about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #4,294 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is GMO use in cotton in Arkansas and the second variable is How provocative The Game Theorists YouTube video titles are.  The chart goes from 2009 to 2022, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

As GMO cotton production in Arkansas surged, it inadvertently led to the creation of ultra-smooth cotton, elevating the comfort of clothing. This newfound comfort sparked a wave of relaxation, causing The Game Theorists to brainstorm and come up with more thought-provoking video titles as they luxuriated in their genetically modified cotton garments. The softer the cotton, the harder they tugged at our intellectual threads with their enticing video concepts. Who knew that a little GM tinkering could lead to a fashionably strategic move in the game of YouTube titling!

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Prompt: Generate an image showing The Game Theorists sitting in a cozy room wearing plush cotton clothing inspired by the surge of GMO cotton production in Arkansas. The soft fabric wraps them in comfort as they brainstorm provocative video titles, tugging at intellectual threads, fueled by the newfound relaxation of ultra-smooth cotton. The image should mimic the dynamic and energetic style of a Discovery magazine cover, capturing the essence of creativity, comfort, and intellectual exploration. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: GMO use in cotton in Arkansas and How provocative The Game Theorists YouTube video titles are. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Woodblock painting Macabre A Discovery magazine cover image Photorealism Scalar art
ChatGPT: A Discovery magazine cover image

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both GMO use in cotton in Arkansas and How provocative The Game Theorists YouTube video titles are, in the following situation: As GMO cotton production in Arkansas surged, it inadvertently led to the creation of ultra-smooth cotton, elevating the comfort of clothing. This newfound comfort sparked a wave of relaxation, causing The Game Theorists to brainstorm and come up with more thought-provoking video titles as they luxuriated in their genetically modified cotton garments. The softer the cotton, the harder they tugged at our intellectual threads with their enticing video concepts. Who knew that a little GM tinkering could lead to a fashionably strategic move in the game of YouTube titling!. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In a cozy room, The Game Theorists sit wearing plush cotton clothing, inspired by the surge of GMO cotton production in Arkansas. The soft fabric wraps them in comfort as they brainstorm provocative video titles, tugging at intellectual threads, fueled by the newfound relaxation of ultra-smooth cotton.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ A Discovery magazine cover image ] and depicting this scene: In a cozy room, The Game Theorists sit wearing plush cotton clothing, inspired by the surge of GMO cotton production in Arkansas. The soft fabric wraps them in comfort as they brainstorm provocative video titles, tugging at intellectual threads, fueled by the newfound relaxation of ultra-smooth cotton. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Prompt: Generate an image showing The Game Theorists sitting in a cozy room wearing plush cotton clothing inspired by the surge of GMO cotton production in Arkansas. The soft fabric wraps them in comfort as they brainstorm provocative video titles, tugging at intellectual threads, fueled by the newfound relaxation of ultra-smooth cotton. The image should mimic the dynamic and energetic style of a Discovery magazine cover, capturing the essence of creativity, comfort, and intellectual exploration.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in GMO use in cotton in Arkansas caused How provocative The Game Theorists YouTube video titles are to increase. Make it feel plausible.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Cotton and Clickbait: Correlating Cotton GMO Use in Arkansas with the Catchiness of The Game Theorists YouTube Video Titles

The Journal of Agricultural Memetics

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in cotton in Arkansas and How provocative The Game Theorists YouTube video titles are. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Make the title an alliteration.

Your research team used data from USDA and AI analysis of YouTube video titles to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9235761 and p < 0.01 for 2009 to 2022.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
Cotton and Clickbait: Correlating Cotton GMO Use in Arkansas with the Catchiness of The Game Theorists YouTube Video Titles

[[ABSTRACT]]
The use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in cotton cultivation has been a hot-button issue, sparking debates among policymakers, agricultural experts, and environmentalists. At the same time, the rise of YouTube as a platform for science and pop culture analysis has brought attention to the art of crafting catchy and provocative video titles. This study delves into the correlation between GMO use in cotton in Arkansas and the click-worthiness of The Game Theorists' YouTube video titles.

Our research team conducted a comprehensive analysis of USDA data on cotton GMO usage in Arkansas from 2009 to 2022, alongside an AI-assisted examination of the linguistic and psychological impact of YouTube video titles by The Game Theorists. The correlation coefficient of 0.9235761 and p < 0.01 revealed a strong positive association between the two variables.

It turns out that the more cotton farmers use GMOs, the more engaging and tantalizing The Game Theorists' video titles become. This unexpected linkage may have significant implications for both the agricultural and digital entertainment industries. As for the dad joke, we couldn't resist: Why did the corn farmer become a Game Theorists fan? Because he wanted to "crop" all the latest theories!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in cotton in Arkansas and How provocative The Game Theorists YouTube video titles are. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Cotton and Clickbait: Correlating Cotton GMO Use in Arkansas with the Catchiness of The Game Theorists YouTube Video Titles

[[ABSTRACT]]
The use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in cotton cultivation has been a hot-button issue, sparking debates among policymakers, agricultural experts, and environmentalists. At the same time, the rise of YouTube as a platform for science and pop culture analysis has brought attention to the art of crafting catchy and provocative video titles. This study delves into the correlation between GMO use in cotton in Arkansas and the click-worthiness of The Game Theorists' YouTube video titles.

Our research team conducted a comprehensive analysis of USDA data on cotton GMO usage in Arkansas from 2009 to 2022, alongside an AI-assisted examination of the linguistic and psychological impact of YouTube video titles by The Game Theorists. The correlation coefficient of 0.9235761 and p < 0.01 revealed a strong positive association between the two variables.

It turns out that the more cotton farmers use GMOs, the more engaging and tantalizing The Game Theorists' video titles become. This unexpected linkage may have significant implications for both the agricultural and digital entertainment industries. As for the dad joke, we couldn't resist: Why did the corn farmer become a Game Theorists fan? Because he wanted to "crop" all the latest theories!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

The utilization of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in agricultural practices has been a subject of great interest and controversy in recent decades, particularly in the context of cotton farming. Concurrently, the rise of digital media and the art of crafting attention-grabbing video titles has contributed to the allure of online content. At the intersection of these seemingly disparate realms lies the correlation between the adoption of GMOs in cotton cultivation and the captivation of The Game Theorists' YouTube video titles.

The question of whether there is a genuine connection between these two divergent fields has ignited curiosity among researchers and enthusiasts alike. It has become as intriguing as pondering the age-old inquiry: Why don't scientists trust atoms? Because they make up everything!

The objective of this study is to explore the relationship between the usage of GMOs in cotton farming in Arkansas and the level of click-worthiness exhibited by The Game Theorists' YouTube video titles. This research is not merely an exercise in academic whimsy, but rather a serious attempt to uncover potential underlying factors that may influence the creation and consumption of digital content.

As we embark on this academic pursuit, it is important to recognize that the seemingly incongruent pair of GMO cotton data and YouTube video titles share a common thread – their capacity to attract attention and prompt engagement. This compels us to investigate the correlation between these seemingly disparate phenomena in a manner akin to asking: Why did the scarecrow win an award? Because he was outstanding in his field!

The findings of this study may illuminate unforeseen connections between agricultural practices and digital media trends, offering insights that could have implications for multiple industries. Through our research, we aim to bridge the gap between the agricultural and entertainment realms, tying together threads of scientific inquiry and popular culture – much like attempting to sew together a punny joke and a serious academic pursuit!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in cotton in Arkansas and How provocative The Game Theorists YouTube video titles are. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then name a couple popular internet memes that are related to one of the topics.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Cotton and Clickbait: Correlating Cotton GMO Use in Arkansas with the Catchiness of The Game Theorists YouTube Video Titles

[[ABSTRACT]]
The use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in cotton cultivation has been a hot-button issue, sparking debates among policymakers, agricultural experts, and environmentalists. At the same time, the rise of YouTube as a platform for science and pop culture analysis has brought attention to the art of crafting catchy and provocative video titles. This study delves into the correlation between GMO use in cotton in Arkansas and the click-worthiness of The Game Theorists' YouTube video titles.

Our research team conducted a comprehensive analysis of USDA data on cotton GMO usage in Arkansas from 2009 to 2022, alongside an AI-assisted examination of the linguistic and psychological impact of YouTube video titles by The Game Theorists. The correlation coefficient of 0.9235761 and p < 0.01 revealed a strong positive association between the two variables.

It turns out that the more cotton farmers use GMOs, the more engaging and tantalizing The Game Theorists' video titles become. This unexpected linkage may have significant implications for both the agricultural and digital entertainment industries. As for the dad joke, we couldn't resist: Why did the corn farmer become a Game Theorists fan? Because he wanted to "crop" all the latest theories!

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The utilization of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in agricultural practices has been a subject of great interest and controversy in recent decades, particularly in the context of cotton farming. Concurrently, the rise of digital media and the art of crafting attention-grabbing video titles has contributed to the allure of online content. At the intersection of these seemingly disparate realms lies the correlation between the adoption of GMOs in cotton cultivation and the captivation of The Game Theorists' YouTube video titles.
The question of whether there is a genuine connection between these two divergent fields has ignited curiosity among researchers and enthusiasts alike. It has become as intriguing as pondering the age-old inquiry: Why don't scientists trust atoms? Because they make up everything!
The objective of this study is to explore the relationship between the usage of GMOs in cotton farming in Arkansas and the level of click-worthiness exhibited by The Game Theorists' YouTube video titles. This research is not merely an exercise in academic whimsy, but rather a serious attempt to uncover potential underlying factors that may influence the creation and consumption of digital content.
As we embark on this academic pursuit, it is important to recognize that the seemingly incongruent pair of GMO cotton data and YouTube video titles share a common thread – their capacity to attract attention and prompt engagement. This compels us to investigate the correlation between these seemingly disparate phenomena in a manner akin to asking: Why did the scarecrow win an award? Because he was outstanding in his field!
The findings of this study may illuminate unforeseen connections between agricultural practices and digital media trends, offering insights that could have implications for multiple industries. Through our research, we aim to bridge the gap between the agricultural and entertainment realms, tying together threads of scientific inquiry and popular culture – much like attempting to sew together a punny joke and a serious academic pursuit!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

In their study, "Cotton: A Textile for the Modern World," Smith and Doe emphasize the widespread utilization of genetically modified cotton and its impact on agricultural productivity. The authors underscore the role of GMO technology in enhancing pest resistance and yield, shedding light on the economic implications for cotton farmers. Similarly, Jones et al., in "Genetically Modified Crops and Their Applications," present a comprehensive overview of GMO adoption in various agricultural contexts, including cotton cultivation, and highlight the implications for sustainability and productivity.

Now, let's take a brief detour from the world of academic literature and delve into some reads that sound related but are, in fact, a bit more whimsical. Imagine the fictional "Cotton Tales: A Spintastic Adventure" by A. Woolsmith - a tale of anthropomorphic cotton fibers embarking on a daring quest. In a similar vein, "The Game Theorists' Game-Changing Theories" by T. Clicks delves into the enigmatic world of digital entertainment and speculative analysis, albeit not in the context of cotton farming.

Moving on from fiction, let's not forget the popular internet meme "This is the Title of a Game Theorists Video... But Can You Guess the Topic?" that has garnered attention among online communities. The viral meme playfully encapsulates the element of intrigue and anticipation associated with The Game Theorists' content, while also serving as a testament to the curiosity it elicits.

Returning to scholarly works, the correlation between cotton GMO usage in Arkansas and the allure of The Game Theorists' YouTube video titles may seem unconventional, yet our research finds a surprisingly strong association between these seemingly disparate domains. This unexpected link prompts a re-evaluation of the dynamics at play, akin to realizing that the phrase "science puns" is actually quite relative - because it "Hz" so many dimensions!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in cotton in Arkansas and How provocative The Game Theorists YouTube video titles are. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from USDA and AI analysis of YouTube video titles . You used data from 2009 to 2022

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Cotton and Clickbait: Correlating Cotton GMO Use in Arkansas with the Catchiness of The Game Theorists YouTube Video Titles

[[ABSTRACT]]
The use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in cotton cultivation has been a hot-button issue, sparking debates among policymakers, agricultural experts, and environmentalists. At the same time, the rise of YouTube as a platform for science and pop culture analysis has brought attention to the art of crafting catchy and provocative video titles. This study delves into the correlation between GMO use in cotton in Arkansas and the click-worthiness of The Game Theorists' YouTube video titles.

Our research team conducted a comprehensive analysis of USDA data on cotton GMO usage in Arkansas from 2009 to 2022, alongside an AI-assisted examination of the linguistic and psychological impact of YouTube video titles by The Game Theorists. The correlation coefficient of 0.9235761 and p < 0.01 revealed a strong positive association between the two variables.

It turns out that the more cotton farmers use GMOs, the more engaging and tantalizing The Game Theorists' video titles become. This unexpected linkage may have significant implications for both the agricultural and digital entertainment industries. As for the dad joke, we couldn't resist: Why did the corn farmer become a Game Theorists fan? Because he wanted to "crop" all the latest theories!

[[INTRODUCTION]]
The utilization of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in agricultural practices has been a subject of great interest and controversy in recent decades, particularly in the context of cotton farming. Concurrently, the rise of digital media and the art of crafting attention-grabbing video titles has contributed to the allure of online content. At the intersection of these seemingly disparate realms lies the correlation between the adoption of GMOs in cotton cultivation and the captivation of The Game Theorists' YouTube video titles.
The question of whether there is a genuine connection between these two divergent fields has ignited curiosity among researchers and enthusiasts alike. It has become as intriguing as pondering the age-old inquiry: Why don't scientists trust atoms? Because they make up everything!
The objective of this study is to explore the relationship between the usage of GMOs in cotton farming in Arkansas and the level of click-worthiness exhibited by The Game Theorists' YouTube video titles. This research is not merely an exercise in academic whimsy, but rather a serious attempt to uncover potential underlying factors that may influence the creation and consumption of digital content.
As we embark on this academic pursuit, it is important to recognize that the seemingly incongruent pair of GMO cotton data and YouTube video titles share a common thread – their capacity to attract attention and prompt engagement. This compels us to investigate the correlation between these seemingly disparate phenomena in a manner akin to asking: Why did the scarecrow win an award? Because he was outstanding in his field!
The findings of this study may illuminate unforeseen connections between agricultural practices and digital media trends, offering insights that could have implications for multiple industries. Through our research, we aim to bridge the gap between the agricultural and entertainment realms, tying together threads of scientific inquiry and popular culture – much like attempting to sew together a punny joke and a serious academic pursuit!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To unpack the relationship between cotton GMO use in Arkansas and the irresistibility of The Game Theorists’ YouTube video titles, our research employed a multi-faceted approach that melded agricultural data analysis with linguistic and psychological scrutiny of digital content. While the methods used may sound as complex as trying to explain a pun to an AI, each step was crucial in unraveling the enigmatic bond between these seemingly incongruous domains.

Firstly, we meticulously gathered USDA data on the adoption of GMOs in cotton farming in Arkansas from 2009 to 2022. This involved poring over acres of statistical reports and conducting interviews with agricultural experts, who were surprisingly game for our exploration into the uncharted territory of GMO-cotton-YouTube-title interactions. It was like diving deep into a field of wordplay, searching for that elusive pun that ties everything together.

Simultaneously, we turned to advanced artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms to dissect The Game Theorists’ YouTube video titles. Through linguistic analysis and psychological profiling, we sought to quantify the click-inducing qualities of their titles, with all the seriousness of a dad joke delivery at a family gathering. Our AI tools had the momentous task of discerning whether their titles were as attention-grabbing as a magician at a library.

The next phase of our research involved applying complex statistical models, including correlation analysis and regression techniques, to discern any patterns or associations between cotton GMO usage and the captivation level of The Game Theorists’ YouTube video titles. It was like trying to decipher the perfect punchline in a sea of potential dad jokes, a task that required precision and dedication – much like the pursuit of knowledge in any scientific endeavor.

Additionally, we employed qualitative methods to glean insights from both cotton farmers and avid followers of The Game Theorists. Interviews, surveys, and focus groups were conducted to gain a deeper understanding of their perceptions and experiences related to GMO use in agriculture and the allure of YouTube video titles, illuminating the human dimension of our investigation. It was akin to engaging in a lively debate on the merits of clever wordplay, as we delved into the subjective interpretations and preferences of our participants.

Ultimately, this quirky amalgamation of methods allowed us to piece together the puzzle of GMO cotton and YouTube title magnetism, illuminating unexpected connections and shedding light on the intertwined nature of seemingly disparate phenomena. It was as though we were concocting a perfect blend of serious research and lighthearted amusement, much like the art of punctuating a scholarly paper with strategically placed dad jokes.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in cotton in Arkansas and How provocative The Game Theorists YouTube video titles are. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from USDA and AI analysis of YouTube video titles .

For the time period 2009 to 2022, you found a correlation 0.9235761, r-squared of 0.8529927, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Cotton and Clickbait: Correlating Cotton GMO Use in Arkansas with the Catchiness of The Game Theorists YouTube Video Titles

[[ABSTRACT]]
The use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in cotton cultivation has been a hot-button issue, sparking debates among policymakers, agricultural experts, and environmentalists. At the same time, the rise of YouTube as a platform for science and pop culture analysis has brought attention to the art of crafting catchy and provocative video titles. This study delves into the correlation between GMO use in cotton in Arkansas and the click-worthiness of The Game Theorists' YouTube video titles.

Our research team conducted a comprehensive analysis of USDA data on cotton GMO usage in Arkansas from 2009 to 2022, alongside an AI-assisted examination of the linguistic and psychological impact of YouTube video titles by The Game Theorists. The correlation coefficient of 0.9235761 and p < 0.01 revealed a strong positive association between the two variables.

It turns out that the more cotton farmers use GMOs, the more engaging and tantalizing The Game Theorists' video titles become. This unexpected linkage may have significant implications for both the agricultural and digital entertainment industries. As for the dad joke, we couldn't resist: Why did the corn farmer become a Game Theorists fan? Because he wanted to "crop" all the latest theories!

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
The utilization of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in agricultural practices has been a subject of great interest and controversy in recent decades, particularly in the context of cotton farming. Concurrently, the rise of digital media and the art of crafting attention-grabbing video titles has contributed to the allure of online content. At the intersection of these seemingly disparate realms lies the correlation between the adoption of GMOs in cotton cultivation and the captivation of The Game Theorists' YouTube video titles.
The question of whether there is a genuine connection between these two divergent fields has ignited curiosity among researchers and enthusiasts alike. It has become as intriguing as pondering the age-old inquiry: Why don't scientists trust atoms? Because they make up everything!
The objective of this study is to explore the relationship between the usage of GMOs in cotton farming in Arkansas and the level of click-worthiness exhibited by The Game Theorists' YouTube video titles. This research is not merely an exercise in academic whimsy, but rather a serious attempt to uncover potential underlying factors that may influence the creation and consumption of digital content.
As we embark on this academic pursuit, it is important to recognize that the seemingly incongruent pair of GMO cotton data and YouTube video titles share a common thread – their capacity to attract attention and prompt engagement. This compels us to investigate the correlation between these seemingly disparate phenomena in a manner akin to asking: Why did the scarecrow win an award? Because he was outstanding in his field!
The findings of this study may illuminate unforeseen connections between agricultural practices and digital media trends, offering insights that could have implications for multiple industries. Through our research, we aim to bridge the gap between the agricultural and entertainment realms, tying together threads of scientific inquiry and popular culture – much like attempting to sew together a punny joke and a serious academic pursuit!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The correlation analysis between the usage of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in cotton farming in Arkansas and the allure of The Game Theorists' YouTube video titles yielded intriguing results. The correlation coefficient of 0.9235761 and an r-squared value of 0.8529927 indicated a strong positive association between the two variables. This significant correlation suggests that as GMO usage in cotton cultivation increased, the click-worthiness of The Game Theorists' video titles also exhibited a notable rise.

The strength of the relationship may come as a surprise to many, akin to stumbling upon a corny pun in the midst of a serious research paper. It appears that the urge to engage and captivate audiences extends beyond the fields of agriculture and extends into the realm of digital entertainment. One can't help but wonder: Why did the GMO cotton farmer invest in YouTube sponsorship? Because he wanted to "plant" his brand in the minds of a captivating audience!

Fig. 1 presents a scatterplot illustrating the robust correlation between the use of GMOs in cotton farming and the catchiness of The Game Theorists' YouTube video titles. The tightly clustered data points on the plot further emphasize the strength of the correlation, leaving little room for doubt or skepticism.

The implications of this unexpected linkage are far-reaching, and they raise intriguing questions about the interplay between agricultural practices and online content creation. Just as one might ponder the intricacies of game theory, the correlation observed in this study adds a layer of complexity to the relationship between GMO usage and digital engagement. One can't help but be drawn in, much like a well-crafted video title that promises intriguing revelations: "Cotton Clickbait: Unraveling the Game Theory of GMOs and YouTube Captivation!"

In summary, the results of this study unveil a strong correlation between GMO use in cotton in Arkansas and the allure of The Game Theorists' YouTube video titles. This unexpected connection may have profound implications for both the agricultural and digital entertainment industries. As the age-old dad joke goes, indeed, "the correlations between cotton and clickbait are truly 'bale'-seeding!"


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in cotton in Arkansas and How provocative The Game Theorists YouTube video titles are. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
Cotton and Clickbait: Correlating Cotton GMO Use in Arkansas with the Catchiness of The Game Theorists YouTube Video Titles

[[ABSTRACT]]
The use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in cotton cultivation has been a hot-button issue, sparking debates among policymakers, agricultural experts, and environmentalists. At the same time, the rise of YouTube as a platform for science and pop culture analysis has brought attention to the art of crafting catchy and provocative video titles. This study delves into the correlation between GMO use in cotton in Arkansas and the click-worthiness of The Game Theorists' YouTube video titles.

Our research team conducted a comprehensive analysis of USDA data on cotton GMO usage in Arkansas from 2009 to 2022, alongside an AI-assisted examination of the linguistic and psychological impact of YouTube video titles by The Game Theorists. The correlation coefficient of 0.9235761 and p < 0.01 revealed a strong positive association between the two variables.

It turns out that the more cotton farmers use GMOs, the more engaging and tantalizing The Game Theorists' video titles become. This unexpected linkage may have significant implications for both the agricultural and digital entertainment industries. As for the dad joke, we couldn't resist: Why did the corn farmer become a Game Theorists fan? Because he wanted to "crop" all the latest theories!

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
In their study, "Cotton: A Textile for the Modern World," Smith and Doe emphasize the widespread utilization of genetically modified cotton and its impact on agricultural productivity. The authors underscore the role of GMO technology in enhancing pest resistance and yield, shedding light on the economic implications for cotton farmers. Similarly, Jones et al., in "Genetically Modified Crops and Their Applications," present a comprehensive overview of GMO adoption in various agricultural contexts, including cotton cultivation, and highlight the implications for sustainability and productivity.
Now, let's take a brief detour from the world of academic literature and delve into some reads that sound related but are, in fact, a bit more whimsical. Imagine the fictional "Cotton Tales: A Spintastic Adventure" by A. Woolsmith - a tale of anthropomorphic cotton fibers embarking on a daring quest. In a similar vein, "The Game Theorists' Game-Changing Theories" by T. Clicks delves into the enigmatic world of digital entertainment and speculative analysis, albeit not in the context of cotton farming.
Moving on from fiction, let's not forget the popular internet meme "This is the Title of a Game Theorists Video... But Can You Guess the Topic?" that has garnered attention among online communities. The viral meme playfully encapsulates the element of intrigue and anticipation associated with The Game Theorists' content, while also serving as a testament to the curiosity it elicits.
Returning to scholarly works, the correlation between cotton GMO usage in Arkansas and the allure of The Game Theorists' YouTube video titles may seem unconventional, yet our research finds a surprisingly strong association between these seemingly disparate domains. This unexpected link prompts a re-evaluation of the dynamics at play, akin to realizing that the phrase "science puns" is actually quite relative - because it "Hz" so many dimensions!

[[RESULTS]]
The correlation analysis between the usage of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in cotton farming in Arkansas and the allure of The Game Theorists' YouTube video titles yielded intriguing results. The correlation coefficient of 0.9235761 and an r-squared value of 0.8529927 indicated a strong positive association between the two variables. This significant correlation suggests that as GMO usage in cotton cultivation increased, the click-worthiness of The Game Theorists' video titles also exhibited a notable rise.
The strength of the relationship may come as a surprise to many, akin to stumbling upon a corny pun in the midst of a serious research paper. It appears that the urge to engage and captivate audiences extends beyond the fields of agriculture and extends into the realm of digital entertainment. One can't help but wonder: Why did the GMO cotton farmer invest in YouTube sponsorship? Because he wanted to "plant" his brand in the minds of a captivating audience!
Fig. 1 presents a scatterplot illustrating the robust correlation between the use of GMOs in cotton farming and the catchiness of The Game Theorists' YouTube video titles. The tightly clustered data points on the plot further emphasize the strength of the correlation, leaving little room for doubt or skepticism.
The implications of this unexpected linkage are far-reaching, and they raise intriguing questions about the interplay between agricultural practices and online content creation. Just as one might ponder the intricacies of game theory, the correlation observed in this study adds a layer of complexity to the relationship between GMO usage and digital engagement. One can't help but be drawn in, much like a well-crafted video title that promises intriguing revelations: "Cotton Clickbait: Unraveling the Game Theory of GMOs and YouTube Captivation!"
In summary, the results of this study unveil a strong correlation between GMO use in cotton in Arkansas and the allure of The Game Theorists' YouTube video titles. This unexpected connection may have profound implications for both the agricultural and digital entertainment industries. As the age-old dad joke goes, indeed, "the correlations between cotton and clickbait are truly 'bale'-seeding!"

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The robust correlation between GMO use in cotton farming in Arkansas and the catchiness of The Game Theorists' YouTube video titles presents an intriguing juxtaposition. The strength of this association, with a correlation coefficient of 0.9235761, aligns with previous research on the influential impact of GMO technology on agricultural productivity and sustainability. This unexpected link highlights the complex interplay between seemingly distinct domains, much like the interwoven threads of a cotton fabric.

The findings support the notion put forth by Smith and Doe that GMO technology has tangible effects on agricultural productivity. In this case, it appears to extend its influence beyond the realms of soil and seed to the evocative realm of digital content creation. This unexpected synergy between agriculture and digital engagement may elicit both surprise and amusement, akin to stumbling upon a pun in a scholarly text on agriculture—a reminder that amidst the seriousness of research, levity can often be found.

Moreover, the substantial correlation lends credence to Jones et al.'s emphasis on the widespread adoption of genetically modified crops, indicating that this adoption transcends conventional agricultural spheres. The unexpectedly strong relationship observed in this study underscores the multifaceted impact of agricultural practices, much like the multifaceted allure of an unpredictably catchy video title.

The unexpected correlation also augments the whimsical nature of the meme "This is the Title of a Game Theorists Video... But Can You Guess the Topic?" mentioned in the literature review—demonstrating that the curiosity and anticipation engendered by The Game Theorists' content are more than just internet phenomena; they have tangible associations with real-world agricultural practices. This unanticipated link provokes contemplation, much like a well-constructed riddle, drawing attention to the intriguing complexity of the relationship between GMO usage and digital engagement.

In summary, the unexpected correlation unveiled in this study adds a layer of complexity to our understanding of the interplay between GMO use in cotton agriculture in Arkansas and the allure of The Game Theorists' YouTube video titles. The connection between these seemingly distinct domains may give way to innovative perspectives and cross-disciplinary insights, much like a delightful dad joke that provides a moment of mirth amidst scholarly discourse.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in cotton in Arkansas and How provocative The Game Theorists YouTube video titles are. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
Cotton and Clickbait: Correlating Cotton GMO Use in Arkansas with the Catchiness of The Game Theorists YouTube Video Titles

[[ABSTRACT]]
The use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in cotton cultivation has been a hot-button issue, sparking debates among policymakers, agricultural experts, and environmentalists. At the same time, the rise of YouTube as a platform for science and pop culture analysis has brought attention to the art of crafting catchy and provocative video titles. This study delves into the correlation between GMO use in cotton in Arkansas and the click-worthiness of The Game Theorists' YouTube video titles.

Our research team conducted a comprehensive analysis of USDA data on cotton GMO usage in Arkansas from 2009 to 2022, alongside an AI-assisted examination of the linguistic and psychological impact of YouTube video titles by The Game Theorists. The correlation coefficient of 0.9235761 and p < 0.01 revealed a strong positive association between the two variables.

It turns out that the more cotton farmers use GMOs, the more engaging and tantalizing The Game Theorists' video titles become. This unexpected linkage may have significant implications for both the agricultural and digital entertainment industries. As for the dad joke, we couldn't resist: Why did the corn farmer become a Game Theorists fan? Because he wanted to "crop" all the latest theories!

[[INTRDUCTION]]
The utilization of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in agricultural practices has been a subject of great interest and controversy in recent decades, particularly in the context of cotton farming. Concurrently, the rise of digital media and the art of crafting attention-grabbing video titles has contributed to the allure of online content. At the intersection of these seemingly disparate realms lies the correlation between the adoption of GMOs in cotton cultivation and the captivation of The Game Theorists' YouTube video titles.
The question of whether there is a genuine connection between these two divergent fields has ignited curiosity among researchers and enthusiasts alike. It has become as intriguing as pondering the age-old inquiry: Why don't scientists trust atoms? Because they make up everything!
The objective of this study is to explore the relationship between the usage of GMOs in cotton farming in Arkansas and the level of click-worthiness exhibited by The Game Theorists' YouTube video titles. This research is not merely an exercise in academic whimsy, but rather a serious attempt to uncover potential underlying factors that may influence the creation and consumption of digital content.
As we embark on this academic pursuit, it is important to recognize that the seemingly incongruent pair of GMO cotton data and YouTube video titles share a common thread – their capacity to attract attention and prompt engagement. This compels us to investigate the correlation between these seemingly disparate phenomena in a manner akin to asking: Why did the scarecrow win an award? Because he was outstanding in his field!
The findings of this study may illuminate unforeseen connections between agricultural practices and digital media trends, offering insights that could have implications for multiple industries. Through our research, we aim to bridge the gap between the agricultural and entertainment realms, tying together threads of scientific inquiry and popular culture – much like attempting to sew together a punny joke and a serious academic pursuit!

[[RESULTS]]
The correlation analysis between the usage of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in cotton farming in Arkansas and the allure of The Game Theorists' YouTube video titles yielded intriguing results. The correlation coefficient of 0.9235761 and an r-squared value of 0.8529927 indicated a strong positive association between the two variables. This significant correlation suggests that as GMO usage in cotton cultivation increased, the click-worthiness of The Game Theorists' video titles also exhibited a notable rise.
The strength of the relationship may come as a surprise to many, akin to stumbling upon a corny pun in the midst of a serious research paper. It appears that the urge to engage and captivate audiences extends beyond the fields of agriculture and extends into the realm of digital entertainment. One can't help but wonder: Why did the GMO cotton farmer invest in YouTube sponsorship? Because he wanted to "plant" his brand in the minds of a captivating audience!
Fig. 1 presents a scatterplot illustrating the robust correlation between the use of GMOs in cotton farming and the catchiness of The Game Theorists' YouTube video titles. The tightly clustered data points on the plot further emphasize the strength of the correlation, leaving little room for doubt or skepticism.
The implications of this unexpected linkage are far-reaching, and they raise intriguing questions about the interplay between agricultural practices and online content creation. Just as one might ponder the intricacies of game theory, the correlation observed in this study adds a layer of complexity to the relationship between GMO usage and digital engagement. One can't help but be drawn in, much like a well-crafted video title that promises intriguing revelations: "Cotton Clickbait: Unraveling the Game Theory of GMOs and YouTube Captivation!"
In summary, the results of this study unveil a strong correlation between GMO use in cotton in Arkansas and the allure of The Game Theorists' YouTube video titles. This unexpected connection may have profound implications for both the agricultural and digital entertainment industries. As the age-old dad joke goes, indeed, "the correlations between cotton and clickbait are truly 'bale'-seeding!"

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our investigation has unraveled an unexpected and robust correlation between the usage of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in cotton cultivation in Arkansas and the attractiveness of The Game Theorists' YouTube video titles. This surprising finding brings to light the intriguing interplay between agricultural practices and online content creation, prompting us to consider the possibilities more deeply. It's as if we've stumbled upon a treasure trove of unexpected connections, much like finding a hidden gem in a field of corn. Why did the scientist enjoy the correlation between cotton GMOs and catchy titles? Because it added a "pop" of excitement to the research!

The implications of this study extend beyond the realms of cotton farming and digital entertainment, offering a new perspective on the factors influencing audience engagement and online content consumption. This unexpected linkage may open doors to further exploration into the intricate dynamics underlying the intersection of seemingly disparate industries, not unlike the intricate maneuvers of a thought-provoking game theory model. On a serious note, the potential impact of this correlation on marketing strategies and consumer behavior is not to be dismissed lightly.

Having illuminated this noteworthy correlation, we assert that no further research is needed in this area. The unexpected and robust link between GMO use in cotton cultivation and the allure of The Game Theorists' YouTube video titles has been laid bare for all to see. As for the dad joke: "Why did the researcher stop investigating the connection between cotton GMOs and catchy YouTube titles? Because the correlation was already 'seeded' in the data!"

In the immortal words of The Game Theorists, "And remember, that's just a conclusion. A silly conclusion! Thanks for reading!"


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Cotton and Clickbait: Correlating Cotton GMO Use in Arkansas with the Catchiness of The Game Theorists YouTube Video Titles. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Agricultural Memetics


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Cotton and Clickbait: Correlating Cotton GMO Use in Arkansas with the Catchiness of The Game Theorists YouTube Video Titles. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Society for Quirky Agricultural Research


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Cotton and Clickbait: Correlating Cotton GMO Use in Arkansas with the Catchiness of The Game Theorists YouTube Video Titles with an abstract of The use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in cotton cultivation has been a hot-button issue, sparking debates among policymakers, agricultural experts, and environmentalists. At the same time, the rise of YouTube as a platform for science and pop culture analysis has brought attention to the art of crafting catchy and provocative video titles. This study delves into the correlation between GMO use in cotton in Arkansas and the click-worthiness of The Game Theorists' YouTube video titles.
Our research team conducted a comprehensive analysis of USDA data on cotton GMO usage in Arkansas from 2009 to 2022, alongside an AI-assisted examination of the linguistic and psychological impact of YouTube video titles by The Game Theorists. The correlation coefficient of 0.9235761 and p < 0.01 revealed a strong positive association between the two variables.
It turns out that the more cotton farmers use GMOs, the more engaging and tantalizing The Game Theorists' video titles become. This unexpected linkage may have significant implications for both the agricultural and digital entertainment industries. As for the dad joke, we couldn't resist: Why did the corn farmer become a Game Theorists fan? Because he wanted to "crop" all the latest theories!

ChatGPT:

cotton GMO, cotton cultivation, cotton farming, Arkansas, The Game Theorists, YouTube video titles, GMO use in agriculture, USDA data, linguistic analysis, psychological impact, clickbait, correlation study

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

GMO use in cotton in Arkansas
Detailed data title: Percent of cotton planted in Arkansas genetically modified with both Bt and HT
Source: USDA
See what else correlates with GMO use in cotton in Arkansas

How provocative The Game Theorists YouTube video titles are
Detailed data title: How provocative The Game Theorists YouTube video titles are, as rated by an AI.
Source: AI analysis of YouTube video titles
Additional Info: I asked a large language model, 'On a scale of 1-10, how _______ do you think this YouTube video title is?' for every video.

See what else correlates with How provocative The Game Theorists YouTube video titles are

Correlation r = 0.9235761 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.8529927 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 85.3% of the change in the one variable (i.e., How provocative The Game Theorists YouTube video titles are) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., GMO use in cotton in Arkansas) over the 14 years from 2009 through 2022.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 2.4E-6. 0.0000024358998856837412000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.92 in 0.00024% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 410,526 random variables You don't actually need 410 thousand variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 13 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 13 because we have two variables measured over a period of 14 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.77, 0.98 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
20092010201120122013201420152016201720182019202020212022
GMO use in cotton in Arkansas (GMO cotton %)9798989998999999999999999999
How provocative The Game Theorists YouTube video titles are (Provacative score)2.88243.37544.69573.885.14.90484.44835.32655.22414.77595.37294.81035.2414




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Y-axis doesn't start at zero: I truncated the Y-axes of the graph above. I also used a line graph, which makes the visual connection stand out more than it deserves. Nothing against line graphs. They are great at telling a story when you have linear data! But visually it is deceptive because the only data is at the points on the graph, not the lines on the graph. In between each point, the data could have been doing anything. Like going for a random walk by itself!
    Mathematically what I showed is true, but it is intentionally misleading. Below is the same chart but with both Y-axes starting at zero.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([97,98,98,99,98,99,99,99,99,99,99,99,99,99,])
array_2 = np.array([2.8824,3.375,4,4.6957,3.88,5.1,4.9048,4.4483,5.3265,5.2241,4.7759,5.3729,4.8103,5.2414,])
array_1_name = "GMO use in cotton in Arkansas"
array_2_name = "How provocative The Game Theorists YouTube video titles are"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

I'm genuinely thankful for your rating!


Correlation ID: 4294 · Black Variable ID: 803 · Red Variable ID: 25728
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0