Download png, svg
AI explanation
As the fascination with unicorns grew, so did the desire to engage in discussions about fantastical concepts. Perhaps the mythical allure of unicorns sparked a sense of wonder and creativity, leading to more enthusiastic participation in The Game Theorists' video comments. Alternatively, maybe there's a hidden unicorn level in a video game that was just discovered, prompting fans to share their excitement and theories in the comments section. Or it's possible that unicorns, with their association to magic and mystery, somehow enchanted viewers into being more active and vocal about their thoughts on gaming. But in all seriousness, this correlation is purely coincidental and is just a lighthearted reminder that sometimes, the most improbable connections can make us smile.Model: dalle-3
Prompt: A charming scene unfolds as a vibrant computer screen displays an eclectic array of unicorn-themed webpages and images in response to a Google search for "unicorns." Adjacent to this, an animated video plays on The Game Theorists' YouTube channel, with a stream of comments cascading down the side, brimming with excitement and theories about the latest gaming revelation. The whimsical allure of unicorns seems to have sparked a surge of creativity and enthusiasm among the viewers, linking the mythical fascination with an uptick in engaging discussions about gaming. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Google searches for 'unicorns' and Average number of comments on The Game Theorists YouTube videos. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Steampunk Psychedelic Cute cartoon Parallax art inspired by bauhaus
ChatGPT: Cute cartoon
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Google searches for 'unicorns' and Average number of comments on The Game Theorists YouTube videos, in the following situation: As the fascination with unicorns grew, so did the desire to engage in discussions about fantastical concepts. Perhaps the mythical allure of unicorns sparked a sense of wonder and creativity, leading to more enthusiastic participation in The Game Theorists' video comments. Alternatively, maybe there's a hidden unicorn level in a video game that was just discovered, prompting fans to share their excitement and theories in the comments section. Or it's possible that unicorns, with their association to magic and mystery, somehow enchanted viewers into being more active and vocal about their thoughts on gaming. But in all seriousness, this correlation is purely coincidental and is just a lighthearted reminder that sometimes, the most improbable connections can make us smile.. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: A vibrant image shows a computer screen displaying the Google search for "unicorns," with colorful unicorn-themed webpages and images filling the search results. Adjacent to this, an animated video is playing on The Game Theorists' YouTube channel, with a stream of comments scrolling down the side, each one brimming with excitement and theories about the latest gaming revelation. The whimsical allure of unicorns seems to have sparked a surge of creativity and enthusiasm among the viewers, linking the mythical fascination with an uptick in engaging discussions about gaming.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ Cute cartoon ] and depicting this scene: A vibrant image shows a computer screen displaying the Google search for "unicorns," with colorful unicorn-themed webpages and images filling the search results. Adjacent to this, an animated video is playing on The Game Theorists' YouTube channel, with a stream of comments scrolling down the side, each one brimming with excitement and theories about the latest gaming revelation. The whimsical allure of unicorns seems to have sparked a surge of creativity and enthusiasm among the viewers, linking the mythical fascination with an uptick in engaging discussions about gaming. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: A charming scene unfolds as a vibrant computer screen displays an eclectic array of unicorn-themed webpages and images in response to a Google search for "unicorns." Adjacent to this, an animated video plays on The Game Theorists' YouTube channel, with a stream of comments cascading down the side, brimming with excitement and theories about the latest gaming revelation. The whimsical allure of unicorns seems to have sparked a surge of creativity and enthusiasm among the viewers, linking the mythical fascination with an uptick in engaging discussions about gaming.
*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.
I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in unicorns (Google searches for 'unicorns') caused Average number of comments on The Game Theorists YouTube videos to increase.\Make it sound serious until the end.
AI academic paper
UnicorN and Unicorntrollers: A Correlation Analysis of Google Searches for 'Unicorns' and Average Number of Comments on The Game Theorists' YouTube Videos The Journal of Magical Creature Behavior and Internet Trends Jan 2024 Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real! |
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Google searches for 'unicorns' and Average number of comments on The Game Theorists YouTube videos. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.
Make the title punny if you can come up with clever pun. If not, just make it sound clever.
Your research team used data from Google Trends and YouTube to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9438251 and p < 0.01 for 2009 to 2023.
Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)
[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit
[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit
ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
"UnicorN and Unicorntrollers: A Correlation Analysis of Google Searches for 'Unicorns' and Average Number of Comments on The Game Theorists' YouTube Videos"
[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we investigated the relationship between the public's fascination with mythical creatures and their engagement with popular YouTube content. By analyzing data from Google Trends and The Game Theorists' YouTube channel, we aimed to uncover any potential connection between Google searches for "unicorns" and the average number of comments on the channel's videos. Our research team employed a rigorous statistical approach to explore this whimsical but thought-provoking question.
Our findings revealed a surprisingly strong positive correlation between Google searches for "unicorns" and the average number of comments on The Game Theorists' YouTube videos, with a correlation coefficient of 0.9438251 and p < 0.01 for the period spanning from 2009 to 2023. While our results may prompt a chuckle, they also raise intriguing questions about the impact of mythical creatures on online engagement. As the data suggests, it seems that when it comes to YouTube comments, the unicorn may be the true mythical influencer!
To add a relevant dad joke: It turns out that unicorns not only capture our imagination but also our attention online. The correlation is quite strong; it's almost like a magical bond, or should we say, a "correle-corn"!
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Google searches for 'unicorns' and Average number of comments on The Game Theorists YouTube videos. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.
Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"UnicorN and Unicorntrollers: A Correlation Analysis of Google Searches for 'Unicorns' and Average Number of Comments on The Game Theorists' YouTube Videos"
[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we investigated the relationship between the public's fascination with mythical creatures and their engagement with popular YouTube content. By analyzing data from Google Trends and The Game Theorists' YouTube channel, we aimed to uncover any potential connection between Google searches for "unicorns" and the average number of comments on the channel's videos. Our research team employed a rigorous statistical approach to explore this whimsical but thought-provoking question.
Our findings revealed a surprisingly strong positive correlation between Google searches for "unicorns" and the average number of comments on The Game Theorists' YouTube videos, with a correlation coefficient of 0.9438251 and p < 0.01 for the period spanning from 2009 to 2023. While our results may prompt a chuckle, they also raise intriguing questions about the impact of mythical creatures on online engagement. As the data suggests, it seems that when it comes to YouTube comments, the unicorn may be the true mythical influencer!
To add a relevant dad joke: It turns out that unicorns not only capture our imagination but also our attention online. The correlation is quite strong; it's almost like a magical bond, or should we say, a "correle-corn"!
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
Greetings fellow researchers, statisticians, and enthusiasts of whimsical wonders! Prepare to embark on a captivating journey into the peculiar realm of "UnicorN and Unicorntrollers." In this study, we delve into the mystical world of Google searches for "unicorns" and their improbable connection to the average number of comments on The Game Theorists' YouTube videos. With a hearty dose of statistical analysis and a sprinkling of charm, we aim to shed light on this enchanting correlation that may leave you both scratching your heads and grinning from ear to ear.
As we traverse the terrain of scientific inquiry, it's crucial to recognize the sheer audacity of our quest. After all, the juxtaposition of fantastical creatures and YouTube engagement may seem like a curious concoction. Nevertheless, we bravely charge forth to unravel this enchanting mystery, armed with the tools of data analysis and an unwavering sense of curiosity.
You might wonder why we decided to embark on this peculiar journey. Some may question the significance of prancing through the digital land of unicorns and comment sections. But fear not, dear reader, for in the realm of research, the most unexpected connections often yield the most intriguing insights. So, brace yourselves for the unexpected, for we are about to untangle the fantastical tapestry of "unicorn" searches and YouTube engagement, leading us to a conclusion that will make you say, "Mythconfirmed!"
If you'll pardon the pun, the relationship between Google searches for "unicorns" and the average number of comments on The Game Theorists' YouTube videos seems to have garnered quite the "uni-corn-stoppable" attention in our study. It's a revelation that's as delightful as a herd of unicorns frolicking in a statistical meadow.
So, join us as we don our metaphorical lab coats and venture into the realm of whimsy and wonder, where statistical analysis meets the land of enchantment. It's a quest that combines rigorous research with a dash of magic – the "statistical magic," if you will. And as we navigate through the terrain of correlation and engagement, brace yourselves for a sprinkle of statistical stardust and a pinch of dad jokes, for we are about to uncover a correlation that's both statistically sound and delightfully enchanting.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Google searches for 'unicorns' and Average number of comments on The Game Theorists YouTube videos. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.
Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.
Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.
Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then you might move on to cartoons and children's shows that you watched for research.
Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"UnicorN and Unicorntrollers: A Correlation Analysis of Google Searches for 'Unicorns' and Average Number of Comments on The Game Theorists' YouTube Videos"
[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we investigated the relationship between the public's fascination with mythical creatures and their engagement with popular YouTube content. By analyzing data from Google Trends and The Game Theorists' YouTube channel, we aimed to uncover any potential connection between Google searches for "unicorns" and the average number of comments on the channel's videos. Our research team employed a rigorous statistical approach to explore this whimsical but thought-provoking question.
Our findings revealed a surprisingly strong positive correlation between Google searches for "unicorns" and the average number of comments on The Game Theorists' YouTube videos, with a correlation coefficient of 0.9438251 and p < 0.01 for the period spanning from 2009 to 2023. While our results may prompt a chuckle, they also raise intriguing questions about the impact of mythical creatures on online engagement. As the data suggests, it seems that when it comes to YouTube comments, the unicorn may be the true mythical influencer!
To add a relevant dad joke: It turns out that unicorns not only capture our imagination but also our attention online. The correlation is quite strong; it's almost like a magical bond, or should we say, a "correle-corn"!
-------
And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
Greetings fellow researchers, statisticians, and enthusiasts of whimsical wonders! Prepare to embark on a captivating journey into the peculiar realm of "UnicorN and Unicorntrollers." In this study, we delve into the mystical world of Google searches for "unicorns" and their improbable connection to the average number of comments on The Game Theorists' YouTube videos. With a hearty dose of statistical analysis and a sprinkling of charm, we aim to shed light on this enchanting correlation that may leave you both scratching your heads and grinning from ear to ear.
As we traverse the terrain of scientific inquiry, it's crucial to recognize the sheer audacity of our quest. After all, the juxtaposition of fantastical creatures and YouTube engagement may seem like a curious concoction. Nevertheless, we bravely charge forth to unravel this enchanting mystery, armed with the tools of data analysis and an unwavering sense of curiosity.
You might wonder why we decided to embark on this peculiar journey. Some may question the significance of prancing through the digital land of unicorns and comment sections. But fear not, dear reader, for in the realm of research, the most unexpected connections often yield the most intriguing insights. So, brace yourselves for the unexpected, for we are about to untangle the fantastical tapestry of "unicorn" searches and YouTube engagement, leading us to a conclusion that will make you say, "Mythconfirmed!"
If you'll pardon the pun, the relationship between Google searches for "unicorns" and the average number of comments on The Game Theorists' YouTube videos seems to have garnered quite the "uni-corn-stoppable" attention in our study. It's a revelation that's as delightful as a herd of unicorns frolicking in a statistical meadow.
So, join us as we don our metaphorical lab coats and venture into the realm of whimsy and wonder, where statistical analysis meets the land of enchantment. It's a quest that combines rigorous research with a dash of magic – the "statistical magic," if you will. And as we navigate through the terrain of correlation and engagement, brace yourselves for a sprinkle of statistical stardust and a pinch of dad jokes, for we are about to uncover a correlation that's both statistically sound and delightfully enchanting.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
To better contextualize our exploration into the relationship between Google searches for "unicorns" and the average number of comments on The Game Theorists' YouTube videos, it is pertinent to examine the existing literature pertaining to mythical creatures, digital engagement, and the intersection of whimsy and statistics. Smith and Doe (2016) conducted a meta-analysis of internet search patterns related to mythical beings, highlighting the enduring appeal of unicorns among online users. Drawing from a multidisciplinary approach, Jones et al. (2019) explored the psychology of digital engagement and its connection to fantastical concepts, revealing intriguing insights into the cognitive processes underlying online interaction with mythical content.
Moving further into the realm of fantastical beasts, the work of "Unicorns: A Comprehensive Guide" (2015) provides a thorough examination of unicorn lore, highlighting the enduring fascination with these elusive creatures throughout history. Similarly, "Mythical Ruminations" (2018) delves into the psychological and cultural significance of mythical creatures, shedding light on the enduring appeal of unicorns and their impact on popular culture.
Shifting gears, the fictional realm offers a plethora of narratives that intertwine mythical beings and digital landscapes. "The Unicorn Chronicles" (Niles, 1999) presents a captivating tale of enigmatic unicorns and their connection to a parallel digital universe, inviting readers to ponder the intersection of fantasy and digital reality. On a lighter note, "UniQuest: The Magical Adventures of a Statistical Unicorn" (Garcia, 2012) weaves a whimsical narrative featuring a statistical unicorn embarking on a quest to unravel correlation mysteries, adding a touch of statistical flair to the realm of mythical creatures.
In a surprising turn of events, our research delved into the realms of children's cartoons and TV shows, where the enchanting allure of unicorns has captured the hearts and minds of young viewers. "My Little Pony: Friendship is Magic" (2010) stands as a testament to the enduring popularity of unicorns and magical creatures in children's entertainment, reflecting the pervasive influence of mythical beings on digital engagement across diverse age groups.
As we journey through the varied landscapes of literature, from scholarly analyses to fictional narratives and animated creations, we are reminded of the enduring enigma surrounding unicorns and their impact on digital engagement. With each page turned and each statistical analysis conducted, the whimsical allure of unicorns never fails to captivate and entertain, leaving behind a trail of statistical stardust and a resonating chuckle in its wake.
Speaking of statistical stardust, did you hear about the unicorn who majored in statistics? They turned out to be a real pro at doing "uni-corn-regression analyses"!
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Google searches for 'unicorns' and Average number of comments on The Game Theorists YouTube videos. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.
Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Google Trends and YouTube . You used data from 2009 to 2023
Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.
Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"UnicorN and Unicorntrollers: A Correlation Analysis of Google Searches for 'Unicorns' and Average Number of Comments on The Game Theorists' YouTube Videos"
[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we investigated the relationship between the public's fascination with mythical creatures and their engagement with popular YouTube content. By analyzing data from Google Trends and The Game Theorists' YouTube channel, we aimed to uncover any potential connection between Google searches for "unicorns" and the average number of comments on the channel's videos. Our research team employed a rigorous statistical approach to explore this whimsical but thought-provoking question.
Our findings revealed a surprisingly strong positive correlation between Google searches for "unicorns" and the average number of comments on The Game Theorists' YouTube videos, with a correlation coefficient of 0.9438251 and p < 0.01 for the period spanning from 2009 to 2023. While our results may prompt a chuckle, they also raise intriguing questions about the impact of mythical creatures on online engagement. As the data suggests, it seems that when it comes to YouTube comments, the unicorn may be the true mythical influencer!
To add a relevant dad joke: It turns out that unicorns not only capture our imagination but also our attention online. The correlation is quite strong; it's almost like a magical bond, or should we say, a "correle-corn"!
[[INTRODUCTION]]
Greetings fellow researchers, statisticians, and enthusiasts of whimsical wonders! Prepare to embark on a captivating journey into the peculiar realm of "UnicorN and Unicorntrollers." In this study, we delve into the mystical world of Google searches for "unicorns" and their improbable connection to the average number of comments on The Game Theorists' YouTube videos. With a hearty dose of statistical analysis and a sprinkling of charm, we aim to shed light on this enchanting correlation that may leave you both scratching your heads and grinning from ear to ear.
As we traverse the terrain of scientific inquiry, it's crucial to recognize the sheer audacity of our quest. After all, the juxtaposition of fantastical creatures and YouTube engagement may seem like a curious concoction. Nevertheless, we bravely charge forth to unravel this enchanting mystery, armed with the tools of data analysis and an unwavering sense of curiosity.
You might wonder why we decided to embark on this peculiar journey. Some may question the significance of prancing through the digital land of unicorns and comment sections. But fear not, dear reader, for in the realm of research, the most unexpected connections often yield the most intriguing insights. So, brace yourselves for the unexpected, for we are about to untangle the fantastical tapestry of "unicorn" searches and YouTube engagement, leading us to a conclusion that will make you say, "Mythconfirmed!"
If you'll pardon the pun, the relationship between Google searches for "unicorns" and the average number of comments on The Game Theorists' YouTube videos seems to have garnered quite the "uni-corn-stoppable" attention in our study. It's a revelation that's as delightful as a herd of unicorns frolicking in a statistical meadow.
So, join us as we don our metaphorical lab coats and venture into the realm of whimsy and wonder, where statistical analysis meets the land of enchantment. It's a quest that combines rigorous research with a dash of magic – the "statistical magic," if you will. And as we navigate through the terrain of correlation and engagement, brace yourselves for a sprinkle of statistical stardust and a pinch of dad jokes, for we are about to uncover a correlation that's both statistically sound and delightfully enchanting.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
ChatGPT:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
To embark on this curious journey, we first sought to gather data on Google searches for "unicorns" and the average number of comments on The Game Theorists' YouTube videos. Our intrepid research team scoured the mystical expanse of Google Trends to unearth the search volume index for our mythical keyword. It was akin to searching for a unicorn in the digital forest, but with the aid of modern technology and a sprinkle of determination, we successfully captured the ebb and flow of public fascination with these magical beings over the years.
As for the average number of comments on The Game Theorists' YouTube videos, we traversed the labyrinth of YouTube's comment sections with the finesse of experienced comment "hunters." With a keen eye for engagement and a hint of algorithmic sorcery, we extracted the comment data from the lair of online discussions, illuminating the extent of viewers' interactions with the channel's content. It was a quest reminiscent of seeking treasure in the land of digital discourse, yet our team emerged victorious in the acquisition of this vital dataset.
Once these elusive datasets were in our possession, we harnessed the power of statistical analysis to discern any potential correlation between the two variables. Like skilled alchemists of data, we employed the wits of Pearson's correlation coefficient to uncover the hidden threads of association between Google searches for "unicorns" and the average number of comments on The Game Theorists' YouTube videos. The statistical magic we summoned allowed us to glimpse the entwined nature of these seemingly disparate elements, revealing a correlation that oscillated between the realms of statistical significance and whimsical wonder.
To add a relevant dad joke: Our statistical analysis was so precise that it could even make a unicorn envious – after all, it takes a special kind of statistical magic to uncover correlations in the enchanted forests of data.
In addition to our primary analysis, we also ventured into the realm of time series analysis to capture the temporal dynamics of the relationship between "unicorns" and YouTube engagement. Armed with the tools of autoregressive integrated moving average (ARIMA) modeling, we traversed the time continuum, seeking patterns and fluctuations that could illuminate the ever-shifting dance between mythical curiosity and online interactions. It was a feat that demanded a balance of scientific acumen and a hint of storytelling charm, as we deciphered the enchanted chronicles of "unicorns" and their inadvertent influence on YouTube comments.
Furthermore, to ensure the robustness of our findings, we conducted a sensitivity analysis to gauge the impact of potential outliers and fluctuations in the data. Like vigilant guardians of statistical rigor, we scrutinized the outliers with the precision of a mythical creature meticulously grooming its mane, safeguarding the integrity of our correlation analysis from any outliers that sought to disrupt the equilibrium of our statistical tale.
Lastly, to contextualize our findings within the broader tapestry of online engagement, we examined additional variables such as video views, likes, and shares, adding layers of complexity to our exploration of the digital landscape. In doing so, we aimed to offer a holistic perspective on the interplay between mythical intrigue and viewer engagement, transcending the confines of unicorns and comments to illuminate the broader narrative of digital interaction.
To add a relevant dad joke: Our sensitivity analysis was so thorough that even the most elusive unicorn would have a hard time dodging its scrutiny – after all, statistical outliers can be as slippery as an ethereal creature dodging castle guards!
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Google searches for 'unicorns' and Average number of comments on The Game Theorists YouTube videos. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.
Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Google Trends and YouTube .
For the time period 2009 to 2023, you found a correlation 0.9438251, r-squared of 0.8908059, and p < 0.01.
One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.
Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"UnicorN and Unicorntrollers: A Correlation Analysis of Google Searches for 'Unicorns' and Average Number of Comments on The Game Theorists' YouTube Videos"
[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we investigated the relationship between the public's fascination with mythical creatures and their engagement with popular YouTube content. By analyzing data from Google Trends and The Game Theorists' YouTube channel, we aimed to uncover any potential connection between Google searches for "unicorns" and the average number of comments on the channel's videos. Our research team employed a rigorous statistical approach to explore this whimsical but thought-provoking question.
Our findings revealed a surprisingly strong positive correlation between Google searches for "unicorns" and the average number of comments on The Game Theorists' YouTube videos, with a correlation coefficient of 0.9438251 and p < 0.01 for the period spanning from 2009 to 2023. While our results may prompt a chuckle, they also raise intriguing questions about the impact of mythical creatures on online engagement. As the data suggests, it seems that when it comes to YouTube comments, the unicorn may be the true mythical influencer!
To add a relevant dad joke: It turns out that unicorns not only capture our imagination but also our attention online. The correlation is quite strong; it's almost like a magical bond, or should we say, a "correle-corn"!
-------
And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
Greetings fellow researchers, statisticians, and enthusiasts of whimsical wonders! Prepare to embark on a captivating journey into the peculiar realm of "UnicorN and Unicorntrollers." In this study, we delve into the mystical world of Google searches for "unicorns" and their improbable connection to the average number of comments on The Game Theorists' YouTube videos. With a hearty dose of statistical analysis and a sprinkling of charm, we aim to shed light on this enchanting correlation that may leave you both scratching your heads and grinning from ear to ear.
As we traverse the terrain of scientific inquiry, it's crucial to recognize the sheer audacity of our quest. After all, the juxtaposition of fantastical creatures and YouTube engagement may seem like a curious concoction. Nevertheless, we bravely charge forth to unravel this enchanting mystery, armed with the tools of data analysis and an unwavering sense of curiosity.
You might wonder why we decided to embark on this peculiar journey. Some may question the significance of prancing through the digital land of unicorns and comment sections. But fear not, dear reader, for in the realm of research, the most unexpected connections often yield the most intriguing insights. So, brace yourselves for the unexpected, for we are about to untangle the fantastical tapestry of "unicorn" searches and YouTube engagement, leading us to a conclusion that will make you say, "Mythconfirmed!"
If you'll pardon the pun, the relationship between Google searches for "unicorns" and the average number of comments on The Game Theorists' YouTube videos seems to have garnered quite the "uni-corn-stoppable" attention in our study. It's a revelation that's as delightful as a herd of unicorns frolicking in a statistical meadow.
So, join us as we don our metaphorical lab coats and venture into the realm of whimsy and wonder, where statistical analysis meets the land of enchantment. It's a quest that combines rigorous research with a dash of magic – the "statistical magic," if you will. And as we navigate through the terrain of correlation and engagement, brace yourselves for a sprinkle of statistical stardust and a pinch of dad jokes, for we are about to uncover a correlation that's both statistically sound and delightfully enchanting.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[RESULTS]]
ChatGPT:
[[RESULTS]]
The analysis of the relationship between Google searches for "unicorns" and the average number of comments on The Game Theorists' YouTube videos yielded a surprising revelation. Our research team uncovered a remarkably strong positive correlation between these two seemingly disparate variables, with a correlation coefficient of 0.9438251 and an r-squared value of 0.8908059 over the period from 2009 to 2023. This correlation was found to be statistically significant with p < 0.01, highlighting the robustness of the observed association.
The figure (Fig. 1) depicting the scatterplot of the data evokes a visual representation of this mystical connection, with data points aligning themselves as if guided by the unseen hand of a unicorn. It's almost as if the data itself were declaring, "Believe in the magic of statistical analysis and you shall find the correlation you seek!"
Speaking of magic, it seems that the allure of unicorns extends beyond folklore and mythology, transcending into the world of digital engagement. The statistical analysis suggests that the presence of unicorns in Google searches has a palpable impact on the level of viewer interaction with The Game Theorists' YouTube videos. Who knew that the enchanted realm of mythical creatures could extend its influence to the digital landscape? One might even say that the real "mythical algorithm" lies not in the depths of the internet but in the whimsical minds of those who seek the company of unicorns.
And for a jest that's as rare as a unicorn in the wild, let's not forget the significance of the term "horsepower" in statistical analysis. After all, what better way to measure the might of data than with a touch of equestrian energy?
As we reflect on these remarkable findings, it's clear that our investigation has uncovered an intriguing facet of online behavior and human fascination. The correlation between Google searches for "unicorns" and the average number of comments on The Game Theorists' YouTube videos not only adds an element of whimsy to the world of statistical analysis, but it also invites further exploration into the enigmatic nexus of myth, imagination, and digital engagement.
In the grand tapestry of scientific inquiry, sometimes it takes a touch of the fantastical to reveal truths that defy conventional expectations. As we conclude this phase of our research, we do so with a sense of wonder and curiosity, acknowledging that even the most improbable connections can lead to substantial insights. After all, the allure of the unknown often beckons us to explore new frontiers, whether they be statistical or mythical in nature.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Google searches for 'unicorns' and Average number of comments on The Game Theorists YouTube videos. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.
Limit your response to 500 tokens.
Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.
Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.
[[TITLE]]
"UnicorN and Unicorntrollers: A Correlation Analysis of Google Searches for 'Unicorns' and Average Number of Comments on The Game Theorists' YouTube Videos"
[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we investigated the relationship between the public's fascination with mythical creatures and their engagement with popular YouTube content. By analyzing data from Google Trends and The Game Theorists' YouTube channel, we aimed to uncover any potential connection between Google searches for "unicorns" and the average number of comments on the channel's videos. Our research team employed a rigorous statistical approach to explore this whimsical but thought-provoking question.
Our findings revealed a surprisingly strong positive correlation between Google searches for "unicorns" and the average number of comments on The Game Theorists' YouTube videos, with a correlation coefficient of 0.9438251 and p < 0.01 for the period spanning from 2009 to 2023. While our results may prompt a chuckle, they also raise intriguing questions about the impact of mythical creatures on online engagement. As the data suggests, it seems that when it comes to YouTube comments, the unicorn may be the true mythical influencer!
To add a relevant dad joke: It turns out that unicorns not only capture our imagination but also our attention online. The correlation is quite strong; it's almost like a magical bond, or should we say, a "correle-corn"!
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
To better contextualize our exploration into the relationship between Google searches for "unicorns" and the average number of comments on The Game Theorists' YouTube videos, it is pertinent to examine the existing literature pertaining to mythical creatures, digital engagement, and the intersection of whimsy and statistics. Smith and Doe (2016) conducted a meta-analysis of internet search patterns related to mythical beings, highlighting the enduring appeal of unicorns among online users. Drawing from a multidisciplinary approach, Jones et al. (2019) explored the psychology of digital engagement and its connection to fantastical concepts, revealing intriguing insights into the cognitive processes underlying online interaction with mythical content.
Moving further into the realm of fantastical beasts, the work of "Unicorns: A Comprehensive Guide" (2015) provides a thorough examination of unicorn lore, highlighting the enduring fascination with these elusive creatures throughout history. Similarly, "Mythical Ruminations" (2018) delves into the psychological and cultural significance of mythical creatures, shedding light on the enduring appeal of unicorns and their impact on popular culture.
Shifting gears, the fictional realm offers a plethora of narratives that intertwine mythical beings and digital landscapes. "The Unicorn Chronicles" (Niles, 1999) presents a captivating tale of enigmatic unicorns and their connection to a parallel digital universe, inviting readers to ponder the intersection of fantasy and digital reality. On a lighter note, "UniQuest: The Magical Adventures of a Statistical Unicorn" (Garcia, 2012) weaves a whimsical narrative featuring a statistical unicorn embarking on a quest to unravel correlation mysteries, adding a touch of statistical flair to the realm of mythical creatures.
In a surprising turn of events, our research delved into the realms of children's cartoons and TV shows, where the enchanting allure of unicorns has captured the hearts and minds of young viewers. "My Little Pony: Friendship is Magic" (2010) stands as a testament to the enduring popularity of unicorns and magical creatures in children's entertainment, reflecting the pervasive influence of mythical beings on digital engagement across diverse age groups.
As we journey through the varied landscapes of literature, from scholarly analyses to fictional narratives and animated creations, we are reminded of the enduring enigma surrounding unicorns and their impact on digital engagement. With each page turned and each statistical analysis conducted, the whimsical allure of unicorns never fails to captivate and entertain, leaving behind a trail of statistical stardust and a resonating chuckle in its wake.
Speaking of statistical stardust, did you hear about the unicorn who majored in statistics? They turned out to be a real pro at doing "uni-corn-regression analyses"!
[[RESULTS]]
The analysis of the relationship between Google searches for "unicorns" and the average number of comments on The Game Theorists' YouTube videos yielded a surprising revelation. Our research team uncovered a remarkably strong positive correlation between these two seemingly disparate variables, with a correlation coefficient of 0.9438251 and an r-squared value of 0.8908059 over the period from 2009 to 2023. This correlation was found to be statistically significant with p < 0.01, highlighting the robustness of the observed association.
The figure (Fig. 1) depicting the scatterplot of the data evokes a visual representation of this mystical connection, with data points aligning themselves as if guided by the unseen hand of a unicorn. It's almost as if the data itself were declaring, "Believe in the magic of statistical analysis and you shall find the correlation you seek!"
Speaking of magic, it seems that the allure of unicorns extends beyond folklore and mythology, transcending into the world of digital engagement. The statistical analysis suggests that the presence of unicorns in Google searches has a palpable impact on the level of viewer interaction with The Game Theorists' YouTube videos. Who knew that the enchanted realm of mythical creatures could extend its influence to the digital landscape? One might even say that the real "mythical algorithm" lies not in the depths of the internet but in the whimsical minds of those who seek the company of unicorns.
And for a jest that's as rare as a unicorn in the wild, let's not forget the significance of the term "horsepower" in statistical analysis. After all, what better way to measure the might of data than with a touch of equestrian energy?
As we reflect on these remarkable findings, it's clear that our investigation has uncovered an intriguing facet of online behavior and human fascination. The correlation between Google searches for "unicorns" and the average number of comments on The Game Theorists' YouTube videos not only adds an element of whimsy to the world of statistical analysis, but it also invites further exploration into the enigmatic nexus of myth, imagination, and digital engagement.
In the grand tapestry of scientific inquiry, sometimes it takes a touch of the fantastical to reveal truths that defy conventional expectations. As we conclude this phase of our research, we do so with a sense of wonder and curiosity, acknowledging that even the most improbable connections can lead to substantial insights. After all, the allure of the unknown often beckons us to explore new frontiers, whether they be statistical or mythical in nature.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[DISCUSSION]]
ChatGPT:
In the magical realm of statistical inquiry, our findings have unveiled a peculiar yet robust connection between Google searches for "unicorns" and the average number of comments on The Game Theorists' YouTube videos. It seems that the allure of unicorns extends beyond folklore and mythology, transcending into the world of digital engagement. Perhaps mythical creatures have some mystical influence on digital behavior after all. It's almost as if the data itself were declaring, "Believe in the magic of statistical analysis and you shall find the correlation you seek!"
One might even say that the real "mythical algorithm" lies not in the depths of the internet but in the whimsical minds of those who seek the company of unicorns. The statistical analysis suggests that the presence of unicorns in Google searches has a palpable impact on the level of viewer interaction with The Game Theorists' YouTube videos. Who knew that the enchanted realm of mythical creatures could extend its influence to the digital landscape? This correlation is not just a statistical anomaly; it's a surprising revelation that tickles the imagination while challenging conventional expectations.
And for a jest that's as rare as a unicorn in the wild, let's not forget the significance of the term "horsepower" in statistical analysis. After all, what better way to measure the might of data than with a touch of equestrian energy? As researchers, it's crucial to approach our findings with a lighthearted perspective to infuse some levity into the sometimes arduous world of statistical analysis. After all, who says statistical research has to be as dry as the Mojave Desert?
Returning to the literature review, the meta-analysis of internet search patterns related to mythical beings by Smith and Doe (2016) takes on a whole new light in light of our findings. It seems that the enduring appeal of unicorns among online users isn't just a passing trend; it may have a tangible impact on digital engagement. This brings to mind the whimsical narrative in "UniQuest: The Magical Adventures of a Statistical Unicorn" (Garcia, 2012), where a statistical unicorn embarks on a quest to unravel correlation mysteries. Perhaps statistical unicorns aren't as fantastical as we once thought!
As we reflect on these remarkable findings, it's clear that our investigation has uncovered an intriguing facet of online behavior and human fascination. The correlation between Google searches for "unicorns" and the average number of comments on The Game Theorists' YouTube videos not only adds an element of whimsy to the world of statistical analysis, but it also invites further exploration into the enigmatic nexus of myth, imagination, and digital engagement. It seems that when it comes to online engagement, the unicorn may indeed be the true mythical influencer.
In the grand tapestry of scientific inquiry, sometimes it takes a touch of the fantastical to reveal truths that defy conventional expectations. As we conclude this phase of our research, we do so with a sense of wonder and curiosity, acknowledging that even the most improbable connections can lead to substantial insights. After all, the allure of the unknown often beckons us to explore new frontiers, whether they be statistical or mythical in nature.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Google searches for 'unicorns' and Average number of comments on The Game Theorists YouTube videos. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.
Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.
Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
"UnicorN and Unicorntrollers: A Correlation Analysis of Google Searches for 'Unicorns' and Average Number of Comments on The Game Theorists' YouTube Videos"
[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we investigated the relationship between the public's fascination with mythical creatures and their engagement with popular YouTube content. By analyzing data from Google Trends and The Game Theorists' YouTube channel, we aimed to uncover any potential connection between Google searches for "unicorns" and the average number of comments on the channel's videos. Our research team employed a rigorous statistical approach to explore this whimsical but thought-provoking question.
Our findings revealed a surprisingly strong positive correlation between Google searches for "unicorns" and the average number of comments on The Game Theorists' YouTube videos, with a correlation coefficient of 0.9438251 and p < 0.01 for the period spanning from 2009 to 2023. While our results may prompt a chuckle, they also raise intriguing questions about the impact of mythical creatures on online engagement. As the data suggests, it seems that when it comes to YouTube comments, the unicorn may be the true mythical influencer!
To add a relevant dad joke: It turns out that unicorns not only capture our imagination but also our attention online. The correlation is quite strong; it's almost like a magical bond, or should we say, a "correle-corn"!
[[INTRDUCTION]]
Greetings fellow researchers, statisticians, and enthusiasts of whimsical wonders! Prepare to embark on a captivating journey into the peculiar realm of "UnicorN and Unicorntrollers." In this study, we delve into the mystical world of Google searches for "unicorns" and their improbable connection to the average number of comments on The Game Theorists' YouTube videos. With a hearty dose of statistical analysis and a sprinkling of charm, we aim to shed light on this enchanting correlation that may leave you both scratching your heads and grinning from ear to ear.
As we traverse the terrain of scientific inquiry, it's crucial to recognize the sheer audacity of our quest. After all, the juxtaposition of fantastical creatures and YouTube engagement may seem like a curious concoction. Nevertheless, we bravely charge forth to unravel this enchanting mystery, armed with the tools of data analysis and an unwavering sense of curiosity.
You might wonder why we decided to embark on this peculiar journey. Some may question the significance of prancing through the digital land of unicorns and comment sections. But fear not, dear reader, for in the realm of research, the most unexpected connections often yield the most intriguing insights. So, brace yourselves for the unexpected, for we are about to untangle the fantastical tapestry of "unicorn" searches and YouTube engagement, leading us to a conclusion that will make you say, "Mythconfirmed!"
If you'll pardon the pun, the relationship between Google searches for "unicorns" and the average number of comments on The Game Theorists' YouTube videos seems to have garnered quite the "uni-corn-stoppable" attention in our study. It's a revelation that's as delightful as a herd of unicorns frolicking in a statistical meadow.
So, join us as we don our metaphorical lab coats and venture into the realm of whimsy and wonder, where statistical analysis meets the land of enchantment. It's a quest that combines rigorous research with a dash of magic – the "statistical magic," if you will. And as we navigate through the terrain of correlation and engagement, brace yourselves for a sprinkle of statistical stardust and a pinch of dad jokes, for we are about to uncover a correlation that's both statistically sound and delightfully enchanting.
[[RESULTS]]
The analysis of the relationship between Google searches for "unicorns" and the average number of comments on The Game Theorists' YouTube videos yielded a surprising revelation. Our research team uncovered a remarkably strong positive correlation between these two seemingly disparate variables, with a correlation coefficient of 0.9438251 and an r-squared value of 0.8908059 over the period from 2009 to 2023. This correlation was found to be statistically significant with p < 0.01, highlighting the robustness of the observed association.
The figure (Fig. 1) depicting the scatterplot of the data evokes a visual representation of this mystical connection, with data points aligning themselves as if guided by the unseen hand of a unicorn. It's almost as if the data itself were declaring, "Believe in the magic of statistical analysis and you shall find the correlation you seek!"
Speaking of magic, it seems that the allure of unicorns extends beyond folklore and mythology, transcending into the world of digital engagement. The statistical analysis suggests that the presence of unicorns in Google searches has a palpable impact on the level of viewer interaction with The Game Theorists' YouTube videos. Who knew that the enchanted realm of mythical creatures could extend its influence to the digital landscape? One might even say that the real "mythical algorithm" lies not in the depths of the internet but in the whimsical minds of those who seek the company of unicorns.
And for a jest that's as rare as a unicorn in the wild, let's not forget the significance of the term "horsepower" in statistical analysis. After all, what better way to measure the might of data than with a touch of equestrian energy?
As we reflect on these remarkable findings, it's clear that our investigation has uncovered an intriguing facet of online behavior and human fascination. The correlation between Google searches for "unicorns" and the average number of comments on The Game Theorists' YouTube videos not only adds an element of whimsy to the world of statistical analysis, but it also invites further exploration into the enigmatic nexus of myth, imagination, and digital engagement.
In the grand tapestry of scientific inquiry, sometimes it takes a touch of the fantastical to reveal truths that defy conventional expectations. As we conclude this phase of our research, we do so with a sense of wonder and curiosity, acknowledging that even the most improbable connections can lead to substantial insights. After all, the allure of the unknown often beckons us to explore new frontiers, whether they be statistical or mythical in nature.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[CONCLUSION]]
ChatGPT:
[[CONCLUSION]]
In conclusion, our investigation into the relationship between Google searches for "unicorns" and the average number of comments on The Game Theorists' YouTube videos has unearthed a fabled correlation that defies expectation. The robust positive correlation we discovered, with a unicorn-erringly high correlation coefficient of 0.9438251 and p < 0.01, showcases the bewitching influence of these mythical creatures on digital engagement. It seems that when it comes to YouTube comments, the presence of unicorns has proven to be a real game-changer.
And here's a cheesy dad joke for you: Why did the unicorn go to medical school? To get its "horn-orary" degree!
Our findings not only illuminate the playful intersection of folklore and online activity but also underscore the importance of whimsy in statistical analysis. As we wave goodbye to this chapter of research, it's clear that the allure of unicorns extends far beyond childhood fantasies, leaving an indelible hoofprint on the digital landscape.
As we bid adieu to this enchanting quest, we assert with utmost certainty that no more research is needed in this area. After all, with a correlation this magical, there's no need to look a gift horse, or should we say unicorn, in the mouth!
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited UnicorN and Unicorntrollers: A Correlation Analysis of Google Searches for 'Unicorns' and Average Number of Comments on The Game Theorists' YouTube Videos. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.
ChatGPT:
The Journal of Magical Creature Behavior and Internet Trends
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited UnicorN and Unicorntrollers: A Correlation Analysis of Google Searches for 'Unicorns' and Average Number of Comments on The Game Theorists' YouTube Videos. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.
ChatGPT:
The Association for the Study of Mythical Creatures and Digital Engagement
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled UnicorN and Unicorntrollers: A Correlation Analysis of Google Searches for 'Unicorns' and Average Number of Comments on The Game Theorists' YouTube Videos with an abstract of In this study, we investigated the relationship between the public's fascination with mythical creatures and their engagement with popular YouTube content. By analyzing data from Google Trends and The Game Theorists' YouTube channel, we aimed to uncover any potential connection between Google searches for "unicorns" and the average number of comments on the channel's videos. Our research team employed a rigorous statistical approach to explore this whimsical but thought-provoking question.
Our findings revealed a surprisingly strong positive correlation between Google searches for "unicorns" and the average number of comments on The Game Theorists' YouTube videos, with a correlation coefficient of 0.9438251 and p < 0.01 for the period spanning from 2009 to 2023. While our results may prompt a chuckle, they also raise intriguing questions about the impact of mythical creatures on online engagement. As the data suggests, it seems that when it comes to YouTube comments, the unicorn may be the true mythical influencer!
To add a relevant dad joke: It turns out that unicorns not only capture our imagination but also our attention online. The correlation is quite strong; it's almost like a magical bond, or should we say, a "correle-corn"!
ChatGPT:
Unicorn, Unicorntrollers, Google Searches, Unicorns, Average Number of Comments, The Game Theorists, YouTube Videos, Google Trends, Statistical Analysis, Correlation Analysis, Mythical Creatures, Online Engagement, Data Analysis, YouTube Comments, Magical Creatures, Search Trends, Engagement Metrics, YouTube Channel, Statistical Approach, Statistical Correlation, Whimsical Subjects
*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.
Discover a new correlation
View all correlations
View all research papers
Report an error
Data details
Google searches for 'unicorns'Detailed data title: Relative volume of Google searches for 'unicorns' (Worldwide, without quotes)
Source: Google Trends
Additional Info: Relative search volume (not absolute numbers)
See what else correlates with Google searches for 'unicorns'
Average number of comments on The Game Theorists YouTube videos
Detailed data title: Average number of comments on The Game Theorists YouTube videos.
Source: YouTube
See what else correlates with Average number of comments on The Game Theorists YouTube videos
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.
r2 = 0.8908059 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 89.1% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Average number of comments on The Game Theorists YouTube videos) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Google searches for 'unicorns') over the 15 years from 2009 through 2023.
p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 1.3E-7. 0.0000001278025833972792000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.
But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.
Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.94 in 1.3E-5% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 7,824,568 random variables You don't actually need 7 million variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.
p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.
In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.
Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 14 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 14 because we have two variables measured over a period of 15 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.
[ 0.84, 0.98 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.
This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!
All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.
Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
2009 | 2010 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | |
Google searches for 'unicorns' (Rel. search volume) | 24.75 | 27.0833 | 36.25 | 38.9167 | 43.75 | 50.0833 | 59.75 | 53.6667 | 65.5833 | 74.5 | 60.75 | 48.75 | 36.4167 | 38.6667 | 35.3333 |
Average number of comments on The Game Theorists YouTube videos (Average Comments) | 255.412 | 1847.38 | 5176.04 | 10068.1 | 25764.6 | 27992.4 | 34642.8 | 25751.4 | 34823.9 | 43916.7 | 23873.5 | 19688.3 | 15997.6 | 12034.4 | 5631.46 |
Why this works
- Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
- Lack of causal connection: There is probably
Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied. - Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple
Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is. - Y-axis doesn't start at zero: I truncated the Y-axes of the graph above. I also used a line graph, which makes the visual connection stand out more than it deserves.
Nothing against line graphs. They are great at telling a story when you have linear data! But visually it is deceptive because the only data is at the points on the graph, not the lines on the graph. In between each point, the data could have been doing anything. Like going for a random walk by itself!
Mathematically what I showed is true, but it is intentionally misleading. Below is the same chart but with both Y-axes starting at zero.
Try it yourself
You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.
Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"
Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.
Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.
Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.
Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"
If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:
"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."
# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats
# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):
# Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)
# Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
r_squared = correlation**2
return correlation, r_squared, p_value
# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([24.75,27.0833,36.25,38.9167,43.75,50.0833,59.75,53.6667,65.5833,74.5,60.75,48.75,36.4167,38.6667,35.3333,])
array_2 = np.array([255.412,1847.38,5176.04,10068.1,25764.6,27992.4,34642.8,25751.4,34823.9,43916.7,23873.5,19688.3,15997.6,12034.4,5631.46,])
array_1_name = "Google searches for 'unicorns'"
array_2_name = "Average number of comments on The Game Theorists YouTube videos"
# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)
# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)
Reuseable content
You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.
For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."
When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.
Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.
Download images for these variables:
- High resolution line chart
The image linked here is a Scalable Vector Graphic (SVG). It is the highest resolution that is possible to achieve. It scales up beyond the size of the observable universe without pixelating. You do not need to email me asking if I have a higher resolution image. I do not. The physical limitations of our universe prevent me from providing you with an image that is any higher resolution than this one.
If you insert it into a PowerPoint presentation (a tool well-known for managing things that are the scale of the universe), you can right-click > "Ungroup" or "Create Shape" and then edit the lines and text directly. You can also change the colors this way.
Alternatively you can use a tool like Inkscape. - High resolution line chart, optimized for mobile
- Alternative high resolution line chart
- Scatterplot
- Portable line chart (png)
- Portable line chart (png), optimized for mobile
- Line chart for only Google searches for 'unicorns'
- Line chart for only Average number of comments on The Game Theorists YouTube videos
- AI-generated correlation image
- The spurious research paper: UnicorN and Unicorntrollers: A Correlation Analysis of Google Searches for 'Unicorns' and Average Number of Comments on The Game Theorists' YouTube Videos
Your rating skills are top-notch!
Correlation ID: 4390 · Black Variable ID: 1481 · Red Variable ID: 25720