about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #4,419 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Votes for Republican Senators in Wyoming and the second variable is Jet fuel used in Niue.  The chart goes from 2000 to 2018, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

As Republican votes for Senators in Wyoming increased, the political climate warmed up, leading to higher temperatures. These higher temperatures, in turn, increased the demand for air travel to the tropical paradise of Niue. And as we all know, more flights mean more jet fuel being burned, ultimately contributing to the local economy. Plus, the idea of conservative values soaring through the air just seems to fuel the nation. So, it's clear that the political decisions in Wyoming are really keeping Niue flying high!

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Generate an image illustrating a vibrant Wyoming landscape with a serene river meandering through lush, green mountains. At the apex of one peak, visualize a majestic bald eagle, symbolizing Republican votes for Senators, soaring proudly in the sky. In the distance, a vivid sunset casts a warm glow, representing the warming political climate. In the foreground, visualize a modern jet plane taking off towards Niue, leaving a trail of clouds in the sky. This plane is a metaphor for increased air travel demand due to higher temperatures in Wyoming, fueling the local economy. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Republican votes for Senators in Wyoming and Jet fuel used in Niue. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Data cyber art Data cyber art An image that looks like it is a scene from a Pixar movie Parallax art High-tech
ChatGPT: High-tech

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Republican votes for Senators in Wyoming and Jet fuel used in Niue, in the following situation: As Republican votes for Senators in Wyoming increased, the political climate warmed up, leading to higher temperatures. These higher temperatures, in turn, increased the demand for air travel to the tropical paradise of Niue. And as we all know, more flights mean more jet fuel being burned, ultimately contributing to the local economy. Plus, the idea of conservative values soaring through the air just seems to fuel the nation. So, it's clear that the political decisions in Wyoming are really keeping Niue flying high!. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: Imagine a picturesque Wyoming landscape with a serene river flowing through the lush, green mountains. Atop one of the peaks sits a majestic bald eagle, representing Republican votes for Senators soaring above. In the distance, a vibrant sunset casts a warm glow, symbolizing the political climate warming up. In the foreground, a modern jet plane takes off towards Niue, leaving a trail of clouds in the sky. The plane is fueling the local economy there, as it connects to the tropical paradise. It's a visual metaphor for the increased demand for air travel due to the higher temperatures in Wyoming.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ High-tech ] and depicting this scene: Imagine a picturesque Wyoming landscape with a serene river flowing through the lush, green mountains. Atop one of the peaks sits a majestic bald eagle, representing Republican votes for Senators soaring above. In the distance, a vibrant sunset casts a warm glow, symbolizing the political climate warming up. In the foreground, a modern jet plane takes off towards Niue, leaving a trail of clouds in the sky. The plane is fueling the local economy there, as it connects to the tropical paradise. It's a visual metaphor for the increased demand for air travel due to the higher temperatures in Wyoming. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Generate an image illustrating a vibrant Wyoming landscape with a serene river meandering through lush, green mountains. At the apex of one peak, visualize a majestic bald eagle, symbolizing Republican votes for Senators, soaring proudly in the sky. In the distance, a vivid sunset casts a warm glow, representing the warming political climate. In the foreground, visualize a modern jet plane taking off towards Niue, leaving a trail of clouds in the sky. This plane is a metaphor for increased air travel demand due to higher temperatures in Wyoming, fueling the local economy.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how increases in Republican votes for Senators in Wyoming positively influenced Jet fuel used in Niue.\Make it sound serious until the end.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
The WY of Republican Votes: The Jet Fuel Niue-nce

The Journal of Political Quirks and Quandaries

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Republican votes for Senators in Wyoming and Jet fuel used in Niue. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Include a pun in the title.

Your research team used data from MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse and Energy Information Administration to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9167223 and p < 0.01 for 2000 to 2018.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
The "WY" of Republican Votes: The Jet Fuel Niue-nce

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study examines the curious relationship between Republican votes for Senators in Wyoming and the jet fuel used in Niue, uncovering a significant correlation between the two seemingly unrelated factors. Leveraging data from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and the Energy Information Administration, our research team compiled and analyzed data from 2000 to 2018 to probe this quirky conundrum.

We observed a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9167223 and a p-value less than 0.01, revealing a robust statistical association between the two variables. It appears that as Republican votes in Wyoming fluctuated, so did the consumption of jet fuel in Niue, providing an unexpected twist to the relationship between political preferences and energy consumption.

Dad Joke Alert: Why did the Republican bring a ladder to the election? Because he wanted to climb the political ladder! In a similarly unexpected manner, our findings offer a lighthearted reminder that the interconnectedness of diverse factors in our world can often surprise us, yielding correlations that defy traditional expectations.

Overall, our research sheds light on this unconventional linkage, demonstrating that even in the realm of politics and energy, unexpected connections can emerge to fuel academic curiosity and spark delightful inquiries into the whimsical ways of the world.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Republican votes for Senators in Wyoming and Jet fuel used in Niue. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The "WY" of Republican Votes: The Jet Fuel Niue-nce

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study examines the curious relationship between Republican votes for Senators in Wyoming and the jet fuel used in Niue, uncovering a significant correlation between the two seemingly unrelated factors. Leveraging data from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and the Energy Information Administration, our research team compiled and analyzed data from 2000 to 2018 to probe this quirky conundrum.

We observed a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9167223 and a p-value less than 0.01, revealing a robust statistical association between the two variables. It appears that as Republican votes in Wyoming fluctuated, so did the consumption of jet fuel in Niue, providing an unexpected twist to the relationship between political preferences and energy consumption.

Dad Joke Alert: Why did the Republican bring a ladder to the election? Because he wanted to climb the political ladder! In a similarly unexpected manner, our findings offer a lighthearted reminder that the interconnectedness of diverse factors in our world can often surprise us, yielding correlations that defy traditional expectations.

Overall, our research sheds light on this unconventional linkage, demonstrating that even in the realm of politics and energy, unexpected connections can emerge to fuel academic curiosity and spark delightful inquiries into the whimsical ways of the world.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

The pursuit of knowledge often leads researchers down unexpected paths, uncovering connections between seemingly disparate domains. Our study delves into one such intriguing relationship, exploring the unexpected correlation between Republican votes for Senators in Wyoming and the consumption of jet fuel in Niue. This unconventional pairing piqued our curiosity and propelled us to investigate further, uncovering a link that defies conventional wisdom and offers a playful twist to the realm of political and energy-related phenomena.

Dad Joke Alert: Why did the jet fuel go to therapy? It needed to resolve its burning issues! As we embark on this scholarly journey, we invite our readers to embrace the enigmatic nature of our findings and enjoy the occasional pun or jest that punctuates our exploration of this peculiar correlation.

The state of Wyoming, known for its breathtaking landscapes and robust Republican presence, serves as the focal point for our political inquiry. Simultaneously, Niue, a tiny island nation in the South Pacific, captures our attention with its distinctive pattern of jet fuel consumption. Despite the geographical and ideological chasm that separates these two entities, our rigorous analysis has revealed a surprising connection between them.

As we navigate through the intricate web of data and statistical analyses, it becomes evident that the correlation between Republican votes in Wyoming and jet fuel usage in Niue is not a mere statistical fluke. Our findings suggest a compelling association, prompting us to grapple with the implications of this unanticipated bond and its potential implications for both political and energy-related discourse.

Dad Joke Alert: Did you hear about the politician who took a flight to campaign in Niue? He really wanted to "jet" set his political agenda! Our endeavor to unravel this quirky conundrum promises to offer not only academic insights but also a lighthearted reminder of the delightful idiosyncrasies that permeate the fabric of our interconnected world.

In the following sections, we present our methodology, data sources, and the robust statistical analyses that underpin our findings. By shedding light on this unorthodox linkage, our study aims to ignite intellectual curiosity and inspire a whimsical appreciation for the unexpected threads that weave through the tapestry of political and energy-related phenomena.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Republican votes for Senators in Wyoming and Jet fuel used in Niue. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Perhaps you also got inspiration from some board games that are vaugely related.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The "WY" of Republican Votes: The Jet Fuel Niue-nce

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study examines the curious relationship between Republican votes for Senators in Wyoming and the jet fuel used in Niue, uncovering a significant correlation between the two seemingly unrelated factors. Leveraging data from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and the Energy Information Administration, our research team compiled and analyzed data from 2000 to 2018 to probe this quirky conundrum.

We observed a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9167223 and a p-value less than 0.01, revealing a robust statistical association between the two variables. It appears that as Republican votes in Wyoming fluctuated, so did the consumption of jet fuel in Niue, providing an unexpected twist to the relationship between political preferences and energy consumption.

Dad Joke Alert: Why did the Republican bring a ladder to the election? Because he wanted to climb the political ladder! In a similarly unexpected manner, our findings offer a lighthearted reminder that the interconnectedness of diverse factors in our world can often surprise us, yielding correlations that defy traditional expectations.

Overall, our research sheds light on this unconventional linkage, demonstrating that even in the realm of politics and energy, unexpected connections can emerge to fuel academic curiosity and spark delightful inquiries into the whimsical ways of the world.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The pursuit of knowledge often leads researchers down unexpected paths, uncovering connections between seemingly disparate domains. Our study delves into one such intriguing relationship, exploring the unexpected correlation between Republican votes for Senators in Wyoming and the consumption of jet fuel in Niue. This unconventional pairing piqued our curiosity and propelled us to investigate further, uncovering a link that defies conventional wisdom and offers a playful twist to the realm of political and energy-related phenomena.
Dad Joke Alert: Why did the jet fuel go to therapy? It needed to resolve its burning issues! As we embark on this scholarly journey, we invite our readers to embrace the enigmatic nature of our findings and enjoy the occasional pun or jest that punctuates our exploration of this peculiar correlation.
The state of Wyoming, known for its breathtaking landscapes and robust Republican presence, serves as the focal point for our political inquiry. Simultaneously, Niue, a tiny island nation in the South Pacific, captures our attention with its distinctive pattern of jet fuel consumption. Despite the geographical and ideological chasm that separates these two entities, our rigorous analysis has revealed a surprising connection between them.
As we navigate through the intricate web of data and statistical analyses, it becomes evident that the correlation between Republican votes in Wyoming and jet fuel usage in Niue is not a mere statistical fluke. Our findings suggest a compelling association, prompting us to grapple with the implications of this unanticipated bond and its potential implications for both political and energy-related discourse.
Dad Joke Alert: Did you hear about the politician who took a flight to campaign in Niue? He really wanted to "jet" set his political agenda! Our endeavor to unravel this quirky conundrum promises to offer not only academic insights but also a lighthearted reminder of the delightful idiosyncrasies that permeate the fabric of our interconnected world.
In the following sections, we present our methodology, data sources, and the robust statistical analyses that underpin our findings. By shedding light on this unorthodox linkage, our study aims to ignite intellectual curiosity and inspire a whimsical appreciation for the unexpected threads that weave through the tapestry of political and energy-related phenomena.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

To contextualize the unexpected correlation between Republican votes for Senators in Wyoming and jet fuel consumption in Niue, it is imperative to delve into existing scholarship on political voting patterns, energy consumption, and the potential intersections thereof. Smith et al. (2015) examine the intricate dynamics of state-level Republican voting trends, while Doe and Jones (2017) delve into the nuances of energy demand in small island nations. The juxtaposition of these seemingly disparate strands sets the stage for our exploration of the peculiar interplay between these variables.

In "The Geography of American Voting: An Exploratory Analysis," Smith et al. (2015) delineate the multifaceted determinants of Republican voting behavior at the state level. Their detailed analysis encompasses demographic, economic, and ideological factors, offering a comprehensive portrayal of the nuances that underpin political preferences. Meanwhile, Doe and Jones (2017) shine a spotlight on energy usage patterns in microstates, expounding upon the unique challenges and dynamics of energy consumption in small, geographically isolated territories.

Dad Joke Alert: Why did the Republican vote for the candidate who loved aviation? Because they wanted to "wing" it in the election! As our investigation transcends the boundaries of conventional scholarly inquiry, we turn to non-fiction works that venture into the realm of quirky connections and unexpected correlations. "Freakonomics" by Steven Levitt and Stephen Dubner offers a fascinating exploration of unconventional links between disparate phenomena, encouraging readers to embrace the unanticipated quirks of our world.

Furthermore, "The Tipping Point: How Little Things Can Make a Big Difference" by Malcolm Gladwell provides an insightful perspective on the ripple effects of seemingly inconsequential factors. Although these works do not directly address the specific correlation we are probing, they foster an appreciation for the serendipitous connections that underlie various facets of human behavior and societal phenomena.

Turning to the realm of fiction, the influence of chance and whimsy resonates in "The Coincidence Authority" by John Ironmonger and "The Curious Incident of the Dog in the Night-Time" by Mark Haddon. While these literary works may seem distant from the empirical realm of political voting and energy usage, their thematic exploration of interconnections and unexpected twists aligns with the spirit of our inquiry.

Dad Joke Alert: What do you call a board game based on the correlation between Republican votes in Wyoming and jet fuel usage in Niue? "Politically Fuel'd: The Island Interconnectivity Edition" - where the only rule is to expect the unexpected!

As we navigate through this interdisciplinary landscape, it becomes evident that even in the ostensibly austere domains of politics and energy, a whimsical and quirky tapestry of interconnections awaits exploration.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Republican votes for Senators in Wyoming and Jet fuel used in Niue. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse and Energy Information Administration . You used data from 2000 to 2018

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The "WY" of Republican Votes: The Jet Fuel Niue-nce

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study examines the curious relationship between Republican votes for Senators in Wyoming and the jet fuel used in Niue, uncovering a significant correlation between the two seemingly unrelated factors. Leveraging data from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and the Energy Information Administration, our research team compiled and analyzed data from 2000 to 2018 to probe this quirky conundrum.

We observed a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9167223 and a p-value less than 0.01, revealing a robust statistical association between the two variables. It appears that as Republican votes in Wyoming fluctuated, so did the consumption of jet fuel in Niue, providing an unexpected twist to the relationship between political preferences and energy consumption.

Dad Joke Alert: Why did the Republican bring a ladder to the election? Because he wanted to climb the political ladder! In a similarly unexpected manner, our findings offer a lighthearted reminder that the interconnectedness of diverse factors in our world can often surprise us, yielding correlations that defy traditional expectations.

Overall, our research sheds light on this unconventional linkage, demonstrating that even in the realm of politics and energy, unexpected connections can emerge to fuel academic curiosity and spark delightful inquiries into the whimsical ways of the world.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
The pursuit of knowledge often leads researchers down unexpected paths, uncovering connections between seemingly disparate domains. Our study delves into one such intriguing relationship, exploring the unexpected correlation between Republican votes for Senators in Wyoming and the consumption of jet fuel in Niue. This unconventional pairing piqued our curiosity and propelled us to investigate further, uncovering a link that defies conventional wisdom and offers a playful twist to the realm of political and energy-related phenomena.
Dad Joke Alert: Why did the jet fuel go to therapy? It needed to resolve its burning issues! As we embark on this scholarly journey, we invite our readers to embrace the enigmatic nature of our findings and enjoy the occasional pun or jest that punctuates our exploration of this peculiar correlation.
The state of Wyoming, known for its breathtaking landscapes and robust Republican presence, serves as the focal point for our political inquiry. Simultaneously, Niue, a tiny island nation in the South Pacific, captures our attention with its distinctive pattern of jet fuel consumption. Despite the geographical and ideological chasm that separates these two entities, our rigorous analysis has revealed a surprising connection between them.
As we navigate through the intricate web of data and statistical analyses, it becomes evident that the correlation between Republican votes in Wyoming and jet fuel usage in Niue is not a mere statistical fluke. Our findings suggest a compelling association, prompting us to grapple with the implications of this unanticipated bond and its potential implications for both political and energy-related discourse.
Dad Joke Alert: Did you hear about the politician who took a flight to campaign in Niue? He really wanted to "jet" set his political agenda! Our endeavor to unravel this quirky conundrum promises to offer not only academic insights but also a lighthearted reminder of the delightful idiosyncrasies that permeate the fabric of our interconnected world.
In the following sections, we present our methodology, data sources, and the robust statistical analyses that underpin our findings. By shedding light on this unorthodox linkage, our study aims to ignite intellectual curiosity and inspire a whimsical appreciation for the unexpected threads that weave through the tapestry of political and energy-related phenomena.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To investigate the peculiar association between Republican votes for Senators in Wyoming and the consumption of jet fuel in Niue, our research team employed a multi-faceted approach that encompassed data collection, processing, and statistical analysis. The methodology adopted in this study aimed to rigorously explore the connection between these disparate variables, employing both traditional and innovative analytical techniques to unveil the underlying relationship.

Data Collection:
The primary source of data for Republican votes in Wyoming was the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, which provided comprehensive records of voting patterns from 2000 to 2018. Concurrently, information on jet fuel consumption in Niue was obtained from the Energy Information Administration, offering insights into the energy usage trends within the specified timeframe. Additionally, we cross-referenced and supplemented our data with relevant datasets from the Harvard Dataverse to ensure the comprehensiveness and accuracy of our analyses.

In a more light-hearted note, our data collection process was akin to embarking on a treasure hunt, carefully sifting through the digital landscape to uncover the hidden gems of information. Just like a relentless seeker of curiosity, we navigated through the vast expanse of data repositories, unearthing the nuggets of electoral and energy-related data that would ultimately illuminate the perplexing relationship between Republican votes in Wyoming and jet fuel consumption in Niue.

Data Processing:
Upon procuring the raw data, our research team meticulously processed the information, harmonizing the disparate datasets to facilitate systematic analysis. This involved data cleaning, normalization, and validation to mitigate potential anomalies and ensure the integrity of the dataset. Furthermore, we employed sophisticated algorithms and statistical tools to transform the raw data into meaningful insights, preparing the groundwork for the subsequent analytical phase.

Through the intricacies of data processing, our team endeavored to untangle the convoluted strands of information, weaving together a cohesive fabric of interconnected data points. Just as an artisan crafts a masterpiece from diverse threads, we meticulously wove the electoral and energy-related data into a comprehensive tapestry, ready to be scrutinized through the lens of statistical analysis.

Statistical Analysis:
The core of our methodology revolved around the application of robust statistical techniques to discern patterns, correlations, and potential causal relationships between Republican votes in Wyoming and jet fuel consumption in Niue. We calculated correlation coefficients, performed regression analyses, and employed time series modeling to unravel the intricate dynamics governing the interplay between these variables. Notably, this thorough analytical process allowed us to unearth the striking statistical association that underpins our findings.

In a lighthearted twist, our statistical analyses resembled a tango between numerical entities, each data point gracefully moving to the rhythm of mathematical equations. Just as dancers intricately choreograph their movements, our statistical analyses orchestrated an elegant interplay of variables, waltzing through the data landscape to reveal the harmonious convergence of Republican votes in Wyoming and jet fuel consumption in Niue.

Ultimately, the culmination of our methodology yielded compelling insights into the unexpected correlation between these seemingly unrelated factors, offering a whimsical dimension to the discourse surrounding political preferences and energy consumption.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Republican votes for Senators in Wyoming and Jet fuel used in Niue. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse and Energy Information Administration .

For the time period 2000 to 2018, you found a correlation 0.9167223, r-squared of 0.8403798, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The "WY" of Republican Votes: The Jet Fuel Niue-nce

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study examines the curious relationship between Republican votes for Senators in Wyoming and the jet fuel used in Niue, uncovering a significant correlation between the two seemingly unrelated factors. Leveraging data from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and the Energy Information Administration, our research team compiled and analyzed data from 2000 to 2018 to probe this quirky conundrum.

We observed a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9167223 and a p-value less than 0.01, revealing a robust statistical association between the two variables. It appears that as Republican votes in Wyoming fluctuated, so did the consumption of jet fuel in Niue, providing an unexpected twist to the relationship between political preferences and energy consumption.

Dad Joke Alert: Why did the Republican bring a ladder to the election? Because he wanted to climb the political ladder! In a similarly unexpected manner, our findings offer a lighthearted reminder that the interconnectedness of diverse factors in our world can often surprise us, yielding correlations that defy traditional expectations.

Overall, our research sheds light on this unconventional linkage, demonstrating that even in the realm of politics and energy, unexpected connections can emerge to fuel academic curiosity and spark delightful inquiries into the whimsical ways of the world.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
The pursuit of knowledge often leads researchers down unexpected paths, uncovering connections between seemingly disparate domains. Our study delves into one such intriguing relationship, exploring the unexpected correlation between Republican votes for Senators in Wyoming and the consumption of jet fuel in Niue. This unconventional pairing piqued our curiosity and propelled us to investigate further, uncovering a link that defies conventional wisdom and offers a playful twist to the realm of political and energy-related phenomena.
Dad Joke Alert: Why did the jet fuel go to therapy? It needed to resolve its burning issues! As we embark on this scholarly journey, we invite our readers to embrace the enigmatic nature of our findings and enjoy the occasional pun or jest that punctuates our exploration of this peculiar correlation.
The state of Wyoming, known for its breathtaking landscapes and robust Republican presence, serves as the focal point for our political inquiry. Simultaneously, Niue, a tiny island nation in the South Pacific, captures our attention with its distinctive pattern of jet fuel consumption. Despite the geographical and ideological chasm that separates these two entities, our rigorous analysis has revealed a surprising connection between them.
As we navigate through the intricate web of data and statistical analyses, it becomes evident that the correlation between Republican votes in Wyoming and jet fuel usage in Niue is not a mere statistical fluke. Our findings suggest a compelling association, prompting us to grapple with the implications of this unanticipated bond and its potential implications for both political and energy-related discourse.
Dad Joke Alert: Did you hear about the politician who took a flight to campaign in Niue? He really wanted to "jet" set his political agenda! Our endeavor to unravel this quirky conundrum promises to offer not only academic insights but also a lighthearted reminder of the delightful idiosyncrasies that permeate the fabric of our interconnected world.
In the following sections, we present our methodology, data sources, and the robust statistical analyses that underpin our findings. By shedding light on this unorthodox linkage, our study aims to ignite intellectual curiosity and inspire a whimsical appreciation for the unexpected threads that weave through the tapestry of political and energy-related phenomena.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The analysis of data collected between 2000 to 2018 revealed a strong positive correlation between Republican votes for Senators in Wyoming and the quantity of jet fuel used in Niue. The correlation coefficient of 0.9167223 indicated a highly significant relationship, with an r-squared value of 0.8403798 that underscored the robustness of the association. The p-value of less than 0.01 further validated the statistical significance of this surprising linkage.

Fig. 1 illustrates the scatterplot depicting the undeniable correlation between these seemingly unrelated variables, providing a visual representation of the unexpected connection uncovered by our research efforts.

Dad Joke Alert: Why don't scientists trust atoms? Because they make up everything! Similarly, our findings attest to the pervasive and often amusing interconnectedness of phenomena, transcending traditional boundaries and encouraging a lighthearted reflection on the whimsical nature of statistical relationships.

The substantial correlation between Republican votes in Wyoming and jet fuel consumption in Niue challenges conventional expectations and emphasizes the need for a nuanced understanding of the intricate interplay between political dynamics and global energy patterns. This correlation, while unanticipated, presents an intriguing avenue for further exploration and underscores the complexity of societal and environmental interactions in a manner that transcends geographical and ideological boundaries.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Republican votes for Senators in Wyoming and Jet fuel used in Niue. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
The "WY" of Republican Votes: The Jet Fuel Niue-nce

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study examines the curious relationship between Republican votes for Senators in Wyoming and the jet fuel used in Niue, uncovering a significant correlation between the two seemingly unrelated factors. Leveraging data from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and the Energy Information Administration, our research team compiled and analyzed data from 2000 to 2018 to probe this quirky conundrum.

We observed a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9167223 and a p-value less than 0.01, revealing a robust statistical association between the two variables. It appears that as Republican votes in Wyoming fluctuated, so did the consumption of jet fuel in Niue, providing an unexpected twist to the relationship between political preferences and energy consumption.

Dad Joke Alert: Why did the Republican bring a ladder to the election? Because he wanted to climb the political ladder! In a similarly unexpected manner, our findings offer a lighthearted reminder that the interconnectedness of diverse factors in our world can often surprise us, yielding correlations that defy traditional expectations.

Overall, our research sheds light on this unconventional linkage, demonstrating that even in the realm of politics and energy, unexpected connections can emerge to fuel academic curiosity and spark delightful inquiries into the whimsical ways of the world.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
To contextualize the unexpected correlation between Republican votes for Senators in Wyoming and jet fuel consumption in Niue, it is imperative to delve into existing scholarship on political voting patterns, energy consumption, and the potential intersections thereof. Smith et al. (2015) examine the intricate dynamics of state-level Republican voting trends, while Doe and Jones (2017) delve into the nuances of energy demand in small island nations. The juxtaposition of these seemingly disparate strands sets the stage for our exploration of the peculiar interplay between these variables.
In "The Geography of American Voting: An Exploratory Analysis," Smith et al. (2015) delineate the multifaceted determinants of Republican voting behavior at the state level. Their detailed analysis encompasses demographic, economic, and ideological factors, offering a comprehensive portrayal of the nuances that underpin political preferences. Meanwhile, Doe and Jones (2017) shine a spotlight on energy usage patterns in microstates, expounding upon the unique challenges and dynamics of energy consumption in small, geographically isolated territories.
Dad Joke Alert: Why did the Republican vote for the candidate who loved aviation? Because they wanted to "wing" it in the election! As our investigation transcends the boundaries of conventional scholarly inquiry, we turn to non-fiction works that venture into the realm of quirky connections and unexpected correlations. "Freakonomics" by Steven Levitt and Stephen Dubner offers a fascinating exploration of unconventional links between disparate phenomena, encouraging readers to embrace the unanticipated quirks of our world.
Furthermore, "The Tipping Point: How Little Things Can Make a Big Difference" by Malcolm Gladwell provides an insightful perspective on the ripple effects of seemingly inconsequential factors. Although these works do not directly address the specific correlation we are probing, they foster an appreciation for the serendipitous connections that underlie various facets of human behavior and societal phenomena.
Turning to the realm of fiction, the influence of chance and whimsy resonates in "The Coincidence Authority" by John Ironmonger and "The Curious Incident of the Dog in the Night-Time" by Mark Haddon. While these literary works may seem distant from the empirical realm of political voting and energy usage, their thematic exploration of interconnections and unexpected twists aligns with the spirit of our inquiry.
Dad Joke Alert: What do you call a board game based on the correlation between Republican votes in Wyoming and jet fuel usage in Niue? "Politically Fuel'd: The Island Interconnectivity Edition" - where the only rule is to expect the unexpected!
As we navigate through this interdisciplinary landscape, it becomes evident that even in the ostensibly austere domains of politics and energy, a whimsical and quirky tapestry of interconnections awaits exploration.

[[RESULTS]]
The analysis of data collected between 2000 to 2018 revealed a strong positive correlation between Republican votes for Senators in Wyoming and the quantity of jet fuel used in Niue. The correlation coefficient of 0.9167223 indicated a highly significant relationship, with an r-squared value of 0.8403798 that underscored the robustness of the association. The p-value of less than 0.01 further validated the statistical significance of this surprising linkage.
Fig. 1 illustrates the scatterplot depicting the undeniable correlation between these seemingly unrelated variables, providing a visual representation of the unexpected connection uncovered by our research efforts.
Dad Joke Alert: Why don't scientists trust atoms? Because they make up everything! Similarly, our findings attest to the pervasive and often amusing interconnectedness of phenomena, transcending traditional boundaries and encouraging a lighthearted reflection on the whimsical nature of statistical relationships.
The substantial correlation between Republican votes in Wyoming and jet fuel consumption in Niue challenges conventional expectations and emphasizes the need for a nuanced understanding of the intricate interplay between political dynamics and global energy patterns. This correlation, while unanticipated, presents an intriguing avenue for further exploration and underscores the complexity of societal and environmental interactions in a manner that transcends geographical and ideological boundaries.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

Our study has unveiled a compelling linkage between Republican votes for Senators in Wyoming and the consumption of jet fuel in Niue, aligning with the prior research on unexpected correlations. The meticulous analysis of data spanning nearly two decades has substantiated the unorthodox but statistically robust relationship between these seemingly disparate variables.

The notable correlation coefficient of 0.9167223 aligns with previous scholarship, demonstrating a concordance with the nuanced determinants of Republican voting behavior at the state level, as elucidated by Smith et al. (2015). This unexpected association highlights the influence of multifaceted factors on political preferences, underscoring the whimsical nature of statistical relationships that defy conventional expectations.

Dad Joke Alert: Why was the statistical conclusion always prepared with a good joke? To ensure that the findings were humorously significant! Our findings not only offer statistical significance but also lend an element of amusement to the scholarly discourse, mirroring the unexpected connections depicted in "Freakonomics" and "The Tipping Point."

Moreover, the resonance between our results and the literature on energy usage patterns in small island nations, as explored by Doe and Jones (2017), accentuates the interdisciplinary relevance of our inquiry. The correlation we have unearthed underscores the interplay between local political dynamics and global energy consumption, echoing the thematic exploration of interconnectedness and unexpected twists presented in "The Coincidence Authority" and "The Curious Incident of the Dog in the Night-Time."

The visual representation of our data in Fig. 1 encapsulates the undeniable correlation between Republican votes in Wyoming and jet fuel usage in Niue, akin to the punctuality of a well-crafted dad joke. This compelling visualization substantiates the robustness of the unanticipated linkage we have unraveled, adding a touch of levity to our scholarly endeavor while emphasizing the whimsical and unpredictably interconnected nature of societal phenomena.

In conclusion, our study illuminates a unique juxtaposition of political dynamics and energy patterns, shedding light on the whimsical ways in which seemingly unrelated factors can intertwine. This unexpected correlation prompts further reflection on the intricate interconnections that govern diverse aspects of our world, setting the stage for continued explorations into the captivating conundrums that lace the fabric of societal and environmental interactions.

I look forward to your conclusion, which will undoubtedly tie all these findings together in a manner as seamless as a perfectly executed dad joke!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Republican votes for Senators in Wyoming and Jet fuel used in Niue. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
The "WY" of Republican Votes: The Jet Fuel Niue-nce

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study examines the curious relationship between Republican votes for Senators in Wyoming and the jet fuel used in Niue, uncovering a significant correlation between the two seemingly unrelated factors. Leveraging data from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and the Energy Information Administration, our research team compiled and analyzed data from 2000 to 2018 to probe this quirky conundrum.

We observed a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9167223 and a p-value less than 0.01, revealing a robust statistical association between the two variables. It appears that as Republican votes in Wyoming fluctuated, so did the consumption of jet fuel in Niue, providing an unexpected twist to the relationship between political preferences and energy consumption.

Dad Joke Alert: Why did the Republican bring a ladder to the election? Because he wanted to climb the political ladder! In a similarly unexpected manner, our findings offer a lighthearted reminder that the interconnectedness of diverse factors in our world can often surprise us, yielding correlations that defy traditional expectations.

Overall, our research sheds light on this unconventional linkage, demonstrating that even in the realm of politics and energy, unexpected connections can emerge to fuel academic curiosity and spark delightful inquiries into the whimsical ways of the world.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
The pursuit of knowledge often leads researchers down unexpected paths, uncovering connections between seemingly disparate domains. Our study delves into one such intriguing relationship, exploring the unexpected correlation between Republican votes for Senators in Wyoming and the consumption of jet fuel in Niue. This unconventional pairing piqued our curiosity and propelled us to investigate further, uncovering a link that defies conventional wisdom and offers a playful twist to the realm of political and energy-related phenomena.
Dad Joke Alert: Why did the jet fuel go to therapy? It needed to resolve its burning issues! As we embark on this scholarly journey, we invite our readers to embrace the enigmatic nature of our findings and enjoy the occasional pun or jest that punctuates our exploration of this peculiar correlation.
The state of Wyoming, known for its breathtaking landscapes and robust Republican presence, serves as the focal point for our political inquiry. Simultaneously, Niue, a tiny island nation in the South Pacific, captures our attention with its distinctive pattern of jet fuel consumption. Despite the geographical and ideological chasm that separates these two entities, our rigorous analysis has revealed a surprising connection between them.
As we navigate through the intricate web of data and statistical analyses, it becomes evident that the correlation between Republican votes in Wyoming and jet fuel usage in Niue is not a mere statistical fluke. Our findings suggest a compelling association, prompting us to grapple with the implications of this unanticipated bond and its potential implications for both political and energy-related discourse.
Dad Joke Alert: Did you hear about the politician who took a flight to campaign in Niue? He really wanted to "jet" set his political agenda! Our endeavor to unravel this quirky conundrum promises to offer not only academic insights but also a lighthearted reminder of the delightful idiosyncrasies that permeate the fabric of our interconnected world.
In the following sections, we present our methodology, data sources, and the robust statistical analyses that underpin our findings. By shedding light on this unorthodox linkage, our study aims to ignite intellectual curiosity and inspire a whimsical appreciation for the unexpected threads that weave through the tapestry of political and energy-related phenomena.

[[RESULTS]]
The analysis of data collected between 2000 to 2018 revealed a strong positive correlation between Republican votes for Senators in Wyoming and the quantity of jet fuel used in Niue. The correlation coefficient of 0.9167223 indicated a highly significant relationship, with an r-squared value of 0.8403798 that underscored the robustness of the association. The p-value of less than 0.01 further validated the statistical significance of this surprising linkage.
Fig. 1 illustrates the scatterplot depicting the undeniable correlation between these seemingly unrelated variables, providing a visual representation of the unexpected connection uncovered by our research efforts.
Dad Joke Alert: Why don't scientists trust atoms? Because they make up everything! Similarly, our findings attest to the pervasive and often amusing interconnectedness of phenomena, transcending traditional boundaries and encouraging a lighthearted reflection on the whimsical nature of statistical relationships.
The substantial correlation between Republican votes in Wyoming and jet fuel consumption in Niue challenges conventional expectations and emphasizes the need for a nuanced understanding of the intricate interplay between political dynamics and global energy patterns. This correlation, while unanticipated, presents an intriguing avenue for further exploration and underscores the complexity of societal and environmental interactions in a manner that transcends geographical and ideological boundaries.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our study has unraveled an unexpected and robust correlation between Republican votes for Senators in Wyoming and the consumption of jet fuel in Niue. This quirky conundrum, while initially met with skepticism, has emerged as a significant and thought-provoking connection that challenges conventional wisdom. The statistical analyses yielded a remarkably high correlation coefficient and a p-value less than 0.01, affirming the robustness and statistical significance of this unanticipated association.

Dad Joke Alert: Did you hear about the Republican who advocated for renewable energy in Wyoming and jet-setted to Niue to promote sustainability? He really took the "wind beneath my wings" quite literally! Our findings not only offer intellectual stimulation but also serve as a reminder of the delightful idiosyncrasies that pervade our interconnected world.

This correlation, while seemingly whimsical, underscores the intricate interplay between political preferences and global energy consumption, transcending geographical and ideological boundaries. It prompts a reevaluation of traditional paradigms, emphasizing the need for a nuanced understanding of the multifaceted dynamics that underpin societal and environmental interactions. As we reflect on this peculiar correlation, it becomes apparent that our world is replete with unexpected connections that warrant further exploration and appreciation.

Dad Joke Alert: Why did the statistician break up with the geologist? There was just too much pressure between them! This unexpected correlation between Republican votes in Wyoming and jet fuel consumption in Niue encapsulates the whimsical nature of statistical relationships and the perpetual potential for delightful surprises in academic inquiry.

In light of our compelling findings, we assert that further research in this area is unnecessary. The robust statistical association uncovered in this study stands as an intriguing anomaly that defies traditional expectations and enriches our understanding of the interconnectedness of diverse phenomena in our world. As we embrace the delightful quirks and surprises that emerge from scholarly exploration, let us remember that even the most unexpected correlations can offer insights and amusement, thereby enriching the scholarly landscape.

No more research is needed in this area.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited The WY of Republican Votes: The Jet Fuel Niue-nce. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Political Quirks and Quandaries


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited The WY of Republican Votes: The Jet Fuel Niue-nce. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Society for Quirky Political Analysis and Research (SQPAR)


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled The WY of Republican Votes: The Jet Fuel Niue-nce with an abstract of This study examines the curious relationship between Republican votes for Senators in Wyoming and the jet fuel used in Niue, uncovering a significant correlation between the two seemingly unrelated factors. Leveraging data from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and the Energy Information Administration, our research team compiled and analyzed data from 2000 to 2018 to probe this quirky conundrum.
We observed a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9167223 and a p-value less than 0.01, revealing a robust statistical association between the two variables. It appears that as Republican votes in Wyoming fluctuated, so did the consumption of jet fuel in Niue, providing an unexpected twist to the relationship between political preferences and energy consumption.
Dad Joke Alert: Why did the Republican bring a ladder to the election? Because he wanted to climb the political ladder! In a similarly unexpected manner, our findings offer a lighthearted reminder that the interconnectedness of diverse factors in our world can often surprise us, yielding correlations that defy traditional expectations.
Overall, our research sheds light on this unconventional linkage, demonstrating that even in the realm of politics and energy, unexpected connections can emerge to fuel academic curiosity and spark delightful inquiries into the whimsical ways of the world.

ChatGPT:

Republican votes, Wyoming, jet fuel, Niue, correlation, political preferences, energy consumption, MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, Energy Information Administration, correlation coefficient, statistical association, data analysis, academic curiosity, unexpected connections

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Votes for Republican Senators in Wyoming
Detailed data title: Percentage of votes cast for Federal Republican Senate candidates in Wyoming
Source: MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse
See what else correlates with Votes for Republican Senators in Wyoming

Jet fuel used in Niue
Detailed data title: Volume of jet fuel used consumed in Niue in millions of barrels per day
Source: Energy Information Administration
See what else correlates with Jet fuel used in Niue

Correlation r = 0.9167223 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.8403798 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 84% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Jet fuel used in Niue) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Votes for Republican Senators in Wyoming) over the 7 years from 2000 through 2018.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 0.0037. 0.0036738386155565410000000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.92 in 0.37% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 272 random variables Which I absolutely did.
with the same 6 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 6 because we have two variables measured over a period of 7 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.53, 0.99 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
2000200220062008201220142018
Votes for Republican Senators in Wyoming (Percentage of votes)73.772772.953968.8908148.95373.893171.020766.96
Jet fuel used in Niue (Million Barrels/Day)0.008233330.008147260.008672810.01791230.009611540.01087290.0110803




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Very low n: There are not many data points included in this analysis. Even if the p-value is high, we should be suspicious of using so few datapoints in a correlation.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([73.7727,72.9539,68.8908,148.953,73.8931,71.0207,66.96,])
array_2 = np.array([0.00823333,0.00814726,0.00867281,0.0179123,0.00961154,0.0108729,0.0110803,])
array_1_name = "Votes for Republican Senators in Wyoming"
array_2_name = "Jet fuel used in Niue"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

I'm genuinely thankful for your rating!


Correlation ID: 4419 · Black Variable ID: 26488 · Red Variable ID: 24769
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0