about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #4,286 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Popularity of the first name Storm and the second variable is Total likes of Matt Parker's YouTube videos.  The chart goes from 2011 to 2022, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

Maybe the energy and wit associated with the name Storm inadvertently inspired people to seek out more intellectually stimulating content. After all, it's a perfect storm of entertainment and education!

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Create a comic-book-style illustration with muted colors and a dotted halftone pattern from the 1960s, depicting a bustling city square at night. A vibrant neon sign with the name "Storm" in bold letters illuminates the sky, drawing a crowd of people towards a large outdoor screen. On the screen, a Stand-up Maths video plays, featuring the host delivering a clever and educational monologue. The audience reacts with laughter and applause, and the screen shows the rapid rise of likes on the video, reflecting the perfect storm of popularity and intellectual engagement. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Popularity of the first name Storm and Total likes of Stand-up Maths YouTube videos. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Minimalism A scene from Skyrim Pop art A photo-realistic image A comic-book-style illustration with muted colors and a dotted halftone pattern from the 1960s
ChatGPT: A comic-book-style illustration with muted colors and a dotted halftone pattern from the 1960s

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Popularity of the first name Storm and Total likes of Stand-up Maths YouTube videos, in the following situation: Maybe the energy and wit associated with the name Storm inadvertently inspired people to seek out more intellectually stimulating content. After all, it's a perfect storm of entertainment and education!. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: Amidst a bustling city square, a vibrant neon sign with the name "Storm" in bold letters illuminates the night sky, drawing a crowd of people towards a large outdoor screen. On the screen, a Stand-up Maths video plays, featuring the host delivering a clever and educational monologue. The laughter and applause from the audience, along with the rapid rise of likes on the video, reflect the perfect storm of popularity and intellectual engagement.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ A comic-book-style illustration with muted colors and a dotted halftone pattern from the 1960s ] and depicting this scene: Amidst a bustling city square, a vibrant neon sign with the name "Storm" in bold letters illuminates the night sky, drawing a crowd of people towards a large outdoor screen. On the screen, a Stand-up Maths video plays, featuring the host delivering a clever and educational monologue. The laughter and applause from the audience, along with the rapid rise of likes on the video, reflect the perfect storm of popularity and intellectual engagement. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Create a comic-book-style illustration with muted colors and a dotted halftone pattern from the 1960s, depicting a bustling city square at night. A vibrant neon sign with the name "Storm" in bold letters illuminates the sky, drawing a crowd of people towards a large outdoor screen. On the screen, a Stand-up Maths video plays, featuring the host delivering a clever and educational monologue. The audience reacts with laughter and applause, and the screen shows the rapid rise of likes on the video, reflecting the perfect storm of popularity and intellectual engagement.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in Popularity of the first name Storm caused Total likes of Stand-up Maths YouTube videos to increase.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
The Stormy Stand-Up: A Statistical Analysis of the Name Storm and Its Influence on the Popularity of Stand-Up Maths YouTube Videos

The Journal of Humor in Mathematical Research

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Storm and Total likes of Stand-up Maths YouTube videos. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Make the title seem clever.

Your research team used data from US Social Security Administration and YouTube to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.8550047 and p < 0.01 for 2011 to 2022.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
The Stormy Stand-Up: A Statistical Analysis of the Name "Storm" and Its Influence on the Popularity of Stand-Up Maths YouTube Videos

[[ABSTRACT]]
The impact of a name on one's destiny has captivated scholars for centuries. In this paper, we delve into the enthralling world of nomenclature and its potential influence on the digital realm. Leveraging data from the US Social Security Administration, we conducted a meticulous examination of the first name "Storm" and its correlation with the total likes garnered by Stand-Up Maths YouTube videos from 2011 to 2022. Our findings reveal a striking statistical association, with a correlation coefficient of 0.8550047 and a p-value < 0.01, suggesting a robust relationship between the name "Storm" and the online acclaim of Stand-Up Maths content. While causation remains elusive, our research sheds light on the quirky interplay of nomenclature and digital engagement, prompting us to ponder whether a stormy name may indeed catalyze a whirlwind of YouTube adoration.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Storm and Total likes of Stand-up Maths YouTube videos. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Stormy Stand-Up: A Statistical Analysis of the Name "Storm" and Its Influence on the Popularity of Stand-Up Maths YouTube Videos

[[ABSTRACT]]
The impact of a name on one's destiny has captivated scholars for centuries. In this paper, we delve into the enthralling world of nomenclature and its potential influence on the digital realm. Leveraging data from the US Social Security Administration, we conducted a meticulous examination of the first name "Storm" and its correlation with the total likes garnered by Stand-Up Maths YouTube videos from 2011 to 2022. Our findings reveal a striking statistical association, with a correlation coefficient of 0.8550047 and a p-value < 0.01, suggesting a robust relationship between the name "Storm" and the online acclaim of Stand-Up Maths content. While causation remains elusive, our research sheds light on the quirky interplay of nomenclature and digital engagement, prompting us to ponder whether a stormy name may indeed catalyze a whirlwind of YouTube adoration.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

The significance of names in shaping individuals' lives has long been a subject of fascination and inquiry. From literary and mythological figures to mundane encounters in everyday life, names carry a weight of influence that extends beyond their mere phonetic components. In the digital age, the impact of names has extended into the virtual realm, prompting us to explore the intriguing connection between nomenclature and online engagement.

Our study hones in on the enigmatic first name "Storm" and its potential influence on the digital reception of Stand-Up Maths YouTube videos. A whimsical and evocative name, "Storm" conjures images of tempestuous weather and tumultuous energy, sparking our curiosity about its potential to precipitate a deluge of attention for online content. Leveraging comprehensive data from the US Social Security Administration and the YouTube Analytics platform, we embark on a scholarly endeavor to unravel the complex interplay between this meteorological moniker and the virtual appreciation of mathematical comedy.

While some may dismiss our venture as a mere flight of fancy, we assert that the methodology and statistical rigor underpinning our analysis are no passing breeze. With our findings revealing a correlation coefficient of 0.8550047 and a p-value < 0.01, the evidence did not just rain on our parade but unleashed a veritable downpour of statistical significance. The strength of this correlation suggests a formidable link between the name "Storm" and the surging tide of likes bestowed upon Stand-Up Maths videos, inviting us to navigate the stormy seas of nomenclature and digital resonance.

As we set sail on this scholarly expedition, we are mindful of the inherent limitations surrounding causation and mere correlation. Yet, the allure of uncovering a potential causal mechanism remains as tantalizing as chasing a rainbow amidst the storm clouds. Our investigation, therefore, extends an invitation to ponder the quirky and capricious influence of nomenclature in the digital sphere, where a name, much like a storm, may command an unexpected and captivating force.

In the subsequent sections of this paper, we dive into the intricacies of our data analysis, interpret the implications of our findings, and beckon readers to join us in appreciating the tempestuous dance of names and digital acclaim. Just as a storm brings forth a blend of awe and trepidation, the influence of the name "Storm" on the popularity of Stand-Up Maths YouTube videos elicits a nuanced blend of curiosity and amusement, inviting us to weather the statistical downpour and emerge enlightened by the whimsical forces at play.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Storm and Total likes of Stand-up Maths YouTube videos. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then name a few real TV shows that sound like they might be relevant to the topic that you watched as research.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Stormy Stand-Up: A Statistical Analysis of the Name "Storm" and Its Influence on the Popularity of Stand-Up Maths YouTube Videos

[[ABSTRACT]]
The impact of a name on one's destiny has captivated scholars for centuries. In this paper, we delve into the enthralling world of nomenclature and its potential influence on the digital realm. Leveraging data from the US Social Security Administration, we conducted a meticulous examination of the first name "Storm" and its correlation with the total likes garnered by Stand-Up Maths YouTube videos from 2011 to 2022. Our findings reveal a striking statistical association, with a correlation coefficient of 0.8550047 and a p-value < 0.01, suggesting a robust relationship between the name "Storm" and the online acclaim of Stand-Up Maths content. While causation remains elusive, our research sheds light on the quirky interplay of nomenclature and digital engagement, prompting us to ponder whether a stormy name may indeed catalyze a whirlwind of YouTube adoration.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The significance of names in shaping individuals' lives has long been a subject of fascination and inquiry. From literary and mythological figures to mundane encounters in everyday life, names carry a weight of influence that extends beyond their mere phonetic components. In the digital age, the impact of names has extended into the virtual realm, prompting us to explore the intriguing connection between nomenclature and online engagement.
Our study hones in on the enigmatic first name "Storm" and its potential influence on the digital reception of Stand-Up Maths YouTube videos. A whimsical and evocative name, "Storm" conjures images of tempestuous weather and tumultuous energy, sparking our curiosity about its potential to precipitate a deluge of attention for online content. Leveraging comprehensive data from the US Social Security Administration and the YouTube Analytics platform, we embark on a scholarly endeavor to unravel the complex interplay between this meteorological moniker and the virtual appreciation of mathematical comedy.
While some may dismiss our venture as a mere flight of fancy, we assert that the methodology and statistical rigor underpinning our analysis are no passing breeze. With our findings revealing a correlation coefficient of 0.8550047 and a p-value < 0.01, the evidence did not just rain on our parade but unleashed a veritable downpour of statistical significance. The strength of this correlation suggests a formidable link between the name "Storm" and the surging tide of likes bestowed upon Stand-Up Maths videos, inviting us to navigate the stormy seas of nomenclature and digital resonance.
As we set sail on this scholarly expedition, we are mindful of the inherent limitations surrounding causation and mere correlation. Yet, the allure of uncovering a potential causal mechanism remains as tantalizing as chasing a rainbow amidst the storm clouds. Our investigation, therefore, extends an invitation to ponder the quirky and capricious influence of nomenclature in the digital sphere, where a name, much like a storm, may command an unexpected and captivating force.
In the subsequent sections of this paper, we dive into the intricacies of our data analysis, interpret the implications of our findings, and beckon readers to join us in appreciating the tempestuous dance of names and digital acclaim. Just as a storm brings forth a blend of awe and trepidation, the influence of the name "Storm" on the popularity of Stand-Up Maths YouTube videos elicits a nuanced blend of curiosity and amusement, inviting us to weather the statistical downpour and emerge enlightened by the whimsical forces at play.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

The influence of names on various aspects of human life has been a subject of intrigue across disciplines, prompting researchers to explore the potential correlations between nomenclature and diverse phenomena. In this review, we examine existing literature relevant to the peculiar case of the first name "Storm" and its potential relationship with the total likes garnered by Stand-Up Maths YouTube videos.

Smith et al. (2010) conducted a seminal study on the influence of first names on perceived personality traits, finding that individuals with names evoking natural phenomena, such as Storm, were often associated with attributes reflecting dynamism and unpredictability. This insight lays a foundational understanding for our investigation into the potential impact of the name "Storm" on digital engagement—a concept not to be taken lightly, or should we say, lightly drizzled on.

Doe and Jones (2015) delved into the psychology of name perception, exploring how certain names may evoke subconscious emotions and associations. Their work provides a compelling backdrop for our exploration of whether the name "Storm" triggers an unconscious storm of likes among viewers of Stand-Up Maths content—a storm that, unlike its meteorological counterpart, is eagerly welcomed.

Turning to an eclectic assortment of non-fiction literature, "The Power of Names" by Harold Surname (2008) offers insights into the historical, societal, and psychological significance of names. While the book may not explicitly mention the name "Storm," one cannot help but wonder about the hidden potential of stormy nomenclature to summon a thunderous reception for online content.

In a more whimsical vein, the fictional works "The Storm Within" by Gale Writer (2013) and "Lightning Strikes Twice" by Thunder Author (2005) portray characters with names evocative of inclement weather, inviting us to consider the fanciful notion of a name's atmospheric influence on digital appreciation—a notion that may sound like mere cloud-watching, but could hold a surprising downpour of significance.

In the quest for a broader cultural understanding of storm-related themes, the television series "Storm Chasers" and "Weather Gone Viral" have provided a window into the public's fascination with tempestuous events. Perhaps it is not a stretch to imagine that this fascination extends to the virtual realm, and that a name like "Storm" could stir up a similar whirlwind of attention, albeit in a comedic and mathematical context.

While the literature reviewed thus far provides valuable insights into the psychology and societal perceptions of names, the specific connection between the name "Storm" and the popularity of Stand-Up Maths YouTube videos remains a uniquely uncharted territory—a territory ripe for exploration and, dare we say, a few lightning jokes.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Storm and Total likes of Stand-up Maths YouTube videos. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from US Social Security Administration and YouTube . You used data from 2011 to 2022

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Stormy Stand-Up: A Statistical Analysis of the Name "Storm" and Its Influence on the Popularity of Stand-Up Maths YouTube Videos

[[ABSTRACT]]
The impact of a name on one's destiny has captivated scholars for centuries. In this paper, we delve into the enthralling world of nomenclature and its potential influence on the digital realm. Leveraging data from the US Social Security Administration, we conducted a meticulous examination of the first name "Storm" and its correlation with the total likes garnered by Stand-Up Maths YouTube videos from 2011 to 2022. Our findings reveal a striking statistical association, with a correlation coefficient of 0.8550047 and a p-value < 0.01, suggesting a robust relationship between the name "Storm" and the online acclaim of Stand-Up Maths content. While causation remains elusive, our research sheds light on the quirky interplay of nomenclature and digital engagement, prompting us to ponder whether a stormy name may indeed catalyze a whirlwind of YouTube adoration.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
The significance of names in shaping individuals' lives has long been a subject of fascination and inquiry. From literary and mythological figures to mundane encounters in everyday life, names carry a weight of influence that extends beyond their mere phonetic components. In the digital age, the impact of names has extended into the virtual realm, prompting us to explore the intriguing connection between nomenclature and online engagement.
Our study hones in on the enigmatic first name "Storm" and its potential influence on the digital reception of Stand-Up Maths YouTube videos. A whimsical and evocative name, "Storm" conjures images of tempestuous weather and tumultuous energy, sparking our curiosity about its potential to precipitate a deluge of attention for online content. Leveraging comprehensive data from the US Social Security Administration and the YouTube Analytics platform, we embark on a scholarly endeavor to unravel the complex interplay between this meteorological moniker and the virtual appreciation of mathematical comedy.
While some may dismiss our venture as a mere flight of fancy, we assert that the methodology and statistical rigor underpinning our analysis are no passing breeze. With our findings revealing a correlation coefficient of 0.8550047 and a p-value < 0.01, the evidence did not just rain on our parade but unleashed a veritable downpour of statistical significance. The strength of this correlation suggests a formidable link between the name "Storm" and the surging tide of likes bestowed upon Stand-Up Maths videos, inviting us to navigate the stormy seas of nomenclature and digital resonance.
As we set sail on this scholarly expedition, we are mindful of the inherent limitations surrounding causation and mere correlation. Yet, the allure of uncovering a potential causal mechanism remains as tantalizing as chasing a rainbow amidst the storm clouds. Our investigation, therefore, extends an invitation to ponder the quirky and capricious influence of nomenclature in the digital sphere, where a name, much like a storm, may command an unexpected and captivating force.
In the subsequent sections of this paper, we dive into the intricacies of our data analysis, interpret the implications of our findings, and beckon readers to join us in appreciating the tempestuous dance of names and digital acclaim. Just as a storm brings forth a blend of awe and trepidation, the influence of the name "Storm" on the popularity of Stand-Up Maths YouTube videos elicits a nuanced blend of curiosity and amusement, inviting us to weather the statistical downpour and emerge enlightened by the whimsical forces at play.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To embark on our investigative journey into the captivating correlation between the first name "Storm" and the total likes garnered by Stand-Up Maths YouTube videos, we meticulously crafted a multifaceted methodology that combined quantitative analysis with a sprinkling of whimsy. Our research approach can be likened to a carefully choreographed dance between data mining and statistical inquiry, guided by the winds of curiosity and the magnetic allure of nomenclature.

Data Collection:
Our data collection endeavors commenced with a thorough exploration of the US Social Security Administration's extensive repository of first names and their corresponding frequencies. We cast our net wide, encompassing data from the years 2011 to 2022 to capture the ebbs and flows of "Storm" as a given name. The trove of information offered by the Social Security Administration served as the anchor for our exploration into the prevalence and temporal dynamics of the name "Storm."

Simultaneously, we navigated the expansive seas of YouTube Analytics, where we charted a course to capture the total likes amassed by Stand-Up Maths videos during the same time frame. Our foray into the digital realm of mathematical comedy allowed us to harvest a bounty of engagement metrics, paving the way for a comprehensive assessment of online acclaim.

Data Synthesis:
With the dual currents of name frequency data and YouTube engagement metrics in our possession, we undertook a harmonious blending of these disparate data sets. Like a master alchemist seeking to transmute base elements into gold, we deftly fused the frequencies of the name "Storm" with the voluminous waves of likes garnered by Stand-Up Maths videos. This fusion, akin to the marriage of sky and sea, gave rise to a nuanced juxtaposition of nomenclature and virtual appreciation, setting the stage for our statistical analysis.

Statistical Analysis:
Armed with our synthesized data, we erected the analytical scaffolding for our investigation of the "Storm" phenomenon. Employing a kaleidoscope of statistical tools, including correlation analysis, regression modeling, and hypothesis testing, we endeavored to tease out the underlying dynamics at play. We sought not merely to uncover a statistical association, but to unravel the elusive threads of causation that may underpin the observed correlation between the name "Storm" and the online reception of Stand-Up Maths content.

It is essential to note that our statistical foray was not a tempest in a teapot; rather, it represented a thorough and methodical exploration of the data landscape. Like intrepid explorers navigating uncharted waters, we steered clear of statistical shoals and charted a course guided by the lodestar of scientific rigor.

Ethical Considerations:
Amidst our scholarly pursuits, we remained steadfast in upholding the highest ethical standards. The utilization of aggregate and anonymized data from public sources, such as the US Social Security Administration and YouTube Analytics, ensured that our research adhered to principles of data privacy and confidentiality. Additionally, our exploration of nomenclature steered clear of any implications that could engender societal harm or perpetuate stereotypes, reinforcing our commitment to ethical and responsible inquiry.

In conclusion, our research methodology, akin to a captivating whirlwind, blended meticulous data collection, artful synthesis, and rigorous statistical analysis to illuminate the enthralling interplay between the name "Storm" and the digital applause accorded to Stand-Up Maths YouTube videos. Our next port of call beckons the reader to join us in navigating the choppy seas of data interpretation and contextualizing the whimsical influence of nomenclature in the digital sphere.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Storm and Total likes of Stand-up Maths YouTube videos. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from US Social Security Administration and YouTube .

For the time period 2011 to 2022, you found a correlation 0.8550047, r-squared of 0.7310331, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Stormy Stand-Up: A Statistical Analysis of the Name "Storm" and Its Influence on the Popularity of Stand-Up Maths YouTube Videos

[[ABSTRACT]]
The impact of a name on one's destiny has captivated scholars for centuries. In this paper, we delve into the enthralling world of nomenclature and its potential influence on the digital realm. Leveraging data from the US Social Security Administration, we conducted a meticulous examination of the first name "Storm" and its correlation with the total likes garnered by Stand-Up Maths YouTube videos from 2011 to 2022. Our findings reveal a striking statistical association, with a correlation coefficient of 0.8550047 and a p-value < 0.01, suggesting a robust relationship between the name "Storm" and the online acclaim of Stand-Up Maths content. While causation remains elusive, our research sheds light on the quirky interplay of nomenclature and digital engagement, prompting us to ponder whether a stormy name may indeed catalyze a whirlwind of YouTube adoration.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
The significance of names in shaping individuals' lives has long been a subject of fascination and inquiry. From literary and mythological figures to mundane encounters in everyday life, names carry a weight of influence that extends beyond their mere phonetic components. In the digital age, the impact of names has extended into the virtual realm, prompting us to explore the intriguing connection between nomenclature and online engagement.
Our study hones in on the enigmatic first name "Storm" and its potential influence on the digital reception of Stand-Up Maths YouTube videos. A whimsical and evocative name, "Storm" conjures images of tempestuous weather and tumultuous energy, sparking our curiosity about its potential to precipitate a deluge of attention for online content. Leveraging comprehensive data from the US Social Security Administration and the YouTube Analytics platform, we embark on a scholarly endeavor to unravel the complex interplay between this meteorological moniker and the virtual appreciation of mathematical comedy.
While some may dismiss our venture as a mere flight of fancy, we assert that the methodology and statistical rigor underpinning our analysis are no passing breeze. With our findings revealing a correlation coefficient of 0.8550047 and a p-value < 0.01, the evidence did not just rain on our parade but unleashed a veritable downpour of statistical significance. The strength of this correlation suggests a formidable link between the name "Storm" and the surging tide of likes bestowed upon Stand-Up Maths videos, inviting us to navigate the stormy seas of nomenclature and digital resonance.
As we set sail on this scholarly expedition, we are mindful of the inherent limitations surrounding causation and mere correlation. Yet, the allure of uncovering a potential causal mechanism remains as tantalizing as chasing a rainbow amidst the storm clouds. Our investigation, therefore, extends an invitation to ponder the quirky and capricious influence of nomenclature in the digital sphere, where a name, much like a storm, may command an unexpected and captivating force.
In the subsequent sections of this paper, we dive into the intricacies of our data analysis, interpret the implications of our findings, and beckon readers to join us in appreciating the tempestuous dance of names and digital acclaim. Just as a storm brings forth a blend of awe and trepidation, the influence of the name "Storm" on the popularity of Stand-Up Maths YouTube videos elicits a nuanced blend of curiosity and amusement, inviting us to weather the statistical downpour and emerge enlightened by the whimsical forces at play.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The statistical analysis of our data unveiled a robust and intriguing relationship between the first name "Storm" and the total likes garnered by Stand-Up Maths YouTube videos. Over the period from 2011 to 2022, we observed a remarkably strong correlation coefficient of 0.8550047 between the prevalence of the name "Storm" and the digital acclaim of mathematical comedy. This correlation was further corroborated by an r-squared value of 0.7310331, elucidating that approximately 73.1% of the variability in the likes of Stand-Up Maths videos could be explained by the occurrence of the name "Storm."

It appears that the name "Storm" wielded a considerable influence on the online reception of Stand-Up Maths content, akin to a tempestuous force sweeping across the digital landscape. The p-value of less than 0.01 accentuates the robustness of this association, denoting a level of statistical significance that would make even the most skeptical observer stand up and take notice.

To visually encapsulate this mesmerizing correlation, we present Figure 1, a scatterplot that exhibits the unmistakable alignment of the incidence of the name "Storm" and the total likes received by Stand-Up Maths YouTube videos. Like two weather fronts colliding in a dramatic meteorological display, the data points coalesce into a compelling narrative of nomenclature and online engagement.

While our findings point to a compelling association, we tread carefully in attributing causality to the conspicuous correlation observed. Nevertheless, the statistical tempest that unfolds before us invites contemplation on the captivating interplay of nomenclature and digital resonance. The intriguing possibility of a stormy name serving as a catalyst for a whirlwind of YouTube adoration beckons us to weather the statistical downpour and emerge enlight-ened by the whimsical forces at play.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Storm and Total likes of Stand-up Maths YouTube videos. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
The Stormy Stand-Up: A Statistical Analysis of the Name "Storm" and Its Influence on the Popularity of Stand-Up Maths YouTube Videos

[[ABSTRACT]]
The impact of a name on one's destiny has captivated scholars for centuries. In this paper, we delve into the enthralling world of nomenclature and its potential influence on the digital realm. Leveraging data from the US Social Security Administration, we conducted a meticulous examination of the first name "Storm" and its correlation with the total likes garnered by Stand-Up Maths YouTube videos from 2011 to 2022. Our findings reveal a striking statistical association, with a correlation coefficient of 0.8550047 and a p-value < 0.01, suggesting a robust relationship between the name "Storm" and the online acclaim of Stand-Up Maths content. While causation remains elusive, our research sheds light on the quirky interplay of nomenclature and digital engagement, prompting us to ponder whether a stormy name may indeed catalyze a whirlwind of YouTube adoration.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The influence of names on various aspects of human life has been a subject of intrigue across disciplines, prompting researchers to explore the potential correlations between nomenclature and diverse phenomena. In this review, we examine existing literature relevant to the peculiar case of the first name "Storm" and its potential relationship with the total likes garnered by Stand-Up Maths YouTube videos.
Smith et al. (2010) conducted a seminal study on the influence of first names on perceived personality traits, finding that individuals with names evoking natural phenomena, such as Storm, were often associated with attributes reflecting dynamism and unpredictability. This insight lays a foundational understanding for our investigation into the potential impact of the name "Storm" on digital engagement—a concept not to be taken lightly, or should we say, lightly drizzled on.
Doe and Jones (2015) delved into the psychology of name perception, exploring how certain names may evoke subconscious emotions and associations. Their work provides a compelling backdrop for our exploration of whether the name "Storm" triggers an unconscious storm of likes among viewers of Stand-Up Maths content—a storm that, unlike its meteorological counterpart, is eagerly welcomed.
Turning to an eclectic assortment of non-fiction literature, "The Power of Names" by Harold Surname (2008) offers insights into the historical, societal, and psychological significance of names. While the book may not explicitly mention the name "Storm," one cannot help but wonder about the hidden potential of stormy nomenclature to summon a thunderous reception for online content.
In a more whimsical vein, the fictional works "The Storm Within" by Gale Writer (2013) and "Lightning Strikes Twice" by Thunder Author (2005) portray characters with names evocative of inclement weather, inviting us to consider the fanciful notion of a name's atmospheric influence on digital appreciation—a notion that may sound like mere cloud-watching, but could hold a surprising downpour of significance.
In the quest for a broader cultural understanding of storm-related themes, the television series "Storm Chasers" and "Weather Gone Viral" have provided a window into the public's fascination with tempestuous events. Perhaps it is not a stretch to imagine that this fascination extends to the virtual realm, and that a name like "Storm" could stir up a similar whirlwind of attention, albeit in a comedic and mathematical context.
While the literature reviewed thus far provides valuable insights into the psychology and societal perceptions of names, the specific connection between the name "Storm" and the popularity of Stand-Up Maths YouTube videos remains a uniquely uncharted territory—a territory ripe for exploration and, dare we say, a few lightning jokes.

[[RESULTS]]
The statistical analysis of our data unveiled a robust and intriguing relationship between the first name "Storm" and the total likes garnered by Stand-Up Maths YouTube videos. Over the period from 2011 to 2022, we observed a remarkably strong correlation coefficient of 0.8550047 between the prevalence of the name "Storm" and the digital acclaim of mathematical comedy. This correlation was further corroborated by an r-squared value of 0.7310331, elucidating that approximately 73.1% of the variability in the likes of Stand-Up Maths videos could be explained by the occurrence of the name "Storm."
It appears that the name "Storm" wielded a considerable influence on the online reception of Stand-Up Maths content, akin to a tempestuous force sweeping across the digital landscape. The p-value of less than 0.01 accentuates the robustness of this association, denoting a level of statistical significance that would make even the most skeptical observer stand up and take notice.
To visually encapsulate this mesmerizing correlation, we present Figure 1, a scatterplot that exhibits the unmistakable alignment of the incidence of the name "Storm" and the total likes received by Stand-Up Maths YouTube videos. Like two weather fronts colliding in a dramatic meteorological display, the data points coalesce into a compelling narrative of nomenclature and online engagement.
While our findings point to a compelling association, we tread carefully in attributing causality to the conspicuous correlation observed. Nevertheless, the statistical tempest that unfolds before us invites contemplation on the captivating interplay of nomenclature and digital resonance. The intriguing possibility of a stormy name serving as a catalyst for a whirlwind of YouTube adoration beckons us to weather the statistical downpour and emerge enlight-ened by the whimsical forces at play.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The enthralling interplay of nomenclature and digital acclaim has left us standing awestruck in the wake of our statistical analysis. Our findings bring to light a compelling association between the first name "Storm" and the online reception of Stand-Up Maths videos, suggesting that a stormy moniker may indeed serve as a formidable force in eliciting digital adoration akin to a mathematical thunderclap. Our results fortify the existing body of literature, illuminating the quirky potential for nomenclature to stir up a whirlwind of YouTube engagement.

Harking back to the literature review, the work of Smith et al. (2010) set the stage for our investigation, as our findings resonate with their observations regarding the presumed dynamism and unpredictability associated with names evoking natural phenomena. However, our study goes beyond perceptions of personality traits to unveil a tangible statistical bond between the name "Storm" and the digital resonance of mathematical comedy—a discovery that may leave some nonplussed, but nevertheless sweeps us up in its statistical allure.

Similarly, while the whimsical fiction of Gale Writer (2013) and Thunder Author (2005) might seem worlds apart from empirical research, their portrayal of characters with weather-related names unexpectedly echoes our findings, as the name "Storm" indeed appears to spark a digital storm of likes. While this alignment may seem stranger than fiction, it underscores the lively and unpredictable confluence of nomenclature and online acclaim.

The robust correlation coefficient and r-squared value we uncovered exemplify the compelling relationship between the prevalence of the name "Storm" and the total likes garnered by Stand-Up Maths videos. This statistical tempest not only underscores the striking impact of nomenclature but also raises intriguing questions about the underlying mechanisms at play. While we hesitate to assert causal influence, the statistical downpour of evidence invites us to entertain the possibility of a stormy name serving as a catalyst for a whirlwind of YouTube adoration, perhaps sparking a thunderous round of applause in the digital sphere.

Our study, albeit lighthearted in premise, has serious implications for the broader understanding of digital engagement and the unforeseen influence of nomenclature. As we navigate the whirlwind of statistical revelations, we urge further exploration of the whimsical forces at play, keeping our gaze fixed on the horizon for new avenues of inquiry in the captivating domain of nomenclatural influence. After all, it appears that a name like "Storm" may not just roil the skies but also set the digital landscape abuzz with a surge of mathematical merriment.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Storm and Total likes of Stand-up Maths YouTube videos. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
The Stormy Stand-Up: A Statistical Analysis of the Name "Storm" and Its Influence on the Popularity of Stand-Up Maths YouTube Videos

[[ABSTRACT]]
The impact of a name on one's destiny has captivated scholars for centuries. In this paper, we delve into the enthralling world of nomenclature and its potential influence on the digital realm. Leveraging data from the US Social Security Administration, we conducted a meticulous examination of the first name "Storm" and its correlation with the total likes garnered by Stand-Up Maths YouTube videos from 2011 to 2022. Our findings reveal a striking statistical association, with a correlation coefficient of 0.8550047 and a p-value < 0.01, suggesting a robust relationship between the name "Storm" and the online acclaim of Stand-Up Maths content. While causation remains elusive, our research sheds light on the quirky interplay of nomenclature and digital engagement, prompting us to ponder whether a stormy name may indeed catalyze a whirlwind of YouTube adoration.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
The significance of names in shaping individuals' lives has long been a subject of fascination and inquiry. From literary and mythological figures to mundane encounters in everyday life, names carry a weight of influence that extends beyond their mere phonetic components. In the digital age, the impact of names has extended into the virtual realm, prompting us to explore the intriguing connection between nomenclature and online engagement.
Our study hones in on the enigmatic first name "Storm" and its potential influence on the digital reception of Stand-Up Maths YouTube videos. A whimsical and evocative name, "Storm" conjures images of tempestuous weather and tumultuous energy, sparking our curiosity about its potential to precipitate a deluge of attention for online content. Leveraging comprehensive data from the US Social Security Administration and the YouTube Analytics platform, we embark on a scholarly endeavor to unravel the complex interplay between this meteorological moniker and the virtual appreciation of mathematical comedy.
While some may dismiss our venture as a mere flight of fancy, we assert that the methodology and statistical rigor underpinning our analysis are no passing breeze. With our findings revealing a correlation coefficient of 0.8550047 and a p-value < 0.01, the evidence did not just rain on our parade but unleashed a veritable downpour of statistical significance. The strength of this correlation suggests a formidable link between the name "Storm" and the surging tide of likes bestowed upon Stand-Up Maths videos, inviting us to navigate the stormy seas of nomenclature and digital resonance.
As we set sail on this scholarly expedition, we are mindful of the inherent limitations surrounding causation and mere correlation. Yet, the allure of uncovering a potential causal mechanism remains as tantalizing as chasing a rainbow amidst the storm clouds. Our investigation, therefore, extends an invitation to ponder the quirky and capricious influence of nomenclature in the digital sphere, where a name, much like a storm, may command an unexpected and captivating force.
In the subsequent sections of this paper, we dive into the intricacies of our data analysis, interpret the implications of our findings, and beckon readers to join us in appreciating the tempestuous dance of names and digital acclaim. Just as a storm brings forth a blend of awe and trepidation, the influence of the name "Storm" on the popularity of Stand-Up Maths YouTube videos elicits a nuanced blend of curiosity and amusement, inviting us to weather the statistical downpour and emerge enlightened by the whimsical forces at play.

[[RESULTS]]
The statistical analysis of our data unveiled a robust and intriguing relationship between the first name "Storm" and the total likes garnered by Stand-Up Maths YouTube videos. Over the period from 2011 to 2022, we observed a remarkably strong correlation coefficient of 0.8550047 between the prevalence of the name "Storm" and the digital acclaim of mathematical comedy. This correlation was further corroborated by an r-squared value of 0.7310331, elucidating that approximately 73.1% of the variability in the likes of Stand-Up Maths videos could be explained by the occurrence of the name "Storm."
It appears that the name "Storm" wielded a considerable influence on the online reception of Stand-Up Maths content, akin to a tempestuous force sweeping across the digital landscape. The p-value of less than 0.01 accentuates the robustness of this association, denoting a level of statistical significance that would make even the most skeptical observer stand up and take notice.
To visually encapsulate this mesmerizing correlation, we present Figure 1, a scatterplot that exhibits the unmistakable alignment of the incidence of the name "Storm" and the total likes received by Stand-Up Maths YouTube videos. Like two weather fronts colliding in a dramatic meteorological display, the data points coalesce into a compelling narrative of nomenclature and online engagement.
While our findings point to a compelling association, we tread carefully in attributing causality to the conspicuous correlation observed. Nevertheless, the statistical tempest that unfolds before us invites contemplation on the captivating interplay of nomenclature and digital resonance. The intriguing possibility of a stormy name serving as a catalyst for a whirlwind of YouTube adoration beckons us to weather the statistical downpour and emerge enlight-ened by the whimsical forces at play.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our research has uncovered a compelling correlation between the prevalence of the first name "Storm" and the total likes garnered by Stand-Up Maths YouTube videos. The statistical tempest that unfolds before us highlights the captivating interplay of nomenclature and digital resonance. While our findings evoke a sense of wonder akin to witnessing a thunderstorm in the digital sphere, it is essential to tread cautiously in attributing causality to this association. As much as we would like to proclaim that a stormy name catalyzes a whirlwind of YouTube adoration, caution must prevail in interpreting our findings.

As we weather the statistical downpour and emerge enlightened by the whimsical forces at play, it becomes clear that this correlation opens the floodgates for further study. Yet, it is vital to remember that correlation does not imply causation, and we must not rush into an ill-advised storm chase fueled by our findings. The whims of statistical significance have led us to this intriguing discovery, but the causal mechanism behind this association remains as enigmatic as the path of a lightning bolt during a stormy night.

Ultimately, our exploration into the quirky and capricious influence of nomenclature in the digital realm provides a glimpse into the unpredictable dynamics of online engagement. We invite future researchers to navigate the stormy seas of nomenclature and digital resonance, but we assert that, for now, there is no need for further research in this area. Like a storm that rages and ultimately dissipates, our findings stand as a peculiar but finite phenomenon, highlighting the charm of statistical whimsy without necessitating an enduring deluge of inquiry.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited The Stormy Stand-Up: A Statistical Analysis of the Name Storm and Its Influence on the Popularity of Stand-Up Maths YouTube Videos. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Humor in Mathematical Research


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited The Stormy Stand-Up: A Statistical Analysis of the Name Storm and Its Influence on the Popularity of Stand-Up Maths YouTube Videos. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Institute for Humor and Statistical Analysis


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled The Stormy Stand-Up: A Statistical Analysis of the Name Storm and Its Influence on the Popularity of Stand-Up Maths YouTube Videos with an abstract of The impact of a name on one's destiny has captivated scholars for centuries. In this paper, we delve into the enthralling world of nomenclature and its potential influence on the digital realm. Leveraging data from the US Social Security Administration, we conducted a meticulous examination of the first name "Storm" and its correlation with the total likes garnered by Stand-Up Maths YouTube videos from 2011 to 2022. Our findings reveal a striking statistical association, with a correlation coefficient of 0.8550047 and a p-value < 0.01, suggesting a robust relationship between the name "Storm" and the online acclaim of Stand-Up Maths content. While causation remains elusive, our research sheds light on the quirky interplay of nomenclature and digital engagement, prompting us to ponder whether a stormy name may indeed catalyze a whirlwind of YouTube adoration.

ChatGPT:

"nomenclature influence on digital realm," "impact of name on destiny," "statistical analysis of name Storm," "Stand-Up Maths YouTube videos popularity," "correlation between name Storm and likes," "US Social Security Administration data on name Storm," "causation of name influence on YouTube engagement," "relationship between name and online acclaim," "naming and digital engagement," "Stormy name and YouTube adoration"

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Popularity of the first name Storm
Detailed data title: Babies of all sexes born in the US named Storm
Source: US Social Security Administration
See what else correlates with Popularity of the first name Storm

Total likes of Matt Parker's YouTube videos
Detailed data title: Total likes of Stand-up Maths YouTube videos.
Source: Stand-up Maths on YouTube
See what else correlates with Total likes of Matt Parker's YouTube videos

Correlation r = 0.8550047 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.7310331 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 73.1% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Total likes of Matt Parker's YouTube videos) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Popularity of the first name Storm) over the 12 years from 2011 through 2022.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 0.00039. 0.0003936180125715573000000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.86 in 0.039% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 2,541 random variables Which I absolutely did.
with the same 11 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 11 because we have two variables measured over a period of 12 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.55, 0.96 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
201120122013201420152016201720182019202020212022
Popularity of the first name Storm (Babies born)87107102121139174163177163229245248
Total likes of Matt Parker's YouTube videos (Total likes)218632384450833461788581793077365401185873348413920465992478523114




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Y-axis doesn't start at zero: I truncated the Y-axes of the graph above. I also used a line graph, which makes the visual connection stand out more than it deserves. Nothing against line graphs. They are great at telling a story when you have linear data! But visually it is deceptive because the only data is at the points on the graph, not the lines on the graph. In between each point, the data could have been doing anything. Like going for a random walk by itself!
    Mathematically what I showed is true, but it is intentionally misleading. Below is the same chart but with both Y-axes starting at zero.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([87,107,102,121,139,174,163,177,163,229,245,248,])
array_2 = np.array([21863,23844,5083,34617,88581,793077,365401,185873,348413,920465,992478,523114,])
array_1_name = "Popularity of the first name Storm"
array_2_name = "Total likes of Matt Parker's YouTube videos"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Your correlation inspection deserves a standing ovation!


Correlation ID: 4286 · Black Variable ID: 3636 · Red Variable ID: 25810
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0