about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #4,473 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Popularity of the first name Thaddeus and the second variable is Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Maine.  The chart goes from 1980 to 2020, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image

AI explanation

The name Thaddeus has been tripling in popularity, leading to a Thaddeus surge in support for the Libertarian candidate. It seems that Mainers are saying, "Thaddeus be the best choice for a leader!"

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Generate an image of this scene in the style of pop art, where a bustling town square in Maine is filled with vibrant colors and bold outlines. In the center of the scene, a large banner proudly displays the name "Thaddeus" in bold letters. Surrounding the banner, a crowd of people eagerly holds up signs that read "Vote Libertarian." The scene is filled with cheerful chatter and enthusiastic locals engaging in friendly debates about the upcoming election. The people and surroundings should be depicted in a dynamic, colorful manner, capturing the sense of excitement and momentum as the name Thaddeus sparks newfound support for the Libertarian presidential candidate among the people of Maine. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Popularity of the first name Thaddeus and Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Maine. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Photorealism Data cyber art A comic-book-style illustration with muted colors and a dotted halftone pattern from the 1960s Pop art Glitch art
ChatGPT: Pop art

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Popularity of the first name Thaddeus and Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Maine, in the following situation: The name Thaddeus has been tripling in popularity, leading to a Thaddeus surge in support for the Libertarian candidate. It seems that Mainers are saying, "Thaddeus be the best choice for a leader!". Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In a bustling town square in Maine, a large banner proudly displays the name "Thaddeus" in bold letters, surrounded by a crowd of people eagerly holding up signs that read "Vote Libertarian". The air is filled with the sound of cheerful chatter and the sight of enthusiastic locals engaging in friendly debates about the upcoming election. Amidst the commotion, a sense of excitement and momentum can be felt, as the surge in popularity of the name Thaddeus seems to have sparked a newfound support for the Libertarian presidential candidate among the people of Maine.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ Pop art ] and depicting this scene: In a bustling town square in Maine, a large banner proudly displays the name "Thaddeus" in bold letters, surrounded by a crowd of people eagerly holding up signs that read "Vote Libertarian". The air is filled with the sound of cheerful chatter and the sight of enthusiastic locals engaging in friendly debates about the upcoming election. Amidst the commotion, a sense of excitement and momentum can be felt, as the surge in popularity of the name Thaddeus seems to have sparked a newfound support for the Libertarian presidential candidate among the people of Maine. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Generate an image of this scene in the style of pop art, where a bustling town square in Maine is filled with vibrant colors and bold outlines. In the center of the scene, a large banner proudly displays the name "Thaddeus" in bold letters. Surrounding the banner, a crowd of people eagerly holds up signs that read "Vote Libertarian." The scene is filled with cheerful chatter and enthusiastic locals engaging in friendly debates about the upcoming election. The people and surroundings should be depicted in a dynamic, colorful manner, capturing the sense of excitement and momentum as the name Thaddeus sparks newfound support for the Libertarian presidential candidate among the people of Maine.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how increases in Popularity of the first name Thaddeus positively influenced Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Maine. Include one good pun.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
The Thaddeus Effect: A Statistical Analysis of the Correlation between Name Popularity and Libertarian Presidential Votes in Maine

The Journal of Quirky Sociological Analyses

Jan 2024
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Thaddeus and Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Maine. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Make the title seem clever.

Your research team used data from US Social Security Administration and MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9400329 and p < 0.01 for 1980 to 2020.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
"The Thaddeus Effect: A Statistical Analysis of the Correlation between Name Popularity and Libertarian Presidential Votes in Maine"

[[ABSTRACT]]
The Thaddeus Effect: A Statistical Analysis of the Correlation between Name Popularity and Libertarian Presidential Votes in Maine

As the adage goes, "What's in a name?" According to our research, quite a bit when it comes to the political landscape of Maine. In this study, we delved into the intriguing relationship between the popularity of the first name Thaddeus and votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in the state of Maine. Our research team utilized data from the US Social Security Administration, MIT Election Data and Science Lab, and Harvard Dataverse to assess this quirky yet compelling question.

The findings of our analysis revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.9400329 and p < 0.01 for the period spanning from 1980 to 2020, suggesting a highly significant positive correlation. Furthermore, our study uncovered an unexpected pattern in the correlation where the popularity of the name Thaddeus seemed to coincide with greater support for the Libertarian candidate in presidential elections in Maine.

On a lighter note, one might say that the name Thaddeus is not just making waves in Maine, but also making libertarians "Thad"-ly exhilarated!

This research sheds light on the peculiar and previously overlooked influence of individuals' names on political inclinations, inviting further exploration into the fascinating world of nomenclature and its impact on sociopolitical phenomena.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Thaddeus and Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Maine. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"The Thaddeus Effect: A Statistical Analysis of the Correlation between Name Popularity and Libertarian Presidential Votes in Maine"

[[ABSTRACT]]
The Thaddeus Effect: A Statistical Analysis of the Correlation between Name Popularity and Libertarian Presidential Votes in Maine

As the adage goes, "What's in a name?" According to our research, quite a bit when it comes to the political landscape of Maine. In this study, we delved into the intriguing relationship between the popularity of the first name Thaddeus and votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in the state of Maine. Our research team utilized data from the US Social Security Administration, MIT Election Data and Science Lab, and Harvard Dataverse to assess this quirky yet compelling question.

The findings of our analysis revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.9400329 and p < 0.01 for the period spanning from 1980 to 2020, suggesting a highly significant positive correlation. Furthermore, our study uncovered an unexpected pattern in the correlation where the popularity of the name Thaddeus seemed to coincide with greater support for the Libertarian candidate in presidential elections in Maine.

On a lighter note, one might say that the name Thaddeus is not just making waves in Maine, but also making libertarians "Thad"-ly exhilarated!

This research sheds light on the peculiar and previously overlooked influence of individuals' names on political inclinations, inviting further exploration into the fascinating world of nomenclature and its impact on sociopolitical phenomena.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

Imagine this scenario: You're walking through the snow-laden streets of Maine, sipping on a steaming cup of coffee, and ruminating on the peculiarities of life. Then, a thought strikes you like a frigid winter gust—could there be a connection between the popularity of the name Thaddeus and votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in the great state of Maine? Yes, you might say that's an odd musing, but that's precisely what piqued our curiosity and spurred the investigation presented in this paper.

As we dive into the intriguing world of name-based statistical anomalies, our study sought to venture beyond the conventional realms of political analysis and probe the uncharted territories of nomenclature correlations. With a twinkle in our eyes and a heap of data at our disposal, we embarked on this journey to uncover the "Thaddeus Effect," a phenomenon that seemed to bridge the seemingly disparate realms of popular nomenclature and electoral inclinations.

Now, in case you're wondering what makes the name Thaddeus so special, well, we had some "dad" reasoning behind this choice. And speaking of dads, did you hear about the father who named his twin boys Addison and Subracton? Yeah, he wanted to make sure they would always add and subtract! It seems that in the world of national elections, the name Thaddeus might hold a similar power of addition, at least in terms of Libertarian votes in Maine.

We delved into the intricacies of this relationship by examining data spanning the years 1980 to 2020, sourced from the US Social Security Administration, MIT Election Data and Science Lab, and Harvard Dataverse. Our statistical analysis yielded a remarkable correlation coefficient of 0.9400329, with a p-value of less than 0.01. This is a higher correlation than that found between coffee consumption and productivity—an impressive feat indeed.

The "Thad" jokester within us couldn't resist noticing the pun-worthy connection between the enthusiastic support for the Libertarian presidential candidate in Maine and the name Thaddeus. One might jest that Thaddeus does not just gain popularity in the hearts of parents, but also in the ballot boxes of Maine, where its resonance seems to amplify the battle cry for liberty.

Our research promises to unravel the enigmatic web of name-dependent political preferences, paving the way for further investigations into the influence of nomenclature in sociopolitical dynamics. So, without further ado, let's embark on this whimsical, yet enlightening journey through the esoteric realms of the "Thaddeus Effect."


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Thaddeus and Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Maine. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Perhaps you also got inspiration from some board games that are vaugely related.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"The Thaddeus Effect: A Statistical Analysis of the Correlation between Name Popularity and Libertarian Presidential Votes in Maine"

[[ABSTRACT]]
The Thaddeus Effect: A Statistical Analysis of the Correlation between Name Popularity and Libertarian Presidential Votes in Maine

As the adage goes, "What's in a name?" According to our research, quite a bit when it comes to the political landscape of Maine. In this study, we delved into the intriguing relationship between the popularity of the first name Thaddeus and votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in the state of Maine. Our research team utilized data from the US Social Security Administration, MIT Election Data and Science Lab, and Harvard Dataverse to assess this quirky yet compelling question.

The findings of our analysis revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.9400329 and p < 0.01 for the period spanning from 1980 to 2020, suggesting a highly significant positive correlation. Furthermore, our study uncovered an unexpected pattern in the correlation where the popularity of the name Thaddeus seemed to coincide with greater support for the Libertarian candidate in presidential elections in Maine.

On a lighter note, one might say that the name Thaddeus is not just making waves in Maine, but also making libertarians "Thad"-ly exhilarated!

This research sheds light on the peculiar and previously overlooked influence of individuals' names on political inclinations, inviting further exploration into the fascinating world of nomenclature and its impact on sociopolitical phenomena.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
Imagine this scenario: You're walking through the snow-laden streets of Maine, sipping on a steaming cup of coffee, and ruminating on the peculiarities of life. Then, a thought strikes you like a frigid winter gust—could there be a connection between the popularity of the name Thaddeus and votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in the great state of Maine? Yes, you might say that's an odd musing, but that's precisely what piqued our curiosity and spurred the investigation presented in this paper.
As we dive into the intriguing world of name-based statistical anomalies, our study sought to venture beyond the conventional realms of political analysis and probe the uncharted territories of nomenclature correlations. With a twinkle in our eyes and a heap of data at our disposal, we embarked on this journey to uncover the "Thaddeus Effect," a phenomenon that seemed to bridge the seemingly disparate realms of popular nomenclature and electoral inclinations.
Now, in case you're wondering what makes the name Thaddeus so special, well, we had some "dad" reasoning behind this choice. And speaking of dads, did you hear about the father who named his twin boys Addison and Subracton? Yeah, he wanted to make sure they would always add and subtract! It seems that in the world of national elections, the name Thaddeus might hold a similar power of addition, at least in terms of Libertarian votes in Maine.
We delved into the intricacies of this relationship by examining data spanning the years 1980 to 2020, sourced from the US Social Security Administration, MIT Election Data and Science Lab, and Harvard Dataverse. Our statistical analysis yielded a remarkable correlation coefficient of 0.9400329, with a p-value of less than 0.01. This is a higher correlation than that found between coffee consumption and productivity—an impressive feat indeed.
The "Thad" jokester within us couldn't resist noticing the pun-worthy connection between the enthusiastic support for the Libertarian presidential candidate in Maine and the name Thaddeus. One might jest that Thaddeus does not just gain popularity in the hearts of parents, but also in the ballot boxes of Maine, where its resonance seems to amplify the battle cry for liberty.
Our research promises to unravel the enigmatic web of name-dependent political preferences, paving the way for further investigations into the influence of nomenclature in sociopolitical dynamics. So, without further ado, let's embark on this whimsical, yet enlightening journey through the esoteric realms of the "Thaddeus Effect."

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

The exploration of the correlation between name popularity and political inclinations has long been a subject of intrigue in social science research. Smith et al. (2015) conducted a comprehensive study on the impact of given names on voting behavior in the United States, delving into the subconscious effects of name associations on individual electoral decisions. Their findings shed light on the subtle yet consequential influence of nomenclature on political preferences, setting the stage for further investigations into this captivating phenomenon.

But as we ventured into the enigmatic region of peculiar name correlations, we couldn't help but draw inspiration from some unexpected sources. In "Freakonomics" by Steven D. Levitt and Stephen J. Dubner, the authors discuss the power of names in influencing personal and professional success, offering a thought-provoking perspective on the broader implications of nomenclature. And let's not forget "The Name of the Rose" by Umberto Eco, a literary masterpiece that intricately weaves together themes of mystery and symbolism—much like the mystery behind the captivating allure of the name Thaddeus in Maine's political landscape.

As we continued our journey through the literary labyrinth, we stumbled upon a board game that seemed oddly pertinent to our research—“Scrabble.” Much like the strategic placement of letter tiles to form words, our study sought to unravel the intricate connections between the letters that compose the name "Thaddeus" and its unexpected impact on the political puzzle of Maine.

Returning to the realm of academic inquiry, Doe and Jones (2018) explored the psychological implications of unique names on individual self-perception and societal integration. Their work delved into the social dynamics of nomenclature, highlighting the potential for names to shape not only personal identities but also collective behaviors, a concept that resonates with the unearthing of the Thaddeus Effect in the context of libertarian votes in Maine.

Now for a "Thad" joke to lighten the mood: Why don't we ever see the name "Thaddeus" on a billboard? Because it would be too "sign"-ificant! Just like the impact of Thaddeus on libertarian votes in Maine.

As our investigation meandered through the whimsical terrain of name-based correlations, we encountered a curious blend of truth and fiction. In "Name of the Wind" by Patrick Rothfuss, the protagonist's name holds immense significance, echoing the captivating resonance of the name Thaddeus in the political symphony of Maine.

In conclusion, our review of the literature has provided a foundational framework for understanding the intricate interplay between names, political choices, and societal dynamics. Through this multidisciplinary lens, we set the stage for unraveling the "Thaddeus Effect," a phenomenon that transcends the boundaries of traditional political analysis and stimulates a profound reflection on the quirks of nomenclature in the electoral sphere.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Thaddeus and Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Maine. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from US Social Security Administration and MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse . You used data from 1980 to 2020

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"The Thaddeus Effect: A Statistical Analysis of the Correlation between Name Popularity and Libertarian Presidential Votes in Maine"

[[ABSTRACT]]
The Thaddeus Effect: A Statistical Analysis of the Correlation between Name Popularity and Libertarian Presidential Votes in Maine

As the adage goes, "What's in a name?" According to our research, quite a bit when it comes to the political landscape of Maine. In this study, we delved into the intriguing relationship between the popularity of the first name Thaddeus and votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in the state of Maine. Our research team utilized data from the US Social Security Administration, MIT Election Data and Science Lab, and Harvard Dataverse to assess this quirky yet compelling question.

The findings of our analysis revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.9400329 and p < 0.01 for the period spanning from 1980 to 2020, suggesting a highly significant positive correlation. Furthermore, our study uncovered an unexpected pattern in the correlation where the popularity of the name Thaddeus seemed to coincide with greater support for the Libertarian candidate in presidential elections in Maine.

On a lighter note, one might say that the name Thaddeus is not just making waves in Maine, but also making libertarians "Thad"-ly exhilarated!

This research sheds light on the peculiar and previously overlooked influence of individuals' names on political inclinations, inviting further exploration into the fascinating world of nomenclature and its impact on sociopolitical phenomena.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
Imagine this scenario: You're walking through the snow-laden streets of Maine, sipping on a steaming cup of coffee, and ruminating on the peculiarities of life. Then, a thought strikes you like a frigid winter gust—could there be a connection between the popularity of the name Thaddeus and votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in the great state of Maine? Yes, you might say that's an odd musing, but that's precisely what piqued our curiosity and spurred the investigation presented in this paper.
As we dive into the intriguing world of name-based statistical anomalies, our study sought to venture beyond the conventional realms of political analysis and probe the uncharted territories of nomenclature correlations. With a twinkle in our eyes and a heap of data at our disposal, we embarked on this journey to uncover the "Thaddeus Effect," a phenomenon that seemed to bridge the seemingly disparate realms of popular nomenclature and electoral inclinations.
Now, in case you're wondering what makes the name Thaddeus so special, well, we had some "dad" reasoning behind this choice. And speaking of dads, did you hear about the father who named his twin boys Addison and Subracton? Yeah, he wanted to make sure they would always add and subtract! It seems that in the world of national elections, the name Thaddeus might hold a similar power of addition, at least in terms of Libertarian votes in Maine.
We delved into the intricacies of this relationship by examining data spanning the years 1980 to 2020, sourced from the US Social Security Administration, MIT Election Data and Science Lab, and Harvard Dataverse. Our statistical analysis yielded a remarkable correlation coefficient of 0.9400329, with a p-value of less than 0.01. This is a higher correlation than that found between coffee consumption and productivity—an impressive feat indeed.
The "Thad" jokester within us couldn't resist noticing the pun-worthy connection between the enthusiastic support for the Libertarian presidential candidate in Maine and the name Thaddeus. One might jest that Thaddeus does not just gain popularity in the hearts of parents, but also in the ballot boxes of Maine, where its resonance seems to amplify the battle cry for liberty.
Our research promises to unravel the enigmatic web of name-dependent political preferences, paving the way for further investigations into the influence of nomenclature in sociopolitical dynamics. So, without further ado, let's embark on this whimsical, yet enlightening journey through the esoteric realms of the "Thaddeus Effect."

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To unravel the captivating mystery of the "Thaddeus Effect," our research team utilized a novel blend of statistical analyses and name popularity trends. Our methodology involved a three-pronged approach, combining data mining, trend analysis, and a dash of good-natured jest to illuminate the curious correlation between the name Thaddeus and votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in Maine.

First, we scoured the depths of the US Social Security Administration's treasure trove of birth names, sieving through decades of data to identify the ebbs and flows of Thaddeus's popularity. We then cross-referenced this data with the Maine voter records, delving into the electoral history from MIT Election Data and Science Lab and Harvard Dataverse. There's nothing like a good ol' data mining adventure, sifting through digital haystacks to find our needle in the electoral haystack!

Next, we embarked on a journey akin to name-based stargazing, charting the celestial rise and fall of Thaddeus's prominence against the backdrop of Maine's political landscape. We unleashed the powers of trend analysis, navigating the undulating waves of name popularity and electoral choices to discern patterns that might otherwise have gone unnoticed. It was like navigating a ship through the sea of statistical whimsy, where each surge and dip in popularity whispered tales of political correlation.

Now, before we delve into the nitty-gritty details of our statistical analyses, here's a brief interruption with a dad-approved joke: Why don't skeletons fight each other? They don't have the guts! Speaking of guts, we dived headfirst into the statistical realm, armed with a smorgasbord of correlation analyses, regression models, and a sprinkle of probability theory to uncover the depths of the Thaddeus-Libertarian connection.

We meticulously examined the data spanning from 1980 to 2020, employing rigorous statistical techniques such as Pearson's correlation coefficient and linear regression to disentangle the enigmatic link between Thaddeus's prominence and Libertarian support in Maine. Our statistical odyssey culminated in the unearthing of a correlation coefficient of 0.9400329, with a p-value trembling beneath the hallowed threshold of 0.01. It was a statistical victory akin to finding a rare gem in the bustling marketplace of data analysis, sparking revelry akin to unearthing buried treasure.

In conclusion, our methodology marries the rigors of statistical inquiry with the charm of whimsical curiosity, yielding insights that transcend the conventional boundaries of political analysis. Our approach illuminates not only the "Thaddeus Effect" but also the uncharted potential of name-based correlations in the captivating arena of political preferences. And with that, we invite you to join us on this joyous romp through the idiosyncrasies of Thaddeus, Libertarians, and the delightfully unexpected connections that tether them in the vibrant tapestry of Maine's electoral landscape.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Thaddeus and Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Maine. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from US Social Security Administration and MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse .

For the time period 1980 to 2020, you found a correlation 0.9400329, r-squared of 0.8836619, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"The Thaddeus Effect: A Statistical Analysis of the Correlation between Name Popularity and Libertarian Presidential Votes in Maine"

[[ABSTRACT]]
The Thaddeus Effect: A Statistical Analysis of the Correlation between Name Popularity and Libertarian Presidential Votes in Maine

As the adage goes, "What's in a name?" According to our research, quite a bit when it comes to the political landscape of Maine. In this study, we delved into the intriguing relationship between the popularity of the first name Thaddeus and votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in the state of Maine. Our research team utilized data from the US Social Security Administration, MIT Election Data and Science Lab, and Harvard Dataverse to assess this quirky yet compelling question.

The findings of our analysis revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.9400329 and p < 0.01 for the period spanning from 1980 to 2020, suggesting a highly significant positive correlation. Furthermore, our study uncovered an unexpected pattern in the correlation where the popularity of the name Thaddeus seemed to coincide with greater support for the Libertarian candidate in presidential elections in Maine.

On a lighter note, one might say that the name Thaddeus is not just making waves in Maine, but also making libertarians "Thad"-ly exhilarated!

This research sheds light on the peculiar and previously overlooked influence of individuals' names on political inclinations, inviting further exploration into the fascinating world of nomenclature and its impact on sociopolitical phenomena.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
Imagine this scenario: You're walking through the snow-laden streets of Maine, sipping on a steaming cup of coffee, and ruminating on the peculiarities of life. Then, a thought strikes you like a frigid winter gust—could there be a connection between the popularity of the name Thaddeus and votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in the great state of Maine? Yes, you might say that's an odd musing, but that's precisely what piqued our curiosity and spurred the investigation presented in this paper.
As we dive into the intriguing world of name-based statistical anomalies, our study sought to venture beyond the conventional realms of political analysis and probe the uncharted territories of nomenclature correlations. With a twinkle in our eyes and a heap of data at our disposal, we embarked on this journey to uncover the "Thaddeus Effect," a phenomenon that seemed to bridge the seemingly disparate realms of popular nomenclature and electoral inclinations.
Now, in case you're wondering what makes the name Thaddeus so special, well, we had some "dad" reasoning behind this choice. And speaking of dads, did you hear about the father who named his twin boys Addison and Subracton? Yeah, he wanted to make sure they would always add and subtract! It seems that in the world of national elections, the name Thaddeus might hold a similar power of addition, at least in terms of Libertarian votes in Maine.
We delved into the intricacies of this relationship by examining data spanning the years 1980 to 2020, sourced from the US Social Security Administration, MIT Election Data and Science Lab, and Harvard Dataverse. Our statistical analysis yielded a remarkable correlation coefficient of 0.9400329, with a p-value of less than 0.01. This is a higher correlation than that found between coffee consumption and productivity—an impressive feat indeed.
The "Thad" jokester within us couldn't resist noticing the pun-worthy connection between the enthusiastic support for the Libertarian presidential candidate in Maine and the name Thaddeus. One might jest that Thaddeus does not just gain popularity in the hearts of parents, but also in the ballot boxes of Maine, where its resonance seems to amplify the battle cry for liberty.
Our research promises to unravel the enigmatic web of name-dependent political preferences, paving the way for further investigations into the influence of nomenclature in sociopolitical dynamics. So, without further ado, let's embark on this whimsical, yet enlightening journey through the esoteric realms of the "Thaddeus Effect."

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The statistical analysis of our data revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9400329 and an r-squared value of 0.8836619 for the period from 1980 to 2020, denoting an exceptionally strong association between the popularity of the name Thaddeus and votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in Maine. This correlation, with a p-value of less than 0.01, suggests that there is a highly significant positive relationship between these two variables.

As we examined the scatterplot in Fig. 1, one can't help but marvel at the pronounced clustering of data points, resembling the unwavering alignment between the name Thaddeus and Libertarian votes in Maine. It's almost as if the name itself has declared, "Thad-deus be the name associated with Libertarian support!"

Looking at this data, we couldn't help but think of a great dad joke. Why did the golfer bring two pairs of pants? In case he got a hole in one! Similarly, it seems Thaddeus brings in the votes for the Libertarian candidate in Maine, just in case they need a hole in one for a win!

Our findings shed light on a peculiar yet captivating correlation that adds a new dimension to the influence of nomenclature on political dynamics. It seems that the name Thaddeus possesses a magnetic appeal, not only to parents selecting names, but also to voters in Maine who align with Libertarian ideals.

This research opens the door to further inquiries into the impact of names on sociopolitical phenomena, urging scholars to unravel the enigmatic web of name-dependent political preferences and their role in shaping electoral outcomes. As we continue to explore the "Thaddeus Effect," we may discover myriad other quirks that make the world of politics, and statistical analysis, all the more fascinating.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Thaddeus and Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Maine. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
"The Thaddeus Effect: A Statistical Analysis of the Correlation between Name Popularity and Libertarian Presidential Votes in Maine"

[[ABSTRACT]]
The Thaddeus Effect: A Statistical Analysis of the Correlation between Name Popularity and Libertarian Presidential Votes in Maine

As the adage goes, "What's in a name?" According to our research, quite a bit when it comes to the political landscape of Maine. In this study, we delved into the intriguing relationship between the popularity of the first name Thaddeus and votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in the state of Maine. Our research team utilized data from the US Social Security Administration, MIT Election Data and Science Lab, and Harvard Dataverse to assess this quirky yet compelling question.

The findings of our analysis revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.9400329 and p < 0.01 for the period spanning from 1980 to 2020, suggesting a highly significant positive correlation. Furthermore, our study uncovered an unexpected pattern in the correlation where the popularity of the name Thaddeus seemed to coincide with greater support for the Libertarian candidate in presidential elections in Maine.

On a lighter note, one might say that the name Thaddeus is not just making waves in Maine, but also making libertarians "Thad"-ly exhilarated!

This research sheds light on the peculiar and previously overlooked influence of individuals' names on political inclinations, inviting further exploration into the fascinating world of nomenclature and its impact on sociopolitical phenomena.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The exploration of the correlation between name popularity and political inclinations has long been a subject of intrigue in social science research. Smith et al. (2015) conducted a comprehensive study on the impact of given names on voting behavior in the United States, delving into the subconscious effects of name associations on individual electoral decisions. Their findings shed light on the subtle yet consequential influence of nomenclature on political preferences, setting the stage for further investigations into this captivating phenomenon.
But as we ventured into the enigmatic region of peculiar name correlations, we couldn't help but draw inspiration from some unexpected sources. In "Freakonomics" by Steven D. Levitt and Stephen J. Dubner, the authors discuss the power of names in influencing personal and professional success, offering a thought-provoking perspective on the broader implications of nomenclature. And let's not forget "The Name of the Rose" by Umberto Eco, a literary masterpiece that intricately weaves together themes of mystery and symbolism—much like the mystery behind the captivating allure of the name Thaddeus in Maine's political landscape.
As we continued our journey through the literary labyrinth, we stumbled upon a board game that seemed oddly pertinent to our research—“Scrabble.” Much like the strategic placement of letter tiles to form words, our study sought to unravel the intricate connections between the letters that compose the name "Thaddeus" and its unexpected impact on the political puzzle of Maine.
Returning to the realm of academic inquiry, Doe and Jones (2018) explored the psychological implications of unique names on individual self-perception and societal integration. Their work delved into the social dynamics of nomenclature, highlighting the potential for names to shape not only personal identities but also collective behaviors, a concept that resonates with the unearthing of the Thaddeus Effect in the context of libertarian votes in Maine.
Now for a "Thad" joke to lighten the mood: Why don't we ever see the name "Thaddeus" on a billboard? Because it would be too "sign"-ificant! Just like the impact of Thaddeus on libertarian votes in Maine.
As our investigation meandered through the whimsical terrain of name-based correlations, we encountered a curious blend of truth and fiction. In "Name of the Wind" by Patrick Rothfuss, the protagonist's name holds immense significance, echoing the captivating resonance of the name Thaddeus in the political symphony of Maine.
In conclusion, our review of the literature has provided a foundational framework for understanding the intricate interplay between names, political choices, and societal dynamics. Through this multidisciplinary lens, we set the stage for unraveling the "Thaddeus Effect," a phenomenon that transcends the boundaries of traditional political analysis and stimulates a profound reflection on the quirks of nomenclature in the electoral sphere.

[[RESULTS]]
The statistical analysis of our data revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9400329 and an r-squared value of 0.8836619 for the period from 1980 to 2020, denoting an exceptionally strong association between the popularity of the name Thaddeus and votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in Maine. This correlation, with a p-value of less than 0.01, suggests that there is a highly significant positive relationship between these two variables.
As we examined the scatterplot in Fig. 1, one can't help but marvel at the pronounced clustering of data points, resembling the unwavering alignment between the name Thaddeus and Libertarian votes in Maine. It's almost as if the name itself has declared, "Thad-deus be the name associated with Libertarian support!"
Looking at this data, we couldn't help but think of a great dad joke. Why did the golfer bring two pairs of pants? In case he got a hole in one! Similarly, it seems Thaddeus brings in the votes for the Libertarian candidate in Maine, just in case they need a hole in one for a win!
Our findings shed light on a peculiar yet captivating correlation that adds a new dimension to the influence of nomenclature on political dynamics. It seems that the name Thaddeus possesses a magnetic appeal, not only to parents selecting names, but also to voters in Maine who align with Libertarian ideals.
This research opens the door to further inquiries into the impact of names on sociopolitical phenomena, urging scholars to unravel the enigmatic web of name-dependent political preferences and their role in shaping electoral outcomes. As we continue to explore the "Thaddeus Effect," we may discover myriad other quirks that make the world of politics, and statistical analysis, all the more fascinating.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

Our study unraveled a compelling relationship between the popularity of the name Thaddeus and votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in Maine, echoing the findings of Smith et al. (2015) who emphasized the influence of nomenclature on electoral decisions. This peculiar yet robust association underscores the significance of names in shaping political inclinations, raising intriguing questions about the underlying psychological mechanisms at play. Our results not only corroborate the existence of the "Thaddeus Effect" but also demonstrate its remarkable consistency over a span of four decades, highlighting the enduring impact of this unique phenomenon.

Our findings align closely with the unexpected influences of nomenclature as highlighted by Levitt and Dubner in "Freakonomics," underscoring the nuances of name associations and their profound implications. The "Thaddeus Effect" exemplifies the unanticipated ways in which names can influence societal dynamics, serving as a captivating case study for understanding the intricate interplay between nomenclature and political choices.

The prodigious correlation coefficient and significant p-value further validate the magnitude and statistical robustness of the "Thaddeus Effect," evoking a whimsical reflection on the intriguing resonance of the name Thaddeus in Maine's political tapestry. The peculiar potency of this correlation, akin to the strategic placement of letters in a game of "Scrabble," adds a dimension of playful intrigue to the realm of political analysis, stimulating both scholarly contemplation and lighthearted amusement.

Moreover, our results resonate with the observations of Doe and Jones (2018) regarding the societal integration and self-perception associated with unique names, underscoring the potential for names to shape collective behaviors. The "Thaddeus Effect" serves as a captivating embodiment of the profound influence of nomenclature on political preferences, inviting further exploration into the intricate dynamics of name-dependent electoral phenomena.

In essence, our research has not only confirmed the presence of the "Thaddeus Effect" but has also illuminated the captivating interplay between names and political choices, paving the way for a deeper understanding of the multifaceted relationship between nomenclature and sociopolitical dynamics. As we embark on future investigations, it is imperative to maintain a balanced perspective—acknowledging the inherent humor and intrigue in the "Thad" jokes while simultaneously delving into the profound implications of our findings.

Our analysis has unlocked a Pandora's box of name-dependent political preferences, beckoning scholars to delve deeper into the whimsical yet impactful world of nomenclature in electoral arenas. As we navigate through this intriguing terrain, let us embrace both the lightheartedness of our "Thad" jokes and the profound implications of the "Thaddeus Effect," recognizing that the influence of names extends far beyond mere societal labels, but permeates the very fabric of political expression and collective decision-making.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Thaddeus and Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Maine. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
"The Thaddeus Effect: A Statistical Analysis of the Correlation between Name Popularity and Libertarian Presidential Votes in Maine"

[[ABSTRACT]]
The Thaddeus Effect: A Statistical Analysis of the Correlation between Name Popularity and Libertarian Presidential Votes in Maine

As the adage goes, "What's in a name?" According to our research, quite a bit when it comes to the political landscape of Maine. In this study, we delved into the intriguing relationship between the popularity of the first name Thaddeus and votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in the state of Maine. Our research team utilized data from the US Social Security Administration, MIT Election Data and Science Lab, and Harvard Dataverse to assess this quirky yet compelling question.

The findings of our analysis revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.9400329 and p < 0.01 for the period spanning from 1980 to 2020, suggesting a highly significant positive correlation. Furthermore, our study uncovered an unexpected pattern in the correlation where the popularity of the name Thaddeus seemed to coincide with greater support for the Libertarian candidate in presidential elections in Maine.

On a lighter note, one might say that the name Thaddeus is not just making waves in Maine, but also making libertarians "Thad"-ly exhilarated!

This research sheds light on the peculiar and previously overlooked influence of individuals' names on political inclinations, inviting further exploration into the fascinating world of nomenclature and its impact on sociopolitical phenomena.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
Imagine this scenario: You're walking through the snow-laden streets of Maine, sipping on a steaming cup of coffee, and ruminating on the peculiarities of life. Then, a thought strikes you like a frigid winter gust—could there be a connection between the popularity of the name Thaddeus and votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in the great state of Maine? Yes, you might say that's an odd musing, but that's precisely what piqued our curiosity and spurred the investigation presented in this paper.
As we dive into the intriguing world of name-based statistical anomalies, our study sought to venture beyond the conventional realms of political analysis and probe the uncharted territories of nomenclature correlations. With a twinkle in our eyes and a heap of data at our disposal, we embarked on this journey to uncover the "Thaddeus Effect," a phenomenon that seemed to bridge the seemingly disparate realms of popular nomenclature and electoral inclinations.
Now, in case you're wondering what makes the name Thaddeus so special, well, we had some "dad" reasoning behind this choice. And speaking of dads, did you hear about the father who named his twin boys Addison and Subracton? Yeah, he wanted to make sure they would always add and subtract! It seems that in the world of national elections, the name Thaddeus might hold a similar power of addition, at least in terms of Libertarian votes in Maine.
We delved into the intricacies of this relationship by examining data spanning the years 1980 to 2020, sourced from the US Social Security Administration, MIT Election Data and Science Lab, and Harvard Dataverse. Our statistical analysis yielded a remarkable correlation coefficient of 0.9400329, with a p-value of less than 0.01. This is a higher correlation than that found between coffee consumption and productivity—an impressive feat indeed.
The "Thad" jokester within us couldn't resist noticing the pun-worthy connection between the enthusiastic support for the Libertarian presidential candidate in Maine and the name Thaddeus. One might jest that Thaddeus does not just gain popularity in the hearts of parents, but also in the ballot boxes of Maine, where its resonance seems to amplify the battle cry for liberty.
Our research promises to unravel the enigmatic web of name-dependent political preferences, paving the way for further investigations into the influence of nomenclature in sociopolitical dynamics. So, without further ado, let's embark on this whimsical, yet enlightening journey through the esoteric realms of the "Thaddeus Effect."

[[RESULTS]]
The statistical analysis of our data revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9400329 and an r-squared value of 0.8836619 for the period from 1980 to 2020, denoting an exceptionally strong association between the popularity of the name Thaddeus and votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in Maine. This correlation, with a p-value of less than 0.01, suggests that there is a highly significant positive relationship between these two variables.
As we examined the scatterplot in Fig. 1, one can't help but marvel at the pronounced clustering of data points, resembling the unwavering alignment between the name Thaddeus and Libertarian votes in Maine. It's almost as if the name itself has declared, "Thad-deus be the name associated with Libertarian support!"
Looking at this data, we couldn't help but think of a great dad joke. Why did the golfer bring two pairs of pants? In case he got a hole in one! Similarly, it seems Thaddeus brings in the votes for the Libertarian candidate in Maine, just in case they need a hole in one for a win!
Our findings shed light on a peculiar yet captivating correlation that adds a new dimension to the influence of nomenclature on political dynamics. It seems that the name Thaddeus possesses a magnetic appeal, not only to parents selecting names, but also to voters in Maine who align with Libertarian ideals.
This research opens the door to further inquiries into the impact of names on sociopolitical phenomena, urging scholars to unravel the enigmatic web of name-dependent political preferences and their role in shaping electoral outcomes. As we continue to explore the "Thaddeus Effect," we may discover myriad other quirks that make the world of politics, and statistical analysis, all the more fascinating.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our research has unveiled the "Thaddeus Effect" - a peculiar and robust correlation between the popularity of the name Thaddeus and votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in the state of Maine. It seems that Thaddeus isn't just a popular name; it's also a vote magnet for Libertarians in Maine. Maybe we should start calling it the "Libertarian Thad" effect! This correlation, with a p-value of less than 0.01, illuminates the striking influence of nomenclature on political preferences, adding a lighthearted twist to the realm of electoral analysis.

It's almost as if Thaddeus is whispering to voters, "Thad-deus support the Libertarian candidate!" Our study showcases the unexpected potency of a name in shaping political affiliations, inviting further exploration into the intricate dynamics of nomenclature and its influence on electoral behavior.

Therefore, in the words of a classic dad joke, "I told my wife she should embrace her mistakes. She gave me a hug." It seems the connection between Thaddeus and Libertarian votes in Maine is as strong as a cozy dad hug - undeniably endearing and full of unexpected surprises!

In light of our findings, we assert that the "Thaddeus Effect" warrants no further research. It's a wrap, folks! Thaddeus has made its mark, and it's time to bid adieu to this amusing yet enlightening expedition into the whimsical world of name-based political correlations.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited The Thaddeus Effect: A Statistical Analysis of the Correlation between Name Popularity and Libertarian Presidential Votes in Maine. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Quirky Sociological Analyses


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited The Thaddeus Effect: A Statistical Analysis of the Correlation between Name Popularity and Libertarian Presidential Votes in Maine. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Society for Quirky Social Science Research


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled The Thaddeus Effect: A Statistical Analysis of the Correlation between Name Popularity and Libertarian Presidential Votes in Maine with an abstract of The Thaddeus Effect: A Statistical Analysis of the Correlation between Name Popularity and Libertarian Presidential Votes in Maine
As the adage goes, "What's in a name?" According to our research, quite a bit when it comes to the political landscape of Maine. In this study, we delved into the intriguing relationship between the popularity of the first name Thaddeus and votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in the state of Maine. Our research team utilized data from the US Social Security Administration, MIT Election Data and Science Lab, and Harvard Dataverse to assess this quirky yet compelling question.
The findings of our analysis revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.9400329 and p < 0.01 for the period spanning from 1980 to 2020, suggesting a highly significant positive correlation. Furthermore, our study uncovered an unexpected pattern in the correlation where the popularity of the name Thaddeus seemed to coincide with greater support for the Libertarian candidate in presidential elections in Maine.
On a lighter note, one might say that the name Thaddeus is not just making waves in Maine, but also making libertarians "Thad"-ly exhilarated!
This research sheds light on the peculiar and previously overlooked influence of individuals' names on political inclinations, inviting further exploration into the fascinating world of nomenclature and its impact on sociopolitical phenomena.

ChatGPT:

Thaddeus, name popularity, libertarian, presidential votes, Maine, statistical analysis, correlation, US Social Security Administration, MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, political landscape, nomenclature, sociopolitical phenomena

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Popularity of the first name Thaddeus
Detailed data title: Babies of all sexes born in the US named Thaddeus
Source: US Social Security Administration
See what else correlates with Popularity of the first name Thaddeus

Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Maine
Detailed data title: Percentage of all votes cast for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Maine
Source: MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse
See what else correlates with Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Maine

Correlation r = 0.9400329 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.8836619 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 88.4% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Maine) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Popularity of the first name Thaddeus) over the 9 years from 1980 through 2020.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 0.00016. 0.0001639215280681544200000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.94 in 0.016% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 6,100 random variables Which I absolutely did.
with the same 8 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 8 because we have two variables measured over a period of 9 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.73, 0.99 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
198019881992199620002004201220162020
Popularity of the first name Thaddeus (Babies born)267248250216218189231416297
Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Maine (Percentage of votes)0.9787560.4864560.2473880.4944730.4716050.2652711.290364.936571.70855




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Very low n: There are not many data points included in this analysis. Even if the p-value is high, we should be suspicious of using so few datapoints in a correlation.
  5. Y-axis doesn't start at zero: I truncated the Y-axes of the graph above. I also used a line graph, which makes the visual connection stand out more than it deserves. Nothing against line graphs. They are great at telling a story when you have linear data! But visually it is deceptive because the only data is at the points on the graph, not the lines on the graph. In between each point, the data could have been doing anything. Like going for a random walk by itself!
    Mathematically what I showed is true, but it is intentionally misleading. Below is the same chart but with both Y-axes starting at zero.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([267,248,250,216,218,189,231,416,297,])
array_2 = np.array([0.978756,0.486456,0.247388,0.494473,0.471605,0.265271,1.29036,4.93657,1.70855,])
array_1_name = "Popularity of the first name Thaddeus"
array_2_name = "Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Maine"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

You're a rater extraordinaire!


Correlation ID: 4473 · Black Variable ID: 3584 · Red Variable ID: 26107
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0