about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #4,457 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Votes for Republican Senators in Iowa and the second variable is Google searches for 'harry potter'.  The chart goes from 2004 to 2020, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

Some Iowans mistakenly thought they were voting for a new Defense Against the Dark Arts professor. When they realized their error, they decided to brush up on their Harry Potter knowledge for the next election.

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Create an image showing a warm Iowa living room with a group of Republican voters sitting together, completing their Senate election ballots. A laptop on the coffee table should display a Google search for "harry potter" as they revisit the magical world of Hogwarts to inspire their next vote. Emphasize the cozy atmosphere and the juxtaposition of ordinary political activity with the fantastical allure of Harry Potter. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Republican votes for Senators in Iowa and Google searches for 'harry potter'. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: A TIME magazine cover image Sci-fi fantacy Oragami Data cyber art Sci-fi fantacy
ChatGPT: Sci-fi fantasy

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Republican votes for Senators in Iowa and Google searches for 'harry potter', in the following situation: Some Iowans mistakenly thought they were voting for a new Defense Against the Dark Arts professor. When they realized their error, they decided to brush up on their Harry Potter knowledge for the next election.. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In a cozy Iowa living room, a group of Republican voters sit together, filling out their ballots for the Senatorial election. On the coffee table, a laptop sits open, displaying a Google search for "harry potter," as they diligently prepare for their next vote by revisiting the magical world of Hogwarts.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ Sci-fi fantasy ] and depicting this scene: In a cozy Iowa living room, a group of Republican voters sit together, filling out their ballots for the Senatorial election. On the coffee table, a laptop sits open, displaying a Google search for "harry potter," as they diligently prepare for their next vote by revisiting the magical world of Hogwarts. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Create an image showing a warm Iowa living room with a group of Republican voters sitting together, completing their Senate election ballots. A laptop on the coffee table should display a Google search for "harry potter" as they revisit the magical world of Hogwarts to inspire their next vote. Emphasize the cozy atmosphere and the juxtaposition of ordinary political activity with the fantastical allure of Harry Potter.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how a decrease in Republican votes for Senators in Iowa caused harry potter (Google searches for 'harry potter') to decrease.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.05)
Harry Potter and Iowa Republican Voter Plotter: A Correlational Analysis

The International Journal of Wizarding Psychology

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Republican votes for Senators in Iowa and Google searches for 'harry potter'. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Rhyme words in the title.

Your research team used data from MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse and Google Trends to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.8186347 and p < 0.05 for 2004 to 2020.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
Harry Potter and Iowa Republican Voter Plotter: A Correlational Analysis

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper delves into the remarkable relationship between the electoral behavior of Republican voters in the state of Iowa and their penchant for seeking magical escapades, entwined with the captivating tale of the young wizard Harry Potter. Leveraging data from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and Google Trends, our research not only unveils a correlation coefficient of 0.8186347, but also a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.05, for the period spanning from 2004 to 2020. The findings suggest a striking linkage between the frequency of Senatorial Republican votes in Iowa and the intensity of Google searches for 'Harry Potter', shedding light on an enchanting dimension of political and pop culture propinquity. This study opens the door to further exploration of the remarkable interplay between electoral inclinations and fictional realms, inviting scholars to engage in the magical world of data analysis with a dose of whimsy and wonder.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Republican votes for Senators in Iowa and Google searches for 'harry potter'. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Harry Potter and Iowa Republican Voter Plotter: A Correlational Analysis

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper delves into the remarkable relationship between the electoral behavior of Republican voters in the state of Iowa and their penchant for seeking magical escapades, entwined with the captivating tale of the young wizard Harry Potter. Leveraging data from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and Google Trends, our research not only unveils a correlation coefficient of 0.8186347, but also a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.05, for the period spanning from 2004 to 2020. The findings suggest a striking linkage between the frequency of Senatorial Republican votes in Iowa and the intensity of Google searches for 'Harry Potter', shedding light on an enchanting dimension of political and pop culture propinquity. This study opens the door to further exploration of the remarkable interplay between electoral inclinations and fictional realms, inviting scholars to engage in the magical world of data analysis with a dose of whimsy and wonder.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

As we wade into the curious waters of political behavior and pop culture predilections, it becomes abundantly clear that the intersection of Republican voters in Iowa and their curiosity for wizardry is a tale as enchanting as the Harry Potter series itself. With the unyielding spirit of an intrepid wizard seeking to uncover the mysteries of the electoral realm, we set out to illuminate the unexpected connection between these seemingly disparate realms.

The allure of Harry Potter, with its spells, charms, and bewitching adventures, has captivated the minds and hearts of millions across the globe. At the same time, the political landscape has been a stage for a different brand of enchantment, where charismatic oratory and spellbinding rhetoric often take center stage. Our quest was to unravel whether there existed a nexus between the magical musings of Harry Potter and the electoral inclinations of Iowan Republican voters, a quest that would make even the most seasoned of wizards crack a wry smile.

Armed with a cauldron full of datasets from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and Google Trends, we embarked on a spellbinding journey through the annals of time, spanning from 2004 to 2020. The incantations of statistical analysis, incensed with the essence of correlation coefficients and p-values, revealed a coefficient of 0.8186347 and a p-value of less than 0.05, bewitching us with their unmistakable significance.

It is within this backdrop of statistical sorcery that we invite our esteemed colleagues to traverse with us into uncharted academic territories, where politics and potion-making collide in wondrous and unexpected ways. The research that follows not only sheds light on the compelling confluence of electoral behavior and fictional fascinations, but also beckons us to view the world of data analysis through a lens of whimsy and wonder. Join us, as we unveil the marvels that lie at the crossroads of political votes and wizardly wonders, in a landscape where political pundits and potion-brewing witches might find themselves in jesting company.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Republican votes for Senators in Iowa and Google searches for 'harry potter'. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then name some movies that you watched that are tangentially related to the topic.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Harry Potter and Iowa Republican Voter Plotter: A Correlational Analysis

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper delves into the remarkable relationship between the electoral behavior of Republican voters in the state of Iowa and their penchant for seeking magical escapades, entwined with the captivating tale of the young wizard Harry Potter. Leveraging data from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and Google Trends, our research not only unveils a correlation coefficient of 0.8186347, but also a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.05, for the period spanning from 2004 to 2020. The findings suggest a striking linkage between the frequency of Senatorial Republican votes in Iowa and the intensity of Google searches for 'Harry Potter', shedding light on an enchanting dimension of political and pop culture propinquity. This study opens the door to further exploration of the remarkable interplay between electoral inclinations and fictional realms, inviting scholars to engage in the magical world of data analysis with a dose of whimsy and wonder.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
As we wade into the curious waters of political behavior and pop culture predilections, it becomes abundantly clear that the intersection of Republican voters in Iowa and their curiosity for wizardry is a tale as enchanting as the Harry Potter series itself. With the unyielding spirit of an intrepid wizard seeking to uncover the mysteries of the electoral realm, we set out to illuminate the unexpected connection between these seemingly disparate realms.
The allure of Harry Potter, with its spells, charms, and bewitching adventures, has captivated the minds and hearts of millions across the globe. At the same time, the political landscape has been a stage for a different brand of enchantment, where charismatic oratory and spellbinding rhetoric often take center stage. Our quest was to unravel whether there existed a nexus between the magical musings of Harry Potter and the electoral inclinations of Iowan Republican voters, a quest that would make even the most seasoned of wizards crack a wry smile.
Armed with a cauldron full of datasets from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and Google Trends, we embarked on a spellbinding journey through the annals of time, spanning from 2004 to 2020. The incantations of statistical analysis, incensed with the essence of correlation coefficients and p-values, revealed a coefficient of 0.8186347 and a p-value of less than 0.05, bewitching us with their unmistakable significance.
It is within this backdrop of statistical sorcery that we invite our esteemed colleagues to traverse with us into uncharted academic territories, where politics and potion-making collide in wondrous and unexpected ways. The research that follows not only sheds light on the compelling confluence of electoral behavior and fictional fascinations, but also beckons us to view the world of data analysis through a lens of whimsy and wonder. Join us, as we unveil the marvels that lie at the crossroads of political votes and wizardly wonders, in a landscape where political pundits and potion-brewing witches might find themselves in jesting company.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

In "The Influence of Popular Culture on Political Behavior" by Smith, the authors find a notable correlation between the consumption of popular fiction and its potential to influence political preferences. This study delves into the intricate dance between cultural phenomena and electoral behavior, providing a theoretical framework for considering the impact of fantastical realms on the minds of voters.

Moreover, in "Fandom and the Political Mind" by Doe, the authors explore the curious intersection of fandom culture and political affinities. Their survey data reveal intriguing patterns of fan engagement with fictional universes and the extrapolation of these fantasies into political arenas. The study offers a compelling argument for the subtle yet potent influence of beloved fiction on the psyches of voters.

Jones, in "The Unlikely Correlations of Everyday Life," presents an engaging analysis of seemingly unrelated variables and their unsuspected connections. While the study does not directly touch upon the relationship between Republican voting patterns in Iowa and Google searches for 'Harry Potter', it underscores the unpredictability and unanticipated harmonies that may exist within the vast tapestry of human behaviors.

Turning to non-fiction books, the works of Daniel Kahneman, notably "Thinking, Fast and Slow," prompt reflection on the intricate processes underlying decision-making and cognitive biases. This text provides a lens through which to examine the subconscious factors at play when individuals engage with both political decisions and fictional narratives, paving the way for a deeper understanding of the complexities interweaving these realms.

In the fictional realm, J.K. Rowling's "Harry Potter" series stands as a titan in the landscape of modern literature, enchanting readers and captivating imaginations with its enchanting world of magic and adventure. The series' influence extends beyond the literary realm, permeating popular culture and sparking an enduring fervor among enthusiasts, and potentially infusing the political consciousness of some in unforeseeable ways.

Additionally, the epic saga of "The Lord of the Rings" by J.R.R. Tolkien and the visionary works of Isaac Asimov evoke realms of distant worlds and fantastical narratives that may subtly permeate the psyche of readers, shaping perceptions and proclivities in manners that may surprise even the most avid literary voyagers.

On a tangential note, the cinematic experience of "Star Wars" and the enduring legacy of its characters and themes in popular culture provoke thoughts on the resonance of fictional stories and characters in shaping collective consciousness, potentially imparting sparks of inspiration or contemplation into the sands of political choices.

The interplay between fiction and reality often mirrors the interaction of light and shadow, revealing unexpected contours and shapes that blend and blur as though orchestrated by a cosmic jest. As we embark on this scholarly exploration of the nexus between Iowa's political pulse and the allure of Harry Potter, we invite readers to embark on a whimsical journey, where the tangled threads of politics and wizarding wonders intertwine in a tapestry woven with surprises and mirth.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Republican votes for Senators in Iowa and Google searches for 'harry potter'. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse and Google Trends . You used data from 2004 to 2020

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Harry Potter and Iowa Republican Voter Plotter: A Correlational Analysis

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper delves into the remarkable relationship between the electoral behavior of Republican voters in the state of Iowa and their penchant for seeking magical escapades, entwined with the captivating tale of the young wizard Harry Potter. Leveraging data from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and Google Trends, our research not only unveils a correlation coefficient of 0.8186347, but also a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.05, for the period spanning from 2004 to 2020. The findings suggest a striking linkage between the frequency of Senatorial Republican votes in Iowa and the intensity of Google searches for 'Harry Potter', shedding light on an enchanting dimension of political and pop culture propinquity. This study opens the door to further exploration of the remarkable interplay between electoral inclinations and fictional realms, inviting scholars to engage in the magical world of data analysis with a dose of whimsy and wonder.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
As we wade into the curious waters of political behavior and pop culture predilections, it becomes abundantly clear that the intersection of Republican voters in Iowa and their curiosity for wizardry is a tale as enchanting as the Harry Potter series itself. With the unyielding spirit of an intrepid wizard seeking to uncover the mysteries of the electoral realm, we set out to illuminate the unexpected connection between these seemingly disparate realms.
The allure of Harry Potter, with its spells, charms, and bewitching adventures, has captivated the minds and hearts of millions across the globe. At the same time, the political landscape has been a stage for a different brand of enchantment, where charismatic oratory and spellbinding rhetoric often take center stage. Our quest was to unravel whether there existed a nexus between the magical musings of Harry Potter and the electoral inclinations of Iowan Republican voters, a quest that would make even the most seasoned of wizards crack a wry smile.
Armed with a cauldron full of datasets from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and Google Trends, we embarked on a spellbinding journey through the annals of time, spanning from 2004 to 2020. The incantations of statistical analysis, incensed with the essence of correlation coefficients and p-values, revealed a coefficient of 0.8186347 and a p-value of less than 0.05, bewitching us with their unmistakable significance.
It is within this backdrop of statistical sorcery that we invite our esteemed colleagues to traverse with us into uncharted academic territories, where politics and potion-making collide in wondrous and unexpected ways. The research that follows not only sheds light on the compelling confluence of electoral behavior and fictional fascinations, but also beckons us to view the world of data analysis through a lens of whimsy and wonder. Join us, as we unveil the marvels that lie at the crossroads of political votes and wizardly wonders, in a landscape where political pundits and potion-brewing witches might find themselves in jesting company.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To unravel the enchanting connection between Republican votes for Senators in Iowa and the alluring world of Harry Potter, we brewed a potion of data from multiple sources, primarily the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and the magical realm of Google Trends. Our concoction spanned the time continuum from 2004 to 2020, allowing us to capture the mesmerizing ebb and flow of electoral fervor and wizarding curiosity.

First, we jinxed our way into the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, where we procured detailed information on Republican votes for Iowa Senators, meticulously documenting the electoral incantations cast by the voters over the years. We took care to ensure that the essence of each vote was accurately captured, much like a potions master meticulously concocting a magical elixir.

Next, we summoned the arcane powers of the Harvard Dataverse, where we delved into the spellbinding world of demographic data and historical context. With our wands poised and our quills at the ready, we transcribed the mystical incantations of demographic shifts and temporal flux, painting a vivid portrait of the electoral landscape throughout the years.

Lastly, we tapped into the mystical aura of Google Trends, where we unfurled the enigmatic cloak shrouding the search patterns for 'Harry Potter'. The incantations of Google's search algorithms revealed the ebbs and flows of interest in the revered wizard and his whimsical universe, allowing us to quantify the intensity of wizarding fascination over time.

With our trusty brooms of statistical analysis in hand, we soared through the tempestuous skies of correlation coefficients, casting bewitching spells to unveil the mystical connection between Republican votes and 'Harry Potter' searches. Our incantations revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.8186347, the strength of which would impress even the most shrewd wizards and witches. Additionally, the p-value of less than 0.05, akin to the discovery of a rare and potent potion, solidified the significance of our findings.

As we meander through the enchanting tapestry of political sorcery and wizardly charm, our quest has uncovered a nexus that transcends the boundaries of conventional analysis, beckoning fellow scholars to join us in the magical world of data analysis. Together, let us unravel the threads of electoral behavior and fictional fascinations, and traverse the uncharted territories of statistical sorcery, where the realms of politics and potion-making converge in an enthralling ballet of whimsy and wonder.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Republican votes for Senators in Iowa and Google searches for 'harry potter'. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse and Google Trends .

For the time period 2004 to 2020, you found a correlation 0.8186347, r-squared of 0.6701628, and p < 0.05.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Harry Potter and Iowa Republican Voter Plotter: A Correlational Analysis

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper delves into the remarkable relationship between the electoral behavior of Republican voters in the state of Iowa and their penchant for seeking magical escapades, entwined with the captivating tale of the young wizard Harry Potter. Leveraging data from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and Google Trends, our research not only unveils a correlation coefficient of 0.8186347, but also a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.05, for the period spanning from 2004 to 2020. The findings suggest a striking linkage between the frequency of Senatorial Republican votes in Iowa and the intensity of Google searches for 'Harry Potter', shedding light on an enchanting dimension of political and pop culture propinquity. This study opens the door to further exploration of the remarkable interplay between electoral inclinations and fictional realms, inviting scholars to engage in the magical world of data analysis with a dose of whimsy and wonder.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
As we wade into the curious waters of political behavior and pop culture predilections, it becomes abundantly clear that the intersection of Republican voters in Iowa and their curiosity for wizardry is a tale as enchanting as the Harry Potter series itself. With the unyielding spirit of an intrepid wizard seeking to uncover the mysteries of the electoral realm, we set out to illuminate the unexpected connection between these seemingly disparate realms.
The allure of Harry Potter, with its spells, charms, and bewitching adventures, has captivated the minds and hearts of millions across the globe. At the same time, the political landscape has been a stage for a different brand of enchantment, where charismatic oratory and spellbinding rhetoric often take center stage. Our quest was to unravel whether there existed a nexus between the magical musings of Harry Potter and the electoral inclinations of Iowan Republican voters, a quest that would make even the most seasoned of wizards crack a wry smile.
Armed with a cauldron full of datasets from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and Google Trends, we embarked on a spellbinding journey through the annals of time, spanning from 2004 to 2020. The incantations of statistical analysis, incensed with the essence of correlation coefficients and p-values, revealed a coefficient of 0.8186347 and a p-value of less than 0.05, bewitching us with their unmistakable significance.
It is within this backdrop of statistical sorcery that we invite our esteemed colleagues to traverse with us into uncharted academic territories, where politics and potion-making collide in wondrous and unexpected ways. The research that follows not only sheds light on the compelling confluence of electoral behavior and fictional fascinations, but also beckons us to view the world of data analysis through a lens of whimsy and wonder. Join us, as we unveil the marvels that lie at the crossroads of political votes and wizardly wonders, in a landscape where political pundits and potion-brewing witches might find themselves in jesting company.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The analysis of the data revealed a strong positive correlation between Republican votes for Senators in Iowa and Google searches for 'Harry Potter' during the period from 2004 to 2020. The correlation coefficient of 0.8186347 provided evidence of a robust relationship between these seemingly unrelated phenomena. Additionally, the r-squared value of 0.6701628 indicated that approximately 67% of the variation in Republican votes for Senators in Iowa could be explained by the variation in Google searches for 'Harry Potter'. Moreover, the statistical significance of the correlation was confirmed with a p-value of less than 0.05, adding a touch of enchantment to our findings.

Furthermore, Fig. 1 illustrates the relationship between Republican votes for Senators in Iowa and Google searches for 'Harry Potter', showcasing the unmistakably strong connection between these seemingly divergent domains.

These results not only draw attention to the unexpected convergence of political preferences and magical interests but also invite subsequent scrutiny into the intriguing interplay between common electoral behavior and the allure of fictional worlds. Our analysis thus opens the door to further exploration and contemplation of the ways in which political proclivities and fantastical fascinations may intertwine in the minds and hearts of the electorate.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Republican votes for Senators in Iowa and Google searches for 'harry potter'. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
Harry Potter and Iowa Republican Voter Plotter: A Correlational Analysis

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper delves into the remarkable relationship between the electoral behavior of Republican voters in the state of Iowa and their penchant for seeking magical escapades, entwined with the captivating tale of the young wizard Harry Potter. Leveraging data from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and Google Trends, our research not only unveils a correlation coefficient of 0.8186347, but also a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.05, for the period spanning from 2004 to 2020. The findings suggest a striking linkage between the frequency of Senatorial Republican votes in Iowa and the intensity of Google searches for 'Harry Potter', shedding light on an enchanting dimension of political and pop culture propinquity. This study opens the door to further exploration of the remarkable interplay between electoral inclinations and fictional realms, inviting scholars to engage in the magical world of data analysis with a dose of whimsy and wonder.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
In "The Influence of Popular Culture on Political Behavior" by Smith, the authors find a notable correlation between the consumption of popular fiction and its potential to influence political preferences. This study delves into the intricate dance between cultural phenomena and electoral behavior, providing a theoretical framework for considering the impact of fantastical realms on the minds of voters.
Moreover, in "Fandom and the Political Mind" by Doe, the authors explore the curious intersection of fandom culture and political affinities. Their survey data reveal intriguing patterns of fan engagement with fictional universes and the extrapolation of these fantasies into political arenas. The study offers a compelling argument for the subtle yet potent influence of beloved fiction on the psyches of voters.
Jones, in "The Unlikely Correlations of Everyday Life," presents an engaging analysis of seemingly unrelated variables and their unsuspected connections. While the study does not directly touch upon the relationship between Republican voting patterns in Iowa and Google searches for 'Harry Potter', it underscores the unpredictability and unanticipated harmonies that may exist within the vast tapestry of human behaviors.
Turning to non-fiction books, the works of Daniel Kahneman, notably "Thinking, Fast and Slow," prompt reflection on the intricate processes underlying decision-making and cognitive biases. This text provides a lens through which to examine the subconscious factors at play when individuals engage with both political decisions and fictional narratives, paving the way for a deeper understanding of the complexities interweaving these realms.
In the fictional realm, J.K. Rowling's "Harry Potter" series stands as a titan in the landscape of modern literature, enchanting readers and captivating imaginations with its enchanting world of magic and adventure. The series' influence extends beyond the literary realm, permeating popular culture and sparking an enduring fervor among enthusiasts, and potentially infusing the political consciousness of some in unforeseeable ways.
Additionally, the epic saga of "The Lord of the Rings" by J.R.R. Tolkien and the visionary works of Isaac Asimov evoke realms of distant worlds and fantastical narratives that may subtly permeate the psyche of readers, shaping perceptions and proclivities in manners that may surprise even the most avid literary voyagers.
On a tangential note, the cinematic experience of "Star Wars" and the enduring legacy of its characters and themes in popular culture provoke thoughts on the resonance of fictional stories and characters in shaping collective consciousness, potentially imparting sparks of inspiration or contemplation into the sands of political choices.
The interplay between fiction and reality often mirrors the interaction of light and shadow, revealing unexpected contours and shapes that blend and blur as though orchestrated by a cosmic jest. As we embark on this scholarly exploration of the nexus between Iowa's political pulse and the allure of Harry Potter, we invite readers to embark on a whimsical journey, where the tangled threads of politics and wizarding wonders intertwine in a tapestry woven with surprises and mirth.

[[RESULTS]]
The analysis of the data revealed a strong positive correlation between Republican votes for Senators in Iowa and Google searches for 'Harry Potter' during the period from 2004 to 2020. The correlation coefficient of 0.8186347 provided evidence of a robust relationship between these seemingly unrelated phenomena. Additionally, the r-squared value of 0.6701628 indicated that approximately 67% of the variation in Republican votes for Senators in Iowa could be explained by the variation in Google searches for 'Harry Potter'. Moreover, the statistical significance of the correlation was confirmed with a p-value of less than 0.05, adding a touch of enchantment to our findings.
Furthermore, Fig. 1 illustrates the relationship between Republican votes for Senators in Iowa and Google searches for 'Harry Potter', showcasing the unmistakably strong connection between these seemingly divergent domains.
These results not only draw attention to the unexpected convergence of political preferences and magical interests but also invite subsequent scrutiny into the intriguing interplay between common electoral behavior and the allure of fictional worlds. Our analysis thus opens the door to further exploration and contemplation of the ways in which political proclivities and fantastical fascinations may intertwine in the minds and hearts of the electorate.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The results of our analysis bring to the forefront a peculiar yet striking association between the proclivities of Iowa's Republican voters and their interest in the escapades of the young wizard, Harry Potter. The robust correlation coefficient of 0.8186347 not only echoes the findings of previous studies that divulge the influence of popular fiction on electoral inclinations but also accentuates the unique harmony between electoral patterns and fantastical fascinations, in a way that transcends the average voter's imagination.

Harking back to the word of wisdom from Smith, our findings lend credence to the notion that popular culture possesses a formidable capacity to infiltrate the recesses of political behavior, perhaps even more so than the Imperius Curse. As Doe artfully conveys, the translation of fandom fervor into political affiliations is not merely a flight of fancy but a tangible force that can shape the contours of electoral landscapes, much like the subtle whispers of the Sorting Hat nudging voters in unexpected directions.

Jones, in his exploration of unlikely correlations, seems to have unknowingly foretold this conjuring of Republican votes and 'Harry Potter' searches. The fabric of human behaviors indeed frays the seam of predictability, proving to be as unpredictable as the appearance of a Niffler in a jewelry store.

The influence of J.K. Rowling's magical oeuvre, illuminated within our dataset, mirrors Kahneman's proposition on the subconscious forces guiding decision-making processes. It appears that, much like the enchanting pull of a Pensieve, the world of Harry Potter has stealthily woven itself into the cognitive tapestry of Iowa's Republican voters, leaving behind traces of magic that color their electoral choices.

Delving into the world of other fictional realms, such as Tolkien's Middle-earth and Asimov's visions of distant galaxies, we are reminded of the lasting impact of literature on the human psyche, akin to the enduring glow of the Lumos charm illuminating hidden truths in the midst of darkness. The resonance of these fantastical narratives is not merely a page-turning escapade but a whispered incantation shaping the contours of reality in ways that rival even the spells of the most accomplished witches and wizards.

In the words of the cinematic force, "Star Wars," the saga of 'Harry Potter' and Iowa's political tableau seems to reveal an echo of the Force, transcending the boundaries of mere mortal machinations and echoing the timeless battle between light and dark, reason and caprice, logic and magic.

Our study, unfolding the intriguing relationship between Iowa's political pulse and the allure of 'Harry Potter', beckons us to heed the unspoken revelation that politics and wizarding wonders aren't as dissimilar as they may seem at first glance. Instead, they converge in a dance filled with as many twists and turns as a Whomping Willow, inviting scholars and intrepid readers to join us in unlocking the enigma of this uncanny correlation. So, as we Bat-Bogey Hex our way through this tangled frontier of political and popular culture propinquity, let us keenly observe and illuminate the unexpected, as we unravel the spellbinding connections that bind the realms of electoral behavior and literary enchantment.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Republican votes for Senators in Iowa and Google searches for 'harry potter'. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
Harry Potter and Iowa Republican Voter Plotter: A Correlational Analysis

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper delves into the remarkable relationship between the electoral behavior of Republican voters in the state of Iowa and their penchant for seeking magical escapades, entwined with the captivating tale of the young wizard Harry Potter. Leveraging data from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and Google Trends, our research not only unveils a correlation coefficient of 0.8186347, but also a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.05, for the period spanning from 2004 to 2020. The findings suggest a striking linkage between the frequency of Senatorial Republican votes in Iowa and the intensity of Google searches for 'Harry Potter', shedding light on an enchanting dimension of political and pop culture propinquity. This study opens the door to further exploration of the remarkable interplay between electoral inclinations and fictional realms, inviting scholars to engage in the magical world of data analysis with a dose of whimsy and wonder.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
As we wade into the curious waters of political behavior and pop culture predilections, it becomes abundantly clear that the intersection of Republican voters in Iowa and their curiosity for wizardry is a tale as enchanting as the Harry Potter series itself. With the unyielding spirit of an intrepid wizard seeking to uncover the mysteries of the electoral realm, we set out to illuminate the unexpected connection between these seemingly disparate realms.
The allure of Harry Potter, with its spells, charms, and bewitching adventures, has captivated the minds and hearts of millions across the globe. At the same time, the political landscape has been a stage for a different brand of enchantment, where charismatic oratory and spellbinding rhetoric often take center stage. Our quest was to unravel whether there existed a nexus between the magical musings of Harry Potter and the electoral inclinations of Iowan Republican voters, a quest that would make even the most seasoned of wizards crack a wry smile.
Armed with a cauldron full of datasets from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and Google Trends, we embarked on a spellbinding journey through the annals of time, spanning from 2004 to 2020. The incantations of statistical analysis, incensed with the essence of correlation coefficients and p-values, revealed a coefficient of 0.8186347 and a p-value of less than 0.05, bewitching us with their unmistakable significance.
It is within this backdrop of statistical sorcery that we invite our esteemed colleagues to traverse with us into uncharted academic territories, where politics and potion-making collide in wondrous and unexpected ways. The research that follows not only sheds light on the compelling confluence of electoral behavior and fictional fascinations, but also beckons us to view the world of data analysis through a lens of whimsy and wonder. Join us, as we unveil the marvels that lie at the crossroads of political votes and wizardly wonders, in a landscape where political pundits and potion-brewing witches might find themselves in jesting company.

[[RESULTS]]
The analysis of the data revealed a strong positive correlation between Republican votes for Senators in Iowa and Google searches for 'Harry Potter' during the period from 2004 to 2020. The correlation coefficient of 0.8186347 provided evidence of a robust relationship between these seemingly unrelated phenomena. Additionally, the r-squared value of 0.6701628 indicated that approximately 67% of the variation in Republican votes for Senators in Iowa could be explained by the variation in Google searches for 'Harry Potter'. Moreover, the statistical significance of the correlation was confirmed with a p-value of less than 0.05, adding a touch of enchantment to our findings.
Furthermore, Fig. 1 illustrates the relationship between Republican votes for Senators in Iowa and Google searches for 'Harry Potter', showcasing the unmistakably strong connection between these seemingly divergent domains.
These results not only draw attention to the unexpected convergence of political preferences and magical interests but also invite subsequent scrutiny into the intriguing interplay between common electoral behavior and the allure of fictional worlds. Our analysis thus opens the door to further exploration and contemplation of the ways in which political proclivities and fantastical fascinations may intertwine in the minds and hearts of the electorate.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, the results of this study provide compelling evidence of the enchanting relationship between Republican votes for Senators in Iowa and the fervent pursuit of magical escapades through Google searches for 'Harry Potter'. The robust correlation coefficient of 0.8186347, coupled with a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.05, illuminates a fascinating nexus between political inclinations and fantastical fascinations. Our findings not only highlight the alluring interplay between these seemingly divergent domains but also beckon us, like a siren's call, to delve deeper into the whimsical and often paradoxical realm of political pop culture propinquity.

As we embark upon the uncharted paths of scholarly inquiry, we find ourselves at a crossroads where statistical sorcery and political enchantment converge in ways that continue to mystify and beguile. The juxtaposition of Republican votes and wizardly wonderment not only invites us to ponder the depths of the human psyche but also infuses a touch of whimsy and wonder into the hallowed halls of empirical inquiry.

It is our fervent hope that this study serves as a beacon, guiding scholars through the labyrinthine corridors of electoral behavior and fictional reverence, while never losing sight of the spellbinding implications of our findings. For as we bid adieu to this curious expedition, we do so with the unwavering conviction that the enchanting tale of Republican votes and Harry Potter searches has been meticulously unraveled, leaving us with a sense of wonderment and amusement that lingers like a delightful enchantment.

With our wands firmly sheathed and our curiosity satiated, we assert, with resounding certainty, that no further research is needed in this whimsical realm of political pop culture propinquity.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Harry Potter and Iowa Republican Voter Plotter: A Correlational Analysis. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The International Journal of Wizarding Psychology


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Harry Potter and Iowa Republican Voter Plotter: A Correlational Analysis. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Association for Magical Studies and Political Analysis


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Harry Potter and Iowa Republican Voter Plotter: A Correlational Analysis with an abstract of This paper delves into the remarkable relationship between the electoral behavior of Republican voters in the state of Iowa and their penchant for seeking magical escapades, entwined with the captivating tale of the young wizard Harry Potter. Leveraging data from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and Google Trends, our research not only unveils a correlation coefficient of 0.8186347, but also a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.05, for the period spanning from 2004 to 2020. The findings suggest a striking linkage between the frequency of Senatorial Republican votes in Iowa and the intensity of Google searches for 'Harry Potter', shedding light on an enchanting dimension of political and pop culture propinquity. This study opens the door to further exploration of the remarkable interplay between electoral inclinations and fictional realms, inviting scholars to engage in the magical world of data analysis with a dose of whimsy and wonder.

ChatGPT:

Iowa Republican voters, electoral behavior, Harry Potter, correlation analysis, MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, Google Trends, Republican votes, Iowa, Google searches, political culture, pop culture, data analysis, fictional realms, electoral inclinations, whimsy and wonder

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Votes for Republican Senators in Iowa
Detailed data title: Total number of votes cast for Federal Republican Senate candidates in Iowa
Source: MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse
See what else correlates with Votes for Republican Senators in Iowa

Google searches for 'harry potter'
Detailed data title: Relative volume of Google searches for 'harry potter' (Worldwide, without quotes)
Source: Google Trends
Additional Info: Relative search volume (not absolute numbers)

See what else correlates with Google searches for 'harry potter'

Correlation r = 0.8186347 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.6701628 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 67% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Google searches for 'harry potter') is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Votes for Republican Senators in Iowa) over the 6 years from 2004 through 2020.

p < 0.05, which statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 0.046. 0.0463571921558361400000000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.82 in 4.6% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 22 random variables Which I absolutely did.
with the same 5 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 5 because we have two variables measured over a period of 6 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.02, 0.98 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
200420082010201420162020
Votes for Republican Senators in Iowa (Total votes)1038180560006718215588575926007864997
Google searches for 'harry potter' (Rel. search volume)2211.416714.58339.51314.8333




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Very low n: There are not many data points included in this analysis. Even if the p-value is high, we should be suspicious of using so few datapoints in a correlation.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([1038180,560006,718215,588575,926007,864997,])
array_2 = np.array([22,11.4167,14.5833,9.5,13,14.8333,])
array_1_name = "Votes for Republican Senators in Iowa"
array_2_name = "Google searches for 'harry potter'"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Kudos for rating!


Correlation ID: 4457 · Black Variable ID: 26239 · Red Variable ID: 1531
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0