about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #4,288 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Petroluem consumption in Vanuatu and the second variable is Average length of minutephysics YouTube videos.  The chart goes from 2011 to 2021, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

The demand for Vanuatu's petroleum skyrocketed, leading to higher prices. This prompted minutephysics to create longer videos in order to cash in on the extra fuel money they could make. After all, when it comes to video length, it's all about that oil 'change'!

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Create an image showing a bustling, colorful gas station in Vanuatu, with cars lined up at the fuel pumps and people bustling about. In the background, there should be a vibrant video studio with the minutephysics logo on the door, where longer and more elaborate YouTube videos are being produced. The scene should capture the contrast between the fast-paced activity at the gas station and the creative energy of the video studio. Ensure the details of the environment are rich and vivid, drawing attention to the unique setting with a scalar art style. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Petroluem consumption in Vanuatu and Average length of minutephysics YouTube videos. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Futuristic Art nouveau Realistic Sci-fi fantacy Scalar art
ChatGPT: Scalar art

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Petroluem consumption in Vanuatu and Average length of minutephysics YouTube videos, in the following situation: The demand for Vanuatu's petroleum skyrocketed, leading to higher prices. This prompted minutephysics to create longer videos in order to cash in on the extra fuel money they could make. After all, when it comes to video length, it's all about that oil 'change'!. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: A crowded gas station in Vanuatu with long queues of cars waiting to fill up, while in the background, a video studio with the minutephysics logo on the door churns out longer and more elaborate YouTube videos.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ Scalar art ] and depicting this scene: A crowded gas station in Vanuatu with long queues of cars waiting to fill up, while in the background, a video studio with the minutephysics logo on the door churns out longer and more elaborate YouTube videos. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Create an image showing a bustling, colorful gas station in Vanuatu, with cars lined up at the fuel pumps and people bustling about. In the background, there should be a vibrant video studio with the minutephysics logo on the door, where longer and more elaborate YouTube videos are being produced. The scene should capture the contrast between the fast-paced activity at the gas station and the creative energy of the video studio. Ensure the details of the environment are rich and vivid, drawing attention to the unique setting with a scalar art style.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in Petroluem consumption in Vanuatu caused Average length of minutephysics YouTube videos to increase. Include one good pun.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Fuel for Thought: Exploring the Relationship Between Petroleum Consumption in Vanuatu and the Average Length of Minutephysics YouTube Videos

Journal of Offbeat Energy Research

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Petroluem consumption in Vanuatu and Average length of minutephysics YouTube videos. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Make the title punny if you can come up with clever pun. If not, make it sound serious.

Your research team used data from Energy Information Administration and YouTube to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9112549 and p < 0.01 for 2011 to 2021.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
"Fuel for Thought: Exploring the Relationship Between Petroleum Consumption in Vanuatu and the Average Length of Minutephysics YouTube Videos"

[[ABSTRACT]]
The curious case of the connection between petroleum consumption in Vanuatu and the average length of minutephysics YouTube videos has been a subject of inquisitive contemplation in both the digital and energy realms. In this study, we embarked on an illuminating investigation, utilizing data meticulously sourced from the Energy Information Administration and YouTube, to scrutinize this intriguing conundrum. Through rigorous statistical analysis, we unearthed a remarkably robust correlation coefficient of 0.9112549, accompanied by a strikingly low p-value of less than 0.01, during the time span from 2011 to 2021. Our findings not only shed light on the unforeseen interplay between these seemingly disparate variables but also elicit questions regarding the nuanced dynamics of online content creation and its unforeseen relationship with energy consumption patterns. This study provides a quirky twist to the conventional understanding of causality, inviting a playful pondering of the peculiar parallels between petroleum dynamics in a Pacific island nation and the temporal intricacies of educational physics videos on a digital platform.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Petroluem consumption in Vanuatu and Average length of minutephysics YouTube videos. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Fuel for Thought: Exploring the Relationship Between Petroleum Consumption in Vanuatu and the Average Length of Minutephysics YouTube Videos"

[[ABSTRACT]]
The curious case of the connection between petroleum consumption in Vanuatu and the average length of minutephysics YouTube videos has been a subject of inquisitive contemplation in both the digital and energy realms. In this study, we embarked on an illuminating investigation, utilizing data meticulously sourced from the Energy Information Administration and YouTube, to scrutinize this intriguing conundrum. Through rigorous statistical analysis, we unearthed a remarkably robust correlation coefficient of 0.9112549, accompanied by a strikingly low p-value of less than 0.01, during the time span from 2011 to 2021. Our findings not only shed light on the unforeseen interplay between these seemingly disparate variables but also elicit questions regarding the nuanced dynamics of online content creation and its unforeseen relationship with energy consumption patterns. This study provides a quirky twist to the conventional understanding of causality, inviting a playful pondering of the peculiar parallels between petroleum dynamics in a Pacific island nation and the temporal intricacies of educational physics videos on a digital platform.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
The enigmatic relationship between petroleum consumption in the South Pacific archipelago of Vanuatu and the average duration of minutephysics YouTube videos has sparked scholarly curiosity and playful speculation. As the famous physicist Richard Feynman once quipped, "It's a kind of scientific poetry." In this paper, we delve into an investigation that combines the seemingly incongruous realms of energy utilization and online video trends—a juxtaposition that may leave one wondering if we've stumbled into a virtual reality of coincidental correlations.

The premise behind this study was not merely to play matchmaker between barrels of fuel and bytes of digital wisdom, but rather to undertake an empirical rummaging through the digital archives and energy data sets, hoping to uncover the concealed threads linking Vanuatu's oil appetite and the ebb and flow of minute physics tutoring. This pursuit is not unlike trying to reconcile the seemingly discordant coexistence of Schrödinger's cat and the law of thermodynamics—both bewildering and undeniably captivating.

Our pursuit was guided by a blend of statistical curiosity and a latent desire to untangle the web of interconnectedness that weaves through the labyrinthine corridors of datasets. As we embarked on this intellectual escapade, we aimed to bring to the fore the seldom-seen overlap between the seemingly mundane act of fuel consumption in a remote island nation and the decidedly more esoteric domain of short-form educational content, where the average video takes more turns than an electron in a magnetic field.

By revealing the robust correlation coefficient and a p-value that would make even the most skeptical physicist raise an eyebrow, our intent is not to merely fascinate but to provoke a mirthful reconsideration of cause and effect. So sit back, fuel your curiosity, and enjoy the quirky journey through the offbeat intersection of petrol dynamics and physics pedagogy—two domains that, at first glance, seem as dissimilar as apples and antimatter.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Petroluem consumption in Vanuatu and Average length of minutephysics YouTube videos. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then you might move on to cartoons and children's shows that you watched for research.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Fuel for Thought: Exploring the Relationship Between Petroleum Consumption in Vanuatu and the Average Length of Minutephysics YouTube Videos"

[[ABSTRACT]]
The curious case of the connection between petroleum consumption in Vanuatu and the average length of minutephysics YouTube videos has been a subject of inquisitive contemplation in both the digital and energy realms. In this study, we embarked on an illuminating investigation, utilizing data meticulously sourced from the Energy Information Administration and YouTube, to scrutinize this intriguing conundrum. Through rigorous statistical analysis, we unearthed a remarkably robust correlation coefficient of 0.9112549, accompanied by a strikingly low p-value of less than 0.01, during the time span from 2011 to 2021. Our findings not only shed light on the unforeseen interplay between these seemingly disparate variables but also elicit questions regarding the nuanced dynamics of online content creation and its unforeseen relationship with energy consumption patterns. This study provides a quirky twist to the conventional understanding of causality, inviting a playful pondering of the peculiar parallels between petroleum dynamics in a Pacific island nation and the temporal intricacies of educational physics videos on a digital platform.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The enigmatic relationship between petroleum consumption in the South Pacific archipelago of Vanuatu and the average duration of minutephysics YouTube videos has sparked scholarly curiosity and playful speculation. As the famous physicist Richard Feynman once quipped, "It's a kind of scientific poetry." In this paper, we delve into an investigation that combines the seemingly incongruous realms of energy utilization and online video trends—a juxtaposition that may leave one wondering if we've stumbled into a virtual reality of coincidental correlations.
The premise behind this study was not merely to play matchmaker between barrels of fuel and bytes of digital wisdom, but rather to undertake an empirical rummaging through the digital archives and energy data sets, hoping to uncover the concealed threads linking Vanuatu's oil appetite and the ebb and flow of minute physics tutoring. This pursuit is not unlike trying to reconcile the seemingly discordant coexistence of Schrödinger's cat and the law of thermodynamics—both bewildering and undeniably captivating.
Our pursuit was guided by a blend of statistical curiosity and a latent desire to untangle the web of interconnectedness that weaves through the labyrinthine corridors of datasets. As we embarked on this intellectual escapade, we aimed to bring to the fore the seldom-seen overlap between the seemingly mundane act of fuel consumption in a remote island nation and the decidedly more esoteric domain of short-form educational content, where the average video takes more turns than an electron in a magnetic field.
By revealing the robust correlation coefficient and a p-value that would make even the most skeptical physicist raise an eyebrow, our intent is not to merely fascinate but to provoke a mirthful reconsideration of cause and effect. So sit back, fuel your curiosity, and enjoy the quirky journey through the offbeat intersection of petrol dynamics and physics pedagogy—two domains that, at first glance, seem as dissimilar as apples and antimatter.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

The intersection between petroleum consumption in Vanuatu and the average duration of minutephysics YouTube videos has proven to be a stimulating and, dare we say, electrifying topic of inquiry. This odd coupling has prompted a survey of the existing literature, as we endeavor to untangle the web of interconnectedness between these seemingly incongruous variables.

In "The Petroleum Paradigm: Energy Dynamics in Small Island Nations," Smith et al. discuss the economic and social implications of petroleum usage in Pacific island countries. While their work primarily focuses on the impact of fuel on local economies, it inadvertently alludes to the potential influence of petroleum on broader cultural phenomena, such as the length of educational YouTube content.

Doe and Jones delve into the profound intricacies of online content creation and consumption in their seminal work, "Digital Dilemmas: Navigating the Seas of Online Media." Through their qualitative analysis of digital trends, they shed light on the subtle nuances that define the ebb and flow of internet-based educational resources. While their focus is not explicitly on petroleum consumption, their insights into the dynamics of digital media content present an intriguing parallel to our own inquiry.

Moving beyond the conventional realms of scholarly literature, we encounter "The Physics of Fuel: A Comprehensive Guide," a non-fiction book that promises to demystify the physics behind energy production and consumption. While the book does not directly address the duration of online physics tutorials, it certainly provides a contextual backdrop to our investigation and, dare we say, fuels our curiosity for uncovering unexpected connections.

On a more playful note, the fiction novel "Oil and Quantum: A Tale of Serendipitous Symmetry" by Fictitious Author offers a whimsical and highly speculative account of a parallel universe where petroleum dynamics and quantum physics coalesce in an inexplicably delightful manner. While not a rigorous scientific account, this work certainly embraces the spirit of lighthearted contemplation that motivates our own study.

In our quest for understanding, we have also delved into unexpected realms of entertainment, exploring the seemingly whimsical yet surprisingly relevant cartoon series "Island Adventures in the Quantum Realm." While ostensibly targeted at a younger audience, this cartoon has further piqued our interest in uncovering the undercurrents of interconnectedness between energies both physical and digital.

As we navigate through the maze of existing literature, it becomes apparent that the peculiar pairing of petroleum consumption in Vanuatu and the average length of minutephysics YouTube videos, while unexplored in depth, has garnered curiosity from diverse intellectual domains. These diverse sources have primed us for our own quirky journey through this uncharted territory, promising unexpected revelations and perhaps a few chuckles along the way.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Petroluem consumption in Vanuatu and Average length of minutephysics YouTube videos. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Energy Information Administration and YouTube . You used data from 2011 to 2021

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Fuel for Thought: Exploring the Relationship Between Petroleum Consumption in Vanuatu and the Average Length of Minutephysics YouTube Videos"

[[ABSTRACT]]
The curious case of the connection between petroleum consumption in Vanuatu and the average length of minutephysics YouTube videos has been a subject of inquisitive contemplation in both the digital and energy realms. In this study, we embarked on an illuminating investigation, utilizing data meticulously sourced from the Energy Information Administration and YouTube, to scrutinize this intriguing conundrum. Through rigorous statistical analysis, we unearthed a remarkably robust correlation coefficient of 0.9112549, accompanied by a strikingly low p-value of less than 0.01, during the time span from 2011 to 2021. Our findings not only shed light on the unforeseen interplay between these seemingly disparate variables but also elicit questions regarding the nuanced dynamics of online content creation and its unforeseen relationship with energy consumption patterns. This study provides a quirky twist to the conventional understanding of causality, inviting a playful pondering of the peculiar parallels between petroleum dynamics in a Pacific island nation and the temporal intricacies of educational physics videos on a digital platform.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
The enigmatic relationship between petroleum consumption in the South Pacific archipelago of Vanuatu and the average duration of minutephysics YouTube videos has sparked scholarly curiosity and playful speculation. As the famous physicist Richard Feynman once quipped, "It's a kind of scientific poetry." In this paper, we delve into an investigation that combines the seemingly incongruous realms of energy utilization and online video trends—a juxtaposition that may leave one wondering if we've stumbled into a virtual reality of coincidental correlations.
The premise behind this study was not merely to play matchmaker between barrels of fuel and bytes of digital wisdom, but rather to undertake an empirical rummaging through the digital archives and energy data sets, hoping to uncover the concealed threads linking Vanuatu's oil appetite and the ebb and flow of minute physics tutoring. This pursuit is not unlike trying to reconcile the seemingly discordant coexistence of Schrödinger's cat and the law of thermodynamics—both bewildering and undeniably captivating.
Our pursuit was guided by a blend of statistical curiosity and a latent desire to untangle the web of interconnectedness that weaves through the labyrinthine corridors of datasets. As we embarked on this intellectual escapade, we aimed to bring to the fore the seldom-seen overlap between the seemingly mundane act of fuel consumption in a remote island nation and the decidedly more esoteric domain of short-form educational content, where the average video takes more turns than an electron in a magnetic field.
By revealing the robust correlation coefficient and a p-value that would make even the most skeptical physicist raise an eyebrow, our intent is not to merely fascinate but to provoke a mirthful reconsideration of cause and effect. So sit back, fuel your curiosity, and enjoy the quirky journey through the offbeat intersection of petrol dynamics and physics pedagogy—two domains that, at first glance, seem as dissimilar as apples and antimatter.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To disentangle the convoluted connection between petroleum consumption in Vanuatu and the average length of minutephysics YouTube videos, our research team embarked on a whimsical adventure through the labyrinthine corridors of data collection and analysis. Employing a delightful fusion of statistical inquiry and a dash of digital derring-do, we gallivanted through the virtual archives of the Energy Information Administration and YouTube, aiming to capture the elusive essence of this befuddling association.

Our merry band of researchers scoured the Energy Information Administration's treasure trove of energy data, diligently procuring historical records of petroleum consumption in the idyllic island paradise of Vanuatu from 2011 to 2021. Armed with spreadsheets and a spirit of intrepid curiosity, we navigated the seas of numerical data, all while reining in our urge to indulge in the bountiful distractions of adorable kitten videos and inspirational TED Talks.

Meanwhile, on the digital savannah of YouTube, we deftly wrangled vast swaths of minutephysics videos, meticulously chronicling each video's duration with the precision of a watchmaker crafting intricate timepieces. With a nod to the whimsical nature of our endeavor, we identified and encapsulated the temporal intricacies of these educational physics vignettes, unraveling each video's length with the enthusiasm of a child unwrapping presents on a joyous holiday morning.

Having gathered these disparate datasets, we then engaged in a captivating waltz of statistical analysis, teasing out the underlying patterns and correlations with the finesse of a maestro conducting a symphony. Utilizing robust measures such as correlation coefficients and p-values, we aimed to not only quantify the strength of the relationship between these seemingly incongruous variables but also to infuse a bit of statistical merriment into this wonderful, wacky journey through the underbrush of interdisciplinary exploration.

As we twirled through this eclectic array of data, our research team did not shy away from embracing the delightful quirks and surprises that emerged from this undertaking. After all, just as a physicist eagerly anticipates the unforeseen outcomes of a quantum experiment, we were equally gleeful to uncover the unexpected connections nestled within the bosom of these divergent datasets.

With a playful twist and a statistical flourish, our methodology veritably mirrors the whimsical interplay between the realms of petroleum dynamics and educational physics nuggets, culminating in an academic escapade that embodies the spirit of scholarly exploration and the vibrant canvas of academic eccentricity.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Petroluem consumption in Vanuatu and Average length of minutephysics YouTube videos. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Energy Information Administration and YouTube .

For the time period 2011 to 2021, you found a correlation 0.9112549, r-squared of 0.8303856, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Fuel for Thought: Exploring the Relationship Between Petroleum Consumption in Vanuatu and the Average Length of Minutephysics YouTube Videos"

[[ABSTRACT]]
The curious case of the connection between petroleum consumption in Vanuatu and the average length of minutephysics YouTube videos has been a subject of inquisitive contemplation in both the digital and energy realms. In this study, we embarked on an illuminating investigation, utilizing data meticulously sourced from the Energy Information Administration and YouTube, to scrutinize this intriguing conundrum. Through rigorous statistical analysis, we unearthed a remarkably robust correlation coefficient of 0.9112549, accompanied by a strikingly low p-value of less than 0.01, during the time span from 2011 to 2021. Our findings not only shed light on the unforeseen interplay between these seemingly disparate variables but also elicit questions regarding the nuanced dynamics of online content creation and its unforeseen relationship with energy consumption patterns. This study provides a quirky twist to the conventional understanding of causality, inviting a playful pondering of the peculiar parallels between petroleum dynamics in a Pacific island nation and the temporal intricacies of educational physics videos on a digital platform.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
The enigmatic relationship between petroleum consumption in the South Pacific archipelago of Vanuatu and the average duration of minutephysics YouTube videos has sparked scholarly curiosity and playful speculation. As the famous physicist Richard Feynman once quipped, "It's a kind of scientific poetry." In this paper, we delve into an investigation that combines the seemingly incongruous realms of energy utilization and online video trends—a juxtaposition that may leave one wondering if we've stumbled into a virtual reality of coincidental correlations.
The premise behind this study was not merely to play matchmaker between barrels of fuel and bytes of digital wisdom, but rather to undertake an empirical rummaging through the digital archives and energy data sets, hoping to uncover the concealed threads linking Vanuatu's oil appetite and the ebb and flow of minute physics tutoring. This pursuit is not unlike trying to reconcile the seemingly discordant coexistence of Schrödinger's cat and the law of thermodynamics—both bewildering and undeniably captivating.
Our pursuit was guided by a blend of statistical curiosity and a latent desire to untangle the web of interconnectedness that weaves through the labyrinthine corridors of datasets. As we embarked on this intellectual escapade, we aimed to bring to the fore the seldom-seen overlap between the seemingly mundane act of fuel consumption in a remote island nation and the decidedly more esoteric domain of short-form educational content, where the average video takes more turns than an electron in a magnetic field.
By revealing the robust correlation coefficient and a p-value that would make even the most skeptical physicist raise an eyebrow, our intent is not to merely fascinate but to provoke a mirthful reconsideration of cause and effect. So sit back, fuel your curiosity, and enjoy the quirky journey through the offbeat intersection of petrol dynamics and physics pedagogy—two domains that, at first glance, seem as dissimilar as apples and antimatter.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

Our investigation into the relationship between petroleum consumption in Vanuatu and the average length of minutephysics YouTube videos yielded a correlation coefficient of 0.9112549, signifying a remarkably strong positive association between these seemingly unrelated variables. The coefficient of determination (r-squared) of 0.8303856 indicates that approximately 83.04% of the variability in the average length of minutephysics videos can be explained by the variation in petroleum consumption in Vanuatu during the period of 2011 to 2021. Additionally, the p-value of less than 0.01 underscores the statistical significance of the observed correlation, providing robust support for the relationship uncovered in our analysis.

Furthermore, our findings are visually depicted in Figure 1, wherein a scatterplot showcases the compelling correlation between petroleum consumption in Vanuatu and the average length of minutephysics YouTube videos. This graphical representation serves as a testament to the unexpected interconnectedness between energy dynamics in a remote island nation and the temporal intricacies of educational physics content on a digital platform.

In summary, our results illuminate a captivating correlation between petroleum consumption in Vanuatu and the duration of minutephysics videos, sparking a playful reimagining of the underlying interplay between these seemingly incongruous domains. This unexpected finding not only enriches our understanding of the multifaceted influences shaping online content creation but also invites a lighthearted reflection on the quirky intersections of energy dynamics and digital pedagogy.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Petroluem consumption in Vanuatu and Average length of minutephysics YouTube videos. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
"Fuel for Thought: Exploring the Relationship Between Petroleum Consumption in Vanuatu and the Average Length of Minutephysics YouTube Videos"

[[ABSTRACT]]
The curious case of the connection between petroleum consumption in Vanuatu and the average length of minutephysics YouTube videos has been a subject of inquisitive contemplation in both the digital and energy realms. In this study, we embarked on an illuminating investigation, utilizing data meticulously sourced from the Energy Information Administration and YouTube, to scrutinize this intriguing conundrum. Through rigorous statistical analysis, we unearthed a remarkably robust correlation coefficient of 0.9112549, accompanied by a strikingly low p-value of less than 0.01, during the time span from 2011 to 2021. Our findings not only shed light on the unforeseen interplay between these seemingly disparate variables but also elicit questions regarding the nuanced dynamics of online content creation and its unforeseen relationship with energy consumption patterns. This study provides a quirky twist to the conventional understanding of causality, inviting a playful pondering of the peculiar parallels between petroleum dynamics in a Pacific island nation and the temporal intricacies of educational physics videos on a digital platform.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The intersection between petroleum consumption in Vanuatu and the average duration of minutephysics YouTube videos has proven to be a stimulating and, dare we say, electrifying topic of inquiry. This odd coupling has prompted a survey of the existing literature, as we endeavor to untangle the web of interconnectedness between these seemingly incongruous variables.
In "The Petroleum Paradigm: Energy Dynamics in Small Island Nations," Smith et al. discuss the economic and social implications of petroleum usage in Pacific island countries. While their work primarily focuses on the impact of fuel on local economies, it inadvertently alludes to the potential influence of petroleum on broader cultural phenomena, such as the length of educational YouTube content.
Doe and Jones delve into the profound intricacies of online content creation and consumption in their seminal work, "Digital Dilemmas: Navigating the Seas of Online Media." Through their qualitative analysis of digital trends, they shed light on the subtle nuances that define the ebb and flow of internet-based educational resources. While their focus is not explicitly on petroleum consumption, their insights into the dynamics of digital media content present an intriguing parallel to our own inquiry.
Moving beyond the conventional realms of scholarly literature, we encounter "The Physics of Fuel: A Comprehensive Guide," a non-fiction book that promises to demystify the physics behind energy production and consumption. While the book does not directly address the duration of online physics tutorials, it certainly provides a contextual backdrop to our investigation and, dare we say, fuels our curiosity for uncovering unexpected connections.
On a more playful note, the fiction novel "Oil and Quantum: A Tale of Serendipitous Symmetry" by Fictitious Author offers a whimsical and highly speculative account of a parallel universe where petroleum dynamics and quantum physics coalesce in an inexplicably delightful manner. While not a rigorous scientific account, this work certainly embraces the spirit of lighthearted contemplation that motivates our own study.
In our quest for understanding, we have also delved into unexpected realms of entertainment, exploring the seemingly whimsical yet surprisingly relevant cartoon series "Island Adventures in the Quantum Realm." While ostensibly targeted at a younger audience, this cartoon has further piqued our interest in uncovering the undercurrents of interconnectedness between energies both physical and digital.
As we navigate through the maze of existing literature, it becomes apparent that the peculiar pairing of petroleum consumption in Vanuatu and the average length of minutephysics YouTube videos, while unexplored in depth, has garnered curiosity from diverse intellectual domains. These diverse sources have primed us for our own quirky journey through this uncharted territory, promising unexpected revelations and perhaps a few chuckles along the way.

[[RESULTS]]
Our investigation into the relationship between petroleum consumption in Vanuatu and the average length of minutephysics YouTube videos yielded a correlation coefficient of 0.9112549, signifying a remarkably strong positive association between these seemingly unrelated variables. The coefficient of determination (r-squared) of 0.8303856 indicates that approximately 83.04% of the variability in the average length of minutephysics videos can be explained by the variation in petroleum consumption in Vanuatu during the period of 2011 to 2021. Additionally, the p-value of less than 0.01 underscores the statistical significance of the observed correlation, providing robust support for the relationship uncovered in our analysis.
Furthermore, our findings are visually depicted in Figure 1, wherein a scatterplot showcases the compelling correlation between petroleum consumption in Vanuatu and the average length of minutephysics YouTube videos. This graphical representation serves as a testament to the unexpected interconnectedness between energy dynamics in a remote island nation and the temporal intricacies of educational physics content on a digital platform.
In summary, our results illuminate a captivating correlation between petroleum consumption in Vanuatu and the duration of minutephysics videos, sparking a playful reimagining of the underlying interplay between these seemingly incongruous domains. This unexpected finding not only enriches our understanding of the multifaceted influences shaping online content creation but also invites a lighthearted reflection on the quirky intersections of energy dynamics and digital pedagogy.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The robust correlation coefficient of 0.9112549, along with the remarkably low p-value of less than 0.01, validates the unexpected connection between petroleum consumption in Vanuatu and the average length of minutephysics YouTube videos, as predicted by our prior research. The findings of Smith et al. regarding the broader cultural impact of petroleum usage inadvertently set the stage for our discovery, albeit in a more serious context than the unforeseen relationship we uncovered. As we transition from the dryness of scholarly literature to the "fuel" of our investigation, it's striking how our statistical analysis has managed to "ignite" a new avenue of contemplation.

The work of Doe and Jones, although not explicitly centered on petroleum consumption, proved eerily prescient in offering insights into the nuances of digital educational content. It's as if their qualitative analysis was a sneak peek into the unexpected intrigue we would uncover in our quantitative study. Moving from the propane-fueled heat of online media trends to the quantum "quarks" of theoretical physics, our findings might seem speculative, but they certainly "measure up."

Embracing the spirit of lighthearted curiosity, we must acknowledge the influence of unexpected sources in our exploration, such as the whimsical fiction novel "Oil and Quantum: A Tale of Serendipitous Symmetry." While it may not adhere to scholarly rigor, it primed our imagination for the unconventional synthesis of concepts we encountered in our investigation. Similarly, the seemingly whimsical cartoon "Island Adventures in the Quantum Realm" provided an unexpected spin on energy and physics interplay that, in the end, turned out to be a "quantum leap" closer to our bizarrely fruitful findings.

As we synthesize these diverse and occasionally comical influences, it becomes apparent that our rigorous statistical analysis has extracted a playful and unconventional narrative from an ostensibly peculiar pairing of variables. These unexpected connections, once thought to be as distant as a neutron star, have proved to be as intimately entwined as quantum entanglement. Our findings have not only enriched the body of knowledge but also invited a whimsical reflection on the intriguing intersections of energy dynamics and digital pedagogy.

Now it seems only fitting to conclude this discussion with a toast to serendipity, synergy, and statistical significance – the "Pb" elements that have, unexpectedly, brought us together in this whimsical exploration. Cheers to the unexpected, the peculiar, and the quirky revelations yet to come.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Petroluem consumption in Vanuatu and Average length of minutephysics YouTube videos. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
"Fuel for Thought: Exploring the Relationship Between Petroleum Consumption in Vanuatu and the Average Length of Minutephysics YouTube Videos"

[[ABSTRACT]]
The curious case of the connection between petroleum consumption in Vanuatu and the average length of minutephysics YouTube videos has been a subject of inquisitive contemplation in both the digital and energy realms. In this study, we embarked on an illuminating investigation, utilizing data meticulously sourced from the Energy Information Administration and YouTube, to scrutinize this intriguing conundrum. Through rigorous statistical analysis, we unearthed a remarkably robust correlation coefficient of 0.9112549, accompanied by a strikingly low p-value of less than 0.01, during the time span from 2011 to 2021. Our findings not only shed light on the unforeseen interplay between these seemingly disparate variables but also elicit questions regarding the nuanced dynamics of online content creation and its unforeseen relationship with energy consumption patterns. This study provides a quirky twist to the conventional understanding of causality, inviting a playful pondering of the peculiar parallels between petroleum dynamics in a Pacific island nation and the temporal intricacies of educational physics videos on a digital platform.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
The enigmatic relationship between petroleum consumption in the South Pacific archipelago of Vanuatu and the average duration of minutephysics YouTube videos has sparked scholarly curiosity and playful speculation. As the famous physicist Richard Feynman once quipped, "It's a kind of scientific poetry." In this paper, we delve into an investigation that combines the seemingly incongruous realms of energy utilization and online video trends—a juxtaposition that may leave one wondering if we've stumbled into a virtual reality of coincidental correlations.
The premise behind this study was not merely to play matchmaker between barrels of fuel and bytes of digital wisdom, but rather to undertake an empirical rummaging through the digital archives and energy data sets, hoping to uncover the concealed threads linking Vanuatu's oil appetite and the ebb and flow of minute physics tutoring. This pursuit is not unlike trying to reconcile the seemingly discordant coexistence of Schrödinger's cat and the law of thermodynamics—both bewildering and undeniably captivating.
Our pursuit was guided by a blend of statistical curiosity and a latent desire to untangle the web of interconnectedness that weaves through the labyrinthine corridors of datasets. As we embarked on this intellectual escapade, we aimed to bring to the fore the seldom-seen overlap between the seemingly mundane act of fuel consumption in a remote island nation and the decidedly more esoteric domain of short-form educational content, where the average video takes more turns than an electron in a magnetic field.
By revealing the robust correlation coefficient and a p-value that would make even the most skeptical physicist raise an eyebrow, our intent is not to merely fascinate but to provoke a mirthful reconsideration of cause and effect. So sit back, fuel your curiosity, and enjoy the quirky journey through the offbeat intersection of petrol dynamics and physics pedagogy—two domains that, at first glance, seem as dissimilar as apples and antimatter.

[[RESULTS]]
Our investigation into the relationship between petroleum consumption in Vanuatu and the average length of minutephysics YouTube videos yielded a correlation coefficient of 0.9112549, signifying a remarkably strong positive association between these seemingly unrelated variables. The coefficient of determination (r-squared) of 0.8303856 indicates that approximately 83.04% of the variability in the average length of minutephysics videos can be explained by the variation in petroleum consumption in Vanuatu during the period of 2011 to 2021. Additionally, the p-value of less than 0.01 underscores the statistical significance of the observed correlation, providing robust support for the relationship uncovered in our analysis.
Furthermore, our findings are visually depicted in Figure 1, wherein a scatterplot showcases the compelling correlation between petroleum consumption in Vanuatu and the average length of minutephysics YouTube videos. This graphical representation serves as a testament to the unexpected interconnectedness between energy dynamics in a remote island nation and the temporal intricacies of educational physics content on a digital platform.
In summary, our results illuminate a captivating correlation between petroleum consumption in Vanuatu and the duration of minutephysics videos, sparking a playful reimagining of the underlying interplay between these seemingly incongruous domains. This unexpected finding not only enriches our understanding of the multifaceted influences shaping online content creation but also invites a lighthearted reflection on the quirky intersections of energy dynamics and digital pedagogy.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our study has shed light on the hitherto unsuspected correlation between petroleum consumption in Vanuatu and the average length of minutephysics YouTube videos. The robust correlation coefficient and the strikingly low p-value have established a compelling statistical association, akin to finding a quantum link between two seemingly disparate entities. It appears that the ebb and flow of minute physics tutoring is not just a matter of space and time but also oil barrels and bytes of digital wisdom, a fusion that may leave even Schrödinger's cat scratching its head.

The visual depiction of our findings in Figure 1 serves as an intriguing testament to the unexpected interconnectedness between energy dynamics in a remote island nation and the temporal intricacies of educational physics content on a digital platform—almost like discovering an entangled pair in the quantum realm. It beckons a reimagining of the causality web, where barrels of petroleum in Vanuatu exert their influence on the length of minute physics videos as if they were enchanted by gravitational time dilation.

Our results not only invite a playful rethinking of the unforeseen relationships between energy consumption patterns and online content creation but also highlight the whimsical intersections of fuel dynamics and digital pedagogy. In the words of Richard Feynman, "It's a kind of scientific poetry" - who knew that such poetry would be found in the correlation between the ephemerality of digital education and the persistence of fuel consumption in a Pacific island nation.

Therefore, it is our firm assertion that further research in this area is simply unnecessary. We have unraveled the mysteries that underlie this curious correlation, leaving no more room for inquiry or investigation. It's time to bid adieu to this quirky intersection and move on to other equally peculiar phenomena in the realm of academic exploration.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Fuel for Thought: Exploring the Relationship Between Petroleum Consumption in Vanuatu and the Average Length of Minutephysics YouTube Videos. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

Journal of Offbeat Energy Research


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Fuel for Thought: Exploring the Relationship Between Petroleum Consumption in Vanuatu and the Average Length of Minutephysics YouTube Videos. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Society for Quirky Scientific Inquiry


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Fuel for Thought: Exploring the Relationship Between Petroleum Consumption in Vanuatu and the Average Length of Minutephysics YouTube Videos with an abstract of The curious case of the connection between petroleum consumption in Vanuatu and the average length of minutephysics YouTube videos has been a subject of inquisitive contemplation in both the digital and energy realms. In this study, we embarked on an illuminating investigation, utilizing data meticulously sourced from the Energy Information Administration and YouTube, to scrutinize this intriguing conundrum. Through rigorous statistical analysis, we unearthed a remarkably robust correlation coefficient of 0.9112549, accompanied by a strikingly low p-value of less than 0.01, during the time span from 2011 to 2021. Our findings not only shed light on the unforeseen interplay between these seemingly disparate variables but also elicit questions regarding the nuanced dynamics of online content creation and its unforeseen relationship with energy consumption patterns. This study provides a quirky twist to the conventional understanding of causality, inviting a playful pondering of the peculiar parallels between petroleum dynamics in a Pacific island nation and the temporal intricacies of educational physics videos on a digital platform.

ChatGPT:

petroleum consumption, Vanuatu, YouTube videos, minutephysics, correlation, statistical analysis, Energy Information Administration, online content creation, causality, energy consumption patterns

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Petroluem consumption in Vanuatu
Detailed data title: Volume of petroluem consumption consumed in Vanuatu in millions of barrels per day
Source: Energy Information Administration
See what else correlates with Petroluem consumption in Vanuatu

Average length of minutephysics YouTube videos
Detailed data title: Average length of minutephysics YouTube videos.
Source: YouTube
See what else correlates with Average length of minutephysics YouTube videos

Correlation r = 0.9112549 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.8303856 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 83% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Average length of minutephysics YouTube videos) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Petroluem consumption in Vanuatu) over the 11 years from 2011 through 2021.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 9.5E-5. 0.0000950484257622725500000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.91 in 0.0095% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 10,521 random variables Which I absolutely did.
with the same 10 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 10 because we have two variables measured over a period of 11 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.69, 0.98 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
20112012201320142015201620172018201920202021
Petroluem consumption in Vanuatu (Million Barrels/Day)1.262151.042341.006561.154911.073171.097131.226931.582361.525041.445121.49226
Average length of minutephysics YouTube videos (Length in seconds)221.607206.889115.711188.52202.941209.5277.25407.444336.222384.25296




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Y-axis doesn't start at zero: I truncated the Y-axes of the graph above. I also used a line graph, which makes the visual connection stand out more than it deserves. Nothing against line graphs. They are great at telling a story when you have linear data! But visually it is deceptive because the only data is at the points on the graph, not the lines on the graph. In between each point, the data could have been doing anything. Like going for a random walk by itself!
    Mathematically what I showed is true, but it is intentionally misleading. Below is the same chart but with both Y-axes starting at zero.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([1.26215,1.04234,1.00656,1.15491,1.07317,1.09713,1.22693,1.58236,1.52504,1.44512,1.49226,])
array_2 = np.array([221.607,206.889,115.711,188.52,202.941,209.5,277.25,407.444,336.222,384.25,296,])
array_1_name = "Petroluem consumption in Vanuatu"
array_2_name = "Average length of minutephysics YouTube videos"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

You're the rating guru we've been waiting for!


Correlation ID: 4288 · Black Variable ID: 25064 · Red Variable ID: 25512
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0