about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #4,459 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Associates degrees awarded in Library science and the second variable is Votes for Democratic Senators in Iowa.  The chart goes from 2011 to 2020, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

As more Iowans became knowledgeable about the Dewey Decimal System, they also became more adept at categorizing political issues and candidates. This led to a greater appreciation for the organization and classification of democratic principles, ultimately influencing their votes for Senators who aligned with their newly organized political beliefs. The power of library science education in shaping political ideologies should not be underestimated!

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: [Whimsical illustration] Generate an image of a bustling library in Iowa, portraying a group of students proudly receiving their Associate degrees in Library science. The students are depicted confidently organizing books on shelves using the Dewey Decimal System, showcasing their newfound knowledge. In the background, Democrats in the state are casting their votes for Senators. Show how the influence of library science education is evident in the voters, as they are seen organizing their political beliefs and aligning themselves with candidates who embody their democratic principles.Capture the vibrant atmosphere of the library, the students’ enthusiasm, and the democratic voting process in a simple, imaginative visualization. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Associates degrees awarded in Library science and Democrat votes for Senators in Iowa. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Hyper-realistic Whimsical illustration An image that looks like it is a scene from A Disney Movie Cubism 3D Pixar Style
ChatGPT: Whimsical illustration

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Associates degrees awarded in Library science and Democrat votes for Senators in Iowa, in the following situation: As more Iowans became knowledgeable about the Dewey Decimal System, they also became more adept at categorizing political issues and candidates. This led to a greater appreciation for the organization and classification of democratic principles, ultimately influencing their votes for Senators who aligned with their newly organized political beliefs. The power of library science education in shaping political ideologies should not be underestimated!. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In a bustling library in Iowa, we see a group of students proudly receiving their Associate degrees in Library science, while in the background, Democrats in the state are casting their votes for Senators. The students are confidently organizing books on shelves using the Dewey Decimal System, showcasing their newfound knowledge. Simultaneously, the voters are seen organizing their political beliefs and aligning themselves with candidates who embody their democratic principles. The influence of library science education on their political ideologies is clearly evident.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ Whimsical illustration ] and depicting this scene: In a bustling library in Iowa, we see a group of students proudly receiving their Associate degrees in Library science, while in the background, Democrats in the state are casting their votes for Senators. The students are confidently organizing books on shelves using the Dewey Decimal System, showcasing their newfound knowledge. Simultaneously, the voters are seen organizing their political beliefs and aligning themselves with candidates who embody their democratic principles. The influence of library science education on their political ideologies is clearly evident. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: [Whimsical illustration] Generate an image of a bustling library in Iowa, portraying a group of students proudly receiving their Associate degrees in Library science. The students are depicted confidently organizing books on shelves using the Dewey Decimal System, showcasing their newfound knowledge. In the background, Democrats in the state are casting their votes for Senators. Show how the influence of library science education is evident in the voters, as they are seen organizing their political beliefs and aligning themselves with candidates who embody their democratic principles.Capture the vibrant atmosphere of the library, the students’ enthusiasm, and the democratic voting process in a simple, imaginative visualization.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how increases in Associates degrees awarded in Library science positively influenced Democrat votes for Senators in Iowa.\Make it sound serious until the end.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.05)
Librarianomics: The Dewey Decimal of Political Influence - A Study of the Relationship between Associates Degrees in Library Science and Democrat Votes for Senators in Iowa

The Journal of Political Bibliometrics

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Associates degrees awarded in Library science and Democrat votes for Senators in Iowa. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Make the title seem clever.

Your research team used data from National Center for Education Statistics and MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9977645 and p < 0.05 for 2011 to 2020.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
"Librarianomics: The Dewey Decimal of Political Influence - A Study of the Relationship between Associates Degrees in Library Science and Democrat Votes for Senators in Iowa"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we delve into the intriguing relationship between educational attainment in library science and political leanings, specifically focusing on the impact on Democrat votes for Senators in the state of Iowa. Armed with data from the National Center for Education Statistics and MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, we set out to unpack this enigmatic correlation. We found a correlation coefficient of 0.9977645 and p < 0.05 for the period spanning 2011 to 2020, shedding light on the undeniable connection between the pursuit of knowledge in library science and its repercussions in the political arena.

Our findings reveal a compelling pattern, suggesting that as the number of Associates degrees awarded in library science increases, so does the proportion of Democrat votes for Senators in Iowa. This unexpected linkage between a seemingly niche academic discipline and political inclinations has left us pondering whether there are hidden bookshelves of influence at play here.

Now, for a relevant dad joke: Why did the librarian get kicked off the plane? Because it was overbooked! Just like the findings of our study - overflowing with unexpected connections and surprising correlations.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Associates degrees awarded in Library science and Democrat votes for Senators in Iowa. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Librarianomics: The Dewey Decimal of Political Influence - A Study of the Relationship between Associates Degrees in Library Science and Democrat Votes for Senators in Iowa"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we delve into the intriguing relationship between educational attainment in library science and political leanings, specifically focusing on the impact on Democrat votes for Senators in the state of Iowa. Armed with data from the National Center for Education Statistics and MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, we set out to unpack this enigmatic correlation. We found a correlation coefficient of 0.9977645 and p < 0.05 for the period spanning 2011 to 2020, shedding light on the undeniable connection between the pursuit of knowledge in library science and its repercussions in the political arena.

Our findings reveal a compelling pattern, suggesting that as the number of Associates degrees awarded in library science increases, so does the proportion of Democrat votes for Senators in Iowa. This unexpected linkage between a seemingly niche academic discipline and political inclinations has left us pondering whether there are hidden bookshelves of influence at play here.

Now, for a relevant dad joke: Why did the librarian get kicked off the plane? Because it was overbooked! Just like the findings of our study - overflowing with unexpected connections and surprising correlations.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

Gather 'round, fellow academics and joke enthusiasts, for a journey into the realm of Librarianomics! *Cue dramatic music* In this study, we tackle a truly puzzling and spine-tingling conundrum: the tantalizing correlation between Associates degrees in Library Science and Democrat votes for Senators in Iowa.

As we embark on this adventure, we must be mindful of the profound impact that librarians and their Dewey Decimal wizardry may cast upon the political landscape. Picture this: stacks of books unlocking the secrets of political sway, all neatly organized with precision akin to a well-crafted research hypothesis.

Now, let's not shelve the enthusiasm just yet - we promise scintillating statistical analyses, thought-provoking discussions, and the occasional pun (or ten) along the way. After all, statistics are like a bikini: what they reveal is suggestive, but what they conceal is vital!

As we navigate this maze of data and democratic shifts, we cannot help but wonder: are there untapped reservoirs of political influence lurking within the hallowed halls of library science? Could it be that the mere pursuit of organizing knowledge has a ripple effect on political affiliations?

Speaking of ripples, did you hear about the statistician who drowned in a river with an average depth of 3 feet? Don't worry, we'll make sure our findings are deeper than a particularly hefty statistical anomaly!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Associates degrees awarded in Library science and Democrat votes for Senators in Iowa. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then name a few real TV shows that sound like they might be relevant to the topic that you watched as research.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Librarianomics: The Dewey Decimal of Political Influence - A Study of the Relationship between Associates Degrees in Library Science and Democrat Votes for Senators in Iowa"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we delve into the intriguing relationship between educational attainment in library science and political leanings, specifically focusing on the impact on Democrat votes for Senators in the state of Iowa. Armed with data from the National Center for Education Statistics and MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, we set out to unpack this enigmatic correlation. We found a correlation coefficient of 0.9977645 and p < 0.05 for the period spanning 2011 to 2020, shedding light on the undeniable connection between the pursuit of knowledge in library science and its repercussions in the political arena.

Our findings reveal a compelling pattern, suggesting that as the number of Associates degrees awarded in library science increases, so does the proportion of Democrat votes for Senators in Iowa. This unexpected linkage between a seemingly niche academic discipline and political inclinations has left us pondering whether there are hidden bookshelves of influence at play here.

Now, for a relevant dad joke: Why did the librarian get kicked off the plane? Because it was overbooked! Just like the findings of our study - overflowing with unexpected connections and surprising correlations.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
Gather 'round, fellow academics and joke enthusiasts, for a journey into the realm of Librarianomics! *Cue dramatic music* In this study, we tackle a truly puzzling and spine-tingling conundrum: the tantalizing correlation between Associates degrees in Library Science and Democrat votes for Senators in Iowa.
As we embark on this adventure, we must be mindful of the profound impact that librarians and their Dewey Decimal wizardry may cast upon the political landscape. Picture this: stacks of books unlocking the secrets of political sway, all neatly organized with precision akin to a well-crafted research hypothesis.
Now, let's not shelve the enthusiasm just yet - we promise scintillating statistical analyses, thought-provoking discussions, and the occasional pun (or ten) along the way. After all, statistics are like a bikini: what they reveal is suggestive, but what they conceal is vital!
As we navigate this maze of data and democratic shifts, we cannot help but wonder: are there untapped reservoirs of political influence lurking within the hallowed halls of library science? Could it be that the mere pursuit of organizing knowledge has a ripple effect on political affiliations?
Speaking of ripples, did you hear about the statistician who drowned in a river with an average depth of 3 feet? Don't worry, we'll make sure our findings are deeper than a particularly hefty statistical anomaly!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

In Smith's seminal work, "The Influence of Educational Attainment on Political Beliefs," the authors find a significant correlation between higher education levels and liberal political leanings. As we dig deeper into this phenomenon, we turn our attention to the specific field of library science and its potential influence on political affiliations.

Turning the pages to Doe's "The Role of Library Science in Shaping Civic Engagement," we unearth a wealth of knowledge regarding the impact of library science education on civic participation. This prompts us to consider the intricate web of connections between educational pursuits and political inclinations, raising the question: could a love for the Dewey Decimal System hold sway over voting behaviors?

Now, as we venture into more unconventional explorations, we must not overlook the potential influence of literary works themselves. In "The Library Book" by Susan Orlean, the author vividly portrays the cultural significance and influence of libraries, offering a lens through which we can examine the intertwining realms of knowledge and political ideologies.

Continuing down this whimsical rabbit hole, we encounter "Libriomancer" by Jim C. Hines, a riveting tale that blurs the boundaries between literature and reality. While our study may not involve literal book magic, the notion of harnessing the power of knowledge remains a theme that resonates with our investigation.

Delving further into the realm of media, we turn our attention to television shows such as "Parks and Recreation" and "Biblioburro: The Donkey Library." These portrayals of libraries and their societal impact provide a backdrop for understanding the broader cultural significance of libraries, potentially shaping perceptions and, dare we say, political persuasions.

Now, what do you call a librarian who is also a professional baseball player? A "book"ie! Much like the unexpected synergy between library science education and political preferences, this pun blends seemingly disparate worlds into a harmonious union.

As we navigate this tapestry of literature and media, it becomes apparent that the influence of library science on political landscapes may be more profound than meets the eye. With each turn of the page, we uncover new layers of intrigue, drawing us closer to unraveling the enigmatic connection between Associates degrees in library science and Democrat votes for Senators in Iowa.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Associates degrees awarded in Library science and Democrat votes for Senators in Iowa. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from National Center for Education Statistics and MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse . You used data from 2011 to 2020

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Librarianomics: The Dewey Decimal of Political Influence - A Study of the Relationship between Associates Degrees in Library Science and Democrat Votes for Senators in Iowa"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we delve into the intriguing relationship between educational attainment in library science and political leanings, specifically focusing on the impact on Democrat votes for Senators in the state of Iowa. Armed with data from the National Center for Education Statistics and MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, we set out to unpack this enigmatic correlation. We found a correlation coefficient of 0.9977645 and p < 0.05 for the period spanning 2011 to 2020, shedding light on the undeniable connection between the pursuit of knowledge in library science and its repercussions in the political arena.

Our findings reveal a compelling pattern, suggesting that as the number of Associates degrees awarded in library science increases, so does the proportion of Democrat votes for Senators in Iowa. This unexpected linkage between a seemingly niche academic discipline and political inclinations has left us pondering whether there are hidden bookshelves of influence at play here.

Now, for a relevant dad joke: Why did the librarian get kicked off the plane? Because it was overbooked! Just like the findings of our study - overflowing with unexpected connections and surprising correlations.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
Gather 'round, fellow academics and joke enthusiasts, for a journey into the realm of Librarianomics! *Cue dramatic music* In this study, we tackle a truly puzzling and spine-tingling conundrum: the tantalizing correlation between Associates degrees in Library Science and Democrat votes for Senators in Iowa.
As we embark on this adventure, we must be mindful of the profound impact that librarians and their Dewey Decimal wizardry may cast upon the political landscape. Picture this: stacks of books unlocking the secrets of political sway, all neatly organized with precision akin to a well-crafted research hypothesis.
Now, let's not shelve the enthusiasm just yet - we promise scintillating statistical analyses, thought-provoking discussions, and the occasional pun (or ten) along the way. After all, statistics are like a bikini: what they reveal is suggestive, but what they conceal is vital!
As we navigate this maze of data and democratic shifts, we cannot help but wonder: are there untapped reservoirs of political influence lurking within the hallowed halls of library science? Could it be that the mere pursuit of organizing knowledge has a ripple effect on political affiliations?
Speaking of ripples, did you hear about the statistician who drowned in a river with an average depth of 3 feet? Don't worry, we'll make sure our findings are deeper than a particularly hefty statistical anomaly!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To begin untangling this intriguing web of library science and political allegiance, we employed a combination of robust statistical analyses and an overdose of librarian-approved puns. Our data spelunkers scoured the depths of the National Center for Education Statistics and MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, excavating information on awarded Associates degrees in library science and Democrat votes for Senators in Iowa from the calendar years 2011 to 2020.

Our initial challenge involved ensuring that the data on Associates degrees was accurate and unambiguous. We cross-examined the figures with more scrutiny than a librarian checking for dog-eared pages in their beloved collection of Shakespearean works. After all, we couldn't afford any questionable entries to sneak into our research - any outliers could lead to conclusions as fictitious as a non-fiction book on centaurs in the library science section.

Next came the task of harmonizing the data on Democrat votes for Senators in Iowa with the fluctuating political climates of those years. We observed the shifts in voting patterns with the keen eye of a reference librarian seeking out misplaced books. After all, we needed to avoid any statistical anomalies so egregious that they would be more out of place than a science fiction novel nestled amongst dusty tomes of historical nonfiction.

Upon securing the datasets, we harnessed the might of correlation analysis to unveil the tantalizing relationships between these seemingly disparate variables. We resolved to unravel the enigmatic threads connecting the pursuit of knowledge in library science with the ebb and flow of Democrat votes for Senators in Iowa. We discovered a correlation coefficient that shone brighter than the reading light of a diligent late-night reader, illuminating a linkage that left us in awe.

Adding a touch of levity to the otherwise weighty statistical analyses, we infused our methodology with the occasional dad joke. After all, what's a research study without the occasional chuckle-inducing data point? But fear not, dear reader, we made sure our statistical integrity remained as rock-solid as the foundational principles of library science itself. For we understand that in the realm of research, just like in a library, a good balance of information and entertainment is the key to unlocking the secrets hidden within the shelves of data.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Associates degrees awarded in Library science and Democrat votes for Senators in Iowa. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from National Center for Education Statistics and MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse .

For the time period 2011 to 2020, you found a correlation 0.9977645, r-squared of 0.9955340, and p < 0.05.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Librarianomics: The Dewey Decimal of Political Influence - A Study of the Relationship between Associates Degrees in Library Science and Democrat Votes for Senators in Iowa"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we delve into the intriguing relationship between educational attainment in library science and political leanings, specifically focusing on the impact on Democrat votes for Senators in the state of Iowa. Armed with data from the National Center for Education Statistics and MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, we set out to unpack this enigmatic correlation. We found a correlation coefficient of 0.9977645 and p < 0.05 for the period spanning 2011 to 2020, shedding light on the undeniable connection between the pursuit of knowledge in library science and its repercussions in the political arena.

Our findings reveal a compelling pattern, suggesting that as the number of Associates degrees awarded in library science increases, so does the proportion of Democrat votes for Senators in Iowa. This unexpected linkage between a seemingly niche academic discipline and political inclinations has left us pondering whether there are hidden bookshelves of influence at play here.

Now, for a relevant dad joke: Why did the librarian get kicked off the plane? Because it was overbooked! Just like the findings of our study - overflowing with unexpected connections and surprising correlations.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
Gather 'round, fellow academics and joke enthusiasts, for a journey into the realm of Librarianomics! *Cue dramatic music* In this study, we tackle a truly puzzling and spine-tingling conundrum: the tantalizing correlation between Associates degrees in Library Science and Democrat votes for Senators in Iowa.
As we embark on this adventure, we must be mindful of the profound impact that librarians and their Dewey Decimal wizardry may cast upon the political landscape. Picture this: stacks of books unlocking the secrets of political sway, all neatly organized with precision akin to a well-crafted research hypothesis.
Now, let's not shelve the enthusiasm just yet - we promise scintillating statistical analyses, thought-provoking discussions, and the occasional pun (or ten) along the way. After all, statistics are like a bikini: what they reveal is suggestive, but what they conceal is vital!
As we navigate this maze of data and democratic shifts, we cannot help but wonder: are there untapped reservoirs of political influence lurking within the hallowed halls of library science? Could it be that the mere pursuit of organizing knowledge has a ripple effect on political affiliations?
Speaking of ripples, did you hear about the statistician who drowned in a river with an average depth of 3 feet? Don't worry, we'll make sure our findings are deeper than a particularly hefty statistical anomaly!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

Our analysis uncovers a striking correlation between the number of Associates degrees awarded in Library Science and the percentage of Democrat votes for Senators in Iowa. The correlation coefficient of 0.9977645 and r-squared of 0.9955340 support this astonishing relationship. The p-value of less than 0.05 further solidifies the strong statistical significance of our findings. It seems that the power of knowledge organization extends beyond mere book cataloging and spills into the political domain, leaving us to question the untold influence of well-organized information.

Fig. 1 showcases the robust correlation discovered in our analysis, demonstrating an unmistakable upward trend between the two variables. As the number of Associates degrees in Library Science increases, an undeniable surge in Democrat votes for Senators in Iowa becomes evident. It's as if every meticulously placed bookshelf casts yet another ballot in favor of the Democratic party.

Now, for a relevant dad joke: How do you make a tissue dance? You put a little boogie in it! Similarly, our findings tap into a rhythm of unexpected harmony between education and political sway, reminding us of the whimsical dance of statistics.

Our results prompt a reevaluation of the role of educational disciplines in shaping political landscapes. The profound impact of libraries on communities and the dissemination of information may indeed spill over into the realm of political decision-making. This correlation raises thought-provoking questions about the influences of knowledge curation and elucidates the notion that books may possess not only the power to enlighten but also to sway political tides.

In light of these revelations, we are left to ponder the far-reaching implications of this correlation and the potential for unsuspected political dynamics influenced by the seemingly tranquil world of library science. Our findings breathe new life into the adage, "Knowledge is power," highlighting its subtle nuances beyond the confines of academia and seeping into realms as unexpected as political affiliations.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Associates degrees awarded in Library science and Democrat votes for Senators in Iowa. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
"Librarianomics: The Dewey Decimal of Political Influence - A Study of the Relationship between Associates Degrees in Library Science and Democrat Votes for Senators in Iowa"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we delve into the intriguing relationship between educational attainment in library science and political leanings, specifically focusing on the impact on Democrat votes for Senators in the state of Iowa. Armed with data from the National Center for Education Statistics and MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, we set out to unpack this enigmatic correlation. We found a correlation coefficient of 0.9977645 and p < 0.05 for the period spanning 2011 to 2020, shedding light on the undeniable connection between the pursuit of knowledge in library science and its repercussions in the political arena.

Our findings reveal a compelling pattern, suggesting that as the number of Associates degrees awarded in library science increases, so does the proportion of Democrat votes for Senators in Iowa. This unexpected linkage between a seemingly niche academic discipline and political inclinations has left us pondering whether there are hidden bookshelves of influence at play here.

Now, for a relevant dad joke: Why did the librarian get kicked off the plane? Because it was overbooked! Just like the findings of our study - overflowing with unexpected connections and surprising correlations.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
In Smith's seminal work, "The Influence of Educational Attainment on Political Beliefs," the authors find a significant correlation between higher education levels and liberal political leanings. As we dig deeper into this phenomenon, we turn our attention to the specific field of library science and its potential influence on political affiliations.
Turning the pages to Doe's "The Role of Library Science in Shaping Civic Engagement," we unearth a wealth of knowledge regarding the impact of library science education on civic participation. This prompts us to consider the intricate web of connections between educational pursuits and political inclinations, raising the question: could a love for the Dewey Decimal System hold sway over voting behaviors?
Now, as we venture into more unconventional explorations, we must not overlook the potential influence of literary works themselves. In "The Library Book" by Susan Orlean, the author vividly portrays the cultural significance and influence of libraries, offering a lens through which we can examine the intertwining realms of knowledge and political ideologies.
Continuing down this whimsical rabbit hole, we encounter "Libriomancer" by Jim C. Hines, a riveting tale that blurs the boundaries between literature and reality. While our study may not involve literal book magic, the notion of harnessing the power of knowledge remains a theme that resonates with our investigation.
Delving further into the realm of media, we turn our attention to television shows such as "Parks and Recreation" and "Biblioburro: The Donkey Library." These portrayals of libraries and their societal impact provide a backdrop for understanding the broader cultural significance of libraries, potentially shaping perceptions and, dare we say, political persuasions.
Now, what do you call a librarian who is also a professional baseball player? A "book"ie! Much like the unexpected synergy between library science education and political preferences, this pun blends seemingly disparate worlds into a harmonious union.
As we navigate this tapestry of literature and media, it becomes apparent that the influence of library science on political landscapes may be more profound than meets the eye. With each turn of the page, we uncover new layers of intrigue, drawing us closer to unraveling the enigmatic connection between Associates degrees in library science and Democrat votes for Senators in Iowa.

[[RESULTS]]
Our analysis uncovers a striking correlation between the number of Associates degrees awarded in Library Science and the percentage of Democrat votes for Senators in Iowa. The correlation coefficient of 0.9977645 and r-squared of 0.9955340 support this astonishing relationship. The p-value of less than 0.05 further solidifies the strong statistical significance of our findings. It seems that the power of knowledge organization extends beyond mere book cataloging and spills into the political domain, leaving us to question the untold influence of well-organized information.
Fig. 1 showcases the robust correlation discovered in our analysis, demonstrating an unmistakable upward trend between the two variables. As the number of Associates degrees in Library Science increases, an undeniable surge in Democrat votes for Senators in Iowa becomes evident. It's as if every meticulously placed bookshelf casts yet another ballot in favor of the Democratic party.
Now, for a relevant dad joke: How do you make a tissue dance? You put a little boogie in it! Similarly, our findings tap into a rhythm of unexpected harmony between education and political sway, reminding us of the whimsical dance of statistics.
Our results prompt a reevaluation of the role of educational disciplines in shaping political landscapes. The profound impact of libraries on communities and the dissemination of information may indeed spill over into the realm of political decision-making. This correlation raises thought-provoking questions about the influences of knowledge curation and elucidates the notion that books may possess not only the power to enlighten but also to sway political tides.
In light of these revelations, we are left to ponder the far-reaching implications of this correlation and the potential for unsuspected political dynamics influenced by the seemingly tranquil world of library science. Our findings breathe new life into the adage, "Knowledge is power," highlighting its subtle nuances beyond the confines of academia and seeping into realms as unexpected as political affiliations.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

Our study has unearthed a fascinating connection between the pursuit of knowledge in library science and the political leanings in Iowa. The robust correlation that we detected between the number of Associates degrees awarded in library science and the proportion of Democrat votes for Senators aligns with previous research that highlights the influence of education on political beliefs. Much like Dewey's organizational system brought order to the chaos of library books, our findings bring structured insight into the perplexing realm of political affiliations.

The literature review nudged us to consider the cultural influence of libraries, and as it turns out, the impact goes well beyond shaping civic engagement. Our results suggest that the academic pursuit of library science may seep into the political fabric, creating a ripple effect that transcends the boundaries of information organization. It's as if every shelf meticulously arranged by aspiring library scientists holds within it a collective voice, whispering political inclinations to the masses.

Our statistical analysis reveals a correlation coefficient that nearly hits the theoretical ceiling, making it almost as rare as finding a hushed library these days. And with a p-value of less than 0.05, the significance of our findings stands firm, much like the great oak doors of a historical library. The strength of our results leaves little room for doubt, painting a vivid picture of the intertwined dance between educational pursuits and political propensities.

Now, for a quirky interlude: Why did the book go to the doctor? It had too many stories! Our findings, much like an engaging book, tell a tale that intertwines unexpected themes and captivates the scholarly imagination.

As we wade through the sea of data and statistical analyses, we must acknowledge the potential confounding variables and ensure that our results are not just mere coincidental bookends. While our study design sought to mitigate potential confounders, the possibility of unaccounted regional factors or historical trends influencing both educational pursuits and political stances cannot be entirely discounted.

Nevertheless, the remarkable spate of statistical significance propels the notion that the impact of knowledge and education reaches beyond the confines of the classroom and into the corridors of political power. The age-old saying, "knowledge is power," now gains a new layer of meaning as it resonates through the unexpected corridors of our political landscape. The Dewey Decimal system may have provided order to libraries, but it seems that it also leaves a lasting imprint on the political chapters of our societal narrative.

Our findings beckon further exploration of this unanticipated connection and compel us to consider the depth of influence that educational disciplines exert within our political sphere. It's as if every library card subtly casts a vote, silently orchestrating the symphony of political sway through the humble pursuit of knowledge organization. As we turn the page to unravel more of this intriguing mystery, we are captivated by the tantalizing hints of influence that lie hidden within the tranquil world of library science.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Associates degrees awarded in Library science and Democrat votes for Senators in Iowa. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
"Librarianomics: The Dewey Decimal of Political Influence - A Study of the Relationship between Associates Degrees in Library Science and Democrat Votes for Senators in Iowa"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we delve into the intriguing relationship between educational attainment in library science and political leanings, specifically focusing on the impact on Democrat votes for Senators in the state of Iowa. Armed with data from the National Center for Education Statistics and MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, we set out to unpack this enigmatic correlation. We found a correlation coefficient of 0.9977645 and p < 0.05 for the period spanning 2011 to 2020, shedding light on the undeniable connection between the pursuit of knowledge in library science and its repercussions in the political arena.

Our findings reveal a compelling pattern, suggesting that as the number of Associates degrees awarded in library science increases, so does the proportion of Democrat votes for Senators in Iowa. This unexpected linkage between a seemingly niche academic discipline and political inclinations has left us pondering whether there are hidden bookshelves of influence at play here.

Now, for a relevant dad joke: Why did the librarian get kicked off the plane? Because it was overbooked! Just like the findings of our study - overflowing with unexpected connections and surprising correlations.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
Gather 'round, fellow academics and joke enthusiasts, for a journey into the realm of Librarianomics! *Cue dramatic music* In this study, we tackle a truly puzzling and spine-tingling conundrum: the tantalizing correlation between Associates degrees in Library Science and Democrat votes for Senators in Iowa.
As we embark on this adventure, we must be mindful of the profound impact that librarians and their Dewey Decimal wizardry may cast upon the political landscape. Picture this: stacks of books unlocking the secrets of political sway, all neatly organized with precision akin to a well-crafted research hypothesis.
Now, let's not shelve the enthusiasm just yet - we promise scintillating statistical analyses, thought-provoking discussions, and the occasional pun (or ten) along the way. After all, statistics are like a bikini: what they reveal is suggestive, but what they conceal is vital!
As we navigate this maze of data and democratic shifts, we cannot help but wonder: are there untapped reservoirs of political influence lurking within the hallowed halls of library science? Could it be that the mere pursuit of organizing knowledge has a ripple effect on political affiliations?
Speaking of ripples, did you hear about the statistician who drowned in a river with an average depth of 3 feet? Don't worry, we'll make sure our findings are deeper than a particularly hefty statistical anomaly!

[[RESULTS]]
Our analysis uncovers a striking correlation between the number of Associates degrees awarded in Library Science and the percentage of Democrat votes for Senators in Iowa. The correlation coefficient of 0.9977645 and r-squared of 0.9955340 support this astonishing relationship. The p-value of less than 0.05 further solidifies the strong statistical significance of our findings. It seems that the power of knowledge organization extends beyond mere book cataloging and spills into the political domain, leaving us to question the untold influence of well-organized information.
Fig. 1 showcases the robust correlation discovered in our analysis, demonstrating an unmistakable upward trend between the two variables. As the number of Associates degrees in Library Science increases, an undeniable surge in Democrat votes for Senators in Iowa becomes evident. It's as if every meticulously placed bookshelf casts yet another ballot in favor of the Democratic party.
Now, for a relevant dad joke: How do you make a tissue dance? You put a little boogie in it! Similarly, our findings tap into a rhythm of unexpected harmony between education and political sway, reminding us of the whimsical dance of statistics.
Our results prompt a reevaluation of the role of educational disciplines in shaping political landscapes. The profound impact of libraries on communities and the dissemination of information may indeed spill over into the realm of political decision-making. This correlation raises thought-provoking questions about the influences of knowledge curation and elucidates the notion that books may possess not only the power to enlighten but also to sway political tides.
In light of these revelations, we are left to ponder the far-reaching implications of this correlation and the potential for unsuspected political dynamics influenced by the seemingly tranquil world of library science. Our findings breathe new life into the adage, "Knowledge is power," highlighting its subtle nuances beyond the confines of academia and seeping into realms as unexpected as political affiliations.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In wrapping up our journey through the labyrinth of Librarianomics, we have uncovered a correlation so perplexing and delightful that it rivals the plot twists of a thrilling novel. The connection between Associates degrees in Library Science and Democrat votes for Senators in Iowa has left us not only stunned but also amused, much like stumbling upon a pun in a densely worded research paper.

Our findings bring to mind the classic dad joke: What do you call fake spaghetti? An "impasta"! Similarly, the authenticity of this correlation between educational pursuits and political leanings is not a mere facade but a tangled web of intriguing influence.

As we bid adieu to this study, it becomes abundantly clear that we have embarked upon an academic quest that has not only challenged our assumptions but also tickled our funny bones. This correlation has proven to be as unexpected as a librarian with a penchant for skydiving - defying conventional expectations with a flair for the remarkable.

With that, we boldly assert that no further research is needed in this unlikely association, as our findings have illuminated this enigmatic connection in all its quirky glory. For now, let us bask in the revelry of Librarianomics, a field that never fails to surprise and entertain us with its unexpected correlations and delightful statistical revelations.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Librarianomics: The Dewey Decimal of Political Influence - A Study of the Relationship between Associates Degrees in Library Science and Democrat Votes for Senators in Iowa. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Political Bibliometrics


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Librarianomics: The Dewey Decimal of Political Influence - A Study of the Relationship between Associates Degrees in Library Science and Democrat Votes for Senators in Iowa. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Society for Analytical Librarianship and Political Science Research


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Librarianomics: The Dewey Decimal of Political Influence - A Study of the Relationship between Associates Degrees in Library Science and Democrat Votes for Senators in Iowa with an abstract of In this study, we delve into the intriguing relationship between educational attainment in library science and political leanings, specifically focusing on the impact on Democrat votes for Senators in the state of Iowa. Armed with data from the National Center for Education Statistics and MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, we set out to unpack this enigmatic correlation. We found a correlation coefficient of 0.9977645 and p < 0.05 for the period spanning 2011 to 2020, shedding light on the undeniable connection between the pursuit of knowledge in library science and its repercussions in the political arena.
Our findings reveal a compelling pattern, suggesting that as the number of Associates degrees awarded in library science increases, so does the proportion of Democrat votes for Senators in Iowa. This unexpected linkage between a seemingly niche academic discipline and political inclinations has left us pondering whether there are hidden bookshelves of influence at play here.
Now, for a relevant dad joke: Why did the librarian get kicked off the plane? Because it was overbooked! Just like the findings of our study - overflowing with unexpected connections and surprising correlations.

ChatGPT:

library science, political influence, Democrat votes, Senators, Iowa, educational attainment, correlation coefficient, National Center for Education Statistics, MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, political leanings

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Associates degrees awarded in Library science
Detailed data title: Associate's degrees conferred by postsecondary institutions with a field of study of Library science
Source: National Center for Education Statistics
See what else correlates with Associates degrees awarded in Library science

Votes for Democratic Senators in Iowa
Detailed data title: Percentage of votes cast for Federal Democrat Senate candidates in Iowa
Source: MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse
See what else correlates with Votes for Democratic Senators in Iowa

Correlation r = 0.9977645 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.9955340 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 99.6% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Votes for Democratic Senators in Iowa) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Associates degrees awarded in Library science) over the 3 years from 2011 through 2020.

p < 0.05, which statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 0.043. 0.0425760131392365800000000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 1 in 4.3% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 23 random variables Which I absolutely did.
with the same 2 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 2 because we have two variables measured over a period of 3 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ -1, 1 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
201420162020
Associates degrees awarded in Library science (Degrees awarded)194146202
Votes for Democratic Senators in Iowa (Percentage of votes)43.761235.655244.4001




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Very low n: There are not many data points included in this analysis. Even if the p-value is high, we should be suspicious of using so few datapoints in a correlation.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([194,146,202,])
array_2 = np.array([43.7612,35.6552,44.4001,])
array_1_name = "Associates degrees awarded in Library science"
array_2_name = "Votes for Democratic Senators in Iowa"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Hats off to you for rating!


Correlation ID: 4459 · Black Variable ID: 1243 · Red Variable ID: 26384
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0