about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #4,486 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Votes for Democratic Senators in Oklahoma and the second variable is Google searches for 'how to immigrate to norway'.  The chart goes from 2004 to 2020, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

As Democrat votes for Senators in Oklahoma decreased, there was a corresponding decrease in the cosmic energy that attracted people to Norway. This led to a shift in the Earth's magnetic field, creating a temporary disruption in the alignment of personal aspirations with Scandinavian destinations. Or maybe, just maybe, it's because political preferences in Oklahoma have about as much to do with immigrating to Norway as the price of lemons in Antarctica.

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Generate an adorable 2D animation of a quaint street in a small Oklahoma town where a line of cute, cheerful voters stretches down the street. Each person proudly sports an "I Voted" sticker. Meanwhile, in nearby houses, depict residents of various ages and backgrounds sitting at their computers, eagerly searching for "how to immigrate to Norway." The scene should convey a sense of community and aspiration as people seek new beginnings in the serene landscapes of Scandinavia. The animation should capture the heartwarming essence of civic engagement and the yearning for adventure in a visually engaging manner. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Democrat votes for Senators in Oklahoma and Google searches for 'how to immigrate to norway'. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Cyber folk Voxel art Glitch art Cute 2D animation Cutsy art illustration
ChatGPT: Cute 2D animation

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Democrat votes for Senators in Oklahoma and Google searches for 'how to immigrate to norway', in the following situation: The influx of political disappointment led to a mass exodus to a more Scandinavian state of mind.. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In a small town in Oklahoma, a line of voters stretches down the street as people proudly display "I Voted" stickers. Meanwhile, in nearby houses, residents huddle around their computers, feverishly typing "how to immigrate to Norway" into Google as they search for a new beginning in the serene landscapes of Scandinavia.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ Cute 2D animation ] and depicting this scene: In a small town in Oklahoma, a line of voters stretches down the street as people proudly display "I Voted" stickers. Meanwhile, in nearby houses, residents huddle around their computers, feverishly typing "how to immigrate to Norway" into Google as they search for a new beginning in the serene landscapes of Scandinavia. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Generate an adorable 2D animation of a quaint street in a small Oklahoma town where a line of cute, cheerful voters stretches down the street. Each person proudly sports an "I Voted" sticker. Meanwhile, in nearby houses, depict residents of various ages and backgrounds sitting at their computers, eagerly searching for "how to immigrate to Norway." The scene should convey a sense of community and aspiration as people seek new beginnings in the serene landscapes of Scandinavia. The animation should capture the heartwarming essence of civic engagement and the yearning for adventure in a visually engaging manner.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how a decrease in Democrat votes for Senators in Oklahoma caused how to immigrate to norway (Google searches for 'how to immigrate to norway') to decrease.\Make it sound serious until the end.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.05)
Sooner Senators Sway Scandinavia: A Statistical Study of Oklahoma Democrats' Desire to Dash to Denmark, Bypassing Barriers Blatantly

The Journal of Political Whimsy

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Democrat votes for Senators in Oklahoma and Google searches for 'how to immigrate to norway'. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Rhyme words in the title.

Your research team used data from MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse and Google Trends to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.8334156 and p < 0.05 for 2004 to 2020.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
Sooner Senators Sway Scandinavia: A Statistical Study of Oklahoma Democrats' Desire to Dash to Denmark, Bypassing Barriers Blatantly

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the intriguing relationship between the voting patterns of Democrats for Senators in the state of Oklahoma and their proclivity to seek information on immigrating to Norway, a Scandinavian utopia renowned for its fjords, cuisine, and Norse mythology. Leveraging data from MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and Google Trends, our research team scrutinized the years 2004 to 2020, unearthing a statistically significant correlation coefficient of 0.8334156 (p < 0.05) between the two variables. Our findings not only highlight the magnetism of Nordic nations but also indicate a noteworthy trend of Oklahoman Democrats seeking an escape route to the land of the midnight sun. This paper not only elucidates an interesting social phenomenon but also demonstrates the power of statistical analysis to unveil the unexpected whims and fancies of political constituencies.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Democrat votes for Senators in Oklahoma and Google searches for 'how to immigrate to norway'. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Sooner Senators Sway Scandinavia: A Statistical Study of Oklahoma Democrats' Desire to Dash to Denmark, Bypassing Barriers Blatantly

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the intriguing relationship between the voting patterns of Democrats for Senators in the state of Oklahoma and their proclivity to seek information on immigrating to Norway, a Scandinavian utopia renowned for its fjords, cuisine, and Norse mythology. Leveraging data from MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and Google Trends, our research team scrutinized the years 2004 to 2020, unearthing a statistically significant correlation coefficient of 0.8334156 (p < 0.05) between the two variables. Our findings not only highlight the magnetism of Nordic nations but also indicate a noteworthy trend of Oklahoman Democrats seeking an escape route to the land of the midnight sun. This paper not only elucidates an interesting social phenomenon but also demonstrates the power of statistical analysis to unveil the unexpected whims and fancies of political constituencies.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

Ladies and gentlemen, distinguished colleagues, and esteemed readers, prepare to be whisked away on a statistical rollercoaster ride through the enigmatic corridors of political behavior and wanderlust. Our voyage begins in the heartland of the United States, where the winds of politics blow across the fields of Oklahoma, and then takes a detour to the majestic land of Norway, where the Northern Lights dance in the skies and the smell of lefse fills the air.

As we embark on this scholarly escapade, we are compelled to investigate the seemingly improbable connection between the Democratic electorate's voting choices for Senators in the great state of Oklahoma and their sudden fascination with all things Nordic, particularly the fervent desire to unravel the mystery of "how to immigrate to Norway" through the venerated oracle of our time, Google.

Now, you might be wondering, what on earth could link Oklahoman Democrats and their urge to traverse the Atlantic to reach the Norwegian shores? Are they seeking a respite from the tumultuous winds of U.S. politics by seeking shelter amidst the fjords and the peaceful coexistence with trolls? Or is there an inexplicable attraction toward the Scandinavian lifestyle, perhaps spurred by the allure of hygge and the promise of free healthcare and education?

Intriguingly, our quest transforms into a rigorous statistical examination of this capricious phenomenon, aiming to discern whether the voting patterns of Democrats in Oklahoma exhibit any discernible relationship with their inclination to turn their virtual compasses toward the icy embrace of Norway. Our statistical journey takes us through the labyrinth of election data, Google search trends, and the sumptuous banquet of correlation analyses, as we seek to unravel the mysteries of this perplexing dalliance between politics and the pursuit of a Nordic idyll.

As we navigate the intriguing waters of this unlikely coupling, prepare to be not only enlightened by the power of statistical inference but also entertained by the unexpected quirks and curiosities that emerge when politics and wanderlust intersect. So, fasten your seatbelts, dear readers, for we are about to embark on an academic odyssey that will showcase the fascinating, and at times whimsical, relationship between politics and the perennial yearning for faraway lands.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Democrat votes for Senators in Oklahoma and Google searches for 'how to immigrate to norway'. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then you might move on to cartoons and children's shows that you watched for research.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Sooner Senators Sway Scandinavia: A Statistical Study of Oklahoma Democrats' Desire to Dash to Denmark, Bypassing Barriers Blatantly

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the intriguing relationship between the voting patterns of Democrats for Senators in the state of Oklahoma and their proclivity to seek information on immigrating to Norway, a Scandinavian utopia renowned for its fjords, cuisine, and Norse mythology. Leveraging data from MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and Google Trends, our research team scrutinized the years 2004 to 2020, unearthing a statistically significant correlation coefficient of 0.8334156 (p < 0.05) between the two variables. Our findings not only highlight the magnetism of Nordic nations but also indicate a noteworthy trend of Oklahoman Democrats seeking an escape route to the land of the midnight sun. This paper not only elucidates an interesting social phenomenon but also demonstrates the power of statistical analysis to unveil the unexpected whims and fancies of political constituencies.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
Ladies and gentlemen, distinguished colleagues, and esteemed readers, prepare to be whisked away on a statistical rollercoaster ride through the enigmatic corridors of political behavior and wanderlust. Our voyage begins in the heartland of the United States, where the winds of politics blow across the fields of Oklahoma, and then takes a detour to the majestic land of Norway, where the Northern Lights dance in the skies and the smell of lefse fills the air.
As we embark on this scholarly escapade, we are compelled to investigate the seemingly improbable connection between the Democratic electorate's voting choices for Senators in the great state of Oklahoma and their sudden fascination with all things Nordic, particularly the fervent desire to unravel the mystery of "how to immigrate to Norway" through the venerated oracle of our time, Google.
Now, you might be wondering, what on earth could link Oklahoman Democrats and their urge to traverse the Atlantic to reach the Norwegian shores? Are they seeking a respite from the tumultuous winds of U.S. politics by seeking shelter amidst the fjords and the peaceful coexistence with trolls? Or is there an inexplicable attraction toward the Scandinavian lifestyle, perhaps spurred by the allure of hygge and the promise of free healthcare and education?
Intriguingly, our quest transforms into a rigorous statistical examination of this capricious phenomenon, aiming to discern whether the voting patterns of Democrats in Oklahoma exhibit any discernible relationship with their inclination to turn their virtual compasses toward the icy embrace of Norway. Our statistical journey takes us through the labyrinth of election data, Google search trends, and the sumptuous banquet of correlation analyses, as we seek to unravel the mysteries of this perplexing dalliance between politics and the pursuit of a Nordic idyll.
As we navigate the intriguing waters of this unlikely coupling, prepare to be not only enlightened by the power of statistical inference but also entertained by the unexpected quirks and curiosities that emerge when politics and wanderlust intersect. So, fasten your seatbelts, dear readers, for we are about to embark on an academic odyssey that will showcase the fascinating, and at times whimsical, relationship between politics and the perennial yearning for faraway lands.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

The enthralling quest to decipher the inexplicable connection between the Democrats' voting preferences in the heartland of Oklahoma and their sudden fascination with immigrating to the fjord-filled utopia of Norway has elicited the scholarly attention of a plethora of researchers in numerous fields. Smith et al. (2015) scrutinized the demographics and political leanings of Oklahomans, shedding light on the intricate tapestry of public opinion and its convergence with regional political dynamics. Meanwhile, Doe and Jones (2018) probed into the underlying factors influencing individuals' propensities to seek international relocation, uncovering a myriad of motivations ranging from economic opportunities to a desire for cultural enrichment.

As we traverse the scholarly landscape, one cannot help but be drawn to seminal works such as "Nordic Dreams: The Allure of Scandinavian Societies" by von Hauge (2017) and "Fjords and Fauna: A Practical Guide to Embracing Norway" by Leifsdottir (2019) for insights into the romanticized appeal of the land of the Northern Lights. While the former provides a comprehensive analysis of the cultural, socio-economic, and political factors driving the allure of Nordic societies, the latter offers a pragmatic roadmap for prospective immigrants seeking to navigate the labyrinthine pathways of international relocation.

In a departure from the traditional academic sources, it is worth noting the unexpected inspiration derived from the realm of fiction. The subtly relevant undertones of escapism and the longing for uncharted territories in authors such as J.R.R. Tolkien's "The Lord of the Rings" and C.S. Lewis's "The Chronicles of Narnia" cannot be overlooked. The allure of fantastical realms and the pursuit of a new beginning parallels the Democrats' yearning for an escape to Norway in the face of political tumult.

Moreover, the authors found unexpected insight from the world of children's television. The prevalence of suffused yearning for adventure and escapism in cartoon classics such as "The Magic School Bus" and "Dora the Explorer" cannot be underestimated. Whether through the whimsical voyages of Ms. Frizzle's magical school bus or Dora's perennial quest to explore uncharted territories, the underlying theme of seeking the unknown resonates with the Democrats' virtual expeditions to unearth the secrets of Norwegian immigration.

In unraveling this enchantingly peculiar saga, our research team has delved into a rich tapestry of scholarly and literary works, transcending conventional boundaries to glean a nuanced understanding of the symbiotic relationship between political proclivities and the allure of distant shores.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Democrat votes for Senators in Oklahoma and Google searches for 'how to immigrate to norway'. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse and Google Trends . You used data from 2004 to 2020

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Sooner Senators Sway Scandinavia: A Statistical Study of Oklahoma Democrats' Desire to Dash to Denmark, Bypassing Barriers Blatantly

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the intriguing relationship between the voting patterns of Democrats for Senators in the state of Oklahoma and their proclivity to seek information on immigrating to Norway, a Scandinavian utopia renowned for its fjords, cuisine, and Norse mythology. Leveraging data from MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and Google Trends, our research team scrutinized the years 2004 to 2020, unearthing a statistically significant correlation coefficient of 0.8334156 (p < 0.05) between the two variables. Our findings not only highlight the magnetism of Nordic nations but also indicate a noteworthy trend of Oklahoman Democrats seeking an escape route to the land of the midnight sun. This paper not only elucidates an interesting social phenomenon but also demonstrates the power of statistical analysis to unveil the unexpected whims and fancies of political constituencies.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
Ladies and gentlemen, distinguished colleagues, and esteemed readers, prepare to be whisked away on a statistical rollercoaster ride through the enigmatic corridors of political behavior and wanderlust. Our voyage begins in the heartland of the United States, where the winds of politics blow across the fields of Oklahoma, and then takes a detour to the majestic land of Norway, where the Northern Lights dance in the skies and the smell of lefse fills the air.
As we embark on this scholarly escapade, we are compelled to investigate the seemingly improbable connection between the Democratic electorate's voting choices for Senators in the great state of Oklahoma and their sudden fascination with all things Nordic, particularly the fervent desire to unravel the mystery of "how to immigrate to Norway" through the venerated oracle of our time, Google.
Now, you might be wondering, what on earth could link Oklahoman Democrats and their urge to traverse the Atlantic to reach the Norwegian shores? Are they seeking a respite from the tumultuous winds of U.S. politics by seeking shelter amidst the fjords and the peaceful coexistence with trolls? Or is there an inexplicable attraction toward the Scandinavian lifestyle, perhaps spurred by the allure of hygge and the promise of free healthcare and education?
Intriguingly, our quest transforms into a rigorous statistical examination of this capricious phenomenon, aiming to discern whether the voting patterns of Democrats in Oklahoma exhibit any discernible relationship with their inclination to turn their virtual compasses toward the icy embrace of Norway. Our statistical journey takes us through the labyrinth of election data, Google search trends, and the sumptuous banquet of correlation analyses, as we seek to unravel the mysteries of this perplexing dalliance between politics and the pursuit of a Nordic idyll.
As we navigate the intriguing waters of this unlikely coupling, prepare to be not only enlightened by the power of statistical inference but also entertained by the unexpected quirks and curiosities that emerge when politics and wanderlust intersect. So, fasten your seatbelts, dear readers, for we are about to embark on an academic odyssey that will showcase the fascinating, and at times whimsical, relationship between politics and the perennial yearning for faraway lands.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To unravel the mystifying connection between the voting behavior of Oklahoma Democrats and their yearning to migrate to Norway, our research team embarked on an exhilarating statistical adventure. Our data hounds scoured the vast expanse of the internet, rummaging through the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and Google Trends, akin to intrepid explorers hunting for statistical treasure amidst the digital wilderness.

The first component of our methodology involved mining the troves of historical election data from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab. We meticulously gathered information on the voting patterns of Democrats for Senators in the state of Oklahoma spanning from 2004 to 2020, constructing a comprehensive timeline of their political choices. This historical excavation allowed us to capture the nuanced ebbs and flows of political allegiance, akin to unraveling the intricate layers of an onion, albeit without the tears.

Simultaneously, in an effort to gauge the unanticipated fascination of Oklahoma Democrats with the Nordic utopia of Norway, we delved into the search query labyrinth of Google Trends. Our intrepid expedition into the realm of digital inquiries involved identifying the search volume for the perplexing phrase "how to immigrate to Norway" within the state of Oklahoma from 2004 to 2020. This peculiar linguistic expedition unveiled the crescendos and diminuendos of Oklahoman inquiries regarding emigrating to the land of fjords and reindeer, akin to deciphering the undulating waves of a statistical siren song.

With our arsenal of data in hand, we unfurled the banner of statistical analysis and embarked on a journey of correlation exploration. Employing the venerable tools of correlation coefficients, we sought to disentangle the potential relationship between the voting patterns of Oklahoma Democrats and their yearning to venture into the Nordic panorama. Our statistical compass guided us through the tumultuous seas of hypothesis testing, leading to the unearthing of a tantalizingly robust correlation coefficient of 0.8334156, adorned with the illustrious seal of statistical significance (p < 0.05).

In essence, our research methodology marries the dance of data retrieval with the art of statistical investigation, yielding a captivating narrative of the improbable dalliance between political proclivities and the allure of distant shores. Our approach not only illuminates the hidden connections between seemingly disparate phenomena but also showcases the whimsical surprises that await those who dare to traverse the uncharted territories of statistical inquiry.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Democrat votes for Senators in Oklahoma and Google searches for 'how to immigrate to norway'. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse and Google Trends .

For the time period 2004 to 2020, you found a correlation 0.8334156, r-squared of 0.6945816, and p < 0.05.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Sooner Senators Sway Scandinavia: A Statistical Study of Oklahoma Democrats' Desire to Dash to Denmark, Bypassing Barriers Blatantly

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the intriguing relationship between the voting patterns of Democrats for Senators in the state of Oklahoma and their proclivity to seek information on immigrating to Norway, a Scandinavian utopia renowned for its fjords, cuisine, and Norse mythology. Leveraging data from MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and Google Trends, our research team scrutinized the years 2004 to 2020, unearthing a statistically significant correlation coefficient of 0.8334156 (p < 0.05) between the two variables. Our findings not only highlight the magnetism of Nordic nations but also indicate a noteworthy trend of Oklahoman Democrats seeking an escape route to the land of the midnight sun. This paper not only elucidates an interesting social phenomenon but also demonstrates the power of statistical analysis to unveil the unexpected whims and fancies of political constituencies.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
Ladies and gentlemen, distinguished colleagues, and esteemed readers, prepare to be whisked away on a statistical rollercoaster ride through the enigmatic corridors of political behavior and wanderlust. Our voyage begins in the heartland of the United States, where the winds of politics blow across the fields of Oklahoma, and then takes a detour to the majestic land of Norway, where the Northern Lights dance in the skies and the smell of lefse fills the air.
As we embark on this scholarly escapade, we are compelled to investigate the seemingly improbable connection between the Democratic electorate's voting choices for Senators in the great state of Oklahoma and their sudden fascination with all things Nordic, particularly the fervent desire to unravel the mystery of "how to immigrate to Norway" through the venerated oracle of our time, Google.
Now, you might be wondering, what on earth could link Oklahoman Democrats and their urge to traverse the Atlantic to reach the Norwegian shores? Are they seeking a respite from the tumultuous winds of U.S. politics by seeking shelter amidst the fjords and the peaceful coexistence with trolls? Or is there an inexplicable attraction toward the Scandinavian lifestyle, perhaps spurred by the allure of hygge and the promise of free healthcare and education?
Intriguingly, our quest transforms into a rigorous statistical examination of this capricious phenomenon, aiming to discern whether the voting patterns of Democrats in Oklahoma exhibit any discernible relationship with their inclination to turn their virtual compasses toward the icy embrace of Norway. Our statistical journey takes us through the labyrinth of election data, Google search trends, and the sumptuous banquet of correlation analyses, as we seek to unravel the mysteries of this perplexing dalliance between politics and the pursuit of a Nordic idyll.
As we navigate the intriguing waters of this unlikely coupling, prepare to be not only enlightened by the power of statistical inference but also entertained by the unexpected quirks and curiosities that emerge when politics and wanderlust intersect. So, fasten your seatbelts, dear readers, for we are about to embark on an academic odyssey that will showcase the fascinating, and at times whimsical, relationship between politics and the perennial yearning for faraway lands.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

Intriguingly, our analysis revealed a robust and statistically significant correlation between the voting behavior of Democrats for Senators in the state of Oklahoma and their online exploration of "how to immigrate to Norway." The correlation coefficient of 0.8334156, with an r-squared of 0.6945816 and p < 0.05, unveils a compelling association that prompts us to ponder the duality of political engagement and global wanderlust.

To visually capture the undeniable allure of Nordic aspirations amongst Oklahoman Democrats, we present Figure 1, a scatterplot that graphically depicts the strong correlation between these two seemingly disparate variables. As you gaze upon this figure, let your imagination roam across the wheat fields of Oklahoma, adorned with the colors of electoral fervor, and then soar across the North Sea to the emerald landscapes of Norway, where fjords and reindeer await the arrival of those dreaming of a Nordic haven.

The compelling statistical evidence we have unearthed not only underscores the magnetic pull of Scandinavia but also highlights the whimsical charm of political proclivities. It appears that amidst the tumultuous landscape of modern politics, there exists a latent aspiration among a segment of the electorate in Oklahoma to seek sanctuary amidst the fjords and auroras of Norway. This unlikely pairing of political allegiance and Transatlantic yearning paints a colorful portrait of the human spirit, echoing the age-old sentiment that, indeed, the grass may appear greener on the other side - especially if that grass is nestled beneath the Northern Lights.

Our findings not only add a delightful twist to the tapestry of political science but also shed light on the unexpected connections that emerge when statistical analysis meets the vagaries of human desires. It is through the lens of data-driven inquiry that we uncover not only the hitherto unseen patterns but also the delightful idiosyncrasies that underpin the multifaceted nature of societal yearnings.

As we conclude this riveting expedition into the intertwining realms of politics and wanderlust, we invite our esteemed colleagues to ponder the profound implications of our findings, and perhaps, to mull over their own hypothetical dalliance with the idea of immigrating to Norway. After all, who can resist the allure of the Norwegian fjords and the promise of a political landscape free from partisan squabbles?


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Democrat votes for Senators in Oklahoma and Google searches for 'how to immigrate to norway'. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
Sooner Senators Sway Scandinavia: A Statistical Study of Oklahoma Democrats' Desire to Dash to Denmark, Bypassing Barriers Blatantly

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the intriguing relationship between the voting patterns of Democrats for Senators in the state of Oklahoma and their proclivity to seek information on immigrating to Norway, a Scandinavian utopia renowned for its fjords, cuisine, and Norse mythology. Leveraging data from MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and Google Trends, our research team scrutinized the years 2004 to 2020, unearthing a statistically significant correlation coefficient of 0.8334156 (p < 0.05) between the two variables. Our findings not only highlight the magnetism of Nordic nations but also indicate a noteworthy trend of Oklahoman Democrats seeking an escape route to the land of the midnight sun. This paper not only elucidates an interesting social phenomenon but also demonstrates the power of statistical analysis to unveil the unexpected whims and fancies of political constituencies.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The enthralling quest to decipher the inexplicable connection between the Democrats' voting preferences in the heartland of Oklahoma and their sudden fascination with immigrating to the fjord-filled utopia of Norway has elicited the scholarly attention of a plethora of researchers in numerous fields. Smith et al. (2015) scrutinized the demographics and political leanings of Oklahomans, shedding light on the intricate tapestry of public opinion and its convergence with regional political dynamics. Meanwhile, Doe and Jones (2018) probed into the underlying factors influencing individuals' propensities to seek international relocation, uncovering a myriad of motivations ranging from economic opportunities to a desire for cultural enrichment.
As we traverse the scholarly landscape, one cannot help but be drawn to seminal works such as "Nordic Dreams: The Allure of Scandinavian Societies" by von Hauge (2017) and "Fjords and Fauna: A Practical Guide to Embracing Norway" by Leifsdottir (2019) for insights into the romanticized appeal of the land of the Northern Lights. While the former provides a comprehensive analysis of the cultural, socio-economic, and political factors driving the allure of Nordic societies, the latter offers a pragmatic roadmap for prospective immigrants seeking to navigate the labyrinthine pathways of international relocation.
In a departure from the traditional academic sources, it is worth noting the unexpected inspiration derived from the realm of fiction. The subtly relevant undertones of escapism and the longing for uncharted territories in authors such as J.R.R. Tolkien's "The Lord of the Rings" and C.S. Lewis's "The Chronicles of Narnia" cannot be overlooked. The allure of fantastical realms and the pursuit of a new beginning parallels the Democrats' yearning for an escape to Norway in the face of political tumult.
Moreover, the authors found unexpected insight from the world of children's television. The prevalence of suffused yearning for adventure and escapism in cartoon classics such as "The Magic School Bus" and "Dora the Explorer" cannot be underestimated. Whether through the whimsical voyages of Ms. Frizzle's magical school bus or Dora's perennial quest to explore uncharted territories, the underlying theme of seeking the unknown resonates with the Democrats' virtual expeditions to unearth the secrets of Norwegian immigration.
In unraveling this enchantingly peculiar saga, our research team has delved into a rich tapestry of scholarly and literary works, transcending conventional boundaries to glean a nuanced understanding of the symbiotic relationship between political proclivities and the allure of distant shores.

[[RESULTS]]
Intriguingly, our analysis revealed a robust and statistically significant correlation between the voting behavior of Democrats for Senators in the state of Oklahoma and their online exploration of "how to immigrate to Norway." The correlation coefficient of 0.8334156, with an r-squared of 0.6945816 and p < 0.05, unveils a compelling association that prompts us to ponder the duality of political engagement and global wanderlust.
To visually capture the undeniable allure of Nordic aspirations amongst Oklahoman Democrats, we present Figure 1, a scatterplot that graphically depicts the strong correlation between these two seemingly disparate variables. As you gaze upon this figure, let your imagination roam across the wheat fields of Oklahoma, adorned with the colors of electoral fervor, and then soar across the North Sea to the emerald landscapes of Norway, where fjords and reindeer await the arrival of those dreaming of a Nordic haven.
The compelling statistical evidence we have unearthed not only underscores the magnetic pull of Scandinavia but also highlights the whimsical charm of political proclivities. It appears that amidst the tumultuous landscape of modern politics, there exists a latent aspiration among a segment of the electorate in Oklahoma to seek sanctuary amidst the fjords and auroras of Norway. This unlikely pairing of political allegiance and Transatlantic yearning paints a colorful portrait of the human spirit, echoing the age-old sentiment that, indeed, the grass may appear greener on the other side - especially if that grass is nestled beneath the Northern Lights.
Our findings not only add a delightful twist to the tapestry of political science but also shed light on the unexpected connections that emerge when statistical analysis meets the vagaries of human desires. It is through the lens of data-driven inquiry that we uncover not only the hitherto unseen patterns but also the delightful idiosyncrasies that underpin the multifaceted nature of societal yearnings.
As we conclude this riveting expedition into the intertwining realms of politics and wanderlust, we invite our esteemed colleagues to ponder the profound implications of our findings, and perhaps, to mull over their own hypothetical dalliance with the idea of immigrating to Norway. After all, who can resist the allure of the Norwegian fjords and the promise of a political landscape free from partisan squabbles?

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The correlation we uncovered between the voting behavior of Democrats for Senators in Oklahoma and their curiosity about immigrating to Norway is, without a shadow of a fjord, a striking revelation. Our findings waltz in tune with prior research that delved into the allure of Nordic societies and the yearning for international relocation. Smith et al.’s scrutiny of demographics and political leanings in Oklahoma hints at the nuanced tapestry of public opinion, mirroring our own quest to unravel the mystical ties between Oklahoma Democrats and the seductive pull of Norway. It seems that the call of the North resonates deeply with segments of the Oklahoma electorate, much like a siren song drawing sailors to their fate.

Moreover, the unexpected sources of inspiration from fiction and children's television, while seemingly whimsical, indeed hint at the universal undercurrent of escapism and the longing for uncharted territories that intertwine with the Democrats' virtual voyages to explore the intricacies of Norwegian immigration. The subtle echoes of longing for new beginnings in J.R.R. Tolkien's "The Lord of the Rings" and C.S. Lewis's "The Chronicles of Narnia" surreptitiously align with the Democrats' desire for an escape to Norway in the midst of political upheaval. Similarly, the whimsical voyages of Ms. Frizzle's magical school bus and Dora the Explorer's unyielding quest to uncover uncharted territories invoke the same yearning for adventure and new experiences that drive the virtual expeditions of our intrepid Oklahoma Democrats.

In essence, our results amplify and corroborate the line of inquiry from the literature review, revealing an unanticipated and intriguing connection between political leanings and the desire to emigrate to Norway. The statistical robustness of our findings not only underscores the allure of Scandinavia but also illustrates the whimsical charm of political proclivities. It leaves us pondering the enigmatic forces at play, evoking images of Democrats in Oklahoma gazing wistfully at posters of majestic Norwegian fjords while casting their votes amidst the windswept plains of the Sooner State.

As we beckon our esteemed colleagues to contemplate the implications of our findings, we are reminded of the words of Robert Frost: “Two roads diverged in a wood, and I – I took the one less traveled by." Perhaps, in the case of our intrepid Oklahoma Democrats, the road to Oslo, with its promise of fjords and reindeer, beckoned louder than we could have imagined.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Democrat votes for Senators in Oklahoma and Google searches for 'how to immigrate to norway'. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
Sooner Senators Sway Scandinavia: A Statistical Study of Oklahoma Democrats' Desire to Dash to Denmark, Bypassing Barriers Blatantly

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the intriguing relationship between the voting patterns of Democrats for Senators in the state of Oklahoma and their proclivity to seek information on immigrating to Norway, a Scandinavian utopia renowned for its fjords, cuisine, and Norse mythology. Leveraging data from MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and Google Trends, our research team scrutinized the years 2004 to 2020, unearthing a statistically significant correlation coefficient of 0.8334156 (p < 0.05) between the two variables. Our findings not only highlight the magnetism of Nordic nations but also indicate a noteworthy trend of Oklahoman Democrats seeking an escape route to the land of the midnight sun. This paper not only elucidates an interesting social phenomenon but also demonstrates the power of statistical analysis to unveil the unexpected whims and fancies of political constituencies.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
Ladies and gentlemen, distinguished colleagues, and esteemed readers, prepare to be whisked away on a statistical rollercoaster ride through the enigmatic corridors of political behavior and wanderlust. Our voyage begins in the heartland of the United States, where the winds of politics blow across the fields of Oklahoma, and then takes a detour to the majestic land of Norway, where the Northern Lights dance in the skies and the smell of lefse fills the air.
As we embark on this scholarly escapade, we are compelled to investigate the seemingly improbable connection between the Democratic electorate's voting choices for Senators in the great state of Oklahoma and their sudden fascination with all things Nordic, particularly the fervent desire to unravel the mystery of "how to immigrate to Norway" through the venerated oracle of our time, Google.
Now, you might be wondering, what on earth could link Oklahoman Democrats and their urge to traverse the Atlantic to reach the Norwegian shores? Are they seeking a respite from the tumultuous winds of U.S. politics by seeking shelter amidst the fjords and the peaceful coexistence with trolls? Or is there an inexplicable attraction toward the Scandinavian lifestyle, perhaps spurred by the allure of hygge and the promise of free healthcare and education?
Intriguingly, our quest transforms into a rigorous statistical examination of this capricious phenomenon, aiming to discern whether the voting patterns of Democrats in Oklahoma exhibit any discernible relationship with their inclination to turn their virtual compasses toward the icy embrace of Norway. Our statistical journey takes us through the labyrinth of election data, Google search trends, and the sumptuous banquet of correlation analyses, as we seek to unravel the mysteries of this perplexing dalliance between politics and the pursuit of a Nordic idyll.
As we navigate the intriguing waters of this unlikely coupling, prepare to be not only enlightened by the power of statistical inference but also entertained by the unexpected quirks and curiosities that emerge when politics and wanderlust intersect. So, fasten your seatbelts, dear readers, for we are about to embark on an academic odyssey that will showcase the fascinating, and at times whimsical, relationship between politics and the perennial yearning for faraway lands.

[[RESULTS]]
Intriguingly, our analysis revealed a robust and statistically significant correlation between the voting behavior of Democrats for Senators in the state of Oklahoma and their online exploration of "how to immigrate to Norway." The correlation coefficient of 0.8334156, with an r-squared of 0.6945816 and p < 0.05, unveils a compelling association that prompts us to ponder the duality of political engagement and global wanderlust.
To visually capture the undeniable allure of Nordic aspirations amongst Oklahoman Democrats, we present Figure 1, a scatterplot that graphically depicts the strong correlation between these two seemingly disparate variables. As you gaze upon this figure, let your imagination roam across the wheat fields of Oklahoma, adorned with the colors of electoral fervor, and then soar across the North Sea to the emerald landscapes of Norway, where fjords and reindeer await the arrival of those dreaming of a Nordic haven.
The compelling statistical evidence we have unearthed not only underscores the magnetic pull of Scandinavia but also highlights the whimsical charm of political proclivities. It appears that amidst the tumultuous landscape of modern politics, there exists a latent aspiration among a segment of the electorate in Oklahoma to seek sanctuary amidst the fjords and auroras of Norway. This unlikely pairing of political allegiance and Transatlantic yearning paints a colorful portrait of the human spirit, echoing the age-old sentiment that, indeed, the grass may appear greener on the other side - especially if that grass is nestled beneath the Northern Lights.
Our findings not only add a delightful twist to the tapestry of political science but also shed light on the unexpected connections that emerge when statistical analysis meets the vagaries of human desires. It is through the lens of data-driven inquiry that we uncover not only the hitherto unseen patterns but also the delightful idiosyncrasies that underpin the multifaceted nature of societal yearnings.
As we conclude this riveting expedition into the intertwining realms of politics and wanderlust, we invite our esteemed colleagues to ponder the profound implications of our findings, and perhaps, to mull over their own hypothetical dalliance with the idea of immigrating to Norway. After all, who can resist the allure of the Norwegian fjords and the promise of a political landscape free from partisan squabbles?

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our research has uncovered a captivating correlation between the voting tendencies of Democrats in Oklahoma and their penchant for exploring the realms of Nordic immigration, akin to a political journey of "From Oklahoma to Oslo." Our statistically significant findings not only shed light on the unexpected allure of Scandinavia but also provide a whimsical reminder of the human spirit's proclivity for wanderlust, even amidst the political maelstrom.

As we bid adieu to this comical escapade into the statistical symphony of Scandinavian dreams, it is evident that the allure of the fjords and the enchanting prospect of crossing the political spectrum to reach the verdant lands of Norway have captivated the hearts and minds of some Oklahoman Democrats. Our findings serve as a delightful reminder that, in the grand tapestry of statistical inquiry, even the unlikeliest of correlations can emerge from the woodwork, much like a mischievous gnome from the Norwegian forests.

However, as we polished our conclusions like the fjord-kissed pebbles of a Scandinavian shoreline, it became evident that further research in this domain may yield diminishing returns, much like expecting the Northern Lights to perform an encore late into the Arctic night. While the temptation to embark on further statistical journeys into the nexus of political allegiance and transcontinental yearning is undeniable, it is our scholarly duty to recognize that, in the realm of statistical quirks, we have struck oil, or rather, discovered a cache of lutefisk in the data mines of the Oklahoma-Norway connection.

Hence, we assert with statistical confidence that no more research is needed in this area, and instead, we encourage our esteemed peers to join us in raising a virtual toast with akvavit to the unpredictability and amusement that statistical inquiry can unravel, particularly when it ventures beyond the realms of mundane association. Let us cherish the delightful correlation we have unveiled, for it is like a rare Northern Lights display, a statistical marvel in the tapestry of political curiosities. Cheers to the wondrous world of statistics, where even the most unexpected pairings can emerge like a statistical unicorn amidst the data forests!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Sooner Senators Sway Scandinavia: A Statistical Study of Oklahoma Democrats' Desire to Dash to Denmark, Bypassing Barriers Blatantly. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Political Whimsy


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Sooner Senators Sway Scandinavia: A Statistical Study of Oklahoma Democrats' Desire to Dash to Denmark, Bypassing Barriers Blatantly. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Institute for Transcontinental Transitions and Territorial Trends


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Sooner Senators Sway Scandinavia: A Statistical Study of Oklahoma Democrats' Desire to Dash to Denmark, Bypassing Barriers Blatantly with an abstract of This study delves into the intriguing relationship between the voting patterns of Democrats for Senators in the state of Oklahoma and their proclivity to seek information on immigrating to Norway, a Scandinavian utopia renowned for its fjords, cuisine, and Norse mythology. Leveraging data from MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and Google Trends, our research team scrutinized the years 2004 to 2020, unearthing a statistically significant correlation coefficient of 0.8334156 (p < 0.05) between the two variables. Our findings not only highlight the magnetism of Nordic nations but also indicate a noteworthy trend of Oklahoman Democrats seeking an escape route to the land of the midnight sun. This paper not only elucidates an interesting social phenomenon but also demonstrates the power of statistical analysis to unveil the unexpected whims and fancies of political constituencies.

ChatGPT:

Oklahoma Democrats, Senators voting patterns, Scandinavia immigration, Norway immigration, Oklahoma voters, Nordic nations, immigration trends, Oklahoma political constituency, voting behavior, statistical analysis, MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, Google Trends, correlation coefficient, political whims and fancies

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Votes for Democratic Senators in Oklahoma
Detailed data title: Total number of votes cast for Federal Democrat Senate candidates in Oklahoma
Source: MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse
See what else correlates with Votes for Democratic Senators in Oklahoma

Google searches for 'how to immigrate to norway'
Detailed data title: Relative volume of Google searches for 'how to immigrate to norway' (Worldwide, without quotes)
Source: Google Trends
Additional Info: Relative search volume (not absolute numbers)

See what else correlates with Google searches for 'how to immigrate to norway'

Correlation r = 0.8334156 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.6945816 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 69.5% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Google searches for 'how to immigrate to norway') is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Votes for Democratic Senators in Oklahoma) over the 6 years from 2004 through 2020.

p < 0.05, which statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 0.039. 0.0393141322223927300000000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.83 in 3.9% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 25 random variables Which I absolutely did.
with the same 5 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 5 because we have two variables measured over a period of 6 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.07, 0.98 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
200420082010201420162020
Votes for Democratic Senators in Oklahoma (Total votes)596750527736265814472230355911509763
Google searches for 'how to immigrate to norway' (Rel. search volume)15.66677.416672.333336.083336.758.41667




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Very low n: There are not many data points included in this analysis. Even if the p-value is high, we should be suspicious of using so few datapoints in a correlation.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([596750,527736,265814,472230,355911,509763,])
array_2 = np.array([15.6667,7.41667,2.33333,6.08333,6.75,8.41667,])
array_1_name = "Votes for Democratic Senators in Oklahoma"
array_2_name = "Google searches for 'how to immigrate to norway'"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Big thanks for reviewing!


Correlation ID: 4486 · Black Variable ID: 26299 · Red Variable ID: 1351
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0