Download png, svg
AI explanation
The decrease in trendy Deep Look YouTube video titles is causing a decrease in hot air, leading to a cooling effect that reduces snowfall in Charlotte. Remember, stay cool but not trendy!Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Generate an image that looks like a scene from a Disney movie, where a YouTube trending page is shown with fewer trendy Deep Look video titles featuring cool, icy visuals. The hot air around the titles decreases, causing a cooling effect on the snowfall in Charlotte. The lighter snowflakes gently fall as the scene transitions from the trending page to the serene snow-covered landscape. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: How trendy Deep Look YouTube video titles are and Snowfall in Charlotte. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Futuristic Scalar art An image that looks like it is a scene from A Disney Movie Woodblock painting Parallax art
ChatGPT: An image that looks like it is a scene from A Disney Movie
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both How trendy Deep Look YouTube video titles are and Snowfall in Charlotte, in the following situation: The decrease in trendy Deep Look YouTube video titles is causing a decrease in hot air, leading to a cooling effect that reduces snowfall in Charlotte. Remember, stay cool but not trendy!. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: A YouTube trending page shows fewer trendy Deep Look video titles with cool, icy visuals. As the hot air around the titles decreases, it creates a cooling effect on the snowfall in Charlotte, where lighter snowflakes gently fall.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ An image that looks like it is a scene from A Disney Movie ] and depicting this scene: A YouTube trending page shows fewer trendy Deep Look video titles with cool, icy visuals. As the hot air around the titles decreases, it creates a cooling effect on the snowfall in Charlotte, where lighter snowflakes gently fall. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Generate an image that looks like a scene from a Disney movie, where a YouTube trending page is shown with fewer trendy Deep Look video titles featuring cool, icy visuals. The hot air around the titles decreases, causing a cooling effect on the snowfall in Charlotte. The lighter snowflakes gently fall as the scene transitions from the trending page to the serene snow-covered landscape.
*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.
I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how a decrease in How trendy Deep Look YouTube video titles are caused Snowfall in Charlotte to decrease. Add a funny one-liner at the end.
AI academic paper
Snow Joke: The Snowfall-Deep Look Connection - A Trendy Relationship The Journal of Atmospheric Mirth and Meteorological Merriment Jan 2024 Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real! |
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between How trendy Deep Look YouTube video titles are and Snowfall in Charlotte. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.
Make the title punny if you can come up with clever pun. If not, just make it sound clever.
Your research team used data from AI analysis of YouTube video titles and NOAA National Climate Data Center to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.8690881 and p < 0.01 for 2014 to 2022.
Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)
[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit
[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit
ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
"Snow Joke: The Snowfall-Deep Look Connection - A Trendy Relationship"
[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the curious relationship between the trendiness of Deep Look YouTube video titles and snowfall patterns in Charlotte, North Carolina. By leveraging AI analysis of YouTube video titles and data from the NOAA National Climate Data Center, we aimed to shed light on this unexpected pairing. Our findings reveal a significant correlation coefficient of 0.8690881 and p < 0.01 for the period spanning 2014 to 2022, presenting an enticing correlation worthy of further investigation. With a lighthearted nod to the unexpected, this research challenges traditional academic boundaries and invites a playful exploration of the whimsical connections that may underlie seemingly unrelated phenomena.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between How trendy Deep Look YouTube video titles are and Snowfall in Charlotte. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.
Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Snow Joke: The Snowfall-Deep Look Connection - A Trendy Relationship"
[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the curious relationship between the trendiness of Deep Look YouTube video titles and snowfall patterns in Charlotte, North Carolina. By leveraging AI analysis of YouTube video titles and data from the NOAA National Climate Data Center, we aimed to shed light on this unexpected pairing. Our findings reveal a significant correlation coefficient of 0.8690881 and p < 0.01 for the period spanning 2014 to 2022, presenting an enticing correlation worthy of further investigation. With a lighthearted nod to the unexpected, this research challenges traditional academic boundaries and invites a playful exploration of the whimsical connections that may underlie seemingly unrelated phenomena.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
ChatGPT:
INTRODUCTION
The phenomena surrounding the links between seemingly unrelated variables have long piqued the curiosity of researchers, eliciting both fascination and skepticism within the academic community. As we embark upon our investigation of the connection between the trendiness of Deep Look YouTube video titles and snowfall in Charlotte, North Carolina, we are reminded of the adage, "There are no snowflakes alike, nor correlations, but in Charlotte, they do tend to flock together." (Psst, please forgive the indulgence in the snow-related pun. Science can be a bit "chilly" sometimes, so a little levity is in order.)
The allure of this peculiar association between online video titles and atmospheric phenomena beckons us to consider the notion that perhaps there exists a hidden undercurrent of trending influences that extend beyond the digital realm into the very fabric of weather patterns. In the spirit of scientific inquiry, we delve into this unconventional correlation with a mix of skepticism and a healthy dose of humor. After all, as researchers, we must always be willing to release a little bit of our "snow-serious" demeanor in the pursuit of truth. (Please bear with the puns; we cannot resist the urge to sprinkle a few here and there.)
Our aim is to provide a lighthearted yet rigorous analysis of the potential relationship between the rising and falling trends in YouTube video titles from the acclaimed Deep Look series and the ebb and flow of snowfall in Charlotte. By harnessing the power of artificial intelligence to scrutinize the captivating allure of YouTube titles and coupling it with the formidable data prowess of the NOAA National Climate Data Center, we endeavor to uncover the delightful secrets that may lurk within this unexpected pairing. In doing so, our research intends to thaw the icy skepticism surrounding unconventional correlations and pave the way for a more playful, inquisitive approach to scientific investigation. So, let's embark on this "cool" journey (apologies again for the flurry of snow-related puns) and see where the evidence guides us.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between How trendy Deep Look YouTube video titles are and Snowfall in Charlotte. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.
Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.
Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.
Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then name some movies that you watched that are tangentially related to the topic.
Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Snow Joke: The Snowfall-Deep Look Connection - A Trendy Relationship"
[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the curious relationship between the trendiness of Deep Look YouTube video titles and snowfall patterns in Charlotte, North Carolina. By leveraging AI analysis of YouTube video titles and data from the NOAA National Climate Data Center, we aimed to shed light on this unexpected pairing. Our findings reveal a significant correlation coefficient of 0.8690881 and p < 0.01 for the period spanning 2014 to 2022, presenting an enticing correlation worthy of further investigation. With a lighthearted nod to the unexpected, this research challenges traditional academic boundaries and invites a playful exploration of the whimsical connections that may underlie seemingly unrelated phenomena.
-------
And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
INTRODUCTION
The phenomena surrounding the links between seemingly unrelated variables have long piqued the curiosity of researchers, eliciting both fascination and skepticism within the academic community. As we embark upon our investigation of the connection between the trendiness of Deep Look YouTube video titles and snowfall in Charlotte, North Carolina, we are reminded of the adage, "There are no snowflakes alike, nor correlations, but in Charlotte, they do tend to flock together." (Psst, please forgive the indulgence in the snow-related pun. Science can be a bit "chilly" sometimes, so a little levity is in order.)
The allure of this peculiar association between online video titles and atmospheric phenomena beckons us to consider the notion that perhaps there exists a hidden undercurrent of trending influences that extend beyond the digital realm into the very fabric of weather patterns. In the spirit of scientific inquiry, we delve into this unconventional correlation with a mix of skepticism and a healthy dose of humor. After all, as researchers, we must always be willing to release a little bit of our "snow-serious" demeanor in the pursuit of truth. (Please bear with the puns; we cannot resist the urge to sprinkle a few here and there.)
Our aim is to provide a lighthearted yet rigorous analysis of the potential relationship between the rising and falling trends in YouTube video titles from the acclaimed Deep Look series and the ebb and flow of snowfall in Charlotte. By harnessing the power of artificial intelligence to scrutinize the captivating allure of YouTube titles and coupling it with the formidable data prowess of the NOAA National Climate Data Center, we endeavor to uncover the delightful secrets that may lurk within this unexpected pairing. In doing so, our research intends to thaw the icy skepticism surrounding unconventional correlations and pave the way for a more playful, inquisitive approach to scientific investigation. So, let's embark on this "cool" journey (apologies again for the flurry of snow-related puns) and see where the evidence guides us.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
Prior research has largely focused on investigating correlations between conventional variables, oftentimes neglecting the potential whimsical associations that may exist between seemingly unrelated phenomena. However, a new wave of scholarship has recently emerged to explore the unorthodox connections that defy traditional academic boundaries.
Smith et al. (2016) delved into the influence of online content trends on societal behaviors, shedding light on the captivating allure of viral video titles and their potential impact on consumer preferences. Similarly, Doe and Jones (2018) examined the psychological underpinnings of internet trends, highlighting the persuasive power of attention-grabbing titles in shaping public interest. These studies laid the groundwork for understanding the potent influence of digital content trends on human cognition and behavior.
In a tangentially related context, "Snowfall and Its Significance in Modern Society" (Brown, 2017) and "The Fractal Nature of Snowflake Formation" (White, 2019) offered insightful perspectives on the enigmatic nature of snow phenomena, hinting at the possibility of hidden patterns that transcend the boundaries of traditional meteorological analysis.
Expanding beyond non-fiction literature, fictional works such as "The Secret Life of Snowflakes" by Winter (2005) and "Blizzard of Secrets" by Frost (2013) offered imaginative portrayals of the mystique surrounding snow-related phenomena, inspiring a sense of wonder and intrigue that transcends empirical observation.
In a less conventional vein, movies such as "The Snowflake Effect" and "The YouTube Trend: A Snowy Surprise" provided whimsical interpretations of unexpected correlations, offering a lighthearted glimpse into the potential interplay between digital trends and atmospheric phenomena.
As we venture into the exploration of the correlation between the trendiness of Deep Look YouTube video titles and snowfall patterns in Charlotte, North Carolina, we are reminded of the diverse array of perspectives that enrich our understanding of seemingly obscure connections. It is within this multidimensional landscape that we aim to situate our investigation, embracing the unexpected with a playful spirit of inquiry.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between How trendy Deep Look YouTube video titles are and Snowfall in Charlotte. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.
Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from AI analysis of YouTube video titles and NOAA National Climate Data Center . You used data from 2014 to 2022
Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.
Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Snow Joke: The Snowfall-Deep Look Connection - A Trendy Relationship"
[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the curious relationship between the trendiness of Deep Look YouTube video titles and snowfall patterns in Charlotte, North Carolina. By leveraging AI analysis of YouTube video titles and data from the NOAA National Climate Data Center, we aimed to shed light on this unexpected pairing. Our findings reveal a significant correlation coefficient of 0.8690881 and p < 0.01 for the period spanning 2014 to 2022, presenting an enticing correlation worthy of further investigation. With a lighthearted nod to the unexpected, this research challenges traditional academic boundaries and invites a playful exploration of the whimsical connections that may underlie seemingly unrelated phenomena.
[[INTRODUCTION]]
INTRODUCTION
The phenomena surrounding the links between seemingly unrelated variables have long piqued the curiosity of researchers, eliciting both fascination and skepticism within the academic community. As we embark upon our investigation of the connection between the trendiness of Deep Look YouTube video titles and snowfall in Charlotte, North Carolina, we are reminded of the adage, "There are no snowflakes alike, nor correlations, but in Charlotte, they do tend to flock together." (Psst, please forgive the indulgence in the snow-related pun. Science can be a bit "chilly" sometimes, so a little levity is in order.)
The allure of this peculiar association between online video titles and atmospheric phenomena beckons us to consider the notion that perhaps there exists a hidden undercurrent of trending influences that extend beyond the digital realm into the very fabric of weather patterns. In the spirit of scientific inquiry, we delve into this unconventional correlation with a mix of skepticism and a healthy dose of humor. After all, as researchers, we must always be willing to release a little bit of our "snow-serious" demeanor in the pursuit of truth. (Please bear with the puns; we cannot resist the urge to sprinkle a few here and there.)
Our aim is to provide a lighthearted yet rigorous analysis of the potential relationship between the rising and falling trends in YouTube video titles from the acclaimed Deep Look series and the ebb and flow of snowfall in Charlotte. By harnessing the power of artificial intelligence to scrutinize the captivating allure of YouTube titles and coupling it with the formidable data prowess of the NOAA National Climate Data Center, we endeavor to uncover the delightful secrets that may lurk within this unexpected pairing. In doing so, our research intends to thaw the icy skepticism surrounding unconventional correlations and pave the way for a more playful, inquisitive approach to scientific investigation. So, let's embark on this "cool" journey (apologies again for the flurry of snow-related puns) and see where the evidence guides us.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
ChatGPT:
METHODOLOGY
In order to systematically investigate the correlation between the trendiness of Deep Look YouTube video titles and snowfall patterns in Charlotte, North Carolina, the present study employed a methodological approach that aimed to capture the essence of this curious relationship. With the use of data collected from 2014 to 2022, the following methods were implemented with a whimsical flair befitting the unconventional nature of the research subject.
1. Data Collection: The initial step in this endeavor involved the sourcing of YouTube video titles from the esteemed Deep Look series. Leveraging the capabilities of artificial intelligence, a specialized algorithmic tool was employed to scour the vast expanse of the internet for these intriguing video titles. The selection process favored video titles that exuded a palpable aura of trendiness, characterized by captivating language and enticing imagery. Simultaneously, historical snowfall data for Charlotte, North Carolina was obtained from the NOAA National Climate Data Center, ensuring a comprehensive representation of the variable under investigation.
2. AI Analysis of YouTube Video Titles: The collected Deep Look YouTube video titles underwent a meticulous analysis using state-of-the-art artificial intelligence algorithms. This process involved the extraction of linguistic features, including word frequency, sentiment analysis, and semantic coherence. The goal was to discern the underlying trendy patterns that permeated the video titles, allowing for a quantitative estimation of their level of trendiness. The algorithm measured the titles' appeal through a combination of linguistic markers and engagement metrics, peppering the analysis with a dash of digital finesse.
3. Statistical Examination: The acquired data, comprising the trendiness of Deep Look YouTube video titles and snowfall measurements in Charlotte, underwent rigorous statistical analysis. Correlation coefficients were computed to determine the strength and direction of the relationship between these seemingly disparate variables. Additionally, time series analysis techniques were applied to identify potential temporal patterns and fluctuations, highlighting the nuanced interplay between trending video titles and atmospheric snowfall in a manner that defies conventional expectations.
4. Cross-Validation and Sensitivity Analysis: To ensure the robustness of the findings, a cross-validation procedure was implemented to assess the stability of the identified correlation across different sub-periods within the study timeframe. Sensitivity analyses were also conducted to evaluate the influence of potential confounding variables, such as seasonality and external environmental factors, on the observed correlation, shedding light on the interplay of diverse influences in this quirky relationship.
5. Qualitative Assessment: Complementing the quantitative analyses, a qualitative evaluation was employed to capture the nuances of the relationship between the trendiness of Deep Look YouTube video titles and snowfall in Charlotte. This involved a playful engagement with the cultural and perceptual aspects of trendiness, as well as the whimsical nature of the YouTube titles, eliciting both scholarly contemplation and lighthearted amusement among the research team.
Overall, the methodology adopted in this study aimed to blend scientific rigor with a playful spirit, embracing the interplay of unexpected variables and infusing the research process with an air of delightful curiosity. Through this approach, we endeavored to capture the essence of a complex relationship that challenges traditional academic boundaries while inviting a more imaginative exploration of the interconnections that may underpin seemingly unrelated phenomena.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between How trendy Deep Look YouTube video titles are and Snowfall in Charlotte. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.
Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from AI analysis of YouTube video titles and NOAA National Climate Data Center .
For the time period 2014 to 2022, you found a correlation 0.8690881, r-squared of 0.7553141, and p < 0.01.
One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.
Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Snow Joke: The Snowfall-Deep Look Connection - A Trendy Relationship"
[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the curious relationship between the trendiness of Deep Look YouTube video titles and snowfall patterns in Charlotte, North Carolina. By leveraging AI analysis of YouTube video titles and data from the NOAA National Climate Data Center, we aimed to shed light on this unexpected pairing. Our findings reveal a significant correlation coefficient of 0.8690881 and p < 0.01 for the period spanning 2014 to 2022, presenting an enticing correlation worthy of further investigation. With a lighthearted nod to the unexpected, this research challenges traditional academic boundaries and invites a playful exploration of the whimsical connections that may underlie seemingly unrelated phenomena.
-------
And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
INTRODUCTION
The phenomena surrounding the links between seemingly unrelated variables have long piqued the curiosity of researchers, eliciting both fascination and skepticism within the academic community. As we embark upon our investigation of the connection between the trendiness of Deep Look YouTube video titles and snowfall in Charlotte, North Carolina, we are reminded of the adage, "There are no snowflakes alike, nor correlations, but in Charlotte, they do tend to flock together." (Psst, please forgive the indulgence in the snow-related pun. Science can be a bit "chilly" sometimes, so a little levity is in order.)
The allure of this peculiar association between online video titles and atmospheric phenomena beckons us to consider the notion that perhaps there exists a hidden undercurrent of trending influences that extend beyond the digital realm into the very fabric of weather patterns. In the spirit of scientific inquiry, we delve into this unconventional correlation with a mix of skepticism and a healthy dose of humor. After all, as researchers, we must always be willing to release a little bit of our "snow-serious" demeanor in the pursuit of truth. (Please bear with the puns; we cannot resist the urge to sprinkle a few here and there.)
Our aim is to provide a lighthearted yet rigorous analysis of the potential relationship between the rising and falling trends in YouTube video titles from the acclaimed Deep Look series and the ebb and flow of snowfall in Charlotte. By harnessing the power of artificial intelligence to scrutinize the captivating allure of YouTube titles and coupling it with the formidable data prowess of the NOAA National Climate Data Center, we endeavor to uncover the delightful secrets that may lurk within this unexpected pairing. In doing so, our research intends to thaw the icy skepticism surrounding unconventional correlations and pave the way for a more playful, inquisitive approach to scientific investigation. So, let's embark on this "cool" journey (apologies again for the flurry of snow-related puns) and see where the evidence guides us.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[RESULTS]]
ChatGPT:
[[RESULTS]]
The analysis of the data revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8690881 between the trendiness of Deep Look YouTube video titles and snowfall in Charlotte, North Carolina, for the period from 2014 to 2022. The coefficient of determination (r-squared) was calculated to be 0.7553141, indicating that approximately 75.53% of the variability in snowfall can be explained by the trendiness of the video titles. The p-value was found to be less than 0.01, signifying a highly significant relationship between the two variables.
As evident in Figure 1 (not shown here, sadly), the scatterplot depicts the robust correlation between the trendiness of Deep Look YouTube video titles and snowfall in Charlotte, reflecting a trend that even the most skeptical minds in the scientific community would find difficult to brush off.
These results highlight the surprising connection between online video trends and localized weather phenomena, raising intriguing questions about the potential influences of digital trends on environmental patterns. It appears that the impact of captivating YouTube titles may not be as fleeting as one might initially presume, but rather may extend into the realm of atmospheric conditions, leaving a unique imprint on snowfall patterns in Charlotte.
In uncovering this unexpected relationship, one cannot help but marvel at the whimsical intricacies of our interconnected world, where the digital and meteorological domains converge in a dance of statistical significance. This finding undoubtedly adds a playful twist to the scientific discourse, offering a delightful reminder of the unexpected connections that may lie beneath the surface of seemingly disparate data.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between How trendy Deep Look YouTube video titles are and Snowfall in Charlotte. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.
Limit your response to 500 tokens.
Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.
Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.
[[TITLE]]
"Snow Joke: The Snowfall-Deep Look Connection - A Trendy Relationship"
[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the curious relationship between the trendiness of Deep Look YouTube video titles and snowfall patterns in Charlotte, North Carolina. By leveraging AI analysis of YouTube video titles and data from the NOAA National Climate Data Center, we aimed to shed light on this unexpected pairing. Our findings reveal a significant correlation coefficient of 0.8690881 and p < 0.01 for the period spanning 2014 to 2022, presenting an enticing correlation worthy of further investigation. With a lighthearted nod to the unexpected, this research challenges traditional academic boundaries and invites a playful exploration of the whimsical connections that may underlie seemingly unrelated phenomena.
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
Prior research has largely focused on investigating correlations between conventional variables, oftentimes neglecting the potential whimsical associations that may exist between seemingly unrelated phenomena. However, a new wave of scholarship has recently emerged to explore the unorthodox connections that defy traditional academic boundaries.
Smith et al. (2016) delved into the influence of online content trends on societal behaviors, shedding light on the captivating allure of viral video titles and their potential impact on consumer preferences. Similarly, Doe and Jones (2018) examined the psychological underpinnings of internet trends, highlighting the persuasive power of attention-grabbing titles in shaping public interest. These studies laid the groundwork for understanding the potent influence of digital content trends on human cognition and behavior.
In a tangentially related context, "Snowfall and Its Significance in Modern Society" (Brown, 2017) and "The Fractal Nature of Snowflake Formation" (White, 2019) offered insightful perspectives on the enigmatic nature of snow phenomena, hinting at the possibility of hidden patterns that transcend the boundaries of traditional meteorological analysis.
Expanding beyond non-fiction literature, fictional works such as "The Secret Life of Snowflakes" by Winter (2005) and "Blizzard of Secrets" by Frost (2013) offered imaginative portrayals of the mystique surrounding snow-related phenomena, inspiring a sense of wonder and intrigue that transcends empirical observation.
In a less conventional vein, movies such as "The Snowflake Effect" and "The YouTube Trend: A Snowy Surprise" provided whimsical interpretations of unexpected correlations, offering a lighthearted glimpse into the potential interplay between digital trends and atmospheric phenomena.
As we venture into the exploration of the correlation between the trendiness of Deep Look YouTube video titles and snowfall patterns in Charlotte, North Carolina, we are reminded of the diverse array of perspectives that enrich our understanding of seemingly obscure connections. It is within this multidimensional landscape that we aim to situate our investigation, embracing the unexpected with a playful spirit of inquiry.
[[RESULTS]]
The analysis of the data revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8690881 between the trendiness of Deep Look YouTube video titles and snowfall in Charlotte, North Carolina, for the period from 2014 to 2022. The coefficient of determination (r-squared) was calculated to be 0.7553141, indicating that approximately 75.53% of the variability in snowfall can be explained by the trendiness of the video titles. The p-value was found to be less than 0.01, signifying a highly significant relationship between the two variables.
As evident in Figure 1 (not shown here, sadly), the scatterplot depicts the robust correlation between the trendiness of Deep Look YouTube video titles and snowfall in Charlotte, reflecting a trend that even the most skeptical minds in the scientific community would find difficult to brush off.
These results highlight the surprising connection between online video trends and localized weather phenomena, raising intriguing questions about the potential influences of digital trends on environmental patterns. It appears that the impact of captivating YouTube titles may not be as fleeting as one might initially presume, but rather may extend into the realm of atmospheric conditions, leaving a unique imprint on snowfall patterns in Charlotte.
In uncovering this unexpected relationship, one cannot help but marvel at the whimsical intricacies of our interconnected world, where the digital and meteorological domains converge in a dance of statistical significance. This finding undoubtedly adds a playful twist to the scientific discourse, offering a delightful reminder of the unexpected connections that may lie beneath the surface of seemingly disparate data.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[DISCUSSION]]
ChatGPT:
[[DISCUSSION]]
The present study set out to investigate the association between the trendiness of Deep Look YouTube video titles and snowfall patterns in Charlotte, North Carolina. Our findings support and extend prior research, which, at first glance, may seem whimsical or even comical in nature. However, the robust correlation coefficient of 0.8690881, accompanied by a highly significant p-value, substantiates the intriguing relationship between these seemingly unrelated variables.
The literature review highlighted pioneering works that sought to uncover unconventional connections, much like our investigation into the eclectic pair of YouTube trendiness and snowfall. However, it is notable that the scholarly community has historically gravitated towards more conventional variables, thereby overlooking the potential for serendipitous connections. By embracing the unexpected with a playful spirit of inquiry, as observed in fictional literature and movies, we expand the boundaries of possibilities, revealing the hidden whimsy that exists within the scientific landscape.
Smith et al. (2016) shed light on the influence of online content trends, providing a foundation for our exploration into the impact of captivating video titles on environmental phenomena. Furthermore, Doe and Jones (2018) underscored the persuasive power of attention-grabbing titles, accentuating the potential influence of digital trends on human cognition and behavior - a perspective that extends to our own investigation of the impact on meteorological conditions.
Likewise, the enthralling portrayal of snow-related phenomena in the work of Winter (2005) and Frost (2013) inspired a sense of wonder that transcends empirical observation, mirroring the allure of the unexpected association we unearthed between YouTube trendiness and snowfall. The incorporation of whimsical interpretations in movies further emphasized the potential interplay between digital trends and atmospheric phenomena, although in a more lighthearted manner.
Our results provide empirical support for the notion that seemingly incongruous variables, when examined with an open and playful mindset, may reveal surprising relationships. The robust correlation coefficient not only substantiates the unexpected pairing of YouTube trendiness and snowfall but also challenges the limits of traditional scholarly inquiry, inviting a broader consideration of unconventional associations.
In conclusion, our findings contribute to a shift in perspective, offering a delightful reminder of the whimsical intricacies and unexpected connections that underpin our interconnected world. As we continue to uncover the unexpected and embrace the playful spirit of inquiry, we can look forward to unearthing further whimsical associations that enrich our understanding of complex phenomena.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between How trendy Deep Look YouTube video titles are and Snowfall in Charlotte. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.
Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.
Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
"Snow Joke: The Snowfall-Deep Look Connection - A Trendy Relationship"
[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the curious relationship between the trendiness of Deep Look YouTube video titles and snowfall patterns in Charlotte, North Carolina. By leveraging AI analysis of YouTube video titles and data from the NOAA National Climate Data Center, we aimed to shed light on this unexpected pairing. Our findings reveal a significant correlation coefficient of 0.8690881 and p < 0.01 for the period spanning 2014 to 2022, presenting an enticing correlation worthy of further investigation. With a lighthearted nod to the unexpected, this research challenges traditional academic boundaries and invites a playful exploration of the whimsical connections that may underlie seemingly unrelated phenomena.
[[INTRDUCTION]]
INTRODUCTION
The phenomena surrounding the links between seemingly unrelated variables have long piqued the curiosity of researchers, eliciting both fascination and skepticism within the academic community. As we embark upon our investigation of the connection between the trendiness of Deep Look YouTube video titles and snowfall in Charlotte, North Carolina, we are reminded of the adage, "There are no snowflakes alike, nor correlations, but in Charlotte, they do tend to flock together." (Psst, please forgive the indulgence in the snow-related pun. Science can be a bit "chilly" sometimes, so a little levity is in order.)
The allure of this peculiar association between online video titles and atmospheric phenomena beckons us to consider the notion that perhaps there exists a hidden undercurrent of trending influences that extend beyond the digital realm into the very fabric of weather patterns. In the spirit of scientific inquiry, we delve into this unconventional correlation with a mix of skepticism and a healthy dose of humor. After all, as researchers, we must always be willing to release a little bit of our "snow-serious" demeanor in the pursuit of truth. (Please bear with the puns; we cannot resist the urge to sprinkle a few here and there.)
Our aim is to provide a lighthearted yet rigorous analysis of the potential relationship between the rising and falling trends in YouTube video titles from the acclaimed Deep Look series and the ebb and flow of snowfall in Charlotte. By harnessing the power of artificial intelligence to scrutinize the captivating allure of YouTube titles and coupling it with the formidable data prowess of the NOAA National Climate Data Center, we endeavor to uncover the delightful secrets that may lurk within this unexpected pairing. In doing so, our research intends to thaw the icy skepticism surrounding unconventional correlations and pave the way for a more playful, inquisitive approach to scientific investigation. So, let's embark on this "cool" journey (apologies again for the flurry of snow-related puns) and see where the evidence guides us.
[[RESULTS]]
The analysis of the data revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8690881 between the trendiness of Deep Look YouTube video titles and snowfall in Charlotte, North Carolina, for the period from 2014 to 2022. The coefficient of determination (r-squared) was calculated to be 0.7553141, indicating that approximately 75.53% of the variability in snowfall can be explained by the trendiness of the video titles. The p-value was found to be less than 0.01, signifying a highly significant relationship between the two variables.
As evident in Figure 1 (not shown here, sadly), the scatterplot depicts the robust correlation between the trendiness of Deep Look YouTube video titles and snowfall in Charlotte, reflecting a trend that even the most skeptical minds in the scientific community would find difficult to brush off.
These results highlight the surprising connection between online video trends and localized weather phenomena, raising intriguing questions about the potential influences of digital trends on environmental patterns. It appears that the impact of captivating YouTube titles may not be as fleeting as one might initially presume, but rather may extend into the realm of atmospheric conditions, leaving a unique imprint on snowfall patterns in Charlotte.
In uncovering this unexpected relationship, one cannot help but marvel at the whimsical intricacies of our interconnected world, where the digital and meteorological domains converge in a dance of statistical significance. This finding undoubtedly adds a playful twist to the scientific discourse, offering a delightful reminder of the unexpected connections that may lie beneath the surface of seemingly disparate data.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[CONCLUSION]]
ChatGPT:
[[CONCLUSION]]
In conclusion, this research has unveiled a tantalizing association between the trendiness of Deep Look YouTube video titles and the snowfall patterns in Charlotte, North Carolina, encapsulating a connection that prompts both scientific intrigue and a chuckle or two. The robust correlation coefficient of 0.8690881 and a p-value of less than 0.01 underscore the surprising entanglement of digital trends and meteorological whimsy. While one may be tempted to dismiss this correlation as a mere quirk of statistical fate, the compelling evidence insists otherwise, beckoning us to appreciate the whimsical tapestry of unseen influences that may pervade the fabric of our environment.
The implications of this discovery are as exhilarating as a snow day for a diligent researcher. It prompts us to consider the potential impact of online trends on localized weather patterns, perhaps posing the question: are snowflakes the only things that gather in flurries in Charlotte? This intriguing finding challenges us to embrace a broader perspective in our scientific inquiries and to remain open to uncovering unexpected connections, even those that initially appear as far-fetched as a snowball's chance in Hades.
As we close the chapter on this curious exploration, we are reminded that in the seemingly disparate realms of online media and atmospheric phenomena, there may exist a hidden commonality that defies traditional scientific boundaries and leaves us delightfully perplexed. Our research encourages others to approach their investigations with a measure of humor and a willingness to entertain the unforeseen. In the spirit of scientific curiosity, let us raise our figurative snow goggles to the unexpected correlations that await our discovery.
In light of these findings, we assert, quite snow-cerely, that no further research is needed in this area. For now, let us revel in the enchanting whimsy of this correlation and reflect upon the snow joke that became a scientific reality. And remember, when it comes to peculiar correlations, there's snow business like research business.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Snow Joke: The Snowfall-Deep Look Connection - A Trendy Relationship. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.
ChatGPT:
The Journal of Atmospheric Mirth and Meteorological Merriment
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Snow Joke: The Snowfall-Deep Look Connection - A Trendy Relationship. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.
ChatGPT:
Association for Whimsical Snowfall Studies
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Snow Joke: The Snowfall-Deep Look Connection - A Trendy Relationship with an abstract of This study delves into the curious relationship between the trendiness of Deep Look YouTube video titles and snowfall patterns in Charlotte, North Carolina. By leveraging AI analysis of YouTube video titles and data from the NOAA National Climate Data Center, we aimed to shed light on this unexpected pairing. Our findings reveal a significant correlation coefficient of 0.8690881 and p < 0.01 for the period spanning 2014 to 2022, presenting an enticing correlation worthy of further investigation. With a lighthearted nod to the unexpected, this research challenges traditional academic boundaries and invites a playful exploration of the whimsical connections that may underlie seemingly unrelated phenomena.
ChatGPT:
Snowfall, Deep Look YouTube videos, YouTube video titles, AI analysis, NOAA National Climate Data Center, correlation coefficient, snowfall patterns, Charlotte, North Carolina, trendiness, relationship, unexpected pairings, climate data, playful exploration, academic boundaries
*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.
Discover a new correlation
View all correlations
View all research papers
Report an error
Data details
How trendy Deep Look YouTube video titles areDetailed data title: How trendy Deep Look YouTube video titles are, as rated by an AI.
Source: AI analysis of YouTube video titles
Additional Info: I asked a large language model, 'On a scale of 1-10, how _______ do you think this YouTube video title is?' for every video.
See what else correlates with How trendy Deep Look YouTube video titles are
Snowfall in Charlotte
Detailed data title: Total Annual Snowfall at CHARLOTTE DOUGLAS AIRPORT, NC US
Source: NOAA National Climate Data Center
See what else correlates with Snowfall in Charlotte
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.
r2 = 0.7553141 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 75.5% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Snowfall in Charlotte) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., How trendy Deep Look YouTube video titles are) over the 9 years from 2014 through 2022.
p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 0.0023. 0.0023461416388961525000000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.
But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.
Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.87 in 0.23% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 426 random variables Which I absolutely did.
with the same 8 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 8 because we have two variables measured over a period of 9 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.
[ 0.48, 0.97 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.
This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!
All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.
Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
2014 | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | |
How trendy Deep Look YouTube video titles are (Trendiness score) | 7.8 | 6.75 | 6.5217 | 6.4762 | 6.85 | 6.5 | 6.5238 | 6.5 | 6.9348 |
Snowfall in Charlotte (Inches of snow) | 9.3 | 3.1 | 3.3 | 2.3 | 7 | 0.1 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 4.3 |
Why this works
- Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
- Lack of causal connection: There is probably
Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied. - Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple
Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is. - Very low n: There are not many data points included in this analysis. Even if the p-value is high, we should be suspicious of using so few datapoints in a correlation.
- Y-axis doesn't start at zero: I truncated the Y-axes of the graph above. I also used a line graph, which makes the visual connection stand out more than it deserves.
Nothing against line graphs. They are great at telling a story when you have linear data! But visually it is deceptive because the only data is at the points on the graph, not the lines on the graph. In between each point, the data could have been doing anything. Like going for a random walk by itself!
Mathematically what I showed is true, but it is intentionally misleading. Below is the same chart but with both Y-axes starting at zero.
Try it yourself
You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.
Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"
Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.
Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.
Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.
Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"
If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:
"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."
# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats
# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):
# Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)
# Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
r_squared = correlation**2
return correlation, r_squared, p_value
# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([7.8,6.75,6.5217,6.4762,6.85,6.5,6.5238,6.5,6.9348,])
array_2 = np.array([9.3,3.1,3.3,2.3,7,0.1,0.3,0.3,4.3,])
array_1_name = "How trendy Deep Look YouTube video titles are"
array_2_name = "Snowfall in Charlotte"
# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)
# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)
Reuseable content
You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.
For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."
When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.
Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.
Download images for these variables:
- High resolution line chart
The image linked here is a Scalable Vector Graphic (SVG). It is the highest resolution that is possible to achieve. It scales up beyond the size of the observable universe without pixelating. You do not need to email me asking if I have a higher resolution image. I do not. The physical limitations of our universe prevent me from providing you with an image that is any higher resolution than this one.
If you insert it into a PowerPoint presentation (a tool well-known for managing things that are the scale of the universe), you can right-click > "Ungroup" or "Create Shape" and then edit the lines and text directly. You can also change the colors this way.
Alternatively you can use a tool like Inkscape. - High resolution line chart, optimized for mobile
- Alternative high resolution line chart
- Scatterplot
- Portable line chart (png)
- Portable line chart (png), optimized for mobile
- Line chart for only How trendy Deep Look YouTube video titles are
- Line chart for only Snowfall in Charlotte
- AI-generated correlation image
- The spurious research paper: Snow Joke: The Snowfall-Deep Look Connection - A Trendy Relationship
I'm genuinely thankful for your rating!
Correlation ID: 4490 · Black Variable ID: 25938 · Red Variable ID: 25229