about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #4,378 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Annual US household spending on fresh milk and cream and the second variable is Votes for the Democratic Presidential candidate in South Dakota.  The chart goes from 2000 to 2020, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

As US household spending on fresh milk and cream increased, more families experienced stronger bones, allowing them to travel to South Dakota. These calcium-charged tourists were utterly impressed by the state, leading them to vote for the Democratic Presidential candidate in a cream of the crop campaign. It seems like dairy really does do a body politic good!

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Generate an image of a TIME magazine cover with a vibrant South Dakota landscape as the backdrop. In the foreground, show a group of diverse families casting their votes for the Democratic Presidential candidate. These families emanate happiness and confidence, with a subtle touch highlighting their strong bones. Behind them, include a graph illustrating the steady rise in US household spending on fresh milk and cream. The graph's upward trend symbolizes the newfound ability of families to enjoy and explore South Dakota's captivating scenery. The image should capture the essence of unity, progress, and the connection between dairy consumption and a strengthened appreciation for local attractions. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Annual US household spending on fresh milk and cream and Votes for the Democrat Presidential candidate in South Dakota. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Symbolism A Discovery magazine cover image A TIME magazine cover image Vaporwave Glitch art
ChatGPT: A TIME magazine cover image

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Annual US household spending on fresh milk and cream and Votes for the Democrat Presidential candidate in South Dakota, in the following situation: As US household spending on fresh milk and cream increased, more families experienced stronger bones, allowing them to travel to South Dakota. These calcium-charged tourists were utterly impressed by the state, leading them to vote for the Democratic Presidential candidate in a cream of the crop campaign. It seems like dairy really does do a body politic good!. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In a scenic South Dakota landscape, a group of families with beaming smiles and sturdy bones stand in line to cast their votes for the Democratic Presidential candidate. In the background, a graph shows the annual increase in US household spending on fresh milk and cream, symbolizing the link between stronger bones from dairy consumption and the newfound ability of families to visit and appreciate South Dakota's attractions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ A TIME magazine cover image ] and depicting this scene: In a scenic South Dakota landscape, a group of families with beaming smiles and sturdy bones stand in line to cast their votes for the Democratic Presidential candidate. In the background, a graph shows the annual increase in US household spending on fresh milk and cream, symbolizing the link between stronger bones from dairy consumption and the newfound ability of families to visit and appreciate South Dakota's attractions. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Generate an image of a TIME magazine cover with a vibrant South Dakota landscape as the backdrop. In the foreground, show a group of diverse families casting their votes for the Democratic Presidential candidate. These families emanate happiness and confidence, with a subtle touch highlighting their strong bones. Behind them, include a graph illustrating the steady rise in US household spending on fresh milk and cream. The graph's upward trend symbolizes the newfound ability of families to enjoy and explore South Dakota's captivating scenery. The image should capture the essence of unity, progress, and the connection between dairy consumption and a strengthened appreciation for local attractions.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in Annual US household spending on fresh milk and cream caused Votes for the Democrat Presidential candidate in South Dakota to increase.\Make it sound serious until the end.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.05)
Milk and Cream: A Scream or a Dream for the Democratic Presidential Candidate's Regime?

The Journal of Political Dairy Studies

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Annual US household spending on fresh milk and cream and Votes for the Democrat Presidential candidate in South Dakota. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Rhyme words in the title.

Your research team used data from Bureau of Labor Statistics and MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9020729 and p < 0.05 for 2000 to 2020.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
Milk and Cream: A Scream or a Dream for the Democratic Presidential Candidate's Regime?

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper investigates the peculiar relationship between annual US household spending on fresh milk and cream and the votes for the Democrat presidential candidate in South Dakota from 2000 to 2020. Utilizing data sourced from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the MIT Election Data and Science Lab at the Harvard Dataverse, our research team sought to unravel this conundrum. Unexpectedly, we discovered a staggeringly high correlation coefficient of 0.9020729, with a p-value less than 0.05, which left us in udder disbelief! The results suggest a potential link between dairy consumption behaviors and political preferences, as creamy political leanings seem to moo-ve voters in South Dakota. This research sheds light on the whimsical relationship between dairy habits and political sentiments, emphasizing the importance of considering lactose-laden variables in election analyses.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Annual US household spending on fresh milk and cream and Votes for the Democrat Presidential candidate in South Dakota. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Milk and Cream: A Scream or a Dream for the Democratic Presidential Candidate's Regime?

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper investigates the peculiar relationship between annual US household spending on fresh milk and cream and the votes for the Democrat presidential candidate in South Dakota from 2000 to 2020. Utilizing data sourced from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the MIT Election Data and Science Lab at the Harvard Dataverse, our research team sought to unravel this conundrum. Unexpectedly, we discovered a staggeringly high correlation coefficient of 0.9020729, with a p-value less than 0.05, which left us in udder disbelief! The results suggest a potential link between dairy consumption behaviors and political preferences, as creamy political leanings seem to moo-ve voters in South Dakota. This research sheds light on the whimsical relationship between dairy habits and political sentiments, emphasizing the importance of considering lactose-laden variables in election analyses.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
INTRODUCTION

Milk and cream have played a significant role in the dietary habits of Americans for centuries, with their consumption intertwined in the fabric of daily life. In recent years, their involvement has extended beyond the realm of nutrition to intersect with political affiliations, creating a rather unexpected union between dairy and democracy. This paper delves into the enigmatic connection between annual US household spending on fresh milk and cream and the votes for the Democrat presidential candidate in South Dakota, a correlation that, like the cream on a latte, froths with intrigue.

The dairy industry is undoubtedly udderly influential in American culture, yet its involvement in shaping political inclinations raises eyebrows as much as it does teacups. Our research explores this delectable yet confounding partnership using data collected from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the MIT Election Data and Science Lab at the Harvard Dataverse. The unexpectedly high correlation coefficient of 0.9020729, seasoned with a p-value less than 0.05, has left our research team pondering over the cream of the crop of statistical relationships.

While political pundits may be tempted to dismiss this association as mere coincidence, the potent p-value suggests otherwise, teasing at the cream-tastic possibility of a substantial link between dairy consumption and political preferences. This unexpected finding tilts previous election analyses on its dairy air, emphasizing the pivotal role of lactose-laden variables in gauging and predicting voter behavior.

As we embark on this dairy-filled journey, we must carefully curdle through the data to unearth the underlying mechanisms behind this amusing correlation. From cow to Congress, the whimsical relationship between dairy habits and political sentiments beckons us to ponder the potential implications and significance of this milk-and-politics romance. Our findings contribute to the mooo-nting evidence that creamy political leanings are not to be dismissed lightly and, much like a well-steamed latte, offer an invigorating twist to the palate of electoral analysis.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Annual US household spending on fresh milk and cream and Votes for the Democrat Presidential candidate in South Dakota. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then name some movies that you watched that are tangentially related to the topic.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Milk and Cream: A Scream or a Dream for the Democratic Presidential Candidate's Regime?

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper investigates the peculiar relationship between annual US household spending on fresh milk and cream and the votes for the Democrat presidential candidate in South Dakota from 2000 to 2020. Utilizing data sourced from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the MIT Election Data and Science Lab at the Harvard Dataverse, our research team sought to unravel this conundrum. Unexpectedly, we discovered a staggeringly high correlation coefficient of 0.9020729, with a p-value less than 0.05, which left us in udder disbelief! The results suggest a potential link between dairy consumption behaviors and political preferences, as creamy political leanings seem to moo-ve voters in South Dakota. This research sheds light on the whimsical relationship between dairy habits and political sentiments, emphasizing the importance of considering lactose-laden variables in election analyses.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
INTRODUCTION
Milk and cream have played a significant role in the dietary habits of Americans for centuries, with their consumption intertwined in the fabric of daily life. In recent years, their involvement has extended beyond the realm of nutrition to intersect with political affiliations, creating a rather unexpected union between dairy and democracy. This paper delves into the enigmatic connection between annual US household spending on fresh milk and cream and the votes for the Democrat presidential candidate in South Dakota, a correlation that, like the cream on a latte, froths with intrigue.
The dairy industry is undoubtedly udderly influential in American culture, yet its involvement in shaping political inclinations raises eyebrows as much as it does teacups. Our research explores this delectable yet confounding partnership using data collected from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the MIT Election Data and Science Lab at the Harvard Dataverse. The unexpectedly high correlation coefficient of 0.9020729, seasoned with a p-value less than 0.05, has left our research team pondering over the cream of the crop of statistical relationships.
While political pundits may be tempted to dismiss this association as mere coincidence, the potent p-value suggests otherwise, teasing at the cream-tastic possibility of a substantial link between dairy consumption and political preferences. This unexpected finding tilts previous election analyses on its dairy air, emphasizing the pivotal role of lactose-laden variables in gauging and predicting voter behavior.
As we embark on this dairy-filled journey, we must carefully curdle through the data to unearth the underlying mechanisms behind this amusing correlation. From cow to Congress, the whimsical relationship between dairy habits and political sentiments beckons us to ponder the potential implications and significance of this milk-and-politics romance. Our findings contribute to the mooo-nting evidence that creamy political leanings are not to be dismissed lightly and, much like a well-steamed latte, offer an invigorating twist to the palate of electoral analysis.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
LITERATURE REVIEW
The authors perused a stack of academic studies in search of insight into the perplexing relationship between annual US household spending on fresh milk and cream and the votes for the Democrat presidential candidate in South Dakota. Smith and Doe (2010) began to touch upon the concept of consumer behavior and its potential influence on political decision-making. However, their work quickly skimmed over the dairy aisle without lingering on the creamy specifics that truly churn the minds of voters. Jones et al. (2015) conducted a thorough analysis of regional voting patterns and consumption habits, shedding marginal light on the tantalizing dairy-democracy nexus but ultimately failing to fully milk the topic for all its worth.

Turning to non-fiction sources, "Got Milk Politics: Exploring Dairy's Political Influence" by Farmington (2018) provides a serious exploration of the dairy industry's engagement in political spheres. Meanwhile, "The Cream of Democracy: A Churned Perspective" by Butterman (2013) takes a denser look at the intersection of cream-centric economics and political choices. Although these works offer in-depth analyses, they fail to whip up the same enchanting and amusing insights as discovery of the startling correlation coefficient at hand.

In the realm of fiction, "The Milk Mystique: A Creamy Conspiracy" by Dairyman (2016) offers a fanciful tale of political intrigue surrounding a dairy-based conspiracy, serving as an entertaining deviation from the cream-and-dry academic sources. Similarly, "Creamed: A Political Cow-tastrophe" by Frostie (2011) adds a whimsical twist to the exploration of dairy politics, though its factual basis remains highly questionable.

Diving into popular culture, the films "Milk Money" and "There Will Be Blood" beckon the reader to consider the cinematic representation of milk and cream and their potential influence on political dynamics. While these movies may not directly address the specific correlation under investigation, they certainly milk the entertainment value from the intersection of dairy products and societal dynamics.

In conclusion, the literature examined falls short of fully capturing the udderly amusing connection between annual US household spending on fresh milk and cream and votes for the Democrat presidential candidate in South Dakota. The dearth of comprehensive studies on this topic leaves the field wide open for our present inquiry, beckoning us to fill the research churn with our own carefully concocted analysis.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Annual US household spending on fresh milk and cream and Votes for the Democrat Presidential candidate in South Dakota. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Bureau of Labor Statistics and MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse . You used data from 2000 to 2020

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Milk and Cream: A Scream or a Dream for the Democratic Presidential Candidate's Regime?

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper investigates the peculiar relationship between annual US household spending on fresh milk and cream and the votes for the Democrat presidential candidate in South Dakota from 2000 to 2020. Utilizing data sourced from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the MIT Election Data and Science Lab at the Harvard Dataverse, our research team sought to unravel this conundrum. Unexpectedly, we discovered a staggeringly high correlation coefficient of 0.9020729, with a p-value less than 0.05, which left us in udder disbelief! The results suggest a potential link between dairy consumption behaviors and political preferences, as creamy political leanings seem to moo-ve voters in South Dakota. This research sheds light on the whimsical relationship between dairy habits and political sentiments, emphasizing the importance of considering lactose-laden variables in election analyses.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
INTRODUCTION
Milk and cream have played a significant role in the dietary habits of Americans for centuries, with their consumption intertwined in the fabric of daily life. In recent years, their involvement has extended beyond the realm of nutrition to intersect with political affiliations, creating a rather unexpected union between dairy and democracy. This paper delves into the enigmatic connection between annual US household spending on fresh milk and cream and the votes for the Democrat presidential candidate in South Dakota, a correlation that, like the cream on a latte, froths with intrigue.
The dairy industry is undoubtedly udderly influential in American culture, yet its involvement in shaping political inclinations raises eyebrows as much as it does teacups. Our research explores this delectable yet confounding partnership using data collected from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the MIT Election Data and Science Lab at the Harvard Dataverse. The unexpectedly high correlation coefficient of 0.9020729, seasoned with a p-value less than 0.05, has left our research team pondering over the cream of the crop of statistical relationships.
While political pundits may be tempted to dismiss this association as mere coincidence, the potent p-value suggests otherwise, teasing at the cream-tastic possibility of a substantial link between dairy consumption and political preferences. This unexpected finding tilts previous election analyses on its dairy air, emphasizing the pivotal role of lactose-laden variables in gauging and predicting voter behavior.
As we embark on this dairy-filled journey, we must carefully curdle through the data to unearth the underlying mechanisms behind this amusing correlation. From cow to Congress, the whimsical relationship between dairy habits and political sentiments beckons us to ponder the potential implications and significance of this milk-and-politics romance. Our findings contribute to the mooo-nting evidence that creamy political leanings are not to be dismissed lightly and, much like a well-steamed latte, offer an invigorating twist to the palate of electoral analysis.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

Data Collection:
The data used in this study was sourced from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the MIT Election Data and Science Lab at the Harvard Dataverse, offering a rich blend of dairy expenditure and electoral data from the years 2000 to 2020. We collected data on annual US household spending on fresh milk and cream, as well as the votes for the Democrat presidential candidate in South Dakota. This data was skilfully harvested from the internet's pastures and corralled with the utmost care - after all, we couldn't let any dairy outliers or electoral stragglers escape our grasp!

Data Analysis:
For the dairy expenditure data, we employed a variety of statistical methods, including but not limited to, mean comparison, regression analysis, and time series modeling. Our statistical sleuths left no stone unturned in their quest to unearth the cream of the data crop. As for the electoral data, we dusted off our seasoned algorithms and delved into the world of vote counting, margin analysis, and electoral demographics to uncover the rich, creamy undertones of voter behavior. We then whisked the dairy and electoral data together, creating a delectable statistical soufflé that would make any data chef proud.

Statistical Testing:
To ascertain the nature of the relationship between annual US household spending on fresh milk and cream and votes for the Democrat presidential candidate in South Dakota, we utilized the trusty Pearson correlation coefficient and conducted a hypothesis test to determine the statistical significance of the relationship. Our statistical toolkit also included some rather sophisticated models that involved wrangling with multivariate analysis and polynomial regression, teasing out the nuanced interplay between dairy spending and electoral preferences. We utilized a p-value threshold of less than 0.05 to distinguish between statistical noise and a noteworthy association, ensuring that our findings were as robust as an aged Gouda.

Control Variables:
To ensure that our findings were as pure as a glass of 2% milk, we controlled for various factors that could potentially confound our results. Household income, regional demographics, and lactose intolerance prevalence were just a few of the variables we accounted for in our analysis. Our data diet was comprehensive, ensuring that our results weren't spoiled by unexpected contaminants.

Ethical Considerations:
As with any research endeavor, ethical considerations were at the forefront of our minds. We handled the data with the utmost respect and confidentiality, ensuring that the privacy of households and the sanctity of the democratic process were upheld. Additionally, we made sure to give credit where credit was due, acknowledging the hard work of the statisticians and economists who toiled to bring these datasets to light.

In summary, our data collection, analysis, and statistical testing methods formed the sturdy cud of this research, allowing us to dig deeper into the creamy intricacies of dairy spending and electoral preferences in South Dakota. The findings of this study are poised to churn the way we view the intersection of dairy consumption and political leanings, adding a rich layer of complexity to the canvas of electoral analysis.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Annual US household spending on fresh milk and cream and Votes for the Democrat Presidential candidate in South Dakota. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Bureau of Labor Statistics and MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse .

For the time period 2000 to 2020, you found a correlation 0.9020729, r-squared of 0.8137355, and p < 0.05.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Milk and Cream: A Scream or a Dream for the Democratic Presidential Candidate's Regime?

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper investigates the peculiar relationship between annual US household spending on fresh milk and cream and the votes for the Democrat presidential candidate in South Dakota from 2000 to 2020. Utilizing data sourced from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the MIT Election Data and Science Lab at the Harvard Dataverse, our research team sought to unravel this conundrum. Unexpectedly, we discovered a staggeringly high correlation coefficient of 0.9020729, with a p-value less than 0.05, which left us in udder disbelief! The results suggest a potential link between dairy consumption behaviors and political preferences, as creamy political leanings seem to moo-ve voters in South Dakota. This research sheds light on the whimsical relationship between dairy habits and political sentiments, emphasizing the importance of considering lactose-laden variables in election analyses.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
INTRODUCTION
Milk and cream have played a significant role in the dietary habits of Americans for centuries, with their consumption intertwined in the fabric of daily life. In recent years, their involvement has extended beyond the realm of nutrition to intersect with political affiliations, creating a rather unexpected union between dairy and democracy. This paper delves into the enigmatic connection between annual US household spending on fresh milk and cream and the votes for the Democrat presidential candidate in South Dakota, a correlation that, like the cream on a latte, froths with intrigue.
The dairy industry is undoubtedly udderly influential in American culture, yet its involvement in shaping political inclinations raises eyebrows as much as it does teacups. Our research explores this delectable yet confounding partnership using data collected from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the MIT Election Data and Science Lab at the Harvard Dataverse. The unexpectedly high correlation coefficient of 0.9020729, seasoned with a p-value less than 0.05, has left our research team pondering over the cream of the crop of statistical relationships.
While political pundits may be tempted to dismiss this association as mere coincidence, the potent p-value suggests otherwise, teasing at the cream-tastic possibility of a substantial link between dairy consumption and political preferences. This unexpected finding tilts previous election analyses on its dairy air, emphasizing the pivotal role of lactose-laden variables in gauging and predicting voter behavior.
As we embark on this dairy-filled journey, we must carefully curdle through the data to unearth the underlying mechanisms behind this amusing correlation. From cow to Congress, the whimsical relationship between dairy habits and political sentiments beckons us to ponder the potential implications and significance of this milk-and-politics romance. Our findings contribute to the mooo-nting evidence that creamy political leanings are not to be dismissed lightly and, much like a well-steamed latte, offer an invigorating twist to the palate of electoral analysis.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The analysis of the data collected from 2000 to 2020 revealed a remarkably strong correlation between annual US household spending on fresh milk and cream and votes for the Democrat presidential candidate in South Dakota. The correlation coefficient of 0.9020729 took us by surprise, akin to a sudden milk spill in a serene coffee shop. This robust correlation was further supported by an r-squared value of 0.8137355, indicating that over 80% of the variation in presidential votes could be explained by the annual dairy expenditure. If that doesn't make you utter "wow," we don't know what will!

The p-value of less than 0.05 added an extra layer of creaminess to this finding, suggesting that the relationship we uncovered is quite unlikely to be a random, frothy occurrence. It seems that dairy habits and political inclinations have been churning beneath the surface of electoral analysis all along, waiting to be whipped into statistical shape.

To visually capture the essence of this dairy-politics correlation, Fig. 1 presents a scatterplot that unmistakably demonstrates the strong affinity between annual spending on milk and cream and votes for the Democrat presidential candidate in South Dakota. The data points are so neatly aligned that one might mistake them for a herd of content cows grazing in a pasture of statistical significance.

This finding raises questions about the role of dairy consumption as a predictor of political preferences, as creamy political leanings seem to be more than just a moo-t point in South Dakota. We hope that our research brings a lactose-tolerant perspective to the field of election analyses and encourages others to milk the potential of unconventional variables in political research.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Annual US household spending on fresh milk and cream and Votes for the Democrat Presidential candidate in South Dakota. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
Milk and Cream: A Scream or a Dream for the Democratic Presidential Candidate's Regime?

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper investigates the peculiar relationship between annual US household spending on fresh milk and cream and the votes for the Democrat presidential candidate in South Dakota from 2000 to 2020. Utilizing data sourced from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the MIT Election Data and Science Lab at the Harvard Dataverse, our research team sought to unravel this conundrum. Unexpectedly, we discovered a staggeringly high correlation coefficient of 0.9020729, with a p-value less than 0.05, which left us in udder disbelief! The results suggest a potential link between dairy consumption behaviors and political preferences, as creamy political leanings seem to moo-ve voters in South Dakota. This research sheds light on the whimsical relationship between dairy habits and political sentiments, emphasizing the importance of considering lactose-laden variables in election analyses.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
LITERATURE REVIEW
The authors perused a stack of academic studies in search of insight into the perplexing relationship between annual US household spending on fresh milk and cream and the votes for the Democrat presidential candidate in South Dakota. Smith and Doe (2010) began to touch upon the concept of consumer behavior and its potential influence on political decision-making. However, their work quickly skimmed over the dairy aisle without lingering on the creamy specifics that truly churn the minds of voters. Jones et al. (2015) conducted a thorough analysis of regional voting patterns and consumption habits, shedding marginal light on the tantalizing dairy-democracy nexus but ultimately failing to fully milk the topic for all its worth.
Turning to non-fiction sources, "Got Milk Politics: Exploring Dairy's Political Influence" by Farmington (2018) provides a serious exploration of the dairy industry's engagement in political spheres. Meanwhile, "The Cream of Democracy: A Churned Perspective" by Butterman (2013) takes a denser look at the intersection of cream-centric economics and political choices. Although these works offer in-depth analyses, they fail to whip up the same enchanting and amusing insights as discovery of the startling correlation coefficient at hand.
In the realm of fiction, "The Milk Mystique: A Creamy Conspiracy" by Dairyman (2016) offers a fanciful tale of political intrigue surrounding a dairy-based conspiracy, serving as an entertaining deviation from the cream-and-dry academic sources. Similarly, "Creamed: A Political Cow-tastrophe" by Frostie (2011) adds a whimsical twist to the exploration of dairy politics, though its factual basis remains highly questionable.
Diving into popular culture, the films "Milk Money" and "There Will Be Blood" beckon the reader to consider the cinematic representation of milk and cream and their potential influence on political dynamics. While these movies may not directly address the specific correlation under investigation, they certainly milk the entertainment value from the intersection of dairy products and societal dynamics.
In conclusion, the literature examined falls short of fully capturing the udderly amusing connection between annual US household spending on fresh milk and cream and votes for the Democrat presidential candidate in South Dakota. The dearth of comprehensive studies on this topic leaves the field wide open for our present inquiry, beckoning us to fill the research churn with our own carefully concocted analysis.

[[RESULTS]]
The analysis of the data collected from 2000 to 2020 revealed a remarkably strong correlation between annual US household spending on fresh milk and cream and votes for the Democrat presidential candidate in South Dakota. The correlation coefficient of 0.9020729 took us by surprise, akin to a sudden milk spill in a serene coffee shop. This robust correlation was further supported by an r-squared value of 0.8137355, indicating that over 80% of the variation in presidential votes could be explained by the annual dairy expenditure. If that doesn't make you utter "wow," we don't know what will!
The p-value of less than 0.05 added an extra layer of creaminess to this finding, suggesting that the relationship we uncovered is quite unlikely to be a random, frothy occurrence. It seems that dairy habits and political inclinations have been churning beneath the surface of electoral analysis all along, waiting to be whipped into statistical shape.
To visually capture the essence of this dairy-politics correlation, Fig. 1 presents a scatterplot that unmistakably demonstrates the strong affinity between annual spending on milk and cream and votes for the Democrat presidential candidate in South Dakota. The data points are so neatly aligned that one might mistake them for a herd of content cows grazing in a pasture of statistical significance.
This finding raises questions about the role of dairy consumption as a predictor of political preferences, as creamy political leanings seem to be more than just a moo-t point in South Dakota. We hope that our research brings a lactose-tolerant perspective to the field of election analyses and encourages others to milk the potential of unconventional variables in political research.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The results of our investigation support and extend prior literature that hinted at the whimsical connection between annual US household spending on fresh milk and cream and votes for the Democrat presidential candidate in South Dakota. Our findings align with the insightful work of Smith and Doe (2010), who first grazed the field of consumer behavior and its potential impact on political decisions. While their study cursorily touched upon the dairy aisle, our research delved deeper into the creamy specifics and uncovered a robust correlation that can only be described as utterly astounding.

Moreover, our results offer a bovinely comprehensive validation of the work done by Jones et al. (2015) on regional voting patterns and consumption habits. While their analysis skimmed the surface of the tantalizing dairy-democracy nexus, our research churned out a significantly high correlation coefficient, which speaks to the profound influence of dairy habits on political leanings.

In line with the non-fiction sources examined, particularly the serious exploration by Farmington (2018) and the denser perspective from Butterman (2013), our study solidifies the notion that the dairy industry has indeed found its way into the political sphere, perhaps through the sheer creamy power of its products. The correlation uncovered in our research not only supports but also amplifies the importance of considering lactose-laden variables in election analyses, as these dairy-centric economic and political choices bring more than just froth to the political table.

While acknowledging the limitations of fiction-based sources such as "The Milk Mystique: A Creamy Conspiracy" by Dairyman (2016) and "Creamed: A Political Cow-tastrophe" by Frostie (2011), our findings inject a much-needed dose of reality into the whimsical intersection of dairy politics. We've certainly moved beyond the realm of entertaining deviations to ground the dairy-democracy connection in empirical evidence, as depicted by the robust statistical significance of our results.

To veer into popular culture briefly, the cinematic representation of milk and cream in "Milk Money" and "There Will Be Blood" may not directly address this specific correlation, but they certainly underscore the far-reaching influence of dairy products on societal dynamics. Our research provides an empirical foundation for understanding the dairy-politics correlation and urges further investigation into the creamy conjectures that have long been simmering beneath the surface of electoral analyses.

In essence, our study fills the research churn with an in-depth examination of the connection between annual US household spending on fresh milk and cream and the votes for the Democrat presidential candidate in South Dakota. We hope this study acts as a refreshing splash in the pool of political research, encouraging others to take a lactose-tolerant perspective and milk the potential of unconventional variables in understanding voter behavior.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Annual US household spending on fresh milk and cream and Votes for the Democrat Presidential candidate in South Dakota. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
Milk and Cream: A Scream or a Dream for the Democratic Presidential Candidate's Regime?

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper investigates the peculiar relationship between annual US household spending on fresh milk and cream and the votes for the Democrat presidential candidate in South Dakota from 2000 to 2020. Utilizing data sourced from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the MIT Election Data and Science Lab at the Harvard Dataverse, our research team sought to unravel this conundrum. Unexpectedly, we discovered a staggeringly high correlation coefficient of 0.9020729, with a p-value less than 0.05, which left us in udder disbelief! The results suggest a potential link between dairy consumption behaviors and political preferences, as creamy political leanings seem to moo-ve voters in South Dakota. This research sheds light on the whimsical relationship between dairy habits and political sentiments, emphasizing the importance of considering lactose-laden variables in election analyses.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
INTRODUCTION
Milk and cream have played a significant role in the dietary habits of Americans for centuries, with their consumption intertwined in the fabric of daily life. In recent years, their involvement has extended beyond the realm of nutrition to intersect with political affiliations, creating a rather unexpected union between dairy and democracy. This paper delves into the enigmatic connection between annual US household spending on fresh milk and cream and the votes for the Democrat presidential candidate in South Dakota, a correlation that, like the cream on a latte, froths with intrigue.
The dairy industry is undoubtedly udderly influential in American culture, yet its involvement in shaping political inclinations raises eyebrows as much as it does teacups. Our research explores this delectable yet confounding partnership using data collected from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the MIT Election Data and Science Lab at the Harvard Dataverse. The unexpectedly high correlation coefficient of 0.9020729, seasoned with a p-value less than 0.05, has left our research team pondering over the cream of the crop of statistical relationships.
While political pundits may be tempted to dismiss this association as mere coincidence, the potent p-value suggests otherwise, teasing at the cream-tastic possibility of a substantial link between dairy consumption and political preferences. This unexpected finding tilts previous election analyses on its dairy air, emphasizing the pivotal role of lactose-laden variables in gauging and predicting voter behavior.
As we embark on this dairy-filled journey, we must carefully curdle through the data to unearth the underlying mechanisms behind this amusing correlation. From cow to Congress, the whimsical relationship between dairy habits and political sentiments beckons us to ponder the potential implications and significance of this milk-and-politics romance. Our findings contribute to the mooo-nting evidence that creamy political leanings are not to be dismissed lightly and, much like a well-steamed latte, offer an invigorating twist to the palate of electoral analysis.

[[RESULTS]]
The analysis of the data collected from 2000 to 2020 revealed a remarkably strong correlation between annual US household spending on fresh milk and cream and votes for the Democrat presidential candidate in South Dakota. The correlation coefficient of 0.9020729 took us by surprise, akin to a sudden milk spill in a serene coffee shop. This robust correlation was further supported by an r-squared value of 0.8137355, indicating that over 80% of the variation in presidential votes could be explained by the annual dairy expenditure. If that doesn't make you utter "wow," we don't know what will!
The p-value of less than 0.05 added an extra layer of creaminess to this finding, suggesting that the relationship we uncovered is quite unlikely to be a random, frothy occurrence. It seems that dairy habits and political inclinations have been churning beneath the surface of electoral analysis all along, waiting to be whipped into statistical shape.
To visually capture the essence of this dairy-politics correlation, Fig. 1 presents a scatterplot that unmistakably demonstrates the strong affinity between annual spending on milk and cream and votes for the Democrat presidential candidate in South Dakota. The data points are so neatly aligned that one might mistake them for a herd of content cows grazing in a pasture of statistical significance.
This finding raises questions about the role of dairy consumption as a predictor of political preferences, as creamy political leanings seem to be more than just a moo-t point in South Dakota. We hope that our research brings a lactose-tolerant perspective to the field of election analyses and encourages others to milk the potential of unconventional variables in political research.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, the findings of this study unveil a compelling correlation between annual US household spending on fresh milk and cream and votes for the Democrat presidential candidate in South Dakota. The remarkably strong correlation coefficient, akin to a rich, creamy latte, has undoubtedly churned the waters of traditional election analysis. The persuasive power of dairy consumption habits in predicting political leanings is no longer just a lactose-tolerant dream but a statistically significant reality.

It is intriguing to ponder the potential mechanisms behind this udderly unexpected correlation. Could it be that the comforting embrace of a warm glass of milk sways voters towards certain political preferences? Or perhaps the sheer delight of creamy indulgence inspires a democratic voting pattern? However, further research is necessary to milk this captivating association fully.

This study serves as a mooo-ving reminder that election analyses should not skim over unconventional variables. While the idea of dairy influencing democracy may sound utterly cheesy, the statistical evidence leaves little room for skepticism. So, let's raise our glasses of milk and toast to the unforeseen influence of creamy political leanings in the heart of South Dakota.

In the grand scheme of political research, this study urges scholars to harness the potential of alternative variables, without buttering up the significance of milk and cream in shaping political sentiments. With such compelling evidence, it is safe to say that no further research is needed in this area. The verdict is in: dairy and democracy make quite the "moo"-some twosome!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Milk and Cream: A Scream or a Dream for the Democratic Presidential Candidate's Regime?. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Political Dairy Studies


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Milk and Cream: A Scream or a Dream for the Democratic Presidential Candidate's Regime?. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Society for Dairy and Political Studies


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Milk and Cream: A Scream or a Dream for the Democratic Presidential Candidate's Regime? with an abstract of This paper investigates the peculiar relationship between annual US household spending on fresh milk and cream and the votes for the Democrat presidential candidate in South Dakota from 2000 to 2020. Utilizing data sourced from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the MIT Election Data and Science Lab at the Harvard Dataverse, our research team sought to unravel this conundrum. Unexpectedly, we discovered a staggeringly high correlation coefficient of 0.9020729, with a p-value less than 0.05, which left us in udder disbelief! The results suggest a potential link between dairy consumption behaviors and political preferences, as creamy political leanings seem to moo-ve voters in South Dakota. This research sheds light on the whimsical relationship between dairy habits and political sentiments, emphasizing the importance of considering lactose-laden variables in election analyses.

ChatGPT:

Milk consumption, cream consumption, household spending, Democrat presidential candidate, South Dakota, voting behavior, correlation coefficient, political preferences, dairy consumption, election analysis

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Annual US household spending on fresh milk and cream
Detailed data title: Average annual household spend on fresh milk and cream
Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics
See what else correlates with Annual US household spending on fresh milk and cream

Votes for the Democratic Presidential candidate in South Dakota
Detailed data title: Total votes cast for the Democrat Presidential candidate in South Dakota
Source: MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse
See what else correlates with Votes for the Democratic Presidential candidate in South Dakota

Correlation r = 0.9020729 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.8137355 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 81.4% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Votes for the Democratic Presidential candidate in South Dakota) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Annual US household spending on fresh milk and cream) over the 6 years from 2000 through 2020.

p < 0.05, which statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 0.014. 0.0139150387958409120000000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.9 in 1.4% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 72 random variables Which I absolutely did.
with the same 5 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 5 because we have two variables measured over a period of 6 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.34, 0.99 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
200020042008201220162020
Annual US household spending on fresh milk and cream (Household spend)131144168152139147
Votes for the Democratic Presidential candidate in South Dakota (Total votes)118804149244170924145039117458150471




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Very low n: There are not many data points included in this analysis. Even if the p-value is high, we should be suspicious of using so few datapoints in a correlation.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([131,144,168,152,139,147,])
array_2 = np.array([118804,149244,170924,145039,117458,150471,])
array_1_name = "Annual US household spending on fresh milk and cream"
array_2_name = "Votes for the Democratic Presidential candidate in South Dakota"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

You're the correlation whisperer we needed!


Correlation ID: 4378 · Black Variable ID: 19895 · Red Variable ID: 26030
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0