Download png, svg
AI explanation
As the name Thaddeus gained popularity, more and more people couldn't help but associate it with the image of a sophisticated philosopher. This subconscious connection led to a surge in interest in political ideologies, prompting a notable increase in support for the Libertarian candidate among the intellectually-inclined population of Washington. It seems like Thaddeus was unwittingly paving the way for a politico-philosophical revolution!Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Prompt: Generate an image inspired by the meme style, depicting a busy downtown Washington square filled with intellectuals and free-thinkers. Capture the crowd casting their ballots with the name Thaddeus gaining popularity among parents. As the name is whispered, visualize wise philosophers appearing in the scene. Reflect the rising vote count for the Libertarian candidate and the spark of interest in political ideologies. Make the association of Thaddeus with intellectual curiosity and philosophical musings prominent in the image. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Popularity of the first name Thaddeus and Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Washington. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: A comic-book-style illustration with muted colors and a dotted halftone pattern from the 1960s A scene from Skyrim Cubism a meme a meme
ChatGPT: A meme
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Popularity of the first name Thaddeus and Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Washington, in the following situation: As the name Thaddeus gained popularity, more and more people couldn't help but associate it with the image of a sophisticated philosopher. This subconscious connection led to a surge in interest in political ideologies, prompting a notable increase in support for the Libertarian candidate among the intellectually-inclined population of Washington. It seems like Thaddeus was unwittingly paving the way for a politico-philosophical revolution!. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In downtown Washington, a gathering of intellectuals and free-thinkers filled the square. The name Thaddeus appeared more and more on the ballot papers, as the people's choice for their child's name, and it seemed to be whispered on the wind throughout the crowd. Each time it was spoken, an image of a wise philosopher appeared. And as the ballots were cast, the Libertarian candidate's vote count rose, and a wave of interest in political ideologies swept through the crowd, sparked by the growing association of Thaddeus with intellectual curiosity and philosophical musings.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ A meme ] and depicting this scene: In downtown Washington, a gathering of intellectuals and free-thinkers filled the square. The name Thaddeus appeared more and more on the ballot papers, as the people's choice for their child's name, and it seemed to be whispered on the wind throughout the crowd. Each time it was spoken, an image of a wise philosopher appeared. And as the ballots were cast, the Libertarian candidate's vote count rose, and a wave of interest in political ideologies swept through the crowd, sparked by the growing association of Thaddeus with intellectual curiosity and philosophical musings. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Prompt: Generate an image inspired by the meme style, depicting a busy downtown Washington square filled with intellectuals and free-thinkers. Capture the crowd casting their ballots with the name Thaddeus gaining popularity among parents. As the name is whispered, visualize wise philosophers appearing in the scene. Reflect the rising vote count for the Libertarian candidate and the spark of interest in political ideologies. Make the association of Thaddeus with intellectual curiosity and philosophical musings prominent in the image.
*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.
I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how increases in Popularity of the first name Thaddeus positively influenced Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Washington.
AI academic paper
The Thaddeus Effect: Examining the Relationship Between Name Popularity and Political Leanings in Washington State The Journal of Quirky Social Patterns Jan 2024 Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real! |
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Thaddeus and Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Washington. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.
Make the title seem clever.
Your research team used data from US Social Security Administration and MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9022705 and p < 0.01 for 1976 to 2020.
Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)
[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit
[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit
ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
"The Thaddeus Effect: Examining the Relationship Between Name Popularity and Political Leanings in Washington State"
[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the intriguing connection between the prevalence of the first name "Thaddeus" and voting patterns for the Libertarian presidential candidate in the state of Washington. Utilizing data from the US Social Security Administration and the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, our research team conducted an extensive examination spanning the years 1976 to 2020. Employing rigorous statistical analysis, we uncovered a surprisingly robust correlation coefficient of 0.9022705 and a significance level of p < 0.01.
The implications of these findings are not to be scoffed at, as they add a whimsical twist to the often austere field of political research. The Thaddeus effect, as we endearingly refer to it, unveils a fascinating interplay between seemingly unrelated domains. Is there truly something special about the name Thaddeus that aligns it with libertarian ideals? Or is this mere serendipity disguised as statistical significance? Our study highlights the need for further investigations into this enigmatic phenomenon, underscoring the notion that in the complex realm of human behavior, even the most unassuming factors may hold unexpected sway.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Thaddeus and Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Washington. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.
Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"The Thaddeus Effect: Examining the Relationship Between Name Popularity and Political Leanings in Washington State"
[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the intriguing connection between the prevalence of the first name "Thaddeus" and voting patterns for the Libertarian presidential candidate in the state of Washington. Utilizing data from the US Social Security Administration and the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, our research team conducted an extensive examination spanning the years 1976 to 2020. Employing rigorous statistical analysis, we uncovered a surprisingly robust correlation coefficient of 0.9022705 and a significance level of p < 0.01.
The implications of these findings are not to be scoffed at, as they add a whimsical twist to the often austere field of political research. The Thaddeus effect, as we endearingly refer to it, unveils a fascinating interplay between seemingly unrelated domains. Is there truly something special about the name Thaddeus that aligns it with libertarian ideals? Or is this mere serendipity disguised as statistical significance? Our study highlights the need for further investigations into this enigmatic phenomenon, underscoring the notion that in the complex realm of human behavior, even the most unassuming factors may hold unexpected sway.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The relationship between individual names and political preferences has long been an area of interest for researchers seeking to unravel the subtleties of human behavior. While the field of political science often grapples with weighty matters of policy and ideology, the peculiar influence of nomenclature on electoral choices has remained an underexplored terrain. In this context, the present study sets out to investigate the quirkily named "Thaddeus" effect and its intriguing association with voting patterns for the Libertarian presidential candidate in the state of Washington.
Naming trends have fascinated scholars and laypeople alike, from the ebb and flow of popular baby names to the staying power of classics. It is as if the endless possibilities in the baby name book can foretell the proclivities and predispositions of the individuals who bear them. Rarely, however, have researchers endeavored to connect the dots between the popularity of a particular name and its consonance with political leanings. As such, the Thaddeus effect stands as a distinctly curious anomaly that beckons us to peer beyond the expected contours of political allegiances.
Our quest to unravel the Thaddeus effect led us to peruse copious volumes of data, panning through the annals of the US Social Security Administration's name records and the labyrinthine corridors of the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse. Our meticulous analysis uncovered a remarkably robust correlation coefficient of 0.9022705, sighting our statistical significance at p < 0.01. Perhaps even more astonishing was the realization that the prevalence of the name Thaddeus seemed to walk hand in hand with votes for the Libertarian candidate, painting a whimsically unexpected picture of interconnectedness.
As we delve deeper into the ramifications of the Thaddeus effect, we are reminded that research often unearths the most surprising juxtapositions. Our study seeks not only to shed light on the idiosyncratic link between name popularity and political affiliations but also to inject a dash of levity and curiosity into the staid corridors of political science. The Thaddeus effect, with its peculiar charm, invites us to question the infinite nuances that shape the human landscape, beckoning us to ponder the delightful mysteries that lurk behind the veneer of statistical analysis and numerical precision.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Thaddeus and Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Washington. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.
Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.
Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.
Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Perhaps you also got inspiration from some board games that are vaugely related.
Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"The Thaddeus Effect: Examining the Relationship Between Name Popularity and Political Leanings in Washington State"
[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the intriguing connection between the prevalence of the first name "Thaddeus" and voting patterns for the Libertarian presidential candidate in the state of Washington. Utilizing data from the US Social Security Administration and the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, our research team conducted an extensive examination spanning the years 1976 to 2020. Employing rigorous statistical analysis, we uncovered a surprisingly robust correlation coefficient of 0.9022705 and a significance level of p < 0.01.
The implications of these findings are not to be scoffed at, as they add a whimsical twist to the often austere field of political research. The Thaddeus effect, as we endearingly refer to it, unveils a fascinating interplay between seemingly unrelated domains. Is there truly something special about the name Thaddeus that aligns it with libertarian ideals? Or is this mere serendipity disguised as statistical significance? Our study highlights the need for further investigations into this enigmatic phenomenon, underscoring the notion that in the complex realm of human behavior, even the most unassuming factors may hold unexpected sway.
-------
And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The relationship between individual names and political preferences has long been an area of interest for researchers seeking to unravel the subtleties of human behavior. While the field of political science often grapples with weighty matters of policy and ideology, the peculiar influence of nomenclature on electoral choices has remained an underexplored terrain. In this context, the present study sets out to investigate the quirkily named "Thaddeus" effect and its intriguing association with voting patterns for the Libertarian presidential candidate in the state of Washington.
Naming trends have fascinated scholars and laypeople alike, from the ebb and flow of popular baby names to the staying power of classics. It is as if the endless possibilities in the baby name book can foretell the proclivities and predispositions of the individuals who bear them. Rarely, however, have researchers endeavored to connect the dots between the popularity of a particular name and its consonance with political leanings. As such, the Thaddeus effect stands as a distinctly curious anomaly that beckons us to peer beyond the expected contours of political allegiances.
Our quest to unravel the Thaddeus effect led us to peruse copious volumes of data, panning through the annals of the US Social Security Administration's name records and the labyrinthine corridors of the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse. Our meticulous analysis uncovered a remarkably robust correlation coefficient of 0.9022705, sighting our statistical significance at p < 0.01. Perhaps even more astonishing was the realization that the prevalence of the name Thaddeus seemed to walk hand in hand with votes for the Libertarian candidate, painting a whimsically unexpected picture of interconnectedness.
As we delve deeper into the ramifications of the Thaddeus effect, we are reminded that research often unearths the most surprising juxtapositions. Our study seeks not only to shed light on the idiosyncratic link between name popularity and political affiliations but also to inject a dash of levity and curiosity into the staid corridors of political science. The Thaddeus effect, with its peculiar charm, invites us to question the infinite nuances that shape the human landscape, beckoning us to ponder the delightful mysteries that lurk behind the veneer of statistical analysis and numerical precision.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The study of the influence of names on human behavior has a long and storied tradition, dating back to the seminal work of Smith and Doe in "The Name Game: Exploring the Intriguing Interplay of Nomenclature and Behavior." While much of the research in this area has focused on the broader implications of names on societal perceptions and individual experiences, a handful of studies have ventured into the realm of political preferences. Jones, in "Naming Politics: An Examination of the Subtle Nuances of Individual Names and Political Leanings," delves into the curious confluence of nomenclature and ideology, setting the stage for our exploration of the Thaddeus effect.
Turning to the quirkily delightful world of baby names, popular non-fiction works such as "Freakonomics: A Rogue Economist Explores the Hidden Side of Everything" by Steven D. Levitt and Stephen J. Dubner, and "The Baby Name Wizard: A Magical Method for Finding the Perfect Name for Your Baby" by Laura Wattenberg, have captivated readers with their insights into the enigmatic realm of naming conventions. Additionally, the works of fiction, such as Aldous Huxley's "Brave New World" and George Orwell's "1984," with their explorations of society and individual identity, provide an unconventional lens through which to contemplate the intersecting domains of names and political inclinations.
In the realm of games, the classic board game "Scrabble" offers a lighthearted perspective on the significance of individual letters and their influence on language. The game "Codenames," known for its clever word associations and hidden connections, adds a playful touch to the consideration of the mysterious interplay between names and human behaviors.
As we navigate through the eddies of prior research and diverse literary inspirations, we endeavor to shed light on the unexpected association between the prevalence of the first name Thaddeus and votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in the state of Washington. The Thaddeus effect, with its whimsical allure, serves as a testament to the delightful mysteries that underlie the unassuming factors shaping our political landscape.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Thaddeus and Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Washington. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.
Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from US Social Security Administration and MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse . You used data from 1976 to 2020
Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.
Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"The Thaddeus Effect: Examining the Relationship Between Name Popularity and Political Leanings in Washington State"
[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the intriguing connection between the prevalence of the first name "Thaddeus" and voting patterns for the Libertarian presidential candidate in the state of Washington. Utilizing data from the US Social Security Administration and the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, our research team conducted an extensive examination spanning the years 1976 to 2020. Employing rigorous statistical analysis, we uncovered a surprisingly robust correlation coefficient of 0.9022705 and a significance level of p < 0.01.
The implications of these findings are not to be scoffed at, as they add a whimsical twist to the often austere field of political research. The Thaddeus effect, as we endearingly refer to it, unveils a fascinating interplay between seemingly unrelated domains. Is there truly something special about the name Thaddeus that aligns it with libertarian ideals? Or is this mere serendipity disguised as statistical significance? Our study highlights the need for further investigations into this enigmatic phenomenon, underscoring the notion that in the complex realm of human behavior, even the most unassuming factors may hold unexpected sway.
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The relationship between individual names and political preferences has long been an area of interest for researchers seeking to unravel the subtleties of human behavior. While the field of political science often grapples with weighty matters of policy and ideology, the peculiar influence of nomenclature on electoral choices has remained an underexplored terrain. In this context, the present study sets out to investigate the quirkily named "Thaddeus" effect and its intriguing association with voting patterns for the Libertarian presidential candidate in the state of Washington.
Naming trends have fascinated scholars and laypeople alike, from the ebb and flow of popular baby names to the staying power of classics. It is as if the endless possibilities in the baby name book can foretell the proclivities and predispositions of the individuals who bear them. Rarely, however, have researchers endeavored to connect the dots between the popularity of a particular name and its consonance with political leanings. As such, the Thaddeus effect stands as a distinctly curious anomaly that beckons us to peer beyond the expected contours of political allegiances.
Our quest to unravel the Thaddeus effect led us to peruse copious volumes of data, panning through the annals of the US Social Security Administration's name records and the labyrinthine corridors of the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse. Our meticulous analysis uncovered a remarkably robust correlation coefficient of 0.9022705, sighting our statistical significance at p < 0.01. Perhaps even more astonishing was the realization that the prevalence of the name Thaddeus seemed to walk hand in hand with votes for the Libertarian candidate, painting a whimsically unexpected picture of interconnectedness.
As we delve deeper into the ramifications of the Thaddeus effect, we are reminded that research often unearths the most surprising juxtapositions. Our study seeks not only to shed light on the idiosyncratic link between name popularity and political affiliations but also to inject a dash of levity and curiosity into the staid corridors of political science. The Thaddeus effect, with its peculiar charm, invites us to question the infinite nuances that shape the human landscape, beckoning us to ponder the delightful mysteries that lurk behind the veneer of statistical analysis and numerical precision.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
ChatGPT:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
To explore the captivating correlation between the prominence of the moniker "Thaddeus" and voting tendencies for the Libertarian presidential candidate in the state of Washington, our research team embarked on a comically convoluted journey through the labyrinth of data analysis. We harnessed the data repositories of the US Social Security Administration and the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, casting our statistical net over the years 1976 to 2020 – a period characterized by disco, digital transformation, and a deluge of captivating baby names.
Our first step involved gazing deeply into the annals of the US Social Security Administration's name records, distilling the numerical tapestry of first names into an ocean of Thaddeuses and non-Thaddeuses. We then proceeded to fish for electoral insights within the tumultuous seas of the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, searching for the libertarian voting patterns that would reveal if Thaddeus carried the torch for individual freedom and political maverickery.
In synthesizing these disparate strands of data, we employed rigorous statistical analyses, referencing a menagerie of mathematical beasts such as correlation coefficients, significance levels, and perhaps even a sprinkle of palindromic magic to delight our statistical wizards. This methodical sleight of hand ultimately unveiled a correlation coefficient of 0.9022705 and a significance level of p < 0.01, akin to discovering a rare gem in a kaleidoscope of electoral data.
The complexity of human behavior and the capriciousness of nomenclature defy simple explanations, and thus, we embarked on this light-hearted yet serious quest to unravel the enigmatic riddle of the Thaddeus effect. Our methodology lay at the crossroads of whimsy and statistical prowess, unearthing a zany correlation that will undoubtedly inspire further inquiries and, with any luck, a chuckle or two.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Thaddeus and Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Washington. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.
Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from US Social Security Administration and MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse .
For the time period 1976 to 2020, you found a correlation 0.9022705, r-squared of 0.8140921, and p < 0.01.
One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.
Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"The Thaddeus Effect: Examining the Relationship Between Name Popularity and Political Leanings in Washington State"
[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the intriguing connection between the prevalence of the first name "Thaddeus" and voting patterns for the Libertarian presidential candidate in the state of Washington. Utilizing data from the US Social Security Administration and the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, our research team conducted an extensive examination spanning the years 1976 to 2020. Employing rigorous statistical analysis, we uncovered a surprisingly robust correlation coefficient of 0.9022705 and a significance level of p < 0.01.
The implications of these findings are not to be scoffed at, as they add a whimsical twist to the often austere field of political research. The Thaddeus effect, as we endearingly refer to it, unveils a fascinating interplay between seemingly unrelated domains. Is there truly something special about the name Thaddeus that aligns it with libertarian ideals? Or is this mere serendipity disguised as statistical significance? Our study highlights the need for further investigations into this enigmatic phenomenon, underscoring the notion that in the complex realm of human behavior, even the most unassuming factors may hold unexpected sway.
-------
And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
The relationship between individual names and political preferences has long been an area of interest for researchers seeking to unravel the subtleties of human behavior. While the field of political science often grapples with weighty matters of policy and ideology, the peculiar influence of nomenclature on electoral choices has remained an underexplored terrain. In this context, the present study sets out to investigate the quirkily named "Thaddeus" effect and its intriguing association with voting patterns for the Libertarian presidential candidate in the state of Washington.
Naming trends have fascinated scholars and laypeople alike, from the ebb and flow of popular baby names to the staying power of classics. It is as if the endless possibilities in the baby name book can foretell the proclivities and predispositions of the individuals who bear them. Rarely, however, have researchers endeavored to connect the dots between the popularity of a particular name and its consonance with political leanings. As such, the Thaddeus effect stands as a distinctly curious anomaly that beckons us to peer beyond the expected contours of political allegiances.
Our quest to unravel the Thaddeus effect led us to peruse copious volumes of data, panning through the annals of the US Social Security Administration's name records and the labyrinthine corridors of the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse. Our meticulous analysis uncovered a remarkably robust correlation coefficient of 0.9022705, sighting our statistical significance at p < 0.01. Perhaps even more astonishing was the realization that the prevalence of the name Thaddeus seemed to walk hand in hand with votes for the Libertarian candidate, painting a whimsically unexpected picture of interconnectedness.
As we delve deeper into the ramifications of the Thaddeus effect, we are reminded that research often unearths the most surprising juxtapositions. Our study seeks not only to shed light on the idiosyncratic link between name popularity and political affiliations but also to inject a dash of levity and curiosity into the staid corridors of political science. The Thaddeus effect, with its peculiar charm, invites us to question the infinite nuances that shape the human landscape, beckoning us to ponder the delightful mysteries that lurk behind the veneer of statistical analysis and numerical precision.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[RESULTS]]
ChatGPT:
[[RESULTS]]
The analysis of the relationship between the frequency of the first name "Thaddeus" and votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in the state of Washington yielded intriguing results. Over the period from 1976 to 2020, our research team found a substantial and robust correlation coefficient of 0.9022705. This strong correlation was underscored by an r-squared value of 0.8140921, further supporting the connection between the prevalence of the name "Thaddeus" and voting patterns for the Libertarian candidate in Washington.
The statistical significance of this correlation was notably strong, with a p-value of less than 0.01. Essentially, this indicates that the observed relationship is unlikely to be due to random chance, providing further credence to the existence of the Thaddeus effect. This effect points to an unexpected nexus between the popularity of a seemingly innocuous name and political leanings, adding a whimsical and thought-provoking dimension to the study of electoral behaviors.
Notably, our findings were graphically represented in a scatterplot (Fig. 1), vividly illustrating the conspicuous relationship between the frequency of the name "Thaddeus" and votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in Washington. The figure visually conveys the substantial linear association between these two variables, visually encapsulating the unexpected correlation that our analysis brought to light.
In conclusion, our research unveils the Thaddeus effect as a captivating revelation, bridging two seemingly disparate domains in a manner that is as intriguing as it is unanticipated. These results prompt further inquiry into the curious interplay between nomenclature and political preferences, inviting scholars and inquisitive minds to unravel the captivating mysteries that underlie the Thaddeus effect.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Thaddeus and Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Washington. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.
Limit your response to 500 tokens.
Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.
Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.
[[TITLE]]
"The Thaddeus Effect: Examining the Relationship Between Name Popularity and Political Leanings in Washington State"
[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the intriguing connection between the prevalence of the first name "Thaddeus" and voting patterns for the Libertarian presidential candidate in the state of Washington. Utilizing data from the US Social Security Administration and the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, our research team conducted an extensive examination spanning the years 1976 to 2020. Employing rigorous statistical analysis, we uncovered a surprisingly robust correlation coefficient of 0.9022705 and a significance level of p < 0.01.
The implications of these findings are not to be scoffed at, as they add a whimsical twist to the often austere field of political research. The Thaddeus effect, as we endearingly refer to it, unveils a fascinating interplay between seemingly unrelated domains. Is there truly something special about the name Thaddeus that aligns it with libertarian ideals? Or is this mere serendipity disguised as statistical significance? Our study highlights the need for further investigations into this enigmatic phenomenon, underscoring the notion that in the complex realm of human behavior, even the most unassuming factors may hold unexpected sway.
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The study of the influence of names on human behavior has a long and storied tradition, dating back to the seminal work of Smith and Doe in "The Name Game: Exploring the Intriguing Interplay of Nomenclature and Behavior." While much of the research in this area has focused on the broader implications of names on societal perceptions and individual experiences, a handful of studies have ventured into the realm of political preferences. Jones, in "Naming Politics: An Examination of the Subtle Nuances of Individual Names and Political Leanings," delves into the curious confluence of nomenclature and ideology, setting the stage for our exploration of the Thaddeus effect.
Turning to the quirkily delightful world of baby names, popular non-fiction works such as "Freakonomics: A Rogue Economist Explores the Hidden Side of Everything" by Steven D. Levitt and Stephen J. Dubner, and "The Baby Name Wizard: A Magical Method for Finding the Perfect Name for Your Baby" by Laura Wattenberg, have captivated readers with their insights into the enigmatic realm of naming conventions. Additionally, the works of fiction, such as Aldous Huxley's "Brave New World" and George Orwell's "1984," with their explorations of society and individual identity, provide an unconventional lens through which to contemplate the intersecting domains of names and political inclinations.
In the realm of games, the classic board game "Scrabble" offers a lighthearted perspective on the significance of individual letters and their influence on language. The game "Codenames," known for its clever word associations and hidden connections, adds a playful touch to the consideration of the mysterious interplay between names and human behaviors.
As we navigate through the eddies of prior research and diverse literary inspirations, we endeavor to shed light on the unexpected association between the prevalence of the first name Thaddeus and votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in the state of Washington. The Thaddeus effect, with its whimsical allure, serves as a testament to the delightful mysteries that underlie the unassuming factors shaping our political landscape.
[[RESULTS]]
The analysis of the relationship between the frequency of the first name "Thaddeus" and votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in the state of Washington yielded intriguing results. Over the period from 1976 to 2020, our research team found a substantial and robust correlation coefficient of 0.9022705. This strong correlation was underscored by an r-squared value of 0.8140921, further supporting the connection between the prevalence of the name "Thaddeus" and voting patterns for the Libertarian candidate in Washington.
The statistical significance of this correlation was notably strong, with a p-value of less than 0.01. Essentially, this indicates that the observed relationship is unlikely to be due to random chance, providing further credence to the existence of the Thaddeus effect. This effect points to an unexpected nexus between the popularity of a seemingly innocuous name and political leanings, adding a whimsical and thought-provoking dimension to the study of electoral behaviors.
Notably, our findings were graphically represented in a scatterplot (Fig. 1), vividly illustrating the conspicuous relationship between the frequency of the name "Thaddeus" and votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in Washington. The figure visually conveys the substantial linear association between these two variables, visually encapsulating the unexpected correlation that our analysis brought to light.
In conclusion, our research unveils the Thaddeus effect as a captivating revelation, bridging two seemingly disparate domains in a manner that is as intriguing as it is unanticipated. These results prompt further inquiry into the curious interplay between nomenclature and political preferences, inviting scholars and inquisitive minds to unravel the captivating mysteries that underlie the Thaddeus effect.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[DISCUSSION]]
ChatGPT:
[[DISCUSSION]]
The Thaddeus effect, a resplendent manifestation of statistical ballet, pirouettes gracefully into the grand ballroom of political intrigue. Our findings not only corroborate the prior research delving into the subtle nuances of individual names and political leanings but also elevate it to a symphonic crescendo of enigmatic dalliance. From Jones' exploration of naming politics to Levitt and Dubner's captivating prophesies in "Freakonomics," our study tenderly embraces the whimsical twists and turns of nomenclature's courtship with political affiliation.
The substantial correlation coefficient of 0.9022705 brings to mind the melodious harmony of a serendipitous symphony, hinting at a clandestine waltz between the name "Thaddeus" and libertarian predilections. It is as if the name itself were a ballad, orchestrating an alluring dance, luring voters to the libertarian rhythm. The robust r-squared value further fortifies this mesmerizing duet, weaving an intricate web of statistical significance that captivates the imagination and beckons further exploration.
The vivid visual narrative conveyed by the scatterplot (Fig. 1) accentuates the compelling liaison between the frequency of the name "Thaddeus" and votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate, akin to an inspired canvas painted with the colors of inadvertent intrigue. The interplay between these variables unveils a dramaturgical prowess, leaving the beholder in awe of this hypnotic performance of statistical choreography.
As our findings pronounce the Thaddeus effect with resolute conviction, it becomes evident that this capricious dalliance between nomenclature and political predilections transcends mere statistical significance. It stands as a testament to the charming mysteries that imbue the unassuming factors shaping our political landscape. Thus, with each name spoken and each vote cast, the idiosyncrasies of human behavior pirouette elegantly, revealing that even the most unassuming factors may hold unexpected sway in the delicate dance of politics.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Thaddeus and Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Washington. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.
Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.
Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
"The Thaddeus Effect: Examining the Relationship Between Name Popularity and Political Leanings in Washington State"
[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the intriguing connection between the prevalence of the first name "Thaddeus" and voting patterns for the Libertarian presidential candidate in the state of Washington. Utilizing data from the US Social Security Administration and the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, our research team conducted an extensive examination spanning the years 1976 to 2020. Employing rigorous statistical analysis, we uncovered a surprisingly robust correlation coefficient of 0.9022705 and a significance level of p < 0.01.
The implications of these findings are not to be scoffed at, as they add a whimsical twist to the often austere field of political research. The Thaddeus effect, as we endearingly refer to it, unveils a fascinating interplay between seemingly unrelated domains. Is there truly something special about the name Thaddeus that aligns it with libertarian ideals? Or is this mere serendipity disguised as statistical significance? Our study highlights the need for further investigations into this enigmatic phenomenon, underscoring the notion that in the complex realm of human behavior, even the most unassuming factors may hold unexpected sway.
[[INTRDUCTION]]
The relationship between individual names and political preferences has long been an area of interest for researchers seeking to unravel the subtleties of human behavior. While the field of political science often grapples with weighty matters of policy and ideology, the peculiar influence of nomenclature on electoral choices has remained an underexplored terrain. In this context, the present study sets out to investigate the quirkily named "Thaddeus" effect and its intriguing association with voting patterns for the Libertarian presidential candidate in the state of Washington.
Naming trends have fascinated scholars and laypeople alike, from the ebb and flow of popular baby names to the staying power of classics. It is as if the endless possibilities in the baby name book can foretell the proclivities and predispositions of the individuals who bear them. Rarely, however, have researchers endeavored to connect the dots between the popularity of a particular name and its consonance with political leanings. As such, the Thaddeus effect stands as a distinctly curious anomaly that beckons us to peer beyond the expected contours of political allegiances.
Our quest to unravel the Thaddeus effect led us to peruse copious volumes of data, panning through the annals of the US Social Security Administration's name records and the labyrinthine corridors of the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse. Our meticulous analysis uncovered a remarkably robust correlation coefficient of 0.9022705, sighting our statistical significance at p < 0.01. Perhaps even more astonishing was the realization that the prevalence of the name Thaddeus seemed to walk hand in hand with votes for the Libertarian candidate, painting a whimsically unexpected picture of interconnectedness.
As we delve deeper into the ramifications of the Thaddeus effect, we are reminded that research often unearths the most surprising juxtapositions. Our study seeks not only to shed light on the idiosyncratic link between name popularity and political affiliations but also to inject a dash of levity and curiosity into the staid corridors of political science. The Thaddeus effect, with its peculiar charm, invites us to question the infinite nuances that shape the human landscape, beckoning us to ponder the delightful mysteries that lurk behind the veneer of statistical analysis and numerical precision.
[[RESULTS]]
The analysis of the relationship between the frequency of the first name "Thaddeus" and votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in the state of Washington yielded intriguing results. Over the period from 1976 to 2020, our research team found a substantial and robust correlation coefficient of 0.9022705. This strong correlation was underscored by an r-squared value of 0.8140921, further supporting the connection between the prevalence of the name "Thaddeus" and voting patterns for the Libertarian candidate in Washington.
The statistical significance of this correlation was notably strong, with a p-value of less than 0.01. Essentially, this indicates that the observed relationship is unlikely to be due to random chance, providing further credence to the existence of the Thaddeus effect. This effect points to an unexpected nexus between the popularity of a seemingly innocuous name and political leanings, adding a whimsical and thought-provoking dimension to the study of electoral behaviors.
Notably, our findings were graphically represented in a scatterplot (Fig. 1), vividly illustrating the conspicuous relationship between the frequency of the name "Thaddeus" and votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in Washington. The figure visually conveys the substantial linear association between these two variables, visually encapsulating the unexpected correlation that our analysis brought to light.
In conclusion, our research unveils the Thaddeus effect as a captivating revelation, bridging two seemingly disparate domains in a manner that is as intriguing as it is unanticipated. These results prompt further inquiry into the curious interplay between nomenclature and political preferences, inviting scholars and inquisitive minds to unravel the captivating mysteries that underlie the Thaddeus effect.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[CONCLUSION]]
ChatGPT:
[[CONCLUSION]]
In conclusion, the Thaddeus effect presents a captivating conundrum that extends an irresistible invitation to ponder the quirkier aspects of human behavior. Our study has unveiled a robust correlation between the prevalence of the first name "Thaddeus" and votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in Washington State, offering a whimsically unexpected twist to the landscape of electoral behaviors. The statistical robustness of our findings, with a correlation coefficient of 0.9022705 and a significance level of p < 0.01, underscores the substantive link between nomenclature and political leanings.
This unforeseen connection between a seemingly innocuous name and political affiliations serves as a beguiling reminder that within the seemingly serious realm of political science, mirthful curiosities may lurk. The Thaddeus effect, with its captivating charm, stands as a testament to the delightful surprises that statistical analysis can unveil, defying predictability and adding a delightful dash of whimsy to the discourse on electoral patterns. As we reflect on the interplay between the popularity of a name and libertarian ideals, it becomes evident that the enigmatic Thaddeus effect beckons us to traverse the unexpected corridors of human idiosyncrasies.
Ultimately, our research accentuates the need for continued exploration into the interrelationship between nomenclature and political proclivities, as we seek to unravel the endearing mysteries that enshroud the Thaddeus effect. Nevertheless, it is our firm contention that the findings of this study merit due consideration and reflection, thrilling as they are, thus contributing to the rich tapestry of knowledge within the domain of political science. With the Thaddeus effect reigning as a quietly compelling presence in the realm of electoral behaviors, we assert that no further research is needed in this delightfully offbeat avenue of inquiry.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited The Thaddeus Effect: Examining the Relationship Between Name Popularity and Political Leanings in Washington State. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.
ChatGPT:
The Journal of Quirky Social Patterns
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited The Thaddeus Effect: Examining the Relationship Between Name Popularity and Political Leanings in Washington State. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.
ChatGPT:
The Institute for Social Moniker Studies
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled The Thaddeus Effect: Examining the Relationship Between Name Popularity and Political Leanings in Washington State with an abstract of This study delves into the intriguing connection between the prevalence of the first name "Thaddeus" and voting patterns for the Libertarian presidential candidate in the state of Washington. Utilizing data from the US Social Security Administration and the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, our research team conducted an extensive examination spanning the years 1976 to 2020. Employing rigorous statistical analysis, we uncovered a surprisingly robust correlation coefficient of 0.9022705 and a significance level of p < 0.01.
The implications of these findings are not to be scoffed at, as they add a whimsical twist to the often austere field of political research. The Thaddeus effect, as we endearingly refer to it, unveils a fascinating interplay between seemingly unrelated domains. Is there truly something special about the name Thaddeus that aligns it with libertarian ideals? Or is this mere serendipity disguised as statistical significance? Our study highlights the need for further investigations into this enigmatic phenomenon, underscoring the notion that in the complex realm of human behavior, even the most unassuming factors may hold unexpected sway.
ChatGPT:
Thaddeus, name popularity, political leanings, Washington State, Libertarian presidential candidate, US Social Security Administration data, MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, correlation coefficient, significance level, statistical analysis, political research, Thaddeus effect, human behavior, name influence, political affiliation, voter behavior
*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.
Discover a new correlation
View all correlations
View all research papers
Report an error
Data details
Popularity of the first name ThaddeusDetailed data title: Babies of all sexes born in the US named Thaddeus
Source: US Social Security Administration
See what else correlates with Popularity of the first name Thaddeus
Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Washington
Detailed data title: Percentage of all votes cast for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Washington
Source: MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse
See what else correlates with Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Washington
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.
r2 = 0.8140921 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 81.4% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Washington) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Popularity of the first name Thaddeus) over the 12 years from 1976 through 2020.
p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 5.9E-5. 0.0000594694660563168700000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.
But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.
Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.9 in 0.0059% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 16,815 random variables Which I absolutely did.
with the same 11 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 11 because we have two variables measured over a period of 12 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.
[ 0.68, 0.97 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.
This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!
All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.
Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
1976 | 1980 | 1984 | 1988 | 1992 | 1996 | 2000 | 2004 | 2008 | 2012 | 2016 | 2020 | |
Popularity of the first name Thaddeus (Babies born) | 267 | 267 | 175 | 248 | 250 | 216 | 218 | 189 | 211 | 231 | 416 | 297 |
Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Washington (Percentage of votes) | 0.324133 | 1.6766 | 0.471703 | 0.924271 | 0.329302 | 0.555586 | 0.528054 | 0.418141 | 0.419115 | 1.35024 | 4.85011 | 1.96936 |
Why this works
- Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
- Lack of causal connection: There is probably
Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied. - Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple
Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is. - Y-axis doesn't start at zero: I truncated the Y-axes of the graph above. I also used a line graph, which makes the visual connection stand out more than it deserves.
Nothing against line graphs. They are great at telling a story when you have linear data! But visually it is deceptive because the only data is at the points on the graph, not the lines on the graph. In between each point, the data could have been doing anything. Like going for a random walk by itself!
Mathematically what I showed is true, but it is intentionally misleading. Below is the same chart but with both Y-axes starting at zero.
Try it yourself
You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.
Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"
Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.
Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.
Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.
Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"
If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:
"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."
# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats
# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):
# Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)
# Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
r_squared = correlation**2
return correlation, r_squared, p_value
# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([267,267,175,248,250,216,218,189,211,231,416,297,])
array_2 = np.array([0.324133,1.6766,0.471703,0.924271,0.329302,0.555586,0.528054,0.418141,0.419115,1.35024,4.85011,1.96936,])
array_1_name = "Popularity of the first name Thaddeus"
array_2_name = "Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Washington"
# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)
# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)
Reuseable content
You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.
For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."
When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.
Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.
Download images for these variables:
- High resolution line chart
The image linked here is a Scalable Vector Graphic (SVG). It is the highest resolution that is possible to achieve. It scales up beyond the size of the observable universe without pixelating. You do not need to email me asking if I have a higher resolution image. I do not. The physical limitations of our universe prevent me from providing you with an image that is any higher resolution than this one.
If you insert it into a PowerPoint presentation (a tool well-known for managing things that are the scale of the universe), you can right-click > "Ungroup" or "Create Shape" and then edit the lines and text directly. You can also change the colors this way.
Alternatively you can use a tool like Inkscape. - High resolution line chart, optimized for mobile
- Alternative high resolution line chart
- Scatterplot
- Portable line chart (png)
- Portable line chart (png), optimized for mobile
- Line chart for only Popularity of the first name Thaddeus
- Line chart for only Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Washington
- AI-generated correlation image
- The spurious research paper: The Thaddeus Effect: Examining the Relationship Between Name Popularity and Political Leanings in Washington State
Your rating is pure awesomeness!
Correlation ID: 4484 · Black Variable ID: 3584 · Red Variable ID: 26185