about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #4,406 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is The distance between Neptune and Mercury and the second variable is Votes for Democratic Senators in Louisiana.  The chart goes from 1978 to 2020, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

As the distance between Neptune and Mercury decreases, the gravitational pull intensifies, creating a ripple effect on the universal political consciousness. This celestial shift directly impacts the moods and decision-making processes of voters in Louisiana, ultimately swaying their support away from Democratic senators. The alignment of these distant planets somehow manages to influence the state's political climate, leading to a decrease in Democrat votes.

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: An image that looks like it is a scene from a Disney movie, in which in the night sky, Neptune and Mercury draw closer together, their vibrant celestial bodies casting a magical glow across the universe. The stars twinkle as the gravitational forces between the two planets create a shimmering ripple effect that resonates through the cosmos. Closer to Earth, the energetic dance of the planets seems to manifest as a captivating celestial light show that illuminates the bayous of Louisiana. In the foreground, Democratic senators stand in a state of wonder, surrounded by the enchanting glow of the celestial event, their expressions reflecting the impactful shift in the political atmosphere. A hint of mystery and intrigue fills the scene as the celestial alignment weaves its spell on the hearts and minds of the state's voters. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: The distance between Neptune and Mercury and Democrat votes for Senators in Louisiana. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Pop art a funny image you would see on reddit An image that looks like it is a scene from A Disney Movie Woodblock painting Celtic art
ChatGPT: An image that looks like it is a scene from A Disney Movie

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both The distance between Neptune and Mercury and Democrat votes for Senators in Louisiana, in the following situation: As the distance between Neptune and Mercury decreases, the gravitational pull intensifies, creating a ripple effect on the universal political consciousness. This celestial shift directly impacts the moods and decision-making processes of voters in Louisiana, ultimately swaying their support away from Democratic senators. The alignment of these distant planets somehow manages to influence the state's political climate, leading to a decrease in Democrat votes.. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In the night sky, Neptune and Mercury draw closer together, their orbits bringing them within sight of each other. As they near, the pull of their gravitational forces grows stronger, creating a ripple effect that resonates across the universe. This celestial dance somehow reaches the state of Louisiana, where the mood and decisions of voters are directly influenced. In Louisiana, Democratic senators find themselves facing a shift in support as the celestial alignment impacts the political consciousness of the state. The distance between Neptune and Mercury seems to intensify the tides of public opinion, ultimately leading to a decrease in Democrat votes and altering the political climate.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ An image that looks like it is a scene from A Disney Movie ] and depicting this scene: In the night sky, Neptune and Mercury draw closer together, their orbits bringing them within sight of each other. As they near, the pull of their gravitational forces grows stronger, creating a ripple effect that resonates across the universe. This celestial dance somehow reaches the state of Louisiana, where the mood and decisions of voters are directly influenced. In Louisiana, Democratic senators find themselves facing a shift in support as the celestial alignment impacts the political consciousness of the state. The distance between Neptune and Mercury seems to intensify the tides of public opinion, ultimately leading to a decrease in Democrat votes and altering the political climate. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: An image that looks like it is a scene from a Disney movie, in which in the night sky, Neptune and Mercury draw closer together, their vibrant celestial bodies casting a magical glow across the universe. The stars twinkle as the gravitational forces between the two planets create a shimmering ripple effect that resonates through the cosmos. Closer to Earth, the energetic dance of the planets seems to manifest as a captivating celestial light show that illuminates the bayous of Louisiana. In the foreground, Democratic senators stand in a state of wonder, surrounded by the enchanting glow of the celestial event, their expressions reflecting the impactful shift in the political atmosphere. A hint of mystery and intrigue fills the scene as the celestial alignment weaves its spell on the hearts and minds of the state's voters.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how a decrease in The distance between Neptune and Mercury caused Democrat votes for Senators in Louisiana to decrease.\Make it sound serious until the end.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Planetary Politics: Exploring the Correlation Between Interplanetary Distance and Democrat Votes for Senators in Louisiana

The Journal of Extraterrestrial Electoral Research

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The distance between Neptune and Mercury and Democrat votes for Senators in Louisiana. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Include a pun in the title.

Your research team used data from Caclculated using Astropy and MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.8605344 and p < 0.01 for 1978 to 2020.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
"Planetary Politics: Exploring the Correlation Between Interplanetary Distance and Democrat Votes for Senators in Louisiana"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the peculiar but intriguing relationship between the distance separating Neptune and Mercury and the voting patterns for Senatorial candidates affiliated with the Democratic Party in the state of Louisiana. Leveraging data derived from Astropy and MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, our research team embarked on a rigorous analysis spanning the years 1978 to 2020. Our findings unveiled a remarkable correlation coefficient of 0.8605344 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01, ultimately pointing to a noteworthy connection between these celestial bodies and political preferences. The implications of this cosmic correlation beckon further investigation, as they introduce a celestial component to the dynamics of political allegiance that invites contemplation of astronomical proportions.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The distance between Neptune and Mercury and Democrat votes for Senators in Louisiana. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Planetary Politics: Exploring the Correlation Between Interplanetary Distance and Democrat Votes for Senators in Louisiana"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the peculiar but intriguing relationship between the distance separating Neptune and Mercury and the voting patterns for Senatorial candidates affiliated with the Democratic Party in the state of Louisiana. Leveraging data derived from Astropy and MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, our research team embarked on a rigorous analysis spanning the years 1978 to 2020. Our findings unveiled a remarkable correlation coefficient of 0.8605344 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01, ultimately pointing to a noteworthy connection between these celestial bodies and political preferences. The implications of this cosmic correlation beckon further investigation, as they introduce a celestial component to the dynamics of political allegiance that invites contemplation of astronomical proportions.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

The intersection of the celestial and the terrestrial holds a certain allure, captivating scientists and statisticians alike with its enigmatic potential to unearth unexpected connections. In this study, we delve deep into the uncharted territory of planetary politics, seeking to unravel the puzzling correlation between the distance separating Neptune and Mercury, two planets with contrasting dispositions, and the partisan preferences of Senatorial candidates in the captivating state of Louisiana. As we embark on this cosmic journey, we are reminded of the profound words of Carl Sagan, who once mused, "Somewhere, something incredible is waiting to be known"—little did we know that this "something incredible" may just be lurking within the tumultuous realm of political alliances.

The gravitational pull of our curiosity led us to consider the alignment of the stars, or rather, the planets, with the often tempestuous landscape of political affiliations. It is essential to note that our exploration is not driven by mere whimsy, but rather, by the hallowed principles of scientific inquiry and the relentless pursuit of knowledge, peppered with an occasional dash of intergalactic humor. In this pursuit, we lean on the shoulders of giants, drawing inspiration from the likes of Isaac Newton and Johannes Kepler, whose groundbreaking work in celestial mechanics laid the foundation for modern astrophysical investigations.

Armed with data acquired from reputable sources such as Astropy, MIT Election Data and Science Lab, and Harvard Dataverse, we set out to rigorously scrutinize electoral trends in the vibrant state of Louisiana. Intriguingly, our initial analysis unearthed a correlation coefficient of 0.8605344 and a p-value of less than 0.01, leaving us pondering the cosmic conundrum that lay before us. Yet, as we cautiously approach these findings, we are mindful of the sage counsel of Galileo Galilei, who cautioned, "All truths are easy to understand once they are discovered; the point is to discover them." In parallel, we are acutely aware of the potential for serendipitous correlations to emerge from rigorous statistical exploration—a cosmic caprice, if you will.

The implications of our findings stretch far beyond the realms of traditional political analysis, transcending the mundane and venturing into the celestial. The implications are so profound, in fact, that they invite contemplation of astronomical proportions, prompting us to wonder if the gravitational forces that govern planetary orbits might exert an unforeseen influence on the political orbits of the denizens of Louisiana. As we embark on this whimsical yet scholarly endeavor, we invite our readers to join us in a lighthearted exploration of the cosmic dance that appears to echo, in some mysterious way, the cadence of political allegiance.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The distance between Neptune and Mercury and Democrat votes for Senators in Louisiana. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then name a few real TV shows that sound like they might be relevant to the topic that you watched as research.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Planetary Politics: Exploring the Correlation Between Interplanetary Distance and Democrat Votes for Senators in Louisiana"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the peculiar but intriguing relationship between the distance separating Neptune and Mercury and the voting patterns for Senatorial candidates affiliated with the Democratic Party in the state of Louisiana. Leveraging data derived from Astropy and MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, our research team embarked on a rigorous analysis spanning the years 1978 to 2020. Our findings unveiled a remarkable correlation coefficient of 0.8605344 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01, ultimately pointing to a noteworthy connection between these celestial bodies and political preferences. The implications of this cosmic correlation beckon further investigation, as they introduce a celestial component to the dynamics of political allegiance that invites contemplation of astronomical proportions.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The intersection of the celestial and the terrestrial holds a certain allure, captivating scientists and statisticians alike with its enigmatic potential to unearth unexpected connections. In this study, we delve deep into the uncharted territory of planetary politics, seeking to unravel the puzzling correlation between the distance separating Neptune and Mercury, two planets with contrasting dispositions, and the partisan preferences of Senatorial candidates in the captivating state of Louisiana. As we embark on this cosmic journey, we are reminded of the profound words of Carl Sagan, who once mused, "Somewhere, something incredible is waiting to be known"—little did we know that this "something incredible" may just be lurking within the tumultuous realm of political alliances.
The gravitational pull of our curiosity led us to consider the alignment of the stars, or rather, the planets, with the often tempestuous landscape of political affiliations. It is essential to note that our exploration is not driven by mere whimsy, but rather, by the hallowed principles of scientific inquiry and the relentless pursuit of knowledge, peppered with an occasional dash of intergalactic humor. In this pursuit, we lean on the shoulders of giants, drawing inspiration from the likes of Isaac Newton and Johannes Kepler, whose groundbreaking work in celestial mechanics laid the foundation for modern astrophysical investigations.
Armed with data acquired from reputable sources such as Astropy, MIT Election Data and Science Lab, and Harvard Dataverse, we set out to rigorously scrutinize electoral trends in the vibrant state of Louisiana. Intriguingly, our initial analysis unearthed a correlation coefficient of 0.8605344 and a p-value of less than 0.01, leaving us pondering the cosmic conundrum that lay before us. Yet, as we cautiously approach these findings, we are mindful of the sage counsel of Galileo Galilei, who cautioned, "All truths are easy to understand once they are discovered; the point is to discover them." In parallel, we are acutely aware of the potential for serendipitous correlations to emerge from rigorous statistical exploration—a cosmic caprice, if you will.
The implications of our findings stretch far beyond the realms of traditional political analysis, transcending the mundane and venturing into the celestial. The implications are so profound, in fact, that they invite contemplation of astronomical proportions, prompting us to wonder if the gravitational forces that govern planetary orbits might exert an unforeseen influence on the political orbits of the denizens of Louisiana. As we embark on this whimsical yet scholarly endeavor, we invite our readers to join us in a lighthearted exploration of the cosmic dance that appears to echo, in some mysterious way, the cadence of political allegiance.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

Smith et al. (2010) conducted a comprehensive analysis on celestial bodies and their potential influence on political tendencies, although their focus was primarily on the lunar phases and electoral outcomes. The authors find a tantalizing connection between the waxing gibbous phase and incumbent victories, shedding moonlight on the subtle yet significant impact of lunar cycles on political fortunes.

Doe and Jones (2015) explored the interplay of astronomical phenomena and voter behavior, yet their attention centered on solar flares and voter turnout, with a particularly enlightening expose on how solar activity coincided with heightened civic engagement. The authors' findings shed light on the radiant effect of cosmic occurrences on democratic participation, illuminating the intricate dance between solar flares and political fervor.

Lo and Behold (2018) examined the intricate relationship between celestial bodies and political allegiances, with an unexpected focus on the hypothetical influence of Saturn's rings on voter apathy. While their hypothesis remains speculative, their investigation opens the cosmic door to a myriad of celestial conjectures regarding their potential sway over political dispositions.

Turning to works that offer a broader perspective on cosmic influences, "Cosmos: A Personal Voyage" by Carl Sagan and "Astrophysics for People in a Hurry" by Neil deGrasse Tyson provide a lens through which to ponder the cosmic ballet and its potential interplay with earthly matters. These works inspire a contemplation of the vast cosmic tapestry and its possible nuances in shaping the narratives of political allegiance, albeit in a lighthearted and intellectually stimulating manner.

In the realm of fiction, "The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy" by Douglas Adams and "The Sirens of Titan" by Kurt Vonnegut offer imaginative forays into the cosmic unknown, inspiring the subconscious musing on celestial perturbations and their influence on the terrestrial domain. While these works may seem whimsical, they invite a playful exploration of the interstellar realm and its potential influence on human affairs.

In a more unconventional vein, viewing episodes of "The Big Bang Theory" and "Cosmos: A Spacetime Odyssey" while sipping Earl Grey tea and nibbling on moon-shaped cookies offers a peculiar yet strangely insightful lens through which to contemplate the cosmic and its playful juxtaposition with the political. These unconventional sources of inspiration spark a whimsical yet intellectually enriching consideration of the cosmic dance and its potential harmonies with the ballads of political affiliation.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The distance between Neptune and Mercury and Democrat votes for Senators in Louisiana. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Caclculated using Astropy and MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse . You used data from 1978 to 2020

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Planetary Politics: Exploring the Correlation Between Interplanetary Distance and Democrat Votes for Senators in Louisiana"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the peculiar but intriguing relationship between the distance separating Neptune and Mercury and the voting patterns for Senatorial candidates affiliated with the Democratic Party in the state of Louisiana. Leveraging data derived from Astropy and MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, our research team embarked on a rigorous analysis spanning the years 1978 to 2020. Our findings unveiled a remarkable correlation coefficient of 0.8605344 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01, ultimately pointing to a noteworthy connection between these celestial bodies and political preferences. The implications of this cosmic correlation beckon further investigation, as they introduce a celestial component to the dynamics of political allegiance that invites contemplation of astronomical proportions.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
The intersection of the celestial and the terrestrial holds a certain allure, captivating scientists and statisticians alike with its enigmatic potential to unearth unexpected connections. In this study, we delve deep into the uncharted territory of planetary politics, seeking to unravel the puzzling correlation between the distance separating Neptune and Mercury, two planets with contrasting dispositions, and the partisan preferences of Senatorial candidates in the captivating state of Louisiana. As we embark on this cosmic journey, we are reminded of the profound words of Carl Sagan, who once mused, "Somewhere, something incredible is waiting to be known"—little did we know that this "something incredible" may just be lurking within the tumultuous realm of political alliances.
The gravitational pull of our curiosity led us to consider the alignment of the stars, or rather, the planets, with the often tempestuous landscape of political affiliations. It is essential to note that our exploration is not driven by mere whimsy, but rather, by the hallowed principles of scientific inquiry and the relentless pursuit of knowledge, peppered with an occasional dash of intergalactic humor. In this pursuit, we lean on the shoulders of giants, drawing inspiration from the likes of Isaac Newton and Johannes Kepler, whose groundbreaking work in celestial mechanics laid the foundation for modern astrophysical investigations.
Armed with data acquired from reputable sources such as Astropy, MIT Election Data and Science Lab, and Harvard Dataverse, we set out to rigorously scrutinize electoral trends in the vibrant state of Louisiana. Intriguingly, our initial analysis unearthed a correlation coefficient of 0.8605344 and a p-value of less than 0.01, leaving us pondering the cosmic conundrum that lay before us. Yet, as we cautiously approach these findings, we are mindful of the sage counsel of Galileo Galilei, who cautioned, "All truths are easy to understand once they are discovered; the point is to discover them." In parallel, we are acutely aware of the potential for serendipitous correlations to emerge from rigorous statistical exploration—a cosmic caprice, if you will.
The implications of our findings stretch far beyond the realms of traditional political analysis, transcending the mundane and venturing into the celestial. The implications are so profound, in fact, that they invite contemplation of astronomical proportions, prompting us to wonder if the gravitational forces that govern planetary orbits might exert an unforeseen influence on the political orbits of the denizens of Louisiana. As we embark on this whimsical yet scholarly endeavor, we invite our readers to join us in a lighthearted exploration of the cosmic dance that appears to echo, in some mysterious way, the cadence of political allegiance.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To unravel the cosmic conundrum of the correlation between the distance separating Neptune and Mercury and the voting behaviors of Democratic Senatorial candidates in Louisiana, our research team employed a multidimensional approach that was as dynamic as the celestial bodies under scrutiny. Our data, procured from esteemed sources including Astropy, MIT Election Data and Science Lab, and Harvard Dataverse, underwent meticulous curation to ensure the veracity of the findings.

Initially, we harnessed the celestial mechanics embodied in Astropy, which facilitated the calculation of the precise interplanetary distances over the years 1978 to 2020. Through a harmonious fusion of algorithms and computations, we derived a comprehensive dataset that encapsulated the distances between Neptune and Mercury, serving as the cornerstone of our cosmic investigation. We then indulged in some "stellar" visualizations, plotting the fluctuating distances against the backdrop of time, akin to capturing the planetary waltz in the grand cosmic ballroom.

In parallel, the electoral data from the illustrious MIT Election Data and Science Lab, coupled with the invaluable resources from Harvard Dataverse, furnished us with the detailed voting patterns for Democratic Senatorial candidates in the captivating state of Louisiana. Leveraging the power of statistical software and our ability to navigate complex databases with the ease of seasoned astronomers charting their course through the constellations, we meticulously distilled the electoral data into a format that harmonized with the celestial dataset.

The heart of our methodology lay in the celestial-statistical synergy that propelled our investigation forward. Through a series of intricate statistical analyses, we sought to unearth the hidden patterns that may belie the apparent cosmic chaos, peering through the layers of data with the precision of an astronomer examining the rings of Saturn. Employing sophisticated statistical techniques, we initially computed the correlation coefficient and its associated p-value, mindful of the potential for cosmic caprices to influence our findings.

It is important to note that our methodology was not without its share of celestial humor and scientific whimsy, as we navigated the cosmic intricacies with a steadfast commitment to methodological rigor. The enigmatic dance of planetary orbits and the intriguing flux of political allegiances were explored with a hint of intergalactic levity, underscoring the inextricable link between the celestial and the political that continues to tantalize the inquisitive mind. In this way, our methodology was not only driven by statistical precision but also by an unwavering sense of cosmic curiosity, infusing our investigation with a touch of otherworldly charm.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The distance between Neptune and Mercury and Democrat votes for Senators in Louisiana. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Caclculated using Astropy and MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse .

For the time period 1978 to 2020, you found a correlation 0.8605344, r-squared of 0.7405194, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Planetary Politics: Exploring the Correlation Between Interplanetary Distance and Democrat Votes for Senators in Louisiana"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the peculiar but intriguing relationship between the distance separating Neptune and Mercury and the voting patterns for Senatorial candidates affiliated with the Democratic Party in the state of Louisiana. Leveraging data derived from Astropy and MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, our research team embarked on a rigorous analysis spanning the years 1978 to 2020. Our findings unveiled a remarkable correlation coefficient of 0.8605344 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01, ultimately pointing to a noteworthy connection between these celestial bodies and political preferences. The implications of this cosmic correlation beckon further investigation, as they introduce a celestial component to the dynamics of political allegiance that invites contemplation of astronomical proportions.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
The intersection of the celestial and the terrestrial holds a certain allure, captivating scientists and statisticians alike with its enigmatic potential to unearth unexpected connections. In this study, we delve deep into the uncharted territory of planetary politics, seeking to unravel the puzzling correlation between the distance separating Neptune and Mercury, two planets with contrasting dispositions, and the partisan preferences of Senatorial candidates in the captivating state of Louisiana. As we embark on this cosmic journey, we are reminded of the profound words of Carl Sagan, who once mused, "Somewhere, something incredible is waiting to be known"—little did we know that this "something incredible" may just be lurking within the tumultuous realm of political alliances.
The gravitational pull of our curiosity led us to consider the alignment of the stars, or rather, the planets, with the often tempestuous landscape of political affiliations. It is essential to note that our exploration is not driven by mere whimsy, but rather, by the hallowed principles of scientific inquiry and the relentless pursuit of knowledge, peppered with an occasional dash of intergalactic humor. In this pursuit, we lean on the shoulders of giants, drawing inspiration from the likes of Isaac Newton and Johannes Kepler, whose groundbreaking work in celestial mechanics laid the foundation for modern astrophysical investigations.
Armed with data acquired from reputable sources such as Astropy, MIT Election Data and Science Lab, and Harvard Dataverse, we set out to rigorously scrutinize electoral trends in the vibrant state of Louisiana. Intriguingly, our initial analysis unearthed a correlation coefficient of 0.8605344 and a p-value of less than 0.01, leaving us pondering the cosmic conundrum that lay before us. Yet, as we cautiously approach these findings, we are mindful of the sage counsel of Galileo Galilei, who cautioned, "All truths are easy to understand once they are discovered; the point is to discover them." In parallel, we are acutely aware of the potential for serendipitous correlations to emerge from rigorous statistical exploration—a cosmic caprice, if you will.
The implications of our findings stretch far beyond the realms of traditional political analysis, transcending the mundane and venturing into the celestial. The implications are so profound, in fact, that they invite contemplation of astronomical proportions, prompting us to wonder if the gravitational forces that govern planetary orbits might exert an unforeseen influence on the political orbits of the denizens of Louisiana. As we embark on this whimsical yet scholarly endeavor, we invite our readers to join us in a lighthearted exploration of the cosmic dance that appears to echo, in some mysterious way, the cadence of political allegiance.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The analysis of the data collected from our cosmic foray has yielded some fascinating results. We found a strong correlation between the distance separating Neptune and Mercury and the votes for Senators affiliated with the Democratic Party in Louisiana. The correlation coefficient of 0.8605344 indicates a robust positive relationship between these celestial distances and political preferences. In simpler terms, as the distance between Neptune and Mercury changes, so do the votes for Democratic Senators in Louisiana. It seems the cosmic dance of the planets has an unforeseen sway on earthly political allegiances!

Furthermore, the r-squared value of 0.7405194 suggests that approximately 74.05% of the variability in Democrat votes for Senators in Louisiana can be explained by the changes in the distance between Neptune and Mercury. This is certainly a cosmic chunk of variability explaining!

In addition, the p-value of less than 0.01 provides strong evidence against the null hypothesis and indicates that the observed correlation is statistically significant. It appears that the celestial bodies have more influence on earthly matters than previously thought!

To provide a visual depiction of this celestial influence on political preferences, we present a scatterplot (Fig. 1) demonstrating the striking correlation between the distance separating Neptune and Mercury and the votes for Democratic Senators in Louisiana. The figure elegantly captures the relationship, adding a touch of cosmic flair to the otherwise mundane world of political data analysis.

These findings not only raise eyebrows but also send our scientific imaginations hurdling into the cosmos, reminding us that even in the realm of politics, the stars may have a peculiar way of influencing our earthly affairs. It appears that in the cosmic symphony of celestial bodies, the planets may have choreographed an unexpected dance with the political tango of Louisiana.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The distance between Neptune and Mercury and Democrat votes for Senators in Louisiana. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
"Planetary Politics: Exploring the Correlation Between Interplanetary Distance and Democrat Votes for Senators in Louisiana"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the peculiar but intriguing relationship between the distance separating Neptune and Mercury and the voting patterns for Senatorial candidates affiliated with the Democratic Party in the state of Louisiana. Leveraging data derived from Astropy and MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, our research team embarked on a rigorous analysis spanning the years 1978 to 2020. Our findings unveiled a remarkable correlation coefficient of 0.8605344 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01, ultimately pointing to a noteworthy connection between these celestial bodies and political preferences. The implications of this cosmic correlation beckon further investigation, as they introduce a celestial component to the dynamics of political allegiance that invites contemplation of astronomical proportions.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
Smith et al. (2010) conducted a comprehensive analysis on celestial bodies and their potential influence on political tendencies, although their focus was primarily on the lunar phases and electoral outcomes. The authors find a tantalizing connection between the waxing gibbous phase and incumbent victories, shedding moonlight on the subtle yet significant impact of lunar cycles on political fortunes.
Doe and Jones (2015) explored the interplay of astronomical phenomena and voter behavior, yet their attention centered on solar flares and voter turnout, with a particularly enlightening expose on how solar activity coincided with heightened civic engagement. The authors' findings shed light on the radiant effect of cosmic occurrences on democratic participation, illuminating the intricate dance between solar flares and political fervor.
Lo and Behold (2018) examined the intricate relationship between celestial bodies and political allegiances, with an unexpected focus on the hypothetical influence of Saturn's rings on voter apathy. While their hypothesis remains speculative, their investigation opens the cosmic door to a myriad of celestial conjectures regarding their potential sway over political dispositions.
Turning to works that offer a broader perspective on cosmic influences, "Cosmos: A Personal Voyage" by Carl Sagan and "Astrophysics for People in a Hurry" by Neil deGrasse Tyson provide a lens through which to ponder the cosmic ballet and its potential interplay with earthly matters. These works inspire a contemplation of the vast cosmic tapestry and its possible nuances in shaping the narratives of political allegiance, albeit in a lighthearted and intellectually stimulating manner.
In the realm of fiction, "The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy" by Douglas Adams and "The Sirens of Titan" by Kurt Vonnegut offer imaginative forays into the cosmic unknown, inspiring the subconscious musing on celestial perturbations and their influence on the terrestrial domain. While these works may seem whimsical, they invite a playful exploration of the interstellar realm and its potential influence on human affairs.
In a more unconventional vein, viewing episodes of "The Big Bang Theory" and "Cosmos: A Spacetime Odyssey" while sipping Earl Grey tea and nibbling on moon-shaped cookies offers a peculiar yet strangely insightful lens through which to contemplate the cosmic and its playful juxtaposition with the political. These unconventional sources of inspiration spark a whimsical yet intellectually enriching consideration of the cosmic dance and its potential harmonies with the ballads of political affiliation.

[[RESULTS]]
The analysis of the data collected from our cosmic foray has yielded some fascinating results. We found a strong correlation between the distance separating Neptune and Mercury and the votes for Senators affiliated with the Democratic Party in Louisiana. The correlation coefficient of 0.8605344 indicates a robust positive relationship between these celestial distances and political preferences. In simpler terms, as the distance between Neptune and Mercury changes, so do the votes for Democratic Senators in Louisiana. It seems the cosmic dance of the planets has an unforeseen sway on earthly political allegiances!
Furthermore, the r-squared value of 0.7405194 suggests that approximately 74.05% of the variability in Democrat votes for Senators in Louisiana can be explained by the changes in the distance between Neptune and Mercury. This is certainly a cosmic chunk of variability explaining!
In addition, the p-value of less than 0.01 provides strong evidence against the null hypothesis and indicates that the observed correlation is statistically significant. It appears that the celestial bodies have more influence on earthly matters than previously thought!
To provide a visual depiction of this celestial influence on political preferences, we present a scatterplot (Fig. 1) demonstrating the striking correlation between the distance separating Neptune and Mercury and the votes for Democratic Senators in Louisiana. The figure elegantly captures the relationship, adding a touch of cosmic flair to the otherwise mundane world of political data analysis.
These findings not only raise eyebrows but also send our scientific imaginations hurdling into the cosmos, reminding us that even in the realm of politics, the stars may have a peculiar way of influencing our earthly affairs. It appears that in the cosmic symphony of celestial bodies, the planets may have choreographed an unexpected dance with the political tango of Louisiana.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The results of our study have unveiled a celestial twist in the tale of political allegiance, shedding light on the unexpected nexus between planetary positions and voting behavior. The remarkable correlation we have identified between the distance separating Neptune and Mercury and Democrat votes for Senators in Louisiana bolsters the existing literature on cosmic influences on earthly matters in a truly astronomical manner.

Our findings not only resonate with the cosmic ballet envisioned by Carl Sagan and Neil deGrasse Tyson but also lend empirical support to the erstwhile speculative hypotheses regarding the potential sway of celestial bodies over political dispositions. Indeed, our results add a cosmic hue to the canvass of political allegiances, as described by Lo and Behold (2018), although their focus on Saturn's rings remained a mere tantalizing conjecture compared to our robust statistical evidence.

The statistically significant correlation coefficient of 0.8605344 and the r-squared value of 0.7405194 accentuate the compelling influence of the interplanetary dance on political preferences, elucidating a cosmic variable in the intricate calculus of voter behavior. This unexpected cosmic connection seems to have more sway over earthly matters than even the most fervent cosmological enthusiast might have foreseen. Furthermore, the p-value of less than 0.01 provides resounding evidence of the cosmic impact on the political tango of Louisiana, veritably eclipsing prior studies that explore the solar flares and lunar phases (Doe & Jones, 2015; Smith et al., 2010).

As we contemplate the implications of our celestial findings, the cosmic dance of the planets seems to have choreographed an unexpected waltz with the political tides of Louisiana, illustrating how the stars may have aligned to develop a partisan preference that is out of this world. These results challenge us to ponder the cosmic sway over the political sphere and beckon us to reflect on the cosmic influences that may be at play in shaping the narratives of political allegiance – thus transforming the traditionally mundane world of political data analysis into a celestial spectacle.

The interstellar twist in our findings underscores the need for further exploration of cosmic influences on political affairs, inviting contemplation of astronomical proportions… and electoral prospects. The confluence of cosmic phenomena and earthly matters provides an intriguing area for future research, where the celestial and terrestrial realms meet in a whimsical yet intellectually stimulating embrace. Yes, our inquiry into planetary politics has indeed proved to be a stellar revelation, confirming that even in the realm of politics, the stars may have a flair for the dramatic when it comes to celestial shenanigans.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The distance between Neptune and Mercury and Democrat votes for Senators in Louisiana. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
"Planetary Politics: Exploring the Correlation Between Interplanetary Distance and Democrat Votes for Senators in Louisiana"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the peculiar but intriguing relationship between the distance separating Neptune and Mercury and the voting patterns for Senatorial candidates affiliated with the Democratic Party in the state of Louisiana. Leveraging data derived from Astropy and MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, our research team embarked on a rigorous analysis spanning the years 1978 to 2020. Our findings unveiled a remarkable correlation coefficient of 0.8605344 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01, ultimately pointing to a noteworthy connection between these celestial bodies and political preferences. The implications of this cosmic correlation beckon further investigation, as they introduce a celestial component to the dynamics of political allegiance that invites contemplation of astronomical proportions.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
The intersection of the celestial and the terrestrial holds a certain allure, captivating scientists and statisticians alike with its enigmatic potential to unearth unexpected connections. In this study, we delve deep into the uncharted territory of planetary politics, seeking to unravel the puzzling correlation between the distance separating Neptune and Mercury, two planets with contrasting dispositions, and the partisan preferences of Senatorial candidates in the captivating state of Louisiana. As we embark on this cosmic journey, we are reminded of the profound words of Carl Sagan, who once mused, "Somewhere, something incredible is waiting to be known"—little did we know that this "something incredible" may just be lurking within the tumultuous realm of political alliances.
The gravitational pull of our curiosity led us to consider the alignment of the stars, or rather, the planets, with the often tempestuous landscape of political affiliations. It is essential to note that our exploration is not driven by mere whimsy, but rather, by the hallowed principles of scientific inquiry and the relentless pursuit of knowledge, peppered with an occasional dash of intergalactic humor. In this pursuit, we lean on the shoulders of giants, drawing inspiration from the likes of Isaac Newton and Johannes Kepler, whose groundbreaking work in celestial mechanics laid the foundation for modern astrophysical investigations.
Armed with data acquired from reputable sources such as Astropy, MIT Election Data and Science Lab, and Harvard Dataverse, we set out to rigorously scrutinize electoral trends in the vibrant state of Louisiana. Intriguingly, our initial analysis unearthed a correlation coefficient of 0.8605344 and a p-value of less than 0.01, leaving us pondering the cosmic conundrum that lay before us. Yet, as we cautiously approach these findings, we are mindful of the sage counsel of Galileo Galilei, who cautioned, "All truths are easy to understand once they are discovered; the point is to discover them." In parallel, we are acutely aware of the potential for serendipitous correlations to emerge from rigorous statistical exploration—a cosmic caprice, if you will.
The implications of our findings stretch far beyond the realms of traditional political analysis, transcending the mundane and venturing into the celestial. The implications are so profound, in fact, that they invite contemplation of astronomical proportions, prompting us to wonder if the gravitational forces that govern planetary orbits might exert an unforeseen influence on the political orbits of the denizens of Louisiana. As we embark on this whimsical yet scholarly endeavor, we invite our readers to join us in a lighthearted exploration of the cosmic dance that appears to echo, in some mysterious way, the cadence of political allegiance.

[[RESULTS]]
The analysis of the data collected from our cosmic foray has yielded some fascinating results. We found a strong correlation between the distance separating Neptune and Mercury and the votes for Senators affiliated with the Democratic Party in Louisiana. The correlation coefficient of 0.8605344 indicates a robust positive relationship between these celestial distances and political preferences. In simpler terms, as the distance between Neptune and Mercury changes, so do the votes for Democratic Senators in Louisiana. It seems the cosmic dance of the planets has an unforeseen sway on earthly political allegiances!
Furthermore, the r-squared value of 0.7405194 suggests that approximately 74.05% of the variability in Democrat votes for Senators in Louisiana can be explained by the changes in the distance between Neptune and Mercury. This is certainly a cosmic chunk of variability explaining!
In addition, the p-value of less than 0.01 provides strong evidence against the null hypothesis and indicates that the observed correlation is statistically significant. It appears that the celestial bodies have more influence on earthly matters than previously thought!
To provide a visual depiction of this celestial influence on political preferences, we present a scatterplot (Fig. 1) demonstrating the striking correlation between the distance separating Neptune and Mercury and the votes for Democratic Senators in Louisiana. The figure elegantly captures the relationship, adding a touch of cosmic flair to the otherwise mundane world of political data analysis.
These findings not only raise eyebrows but also send our scientific imaginations hurdling into the cosmos, reminding us that even in the realm of politics, the stars may have a peculiar way of influencing our earthly affairs. It appears that in the cosmic symphony of celestial bodies, the planets may have choreographed an unexpected dance with the political tango of Louisiana.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our investigation into the correlation between the distance separating Neptune and Mercury and the Democrat votes for Senators in Louisiana has unearthed a celestial conundrum of astronomical proportions. The findings revealed a strong correlation coefficient and a statistically significant p-value, suggesting a captivating connection between planetary distances and political preferences. It seems that as the planets engage in their cosmic ballet, they inadvertently sway the terrestrial political stage, demonstrating an unforeseen influence that is truly out of this world.

The implications of our research extend beyond the usual terrestrial confines, resonating with the ancient notion of "as above, so below." These findings not only add a cosmic twist to the political discourse but also prompt a celestial sense of wonder, reminding us that the universe holds mysteries that transcend traditional scholarly boundaries.

As we reflect on the enigmatic linkage between celestial distances and political allegiances, one cannot help but contemplate the whimsical dance of statistical probability and galactic influences. It tickles the scientific imagination to envision the gravitational pull of celestial bodies subtly nudging the political leanings of Louisiana voters. It appears that the penchants of politicians and planets may be more entangled than we previously pondered—a truly cosmic revelation!

With these intriguing findings, we are compelled to echo the late Carl Sagan's timeless words: "Somewhere, something incredible is waiting to be known." However, in this particular avenue of inquiry, it seems that the celestial and the political forces have already revealed a remarkably compelling association.

In the spirit of gazing at the stars and uncovering unconventional connections, we assert that further research in this uncharted cosmic-political territory may yield diminishing returns. It appears that the cosmic dance between Neptune and Mercury has already unveiled its captivating link to Democrat votes in Louisiana, leaving us with a cosmic conundrum that may simply be beyond the grasp of further statistical inquiry. As such, we make our cosmic departure from this investigation, content in the knowledge that we have touched the celestial edge of political science, leaving our readers with a twinkle of celestial curiosity and a pun-derful appreciation for the intertwining of science and political whims.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Planetary Politics: Exploring the Correlation Between Interplanetary Distance and Democrat Votes for Senators in Louisiana. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Extraterrestrial Electoral Research


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Planetary Politics: Exploring the Correlation Between Interplanetary Distance and Democrat Votes for Senators in Louisiana. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Consortium for Extraterrestrial Socio-Political Research


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Planetary Politics: Exploring the Correlation Between Interplanetary Distance and Democrat Votes for Senators in Louisiana with an abstract of This study delves into the peculiar but intriguing relationship between the distance separating Neptune and Mercury and the voting patterns for Senatorial candidates affiliated with the Democratic Party in the state of Louisiana. Leveraging data derived from Astropy and MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, our research team embarked on a rigorous analysis spanning the years 1978 to 2020. Our findings unveiled a remarkable correlation coefficient of 0.8605344 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01, ultimately pointing to a noteworthy connection between these celestial bodies and political preferences. The implications of this cosmic correlation beckon further investigation, as they introduce a celestial component to the dynamics of political allegiance that invites contemplation of astronomical proportions.

ChatGPT:

interplanetary distance, democrat votes, senators in Louisiana, Neptune, Mercury, voting patterns, democratic party, Louisiana, Astropy, MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, political preferences, correlation coefficient, celestial bodies, political allegiance

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

The distance between Neptune and Mercury
Detailed data title: The average distance between Neptune and Mercury as measured on the first day of each month
Source: Caclculated using Astropy
Additional Info: I wrote a Python script using Astropy to calculate the distance between the named planets on the first day of each month for every year.

See what else correlates with The distance between Neptune and Mercury

Votes for Democratic Senators in Louisiana
Detailed data title: Percentage of votes cast for Federal Democrat Senate candidates in Louisiana
Source: MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse
See what else correlates with Votes for Democratic Senators in Louisiana

Correlation r = 0.8605344 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.7405194 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 74.1% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Votes for Democratic Senators in Louisiana) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., The distance between Neptune and Mercury) over the 15 years from 1978 through 2020.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 3.8E-5. 0.0000383584811269347750000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.86 in 0.0038% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 26,070 random variables You don't actually need 26 thousand variables to find a correlation like this one. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 14 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 14 because we have two variables measured over a period of 15 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.62, 0.95 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
197819801984198619901992199619982002200420082010201420162020
The distance between Neptune and Mercury (Planetary distance (AU))30.181730.150230.161430.135630.105330.107230.056330.067430.000530.014129.982629.976429.953829.923829.9382
Votes for Democratic Senators in Louisiana (Percentage of votes)10096.394710052.820510010050.170265.045249.78847.481452.109637.673944.875435.312735.2872




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Y-axis doesn't start at zero: I truncated the Y-axes of the graph above. I also used a line graph, which makes the visual connection stand out more than it deserves. Nothing against line graphs. They are great at telling a story when you have linear data! But visually it is deceptive because the only data is at the points on the graph, not the lines on the graph. In between each point, the data could have been doing anything. Like going for a random walk by itself!
    Mathematically what I showed is true, but it is intentionally misleading. Below is the same chart but with both Y-axes starting at zero.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([30.1817,30.1502,30.1614,30.1356,30.1053,30.1072,30.0563,30.0674,30.0005,30.0141,29.9826,29.9764,29.9538,29.9238,29.9382,])
array_2 = np.array([100,96.3947,100,52.8205,100,100,50.1702,65.0452,49.788,47.4814,52.1096,37.6739,44.8754,35.3127,35.2872,])
array_1_name = "The distance between Neptune and Mercury"
array_2_name = "Votes for Democratic Senators in Louisiana"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Your rating is pure awesomeness!


Correlation ID: 4406 · Black Variable ID: 1954 · Red Variable ID: 26393
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0