Spurious correlation #4,313 · View random
A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Air pollution in Lumberton, North Carolina and the second variable is Liquefied petroleum gas used in Samoa. The chart goes from 2000 to 2007, and the two variables track closely in value over that time.

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Air pollution in Lumberton, North Carolina and the second variable is Liquefied petroleum gas used in Samoa. The chart goes from 2000 to 2007, and the two variables track closely in value over that time.

AI explanation

As the smog thickened over Lumberton, it gave rise to a gas-sy situation. This, in turn, created a demand for cleaner-burning fuel, prompting an unexpected surge in the use of LPG all the way in Samoa. It seems pollution in one place really does lead to solution in another!

^{Show image generation prompt} Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Generate an image that showcases a contrast between a steampunk-inspired industrial city shrouded in thick smog and a peaceful Samoan village with families gathered around clean-burning stoves, set against a backdrop of untouched natural beauty. The cityscape should feature towering, intricate steampunk-style buildings emitting smoke and steam, creating a hazy, polluted skyline. In contrast, the Samoan village should exude a serene atmosphere, with families cooking amidst lush greenery and pristine landscapes, emphasizing the use of sustainable fuel sources. The image should evoke a visually striking dichotomy between industrial pollution and sustainable living. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.

This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Air pollution in Lumberton, North Carolina and Liquefied petroleum gas used in Samoa. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Cute cartoon Glitch art Steampunk Art nouveau a funny image macro
ChatGPT: Steampunk

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Air pollution in Lumberton, North Carolina and Liquefied petroleum gas used in Samoa, in the following situation: As the smog thickened over Lumberton, it gave rise to a gas-sy situation. This, in turn, created a demand for cleaner-burning fuel, prompting an unexpected surge in the use of LPG all the way in Samoa. It seems pollution in one place really does lead to solution in another!. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In Lumberton, North Carolina, thick smog hangs in the air, creating a hazy and polluted skyline. Meanwhile, in Samoa, families gather around clean-burning LPG stoves, cooking their meals with a safer and more sustainable fuel source.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ Steampunk ] and depicting this scene: In Lumberton, North Carolina, thick smog hangs in the air, creating a hazy and polluted skyline. Meanwhile, in Samoa, families gather around clean-burning LPG stoves, cooking their meals with a safer and more sustainable fuel source. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Generate an image that showcases a contrast between a steampunk-inspired industrial city shrouded in thick smog and a peaceful Samoan village with families gathered around clean-burning stoves, set against a backdrop of untouched natural beauty. The cityscape should feature towering, intricate steampunk-style buildings emitting smoke and steam, creating a hazy, polluted skyline. In contrast, the Samoan village should exude a serene atmosphere, with families cooking amidst lush greenery and pristine landscapes, emphasizing the use of sustainable fuel sources. The image should evoke a visually striking dichotomy between industrial pollution and sustainable living.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.
^{Show prompt for explanation} Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in Air pollution in Lumberton, North Carolina caused Liquefied petroleum gas used in Samoa to increase. Include one good pun.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.05)

When Gas Meets Polluted Air: Uncovering the Link Between Liquefied Petroleum Gas in Samoa and Air Pollution in Lumberton, North Carolina

Journal of Ecological Connections

Jan 2024

^{Show prompt used to generate this paper} Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Lumberton, North Carolina and Liquefied petroleum gas used in Samoa. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then name some cartoons and childrens' shows that you watched that are related to the topic.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
When Gas Meets Polluted Air: Uncovering the Link Between Liquefied Petroleum Gas in Samoa and Air Pollution in Lumberton, North Carolina

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we dive into the relationship between air pollution in Lumberton, North Carolina, and the usage of liquefied petroleum gas in Samoa, expecting to shed light on their unexpected connection. Channeling our inner Sherlock Holmes, we extensively analyzed data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the Energy Information Administration to discern any telling patterns.

Our findings, with a correlation coefficient of 0.8013468 and p < 0.05 for the period spanning 2000 to 2007, surprise us almost as much as discovering a "dad bod" on Father's Day. Despite the geographical and cultural distance between the two locations, the correlations rise stronger than the yeast in dad's famous homemade bread, hinting at a compelling linkage.

So, what's the punchline here? Our research insinuates that the use of liquefied petroleum gas in Samoa, like a sneaky prank played by an elusive dad, might have unforeseen implications on air quality in Lumberton, North Carolina. As we dust off the pieces of this puzzle, we urge policymakers and environmentalists to consider this odd coupling in their deliberations, for the sake of both local and global air quality.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The world of environmental research is often filled with unexpected connections and surprising correlations, much like finding out your dad has an uncanny talent for dad jokes. In this paper, we explore the intriguing link between air pollution in Lumberton, North Carolina, and the utilization of liquefied petroleum gas in Samoa, expecting to unravel this unusual pairing with the same level of awe as when dad pulls out a perfectly timed "pull my finger" joke at the family dinner table.
As researchers, we are constantly reminded that the world is interconnected in ways we may not initially comprehend, much like how the air pollutants from Lumberton, North Carolina can hitch a ride on atmospheric currents and end up mingling with the pristine air of Samoa, like unexpected guests at a surprise birthday party. It is this intricate dance of pollutants and gases that drove us to investigate whether there might be a hidden link, like discovering a pun in a complex mathematical equation.
The pursuit of this inquiry led us to an exhaustive analysis of data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the Energy Information Administration, akin to a determined detective poring over clues at a crime scene, searching for any hint, no matter how small, that might unlock the mystery of this unexpected relationship. And much like a detective unearthing a trove of dad jokes in a hidden compartment, our findings astounded us with a correlation coefficient of 0.8013468 and p < 0.05 for the period spanning 2000 to 2007, a discovery that caused as much shock as walking in on your dad practicing his "dad dance" moves in front of the mirror.
The strength of this correlation, despite the geographical and cultural disparities between the two locations, was as compelling as the aroma of freshly baked bread, rising steadily like the suggestive implications of a well-timed dad joke. It is in this resemblance that we found our punchline, implying that the use of liquefied petroleum gas in Samoa may indeed have unforeseen repercussions, just like a dad's mischievous prank during a solemn family gathering.
Our hope is that this research provides both a lighthearted musing and a serious call to action, much like a dad's advice coupled with a dad joke, urging policymakers and environmental advocates to consider this unexpected connection for the betterment of air quality, both locally and globally. In the pursuit of understanding, it is essential to recognize that even the most unlikely pairings, much like the unassuming combination of gas and air pollution, can hold significant implications for our world.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

The investigation of the relationship between air pollution in Lumberton, North Carolina, and the use of liquefied petroleum gas in Samoa has sparked intriguing inquiries and unexpected revelations, much like finding out your dad can do a one-handed handstand. In "Smith et al.'s study on Atmospheric Dynamics," the authors found compelling evidence of atmospheric transport mechanisms that could potentially facilitate the cross-continental movement of pollutants, underscoring the likelihood of these two seemingly distant locales interacting on an environmental level.

Moving on from serious studies to something a bit more lighthearted, in "Doe's Environmental Chemistry and You," the authors discuss the impact of gas emissions on air quality, delving into the intricate web of atmospheric reactions and transport, much like a dramatic plot twist in a mystery novel. Moreover, Jones and colleagues, in their work "Energy Policies in Small Island Nations," highlight the growing usage of liquefied petroleum gas in small island states, raising important questions about the global implications of local energy choices, not unlike the suspense of a good whodunit.

Transitioning to fictional works that have an air of relevance to our investigation, "The Airbender Chronicles" by A. Nomatown presents a fantastical world where elemental forces intertwine, echoing the intricate interplay of air pollutants and gas in our own reality. Similarly, "The Poisoned Air Affair" by A. Q. Reader weaves a tale of intrigue and clandestine connections, albeit in a fictional setting, mirroring the unexpected link we seek to unravel between Samoa and North Carolina.

On a lighter note, our foray into childhood memories also offers an unexpected array of connections. For instance, the environmental consciousness depicted in "Captain Planet and the Planeteers" serves as a nostalgic reminder of the importance of safeguarding the planet, much like the pressing need to understand and address the unlikely coupling of gas and air pollution in our study. Similarly, "The Magic School Bus" episodes on air quality and pollution provide a whimsical yet educational backdrop, where Ms. Frizzle's colorful expeditions parallel the journey we embark on to unravel the mysteries of air pollution and gas usage.

Now, let's not forget that just like the humorous twist in a dad joke, these varied sources underscore the surprising nature of our investigation, revealing unexpected connections that stretch across disciplines and storytelling realms, much like finding out your dad has secretly been a member of a clown troupe all along.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Lumberton, North Carolina and Liquefied petroleum gas used in Samoa. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Environmental Protection Agency and Energy Information Administration . You used data from 2000 to 2007

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
When Gas Meets Polluted Air: Uncovering the Link Between Liquefied Petroleum Gas in Samoa and Air Pollution in Lumberton, North Carolina

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we dive into the relationship between air pollution in Lumberton, North Carolina, and the usage of liquefied petroleum gas in Samoa, expecting to shed light on their unexpected connection. Channeling our inner Sherlock Holmes, we extensively analyzed data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the Energy Information Administration to discern any telling patterns.

Our findings, with a correlation coefficient of 0.8013468 and p < 0.05 for the period spanning 2000 to 2007, surprise us almost as much as discovering a "dad bod" on Father's Day. Despite the geographical and cultural distance between the two locations, the correlations rise stronger than the yeast in dad's famous homemade bread, hinting at a compelling linkage.

So, what's the punchline here? Our research insinuates that the use of liquefied petroleum gas in Samoa, like a sneaky prank played by an elusive dad, might have unforeseen implications on air quality in Lumberton, North Carolina. As we dust off the pieces of this puzzle, we urge policymakers and environmentalists to consider this odd coupling in their deliberations, for the sake of both local and global air quality.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
The world of environmental research is often filled with unexpected connections and surprising correlations, much like finding out your dad has an uncanny talent for dad jokes. In this paper, we explore the intriguing link between air pollution in Lumberton, North Carolina, and the utilization of liquefied petroleum gas in Samoa, expecting to unravel this unusual pairing with the same level of awe as when dad pulls out a perfectly timed "pull my finger" joke at the family dinner table.
As researchers, we are constantly reminded that the world is interconnected in ways we may not initially comprehend, much like how the air pollutants from Lumberton, North Carolina can hitch a ride on atmospheric currents and end up mingling with the pristine air of Samoa, like unexpected guests at a surprise birthday party. It is this intricate dance of pollutants and gases that drove us to investigate whether there might be a hidden link, like discovering a pun in a complex mathematical equation.
The pursuit of this inquiry led us to an exhaustive analysis of data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the Energy Information Administration, akin to a determined detective poring over clues at a crime scene, searching for any hint, no matter how small, that might unlock the mystery of this unexpected relationship. And much like a detective unearthing a trove of dad jokes in a hidden compartment, our findings astounded us with a correlation coefficient of 0.8013468 and p < 0.05 for the period spanning 2000 to 2007, a discovery that caused as much shock as walking in on your dad practicing his "dad dance" moves in front of the mirror.
The strength of this correlation, despite the geographical and cultural disparities between the two locations, was as compelling as the aroma of freshly baked bread, rising steadily like the suggestive implications of a well-timed dad joke. It is in this resemblance that we found our punchline, implying that the use of liquefied petroleum gas in Samoa may indeed have unforeseen repercussions, just like a dad's mischievous prank during a solemn family gathering.
Our hope is that this research provides both a lighthearted musing and a serious call to action, much like a dad's advice coupled with a dad joke, urging policymakers and environmental advocates to consider this unexpected connection for the betterment of air quality, both locally and globally. In the pursuit of understanding, it is essential to recognize that even the most unlikely pairings, much like the unassuming combination of gas and air pollution, can hold significant implications for our world.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

In this section, we outline the peculiar and slightly off-kilter methods employed in our quest to uncover the connection between air pollution in Lumberton, North Carolina, and the utilization of liquefied petroleum gas in Samoa. Our approach was as rigorous as a dad trying to assemble an Ikea furniture without looking at the instructions - that is to say, somewhat haphazard, yet determined.

To initiate our investigation, we channeled the spirit of enthusiastic amateur detectives and clumsily stumbled into the vast territories of the Environmental Protection Agency and the Energy Information Administration databases like a trio of bumbling sleuths tripping over each other at a crime scene. Most of the data used in our analysis was sourced from this digital treasure trove, much the way a dad's vast collection of "favorite" dad jokes provides a plethora of material for every family gathering.

Our time period of interest spanned from 2000 to 2007, a period that saw more changes than a dad trying to fix a leaky faucet without calling a plumber. We thought this time frame would provide us with a good look at the dynamic interaction between air pollution in Lumberton and the usage of liquefied petroleum gas in Samoa, without going back so far that we'd have to crack open a dusty old file cabinet like it's a vintage vault of forgotten secrets.

Now, at this point, you may be wondering: what's with all the dad jokes? Well, much like a good dad joke, we believe a little humor can make even the most complex research methodology more palatable. And frankly, we just couldn't resist the opportunity to sprinkle in a few puns and playful jabs throughout this study - it keeps things light, much like a dad's favorite comedic relief during a tense family gathering.

Next, we employed some statistical wizardry to analyze the data, using methods as complex as a dad's daily crossword puzzle. We calculated correlation coefficients, p-values, and other statistical measures with the fervor of a dad trying to beat his own record on the lawnmower racing game at the local arcade.

Our analysis involved comparing the levels of air pollution in Lumberton, North Carolina, with the usage of liquefied petroleum gas in Samoa, seeking patterns and associations as though we were attempting to untangle a mess of Christmas lights - a task some might consider daunting, but also oddly satisfying once you get the hang of it.

In conclusion, our methodology may have been whimsical at times, but it was carried out with the precision and dedication befitting a group of researchers on a quest for knowledge and understanding, much like a dad tackling a new recipe for the family barbecue with equal parts enthusiasm and determination.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Lumberton, North Carolina and Liquefied petroleum gas used in Samoa. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Environmental Protection Agency and Energy Information Administration .

For the time period 2000 to 2007, you found a correlation 0.8013468, r-squared of 0.6421567, and p < 0.05.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
When Gas Meets Polluted Air: Uncovering the Link Between Liquefied Petroleum Gas in Samoa and Air Pollution in Lumberton, North Carolina

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we dive into the relationship between air pollution in Lumberton, North Carolina, and the usage of liquefied petroleum gas in Samoa, expecting to shed light on their unexpected connection. Channeling our inner Sherlock Holmes, we extensively analyzed data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the Energy Information Administration to discern any telling patterns.

Our findings, with a correlation coefficient of 0.8013468 and p < 0.05 for the period spanning 2000 to 2007, surprise us almost as much as discovering a "dad bod" on Father's Day. Despite the geographical and cultural distance between the two locations, the correlations rise stronger than the yeast in dad's famous homemade bread, hinting at a compelling linkage.

So, what's the punchline here? Our research insinuates that the use of liquefied petroleum gas in Samoa, like a sneaky prank played by an elusive dad, might have unforeseen implications on air quality in Lumberton, North Carolina. As we dust off the pieces of this puzzle, we urge policymakers and environmentalists to consider this odd coupling in their deliberations, for the sake of both local and global air quality.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
The world of environmental research is often filled with unexpected connections and surprising correlations, much like finding out your dad has an uncanny talent for dad jokes. In this paper, we explore the intriguing link between air pollution in Lumberton, North Carolina, and the utilization of liquefied petroleum gas in Samoa, expecting to unravel this unusual pairing with the same level of awe as when dad pulls out a perfectly timed "pull my finger" joke at the family dinner table.
As researchers, we are constantly reminded that the world is interconnected in ways we may not initially comprehend, much like how the air pollutants from Lumberton, North Carolina can hitch a ride on atmospheric currents and end up mingling with the pristine air of Samoa, like unexpected guests at a surprise birthday party. It is this intricate dance of pollutants and gases that drove us to investigate whether there might be a hidden link, like discovering a pun in a complex mathematical equation.
The pursuit of this inquiry led us to an exhaustive analysis of data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the Energy Information Administration, akin to a determined detective poring over clues at a crime scene, searching for any hint, no matter how small, that might unlock the mystery of this unexpected relationship. And much like a detective unearthing a trove of dad jokes in a hidden compartment, our findings astounded us with a correlation coefficient of 0.8013468 and p < 0.05 for the period spanning 2000 to 2007, a discovery that caused as much shock as walking in on your dad practicing his "dad dance" moves in front of the mirror.
The strength of this correlation, despite the geographical and cultural disparities between the two locations, was as compelling as the aroma of freshly baked bread, rising steadily like the suggestive implications of a well-timed dad joke. It is in this resemblance that we found our punchline, implying that the use of liquefied petroleum gas in Samoa may indeed have unforeseen repercussions, just like a dad's mischievous prank during a solemn family gathering.
Our hope is that this research provides both a lighthearted musing and a serious call to action, much like a dad's advice coupled with a dad joke, urging policymakers and environmental advocates to consider this unexpected connection for the betterment of air quality, both locally and globally. In the pursuit of understanding, it is essential to recognize that even the most unlikely pairings, much like the unassuming combination of gas and air pollution, can hold significant implications for our world.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]

ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

Our analysis revealed a strong positive correlation between the usage of liquefied petroleum gas in Samoa and the levels of air pollution in Lumberton, North Carolina during the period from 2000 to 2007. The correlation coefficient of 0.8013468 and r-squared of 0.6421567 pointed to a robust relationship between the two variables. To put it in layman's terms, the connection between these two seemingly disparate elements was tighter than the grip on a dad's wallet when his kids ask for a raise in their allowance.

As depicted in Fig. 1, our scatterplot visually demonstrates the unusually strong correlation between the usage of liquefied petroleum gas in Samoa and air pollution in Lumberton, North Carolina. It's almost as if these two variables were holding hands across the vast expanse of the ocean, much like a long-distance relationship between two star-crossed lovers.

The statistical significance of our findings, with p < 0.05, reinforces the reliability of the observed correlation. This connection between gas usage in one location and its impact on air quality in another is as surprising as finding a rogue clown at a gas station - unexpected and, let's be honest, a little unsettling.

This unexpected linkage, as indicated by our research, underscores the need to consider the far-reaching consequences of seemingly isolated activities. Just like a dad joke unexpectedly shedding light on a serious matter, our findings urge a reevaluation of environmental policies and practices to account for the potential ripple effects of gas usage across borders.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Lumberton, North Carolina and Liquefied petroleum gas used in Samoa. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
When Gas Meets Polluted Air: Uncovering the Link Between Liquefied Petroleum Gas in Samoa and Air Pollution in Lumberton, North Carolina

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we dive into the relationship between air pollution in Lumberton, North Carolina, and the usage of liquefied petroleum gas in Samoa, expecting to shed light on their unexpected connection. Channeling our inner Sherlock Holmes, we extensively analyzed data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the Energy Information Administration to discern any telling patterns.

Our findings, with a correlation coefficient of 0.8013468 and p < 0.05 for the period spanning 2000 to 2007, surprise us almost as much as discovering a "dad bod" on Father's Day. Despite the geographical and cultural distance between the two locations, the correlations rise stronger than the yeast in dad's famous homemade bread, hinting at a compelling linkage.

So, what's the punchline here? Our research insinuates that the use of liquefied petroleum gas in Samoa, like a sneaky prank played by an elusive dad, might have unforeseen implications on air quality in Lumberton, North Carolina. As we dust off the pieces of this puzzle, we urge policymakers and environmentalists to consider this odd coupling in their deliberations, for the sake of both local and global air quality.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The investigation of the relationship between air pollution in Lumberton, North Carolina, and the use of liquefied petroleum gas in Samoa has sparked intriguing inquiries and unexpected revelations, much like finding out your dad can do a one-handed handstand. In "Smith et al.'s study on Atmospheric Dynamics," the authors found compelling evidence of atmospheric transport mechanisms that could potentially facilitate the cross-continental movement of pollutants, underscoring the likelihood of these two seemingly distant locales interacting on an environmental level.
Moving on from serious studies to something a bit more lighthearted, in "Doe's Environmental Chemistry and You," the authors discuss the impact of gas emissions on air quality, delving into the intricate web of atmospheric reactions and transport, much like a dramatic plot twist in a mystery novel. Moreover, Jones and colleagues, in their work "Energy Policies in Small Island Nations," highlight the growing usage of liquefied petroleum gas in small island states, raising important questions about the global implications of local energy choices, not unlike the suspense of a good whodunit.
Transitioning to fictional works that have an air of relevance to our investigation, "The Airbender Chronicles" by A. Nomatown presents a fantastical world where elemental forces intertwine, echoing the intricate interplay of air pollutants and gas in our own reality. Similarly, "The Poisoned Air Affair" by A. Q. Reader weaves a tale of intrigue and clandestine connections, albeit in a fictional setting, mirroring the unexpected link we seek to unravel between Samoa and North Carolina.
On a lighter note, our foray into childhood memories also offers an unexpected array of connections. For instance, the environmental consciousness depicted in "Captain Planet and the Planeteers" serves as a nostalgic reminder of the importance of safeguarding the planet, much like the pressing need to understand and address the unlikely coupling of gas and air pollution in our study. Similarly, "The Magic School Bus" episodes on air quality and pollution provide a whimsical yet educational backdrop, where Ms. Frizzle's colorful expeditions parallel the journey we embark on to unravel the mysteries of air pollution and gas usage.
Now, let's not forget that just like the humorous twist in a dad joke, these varied sources underscore the surprising nature of our investigation, revealing unexpected connections that stretch across disciplines and storytelling realms, much like finding out your dad has secretly been a member of a clown troupe all along.

[[RESULTS]]
Our analysis revealed a strong positive correlation between the usage of liquefied petroleum gas in Samoa and the levels of air pollution in Lumberton, North Carolina during the period from 2000 to 2007. The correlation coefficient of 0.8013468 and r-squared of 0.6421567 pointed to a robust relationship between the two variables. To put it in layman's terms, the connection between these two seemingly disparate elements was tighter than the grip on a dad's wallet when his kids ask for a raise in their allowance.
As depicted in Fig. 1, our scatterplot visually demonstrates the unusually strong correlation between the usage of liquefied petroleum gas in Samoa and air pollution in Lumberton, North Carolina. It's almost as if these two variables were holding hands across the vast expanse of the ocean, much like a long-distance relationship between two star-crossed lovers.
The statistical significance of our findings, with p < 0.05, reinforces the reliability of the observed correlation. This connection between gas usage in one location and its impact on air quality in another is as surprising as finding a rogue clown at a gas station - unexpected and, let's be honest, a little unsettling.
This unexpected linkage, as indicated by our research, underscores the need to consider the far-reaching consequences of seemingly isolated activities. Just like a dad joke unexpectedly shedding light on a serious matter, our findings urge a reevaluation of environmental policies and practices to account for the potential ripple effects of gas usage across borders.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]

ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

Our study sought to uncover the mysterious link between the usage of liquefied petroleum gas in Samoa and the levels of air pollution in Lumberton, North Carolina. Much like a dad joke that catches you off guard, our findings have brought to light an unexpected and surprisingly strong connection between these two distant locales. Building on the serious inquiries of previous researchers, our results not only support but also emphasize the importance of considering the global implications of local energy choices, much like a dad's insistence on everyone turning off the lights to save energy.

Our discoveries align with the proposition put forth by Smith et al., reflecting the potential for long-distance atmospheric transport mechanisms to bridge the gap between these seemingly unrelated regions. It's almost as if the air itself is playing matchmaker, orchestrating a union between gas emissions in Samoa and air quality in North Carolina – a union that is as unexpected as a dad successfully executing a "dad joke" in a serious conversation.

Furthermore, our findings echo the insights provided by a more lighthearted source, "The Airbender Chronicles." Much like the elemental forces intertwined in the fantastical world presented in this fictional work, our study elucidates the intricate web of interactions between gas emissions and air quality, revealing a connection that is as surprising as a dad showing off his karaoke skills at a family gathering.

In addition, the statistically significant correlation we observed supports the concept introduced by Doe's "Environmental Chemistry and You," emphasizing the profound impact of gas emissions on air quality. Much like a dramatic plot twist in a mystery novel, our results unveil a compelling relationship that urges a reevaluation of environmental policies and practices, not unlike a dad joke making us reconsider our preconceived notions.

The reliability and robustness of our findings also resonate with the unexpected connections highlighted in both serious and whimsical realms presented in our literature review. Just like the humorous twist in a dad joke, our study reveals a surprising bond that spans across disciplines and storylines, underscoring the need to consider the far-reaching consequences of seemingly isolated activities – much like a dad joke shedding light on a serious environmental concern.

In essence, our research has uncovered a striking association between gas usage in Samoa and air pollution in Lumberton, North Carolina, raising important questions about the global impact of local energy choices and emphasizing the need for a reevaluation of environmental policies. Thus, our study, much like a good dad joke, proves that even seemingly disparate elements can have unexpected connections, offering a lens through which to view environmental issues with newfound clarity and urgency.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Lumberton, North Carolina and Liquefied petroleum gas used in Samoa. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
When Gas Meets Polluted Air: Uncovering the Link Between Liquefied Petroleum Gas in Samoa and Air Pollution in Lumberton, North Carolina

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we dive into the relationship between air pollution in Lumberton, North Carolina, and the usage of liquefied petroleum gas in Samoa, expecting to shed light on their unexpected connection. Channeling our inner Sherlock Holmes, we extensively analyzed data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the Energy Information Administration to discern any telling patterns.

Our findings, with a correlation coefficient of 0.8013468 and p < 0.05 for the period spanning 2000 to 2007, surprise us almost as much as discovering a "dad bod" on Father's Day. Despite the geographical and cultural distance between the two locations, the correlations rise stronger than the yeast in dad's famous homemade bread, hinting at a compelling linkage.

So, what's the punchline here? Our research insinuates that the use of liquefied petroleum gas in Samoa, like a sneaky prank played by an elusive dad, might have unforeseen implications on air quality in Lumberton, North Carolina. As we dust off the pieces of this puzzle, we urge policymakers and environmentalists to consider this odd coupling in their deliberations, for the sake of both local and global air quality.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
The world of environmental research is often filled with unexpected connections and surprising correlations, much like finding out your dad has an uncanny talent for dad jokes. In this paper, we explore the intriguing link between air pollution in Lumberton, North Carolina, and the utilization of liquefied petroleum gas in Samoa, expecting to unravel this unusual pairing with the same level of awe as when dad pulls out a perfectly timed "pull my finger" joke at the family dinner table.
As researchers, we are constantly reminded that the world is interconnected in ways we may not initially comprehend, much like how the air pollutants from Lumberton, North Carolina can hitch a ride on atmospheric currents and end up mingling with the pristine air of Samoa, like unexpected guests at a surprise birthday party. It is this intricate dance of pollutants and gases that drove us to investigate whether there might be a hidden link, like discovering a pun in a complex mathematical equation.
The pursuit of this inquiry led us to an exhaustive analysis of data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the Energy Information Administration, akin to a determined detective poring over clues at a crime scene, searching for any hint, no matter how small, that might unlock the mystery of this unexpected relationship. And much like a detective unearthing a trove of dad jokes in a hidden compartment, our findings astounded us with a correlation coefficient of 0.8013468 and p < 0.05 for the period spanning 2000 to 2007, a discovery that caused as much shock as walking in on your dad practicing his "dad dance" moves in front of the mirror.
The strength of this correlation, despite the geographical and cultural disparities between the two locations, was as compelling as the aroma of freshly baked bread, rising steadily like the suggestive implications of a well-timed dad joke. It is in this resemblance that we found our punchline, implying that the use of liquefied petroleum gas in Samoa may indeed have unforeseen repercussions, just like a dad's mischievous prank during a solemn family gathering.
Our hope is that this research provides both a lighthearted musing and a serious call to action, much like a dad's advice coupled with a dad joke, urging policymakers and environmental advocates to consider this unexpected connection for the betterment of air quality, both locally and globally. In the pursuit of understanding, it is essential to recognize that even the most unlikely pairings, much like the unassuming combination of gas and air pollution, can hold significant implications for our world.

[[RESULTS]]
Our analysis revealed a strong positive correlation between the usage of liquefied petroleum gas in Samoa and the levels of air pollution in Lumberton, North Carolina during the period from 2000 to 2007. The correlation coefficient of 0.8013468 and r-squared of 0.6421567 pointed to a robust relationship between the two variables. To put it in layman's terms, the connection between these two seemingly disparate elements was tighter than the grip on a dad's wallet when his kids ask for a raise in their allowance.
As depicted in Fig. 1, our scatterplot visually demonstrates the unusually strong correlation between the usage of liquefied petroleum gas in Samoa and air pollution in Lumberton, North Carolina. It's almost as if these two variables were holding hands across the vast expanse of the ocean, much like a long-distance relationship between two star-crossed lovers.
The statistical significance of our findings, with p < 0.05, reinforces the reliability of the observed correlation. This connection between gas usage in one location and its impact on air quality in another is as surprising as finding a rogue clown at a gas station - unexpected and, let's be honest, a little unsettling.
This unexpected linkage, as indicated by our research, underscores the need to consider the far-reaching consequences of seemingly isolated activities. Just like a dad joke unexpectedly shedding light on a serious matter, our findings urge a reevaluation of environmental policies and practices to account for the potential ripple effects of gas usage across borders.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]

ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our investigation into the connection between the usage of liquefied petroleum gas in Samoa and air pollution in Lumberton, North Carolina has unveiled a surprising correlation that is as intriguing as stumbling upon a dad joke in a scholarly discussion. Our findings have highlighted a robust relationship between these seemingly unrelated factors, akin to the unexpected yet undeniable bond between a dad and his questionable fashion choices.

The statistical evidence of a correlation coefficient of 0.8013468 and p < 0.05 during the period from 2000 to 2007 suggests a connection that is as tight as a dad's hug when he's proud of his cheesy puns. Our scatterplot visually portrays this unlikely bond, with the gas usage and air pollution holding hands across the ocean like a pair of mismatched socks, proving that even the most inexplicable connections can have tangible consequences.

As we reflect on the implications of our research, we are reminded of the delicate interplay between seemingly disparate elements, much like trying to comprehend a dad's fascination with dad jokes. This unexpected linkage stresses the need for policymakers and environmentalists to consider the far-reaching effects of gas usage, especially across geographical borders, much like a dad joke shedding light on a serious matter at a family gathering.

In light of this, it is evident that no more research is needed in this area, as we feel we have uncovered the ultimate 'dad joke' of correlations between these two unlikely bedfellows. Our findings suggest that the influence of gas usage in one location on air quality in another is not something to be taken lightly, much like a dad's obscure sense of humor. It is our hope that this work inspires further interdisciplinary collaborations and sparks discussions, just like a good dad joke at a social gathering.

And with this, we urge policymakers and environmentalists to consider this odd coupling to ensure the improvement of air quality, both locally and globally, as the last thing we need is the atmosphere turning into a room filled with awkward dad jokes!

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited When Gas Meets Polluted Air: Uncovering the Link Between Liquefied Petroleum Gas in Samoa and Air Pollution in Lumberton, North Carolina. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

Journal of Ecological Connections

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited When Gas Meets Polluted Air: Uncovering the Link Between Liquefied Petroleum Gas in Samoa and Air Pollution in Lumberton, North Carolina. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

Society for Interdisciplinary Environmental Research and Analysis (SIERA)

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled When Gas Meets Polluted Air: Uncovering the Link Between Liquefied Petroleum Gas in Samoa and Air Pollution in Lumberton, North Carolina with an abstract of In this study, we dive into the relationship between air pollution in Lumberton, North Carolina, and the usage of liquefied petroleum gas in Samoa, expecting to shed light on their unexpected connection. Channeling our inner Sherlock Holmes, we extensively analyzed data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the Energy Information Administration to discern any telling patterns.
Our findings, with a correlation coefficient of 0.8013468 and p < 0.05 for the period spanning 2000 to 2007, surprise us almost as much as discovering a "dad bod" on Father's Day. Despite the geographical and cultural distance between the two locations, the correlations rise stronger than the yeast in dad's famous homemade bread, hinting at a compelling linkage.
So, what's the punchline here? Our research insinuates that the use of liquefied petroleum gas in Samoa, like a sneaky prank played by an elusive dad, might have unforeseen implications on air quality in Lumberton, North Carolina. As we dust off the pieces of this puzzle, we urge policymakers and environmentalists to consider this odd coupling in their deliberations, for the sake of both local and global air quality.

ChatGPT:

air pollution, liquefied petroleum gas, Samoa, Lumberton, North Carolina, correlation coefficient, environmental protection agency, energy information administration, air quality, global air quality, geographical distance, cultural distance, policymaker, environmentalist

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.

Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error

Data details

Air pollution in Lumberton, North Carolina
Detailed data title: Percentage of days with air quality at 'unhealthy for sensitive groups' or worse in Lumberton, NC
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
See what else correlates with Air pollution in Lumberton, North Carolina

Liquefied petroleum gas used in Samoa
Detailed data title: Volume of liquefied petroleum gas used consumed in Samoa in millions of barrels per day
Source: Energy Information Administration
See what else correlates with Liquefied petroleum gas used in Samoa

Correlation r = 0.8013468 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r² = 0.6421567 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 64.2% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Liquefied petroleum gas used in Samoa) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Air pollution in Lumberton, North Carolina) over the 8 years from 2000 through 2007.

p < 0.05, which statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 0.017.^Show 0.0167946890705558100000000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme.^Note More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.8 in 1.7% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 60 random variables^Note Which I absolutely did.
with the same 7 degrees of freedom, ^Note Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 7 because we have two variables measured over a period of 8 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.22, 0.96 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
^{Read more about the confidence interval} The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!

All values for the years included above: ^Note If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.

	2000	2001	2002	2003	2004	2005	2006	2007
Air pollution in Lumberton, North Carolina (Bad air quality days)	0	0	0.00833333	0	0.00833333	0	0	0.0168067
Liquefied petroleum gas used in Samoa (Million Barrels/Day)	0.031694	0.0317808	0.0317808	0.0317808	0.031694	0.0317808	0.0317808	0.038137

Why this works

Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
Lack of causal connection: There is probably^Note Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple^Note Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
Very low n: There are not many data points included in this analysis. Even if the p-value is high, we should be suspicious of using so few datapoints in a correlation.
Y-axis doesn't start at zero: I truncated the Y-axes of the graph above. I also used a line graph, which makes the visual connection stand out more than it deserves. ^Note Nothing against line graphs. They are great at telling a story when you have linear data! But visually it is deceptive because the only data is at the points on the graph, not the lines on the graph. In between each point, the data could have been doing anything. Like going for a random walk by itself!
Mathematically what I showed is true, but it is intentionally misleading. Below is the same chart but with both Y-axes starting at zero.

Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. ^{Show the steps to do this.} Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."

# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([0,0,0.00833333,0,0.00833333,0,0,0.0168067,])
array_2 = np.array([0.031694,0.0317808,0.0317808,0.0317808,0.031694,0.0317808,0.0317808,0.038137,])
array_1_name = "Air pollution in Lumberton, North Carolina"
array_2_name = "Liquefied petroleum gas used in Samoa"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)

Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. ^Note Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:

High resolution line chart ^Note The image linked here is a Scalable Vector Graphic (SVG). It is the highest resolution that is possible to achieve. It scales up beyond the size of the observable universe without pixelating. You do not need to email me asking if I have a higher resolution image. I do not. The physical limitations of our universe prevent me from providing you with an image that is any higher resolution than this one.

If you insert it into a PowerPoint presentation (a tool well-known for managing things that are the scale of the universe), you can right-click > "Ungroup" or "Create Shape" and then edit the lines and text directly. You can also change the colors this way.

Alternatively you can use a tool like Inkscape.
High resolution line chart, optimized for mobile
Alternative high resolution line chart
Scatterplot
Portable line chart (png)
Portable line chart (png), optimized for mobile
Line chart for only Air pollution in Lumberton, North Carolina
Line chart for only Liquefied petroleum gas used in Samoa
AI-generated correlation image
The spurious research paper: When Gas Meets Polluted Air: Uncovering the Link Between Liquefied Petroleum Gas in Samoa and Air Pollution in Lumberton, North Carolina

View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

You're a rater extraordinaire!

Correlation ID: 4313 · Black Variable ID: 21621 · Red Variable ID: 24871


Problem variable:
Issue:
Additional details: Optional
Confirm you are a human: