about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #4,509 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Average views of SciShow Space YouTube videos and the second variable is The number of nuclear medicine technologists in New York.  The chart goes from 2014 to 2022, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

The pun: It seems the nuclear medicine technologists couldn't keep up with the decaying views! A decrease in Average views of SciShow Space YouTube videos caused The number of nuclear medicine technologists in New York to decrease because as the interest in space decreased, it created a Black Hole of employment opportunities for nuclear medicine technologists, leading them to seek out new careers with more universal appeal. As the Space videos fizzled out, so did the desire to atomically specialize, leaving the field feeling a bit radioactive. Even in the city that never sleeps, it seems the nuclear medicine technologists were experiencing a cosmic shift in their job market.

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Generate an image of a deserted city street set against a space-themed backdrop. The hyper-realistic scene should capture the somber atmosphere as former nuclear medicine technologists are seen leaving the street. The setting should be filled with details that highlight the once thriving nature of the area, now faded and decaying. Adorn the scene with subtle hints of technology and radiation-related elements to evoke the theme of former careers and the search for new paths, as well as the plummeting viewership of the SciShow Space YouTube channel. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Average views of SciShow Space YouTube videos and The number of nuclear medicine technologists in New York. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Whimsical illustration An image that looks like it is a scene from A Disney Movie Cybernetic art Steampunk Hyper-realistic
ChatGPT: Hyper-realistic

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Average views of SciShow Space YouTube videos and The number of nuclear medicine technologists in New York, in the following situation: The pun: It seems the nuclear medicine technologists couldn't keep up with the decaying views! A decrease in Average views of SciShow Space YouTube videos caused The number of nuclear medicine technologists in New York to decrease because as the interest in space decreased, it created a Black Hole of employment opportunities for nuclear medicine technologists, leading them to seek out new careers with more universal appeal. As the Space videos fizzled out, so did the desire to atomically specialize, leaving the field feeling a bit radioactive. Even in the city that never sleeps, it seems the nuclear medicine technologists were experiencing a cosmic shift in their job market.. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In a bustling city, the once thriving nuclear medicine technologists in New York found themselves on a deserted space-themed street. The view count on the SciShow Space YouTube channel plummeted, causing the once bright and active street to decay into a desolate, shadowy place. Formerly enthusiastic technologists were seen leaving the street, their radiation badges shimmering sadly in the fading light, in search of new career paths with broader appeal.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ Hyper-realistic ] and depicting this scene: In a bustling city, the once thriving nuclear medicine technologists in New York found themselves on a deserted space-themed street. The view count on the SciShow Space YouTube channel plummeted, causing the once bright and active street to decay into a desolate, shadowy place. Formerly enthusiastic technologists were seen leaving the street, their radiation badges shimmering sadly in the fading light, in search of new career paths with broader appeal. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Generate an image of a deserted city street set against a space-themed backdrop. The hyper-realistic scene should capture the somber atmosphere as former nuclear medicine technologists are seen leaving the street. The setting should be filled with details that highlight the once thriving nature of the area, now faded and decaying. Adorn the scene with subtle hints of technology and radiation-related elements to evoke the theme of former careers and the search for new paths, as well as the plummeting viewership of the SciShow Space YouTube channel.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how a decrease in Average views of SciShow Space YouTube videos caused The number of nuclear medicine technologists in New York to decrease. Include one good pun.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Cosmic Connection: Correlating the Counts of Cosmic Content with Careers in Canvassing the Cosmos

The Journal of Interstellar Inquiry

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Average views of SciShow Space YouTube videos and The number of nuclear medicine technologists in New York. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Make the title an alliteration.

Your research team used data from YouTube and Bureau of Larbor Statistics to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9873001 and p < 0.01 for 2014 to 2022.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
Cosmic Connection: Correlating the Counts of Cosmic Content with Careers in Canvassing the Cosmos

[[ABSTRACT]]
This cosmic research embarks on an astral expedition to elucidate the entwined destiny of SciShow Space viewership and the workforce of nuclear medicine technologists in New York. With a sprinkle of stardust, we amalgamated data from the YouTube galaxy and the Bureau of Labor Statistics universe to unravel the celestial correlation. Our findings unveil a gravitational bond, with a cosmic correlation coefficient of 0.9873001 and a p-value less than 0.01 from 2014 to 2022. As we traverse through this cosmic journey, we uncover the gravitational pull of educational entertainment on the terrestrial Venn diagram of vocational choices. The celestial musings from SciShow Space seemingly have a supernova effect on propelling interest in cosmic vocations. Our research not only sheds light on this unexpected cosmic coupling but also serves as a glowing testament to the interstellar influence of educational media.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Average views of SciShow Space YouTube videos and The number of nuclear medicine technologists in New York. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Cosmic Connection: Correlating the Counts of Cosmic Content with Careers in Canvassing the Cosmos

[[ABSTRACT]]
This cosmic research embarks on an astral expedition to elucidate the entwined destiny of SciShow Space viewership and the workforce of nuclear medicine technologists in New York. With a sprinkle of stardust, we amalgamated data from the YouTube galaxy and the Bureau of Labor Statistics universe to unravel the celestial correlation. Our findings unveil a gravitational bond, with a cosmic correlation coefficient of 0.9873001 and a p-value less than 0.01 from 2014 to 2022. As we traverse through this cosmic journey, we uncover the gravitational pull of educational entertainment on the terrestrial Venn diagram of vocational choices. The celestial musings from SciShow Space seemingly have a supernova effect on propelling interest in cosmic vocations. Our research not only sheds light on this unexpected cosmic coupling but also serves as a glowing testament to the interstellar influence of educational media.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

Gather 'round, fellow cosmic enthusiasts and intrepid explorers of the intergalactic web of knowledge! As we embark on this celestial expedition, we are compelled to delve into the enigmatic connection between the average views of SciShow Space YouTube videos and the number of nuclear medicine technologists in the illustrious state of New York.

Now, you might be thinking, "What in the cosmic continuum could these two disparate realms possibly have in common?" Fear not, dear reader, for our research aims to unravel this celestial conundrum and shed light on the cosmic correlations that lurk within.

In the vast expanse of the digital cosmos, where the stars of educational content shine bright, we find the celestial spectacle of SciShow Space. This beacon of knowledge serves as a cosmic communicator, disseminating captivating musings on the wonders of the universe to eager viewers. Meanwhile, in the terrestrial realm, the noble nuclear medicine technologists navigate the celestial body of human health, harnessing the power of atomic particles in diagnosing and treating various maladies.

But what could possibly link the cosmic curiosities of space exploration with the earthly endeavors of nuclear medicine technology? Could it be the gravitational force of cosmic curiosity luring individuals into the cosmic career paths? Or perhaps there's an unseen cosmic energy that weaves these seemingly divergent domains into a celestial tapestry of professional pursuits?

Through the application of rigorous statistical analyses and a dash of cosmic curiosity, we endeavor to unearth the hidden forces at play. From the reaches of the YouTube galaxy to the terrestrial landscapes of the New York labor market, our quest is fueled by a celestial fervor to illuminate the unexpected connections that defy the confines of conventional wisdom.

So, buckle up and prepare for an astronomical adventure as we traverse the cosmic continuum in pursuit of understanding the entwined destiny of cosmic content and careers in the cosmos. This journey promises not only to entertain but to provide a stellar testament to the interstellar influence of educational media on the celestial choices of vocation. Let's boldly go where no research has gone before and unravel the cosmic mysteries that await us!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Average views of SciShow Space YouTube videos and The number of nuclear medicine technologists in New York. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then name a couple popular internet memes that are related to one of the topics.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Cosmic Connection: Correlating the Counts of Cosmic Content with Careers in Canvassing the Cosmos

[[ABSTRACT]]
This cosmic research embarks on an astral expedition to elucidate the entwined destiny of SciShow Space viewership and the workforce of nuclear medicine technologists in New York. With a sprinkle of stardust, we amalgamated data from the YouTube galaxy and the Bureau of Labor Statistics universe to unravel the celestial correlation. Our findings unveil a gravitational bond, with a cosmic correlation coefficient of 0.9873001 and a p-value less than 0.01 from 2014 to 2022. As we traverse through this cosmic journey, we uncover the gravitational pull of educational entertainment on the terrestrial Venn diagram of vocational choices. The celestial musings from SciShow Space seemingly have a supernova effect on propelling interest in cosmic vocations. Our research not only sheds light on this unexpected cosmic coupling but also serves as a glowing testament to the interstellar influence of educational media.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
Gather 'round, fellow cosmic enthusiasts and intrepid explorers of the intergalactic web of knowledge! As we embark on this celestial expedition, we are compelled to delve into the enigmatic connection between the average views of SciShow Space YouTube videos and the number of nuclear medicine technologists in the illustrious state of New York.
Now, you might be thinking, "What in the cosmic continuum could these two disparate realms possibly have in common?" Fear not, dear reader, for our research aims to unravel this celestial conundrum and shed light on the cosmic correlations that lurk within.
In the vast expanse of the digital cosmos, where the stars of educational content shine bright, we find the celestial spectacle of SciShow Space. This beacon of knowledge serves as a cosmic communicator, disseminating captivating musings on the wonders of the universe to eager viewers. Meanwhile, in the terrestrial realm, the noble nuclear medicine technologists navigate the celestial body of human health, harnessing the power of atomic particles in diagnosing and treating various maladies.
But what could possibly link the cosmic curiosities of space exploration with the earthly endeavors of nuclear medicine technology? Could it be the gravitational force of cosmic curiosity luring individuals into the cosmic career paths? Or perhaps there's an unseen cosmic energy that weaves these seemingly divergent domains into a celestial tapestry of professional pursuits?
Through the application of rigorous statistical analyses and a dash of cosmic curiosity, we endeavor to unearth the hidden forces at play. From the reaches of the YouTube galaxy to the terrestrial landscapes of the New York labor market, our quest is fueled by a celestial fervor to illuminate the unexpected connections that defy the confines of conventional wisdom.
So, buckle up and prepare for an astronomical adventure as we traverse the cosmic continuum in pursuit of understanding the entwined destiny of cosmic content and careers in the cosmos. This journey promises not only to entertain but to provide a stellar testament to the interstellar influence of educational media on the celestial choices of vocation. Let's boldly go where no research has gone before and unravel the cosmic mysteries that await us!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The cosmic connotations of our research prompt us to examine the existing body of knowledge on the correlation between educational space content and vocational choices in the realm of the celestial sciences. Smith and Doe (2018) conducted a comprehensive study exploring the impact of science communication platforms on viewer engagement and interest in scientific careers. Their findings revealed a meteoric rise in curiosity regarding cosmic vocations following exposure to captivating space-related content. Similarly, Jones et al. (2020) delved into the correlation between online science education and career aspirations, positing a gravitational pull of educational entertainment on the professional trajectories of aspiring scientists and technologists.

Venturing further into the annals of literature related to cosmic curiosities, "The Universe Unveiled: Cosmic Wonders and Career Conundrums" by Astronomer A. Fictional (2019) presents a fictional account of cosmic musings intertwining with the vocational fabric of society. Furthermore, "Nuclear Nebulas and the Technological Terrain" by Physicist P. Imagination (2017) offers a fictional exploration of the interstellar allure on the careers of nuclear medicine technologists. While these works may seem otherworldly, they provide intriguing perspectives that parallel our celestial research pursuits.

In a galactic twist, the internet meme "This is the Way" from the cosmic saga of a mandalorian and "Big Bang Theory" references have permeated the virtual cosmos, underscoring the widespread fascination with cosmic phenomena and its potential influence on career paths.

As we traverse the cosmos of literature, it becomes apparent that the intersection of educational space content and vocational preferences embodies a cosmic enigma waiting to be unveiled. Through our research, we aim to propel this inquiry beyond the bounds of conventional wisdom and into the uncharted realms of celestial connections.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Average views of SciShow Space YouTube videos and The number of nuclear medicine technologists in New York. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from YouTube and Bureau of Larbor Statistics . You used data from 2014 to 2022

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Cosmic Connection: Correlating the Counts of Cosmic Content with Careers in Canvassing the Cosmos

[[ABSTRACT]]
This cosmic research embarks on an astral expedition to elucidate the entwined destiny of SciShow Space viewership and the workforce of nuclear medicine technologists in New York. With a sprinkle of stardust, we amalgamated data from the YouTube galaxy and the Bureau of Labor Statistics universe to unravel the celestial correlation. Our findings unveil a gravitational bond, with a cosmic correlation coefficient of 0.9873001 and a p-value less than 0.01 from 2014 to 2022. As we traverse through this cosmic journey, we uncover the gravitational pull of educational entertainment on the terrestrial Venn diagram of vocational choices. The celestial musings from SciShow Space seemingly have a supernova effect on propelling interest in cosmic vocations. Our research not only sheds light on this unexpected cosmic coupling but also serves as a glowing testament to the interstellar influence of educational media.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
Gather 'round, fellow cosmic enthusiasts and intrepid explorers of the intergalactic web of knowledge! As we embark on this celestial expedition, we are compelled to delve into the enigmatic connection between the average views of SciShow Space YouTube videos and the number of nuclear medicine technologists in the illustrious state of New York.
Now, you might be thinking, "What in the cosmic continuum could these two disparate realms possibly have in common?" Fear not, dear reader, for our research aims to unravel this celestial conundrum and shed light on the cosmic correlations that lurk within.
In the vast expanse of the digital cosmos, where the stars of educational content shine bright, we find the celestial spectacle of SciShow Space. This beacon of knowledge serves as a cosmic communicator, disseminating captivating musings on the wonders of the universe to eager viewers. Meanwhile, in the terrestrial realm, the noble nuclear medicine technologists navigate the celestial body of human health, harnessing the power of atomic particles in diagnosing and treating various maladies.
But what could possibly link the cosmic curiosities of space exploration with the earthly endeavors of nuclear medicine technology? Could it be the gravitational force of cosmic curiosity luring individuals into the cosmic career paths? Or perhaps there's an unseen cosmic energy that weaves these seemingly divergent domains into a celestial tapestry of professional pursuits?
Through the application of rigorous statistical analyses and a dash of cosmic curiosity, we endeavor to unearth the hidden forces at play. From the reaches of the YouTube galaxy to the terrestrial landscapes of the New York labor market, our quest is fueled by a celestial fervor to illuminate the unexpected connections that defy the confines of conventional wisdom.
So, buckle up and prepare for an astronomical adventure as we traverse the cosmic continuum in pursuit of understanding the entwined destiny of cosmic content and careers in the cosmos. This journey promises not only to entertain but to provide a stellar testament to the interstellar influence of educational media on the celestial choices of vocation. Let's boldly go where no research has gone before and unravel the cosmic mysteries that await us!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To unravel the cosmic mysteries entwining the viewership of SciShow Space YouTube videos and the number of nuclear medicine technologists in the sprawling celestial landscape of New York, our research team embarked on a cosmic journey that fused data collection methods as diverse as the constellations themselves.

Data Collection:
Our data collection process was a cosmic endeavor spanning the digital cosmos and the terrestrial terrain. We harnessed the magical powers of web scraping techniques to harvest data from the ethereal realm of YouTube, capturing the average number of views for SciShow Space videos from 2014 to 2022. We might say that we embarked on a data fishing expedition, casting our virtual net into the vast expanse of the internet to reel in the celestial statistics.

Simultaneously, in the terrestrial domain, our research team navigated the labyrinthine pathways of the Bureau of Labor Statistics universe, extracting data on the number of nuclear medicine technologists in the cosmic metropolis of New York. Our efforts in data collection were akin to cosmic prospecting, sifting through the statistical strata to unearth nuggets of celestial insight.

Data Analysis:
Once the celestial data had been rounded up, we set our coordinates for the statistical stronghold, where we unleashed the forces of correlation analysis to illuminate the celestial connections that transcend traditional boundaries. We computed the Pearson correlation coefficient with a twinkle of statistical stardust, unveiling a cosmic correlation coefficient of 0.9873001 and a p-value less than 0.01. This statistical revelation sent cosmic waves of excitement pulsating through our research team, akin to the discovery of a new celestial body in the galactic tapestry of data.

Regression Analysis:
In our quest to further elucidate the interstellar interplay between SciShow Space viewership and the noble cadre of nuclear medicine technologists, we propelled ourselves into the cosmos of regression analysis. Our aim was to discern whether the celestial influx of knowledge from SciShow Space could serve as a cosmic catalyst, influencing the cosmic career choices of individuals entering the realm of nuclear medicine technology. Through regression modeling, we sought to capture the celestial dynamics at play and unveil the magnitude of the cosmic influence exerted by educational media.

Outlier Detection:
The celestial journey through data analysis also led us to the celestial realm of outlier detection. We combed through the celestial data points with a cosmic comb, seeking out anomalies that sparkled like cosmic diamonds amidst the statistical constellations. These celestial anomalies were carefully examined to ensure that they did not distort the cosmic correlations unearthed by our research.

Limitations:
As with any cosmic endeavor, our celestial expedition encountered its share of limitations. The cosmic constraints of data availability and the terrestrial bounds of statistical methodologies naturally influenced the contours of our research universe. Additionally, the temporal scope of our data, spanning from 2014 to 2022, encapsulated a cosmic slice of time, yet we recognized that the celestial currents of data might evolve in the cosmic continuum beyond our purview.

In conclusion, our cosmic methodology illuminated the entwined destiny of cosmic content with careers in canvassing the cosmos. From the depths of the digital galaxy to the cosmic landscapes of New York's labor market, our approach to data collection, analysis, and interpretation was infused with a cosmic fervor for knowledge. As we gazed into the celestial abyss of cosmic connections, our methodology served as the cosmic compass guiding us through the interstellar realms of statistical inquiry.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Average views of SciShow Space YouTube videos and The number of nuclear medicine technologists in New York. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from YouTube and Bureau of Larbor Statistics .

For the time period 2014 to 2022, you found a correlation 0.9873001, r-squared of 0.9747615, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Cosmic Connection: Correlating the Counts of Cosmic Content with Careers in Canvassing the Cosmos

[[ABSTRACT]]
This cosmic research embarks on an astral expedition to elucidate the entwined destiny of SciShow Space viewership and the workforce of nuclear medicine technologists in New York. With a sprinkle of stardust, we amalgamated data from the YouTube galaxy and the Bureau of Labor Statistics universe to unravel the celestial correlation. Our findings unveil a gravitational bond, with a cosmic correlation coefficient of 0.9873001 and a p-value less than 0.01 from 2014 to 2022. As we traverse through this cosmic journey, we uncover the gravitational pull of educational entertainment on the terrestrial Venn diagram of vocational choices. The celestial musings from SciShow Space seemingly have a supernova effect on propelling interest in cosmic vocations. Our research not only sheds light on this unexpected cosmic coupling but also serves as a glowing testament to the interstellar influence of educational media.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
Gather 'round, fellow cosmic enthusiasts and intrepid explorers of the intergalactic web of knowledge! As we embark on this celestial expedition, we are compelled to delve into the enigmatic connection between the average views of SciShow Space YouTube videos and the number of nuclear medicine technologists in the illustrious state of New York.
Now, you might be thinking, "What in the cosmic continuum could these two disparate realms possibly have in common?" Fear not, dear reader, for our research aims to unravel this celestial conundrum and shed light on the cosmic correlations that lurk within.
In the vast expanse of the digital cosmos, where the stars of educational content shine bright, we find the celestial spectacle of SciShow Space. This beacon of knowledge serves as a cosmic communicator, disseminating captivating musings on the wonders of the universe to eager viewers. Meanwhile, in the terrestrial realm, the noble nuclear medicine technologists navigate the celestial body of human health, harnessing the power of atomic particles in diagnosing and treating various maladies.
But what could possibly link the cosmic curiosities of space exploration with the earthly endeavors of nuclear medicine technology? Could it be the gravitational force of cosmic curiosity luring individuals into the cosmic career paths? Or perhaps there's an unseen cosmic energy that weaves these seemingly divergent domains into a celestial tapestry of professional pursuits?
Through the application of rigorous statistical analyses and a dash of cosmic curiosity, we endeavor to unearth the hidden forces at play. From the reaches of the YouTube galaxy to the terrestrial landscapes of the New York labor market, our quest is fueled by a celestial fervor to illuminate the unexpected connections that defy the confines of conventional wisdom.
So, buckle up and prepare for an astronomical adventure as we traverse the cosmic continuum in pursuit of understanding the entwined destiny of cosmic content and careers in the cosmos. This journey promises not only to entertain but to provide a stellar testament to the interstellar influence of educational media on the celestial choices of vocation. Let's boldly go where no research has gone before and unravel the cosmic mysteries that await us!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

Our foray into the cosmic correlation between the average views of SciShow Space YouTube videos and the number of nuclear medicine technologists in New York has yielded truly stellar results. The captivating allure of celestial content seems to have an astronomical effect on the vocational preferences of individuals drawn to the cosmic career paths, as evidenced by our findings.

The correlation coefficient of 0.9873001 indicates a nearly perfect positive correlation between average views of SciShow Space videos and the number of nuclear medicine technologists in New York. This astronomical correlation, with an r-squared value of 0.9747615, underscores the strong relationship between these seemingly disparate domains.

The p-value of less than 0.01 further solidifies the statistical significance of the cosmic connection we have unearthed. It appears that the gravitational pull of educational entertainment on the terrestrial Venn diagram of vocational choices is indeed substantial and cosmic in magnitude.

Upon gazing at the scatterplot (Fig. 1) that encapsulates our findings, one cannot help but marvel at the cosmic alignment of these variables. The celestial musings from SciShow Space seem to cast a stellar influence on propelling interest in cosmic vocations, creating ripples in the celestial sea of career choices.

In conclusion, our research not only reveals an unexpected cosmic coupling but also serves as a testament to the interstellar influence of educational media. The cosmic correlation we have unveiled transcends the boundaries of conventional understanding, highlighting the profound impact of celestial content on the terrestrial tapestry of vocational aspirations.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Average views of SciShow Space YouTube videos and The number of nuclear medicine technologists in New York. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
Cosmic Connection: Correlating the Counts of Cosmic Content with Careers in Canvassing the Cosmos

[[ABSTRACT]]
This cosmic research embarks on an astral expedition to elucidate the entwined destiny of SciShow Space viewership and the workforce of nuclear medicine technologists in New York. With a sprinkle of stardust, we amalgamated data from the YouTube galaxy and the Bureau of Labor Statistics universe to unravel the celestial correlation. Our findings unveil a gravitational bond, with a cosmic correlation coefficient of 0.9873001 and a p-value less than 0.01 from 2014 to 2022. As we traverse through this cosmic journey, we uncover the gravitational pull of educational entertainment on the terrestrial Venn diagram of vocational choices. The celestial musings from SciShow Space seemingly have a supernova effect on propelling interest in cosmic vocations. Our research not only sheds light on this unexpected cosmic coupling but also serves as a glowing testament to the interstellar influence of educational media.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The cosmic connotations of our research prompt us to examine the existing body of knowledge on the correlation between educational space content and vocational choices in the realm of the celestial sciences. Smith and Doe (2018) conducted a comprehensive study exploring the impact of science communication platforms on viewer engagement and interest in scientific careers. Their findings revealed a meteoric rise in curiosity regarding cosmic vocations following exposure to captivating space-related content. Similarly, Jones et al. (2020) delved into the correlation between online science education and career aspirations, positing a gravitational pull of educational entertainment on the professional trajectories of aspiring scientists and technologists.
Venturing further into the annals of literature related to cosmic curiosities, "The Universe Unveiled: Cosmic Wonders and Career Conundrums" by Astronomer A. Fictional (2019) presents a fictional account of cosmic musings intertwining with the vocational fabric of society. Furthermore, "Nuclear Nebulas and the Technological Terrain" by Physicist P. Imagination (2017) offers a fictional exploration of the interstellar allure on the careers of nuclear medicine technologists. While these works may seem otherworldly, they provide intriguing perspectives that parallel our celestial research pursuits.
In a galactic twist, the internet meme "This is the Way" from the cosmic saga of a mandalorian and "Big Bang Theory" references have permeated the virtual cosmos, underscoring the widespread fascination with cosmic phenomena and its potential influence on career paths.
As we traverse the cosmos of literature, it becomes apparent that the intersection of educational space content and vocational preferences embodies a cosmic enigma waiting to be unveiled. Through our research, we aim to propel this inquiry beyond the bounds of conventional wisdom and into the uncharted realms of celestial connections.

[[RESULTS]]
Our foray into the cosmic correlation between the average views of SciShow Space YouTube videos and the number of nuclear medicine technologists in New York has yielded truly stellar results. The captivating allure of celestial content seems to have an astronomical effect on the vocational preferences of individuals drawn to the cosmic career paths, as evidenced by our findings.
The correlation coefficient of 0.9873001 indicates a nearly perfect positive correlation between average views of SciShow Space videos and the number of nuclear medicine technologists in New York. This astronomical correlation, with an r-squared value of 0.9747615, underscores the strong relationship between these seemingly disparate domains.
The p-value of less than 0.01 further solidifies the statistical significance of the cosmic connection we have unearthed. It appears that the gravitational pull of educational entertainment on the terrestrial Venn diagram of vocational choices is indeed substantial and cosmic in magnitude.
Upon gazing at the scatterplot (Fig. 1) that encapsulates our findings, one cannot help but marvel at the cosmic alignment of these variables. The celestial musings from SciShow Space seem to cast a stellar influence on propelling interest in cosmic vocations, creating ripples in the celestial sea of career choices.
In conclusion, our research not only reveals an unexpected cosmic coupling but also serves as a testament to the interstellar influence of educational media. The cosmic correlation we have unveiled transcends the boundaries of conventional understanding, highlighting the profound impact of celestial content on the terrestrial tapestry of vocational aspirations.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

The results of our study provide compelling evidence pointing to a fascinating and previously unexplored connection between the average views of SciShow Space YouTube videos and the number of nuclear medicine technologists in New York. Our findings not only mirror but also supernova-charge the prior research on the influence of educational space content on vocational choices.

In line with the works of Smith and Doe (2018) and Jones et al. (2020), our study supports the notion of a cosmic correlation between educational space content and the professional aspirations of individuals. It seems that the gravitational pull of celestial content on aspiring technologists is as real as a black hole's influence on interstellar matter! Our results demonstrate a nearly perfect positive correlation, highlighting the cosmic magnitude of this relationship. We may need a cosmic-scale telescope to capture the full extent of this influence.

And let's not forget the cosmic conundrums unearthed by Astronomer A. Fictional (2019) and Physicist P. Imagination (2017). Although initially perceived as otherworldly, their fictional narratives now seem eerily prophetic. After all, who could have foreseen that the musings from SciShow Space would have such a supernova effect on inspiring future nuclear medicine technologists? It's as if cosmic phenomena have stealthily navigated our terrestrial career paths, leaving stardust in their wake.

On a lighter note, the permeation of internet memes and pop culture references in the virtual cosmos emphasizes the widespread fascination with cosmic phenomena and its profound impact on career choices. In essence, the cosmic saga of a mandalorian and the "Big Bang Theory" illustrate the interstellar allure that captivates and influences the collective vocational fabric of society.

In the midst of this cosmic merriment, it's pivotal to recognize the empirical significance of our findings. The statistical robustness with a correlation coefficient of 0.9873001 and an r-squared value of 0.9747615 speaks volumes about the cosmic connection we've unveiled. The p-value of less than 0.01 further solidifies the statistical significance of this interstellar phenomenon.

As we transcend the bounds of conventional understanding, our research provides a fresh perspective on the profound impact of celestial content on the terrestrial tapestry of vocational aspirations. It seems that what happens in space definitely doesn't stay in space. The celestial musings from SciShow Space wield a cosmic influence on inspiring future nuclear medicine technologists, leaving an indelible mark on the cosmic canvas of career choices.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Average views of SciShow Space YouTube videos and The number of nuclear medicine technologists in New York. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
Cosmic Connection: Correlating the Counts of Cosmic Content with Careers in Canvassing the Cosmos

[[ABSTRACT]]
This cosmic research embarks on an astral expedition to elucidate the entwined destiny of SciShow Space viewership and the workforce of nuclear medicine technologists in New York. With a sprinkle of stardust, we amalgamated data from the YouTube galaxy and the Bureau of Labor Statistics universe to unravel the celestial correlation. Our findings unveil a gravitational bond, with a cosmic correlation coefficient of 0.9873001 and a p-value less than 0.01 from 2014 to 2022. As we traverse through this cosmic journey, we uncover the gravitational pull of educational entertainment on the terrestrial Venn diagram of vocational choices. The celestial musings from SciShow Space seemingly have a supernova effect on propelling interest in cosmic vocations. Our research not only sheds light on this unexpected cosmic coupling but also serves as a glowing testament to the interstellar influence of educational media.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
Gather 'round, fellow cosmic enthusiasts and intrepid explorers of the intergalactic web of knowledge! As we embark on this celestial expedition, we are compelled to delve into the enigmatic connection between the average views of SciShow Space YouTube videos and the number of nuclear medicine technologists in the illustrious state of New York.
Now, you might be thinking, "What in the cosmic continuum could these two disparate realms possibly have in common?" Fear not, dear reader, for our research aims to unravel this celestial conundrum and shed light on the cosmic correlations that lurk within.
In the vast expanse of the digital cosmos, where the stars of educational content shine bright, we find the celestial spectacle of SciShow Space. This beacon of knowledge serves as a cosmic communicator, disseminating captivating musings on the wonders of the universe to eager viewers. Meanwhile, in the terrestrial realm, the noble nuclear medicine technologists navigate the celestial body of human health, harnessing the power of atomic particles in diagnosing and treating various maladies.
But what could possibly link the cosmic curiosities of space exploration with the earthly endeavors of nuclear medicine technology? Could it be the gravitational force of cosmic curiosity luring individuals into the cosmic career paths? Or perhaps there's an unseen cosmic energy that weaves these seemingly divergent domains into a celestial tapestry of professional pursuits?
Through the application of rigorous statistical analyses and a dash of cosmic curiosity, we endeavor to unearth the hidden forces at play. From the reaches of the YouTube galaxy to the terrestrial landscapes of the New York labor market, our quest is fueled by a celestial fervor to illuminate the unexpected connections that defy the confines of conventional wisdom.
So, buckle up and prepare for an astronomical adventure as we traverse the cosmic continuum in pursuit of understanding the entwined destiny of cosmic content and careers in the cosmos. This journey promises not only to entertain but to provide a stellar testament to the interstellar influence of educational media on the celestial choices of vocation. Let's boldly go where no research has gone before and unravel the cosmic mysteries that await us!

[[RESULTS]]
Our foray into the cosmic correlation between the average views of SciShow Space YouTube videos and the number of nuclear medicine technologists in New York has yielded truly stellar results. The captivating allure of celestial content seems to have an astronomical effect on the vocational preferences of individuals drawn to the cosmic career paths, as evidenced by our findings.
The correlation coefficient of 0.9873001 indicates a nearly perfect positive correlation between average views of SciShow Space videos and the number of nuclear medicine technologists in New York. This astronomical correlation, with an r-squared value of 0.9747615, underscores the strong relationship between these seemingly disparate domains.
The p-value of less than 0.01 further solidifies the statistical significance of the cosmic connection we have unearthed. It appears that the gravitational pull of educational entertainment on the terrestrial Venn diagram of vocational choices is indeed substantial and cosmic in magnitude.
Upon gazing at the scatterplot (Fig. 1) that encapsulates our findings, one cannot help but marvel at the cosmic alignment of these variables. The celestial musings from SciShow Space seem to cast a stellar influence on propelling interest in cosmic vocations, creating ripples in the celestial sea of career choices.
In conclusion, our research not only reveals an unexpected cosmic coupling but also serves as a testament to the interstellar influence of educational media. The cosmic correlation we have unveiled transcends the boundaries of conventional understanding, highlighting the profound impact of celestial content on the terrestrial tapestry of vocational aspirations.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

As we conclude our cosmic odyssey, it's clear that the celestial musings of SciShow Space are no mere shooting stars in the realm of vocational influence. Our findings paint a picture of an interstellar tango between YouTube viewership and the cosmos-confound career path of nuclear medicine technology. The data may be stellar, but let's not forget the cosmic giggle factor. Who knew that celestial curiosity could have such a gravitational pull on career choices?

Like a black hole sucking in unsuspecting stardust, the allure of educational space content seems to have a cosmic sway on the vocational destiny of aspiring nuclear medicine technologists. We must admit, there's something truly cosmic about the way these variables align, creating a celestial harmony that defies conventional earthly wisdom.

From the terrestrial landscapes of New York to the reaches of the YouTube galaxy, our research highlights the interstellar influence of educational media on the celestial choices of vocation. It seems that when it comes to cosmic career paths, the cosmic proportions of educational content cannot be overlooked.

In light of these stellar revelations, we assert that no further research is needed in this area. The celestial puzzle has been unraveled, the cosmic conundrum deciphered, and the interstellar influence of educational media duly noted. Let us bid adieu to this cosmic escapade and set our sights on new frontiers of research, leaving this cosmic coupling to sparkle in the celestial expanse of scientific understanding.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Cosmic Connection: Correlating the Counts of Cosmic Content with Careers in Canvassing the Cosmos. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Interstellar Inquiry


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Cosmic Connection: Correlating the Counts of Cosmic Content with Careers in Canvassing the Cosmos. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Intergalactic Research Consortium


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Cosmic Connection: Correlating the Counts of Cosmic Content with Careers in Canvassing the Cosmos with an abstract of This cosmic research embarks on an astral expedition to elucidate the entwined destiny of SciShow Space viewership and the workforce of nuclear medicine technologists in New York. With a sprinkle of stardust, we amalgamated data from the YouTube galaxy and the Bureau of Labor Statistics universe to unravel the celestial correlation. Our findings unveil a gravitational bond, with a cosmic correlation coefficient of 0.9873001 and a p-value less than 0.01 from 2014 to 2022. As we traverse through this cosmic journey, we uncover the gravitational pull of educational entertainment on the terrestrial Venn diagram of vocational choices. The celestial musings from SciShow Space seemingly have a supernova effect on propelling interest in cosmic vocations. Our research not only sheds light on this unexpected cosmic coupling but also serves as a glowing testament to the interstellar influence of educational media.

ChatGPT:

SciShow Space viewership, nuclear medicine technologists, celestial correlation, YouTube viewership data, Bureau of Labor Statistics, gravitational correlation, cosmic vocations, educational entertainment influence, cosmic workforce, interstellar influence, cosmic research, celestial connection

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Average views of SciShow Space YouTube videos
Detailed data title: Average views of SciShow Space YouTube videos.
Source: YouTube
Additional Info: Current total views of videos released that year.

See what else correlates with Average views of SciShow Space YouTube videos

The number of nuclear medicine technologists in New York
Detailed data title: BLS estimate of nuclear medicine technologists in New York
Source: Bureau of Larbor Statistics
See what else correlates with The number of nuclear medicine technologists in New York

Correlation r = 0.9873001 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.9747615 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 97.5% of the change in the one variable (i.e., The number of nuclear medicine technologists in New York) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Average views of SciShow Space YouTube videos) over the 9 years from 2014 through 2022.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 7.51E-7. 0.0000007506889404281416000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.99 in 7.51E-5% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 1,332,110 random variables You don't actually need 1 million variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 8 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 8 because we have two variables measured over a period of 9 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.94, 1 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
201420152016201720182019202020212022
Average views of SciShow Space YouTube videos (Average views)383858304009363070269258231013214849152307157106110663
The number of nuclear medicine technologists in New York (Laborers)13301230126011501040970870880820




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Very low n: There are not many data points included in this analysis. Even if the p-value is high, we should be suspicious of using so few datapoints in a correlation.
  5. Y-axis doesn't start at zero: I truncated the Y-axes of the graph above. I also used a line graph, which makes the visual connection stand out more than it deserves. Nothing against line graphs. They are great at telling a story when you have linear data! But visually it is deceptive because the only data is at the points on the graph, not the lines on the graph. In between each point, the data could have been doing anything. Like going for a random walk by itself!
    Mathematically what I showed is true, but it is intentionally misleading. Below is the same chart but with both Y-axes starting at zero.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([383858,304009,363070,269258,231013,214849,152307,157106,110663,])
array_2 = np.array([1330,1230,1260,1150,1040,970,870,880,820,])
array_1_name = "Average views of SciShow Space YouTube videos"
array_2_name = "The number of nuclear medicine technologists in New York"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Your rating is pure awesomeness!


Correlation ID: 4509 · Black Variable ID: 25661 · Red Variable ID: 12097
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0