Download png, svg
AI explanation
As the Libertarian candidate gained popularity, more people started carpooling to rallies and events. This sudden increase in the number of passengers in vehicles put additional pressure on the air bags, leading to a higher rate of malfunctions and ultimately triggering more automotive recalls. It seems like even air bags can't handle the surge of individual freedom and shared road trips!Model: dalle-3
Prompt: [A photo-realistic image] Generate an image of a sleek, silver sedan parked on a busy Maryland street. A group of enthusiastic voters is seen eagerly piling into the car, proudly displaying "Libertarian" campaign stickers on their clothing. As the car sets off, the weight of the extra passengers triggers the airbag sensor, causing the airbag light to flicker on. Capture the moment where the collision of political enthusiasm and the strain on automotive safety systems is evident, symbolizing the increased rate of malfunctions and automotive recalls due to the sudden surge in carpooling. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Maryland and Automotive recalls for issues with the Air Bags. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Steampunk Oragami Oragami A photo-realistic image a Polaroid photo
ChatGPT: A photo-realistic image
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Maryland and Automotive recalls for issues with the Air Bags, in the following situation: As the Libertarian candidate gained popularity, more people started carpooling to rallies and events. This sudden increase in the number of passengers in vehicles put additional pressure on the air bags, leading to a higher rate of malfunctions and ultimately triggering more automotive recalls. It seems like even air bags can't handle the surge of individual freedom and shared road trips!. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In Maryland, a sleek, silver sedan is parked on a bustling street. A group of enthusiastic voters eagerly pile into the car, proudly displaying "Libertarian" campaign stickers. As the car sets off, the weight of extra passengers triggers the air bag sensor, causing the air bag light to flicker on. The sudden surge in carpooling has put a strain on the air bags, leading to an increased rate of malfunctions and ultimately triggering more automotive recalls. The scene captures the collision of political enthusiasm and the burden on automotive safety systems.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ A photo-realistic image ] and depicting this scene: In Maryland, a sleek, silver sedan is parked on a bustling street. A group of enthusiastic voters eagerly pile into the car, proudly displaying "Libertarian" campaign stickers. As the car sets off, the weight of extra passengers triggers the air bag sensor, causing the air bag light to flicker on. The sudden surge in carpooling has put a strain on the air bags, leading to an increased rate of malfunctions and ultimately triggering more automotive recalls. The scene captures the collision of political enthusiasm and the burden on automotive safety systems. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: [A photo-realistic image] Generate an image of a sleek, silver sedan parked on a busy Maryland street. A group of enthusiastic voters is seen eagerly piling into the car, proudly displaying "Libertarian" campaign stickers on their clothing. As the car sets off, the weight of the extra passengers triggers the airbag sensor, causing the airbag light to flicker on. Capture the moment where the collision of political enthusiasm and the strain on automotive safety systems is evident, symbolizing the increased rate of malfunctions and automotive recalls due to the sudden surge in carpooling.
*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.
I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Maryland caused Automotive recalls for issues with the Air Bags to increase.
AI academic paper
Air-Bagged Ballots: A Libertarian Look at Automotive Recalls in Maryland The Journal of Whimsical Automotive Studies Jan 2024 Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real! |
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Maryland and Automotive recalls for issues with the Air Bags. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.
Make the title punny if you can come up with clever pun. If not, just make it sound clever.
Your research team used data from MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse and US DOT to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9520018 and p < 0.01 for 1990 to 2020.
Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)
[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit
[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit
ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
Air-Bagged Ballots: A Libertarian Look at Automotive Recalls in Maryland
[[ABSTRACT]]
This whimsically-named study delves into the fascinating connection between votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in Maryland and automotive recalls for issues with airbags. Utilizing data from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and the US Department of Transportation, this research uncovers a surprisingly strong correlation coefficient of 0.9520018 with a significance level of p < 0.01 for the years 1990 to 2020. The results of this study offer an entertaining yet insightful exploration of the relationship between political preferences and automotive safety concerns.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Maryland and Automotive recalls for issues with the Air Bags. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.
Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Air-Bagged Ballots: A Libertarian Look at Automotive Recalls in Maryland
[[ABSTRACT]]
This whimsically-named study delves into the fascinating connection between votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in Maryland and automotive recalls for issues with airbags. Utilizing data from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and the US Department of Transportation, this research uncovers a surprisingly strong correlation coefficient of 0.9520018 with a significance level of p < 0.01 for the years 1990 to 2020. The results of this study offer an entertaining yet insightful exploration of the relationship between political preferences and automotive safety concerns.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The interplay between politics and automotive safety has long been a topic of interest, with many scholars striving to unseat the mysteries of this peculiar relationship. In the case of Maryland, a state with a penchant for the unexpected, the connection between votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate and automotive recalls for issues with airbags has proven to be particularly intriguing. Who would have thought that the political aspirations of free-spirited voters could somehow be intertwined with the life-saving contraptions in our automobiles?
This study, aptly named "Air-Bagged Ballots: A Libertarian Look at Automotive Recalls in Maryland," emerges as a svelte attempt to unravel the enigma that underpins the seemingly unrelated realms of politics and automotive safety. With the emergence of data from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and the US Department of Transportation, we embark on a journey that may leave you both amused and enlightened.
As if peering into a funhouse mirror of statistical analysis, we invite you to take a whimsical romp through the correlations, significance levels, and alluring p-values that characterize this captivating connection. Are you prepared to delve into the empirical depths and witness the comedy of errors that underpin the political proclivities of Maryland residents and the airbag-related foibles of the automotive industry? If not, fasten your seatbelt; it's going to be a bumpy – yet enlightening – ride.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Maryland and Automotive recalls for issues with the Air Bags. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.
Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.
Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.
Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then devolve ever further, and mention something completely ridiculous, like you conducted literature review by reading CVS receipts.
Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Air-Bagged Ballots: A Libertarian Look at Automotive Recalls in Maryland
[[ABSTRACT]]
This whimsically-named study delves into the fascinating connection between votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in Maryland and automotive recalls for issues with airbags. Utilizing data from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and the US Department of Transportation, this research uncovers a surprisingly strong correlation coefficient of 0.9520018 with a significance level of p < 0.01 for the years 1990 to 2020. The results of this study offer an entertaining yet insightful exploration of the relationship between political preferences and automotive safety concerns.
-------
And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The interplay between politics and automotive safety has long been a topic of interest, with many scholars striving to unseat the mysteries of this peculiar relationship. In the case of Maryland, a state with a penchant for the unexpected, the connection between votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate and automotive recalls for issues with airbags has proven to be particularly intriguing. Who would have thought that the political aspirations of free-spirited voters could somehow be intertwined with the life-saving contraptions in our automobiles?
This study, aptly named "Air-Bagged Ballots: A Libertarian Look at Automotive Recalls in Maryland," emerges as a svelte attempt to unravel the enigma that underpins the seemingly unrelated realms of politics and automotive safety. With the emergence of data from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and the US Department of Transportation, we embark on a journey that may leave you both amused and enlightened.
As if peering into a funhouse mirror of statistical analysis, we invite you to take a whimsical romp through the correlations, significance levels, and alluring p-values that characterize this captivating connection. Are you prepared to delve into the empirical depths and witness the comedy of errors that underpin the political proclivities of Maryland residents and the airbag-related foibles of the automotive industry? If not, fasten your seatbelt; it's going to be a bumpy – yet enlightening – ride.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The literature on the curious relationship between political voting patterns and automotive safety concerns is rather sparse, reflecting the novelty and peculiarity of the topic at hand. Smith (2005) examines the electoral landscape in Maryland and the prevalence of automotive recalls, laying the groundwork for understanding the interplay between political preferences and vehicular safety. Similarly, Doe (2010) provides a thorough analysis of airbag-related recalls across various states, hinting at potential connections with political affiliations. Jones (2013) underscores the importance of rigorous statistical methodologies in untangling the enigmatic web of correlations between voting behaviors and automotive defects, setting the stage for this delightfully absurd investigation.
In "The Airbag: A Saga of Safety and Betrayal," the authors immerse readers in the captivating history of airbag technology, offering insights into its triumphs, tribulations, and unexpected ties to the realm of politics. "On the Road: A Libertarian Perspective" presents a fictional account of an intrepid traveler navigating the labyrinthine highways of Maryland while contemplating the philosophies of liberty and the perils of malfunctioning airbags. With a nod to speculative fiction, "The Airbag Chronicles: Tales of Political Intrigue" weaves a tapestry of political conspiracy theories amidst the backdrop of automotive peril, providing a whimsical but unapologetically tenuous connection to the current inquiry.
Expanding beyond conventional scholarly sources, the researchers dared to cast a wide net in their quest for insights. Utilizing unconventional sources, including but not limited to folklore, fortune cookies, and CVS receipts, unveiled unexpected anecdotes and peculiar associations that may or may not have enriched the peculiar tapestry of this research endeavor.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Maryland and Automotive recalls for issues with the Air Bags. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.
Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse and US DOT . You used data from 1990 to 2020
Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.
Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Air-Bagged Ballots: A Libertarian Look at Automotive Recalls in Maryland
[[ABSTRACT]]
This whimsically-named study delves into the fascinating connection between votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in Maryland and automotive recalls for issues with airbags. Utilizing data from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and the US Department of Transportation, this research uncovers a surprisingly strong correlation coefficient of 0.9520018 with a significance level of p < 0.01 for the years 1990 to 2020. The results of this study offer an entertaining yet insightful exploration of the relationship between political preferences and automotive safety concerns.
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The interplay between politics and automotive safety has long been a topic of interest, with many scholars striving to unseat the mysteries of this peculiar relationship. In the case of Maryland, a state with a penchant for the unexpected, the connection between votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate and automotive recalls for issues with airbags has proven to be particularly intriguing. Who would have thought that the political aspirations of free-spirited voters could somehow be intertwined with the life-saving contraptions in our automobiles?
This study, aptly named "Air-Bagged Ballots: A Libertarian Look at Automotive Recalls in Maryland," emerges as a svelte attempt to unravel the enigma that underpins the seemingly unrelated realms of politics and automotive safety. With the emergence of data from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and the US Department of Transportation, we embark on a journey that may leave you both amused and enlightened.
As if peering into a funhouse mirror of statistical analysis, we invite you to take a whimsical romp through the correlations, significance levels, and alluring p-values that characterize this captivating connection. Are you prepared to delve into the empirical depths and witness the comedy of errors that underpin the political proclivities of Maryland residents and the airbag-related foibles of the automotive industry? If not, fasten your seatbelt; it's going to be a bumpy – yet enlightening – ride.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
ChatGPT:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
To investigate the enthralling link between votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in Maryland and automotive recalls for issues with airbags, a multifaceted and somewhat whimsical approach was undertaken. The research team, armed with their trusty laptops and a myriad of caffeinated beverages, set out to navigate the labyrinthine pathways of data acquisition and analysis.
The first step involved tapping into the boundless well of information available from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and the US Department of Transportation. These sources provided a rich tapestry of electoral data and automotive recall records dating from 1990 to 2020, allowing for a comprehensive examination of trends over the years.
With data in hand, the team waded into the murky waters of statistical analysis, opting for the tried-and-true method of regression analysis. As our researchers painstakingly dusted off their trusty calculators and donned their most scholarly attire, they probed the data to uncover the secrets lurking within.
Furthermore, to ensure the robustness of the findings, a series of sensitivity analyses were performed, scrutinizing the data from various angles to ascertain the resilience of the observed relationship. This process was akin to peeling layers of an onion, revealing the pungent yet enlightening essence hidden within.
In a stroke of completely unanticipated and whimsical inspiration, the researchers also resorted to a highly unconventional method colloquially known as the "Magic 8-Ball Technique." This method involved posing perplexing yes-no questions to a classic fortune-telling toy, with its responses purportedly guiding the direction of the analysis. While the validity of this technique may be subject to spirited debate, its role in sparking lateral thinking and generating offbeat hypotheses cannot be understated.
Lastly, the research team conducted a thorough review of existing literature, plumbing the depths of scholarly journals and online archives to gain insights into previous studies on seemingly unrelated phenomena and their obscure interconnections. This process was akin to rummaging through an attic of antiquated knowledge, uncovering dusty tomes that shed light on the enigmatic relationship between political proclivities and automotive safety concerns.
In summary, the methodological approach adopted in this study was a concoction of empirical rigor, unorthodox flair, and a generous sprinkling of waggish charm. The convergence of traditional statistical analyses, unconventional methodologies, and a dash of scholarly curiosity culminated in the elucidation of the captivating nexus between votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in Maryland and automotive recalls for issues with airbags.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Maryland and Automotive recalls for issues with the Air Bags. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.
Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse and US DOT .
For the time period 1990 to 2020, you found a correlation 0.9520018, r-squared of 0.9063075, and p < 0.01.
One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.
Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Air-Bagged Ballots: A Libertarian Look at Automotive Recalls in Maryland
[[ABSTRACT]]
This whimsically-named study delves into the fascinating connection between votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in Maryland and automotive recalls for issues with airbags. Utilizing data from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and the US Department of Transportation, this research uncovers a surprisingly strong correlation coefficient of 0.9520018 with a significance level of p < 0.01 for the years 1990 to 2020. The results of this study offer an entertaining yet insightful exploration of the relationship between political preferences and automotive safety concerns.
-------
And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
The interplay between politics and automotive safety has long been a topic of interest, with many scholars striving to unseat the mysteries of this peculiar relationship. In the case of Maryland, a state with a penchant for the unexpected, the connection between votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate and automotive recalls for issues with airbags has proven to be particularly intriguing. Who would have thought that the political aspirations of free-spirited voters could somehow be intertwined with the life-saving contraptions in our automobiles?
This study, aptly named "Air-Bagged Ballots: A Libertarian Look at Automotive Recalls in Maryland," emerges as a svelte attempt to unravel the enigma that underpins the seemingly unrelated realms of politics and automotive safety. With the emergence of data from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and the US Department of Transportation, we embark on a journey that may leave you both amused and enlightened.
As if peering into a funhouse mirror of statistical analysis, we invite you to take a whimsical romp through the correlations, significance levels, and alluring p-values that characterize this captivating connection. Are you prepared to delve into the empirical depths and witness the comedy of errors that underpin the political proclivities of Maryland residents and the airbag-related foibles of the automotive industry? If not, fasten your seatbelt; it's going to be a bumpy – yet enlightening – ride.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[RESULTS]]
ChatGPT:
[[RESULTS]]
The data analysis revealed a remarkably strong correlation coefficient of 0.9520018 between votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in Maryland and automotive recalls for issues with airbags, spanning the years 1990 to 2020. The resulting R-squared value of 0.9063075 further substantiates the robustness of this connection, indicating that 90.63% of the variation in automotive recalls for airbag issues can be explained by the votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in Maryland. Additionally, the significance level of p < 0.01 underscores the reliability of this relationship, leaving little room for doubt regarding its statistical validity.
Furthermore, the scatterplot (Fig. 1) vividly illustrates the compelling association between these two seemingly disparate phenomena. One can almost envision airbag-related concerns inflating alongside the fervent support for Libertarian ideals, creating an unexpected but undeniably captivating pattern.
In light of these findings, it becomes clear that the political leanings of Maryland residents hold a surprising influence over the prevalence of automotive recalls for airbag issues. Who would have thought that the political palette could have such a profound impact on the safety mechanisms within our vehicles? Perhaps this unexpected correlation offers a poignant reminder that even in the realm of automotive safety, political ideologies may play a role – whether as a driving force or an airbag-activating collision with reality.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Maryland and Automotive recalls for issues with the Air Bags. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.
Limit your response to 500 tokens.
Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.
Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.
[[TITLE]]
Air-Bagged Ballots: A Libertarian Look at Automotive Recalls in Maryland
[[ABSTRACT]]
This whimsically-named study delves into the fascinating connection between votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in Maryland and automotive recalls for issues with airbags. Utilizing data from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and the US Department of Transportation, this research uncovers a surprisingly strong correlation coefficient of 0.9520018 with a significance level of p < 0.01 for the years 1990 to 2020. The results of this study offer an entertaining yet insightful exploration of the relationship between political preferences and automotive safety concerns.
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The literature on the curious relationship between political voting patterns and automotive safety concerns is rather sparse, reflecting the novelty and peculiarity of the topic at hand. Smith (2005) examines the electoral landscape in Maryland and the prevalence of automotive recalls, laying the groundwork for understanding the interplay between political preferences and vehicular safety. Similarly, Doe (2010) provides a thorough analysis of airbag-related recalls across various states, hinting at potential connections with political affiliations. Jones (2013) underscores the importance of rigorous statistical methodologies in untangling the enigmatic web of correlations between voting behaviors and automotive defects, setting the stage for this delightfully absurd investigation.
In "The Airbag: A Saga of Safety and Betrayal," the authors immerse readers in the captivating history of airbag technology, offering insights into its triumphs, tribulations, and unexpected ties to the realm of politics. "On the Road: A Libertarian Perspective" presents a fictional account of an intrepid traveler navigating the labyrinthine highways of Maryland while contemplating the philosophies of liberty and the perils of malfunctioning airbags. With a nod to speculative fiction, "The Airbag Chronicles: Tales of Political Intrigue" weaves a tapestry of political conspiracy theories amidst the backdrop of automotive peril, providing a whimsical but unapologetically tenuous connection to the current inquiry.
Expanding beyond conventional scholarly sources, the researchers dared to cast a wide net in their quest for insights. Utilizing unconventional sources, including but not limited to folklore, fortune cookies, and CVS receipts, unveiled unexpected anecdotes and peculiar associations that may or may not have enriched the peculiar tapestry of this research endeavor.
[[RESULTS]]
The data analysis revealed a remarkably strong correlation coefficient of 0.9520018 between votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in Maryland and automotive recalls for issues with airbags, spanning the years 1990 to 2020. The resulting R-squared value of 0.9063075 further substantiates the robustness of this connection, indicating that 90.63% of the variation in automotive recalls for airbag issues can be explained by the votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in Maryland. Additionally, the significance level of p < 0.01 underscores the reliability of this relationship, leaving little room for doubt regarding its statistical validity.
Furthermore, the scatterplot (Fig. 1) vividly illustrates the compelling association between these two seemingly disparate phenomena. One can almost envision airbag-related concerns inflating alongside the fervent support for Libertarian ideals, creating an unexpected but undeniably captivating pattern.
In light of these findings, it becomes clear that the political leanings of Maryland residents hold a surprising influence over the prevalence of automotive recalls for airbag issues. Who would have thought that the political palette could have such a profound impact on the safety mechanisms within our vehicles? Perhaps this unexpected correlation offers a poignant reminder that even in the realm of automotive safety, political ideologies may play a role – whether as a driving force or an airbag-activating collision with reality.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[DISCUSSION]]
ChatGPT:
[[DISCUSSION]]
The results of this study not only confirm, but also emphasize the unparalleled connection between votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in Maryland and automotive recalls for issues with airbags. The strikingly high correlation coefficient of 0.9520018, accompanied by a compelling R-squared value, echoes the prior scholarly whimsy and unconventional speculations.
Previous literature, which at times ventured into the outlandish, hinted at the possibility of a link between political proclivities and airbag-related travails. As the scatterplot vividly illustrates, one can almost envision airbag-related concerns inflating alongside the fervent support for Libertarian ideals, leaving us to ponder whether these revelations are an epiphany or merely hot air.
The findings of the present study reaffirm the unforeseen influence of political ideologies on the prevalence of automotive recalls for airbag issues. While the implications of these correlations may seem overinflated, the statistical validity and robustness of the relationship leave little room for doubt. This unexpectedly robust association between political leanings and automotive safety concerns prompts us to reevaluate the traditional boundaries of influence in regulatory and safety arenas.
This uproariously offbeat inquiry has proven to be more than just a flight of fancy. The unexpected ties between automotive recalls and political preferences, once considered a quirky conjecture, have now been lent empirical support. As we unravel the complexities of this connection, we are left to ponder the profound and peculiar ways in which political inclinations may permeate even the most mundane aspects of our daily lives, be it the quiet solitude of the voting booth or the rambunctious rattle of an airbag deployment.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Maryland and Automotive recalls for issues with the Air Bags. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.
Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.
Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
Air-Bagged Ballots: A Libertarian Look at Automotive Recalls in Maryland
[[ABSTRACT]]
This whimsically-named study delves into the fascinating connection between votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in Maryland and automotive recalls for issues with airbags. Utilizing data from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and the US Department of Transportation, this research uncovers a surprisingly strong correlation coefficient of 0.9520018 with a significance level of p < 0.01 for the years 1990 to 2020. The results of this study offer an entertaining yet insightful exploration of the relationship between political preferences and automotive safety concerns.
[[INTRDUCTION]]
The interplay between politics and automotive safety has long been a topic of interest, with many scholars striving to unseat the mysteries of this peculiar relationship. In the case of Maryland, a state with a penchant for the unexpected, the connection between votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate and automotive recalls for issues with airbags has proven to be particularly intriguing. Who would have thought that the political aspirations of free-spirited voters could somehow be intertwined with the life-saving contraptions in our automobiles?
This study, aptly named "Air-Bagged Ballots: A Libertarian Look at Automotive Recalls in Maryland," emerges as a svelte attempt to unravel the enigma that underpins the seemingly unrelated realms of politics and automotive safety. With the emergence of data from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and the US Department of Transportation, we embark on a journey that may leave you both amused and enlightened.
As if peering into a funhouse mirror of statistical analysis, we invite you to take a whimsical romp through the correlations, significance levels, and alluring p-values that characterize this captivating connection. Are you prepared to delve into the empirical depths and witness the comedy of errors that underpin the political proclivities of Maryland residents and the airbag-related foibles of the automotive industry? If not, fasten your seatbelt; it's going to be a bumpy – yet enlightening – ride.
[[RESULTS]]
The data analysis revealed a remarkably strong correlation coefficient of 0.9520018 between votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in Maryland and automotive recalls for issues with airbags, spanning the years 1990 to 2020. The resulting R-squared value of 0.9063075 further substantiates the robustness of this connection, indicating that 90.63% of the variation in automotive recalls for airbag issues can be explained by the votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in Maryland. Additionally, the significance level of p < 0.01 underscores the reliability of this relationship, leaving little room for doubt regarding its statistical validity.
Furthermore, the scatterplot (Fig. 1) vividly illustrates the compelling association between these two seemingly disparate phenomena. One can almost envision airbag-related concerns inflating alongside the fervent support for Libertarian ideals, creating an unexpected but undeniably captivating pattern.
In light of these findings, it becomes clear that the political leanings of Maryland residents hold a surprising influence over the prevalence of automotive recalls for airbag issues. Who would have thought that the political palette could have such a profound impact on the safety mechanisms within our vehicles? Perhaps this unexpected correlation offers a poignant reminder that even in the realm of automotive safety, political ideologies may play a role – whether as a driving force or an airbag-activating collision with reality.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[CONCLUSION]]
ChatGPT:
[[CONCLUSION]]
In summation, our study has unveiled a striking association between votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in Maryland and automotive recalls for issues with airbags. While we initially approached this investigation with a degree of skepticism, the results have left us feeling as inflated with certainty as an overzealous airbag. The correlation coefficient of 0.9520018 ties together the political preferences of Marylanders and the automotive industry's airbag-related adventures in a manner that can only be described as serendipitous.
The scatterplot featured in our analysis has rendered this relationship visually palpable, almost as if the data points themselves were bursting forth with a newfound sense of purpose. It is as if the spirit of political freedom has taken on a tangible form within the confines of automotive safety mechanisms, manifesting as a resilient bond that transcends conventional wisdom.
While the specific mechanisms underlying this connection remain enigmatic, we are left with a sense of wonder at the interconnectedness of seemingly unrelated phenomena. What hidden forces guide the hands of Libertarian voters and automotive engineers, leading them into this harmonious dance of statistical significance? The answer, much like a deftly deployed airbag, remains elusive yet undeniably impactful.
In light of these revelatory findings, it is evident that further research in this domain is unnecessary. The results of this study stand as a testament to the idiosyncrasies of human behavior and the unpredictable dance of political proclivities and automotive safety concerns. With that, we conclude that the intersection of votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in Maryland and automotive recalls for issues with airbags is a domain ripe with unexpected connections, providing a whimsical yet compelling tableau of the human experience.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Air-Bagged Ballots: A Libertarian Look at Automotive Recalls in Maryland. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.
ChatGPT:
The Journal of Whimsical Automotive Studies
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Air-Bagged Ballots: A Libertarian Look at Automotive Recalls in Maryland. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.
ChatGPT:
The Society for Ethical Research and Analysis in Automotive Affairs
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Air-Bagged Ballots: A Libertarian Look at Automotive Recalls in Maryland with an abstract of This whimsically-named study delves into the fascinating connection between votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in Maryland and automotive recalls for issues with airbags. Utilizing data from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and the US Department of Transportation, this research uncovers a surprisingly strong correlation coefficient of 0.9520018 with a significance level of p < 0.01 for the years 1990 to 2020. The results of this study offer an entertaining yet insightful exploration of the relationship between political preferences and automotive safety concerns.
ChatGPT:
automotive recalls, Maryland, Libertarian presidential candidate, votes, correlation coefficient, data analysis, MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, US Department of Transportation, political preferences, automotive safety concerns, correlation with airbags
*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.
Discover a new correlation
View all correlations
View all research papers
Report an error
Data details
Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in MarylandDetailed data title: Percentage of all votes cast for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Maryland
Source: MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse
See what else correlates with Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Maryland
Automotive recalls for issues with the Air Bags
Source: US DOT
See what else correlates with Automotive recalls for issues with the Air Bags
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.
r2 = 0.9063075 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 90.6% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Automotive recalls for issues with the Air Bags) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Maryland) over the 8 years from 1990 through 2020.
p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 0.00027. 0.0002665919239035477400000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.
But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.
Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.95 in 0.027% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 3,751 random variables Which I absolutely did.
with the same 7 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 7 because we have two variables measured over a period of 8 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.
[ 0.75, 0.99 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.
This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!
All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.
Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
1992 | 1996 | 2000 | 2004 | 2008 | 2012 | 2016 | 2020 | |
Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Maryland (Percentage of votes) | 0.237582 | 0.492175 | 0.262195 | 0.255595 | 0.373994 | 1.11531 | 2.862 | 1.10266 |
Automotive recalls for issues with the Air Bags (Recalls) | 4 | 8 | 15 | 14 | 13 | 23 | 106 | 58 |
Why this works
- Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
- Lack of causal connection: There is probably
Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied. - Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple
Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is. - Very low n: There are not many data points included in this analysis. Even if the p-value is high, we should be suspicious of using so few datapoints in a correlation.
Try it yourself
You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.
Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"
Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.
Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.
Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.
Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"
If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:
"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."
# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats
# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):
# Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)
# Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
r_squared = correlation**2
return correlation, r_squared, p_value
# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([0.237582,0.492175,0.262195,0.255595,0.373994,1.11531,2.862,1.10266,])
array_2 = np.array([4,8,15,14,13,23,106,58,])
array_1_name = "Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Maryland"
array_2_name = "Automotive recalls for issues with the Air Bags"
# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)
# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)
Reuseable content
You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.
For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."
When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.
Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.
Download images for these variables:
- High resolution line chart
The image linked here is a Scalable Vector Graphic (SVG). It is the highest resolution that is possible to achieve. It scales up beyond the size of the observable universe without pixelating. You do not need to email me asking if I have a higher resolution image. I do not. The physical limitations of our universe prevent me from providing you with an image that is any higher resolution than this one.
If you insert it into a PowerPoint presentation (a tool well-known for managing things that are the scale of the universe), you can right-click > "Ungroup" or "Create Shape" and then edit the lines and text directly. You can also change the colors this way.
Alternatively you can use a tool like Inkscape. - High resolution line chart, optimized for mobile
- Alternative high resolution line chart
- Scatterplot
- Portable line chart (png)
- Portable line chart (png), optimized for mobile
- Line chart for only Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Maryland
- Line chart for only Automotive recalls for issues with the Air Bags
- AI-generated correlation image
- The spurious research paper: Air-Bagged Ballots: A Libertarian Look at Automotive Recalls in Maryland
Your correlation rating is out of this world!
Correlation ID: 4359 · Black Variable ID: 26110 · Red Variable ID: 1105