Download png, svg
AI explanation
As the old saying goes, "As Connecticut's red votes went up, so did the search for a new Europe move-ment! Maybe it's because as political tension rises, people just want to take a Brussels sprout and find some Greece and serenity. Or perhaps they're simply Hungary for a change and thinking, 'Czech, please!' But one thing's for Switzerland: There's Norway they're letting this decision Denmark their future plans! It's a veritable United Kingdom of motivations, all stemming from the ballot box. It's like they say, when the going gets tough politically, the tough book a flight to Paris. After all, if you can't beat 'em, join 'em... in a different hemisphere!"Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Generate an image of friends in a cozy living room in Connecticut, surrounded by high-tech gadgets, watching election results on TV. One friend proudly holds up a Republican vote sticker in a tense atmosphere, while another friend sits on the couch, typing "how to move to Europe" into the Google search bar on their laptop. The room is filled with a mix of political tension and wanderlust, with excitement and pensive expressions. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Republican votes for Senators in Connecticut and Google searches for 'how to move to europe'. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Whimsical illustration Surrealism High-tech inspired by bauhaus Steampunk
ChatGPT: High-tech
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Republican votes for Senators in Connecticut and Google searches for 'how to move to europe', in the following situation: As the old saying goes, "As Connecticut's red votes went up, so did the search for a new Europe move-ment! Maybe it's because as political tension rises, people just want to take a Brussels sprout and find some Greece and serenity. Or perhaps they're simply Hungary for a change and thinking, 'Czech, please!' But one thing's for Switzerland: There's Norway they're letting this decision Denmark their future plans! It's a veritable United Kingdom of motivations, all stemming from the ballot box. It's like they say, when the going gets tough politically, the tough book a flight to Paris. After all, if you can't beat 'em, join 'em... in a different hemisphere!". Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In a cozy living room in Connecticut, a group of friends is gathered around the TV, watching election results. One friend proudly holds up a Republican vote sticker while another friend sits on the couch, typing "how to move to europe" into the Google search bar on their laptop. The atmosphere is a mix of political tension and a sense of wanderlust, with the room filled with both excitement and the pensive hum of future plans being pondered.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ High-tech ] and depicting this scene: In a cozy living room in Connecticut, a group of friends is gathered around the TV, watching election results. One friend proudly holds up a Republican vote sticker while another friend sits on the couch, typing "how to move to europe" into the Google search bar on their laptop. The atmosphere is a mix of political tension and a sense of wanderlust, with the room filled with both excitement and the pensive hum of future plans being pondered. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Generate an image of friends in a cozy living room in Connecticut, surrounded by high-tech gadgets, watching election results on TV. One friend proudly holds up a Republican vote sticker in a tense atmosphere, while another friend sits on the couch, typing "how to move to Europe" into the Google search bar on their laptop. The room is filled with a mix of political tension and wanderlust, with excitement and pensive expressions.
*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.
I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how increases in Republican votes for Senators in Connecticut positively influenced how to move to europe (Google searches for 'how to move to europe'). Include one good pun.
AI academic paper
Navigating Ideological Tides: A Correlational Analysis of Republican Votes for Senators in Connecticut and Google Searches for 'How to Move to Europe' The Journal of Political Surfing Studies Jan 2024 Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real! |
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Republican votes for Senators in Connecticut and Google searches for 'how to move to europe'. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.
Make the title seem clever.
Your research team used data from MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse and Google Trends to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.8776104 and p < 0.05 for 2004 to 2018.
Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)
[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit
[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit
ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
Navigating Ideological Tides: A Correlational Analysis of Republican Votes for Senators in Connecticut and Google Searches for 'How to Move to Europe'
[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper presents the findings of an empirical investigation into the potential relationship between Republican votes for Senators in Connecticut and Google searches for 'how to move to Europe'. Utilizing data from MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and Google Trends, we analyzed the period from 2004 to 2018 to unravel the intertwined currents of political sentiment and the impulse for continental relocation.
The study uncovered a correlation coefficient of 0.8776104 with a statistically significant p-value (p < 0.05), indicating a strong positive association between the two seemingly unrelated variables. Our findings suggest that the political landscape may indeed influence individuals' contemplation of cross-continental resettlement. While this association prompts speculation about underlying motivations and implications, it also serves as a lighthearted reminder of the intricate interplay between political environments and the compelling allure of European living.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Republican votes for Senators in Connecticut and Google searches for 'how to move to europe'. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.
Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Navigating Ideological Tides: A Correlational Analysis of Republican Votes for Senators in Connecticut and Google Searches for 'How to Move to Europe'
[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper presents the findings of an empirical investigation into the potential relationship between Republican votes for Senators in Connecticut and Google searches for 'how to move to Europe'. Utilizing data from MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and Google Trends, we analyzed the period from 2004 to 2018 to unravel the intertwined currents of political sentiment and the impulse for continental relocation.
The study uncovered a correlation coefficient of 0.8776104 with a statistically significant p-value (p < 0.05), indicating a strong positive association between the two seemingly unrelated variables. Our findings suggest that the political landscape may indeed influence individuals' contemplation of cross-continental resettlement. While this association prompts speculation about underlying motivations and implications, it also serves as a lighthearted reminder of the intricate interplay between political environments and the compelling allure of European living.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The relationship between political affiliation and the propensity to entertain the idea of relocating across the pond has long been a matter of speculation. While it might seem like mere whimsy or perhaps a harmless flight of fancy, the impulse to query "how to move to Europe" on Google could represent a deeper sentiment influenced by the political climate. In this paper, we delve into this peculiar correlation and attempt to shed light on the intertwined currents of politics and the fantasy of European immigration.
On the surface, one might think of this study as a bit of a "political escapade," an expedition into the uncharted waters of offbeat correlations. Nonetheless, we endeavor to treat these findings with all due rigor, wading through the data with the earnestness of adventurers charting a new course.
The state of Connecticut provides a fascinating setting for our investigation. Traditionally known for its scenic beauty and the idyllic New England charm, Connecticut has also surfaced as a battleground for political ideologies. It's like the state couldn't quite decide whether it prefers to ritually consume lobster rolls with a liberal mindset or delve into conservative ideologies while sipping maple syrup. The very juxtaposition of these elements creates a unique tapestry for our analysis.
As we navigate through this study, we aim to engender a lively discussion about the nuances of political sentiment and the allure of a European interlude. While this investigation may seem like a whimsical pursuit, the potential implications and underlying motivations beckon our attention. It's a reminder that in the seemingly mundane, even in the realm of political data, there are quirky patterns waiting to be uncovered. So let us set sail on this quest, poised to decipher the underlying currents of political expression and daydreams of European exploration.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Republican votes for Senators in Connecticut and Google searches for 'how to move to europe'. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.
Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.
Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.
Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Perhaps you also got inspiration from some board games that are vaugely related.
Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Navigating Ideological Tides: A Correlational Analysis of Republican Votes for Senators in Connecticut and Google Searches for 'How to Move to Europe'
[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper presents the findings of an empirical investigation into the potential relationship between Republican votes for Senators in Connecticut and Google searches for 'how to move to Europe'. Utilizing data from MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and Google Trends, we analyzed the period from 2004 to 2018 to unravel the intertwined currents of political sentiment and the impulse for continental relocation.
The study uncovered a correlation coefficient of 0.8776104 with a statistically significant p-value (p < 0.05), indicating a strong positive association between the two seemingly unrelated variables. Our findings suggest that the political landscape may indeed influence individuals' contemplation of cross-continental resettlement. While this association prompts speculation about underlying motivations and implications, it also serves as a lighthearted reminder of the intricate interplay between political environments and the compelling allure of European living.
-------
And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The relationship between political affiliation and the propensity to entertain the idea of relocating across the pond has long been a matter of speculation. While it might seem like mere whimsy or perhaps a harmless flight of fancy, the impulse to query "how to move to Europe" on Google could represent a deeper sentiment influenced by the political climate. In this paper, we delve into this peculiar correlation and attempt to shed light on the intertwined currents of politics and the fantasy of European immigration.
On the surface, one might think of this study as a bit of a "political escapade," an expedition into the uncharted waters of offbeat correlations. Nonetheless, we endeavor to treat these findings with all due rigor, wading through the data with the earnestness of adventurers charting a new course.
The state of Connecticut provides a fascinating setting for our investigation. Traditionally known for its scenic beauty and the idyllic New England charm, Connecticut has also surfaced as a battleground for political ideologies. It's like the state couldn't quite decide whether it prefers to ritually consume lobster rolls with a liberal mindset or delve into conservative ideologies while sipping maple syrup. The very juxtaposition of these elements creates a unique tapestry for our analysis.
As we navigate through this study, we aim to engender a lively discussion about the nuances of political sentiment and the allure of a European interlude. While this investigation may seem like a whimsical pursuit, the potential implications and underlying motivations beckon our attention. It's a reminder that in the seemingly mundane, even in the realm of political data, there are quirky patterns waiting to be uncovered. So let us set sail on this quest, poised to decipher the underlying currents of political expression and daydreams of European exploration.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
In their study, Smith and Doe (2015) explored the correlation between political leanings and the inclination to pursue regional relocation. Their analysis, while comprehensive, focused primarily on domestic migration patterns, overlooking potential international aspirations. Similarly, Jones et al. (2018) investigated the influence of political climate on individuals' search behavior, but their research did not delve into the specific nuances of transcontinental relocation desires.
Expanding beyond these empirical investigations, several non-fiction works offer insightful perspectives on the interconnectedness of politics and personal aspirations. "The Age of Migration" by Stephen Castles and Mark J. Miller sheds light on the complexities of global migration dynamics, albeit with a broader focus. Moreover, "The Art of Political Manipulation" by Arlene Stein unpacks the intricacies of political messaging, potentially influencing individuals' contemplation of relocation with its captivating prose.
In the realm of fiction, the work of Paulo Coelho, particularly "The Alchemist," provides allegorical glimpses into the pursuit of dreams and aspirations, albeit within a different context. Furthermore, the dystopian narrative of political upheaval and exodus portrayed in Margaret Atwood's "The Handmaid's Tale" subtly underscores the underlying motives for embarking on a journey toward distant shores.
Drawing from unexpected sources, the parallels between the board game "Ticket to Ride" and the ethos of political affiliation offer whimsical yet thought-provoking insights into the concept of charting new paths. With players competing to connect cities across Europe, the game presents a playful mirror to the inclination for international mobility prompted by the ebb and flow of political sentiments.
As we synthesize these diverse strands of literature, we embark on a journey of understanding the interconnectedness of political inclinations and the magnetic allure of European relocation. With a playful nod to the unconventional, our analysis aims to unravel the enigmatic threads of political expression and the whimsical yearning for distant horizons.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Republican votes for Senators in Connecticut and Google searches for 'how to move to europe'. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.
Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse and Google Trends . You used data from 2004 to 2018
Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.
Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Navigating Ideological Tides: A Correlational Analysis of Republican Votes for Senators in Connecticut and Google Searches for 'How to Move to Europe'
[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper presents the findings of an empirical investigation into the potential relationship between Republican votes for Senators in Connecticut and Google searches for 'how to move to Europe'. Utilizing data from MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and Google Trends, we analyzed the period from 2004 to 2018 to unravel the intertwined currents of political sentiment and the impulse for continental relocation.
The study uncovered a correlation coefficient of 0.8776104 with a statistically significant p-value (p < 0.05), indicating a strong positive association between the two seemingly unrelated variables. Our findings suggest that the political landscape may indeed influence individuals' contemplation of cross-continental resettlement. While this association prompts speculation about underlying motivations and implications, it also serves as a lighthearted reminder of the intricate interplay between political environments and the compelling allure of European living.
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The relationship between political affiliation and the propensity to entertain the idea of relocating across the pond has long been a matter of speculation. While it might seem like mere whimsy or perhaps a harmless flight of fancy, the impulse to query "how to move to Europe" on Google could represent a deeper sentiment influenced by the political climate. In this paper, we delve into this peculiar correlation and attempt to shed light on the intertwined currents of politics and the fantasy of European immigration.
On the surface, one might think of this study as a bit of a "political escapade," an expedition into the uncharted waters of offbeat correlations. Nonetheless, we endeavor to treat these findings with all due rigor, wading through the data with the earnestness of adventurers charting a new course.
The state of Connecticut provides a fascinating setting for our investigation. Traditionally known for its scenic beauty and the idyllic New England charm, Connecticut has also surfaced as a battleground for political ideologies. It's like the state couldn't quite decide whether it prefers to ritually consume lobster rolls with a liberal mindset or delve into conservative ideologies while sipping maple syrup. The very juxtaposition of these elements creates a unique tapestry for our analysis.
As we navigate through this study, we aim to engender a lively discussion about the nuances of political sentiment and the allure of a European interlude. While this investigation may seem like a whimsical pursuit, the potential implications and underlying motivations beckon our attention. It's a reminder that in the seemingly mundane, even in the realm of political data, there are quirky patterns waiting to be uncovered. So let us set sail on this quest, poised to decipher the underlying currents of political expression and daydreams of European exploration.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
ChatGPT:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
Data Collection:
The data for this study was acquired from multiple sources, reflecting our commitment to thoroughly canvassing the digital landscape. We traversed the expanse of the internet, navigating through the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and Google Trends. We did consider using a Magic 8-Ball to predict political preferences and a crystal ball to envision potential European escapades, but alas, the scientific community frowns upon such unconventional methods.
We focused on the period from 2004 to 2018, as this timeframe allowed us to capture the ebbs and flows of political dynamics and the evolving nature of searches for geographical relocation. We admit, though, that choosing the 2004 start date was not without its amusement, given that it coincided with the release of the comedy film "EuroTrip," which might have had some influence on individuals' search behavior.
Data Analysis:
To assess the correlation between Republican votes for Senators in Connecticut and Google searches for 'how to move to Europe', we employed a whimsically diverse array of statistical techniques. First, we computed the correlation coefficient, utilizing our trusty spreadsheet software and a hefty dose of caffeinated beverages. We also employed regression analysis to discern the potential predictive nature of Senate voting patterns on the propensity to contemplate European sojourns.
We must confess that we initially considered employing a crystal ball to determine correlation coefficients and a tarot card reading for predictive modeling, but we ultimately opted for more conventional statistical techniques.
Afterwards, we engaged in rigorous sensitivity analyses, accounting for various potential confounding factors such as socioeconomic indicators, local weather patterns, and the prevalence of European travel advertisements. We recognize that this pursuit was akin to untangling a particularly knotty holiday light decoration - enthralling yet exasperating.
Ethical Considerations:
Throughout this study, we upheld the principles of ethical inquiry, ensuring the responsible handling of data and safeguarding the anonymity of individuals participating in Google searches. We also maintained a commitment to lightheartedness, recognizing that this investigation, while academically rigorous, touched upon the realm of whimsy and amusement. After all, academic pursuits need not always be as serious as a presidential debate; sometimes, they can be as playful as a political parody skit.
In conclusion, our methodology was driven by a blend of academic rigor and a dash of whimsy, encapsulating the spirit of our inquiry into the enigmatic dance between political proclivities and the allure of European adventure.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Republican votes for Senators in Connecticut and Google searches for 'how to move to europe'. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.
Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse and Google Trends .
For the time period 2004 to 2018, you found a correlation 0.8776104, r-squared of 0.7702000, and p < 0.05.
One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.
Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Navigating Ideological Tides: A Correlational Analysis of Republican Votes for Senators in Connecticut and Google Searches for 'How to Move to Europe'
[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper presents the findings of an empirical investigation into the potential relationship between Republican votes for Senators in Connecticut and Google searches for 'how to move to Europe'. Utilizing data from MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and Google Trends, we analyzed the period from 2004 to 2018 to unravel the intertwined currents of political sentiment and the impulse for continental relocation.
The study uncovered a correlation coefficient of 0.8776104 with a statistically significant p-value (p < 0.05), indicating a strong positive association between the two seemingly unrelated variables. Our findings suggest that the political landscape may indeed influence individuals' contemplation of cross-continental resettlement. While this association prompts speculation about underlying motivations and implications, it also serves as a lighthearted reminder of the intricate interplay between political environments and the compelling allure of European living.
-------
And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
The relationship between political affiliation and the propensity to entertain the idea of relocating across the pond has long been a matter of speculation. While it might seem like mere whimsy or perhaps a harmless flight of fancy, the impulse to query "how to move to Europe" on Google could represent a deeper sentiment influenced by the political climate. In this paper, we delve into this peculiar correlation and attempt to shed light on the intertwined currents of politics and the fantasy of European immigration.
On the surface, one might think of this study as a bit of a "political escapade," an expedition into the uncharted waters of offbeat correlations. Nonetheless, we endeavor to treat these findings with all due rigor, wading through the data with the earnestness of adventurers charting a new course.
The state of Connecticut provides a fascinating setting for our investigation. Traditionally known for its scenic beauty and the idyllic New England charm, Connecticut has also surfaced as a battleground for political ideologies. It's like the state couldn't quite decide whether it prefers to ritually consume lobster rolls with a liberal mindset or delve into conservative ideologies while sipping maple syrup. The very juxtaposition of these elements creates a unique tapestry for our analysis.
As we navigate through this study, we aim to engender a lively discussion about the nuances of political sentiment and the allure of a European interlude. While this investigation may seem like a whimsical pursuit, the potential implications and underlying motivations beckon our attention. It's a reminder that in the seemingly mundane, even in the realm of political data, there are quirky patterns waiting to be uncovered. So let us set sail on this quest, poised to decipher the underlying currents of political expression and daydreams of European exploration.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[RESULTS]]
ChatGPT:
[[RESULTS]]
The analysis of the data revealed a strong positive correlation between Republican votes for Senators in Connecticut and Google searches for 'how to move to Europe' from 2004 to 2018. The correlation coefficient of 0.8776104 denoted a robust relationship between these two disparate yet curiously linked phenomena.
The R-squared value of 0.7702000 indicated that approximately 77.02% of the variance in "how to move to Europe" Google searches could be explained by the variance in Republican votes for Senators in Connecticut. This finding suggests that the political climate in Connecticut may have been a significant determinant of the interest in European relocation, capturing the attention of both scholarly voyagers and armchair adventurers alike.
The p-value of less than 0.05 further underscores the statistical significance of the observed correlation, affirming that the relationship is not merely a fluke or a figment of statistical whimsy but rather a substantive connection worthy of exploration and deliberation.
Additionally, the scatterplot (Fig. 1) visually illustrates the compelling relationship between these variables, depicting a trend that appears to validate the seemingly unconventional connection. The well-defined pattern in the plot lends credence to the notion that political tides may indeed sway the contemplation of traversing the Atlantic, adding a touch of whimsy to the realm of empirical inquiry.
These results not only shed light on a thought-provoking correlation but also emphasize the dynamic interplay between politics and the allure of European living. They beckon further inquiry into the underlying motivations and implications, inviting scholarly and lighthearted discourse alike.
It is worth noting that while our findings are both compelling and peculiar in their own right, they should be interpreted with caution. Correlation does not necessarily imply causation, and the observed relationship may be influenced by confounding factors not accounted for in this analysis. Nonetheless, this study provides a captivating glimpse into the potential interweaving of political ideology and daydreams of cross-continental relocation, inviting researchers to embark on further expeditions into the eccentric currents of human behavior.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Republican votes for Senators in Connecticut and Google searches for 'how to move to europe'. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.
Limit your response to 500 tokens.
Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.
Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.
[[TITLE]]
Navigating Ideological Tides: A Correlational Analysis of Republican Votes for Senators in Connecticut and Google Searches for 'How to Move to Europe'
[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper presents the findings of an empirical investigation into the potential relationship between Republican votes for Senators in Connecticut and Google searches for 'how to move to Europe'. Utilizing data from MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and Google Trends, we analyzed the period from 2004 to 2018 to unravel the intertwined currents of political sentiment and the impulse for continental relocation.
The study uncovered a correlation coefficient of 0.8776104 with a statistically significant p-value (p < 0.05), indicating a strong positive association between the two seemingly unrelated variables. Our findings suggest that the political landscape may indeed influence individuals' contemplation of cross-continental resettlement. While this association prompts speculation about underlying motivations and implications, it also serves as a lighthearted reminder of the intricate interplay between political environments and the compelling allure of European living.
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
In their study, Smith and Doe (2015) explored the correlation between political leanings and the inclination to pursue regional relocation. Their analysis, while comprehensive, focused primarily on domestic migration patterns, overlooking potential international aspirations. Similarly, Jones et al. (2018) investigated the influence of political climate on individuals' search behavior, but their research did not delve into the specific nuances of transcontinental relocation desires.
Expanding beyond these empirical investigations, several non-fiction works offer insightful perspectives on the interconnectedness of politics and personal aspirations. "The Age of Migration" by Stephen Castles and Mark J. Miller sheds light on the complexities of global migration dynamics, albeit with a broader focus. Moreover, "The Art of Political Manipulation" by Arlene Stein unpacks the intricacies of political messaging, potentially influencing individuals' contemplation of relocation with its captivating prose.
In the realm of fiction, the work of Paulo Coelho, particularly "The Alchemist," provides allegorical glimpses into the pursuit of dreams and aspirations, albeit within a different context. Furthermore, the dystopian narrative of political upheaval and exodus portrayed in Margaret Atwood's "The Handmaid's Tale" subtly underscores the underlying motives for embarking on a journey toward distant shores.
Drawing from unexpected sources, the parallels between the board game "Ticket to Ride" and the ethos of political affiliation offer whimsical yet thought-provoking insights into the concept of charting new paths. With players competing to connect cities across Europe, the game presents a playful mirror to the inclination for international mobility prompted by the ebb and flow of political sentiments.
As we synthesize these diverse strands of literature, we embark on a journey of understanding the interconnectedness of political inclinations and the magnetic allure of European relocation. With a playful nod to the unconventional, our analysis aims to unravel the enigmatic threads of political expression and the whimsical yearning for distant horizons.
[[RESULTS]]
The analysis of the data revealed a strong positive correlation between Republican votes for Senators in Connecticut and Google searches for 'how to move to Europe' from 2004 to 2018. The correlation coefficient of 0.8776104 denoted a robust relationship between these two disparate yet curiously linked phenomena.
The R-squared value of 0.7702000 indicated that approximately 77.02% of the variance in "how to move to Europe" Google searches could be explained by the variance in Republican votes for Senators in Connecticut. This finding suggests that the political climate in Connecticut may have been a significant determinant of the interest in European relocation, capturing the attention of both scholarly voyagers and armchair adventurers alike.
The p-value of less than 0.05 further underscores the statistical significance of the observed correlation, affirming that the relationship is not merely a fluke or a figment of statistical whimsy but rather a substantive connection worthy of exploration and deliberation.
Additionally, the scatterplot (Fig. 1) visually illustrates the compelling relationship between these variables, depicting a trend that appears to validate the seemingly unconventional connection. The well-defined pattern in the plot lends credence to the notion that political tides may indeed sway the contemplation of traversing the Atlantic, adding a touch of whimsy to the realm of empirical inquiry.
These results not only shed light on a thought-provoking correlation but also emphasize the dynamic interplay between politics and the allure of European living. They beckon further inquiry into the underlying motivations and implications, inviting scholarly and lighthearted discourse alike.
It is worth noting that while our findings are both compelling and peculiar in their own right, they should be interpreted with caution. Correlation does not necessarily imply causation, and the observed relationship may be influenced by confounding factors not accounted for in this analysis. Nonetheless, this study provides a captivating glimpse into the potential interweaving of political ideology and daydreams of cross-continental relocation, inviting researchers to embark on further expeditions into the eccentric currents of human behavior.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[DISCUSSION]]
ChatGPT:
[[DISCUSSION]]
The serendipitous surfacing of a noteworthy connection between Republican votes for Senators in Connecticut and Google searches for 'how to move to Europe' compels us to delve into the whimsical yet captivating undercurrents of this peculiar correlation. Our findings add credence to prior research, aligning with Smith and Doe's (2015) and Jones et al.'s (2018) suggestion of a possible connection between political leanings and relocation aspirations. The study not only corroborates these propositions but expands the canvas of inquiry to the majestically alluring landscape of European relocation fantasies.
The tangential references in our literature review, while seemingly light-hearted, offer tantalizing clues for understanding the deep-seated motivations underpinning this observed correlation. The parallels drawn from diverse sources, ranging from academic works to board games, serve as delightful yet substantive reminders of the intricate interplay between political environments and the magnetic allure of European living. As we navigate these theoretical waters, we are reminded of the subtle yet robust influences of political inclinations on individuals' contemplation of transcontinental relocation, metaphorically resembling the gentle lapping of waves against the shores of scholarly discourse.
The statistical significance of our findings, with a correlation coefficient of 0.8776104 and a p-value of < 0.05, underscores the bountiful relevance of this seemingly unconventional association. The R-squared value of 77.02% echoes the harmonious resonance between political sentiments and the allure of European relocation, akin to the synchronous dance of scholarly inquiry and whimsical reveries. The scatterplot visually narrates a compelling tale, mirroring the tides of political climate and the ebb and flow of relocation musings, akin to the timeless allure of literary narratives set against the backdrop of European landscapes.
Our study, though not without its limitations, invites further discourse and exploration into the enigmatic currents of human behavior, beckoning researchers to embark on intellectual journeys that blend empirical rigor with the playful indulgence of wit and whimsy. As we set sail on this scholarly voyage, we revel in the quirky allure of uncovering unexpected connections and bid adieu, albeit momentarily, to the mundane shores of conventional inquiry.
Shall we, then, anchor our academic compasses and set sail toward the uncharted realms of correlational whimsy and the boundless allure of European shores, navigating the ideological tides with scholarly exuberance and a whimsical glint in our academic eye? The journey invites us to ponder the profound yet playfully enigmatic interplay between political sentiment and the transcontinental yearning, beckoning us to embrace the scholarly quest as a delightful yet substantive expedition into the eccentric realms of human inquiry.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Republican votes for Senators in Connecticut and Google searches for 'how to move to europe'. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.
Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.
Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
Navigating Ideological Tides: A Correlational Analysis of Republican Votes for Senators in Connecticut and Google Searches for 'How to Move to Europe'
[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper presents the findings of an empirical investigation into the potential relationship between Republican votes for Senators in Connecticut and Google searches for 'how to move to Europe'. Utilizing data from MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and Google Trends, we analyzed the period from 2004 to 2018 to unravel the intertwined currents of political sentiment and the impulse for continental relocation.
The study uncovered a correlation coefficient of 0.8776104 with a statistically significant p-value (p < 0.05), indicating a strong positive association between the two seemingly unrelated variables. Our findings suggest that the political landscape may indeed influence individuals' contemplation of cross-continental resettlement. While this association prompts speculation about underlying motivations and implications, it also serves as a lighthearted reminder of the intricate interplay between political environments and the compelling allure of European living.
[[INTRDUCTION]]
The relationship between political affiliation and the propensity to entertain the idea of relocating across the pond has long been a matter of speculation. While it might seem like mere whimsy or perhaps a harmless flight of fancy, the impulse to query "how to move to Europe" on Google could represent a deeper sentiment influenced by the political climate. In this paper, we delve into this peculiar correlation and attempt to shed light on the intertwined currents of politics and the fantasy of European immigration.
On the surface, one might think of this study as a bit of a "political escapade," an expedition into the uncharted waters of offbeat correlations. Nonetheless, we endeavor to treat these findings with all due rigor, wading through the data with the earnestness of adventurers charting a new course.
The state of Connecticut provides a fascinating setting for our investigation. Traditionally known for its scenic beauty and the idyllic New England charm, Connecticut has also surfaced as a battleground for political ideologies. It's like the state couldn't quite decide whether it prefers to ritually consume lobster rolls with a liberal mindset or delve into conservative ideologies while sipping maple syrup. The very juxtaposition of these elements creates a unique tapestry for our analysis.
As we navigate through this study, we aim to engender a lively discussion about the nuances of political sentiment and the allure of a European interlude. While this investigation may seem like a whimsical pursuit, the potential implications and underlying motivations beckon our attention. It's a reminder that in the seemingly mundane, even in the realm of political data, there are quirky patterns waiting to be uncovered. So let us set sail on this quest, poised to decipher the underlying currents of political expression and daydreams of European exploration.
[[RESULTS]]
The analysis of the data revealed a strong positive correlation between Republican votes for Senators in Connecticut and Google searches for 'how to move to Europe' from 2004 to 2018. The correlation coefficient of 0.8776104 denoted a robust relationship between these two disparate yet curiously linked phenomena.
The R-squared value of 0.7702000 indicated that approximately 77.02% of the variance in "how to move to Europe" Google searches could be explained by the variance in Republican votes for Senators in Connecticut. This finding suggests that the political climate in Connecticut may have been a significant determinant of the interest in European relocation, capturing the attention of both scholarly voyagers and armchair adventurers alike.
The p-value of less than 0.05 further underscores the statistical significance of the observed correlation, affirming that the relationship is not merely a fluke or a figment of statistical whimsy but rather a substantive connection worthy of exploration and deliberation.
Additionally, the scatterplot (Fig. 1) visually illustrates the compelling relationship between these variables, depicting a trend that appears to validate the seemingly unconventional connection. The well-defined pattern in the plot lends credence to the notion that political tides may indeed sway the contemplation of traversing the Atlantic, adding a touch of whimsy to the realm of empirical inquiry.
These results not only shed light on a thought-provoking correlation but also emphasize the dynamic interplay between politics and the allure of European living. They beckon further inquiry into the underlying motivations and implications, inviting scholarly and lighthearted discourse alike.
It is worth noting that while our findings are both compelling and peculiar in their own right, they should be interpreted with caution. Correlation does not necessarily imply causation, and the observed relationship may be influenced by confounding factors not accounted for in this analysis. Nonetheless, this study provides a captivating glimpse into the potential interweaving of political ideology and daydreams of cross-continental relocation, inviting researchers to embark on further expeditions into the eccentric currents of human behavior.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[CONCLUSION]]
ChatGPT:
[[CONCLUSION]]
In conclusion, our findings have navigated the uncharted waters of the curious correlation between Republican votes for Senators in Connecticut and Google searches for 'how to move to Europe', shedding light on a compelling yet whimsical relationship. The robust statistical significance coupled with the seemingly unconventional nature of this connection encourages further scholarly speculation and tongue-in-cheek commentary. These findings not only underscore the intricate interplay between political sentiments and daydreams of European adventure but also serve as a reminder that even in the realm of data analysis, there are whimsical patterns waiting to be discovered.
As captivating as this correlation may be, we caution that correlation does not imply causation, and other confounding factors could influence this relationship. However, our research provides a charming reminder that in the mundane realm of statistical analysis, there are unexpected voyages of discovery awaiting exploration.
While it might be tempting to allow our curiosity to turn into more whimsical musings or pun-laden forays into uncharted territory, we assert that no further research is needed in this area. The data may have been charted, but the intriguing essence of this correlation will continue to beguile researchers and armchair adventurers alike, emphasizing the joy of academic whimsy within the often serious realm of data analysis and scholarly inquiry.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Navigating Ideological Tides: A Correlational Analysis of Republican Votes for Senators in Connecticut and Google Searches for 'How to Move to Europe'. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.
ChatGPT:
The Journal of Political Surfing Studies
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Navigating Ideological Tides: A Correlational Analysis of Republican Votes for Senators in Connecticut and Google Searches for 'How to Move to Europe'. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.
ChatGPT:
The Institute for Social & Political Inquiry
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Navigating Ideological Tides: A Correlational Analysis of Republican Votes for Senators in Connecticut and Google Searches for 'How to Move to Europe' with an abstract of This paper presents the findings of an empirical investigation into the potential relationship between Republican votes for Senators in Connecticut and Google searches for 'how to move to Europe'. Utilizing data from MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and Google Trends, we analyzed the period from 2004 to 2018 to unravel the intertwined currents of political sentiment and the impulse for continental relocation.
The study uncovered a correlation coefficient of 0.8776104 with a statistically significant p-value (p < 0.05), indicating a strong positive association between the two seemingly unrelated variables. Our findings suggest that the political landscape may indeed influence individuals' contemplation of cross-continental resettlement. While this association prompts speculation about underlying motivations and implications, it also serves as a lighthearted reminder of the intricate interplay between political environments and the compelling allure of European living.
ChatGPT:
Republican votes, Senators, Connecticut, Google searches, 'how to move to Europe', correlation analysis, political sentiment, continental relocation, empirical investigation, MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, Google Trends, political landscape, cross-continental resettlement, correlation coefficient, statistical significance, underlying motivations, European living, political environments
*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.
Discover a new correlation
View all correlations
View all research papers
Report an error
Data details
Votes for Republican Senators in ConnecticutDetailed data title: Total number of votes cast for Federal Republican Senate candidates in Connecticut
Source: MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse
See what else correlates with Votes for Republican Senators in Connecticut
Google searches for 'how to move to europe'
Detailed data title: Relative volume of Google searches for 'how to move to europe' (Worldwide, without quotes)
Source: Google Trends
Additional Info: Relative search volume (not absolute numbers)
See what else correlates with Google searches for 'how to move to europe'
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.
r2 = 0.7702000 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 77% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Google searches for 'how to move to europe') is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Votes for Republican Senators in Connecticut) over the 6 years from 2004 through 2018.
p < 0.05, which statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 0.022. 0.0215521643438868070000000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.
But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.
Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.88 in 2.2% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 46 random variables Which I absolutely did.
with the same 5 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 5 because we have two variables measured over a period of 6 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.
[ 0.23, 0.99 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.
This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!
All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.
Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
2004 | 2006 | 2010 | 2012 | 2016 | 2018 | |
Votes for Republican Senators in Connecticut (Total votes) | 457749 | 109198 | 498341 | 604569 | 552621 | 545717 |
Google searches for 'how to move to europe' (Rel. search volume) | 20.9167 | 6.83333 | 21.5833 | 25.1667 | 32.3333 | 34.25 |
Why this works
- Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
- Lack of causal connection: There is probably
Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied. - Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple
Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is. - Very low n: There are not many data points included in this analysis. Even if the p-value is high, we should be suspicious of using so few datapoints in a correlation.
Try it yourself
You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.
Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"
Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.
Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.
Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.
Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"
If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:
"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."
# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats
# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):
# Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)
# Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
r_squared = correlation**2
return correlation, r_squared, p_value
# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([457749,109198,498341,604569,552621,545717,])
array_2 = np.array([20.9167,6.83333,21.5833,25.1667,32.3333,34.25,])
array_1_name = "Votes for Republican Senators in Connecticut"
array_2_name = "Google searches for 'how to move to europe'"
# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)
# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)
Reuseable content
You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.
For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."
When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.
Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.
Download images for these variables:
- High resolution line chart
The image linked here is a Scalable Vector Graphic (SVG). It is the highest resolution that is possible to achieve. It scales up beyond the size of the observable universe without pixelating. You do not need to email me asking if I have a higher resolution image. I do not. The physical limitations of our universe prevent me from providing you with an image that is any higher resolution than this one.
If you insert it into a PowerPoint presentation (a tool well-known for managing things that are the scale of the universe), you can right-click > "Ungroup" or "Create Shape" and then edit the lines and text directly. You can also change the colors this way.
Alternatively you can use a tool like Inkscape. - High resolution line chart, optimized for mobile
- Alternative high resolution line chart
- Scatterplot
- Portable line chart (png)
- Portable line chart (png), optimized for mobile
- Line chart for only Votes for Republican Senators in Connecticut
- Line chart for only Google searches for 'how to move to europe'
- AI-generated correlation image
- The spurious research paper: Navigating Ideological Tides: A Correlational Analysis of Republican Votes for Senators in Connecticut and Google Searches for 'How to Move to Europe'
Kudos for rating!
Correlation ID: 4410 · Black Variable ID: 26215 · Red Variable ID: 1493