California is highly unlikely to have occurred by chance. This result paws-itively affirms the presence of a genuine association between these variables, strengthening the notion that online cat-related content may have an impact on political preferences. Who would have thought that a simple search for adorable cat content could have such profound implications for the political landscape?

Fig. 1 showcases the relationship between the frequency of 'cat memes' searches and Democrat votes for Senators in California. The scatterplot unmistakably illustrates the strong positive correlation we observed, with data points tightly clustered around a clear upward trend. It's almost as if the data points themselves were saying, "You've cat to be kitten me right meow with this correlation!"

In conclusion, our analysis provides compelling evidence of a significant relationship between Google searches for 'cat memes' and Democrat votes for Senators in California. These findings raise important questions about the influence of online culture on political behavior and highlight the need for further research into the role of internet memes in shaping real-world outcomes. It's a reminder that even the most seemingly light-hearted internet phenomena can wield tangible influence—a realization that may just prompt a world-wide "paws" for thought!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Google searches for 'cat memes' and Democrat votes for Senators in California. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
Pawsitively Political: A Feline-Fueled Analysis of Google Searches for 'Cat Memes' and Democrat Votes for Senators in California

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we delve into the purr-plexing connection between online feline fandom and political preferences in the Golden State. Utilizing data from Google Trends and the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, we set out to determine if the popularity of 'cat memes' could be correlated with Democrat votes for Senators in California. Our analysis covering the period from 2004 to 2018 revealed a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9892500 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01. Meow that's something to sink your claws into! Our findings suggest a strong relationship between the frequency of 'cat memes' searches and the political inclinations of Californians, supporting the notion that internet memes may have a subtle yet discernible influence on voting behavior. These results prompt a re-fur-endum on the role of online culture in shaping political engagements. Our research adds to the growing body of evidence on the impact of seemingly whimsical online phenomena on serious real-world outcomes. It's time to take this 'purr-fectly' serious!

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
Turning our attention to the scholarly works that have examined the intersection of internet culture and political behavior, we find a trove of compelling research. In "Smith et al.," the authors find a direct correlation between online engagement with pet-related content and civic engagement, suggesting that the digital adoration of feline companions might extend to influencing political choices. This begs the question: are Californians casting their votes based on the latest viral cat memes? Paws for thought, indeed.
What's black and white and red all over? A sunburned zebra! But on a more scholarly note, "Doe and Jones" delve into the role of online humor in shaping political discourse, with particular emphasis on the influence of animal-themed memes. Their findings hint at the possibility of a nuanced relationship between internet humor and voting preferences, with a potential for memes, including 'cat memes,' to sway political inclinations. It's as if the very fabric of democracy is woven with threads of feline frivolity!
Continuing down the scholarly alley, "Peterson and Garcia" examine the impact of online phenomena on human behavior, drawing attention to the persuasive power of internet memes in shaping opinions and decisions. While their study does not explicitly focus on cat-related content, it sets the stage for exploring the broader influence of internet culture on political engagements. When it comes to internet memes and politics, it's clear that there's more than one way to skin a cat—figuratively speaking, of course!
Now, let's turn our attention to non-fiction literature of relevance. Works such as "The Psychology of Online Behavior" by Robert Cialdini and "Politics and Internet Culture" by Lisa Nakamura offer valuable insights into the ways in which digital interactions permeate our societal and political landscape. Although these texts do not specifically address the influence of 'cat memes' on voting behavior, they provide a solid grounding for understanding the broader dynamics of online culture and civic participation. After all, understanding internet behavior is no small feat—it's like herding cats!
In a more fictional realm, the classic novel "Cat's Cradle" by Kurt Vonnegut and the whimsical "The Unbearable Lightness of Being" by Milan Kundera explore the intricate connections between seemingly unrelated phenomena, paving the way for a feline-inspired foray into the enigmatic world of internet culture and politics. While these literary works may not tackle the precise relationship between 'cat memes' and political votes, they stimulate the imagination and remind us that truth can be stranger than fiction. Much like the surprising correlation we've uncovered!
In the realm of cinema, movies such as "The Secret Life of Pets" and "The Internet's Own Boy: The Story of Aaron Swartz" provide cinematic lenses through which to view the interplay of technology, online content, and societal influence. While these films may not focus explicitly on the crossover between online cat fandom and political allegiances, they offer a glimpse into the intricate web of digital culture and its impact on human behavior. It's like watching a cat chase a laser pointer—fascinating and unpredictable, with potential for unexpected outcomes!
So, as we survey the landscape of scholarly works, non-fiction literature, and fictional narratives, we see a rich tapestry of ideas that lay the groundwork for our feline-fueled analysis of Google searches for 'cat memes' and Democrat votes for Senators in California. From scholarly musings to literary adventures, the stage is set for unraveling the quirks and quarks of internet-based political purr-suasion. After all, when it comes to understanding internet memes and voting behavior, there's no denying the purr-vasive influence of our feline friends!

[[RESULTS]]
The analysis of the data revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9892500 between the frequency of Google searches for 'cat memes' and Democrat votes for Senators in California. This coefficient indicates a very strong positive linear relationship between the two variables. Our findings indicate that as the volume of 'cat memes' searches increases, so does the number of Democrat votes for Senators in California. It's almost as if the online feline frenzy is driving the political purr-spective of Californians!
The r-squared value of 0.9786155 further emphasizes the robustness of the relationship observed in our analysis. This value suggests that a whopping 97.86% of the variability in Democrat votes for Senators in California can be explained by the frequency of 'cat memes' searches. It appears that the allure of feline-themed internet humor is more influential than we could have ever imagined. It's truly the cat's meow of statistical significance!
With a p-value of less than 0.01, the statistical significance of our findings cannot be ignored. This implies that the observed correlation between 'cat memes' searches and Democrat votes for Senators in California is highly unlikely to have occurred by chance. This result paws-itively affirms the presence of a genuine association between these variables, strengthening the notion that online cat-related content may have an impact on political preferences. Who would have thought that a simple search for adorable cat content could have such profound implications for the political landscape?
Fig. 1 showcases the relationship between the frequency of 'cat memes' searches and Democrat votes for Senators in California. The scatterplot unmistakably illustrates the strong positive correlation we observed, with data points tightly clustered around a clear upward trend. It's almost as if the data points themselves were saying, "You've cat to be kitten me right meow with this correlation!"
In conclusion, our analysis provides compelling evidence of a significant relationship between Google searches for 'cat memes' and Democrat votes for Senators in California. These findings raise important questions about the influence of online culture on political behavior and highlight the need for further research into the role of internet memes in shaping real-world outcomes. It's a reminder that even the most seemingly light-hearted internet phenomena can wield tangible influence—a realization that may just prompt a world-wide "paws" for thought!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

Our findings not only support, but also amplify the purr-vious research that has explored the interplay between internet culture and political behavior. A direct correlation between the frequency of 'cat memes' searches and Democrat votes for Senators in California has been established, reinforcing the notion that seemingly whimsical online phenomena can exert a tangible influence on real-world outcomes.

The remarkable correlation coefficient of 0.9892500 that we've unveiled underscores the strength of the relationship between online feline fandom and political preferences. It's as if the internet is saying, "Fur real, I'm not kitten around when it comes to impacting voting behavior!" Meow that's a statistically significant discovery, isn't it?

The literature review pointed us in the direction of previous research that meowtivated our study, including the work of "Smith et al.," "Doe and Jones," and "Peterson and Garcia." Their insights into the influence of online pet-related content and internet humor on civic engagement provided the foundation for our investigation. It's almost as if our research is the cat's pajamas of statistical confirmation!

Not to mention, the eye-catching scatterplot in Fig. 1 visually reinforces the strength of the positive correlation we unearthed. It's as if the data points themselves were lining up to confess, "We're not just here for a giggle; we're voting for change!"

The r-squared value of 0.9786155 further emphasizes the robustness of the relationship observed in our analysis. This value suggests that a whopping 97.86% of the variability in Democrat votes for Senators in California can be attributable to the frequency of 'cat memes' searches. That's a landslide victory for the influence of internet feline fervor!

With a p-value of less than 0.01, our findings provide strong evidence against the null hypothesis and reinforce the conclusion that the observed relationship between 'cat memes' searches and Democrat votes for Senators in California is unlikely to be due to chance. This result is nothing to scoff at—it's the cat's whiskers of statistical validation!

In the words of Albert Einstein, "Not everything that counts can be counted, and not everything that can be counted counts." However, in this feline-infused study, it seems that what can be counted does indeed count—a whole lot! These results prompt us to re-fur back to the drawing board and explore the broader implications of internet culture on political engagements. It's a reminder that even the most seemingly light-hearted internet phenomena can wield tangible influence—a realization that may just prompt a world-wide "paws" for thought!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Google searches for 'cat memes' and Democrat votes for Senators in California. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
Pawsitively Political: A Feline-Fueled Analysis of Google Searches for 'Cat Memes' and Democrat Votes for Senators in California

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we delve into the purr-plexing connection between online feline fandom and political preferences in the Golden State. Utilizing data from Google Trends and the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, we set out to determine if the popularity of 'cat memes' could be correlated with Democrat votes for Senators in California. Our analysis covering the period from 2004 to 2018 revealed a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9892500 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01. Meow that's something to sink your claws into! Our findings suggest a strong relationship between the frequency of 'cat memes' searches and the political inclinations of Californians, supporting the notion that internet memes may have a subtle yet discernible influence on voting behavior. These results prompt a re-fur-endum on the role of online culture in shaping political engagements. Our research adds to the growing body of evidence on the impact of seemingly whimsical online phenomena on serious real-world outcomes. It's time to take this 'purr-fectly' serious!

[[INTRDUCTION]]
As scientific explorers of the digital realm, we cat-not help but be intrigued by the interplay between internet culture and political decision-making. It is a tale as old as time—well, at least as old as the internet—and it has led us down a rabbit hole, or should I say, a litter box, of unprecedented discoveries. Our prowl through the data has unearthed some fascinating findings that promise to cat-apult our understanding of the curious connections between online behavior and voting patterns.
The Internet, that vast digital savannah where information prowls and memes roam, has become an integral part of our daily lives. From "keyboard warriors" to "troll patrols," the denizens of the web shape and reshape our perceptions, opinions, and perhaps even our voting tendencies. It's enough to make a computer mouse rethink its life choices! The online landscape is a rich tapestry of ideas, emotions, and, of course, adorable pictures and videos of our feline friends. Meow, that's a lot of online purr-suasion!
This fur-tile ground of online feline fandom provides the backdrop for our investigation into the curious correlation between Google searches for 'cat memes' and Democrat votes for Senators in the Sunshine State. California, a state known for its tech-savvy population and progressive politics, serves as the purr-fect petri dish for this experiment. After all, where else would one expect to find a high concentration of both internet-savvy voters and cat aficionados? It's enough to make a statistical analyst purr with delight!
Our journey begins with the purr-usal of Google Trends data, a treasure trove of information on the search habits of netizens. With the precision of a laser pointer, we tracked the frequency of searches for 'cat memes' in California over the span of 14 years. Each search query, a tiny digital footprint in the sand, offered a glimpse into the feline fascination of the online electorate. If only we could get our paws on this data sooner! But alas, we had to wait and mewse over the numbers.
In parallel, our quest led us to the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, where we dug up the voting records for California Senators during the same period. With the patience of a cat stalking its prey, we meticulously combed through the electoral data, seeking patterns, trends, or any clues that could shed light on the potential link between online feline fervor and political leanings. It was a statistical game of cat and mouse, whiskers-to-whiskers with uncertainty and ambiguity.
The findings of our study revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.9892500, sending shockwaves through the hallowed halls of statistical analysis. In simpler terms, the relationship between 'cat memes' searches and Democrat votes for Senators in California was stronger than a cup of catnip-infused coffee! Meow that's what we call a statistically significant finding!
But what does this all mean, you might ask? Are Californians casting their ballots based on the latest cute kitten video on the internet? It's enough to make one paws and reflect on the curious ways in which the digital domain shapes our political landscape. Our findings paws-itively suggest that internet memes, as seemingly frivolous as they may appear, could wield a subtle yet discernible influence on the voting behaviors of the electorate. It's a reminder that even the most whimsical online phenomena can have real-world implications. After all, in the digital age, sometimes the smallest mouse click can produce the most profound ripple effect.

[[RESULTS]]
The analysis of the data revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9892500 between the frequency of Google searches for 'cat memes' and Democrat votes for Senators in California. This coefficient indicates a very strong positive linear relationship between the two variables. Our findings indicate that as the volume of 'cat memes' searches increases, so does the number of Democrat votes for Senators in California. It's almost as if the online feline frenzy is driving the political purr-spective of Californians!
The r-squared value of 0.9786155 further emphasizes the robustness of the relationship observed in our analysis. This value suggests that a whopping 97.86% of the variability in Democrat votes for Senators in California can be explained by the frequency of 'cat memes' searches. It appears that the allure of feline-themed internet humor is more influential than we could have ever imagined. It's truly the cat's meow of statistical significance!
With a p-value of less than 0.01, the statistical significance of our findings cannot be ignored. This implies that the observed correlation between 'cat memes' searches and Democrat votes for Senators in California is highly unlikely to have occurred by chance. This result paws-itively affirms the presence of a genuine association between these variables, strengthening the notion that online cat-related content may have an impact on political preferences. Who would have thought that a simple search for adorable cat content could have such profound implications for the political landscape?
Fig. 1 showcases the relationship between the frequency of 'cat memes' searches and Democrat votes for Senators in California. The scatterplot unmistakably illustrates the strong positive correlation we observed, with data points tightly clustered around a clear upward trend. It's almost as if the data points themselves were saying, "You've cat to be kitten me right meow with this correlation!"
In conclusion, our analysis provides compelling evidence of a significant relationship between Google searches for 'cat memes' and Democrat votes for Senators in California. These findings raise important questions about the influence of online culture on political behavior and highlight the need for further research into the role of internet memes in shaping real-world outcomes. It's a reminder that even the most seemingly light-hearted internet phenomena can wield tangible influence—a realization that may just prompt a world-wide "paws" for thought!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our study has shed light on the whisker-raising connection between Google searches for 'cat memes' and Democrat votes for Senators in California. Our findings suggest a purr-suasive relationship between the frequency of 'cat memes' searches and political leanings, demonstrating that the impact of internet paws-itivity extends beyond cute kitty videos.

With a correlation coefficient of 0.9892500, our results are not just statistically significant; they're the cat's pajamas of statistical significance. It's almost as if feline fandom is taking the reins in shaping political purr-spectives! This correlation is stronger than the bond between a cat and its favorite scratching post.

The r-squared value of 0.9786155 underscores the extent to which 'cat memes' searches can explain the variability in Democrat votes for Senators in California. It's as if the 'purr-suasion' of online feline fervor is almost as compelling as a bowl of fresh milk to a curious kitty.

With a p-value of less than 0.01, the likelihood of this correlation happening by chance is as improbable as getting a cat to obey a command. This result paws-itively confirms the genuine association between 'cat memes' searches and political preferences. Who would have thought that a simple search for adorable cat content could have such profound implications for the political landscape?

Therefore, we assert that no more research is needed in this area. This study has cat-apulted our understanding of the influence of internet culture on political behaviors—because when it comes to 'cat memes,' it seems that every vote truly does count. It's time we close this chapter, or should I say "purr"-haps "paws" this line of inquiry. Thank you, and good night!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Pawsitively Political: A Feline-Fueled Analysis of Google Searches for 'Cat Memes' and Democrat Votes for Senators in California. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Quarterly Journal of Feline Behavior and Political Science


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Pawsitively Political: A Feline-Fueled Analysis of Google Searches for 'Cat Memes' and Democrat Votes for Senators in California. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

Feline Research Institute


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Pawsitively Political: A Feline-Fueled Analysis of Google Searches for 'Cat Memes' and Democrat Votes for Senators in California with an abstract of In this study, we delve into the purr-plexing connection between online feline fandom and political preferences in the Golden State. Utilizing data from Google Trends and the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, we set out to determine if the popularity of 'cat memes' could be correlated with Democrat votes for Senators in California. Our analysis covering the period from 2004 to 2018 revealed a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9892500 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01. Meow that's something to sink your claws into! Our findings suggest a strong relationship between the frequency of 'cat memes' searches and the political inclinations of Californians, supporting the notion that internet memes may have a subtle yet discernible influence on voting behavior. These results prompt a re-fur-endum on the role of online culture in shaping political engagements. Our research adds to the growing body of evidence on the impact of seemingly whimsical online phenomena on serious real-world outcomes. It's time to take this 'purr-fectly' serious!

ChatGPT:

cat memes, Google searches, Democrat votes, Senators, California, feline fandom, political preferences, online culture, internet memes, voting behavior, MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, correlation coefficient, statistical significance, online phenomena, political engagement, California voting behavior

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Google searches for 'cat memes'
Detailed data title: Relative volume of Google searches for 'cat memes' (Worldwide, without quotes)
Source: Google Trends
Additional Info: Relative search volume (not absolute numbers)

See what else correlates with Google searches for 'cat memes'

Votes for Democratic Senators in California
Detailed data title: Percentage of votes cast for Federal Democrat Senate candidates in California
Source: MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse
See what else correlates with Votes for Democratic Senators in California

Correlation r = 0.9892500 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.9786155 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 97.9% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Votes for Democratic Senators in California) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Google searches for 'cat memes') over the 6 years from 2004 through 2018.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 0.00017. 0.0001727228056227182700000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.99 in 0.017% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 5,790 random variables Which I absolutely did.
with the same 5 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 5 because we have two variables measured over a period of 6 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.9, 1 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
200420062010201220162018
Google searches for 'cat memes' (Rel. search volume)0.1666670.1818180.59.2536.666735.75
Votes for Democratic Senators in California (Percentage of votes)57.708159.431152.183662.5243100100




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Very low n: There are not many data points included in this analysis. Even if the p-value is high, we should be suspicious of using so few datapoints in a correlation.
  5. Y-axis doesn't start at zero: I truncated the Y-axes of the graph above. I also used a line graph, which makes the visual connection stand out more than it deserves. Nothing against line graphs. They are great at telling a story when you have linear data! But visually it is deceptive because the only data is at the points on the graph, not the lines on the graph. In between each point, the data could have been doing anything. Like going for a random walk by itself!
    Mathematically what I showed is true, but it is intentionally misleading. Below is the same chart but with both Y-axes starting at zero.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([0.166667,0.181818,0.5,9.25,36.6667,35.75,])
array_2 = np.array([57.7081,59.4311,52.1836,62.5243,100,100,])
array_1_name = "Google searches for 'cat memes'"
array_2_name = "Votes for Democratic Senators in California"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Thanks for being the explorer we needed!


Correlation ID: 4598 · Black Variable ID: 1355 · Red Variable ID: 26354
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0