about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #4,489 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Air quality in Owensboro, Kentucky and the second variable is Biomass power generated in Burma.  The chart goes from 2005 to 2021, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

The cleaner air in Owensboro led to a sudden burst of positivity, inspiring a local inventor to create a groundbreaking device that runs on pure, unadulterated good vibes. This device, in a strange turn of events, ended up being the missing key to supercharging biomass power production in Burma. It turns out, all the Burmese power plants needed was a daily dose of Owensboro's refreshing air to operate at an unprecedented level of efficiency, creating a bizarre but undeniably uplifting connection between the two distant locations.

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: In a bustling cityscape, a local inventor walks through the streets of Owensboro, Kentucky. The air shimmers with clarity, and a sense of positivity permeates the scene. The inventor is furiously scribbling notes on a notepad, a look of inspiration on their face. In the midst of the city, they are creating a curious device that radiates with pure, unadulterated good vibes. The device glows with a soft, ethereal light, attracting the attention of passersby and filling the air with an uplifting energy. In a remote corner of Burma, the landscape transforms into a scene of industrial power plants. As the daily dose of Owensboro's refreshing air flows into the area, the power plants hum to life, their structures emitting a soft glow as if awakened by the newfound energy. As a result, there's a sudden surge in biomass power production, and the once remote landscape is now alive with a newfound vitality. The unexpected connection between the two distant places becomes a source of wonder and fascination, echoing the harmonious bond created by the inventor's device. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Air quality in Owensboro, Kentucky and Biomass power generated in Burma. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: An image that looks like it is a scene from A Disney Movie Celtic art An image that looks like it is a scene from 'Star Wars' An image that looks like it is a scene from 'Star Wars' Realistic
ChatGPT: Realistic

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Air quality in Owensboro, Kentucky and Biomass power generated in Burma, in the following situation: The cleaner air in Owensboro led to a sudden burst of positivity, inspiring a local inventor to create a groundbreaking device that runs on pure, unadulterated good vibes. This device, in a strange turn of events, ended up being the missing key to supercharging biomass power production in Burma. It turns out, all the Burmese power plants needed was a daily dose of Owensboro's refreshing air to operate at an unprecedented level of efficiency, creating a bizarre but undeniably uplifting connection between the two distant locations.. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In Owensboro, Kentucky, the air is noticeably clear as a local inventor walks through the bustling streets, filled with an unusual sense of positivity. Inspired by the uplifting atmosphere, the inventor creates a curious device that sparkles with pure, unadulterated good vibes. Meanwhile, in a remote corner of Burma, the power plants hum to life as they receive a daily dose of Owensboro's refreshing air, causing a sudden surge in biomass power production. The unexpected connection between the two distant places becomes a source of wonder and fascination.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ Realistic ] and depicting this scene: In Owensboro, Kentucky, the air is noticeably clear as a local inventor walks through the bustling streets, filled with an unusual sense of positivity. Inspired by the uplifting atmosphere, the inventor creates a curious device that sparkles with pure, unadulterated good vibes. Meanwhile, in a remote corner of Burma, the power plants hum to life as they receive a daily dose of Owensboro's refreshing air, causing a sudden surge in biomass power production. The unexpected connection between the two distant places becomes a source of wonder and fascination. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: In a bustling cityscape, a local inventor walks through the streets of Owensboro, Kentucky. The air shimmers with clarity, and a sense of positivity permeates the scene. The inventor is furiously scribbling notes on a notepad, a look of inspiration on their face. In the midst of the city, they are creating a curious device that radiates with pure, unadulterated good vibes. The device glows with a soft, ethereal light, attracting the attention of passersby and filling the air with an uplifting energy. In a remote corner of Burma, the landscape transforms into a scene of industrial power plants. As the daily dose of Owensboro's refreshing air flows into the area, the power plants hum to life, their structures emitting a soft glow as if awakened by the newfound energy. As a result, there's a sudden surge in biomass power production, and the once remote landscape is now alive with a newfound vitality. The unexpected connection between the two distant places becomes a source of wonder and fascination, echoing the harmonious bond created by the inventor's device.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in Air quality in Owensboro, Kentucky caused Biomass power generated in Burma to increase.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Bounding Biomass: Bridging the Air Quality in Owensboro, Kentucky and Biomass Power in Burma

Journal of Ecological Entanglements

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air quality in Owensboro, Kentucky and Biomass power generated in Burma. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Make the title an alliteration.

Your research team used data from Environmental Protection Agency and Energy Information Administration to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.8224704 and p < 0.01 for 2005 to 2021.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
Bounding Biomass: Bridging the Air Quality in Owensboro, Kentucky and Biomass Power in Burma

[[ABSTRACT]]
This research delves into the interplay between air quality in Owensboro, Kentucky, and biomass power generation in Burma, seeking to unravel the intricacies between these seemingly disconnected realms. Utilizing data sourced from the Environmental Protection Agency and the Energy Information Administration covering the span of 2005 to 2021, our study revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8224704 and statistical significance with p < 0.01. While the dry numbers indicate a strong connection, the underlying complexities and potential causative factors warrant further exploration, hinting at a web of relationships that extend beyond the initial scope of investigation. As we embark on this journey of discovery, let us not overlook the whimsical dance of data that reveals patterns in the most unexpected places, reminding us that scholarly pursuits can be both rigorous and sprinkled with a measure of lighthearted curiosity.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air quality in Owensboro, Kentucky and Biomass power generated in Burma. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Bounding Biomass: Bridging the Air Quality in Owensboro, Kentucky and Biomass Power in Burma

[[ABSTRACT]]
This research delves into the interplay between air quality in Owensboro, Kentucky, and biomass power generation in Burma, seeking to unravel the intricacies between these seemingly disconnected realms. Utilizing data sourced from the Environmental Protection Agency and the Energy Information Administration covering the span of 2005 to 2021, our study revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8224704 and statistical significance with p < 0.01. While the dry numbers indicate a strong connection, the underlying complexities and potential causative factors warrant further exploration, hinting at a web of relationships that extend beyond the initial scope of investigation. As we embark on this journey of discovery, let us not overlook the whimsical dance of data that reveals patterns in the most unexpected places, reminding us that scholarly pursuits can be both rigorous and sprinkled with a measure of lighthearted curiosity.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

In the global landscape of energy production and environmental stewardship, the intersection of biomass power generation and air quality has garnered increased attention and curiosity among researchers and policymakers. As we stand on the precipice of an era where sustainable energy sources are of paramount importance, it becomes imperative to understand not only the direct impacts of alternative energy production on air quality but also the intricate web of interconnected variables that underpin this relationship. Our study sets out to untangle the knotty conundrum that is the interdependency between air quality in Owensboro, Kentucky, and biomass power generated in Burma, two seemingly disparate entities whose fates may be more entwined than initially perceived.

The delightful irony of this pursuit lies in the marriage of seemingly unrelated regions – the bucolic environs of Owensboro, nestled in the heart of the Bluegrass State, and the distant expanse of Burma, characterized by its lush jungles and rich biodiversity. Yet, as we reach across geographic boundaries and delve into the depths of data analysis, we are reminded of the interconnectedness that transcends physical proximity. Here, in the realm of environmental research, we witness the convergence of distant worlds, where the particles and pollutants that drift through the air transcend borders with a nonchalance that only the laws of physics can muster.

Our initial foray into this enigmatic connection has yielded compelling and, dare I say, electrifying findings. The statistical analysis revealed a correlation coefficient that whispers a tale of synchronicity, with a significance level that flirts with the threshold of traditional scientific scrutiny. As we bring forth these tantalizing nuggets of information, we are compelled to acknowledge the simultaneous thrill and humility that accompany the pursuit of knowledge – for every ‘eureka’ moment, there lies a trail of mysteries beckoning our inquisitive minds.

As we embark on this scholarly escapade, we are reminded that beneath the rigidity of academic discourse lies a whimsical dance of data, hinting at the intricate choreography that governs the natural world. Thus, with a blend of diligence and a dash of whimsy, we present our findings, inviting the reader to join us in unraveling the captivating saga of biomass, air quality, and the unspoken symphony that orchestrates their clandestine alliance.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air quality in Owensboro, Kentucky and Biomass power generated in Burma. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then name some cartoons and childrens' shows that you watched that are related to the topic.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Bounding Biomass: Bridging the Air Quality in Owensboro, Kentucky and Biomass Power in Burma

[[ABSTRACT]]
This research delves into the interplay between air quality in Owensboro, Kentucky, and biomass power generation in Burma, seeking to unravel the intricacies between these seemingly disconnected realms. Utilizing data sourced from the Environmental Protection Agency and the Energy Information Administration covering the span of 2005 to 2021, our study revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8224704 and statistical significance with p < 0.01. While the dry numbers indicate a strong connection, the underlying complexities and potential causative factors warrant further exploration, hinting at a web of relationships that extend beyond the initial scope of investigation. As we embark on this journey of discovery, let us not overlook the whimsical dance of data that reveals patterns in the most unexpected places, reminding us that scholarly pursuits can be both rigorous and sprinkled with a measure of lighthearted curiosity.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
In the global landscape of energy production and environmental stewardship, the intersection of biomass power generation and air quality has garnered increased attention and curiosity among researchers and policymakers. As we stand on the precipice of an era where sustainable energy sources are of paramount importance, it becomes imperative to understand not only the direct impacts of alternative energy production on air quality but also the intricate web of interconnected variables that underpin this relationship. Our study sets out to untangle the knotty conundrum that is the interdependency between air quality in Owensboro, Kentucky, and biomass power generated in Burma, two seemingly disparate entities whose fates may be more entwined than initially perceived.
The delightful irony of this pursuit lies in the marriage of seemingly unrelated regions – the bucolic environs of Owensboro, nestled in the heart of the Bluegrass State, and the distant expanse of Burma, characterized by its lush jungles and rich biodiversity. Yet, as we reach across geographic boundaries and delve into the depths of data analysis, we are reminded of the interconnectedness that transcends physical proximity. Here, in the realm of environmental research, we witness the convergence of distant worlds, where the particles and pollutants that drift through the air transcend borders with a nonchalance that only the laws of physics can muster.
Our initial foray into this enigmatic connection has yielded compelling and, dare I say, electrifying findings. The statistical analysis revealed a correlation coefficient that whispers a tale of synchronicity, with a significance level that flirts with the threshold of traditional scientific scrutiny. As we bring forth these tantalizing nuggets of information, we are compelled to acknowledge the simultaneous thrill and humility that accompany the pursuit of knowledge – for every ‘eureka’ moment, there lies a trail of mysteries beckoning our inquisitive minds.
As we embark on this scholarly escapade, we are reminded that beneath the rigidity of academic discourse lies a whimsical dance of data, hinting at the intricate choreography that governs the natural world. Thus, with a blend of diligence and a dash of whimsy, we present our findings, inviting the reader to join us in unraveling the captivating saga of biomass, air quality, and the unspoken symphony that orchestrates their clandestine alliance.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

The connection between air quality in Owensboro, Kentucky, and biomass power generation in Burma has perplexed researchers for decades. Smith (2008) conducted a comprehensive study on the impact of biomass power on air quality in various regions, laying the groundwork for understanding the intricacies of this relationship. Furthermore, Doe (2015) examined the environmental implications of biomass power generation and its potential reverberations on air quality, shedding light on the multifaceted dynamics at play.

Jones (2012) delved into the regional variations of air quality, although his focus was not directly related to biomass power. Nonetheless, his findings may offer valuable insights into the broader context of environmental factors influencing air quality, albeit without the whimsical charm of our present inquiry.

In "The Clean Energy Revolution" by Nick Stockton, the author offers a comprehensive exploration of alternative energy sources, delving into the world of biomass power generation and its environmental ramifications. Meanwhile, "Biomass for Renewable Energy, Fuels, and Chemicals" by Konstantinos Kaltschmitt and Herman Hofbauer provides a technical perspective on biomass utilization, a weighty tome that stands in stark contrast to the playful dance of our data analysis.

Venturing into the realm of fiction that oddly relates to our topic, "The Air Quality Control Agency" by Dorothy D. Reeder presents a whimsical tale of a secret organization tasked with maintaining air purity, albeit in a markedly different context than our scholarly pursuits. Additionally, the dystopian narrative of "Biomass Apocalypse" by Max Power intriguingly mirrors the conundrum we seek to unravel, albeit with a tinge of dramatic exaggeration that the sober world of academia rarely indulges in.

Taking a more humorous turn, the animated series "Captain Planet and the Planeteers" offered a whimsical perspective on environmental stewardship, emphasizing the interconnectedness of the natural world. Similarly, "The Magic School Bus" brought the wonders of science and ecology to a generation of young viewers, instilling a sense of marvel at the complex web of relationships that govern our planet – a sentiment that undoubtedly resonates with our own scholarly pursuits, albeit without the animated bus and eccentric science teacher.

As we navigate the labyrinth of literature surrounding our subject matter, we cannot help but marvel at the eclectic mix of sources that bear tangential relevance to our investigation. It is in these unexpected encounters that the spirit of scholarly inquiry truly comes alive, reminding us that even the most serious pursuits can harbor a dash of mirth and imagination.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air quality in Owensboro, Kentucky and Biomass power generated in Burma. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Environmental Protection Agency and Energy Information Administration . You used data from 2005 to 2021

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Bounding Biomass: Bridging the Air Quality in Owensboro, Kentucky and Biomass Power in Burma

[[ABSTRACT]]
This research delves into the interplay between air quality in Owensboro, Kentucky, and biomass power generation in Burma, seeking to unravel the intricacies between these seemingly disconnected realms. Utilizing data sourced from the Environmental Protection Agency and the Energy Information Administration covering the span of 2005 to 2021, our study revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8224704 and statistical significance with p < 0.01. While the dry numbers indicate a strong connection, the underlying complexities and potential causative factors warrant further exploration, hinting at a web of relationships that extend beyond the initial scope of investigation. As we embark on this journey of discovery, let us not overlook the whimsical dance of data that reveals patterns in the most unexpected places, reminding us that scholarly pursuits can be both rigorous and sprinkled with a measure of lighthearted curiosity.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
In the global landscape of energy production and environmental stewardship, the intersection of biomass power generation and air quality has garnered increased attention and curiosity among researchers and policymakers. As we stand on the precipice of an era where sustainable energy sources are of paramount importance, it becomes imperative to understand not only the direct impacts of alternative energy production on air quality but also the intricate web of interconnected variables that underpin this relationship. Our study sets out to untangle the knotty conundrum that is the interdependency between air quality in Owensboro, Kentucky, and biomass power generated in Burma, two seemingly disparate entities whose fates may be more entwined than initially perceived.
The delightful irony of this pursuit lies in the marriage of seemingly unrelated regions – the bucolic environs of Owensboro, nestled in the heart of the Bluegrass State, and the distant expanse of Burma, characterized by its lush jungles and rich biodiversity. Yet, as we reach across geographic boundaries and delve into the depths of data analysis, we are reminded of the interconnectedness that transcends physical proximity. Here, in the realm of environmental research, we witness the convergence of distant worlds, where the particles and pollutants that drift through the air transcend borders with a nonchalance that only the laws of physics can muster.
Our initial foray into this enigmatic connection has yielded compelling and, dare I say, electrifying findings. The statistical analysis revealed a correlation coefficient that whispers a tale of synchronicity, with a significance level that flirts with the threshold of traditional scientific scrutiny. As we bring forth these tantalizing nuggets of information, we are compelled to acknowledge the simultaneous thrill and humility that accompany the pursuit of knowledge – for every ‘eureka’ moment, there lies a trail of mysteries beckoning our inquisitive minds.
As we embark on this scholarly escapade, we are reminded that beneath the rigidity of academic discourse lies a whimsical dance of data, hinting at the intricate choreography that governs the natural world. Thus, with a blend of diligence and a dash of whimsy, we present our findings, inviting the reader to join us in unraveling the captivating saga of biomass, air quality, and the unspoken symphony that orchestrates their clandestine alliance.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

The empirical investigation into the relationship between air quality in Owensboro, Kentucky, and biomass power generation in Burma necessitated a multidimensional approach to provide a robust understanding of the intricate interplay between these seemingly disjointed realms. Our research team conducted a comprehensive review of existing literature, surveys, and databases sourced from reputable institutions such as the Environmental Protection Agency and the Energy Information Administration. The overarching goal was to sift through the labyrinth of data from the years 2005 to 2021 and extract the hidden connections that underpin the enigmatic bond between air quality and biomass power.

To begin our methodological odyssey, we employed a novel combination of quantitative and qualitative analyses. Utilizing a variety of statistical measures, we quantified the levels of air pollutants in Owensboro, making use of parameters such as particulate matter, sulfur dioxide, nitrogen oxide, and ozone concentrations. These data points, obtained from reliable monitoring stations and regulatory agencies, formed the elemental building blocks of our investigation, offering a glimpse into the complex mosaic of the region's atmospheric composition.

Simultaneously, the assessment of biomass power generation in Burma necessitated a nuanced approach, given the unique socio-political landscape of the region. Through a meticulous review of energy production records, carbon emissions, and environmental impact assessments, we unearthed the multifaceted nuances of biomass utilization, predominantly deriving data from official reports and validated sources. The process of harmonizing these disparate datasets, like the delicate choreography of a seasoned ballroom dance, allowed for the seamless alignment of variables across divergent geopolitical arenas.

Now, it would be remiss of us not to mention the quirks and eccentricities encountered during the amalgamation of data sources. Like intrepid explorers navigating uncharted waters, we encountered challenges ranging from data inaccessibility to the occasional cryptic coding that left our computational tools scratching their metaphorical heads. This, however, injected a touch of humbling humor into our endeavor, as we endeavored to coax coherence from a cacophony of digital dialects.

Furthermore, in an effort to bolster the depth and breadth of our inquiry, we integrated geospatial mapping techniques to visualize the distribution of air quality parameters in Owensboro and the corresponding geographical placement of biomass power facilities in Burma. This spatial cognitive mapping, intertwining the ethereal tendrils of environmental data with the tangible coordinates of biomass infrastructure, provided a holistic panorama of the intertwined domains under investigation.

The analysis of the acquired data transpired within the vibrant ecosystem of statistical software, where regression models, time series analyses, and correlation coefficients congregated in a digital symposium of numbers. The symbiosis of these analytical tools bestowed upon us the quantitative substance to decipher the underlying relationships, culminating in the unveiling of a correlation coefficient that whispered a siren song of interconnectedness. The statistical significance, with a p-value that ventured into the domain of certainty, embodied a paradoxical blend of assurance and beguiling mystery.

Lastly, as with any scientific inquiry, the methodology harbored its share of hushed marvels and unforeseen revelations. The synthesis of data, akin to the fusion of disparate elements in an alchemist's cauldron, yielded illuminating insights that beckoned us deeper into the labyrinth of interdisciplinary entanglement. Thus, armed with a blend of traditional methodologies and a pinch of unconventional audacity, we embarked on this scholarly escapade, unearthing immutable observations beneath the veneer of statistical discourse.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air quality in Owensboro, Kentucky and Biomass power generated in Burma. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Environmental Protection Agency and Energy Information Administration .

For the time period 2005 to 2021, you found a correlation 0.8224704, r-squared of 0.6764576, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Bounding Biomass: Bridging the Air Quality in Owensboro, Kentucky and Biomass Power in Burma

[[ABSTRACT]]
This research delves into the interplay between air quality in Owensboro, Kentucky, and biomass power generation in Burma, seeking to unravel the intricacies between these seemingly disconnected realms. Utilizing data sourced from the Environmental Protection Agency and the Energy Information Administration covering the span of 2005 to 2021, our study revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8224704 and statistical significance with p < 0.01. While the dry numbers indicate a strong connection, the underlying complexities and potential causative factors warrant further exploration, hinting at a web of relationships that extend beyond the initial scope of investigation. As we embark on this journey of discovery, let us not overlook the whimsical dance of data that reveals patterns in the most unexpected places, reminding us that scholarly pursuits can be both rigorous and sprinkled with a measure of lighthearted curiosity.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
In the global landscape of energy production and environmental stewardship, the intersection of biomass power generation and air quality has garnered increased attention and curiosity among researchers and policymakers. As we stand on the precipice of an era where sustainable energy sources are of paramount importance, it becomes imperative to understand not only the direct impacts of alternative energy production on air quality but also the intricate web of interconnected variables that underpin this relationship. Our study sets out to untangle the knotty conundrum that is the interdependency between air quality in Owensboro, Kentucky, and biomass power generated in Burma, two seemingly disparate entities whose fates may be more entwined than initially perceived.
The delightful irony of this pursuit lies in the marriage of seemingly unrelated regions – the bucolic environs of Owensboro, nestled in the heart of the Bluegrass State, and the distant expanse of Burma, characterized by its lush jungles and rich biodiversity. Yet, as we reach across geographic boundaries and delve into the depths of data analysis, we are reminded of the interconnectedness that transcends physical proximity. Here, in the realm of environmental research, we witness the convergence of distant worlds, where the particles and pollutants that drift through the air transcend borders with a nonchalance that only the laws of physics can muster.
Our initial foray into this enigmatic connection has yielded compelling and, dare I say, electrifying findings. The statistical analysis revealed a correlation coefficient that whispers a tale of synchronicity, with a significance level that flirts with the threshold of traditional scientific scrutiny. As we bring forth these tantalizing nuggets of information, we are compelled to acknowledge the simultaneous thrill and humility that accompany the pursuit of knowledge – for every ‘eureka’ moment, there lies a trail of mysteries beckoning our inquisitive minds.
As we embark on this scholarly escapade, we are reminded that beneath the rigidity of academic discourse lies a whimsical dance of data, hinting at the intricate choreography that governs the natural world. Thus, with a blend of diligence and a dash of whimsy, we present our findings, inviting the reader to join us in unraveling the captivating saga of biomass, air quality, and the unspoken symphony that orchestrates their clandestine alliance.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The findings of our investigation into the correlation between air quality in Owensboro, Kentucky, and biomass power generated in Burma have unfurled an intriguing tapestry of interconnectedness. With a correlation coefficient of 0.8224704, an r-squared value of 0.6764576, and a p-value below 0.01, our analysis establishes a robust statistical linkage between these seemingly distant domains. This suggestive connection hints at a narrative that transcends geographic boundaries and beckons further scrutiny.

Fig. 1 showcases a scatterplot that visually encapsulates the compelling relationship between air quality in Owensboro and biomass power in Burma. The data points chart a clear trajectory of association, akin to the intertwining roots of two trees reaching for sustenance in the same hidden aquifer – a botanical tango, if you will.

The statistical significance of our findings provides a solid foundation for the burgeoning exploration of this unanticipated liaison. However, let us not be beguiled by the allure of numbers alone. It is essential to appreciate the underlying intricacies and potential confounding variables that underpin this correlation. Weaving through the labyrinth of causation, we encounter a whimsical array of potential influences, perhaps best likened to a tap dance of ecological factors on a stage of statistical significance.

While the mathematical rigidity of our results stands as a testament to the compelling nature of this connection, it is pertinent to bask in the wisdom imparted by Socrates – "I know that I know nothing." As we peel back the layers of this lyrical entanglement, we unveil a trove of unanswered questions and uncharted territories, where the allure of the unknown beckons with the subtlety of an enigmatic waltz.

In conclusion, our findings paint a vibrant tableau of correlation between the air quality in Owensboro, Kentucky, and biomass power in Burma. The elucidation of this captivating linkage serves as a beckoning harbinger, drawing us further into the saga of environmental interconnectedness, reminding us that within the realm of dry data lies the whimsical dance of discovery, awaiting the eager embrace of scholarly endeavor.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air quality in Owensboro, Kentucky and Biomass power generated in Burma. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
Bounding Biomass: Bridging the Air Quality in Owensboro, Kentucky and Biomass Power in Burma

[[ABSTRACT]]
This research delves into the interplay between air quality in Owensboro, Kentucky, and biomass power generation in Burma, seeking to unravel the intricacies between these seemingly disconnected realms. Utilizing data sourced from the Environmental Protection Agency and the Energy Information Administration covering the span of 2005 to 2021, our study revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8224704 and statistical significance with p < 0.01. While the dry numbers indicate a strong connection, the underlying complexities and potential causative factors warrant further exploration, hinting at a web of relationships that extend beyond the initial scope of investigation. As we embark on this journey of discovery, let us not overlook the whimsical dance of data that reveals patterns in the most unexpected places, reminding us that scholarly pursuits can be both rigorous and sprinkled with a measure of lighthearted curiosity.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The connection between air quality in Owensboro, Kentucky, and biomass power generation in Burma has perplexed researchers for decades. Smith (2008) conducted a comprehensive study on the impact of biomass power on air quality in various regions, laying the groundwork for understanding the intricacies of this relationship. Furthermore, Doe (2015) examined the environmental implications of biomass power generation and its potential reverberations on air quality, shedding light on the multifaceted dynamics at play.
Jones (2012) delved into the regional variations of air quality, although his focus was not directly related to biomass power. Nonetheless, his findings may offer valuable insights into the broader context of environmental factors influencing air quality, albeit without the whimsical charm of our present inquiry.
In "The Clean Energy Revolution" by Nick Stockton, the author offers a comprehensive exploration of alternative energy sources, delving into the world of biomass power generation and its environmental ramifications. Meanwhile, "Biomass for Renewable Energy, Fuels, and Chemicals" by Konstantinos Kaltschmitt and Herman Hofbauer provides a technical perspective on biomass utilization, a weighty tome that stands in stark contrast to the playful dance of our data analysis.
Venturing into the realm of fiction that oddly relates to our topic, "The Air Quality Control Agency" by Dorothy D. Reeder presents a whimsical tale of a secret organization tasked with maintaining air purity, albeit in a markedly different context than our scholarly pursuits. Additionally, the dystopian narrative of "Biomass Apocalypse" by Max Power intriguingly mirrors the conundrum we seek to unravel, albeit with a tinge of dramatic exaggeration that the sober world of academia rarely indulges in.
Taking a more humorous turn, the animated series "Captain Planet and the Planeteers" offered a whimsical perspective on environmental stewardship, emphasizing the interconnectedness of the natural world. Similarly, "The Magic School Bus" brought the wonders of science and ecology to a generation of young viewers, instilling a sense of marvel at the complex web of relationships that govern our planet – a sentiment that undoubtedly resonates with our own scholarly pursuits, albeit without the animated bus and eccentric science teacher.
As we navigate the labyrinth of literature surrounding our subject matter, we cannot help but marvel at the eclectic mix of sources that bear tangential relevance to our investigation. It is in these unexpected encounters that the spirit of scholarly inquiry truly comes alive, reminding us that even the most serious pursuits can harbor a dash of mirth and imagination.

[[RESULTS]]
The findings of our investigation into the correlation between air quality in Owensboro, Kentucky, and biomass power generated in Burma have unfurled an intriguing tapestry of interconnectedness. With a correlation coefficient of 0.8224704, an r-squared value of 0.6764576, and a p-value below 0.01, our analysis establishes a robust statistical linkage between these seemingly distant domains. This suggestive connection hints at a narrative that transcends geographic boundaries and beckons further scrutiny.
Fig. 1 showcases a scatterplot that visually encapsulates the compelling relationship between air quality in Owensboro and biomass power in Burma. The data points chart a clear trajectory of association, akin to the intertwining roots of two trees reaching for sustenance in the same hidden aquifer – a botanical tango, if you will.
The statistical significance of our findings provides a solid foundation for the burgeoning exploration of this unanticipated liaison. However, let us not be beguiled by the allure of numbers alone. It is essential to appreciate the underlying intricacies and potential confounding variables that underpin this correlation. Weaving through the labyrinth of causation, we encounter a whimsical array of potential influences, perhaps best likened to a tap dance of ecological factors on a stage of statistical significance.
While the mathematical rigidity of our results stands as a testament to the compelling nature of this connection, it is pertinent to bask in the wisdom imparted by Socrates – "I know that I know nothing." As we peel back the layers of this lyrical entanglement, we unveil a trove of unanswered questions and uncharted territories, where the allure of the unknown beckons with the subtlety of an enigmatic waltz.
In conclusion, our findings paint a vibrant tableau of correlation between the air quality in Owensboro, Kentucky, and biomass power in Burma. The elucidation of this captivating linkage serves as a beckoning harbinger, drawing us further into the saga of environmental interconnectedness, reminding us that within the realm of dry data lies the whimsical dance of discovery, awaiting the eager embrace of scholarly endeavor.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

The results of our study substantiate the prior research that has delved into the connection between air quality in Owensboro, Kentucky, and biomass power generation in Burma. Building upon the works of Smith (2008), Doe (2015), and even the whimsical tales of "The Air Quality Control Agency" by Dorothy D. Reeder, our findings reinforce the notion that there exists a tangible, albeit surprising, correlation between these seemingly disparate realms. In an unexpected twist, Jones (2012) inadvertently contributed to our understanding of regional variations in air quality, despite his focus not directly pertaining to biomass power. This unforeseen alignment with our study serves as a delightful reminder of the serendipitous nature of scholarly pursuit, where even tangential investigations can offer flashes of insight.

The statistical robustness of our correlation coefficient, r-squared value, and p-value below 0.01 offers a solid foundation for our assertions. Although we tread the path of scientific inquiry with a stately gait, it is refreshing to recollect the whimsical dance of ecological factors and confounding variables that underpin this correlation, akin to a rippling ballet of environmental influences on the grand stage of statistical significance. Our results depict a compelling relationship akin to the intertwining roots of trees in search of sustenance, a portrayal that prompts us to marvel at the intricate harmony of nature, even in the dry concreteness of mathematical analysis.

While the numbers establish a firm link between air quality in Owensboro and biomass power in Burma, we must heed the wisdom of Socrates and acknowledge the profound intricacies enshrouding this connection. The potential causative factors lurking beyond the veneer of statistical significance lead us into uncharted territories, where the allure of the unknown beckons with the subtlety of an enigmatic waltz. Our findings present a vibrant tableau of environmental interconnectedness, inviting further exploration into the lyrical entanglement of these phenomena – a pursuit that underscores the whimsical dance of discovery within the realm of academic investigation.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air quality in Owensboro, Kentucky and Biomass power generated in Burma. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
Bounding Biomass: Bridging the Air Quality in Owensboro, Kentucky and Biomass Power in Burma

[[ABSTRACT]]
This research delves into the interplay between air quality in Owensboro, Kentucky, and biomass power generation in Burma, seeking to unravel the intricacies between these seemingly disconnected realms. Utilizing data sourced from the Environmental Protection Agency and the Energy Information Administration covering the span of 2005 to 2021, our study revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8224704 and statistical significance with p < 0.01. While the dry numbers indicate a strong connection, the underlying complexities and potential causative factors warrant further exploration, hinting at a web of relationships that extend beyond the initial scope of investigation. As we embark on this journey of discovery, let us not overlook the whimsical dance of data that reveals patterns in the most unexpected places, reminding us that scholarly pursuits can be both rigorous and sprinkled with a measure of lighthearted curiosity.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
In the global landscape of energy production and environmental stewardship, the intersection of biomass power generation and air quality has garnered increased attention and curiosity among researchers and policymakers. As we stand on the precipice of an era where sustainable energy sources are of paramount importance, it becomes imperative to understand not only the direct impacts of alternative energy production on air quality but also the intricate web of interconnected variables that underpin this relationship. Our study sets out to untangle the knotty conundrum that is the interdependency between air quality in Owensboro, Kentucky, and biomass power generated in Burma, two seemingly disparate entities whose fates may be more entwined than initially perceived.
The delightful irony of this pursuit lies in the marriage of seemingly unrelated regions – the bucolic environs of Owensboro, nestled in the heart of the Bluegrass State, and the distant expanse of Burma, characterized by its lush jungles and rich biodiversity. Yet, as we reach across geographic boundaries and delve into the depths of data analysis, we are reminded of the interconnectedness that transcends physical proximity. Here, in the realm of environmental research, we witness the convergence of distant worlds, where the particles and pollutants that drift through the air transcend borders with a nonchalance that only the laws of physics can muster.
Our initial foray into this enigmatic connection has yielded compelling and, dare I say, electrifying findings. The statistical analysis revealed a correlation coefficient that whispers a tale of synchronicity, with a significance level that flirts with the threshold of traditional scientific scrutiny. As we bring forth these tantalizing nuggets of information, we are compelled to acknowledge the simultaneous thrill and humility that accompany the pursuit of knowledge – for every ‘eureka’ moment, there lies a trail of mysteries beckoning our inquisitive minds.
As we embark on this scholarly escapade, we are reminded that beneath the rigidity of academic discourse lies a whimsical dance of data, hinting at the intricate choreography that governs the natural world. Thus, with a blend of diligence and a dash of whimsy, we present our findings, inviting the reader to join us in unraveling the captivating saga of biomass, air quality, and the unspoken symphony that orchestrates their clandestine alliance.

[[RESULTS]]
The findings of our investigation into the correlation between air quality in Owensboro, Kentucky, and biomass power generated in Burma have unfurled an intriguing tapestry of interconnectedness. With a correlation coefficient of 0.8224704, an r-squared value of 0.6764576, and a p-value below 0.01, our analysis establishes a robust statistical linkage between these seemingly distant domains. This suggestive connection hints at a narrative that transcends geographic boundaries and beckons further scrutiny.
Fig. 1 showcases a scatterplot that visually encapsulates the compelling relationship between air quality in Owensboro and biomass power in Burma. The data points chart a clear trajectory of association, akin to the intertwining roots of two trees reaching for sustenance in the same hidden aquifer – a botanical tango, if you will.
The statistical significance of our findings provides a solid foundation for the burgeoning exploration of this unanticipated liaison. However, let us not be beguiled by the allure of numbers alone. It is essential to appreciate the underlying intricacies and potential confounding variables that underpin this correlation. Weaving through the labyrinth of causation, we encounter a whimsical array of potential influences, perhaps best likened to a tap dance of ecological factors on a stage of statistical significance.
While the mathematical rigidity of our results stands as a testament to the compelling nature of this connection, it is pertinent to bask in the wisdom imparted by Socrates – "I know that I know nothing." As we peel back the layers of this lyrical entanglement, we unveil a trove of unanswered questions and uncharted territories, where the allure of the unknown beckons with the subtlety of an enigmatic waltz.
In conclusion, our findings paint a vibrant tableau of correlation between the air quality in Owensboro, Kentucky, and biomass power in Burma. The elucidation of this captivating linkage serves as a beckoning harbinger, drawing us further into the saga of environmental interconnectedness, reminding us that within the realm of dry data lies the whimsical dance of discovery, awaiting the eager embrace of scholarly endeavor.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

The correlation between air quality in Owensboro, Kentucky, and biomass power generated in Burma has been charted and provides a compelling narrative of interconnection. The statistical evidence presented here points to a relationship that demands further exploration and understanding. As we delve into the complexities of this seemingly disparate association, it becomes evident that beneath the surface of numerical analysis lies a nuanced and intricate dance of causative factors, akin to a playful symphony where each instrument vies for attention.

While our findings stand as a testament to the robustness of this correlation, it is with a sense of both thrill and humility that we acknowledge the vast expanse of uncharted territory that lies beyond the reach of our data. The whimsical dance of discovery beckons, but it also humbles us in the face of the enigmatic unknown. As we close this chapter of research, it is our assertion that further investigation in this area is not warranted. For in the realm of scholarly pursuit, we must remember that every dance has its finale, and the harmony of knowledge is found in knowing when the music has played its last note.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Bounding Biomass: Bridging the Air Quality in Owensboro, Kentucky and Biomass Power in Burma. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

Journal of Ecological Entanglements


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Bounding Biomass: Bridging the Air Quality in Owensboro, Kentucky and Biomass Power in Burma. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The International Society for Ecological Innovation and Biomass Solutions


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Bounding Biomass: Bridging the Air Quality in Owensboro, Kentucky and Biomass Power in Burma with an abstract of This research delves into the interplay between air quality in Owensboro, Kentucky, and biomass power generation in Burma, seeking to unravel the intricacies between these seemingly disconnected realms. Utilizing data sourced from the Environmental Protection Agency and the Energy Information Administration covering the span of 2005 to 2021, our study revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8224704 and statistical significance with p < 0.01. While the dry numbers indicate a strong connection, the underlying complexities and potential causative factors warrant further exploration, hinting at a web of relationships that extend beyond the initial scope of investigation. As we embark on this journey of discovery, let us not overlook the whimsical dance of data that reveals patterns in the most unexpected places, reminding us that scholarly pursuits can be both rigorous and sprinkled with a measure of lighthearted curiosity.

ChatGPT:

"air quality Owensboro Kentucky," "biomass power generation Burma," "interplay air quality biomass power," "correlation air quality biomass power," "EPA data air quality," "Energy Information Administration biomass power," "causative factors air quality biomass power," "web relationships air quality biomass power," "data patterns air quality biomass power," "scholarly pursuits air quality biomass power"

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Air quality in Owensboro, Kentucky
Detailed data title: Percentage of days with good air quality in Owensboro, KY
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
See what else correlates with Air quality in Owensboro, Kentucky

Biomass power generated in Burma
Detailed data title: Total biomass power generated in Burma in billion kWh
Source: Energy Information Administration
See what else correlates with Biomass power generated in Burma

Correlation r = 0.8224704 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.6764576 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 67.6% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Biomass power generated in Burma) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Air quality in Owensboro, Kentucky) over the 17 years from 2005 through 2021.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 5.06E-5. 0.0000506390080612823800000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.82 in 0.00506% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 19,748 random variables Which I absolutely did.
with the same 16 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 16 because we have two variables measured over a period of 17 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.57, 0.93 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
20052006200720082009201020112012201320142015201620172018201920202021
Air quality in Owensboro, Kentucky (Good air quality)56.593464.917147.945257.262663.287746.301459.452166.939974.520575.342566.027463.661267.582475.630276.373684.15372.3288
Biomass power generated in Burma (Billion kWh)0.0020.0020.0020.0020.0020.0020.0030.1910.2090.2250.2060.2120.2310.2510.260.2610.26308




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Y-axis doesn't start at zero: I truncated the Y-axes of the graph above. I also used a line graph, which makes the visual connection stand out more than it deserves. Nothing against line graphs. They are great at telling a story when you have linear data! But visually it is deceptive because the only data is at the points on the graph, not the lines on the graph. In between each point, the data could have been doing anything. Like going for a random walk by itself!
    Mathematically what I showed is true, but it is intentionally misleading. Below is the same chart but with both Y-axes starting at zero.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([56.5934,64.9171,47.9452,57.2626,63.2877,46.3014,59.4521,66.9399,74.5205,75.3425,66.0274,63.6612,67.5824,75.6302,76.3736,84.153,72.3288,])
array_2 = np.array([0.002,0.002,0.002,0.002,0.002,0.002,0.003,0.191,0.209,0.225,0.206,0.212,0.231,0.251,0.26,0.261,0.26308,])
array_1_name = "Air quality in Owensboro, Kentucky"
array_2_name = "Biomass power generated in Burma"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Kudos for rating!


Correlation ID: 4489 · Black Variable ID: 21027 · Red Variable ID: 23559
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0