Download png, svg
AI explanation
With the rise in popularity of the first name Joelle, there has been a corresponding increase in the number of individuals taking up knitting as a hobby. This has inadvertently led to a surge in demand for alpaca wool, thereby boosting the alpaca farming industry in Alaska. As a result, Alaskan libertarian senators, who have long been advocates for the rights of alpaca farmers, have seen an uptick in support and votes from their constituents who are involved in this unforeseen economic ripple effect. Remember, behind every political trend, there's a thread of yarn leading back to unexpected beginnings.Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Generate an image of a glitch art style, focusing on a cozy Alaskan town scene. Show a group of people cheerfully knitting with balls of alpaca wool around a table in a warmly lit room. Feature a prominently displayed poster with "Joelle Knitting Club" and a banner reading "Alpaca Farmers for Liberty" in the background, along with a crowd rallying around two smiling libertarian senators expressing their support. Ensure that the glitch art style adds a unique visual twist to the cozy scene, introducing subtle distortions and unexpected visual elements that challenge the traditional depiction of the setting. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Popularity of the first name Joelle and Libertarian votes for Senators in Alaska. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Glitch art Macabre Futuristic Celtic art Glitch art
ChatGPT: Glitch art
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Popularity of the first name Joelle and Libertarian votes for Senators in Alaska, in the following situation: With the rise in popularity of the first name Joelle, there has been a corresponding increase in the number of individuals taking up knitting as a hobby. This has inadvertently led to a surge in demand for alpaca wool, thereby boosting the alpaca farming industry in Alaska. As a result, Alaskan libertarian senators, who have long been advocates for the rights of alpaca farmers, have seen an uptick in support and votes from their constituents who are involved in this unforeseen economic ripple effect. Remember, behind every political trend, there's a thread of yarn leading back to unexpected beginnings.. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In a cozy Alaskan town, a group of people gathers around a table, cheerfully knitting with balls of alpaca wool. The air is filled with laughter and chatter as they create beautiful garments. Nearby, a poster proudly displays the "Joelle Knitting Club." In the background, a banner reads "Alpaca Farmers for Liberty," as a crowd rallies around two smiling libertarian senators, expressing their support.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ Glitch art ] and depicting this scene: In a cozy Alaskan town, a group of people gathers around a table, cheerfully knitting with balls of alpaca wool. The air is filled with laughter and chatter as they create beautiful garments. Nearby, a poster proudly displays the "Joelle Knitting Club." In the background, a banner reads "Alpaca Farmers for Liberty," as a crowd rallies around two smiling libertarian senators, expressing their support. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Generate an image of a glitch art style, focusing on a cozy Alaskan town scene. Show a group of people cheerfully knitting with balls of alpaca wool around a table in a warmly lit room. Feature a prominently displayed poster with "Joelle Knitting Club" and a banner reading "Alpaca Farmers for Liberty" in the background, along with a crowd rallying around two smiling libertarian senators expressing their support. Ensure that the glitch art style adds a unique visual twist to the cozy scene, introducing subtle distortions and unexpected visual elements that challenge the traditional depiction of the setting.
*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.
I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in Popularity of the first name Joelle caused Libertarian votes for Senators in Alaska to increase.\Make it sound serious until the end.
AI academic paper
Joelle-itarianism: A Statistical Analysis of the Correlation between Joelle's Popularity and Libertarian Votes for Senators in Alaska The Journal of Political Pseudoscience Jan 2024 Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real! |
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Joelle and Libertarian votes for Senators in Alaska. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.
Make the title punny if you can come up with clever pun. If not, make it sound serious.
Your research team used data from US Social Security Administration and MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9564081 and p < 0.01 for 1986 to 2016.
Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)
[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit
[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit
ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
"Joelle-itarianism: A Statistical Analysis of the Correlation between Joelle's Popularity and Libertarian Votes for Senators in Alaska"
[[ABSTRACT]]
It's no surprise that politicians strive to win over as many voters as possible - even those with uncommon names like Joelle. In this study, we delved into the perplexing relationship between the popularity of the first name Joelle and the votes received by Libertarian candidates for Senate in Alaska. Drawing upon US Social Security Administration data and MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, we explored electoral results from 1986 to 2016, uncovering a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9564081 and a significant p-value of less than 0.01. So, what's in a name? As it turns out, quite a lot, especially when it comes to political preferences in the Last Frontier state. Our findings shed light on the quirky nuances of voter behavior, prompting a deeper contemplation of the idiosyncrasies that drive democracy. So, the next time you encounter a Joelle, remember - there may just be an entire political movement tethered to that moniker!
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Joelle and Libertarian votes for Senators in Alaska. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.
Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Joelle-itarianism: A Statistical Analysis of the Correlation between Joelle's Popularity and Libertarian Votes for Senators in Alaska"
[[ABSTRACT]]
It's no surprise that politicians strive to win over as many voters as possible - even those with uncommon names like Joelle. In this study, we delved into the perplexing relationship between the popularity of the first name Joelle and the votes received by Libertarian candidates for Senate in Alaska. Drawing upon US Social Security Administration data and MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, we explored electoral results from 1986 to 2016, uncovering a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9564081 and a significant p-value of less than 0.01. So, what's in a name? As it turns out, quite a lot, especially when it comes to political preferences in the Last Frontier state. Our findings shed light on the quirky nuances of voter behavior, prompting a deeper contemplation of the idiosyncrasies that drive democracy. So, the next time you encounter a Joelle, remember - there may just be an entire political movement tethered to that moniker!
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
From the dawn of time, humanity has been fascinated by the power of names. Whether it's pondering the significance of our own given names or chuckling at the absurdity of certain celebrity baby names, the impact of nomenclature has always been a source of subdued intrigue. Similarly, elections have long provided an endless supply of captivating data, with analysts poring over voter demographics to decipher the mysterious dance of democracy.
In the pursuit of unraveling this tangled web of human behavior, we present our study on the fascinating intersection of the name "Joelle" and the libertarian leanings of voters in the rugged, untamed wilderness that is Alaska. Picture this: a land of majestic glaciers, towering mountains, and a population seemingly drawn to the siren song of liberty. It is within this iconic setting that we endeavor to explore the connection—nay, the conflation—of Joelle's favor and libertarian votes for Senate candidates.
Lest one assumes this to be a mere flight of fancy, dear reader, let us assure you that every effort has been made to approach this investigation with the utmost rigor and academic gravitas. At the outset, skepticism may rear its ever-doubting head, much like the proverbial groundhog peeking out of its burrow, but as we navigate the labyrinthine passages of data and statistical analysis, our findings promise to tickle the most ardent curiosity.
Ironically, the moniker "Joelle," a name that has itself flitted at the periphery of notoriety, awaits its moment in the academic sun. As we wade through the numerical labyrinth and tease out the correlations between this name's favor and the proclivities of Alaska's electorate, we invite you, dear reader, to join us on this curious escapade. Let us peel back the layers of this enigmatic onion, fully aware of the potential for watery eyes but undeterred in our pursuit of truth—no matter how pungent.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Joelle and Libertarian votes for Senators in Alaska. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.
Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.
Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.
Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then name a couple popular internet memes that are related to one of the topics.
Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Joelle-itarianism: A Statistical Analysis of the Correlation between Joelle's Popularity and Libertarian Votes for Senators in Alaska"
[[ABSTRACT]]
It's no surprise that politicians strive to win over as many voters as possible - even those with uncommon names like Joelle. In this study, we delved into the perplexing relationship between the popularity of the first name Joelle and the votes received by Libertarian candidates for Senate in Alaska. Drawing upon US Social Security Administration data and MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, we explored electoral results from 1986 to 2016, uncovering a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9564081 and a significant p-value of less than 0.01. So, what's in a name? As it turns out, quite a lot, especially when it comes to political preferences in the Last Frontier state. Our findings shed light on the quirky nuances of voter behavior, prompting a deeper contemplation of the idiosyncrasies that drive democracy. So, the next time you encounter a Joelle, remember - there may just be an entire political movement tethered to that moniker!
-------
And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
From the dawn of time, humanity has been fascinated by the power of names. Whether it's pondering the significance of our own given names or chuckling at the absurdity of certain celebrity baby names, the impact of nomenclature has always been a source of subdued intrigue. Similarly, elections have long provided an endless supply of captivating data, with analysts poring over voter demographics to decipher the mysterious dance of democracy.
In the pursuit of unraveling this tangled web of human behavior, we present our study on the fascinating intersection of the name "Joelle" and the libertarian leanings of voters in the rugged, untamed wilderness that is Alaska. Picture this: a land of majestic glaciers, towering mountains, and a population seemingly drawn to the siren song of liberty. It is within this iconic setting that we endeavor to explore the connection—nay, the conflation—of Joelle's favor and libertarian votes for Senate candidates.
Lest one assumes this to be a mere flight of fancy, dear reader, let us assure you that every effort has been made to approach this investigation with the utmost rigor and academic gravitas. At the outset, skepticism may rear its ever-doubting head, much like the proverbial groundhog peeking out of its burrow, but as we navigate the labyrinthine passages of data and statistical analysis, our findings promise to tickle the most ardent curiosity.
Ironically, the moniker "Joelle," a name that has itself flitted at the periphery of notoriety, awaits its moment in the academic sun. As we wade through the numerical labyrinth and tease out the correlations between this name's favor and the proclivities of Alaska's electorate, we invite you, dear reader, to join us on this curious escapade. Let us peel back the layers of this enigmatic onion, fully aware of the potential for watery eyes but undeterred in our pursuit of truth—no matter how pungent.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The correlation between names and political affiliations has intrigued researchers for decades. Smith et al. (2010) examined the influence of first names on voter turnout, finding a modest but statistically significant association between certain names and political engagement. Doe and Jones (2014) expanded on this work, delving into the impact of uncommon names on party loyalty, revealing a curious pattern of allegiance among individuals with less common monikers. These studies, rooted in the empirical tradition of political science, provide a solid foundation for our exploration of the Joelle-Libertarian nexus.
Turning to the realm of popular non-fiction, Diving into Data by M. Statistician and Numbers Don't Lie by A. Analyst offer invaluable insights into the intricate world of quantitative analysis and the interpretation of electoral trends. In the fiction department, Margaret Atwood's The Handmaid's Tale and George Orwell's 1984, while not directly related to our topic, parallel themes of control and individuality, reinforcing the significance of political agency and personal identity. It is perhaps in the synthesis of these academic and literary realms that we may find the key to unraveling the enigma of Joelle-itarianism.
In the ever-evolving landscape of internet culture, one cannot overlook the meme-orable impact of the "Keep Calm and Vote Libertarian Joelle" meme. While largely satirical, it underscores the intersection of name recognition and political ideology within the public consciousness. Furthermore, the "Distracted Joelle" meme, though unrelated to politics, serves as a whimsical testament to the versatility and ubiquity of the name Joelle in contemporary digital discourse.
As we navigate the labyrinth of scholarship and popular culture, it becomes abundantly clear that the significance of Joelle's popularity in influencing political preferences cannot be dismissed lightly. With these diverse sources in mind, we embark upon our analysis with a sense of scholarly rigor and a healthy dose of humor, firmly grounded in the belief that truth, like a good pun, often lies just beneath the surface.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Joelle and Libertarian votes for Senators in Alaska. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.
Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from US Social Security Administration and MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse . You used data from 1986 to 2016
Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.
Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Joelle-itarianism: A Statistical Analysis of the Correlation between Joelle's Popularity and Libertarian Votes for Senators in Alaska"
[[ABSTRACT]]
It's no surprise that politicians strive to win over as many voters as possible - even those with uncommon names like Joelle. In this study, we delved into the perplexing relationship between the popularity of the first name Joelle and the votes received by Libertarian candidates for Senate in Alaska. Drawing upon US Social Security Administration data and MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, we explored electoral results from 1986 to 2016, uncovering a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9564081 and a significant p-value of less than 0.01. So, what's in a name? As it turns out, quite a lot, especially when it comes to political preferences in the Last Frontier state. Our findings shed light on the quirky nuances of voter behavior, prompting a deeper contemplation of the idiosyncrasies that drive democracy. So, the next time you encounter a Joelle, remember - there may just be an entire political movement tethered to that moniker!
[[INTRODUCTION]]
From the dawn of time, humanity has been fascinated by the power of names. Whether it's pondering the significance of our own given names or chuckling at the absurdity of certain celebrity baby names, the impact of nomenclature has always been a source of subdued intrigue. Similarly, elections have long provided an endless supply of captivating data, with analysts poring over voter demographics to decipher the mysterious dance of democracy.
In the pursuit of unraveling this tangled web of human behavior, we present our study on the fascinating intersection of the name "Joelle" and the libertarian leanings of voters in the rugged, untamed wilderness that is Alaska. Picture this: a land of majestic glaciers, towering mountains, and a population seemingly drawn to the siren song of liberty. It is within this iconic setting that we endeavor to explore the connection—nay, the conflation—of Joelle's favor and libertarian votes for Senate candidates.
Lest one assumes this to be a mere flight of fancy, dear reader, let us assure you that every effort has been made to approach this investigation with the utmost rigor and academic gravitas. At the outset, skepticism may rear its ever-doubting head, much like the proverbial groundhog peeking out of its burrow, but as we navigate the labyrinthine passages of data and statistical analysis, our findings promise to tickle the most ardent curiosity.
Ironically, the moniker "Joelle," a name that has itself flitted at the periphery of notoriety, awaits its moment in the academic sun. As we wade through the numerical labyrinth and tease out the correlations between this name's favor and the proclivities of Alaska's electorate, we invite you, dear reader, to join us on this curious escapade. Let us peel back the layers of this enigmatic onion, fully aware of the potential for watery eyes but undeterred in our pursuit of truth—no matter how pungent.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
ChatGPT:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
Data Collection:
To commence our caper into the tangled skein of Joelle-itarian whims and libertarian voter sway, we first amassed an extensive array of data. The primary font of information was the US Social Security Administration, which served as the tranquil abode of all things nomenclature. Here, we carefully extracted the historical popularity of the name "Joelle" from 1986 to 2016, akin to a culinary maestro extracting the essence from a bouquet garni.
In parallel, we summoned the electoral results for Senate races in Alaska from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse. Undoubtedly, one could draw analogies between procuring data and casting a net into the unpredictable ocean, hoping to ensnare the elusive mackerel of truth. Should one fancy the image, envision us as buccaneers of academia, sailing the high seas of data in search of electoral treasure.
Data Analysis:
With our plunder of data secured, we commenced the perilous journey of statistical analysis. Our trusty steeds on this expedition were the stalwart tools of correlation coefficient and p-value, which we wielded as intrepid navigators through the stormy seas of data deluge.
The connection between Joelle's ascendancy and the libertarian pull of Alaskan voters was fathomed using Pearson's correlation coefficient. We essentially sought to discern if the two variables, the popularity of the name Joelle and libertarian votes for Senators, danced in harmonious lockstep or engaged in a discordant, offbeat waltz. This analysis, dear reader, provided the numerical flair that illuminated the nuanced relationship between nomenclature and political preference.
Not to be outdone, the p-value, that enigmatic marker of statistical significance, cast its spell over our findings. Like a mischievous sprite weaving through the data forest, the p-value validated our discoveries and bestowed upon us the coveted imprimatur of academic respectability.
It is worth mentioning that amidst this statistical choreography, we dutifully adhered to the principles of rigorous sampling and unbiased analysis, ensuring our results were not colored by the capricious winds of chance.
In conclusion, our methodological odyssey was a quest marked by steadfast determination, a flair for the dramatic, and a penchant for extracting significance from the minutiae of data. With our trusty tools in hand and the spirit of exploration in our hearts, we emerged from this statistical sojourn ready to unfurl the banner of Joelle-itarian insight before the academic audience.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Joelle and Libertarian votes for Senators in Alaska. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.
Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from US Social Security Administration and MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse .
For the time period 1986 to 2016, you found a correlation 0.9564081, r-squared of 0.9147165, and p < 0.01.
One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.
Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Joelle-itarianism: A Statistical Analysis of the Correlation between Joelle's Popularity and Libertarian Votes for Senators in Alaska"
[[ABSTRACT]]
It's no surprise that politicians strive to win over as many voters as possible - even those with uncommon names like Joelle. In this study, we delved into the perplexing relationship between the popularity of the first name Joelle and the votes received by Libertarian candidates for Senate in Alaska. Drawing upon US Social Security Administration data and MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, we explored electoral results from 1986 to 2016, uncovering a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9564081 and a significant p-value of less than 0.01. So, what's in a name? As it turns out, quite a lot, especially when it comes to political preferences in the Last Frontier state. Our findings shed light on the quirky nuances of voter behavior, prompting a deeper contemplation of the idiosyncrasies that drive democracy. So, the next time you encounter a Joelle, remember - there may just be an entire political movement tethered to that moniker!
-------
And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
From the dawn of time, humanity has been fascinated by the power of names. Whether it's pondering the significance of our own given names or chuckling at the absurdity of certain celebrity baby names, the impact of nomenclature has always been a source of subdued intrigue. Similarly, elections have long provided an endless supply of captivating data, with analysts poring over voter demographics to decipher the mysterious dance of democracy.
In the pursuit of unraveling this tangled web of human behavior, we present our study on the fascinating intersection of the name "Joelle" and the libertarian leanings of voters in the rugged, untamed wilderness that is Alaska. Picture this: a land of majestic glaciers, towering mountains, and a population seemingly drawn to the siren song of liberty. It is within this iconic setting that we endeavor to explore the connection—nay, the conflation—of Joelle's favor and libertarian votes for Senate candidates.
Lest one assumes this to be a mere flight of fancy, dear reader, let us assure you that every effort has been made to approach this investigation with the utmost rigor and academic gravitas. At the outset, skepticism may rear its ever-doubting head, much like the proverbial groundhog peeking out of its burrow, but as we navigate the labyrinthine passages of data and statistical analysis, our findings promise to tickle the most ardent curiosity.
Ironically, the moniker "Joelle," a name that has itself flitted at the periphery of notoriety, awaits its moment in the academic sun. As we wade through the numerical labyrinth and tease out the correlations between this name's favor and the proclivities of Alaska's electorate, we invite you, dear reader, to join us on this curious escapade. Let us peel back the layers of this enigmatic onion, fully aware of the potential for watery eyes but undeterred in our pursuit of truth—no matter how pungent.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[RESULTS]]
ChatGPT:
[[RESULTS]]
Upon scrutinizing the vast expanse of data collected from the US Social Security Administration and the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, it becomes evident that there exists a remarkably strong correlation between the popularity of the first name Joelle and the votes garnered by Libertarian candidates for Senate in the state of Alaska. Our analysis revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.9564081, signifying a potent association between these seemingly incongruous variables. This robust correlation is further confirmed by an r-squared value of 0.9147165, indicating that approximately 91.47% of the variation in Libertarian votes for Senators in Alaska can be explained by the popularity of the name Joelle. To put it in simpler terms, the allure of the name "Joelle" appears to have woven itself intricately into the fabric of Alaskan political preferences, much like a fine lace adorning a rugged winter garment.
The statistical significance of our findings is underscored by a p-value of less than 0.01, emphatically rejecting the null hypothesis and cementing the substantive relationship between the aforementioned variables. This p-value serves as a resounding declaration that the observed correlation is not a mere quirk of random chance, but rather a compelling indication of a genuine connection. In other words, the connection between Joelle's popularity and the penchant for libertarianism amongst Alaskan voters is as palpable as the biting chill of an Alaskan winter.
Furthermore, the scatterplot presented in Figure 1 unequivocally depicts the strong positive relationship between the popularity of the name Joelle and the proportion of Libertarian votes received by Senate candidates in Alaska. One cannot help but marvel at the visual representation of this intriguing correlation, and it serves as a gentle reminder that even the most unassuming variables can weave an intricate dance in the realm of electoral dynamics. As they say, a picture is worth a thousand words, and this scatterplot speaks volumes about the intertwining of nomenclature and political inclination in The Last Frontier.
In closing, the results of this study undeniably highlight the enigmatic influence of a name in the realm of politics, unfolding a narrative that is as captivating as a timeless fable. The statistical evidence gleaned from this research underscores the intricate interplay between individual identities and the collective political ethos, offering a tantalizing glimpse into the whimsical intricacies of democracy. As we uncover the mystique of Joelle-itarianism, it becomes apparent that even the most seemingly whimsical elements can exert a profound impact on the tapestry of electoral preferences. This study encourages a whimsical musing on the thought-provoking whimsies embedded in the electoral process, prompting a fond reflection on the capricious cadence of democracy itself.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Joelle and Libertarian votes for Senators in Alaska. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.
Limit your response to 500 tokens.
Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.
Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.
[[TITLE]]
"Joelle-itarianism: A Statistical Analysis of the Correlation between Joelle's Popularity and Libertarian Votes for Senators in Alaska"
[[ABSTRACT]]
It's no surprise that politicians strive to win over as many voters as possible - even those with uncommon names like Joelle. In this study, we delved into the perplexing relationship between the popularity of the first name Joelle and the votes received by Libertarian candidates for Senate in Alaska. Drawing upon US Social Security Administration data and MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, we explored electoral results from 1986 to 2016, uncovering a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9564081 and a significant p-value of less than 0.01. So, what's in a name? As it turns out, quite a lot, especially when it comes to political preferences in the Last Frontier state. Our findings shed light on the quirky nuances of voter behavior, prompting a deeper contemplation of the idiosyncrasies that drive democracy. So, the next time you encounter a Joelle, remember - there may just be an entire political movement tethered to that moniker!
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The correlation between names and political affiliations has intrigued researchers for decades. Smith et al. (2010) examined the influence of first names on voter turnout, finding a modest but statistically significant association between certain names and political engagement. Doe and Jones (2014) expanded on this work, delving into the impact of uncommon names on party loyalty, revealing a curious pattern of allegiance among individuals with less common monikers. These studies, rooted in the empirical tradition of political science, provide a solid foundation for our exploration of the Joelle-Libertarian nexus.
Turning to the realm of popular non-fiction, Diving into Data by M. Statistician and Numbers Don't Lie by A. Analyst offer invaluable insights into the intricate world of quantitative analysis and the interpretation of electoral trends. In the fiction department, Margaret Atwood's The Handmaid's Tale and George Orwell's 1984, while not directly related to our topic, parallel themes of control and individuality, reinforcing the significance of political agency and personal identity. It is perhaps in the synthesis of these academic and literary realms that we may find the key to unraveling the enigma of Joelle-itarianism.
In the ever-evolving landscape of internet culture, one cannot overlook the meme-orable impact of the "Keep Calm and Vote Libertarian Joelle" meme. While largely satirical, it underscores the intersection of name recognition and political ideology within the public consciousness. Furthermore, the "Distracted Joelle" meme, though unrelated to politics, serves as a whimsical testament to the versatility and ubiquity of the name Joelle in contemporary digital discourse.
As we navigate the labyrinth of scholarship and popular culture, it becomes abundantly clear that the significance of Joelle's popularity in influencing political preferences cannot be dismissed lightly. With these diverse sources in mind, we embark upon our analysis with a sense of scholarly rigor and a healthy dose of humor, firmly grounded in the belief that truth, like a good pun, often lies just beneath the surface.
[[RESULTS]]
Upon scrutinizing the vast expanse of data collected from the US Social Security Administration and the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, it becomes evident that there exists a remarkably strong correlation between the popularity of the first name Joelle and the votes garnered by Libertarian candidates for Senate in the state of Alaska. Our analysis revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.9564081, signifying a potent association between these seemingly incongruous variables. This robust correlation is further confirmed by an r-squared value of 0.9147165, indicating that approximately 91.47% of the variation in Libertarian votes for Senators in Alaska can be explained by the popularity of the name Joelle. To put it in simpler terms, the allure of the name "Joelle" appears to have woven itself intricately into the fabric of Alaskan political preferences, much like a fine lace adorning a rugged winter garment.
The statistical significance of our findings is underscored by a p-value of less than 0.01, emphatically rejecting the null hypothesis and cementing the substantive relationship between the aforementioned variables. This p-value serves as a resounding declaration that the observed correlation is not a mere quirk of random chance, but rather a compelling indication of a genuine connection. In other words, the connection between Joelle's popularity and the penchant for libertarianism amongst Alaskan voters is as palpable as the biting chill of an Alaskan winter.
Furthermore, the scatterplot presented in Figure 1 unequivocally depicts the strong positive relationship between the popularity of the name Joelle and the proportion of Libertarian votes received by Senate candidates in Alaska. One cannot help but marvel at the visual representation of this intriguing correlation, and it serves as a gentle reminder that even the most unassuming variables can weave an intricate dance in the realm of electoral dynamics. As they say, a picture is worth a thousand words, and this scatterplot speaks volumes about the intertwining of nomenclature and political inclination in The Last Frontier.
In closing, the results of this study undeniably highlight the enigmatic influence of a name in the realm of politics, unfolding a narrative that is as captivating as a timeless fable. The statistical evidence gleaned from this research underscores the intricate interplay between individual identities and the collective political ethos, offering a tantalizing glimpse into the whimsical intricacies of democracy. As we uncover the mystique of Joelle-itarianism, it becomes apparent that even the most seemingly whimsical elements can exert a profound impact on the tapestry of electoral preferences. This study encourages a whimsical musing on the thought-provoking whimsies embedded in the electoral process, prompting a fond reflection on the capricious cadence of democracy itself.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[DISCUSSION]]
ChatGPT:
[[DISCUSSION]]
The findings of this study bring to light the captivating link between the popularity of the name Joelle and the Libertarian votes for Senators in the rugged political terrain of Alaska. Our results align with prior research, including the work of Smith et al. (2010) and Doe and Jones (2014), which hinted at the influence of first names on political engagement and party loyalty. By embodying a blend of academic rigor and subtle whimsy, our study provides empirical support for the notion that, indeed, there may be more to a name than meets the eye, or as Shakespeare might say, "What's in a name? That which we call a Joelle by any other name would vote as Libertarian."
The striking correlation coefficient of 0.9564081 and the r-squared value of 0.9147165 found in our study serve as delightful validation of the unexpected connection between the popularity of the name Joelle and the inclination towards libertarianism in Alaska. This robust correlation, akin to discovering a hidden treasure trove in a statistical landscape, suggests that there may reside a subtle but compelling influence of nomenclature on political ideology, much like finding a rare herb growing amidst the tundra.
The statistical significance, as indicated by the p-value of less than 0.01, is a revelation as momentous as chancing upon a breathtaking vista in the Alaskan wilderness; it unequivocally affirms that the observed association is not a mere fluke, but rather a substantial revelation in the enigmatic interplay of personal identity and political inclination. This profound link between Joelle's popularity and libertarianism in Alaska may be as unexpected as stumbling upon a glacier in a valley, yet it captivates and beckons further exploration into the quirks of political behavior, much like uncovering hidden treasures in an uncharted territory.
In sum, our findings bolster the rich tapestry of research on the relationship between names and political preferences, painting a portrait as captivating as the shimmering auroras gracing the Alaskan skies. As we delve further into the allure of Joelle-itarianism, we are reminded that even the most seemingly whimsical elements of our identities can shape the political landscape in profound and unexpected ways, much like a gentle breeze carrying whispers of change across an open plain. This study not only adds a delightful chapter to the evolving narrative of political science but also invites us to revel in the delightful quirks and undocumented splendors that await in the realm of academia.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Joelle and Libertarian votes for Senators in Alaska. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.
Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.
Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
"Joelle-itarianism: A Statistical Analysis of the Correlation between Joelle's Popularity and Libertarian Votes for Senators in Alaska"
[[ABSTRACT]]
It's no surprise that politicians strive to win over as many voters as possible - even those with uncommon names like Joelle. In this study, we delved into the perplexing relationship between the popularity of the first name Joelle and the votes received by Libertarian candidates for Senate in Alaska. Drawing upon US Social Security Administration data and MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, we explored electoral results from 1986 to 2016, uncovering a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9564081 and a significant p-value of less than 0.01. So, what's in a name? As it turns out, quite a lot, especially when it comes to political preferences in the Last Frontier state. Our findings shed light on the quirky nuances of voter behavior, prompting a deeper contemplation of the idiosyncrasies that drive democracy. So, the next time you encounter a Joelle, remember - there may just be an entire political movement tethered to that moniker!
[[INTRDUCTION]]
From the dawn of time, humanity has been fascinated by the power of names. Whether it's pondering the significance of our own given names or chuckling at the absurdity of certain celebrity baby names, the impact of nomenclature has always been a source of subdued intrigue. Similarly, elections have long provided an endless supply of captivating data, with analysts poring over voter demographics to decipher the mysterious dance of democracy.
In the pursuit of unraveling this tangled web of human behavior, we present our study on the fascinating intersection of the name "Joelle" and the libertarian leanings of voters in the rugged, untamed wilderness that is Alaska. Picture this: a land of majestic glaciers, towering mountains, and a population seemingly drawn to the siren song of liberty. It is within this iconic setting that we endeavor to explore the connection—nay, the conflation—of Joelle's favor and libertarian votes for Senate candidates.
Lest one assumes this to be a mere flight of fancy, dear reader, let us assure you that every effort has been made to approach this investigation with the utmost rigor and academic gravitas. At the outset, skepticism may rear its ever-doubting head, much like the proverbial groundhog peeking out of its burrow, but as we navigate the labyrinthine passages of data and statistical analysis, our findings promise to tickle the most ardent curiosity.
Ironically, the moniker "Joelle," a name that has itself flitted at the periphery of notoriety, awaits its moment in the academic sun. As we wade through the numerical labyrinth and tease out the correlations between this name's favor and the proclivities of Alaska's electorate, we invite you, dear reader, to join us on this curious escapade. Let us peel back the layers of this enigmatic onion, fully aware of the potential for watery eyes but undeterred in our pursuit of truth—no matter how pungent.
[[RESULTS]]
Upon scrutinizing the vast expanse of data collected from the US Social Security Administration and the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, it becomes evident that there exists a remarkably strong correlation between the popularity of the first name Joelle and the votes garnered by Libertarian candidates for Senate in the state of Alaska. Our analysis revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.9564081, signifying a potent association between these seemingly incongruous variables. This robust correlation is further confirmed by an r-squared value of 0.9147165, indicating that approximately 91.47% of the variation in Libertarian votes for Senators in Alaska can be explained by the popularity of the name Joelle. To put it in simpler terms, the allure of the name "Joelle" appears to have woven itself intricately into the fabric of Alaskan political preferences, much like a fine lace adorning a rugged winter garment.
The statistical significance of our findings is underscored by a p-value of less than 0.01, emphatically rejecting the null hypothesis and cementing the substantive relationship between the aforementioned variables. This p-value serves as a resounding declaration that the observed correlation is not a mere quirk of random chance, but rather a compelling indication of a genuine connection. In other words, the connection between Joelle's popularity and the penchant for libertarianism amongst Alaskan voters is as palpable as the biting chill of an Alaskan winter.
Furthermore, the scatterplot presented in Figure 1 unequivocally depicts the strong positive relationship between the popularity of the name Joelle and the proportion of Libertarian votes received by Senate candidates in Alaska. One cannot help but marvel at the visual representation of this intriguing correlation, and it serves as a gentle reminder that even the most unassuming variables can weave an intricate dance in the realm of electoral dynamics. As they say, a picture is worth a thousand words, and this scatterplot speaks volumes about the intertwining of nomenclature and political inclination in The Last Frontier.
In closing, the results of this study undeniably highlight the enigmatic influence of a name in the realm of politics, unfolding a narrative that is as captivating as a timeless fable. The statistical evidence gleaned from this research underscores the intricate interplay between individual identities and the collective political ethos, offering a tantalizing glimpse into the whimsical intricacies of democracy. As we uncover the mystique of Joelle-itarianism, it becomes apparent that even the most seemingly whimsical elements can exert a profound impact on the tapestry of electoral preferences. This study encourages a whimsical musing on the thought-provoking whimsies embedded in the electoral process, prompting a fond reflection on the capricious cadence of democracy itself.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[CONCLUSION]]
ChatGPT:
[[CONCLUSION]]
In demystifying the magnetic pull of the name "Joelle" on the political predilections of Alaskan voters, this study has delved into a realm as quizzical as a riddle wrapped in an enigma. From the statistical depths emerged a resounding chorus of correlation, as the popularity of Joelle waltzed hand in hand with Libertarian votes, creating a harmonious symphony of electoral intrigue. The robust correlation coefficient and the p-value of less than 0.01 underscore the undeniable gravitational force that Joelle exerts on the political compass of the Last Frontier.
Now, as we bask in the glow of this fascinating revelation, it is apparent that further exploration of Joelle-itarianism may yield a bounty of whimsical insights. However, with our findings illuminating the idiosyncratic dance of democracy, it seems that the bonanza of revelations has reached its crescendo. Therefore, it is with a twinkle in our eyes and a nod to the wondrous caprice of democracy that we assert, in the immortal words of Elsa from "Frozen," "The research never bothered us anyway." Thus, we decree that the saga of Joelle-itarianism stands as a charming anecdote of statistical peculiarity, requiring no further scholarly pursuit.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Joelle-itarianism: A Statistical Analysis of the Correlation between Joelle's Popularity and Libertarian Votes for Senators in Alaska. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.
ChatGPT:
The Journal of Political Pseudoscience
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Joelle-itarianism: A Statistical Analysis of the Correlation between Joelle's Popularity and Libertarian Votes for Senators in Alaska. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.
ChatGPT:
The Institute for Quirky Social Dynamics Analysis
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Joelle-itarianism: A Statistical Analysis of the Correlation between Joelle's Popularity and Libertarian Votes for Senators in Alaska with an abstract of It's no surprise that politicians strive to win over as many voters as possible - even those with uncommon names like Joelle. In this study, we delved into the perplexing relationship between the popularity of the first name Joelle and the votes received by Libertarian candidates for Senate in Alaska. Drawing upon US Social Security Administration data and MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, we explored electoral results from 1986 to 2016, uncovering a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9564081 and a significant p-value of less than 0.01. So, what's in a name? As it turns out, quite a lot, especially when it comes to political preferences in the Last Frontier state. Our findings shed light on the quirky nuances of voter behavior, prompting a deeper contemplation of the idiosyncrasies that drive democracy. So, the next time you encounter a Joelle, remember - there may just be an entire political movement tethered to that moniker!
ChatGPT:
Joelle, Libertarian, Alaska, correlation, popularity, senators, votes, statistical analysis, US Social Security Administration data, MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, political preferences, voter behavior, democracy
*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.
Discover a new correlation
View all correlations
View all research papers
Report an error
Data details
Popularity of the first name JoelleDetailed data title: Babies of all sexes born in the US named Joelle
Source: US Social Security Administration
See what else correlates with Popularity of the first name Joelle
Votes for Libertarian Senators in Alaska
Detailed data title: Total number of votes cast for Federal Libertarian Senate candidates in Alaska
Source: MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse
See what else correlates with Votes for Libertarian Senators in Alaska
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.
r2 = 0.9147165 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 91.5% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Votes for Libertarian Senators in Alaska) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Popularity of the first name Joelle) over the 7 years from 1986 through 2016.
p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 0.00074. 0.0007443037425242694000000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.
But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.
Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.96 in 0.074% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 1,344 random variables Which I absolutely did.
with the same 6 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 6 because we have two variables measured over a period of 7 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.
[ 0.73, 0.99 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.
This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!
All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.
Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
1986 | 1998 | 2002 | 2008 | 2010 | 2014 | 2016 | |
Popularity of the first name Joelle (Babies born) | 283 | 263 | 252 | 275 | 237 | 269 | 387 |
Votes for Libertarian Senators in Alaska (Total votes) | 3161 | 5046 | 2354 | 2483 | 1459 | 10512 | 90825 |
Why this works
- Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
- Lack of causal connection: There is probably
Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied. - Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple
Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is. - Very low n: There are not many data points included in this analysis. Even if the p-value is high, we should be suspicious of using so few datapoints in a correlation.
- Y-axis doesn't start at zero: I truncated the Y-axes of the graph above. I also used a line graph, which makes the visual connection stand out more than it deserves.
Nothing against line graphs. They are great at telling a story when you have linear data! But visually it is deceptive because the only data is at the points on the graph, not the lines on the graph. In between each point, the data could have been doing anything. Like going for a random walk by itself!
Mathematically what I showed is true, but it is intentionally misleading. Below is the same chart but with both Y-axes starting at zero.
Try it yourself
You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.
Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"
Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.
Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.
Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.
Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"
If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:
"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."
# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats
# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):
# Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)
# Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
r_squared = correlation**2
return correlation, r_squared, p_value
# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([283,263,252,275,237,269,387,])
array_2 = np.array([3161,5046,2354,2483,1459,10512,90825,])
array_1_name = "Popularity of the first name Joelle"
array_2_name = "Votes for Libertarian Senators in Alaska"
# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)
# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)
Reuseable content
You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.
For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."
When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.
Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.
Download images for these variables:
- High resolution line chart
The image linked here is a Scalable Vector Graphic (SVG). It is the highest resolution that is possible to achieve. It scales up beyond the size of the observable universe without pixelating. You do not need to email me asking if I have a higher resolution image. I do not. The physical limitations of our universe prevent me from providing you with an image that is any higher resolution than this one.
If you insert it into a PowerPoint presentation (a tool well-known for managing things that are the scale of the universe), you can right-click > "Ungroup" or "Create Shape" and then edit the lines and text directly. You can also change the colors this way.
Alternatively you can use a tool like Inkscape. - High resolution line chart, optimized for mobile
- Alternative high resolution line chart
- Scatterplot
- Portable line chart (png)
- Portable line chart (png), optimized for mobile
- Line chart for only Popularity of the first name Joelle
- Line chart for only Votes for Libertarian Senators in Alaska
- AI-generated correlation image
- The spurious research paper: Joelle-itarianism: A Statistical Analysis of the Correlation between Joelle's Popularity and Libertarian Votes for Senators in Alaska
Hats off to you for rating!
Correlation ID: 4316 · Black Variable ID: 3454 · Red Variable ID: 26199