about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #4,284 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is The number of sewing machine operators in Iowa and the second variable is Total comments on minutephysics YouTube videos.  The chart goes from 2011 to 2022, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

As the skilled sewing machine operators dwindled in Iowa, their exceptional hand-eye coordination and nimble finger movements were sorely missed. This led to a decrease in the overall dexterity of the Iowa population. Consequently, Iowans found it increasingly challenging to perform tiny tasks, such as typing comments on minutephysics videos with the same level of precision and speed as before. This ultimately resulted in a dip in the total comments on minutephysics YouTube videos.

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Style: Whimsical illustration Description: In a vibrant Iowa town, rows of vintage sewing machines buzz with activity as a team of enthusiastic operators meticulously craft stylish clothing. Each operator is depicted with a distinct quirky fashion sense, adding a whimsical touch. Nearby, a large screen beams with a minutephysics YouTube video, surrounded by a flurry of colorful comments floating around. The video is whimsically portrayed with vibrant visuals, showcasing a fusion of physics concepts and textile patterns. Amidst the threads and fabric, a poster of a fashionable physics equation adorns the wall, serving as a playful symbol of the captivating intersection between sewing and physics. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: The number of sewing machine operators in Iowa and Total comments on minutephysics YouTube videos. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: A comic-book-style illustration with muted colors and a dotted halftone pattern from the 1960s Data cyber art a funny image you would see on reddit Whimsical illustration Cybernetic art
ChatGPT: Whimsical illustration

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both The number of sewing machine operators in Iowa and Total comments on minutephysics YouTube videos, in the following situation: The increase in sewing machine operators in Iowa has led to a surge in demand for stylish clothing, prompting a greater interest in understanding the physics behind fashion, thus driving up the total comments on minutephysics YouTube videos. This just goes to show that even quantum mechanics can't sew up the fashion industry!. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In a bustling Iowa town, rows of sewing machines hum with activity as a team of operators meticulously sew stylish clothing. Nearby, a large screen displays a minutephysics YouTube video, which garners a deluge of comments. Among the threads and fabric, a poster of a fashionable physics equation hangs, symbolizing the intersection of sewing and physics that has captivated the community.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ Whimsical illustration ] and depicting this scene: In a bustling Iowa town, rows of sewing machines hum with activity as a team of operators meticulously sew stylish clothing. Nearby, a large screen displays a minutephysics YouTube video, which garners a deluge of comments. Among the threads and fabric, a poster of a fashionable physics equation hangs, symbolizing the intersection of sewing and physics that has captivated the community. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Style: Whimsical illustration Description: In a vibrant Iowa town, rows of vintage sewing machines buzz with activity as a team of enthusiastic operators meticulously craft stylish clothing. Each operator is depicted with a distinct quirky fashion sense, adding a whimsical touch. Nearby, a large screen beams with a minutephysics YouTube video, surrounded by a flurry of colorful comments floating around. The video is whimsically portrayed with vibrant visuals, showcasing a fusion of physics concepts and textile patterns. Amidst the threads and fabric, a poster of a fashionable physics equation adorns the wall, serving as a playful symbol of the captivating intersection between sewing and physics.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how a decrease in The number of sewing machine operators in Iowa caused Total comments on minutephysics YouTube videos to decrease.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Unraveling Threads of Influence: The Stitch Between Sewing Machine Operators in Iowa and Total Comment-ary on minutephysics YouTube Videos

The Journal of Textile Technology and Internet Culture

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of sewing machine operators in Iowa and Total comments on minutephysics YouTube videos. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Include a pun in the title.

Your research team used data from Bureau of Larbor Statistics and YouTube to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9502098 and p < 0.01 for 2011 to 2022.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
Unraveling Threads of Influence: The Stitch Between Sewing Machine Operators in Iowa and Total Comment-ary on minutephysics YouTube Videos

[[ABSTRACT]]
This research delves into the seemingly woven relationship between the number of sewing machine operators in Iowa and the total comments on minutephysics YouTube videos. By harnessing data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and YouTube, we embarked on a journey to untangle this eccentric yarn of influence. Our findings revealed a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9502098 and p < 0.01 during the period spanning 2011 to 2022, indicating a strong association between these seemingly disparate variables.

Just as a flawlessly executed stitch can hold a garment together, our analysis revealed that the number of sewing machine operators in Iowa curiously holds a tight connection to the total commentary on minutephysics YouTube videos. It seems that the threads of influence extend beyond the realm of textiles, weaving a web of relevance in the digital sphere. As Albert Einstein once quipped, "A clever person solves a problem, a wise person avoids it," but we chose to wade into this perplexing conundrum and found threads of connection that even the most cunning tailors of statistical analysis may have overlooked.

Through our study, we hope to sew seeds of curiosity and inspire further investigations into the unexpected connections that may thread the tapestry of our socio-digital landscape. After all, as every good dad knows, "A good pun is its own reword."


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of sewing machine operators in Iowa and Total comments on minutephysics YouTube videos. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Unraveling Threads of Influence: The Stitch Between Sewing Machine Operators in Iowa and Total Comment-ary on minutephysics YouTube Videos

[[ABSTRACT]]
This research delves into the seemingly woven relationship between the number of sewing machine operators in Iowa and the total comments on minutephysics YouTube videos. By harnessing data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and YouTube, we embarked on a journey to untangle this eccentric yarn of influence. Our findings revealed a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9502098 and p < 0.01 during the period spanning 2011 to 2022, indicating a strong association between these seemingly disparate variables.

Just as a flawlessly executed stitch can hold a garment together, our analysis revealed that the number of sewing machine operators in Iowa curiously holds a tight connection to the total commentary on minutephysics YouTube videos. It seems that the threads of influence extend beyond the realm of textiles, weaving a web of relevance in the digital sphere. As Albert Einstein once quipped, "A clever person solves a problem, a wise person avoids it," but we chose to wade into this perplexing conundrum and found threads of connection that even the most cunning tailors of statistical analysis may have overlooked.

Through our study, we hope to sew seeds of curiosity and inspire further investigations into the unexpected connections that may thread the tapestry of our socio-digital landscape. After all, as every good dad knows, "A good pun is its own reword."

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

The world of statistics is often perceived as a rigid framework of numbers and correlations, yet every now and then, a peculiar set of variables emerges, tempting researchers to unravel the fabric of conventional wisdom. In this paper, we embark on just such a journey, probing the curious relationship between the number of sewing machine operators in Iowa and the total comments on minutephysics YouTube videos. So buckle up as we thread through this intriguing tapestry of unlikely associations, and don't be alarmed if you find a few unexpected stitches of humor along the way. After all, as researchers, we must always be ready to *spool* with the unexpected!

It is *sew* strange how these seemingly disconnected variables appear to intertwine in the vast fabric of data. One might think that the click-clack of sewing machines and the musings of YouTube commentators exist in entirely separate realms. However, the winding of statistics often leads us down unexpected paths, and just like a poorly-stitched seam, assumptions can easily unravel before our eyes. As researchers, it is our duty to *weave* our way through these intriguing findings with precision and *patience*, just like a vexing knitting pattern.

As we delve deeper into the analysis, it becomes clear that the threads of influence in this seemingly bizarre correlation are not easily snipped. The *fabric* of statistical significance reveals a surprisingly high correlation coefficient, beckoning us to consider the possibility that something more than mere chance may be at play here. As we unravel the intricacies of this unique relationship, we must remember that true *stitch*istics demands not just hard data, but also a healthy dose of whimsy and wonderment.

Our findings are not just mere *puns* and *needles* in the haystack of statistical research. They expose a web of influence that stretches across the domains of labor and digital content, reminding us that the world of statistics is not a *seam*less tapestry, but rather a patchwork of unexpected connections waiting to be discovered. So, as we present our findings, let us acknowledge that every great statistical discovery deserves its own *thread* of amusement, for as the saying goes, "A joke a day keeps the researcher's dismay away!"


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of sewing machine operators in Iowa and Total comments on minutephysics YouTube videos. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then you might move on to cartoons and children's shows that you watched for research.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Unraveling Threads of Influence: The Stitch Between Sewing Machine Operators in Iowa and Total Comment-ary on minutephysics YouTube Videos

[[ABSTRACT]]
This research delves into the seemingly woven relationship between the number of sewing machine operators in Iowa and the total comments on minutephysics YouTube videos. By harnessing data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and YouTube, we embarked on a journey to untangle this eccentric yarn of influence. Our findings revealed a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9502098 and p < 0.01 during the period spanning 2011 to 2022, indicating a strong association between these seemingly disparate variables.

Just as a flawlessly executed stitch can hold a garment together, our analysis revealed that the number of sewing machine operators in Iowa curiously holds a tight connection to the total commentary on minutephysics YouTube videos. It seems that the threads of influence extend beyond the realm of textiles, weaving a web of relevance in the digital sphere. As Albert Einstein once quipped, "A clever person solves a problem, a wise person avoids it," but we chose to wade into this perplexing conundrum and found threads of connection that even the most cunning tailors of statistical analysis may have overlooked.

Through our study, we hope to sew seeds of curiosity and inspire further investigations into the unexpected connections that may thread the tapestry of our socio-digital landscape. After all, as every good dad knows, "A good pun is its own reword."

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The world of statistics is often perceived as a rigid framework of numbers and correlations, yet every now and then, a peculiar set of variables emerges, tempting researchers to unravel the fabric of conventional wisdom. In this paper, we embark on just such a journey, probing the curious relationship between the number of sewing machine operators in Iowa and the total comments on minutephysics YouTube videos. So buckle up as we thread through this intriguing tapestry of unlikely associations, and don't be alarmed if you find a few unexpected stitches of humor along the way. After all, as researchers, we must always be ready to *spool* with the unexpected!
It is *sew* strange how these seemingly disconnected variables appear to intertwine in the vast fabric of data. One might think that the click-clack of sewing machines and the musings of YouTube commentators exist in entirely separate realms. However, the winding of statistics often leads us down unexpected paths, and just like a poorly-stitched seam, assumptions can easily unravel before our eyes. As researchers, it is our duty to *weave* our way through these intriguing findings with precision and *patience*, just like a vexing knitting pattern.
As we delve deeper into the analysis, it becomes clear that the threads of influence in this seemingly bizarre correlation are not easily snipped. The *fabric* of statistical significance reveals a surprisingly high correlation coefficient, beckoning us to consider the possibility that something more than mere chance may be at play here. As we unravel the intricacies of this unique relationship, we must remember that true *stitch*istics demands not just hard data, but also a healthy dose of whimsy and wonderment.
Our findings are not just mere *puns* and *needles* in the haystack of statistical research. They expose a web of influence that stretches across the domains of labor and digital content, reminding us that the world of statistics is not a *seam*less tapestry, but rather a patchwork of unexpected connections waiting to be discovered. So, as we present our findings, let us acknowledge that every great statistical discovery deserves its own *thread* of amusement, for as the saying goes, "A joke a day keeps the researcher's dismay away!"

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

The investigation into the seemingly interwoven relationship between the number of sewing machine operators in Iowa and the total comments on minutephysics YouTube videos has stirred the academic community, spurring forth a kaleidoscope of discussions and research efforts. The seminal work of Smith and Jones (2020) unearthed the intriguing statistical link between seemingly unrelated variables, setting the stage for subsequent inquiries into this peculiar web of influence. Expanding on this foundational work, Doe and Smith (2021) corroborated the unexpected correlation between the labor force in Iowa's textile industry and the digital discourse surrounding popular YouTube content.

In "The Art of Sewing: A Practical Guide," the authors expound upon the intricate mechanics of sewing machines and the art of fabric manipulation, garnering a newfound appreciation for the craftsmanship that underpins this age-old practice. Likewise, "The Physics of YouTube: Unraveling Digital Dimensions" delves into the enigmatic world of online content creation, shedding light on the multifaceted dynamics of audience engagement and interaction.

Drawing inspiration from a myriad of sources, from the scholarly realism of "Fabricating Reality: A Textile Analysis" to the whimsically speculative narratives of "The Quantum Tailor Chronicles," the literature surrounding this peculiar nexus of variables has taken on a tapestry of its own, woven with threads of insight and imagination.

As the research journey continued, the authors found themselves venturing into uncharted territory, seeking understanding from unexpected sources. Animated series such as "Sewing Adventures with Sandy Stitch" and "The Physics of Fantastical Weaving" provided a light-hearted lens through which to view the complex interplay between labor economics and digital content consumption. Through the lens of these creative yet informative portrayals, the researchers gained a renewed appreciation for the playful undercurrents that pervade even the most ostensibly serious of statistical pursuits.

In the spirit of exploration, the authors also turned to children's programming, pleading that their academic pursuit of knowledge be not relegated solely to the realm of adulthood. The timeless lessons embedded in shows such as "Loopy Threads: A Yarn of Discovery" and "Milo's Mystical Measurement Misadventures" imparted wisdom that transcends age barriers, reminding the researchers that the pursuit of knowledge need not always be a solemn affair.

These diverse influences have coalesced to create a colorful mosaic of understanding, illustrating that the pursuit of knowledge is not bound by rigid conventions but is rather a dynamic tapestry, interwoven with unexpected quirks and discoveries. In the words of every dad with a love for data, "When it comes to research, don't be afraid to *sew* the unexpected and embrace every statistical curveball with a hearty chuckle."


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of sewing machine operators in Iowa and Total comments on minutephysics YouTube videos. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Bureau of Larbor Statistics and YouTube . You used data from 2011 to 2022

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Unraveling Threads of Influence: The Stitch Between Sewing Machine Operators in Iowa and Total Comment-ary on minutephysics YouTube Videos

[[ABSTRACT]]
This research delves into the seemingly woven relationship between the number of sewing machine operators in Iowa and the total comments on minutephysics YouTube videos. By harnessing data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and YouTube, we embarked on a journey to untangle this eccentric yarn of influence. Our findings revealed a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9502098 and p < 0.01 during the period spanning 2011 to 2022, indicating a strong association between these seemingly disparate variables.

Just as a flawlessly executed stitch can hold a garment together, our analysis revealed that the number of sewing machine operators in Iowa curiously holds a tight connection to the total commentary on minutephysics YouTube videos. It seems that the threads of influence extend beyond the realm of textiles, weaving a web of relevance in the digital sphere. As Albert Einstein once quipped, "A clever person solves a problem, a wise person avoids it," but we chose to wade into this perplexing conundrum and found threads of connection that even the most cunning tailors of statistical analysis may have overlooked.

Through our study, we hope to sew seeds of curiosity and inspire further investigations into the unexpected connections that may thread the tapestry of our socio-digital landscape. After all, as every good dad knows, "A good pun is its own reword."

[[INTRODUCTION]]
The world of statistics is often perceived as a rigid framework of numbers and correlations, yet every now and then, a peculiar set of variables emerges, tempting researchers to unravel the fabric of conventional wisdom. In this paper, we embark on just such a journey, probing the curious relationship between the number of sewing machine operators in Iowa and the total comments on minutephysics YouTube videos. So buckle up as we thread through this intriguing tapestry of unlikely associations, and don't be alarmed if you find a few unexpected stitches of humor along the way. After all, as researchers, we must always be ready to *spool* with the unexpected!
It is *sew* strange how these seemingly disconnected variables appear to intertwine in the vast fabric of data. One might think that the click-clack of sewing machines and the musings of YouTube commentators exist in entirely separate realms. However, the winding of statistics often leads us down unexpected paths, and just like a poorly-stitched seam, assumptions can easily unravel before our eyes. As researchers, it is our duty to *weave* our way through these intriguing findings with precision and *patience*, just like a vexing knitting pattern.
As we delve deeper into the analysis, it becomes clear that the threads of influence in this seemingly bizarre correlation are not easily snipped. The *fabric* of statistical significance reveals a surprisingly high correlation coefficient, beckoning us to consider the possibility that something more than mere chance may be at play here. As we unravel the intricacies of this unique relationship, we must remember that true *stitch*istics demands not just hard data, but also a healthy dose of whimsy and wonderment.
Our findings are not just mere *puns* and *needles* in the haystack of statistical research. They expose a web of influence that stretches across the domains of labor and digital content, reminding us that the world of statistics is not a *seam*less tapestry, but rather a patchwork of unexpected connections waiting to be discovered. So, as we present our findings, let us acknowledge that every great statistical discovery deserves its own *thread* of amusement, for as the saying goes, "A joke a day keeps the researcher's dismay away!"

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To begin our investigation into this quirky confluence of variables, we first compiled data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics to unravel the patterns of the number of sewing machine operators in Iowa from 2011 to 2022. We diligently sewed together this data, carefully guiding the needle of our inquiry through the fabric of labor statistics, all the while making sure to avoid any pesky statistical "snags" along the way. After all, we wouldn't want to "hem" ourselves into a corner with biased data.

With our needle threaded with the *yarn* of curiosity, we then turned our attention to the realm of YouTube, where we collected data on the total comments on minutephysics videos during the same period. Much like a tailor meticulously selecting the finest fabric for a bespoke suit, we sifted through this digital *fabric* of commentary, ensuring that our dataset was tailored to capture the essence of engagement with minutephysics content.

In order to establish the relationship between these seemingly unrelated variables, we employed a rigorous statistical analysis, including a correlation coefficient calculation and regression modeling. We carefully *stitched* each analysis together, ensuring that the fabric of our statistical approach was robust and free from any unraveling threads.

To further bolster the credibility of our findings, we also conducted a comprehensive time series analysis to discern any temporal trends in the data. This allowed us to examine how the number of sewing machine operators in Iowa influenced the *weaving* of commentary on minutephysics videos over time, shedding light on the dynamic nature of this unexpected relationship. After all, we couldn't afford to leave any loose ends in our pursuit of statistical truth.

In addition to these quantitative methods, we also engaged in qualitative data analysis to gain insights into the underlying factors that may be at play in this curious correlation. Through a series of thematic coding exercises, we sought to *embroider* the narrative of our findings, weaving a rich tapestry of insights that extended beyond the realm of numbers and coefficients. As researchers, it's important to remember that sometimes the most illuminating details can be found in the *knitty* gritty of qualitative analysis.

Returning to the question at hand, we sought to answer not only *how* these variables were connected, but also *why* they exhibited such an unexpected relationship. To achieve this, we performed a factor analysis to unravel the underlying constructs that may be intertwining the number of sewing machine operators in Iowa with the total commentary on minutephysics YouTube videos. It was a bit like untangling a particularly stubborn knot in a ball of wool, but we held our focus and persisted, knowing that the *thread* of insight lay just beyond the entangled fibers.

Throughout this methodological odyssey, we remained steadfast in our commitment to precision, thoroughness, and a touch of scientific whimsy. After all, as geneticists like to say, "There's no *sew* gene for intelligence," but there just might be a *sew* gene for statistical exploration.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of sewing machine operators in Iowa and Total comments on minutephysics YouTube videos. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Bureau of Larbor Statistics and YouTube .

For the time period 2011 to 2022, you found a correlation 0.9502098, r-squared of 0.9028986, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Unraveling Threads of Influence: The Stitch Between Sewing Machine Operators in Iowa and Total Comment-ary on minutephysics YouTube Videos

[[ABSTRACT]]
This research delves into the seemingly woven relationship between the number of sewing machine operators in Iowa and the total comments on minutephysics YouTube videos. By harnessing data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and YouTube, we embarked on a journey to untangle this eccentric yarn of influence. Our findings revealed a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9502098 and p < 0.01 during the period spanning 2011 to 2022, indicating a strong association between these seemingly disparate variables.

Just as a flawlessly executed stitch can hold a garment together, our analysis revealed that the number of sewing machine operators in Iowa curiously holds a tight connection to the total commentary on minutephysics YouTube videos. It seems that the threads of influence extend beyond the realm of textiles, weaving a web of relevance in the digital sphere. As Albert Einstein once quipped, "A clever person solves a problem, a wise person avoids it," but we chose to wade into this perplexing conundrum and found threads of connection that even the most cunning tailors of statistical analysis may have overlooked.

Through our study, we hope to sew seeds of curiosity and inspire further investigations into the unexpected connections that may thread the tapestry of our socio-digital landscape. After all, as every good dad knows, "A good pun is its own reword."

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
The world of statistics is often perceived as a rigid framework of numbers and correlations, yet every now and then, a peculiar set of variables emerges, tempting researchers to unravel the fabric of conventional wisdom. In this paper, we embark on just such a journey, probing the curious relationship between the number of sewing machine operators in Iowa and the total comments on minutephysics YouTube videos. So buckle up as we thread through this intriguing tapestry of unlikely associations, and don't be alarmed if you find a few unexpected stitches of humor along the way. After all, as researchers, we must always be ready to *spool* with the unexpected!
It is *sew* strange how these seemingly disconnected variables appear to intertwine in the vast fabric of data. One might think that the click-clack of sewing machines and the musings of YouTube commentators exist in entirely separate realms. However, the winding of statistics often leads us down unexpected paths, and just like a poorly-stitched seam, assumptions can easily unravel before our eyes. As researchers, it is our duty to *weave* our way through these intriguing findings with precision and *patience*, just like a vexing knitting pattern.
As we delve deeper into the analysis, it becomes clear that the threads of influence in this seemingly bizarre correlation are not easily snipped. The *fabric* of statistical significance reveals a surprisingly high correlation coefficient, beckoning us to consider the possibility that something more than mere chance may be at play here. As we unravel the intricacies of this unique relationship, we must remember that true *stitch*istics demands not just hard data, but also a healthy dose of whimsy and wonderment.
Our findings are not just mere *puns* and *needles* in the haystack of statistical research. They expose a web of influence that stretches across the domains of labor and digital content, reminding us that the world of statistics is not a *seam*less tapestry, but rather a patchwork of unexpected connections waiting to be discovered. So, as we present our findings, let us acknowledge that every great statistical discovery deserves its own *thread* of amusement, for as the saying goes, "A joke a day keeps the researcher's dismay away!"

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

Our analysis of the relationship between the number of sewing machine operators in Iowa and the total comments on minutephysics YouTube videos has unearthed an unexpectedly strong correlation. The correlation coefficient of 0.9502098 suggests a remarkably close-knit connection between these two variables, with an r-squared value of 0.9028986 further emphasizing the robustness of the relationship. Additionally, the p-value of less than 0.01 provides convincing evidence of the statistical significance of this association, making it clear that this isn't just some loosely stitched coincidence.

One might say that this correlation has left us in stitches, as the seemingly unrelated fields of textile production and online physics discussions have been woven together in our analysis. It's as if our statistical findings have threaded a needle, stitching together an unexpected relationship that eluded previous scrutiny. This discovery is more than just a quirk of data; it's a testament to the colorful tapestry that statistics can uncover when we're open to seeing beyond conventional patterns.

In Figure 1, the scatterplot vividly illustrates the strong positive correlation between the number of sewing machine operators in Iowa and the total comments on minutephysics YouTube videos. The plot resembles a perfectly tailored suit, presenting a seamless connection between these variables that might at first glance appear to be as mismatched as a pair of socks pulled from the wrong drawer.

As we reflect on these findings, it becomes clear that the world of statistics is as unpredictable as a ball of yarn. Just when you think you've spun out all the possible connections, a new thread of discovery emerges, knitting together the seemingly unrelated into a cohesive fabric of knowledge. Like a well-executed dad joke, these findings blend surprise with insight, reminding us that exploring the unexpected can lead to the most satisfying revelations.

We hope that this study not only sheds light on the peculiar association between sewing machine operators in Iowa and YouTube commentary but also invites future research to unravel more of these intriguing connections. After all, in the world of statistics, every unexpected correlation is not just a data point but a potential punchline waiting to be unraveled.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of sewing machine operators in Iowa and Total comments on minutephysics YouTube videos. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
Unraveling Threads of Influence: The Stitch Between Sewing Machine Operators in Iowa and Total Comment-ary on minutephysics YouTube Videos

[[ABSTRACT]]
This research delves into the seemingly woven relationship between the number of sewing machine operators in Iowa and the total comments on minutephysics YouTube videos. By harnessing data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and YouTube, we embarked on a journey to untangle this eccentric yarn of influence. Our findings revealed a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9502098 and p < 0.01 during the period spanning 2011 to 2022, indicating a strong association between these seemingly disparate variables.

Just as a flawlessly executed stitch can hold a garment together, our analysis revealed that the number of sewing machine operators in Iowa curiously holds a tight connection to the total commentary on minutephysics YouTube videos. It seems that the threads of influence extend beyond the realm of textiles, weaving a web of relevance in the digital sphere. As Albert Einstein once quipped, "A clever person solves a problem, a wise person avoids it," but we chose to wade into this perplexing conundrum and found threads of connection that even the most cunning tailors of statistical analysis may have overlooked.

Through our study, we hope to sew seeds of curiosity and inspire further investigations into the unexpected connections that may thread the tapestry of our socio-digital landscape. After all, as every good dad knows, "A good pun is its own reword."

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The investigation into the seemingly interwoven relationship between the number of sewing machine operators in Iowa and the total comments on minutephysics YouTube videos has stirred the academic community, spurring forth a kaleidoscope of discussions and research efforts. The seminal work of Smith and Jones (2020) unearthed the intriguing statistical link between seemingly unrelated variables, setting the stage for subsequent inquiries into this peculiar web of influence. Expanding on this foundational work, Doe and Smith (2021) corroborated the unexpected correlation between the labor force in Iowa's textile industry and the digital discourse surrounding popular YouTube content.
In "The Art of Sewing: A Practical Guide," the authors expound upon the intricate mechanics of sewing machines and the art of fabric manipulation, garnering a newfound appreciation for the craftsmanship that underpins this age-old practice. Likewise, "The Physics of YouTube: Unraveling Digital Dimensions" delves into the enigmatic world of online content creation, shedding light on the multifaceted dynamics of audience engagement and interaction.
Drawing inspiration from a myriad of sources, from the scholarly realism of "Fabricating Reality: A Textile Analysis" to the whimsically speculative narratives of "The Quantum Tailor Chronicles," the literature surrounding this peculiar nexus of variables has taken on a tapestry of its own, woven with threads of insight and imagination.
As the research journey continued, the authors found themselves venturing into uncharted territory, seeking understanding from unexpected sources. Animated series such as "Sewing Adventures with Sandy Stitch" and "The Physics of Fantastical Weaving" provided a light-hearted lens through which to view the complex interplay between labor economics and digital content consumption. Through the lens of these creative yet informative portrayals, the researchers gained a renewed appreciation for the playful undercurrents that pervade even the most ostensibly serious of statistical pursuits.
In the spirit of exploration, the authors also turned to children's programming, pleading that their academic pursuit of knowledge be not relegated solely to the realm of adulthood. The timeless lessons embedded in shows such as "Loopy Threads: A Yarn of Discovery" and "Milo's Mystical Measurement Misadventures" imparted wisdom that transcends age barriers, reminding the researchers that the pursuit of knowledge need not always be a solemn affair.
These diverse influences have coalesced to create a colorful mosaic of understanding, illustrating that the pursuit of knowledge is not bound by rigid conventions but is rather a dynamic tapestry, interwoven with unexpected quirks and discoveries. In the words of every dad with a love for data, "When it comes to research, don't be afraid to *sew* the unexpected and embrace every statistical curveball with a hearty chuckle."

[[RESULTS]]
Our analysis of the relationship between the number of sewing machine operators in Iowa and the total comments on minutephysics YouTube videos has unearthed an unexpectedly strong correlation. The correlation coefficient of 0.9502098 suggests a remarkably close-knit connection between these two variables, with an r-squared value of 0.9028986 further emphasizing the robustness of the relationship. Additionally, the p-value of less than 0.01 provides convincing evidence of the statistical significance of this association, making it clear that this isn't just some loosely stitched coincidence.
One might say that this correlation has left us in stitches, as the seemingly unrelated fields of textile production and online physics discussions have been woven together in our analysis. It's as if our statistical findings have threaded a needle, stitching together an unexpected relationship that eluded previous scrutiny. This discovery is more than just a quirk of data; it's a testament to the colorful tapestry that statistics can uncover when we're open to seeing beyond conventional patterns.
In Figure 1, the scatterplot vividly illustrates the strong positive correlation between the number of sewing machine operators in Iowa and the total comments on minutephysics YouTube videos. The plot resembles a perfectly tailored suit, presenting a seamless connection between these variables that might at first glance appear to be as mismatched as a pair of socks pulled from the wrong drawer.
As we reflect on these findings, it becomes clear that the world of statistics is as unpredictable as a ball of yarn. Just when you think you've spun out all the possible connections, a new thread of discovery emerges, knitting together the seemingly unrelated into a cohesive fabric of knowledge. Like a well-executed dad joke, these findings blend surprise with insight, reminding us that exploring the unexpected can lead to the most satisfying revelations.
We hope that this study not only sheds light on the peculiar association between sewing machine operators in Iowa and YouTube commentary but also invites future research to unravel more of these intriguing connections. After all, in the world of statistics, every unexpected correlation is not just a data point but a potential punchline waiting to be unraveled.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The findings of our study provide compelling evidence of a strong association between the number of sewing machine operators in Iowa and the total comments on minutephysics YouTube videos. This unexpected relationship, akin to finding a needle in a digital haystack, has certainly left us in stitches. Our results not only align with previous research by Smith and Jones (2020) and Doe and Smith (2021), but also offer a more robust understanding of the intricate web that intertwines labor economics and online engagement.

It's fascinating to consider how the labor force in Iowa's textile industry has stitched itself into the digital discourse surrounding popular physics content on YouTube. Just as a well-tailored suit accentuates one's physique, our findings accentuate the unmistakable influence of sewing machine operators on the virtual conversations sparked by minutephysics videos. Our statistical analysis has seamlessly woven these seemingly disparate variables into a cohesive fabric of knowledge, much like a masterful patchwork quilt.

The high correlation coefficient and r-squared value further corroborate the strength of this association, underscoring that this isn't just a loosely stitched coincidence but rather a tightly woven connection. The p-value of less than 0.01 serves as a bold thread of evidence, stitching together the significance of this relationship with the precision of a skilled seamstress.

Our scatterplot, akin to a meticulously crafted needlepoint tapestry, vividly portrays the close-knit nature of this correlation. It's as if the variables have been perfectly hemmed together, creating a seamless visual representation of the interwoven influence of labor economics and digital engagement. This unexpected convergence is a testament to the colorful tapestry that statistics can uncover, reminding us that sometimes the most intricate patterns emerge from the most unexpected pairings.

In the spirit of embracing unexpected correlations, we are reminded of the wise words of Albert Einstein, who once proclaimed, "The only reason for time is so that everything doesn't happen at once." Similarly, in the realm of statistics, it's precisely the unexpected pairings and correlations that unravel the timeline of discovery, infusing the pursuit of knowledge with an element of surprise.

Through this study, we have not only unraveled a unique association but have also woven a thread of curiosity that extends into the uncharted landscape of seemingly unrelated variables. As every dad knows, a well-crafted joke is like good statistics – it strikes the perfect balance between surprise and insight. In the same vein, our findings invite future research to unfurl more of these intriguing connections, ensuring that every data point is not just a statistic but a potential punchline waiting to be unraveled.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of sewing machine operators in Iowa and Total comments on minutephysics YouTube videos. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
Unraveling Threads of Influence: The Stitch Between Sewing Machine Operators in Iowa and Total Comment-ary on minutephysics YouTube Videos

[[ABSTRACT]]
This research delves into the seemingly woven relationship between the number of sewing machine operators in Iowa and the total comments on minutephysics YouTube videos. By harnessing data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and YouTube, we embarked on a journey to untangle this eccentric yarn of influence. Our findings revealed a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9502098 and p < 0.01 during the period spanning 2011 to 2022, indicating a strong association between these seemingly disparate variables.

Just as a flawlessly executed stitch can hold a garment together, our analysis revealed that the number of sewing machine operators in Iowa curiously holds a tight connection to the total commentary on minutephysics YouTube videos. It seems that the threads of influence extend beyond the realm of textiles, weaving a web of relevance in the digital sphere. As Albert Einstein once quipped, "A clever person solves a problem, a wise person avoids it," but we chose to wade into this perplexing conundrum and found threads of connection that even the most cunning tailors of statistical analysis may have overlooked.

Through our study, we hope to sew seeds of curiosity and inspire further investigations into the unexpected connections that may thread the tapestry of our socio-digital landscape. After all, as every good dad knows, "A good pun is its own reword."

[[INTRDUCTION]]
The world of statistics is often perceived as a rigid framework of numbers and correlations, yet every now and then, a peculiar set of variables emerges, tempting researchers to unravel the fabric of conventional wisdom. In this paper, we embark on just such a journey, probing the curious relationship between the number of sewing machine operators in Iowa and the total comments on minutephysics YouTube videos. So buckle up as we thread through this intriguing tapestry of unlikely associations, and don't be alarmed if you find a few unexpected stitches of humor along the way. After all, as researchers, we must always be ready to *spool* with the unexpected!
It is *sew* strange how these seemingly disconnected variables appear to intertwine in the vast fabric of data. One might think that the click-clack of sewing machines and the musings of YouTube commentators exist in entirely separate realms. However, the winding of statistics often leads us down unexpected paths, and just like a poorly-stitched seam, assumptions can easily unravel before our eyes. As researchers, it is our duty to *weave* our way through these intriguing findings with precision and *patience*, just like a vexing knitting pattern.
As we delve deeper into the analysis, it becomes clear that the threads of influence in this seemingly bizarre correlation are not easily snipped. The *fabric* of statistical significance reveals a surprisingly high correlation coefficient, beckoning us to consider the possibility that something more than mere chance may be at play here. As we unravel the intricacies of this unique relationship, we must remember that true *stitch*istics demands not just hard data, but also a healthy dose of whimsy and wonderment.
Our findings are not just mere *puns* and *needles* in the haystack of statistical research. They expose a web of influence that stretches across the domains of labor and digital content, reminding us that the world of statistics is not a *seam*less tapestry, but rather a patchwork of unexpected connections waiting to be discovered. So, as we present our findings, let us acknowledge that every great statistical discovery deserves its own *thread* of amusement, for as the saying goes, "A joke a day keeps the researcher's dismay away!"

[[RESULTS]]
Our analysis of the relationship between the number of sewing machine operators in Iowa and the total comments on minutephysics YouTube videos has unearthed an unexpectedly strong correlation. The correlation coefficient of 0.9502098 suggests a remarkably close-knit connection between these two variables, with an r-squared value of 0.9028986 further emphasizing the robustness of the relationship. Additionally, the p-value of less than 0.01 provides convincing evidence of the statistical significance of this association, making it clear that this isn't just some loosely stitched coincidence.
One might say that this correlation has left us in stitches, as the seemingly unrelated fields of textile production and online physics discussions have been woven together in our analysis. It's as if our statistical findings have threaded a needle, stitching together an unexpected relationship that eluded previous scrutiny. This discovery is more than just a quirk of data; it's a testament to the colorful tapestry that statistics can uncover when we're open to seeing beyond conventional patterns.
In Figure 1, the scatterplot vividly illustrates the strong positive correlation between the number of sewing machine operators in Iowa and the total comments on minutephysics YouTube videos. The plot resembles a perfectly tailored suit, presenting a seamless connection between these variables that might at first glance appear to be as mismatched as a pair of socks pulled from the wrong drawer.
As we reflect on these findings, it becomes clear that the world of statistics is as unpredictable as a ball of yarn. Just when you think you've spun out all the possible connections, a new thread of discovery emerges, knitting together the seemingly unrelated into a cohesive fabric of knowledge. Like a well-executed dad joke, these findings blend surprise with insight, reminding us that exploring the unexpected can lead to the most satisfying revelations.
We hope that this study not only sheds light on the peculiar association between sewing machine operators in Iowa and YouTube commentary but also invites future research to unravel more of these intriguing connections. After all, in the world of statistics, every unexpected correlation is not just a data point but a potential punchline waiting to be unraveled.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our study has uncovered a tightly woven relationship between the number of sewing machine operators in Iowa and the total comments on minutephysics YouTube videos, shedding light on a unique interconnection that transcends traditional boundaries. It appears that the threads of influence in these disparate domains are more finely intertwined than a meticulously knit sweater. Our analysis has revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.9502098, a value so strikingly high that one might *needle* few more data points to pick out such a *seamless* connection!

The statistical significance of this association, with a p-value of less than 0.01, reinforces the strength of this unexpected bond, leaving us in stitches at the unanticipated synergy between these variables. As researchers, we must remain *spool* level-headed and acknowledge that these findings are not mere fabrications but a *measure* of the unexpected richness of data exploration.

Just as every good chimney sweep knows, it's important to leave no soot-filled flue uncleaned, but we are confident in asserting that no more research is needed in this area. After all, sometimes the most exciting discoveries in statistics are those that *sew*prise us the most!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Unraveling Threads of Influence: The Stitch Between Sewing Machine Operators in Iowa and Total Comment-ary on minutephysics YouTube Videos. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Textile Technology and Internet Culture


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Unraveling Threads of Influence: The Stitch Between Sewing Machine Operators in Iowa and Total Comment-ary on minutephysics YouTube Videos. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Center for Stitched Social Sciences


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Unraveling Threads of Influence: The Stitch Between Sewing Machine Operators in Iowa and Total Comment-ary on minutephysics YouTube Videos with an abstract of This research delves into the seemingly woven relationship between the number of sewing machine operators in Iowa and the total comments on minutephysics YouTube videos. By harnessing data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and YouTube, we embarked on a journey to untangle this eccentric yarn of influence. Our findings revealed a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9502098 and p < 0.01 during the period spanning 2011 to 2022, indicating a strong association between these seemingly disparate variables.
Just as a flawlessly executed stitch can hold a garment together, our analysis revealed that the number of sewing machine operators in Iowa curiously holds a tight connection to the total commentary on minutephysics YouTube videos. It seems that the threads of influence extend beyond the realm of textiles, weaving a web of relevance in the digital sphere. As Albert Einstein once quipped, "A clever person solves a problem, a wise person avoids it," but we chose to wade into this perplexing conundrum and found threads of connection that even the most cunning tailors of statistical analysis may have overlooked.
Through our study, we hope to sew seeds of curiosity and inspire further investigations into the unexpected connections that may thread the tapestry of our socio-digital landscape. After all, as every good dad knows, "A good pun is its own reword.

ChatGPT:

sewing machine operators Iowa, total comments minutephysics YouTube videos, correlation coefficient sewing machine operators YouTube comments, Bureau of Labor Statistics YouTube data analysis, relationship sewing machine operators digital influence, sewing machine operators Iowa YouTube engagement, unexpected connections socio-digital landscape, influence of sewing machine operators on YouTube commentary

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

The number of sewing machine operators in Iowa
Detailed data title: BLS estimate of sewing machine operators in Iowa
Source: Bureau of Larbor Statistics
See what else correlates with The number of sewing machine operators in Iowa

Total comments on minutephysics YouTube videos
Detailed data title: Total comments on minutephysics YouTube videos.
Source: YouTube
See what else correlates with Total comments on minutephysics YouTube videos

Correlation r = 0.9502098 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.9028986 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 90.3% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Total comments on minutephysics YouTube videos) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., The number of sewing machine operators in Iowa) over the 12 years from 2011 through 2022.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 2.2E-6. 0.0000022160806133163254000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.95 in 0.00022% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 451,247 random variables You don't actually need 451 thousand variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 11 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 11 because we have two variables measured over a period of 12 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.83, 0.99 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
201120122013201420152016201720182019202020212022
The number of sewing machine operators in Iowa (Sewing Machine Operators)97012701090810770860810720770700760740
Total comments on minutephysics YouTube videos (Total comments)71921229226160045819194112071986866092618851468350922118919357




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Y-axis doesn't start at zero: I truncated the Y-axes of the graph above. I also used a line graph, which makes the visual connection stand out more than it deserves. Nothing against line graphs. They are great at telling a story when you have linear data! But visually it is deceptive because the only data is at the points on the graph, not the lines on the graph. In between each point, the data could have been doing anything. Like going for a random walk by itself!
    Mathematically what I showed is true, but it is intentionally misleading. Below is the same chart but with both Y-axes starting at zero.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([970,1270,1090,810,770,860,810,720,770,700,760,740,])
array_2 = np.array([71921,229226,160045,81919,41120,71986,86609,26188,51468,35092,21189,19357,])
array_1_name = "The number of sewing machine operators in Iowa"
array_2_name = "Total comments on minutephysics YouTube videos"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Big thanks for reviewing!


Correlation ID: 4284 · Black Variable ID: 8087 · Red Variable ID: 25526
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0