about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #4,319 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Votes for the Democratic Presidential candidate in Tennessee and the second variable is Kerosene used in Philippines.  The chart goes from 1980 to 2020, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

The shift in voting patterns created a "fuel" for thought which ultimately led to a decrease in kerosene usage in the Philippines. As Tennesseans veered away from the Democrat candidate, it somehow ignited a ripple effect, prompting a parallel decline in kerosene consumption in the Philippines. It seems like the political heat in Tennessee had an unexpected connection to the energy situation in the Philippines, proving that in the grand scheme of things, every election result can have far-reaching "consequences."

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Generate an image that resembles a galactic cityscape, with towering futuristic structures and sleek vehicles zipping through the air. The scene should convey a sense of political fervor and energy, with subtle nods to global impact. The lights of the city should shimmer and dim, reflecting the unexpected effects of distant political choices on daily life. The overall atmosphere should evoke the spirit of 'Star Wars' while subtly incorporating the described political and societal themes. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Votes for the Democrat Presidential candidate in Tennessee and Kerosene used in Philippines. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Psychedelic Steampunk An image that looks like it is a scene from 'Star Wars' Cutsy graphics Minimalism
ChatGPT: An image that looks like it is a scene from 'Star Wars'

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Votes for the Democrat Presidential candidate in Tennessee and Kerosene used in Philippines, in the following situation: The shift in voting patterns created a "fuel" for thought which ultimately led to a decrease in kerosene usage in the Philippines. As Tennesseans veered away from the Democrat candidate, it somehow ignited a ripple effect, prompting a parallel decline in kerosene consumption in the Philippines. It seems like the political heat in Tennessee had an unexpected connection to the energy situation in the Philippines, proving that in the grand scheme of things, every election result can have far-reaching "consequences.". Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In Tennessee, as the Democrat Presidential candidate votes dwindled, the political fervor ignited like a spark, subtly spreading across the globe. In the Philippines, kerosene lamps dimmed as the energy of the people shifted away from traditional fuel sources, reflecting the unexpected impact of distant political choices on daily life.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ An image that looks like it is a scene from 'Star Wars' ] and depicting this scene: In Tennessee, as the Democrat Presidential candidate votes dwindled, the political fervor ignited like a spark, subtly spreading across the globe. In the Philippines, kerosene lamps dimmed as the energy of the people shifted away from traditional fuel sources, reflecting the unexpected impact of distant political choices on daily life. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Generate an image that resembles a galactic cityscape, with towering futuristic structures and sleek vehicles zipping through the air. The scene should convey a sense of political fervor and energy, with subtle nods to global impact. The lights of the city should shimmer and dim, reflecting the unexpected effects of distant political choices on daily life. The overall atmosphere should evoke the spirit of 'Star Wars' while subtly incorporating the described political and societal themes.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how a decrease in Votes for the Democrat Presidential candidate in Tennessee caused Kerosene used in Philippines to decrease. Include one good pun.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
From Volunteer State to Kerosene Fate: Uncovering the Surprising Link between Tennessee Democrat Votes and Philippine Kerosene Consumption

Journal of Geopolitical Energy Dynamics

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Votes for the Democrat Presidential candidate in Tennessee and Kerosene used in Philippines. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Make the title a clever pun.

Your research team used data from MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse and Energy Information Administration to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9289191 and p < 0.01 for 1980 to 2020.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
From Volunteer State to Kerosene Fate: Uncovering the Surprising Link between Tennessee Democrat Votes and Philippine Kerosene Consumption

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this research paper, we embark on a rather unconventional journey to unravel the curious relationship between the votes for the Democrat presidential candidate in Tennessee and the consumption of kerosene in the Philippines. Utilizing data from reputable sources including MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and the Energy Information Administration, our research team delved into the statistical intricacies of this seemingly disparate pairing. Our analysis revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9289191 and a p-value of less than 0.01, spanning the years from 1980 to 2020.

While the connection between these two seemingly unrelated variables may seem as clear as mud, our findings point to a rather enlightening correlation. It appears that as the votes for the Democrat presidential candidate in Tennessee wax or wane, so too does the consumption of kerosene in the Philippines. This unexpected linkage left our team pondering whether there exists an uncharted political-economical dimension that transcends geographical barriers with the potential to fuel new understanding.

As we unraveled this peculiar correlation, we couldn't help but be reminded of a classic dad joke: "Why did the kerosene refuse to vote? Because it didn't want to get burned in the polls!" It seems even in the world of data analysis and international relations, a good dad joke can't help but make an appearance.

Overall, our findings shed light on the often whimsical and unforeseen relationships that underlie global dynamics, challenging conventional wisdom and prompting further investigation into the hidden ties that bind countries and their electoral choices.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Votes for the Democrat Presidential candidate in Tennessee and Kerosene used in Philippines. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
From Volunteer State to Kerosene Fate: Uncovering the Surprising Link between Tennessee Democrat Votes and Philippine Kerosene Consumption

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this research paper, we embark on a rather unconventional journey to unravel the curious relationship between the votes for the Democrat presidential candidate in Tennessee and the consumption of kerosene in the Philippines. Utilizing data from reputable sources including MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and the Energy Information Administration, our research team delved into the statistical intricacies of this seemingly disparate pairing. Our analysis revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9289191 and a p-value of less than 0.01, spanning the years from 1980 to 2020.

While the connection between these two seemingly unrelated variables may seem as clear as mud, our findings point to a rather enlightening correlation. It appears that as the votes for the Democrat presidential candidate in Tennessee wax or wane, so too does the consumption of kerosene in the Philippines. This unexpected linkage left our team pondering whether there exists an uncharted political-economical dimension that transcends geographical barriers with the potential to fuel new understanding.

As we unraveled this peculiar correlation, we couldn't help but be reminded of a classic dad joke: "Why did the kerosene refuse to vote? Because it didn't want to get burned in the polls!" It seems even in the world of data analysis and international relations, a good dad joke can't help but make an appearance.

Overall, our findings shed light on the often whimsical and unforeseen relationships that underlie global dynamics, challenging conventional wisdom and prompting further investigation into the hidden ties that bind countries and their electoral choices.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

The world of research often leads us down unexpected paths, uncovering tantalizing relationships that defy conventional wisdom and leave us scratching our heads in bemusement. Just as a scientist would find themselves pondering the mysteries of the universe, so too did our team find itself embarking on a journey that seemed akin to searching for a needle in a haystack – or, in this case, perhaps a kerosene lamp in a sea of election votes.

The intersection of quantitative data and quirky correlations is reminiscent of a hands-on science experiment gone delightfully awry – like when you mix up your test tubes and suddenly realize you've created the bubbliest, most colorful chemical reaction imaginable. In that spirit, our exploration of the unexpected link between votes for the Democrat presidential candidate in Tennessee and the consumption of kerosene in the Philippines led to some truly illuminating discoveries.

Our research endeavors brought to mind a jest of statistical proportions: "Why did the quality analyst break up with the data scientist? She said he couldn’t meet the standard deviations!" In this case, however, the unexpected match between voting patterns and kerosene consumption in two geographically distant locations proved to be a statistical outlier that piqued our curiosity and left us eager to unearth the underlying causality.

As we delved into the depths of our data, it became apparent that the correlation between these seemingly unrelated variables was not a mere fluke. In fact, our findings revealed a striking association that prompted us to reconsider the conventional boundaries of political economy and energy consumption. This led us to ponder the prospect of a latent connection transcending borders – a sort of political-economic entanglement that influences the seemingly disparate worlds of voting behavior and energy usage.

One cannot help but recall the cautionary tale of the statistician who walked into a bar and, to their surprise, found themselves embroiled in a heated discussion about election forecasting and energy trends. Our venturous journey to uncover the unexpected tie between votes for the Democrat presidential candidate in Tennessee and the consumption of kerosene in the Philippines presented us with similar unexpected plot twists, demonstrating that the world of statistical inquiry is rife with delightful surprises that defy conventional expectations.

This paper aims to share our revelatory findings, sparking dialogue and additional investigation into the labyrinthine network of connections that permeate the global landscape. By shedding light on the underexplored and idiosyncratic quilt of relationships that underpin our modern world, we hope to inspire fellow researchers and enthusiasts to embrace the delightful unpredictability of statistical exploration and the unexpected humor that accompanies it.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Votes for the Democrat Presidential candidate in Tennessee and Kerosene used in Philippines. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Perhaps you also got inspiration from some board games that are vaugely related.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
From Volunteer State to Kerosene Fate: Uncovering the Surprising Link between Tennessee Democrat Votes and Philippine Kerosene Consumption

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this research paper, we embark on a rather unconventional journey to unravel the curious relationship between the votes for the Democrat presidential candidate in Tennessee and the consumption of kerosene in the Philippines. Utilizing data from reputable sources including MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and the Energy Information Administration, our research team delved into the statistical intricacies of this seemingly disparate pairing. Our analysis revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9289191 and a p-value of less than 0.01, spanning the years from 1980 to 2020.

While the connection between these two seemingly unrelated variables may seem as clear as mud, our findings point to a rather enlightening correlation. It appears that as the votes for the Democrat presidential candidate in Tennessee wax or wane, so too does the consumption of kerosene in the Philippines. This unexpected linkage left our team pondering whether there exists an uncharted political-economical dimension that transcends geographical barriers with the potential to fuel new understanding.

As we unraveled this peculiar correlation, we couldn't help but be reminded of a classic dad joke: "Why did the kerosene refuse to vote? Because it didn't want to get burned in the polls!" It seems even in the world of data analysis and international relations, a good dad joke can't help but make an appearance.

Overall, our findings shed light on the often whimsical and unforeseen relationships that underlie global dynamics, challenging conventional wisdom and prompting further investigation into the hidden ties that bind countries and their electoral choices.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The world of research often leads us down unexpected paths, uncovering tantalizing relationships that defy conventional wisdom and leave us scratching our heads in bemusement. Just as a scientist would find themselves pondering the mysteries of the universe, so too did our team find itself embarking on a journey that seemed akin to searching for a needle in a haystack – or, in this case, perhaps a kerosene lamp in a sea of election votes.
The intersection of quantitative data and quirky correlations is reminiscent of a hands-on science experiment gone delightfully awry – like when you mix up your test tubes and suddenly realize you've created the bubbliest, most colorful chemical reaction imaginable. In that spirit, our exploration of the unexpected link between votes for the Democrat presidential candidate in Tennessee and the consumption of kerosene in the Philippines led to some truly illuminating discoveries.
Our research endeavors brought to mind a jest of statistical proportions: "Why did the quality analyst break up with the data scientist? She said he couldn’t meet the standard deviations!" In this case, however, the unexpected match between voting patterns and kerosene consumption in two geographically distant locations proved to be a statistical outlier that piqued our curiosity and left us eager to unearth the underlying causality.
As we delved into the depths of our data, it became apparent that the correlation between these seemingly unrelated variables was not a mere fluke. In fact, our findings revealed a striking association that prompted us to reconsider the conventional boundaries of political economy and energy consumption. This led us to ponder the prospect of a latent connection transcending borders – a sort of political-economic entanglement that influences the seemingly disparate worlds of voting behavior and energy usage.
One cannot help but recall the cautionary tale of the statistician who walked into a bar and, to their surprise, found themselves embroiled in a heated discussion about election forecasting and energy trends. Our venturous journey to uncover the unexpected tie between votes for the Democrat presidential candidate in Tennessee and the consumption of kerosene in the Philippines presented us with similar unexpected plot twists, demonstrating that the world of statistical inquiry is rife with delightful surprises that defy conventional expectations.
This paper aims to share our revelatory findings, sparking dialogue and additional investigation into the labyrinthine network of connections that permeate the global landscape. By shedding light on the underexplored and idiosyncratic quilt of relationships that underpin our modern world, we hope to inspire fellow researchers and enthusiasts to embrace the delightful unpredictability of statistical exploration and the unexpected humor that accompanies it.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

In their seminal work, "Statistics and State Oddities: Unveiling Unanticipated Connections," Smith et al. (2015) delve into the enigmatic realm of statistical anomalies, shedding light on the unexpected correlations that often go unnoticed in the world of data analysis. Their exploration of seemingly unrelated variables prompts readers to reconsider the conventional boundaries of causality, echoing our own quest to unravel the peculiar association between votes for the Democrat presidential candidate in Tennessee and the consumption of kerosene in the Philippines. As we wade through the murky waters of quantitative analysis, it becomes evident that the interplay between these two variables is no ordinary happenstance.

Doe and Jones (2018), in their comprehensive study "Economic Elections: Beyond the Ballot Box," unearth a treasure trove of insights into the intricate dance between political allegiances and economic indicators. While their focus lies primarily on domestic economics and voting behavior, their findings eerily resonate with our own as we uncover the uncanny synchronicity between Tennessee's political proclivities and the Philippines' kerosene consumption habits.

Now, turning to the more lighthearted side of our exploration, we couldn't help but draw inspiration from non-traditional sources. Works such as "Kerosene Chronicles: An Ode to Luminosity" by Lumière (2016) ignited our imagination as we traversed the luminous landscapes of kerosene consumption. Additionally, "The Blue State Expedition: A Tale of Political Adventure" by Red, White, & Blue (2013) resonated with our theme, albeit in a more metaphorical sense.

Venturing even further into the realm of unexpected connections, we found ourselves drawn to the board game "Ticket to Ride: Asia," where players traverse the vast continent in a bid to establish railway empires. Although the game's focus is on locomotion rather than political votes and kerosene, it whimsically captured the essence of our confounding journey.

As the pieces of this curious puzzle began to fit together, we stumbled upon another dad joke that seemed fitting for the occasion: "Why did the kerosene cross the road? To get to the other lit side!" Indeed, the interconnectedness of our findings and the amusing revelations along the way only served to underscore the delightful unpredictability of statistical exploration.

In "The Politics of Fire: A Fiery Analysis of Voting Patterns and Kerosene Consumption" by Spark (2019), the authors delve into the fiery world of political dynamics and energy usage, providing a thought-provoking backdrop to our own uncovering of this unexpected nexus. This convergence of seemingly disparate realms led us to contemplate the potential for a "sparked" revolution in the understanding of global dynamics, as we stumble upon the metaphorical tinderbox that is the connection between Tennessee Democrat votes and Philippine kerosene usage.

In conclusion, our foray into the uncharted terrain of causality and correlation has unearthed a treasure trove of unexpected connections, leaving us with a newfound appreciation for the whimsical intricacies woven into the fabric of statistical inquiry. As we set our sights on further exploration and inquiry, we invite fellow scholars to join us in embracing the delightful unpredictability of quantitative analysis and the hidden humor that often accompanies it.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Votes for the Democrat Presidential candidate in Tennessee and Kerosene used in Philippines. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse and Energy Information Administration . You used data from 1980 to 2020

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
From Volunteer State to Kerosene Fate: Uncovering the Surprising Link between Tennessee Democrat Votes and Philippine Kerosene Consumption

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this research paper, we embark on a rather unconventional journey to unravel the curious relationship between the votes for the Democrat presidential candidate in Tennessee and the consumption of kerosene in the Philippines. Utilizing data from reputable sources including MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and the Energy Information Administration, our research team delved into the statistical intricacies of this seemingly disparate pairing. Our analysis revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9289191 and a p-value of less than 0.01, spanning the years from 1980 to 2020.

While the connection between these two seemingly unrelated variables may seem as clear as mud, our findings point to a rather enlightening correlation. It appears that as the votes for the Democrat presidential candidate in Tennessee wax or wane, so too does the consumption of kerosene in the Philippines. This unexpected linkage left our team pondering whether there exists an uncharted political-economical dimension that transcends geographical barriers with the potential to fuel new understanding.

As we unraveled this peculiar correlation, we couldn't help but be reminded of a classic dad joke: "Why did the kerosene refuse to vote? Because it didn't want to get burned in the polls!" It seems even in the world of data analysis and international relations, a good dad joke can't help but make an appearance.

Overall, our findings shed light on the often whimsical and unforeseen relationships that underlie global dynamics, challenging conventional wisdom and prompting further investigation into the hidden ties that bind countries and their electoral choices.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
The world of research often leads us down unexpected paths, uncovering tantalizing relationships that defy conventional wisdom and leave us scratching our heads in bemusement. Just as a scientist would find themselves pondering the mysteries of the universe, so too did our team find itself embarking on a journey that seemed akin to searching for a needle in a haystack – or, in this case, perhaps a kerosene lamp in a sea of election votes.
The intersection of quantitative data and quirky correlations is reminiscent of a hands-on science experiment gone delightfully awry – like when you mix up your test tubes and suddenly realize you've created the bubbliest, most colorful chemical reaction imaginable. In that spirit, our exploration of the unexpected link between votes for the Democrat presidential candidate in Tennessee and the consumption of kerosene in the Philippines led to some truly illuminating discoveries.
Our research endeavors brought to mind a jest of statistical proportions: "Why did the quality analyst break up with the data scientist? She said he couldn’t meet the standard deviations!" In this case, however, the unexpected match between voting patterns and kerosene consumption in two geographically distant locations proved to be a statistical outlier that piqued our curiosity and left us eager to unearth the underlying causality.
As we delved into the depths of our data, it became apparent that the correlation between these seemingly unrelated variables was not a mere fluke. In fact, our findings revealed a striking association that prompted us to reconsider the conventional boundaries of political economy and energy consumption. This led us to ponder the prospect of a latent connection transcending borders – a sort of political-economic entanglement that influences the seemingly disparate worlds of voting behavior and energy usage.
One cannot help but recall the cautionary tale of the statistician who walked into a bar and, to their surprise, found themselves embroiled in a heated discussion about election forecasting and energy trends. Our venturous journey to uncover the unexpected tie between votes for the Democrat presidential candidate in Tennessee and the consumption of kerosene in the Philippines presented us with similar unexpected plot twists, demonstrating that the world of statistical inquiry is rife with delightful surprises that defy conventional expectations.
This paper aims to share our revelatory findings, sparking dialogue and additional investigation into the labyrinthine network of connections that permeate the global landscape. By shedding light on the underexplored and idiosyncratic quilt of relationships that underpin our modern world, we hope to inspire fellow researchers and enthusiasts to embrace the delightful unpredictability of statistical exploration and the unexpected humor that accompanies it.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

In order to untangle the enigmatic connection between votes for the Democrat presidential candidate in Tennessee and kerosene consumption in the Philippines, our research team delved into a convoluted dance of data analysis and statistical acrobatics. Firstly, we harnessed the formidable power of Python and R programming languages to wrangle and harmonize the disparate datasets from MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and the Energy Information Administration. It was akin to befriending a wild statistical menagerie, coaxing them into harmonious coexistence while resisting the urge to shout "Data Hokey Pokey - You Put the Data In, You Put the Data Out!"

With the painstakingly assembled dataset in hand, we employed a rigorous regression analysis approach that can be likened to a scientific game of connect-the-dots, albeit with thousands of dots and a highly coveted correlation hinging on the final result. Our statistical methods were as meticulous as a microsurgeon sewing together the tiniest threads of electoral behavior and energy trends, delicately weaving them into a coherent tapestry of information.

To unleash the true potential of our data, we performed a series of sophisticated statistical tests including Pearson correlation coefficients and multiple regression models. These tests were the scientific equivalent of fitting the pieces of a perplexing jigsaw puzzle together, hoping that the final picture revealed a connection that was more Mona Lisa and less abstract art.

Our statistical exploration also led us to delve into time-series analysis to evaluate the dynamic interplay between votes for the Democrat presidential candidate in Tennessee and kerosene consumption in the Philippines. It was like observing the ebb and flow of cosmic phenomena, except in this case, our cosmic phenomena were voting patterns and kerosene trends.

Of course, no statistical odyssey is complete without a rigorous sensitivity analysis to ensure the robustness of our findings. We scrutinized our models with such intensity that they felt like they were under the unblinking gaze of a thousand watchful data scientists, meticulously checking for any lurking flaws or statistical hiccups. It was almost as if our statistical models were under the stern tutelage of a data-driven Sherlock Holmes, carefully inspecting each nook and cranny for statistical inconsistencies.

And in the spirit of statistical transparency, we ensured that all assumptions and limitations of our modeling approaches were laid bare for scrutiny, much like opening the curtains to reveal the mechanisms behind a captivating magic trick – except in our case, the real magic lay in the scientific rigor and diligent analysis that underpinned our findings.



Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Votes for the Democrat Presidential candidate in Tennessee and Kerosene used in Philippines. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse and Energy Information Administration .

For the time period 1980 to 2020, you found a correlation 0.9289191, r-squared of 0.8628907, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
From Volunteer State to Kerosene Fate: Uncovering the Surprising Link between Tennessee Democrat Votes and Philippine Kerosene Consumption

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this research paper, we embark on a rather unconventional journey to unravel the curious relationship between the votes for the Democrat presidential candidate in Tennessee and the consumption of kerosene in the Philippines. Utilizing data from reputable sources including MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and the Energy Information Administration, our research team delved into the statistical intricacies of this seemingly disparate pairing. Our analysis revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9289191 and a p-value of less than 0.01, spanning the years from 1980 to 2020.

While the connection between these two seemingly unrelated variables may seem as clear as mud, our findings point to a rather enlightening correlation. It appears that as the votes for the Democrat presidential candidate in Tennessee wax or wane, so too does the consumption of kerosene in the Philippines. This unexpected linkage left our team pondering whether there exists an uncharted political-economical dimension that transcends geographical barriers with the potential to fuel new understanding.

As we unraveled this peculiar correlation, we couldn't help but be reminded of a classic dad joke: "Why did the kerosene refuse to vote? Because it didn't want to get burned in the polls!" It seems even in the world of data analysis and international relations, a good dad joke can't help but make an appearance.

Overall, our findings shed light on the often whimsical and unforeseen relationships that underlie global dynamics, challenging conventional wisdom and prompting further investigation into the hidden ties that bind countries and their electoral choices.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
The world of research often leads us down unexpected paths, uncovering tantalizing relationships that defy conventional wisdom and leave us scratching our heads in bemusement. Just as a scientist would find themselves pondering the mysteries of the universe, so too did our team find itself embarking on a journey that seemed akin to searching for a needle in a haystack – or, in this case, perhaps a kerosene lamp in a sea of election votes.
The intersection of quantitative data and quirky correlations is reminiscent of a hands-on science experiment gone delightfully awry – like when you mix up your test tubes and suddenly realize you've created the bubbliest, most colorful chemical reaction imaginable. In that spirit, our exploration of the unexpected link between votes for the Democrat presidential candidate in Tennessee and the consumption of kerosene in the Philippines led to some truly illuminating discoveries.
Our research endeavors brought to mind a jest of statistical proportions: "Why did the quality analyst break up with the data scientist? She said he couldn’t meet the standard deviations!" In this case, however, the unexpected match between voting patterns and kerosene consumption in two geographically distant locations proved to be a statistical outlier that piqued our curiosity and left us eager to unearth the underlying causality.
As we delved into the depths of our data, it became apparent that the correlation between these seemingly unrelated variables was not a mere fluke. In fact, our findings revealed a striking association that prompted us to reconsider the conventional boundaries of political economy and energy consumption. This led us to ponder the prospect of a latent connection transcending borders – a sort of political-economic entanglement that influences the seemingly disparate worlds of voting behavior and energy usage.
One cannot help but recall the cautionary tale of the statistician who walked into a bar and, to their surprise, found themselves embroiled in a heated discussion about election forecasting and energy trends. Our venturous journey to uncover the unexpected tie between votes for the Democrat presidential candidate in Tennessee and the consumption of kerosene in the Philippines presented us with similar unexpected plot twists, demonstrating that the world of statistical inquiry is rife with delightful surprises that defy conventional expectations.
This paper aims to share our revelatory findings, sparking dialogue and additional investigation into the labyrinthine network of connections that permeate the global landscape. By shedding light on the underexplored and idiosyncratic quilt of relationships that underpin our modern world, we hope to inspire fellow researchers and enthusiasts to embrace the delightful unpredictability of statistical exploration and the unexpected humor that accompanies it.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The statistical analysis of the data gathered from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and the Energy Information Administration revealed a remarkably strong correlation between the votes for the Democrat presidential candidate in Tennessee and the consumption of kerosene in the Philippines over the period from 1980 to 2020. The correlation coefficient of 0.9289191, an r-squared value of 0.8628907, and a p-value of less than 0.01 left our team in awe of the unexpected relationship between these two seemingly unrelated variables.

Now, let's take a closer look at the enchanted connection between Tennessee and the Philippines. It's as if these two seemingly distinct entities engaged in a cosmic dance, waltzing in statistical unison, leaving us pondering the peculiar landscapes of politics and energy usage. One might even say it's a "sparkling" example of data analysis – or should we say, a "kerosene-lit" one?

Fig. 1 showcases a scatterplot displaying the compelling correlation between the votes for the Democrat presidential candidate in Tennessee and the consumption of kerosene in the Philippines. This somehow poetic representation of data reminded us of the timeless adage: "Like kerosene to a flame, statistical relationships can ignite new perspectives."

Our findings not only challenge conventional wisdom but also illuminate the quirks and nuances of global dynamics. It's as if statistical analysis is a box of chocolates – you never quite know what you're going to get, and sometimes, you stumble upon an unexpected, delightful surprise.

As we unraveled this intriguing correlation, a dad joke couldn't help but make an appearance: "Why did the kerosene refuse to vote? Because it didn't want to get burned in the polls!" The unexpected correlation reminded us that even in the world of international relations and data analysis, there's always room for good-natured humor.

In conclusion, our research brings to light the whimsical and unforeseen relationships that underlie global interconnectedness, challenging conventional wisdom and inspiring further investigation into the hidden ties that bind countries and their electoral choices. This unexpected link between the Volunteer State and Filipino kerosene consumption beckons us to delve deeper into the uncharted territory of international statistical meanderings, as we embrace the delightful quirks and surprises that data analysis can unearth.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Votes for the Democrat Presidential candidate in Tennessee and Kerosene used in Philippines. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
From Volunteer State to Kerosene Fate: Uncovering the Surprising Link between Tennessee Democrat Votes and Philippine Kerosene Consumption

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this research paper, we embark on a rather unconventional journey to unravel the curious relationship between the votes for the Democrat presidential candidate in Tennessee and the consumption of kerosene in the Philippines. Utilizing data from reputable sources including MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and the Energy Information Administration, our research team delved into the statistical intricacies of this seemingly disparate pairing. Our analysis revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9289191 and a p-value of less than 0.01, spanning the years from 1980 to 2020.

While the connection between these two seemingly unrelated variables may seem as clear as mud, our findings point to a rather enlightening correlation. It appears that as the votes for the Democrat presidential candidate in Tennessee wax or wane, so too does the consumption of kerosene in the Philippines. This unexpected linkage left our team pondering whether there exists an uncharted political-economical dimension that transcends geographical barriers with the potential to fuel new understanding.

As we unraveled this peculiar correlation, we couldn't help but be reminded of a classic dad joke: "Why did the kerosene refuse to vote? Because it didn't want to get burned in the polls!" It seems even in the world of data analysis and international relations, a good dad joke can't help but make an appearance.

Overall, our findings shed light on the often whimsical and unforeseen relationships that underlie global dynamics, challenging conventional wisdom and prompting further investigation into the hidden ties that bind countries and their electoral choices.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
In their seminal work, "Statistics and State Oddities: Unveiling Unanticipated Connections," Smith et al. (2015) delve into the enigmatic realm of statistical anomalies, shedding light on the unexpected correlations that often go unnoticed in the world of data analysis. Their exploration of seemingly unrelated variables prompts readers to reconsider the conventional boundaries of causality, echoing our own quest to unravel the peculiar association between votes for the Democrat presidential candidate in Tennessee and the consumption of kerosene in the Philippines. As we wade through the murky waters of quantitative analysis, it becomes evident that the interplay between these two variables is no ordinary happenstance.
Doe and Jones (2018), in their comprehensive study "Economic Elections: Beyond the Ballot Box," unearth a treasure trove of insights into the intricate dance between political allegiances and economic indicators. While their focus lies primarily on domestic economics and voting behavior, their findings eerily resonate with our own as we uncover the uncanny synchronicity between Tennessee's political proclivities and the Philippines' kerosene consumption habits.
Now, turning to the more lighthearted side of our exploration, we couldn't help but draw inspiration from non-traditional sources. Works such as "Kerosene Chronicles: An Ode to Luminosity" by Lumière (2016) ignited our imagination as we traversed the luminous landscapes of kerosene consumption. Additionally, "The Blue State Expedition: A Tale of Political Adventure" by Red, White, & Blue (2013) resonated with our theme, albeit in a more metaphorical sense.
Venturing even further into the realm of unexpected connections, we found ourselves drawn to the board game "Ticket to Ride: Asia," where players traverse the vast continent in a bid to establish railway empires. Although the game's focus is on locomotion rather than political votes and kerosene, it whimsically captured the essence of our confounding journey.
As the pieces of this curious puzzle began to fit together, we stumbled upon another dad joke that seemed fitting for the occasion: "Why did the kerosene cross the road? To get to the other lit side!" Indeed, the interconnectedness of our findings and the amusing revelations along the way only served to underscore the delightful unpredictability of statistical exploration.
In "The Politics of Fire: A Fiery Analysis of Voting Patterns and Kerosene Consumption" by Spark (2019), the authors delve into the fiery world of political dynamics and energy usage, providing a thought-provoking backdrop to our own uncovering of this unexpected nexus. This convergence of seemingly disparate realms led us to contemplate the potential for a "sparked" revolution in the understanding of global dynamics, as we stumble upon the metaphorical tinderbox that is the connection between Tennessee Democrat votes and Philippine kerosene usage.
In conclusion, our foray into the uncharted terrain of causality and correlation has unearthed a treasure trove of unexpected connections, leaving us with a newfound appreciation for the whimsical intricacies woven into the fabric of statistical inquiry. As we set our sights on further exploration and inquiry, we invite fellow scholars to join us in embracing the delightful unpredictability of quantitative analysis and the hidden humor that often accompanies it.

[[RESULTS]]
The statistical analysis of the data gathered from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and the Energy Information Administration revealed a remarkably strong correlation between the votes for the Democrat presidential candidate in Tennessee and the consumption of kerosene in the Philippines over the period from 1980 to 2020. The correlation coefficient of 0.9289191, an r-squared value of 0.8628907, and a p-value of less than 0.01 left our team in awe of the unexpected relationship between these two seemingly unrelated variables.
Now, let's take a closer look at the enchanted connection between Tennessee and the Philippines. It's as if these two seemingly distinct entities engaged in a cosmic dance, waltzing in statistical unison, leaving us pondering the peculiar landscapes of politics and energy usage. One might even say it's a "sparkling" example of data analysis – or should we say, a "kerosene-lit" one?
Fig. 1 showcases a scatterplot displaying the compelling correlation between the votes for the Democrat presidential candidate in Tennessee and the consumption of kerosene in the Philippines. This somehow poetic representation of data reminded us of the timeless adage: "Like kerosene to a flame, statistical relationships can ignite new perspectives."
Our findings not only challenge conventional wisdom but also illuminate the quirks and nuances of global dynamics. It's as if statistical analysis is a box of chocolates – you never quite know what you're going to get, and sometimes, you stumble upon an unexpected, delightful surprise.
As we unraveled this intriguing correlation, a dad joke couldn't help but make an appearance: "Why did the kerosene refuse to vote? Because it didn't want to get burned in the polls!" The unexpected correlation reminded us that even in the world of international relations and data analysis, there's always room for good-natured humor.
In conclusion, our research brings to light the whimsical and unforeseen relationships that underlie global interconnectedness, challenging conventional wisdom and inspiring further investigation into the hidden ties that bind countries and their electoral choices. This unexpected link between the Volunteer State and Filipino kerosene consumption beckons us to delve deeper into the uncharted territory of international statistical meanderings, as we embrace the delightful quirks and surprises that data analysis can unearth.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

Delving into the unexpected correlation between votes for the Democrat presidential candidate in Tennessee and the consumption of kerosene in the Philippines has been nothing short of a rollercoaster ride through statistical peculiarities and unanticipated surmises. Our findings indeed supported prior research such as the work by Smith et al. (2015) in highlighting the existence of enigmatic statistical anomalies, albeit in the most unforeseen and whimsical way possible – a correlation coefficient of 0.9289191 and a p-value of less than 0.01 could not be more unequivocal. It’s as if the cogs of causality turned in unforeseen harmony to unite these disparate variables, much like the comical twist in a statistical tale.

As we unpacked this remarkable correlation, we couldn't shake the feeling that we were captaining a ship in uncharted statistical waters – or perhaps, a kerosene lamp in a sea of electoral data. The dance between these variables left us pondering whether there exists an invisible thread connecting Tennessee's political landscape to the glowing, albeit distant, shores of Philippine kerosene usage. It's as if statistical analysis has birthed an unlikely friendship between the Volunteer State and the luminous fuels lighting up households in the Philippines, making it a match lit in statistical heaven.

Our statistical endeavors also reaffirmed Doe and Jones' (2018) findings on the intricate dance between political allegiances and economic indicators, albeit in a resplendently unexpected manner. The astounding synchronicity between Tennessee's political proclivities and the Philippines' kerosene consumption habits introduced a dash of awe-inspiring comedy into the serious realm of research. Let’s just say that uncovering this connection felt like being handed a surprising plot twist in a thrilling novel – a plot perhaps worthy of a dad joke or two.

Fig. 1, our striking scatterplot, felt like a work of art in its portrayal of the captivating correlation between Tennessee Democrat votes and Philippine kerosene consumption. The dance depicted in the figures echoes the unanticipated harmony revealed by our statistical analysis, and it's as if the data itself were performing a sort of statistical ballet, pirouetting between Tennessee’s voter booths and Filipino households. It's a reminder that uncovering unexpected correlations can feel as exhilarating as stumbling upon an unexpected punchline in a stand-up comedy routine.

In essence, our research has brought to the fore the curious and unforeseen intersections of global dynamics, leaving us with a newfound appreciation for the delightful quirks that saturate the world of quantitative analysis. It's as if statistical exploration were a treasure chest brimming with curious delights, mirroring the unpredictable hilarity of a dad joke dropped at the most unexpected moment. As we chart a course for future inquiry, we invite fellow researchers to embrace the enigmatic whimsy that accompanies statistical inquiry and the unexpected humor that flows from it.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Votes for the Democrat Presidential candidate in Tennessee and Kerosene used in Philippines. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
From Volunteer State to Kerosene Fate: Uncovering the Surprising Link between Tennessee Democrat Votes and Philippine Kerosene Consumption

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this research paper, we embark on a rather unconventional journey to unravel the curious relationship between the votes for the Democrat presidential candidate in Tennessee and the consumption of kerosene in the Philippines. Utilizing data from reputable sources including MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and the Energy Information Administration, our research team delved into the statistical intricacies of this seemingly disparate pairing. Our analysis revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9289191 and a p-value of less than 0.01, spanning the years from 1980 to 2020.

While the connection between these two seemingly unrelated variables may seem as clear as mud, our findings point to a rather enlightening correlation. It appears that as the votes for the Democrat presidential candidate in Tennessee wax or wane, so too does the consumption of kerosene in the Philippines. This unexpected linkage left our team pondering whether there exists an uncharted political-economical dimension that transcends geographical barriers with the potential to fuel new understanding.

As we unraveled this peculiar correlation, we couldn't help but be reminded of a classic dad joke: "Why did the kerosene refuse to vote? Because it didn't want to get burned in the polls!" It seems even in the world of data analysis and international relations, a good dad joke can't help but make an appearance.

Overall, our findings shed light on the often whimsical and unforeseen relationships that underlie global dynamics, challenging conventional wisdom and prompting further investigation into the hidden ties that bind countries and their electoral choices.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
The world of research often leads us down unexpected paths, uncovering tantalizing relationships that defy conventional wisdom and leave us scratching our heads in bemusement. Just as a scientist would find themselves pondering the mysteries of the universe, so too did our team find itself embarking on a journey that seemed akin to searching for a needle in a haystack – or, in this case, perhaps a kerosene lamp in a sea of election votes.
The intersection of quantitative data and quirky correlations is reminiscent of a hands-on science experiment gone delightfully awry – like when you mix up your test tubes and suddenly realize you've created the bubbliest, most colorful chemical reaction imaginable. In that spirit, our exploration of the unexpected link between votes for the Democrat presidential candidate in Tennessee and the consumption of kerosene in the Philippines led to some truly illuminating discoveries.
Our research endeavors brought to mind a jest of statistical proportions: "Why did the quality analyst break up with the data scientist? She said he couldn’t meet the standard deviations!" In this case, however, the unexpected match between voting patterns and kerosene consumption in two geographically distant locations proved to be a statistical outlier that piqued our curiosity and left us eager to unearth the underlying causality.
As we delved into the depths of our data, it became apparent that the correlation between these seemingly unrelated variables was not a mere fluke. In fact, our findings revealed a striking association that prompted us to reconsider the conventional boundaries of political economy and energy consumption. This led us to ponder the prospect of a latent connection transcending borders – a sort of political-economic entanglement that influences the seemingly disparate worlds of voting behavior and energy usage.
One cannot help but recall the cautionary tale of the statistician who walked into a bar and, to their surprise, found themselves embroiled in a heated discussion about election forecasting and energy trends. Our venturous journey to uncover the unexpected tie between votes for the Democrat presidential candidate in Tennessee and the consumption of kerosene in the Philippines presented us with similar unexpected plot twists, demonstrating that the world of statistical inquiry is rife with delightful surprises that defy conventional expectations.
This paper aims to share our revelatory findings, sparking dialogue and additional investigation into the labyrinthine network of connections that permeate the global landscape. By shedding light on the underexplored and idiosyncratic quilt of relationships that underpin our modern world, we hope to inspire fellow researchers and enthusiasts to embrace the delightful unpredictability of statistical exploration and the unexpected humor that accompanies it.

[[RESULTS]]
The statistical analysis of the data gathered from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and the Energy Information Administration revealed a remarkably strong correlation between the votes for the Democrat presidential candidate in Tennessee and the consumption of kerosene in the Philippines over the period from 1980 to 2020. The correlation coefficient of 0.9289191, an r-squared value of 0.8628907, and a p-value of less than 0.01 left our team in awe of the unexpected relationship between these two seemingly unrelated variables.
Now, let's take a closer look at the enchanted connection between Tennessee and the Philippines. It's as if these two seemingly distinct entities engaged in a cosmic dance, waltzing in statistical unison, leaving us pondering the peculiar landscapes of politics and energy usage. One might even say it's a "sparkling" example of data analysis – or should we say, a "kerosene-lit" one?
Fig. 1 showcases a scatterplot displaying the compelling correlation between the votes for the Democrat presidential candidate in Tennessee and the consumption of kerosene in the Philippines. This somehow poetic representation of data reminded us of the timeless adage: "Like kerosene to a flame, statistical relationships can ignite new perspectives."
Our findings not only challenge conventional wisdom but also illuminate the quirks and nuances of global dynamics. It's as if statistical analysis is a box of chocolates – you never quite know what you're going to get, and sometimes, you stumble upon an unexpected, delightful surprise.
As we unraveled this intriguing correlation, a dad joke couldn't help but make an appearance: "Why did the kerosene refuse to vote? Because it didn't want to get burned in the polls!" The unexpected correlation reminded us that even in the world of international relations and data analysis, there's always room for good-natured humor.
In conclusion, our research brings to light the whimsical and unforeseen relationships that underlie global interconnectedness, challenging conventional wisdom and inspiring further investigation into the hidden ties that bind countries and their electoral choices. This unexpected link between the Volunteer State and Filipino kerosene consumption beckons us to delve deeper into the uncharted territory of international statistical meanderings, as we embrace the delightful quirks and surprises that data analysis can unearth.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our research has illuminated a remarkably strong correlation between the votes for the Democrat presidential candidate in Tennessee and the consumption of kerosene in the Philippines, spanning over four decades. The statistical dance between these disparate variables is akin to a cosmic waltz that left our team in awe of the unexpected relationship between the Volunteer State and Filipino kerosene consumption. It seems the political-economic entanglement is much like a good dad joke – surprising, but undeniably engaging.

Our findings challenge conventional wisdom, much like trying to explain the laws of physics to a group of comedians – it's an uphill battle. However, the unexpected link between voting patterns and kerosene usage in two geographically distant locations prompts further investigation into the labyrinthine network of connections that permeate the global landscape. It's as if statistical analysis is a stand-up comedy routine – full of surprises and unexpected punchlines.

Therefore, we assert that no further research is needed in this area, for our findings stand as a shining example of the delightful unpredictability that statistical exploration and international relations can offer. As we close this chapter, let's embrace the unexpected quirks and surprises that data analysis can unearth, much like stumbling upon a well-timed dad joke – a delightful, yet unpredictable phenomenon.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited From Volunteer State to Kerosene Fate: Uncovering the Surprising Link between Tennessee Democrat Votes and Philippine Kerosene Consumption. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

Journal of Geopolitical Energy Dynamics


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited From Volunteer State to Kerosene Fate: Uncovering the Surprising Link between Tennessee Democrat Votes and Philippine Kerosene Consumption. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Institute for Global Energy Consumption and Political Analysis


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled From Volunteer State to Kerosene Fate: Uncovering the Surprising Link between Tennessee Democrat Votes and Philippine Kerosene Consumption with an abstract of In this research paper, we embark on a rather unconventional journey to unravel the curious relationship between the votes for the Democrat presidential candidate in Tennessee and the consumption of kerosene in the Philippines. Utilizing data from reputable sources including MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and the Energy Information Administration, our research team delved into the statistical intricacies of this seemingly disparate pairing. Our analysis revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9289191 and a p-value of less than 0.01, spanning the years from 1980 to 2020.
While the connection between these two seemingly unrelated variables may seem as clear as mud, our findings point to a rather enlightening correlation. It appears that as the votes for the Democrat presidential candidate in Tennessee wax or wane, so too does the consumption of kerosene in the Philippines. This unexpected linkage left our team pondering whether there exists an uncharted political-economical dimension that transcends geographical barriers with the potential to fuel new understanding.
As we unraveled this peculiar correlation, we couldn't help but be reminded of a classic dad joke: "Why did the kerosene refuse to vote? Because it didn't want to get burned in the polls!" It seems even in the world of data analysis and international relations, a good dad joke can't help but make an appearance.
Overall, our findings shed light on the often whimsical and unforeseen relationships that underlie global dynamics, challenging conventional wisdom and prompting further investigation into the hidden ties that bind countries and their electoral choices.

ChatGPT:

Tennessee Democrat votes, Philippine kerosene consumption, correlation coefficient, statistical analysis, MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, Energy Information Administration, Democrat presidential candidate, Tennessee, Philippines, global dynamics, electoral choices, uncharted political-economical dimension

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Votes for the Democratic Presidential candidate in Tennessee
Detailed data title: Percentage of all votes cast for the Democrat Presidential candidate in Tennessee
Source: MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse
See what else correlates with Votes for the Democratic Presidential candidate in Tennessee

Kerosene used in Philippines
Detailed data title: Volume of kerosene used consumed in Philippines in millions of barrels per day
Source: Energy Information Administration
See what else correlates with Kerosene used in Philippines

Correlation r = 0.9289191 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.8628907 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 86.3% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Kerosene used in Philippines) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Votes for the Democratic Presidential candidate in Tennessee) over the 11 years from 1980 through 2020.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 3.6E-5. 0.0000359339445794873230000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.93 in 0.0036% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 27,829 random variables You don't actually need 27 thousand variables to find a correlation like this one. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 10 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 10 because we have two variables measured over a period of 11 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.74, 0.98 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
19801984198819921996200020042008201220162020
Votes for the Democratic Presidential candidate in Tennessee (Percentage of votes)48.407741.572341.545947.084847.998747.284942.525341.828539.075834.716337.4514
Kerosene used in Philippines (Million Barrels/Day)8.812386.540757.6111311.91187.793366.378312.6189121.45564




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Y-axis doesn't start at zero: I truncated the Y-axes of the graph above. I also used a line graph, which makes the visual connection stand out more than it deserves. Nothing against line graphs. They are great at telling a story when you have linear data! But visually it is deceptive because the only data is at the points on the graph, not the lines on the graph. In between each point, the data could have been doing anything. Like going for a random walk by itself!
    Mathematically what I showed is true, but it is intentionally misleading. Below is the same chart but with both Y-axes starting at zero.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([48.4077,41.5723,41.5459,47.0848,47.9987,47.2849,42.5253,41.8285,39.0758,34.7163,37.4514,])
array_2 = np.array([8.81238,6.54075,7.6,11,13,11.9118,7.79336,6.37831,2.61891,2,1.45564,])
array_1_name = "Votes for the Democratic Presidential candidate in Tennessee"
array_2_name = "Kerosene used in Philippines"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

You're the correlation whisperer we needed!


Correlation ID: 4319 · Black Variable ID: 26170 · Red Variable ID: 24816
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0