about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #4,542 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Votes for Democratic Senators in Rhode Island and the second variable is Kerosene used in Czechia.  The chart goes from 1993 to 2020, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

Perhaps the sudden spike in Democrat votes in Rhode Island created a ripple effect, leading to an unexpected surge in the demand for kerosene in Czechia. It's possible that a group of overly enthusiastic kerosene enthusiasts mistook the election excitement for a burning passion for kerosene, sparking a nationwide craze for this flammable fuel. As the saying goes, where there's smoke, there's fire, and in this case, where there's Democrat votes in Rhode Island, there's a burning desire for kerosene in Czechia!

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Prompt: Generate a hyper-realistic image of a lively town square in Rhode Island where a group of cheering Democrats celebrates their victory. In the background, a cargo ship is being loaded with kerosene barrels destined for Czechia. People in Czechia excitedly line up to purchase the suddenly popular fuel. The scene should convey the unexpected surge in demand for kerosene following the election, with fervent enthusiasm for the flammable fuel evident across the country. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Democrat votes for Senators in Rhode Island and Kerosene used in Czechia. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Oragami Concept art Futuristic An image that looks like it is a scene from 'Star Wars' Hyper-realistic
ChatGPT: Hyper-realistic

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Democrat votes for Senators in Rhode Island and Kerosene used in Czechia, in the following situation: Perhaps the sudden spike in Democrat votes in Rhode Island created a ripple effect, leading to an unexpected surge in the demand for kerosene in Czechia. It's possible that a group of overly enthusiastic kerosene enthusiasts mistook the election excitement for a burning passion for kerosene, sparking a nationwide craze for this flammable fuel. As the saying goes, where there's smoke, there's fire, and in this case, where there's Democrat votes in Rhode Island, there's a burning desire for kerosene in Czechia!. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In a lively town square in Rhode Island, a group of cheering Democrats hold up their Senator votes, celebrating their victory. In the distance, a cargo ship filled with kerosene barrels is being loaded to be shipped to Czechia, where people excitedly line up to purchase the suddenly popular fuel. The excitement from the election has sparked an unexpected surge in the demand for kerosene, leading to a fervent wave of enthusiasm for the flammable fuel across the country.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ Hyper-realistic ] and depicting this scene: In a lively town square in Rhode Island, a group of cheering Democrats hold up their Senator votes, celebrating their victory. In the distance, a cargo ship filled with kerosene barrels is being loaded to be shipped to Czechia, where people excitedly line up to purchase the suddenly popular fuel. The excitement from the election has sparked an unexpected surge in the demand for kerosene, leading to a fervent wave of enthusiasm for the flammable fuel across the country. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Prompt: Generate a hyper-realistic image of a lively town square in Rhode Island where a group of cheering Democrats celebrates their victory. In the background, a cargo ship is being loaded with kerosene barrels destined for Czechia. People in Czechia excitedly line up to purchase the suddenly popular fuel. The scene should convey the unexpected surge in demand for kerosene following the election, with fervent enthusiasm for the flammable fuel evident across the country.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in Democrat votes for Senators in Rhode Island caused Kerosene used in Czechia to increase.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
An Illuminating Connection: The Correlation Between Democrat Votes for Senators in Rhode Island and Kerosene Use in Czechia

The International Journal of Political Paradoxes and Cross-Cultural Connections

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Democrat votes for Senators in Rhode Island and Kerosene used in Czechia. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Make the title a clever pun.

Your research team used data from MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse and Energy Information Administration to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.8749396 and p < 0.01 for 1993 to 2020.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
"An Illuminating Connection: The Correlation Between Democrat Votes for Senators in Rhode Island and Kerosene Use in Czechia"

[[ABSTRACT]]
Fueling the flames of political analysis, this research sets out to investigate the unexpected and seemingly unrelated relationship between Democrat votes for Senators in Rhode Island and kerosene consumption in Czechia. Drawing on data from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and the Energy Information Administration, our study uncovers a statistically significant correlation between these two seemingly unrelated elements, with a correlation coefficient of 0.8749396 and p < 0.01, spanning the years from 1993 to 2020.

In shedding light on this puzzling connection, we employ a combination of econometric and political analysis to provide a comprehensive understanding of this unusual phenomenon. Our findings not only highlight a surprising linkage between political preferences and energy usage, but also present intriguing implications for both electoral behavior and energy consumption patterns. Who would have guessed that the flicker of a kerosene lamp in Czechia could be intertwined with the political leanings of voters across the Atlantic in Rhode Island? It seems that the glow of political influence truly knows no boundaries!

Amidst the serious undertakings of data analysis and econometric modeling, we aim to infuse a spark of humor, much akin to the striking of a match in a dark room, to illuminate the unexpected connections that drive our world. As a wise man once said, "I told my wife she should embrace her mistakes - she gave me a hug!" And so, we invite our readers to embrace the delightful surprises that emerge from the intersection of data analysis and human behavior. After all, as this research demonstrates, the world of statistics and politics is not all black and white - sometimes, it's kerosene orange!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Democrat votes for Senators in Rhode Island and Kerosene used in Czechia. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"An Illuminating Connection: The Correlation Between Democrat Votes for Senators in Rhode Island and Kerosene Use in Czechia"

[[ABSTRACT]]
Fueling the flames of political analysis, this research sets out to investigate the unexpected and seemingly unrelated relationship between Democrat votes for Senators in Rhode Island and kerosene consumption in Czechia. Drawing on data from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and the Energy Information Administration, our study uncovers a statistically significant correlation between these two seemingly unrelated elements, with a correlation coefficient of 0.8749396 and p < 0.01, spanning the years from 1993 to 2020.

In shedding light on this puzzling connection, we employ a combination of econometric and political analysis to provide a comprehensive understanding of this unusual phenomenon. Our findings not only highlight a surprising linkage between political preferences and energy usage, but also present intriguing implications for both electoral behavior and energy consumption patterns. Who would have guessed that the flicker of a kerosene lamp in Czechia could be intertwined with the political leanings of voters across the Atlantic in Rhode Island? It seems that the glow of political influence truly knows no boundaries!

Amidst the serious undertakings of data analysis and econometric modeling, we aim to infuse a spark of humor, much akin to the striking of a match in a dark room, to illuminate the unexpected connections that drive our world. As a wise man once said, "I told my wife she should embrace her mistakes - she gave me a hug!" And so, we invite our readers to embrace the delightful surprises that emerge from the intersection of data analysis and human behavior. After all, as this research demonstrates, the world of statistics and politics is not all black and white - sometimes, it's kerosene orange!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

In the pursuit of understanding the enigmatic and often convoluted tapestry of human behavior, researchers have delved into the most unexpected realms to uncover patterns and correlations that defy conventional wisdom. Our investigation into the relationship between Democrat votes for Senators in Rhode Island and kerosene consumption in Czechia epitomizes this spirit of exploration, transcending geographical boundaries and disciplinary confines to unravel a truly puzzling connection. It's as if politics and energy usage have decided to dance together in an intricate waltz, illuminating a fascinating tale of intercontinental intrigue.

What do you call a lamp powered by political preferences and kerosene? A shining example of how global connections can light up even the most unconventional of research endeavors! As we venture into the realm of statistical analysis and political intricacies, we invite our readers to join us on this journey, where the unexpected is the norm, and where puns are as abundant as kerosene fumes in a Czechian village square.

As researchers, we thrive on delving into the murky depths of the unexplored and shedding light on the murky connections that underpin our world. In the same vein, one might say that uncovering the correlation between Democrat votes in Rhode Island and kerosene use in Czechia is akin to finding a match in a dark room - unexpectedly illuminating, and perhaps a bit too metaphorical for its own good.

The juxtaposition of political affiliations in a small U.S. state and the use of kerosene in a distant European country may seem like an odd couple, but as Forrest Gump might say, life is like a box of data - you never know what surprising correlations you're going to find! And indeed, as we navigate through the intersections of electoral trends and energy consumption patterns, we are confronted with a curious conundrum - the unexpected marriage of politics and petrol.

In the words of a true pioneer of illuminating observations, "The light at the end of the tunnel may be an oncoming train, or it may just be the glow of statistical significance." It seems that our research is poised to bring forth not just the light at the end of the tunnel, but a fireworks display of unexpected revelations and delightful surprises - much like a kerosene-fueled Fourth of July celebration in Czechia!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Democrat votes for Senators in Rhode Island and Kerosene used in Czechia. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then name a few real TV shows that sound like they might be relevant to the topic that you watched as research.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"An Illuminating Connection: The Correlation Between Democrat Votes for Senators in Rhode Island and Kerosene Use in Czechia"

[[ABSTRACT]]
Fueling the flames of political analysis, this research sets out to investigate the unexpected and seemingly unrelated relationship between Democrat votes for Senators in Rhode Island and kerosene consumption in Czechia. Drawing on data from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and the Energy Information Administration, our study uncovers a statistically significant correlation between these two seemingly unrelated elements, with a correlation coefficient of 0.8749396 and p < 0.01, spanning the years from 1993 to 2020.

In shedding light on this puzzling connection, we employ a combination of econometric and political analysis to provide a comprehensive understanding of this unusual phenomenon. Our findings not only highlight a surprising linkage between political preferences and energy usage, but also present intriguing implications for both electoral behavior and energy consumption patterns. Who would have guessed that the flicker of a kerosene lamp in Czechia could be intertwined with the political leanings of voters across the Atlantic in Rhode Island? It seems that the glow of political influence truly knows no boundaries!

Amidst the serious undertakings of data analysis and econometric modeling, we aim to infuse a spark of humor, much akin to the striking of a match in a dark room, to illuminate the unexpected connections that drive our world. As a wise man once said, "I told my wife she should embrace her mistakes - she gave me a hug!" And so, we invite our readers to embrace the delightful surprises that emerge from the intersection of data analysis and human behavior. After all, as this research demonstrates, the world of statistics and politics is not all black and white - sometimes, it's kerosene orange!

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
In the pursuit of understanding the enigmatic and often convoluted tapestry of human behavior, researchers have delved into the most unexpected realms to uncover patterns and correlations that defy conventional wisdom. Our investigation into the relationship between Democrat votes for Senators in Rhode Island and kerosene consumption in Czechia epitomizes this spirit of exploration, transcending geographical boundaries and disciplinary confines to unravel a truly puzzling connection. It's as if politics and energy usage have decided to dance together in an intricate waltz, illuminating a fascinating tale of intercontinental intrigue.
What do you call a lamp powered by political preferences and kerosene? A shining example of how global connections can light up even the most unconventional of research endeavors! As we venture into the realm of statistical analysis and political intricacies, we invite our readers to join us on this journey, where the unexpected is the norm, and where puns are as abundant as kerosene fumes in a Czechian village square.
As researchers, we thrive on delving into the murky depths of the unexplored and shedding light on the murky connections that underpin our world. In the same vein, one might say that uncovering the correlation between Democrat votes in Rhode Island and kerosene use in Czechia is akin to finding a match in a dark room - unexpectedly illuminating, and perhaps a bit too metaphorical for its own good.
The juxtaposition of political affiliations in a small U.S. state and the use of kerosene in a distant European country may seem like an odd couple, but as Forrest Gump might say, life is like a box of data - you never know what surprising correlations you're going to find! And indeed, as we navigate through the intersections of electoral trends and energy consumption patterns, we are confronted with a curious conundrum - the unexpected marriage of politics and petrol.
In the words of a true pioneer of illuminating observations, "The light at the end of the tunnel may be an oncoming train, or it may just be the glow of statistical significance." It seems that our research is poised to bring forth not just the light at the end of the tunnel, but a fireworks display of unexpected revelations and delightful surprises - much like a kerosene-fueled Fourth of July celebration in Czechia!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

In "Smith et al.," the authors find that Democrat votes for Senators in Rhode Island have historically exhibited a strong partisan alignment, with a consistent preference for Democratic candidates in federal and state elections. Similarly, "Doe and Jones" argue that kerosene consumption in Czechia has followed an upward trajectory over the past two decades, owing to a variety of economic and technological factors.

It seems that the correlation between political leanings and energy usage has sparked a new era of intercontinental intrigue - a union that could be likened to the marriage between a match and a kerosene lamp. Why did the kerosene cross the ocean? To cast its illuminating influence on the political preferences of Rhode Island voters, of course! These unexpected ties underscore the importance of examining seemingly disparate elements in tandem, as the saying goes, "There's no such thing as too much light - or too much data analysis!"

Turning to the insights from non-fiction literature, "The Geography of Thought" by Richard Nisbett provides a fascinating exploration of how cultural beliefs and practices shape human cognition and behavior. In a similar vein, "The Energy of Nations" by Jeremy Leggett delves into the complex interplay between political dynamics and energy policies, hinting at the nuanced web of connections that underpin our world. As the old adage goes, "Politics and energy consumption make for strange bedfellows - much like a kerosene lamp and a ballot box!"

On the fictional front, the works of Dan Brown, particularly "Origin," come to mind, with their penchant for unraveling cryptic mysteries and uncovering hidden connections. In this case, our research aims to unearth the enigmatic threads that bind political preferences in Rhode Island and kerosene use in Czechia, painting a narrative that is as intriguing as it is unexpected. As our investigation unfolds, it's clear that our quest for understanding resembles a gripping novel, where the plot thickens with every twist and turn - not unlike the wick of a kerosene lamp seeking to ignite a flame of insight.

In the realm of television, "Stranger Things" offers a captivating portrayal of the unforeseen forces at play in a seemingly mundane setting, drawing eerie parallels to the unanticipated correlation between Democrat votes in Rhode Island and kerosene consumption in Czechia. Our research journey mirrors the intrigue and suspense of such riveting shows, as we aim to shed light on the uncanny connections that defy conventional wisdom and spark a sense of wonder - much like the flickering glow of a kerosene lamp in the night.

As we navigate through the annals of literature and media, one cannot help but be reminded of the words of William Shakespeare: "All the world's a stage, and all the data mere players." Indeed, our research envisions a stage where the most unexpected correlations take center stage, captivating audiences with a blend of statistical significance and unexpected plot twists. After all, as our findings illustrate, the realm of scientific inquiry and human behavior is not all serious business - sometimes, it's a comedy of errors, much like a kerosene-fueled play that keeps the audience guessing till the very end!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Democrat votes for Senators in Rhode Island and Kerosene used in Czechia. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse and Energy Information Administration . You used data from 1993 to 2020

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"An Illuminating Connection: The Correlation Between Democrat Votes for Senators in Rhode Island and Kerosene Use in Czechia"

[[ABSTRACT]]
Fueling the flames of political analysis, this research sets out to investigate the unexpected and seemingly unrelated relationship between Democrat votes for Senators in Rhode Island and kerosene consumption in Czechia. Drawing on data from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and the Energy Information Administration, our study uncovers a statistically significant correlation between these two seemingly unrelated elements, with a correlation coefficient of 0.8749396 and p < 0.01, spanning the years from 1993 to 2020.

In shedding light on this puzzling connection, we employ a combination of econometric and political analysis to provide a comprehensive understanding of this unusual phenomenon. Our findings not only highlight a surprising linkage between political preferences and energy usage, but also present intriguing implications for both electoral behavior and energy consumption patterns. Who would have guessed that the flicker of a kerosene lamp in Czechia could be intertwined with the political leanings of voters across the Atlantic in Rhode Island? It seems that the glow of political influence truly knows no boundaries!

Amidst the serious undertakings of data analysis and econometric modeling, we aim to infuse a spark of humor, much akin to the striking of a match in a dark room, to illuminate the unexpected connections that drive our world. As a wise man once said, "I told my wife she should embrace her mistakes - she gave me a hug!" And so, we invite our readers to embrace the delightful surprises that emerge from the intersection of data analysis and human behavior. After all, as this research demonstrates, the world of statistics and politics is not all black and white - sometimes, it's kerosene orange!

[[INTRODUCTION]]
In the pursuit of understanding the enigmatic and often convoluted tapestry of human behavior, researchers have delved into the most unexpected realms to uncover patterns and correlations that defy conventional wisdom. Our investigation into the relationship between Democrat votes for Senators in Rhode Island and kerosene consumption in Czechia epitomizes this spirit of exploration, transcending geographical boundaries and disciplinary confines to unravel a truly puzzling connection. It's as if politics and energy usage have decided to dance together in an intricate waltz, illuminating a fascinating tale of intercontinental intrigue.
What do you call a lamp powered by political preferences and kerosene? A shining example of how global connections can light up even the most unconventional of research endeavors! As we venture into the realm of statistical analysis and political intricacies, we invite our readers to join us on this journey, where the unexpected is the norm, and where puns are as abundant as kerosene fumes in a Czechian village square.
As researchers, we thrive on delving into the murky depths of the unexplored and shedding light on the murky connections that underpin our world. In the same vein, one might say that uncovering the correlation between Democrat votes in Rhode Island and kerosene use in Czechia is akin to finding a match in a dark room - unexpectedly illuminating, and perhaps a bit too metaphorical for its own good.
The juxtaposition of political affiliations in a small U.S. state and the use of kerosene in a distant European country may seem like an odd couple, but as Forrest Gump might say, life is like a box of data - you never know what surprising correlations you're going to find! And indeed, as we navigate through the intersections of electoral trends and energy consumption patterns, we are confronted with a curious conundrum - the unexpected marriage of politics and petrol.
In the words of a true pioneer of illuminating observations, "The light at the end of the tunnel may be an oncoming train, or it may just be the glow of statistical significance." It seems that our research is poised to bring forth not just the light at the end of the tunnel, but a fireworks display of unexpected revelations and delightful surprises - much like a kerosene-fueled Fourth of July celebration in Czechia!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To uncover the mysterious correlation between Democrat votes for Senators in Rhode Island and kerosene consumption in Czechia, our research employed a multidisciplinary approach that danced across the realms of political science, econometrics, and energy analysis. Like assembling the pieces of a particularly perplexing puzzle, our methodology integrated data from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and the Energy Information Administration, spanning the years from 1993 to 2020. It was like gathering ingredients for a grand culinary experiment, except in this case, the main course was a statistical feast rather than a culinary delight.

First, our team delved into the electoral landscape of Rhode Island, meticulously gathering data on Democrat votes for Senators over the years. Much like seeking out the perfect ingredients for a recipe, we scoured through historical election records, sifting through the political landscape to identify the electoral patterns that would ultimately serve as the canvas for our analysis. Our quest for political data across the digital expanse was like embarking on a digital treasure hunt - the thrill of discovery magnified by the promise of uncovering surprising correlations.

Simultaneously, the energy consumption patterns in Czechia underwent a detailed investigation, with kerosene use taking center stage in our analysis. It was as if our research ventured into the realm of energy economics, armed with statistical tools and an insatiable curiosity for the unexpected. This process of collecting energy data was akin to mining for precious jewels, with each data point serving as a shimmering facet in the grand mosaic of our research endeavor. In the true spirit of academic pursuits, we navigated through the depths of energy statistics with vigor, determined to shed light on the fascinating connection between energy usage and political preferences.

The amalgamation of these disparate datasets, much like the blending of seemingly incongruent flavors, served as the foundation for our subsequent econometric analysis. Guided by the principles of statistical inference and economic modeling, our team crafted a robust framework to examine the relationship between Democrat votes for Senators in Rhode Island and kerosene consumption in Czechia. It was like concocting an elaborate scientific experiment, except instead of beakers and test tubes, our apparatus comprised regression models and hypothesis testing.

Harnessing the power of time-series analysis and multivariate regression, we sought to untangle the intricate web of causality and correlation that underpinned the surprising connection between these two seemingly unrelated variables. Our statistical maneuvers were reminiscent of choreographing a symphony of numbers, orchestrating the dance of coefficients and significance levels in a quest to unravel the enigmatic relationship between political leanings and energy usage. It was as if we were dissecting the waltz of perplexing data points, each step revealing a new facet of the captivating correlation we sought to elucidate.

In the spirit of true academic inquiry, we complemented our quantitative analysis with qualitative insights, delving into the historical, social, and cultural contexts that could potentially elucidate the underlying mechanisms linking Democrat votes in Rhode Island to kerosene consumption in Czechia. Like unravelling the intricacies of a complex narrative, this qualitative exploration added depth and nuance to our understanding of the unexpected linkage, shedding light on the broader sociopolitical dynamics that intertwined with energy usage patterns. It was like donning the mantle of investigative historians, tracing the threads of political discourse and energy infrastructure to unearth the nexus of factors that shaped this enthralling correlation.

Through this eclectic blend of data collection, statistical analysis, and qualitative exploration, our research strived to illuminate a hitherto uncharted connection that transcended the boundaries of conventional wisdom. It was like setting sail on the uncharted waters of statistical inquiry, propelled by a spirit of curiosity and the relentless pursuit of academic enlightenment. As we navigated through these uncharted territories of data analysis and interdisciplinary synthesis, it became abundantly clear that the sparks of unexpected connections could illuminate even the most enigmatic of research pursuits. And remember, when it comes to academic exploration, a sense of humor can be as illuminating as a well-placed candle in a dark room - it not only lightens the mood, but also brightens the corridors of knowledge with unexpected insights.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Democrat votes for Senators in Rhode Island and Kerosene used in Czechia. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse and Energy Information Administration .

For the time period 1993 to 2020, you found a correlation 0.8749396, r-squared of 0.7655192, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"An Illuminating Connection: The Correlation Between Democrat Votes for Senators in Rhode Island and Kerosene Use in Czechia"

[[ABSTRACT]]
Fueling the flames of political analysis, this research sets out to investigate the unexpected and seemingly unrelated relationship between Democrat votes for Senators in Rhode Island and kerosene consumption in Czechia. Drawing on data from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and the Energy Information Administration, our study uncovers a statistically significant correlation between these two seemingly unrelated elements, with a correlation coefficient of 0.8749396 and p < 0.01, spanning the years from 1993 to 2020.

In shedding light on this puzzling connection, we employ a combination of econometric and political analysis to provide a comprehensive understanding of this unusual phenomenon. Our findings not only highlight a surprising linkage between political preferences and energy usage, but also present intriguing implications for both electoral behavior and energy consumption patterns. Who would have guessed that the flicker of a kerosene lamp in Czechia could be intertwined with the political leanings of voters across the Atlantic in Rhode Island? It seems that the glow of political influence truly knows no boundaries!

Amidst the serious undertakings of data analysis and econometric modeling, we aim to infuse a spark of humor, much akin to the striking of a match in a dark room, to illuminate the unexpected connections that drive our world. As a wise man once said, "I told my wife she should embrace her mistakes - she gave me a hug!" And so, we invite our readers to embrace the delightful surprises that emerge from the intersection of data analysis and human behavior. After all, as this research demonstrates, the world of statistics and politics is not all black and white - sometimes, it's kerosene orange!

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
In the pursuit of understanding the enigmatic and often convoluted tapestry of human behavior, researchers have delved into the most unexpected realms to uncover patterns and correlations that defy conventional wisdom. Our investigation into the relationship between Democrat votes for Senators in Rhode Island and kerosene consumption in Czechia epitomizes this spirit of exploration, transcending geographical boundaries and disciplinary confines to unravel a truly puzzling connection. It's as if politics and energy usage have decided to dance together in an intricate waltz, illuminating a fascinating tale of intercontinental intrigue.
What do you call a lamp powered by political preferences and kerosene? A shining example of how global connections can light up even the most unconventional of research endeavors! As we venture into the realm of statistical analysis and political intricacies, we invite our readers to join us on this journey, where the unexpected is the norm, and where puns are as abundant as kerosene fumes in a Czechian village square.
As researchers, we thrive on delving into the murky depths of the unexplored and shedding light on the murky connections that underpin our world. In the same vein, one might say that uncovering the correlation between Democrat votes in Rhode Island and kerosene use in Czechia is akin to finding a match in a dark room - unexpectedly illuminating, and perhaps a bit too metaphorical for its own good.
The juxtaposition of political affiliations in a small U.S. state and the use of kerosene in a distant European country may seem like an odd couple, but as Forrest Gump might say, life is like a box of data - you never know what surprising correlations you're going to find! And indeed, as we navigate through the intersections of electoral trends and energy consumption patterns, we are confronted with a curious conundrum - the unexpected marriage of politics and petrol.
In the words of a true pioneer of illuminating observations, "The light at the end of the tunnel may be an oncoming train, or it may just be the glow of statistical significance." It seems that our research is poised to bring forth not just the light at the end of the tunnel, but a fireworks display of unexpected revelations and delightful surprises - much like a kerosene-fueled Fourth of July celebration in Czechia!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

Our analysis revealed a striking correlation between Democrat votes for Senators in Rhode Island and kerosene consumption in Czechia spanning the years 1993 to 2020. The correlation coefficient of 0.8749396 and an r-squared of 0.7655192 indicate a robust and statistically significant relationship between these seemingly disparate variables. It seems that when it comes to energy usage and political leanings, there's no need to remain in the dark!

Figure 1 showcases the noteworthy correlation between these two unexpected elements. The scatterplot graphically displays the unmistakable trend, with Democrat votes in Rhode Island positively associated with kerosene use in Czechia. As the saying goes, "Where there's statistical smoke, there's statistically significant fire!"

This intriguing confluence of variables may seem as unlikely as a kerosene-powered lighthouse guiding the way in landlocked Czechia, yet our findings affirm the reality of this correlation. It appears that the flickering flames of democratic preferences have a peculiar dance with the illumination provided by kerosene in Czechia. One might say that this connection sheds a different light on the interplay between political proclivities and energy consumption on a global scale.

Who would have guessed that the glow of political influence truly knows no boundaries! It seems that while Rhode Island residents may have been casting their ballots, across the sea in Czechia, the kerosene lamps were not to be outshone.

As we unravel this unexpected relationship between the political and the luminous, we invite our readers to embrace the whimsicality of statistical discoveries and the illuminating insights they offer. After all, in the realm of data analysis and human behavior, it's often the most unexpected connections that shine the brightest!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Democrat votes for Senators in Rhode Island and Kerosene used in Czechia. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
"An Illuminating Connection: The Correlation Between Democrat Votes for Senators in Rhode Island and Kerosene Use in Czechia"

[[ABSTRACT]]
Fueling the flames of political analysis, this research sets out to investigate the unexpected and seemingly unrelated relationship between Democrat votes for Senators in Rhode Island and kerosene consumption in Czechia. Drawing on data from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and the Energy Information Administration, our study uncovers a statistically significant correlation between these two seemingly unrelated elements, with a correlation coefficient of 0.8749396 and p < 0.01, spanning the years from 1993 to 2020.

In shedding light on this puzzling connection, we employ a combination of econometric and political analysis to provide a comprehensive understanding of this unusual phenomenon. Our findings not only highlight a surprising linkage between political preferences and energy usage, but also present intriguing implications for both electoral behavior and energy consumption patterns. Who would have guessed that the flicker of a kerosene lamp in Czechia could be intertwined with the political leanings of voters across the Atlantic in Rhode Island? It seems that the glow of political influence truly knows no boundaries!

Amidst the serious undertakings of data analysis and econometric modeling, we aim to infuse a spark of humor, much akin to the striking of a match in a dark room, to illuminate the unexpected connections that drive our world. As a wise man once said, "I told my wife she should embrace her mistakes - she gave me a hug!" And so, we invite our readers to embrace the delightful surprises that emerge from the intersection of data analysis and human behavior. After all, as this research demonstrates, the world of statistics and politics is not all black and white - sometimes, it's kerosene orange!

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
In "Smith et al.," the authors find that Democrat votes for Senators in Rhode Island have historically exhibited a strong partisan alignment, with a consistent preference for Democratic candidates in federal and state elections. Similarly, "Doe and Jones" argue that kerosene consumption in Czechia has followed an upward trajectory over the past two decades, owing to a variety of economic and technological factors.
It seems that the correlation between political leanings and energy usage has sparked a new era of intercontinental intrigue - a union that could be likened to the marriage between a match and a kerosene lamp. Why did the kerosene cross the ocean? To cast its illuminating influence on the political preferences of Rhode Island voters, of course! These unexpected ties underscore the importance of examining seemingly disparate elements in tandem, as the saying goes, "There's no such thing as too much light - or too much data analysis!"
Turning to the insights from non-fiction literature, "The Geography of Thought" by Richard Nisbett provides a fascinating exploration of how cultural beliefs and practices shape human cognition and behavior. In a similar vein, "The Energy of Nations" by Jeremy Leggett delves into the complex interplay between political dynamics and energy policies, hinting at the nuanced web of connections that underpin our world. As the old adage goes, "Politics and energy consumption make for strange bedfellows - much like a kerosene lamp and a ballot box!"
On the fictional front, the works of Dan Brown, particularly "Origin," come to mind, with their penchant for unraveling cryptic mysteries and uncovering hidden connections. In this case, our research aims to unearth the enigmatic threads that bind political preferences in Rhode Island and kerosene use in Czechia, painting a narrative that is as intriguing as it is unexpected. As our investigation unfolds, it's clear that our quest for understanding resembles a gripping novel, where the plot thickens with every twist and turn - not unlike the wick of a kerosene lamp seeking to ignite a flame of insight.
In the realm of television, "Stranger Things" offers a captivating portrayal of the unforeseen forces at play in a seemingly mundane setting, drawing eerie parallels to the unanticipated correlation between Democrat votes in Rhode Island and kerosene consumption in Czechia. Our research journey mirrors the intrigue and suspense of such riveting shows, as we aim to shed light on the uncanny connections that defy conventional wisdom and spark a sense of wonder - much like the flickering glow of a kerosene lamp in the night.
As we navigate through the annals of literature and media, one cannot help but be reminded of the words of William Shakespeare: "All the world's a stage, and all the data mere players." Indeed, our research envisions a stage where the most unexpected correlations take center stage, captivating audiences with a blend of statistical significance and unexpected plot twists. After all, as our findings illustrate, the realm of scientific inquiry and human behavior is not all serious business - sometimes, it's a comedy of errors, much like a kerosene-fueled play that keeps the audience guessing till the very end!

[[RESULTS]]
Our analysis revealed a striking correlation between Democrat votes for Senators in Rhode Island and kerosene consumption in Czechia spanning the years 1993 to 2020. The correlation coefficient of 0.8749396 and an r-squared of 0.7655192 indicate a robust and statistically significant relationship between these seemingly disparate variables. It seems that when it comes to energy usage and political leanings, there's no need to remain in the dark!
Figure 1 showcases the noteworthy correlation between these two unexpected elements. The scatterplot graphically displays the unmistakable trend, with Democrat votes in Rhode Island positively associated with kerosene use in Czechia. As the saying goes, "Where there's statistical smoke, there's statistically significant fire!"
This intriguing confluence of variables may seem as unlikely as a kerosene-powered lighthouse guiding the way in landlocked Czechia, yet our findings affirm the reality of this correlation. It appears that the flickering flames of democratic preferences have a peculiar dance with the illumination provided by kerosene in Czechia. One might say that this connection sheds a different light on the interplay between political proclivities and energy consumption on a global scale.
Who would have guessed that the glow of political influence truly knows no boundaries! It seems that while Rhode Island residents may have been casting their ballots, across the sea in Czechia, the kerosene lamps were not to be outshone.
As we unravel this unexpected relationship between the political and the luminous, we invite our readers to embrace the whimsicality of statistical discoveries and the illuminating insights they offer. After all, in the realm of data analysis and human behavior, it's often the most unexpected connections that shine the brightest!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The findings of our study have illuminated a fascinating intercontinental relationship between Democrat votes for Senators in Rhode Island and kerosene consumption in Czechia. The correlations unveiled in our research not only validate the exploration of unexpected pairings but also contribute to the growing body of knowledge that defies conventional expectations. It seems that when it comes to political preferences and energy usage, one truly never knows where the next spark will ignite!

The statistically significant correlation coefficient of 0.8749396, with a p-value of less than 0.01, aligns with and strengthens prior research on the partisan alignment of Democrat votes in Rhode Island. The long-standing preference for Democratic candidates in federal and state elections, as noted by "Smith et al.," has evidently extended its influence to an unlikely and unconventional partner in Czechia. It appears that the glow of political influence truly transcends time zones and national boundaries, much like a dad joke that never fails to traverse generations!

Furthermore, our findings support the upward trajectory of kerosene consumption in Czechia documented by "Doe and Jones." The unexpected connection between kerosene use and Democrat votes in Rhode Island underscores the interplay of cultural beliefs, technological advancements, and political dynamics that shape human behavior and energy consumption patterns. It seems that this correlation is not merely a statistical oddity but rather a quirky fusion of human choices and global dynamics, much like a dad joke that combines groans with delight.

The thematic parallels with literature and media insights mentioned in our literature review, though initially lighthearted, find a curious semblance of truth in our research. By unraveling the enigmatic threads that bind political preferences in Rhode Island and kerosene use in Czechia, our study mirrors the intrigue and suspense of popular narratives. This unexpected correlation not only adds a twist to the conventional understanding of electoral behavior and energy usage but also serves as a reminder that sometimes, the most illuminating discoveries come from unexpected sources - much like the flickering glow of a kerosene lamp in the night, or a well-timed dad joke that catches you off guard.

In essence, our research has brought to light a peculiar dance between political proclivities and energy consumption on a global scale. As we continue to unpack the implications and significance of this startling correlation, the words of Mark Twain resonate: "The secret source of humor itself is not joy, but sorrow. There is no humor in heaven."

As our investigation unfolds, one cannot help but marvel at the unexpected connections that transpire in the realm of statistical analysis and human behavior. After all, it's often the most unlikely correlations that shed the brightest light on the intricate web of human choices and their far-reaching consequences.

Can you believe the shocking correlation between Democrat votes in Rhode Island and kerosene consumption in Czechia? It seems like something straight out of a dad joke - "Why did the Democrat voter go to Czechia? To light the way with kerosene, of course!"


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Democrat votes for Senators in Rhode Island and Kerosene used in Czechia. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
"An Illuminating Connection: The Correlation Between Democrat Votes for Senators in Rhode Island and Kerosene Use in Czechia"

[[ABSTRACT]]
Fueling the flames of political analysis, this research sets out to investigate the unexpected and seemingly unrelated relationship between Democrat votes for Senators in Rhode Island and kerosene consumption in Czechia. Drawing on data from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and the Energy Information Administration, our study uncovers a statistically significant correlation between these two seemingly unrelated elements, with a correlation coefficient of 0.8749396 and p < 0.01, spanning the years from 1993 to 2020.

In shedding light on this puzzling connection, we employ a combination of econometric and political analysis to provide a comprehensive understanding of this unusual phenomenon. Our findings not only highlight a surprising linkage between political preferences and energy usage, but also present intriguing implications for both electoral behavior and energy consumption patterns. Who would have guessed that the flicker of a kerosene lamp in Czechia could be intertwined with the political leanings of voters across the Atlantic in Rhode Island? It seems that the glow of political influence truly knows no boundaries!

Amidst the serious undertakings of data analysis and econometric modeling, we aim to infuse a spark of humor, much akin to the striking of a match in a dark room, to illuminate the unexpected connections that drive our world. As a wise man once said, "I told my wife she should embrace her mistakes - she gave me a hug!" And so, we invite our readers to embrace the delightful surprises that emerge from the intersection of data analysis and human behavior. After all, as this research demonstrates, the world of statistics and politics is not all black and white - sometimes, it's kerosene orange!

[[INTRDUCTION]]
In the pursuit of understanding the enigmatic and often convoluted tapestry of human behavior, researchers have delved into the most unexpected realms to uncover patterns and correlations that defy conventional wisdom. Our investigation into the relationship between Democrat votes for Senators in Rhode Island and kerosene consumption in Czechia epitomizes this spirit of exploration, transcending geographical boundaries and disciplinary confines to unravel a truly puzzling connection. It's as if politics and energy usage have decided to dance together in an intricate waltz, illuminating a fascinating tale of intercontinental intrigue.
What do you call a lamp powered by political preferences and kerosene? A shining example of how global connections can light up even the most unconventional of research endeavors! As we venture into the realm of statistical analysis and political intricacies, we invite our readers to join us on this journey, where the unexpected is the norm, and where puns are as abundant as kerosene fumes in a Czechian village square.
As researchers, we thrive on delving into the murky depths of the unexplored and shedding light on the murky connections that underpin our world. In the same vein, one might say that uncovering the correlation between Democrat votes in Rhode Island and kerosene use in Czechia is akin to finding a match in a dark room - unexpectedly illuminating, and perhaps a bit too metaphorical for its own good.
The juxtaposition of political affiliations in a small U.S. state and the use of kerosene in a distant European country may seem like an odd couple, but as Forrest Gump might say, life is like a box of data - you never know what surprising correlations you're going to find! And indeed, as we navigate through the intersections of electoral trends and energy consumption patterns, we are confronted with a curious conundrum - the unexpected marriage of politics and petrol.
In the words of a true pioneer of illuminating observations, "The light at the end of the tunnel may be an oncoming train, or it may just be the glow of statistical significance." It seems that our research is poised to bring forth not just the light at the end of the tunnel, but a fireworks display of unexpected revelations and delightful surprises - much like a kerosene-fueled Fourth of July celebration in Czechia!

[[RESULTS]]
Our analysis revealed a striking correlation between Democrat votes for Senators in Rhode Island and kerosene consumption in Czechia spanning the years 1993 to 2020. The correlation coefficient of 0.8749396 and an r-squared of 0.7655192 indicate a robust and statistically significant relationship between these seemingly disparate variables. It seems that when it comes to energy usage and political leanings, there's no need to remain in the dark!
Figure 1 showcases the noteworthy correlation between these two unexpected elements. The scatterplot graphically displays the unmistakable trend, with Democrat votes in Rhode Island positively associated with kerosene use in Czechia. As the saying goes, "Where there's statistical smoke, there's statistically significant fire!"
This intriguing confluence of variables may seem as unlikely as a kerosene-powered lighthouse guiding the way in landlocked Czechia, yet our findings affirm the reality of this correlation. It appears that the flickering flames of democratic preferences have a peculiar dance with the illumination provided by kerosene in Czechia. One might say that this connection sheds a different light on the interplay between political proclivities and energy consumption on a global scale.
Who would have guessed that the glow of political influence truly knows no boundaries! It seems that while Rhode Island residents may have been casting their ballots, across the sea in Czechia, the kerosene lamps were not to be outshone.
As we unravel this unexpected relationship between the political and the luminous, we invite our readers to embrace the whimsicality of statistical discoveries and the illuminating insights they offer. After all, in the realm of data analysis and human behavior, it's often the most unexpected connections that shine the brightest!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our research has successfully illuminated the unexpected connection between Democrat votes for Senators in Rhode Island and kerosene consumption in Czechia. The statistically significant correlation we uncovered has shed light on the intertwined nature of political leanings and energy usage, creating a glow of insight that extends across continents. It's like they say, "Where there's a statistically significant correlation, there's no smoke without political fire!"

This unusual relationship not only adds an intriguing twist to the understanding of electoral behavior and energy consumption but also paves the way for further exploration at the intersection of seemingly unrelated domains. Who would have thought that political preferences and kerosene usage could synergize in such an illuminating manner? It's like a political power play conducted under the warm glow of kerosene lamps - unexpected but undeniably captivating!

At this point, we can confidently assert that no further research is needed in this area. It seems that the light of statistical significance has already illuminated this fascinating connection, leaving us with a delightful understanding of the dance between politics and petrol. As we bask in the glow of these unexpected findings, it's clear that sometimes, the most surprising correlations can light the way to new insights, both statistical and comical!

Who would have guessed that such striking relationships could unfurl from the seemingly unrelated domains of political voting and energy consumption? It's almost as if statistical analysis has its own brand of humor, creating unexpected pairings that shine with the brilliance of statistical significance. After all, as we move forward, we must remember that in the world of data analysis, serendipity can be as illuminating as a well-fueled kerosene lamp.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited An Illuminating Connection: The Correlation Between Democrat Votes for Senators in Rhode Island and Kerosene Use in Czechia. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The International Journal of Political Paradoxes and Cross-Cultural Connections


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited An Illuminating Connection: The Correlation Between Democrat Votes for Senators in Rhode Island and Kerosene Use in Czechia. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Institute for Intercontinental Policy Studies


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled An Illuminating Connection: The Correlation Between Democrat Votes for Senators in Rhode Island and Kerosene Use in Czechia with an abstract of Fueling the flames of political analysis, this research sets out to investigate the unexpected and seemingly unrelated relationship between Democrat votes for Senators in Rhode Island and kerosene consumption in Czechia. Drawing on data from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and the Energy Information Administration, our study uncovers a statistically significant correlation between these two seemingly unrelated elements, with a correlation coefficient of 0.8749396 and p < 0.01, spanning the years from 1993 to 2020.
In shedding light on this puzzling connection, we employ a combination of econometric and political analysis to provide a comprehensive understanding of this unusual phenomenon. Our findings not only highlight a surprising linkage between political preferences and energy usage, but also present intriguing implications for both electoral behavior and energy consumption patterns. Who would have guessed that the flicker of a kerosene lamp in Czechia could be intertwined with the political leanings of voters across the Atlantic in Rhode Island? It seems that the glow of political influence truly knows no boundaries!
Amidst the serious undertakings of data analysis and econometric modeling, we aim to infuse a spark of humor, much akin to the striking of a match in a dark room, to illuminate the unexpected connections that drive our world. As a wise man once said, "I told my wife she should embrace her mistakes - she gave me a hug!" And so, we invite our readers to embrace the delightful surprises that emerge from the intersection of data analysis and human behavior. After all, as this research demonstrates, the world of statistics and politics is not all black and white - sometimes, it's kerosene orange!

ChatGPT:

Democrat votes, Senators, Rhode Island, kerosene use, Czechia, correlation, statistical analysis, data analysis, political behavior, energy consumption, MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, Energy Information Administration, econometric analysis, electoral behavior, energy usage patterns, political influence, humor in research, surprising connections, statistics, politics.

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Votes for Democratic Senators in Rhode Island
Detailed data title: Percentage of votes cast for Federal Democrat Senate candidates in Rhode Island
Source: MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse
See what else correlates with Votes for Democratic Senators in Rhode Island

Kerosene used in Czechia
Detailed data title: Volume of kerosene used consumed in Czechia in millions of barrels per day
Source: Energy Information Administration
See what else correlates with Kerosene used in Czechia

Correlation r = 0.8749396 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.7655192 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 76.6% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Kerosene used in Czechia) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Votes for Democratic Senators in Rhode Island) over the 10 years from 1993 through 2020.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 0.00092. 0.0009177968141316324000000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.87 in 0.092% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 1,090 random variables Which I absolutely did.
with the same 9 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 9 because we have two variables measured over a period of 10 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.55, 0.97 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
1994199620002002200620082012201420182020
Votes for Democratic Senators in Rhode Island (Percentage of votes)35.476663.30841.145278.426553.518673.070964.811470.582661.442466.4777
Kerosene used in Czechia (Million Barrels/Day)0.098630.2622950.1202190.2666670.2649010.2631580.2637360.2666670.2622950.262295




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([35.4766,63.308,41.1452,78.4265,53.5186,73.0709,64.8114,70.5826,61.4424,66.4777,])
array_2 = np.array([0.09863,0.262295,0.120219,0.266667,0.264901,0.263158,0.263736,0.266667,0.262295,0.262295,])
array_1_name = "Votes for Democratic Senators in Rhode Island"
array_2_name = "Kerosene used in Czechia"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

I'm grateful for your review!


Correlation ID: 4542 · Black Variable ID: 26455 · Red Variable ID: 24346
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0