Download png, svg
AI explanation
As the popularity of the first name Thaddeus has risen, so has the preference for unconventional and lesser-known options. This has created a subconscious connection between the underdog status of the name Thaddeus and the appeal of the Libertarian candidate in Kansas. People seem to be subliminally swayed by the idea of embracing the overlooked and offbeat choice, leading to a surprising surge in support for the Libertarian party. Perhaps there's something about the name Thaddeus that just screams, "Let's shake things up!"Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Generate an image showcasing a bustling town square in vibrant pop art style. The large banner in the center proudly displays the name "Thaddeus" in bold, eye-catching colors, surrounded by a crowd of curious onlookers in varied pop art patterns. The setting includes a stage with a podium bearing the name of the Libertarian Presidential candidate, depicted in a retro pop art aesthetic. A surge of people wearing "Thaddeus" t-shirts and holding signs with the candidate's name can be seen, using pop art techniques to create a sense of movement and energy as they cheer and rally around the unconventional choice. The connection between the popularity of the name Thaddeus and the rise of support for the Libertarian candidate is palpable in the air, visibly igniting a sense of embracing the overlooked and offbeat within the community. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Popularity of the first name Thaddeus and Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Kansas. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: An image that looks like it is a scene from a Pixar movie Brutalism Realistic Pop art Cyberpunk
ChatGPT: Pop art
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Popularity of the first name Thaddeus and Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Kansas, in the following situation: As the popularity of the first name Thaddeus has risen, so has the preference for unconventional and lesser-known options. This has created a subconscious connection between the underdog status of the name Thaddeus and the appeal of the Libertarian candidate in Kansas. People seem to be subliminally swayed by the idea of embracing the overlooked and offbeat choice, leading to a surprising surge in support for the Libertarian party. Perhaps there's something about the name Thaddeus that just screams, "Let's shake things up!" . Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In a bustling town square in Kansas, a large banner proudly displays the name "Thaddeus" in bold letters, surrounded by a crowd of curious onlookers. Nearby, a stage is set up with a podium bearing the name of the Libertarian Presidential candidate. A surge of people wearing "Thaddeus" t-shirts and holding signs with the candidate's name can be seen, as they cheer and rally around the unconventional choice. The connection between the popularity of the name Thaddeus and the rise of support for the Libertarian candidate is palpable in the air, visibly igniting a sense of embracing the overlooked and offbeat within the community.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ Pop art ] and depicting this scene: In a bustling town square in Kansas, a large banner proudly displays the name "Thaddeus" in bold letters, surrounded by a crowd of curious onlookers. Nearby, a stage is set up with a podium bearing the name of the Libertarian Presidential candidate. A surge of people wearing "Thaddeus" t-shirts and holding signs with the candidate's name can be seen, as they cheer and rally around the unconventional choice. The connection between the popularity of the name Thaddeus and the rise of support for the Libertarian candidate is palpable in the air, visibly igniting a sense of embracing the overlooked and offbeat within the community. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Generate an image showcasing a bustling town square in vibrant pop art style. The large banner in the center proudly displays the name "Thaddeus" in bold, eye-catching colors, surrounded by a crowd of curious onlookers in varied pop art patterns. The setting includes a stage with a podium bearing the name of the Libertarian Presidential candidate, depicted in a retro pop art aesthetic. A surge of people wearing "Thaddeus" t-shirts and holding signs with the candidate's name can be seen, using pop art techniques to create a sense of movement and energy as they cheer and rally around the unconventional choice. The connection between the popularity of the name Thaddeus and the rise of support for the Libertarian candidate is palpable in the air, visibly igniting a sense of embracing the overlooked and offbeat within the community.
*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.
I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how increases in Popularity of the first name Thaddeus positively influenced Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Kansas.\Make it sound serious until the end.
AI academic paper
Thaddeus for the Libertarianus: An Analysis of the Thaddeus Name Popularity and Presidential Votes in Kansas Journal of Political Names Research Jan 2024 Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real! |
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Thaddeus and Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Kansas. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.
Make the title punny if you can come up with clever pun. If not, make it sound serious.
Your research team used data from US Social Security Administration and MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9412939 and p < 0.01 for 1980 to 2020.
Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)
[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit
[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit
ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
"Thaddeus for the Libertarianus: An Analysis of the Thaddeus Name Popularity and Presidential Votes in Kansas"
[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the intriguing association between the frequency of the first name Thaddeus and votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in the state of Kansas. By employing data from the US Social Security Administration and MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, we endeavored to determine whether there is a substantial relationship between the popularity of the name Thaddeus and support for the Libertarian party. Our findings revealed a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9412939 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the years spanning from 1980 to 2020. This research not only sheds light on the curious connection between nomenclature and political preferences but also provides a lighthearted look at the whimsical world of electoral quirks.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Thaddeus and Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Kansas. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.
Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Thaddeus for the Libertarianus: An Analysis of the Thaddeus Name Popularity and Presidential Votes in Kansas"
[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the intriguing association between the frequency of the first name Thaddeus and votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in the state of Kansas. By employing data from the US Social Security Administration and MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, we endeavored to determine whether there is a substantial relationship between the popularity of the name Thaddeus and support for the Libertarian party. Our findings revealed a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9412939 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the years spanning from 1980 to 2020. This research not only sheds light on the curious connection between nomenclature and political preferences but also provides a lighthearted look at the whimsical world of electoral quirks.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The role of names in influencing our lives has been a topic of fascination for centuries. From the Shakespearean era to the modern day, names have held a peculiar power of shaping our perceptions and even our decisions. In the realm of politics, the connection between a person's name and their voting behavior has remained a subject of both curiosity and conjecture. In this lighthearted and slightly offbeat study, we set out to explore the interplay between the popularity of the first name Thaddeus and votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in the sunflower state of Kansas.
As we embarked on this whimsical journey, we couldn't help but ponder the unique charm of the name Thaddeus. It's a name that rolls off the tongue with an air of old-world sophistication, carrying a dash of timeless charm and a hint of intriguing mystique. One might even say that it bears the essence of a curious blend of quirk and gravitas – much like the political landscape itself.
Drawing inspiration from the playful spirit of statistical inquiry, we sought to unravel the mystery behind the curious correlation between the moniker "Thaddeus" and the libertarian leanings of voters in the heart of America. Bursting with bated breath and a tinge of statistical zeal, we delved into the depths of the U.S. Social Security Administration's treasure trove of name data and the MIT Election Data and Science Lab's repository of electoral insights. Our quest was to fathom whether there existed a substantial nexus between the popularity of the name Thaddeus and the sway of the Libertarian party in the Great Plains.
With a twinkle in our eyes and a penchant for the unexpected, we waded through the sea of data, armed with our trusty tools of regression analysis and hypothesis testing. Little did we know that our journey would lead us to a confluence of amusing discoveries and intriguing revelations, weaving a tapestry of statistical significance and subtle fun facts.
In this endeavor, we did not merely seek to uncover statistical patterns but also aimed to infuse a dash of mirth into the world of electoral analysis. Through the lens of this research, we invite our fellow academics and enthusiasts alike to join us in a light-hearted exploration of the quirkier dimensions of politics – a world where names blend with votes, and statistical insights meet a playful penchant for the peculiar.
So, dear reader, fasten your seatbelts and embrace the statistical rollercoaster ahead – for our journey into the realm of Thaddeus and Libertarianus begins with a statistical zing and promises an intellectual jaunt unlike any other.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Thaddeus and Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Kansas. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.
Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.
Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.
Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then name some movies that you watched that are tangentially related to the topic.
Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Thaddeus for the Libertarianus: An Analysis of the Thaddeus Name Popularity and Presidential Votes in Kansas"
[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the intriguing association between the frequency of the first name Thaddeus and votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in the state of Kansas. By employing data from the US Social Security Administration and MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, we endeavored to determine whether there is a substantial relationship between the popularity of the name Thaddeus and support for the Libertarian party. Our findings revealed a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9412939 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the years spanning from 1980 to 2020. This research not only sheds light on the curious connection between nomenclature and political preferences but also provides a lighthearted look at the whimsical world of electoral quirks.
-------
And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The role of names in influencing our lives has been a topic of fascination for centuries. From the Shakespearean era to the modern day, names have held a peculiar power of shaping our perceptions and even our decisions. In the realm of politics, the connection between a person's name and their voting behavior has remained a subject of both curiosity and conjecture. In this lighthearted and slightly offbeat study, we set out to explore the interplay between the popularity of the first name Thaddeus and votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in the sunflower state of Kansas.
As we embarked on this whimsical journey, we couldn't help but ponder the unique charm of the name Thaddeus. It's a name that rolls off the tongue with an air of old-world sophistication, carrying a dash of timeless charm and a hint of intriguing mystique. One might even say that it bears the essence of a curious blend of quirk and gravitas – much like the political landscape itself.
Drawing inspiration from the playful spirit of statistical inquiry, we sought to unravel the mystery behind the curious correlation between the moniker "Thaddeus" and the libertarian leanings of voters in the heart of America. Bursting with bated breath and a tinge of statistical zeal, we delved into the depths of the U.S. Social Security Administration's treasure trove of name data and the MIT Election Data and Science Lab's repository of electoral insights. Our quest was to fathom whether there existed a substantial nexus between the popularity of the name Thaddeus and the sway of the Libertarian party in the Great Plains.
With a twinkle in our eyes and a penchant for the unexpected, we waded through the sea of data, armed with our trusty tools of regression analysis and hypothesis testing. Little did we know that our journey would lead us to a confluence of amusing discoveries and intriguing revelations, weaving a tapestry of statistical significance and subtle fun facts.
In this endeavor, we did not merely seek to uncover statistical patterns but also aimed to infuse a dash of mirth into the world of electoral analysis. Through the lens of this research, we invite our fellow academics and enthusiasts alike to join us in a light-hearted exploration of the quirkier dimensions of politics – a world where names blend with votes, and statistical insights meet a playful penchant for the peculiar.
So, dear reader, fasten your seatbelts and embrace the statistical rollercoaster ahead – for our journey into the realm of Thaddeus and Libertarianus begins with a statistical zing and promises an intellectual jaunt unlike any other.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
To elucidate the peculiar connection between the prevalence of the name Thaddeus and support for the Libertarian presidential candidate in the state of Kansas, we must first dive into the existing body of literature on the intersection of nomenclature and political proclivities.
In "The Thaddeus Effect: A Comprehensive Analysis of Name-Driven Electoral Dynamics" by Smith et al., the authors find compelling evidence of the influence of names on voter behavior. They detail a series of case studies from various states, showcasing the surprising correlation between specific monikers and political affiliations. The study's analysis of voter demographics and name distributions sheds light on the impact of nomenclature on electoral outcomes, setting the stage for our investigation into the Thaddeus phenomenon.
Moving beyond the realm of names, Doe's "Electoral Quirks: Whimsical Patterns in Voting Behavior" explores the often overlooked idiosyncrasies of electoral dynamics. While the focus of the study is not directly tied to individual names, Doe's work underscores the prevalence of unexpected correlations in voting patterns, hinting at the mirthful mysteries that await within the realm of electoral analysis.
Transitioning to a more lighthearted perspective, Jones et al.'s "The Whimsical World of Electorate Quirks and Peculiar Trends" offers a delightful compendium of offbeat electoral phenomena. Though not explicitly delving into name-based correlations, the book playfully explores the lighter side of electoral analysis, leading the reader on a whimsical journey through the quirks and curiosities that permeate voting behavior.
Taking a slight departure from non-fiction literature, we encounter fictional works that whimsically intertwine the themes of nomenclature and political intrigue. "The Name Game: A Political Paradox" by J.K. Polls spins an engaging tale of a candidate whose name becomes the focal point of a whirlwind electoral campaign, deftly blending elements of satire and political whimsy.
Similarly, "Ballot Box Bliss: The Saga of Thaddeus T. Libertarian" by A.N. Vote teases the reader's imagination with an eccentric narrative centered around a protagonist named Thaddeus who embarks on a comical quest for libertarian ideals. While purely fiction, the book charmingly captures the essence of name-driven electoral follies, offering a refreshing departure from the traditional political thriller.
In our quest for contextual amusement, a cinematic foray into tangentially related themes brings us to "The Candidate Conundrum: A Mirthful Election Tale." Though not directly focused on the interplay between names and voting patterns, the movie's satirical portrayal of the electoral journey, replete with witty quips and whimsical electioneering, encapsulates the playful spirit that infuses our investigation.
As we embark on this empirical escapade into the realm of Thaddeus and Libertarianus, we must not only seek statistical truths but also embrace the enchanting allure of electoral oddities and the endearing whimsy that defines this lighthearted exploration.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Thaddeus and Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Kansas. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.
Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from US Social Security Administration and MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse . You used data from 1980 to 2020
Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.
Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Thaddeus for the Libertarianus: An Analysis of the Thaddeus Name Popularity and Presidential Votes in Kansas"
[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the intriguing association between the frequency of the first name Thaddeus and votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in the state of Kansas. By employing data from the US Social Security Administration and MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, we endeavored to determine whether there is a substantial relationship between the popularity of the name Thaddeus and support for the Libertarian party. Our findings revealed a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9412939 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the years spanning from 1980 to 2020. This research not only sheds light on the curious connection between nomenclature and political preferences but also provides a lighthearted look at the whimsical world of electoral quirks.
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The role of names in influencing our lives has been a topic of fascination for centuries. From the Shakespearean era to the modern day, names have held a peculiar power of shaping our perceptions and even our decisions. In the realm of politics, the connection between a person's name and their voting behavior has remained a subject of both curiosity and conjecture. In this lighthearted and slightly offbeat study, we set out to explore the interplay between the popularity of the first name Thaddeus and votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in the sunflower state of Kansas.
As we embarked on this whimsical journey, we couldn't help but ponder the unique charm of the name Thaddeus. It's a name that rolls off the tongue with an air of old-world sophistication, carrying a dash of timeless charm and a hint of intriguing mystique. One might even say that it bears the essence of a curious blend of quirk and gravitas – much like the political landscape itself.
Drawing inspiration from the playful spirit of statistical inquiry, we sought to unravel the mystery behind the curious correlation between the moniker "Thaddeus" and the libertarian leanings of voters in the heart of America. Bursting with bated breath and a tinge of statistical zeal, we delved into the depths of the U.S. Social Security Administration's treasure trove of name data and the MIT Election Data and Science Lab's repository of electoral insights. Our quest was to fathom whether there existed a substantial nexus between the popularity of the name Thaddeus and the sway of the Libertarian party in the Great Plains.
With a twinkle in our eyes and a penchant for the unexpected, we waded through the sea of data, armed with our trusty tools of regression analysis and hypothesis testing. Little did we know that our journey would lead us to a confluence of amusing discoveries and intriguing revelations, weaving a tapestry of statistical significance and subtle fun facts.
In this endeavor, we did not merely seek to uncover statistical patterns but also aimed to infuse a dash of mirth into the world of electoral analysis. Through the lens of this research, we invite our fellow academics and enthusiasts alike to join us in a light-hearted exploration of the quirkier dimensions of politics – a world where names blend with votes, and statistical insights meet a playful penchant for the peculiar.
So, dear reader, fasten your seatbelts and embrace the statistical rollercoaster ahead – for our journey into the realm of Thaddeus and Libertarianus begins with a statistical zing and promises an intellectual jaunt unlike any other.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
ChatGPT:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
To uncover the tantalizing tale of Thaddeus and Libertarianus, our intrepid team embarked on a statistical odyssey that combined the art of data mining with a touch of whimsy. Armed with an insatiable curiosity and an uncanny knack for uncovering hidden patterns, we set out to navigate the labyrinthine maze of data spanning from 1980 to 2020.
Data Collection:
Our quest for Thaddeus-centric electoral enlightenment led us to scour the vast expanse of the internet, and lo and behold, we struck gold at the US Social Security Administration and MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse. The treasure troves of name popularity and electoral results captured our attention like shiny baubles in a statistical candy store. With a mischievous glint in our eyes, we meticulously extracted and curated data on the frequency of the name Thaddeus and the votes garnered by the Libertarian presidential candidate in the great state of Kansas.
Statistical Alchemy:
As we crafted the elixir of statistical knowledge, we honed our skills in the arcane arts of regression analysis and hypothesis testing. Through the wizardry of regression, we sought to untangle the intricate dance between the popularity of the name Thaddeus and the electoral affections of Kansas voters towards Libertarian ideals. With robust statistical software as our trusty wand, we conjured up the intricate multivariate models, paving the way for a spellbinding journey into the heart of electoral oddities.
Hypothesis Testing:
Armed with a hypothesis as daring as a political tightrope walker, we ventured forth to test the waters of statistical significance. Our aim was to ascertain whether the observed correlation between the popularity of the name Thaddeus and the votes for the Libertarian candidate in Kansas was not a mere fluke of chance. With a flourish of statistical incantations, we invoked the spirit of p-values and significance levels, determined to sift the grains of truth from the chaff of randomness.
Cross-Validation
In our fervent pursuit of knowledge, we subjected our findings to the rigors of cross-validation, akin to sending a gallant knight through a gauntlet of challenges. Our scrutinizing gaze evaluated the robustness of our models and the fidelity of our findings, ensuring that our discoveries stood firm in the face of statistical barrages.
In summary, our methodology danced at the intersection of playful curiosity and robust statistical rigour. Armed with an unyielding spirit of enquiry and a zest for electoral eccentricity, we endeavored to unveil the captivating confluence of Thaddeus and Libertarianus through a lens that added a sprinkle of statistical merriment to our quest.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Thaddeus and Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Kansas. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.
Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from US Social Security Administration and MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse .
For the time period 1980 to 2020, you found a correlation 0.9412939, r-squared of 0.8860343, and p < 0.01.
One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.
Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Thaddeus for the Libertarianus: An Analysis of the Thaddeus Name Popularity and Presidential Votes in Kansas"
[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the intriguing association between the frequency of the first name Thaddeus and votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in the state of Kansas. By employing data from the US Social Security Administration and MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, we endeavored to determine whether there is a substantial relationship between the popularity of the name Thaddeus and support for the Libertarian party. Our findings revealed a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9412939 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the years spanning from 1980 to 2020. This research not only sheds light on the curious connection between nomenclature and political preferences but also provides a lighthearted look at the whimsical world of electoral quirks.
-------
And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
The role of names in influencing our lives has been a topic of fascination for centuries. From the Shakespearean era to the modern day, names have held a peculiar power of shaping our perceptions and even our decisions. In the realm of politics, the connection between a person's name and their voting behavior has remained a subject of both curiosity and conjecture. In this lighthearted and slightly offbeat study, we set out to explore the interplay between the popularity of the first name Thaddeus and votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in the sunflower state of Kansas.
As we embarked on this whimsical journey, we couldn't help but ponder the unique charm of the name Thaddeus. It's a name that rolls off the tongue with an air of old-world sophistication, carrying a dash of timeless charm and a hint of intriguing mystique. One might even say that it bears the essence of a curious blend of quirk and gravitas – much like the political landscape itself.
Drawing inspiration from the playful spirit of statistical inquiry, we sought to unravel the mystery behind the curious correlation between the moniker "Thaddeus" and the libertarian leanings of voters in the heart of America. Bursting with bated breath and a tinge of statistical zeal, we delved into the depths of the U.S. Social Security Administration's treasure trove of name data and the MIT Election Data and Science Lab's repository of electoral insights. Our quest was to fathom whether there existed a substantial nexus between the popularity of the name Thaddeus and the sway of the Libertarian party in the Great Plains.
With a twinkle in our eyes and a penchant for the unexpected, we waded through the sea of data, armed with our trusty tools of regression analysis and hypothesis testing. Little did we know that our journey would lead us to a confluence of amusing discoveries and intriguing revelations, weaving a tapestry of statistical significance and subtle fun facts.
In this endeavor, we did not merely seek to uncover statistical patterns but also aimed to infuse a dash of mirth into the world of electoral analysis. Through the lens of this research, we invite our fellow academics and enthusiasts alike to join us in a light-hearted exploration of the quirkier dimensions of politics – a world where names blend with votes, and statistical insights meet a playful penchant for the peculiar.
So, dear reader, fasten your seatbelts and embrace the statistical rollercoaster ahead – for our journey into the realm of Thaddeus and Libertarianus begins with a statistical zing and promises an intellectual jaunt unlike any other.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[RESULTS]]
ChatGPT:
[[RESULTS]]
Our investigation into the connection between the popularity of the first name Thaddeus and votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in Kansas yielded some truly captivating results. The correlation coefficient of 0.9412939 suggests a remarkably strong positive association between these two seemingly disparate entities. In other words, it seems that the frequency of the name Thaddeus and the inclination to vote for the Libertarian candidate in Kansas are as tightly intertwined as two peas in a pod.
Additionally, the r-squared value of 0.8860343 indicates that a whopping 88.6% of the variation in Libertarian votes in Kansas can be explained by the popularity of the name Thaddeus. It's almost as if the name "Thaddeus" exerts a charmingly influential force in guiding the political preferences of Kansans, akin to a melodious siren song luring sailors toward uncharted electoral waters.
The p-value of less than 0.01 further solidifies our findings, affirming that the relationship between the name Thaddeus and Libertarian support in Kansas is not just a fluke but a bona fide statistical reality. It seems that there's more than meets the eye when it comes to the intriguing interplay between nomenclature and political predilections.
Furthermore, as tended to appear scarcely in the southwest region of the scatter plot, creating a curious anomaly in the otherwise robust correlation plot. Nevertheless, this outlier only serves to add an extra sprinkle of statistical stardust to our already enchanting findings, unveiling the whimsical charm of electoral idiosyncrasies in the heart of America.
Figure 1, the scatterplot, is a visual testament to the striking correlation we've uncovered. It vividly illustrates the striking alignment between the popularity of the name Thaddeus and votes for the Libertarian candidate in Kansas, leaving little room to doubt the compelling bond between these two enigmatic entities.
In sum, our study not only unravels the captivating relationship between the first name Thaddeus and Libertarian votes in Kansas but also imparts a dose of statistical whimsy to the otherwise serious domain of electoral analysis. We hope that these findings will not only pique the intellectual curiosity of our esteemed colleagues but also add a touch of lighthearted amusement to the oftentimes sober world of political inquiry.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Thaddeus and Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Kansas. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.
Limit your response to 500 tokens.
Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.
Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.
[[TITLE]]
"Thaddeus for the Libertarianus: An Analysis of the Thaddeus Name Popularity and Presidential Votes in Kansas"
[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the intriguing association between the frequency of the first name Thaddeus and votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in the state of Kansas. By employing data from the US Social Security Administration and MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, we endeavored to determine whether there is a substantial relationship between the popularity of the name Thaddeus and support for the Libertarian party. Our findings revealed a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9412939 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the years spanning from 1980 to 2020. This research not only sheds light on the curious connection between nomenclature and political preferences but also provides a lighthearted look at the whimsical world of electoral quirks.
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
To elucidate the peculiar connection between the prevalence of the name Thaddeus and support for the Libertarian presidential candidate in the state of Kansas, we must first dive into the existing body of literature on the intersection of nomenclature and political proclivities.
In "The Thaddeus Effect: A Comprehensive Analysis of Name-Driven Electoral Dynamics" by Smith et al., the authors find compelling evidence of the influence of names on voter behavior. They detail a series of case studies from various states, showcasing the surprising correlation between specific monikers and political affiliations. The study's analysis of voter demographics and name distributions sheds light on the impact of nomenclature on electoral outcomes, setting the stage for our investigation into the Thaddeus phenomenon.
Moving beyond the realm of names, Doe's "Electoral Quirks: Whimsical Patterns in Voting Behavior" explores the often overlooked idiosyncrasies of electoral dynamics. While the focus of the study is not directly tied to individual names, Doe's work underscores the prevalence of unexpected correlations in voting patterns, hinting at the mirthful mysteries that await within the realm of electoral analysis.
Transitioning to a more lighthearted perspective, Jones et al.'s "The Whimsical World of Electorate Quirks and Peculiar Trends" offers a delightful compendium of offbeat electoral phenomena. Though not explicitly delving into name-based correlations, the book playfully explores the lighter side of electoral analysis, leading the reader on a whimsical journey through the quirks and curiosities that permeate voting behavior.
Taking a slight departure from non-fiction literature, we encounter fictional works that whimsically intertwine the themes of nomenclature and political intrigue. "The Name Game: A Political Paradox" by J.K. Polls spins an engaging tale of a candidate whose name becomes the focal point of a whirlwind electoral campaign, deftly blending elements of satire and political whimsy.
Similarly, "Ballot Box Bliss: The Saga of Thaddeus T. Libertarian" by A.N. Vote teases the reader's imagination with an eccentric narrative centered around a protagonist named Thaddeus who embarks on a comical quest for libertarian ideals. While purely fiction, the book charmingly captures the essence of name-driven electoral follies, offering a refreshing departure from the traditional political thriller.
In our quest for contextual amusement, a cinematic foray into tangentially related themes brings us to "The Candidate Conundrum: A Mirthful Election Tale." Though not directly focused on the interplay between names and voting patterns, the movie's satirical portrayal of the electoral journey, replete with witty quips and whimsical electioneering, encapsulates the playful spirit that infuses our investigation.
As we embark on this empirical escapade into the realm of Thaddeus and Libertarianus, we must not only seek statistical truths but also embrace the enchanting allure of electoral oddities and the endearing whimsy that defines this lighthearted exploration.
[[RESULTS]]
Our investigation into the connection between the popularity of the first name Thaddeus and votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in Kansas yielded some truly captivating results. The correlation coefficient of 0.9412939 suggests a remarkably strong positive association between these two seemingly disparate entities. In other words, it seems that the frequency of the name Thaddeus and the inclination to vote for the Libertarian candidate in Kansas are as tightly intertwined as two peas in a pod.
Additionally, the r-squared value of 0.8860343 indicates that a whopping 88.6% of the variation in Libertarian votes in Kansas can be explained by the popularity of the name Thaddeus. It's almost as if the name "Thaddeus" exerts a charmingly influential force in guiding the political preferences of Kansans, akin to a melodious siren song luring sailors toward uncharted electoral waters.
The p-value of less than 0.01 further solidifies our findings, affirming that the relationship between the name Thaddeus and Libertarian support in Kansas is not just a fluke but a bona fide statistical reality. It seems that there's more than meets the eye when it comes to the intriguing interplay between nomenclature and political predilections.
Furthermore, as tended to appear scarcely in the southwest region of the scatter plot, creating a curious anomaly in the otherwise robust correlation plot. Nevertheless, this outlier only serves to add an extra sprinkle of statistical stardust to our already enchanting findings, unveiling the whimsical charm of electoral idiosyncrasies in the heart of America.
Figure 1, the scatterplot, is a visual testament to the striking correlation we've uncovered. It vividly illustrates the striking alignment between the popularity of the name Thaddeus and votes for the Libertarian candidate in Kansas, leaving little room to doubt the compelling bond between these two enigmatic entities.
In sum, our study not only unravels the captivating relationship between the first name Thaddeus and Libertarian votes in Kansas but also imparts a dose of statistical whimsy to the otherwise serious domain of electoral analysis. We hope that these findings will not only pique the intellectual curiosity of our esteemed colleagues but also add a touch of lighthearted amusement to the oftentimes sober world of political inquiry.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[DISCUSSION]]
ChatGPT:
[[DISCUSSION]]
Our findings have brought to light an inexplicably robust association between the popularity of the distinguished first name Thaddeus and the inclination to cast votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in the eclectic state of Kansas. Our analysis not only corroborates the earlier research by Smith et al., uncovering the mesmerizing influence of names on electoral leanings, but it also adds a whimsical twist to the seemingly serious domain of political scholarship.
As we cherish the scholarly mirth and observe the serious statistical evidence, it becomes clear that the influence of the name Thaddeus on voting behavior resembles a colorful mosaic blending statistical significance with a touch of electoral enchantment. The correlations we unearthed stand as a testament to the tantalizing potency of nomenclature in guiding political preferences, akin to the unseen hand of fate steering voters toward libertarian vistas.
Our study’s alignment with the lighthearted spirit of Doe's "Electoral Quirks" and Jones et al.'s "The Whimsical World of Electorate Quirks and Peculiar Trends" is more than purely coincidental. The endearing whimsy that permeates our findings echoes the curiosities and caprices celebrated in these literary escapades, underlining the delightful synergy between scholarly rigor and statistical playfulness. Furthermore, the unexpected anomaly in the southwest region of the scatter plot whimsically adds a touch of statistical stardust and shrouds our findings in an aura of delightful peculiarity, beckoning the statistical sleuth to delve into its enigmatic depths.
In light of these results, our investigation not only contributes to the empirical dialogue on name-driven electoral dynamics, but also injects a dose of statistical whimsy into the oftentimes somber world of political analysis. The correlation we’ve unearthed between the name Thaddeus and Libertarian votes in Kansas serves as an enchanting reminder that within the realm of electoral analysis, there is often more than meets the eye, and statistical discoveries can be serenaded by the harmonious melodies of amusing eccentricities.
Our hope is that this study will inspire our esteemed colleagues to tread the delightful path of electoral whimsy and embark on statistical journeys that not only unravel the enigmatic connections in voting behavior but also beckon forth a lighthearted mirth, infusing the serious pursuit of political inquiry with a playful spirit.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Thaddeus and Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Kansas. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.
Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.
Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
"Thaddeus for the Libertarianus: An Analysis of the Thaddeus Name Popularity and Presidential Votes in Kansas"
[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the intriguing association between the frequency of the first name Thaddeus and votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in the state of Kansas. By employing data from the US Social Security Administration and MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, we endeavored to determine whether there is a substantial relationship between the popularity of the name Thaddeus and support for the Libertarian party. Our findings revealed a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9412939 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the years spanning from 1980 to 2020. This research not only sheds light on the curious connection between nomenclature and political preferences but also provides a lighthearted look at the whimsical world of electoral quirks.
[[INTRDUCTION]]
The role of names in influencing our lives has been a topic of fascination for centuries. From the Shakespearean era to the modern day, names have held a peculiar power of shaping our perceptions and even our decisions. In the realm of politics, the connection between a person's name and their voting behavior has remained a subject of both curiosity and conjecture. In this lighthearted and slightly offbeat study, we set out to explore the interplay between the popularity of the first name Thaddeus and votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in the sunflower state of Kansas.
As we embarked on this whimsical journey, we couldn't help but ponder the unique charm of the name Thaddeus. It's a name that rolls off the tongue with an air of old-world sophistication, carrying a dash of timeless charm and a hint of intriguing mystique. One might even say that it bears the essence of a curious blend of quirk and gravitas – much like the political landscape itself.
Drawing inspiration from the playful spirit of statistical inquiry, we sought to unravel the mystery behind the curious correlation between the moniker "Thaddeus" and the libertarian leanings of voters in the heart of America. Bursting with bated breath and a tinge of statistical zeal, we delved into the depths of the U.S. Social Security Administration's treasure trove of name data and the MIT Election Data and Science Lab's repository of electoral insights. Our quest was to fathom whether there existed a substantial nexus between the popularity of the name Thaddeus and the sway of the Libertarian party in the Great Plains.
With a twinkle in our eyes and a penchant for the unexpected, we waded through the sea of data, armed with our trusty tools of regression analysis and hypothesis testing. Little did we know that our journey would lead us to a confluence of amusing discoveries and intriguing revelations, weaving a tapestry of statistical significance and subtle fun facts.
In this endeavor, we did not merely seek to uncover statistical patterns but also aimed to infuse a dash of mirth into the world of electoral analysis. Through the lens of this research, we invite our fellow academics and enthusiasts alike to join us in a light-hearted exploration of the quirkier dimensions of politics – a world where names blend with votes, and statistical insights meet a playful penchant for the peculiar.
So, dear reader, fasten your seatbelts and embrace the statistical rollercoaster ahead – for our journey into the realm of Thaddeus and Libertarianus begins with a statistical zing and promises an intellectual jaunt unlike any other.
[[RESULTS]]
Our investigation into the connection between the popularity of the first name Thaddeus and votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in Kansas yielded some truly captivating results. The correlation coefficient of 0.9412939 suggests a remarkably strong positive association between these two seemingly disparate entities. In other words, it seems that the frequency of the name Thaddeus and the inclination to vote for the Libertarian candidate in Kansas are as tightly intertwined as two peas in a pod.
Additionally, the r-squared value of 0.8860343 indicates that a whopping 88.6% of the variation in Libertarian votes in Kansas can be explained by the popularity of the name Thaddeus. It's almost as if the name "Thaddeus" exerts a charmingly influential force in guiding the political preferences of Kansans, akin to a melodious siren song luring sailors toward uncharted electoral waters.
The p-value of less than 0.01 further solidifies our findings, affirming that the relationship between the name Thaddeus and Libertarian support in Kansas is not just a fluke but a bona fide statistical reality. It seems that there's more than meets the eye when it comes to the intriguing interplay between nomenclature and political predilections.
Furthermore, as tended to appear scarcely in the southwest region of the scatter plot, creating a curious anomaly in the otherwise robust correlation plot. Nevertheless, this outlier only serves to add an extra sprinkle of statistical stardust to our already enchanting findings, unveiling the whimsical charm of electoral idiosyncrasies in the heart of America.
Figure 1, the scatterplot, is a visual testament to the striking correlation we've uncovered. It vividly illustrates the striking alignment between the popularity of the name Thaddeus and votes for the Libertarian candidate in Kansas, leaving little room to doubt the compelling bond between these two enigmatic entities.
In sum, our study not only unravels the captivating relationship between the first name Thaddeus and Libertarian votes in Kansas but also imparts a dose of statistical whimsy to the otherwise serious domain of electoral analysis. We hope that these findings will not only pique the intellectual curiosity of our esteemed colleagues but also add a touch of lighthearted amusement to the oftentimes sober world of political inquiry.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[CONCLUSION]]
ChatGPT:
[[CONCLUSION]]
In this jocular journey through the statistical woods, we ventured to explore the peculiar partnership between the name Thaddeus and voting behavior in the sunflower state of Kansas. As we lifted the veil on this lighthearted enigma, we found ourselves bedazzled by the astonishingly robust correlation between the two, akin to a delightful duet in the grand orchestra of electoral whimsy.
Our findings leap off the page with a correlation coefficient of 0.9412939, revealing a kinship between the name Thaddeus and support for the Libertarian party that is as strong as the allure of freshly baked cookies on a Sunday morning. With an r-squared value of 0.8860343, we must ask ourselves: is there an enchanting, ethereal force emanating from the name Thaddeus that captivates the hearts and ballots of the good folks of Kansas?
Even as we marveled at the statistical dance between Thaddeus and Libertarianus, we stumbled upon an outlier, like a clown amidst a sea of solemn faces. This quirk only adds a touch of whimsy to our already wondrous findings, reminding us that in the statistical wonderland, surprises are always around the corner.
As the curtains close on our exploration, we are compelled to pronounce that the name Thaddeus and the Libertarian vote share a rapport so intimate, it's as if they were long-lost lovers finally reunited. This research not only illuminates the offbeat intersection of nomenclature and political allegiance but also invites scholars and enthusiasts alike to revel in the captivating dance between names and votes.
Thus, we confidently assert that no more research is needed in this area, for we have unraveled the captivating tale of Thaddeus and Libertarianus, leaving behind a trail of statistical stardust and a sprinkle of electoral mirth.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Thaddeus for the Libertarianus: An Analysis of the Thaddeus Name Popularity and Presidential Votes in Kansas. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.
ChatGPT:
Journal of Political Names Research
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Thaddeus for the Libertarianus: An Analysis of the Thaddeus Name Popularity and Presidential Votes in Kansas. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.
ChatGPT:
The Institute for Political Name Analysis and Voter Behavior
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Thaddeus for the Libertarianus: An Analysis of the Thaddeus Name Popularity and Presidential Votes in Kansas with an abstract of This study delves into the intriguing association between the frequency of the first name Thaddeus and votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in the state of Kansas. By employing data from the US Social Security Administration and MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, we endeavored to determine whether there is a substantial relationship between the popularity of the name Thaddeus and support for the Libertarian party. Our findings revealed a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9412939 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the years spanning from 1980 to 2020. This research not only sheds light on the curious connection between nomenclature and political preferences but also provides a lighthearted look at the whimsical world of electoral quirks.
ChatGPT:
Thaddeus, name popularity, presidential votes, Kansas, Libertarian candidate, US Social Security Administration, MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, correlation coefficient, political preferences, electoral quirks
*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.
Discover a new correlation
View all correlations
View all research papers
Report an error
Data details
Popularity of the first name ThaddeusDetailed data title: Babies of all sexes born in the US named Thaddeus
Source: US Social Security Administration
See what else correlates with Popularity of the first name Thaddeus
Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Kansas
Detailed data title: Percentage of all votes cast for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Kansas
Source: MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse
See what else correlates with Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Kansas
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.
r2 = 0.8860343 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 88.6% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Kansas) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Popularity of the first name Thaddeus) over the 10 years from 1980 through 2020.
p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 4.8E-5. 0.0000483929260080879300000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.
But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.
Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.94 in 0.0048% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 20,664 random variables You don't actually need 20 thousand variables to find a correlation like this one. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.
p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.
Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 9 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 9 because we have two variables measured over a period of 10 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.
[ 0.77, 0.99 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.
This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!
All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.
Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
1980 | 1984 | 1992 | 1996 | 2000 | 2004 | 2008 | 2012 | 2016 | 2020 | |
Popularity of the first name Thaddeus (Babies born) | 267 | 175 | 250 | 216 | 218 | 189 | 211 | 231 | 416 | 297 |
Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Kansas (Percentage of votes) | 1.47684 | 0.325737 | 0.372785 | 0.424183 | 0.422023 | 0.337864 | 0.542613 | 1.76349 | 4.67797 | 2.22793 |
Why this works
- Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
- Lack of causal connection: There is probably
Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied. - Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple
Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is. - Y-axis doesn't start at zero: I truncated the Y-axes of the graph above. I also used a line graph, which makes the visual connection stand out more than it deserves.
Nothing against line graphs. They are great at telling a story when you have linear data! But visually it is deceptive because the only data is at the points on the graph, not the lines on the graph. In between each point, the data could have been doing anything. Like going for a random walk by itself!
Mathematically what I showed is true, but it is intentionally misleading. Below is the same chart but with both Y-axes starting at zero.
Try it yourself
You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.
Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"
Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.
Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.
Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.
Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"
If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:
"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."
# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats
# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):
# Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)
# Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
r_squared = correlation**2
return correlation, r_squared, p_value
# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([267,175,250,216,218,189,211,231,416,297,])
array_2 = np.array([1.47684,0.325737,0.372785,0.424183,0.422023,0.337864,0.542613,1.76349,4.67797,2.22793,])
array_1_name = "Popularity of the first name Thaddeus"
array_2_name = "Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Kansas"
# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)
# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)
Reuseable content
You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.
For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."
When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.
Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.
Download images for these variables:
- High resolution line chart
The image linked here is a Scalable Vector Graphic (SVG). It is the highest resolution that is possible to achieve. It scales up beyond the size of the observable universe without pixelating. You do not need to email me asking if I have a higher resolution image. I do not. The physical limitations of our universe prevent me from providing you with an image that is any higher resolution than this one.
If you insert it into a PowerPoint presentation (a tool well-known for managing things that are the scale of the universe), you can right-click > "Ungroup" or "Create Shape" and then edit the lines and text directly. You can also change the colors this way.
Alternatively you can use a tool like Inkscape. - High resolution line chart, optimized for mobile
- Alternative high resolution line chart
- Scatterplot
- Portable line chart (png)
- Portable line chart (png), optimized for mobile
- Line chart for only Popularity of the first name Thaddeus
- Line chart for only Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Kansas
- AI-generated correlation image
- The spurious research paper: Thaddeus for the Libertarianus: An Analysis of the Thaddeus Name Popularity and Presidential Votes in Kansas
Thanks for being the explorer we needed!
Correlation ID: 4339 · Black Variable ID: 3584 · Red Variable ID: 26098