about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #4,462 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Votes for the Republican Presidential candidate in Hawaii and the second variable is Kerosene used in Ecuador.  The chart goes from 1980 to 2020, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image

AI explanation

It seems that as the Republican support in Hawaii dwindles, there's a ripple effect on a global scale. Perhaps it's a case of 'losing steam' as the political landscape shifts. As the votes for the Republican candidate in Hawaii go down, the kerosene usage in Ecuador follows suit. One could say it's a classic case of 'republican't power leading to less 'kero-scene' in Ecuador. It's a connection that really burns bright!

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: An image that looks like it is a scene from 'Star Wars': Amidst the lush landscape of Hawaii, a group of diverse individuals, dressed in vibrant tropical attire, is gathered in a circular formation. Suddenly, a holographic projection of a galactic map materializes in the center of their midst, captivating everyone's attention. Their expressions range from concern to disbelief, as they watch the representation of the Republican Presidential candidate's votes steadily decreasing in real-time. The immersive scene is filled with a somber and contemplative air, echoing the weight of the moment's gravity. In the background, the exotic foliage and crystal-clear waters bring a unique essence to the setting. Meanwhile, a distant echo of solemn whispers and the soft rustle of palm leaves underscores the current turbulent event. The juxtaposition of the galactic hologram against the natural beauty of the island creates a striking image that represents the convergence of global events with the tranquility of a serene paradise. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Votes for the Republican Presidential candidate in Hawaii and Kerosene used in Ecuador. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Cutsy art illustration An image that looks like it is a scene from 'Star Wars' Concept art Cybernetic art Glitch art
ChatGPT: An image that looks like it is a scene from 'Star Wars'

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Votes for the Republican Presidential candidate in Hawaii and Kerosene used in Ecuador, in the following situation: It seems that as the Republican support in Hawaii dwindles, there's a ripple effect on a global scale. Perhaps it's a case of 'losing steam' as the political landscape shifts. As the votes for the Republican candidate in Hawaii go down, the kerosene usage in Ecuador follows suit. One could say it's a classic case of 'republican't power leading to less 'kero-scene' in Ecuador. It's a connection that really burns bright!. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In Hawaii, a group of people is gathered around a television, watching as the votes for the Republican Presidential candidate decrease. The mood is solemn, with some shaking their heads in disappointment. Meanwhile, in Ecuador, a woman is seen reducing the amount of kerosene used for cooking, opting for alternative means. The diminishing support for the Republican candidate in Hawaii is mirrored by the reduction in kerosene usage in Ecuador, symbolizing a global shift in both the political and energy landscapes.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ An image that looks like it is a scene from 'Star Wars' ] and depicting this scene: In Hawaii, a group of people is gathered around a television, watching as the votes for the Republican Presidential candidate decrease. The mood is solemn, with some shaking their heads in disappointment. Meanwhile, in Ecuador, a woman is seen reducing the amount of kerosene used for cooking, opting for alternative means. The diminishing support for the Republican candidate in Hawaii is mirrored by the reduction in kerosene usage in Ecuador, symbolizing a global shift in both the political and energy landscapes. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: An image that looks like it is a scene from 'Star Wars': Amidst the lush landscape of Hawaii, a group of diverse individuals, dressed in vibrant tropical attire, is gathered in a circular formation. Suddenly, a holographic projection of a galactic map materializes in the center of their midst, captivating everyone's attention. Their expressions range from concern to disbelief, as they watch the representation of the Republican Presidential candidate's votes steadily decreasing in real-time. The immersive scene is filled with a somber and contemplative air, echoing the weight of the moment's gravity. In the background, the exotic foliage and crystal-clear waters bring a unique essence to the setting. Meanwhile, a distant echo of solemn whispers and the soft rustle of palm leaves underscores the current turbulent event. The juxtaposition of the galactic hologram against the natural beauty of the island creates a striking image that represents the convergence of global events with the tranquility of a serene paradise.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how a decrease in Votes for the Republican Presidential candidate in Hawaii caused Kerosene used in Ecuador to decrease. Include one good pun.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Burning Down the House: Correlating Votes for the Republican Presidential Candidate in Hawaii with Kerosene Consumption in Ecuador

The International Journal of Political Pyrotechnics

Jan 2024
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Votes for the Republican Presidential candidate in Hawaii and Kerosene used in Ecuador. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Include a pun in the title.

Your research team used data from MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse and Energy Information Administration to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9055015 and p < 0.01 for 1980 to 2020.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
"Burning Down the House: Correlating Votes for the Republican Presidential Candidate in Hawaii with Kerosene Consumption in Ecuador"

[[ABSTRACT]]
Recent research has uncovered an unexpected link between seemingly disparate regions, shining a light on the unlikely connection between Votes for the Republican Presidential candidate in Hawaii and Kerosene used in Ecuador. Utilizing data from MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and the Energy Information Administration, our study investigated this peculiar relationship over the period from 1980 to 2020. Surprisingly, we discovered a positively staggering correlation coefficient of 0.9055015 (p < 0.01), suggesting a compelling association between these two variables. It seems that even across vast oceans and political divides, there exists an underlying connection that cannot be extinguished. As Kerosene usage flares in Ecuador, it appears to ignite a spark of solidarity with the Republican candidate in the Aloha State.

In light of these findings, one cannot help but wonder: what fuels this unexpected correlation? Perhaps it's the burning desire for change, or maybe just a coincidence that sets the political stage ablaze. Regardless, the numbers don't lie – there's something fishy about this combination of kerosene and conservative preferences. Our study illuminates an enigmatic relationship that may have voters and economists alike burning with curiosity. After all, when it comes to statistical correlations, it's not the wattage that counts – it's the Republicans and lumens!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Votes for the Republican Presidential candidate in Hawaii and Kerosene used in Ecuador. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Burning Down the House: Correlating Votes for the Republican Presidential Candidate in Hawaii with Kerosene Consumption in Ecuador"

[[ABSTRACT]]
Recent research has uncovered an unexpected link between seemingly disparate regions, shining a light on the unlikely connection between Votes for the Republican Presidential candidate in Hawaii and Kerosene used in Ecuador. Utilizing data from MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and the Energy Information Administration, our study investigated this peculiar relationship over the period from 1980 to 2020. Surprisingly, we discovered a positively staggering correlation coefficient of 0.9055015 (p < 0.01), suggesting a compelling association between these two variables. It seems that even across vast oceans and political divides, there exists an underlying connection that cannot be extinguished. As Kerosene usage flares in Ecuador, it appears to ignite a spark of solidarity with the Republican candidate in the Aloha State.

In light of these findings, one cannot help but wonder: what fuels this unexpected correlation? Perhaps it's the burning desire for change, or maybe just a coincidence that sets the political stage ablaze. Regardless, the numbers don't lie – there's something fishy about this combination of kerosene and conservative preferences. Our study illuminates an enigmatic relationship that may have voters and economists alike burning with curiosity. After all, when it comes to statistical correlations, it's not the wattage that counts – it's the Republicans and lumens!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

The connection between voting patterns in one region and consumption habits in another has long fascinated researchers in the field of political science and economics. While it is not uncommon to explore the relationship between local and international economic factors, the correlation between Votes for the Republican Presidential candidate in Hawaii and Kerosene consumption in Ecuador brings a new dimension to the concept of cross-regional influence. This unlikely association has set the stage for an intriguing investigation into the underlying factors driving these seemingly unrelated phenomena.

It's not every day that one comes across a correlation as bizarre as this one - unless, of course, it's an "oily" coincidence! The fire of interest in this peculiar relationship has been stoked by the discovery of a statistically significant association, and we aim to shed light on the potential mechanisms behind this unexpected alignment. After all, in the world of statistical research, it's not just about finding illuminating correlations - sometimes, it's about sparking curiosity that cannot be extinguished.

Our study offers an in-depth analysis of the voting trends in Hawaii, a state where the political landscape leans towards the Democratic party historically, with the consumption patterns of kerosene in Ecuador, a region with distinct economic and cultural dynamics. While the dry numbers may seem to suggest an unlikely connection at first glance, the statistical analysis has uncovered a peculiar bond that simply cannot be ignored.

As we delve into the nuances of this unanticipated correlation, it's essential to consider the potential confounding variables and underlying factors that may be driving this association. Is it the flickering flame of political ideology, or a mere coincidence waiting to be extinguished? The data doesn't provide definitive answers, but it certainly ignites a sense of wonder and curiosity.

Stay tuned – the flames of knowledge are about to be fanned with our findings, illuminating a path towards understanding the unexpected interplay between political preferences and global consumption patterns. After all, when it comes to statistics, it's not just about the "data" – it's also about the "dad jokes" that light up the way!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Votes for the Republican Presidential candidate in Hawaii and Kerosene used in Ecuador. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then name a few real TV shows that sound like they might be relevant to the topic that you watched as research.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Burning Down the House: Correlating Votes for the Republican Presidential Candidate in Hawaii with Kerosene Consumption in Ecuador"

[[ABSTRACT]]
Recent research has uncovered an unexpected link between seemingly disparate regions, shining a light on the unlikely connection between Votes for the Republican Presidential candidate in Hawaii and Kerosene used in Ecuador. Utilizing data from MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and the Energy Information Administration, our study investigated this peculiar relationship over the period from 1980 to 2020. Surprisingly, we discovered a positively staggering correlation coefficient of 0.9055015 (p < 0.01), suggesting a compelling association between these two variables. It seems that even across vast oceans and political divides, there exists an underlying connection that cannot be extinguished. As Kerosene usage flares in Ecuador, it appears to ignite a spark of solidarity with the Republican candidate in the Aloha State.

In light of these findings, one cannot help but wonder: what fuels this unexpected correlation? Perhaps it's the burning desire for change, or maybe just a coincidence that sets the political stage ablaze. Regardless, the numbers don't lie – there's something fishy about this combination of kerosene and conservative preferences. Our study illuminates an enigmatic relationship that may have voters and economists alike burning with curiosity. After all, when it comes to statistical correlations, it's not the wattage that counts – it's the Republicans and lumens!

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The connection between voting patterns in one region and consumption habits in another has long fascinated researchers in the field of political science and economics. While it is not uncommon to explore the relationship between local and international economic factors, the correlation between Votes for the Republican Presidential candidate in Hawaii and Kerosene consumption in Ecuador brings a new dimension to the concept of cross-regional influence. This unlikely association has set the stage for an intriguing investigation into the underlying factors driving these seemingly unrelated phenomena.
It's not every day that one comes across a correlation as bizarre as this one - unless, of course, it's an "oily" coincidence! The fire of interest in this peculiar relationship has been stoked by the discovery of a statistically significant association, and we aim to shed light on the potential mechanisms behind this unexpected alignment. After all, in the world of statistical research, it's not just about finding illuminating correlations - sometimes, it's about sparking curiosity that cannot be extinguished.
Our study offers an in-depth analysis of the voting trends in Hawaii, a state where the political landscape leans towards the Democratic party historically, with the consumption patterns of kerosene in Ecuador, a region with distinct economic and cultural dynamics. While the dry numbers may seem to suggest an unlikely connection at first glance, the statistical analysis has uncovered a peculiar bond that simply cannot be ignored.
As we delve into the nuances of this unanticipated correlation, it's essential to consider the potential confounding variables and underlying factors that may be driving this association. Is it the flickering flame of political ideology, or a mere coincidence waiting to be extinguished? The data doesn't provide definitive answers, but it certainly ignites a sense of wonder and curiosity.
Stay tuned – the flames of knowledge are about to be fanned with our findings, illuminating a path towards understanding the unexpected interplay between political preferences and global consumption patterns. After all, when it comes to statistics, it's not just about the "data" – it's also about the "dad jokes" that light up the way!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

The relationship between Votes for the Republican Presidential candidate in Hawaii and Kerosene consumption in Ecuador has piqued the interest of researchers in various fields, prompting a close examination of this unusual association. Smith (2015) explored the voting patterns in Hawaii, noting the historical preference for Democratic candidates, while Doe (2017) investigated the consumption trends of kerosene in Ecuador. These seemingly disparate regions have captivated the academic community with their unexpected connection, igniting a spark of curiosity that cannot be extinguish.

In "Book," the authors find that the correlation between the two variables is as striking as a match in a dark room – illuminating, to say the least. While it may seem like a stretch to draw a link between political leanings in Hawaii and kerosene usage in Ecuador, our study endeavors to unravel the enigmatic bond that ties these distant regions together.

Jones (2018) provided insights into global economic influences on voting behavior, shedding light on the intricate interplay between regional dynamics and political preferences. Furthermore, "Data Analysis and Fire Puns" employed a multidisciplinary approach to examine the potential drivers behind this unexpected correlation, offering a fiery blend of statistical analysis and witty puns to fuel the quest for understanding.

Moving beyond the realm of non-fiction, works of fiction such as "The Kerosene Chronicles" and "Republican Rendezvous in Hawaii" evoke the allure of unconventional connections and untapped mysteries, perhaps hinting at the underlying subtleties that intertwine these seemingly unrelated domains. As the flames of curiosity continue to flicker, it's evident that this unusual association has set the research community ablaze with intrigue.

In addition, the authors of this paper took a more unconventional approach to gathering insights by immersing themselves in relevant television shows such as "Hawaii Five-O" and "Ecuadorian Escapades," delving into the cultural, political, and econom-SEA-faring aspects of these regions. While the data from these shows may not have provided direct statistical evidence, they certainly kindled an appreciation for the diverse dynamics at play.

To conclude, our examination of the literature reveals a tapestry of research efforts, ranging from scholarly analyses to fictional narratives and even televised explorations. Through this eclectic lens, we aim to bring a fresh perspective to the intriguing relationship between Votes for the Republican Presidential candidate in Hawaii and Kerosene consumption in Ecuador, adding a touch of humor to spark interest and kindle the spirit of inquiry. After all, in the world of statistical research, it's not only about uncovering correlations – it's also about igniting a sense of wonder.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Votes for the Republican Presidential candidate in Hawaii and Kerosene used in Ecuador. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse and Energy Information Administration . You used data from 1980 to 2020

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Burning Down the House: Correlating Votes for the Republican Presidential Candidate in Hawaii with Kerosene Consumption in Ecuador"

[[ABSTRACT]]
Recent research has uncovered an unexpected link between seemingly disparate regions, shining a light on the unlikely connection between Votes for the Republican Presidential candidate in Hawaii and Kerosene used in Ecuador. Utilizing data from MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and the Energy Information Administration, our study investigated this peculiar relationship over the period from 1980 to 2020. Surprisingly, we discovered a positively staggering correlation coefficient of 0.9055015 (p < 0.01), suggesting a compelling association between these two variables. It seems that even across vast oceans and political divides, there exists an underlying connection that cannot be extinguished. As Kerosene usage flares in Ecuador, it appears to ignite a spark of solidarity with the Republican candidate in the Aloha State.

In light of these findings, one cannot help but wonder: what fuels this unexpected correlation? Perhaps it's the burning desire for change, or maybe just a coincidence that sets the political stage ablaze. Regardless, the numbers don't lie – there's something fishy about this combination of kerosene and conservative preferences. Our study illuminates an enigmatic relationship that may have voters and economists alike burning with curiosity. After all, when it comes to statistical correlations, it's not the wattage that counts – it's the Republicans and lumens!

[[INTRODUCTION]]
The connection between voting patterns in one region and consumption habits in another has long fascinated researchers in the field of political science and economics. While it is not uncommon to explore the relationship between local and international economic factors, the correlation between Votes for the Republican Presidential candidate in Hawaii and Kerosene consumption in Ecuador brings a new dimension to the concept of cross-regional influence. This unlikely association has set the stage for an intriguing investigation into the underlying factors driving these seemingly unrelated phenomena.
It's not every day that one comes across a correlation as bizarre as this one - unless, of course, it's an "oily" coincidence! The fire of interest in this peculiar relationship has been stoked by the discovery of a statistically significant association, and we aim to shed light on the potential mechanisms behind this unexpected alignment. After all, in the world of statistical research, it's not just about finding illuminating correlations - sometimes, it's about sparking curiosity that cannot be extinguished.
Our study offers an in-depth analysis of the voting trends in Hawaii, a state where the political landscape leans towards the Democratic party historically, with the consumption patterns of kerosene in Ecuador, a region with distinct economic and cultural dynamics. While the dry numbers may seem to suggest an unlikely connection at first glance, the statistical analysis has uncovered a peculiar bond that simply cannot be ignored.
As we delve into the nuances of this unanticipated correlation, it's essential to consider the potential confounding variables and underlying factors that may be driving this association. Is it the flickering flame of political ideology, or a mere coincidence waiting to be extinguished? The data doesn't provide definitive answers, but it certainly ignites a sense of wonder and curiosity.
Stay tuned – the flames of knowledge are about to be fanned with our findings, illuminating a path towards understanding the unexpected interplay between political preferences and global consumption patterns. After all, when it comes to statistics, it's not just about the "data" – it's also about the "dad jokes" that light up the way!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To investigate the intriguing correlation between Votes for the Republican Presidential candidate in Hawaii and kerosene consumption in Ecuador, an array of rigorous methodological approaches was employed. The data utilized in this study spanned the period from 1980 to 2020 and was principally sourced from reputable repositories, including the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and the Energy Information Administration. Our team meticulously combed through these datasets, extracting the pertinent variables with the determination of gold prospectors panning for statistical nuggets.

The first step in our convoluted analytical process involved the construction of time series models to capture the temporal dynamics of Republican voting patterns in Hawaii and kerosene consumption in Ecuador. These models were crafted with the precision of a master sculptor, chiseling away at the data to reveal the underlying patterns and trends. The resulting time series were then subjected to a battery of diagnostic tests to ensure their suitability for further statistical analysis, akin to screening actors for the leading roles in a statistical soap opera.

Following the meticulous construction and validation of the time series models, we deployed advanced econometric techniques to quantify the association between the variables of interest. The application of autoregressive integrated moving average (ARIMA) models, seemingly akin to casting a spell to detect statistically significant correlations, allowed us to unravel the mysterious connection between Republican votes in the Pacific paradise and kerosene consumption in the South American enclave. This process required the finesse of a tightrope walker, navigating the precarious terrain of statistical inference with an unwavering focus on robustness and reliability.

After extracting the coefficients and associated statistics from the ARIMA models, we probed the depths of the relationship between Votes for the Republican Presidential candidate in Hawaii and kerosene consumption in Ecuador using Granger causality tests. Much like detectives gathering evidence to crack open a case, these tests scrutinized the temporal ordering of the variables, unveiling the direction of influence between the two seemingly disparate phenomena. The deployment of such tests unveiled a relationship that was as surprising as finding a fire hydrant in a desert - a rather unexpected discovery indeed!

In addition to the aforementioned model-based approaches, we also ventured into the realm of spatial statistics to examine potential geographic correlations between the political proclivities of Hawaii and the energy preferences of Ecuador. Employing spatial autocorrelation techniques, we sought to discern whether there existed a spatial clustering of Republican votes in Hawaii that corresponded to specific patterns of kerosene consumption in different regions of Ecuador. This endeavor was akin to charting the constellations in the statistical sky, albeit with an assortment of regression coefficients and spatial lags instead of stars.

Upon establishing a robust understanding of the statistical relationship between the variables, we proceeded to conduct sensitivity analyses to ascertain the stability of our findings under varying model specifications and parameterizations. This process was akin to stress-testing the statistical fortitude of our results, ensuring that they could withstand the theoretical temblors and data-driven tremors that often accompany robust scientific inquiry.

As we meticulously navigated this labyrinthine methodological landscape, our endeavors were characterized by a resolute commitment to precision, reliability, and the occasional statistical pun. The complexities of our analytical odyssey notwithstanding, our findings illuminate an unexpected connection that transcends geographical and political boundaries, sparking an inferno of scholarly curiosity that simply cannot be extinguished. After all, when it comes to statistical research, it's not just about the correlations – it's also about the occasional statistical pun that sets the methodological stage ablaze!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Votes for the Republican Presidential candidate in Hawaii and Kerosene used in Ecuador. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse and Energy Information Administration .

For the time period 1980 to 2020, you found a correlation 0.9055015, r-squared of 0.8199330, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Burning Down the House: Correlating Votes for the Republican Presidential Candidate in Hawaii with Kerosene Consumption in Ecuador"

[[ABSTRACT]]
Recent research has uncovered an unexpected link between seemingly disparate regions, shining a light on the unlikely connection between Votes for the Republican Presidential candidate in Hawaii and Kerosene used in Ecuador. Utilizing data from MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and the Energy Information Administration, our study investigated this peculiar relationship over the period from 1980 to 2020. Surprisingly, we discovered a positively staggering correlation coefficient of 0.9055015 (p < 0.01), suggesting a compelling association between these two variables. It seems that even across vast oceans and political divides, there exists an underlying connection that cannot be extinguished. As Kerosene usage flares in Ecuador, it appears to ignite a spark of solidarity with the Republican candidate in the Aloha State.

In light of these findings, one cannot help but wonder: what fuels this unexpected correlation? Perhaps it's the burning desire for change, or maybe just a coincidence that sets the political stage ablaze. Regardless, the numbers don't lie – there's something fishy about this combination of kerosene and conservative preferences. Our study illuminates an enigmatic relationship that may have voters and economists alike burning with curiosity. After all, when it comes to statistical correlations, it's not the wattage that counts – it's the Republicans and lumens!

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
The connection between voting patterns in one region and consumption habits in another has long fascinated researchers in the field of political science and economics. While it is not uncommon to explore the relationship between local and international economic factors, the correlation between Votes for the Republican Presidential candidate in Hawaii and Kerosene consumption in Ecuador brings a new dimension to the concept of cross-regional influence. This unlikely association has set the stage for an intriguing investigation into the underlying factors driving these seemingly unrelated phenomena.
It's not every day that one comes across a correlation as bizarre as this one - unless, of course, it's an "oily" coincidence! The fire of interest in this peculiar relationship has been stoked by the discovery of a statistically significant association, and we aim to shed light on the potential mechanisms behind this unexpected alignment. After all, in the world of statistical research, it's not just about finding illuminating correlations - sometimes, it's about sparking curiosity that cannot be extinguished.
Our study offers an in-depth analysis of the voting trends in Hawaii, a state where the political landscape leans towards the Democratic party historically, with the consumption patterns of kerosene in Ecuador, a region with distinct economic and cultural dynamics. While the dry numbers may seem to suggest an unlikely connection at first glance, the statistical analysis has uncovered a peculiar bond that simply cannot be ignored.
As we delve into the nuances of this unanticipated correlation, it's essential to consider the potential confounding variables and underlying factors that may be driving this association. Is it the flickering flame of political ideology, or a mere coincidence waiting to be extinguished? The data doesn't provide definitive answers, but it certainly ignites a sense of wonder and curiosity.
Stay tuned – the flames of knowledge are about to be fanned with our findings, illuminating a path towards understanding the unexpected interplay between political preferences and global consumption patterns. After all, when it comes to statistics, it's not just about the "data" – it's also about the "dad jokes" that light up the way!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The statistical analysis conducted revealed a remarkably strong correlation between Votes for the Republican Presidential candidate in Hawaii and kerosene consumption in Ecuador over the period from 1980 to 2020. The correlation coefficient of 0.9055015 indicated a robust positive relationship between these seemingly unrelated variables. This finding was further supported by an r-squared value of 0.8199330, suggesting that approximately 82% of the variation in kerosene usage in Ecuador could be explained by the voting patterns in Hawaii. The p-value of less than 0.01 provided strong evidence against the null hypothesis, indicating the statistical significance of the observed correlation.

The correlation is so strong, it's almost as if these two variables were "kerosene" it together all along! It's an unexpected connection that seems to defy geographical and political boundaries, igniting curiosity and prompting further exploration into the underlying mechanisms driving this peculiar relationship. It appears that even across the vast Pacific Ocean, there exists a bond that cannot be extinguished – a flame of correlation that burns brightly amidst the complexities of international relations and political dynamics.

Our findings are succinctly encapsulated in Figure 1, which presents a scatterplot illustrating the compelling correlation between Votes for the Republican Presidential candidate in Hawaii and kerosene consumption in Ecuador. As the scatterplot clearly demonstrates, there is a notable upward trend, indicating a positive association between these variables. The strength of this correlation serves as a beacon, guiding future research efforts toward unraveling the enigmatic connection between political voting patterns and energy consumption on a global scale.

The unexpected relationship uncovered in this study kindles an intellectual fire, inviting further investigation and discussion. It's as if the statistical analysis has sparked a flame of curiosity, illuminating a path toward understanding the intricate interplay between disparate regions and their underlying socio-political dynamics. After all, when it comes to statistical correlations, there's no shortage of "fuel" for thought – and plenty of opportunity for a good dad joke!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Votes for the Republican Presidential candidate in Hawaii and Kerosene used in Ecuador. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
"Burning Down the House: Correlating Votes for the Republican Presidential Candidate in Hawaii with Kerosene Consumption in Ecuador"

[[ABSTRACT]]
Recent research has uncovered an unexpected link between seemingly disparate regions, shining a light on the unlikely connection between Votes for the Republican Presidential candidate in Hawaii and Kerosene used in Ecuador. Utilizing data from MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and the Energy Information Administration, our study investigated this peculiar relationship over the period from 1980 to 2020. Surprisingly, we discovered a positively staggering correlation coefficient of 0.9055015 (p < 0.01), suggesting a compelling association between these two variables. It seems that even across vast oceans and political divides, there exists an underlying connection that cannot be extinguished. As Kerosene usage flares in Ecuador, it appears to ignite a spark of solidarity with the Republican candidate in the Aloha State.

In light of these findings, one cannot help but wonder: what fuels this unexpected correlation? Perhaps it's the burning desire for change, or maybe just a coincidence that sets the political stage ablaze. Regardless, the numbers don't lie – there's something fishy about this combination of kerosene and conservative preferences. Our study illuminates an enigmatic relationship that may have voters and economists alike burning with curiosity. After all, when it comes to statistical correlations, it's not the wattage that counts – it's the Republicans and lumens!

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The relationship between Votes for the Republican Presidential candidate in Hawaii and Kerosene consumption in Ecuador has piqued the interest of researchers in various fields, prompting a close examination of this unusual association. Smith (2015) explored the voting patterns in Hawaii, noting the historical preference for Democratic candidates, while Doe (2017) investigated the consumption trends of kerosene in Ecuador. These seemingly disparate regions have captivated the academic community with their unexpected connection, igniting a spark of curiosity that cannot be extinguish.
In "Book," the authors find that the correlation between the two variables is as striking as a match in a dark room – illuminating, to say the least. While it may seem like a stretch to draw a link between political leanings in Hawaii and kerosene usage in Ecuador, our study endeavors to unravel the enigmatic bond that ties these distant regions together.
Jones (2018) provided insights into global economic influences on voting behavior, shedding light on the intricate interplay between regional dynamics and political preferences. Furthermore, "Data Analysis and Fire Puns" employed a multidisciplinary approach to examine the potential drivers behind this unexpected correlation, offering a fiery blend of statistical analysis and witty puns to fuel the quest for understanding.
Moving beyond the realm of non-fiction, works of fiction such as "The Kerosene Chronicles" and "Republican Rendezvous in Hawaii" evoke the allure of unconventional connections and untapped mysteries, perhaps hinting at the underlying subtleties that intertwine these seemingly unrelated domains. As the flames of curiosity continue to flicker, it's evident that this unusual association has set the research community ablaze with intrigue.
In addition, the authors of this paper took a more unconventional approach to gathering insights by immersing themselves in relevant television shows such as "Hawaii Five-O" and "Ecuadorian Escapades," delving into the cultural, political, and econom-SEA-faring aspects of these regions. While the data from these shows may not have provided direct statistical evidence, they certainly kindled an appreciation for the diverse dynamics at play.
To conclude, our examination of the literature reveals a tapestry of research efforts, ranging from scholarly analyses to fictional narratives and even televised explorations. Through this eclectic lens, we aim to bring a fresh perspective to the intriguing relationship between Votes for the Republican Presidential candidate in Hawaii and Kerosene consumption in Ecuador, adding a touch of humor to spark interest and kindle the spirit of inquiry. After all, in the world of statistical research, it's not only about uncovering correlations – it's also about igniting a sense of wonder.

[[RESULTS]]
The statistical analysis conducted revealed a remarkably strong correlation between Votes for the Republican Presidential candidate in Hawaii and kerosene consumption in Ecuador over the period from 1980 to 2020. The correlation coefficient of 0.9055015 indicated a robust positive relationship between these seemingly unrelated variables. This finding was further supported by an r-squared value of 0.8199330, suggesting that approximately 82% of the variation in kerosene usage in Ecuador could be explained by the voting patterns in Hawaii. The p-value of less than 0.01 provided strong evidence against the null hypothesis, indicating the statistical significance of the observed correlation.
The correlation is so strong, it's almost as if these two variables were "kerosene" it together all along! It's an unexpected connection that seems to defy geographical and political boundaries, igniting curiosity and prompting further exploration into the underlying mechanisms driving this peculiar relationship. It appears that even across the vast Pacific Ocean, there exists a bond that cannot be extinguished – a flame of correlation that burns brightly amidst the complexities of international relations and political dynamics.
Our findings are succinctly encapsulated in Figure 1, which presents a scatterplot illustrating the compelling correlation between Votes for the Republican Presidential candidate in Hawaii and kerosene consumption in Ecuador. As the scatterplot clearly demonstrates, there is a notable upward trend, indicating a positive association between these variables. The strength of this correlation serves as a beacon, guiding future research efforts toward unraveling the enigmatic connection between political voting patterns and energy consumption on a global scale.
The unexpected relationship uncovered in this study kindles an intellectual fire, inviting further investigation and discussion. It's as if the statistical analysis has sparked a flame of curiosity, illuminating a path toward understanding the intricate interplay between disparate regions and their underlying socio-political dynamics. After all, when it comes to statistical correlations, there's no shortage of "fuel" for thought – and plenty of opportunity for a good dad joke!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The findings of this study have illuminated a captivating relationship between Votes for the Republican Presidential candidate in Hawaii and kerosene consumption in Ecuador, establishing a remarkably strong positive correlation between these seemingly unrelated variables. Our results align with prior research that has delved into the intricate connections between regional political preferences and energy usage, shedding light on the unexpected bond that ties these distant regions together.

Building upon the literature review, our investigation has provided empirical evidence that supports the curiosity sparked by previous scholarly and non-scholarly works. The positively staggering correlation coefficient of 0.9055015 echoes the insights from Smith (2015), Doe (2017), and "Book," underscoring the robustness of the association between political voting patterns in Hawaii and kerosene consumption in Ecuador. It's almost as if these variables were bound to be "kerosene" together all along – a connection that defies conventional expectations and fuels the flames of inquiry.

The statistical significance of our findings, as indicated by the p-value of less than 0.01, further strengthens the case for an intriguing relationship between Votes for the Republican Presidential candidate in Hawaii and kerosene usage in Ecuador. It's as if the data itself is igniting a sense of wonder, prompting us to further explore the underlying mechanisms driving this unexpected correlation. One could say that our analysis has set the research community ablaze with interest, fanning the flames of curiosity towards untapped mysteries and unconventional connections in the realm of socio-political dynamics and energy consumption.

The r-squared value of 0.8199330 underscores the substantial explanatory power of voting patterns in Hawaii in elucidating the variations in kerosene usage in Ecuador. This aligns with the intricate interplay between regional dynamics and political preferences highlighted in Jones (2018), affirming the relevance of global economic influences in shaping voting behavior and energy consumption patterns. Such results not only provide statistically significant evidence but also offer a flame of insight into the interwoven complexities of international relations and socio-political dynamics, sparking further interest in exploring the enigmatic relationship between these seemingly disparate domains.

In conclusion, our study has provided empirical support for the unexpected correlation between Votes for the Republican Presidential candidate in Hawaii and kerosene consumption in Ecuador, contributing to a growing body of research that seeks to unravel the underlying mechanisms driving this captivating association. The statistical correlation between these variables may indeed seem surprising, but it serves as a reminder that the world of data analysis is not merely about uncovering correlations – it's also about igniting a sense of wonder and humor, kindling a spirit of inquiry that transcends traditional boundaries and conventional expectations. After all, in the realm of statistical research, there's always room for a good dad joke – particularly when it comes to fueling intellectual curiosity and scholarly engagement.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Votes for the Republican Presidential candidate in Hawaii and Kerosene used in Ecuador. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
"Burning Down the House: Correlating Votes for the Republican Presidential Candidate in Hawaii with Kerosene Consumption in Ecuador"

[[ABSTRACT]]
Recent research has uncovered an unexpected link between seemingly disparate regions, shining a light on the unlikely connection between Votes for the Republican Presidential candidate in Hawaii and Kerosene used in Ecuador. Utilizing data from MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and the Energy Information Administration, our study investigated this peculiar relationship over the period from 1980 to 2020. Surprisingly, we discovered a positively staggering correlation coefficient of 0.9055015 (p < 0.01), suggesting a compelling association between these two variables. It seems that even across vast oceans and political divides, there exists an underlying connection that cannot be extinguished. As Kerosene usage flares in Ecuador, it appears to ignite a spark of solidarity with the Republican candidate in the Aloha State.

In light of these findings, one cannot help but wonder: what fuels this unexpected correlation? Perhaps it's the burning desire for change, or maybe just a coincidence that sets the political stage ablaze. Regardless, the numbers don't lie – there's something fishy about this combination of kerosene and conservative preferences. Our study illuminates an enigmatic relationship that may have voters and economists alike burning with curiosity. After all, when it comes to statistical correlations, it's not the wattage that counts – it's the Republicans and lumens!

[[INTRDUCTION]]
The connection between voting patterns in one region and consumption habits in another has long fascinated researchers in the field of political science and economics. While it is not uncommon to explore the relationship between local and international economic factors, the correlation between Votes for the Republican Presidential candidate in Hawaii and Kerosene consumption in Ecuador brings a new dimension to the concept of cross-regional influence. This unlikely association has set the stage for an intriguing investigation into the underlying factors driving these seemingly unrelated phenomena.
It's not every day that one comes across a correlation as bizarre as this one - unless, of course, it's an "oily" coincidence! The fire of interest in this peculiar relationship has been stoked by the discovery of a statistically significant association, and we aim to shed light on the potential mechanisms behind this unexpected alignment. After all, in the world of statistical research, it's not just about finding illuminating correlations - sometimes, it's about sparking curiosity that cannot be extinguished.
Our study offers an in-depth analysis of the voting trends in Hawaii, a state where the political landscape leans towards the Democratic party historically, with the consumption patterns of kerosene in Ecuador, a region with distinct economic and cultural dynamics. While the dry numbers may seem to suggest an unlikely connection at first glance, the statistical analysis has uncovered a peculiar bond that simply cannot be ignored.
As we delve into the nuances of this unanticipated correlation, it's essential to consider the potential confounding variables and underlying factors that may be driving this association. Is it the flickering flame of political ideology, or a mere coincidence waiting to be extinguished? The data doesn't provide definitive answers, but it certainly ignites a sense of wonder and curiosity.
Stay tuned – the flames of knowledge are about to be fanned with our findings, illuminating a path towards understanding the unexpected interplay between political preferences and global consumption patterns. After all, when it comes to statistics, it's not just about the "data" – it's also about the "dad jokes" that light up the way!

[[RESULTS]]
The statistical analysis conducted revealed a remarkably strong correlation between Votes for the Republican Presidential candidate in Hawaii and kerosene consumption in Ecuador over the period from 1980 to 2020. The correlation coefficient of 0.9055015 indicated a robust positive relationship between these seemingly unrelated variables. This finding was further supported by an r-squared value of 0.8199330, suggesting that approximately 82% of the variation in kerosene usage in Ecuador could be explained by the voting patterns in Hawaii. The p-value of less than 0.01 provided strong evidence against the null hypothesis, indicating the statistical significance of the observed correlation.
The correlation is so strong, it's almost as if these two variables were "kerosene" it together all along! It's an unexpected connection that seems to defy geographical and political boundaries, igniting curiosity and prompting further exploration into the underlying mechanisms driving this peculiar relationship. It appears that even across the vast Pacific Ocean, there exists a bond that cannot be extinguished – a flame of correlation that burns brightly amidst the complexities of international relations and political dynamics.
Our findings are succinctly encapsulated in Figure 1, which presents a scatterplot illustrating the compelling correlation between Votes for the Republican Presidential candidate in Hawaii and kerosene consumption in Ecuador. As the scatterplot clearly demonstrates, there is a notable upward trend, indicating a positive association between these variables. The strength of this correlation serves as a beacon, guiding future research efforts toward unraveling the enigmatic connection between political voting patterns and energy consumption on a global scale.
The unexpected relationship uncovered in this study kindles an intellectual fire, inviting further investigation and discussion. It's as if the statistical analysis has sparked a flame of curiosity, illuminating a path toward understanding the intricate interplay between disparate regions and their underlying socio-political dynamics. After all, when it comes to statistical correlations, there's no shortage of "fuel" for thought – and plenty of opportunity for a good dad joke!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our research has illuminated an astonishing correlation between Votes for the Republican Presidential candidate in Hawaii and kerosene consumption in Ecuador. The exceptionally strong correlation coefficient of 0.9055015 (p < 0.01) has shed light on a connection that defies conventional geographic and political boundaries. It's almost as if these two variables were "kerosene" it together all along! This unexpected linkage ignites curiosity and prompts further exploration into the underlying mechanisms driving this intriguing relationship.

Our findings suggest that there is an underlying bond that cannot be extinguished – a flame of correlation that burns brightly amidst the complexities of international relations and political dynamics. The statistical significance of the observed correlation serves as a beacon, guiding future research efforts toward unraveling the enigmatic connection between political voting patterns and energy consumption on a global scale.

As we wrap up this illuminating research, it's worth noting that no more research is needed in this area – unless, of course, we want to ensure that our findings don't go up in smoke!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Burning Down the House: Correlating Votes for the Republican Presidential Candidate in Hawaii with Kerosene Consumption in Ecuador. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The International Journal of Political Pyrotechnics


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Burning Down the House: Correlating Votes for the Republican Presidential Candidate in Hawaii with Kerosene Consumption in Ecuador. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

Pacific Rim Environmental Research Consortium


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Burning Down the House: Correlating Votes for the Republican Presidential Candidate in Hawaii with Kerosene Consumption in Ecuador with an abstract of Recent research has uncovered an unexpected link between seemingly disparate regions, shining a light on the unlikely connection between Votes for the Republican Presidential candidate in Hawaii and Kerosene used in Ecuador. Utilizing data from MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and the Energy Information Administration, our study investigated this peculiar relationship over the period from 1980 to 2020. Surprisingly, we discovered a positively staggering correlation coefficient of 0.9055015 (p < 0.01), suggesting a compelling association between these two variables. It seems that even across vast oceans and political divides, there exists an underlying connection that cannot be extinguished. As Kerosene usage flares in Ecuador, it appears to ignite a spark of solidarity with the Republican candidate in the Aloha State.
In light of these findings, one cannot help but wonder: what fuels this unexpected correlation? Perhaps it's the burning desire for change, or maybe just a coincidence that sets the political stage ablaze. Regardless, the numbers don't lie – there's something fishy about this combination of kerosene and conservative preferences. Our study illuminates an enigmatic relationship that may have voters and economists alike burning with curiosity. After all, when it comes to statistical correlations, it's not the wattage that counts – it's the Republicans and lumens!

ChatGPT:

"Republican Presidential candidate Hawaii votes," "kerosene consumption Ecuador correlation," "MIT Election Data and Science Lab," "Harvard Dataverse research," "Energy Information Administration data," "relationship between political preferences and energy usage," "unusual statistical correlations," "voter behavior research," "political divides and regional connections," "statistical significance in correlation coefficients."

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Votes for the Republican Presidential candidate in Hawaii
Detailed data title: Percentage of all votes cast for the Republican Presidential candidate in Hawaii
Source: MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse
See what else correlates with Votes for the Republican Presidential candidate in Hawaii

Kerosene used in Ecuador
Detailed data title: Volume of kerosene used consumed in Ecuador in millions of barrels per day
Source: Energy Information Administration
See what else correlates with Kerosene used in Ecuador

Correlation r = 0.9055015 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.8199330 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 82% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Kerosene used in Ecuador) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Votes for the Republican Presidential candidate in Hawaii) over the 8 years from 1980 through 2020.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 0.002. 0.0019629767563834554000000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.91 in 0.2% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 509 random variables Which I absolutely did.
with the same 7 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 7 because we have two variables measured over a period of 8 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.55, 0.98 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
19801984198819921996200820122020
Votes for the Republican Presidential candidate in Hawaii (Percentage of votes)42.900655.099744.75136.69731.640326.436227.682133.9547
Kerosene used in Ecuador (Million Barrels/Day)5.301415.23835.12.420.10560110.869041




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Very low n: There are not many data points included in this analysis. Even if the p-value is high, we should be suspicious of using so few datapoints in a correlation.
  5. Y-axis doesn't start at zero: I truncated the Y-axes of the graph above. I also used a line graph, which makes the visual connection stand out more than it deserves. Nothing against line graphs. They are great at telling a story when you have linear data! But visually it is deceptive because the only data is at the points on the graph, not the lines on the graph. In between each point, the data could have been doing anything. Like going for a random walk by itself!
    Mathematically what I showed is true, but it is intentionally misleading. Below is the same chart but with both Y-axes starting at zero.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([42.9006,55.0997,44.751,36.697,31.6403,26.4362,27.6821,33.9547,])
array_2 = np.array([5.30141,5.2383,5.1,2.4,2,0.105601,1,0.869041,])
array_1_name = "Votes for the Republican Presidential candidate in Hawaii"
array_2_name = "Kerosene used in Ecuador"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Your correlation inspection deserves a standing ovation!


Correlation ID: 4462 · Black Variable ID: 26084 · Red Variable ID: 24370
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0